TORONTO, Sept. 20, 2021 /CNW/ - QC Copper and Gold Inc.
("QC Copper" or the "Company") (TSXV: QCCU) is
pleased to report the results for its initial Mineral Resource
Estimate on the Opemiska Project located in the Chibougamau District of Quebec.
Highlights include:
- The Opemiska Deposit consists of 81.7M tonnes @ 0.88% CuEq of pit constrained
Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources and 21.3M tonnes @ 0.73% CuEq of Inferred Mineral
Resources.
- The Mineral Resource is pit-constrained and contains more than
532,000 tonnes or 1.17 billion lbs of copper and 816,000 ounces of
gold in the Measured & Indicated (M&I) classification and
an additional 109,000 tonnes or 240.3 million lbs of copper and
209,000 ounces of gold in the Inferred classification.
- Over 82% of the total Mineral Resource reports to the M&I
classification.
- Opemiska's initial Mineral Resource includes over 1.05 million
metres of drilling completed by QC Copper and former operators of
the Project. Significant drilling density and extensive records
from previous operators have supported a high-confidence Mineral
Resource.
- Within the larger Mineral Resource, the Company has identified
a high-grade potential starter pit of 10.6M tonnes of M&I Mineral Resources grading
1.26% CuEq.
- The Mineral Resources are pit constrained using pit
optimization algorithms and a 0.2% CuEq cut-off, inclusive of
US$3.50/lb copper and US$1,650/oz gold prices.
- The Company has outlined multiple targets for expansion and
discovery drilling this coming winter. These targets include
extensional drilling to expand the existing Mineral Resource
envelope, proximal former mines including the adjacent Cooke &
Robitaille deposits, and other prospective targets along the
Gwillim and Beaver Lake fault zones.
"We're extremely pleased to report a significant initial Mineral
Resource for our flagship Opemiska project in Quebec. Leveraging over 1 million metres of
drilling completed by QC Copper and previous operators, the current
Mineral Resource demonstrates a high degree of confidence
with 82% of the Mineral Resource in the M&I
classification. We emphasize that this is just the initial Mineral
Resource for Opemiska, and that all Mineral Resources we are
reporting here are constrained to an optimized open pit. Given our
geologic model and knowledge of existing mineralization, we see
ample room to grow this Mineral Resource with further exploration
and definition drilling. We see few comparable copper-gold deposits
that offer this combination of substantial size, robust grades, and
excellent on-site infrastructure all located in the Province of
Quebec. This initial Mineral
Resource firmly establishes Opemiska as a unique and
attractive project backed by a team focused on additional Mineral
Resource growth, aggressive exploration of local exploration
targets and advancing Opemiska towards future development," noted
Stephen Stewart, Chairman & CEO
of QC Copper.
Table 1: Summary of Pit Constained
Mineral Resources in the Opemiska Deposit, 0.2% CuEq
cut-off (see footnotes
1-7)
Category
|
Tonnage
(millions)
|
Copper
(%)
|
Gold
(g/t)
|
CuEq
(g/t)
|
Contained
Copper
(million
lbs)
|
Contained
Gold
(k
oz)
|
Contained
CuEq
(million
lbs)
|
Measured
|
64.94
|
0.64%
|
0.32
|
0.88%
|
918.2
|
676.6
|
1,254.9
|
Indicated
|
16.73
|
0.69%
|
0.26
|
0.88%
|
255.2
|
139.0
|
325.8
|
Total
M&I
|
81.67
|
0.65%
|
0.31
|
0.88%
|
1,173.40
|
815.6
|
1,580.7
|
Inferred
|
21.35
|
0.51%
|
0.30
|
0.73%
|
239.8
|
209.2
|
345.8
|
1.
|
Mineral Resources
which are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic
viability. The estimate of Mineral Resources may be materially
affected by environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation,
socio-political, marketing, or other relevant issues, although QC
Copper & Gold is not aware of any such issues.
|
2.
|
The Inferred Mineral
Resource in this estimate has a lower level of confidence than that
applied to an Indicated Mineral Resource and must not be converted
to a Mineral Reserve. It is reasonably expected that the majority
of the Inferred Mineral Resource could be upgraded to an Indicated
Mineral Resource with continued exploration.
|
3.
|
The Mineral Resources
were estimated using the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy
and Petroleum (CIM), CIM Standards on Mineral Resources and
Reserves, Definitions (2014) and Best Practices Guidelines
(2019).
|
4.
|
All historical
underground excavations and stopes and vein envelopes were
digitized from scanned historical plans and sections. A bulk
density of 2.97 metric tonnes per cubic metre was used for all
resources except for the inferred in the Springer pit where 2.94
was used.
|
5.
|
The Mineral Resource
reported here is based on a pit optimization. All interpolation
routines for the block model were constrained by hard boundary
domained halos constructed from the sectional interpretation of the
disseminated mineralization surrounding the historical mined
veins. Veins were interpolated separately and stope
volumetrics were subsequently subtracted from the vein blocks to
report the correct tonnages and metal content of the residual
high-grade vein material.
|
6.
|
The 0.20% CuEq
cut-off grade was derived from the approximate August 2021
Consensus Economics long term forecast Cu and Au prices of
US$3.50/lb and US$1,650/oz, US$ exchange rate of $0.76, 80% Cu
process recovery and smelter payable, mining C$2.25/t, processing
C$13/t, G&A $3/t.
|
7.
|
CuEq% = Cu% + (Au g/t
x 0.72) + (Ag g/t x 0.01)
|
![Figure 1: Graphical Depiction of Opemiska Mineral Resources and Constraining Pit Shell (CNW Group/QC Copper & Gold Inc.) Figure 1: Graphical Depiction of Opemiska Mineral Resources and Constraining Pit Shell (CNW Group/QC Copper & Gold Inc.)](https://mma.prnewswire.com/media/1629584/QC_Copper___Gold_Inc__QC_Copper_1.jpg)
Next Steps: Ongoing Drilling to Expand Opemiska Mineral
Resource & Explore New Targets
Beyond the current Opemiska Mineral Resource, the Company notes
considerable potential to add additional Mineral Resources in the
immediate vicinity of the conceptual open pit. Earlier work on the
project by RPA Inc. in 2014 highlighted an exploration target at
depth at Perry that spanned a range between 3 and 11 million tonnes
at an average grade of 1.5% to 2.5% copper. To estimate this
Mineral Resource QC Copper and Gold has digitized all the
underground workings and veins down to the bottom of the historical
Perry Mine.
To the east of the Perry Pit, there has been some underground
mining on the deep extensions of the K Veins, however, none of the
excavations reached surface even though the veins themselves do
outcrop. Drilling by QC Copper and Gold confirmed the
presence of veins and disseminated material near the surface. Based
on results obtained, the Company anticipates that with further
drilling, additional Mineral Resources may be outlined in some
satellite pits.
Further east, in the vicinity of the historical Cooke and
Robitaille mines, the mineralized zones are aligned with the Beaver
Lake Fault Zone which occupies the hinge zone of the Beaver Lake
Fold structure, a conjugate fold to the Springer anticlinal
synform. This structural corridor has been drilled extensively by
Falconbridge but only for
high-grade underground-mineable veins. Sampling was sporadic to
capture the high-grade veins and little or no sampling was done
between veins although in many cases, the historical logs describe
lower-grade mineralization that could be economic in an open pit
mining scenario. A significant amount of drilling is required to
test the entire corridor, which is approximately 500 metres wide
and 3.5 kilometres in length with strong indications that
mineralization occurs on both sides of the Gwillim Fault.
"The Company has reached an important milestone with this
initial Mineral Resource on the Opemiska Deposit but our
exploration team is already pivoting towards growing this Mineral
Resource from continued drilling. Our initial drilling will focus
on defining near surface Mineral Resources proximal to the
Springer-Perry pit as well as the definition of underground Mineral
Resources in the Perry Mine at depth beneath the conceptual pit.
Looking beyond Springer and Perry, we will investigate the Beaver
Lake Fault corridor over its 3.5km of mineralized trend; this
includes an in-depth assessment of the historical Cooke and
Robitaille mines. Like the Opemiska, Cooke and Robitaille were
previously mined in significantly lower metal price environments,
host known mineralization, and benefit from significant historical
exploration data from previous operators" said Charles Beaudry, Director and Vice President
Exploration for QC Copper & Gold.
He continued, "In addition to these high confidence targets we
also plan to explore the Gwillim Fault trend to the northeast of
Chapais and we will explore for
Scott Lake-type volcanogenic massive
sulphide (VMS) targets on the eastern extremity of our land
holdings. We are extremely encouraged by this project and
invite all our existing and new investors to accompany us on this
amazing journey of value creation for all stakeholders
involved."
Opemiska Infrastructure
The Opemiska Deposit is next to the Town of Chapais with a population of 1,609
(2019) and the Town of Chibougamau
with a population of 7,559 (2020) is located approximately 40
kilometres to the east. The area has a rich history of mining
and the resident population is favorably disposed to mining
activities and hosts locally available skilled labour. Ample
electrical power is available from a nearby substation on the
James Bay powerlines which cross
QC Copper's land holdings. An operational rail line is
located within few kilometers from Chapais. Paved highways lead south to Lac
St-Jean and Quebec City and
southwest to Val d'Or and
Rouyn-Noranda. Finally, the
project is located in Quebec, the
most mining friendly jurisdiction in Canada and north of the 49th parallel and as
such is part of the Quebec
government's Plan Nord initiative and could benefit from special
fiscal and financial incentives.
Geological Data and Logistics
This Mineral Resource Estimate is based on an optimized open pit
shell that encompasses the surficial part of the historical
Springer and Perry mines, two underground operations that together
produced 22.0M tonnes of ore at 2.40%
copper and 0.33 g/t gold between 1953 and 1991 when the mines were
closed and the camp decommissioned. The prevailing mine
cut-off grade was approximately 1.5% copper over a minimum mining
width of 5 feet (1.5m) and wall rocks
contain a considerable amount of mineralization extending away from
the veins, that was not economic for underground mining during the
period of 1953-1991 but forms the bulk of the current Mineral
Resource.
Moreover, the near-surface portions of many of the veins were
not mined, with crown pillars left to prevent open holes from
marring the landscape. In the vicinity of the former mill, crown
pillars, some reaching 70m in
thickness, were left to protect the process plant infrastructure.
These leftover crown pillars represent an important opportunity for
QC copper as they host a considerable amount of high-grade
mineralization at surface which could drive significant early, cash
flows in an open-pit development scenario. Early cash flows would
serve to reduce operating risk, accelerate capital payback and
enhance potential project economics. The image below (Figure 2)
depicts two high-grade starter pits which host 10.6 million tonnes
grading 1.26% CuEq, or +45% higher grade than the overall Mineral
Resource.
![Figure 2: Plan View of Constraining Pit Shell and Potential High-Grade Starter Pits (CNW Group/QC Copper & Gold Inc.) Figure 2: Plan View of Constraining Pit Shell and Potential High-Grade Starter Pits (CNW Group/QC Copper & Gold Inc.)](https://mma.prnewswire.com/media/1629585/QC_Copper___Gold_Inc__QC_Copper_2.jpg)
The Mineral Resource Estimate on the Opemiska Deposit is based
on a drill hole database containing 16,570 surface and underground
diamond drill holes totaling 1,042,668 metres of core drilling and
348,492 assays. All mine-era drilling was converted from mine
grid to UMT using transformation equations calculated by a land
surveyor based on differential GPS measurements of many located
drill casings.
All historical mine excavations, stopes and veins were digitized
in mine grid from numerous maps, vertical and longitudinal
sections and solid wireframes were built and converted to UTM
coordinates. All stopes were digitized down to the bottom of
the Perry Mine (circa 820m depth) and
down to a depth of 715 metres on the Springer Mine.
Sensitivity to CuEq Cut-Off Grades
The estimated block model has been tabulated at various CuEq
cut-off grades (Table 2). This tabulation does not represent a
Mineral Resource in any way and only serves to illustrate the
nature of the mineralization and sensitivity to various CuEq
cut-offs.
Table 2: Block Model within the
Constraining Pit Shell at Various CuEq Cut-Off Grades
Area
|
Class
|
Cut-off
|
Tonnage
|
Au
|
Au
|
Cu
|
Cu
|
Cu
|
CuEq
|
CuEq
|
CuEq
|
|
|
CuEq%
|
kt
|
g/t
|
oz
|
%
|
t
|
lbs
|
%
|
tonne
|
lbs
|
Springer
|
Measured
|
1
|
14,873
|
0.91
|
433,102
|
1.27
|
188,565
|
415,714,454
|
1.92
|
285,994
|
630,507,361
|
0.5
|
32,815
|
0.54
|
569,638
|
0.87
|
285,673
|
629,799,424
|
1.26
|
414,002
|
912,717,002
|
0.4
|
38,949
|
0.48
|
598,417
|
0.79
|
306,626
|
675,993,447
|
1.13
|
441,502
|
973,343,765
|
0.3
|
46,553
|
0.42
|
625,842
|
0.70
|
326,801
|
720,472,670
|
1.01
|
467,936
|
1,031,621,554
|
0.25
|
51,132
|
0.39
|
639,421
|
0.66
|
336,258
|
741,320,851
|
0.94
|
480,501
|
1,059,321,801
|
0.2
|
56,537
|
0.36
|
653,492
|
0.61
|
345,143
|
760,909,010
|
0.87
|
492,610
|
1,086,017,178
|
0
|
72,287
|
0.29
|
683,259
|
0.50
|
360,157
|
794,008,741
|
0.71
|
514,488
|
1,134,251,042
|
Indicated
|
1
|
4,194
|
0.64
|
86,617
|
1.54
|
64,513
|
142,225,693
|
2.01
|
84,361
|
185,984,329
|
0.5
|
8,855
|
0.41
|
116,108
|
1.02
|
90,729
|
200,022,239
|
1.33
|
117,383
|
258,785,097
|
0.4
|
10,485
|
0.36
|
122,480
|
0.92
|
96,553
|
212,863,231
|
1.19
|
124,697
|
274,909,557
|
0.3
|
12,617
|
0.32
|
128,965
|
0.81
|
102,453
|
225,869,921
|
1.05
|
132,113
|
291,258,065
|
0.25
|
14,000
|
0.29
|
132,534
|
0.75
|
105,411
|
232,390,706
|
0.97
|
135,908
|
299,624,493
|
0.2
|
15,711
|
0.27
|
136,549
|
0.69
|
108,298
|
238,755,694
|
0.89
|
139,743
|
308,080,677
|
0
|
21,643
|
0.21
|
147,632
|
0.53
|
114,451
|
252,321,060
|
0.69
|
148,496
|
327,376,789
|
Inferred
|
1
|
3,780
|
1.05
|
127,314
|
1.34
|
50,599
|
111,551,483
|
2.10
|
79,497
|
175,259,803
|
0.5
|
9,188
|
0.58
|
170,989
|
0.85
|
78,386
|
172,810,636
|
1.28
|
117,385
|
258,789,455
|
0.4
|
11,504
|
0.49
|
181,758
|
0.75
|
86,205
|
190,048,827
|
1.11
|
127,744
|
281,626,304
|
0.3
|
14,983
|
0.40
|
193,932
|
0.64
|
95,371
|
210,257,130
|
0.93
|
139,782
|
308,167,138
|
0.25
|
17,477
|
0.36
|
200,785
|
0.58
|
100,573
|
221,725,500
|
0.84
|
146,615
|
323,230,779
|
0.2
|
21,137
|
0.31
|
208,685
|
0.51
|
106,853
|
235,569,682
|
0.73
|
154,791
|
341,256,138
|
0
|
149,672
|
0.07
|
314,563
|
0.12
|
174,254
|
384,164,935
|
0.17
|
247,491
|
545,624,576
|
Perry
|
Measured
|
1
|
2,403
|
0.21
|
16,021
|
1.78
|
42,696
|
94,127,596
|
1.93
|
46,313
|
102,103,573
|
0.5
|
5,074
|
0.13
|
20,457
|
1.20
|
60,787
|
134,011,566
|
1.29
|
65,427
|
144,242,749
|
0.4
|
5,973
|
0.11
|
21,440
|
1.08
|
64,588
|
142,391,912
|
1.16
|
69,460
|
153,132,214
|
0.3
|
7,096
|
0.10
|
22,317
|
0.96
|
68,288
|
150,549,714
|
1.03
|
73,370
|
161,752,176
|
0.25
|
7,710
|
0.09
|
22,704
|
0.91
|
69,882
|
154,063,047
|
0.97
|
75,057
|
165,471,824
|
0.2
|
8,402
|
0.09
|
23,094
|
0.85
|
71,344
|
157,285,566
|
0.91
|
76,614
|
168,904,279
|
0
|
10,431
|
0.07
|
23,911
|
0.71
|
73,808
|
162,718,961
|
0.76
|
79,285
|
174,792,614
|
Indicated
|
1
|
217
|
0.21
|
1,463
|
1.74
|
3,788
|
8,350,125
|
1.91
|
4,144
|
9,136,254
|
0.5
|
551
|
0.11
|
2,035
|
1.09
|
6,000
|
13,228,245
|
1.18
|
6,497
|
14,322,650
|
0.4
|
672
|
0.10
|
2,162
|
0.97
|
6,511
|
14,353,376
|
1.05
|
7,039
|
15,517,478
|
0.3
|
836
|
0.09
|
2,361
|
0.84
|
7,031
|
15,501,154
|
0.91
|
7,608
|
16,772,922
|
0.25
|
921
|
0.08
|
2,437
|
0.79
|
7,245
|
15,972,249
|
0.85
|
7,841
|
17,286,580
|
0.2
|
1,015
|
0.08
|
2,489
|
0.73
|
7,442
|
16,406,474
|
0.79
|
8,053
|
17,754,738
|
0
|
1,256
|
0.06
|
2,588
|
0.62
|
7,733
|
17,048,540
|
0.67
|
8,377
|
18,467,532
|
Inferred
|
1
|
54
|
0.17
|
294
|
1.75
|
942
|
2,075,680
|
1.88
|
1,014
|
2,234,387
|
0.5
|
158
|
0.09
|
448
|
1.11
|
1,753
|
3,864,362
|
1.18
|
1,863
|
4,107,541
|
0.4
|
175
|
0.08
|
457
|
1.04
|
1,829
|
4,032,173
|
1.11
|
1,942
|
4,280,622
|
0.3
|
197
|
0.07
|
465
|
0.97
|
1,900
|
4,188,798
|
1.03
|
2,015
|
4,443,043
|
0.25
|
204
|
0.07
|
468
|
0.94
|
1,921
|
4,234,020
|
1.00
|
2,037
|
4,489,931
|
0.2
|
208
|
0.07
|
469
|
0.93
|
1,930
|
4,253,947
|
0.98
|
2,046
|
4,510,759
|
0
|
251
|
0.06
|
484
|
0.79
|
1,981
|
4,367,546
|
0.84
|
2,102
|
4,633,395
|
Opemiska Deposit Mineral Resource Estimate
The Mineral Resource Estimate is material within the
constraining pit shell above a 0.2% Cu-Eq cut-off grade. The
Mineral Resource Estimate has an effective date of September 20, 2021 (Table 1), and a corresponding
Technical Report disclosing the Mineral Resource Estimate in
accordance with NI 43-101 will be prepared by P&E Mining
Consultants Inc. for QC Copper and Gold Inc. QC Copper and Gold
will file the Technical Report on SEDAR under its profile at
www.sedar.com within 45 days of this news release.
Reasonable Prospects for Eventual Economic Extraction
A Mineral Resource is a concentration of solid material of
economic interest near the surface of the Earth in such form, grade
or quality and quantity that there are reasonable prospects for
eventual economic extraction (RPEEE). To satisfy the requirement of
RPEEE by open pit mining, a reporting pit shell was determined
based on conceptual parameters and costs (table 1). Copper
and gold recovery will be be achieved using conventional crushing,
milling, gravity, and flotation to produce a copper concentrate
that could be shipped to a smelter for processing.
Mineral Resource Classification
Material within the constraining pit shell was classified
according to Mineral Resource confidence classifications defined in
CIM Definition Standards for Mineral Resources and Mineral
Reserves. Data quality and quantity, geological and grade
continuity, and confidence in the grade and bulk density estimates,
were considered when classifying the Mineral Resource. Mineral
Resources are classified as either Measured, Indicated or
Inferred. Measured, Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources
were determined from respective search ranges of 30, 40 and 120
metres with a respective minimum of seven, four and one
composites.
The estimate of Mineral Resources may be materially affected by
risks set forth in any QC Copper and Gold's Management Discussion
and Analysis Reports and other filings made with Canadian
securities regulatory authorities and available at
www.sedar.com.
About the Opemiska Copper Complex
The Opemiska Copper Complex is located adjacent to Chapais,
Quebec, within
the Chibougamau district. Opemiska is also within the
Abitibi Greenstone Belt and within the boundaries of the Province
of Quebec's Plan Nord, which promotes and funds
infrastructure and development of natural resource projects. The
Opemiska Property covers 12,782 hectares and covers the past
producing Springer, Perry, Robitaille and Cooke mines,
previously-owned and operated by Falconbridge between
1953-1991. The project hosts excellent on-site infrastructure,
including a power station and direct access to Highway 113 and the
Canadian National Railway.
QP Statement
The technical information contained in this news release has
been reviewed and approved by Charles
Beaudry, P.Geo and géo., Director and Vice President
Exploration for QC Copper & Gold, and Eugene Puritch, P.Eng. of P&E Mining
Consultants Inc., both Qualified Persons, as defined in "National
Instrument 43-101, Standards of Disclosure for Mineral
Projects." Mr. Puritch is independent of QC Copper &
Gold.
QAQC Statement
All drilling performed by QC Copper and
Gold was done using NQ sized drill rods and holes were stabilized
to minimized deviations. All core is stored in Chapais in a locked yard. All pulps have
been preserved as well as mineralized rejects.
For the exploration undertaken by QC Copper & Gold, all
assay batches are accompanied by rigorous Quality Assurance
procedures that include insertion of standards and blanks and
verification assays in a secondary laboratory. Quality
Control results, including the laboratory's control samples, are
evaluated immediately on reception of batch results and corrections
implemented immediately if necessary. All drill collars in
2019 and 2021 were positioned in UTM coordinates and post-drilling
surveyed using differential GPS instrumentation. The
historical mine holes were surveyed on surface and underground at
the time of drilling by mine personnel using conventional surveying
methods. The collars for 2019 were oriented by compass but in
2021 accurate non-magnetic orientation of collars was achieved
using the gyroscopic Azimuth Aligner by Minnovare. Downhole
deviations surveys were done with Flex-it instrument by Reflex
instrument at 30m intervals, and all
erroneous azimuths caused by excessive magnetism were purged from
the database. A systematic bulk density measurement program
using the water displacement method was implemented to measure the
bulk density of all rock types. A total of 779 bulk density
measurements were done for the 2019 drilling program and an
additional 267 measurements were done in 2021. No bulk
densities are available for the vendor drill holes or for the
historical mine holes. A specific susceptibility measurement
protocol was also implemented to estimate the relative abundance of
magnetite in the Ventures Sill's variably magnetic rocks. A
focused optical and acoustic televiewer surveying program was done
at the end of the program to obtain correctly oriented structural
measurement.
For the Mineral Resource database additional QAQC measures
included core duplicates. For the historical drilling assay
verification measures comprised core resampling for the holes
drilled by the vendor in 2010, 2015 and 2016 and for the historical
Falconbridge mine era drilling
where no core remains a total of 37 twinned holes were collared and
results compared with the assays from the mine. The results
of these measures confirm that the assays from the vendor period
are equivalent to QC Copper assays and that the mine era assays are
demonstrably equivalent for the range of values from the lower
detection limit up to about 2.0% Cu which represents over 90% of
the assays in the Mineral Resource database. Above this grade
the number of samples in the twinned data is small and the variance
is high such as to be difficult to compare datasets.
Nevertheless, for the bulk of the mine drilling the assays are
comparable to modern-day, QAQC controlled assays. After review of
available data, the assays undertaken by QC Copper as well as the
vendor and the mine are judged to be acceptable for the purposes of
estimating a Mineral Resource on the Opemiska Project.
For information and updates on QC Copper and Gold, please
visit: www.qccopper.com
And please follow us on Twitter @qccoppergold
Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services
Provider (as that term is defined in the TSX Venture Exchange
policies) accept responsibility for this release's adequacy or
accuracy. Certain information in this press release may contain
forward-looking statements. This information is based on current
expectations subject to significant risks and uncertainties that
are difficult to predict. Actual results might differ materially
from results suggested in any forward-looking statements. QC Copper
and Gold Inc. assume no obligation to update the forward-looking
statements or to update the reasons why actual results could differ
from those reflected in the forward looking-statements unless and
until required by securities laws applicable to QC Copper and Gold
Inc. Additional information identifying risks and uncertainties is
contained in QC Copper and Gold Inc. filings with Canadian
securities regulators, which filings are available under QC Copper
and Gold Inc. profile at www.sedar.com.
SOURCE QC Copper & Gold Inc.