COMBINED NOTES TO FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
June 30, 2018
NOTE 1 – SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
General
Ameren, headquartered in St. Louis, Missouri, is a public utility holding company whose primary assets are its equity interests in its subsidiaries. Ameren’s subsidiaries are separate, independent legal entities with separate businesses, assets, and liabilities. Dividends on Ameren’s common stock and the payment of expenses by Ameren depend on distributions made to it by its subsidiaries. Ameren’s principal subsidiaries are listed below. Ameren also has other subsidiaries that conduct other activities, such as providing shared services. Ameren evaluates competitive electric transmission investment opportunities as they arise.
|
|
•
|
Union Electric Company, doing business as Ameren Missouri, operates a rate-regulated electric generation, transmission, and distribution business and a rate-regulated natural gas distribution business in Missouri.
|
|
|
•
|
Ameren Illinois Company, doing business as Ameren Illinois, operates rate-regulated electric transmission, electric distribution, and natural gas distribution businesses in Illinois.
|
|
|
•
|
ATXI operates a FERC rate-regulated electric transmission business. ATXI is developing MISO-approved electric transmission projects, including the Illinois Rivers and Mark Twain projects, and placed the Spoon River project in service in February 2018.
|
Ameren’s financial statements are prepared on a consolidated basis and therefore include the accounts of its majority-owned subsidiaries. All intercompany transactions have been eliminated. Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois have no subsidiaries. All tabular dollar amounts are in millions, unless otherwise indicated.
As of both
June 30, 2018
, and
December 31, 2017
, Ameren had unconsolidated variable interests as a limited partner in various equity method investments, totaling
$17 million
, included in “Other assets” on Ameren’s consolidated balance sheet. Ameren is not the primary beneficiary of these investments because it does not have the power to direct matters that most significantly affect the activities of these variable interest entities. As of
June 30, 2018
, the maximum exposure to loss related to these variable interests is limited to the investment in these partnerships of
$17 million
plus associated outstanding funding commitments of
$19 million
.
Our accounting policies conform to GAAP. Our financial statements reflect all adjustments (which include normal, recurring adjustments) that are necessary, in our opinion, for a fair presentation of our results. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make certain estimates and assumptions. Such estimates and assumptions affect reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the dates of financial statements, and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reported periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates. The results of operations of an interim period may not give a true indication of results that may be expected for a full year. These financial statements should be read in conjunction with the financial statements and accompanying notes included in the Form 10-K.
Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash
Cash and cash equivalents include short-term, highly liquid investments purchased with an original maturity of three months or less. Cash and cash equivalents subject to legal or contractual restrictions and not readily available for use for general corporate purposes are classified as restricted cash.
In November 2016, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that requires, including on a retrospective basis, restricted cash to be included with cash and cash equivalents when reconciling the beginning-of-period and end-of-period total amounts shown on the statement of cash flows. Our adoption of this guidance, effective January 2018, did not result in material changes to previously reported cash flows from operating, investing, or financing activities.
The following table provides a reconciliation of cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash reported within the balance sheets and the statements of cash flows as of
June 30, 2018
and
2017
, and
December 31, 2017
and
2016
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2018
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
|
June 30, 2017
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
Ameren
|
Ameren
Missouri
|
Ameren
Illinois
|
Ameren
|
Ameren
Missouri
|
Ameren
Illinois
|
Ameren
|
Ameren
Missouri
|
Ameren
Illinois
|
Ameren
|
Ameren
Missouri
|
Ameren
Illinois
|
Cash and cash equivalents
(a)
|
$
|
29
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Restricted cash included in “Other current assets”
|
12
|
|
4
|
|
6
|
|
|
21
|
|
5
|
|
6
|
|
|
19
|
|
4
|
|
5
|
|
|
20
|
|
4
|
|
6
|
|
Restricted cash included in “Other assets”
|
51
|
|
—
|
|
51
|
|
|
35
|
|
—
|
|
35
|
|
|
23
|
|
—
|
|
23
|
|
|
22
|
|
—
|
|
22
|
|
Restricted cash included in “Nuclear decommissioning trust fund”
|
4
|
|
4
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
2
|
|
2
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
(b)
|
|
Total cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash
(c)
|
$
|
96
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
$
|
57
|
|
|
$
|
68
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
$
|
52
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
$
|
28
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
As presented on the balance sheet.
|
|
|
(c)
|
As presented on the statement of cash flows.
|
Restricted cash included in Ameren’s other current assets primarily represents participant funds from Ameren (parent)’s DRPlus and funds held by an irrevocable Voluntary Employee Beneficiary Association trust, which provides health care benefits for active employees. Restricted cash included in Ameren Missouri’s and Ameren Illinois’ other current assets primarily represents funds held by the trust.
Restricted cash included in Ameren’s and Ameren Illinois’ other assets primarily represents amounts in a trust fund restricted for the use of funding certain asbestos-related claims and amounts collected under a cost recovery rider that are restricted for use in the procurement of renewable energy credits.
Supplemental Cash Flow Information
The following table provides noncash investing activity excluded from the statements of cash flows for the
six months ended June 30, 2018
and
2017
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2018
|
|
June 30, 2017
|
Ameren
(a)
|
Ameren
Missouri
|
Ameren
Illinois
|
Ameren
(a)
|
Ameren
Missouri
|
Ameren
Illinois
|
Accrued capital expenditures
|
$
|
233
|
|
$
|
80
|
|
$
|
147
|
|
|
$
|
175
|
|
$
|
61
|
|
$
|
79
|
|
Net realized and unrealized gain
–
nuclear decommissioning trust fund
|
1
|
|
1
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
36
|
|
36
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Includes amounts for Ameren registrant and nonregistrant subsidiaries.
|
Accounts Receivable
"Accounts receivable – trade" on Ameren's and Ameren Illinois' balance sheets include certain receivables purchased at a discount from alternative retail electric suppliers that elect to participate in the utility consolidated billing program. At
June 30, 2018
, and
December 31, 2017
, "Other current liabilities" on Ameren's and Ameren Illinois' balance sheets included payables for purchased receivables of
$40 million
and
$31 million
, respectively.
For the
three and six months ended June 30, 2018
and
2017
, the Ameren Companies recorded immaterial bad debt expense.
Asset Retirement Obligations
The following table provides a reconciliation of the beginning and ending carrying amount of AROs for the
six months ended June 30, 2018
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ameren
Missouri
|
|
Ameren
Illinois
(a)
|
|
Ameren
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2017
|
$
|
640
|
|
(b)
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
644
|
|
(b)
|
Liabilities settled
|
(2
|
)
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
Accretion
(d)
|
14
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
Change in estimates
(e)
|
(9
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2018
|
$
|
643
|
|
(b)
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
647
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(a)
|
Included in “Other deferred credits and liabilities” on the balance sheet.
|
|
|
(b)
|
Balance included
$6 million
in “Other current liabilities” on the balance sheet as of both
December 31, 2017
, and
June 30, 2018
, respectively.
|
|
|
(c)
|
Less than
$1 million
.
|
|
|
(d)
|
Accretion expense attributable to Ameren Missouri was recorded as a decrease to regulatory liabilities.
|
|
|
(e)
|
Ameren Missouri changed its fair value estimate primarily due to a reduction in the cost estimate for closure of certain CCR storage facilities.
|
Company-owned Life Insurance
Ameren and Ameren Illinois have company-owned life insurance, which is recorded at the net cash surrender value. The net cash surrender value is the amount that can be realized under the insurance policies at the balance sheet date. As of
June 30, 2018
, the cash surrender value of company-owned life insurance at Ameren and Ameren Illinois was $
249 million
(December 31, 2017 –
$265 million
) and $
117 million
(December 31, 2017 –
$129 million
), respectively, while total borrowings against the policies were $
107 million
(December 31, 2017 –
$120 million
) at both Ameren and Ameren Illinois. Ameren and Ameren Illinois have the right to offset the borrowings against the cash surrender value of the policies and, consequently, present the net asset in “Other assets” on their respective balance sheets.
Stock-based Compensation
The following table summarizes Ameren's nonvested performance share unit and restricted stock unit activity for the
six months ended June 30, 2018
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performance Share Units
|
|
Restricted Stock Units
|
|
Share Units
|
|
Weighted-average Fair Value per Share Unit
|
|
Stock Units
|
|
Weighted-average Fair Value per Stock Unit
|
Nonvested at January 1, 2018
(a)
|
895,489
|
|
|
$
|
52.28
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Granted
|
306,252
|
|
|
62.88
|
|
|
184,351
|
|
|
57.60
|
|
Forfeitures
|
(54,213
|
)
|
|
49.72
|
|
|
(3,560
|
)
|
|
58.99
|
|
Undistributed vested units
(b)
|
(145,169
|
)
|
|
53.50
|
|
|
(12,983
|
)
|
|
58.98
|
|
Vested and distributed
|
(176,043
|
)
|
|
52.88
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Nonvested at June 30, 2018
(c)
|
826,316
|
|
|
$
|
56.03
|
|
|
167,808
|
|
|
$
|
57.46
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Does not include
712,572
undistributed vested performance share units.
|
|
|
(b)
|
Undistributed vested units are awards that vested due to attainment of retirement eligibility by certain employees, but have not yet been distributed. For undistributed vested performance share units, the number of shares issued for retirement-eligible employees will vary depending on actual performance over the
three
-year performance period.
|
|
|
(c)
|
Does not include
476,361
undistributed vested performance share units and
12,983
undistributed vested restricted stock units.
|
Performance Share Units
A performance share unit vests and entitles an employee to receive shares of Ameren common stock (plus accumulated dividends) if, at the end of the
three
-year performance period, certain specified market conditions have been met and if the individual remains employed by Ameren through the required vesting period. The vesting period for share units awarded extends beyond the
three
-year performance period to the payout date, which is approximately
38
months after the grant date. In the event of a participant’s death or retirement at age 55 or older with
five
or more years of service, awards vest on a pro rata basis over the
three
-year performance period. The exact number of shares issued pursuant to a share unit varies from
0%
to
200%
of the target award, depending on actual company performance relative to the performance goals.
The fair value of each performance share unit granted in 2018 was determined to be
$62.88
, which was based on Ameren’s closing common share price of
$58.99
at
December 31, 2017
, and lattice simulations. Lattice simulations are used to estimate expected share payout based on Ameren’s total shareholder return for a
three
-year performance period beginning January 1, 2018, relative to the designated peer group. The simulations can produce a greater fair value for the performance share unit than the December 31 applicable closing
common share price because they include the weighted payout scenarios in which an increase in the share price has occurred. The significant assumptions used to calculate fair value also included a
three
-year risk-free rate of
1.98%
and volatility of
15%
to
23%
for the peer group.
Restricted Stock Units
Restricted stock units vest and entitle an employee to receive shares of Ameren common stock (plus accumulated dividends) if the individual remains employed with Ameren through the payment date of the awards. Generally, in the event of a participant’s death or retirement at age 55 or older with
five
or more years of service, awards vest on a pro rata basis. The payout date of the awards is approximately
38
months after the grant date. The fair value of each restricted stock unit is determined by Ameren’s closing common share price on the grant date.
Deferred Compensation
As of
June 30, 2018
, and
December 31, 2017
, “Other deferred credits and liabilities” on Ameren’s balance sheet included deferred compensation obligations of
$85 million
and
$86 million
, respectively, recorded at the present value of future benefits to be paid.
Operating Revenues
In the first quarter of 2018, we adopted authoritative accounting guidance related to revenue from contracts with customers using the full retrospective method, with no material changes to the amount or timing of revenue recognition. We record revenues from contracts with customers for various electric and natural gas services, which primarily consist of retail distribution, electric transmission, and off-system arrangements. When more than one performance obligation exists in a contract, the consideration under the contract is allocated to the performance obligations based on the relative standalone selling price.
Electric and natural gas retail distribution revenues are earned when the commodity is delivered to our customers. We accrue an estimate of electric and natural gas retail distribution revenues for service provided but unbilled at the end of each accounting period.
Electric transmission revenues are earned as electric transmission services are provided.
Off-system revenues are primarily comprised of MISO revenues and wholesale bilateral revenues. MISO revenues include the sale of electricity, capacity, and ancillary services. Wholesale bilateral revenues include the sale of electricity and capacity. MISO-related electricity and wholesale bilateral electricity revenues are earned as electricity is delivered. MISO-related capacity and ancillary service revenues and wholesale bilateral capacity revenues are earned as services are provided.
Retail distribution, electric transmission, and off-system revenues, including the underlying components described above, represent a series of goods or services that are substantially the same and have the same pattern of transfer over time to our customers. Revenues from contracts with customers is equal to the amounts billed and our estimate of electric and natural gas retail distribution services provided but unbilled at the end of each accounting period. Revenues are billed at least monthly, and payments are due less than one month after goods and/or services are provided. See Note 12 – Segment Information for disaggregated revenue information.
For certain regulatory recovery mechanisms that are alternative revenue programs, rather than revenues from contracts with customers, we recognize revenues that have been authorized for rate recovery, are objectively determinable and probable of recovery, and are expected to be collected from customers within two years from the end of the year. Our alternative revenue programs include revenue requirement reconciliations, MEEIA, and VBA. These revenues are subsequently recognized as revenues from contracts with customers when billed, with an offset to alternative revenue program revenues.
The Ameren Companies elected to exclude disclosure related to the aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to the performance obligations that are unsatisfied as of the end of the reporting period for contracts with an initial expected term of one year or less. As of
June 30, 2018
and
2017
, our remaining performance obligations were immaterial.
Excise Taxes
Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois collect from their customers excise taxes, including municipal and state excise taxes and gross receipts taxes, that are levied on the sale or distribution of natural gas and electricity. Excise taxes are recorded gross in “Operating Revenues – Electric,” “Operating Revenues – Natural gas” and “Operating Expenses – Taxes other than income taxes” on the statements of income. The following table presents the excise taxes recorded in “Operating Revenues – Electric,” “Operating Revenues – Natural gas” and “Operating Expenses – Taxes other than income taxes” for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2018
and
2017
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
Ameren Missouri
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
|
$
|
80
|
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
Ameren Illinois
|
28
|
|
|
23
|
|
(a)
|
|
63
|
|
|
57
|
|
(a)
|
Ameren
|
$
|
74
|
|
|
$
|
63
|
|
(a)
|
|
$
|
143
|
|
|
$
|
128
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(a)
|
Amounts have been adjusted from those previously reported to reflect additional excise taxes for the three and six months ended June 30, 2017, respectively.
|
Income Taxes
The following table presents a reconciliation of the federal statutory corporate income tax rate to the effective income tax rate for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2018
and
2017
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ameren
|
|
Ameren Missouri
|
|
Ameren Illinois
|
Three Months
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
Federal statutory corporate income tax rate:
|
21%
|
|
35%
|
|
21%
|
|
35%
|
|
21%
|
|
35%
|
Increases (decreases) from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of excess deferred taxes
|
(1)
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
(a)
|
—
|
|
(5)
|
|
—
|
Other depreciation differences
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(1)
|
|
(1)
|
Amortization of deferred investment tax credit
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(1)
|
|
(1)
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
State tax
|
5
|
|
4
|
|
4
|
|
3
|
|
8
|
|
5
|
Tax credits
|
(1)
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
Other permanent items
|
—
|
|
(1)
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
Effective income tax rate
|
24%
|
|
38%
|
|
24%
|
|
37%
|
|
23%
|
|
39%
|
Six Months
|
Federal statutory corporate income tax rate:
|
21%
|
|
35%
|
|
21%
|
|
35%
|
|
21%
|
|
35%
|
Increases (decreases) from:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of excess deferred taxes
|
(2)
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
(a)
|
—
|
|
(4)
|
|
—
|
Amortization of deferred investment tax credit
|
(1)
|
|
(1)
|
|
(1)
|
|
(1)
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
State tax
|
6
|
|
5
|
|
4
|
|
3
|
|
7
|
|
5
|
Other permanent items
|
(1)
|
|
(2)
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
(1)
|
Effective income tax rate
|
23%
|
|
37%
|
|
24%
|
|
37%
|
|
24%
|
|
39%
|
|
|
(a)
|
Based on an order issued by the MoPSC in July 2018, Ameren Missouri began amortizing excess deferred taxes in August 2018. See Note 2 – Rate and Regulatory Matters for additional information.
|
In June 2018, legislation modifying Missouri tax law was enacted to decrease the state's corporate income tax rate from
6.25%
to
4%
, effective January 1, 2020. As a result, in the second quarter of 2018, Ameren’s and Ameren Missouri’s accumulated deferred tax balances were revalued, resulting in a net decrease to their accumulated deferred tax liability of
$33 million
, which was offset by a regulatory liability. Additionally, Ameren recorded an immaterial amount to income tax expense. As a result of its expected PISA election under Missouri Senate Bill 564, which would prohibit a change in electric base rates prior to April 2020, Ameren Missouri anticipates that the effect of this tax decrease will be reflected in customer rates upon completion of its next regulatory rate review. Ameren (parent) and nonregistrant subsidiaries do not expect this income tax decrease to have a material impact on net income prospectively.
Earnings Per Share
Basic earnings per share is computed by dividing “Net Income Attributable to Ameren Common Shareholders” by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Earnings per diluted share is computed by dividing “Net Income Attributable to Ameren Common Shareholders” by the weighted-average number of diluted common shares outstanding during the period. Earnings per diluted share reflects the dilution that would occur if certain stock-based performance share units were assumed to be settled. The number of performance share units assumed to be settled was
2.1 million
and
1.8 million
in the
three and six months ended June 30, 2018
, respectively, and
0.8 million
and
1.1 million
, respectively, in the year-ago periods. There were no potentially dilutive securities excluded from the earnings per diluted share calculations for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2018
and
2017
.
Accounting and Reporting Developments
In the first quarter of 2018, the Ameren Companies adopted authoritative accounting guidance on various topics. See the Operating Revenues section above for more information on our adoption of the guidance on revenue from contracts with customers. See Note 11 – Retirement Benefits for more information on our adoption of the guidance on the presentation of net periodic pension and postretirement benefit cost. See the Cash, Cash Equivalents, and Restricted Cash section above for more information on our adoption of the guidance on
restricted cash. Our adoption of the guidance on the recognition and measurement of financial assets and financial liabilities did not have a material impact on our results of operations or financial position.
See Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies under Part II, Item 8, of the Form 10-K for additional information about recently issued authoritative accounting standards relating to leases, the measurement of credit losses on financial instruments, and the reclassification of certain tax effects from accumulated OCI.
NOTE 2 – RATE AND REGULATORY MATTERS
Below is a summary of updates to significant regulatory proceedings and related lawsuits. See also Note 2 – Rate and Regulatory Matters under Part II, Item 8, of the Form 10-K. We are unable to predict the ultimate outcome of these matters, the timing of the final decisions of the various agencies and courts, or the impact on our results of operations, financial position, or liquidity.
Missouri
Missouri Senate Bill 564
On June 1, 2018, Missouri Senate Bill 564 was enacted. The section of the law applicable to the TCJA became effective immediately; the remaining sections, including the ability to elect PISA, become effective August 28, 2018.
The law resulted in certain changes to Missouri utility laws that affect the regulation of Ameren Missouri’s electric service business. These changes include the reduction of customer rates to pass through the effect of the reduction in the federal statutory corporate income tax rate enacted under the TCJA and, at each electric utility's election, the use of PISA. Electric utilities that do not elect to use PISA will be eligible to request permission to implement revenue decoupling of residential and other non-demand metered customer classes.
The law required the MoPSC to authorize a reduction in Ameren Missouri’s rates to pass through the effect of the TCJA within 90 days of the law’s effective date. In July 2018, the MoPSC authorized Ameren Missouri to reduce its annual revenue requirement by
$167 million
and reflect that reduction in rates beginning August 1, 2018.
The reduction included
$74 million
for the amortization of excess accumulated deferred income taxes.
In addition, Ameren Missouri recorded a reduction to revenue and a corresponding regulatory liability of $47 million for the excess amounts collected in rates related to the TCJA from January 1, 2018, through June 30, 2018. An additional amount will be recorded for July 2018 revenues. The regulatory liability will be reflected in customer rates over a period of time to be determined by the MoPSC in the next regulatory rate review.
Upon Ameren Missouri’s expected PISA election, it would be permitted to defer and recover 85% of the depreciation expense and return on rate base on certain property, plant, and equipment placed in-service after August 28, 2018, and not included in base rates
. Eligible PISA deferrals would exclude amounts related to new coal-fired, nuclear, and natural gas generating units and service to new customer premises.
Upon approval in a regulatory rate review, PISA deferrals would be added to rate base prospectively and earn a return based on Ameren Missouri’s weighted-average cost of capital over a recovery period of 20 years.
For electric utilities electing to use PISA, additional provisions apply, including limitations on customer rate increases. Ameren Missouri’s customer rate increases would be limited to a
2.85%
compound annual growth rate in the average overall customer rate per kilowatthour, applied to electric rates effective April 1, 2017, less half of the 2018 savings from the TCJA that was passed on to customers. Upon election to use PISA, Ameren Missouri’s electric base rates would be frozen until April 1, 2020. Recoveries under the MEEIA, the FAC, and the RESRAM riders would not be frozen; however, except for costs recoverable under the MEEIA rider, Ameren Missouri would be unable to recover any amounts above the 2.85% cap from customers. If rate changes from the FAC or the RESRAM riders would cause rates to temporarily exceed the 2.85% cap, the overage would be deferred for future recovery in the next regulatory rate review; however, rates established in such regulatory rate review would be subject to the rate cap. Any deferred overages approved for recovery would be subject to deferral and recovered in a manner consistent with costs recovered under PISA.
Both the rate cap and PISA election would be effective through December 2023, unless Ameren Missouri requests and receives MoPSC approval of an extension through December 2028. Ameren Missouri’s expected PISA election will support Ameren Missouri's ability to invest approximately $1 billion of incremental capital over the 2019 to 2023 period to strengthen and modernize Missouri's electric grid.
MoPSC Federal Income Tax Proceedings
In February 2018, the MoPSC initiated proceedings to investigate how the effect of the reduction in the federal statutory corporate income tax rate enacted under the TCJA should be reflected in rates paid by customers of Missouri’s regulated utilities, including rates paid by electric and natural gas customers of Ameren Missouri. The proceeding for Ameren Missouri’s electric service business was dismissed after Missouri Senate Bill 564 was enacted on June 1, 2018, but the proceeding is still pending for Ameren Missouri’s natural gas distribution business. As of June 30, 2018, the potential reduction in natural gas customer rates is immaterial. The MoPSC is under no deadline to issue an order in the natural gas proceeding.
Wind Generation Facility and RESRAM
In the second quarter of 2018, Ameren Missouri entered into an agreement with a subsidiary of Terra-Gen, LLC to acquire a 400-megawatt wind generation facility after construction. The facility is expected to be located in northeastern Missouri and to be completed in
2020. The acquisition is subject to certain conditions, including the issuance of a certificate of convenience and necessity by the MoPSC, obtaining a MISO transmission interconnection agreement, and approval by the FERC. Ameren Missouri has filed for the certificate of convenience and necessity with the MoPSC. This facility would help Ameren Missouri to comply with the state renewable energy standard.
In addition, Ameren Missouri requested the MoPSC to authorize a proposed RESRAM that would allow Ameren Missouri to adjust customer rates, including recovery of interest at a short-term borrowing rate, on an annual basis without a traditional regulatory rate review. The RESRAM is designed to mitigate the impacts of regulatory lag for investments in wind generation and other renewables by providing more timely recovery of costs and would provide Ameren Missouri a greater opportunity to earn its allowed return on investment. Ameren Missouri anticipates a decision by January 2019 related to the certificate of convenience and necessity and proposed RESRAM.
Renewable Choice Program
In June 2018, the MoPSC approved Ameren Missouri’s Renewable Choice Program, which allows large commercial and industrial customers and municipalities to receive up to 100 percent of their energy from renewable resources. The tariff-based program is designed to recover the costs of the election, net of changes in the market price of such energy. Based on customer contracts, the program enables Ameren Missouri to supply up to 400 megawatts of renewable wind energy generation, up to 200 megawatts of which it could own. As applicable, the addition of generation by Ameren Missouri would be subject to the issuance of a certificate of convenience and necessity by the MoPSC, obtaining transmission interconnection agreements with the MISO or other RTOs, and approval by the FERC. This generation would be incremental to the expected renewable generation included in the 2017 IRP. Without extension, the option to elect into the program will terminate in the third quarter of 2023.
MEEIA
In June 2018, Ameren Missouri filed a proposed customer energy-efficiency plan with the MoPSC under the MEEIA. This filing proposed a six-year plan, which includes a portfolio of customer energy-efficiency programs, along with a cost recovery mechanism. If the plan is approved, beginning in March 2019, Ameren Missouri intends to invest an average of
$92 million
per program year in the proposed customer energy-efficiency programs. Ameren Missouri requested continued use of a MEEIA rider, which allows Ameren Missouri to collect from or refund to customers any difference in the actual amounts incurred and the amounts collected from customers for the MEEIA program costs and its lost revenues. In addition, Ameren Missouri requested incentives to earn additional revenues by achieving certain customer energy-efficiency goals, increasing from
$10 million
to
$24 million
annually, for a total of
$115 million
over the six-year period if
100%
of its annual customer energy-efficiency goals are achieved. A decision by the MoPSC in this proceeding is anticipated by the first quarter of 2019.
The MEEIA 2016 program provided Ameren Missouri with a performance incentive to earn additional revenues by achieving certain customer energy-efficiency goals, including
$27 million
if
100%
of the goals were achieved during the three-year period beginning March 2016, with the potential to earn more if Ameren Missouri’s energy savings exceeded those goals. In September 2017, Ameren Missouri received an order from the MoPSC approving Ameren Missouri’s energy savings results for the first year of the MEEIA 2016 programs. As a result of this order and in accordance with revenue recognition guidance, Ameren Missouri recognized
$5 million
of revenues in the first quarter of 2018 relating to the MEEIA 2016 performance incentive.
In July 2018, the Missouri Supreme Court overturned a 2016 decision by the Missouri Court of Appeals, Western District, which had upheld a 2015 MoPSC order regarding the determination of a certain input used to calculate the MEEIA 2013 performance incentive, and remanded the matter to the MoPSC. The MoPSC is required to issue a revised order consistent with the Missouri Supreme Court’s ruling; however, there is no deadline to issue such order. Upon issuance of the order, Ameren Missouri expects to recognize an additional
$9 million
MEEIA 2013 performance incentive.
Illinois
Electric Distribution Service Rates
In April 2018, Ameren Illinois filed its annual electric distribution service formula rate update to establish the revenue requirement to be used for 2019 rates with the ICC. In July 2018, the ICC staff submitted its calculation of the revenue requirement included in Ameren Illinois’ update filing, recommending an amount comparable to Ameren Illinois’ filing. Pending ICC approval, this update filing will result in a
$72 million
increase in Ameren Illinois’ electric distribution service rates beginning in January 2019.
This update reflects an increase to the annual formula rate based on 2017 actual costs and expected net plant additions for 2018 and an increase to include the 2017 revenue requirement reconciliation adjustment. It also includes a decrease for the conclusion of the 2016 revenue requirement reconciliation adjustment, which will be fully collected from customers in 2018
, consistent with the ICC’s December 2017 annual update filing order. An ICC decision in this proceeding is expected by December 2018. As of
June 30, 2018
, Ameren Illinois had recorded a regulatory asset of
$62 million
to reflect the difference between Ameren Illinois’ estimate of its 2018 revenue requirement and the revenue requirement reflected in customer rates, including interest.
Electric Customer Energy-Efficiency Investments
In June 2018, Ameren Illinois filed its annual electric customer energy-efficiency formula rate update to establish the revenue requirement to be used for 2019 rates with the ICC. Pending ICC approval, this update filing will result in 2019 rates for electric customer energy-efficiency investments of
$34 million
, which represents an increase of
$20 million
from the 2018 rates. An ICC decision regarding the revenue requirement to be used for customer rates in 2019 is expected by December 2018.
Income Tax Regulatory Mechanisms
In February 2018, the ICC granted Ameren Illinois’ request, filed in January 2018, to establish a rider to reduce Ameren Illinois’ electric distribution customer rates for the effect of the reduction in the federal statutory corporate income tax rate enacted under the TCJA and the return of excess deferred taxes, net of the increase in state income taxes enacted in July 2017. Ameren Illinois' electric distribution customer rates were reduced as a result of the rider beginning in the first quarter of 2018. The estimated reduction of
$50 million
per year will continue through 2019, as base rates will reflect the current income tax rates starting in 2020.
In April 2018, the ICC approved a rider for the difference between revenues billed under natural gas rates established pursuant to Ameren Illinois’ most recent natural gas rate order, and the revenues that would have been billed had the state and federal tax rate changes discussed above been in effect. The rider required Ameren Illinois to record this regulatory liability beginning January 25, 2018. Ameren Illinois’ natural gas customer rates were reduced as a result of the rider beginning in May 2018, with an estimated reduction of up to
$17 million
, substantially over a one-year period.
2018 Natural Gas Delivery Service Regulatory Rate Review
In January 2018, Ameren Illinois filed a request with the ICC seeking approval to increase its annual rates for natural gas delivery service. In July 2018, Ameren Illinois and the ICC staff filed a stipulation and agreement with the ICC that, pending ICC approval, would result in an annual natural gas rate increase of $37 million, based on the terms of the agreement and subject to adjustments for updated rate case and other postretirement benefit expenses. This increase in annual rates includes a 9.87% return on common equity, a capital structure composed of 50% common equity, and a rate base of $1.6 billion. It also reflects the reduction in the federal corporate income tax rate as a result of the TCJA, as well as the increase in the Illinois corporate income tax rate that became effective in July 2017, which decreased the annual rates by approximately $17 million. In an attempt to reduce regulatory lag, Ameren Illinois used a 2019 future test year in this proceeding.
A decision by the ICC in this proceeding is required by December 2018, with new rates expected to be effective in January 2019. Ameren Illinois cannot predict the level of any delivery service rate changes the ICC may approve, nor whether any rate changes that may eventually be approved will be sufficient to enable Ameren Illinois to recover its costs and to earn a reasonable return on investments when the rate changes go into effect.
Federal
FERC Complaint Cases
In November 2013, a customer group filed a complaint case with the FERC seeking a reduction in the allowed base return on common equity for FERC-regulated transmission rate base under the MISO tariff from
12.38%
to
9.15%
.
In 2016, the FERC issued a final order in the November 2013 complaint case, which lowered the allowed base return on common equity to 10.32%, or a 10.82% total allowed return on common equity with the inclusion of a 50 basis point incentive adder for participation in an RTO, effective
since September 2016. The
10.82%
allowed return on common equity may be replaced prospectively after the FERC issues a final order in the February 2015 complaint case, discussed below.
Since the maximum FERC-allowed refund period for the November 2013 complaint case ended in February 2015, another customer complaint case was filed in February 2015. MISO transmission owners subsequently filed a motion to dismiss the February 2015 complaint, as discussed below. The February 2015 complaint case seeks a further reduction in the allowed base return on common equity for FERC-regulated transmission rate base under the MISO tariff.
In June 2016, an administrative law judge issued an initial decision in the February 2015 complaint case. If approved by the FERC, it would lower the allowed base return on common equity for the 15-month period of February 2015 to May 2016 to
9.70%
, or a 10.20% total allowed return on equity with the inclusion of a 50 basis point incentive adder for participation in an RTO. It would also require customer refunds, with interest, for that 15-month period.
A final FERC order would also establish the allowed return on common equity that will apply prospectively from the effective date of such order, replacing the current
10.82%
total return on common equity.
In the second quarter of 2017, the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit vacated and remanded to the FERC an order in a separate case in which the FERC established the allowed base return on common equity methodology used in the two MISO complaint cases described above.
Ameren is unable to predict the impact of the outcome of the United States Court of Appeals for
the District of Columbia Circuit’s remand on the MISO FERC complaint cases at this time. As the FERC is under no deadline to issue a final order, the timing of the issuance of the final order in the February 2015 complaint case is uncertain.
In September 2017, MISO transmission owners, including Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois, and ATXI, filed a motion to dismiss the February 2015 complaint case with the FERC. The MISO transmission owners maintain that the February 2015 complaint was predicated on the now superseded
12.38%
allowed base return on common equity and is therefore inapplicable given the current
10.32%
allowed base return on common equity. The MISO transmission owners further maintain that the current
10.32%
allowed base return on common equity has not been proven to be unjust and unreasonable based on information provided, including the base return on common equity methodology ranges set forth in the February 2015 complaint case and in the initial decision issued by an administrative law judge in June 2016. Additionally, the MISO transmission owners maintain that the February 2015 complaint should be dismissed because the approach utilized in the case to assert that a return on common equity was unjust and unreasonable was insufficient. That same approach was rejected by the United States Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit, as discussed above. The FERC is under no deadline to issue an order on this motion.
As of
June 30, 2018
, Ameren and Ameren Illinois had recorded current regulatory liabilities of
$43 million
and
$25 million
, respectively, to reflect the expected refunds, including interest, associated with the reduced allowed returns on common equity in the initial decision in the February 2015 complaint case. Ameren Missouri does not expect that a reduction in the FERC-allowed base return on common equity would be material to its results of operations, financial position, or liquidity.
FERC Federal Income Tax Proceeding and Formula Rate Change
In March 2018, the FERC granted a request filed in February 2018 by MISO transmission owners with forward-looking rate formulas, including Ameren Illinois and ATXI, to allow revisions to their 2018 electric transmission rates to reflect the effect of the reduction in federal income taxes enacted under the TCJA. Ameren Illinois and ATXI’s 2018 electric transmission rates have been reduced by
$27 million
and
$23 million
, respectively.
In May 2018, the FERC accepted Ameren Illinois and ATXI tariff filings to change the formula rate calculation. The change allows for the recovery or refund of both excess deferred income taxes resulting from tax law or rate changes and effect of permanent income tax differences and will be reflected in Ameren Illinois and ATXI’s electric transmission rates starting in January 2019.
NOTE 3 – SHORT-TERM DEBT AND LIQUIDITY
The liquidity needs of the Ameren Companies are typically supported through the use of available cash, drawings under committed credit agreements, commercial paper issuances, or, in the case of Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois, short-term affiliate borrowings. See Note 4 – Short-term Debt and Liquidity under Part II, Item 8, in the Form 10-K for a description of our indebtedness provisions and other covenants as well as a description of money pool arrangements.
The Missouri Credit Agreement and the Illinois Credit Agreement, both of which expire in December 2021, were not utilized for direct borrowings during the
six months ended June 30, 2018
, but were used to support commercial paper issuances and to issue letters of credit. Based on commercial paper outstanding, letters of credit issued under the Credit Agreements, and cash on hand, the aggregate credit capacity available under the Credit Agreements to Ameren (parent), Ameren Missouri, and Ameren Illinois, collectively, at
June 30, 2018
, was
$1.6 billion
. The Ameren Companies were in compliance with the covenants in their Credit Agreements as of
June 30, 2018
. As of
June 30, 2018
, the ratios of consolidated indebtedness to consolidated total capitalization, calculated in accordance with the provisions of the Credit Agreements, were
54%
,
48%
, and
47%
for Ameren, Ameren Missouri, and Ameren Illinois, respectively.
Commercial Paper
The following table presents commercial paper outstanding, net of issuance discounts, as of
June 30, 2018
, and
December 31, 2017
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
Ameren (parent)
|
$
|
506
|
|
|
$
|
383
|
|
Ameren Missouri
|
—
|
|
|
39
|
|
Ameren Illinois
|
—
|
|
|
62
|
|
Ameren Consolidated
|
$
|
506
|
|
|
$
|
484
|
|
The following table summarizes the borrowing activity and relevant interest rates under Ameren (parent)’s, Ameren Missouri’s, and Ameren Illinois’ commercial paper programs for the
six months ended June 30, 2018
and 2017:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ameren
(parent)
|
Ameren
Missouri
|
Ameren
Illinois
|
Ameren Consolidated
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average daily commercial paper outstanding at par value
|
|
$
|
397
|
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
$
|
174
|
|
$
|
693
|
|
Weighted-average interest rate
|
|
2.14
|
%
|
|
1.94
|
%
|
2.20
|
%
|
2.12
|
%
|
Peak commercial paper during period at par value
(a)
|
|
$
|
506
|
|
|
$
|
481
|
|
$
|
442
|
|
$
|
1,295
|
|
Peak interest rate
|
|
2.45
|
%
|
|
2.42
|
%
|
2.55
|
%
|
2.55
|
%
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average daily commercial paper outstanding at par value
|
|
$
|
736
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
$
|
808
|
|
Weighted-average interest rate
|
|
1.19
|
%
|
|
1.10
|
%
|
1.14
|
%
|
1.19
|
%
|
Peak commercial paper during period at par value
(a)
|
|
$
|
841
|
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
$
|
163
|
|
$
|
948
|
|
Peak interest rate
|
|
1.50
|
%
|
|
1.41
|
%
|
1.50
|
%
|
1.50
|
%
|
|
|
(a)
|
The timing of peak outstanding commercial paper issuances varies by company. Therefore, the sum of individual company peak amounts may not equal the Ameren Consolidated peak commercial paper issuances for the period.
|
Money Pools
Ameren has money pool agreements with and among its subsidiaries to coordinate and provide for certain short-term cash and working capital requirements. The average interest rate for borrowings under the money pool for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2018
, was
2.17%
and
2.04%
, respectively (2017 –
1.27%
and
1.14%
, respectively). See Note 8 – Related-party Transactions for the amount of interest income and expense from the money pool arrangements recorded by the Ameren Companies for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2018
and
2017
.
NOTE 4 – LONG-TERM DEBT AND EQUITY FINANCINGS
Ameren
For the three and six months ended
June 30, 2018
, Ameren issued a total of
0.4 million
and
0.7 million
shares, respectively, of common stock under its DRPlus and 401(k) plan and received proceeds of
$23 million
and
$40 million
, respectively. In addition, in the first quarter of 2018, Ameren issued
0.7 million
shares of common stock valued at
$35 million
upon the vesting of stock-based compensation. Ameren did not issue any common stock during the first six months of 2017.
Ameren Missouri
In April 2018, Ameren Missouri issued
$425 million
of
4.00%
first mortgage bonds due April 2048, with interest payable semiannually on April 1 and October 1 of each year, beginning October 1, 2018. Ameren Missouri received proceeds of
$419 million
, which were used to repay outstanding short-term debt, including short-term debt that Ameren Missouri incurred in connection with the repayment of
$179 million
of its
6.00%
senior secured notes that matured April 1, 2018.
Ameren Illinois
In May 2018, Ameren Illinois issued
$430 million
of
3.80%
first mortgage bonds due May 2028, with interest payable semiannually on May 15 and November 15 of each year, beginning November 15, 2018. Ameren Illinois received proceeds of
$427 million
, which were used to repay outstanding short-term debt, including short-term debt that Ameren Illinois incurred in connection with the repayment of
$144 million
of its
6.25%
senior secured notes that matured April 1, 2018.
Indenture Provisions and Other Covenants
See Note 5 – Long-Term Debt and Equity Financings under Part II, Item 8, in the Form 10-K for a description of our indenture provisions and other covenants, as well as restrictions on the payment of dividends. At
June 30, 2018
, the Ameren Companies were in compliance with the provisions and covenants contained in their indentures and articles of incorporation, as applicable, and ATXI was in compliance with the provisions and covenants contained in its note purchase agreement.
Off-balance-sheet Arrangements
At
June 30, 2018
, none of the Ameren Companies had any significant off-balance-sheet financing arrangements, other than operating leases entered into in the ordinary course of business, letters of credit, and Ameren (parent) guarantee arrangements on behalf of its subsidiaries.
NOTE 5 – OTHER INCOME, NET
The following table presents the components of “Other Income, Net” in the Ameren Companies’ statements of income for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2018
and
2017
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
Ameren:
(a)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
14
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
Interest income on industrial development revenue bonds
|
7
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
Other interest income
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
Non-service cost components of net periodic benefit income
|
19
|
|
(b)
|
10
|
|
|
35
|
|
(b)
|
22
|
|
|
Other income
|
2
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
Donations
|
(6
|
)
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
Other expense
|
(4
|
)
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
(6
|
)
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
Total Other Income, Net
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
52
|
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
Ameren Missouri:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
Interest income on industrial development revenue bonds
|
7
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
Other interest income
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Non-service cost components of net periodic benefit income
|
4
|
|
(b)
|
6
|
|
|
9
|
|
(b)
|
12
|
|
|
Other income
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Donations
|
(2
|
)
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
Other expense
|
(1
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
Total Other Income, Net
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
Ameren Illinois:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Income, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for equity funds used during construction
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
Interest income
|
1
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
Non-service cost components of net periodic benefit income
|
10
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
Other income
|
2
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
Donations
|
(1
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
Other expense
|
(1
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
Total Other Income, Net
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Includes amounts for Ameren registrant and nonregistrant subsidiaries and intercompany eliminations.
|
|
|
(b)
|
For the
three and six months ended June 30, 2018
, the non-service cost components of net periodic benefit income were partially offset by a
$4 million
and
$8 million
deferral due to a regulatory tracking mechanism for the difference between the level of such costs incurred by Ameren Missouri under GAAP and the level of such costs included in rates.
|
NOTE 6 – DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
We use derivatives to manage the risk of changes in market prices for natural gas and power, as well as the risk of changes in rail transportation surcharges through fuel oil hedges. Such price fluctuations may cause the following:
|
|
•
|
an unrealized appreciation or depreciation of our contracted commitments to purchase or sell when purchase or sale prices under the commitments are compared with current commodity prices;
|
|
|
•
|
market values of natural gas inventories that differ from the cost of those commodities in inventory; and
|
|
|
•
|
actual cash outlays for the purchase of these commodities that differ from anticipated cash outlays.
|
The derivatives that we use to hedge these risks are governed by our risk management policies for forward contracts, futures, options, and swaps. Our net positions are continually assessed within our structured hedging programs to determine whether new or offsetting transactions are required. The goal of the hedging program is generally to mitigate financial risks while ensuring that sufficient volumes are available to meet our requirements. Contracts we enter into as part of our risk management program may be settled financially, settled by physical delivery, or net settled with the counterparty.
The following table presents open gross commodity contract volumes by commodity type for derivative assets and liabilities as of
June 30, 2018
, and
December 31, 2017
. As of
June 30, 2018
, these contracts extended through October 2021, March 2023, and May 2032 for fuel oils, natural gas, and power, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quantity (in millions, except as indicated)
|
|
2018
|
2017
|
Commodity
|
Ameren Missouri
|
Ameren Illinois
|
Ameren
|
Ameren Missouri
|
Ameren Illinois
|
Ameren
|
Fuel oils (in gallons)
(a)
|
40
|
|
(b)
|
|
40
|
|
28
|
|
(b)
|
|
28
|
|
Natural gas (in mmbtu)
|
23
|
|
149
|
|
172
|
|
24
|
|
139
|
|
163
|
|
Power (in megawatthours)
|
2
|
|
8
|
|
10
|
|
3
|
|
9
|
|
12
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Consists of ultra-low-sulfur diesel products.
|
All contracts considered to be derivative instruments are required to be recorded on the balance sheet at their fair values, unless the NPNS exception applies. See Note 7 – Fair Value Measurements for a discussion of our methods of assessing the fair value of derivative instruments. Many of our physical contracts, such as our purchased power contracts, qualify for the NPNS exception to derivative accounting rules. The revenue or expense on NPNS contracts is recognized at the contract price upon physical delivery.
If we determine that a contract meets the definition of a derivative and is not eligible for the NPNS exception, we review the contract to determine whether the resulting gains or losses qualify for regulatory deferral. Derivative contracts that qualify for regulatory deferral are recorded at fair value, with changes in fair value recorded as regulatory assets or liabilities in the period in which the change occurs. We believe derivative losses and gains deferred as regulatory assets and liabilities are probable of recovery, or refund, through future rates charged to customers. Regulatory assets and liabilities are amortized to operating income as related losses and gains are reflected in rates charged to customers. Therefore, gains and losses on these derivatives have no effect on operating income. As of
June 30, 2018
, and
December 31, 2017
, all contracts that met the definition of a derivative and were not eligible for the NPNS exception received regulatory deferral.
The following table presents the carrying value and balance sheet location of all derivative commodity contracts, none of which were designated as hedging instruments, as of
June 30, 2018
, and
December 31, 2017
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance Sheet Location
|
|
Ameren
Missouri
|
|
Ameren
Illinois
|
|
Ameren
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel oils
|
Other current assets
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
Other current assets
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Power
|
Other current assets
|
|
7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
Total assets
(a)
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
Fuel oils
|
Other deferred credits and liabilities
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
4
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
Other deferred credits and liabilities
|
|
3
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
Power
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
2
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
Other deferred credits and liabilities
|
|
—
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
177
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
(b)
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
215
|
|
|
$
|
225
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel oils
|
Other current assets
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
|
Other assets
|
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
Other assets
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
Power
|
Other current assets
|
|
9
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
Total assets
(a)
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
|
Other deferred credits and liabilities
|
|
3
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
Power
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
1
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
|
Other deferred credits and liabilities
|
|
—
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
182
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities
(b)
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
$
|
217
|
|
|
$
|
226
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
The cumulative amount of pretax net gains on all derivative instruments is deferred as a regulatory liability.
|
|
|
(b)
|
The cumulative amount of pretax net losses on all derivative instruments is deferred as a regulatory asset.
|
Derivative instruments are subject to various credit-related losses in the event of nonperformance by counterparties to the transaction. Exchange-traded contracts are supported by the financial and credit quality of the clearing members of the respective exchanges; these contracts have nominal credit risk. In all other transactions, we are exposed to credit risk. Our credit risk management program involves establishing credit limits and collateral requirements for counterparties, using master netting arrangements or similar agreements, and reporting daily exposure to senior management.
We believe that entering into master netting arrangements or similar agreements mitigates the level of financial loss that could result from default by allowing net settlement of derivative assets and liabilities. These master netting arrangements allow the counterparties to net settle sale and purchase transactions. Further, collateral requirements are calculated at the master netting arrangement or similar agreement level by counterparty.
The Ameren Companies elect to present the fair value amounts of derivative assets and derivative liabilities subject to an enforceable master netting arrangement or similar agreement gross on the balance sheet. However, if the gross amounts recognized on the balance sheet were netted with derivative instruments and cash collateral received or posted, the net amounts would not be materially different from the gross amounts at
June 30, 2018
, and
December 31, 2017
.
Concentrations of Credit Risk
In determining our concentrations of credit risk related to derivative instruments, we review our individual counterparties and categorize each counterparty into groupings according to the primary business in which each engages. We calculate maximum exposures based on the gross fair value of financial instruments, including NPNS and other accrual contracts. These exposures are calculated on a gross basis, which include affiliate exposure not eliminated at the consolidated Ameren level. As of
June 30, 2018
, if all counterparties were to fail to perform on contracts, the Ameren Companies’ maximum exposure would have been immaterial with or without consideration of the application of master netting arrangements or similar agreements and collateral held.
Derivative Instruments with Credit Risk-related Contingent Features
Our commodity contracts contain collateral provisions tied to the Ameren Companies’ credit ratings. If our credit ratings were downgraded, or if a counterparty with reasonable grounds for uncertainty regarding our ability to satisfy an obligation requested adequate assurance of performance, additional collateral postings might be required. The following table presents, as of
June 30, 2018
, the aggregate fair value of all derivative instruments with credit risk-related contingent features in a gross liability position, the cash collateral posted, and the aggregate amount of additional collateral that counterparties could require. The additional collateral required is the net liability position allowed under the master netting arrangements or similar agreements, assuming (1) the credit risk-related contingent features underlying these arrangements were triggered on
June 30, 2018
, and (2) those counterparties with rights to do so requested collateral.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aggregate Fair Value of
Derivative Liabilities
(a)
|
|
Cash
Collateral Posted
|
|
Potential Aggregate Amount of
Additional Collateral Required
(b)
|
Ameren Missouri
|
$
|
63
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
52
|
|
Ameren Illinois
|
52
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
47
|
|
Ameren
|
$
|
115
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
99
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Before consideration of master netting arrangements or similar agreements and including NPNS and other accrual contract exposures.
|
|
|
(b)
|
As collateral requirements with certain counterparties are based on master netting arrangements or similar agreements, the aggregate amount of additional collateral required to be posted is determined after consideration of the effects of such arrangements.
|
NOTE 7 – FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Fair value is defined as the price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. We use various methods to determine fair value, including market, income, and cost approaches. With these approaches, we adopt certain assumptions that market participants would use in pricing the asset or liability, including assumptions about market risk or the risks inherent in the inputs to the valuation. Inputs to valuation can be readily observable, market-corroborated, or unobservable. We use valuation techniques that maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs. Authoritative accounting guidance established a fair value hierarchy that prioritizes the inputs used to measure fair value.
All financial assets and liabilities carried at fair value are classified and disclosed in one of three hierarchy levels. See Note 8 – Fair Value Measurements under Part II, Item 8, of the Form 10-K for information related to hierarchy levels. We perform an analysis each quarter to determine the appropriate hierarchy level of the assets and liabilities subject to fair value measurements. Financial assets and liabilities are classified in their entirety according to the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
We consider nonperformance risk in our valuation of derivative instruments by analyzing the credit standing of our counterparties and considering any counterparty credit enhancements (e.g., collateral). We have also factored the impact of our credit standing, as well as any potential credit enhancements, into the fair value measurement of both derivative assets and derivative liabilities. Included in our valuation, and based on current market conditions, is a valuation adjustment for counterparty default derived from market data such as the price of credit default swaps, bond yields, and credit ratings. No gains or losses related to valuation adjustments for counterparty default risk were recorded at Ameren, Ameren Missouri, or Ameren Illinois in the
three and six months ended June 30, 2018
or
2017
. At
June 30, 2018
, and
December 31, 2017
, the counterparty default risk valuation adjustment related to derivative contracts was immaterial for Ameren, Ameren Missouri, and Ameren Illinois.
The following table sets forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of
June 30, 2018
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
or Liabilities
(Level 1)
|
|
Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
|
|
Significant Other
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
|
|
Total
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ameren
|
Derivative assets – commodity contracts
(a)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel oils
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
Power
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
Total derivative assets – commodity contracts
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
|
Nuclear decommissioning trust fund:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. large capitalization
|
|
$
|
481
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
481
|
|
|
|
Debt securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and agency securities
|
|
—
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
—
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
—
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
Total nuclear decommissioning trust fund
|
|
$
|
481
|
|
|
$
|
227
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
708
|
|
(b)
|
|
Total Ameren
|
|
$
|
489
|
|
|
$
|
228
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
730
|
|
|
Ameren Missouri
|
Derivative assets – commodity contracts
(a)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel oils
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
|
Power
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
Total derivative assets – commodity contracts
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
|
|
Nuclear decommissioning trust fund:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. large capitalization
|
|
$
|
481
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
481
|
|
|
|
Debt securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and agency securities
|
|
—
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
—
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
78
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
—
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
Total nuclear decommissioning trust fund
|
|
$
|
481
|
|
|
$
|
227
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
708
|
|
(b)
|
|
Total Ameren Missouri
|
|
$
|
489
|
|
|
$
|
227
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
728
|
|
|
Ameren Illinois
|
Derivative assets – commodity contracts
(a)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ameren
|
Derivative liabilities – commodity contracts
(a)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel oils
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
1
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
|
Power
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
192
|
|
|
|
Total Ameren
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
198
|
|
|
$
|
225
|
|
|
Ameren Missouri
|
Derivative liabilities – commodity contracts
(a)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel oils
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
Power
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
|
Total Ameren Missouri
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
Ameren Illinois
|
Derivative liabilities – commodity contracts
(a)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
|
Power
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
|
Total Ameren Illinois
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
$
|
195
|
|
|
$
|
215
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
The derivative asset and liability balances are presented net of counterparty credit considerations.
|
|
|
(b)
|
Balance excludes
$6 million
of cash and cash equivalents, receivables, payables, and accrued income, net.
|
The following table sets forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, our assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis as of
December 31, 2017
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted Prices in
Active Markets for
Identical Assets
or Liabilities
(Level 1)
|
|
Significant Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
|
|
Significant Other
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
|
|
Total
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ameren
|
Derivative assets
–
commodity contracts
(a)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel oils
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
Power
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
Total derivative assets
–
commodity contracts
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
|
Nuclear decommissioning trust fund:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. large capitalization
|
|
$
|
468
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
468
|
|
|
|
Debt securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and agency securities
|
|
—
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
—
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
—
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
Total nuclear decommissioning trust fund
|
|
$
|
468
|
|
|
$
|
232
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
700
|
|
(b)
|
|
Total Ameren
|
|
$
|
472
|
|
|
$
|
233
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
717
|
|
|
Ameren Missouri
|
Derivative assets
–
commodity contracts
(a)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel oils
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
Power
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
|
Total derivative assets
–
commodity contracts
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
|
Nuclear decommissioning trust fund:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. large capitalization
|
|
$
|
468
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
468
|
|
|
|
Debt securities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Treasury and agency securities
|
|
—
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
|
Corporate bonds
|
|
—
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
|
Other
|
|
—
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
Total nuclear decommissioning trust fund
|
|
$
|
468
|
|
|
$
|
232
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
700
|
|
(b)
|
|
Total Ameren Missouri
|
|
$
|
472
|
|
|
$
|
233
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
717
|
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ameren
|
Derivative liabilities
–
commodity contracts
(a)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
|
Power
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
196
|
|
|
|
Total Ameren
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
200
|
|
|
$
|
226
|
|
|
Ameren Missouri
|
Derivative liabilities
–
commodity contracts
(a)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
|
Power
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
Total Ameren Missouri
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
9
|
|
|
Ameren Illinois
|
Derivative liabilities
–
commodity contracts
(a)
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Natural gas
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
|
Power
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
195
|
|
|
|
Total Ameren Illinois
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
198
|
|
|
$
|
217
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
The derivative asset and liability balances are presented net of counterparty credit considerations.
|
|
|
(b)
|
Balance excludes
$4 million
of cash and cash equivalents, receivables, payables, and accrued income, net.
|
All costs related to financial assets and liabilities classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy are expected to be recoverable through customer rates; therefore, there is no impact to net income resulting from changes in the fair value of these instruments. For the
three and six months ended June 30, 2018
and 2017, the balances and changes in the fair value of Level 3 financial assets and liabilities associated with fuel oils and natural gas were immaterial.
The following table summarizes the changes in the fair value of power financial assets and liabilities classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net derivative commodity contracts
|
|
|
Ameren
Missouri
|
|
Ameren
Illinois
|
|
Ameren
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance at April 1, 2018
|
$
|
4
|
|
$
|
(191
|
)
|
$
|
(187
|
)
|
Realized and unrealized losses included in regulatory assets/liabilities
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Purchases
|
|
4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4
|
|
Settlements
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
3
|
|
|
1
|
|
Ending balance at June 30, 2018
|
$
|
5
|
|
$
|
(190
|
)
|
$
|
(185
|
)
|
Change in unrealized losses related to assets/liabilities held at June 30, 2018
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
For the three months ended June 30, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance at April 1, 2017
|
$
|
4
|
|
$
|
(194
|
)
|
$
|
(190
|
)
|
Realized and unrealized losses included in regulatory assets/liabilities
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Purchases
|
|
15
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
15
|
|
Settlements
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
3
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Ending balance at June 30, 2017
|
$
|
14
|
|
$
|
(192
|
)
|
$
|
(178
|
)
|
Change in unrealized losses related to assets/liabilities held at June 30, 2017
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
For the six months ended June 30, 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance at January 1, 2018
|
$
|
7
|
|
$
|
(195
|
)
|
$
|
(188
|
)
|
Realized and unrealized losses included in regulatory assets/liabilities
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Purchases
|
|
4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4
|
|
Settlements
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
6
|
|
|
3
|
|
Ending balance at June 30, 2018
|
$
|
5
|
|
$
|
(190
|
)
|
$
|
(185
|
)
|
Change in unrealized losses related to assets/liabilities held at June 30, 2018
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
For the six months ended June 30, 2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Beginning balance at January 1, 2017
|
$
|
7
|
|
$
|
(185
|
)
|
$
|
(178
|
)
|
Realized and unrealized losses included in regulatory assets/liabilities
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
(11
|
)
|
|
(12
|
)
|
Purchases
|
|
15
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
15
|
|
Settlements
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
4
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Ending balance at June 30, 2017
|
$
|
14
|
|
$
|
(192
|
)
|
$
|
(178
|
)
|
Change in unrealized losses related to assets/liabilities held at June 30, 2017
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
(13
|
)
|
$
|
(13
|
)
|
Transfers into or out of Level 3 represent either (1) existing assets and liabilities that were previously categorized as a higher level, but were recategorized to Level 3 because the inputs to the model became unobservable during the period or (2) existing assets and liabilities that were previously classified as Level 3, but were recategorized to a higher level because the lowest significant input became observable during the period. For the three and six months ended
June 30, 2018
and
2017
, there were no material transfers between Level 1 and Level 2, Level 1 and Level 3, or Level 2 and Level 3 related to derivative commodity contracts.
The following table describes the valuation techniques and unobservable inputs utilized by the Ameren Companies for the fair value of financial assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis and classified as Level 3 in the fair value hierarchy for the periods ended
June 30, 2018
, and
December 31, 2017
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average
|
|
|
Assets
|
Liabilities
|
|
Valuation Technique(s)
|
Unobservable Input
|
Range
|
Level 3 Derivative asset and liability
–
commodity contracts
(a)
:
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel oils
|
$
|
5
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
Option model
|
Volatilities(%)
(b)
|
20 – 34
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
Discounted cash flow
|
Counterparty credit risk(%)
(c)(d)
|
0.12 – 0.85
|
0.38
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ameren Missouri credit risk(%)
(c)(d)
|
0.35
|
(e)
|
|
Natural gas
|
1
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Discounted cash flow
|
Nodal basis ($/mmbtu)
(b)
|
(1.30) – 0.30
|
(0.90)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Counterparty credit risk (%)
(c)(d)
|
0.23 – 1
|
0.81
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ameren Illinois credit risk (%)
(c)(d)
|
0.35
|
(e)
|
|
Power
(f)
|
7
|
|
(192
|
)
|
Discounted cash flow
|
Average forward peak and off-peak pricing
–
forwards/swaps ($/MWh)
(g)
|
24 – 39
|
27
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated auction price for FTRs ($/MW)
(b)
|
(898) – 1,180
|
57
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nodal basis ($/MWh)
(g)
|
(10) – 0
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Counterparty credit risk (%)
(c)(d)
|
0.91
|
(e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ameren Illinois credit risk (%)
(c)(d)
|
0.35
|
(e)
|
|
|
|
|
Fundamental energy production model
|
Estimated future natural gas prices ($/mmbtu)
(b)
|
3
|
(e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Escalation rate (%)
(b)(h)
|
4
|
(e)
|
|
|
|
|
Contract price allocation
|
Estimated renewable energy credit costs ($/credit)
(b)
|
5 – 7
|
6
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fuel oils
|
$
|
3
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Option model
|
Volatilities (%)
(b)
|
20 – 26
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
Discounted cash flow
|
Counterparty credit risk (%)
(c)(d)
|
0.12 – 0.72
|
0.41
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ameren Missouri credit risk (%)
(c)(d)
|
0.37
|
(e)
|
|
Natural gas
|
1
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Option model
|
Volatilities (%)
(b)
|
26 – 46
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nodal basis ($/mmbtu)
(c)
|
(0.50) – (0.30)
|
(0.40)
|
|
|
|
|
Discounted cash flow
|
Nodal basis ($/mmbtu)
(b)
|
(1.20) – 0.10
|
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Counterparty credit risk (%)
(c)(d)
|
0.37 – 0.92
|
0.53
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ameren credit risk (%)
(c)(d)
|
0.37
|
(e)
|
|
Power
(f)
|
8
|
|
(196
|
)
|
Discounted cash flow
|
Average forward peak and off-peak pricing – forwards/swaps ($/MWh)
(g)
|
24 – 46
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated auction price for FTRs ($/MW)
(b)
|
(65) – 1,823
|
251
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nodal basis ($/MWh)
(g)
|
(10) – 0
|
(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Counterparty credit risk (%)
(c)(d)
|
0.28
|
(e)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ameren Illinois credit risk (%)
(c)(d)
|
0.37
|
(e)
|
|
|
|
|
Fundamental energy production model
|
Estimated future natural gas prices ($/mmbtu)
(b)
|
3 – 4
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
Escalation rate (%)
(b)(h)
|
5
|
(e)
|
|
|
|
|
Contract price allocation
|
Estimated renewable energy credit costs ($/credit)
(b)
|
5 – 7
|
6
|
|
|
(a)
|
The derivative asset and liability balances are presented net of counterparty credit considerations.
|
|
|
(b)
|
Generally, significant increases (decreases) in this input in isolation would result in a significantly higher (lower) fair value measurement.
|
|
|
(c)
|
Generally, significant increases (decreases) in this input in isolation would result in a significantly lower (higher) fair value measurement.
|
|
|
(d)
|
Counterparty credit risk is applied only to counterparties with derivative asset balances. Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois credit risk is applied only to counterparties with derivative liability balances.
|
|
|
(f)
|
Power valuations use visible third-party pricing evaluated by month for peak and off-peak demand through 2022 for June 30, 2018, and through 2021 for December 31, 2017. Valuations beyond 2022 for June 30, 2018, and 2021 for December 31, 2017, use fundamentally modeled pricing by month for peak and off-peak demand.
|
|
|
(g)
|
The balance at Ameren is comprised of Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois power contracts, which respond differently to unobservable input changes due to their opposing positions.
|
|
|
(h)
|
Escalation rate applies to power prices in 2031 and beyond.
|
The following table sets forth, by level within the fair value hierarchy, the carrying amount and fair value of financial assets and liabilities disclosed, but not carried, at fair value as of
June 30, 2018
, and
December 31, 2017
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2018
|
|
Carrying
Amount
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
Total
|
Ameren:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash
|
$
|
96
|
|
|
$
|
96
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
96
|
|
Investments in held-to-maturity debt securities
(a)
|
276
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
276
|
|
Short-term debt
|
506
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
506
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
506
|
|
Long-term debt (including current portion)
(a)
|
8,460
|
|
(b)
|
—
|
|
|
8,411
|
|
|
438
|
|
(c)
|
8,849
|
|
Preferred stock
(d)
|
142
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
140
|
|
Ameren Missouri:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
Advances to money pool
|
66
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
66
|
|
Investments in held-to-maturity debt securities
(a)
|
276
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
276
|
|
Long-term debt (including current portion)
(a)
|
4,202
|
|
(b)
|
—
|
|
|
4,544
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4,544
|
|
Preferred stock
|
80
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
79
|
|
Ameren Illinois:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash
|
$
|
57
|
|
|
$
|
57
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
57
|
|
Borrowings from money pool
|
31
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
31
|
|
Long-term debt (including current portion)
|
3,113
|
|
(b)
|
—
|
|
|
3,187
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3,187
|
|
Preferred stock
|
62
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
December 31, 2017
|
Ameren:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash
|
$
|
68
|
|
|
$
|
68
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
68
|
|
Investments in held-to-maturity debt securities
(a)
|
276
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
276
|
|
Short-term debt
|
484
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
484
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
484
|
|
Long-term debt (including current portion)
(a)
|
7,935
|
|
(b)
|
—
|
|
|
8,531
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
8,531
|
|
Preferred stock
(c)
|
142
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
131
|
|
Ameren Missouri:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
Investments in held-to-maturity debt securities
(a)
|
276
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
276
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
276
|
|
Short-term debt
|
39
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
39
|
|
Long-term debt (including current portion)
(a)
|
3,961
|
|
(b)
|
—
|
|
|
4,348
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4,348
|
|
Preferred stock
|
80
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
80
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
80
|
|
Ameren Illinois:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents, and restricted cash
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
Short-term debt
|
62
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
62
|
|
Long-term debt (including current portion)
|
2,830
|
|
(b)
|
—
|
|
|
3,028
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3,028
|
|
Preferred stock
|
62
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Ameren and Ameren Missouri have investments in industrial revenue bonds, classified as held-to-maturity and recorded in “Other Assets,” that are equal to the capital lease obligation for CTs leased from the city of Bowling Green and Audrain County. As of
June 30, 2018
, and
December 31, 2017
, the carrying amount of both the investments in industrial revenue bonds and the capital lease obligations approximated fair value.
|
|
|
(b)
|
Included unamortized debt issuance costs, which were excluded from the fair value measurement, of
$56 million
,
$23 million
, and
$27 million
for Ameren, Ameren Missouri, and Ameren Illinois, respectively, as of
June 30, 2018
. Included unamortized debt issuance costs, which were excluded from the fair value measurement, of
$50 million
,
$20 million
, and
$24 million
for Ameren, Ameren Missouri, and Ameren Illinois, respectively, as of
December 31, 2017
.
|
|
|
(c)
|
The Level 3 fair value amount consists of ATXI’s senior unsecured notes. In the first quarter of 2018, the amount was transferred to Level 3 because inputs to the valuation model became unobservable during the period.
|
|
|
(d)
|
Preferred stock is recorded in “Noncontrolling Interests” on the consolidated balance sheet.
|
NOTE 8 – RELATED-PARTY TRANSACTIONS
In the normal course of business, the Ameren Companies engage in affiliate transactions. These transactions primarily consist of natural gas and power purchases and sales, services received or rendered, and borrowings and lendings. Transactions between Ameren’s subsidiaries are reported as affiliate transactions on their individual financial statements, but those transactions are eliminated in consolidation for Ameren’s consolidated financial statements. For a discussion of our material related-party agreements and money pool arrangements, see Note 13 – Related-party Transactions and Note 4 – Short-term Debt and Liquidity under Part II, Item 8, of the Form 10-K.
Electric Power Supply Agreement
In April 2018, Ameren Illinois conducted a procurement event, administered by the IPA, to purchase energy products. Ameren Missouri was among the winning suppliers in this event. As a result, in April 2018, Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois entered into an energy product agreement by which Ameren Missouri agreed to sell, and Ameren Illinois agreed to purchase,
110,000
megawatthours at an average price of
$32
per megawatthour during the period of June 2019 through September 2020.
The following table presents the impact on Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois of related-party transactions for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2018
and
2017
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
|
Six Months
|
Agreement
|
Income Statement
Line Item
|
|
|
Ameren
Missouri
|
|
Ameren
Illinois
|
|
Ameren
Missouri
|
|
Ameren
Illinois
|
Ameren Missouri power supply
|
Operating Revenues
|
2018
|
$
|
3
|
|
$
|
(a)
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
$
|
(a)
|
|
agreements with Ameren Illinois
|
|
2017
|
|
6
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois
|
Operating Revenues
|
2018
|
|
6
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
2
|
|
rent and facility services
|
|
2017
|
|
6
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
2
|
|
Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois
|
Operating Revenues
|
2018
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
miscellaneous support services
|
|
2017
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
1
|
|
Total Operating Revenues
|
|
2018
|
$
|
9
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
12
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
3
|
|
Ameren Illinois power supply
|
Purchased Power
|
2018
|
$
|
(a)
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
$
|
(a)
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
agreements with Ameren Missouri
|
|
2017
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
17
|
|
Ameren Illinois transmission
|
Purchased Power
|
2018
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
1
|
|
services with ATXI
|
|
2017
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
1
|
|
Total Purchased Power
|
|
2018
|
$
|
(a)
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
$
|
(a)
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
18
|
|
Ameren Services support services
|
Other Operations and Maintenance
|
2018
|
$
|
32
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
agreement
|
|
2017
|
|
34
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
66
|
|
Money pool borrowings (advances)
|
Interest Charges/ Other Income, Net
|
2018
|
$
|
(b)
|
|
$
|
(b)
|
|
$
|
(b)
|
|
$
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
Amount less than $1 million.
|
NOTE 9 – COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
We are involved in legal, tax, and regulatory proceedings before various courts, regulatory commissions, authorities, and governmental agencies with respect to matters that arise in the ordinary course of business, some of which involve substantial amounts of money. We believe that the final disposition of these proceedings, except as otherwise disclosed in the notes to our financial statements in this report and in the Form 10-K, will not have a material adverse effect on our results of operations, financial position, or liquidity.
Reference is made to Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, Note 2 – Rate and Regulatory Matters, Note 13 – Related-party Transactions, and Note 14 – Commitments and Contingencies under Part II, Item 8, of the Form 10-K. See also Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies, Note 2 – Rate and Regulatory Matters, Note 8 – Related-party Transactions, and Note 10 – Callaway Energy Center of this report.
Other Obligations
To supply a portion of the fuel requirements of Ameren Missouri’s energy centers, Ameren Missouri has entered into various long-term commitments for the procurement of coal, natural gas, nuclear fuel, and methane gas. Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois also have entered into various long-term commitments for purchased power and natural gas for distribution. The table below presents our estimated minimum fuel, purchased power, and other commitments for fuel at
June 30, 2018
. Ameren’s and Ameren Illinois’ purchased power commitments include the Ameren Illinois agreements entered into as part of the IPA-administered power procurement process. Included in the Other column are minimum purchase commitments under contracts for equipment, design and construction, and meter reading services, among other agreements, at
June 30, 2018
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Coal
|
|
Natural
Gas
(a)
|
|
Nuclear
Fuel
|
|
Purchased
Power
(b)(c)
|
|
Methane
Gas
|
|
Other
|
|
Total
|
Ameren:
(d)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018
|
$
|
181
|
|
|
$
|
148
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
|
$
|
130
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
|
$
|
568
|
|
2019
|
246
|
|
|
210
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
656
|
|
2020
|
85
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
344
|
|
2021
|
27
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
183
|
|
2022
|
—
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
55
|
|
Thereafter
|
—
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
252
|
|
Total
|
$
|
539
|
|
|
$
|
595
|
|
|
$
|
247
|
|
|
$
|
287
|
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
|
$
|
312
|
|
|
$
|
2,058
|
|
Ameren Missouri:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018
|
$
|
181
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
51
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
39
|
|
|
$
|
295
|
|
2019
|
246
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
344
|
|
2020
|
85
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
201
|
|
2021
|
27
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
128
|
|
2022
|
—
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
48
|
|
Thereafter
|
—
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
74
|
|
|
211
|
|
Total
|
$
|
539
|
|
|
$
|
126
|
|
|
$
|
247
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
|
$
|
237
|
|
|
$
|
1,227
|
|
Ameren Illinois:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
126
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
130
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
261
|
|
2019
|
—
|
|
|
172
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
303
|
|
2020
|
—
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
134
|
|
2021
|
—
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
52
|
|
2022
|
—
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
7
|
|
Thereafter
|
—
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
22
|
|
Total
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
469
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
287
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
$
|
779
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Includes amounts for generation and for distribution.
|
|
|
(b)
|
The purchased power amounts for Ameren and Ameren Illinois exclude agreements for renewable energy credits through 2032 with various renewable energy suppliers due to the contingent nature of the payment amounts.
|
|
|
(c)
|
The purchased power amounts for Ameren and Ameren Missouri exclude a
102
-megawatt power purchase agreement with a wind farm operator, which expires in 2024, due to the contingent nature of the payment amounts.
|
|
|
(d)
|
Includes amounts for Ameren registrant and nonregistrant subsidiaries.
|
In January 2018, as required by the FEJA, Ameren Illinois entered into 10-year agreements to acquire zero emission credits. Annual zero emission credit commitment amounts will be published by the IPA each May prior to the start of the subsequent planning year. The amounts above reflect Ameren Illinois’ commitment to acquire zero emission credits of approximately
$57 million
through May 2019.
In April 2018, Ameren Illinois conducted procurement events, administered by the IPA, to purchase energy products through May 2021. In the April 2018 procurement event, Ameren Illinois contracted to purchase
3,956,200
megawatthours of energy products for
$112 million
from June 2018 through May 2021, which is reflected in the amounts above. See Note 8 – Related-party Transactions for additional information regarding energy product agreements between Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois as a result of the April procurement event.
Environmental Matters
We are subject to various environmental laws and regulations enforced by federal, state, and local authorities. The development and operation of electric generation, transmission, and distribution facilities and natural gas storage, transmission, and distribution facilities can trigger compliance obligations with respect to environmental laws and regulations. These laws and regulations address emissions, discharges to water, water usage, impacts to air, land, and water, and chemical and waste handling. Complex and lengthy processes are required to obtain and renew approvals, permits, and licenses for new, existing or modified facilities. Additionally, the use and handling of various chemicals or hazardous materials require release prevention plans and emergency response procedures.
The EPA has promulgated environmental regulations that have a significant impact on the electric utility industry. Over time, compliance with these regulations could be costly for Ameren Missouri, which operates coal-fired power plants. As of December 31, 2017, Ameren Missouri’s fossil fuel-fired energy centers represented
17%
and
33%
of Ameren’s and Ameren Missouri’s rate base, respectively. Regulations that apply to air emissions from the electric utility industry include the NSPS, the CSAPR, the MATS, and the National Ambient Air Quality Standards, which are subject to periodic review for certain pollutants. Collectively, these regulations cover a variety of pollutants, such as SO
2
, particulate matter, NO
x,
mercury, toxic metals, and acid gases, and CO
2
emissions from new power plants. Water intake and discharges from power plants are regulated under the Clean Water Act. Such regulation could require modifications to water intake structures or more stringent limitations on wastewater discharges at Ameren Missouri’s energy centers, either of which could result in significant capital expenditures. The management and disposal of coal ash is regulated under the CCR Rule, which will require the closure of surface
impoundments and the installations of dry ash handling systems at several of Ameren Missouri’s energy centers. The individual or combined effects of existing environmental regulations could result in significant capital expenditures, increased operating costs, or the closure or alteration of operations at some of Ameren Missouri’s energy centers. Ameren and Ameren Missouri expect that such compliance costs would be recoverable through rates, subject to MoPSC prudence review, but the timing of costs and their recovery could be subject to regulatory lag.
Ameren Missouri’s current plan for compliance with existing air emission regulations includes burning ultra-low-sulfur coal and installing new or optimizing existing pollution control equipment. Ameren and Ameren Missouri estimate that they will need to make capital expenditures of
$325 million
to
$425 million
from 2018 through 2022 in order to comply with existing environmental regulations. Additional environmental controls beyond 2022 could be required. This estimate of capital expenditures includes expenditures required by the CCR regulations, by the Clean Water Act rule applicable to cooling water intake structures at existing power plants, and by effluent limitation guidelines applicable to steam electric generating units, all of which are discussed below. The actual amount of capital expenditures required to comply with existing environmental regulations may vary substantially from the above estimate because of uncertainty as to whether the EPA will substantially revise regulatory obligations, exactly which compliance strategies will be used and their ultimate cost, among other things.
The following sections describe the more significant environmental laws and rules and environmental enforcement and remediation matters that affect or could affect our operations. The EPA has initiated an administrative review of several regulations and proposed regulation amendments, including to the effluent limitation guidelines and the CCR Rule, which could ultimately result in the revision of all or part of such rules.
Clean Air Act
Federal and state laws, including CSAPR, regulate emissions of SO
2
and NO
x
through emission source reductions and the use and retirement of emission allowances. The first phase of the CSAPR emission reduction requirements became effective in 2015. The second phase of emission reduction requirements, which were revised by the EPA in 2016, became effective in 2017; additional emission reduction requirements may apply in subsequent years. To achieve compliance with the CSAPR, Ameren Missouri burns ultra-low-sulfur coal, operates
two
scrubbers at its Sioux energy center, and optimizes other existing pollution control equipment. Ameren Missouri expects to incur additional costs to lower its emissions at one or more of its energy centers to comply with the CSAPR in future years. These higher costs are expected to be recovered from customers through the FAC or higher base rates.
CO
2
Emissions Standards
In 2015, the EPA issued the Clean Power Plan, which would have established CO
2
emissions standards applicable to existing power plants. The United States Supreme Court stayed the rule in February 2016, pending various legal challenges. In July 2018, the Office of Management and Budget received the EPA’s proposal to repeal and replace the Clean Power Plan. We expect that the EPA's Clean Power Plan replacement rule, including anticipated future emissions regulation, will be released and made publicly available later this year following the Office of Management and Budget’s review. We cannot predict the outcome of EPA’s rulemaking or the outcome of legal challenges related to such future rulemakings.
NSR and Clean Air Litigation
In January 2011, the Department of Justice, on behalf of the EPA, filed a complaint against Ameren Missouri in the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Missouri. The complaint, as amended in October 2013, alleged that in performing projects at its Rush Island coal-fired energy center in 2007 and 2010, Ameren Missouri violated provisions of the Clean Air Act and Missouri law. The litigation has been divided into two phases: liability and remedy. In January 2017, the district court issued a liability ruling that the projects violated provisions of the Clean Air Act and Missouri law. The case then proceeded to the second phase to determine the actions required to remedy the violations found in the liability phase. The EPA previously withdrew all claims for penalties and fines. No date has been set by the district court for a trial on the remedy phase of the litigation. At the conclusion of both phases of the litigation, Ameren Missouri intends to appeal the liability ruling to the United States Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit.
The ultimate resolution of this matter could have a material adverse effect on the results of operations, financial position, and liquidity of Ameren and Ameren Missouri. Among other things and subject to economic and regulatory considerations, resolution of this matter could result in increased capital expenditures for the installation of pollution control equipment, as well as increased operations and maintenance expenses. We are unable to predict the ultimate resolution of this matter or the costs that might be incurred.
Clean Water Act
In July 2018, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit upheld the EPA’s Section 316(b) Rule applicable to cooling water intake structures at existing power plants. The rule requires a case-by-case evaluation and plan for reducing aquatic organisms impinged on
the facility’s intake screens or entrained through the plant’s cooling water system. All of Ameren Missouri’s coal-fired and nuclear energy centers are subject to the cooling water intake structures rule. The rule will be implemented between 2018 and 2023, during the permit renewal process of each energy center’s water discharge permit.
Additionally, in 2015, the EPA issued a rule to revise the effluent limitation guidelines applicable to steam electric generating units. These guidelines established national standards for water discharges that are based on the effectiveness of available control technology. The EPA’s 2015 rule prohibits effluent discharges of certain waste streams and imposes more stringent limitations on certain water discharges from power plants. In September 2017, the EPA published a rule that postponed the compliance dates by two years for the limitations applicable to two specific waste streams so that it could potentially revise those standards. Ameren Missouri is in the process of constructing wastewater treatment facilities at three of its energy centers. The cost to complete these facilities is included in the capital expenditures, discussed above, that Ameren and Ameren Missouri estimate they will need to make in order to comply with existing environmental regulations.
CCR Management
In 2015, the EPA issued the CCR Rule, which established regulations regarding the management and disposal of CCR from coal-fired energy centers. These regulations affect CCR disposal and handling costs at Ameren Missouri’s energy centers. They require closure of impoundments if performance criteria relating to groundwater impacts and location restrictions are not achieved. In July 2018, the EPA issued revisions to the CCR Rule that extended certain compliance deadlines and indicated that additional revisions to the CCR Rule are likely. Ameren and Ameren Missouri have AROs of
$141 million
recorded on their respective balance sheets as of
June 30, 2018
, associated with CCR storage facilities that reflect the regulations issued in 2015. Ameren plans to close these CCR storage facilities between 2018 and 2023. The recent EPA revisions do not affect Ameren Missouri’s plan. Ameren Missouri estimates it will need to make capital expenditures of
$300 million
to
$350 million
from 2018 through 2022 to implement its CCR management compliance plan, which includes installation of dry ash handling systems, waste water treatment facilities, and groundwater monitoring equipment.
Remediation
The Ameren Companies are involved in a number of remediation actions to clean up sites impacted by the use or disposal of materials containing hazardous substances. Federal and state laws can require responsible parties to fund remediation regardless of their degree of fault, the legality of original disposal, or the ownership of a disposal site. Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois have each been identified by federal or state governments as a potentially responsible party at several contaminated sites.
As of
June 30, 2018
, Ameren Illinois owned or was otherwise responsible for
44
former MGP sites in Illinois, the majority of which have been investigated, remediated, and closed. Ameren Illinois estimates it could substantially conclude remediation efforts by 2023. The ICC allows Ameren Illinois to recover such remediation and related litigation costs from its electric and natural gas utility customers through environmental cost riders. Costs are subject to annual prudence review by the ICC. As of
June 30, 2018
, Ameren Illinois estimated the obligation related to these former MGP sites at
$165 million
to
$236 million
. Ameren and Ameren Illinois recorded a liability of
$165 million
to represent the estimated minimum obligation for these sites, as no other amount within the range was a better estimate.
The scope of the remediation activities at these former MGP sites may increase as remediation efforts continue. Considerable uncertainty remains in these estimates because many site-specific factors can influence the ultimate actual costs, including unanticipated underground structures, technical feasibility of certain remediation measures, regulatory changes, disposal costs, and site accessibility. The actual costs and timing of completion may vary substantially from these estimates.
Ameren Missouri participated in the investigation of various sites known as Sauget Area 2, located in Sauget, Illinois. In 2000, the EPA notified Ameren Missouri and numerous other companies that former landfills and lagoons at those sites may contain soil and groundwater contamination. In 2013, the EPA issued its record of decision for Sauget Area 2 approving the investigation and the remediation actions recommended by the potentially responsible parties. Ameren Missouri is the owner of one of the sites and in July 2018 reached an agreement with the EPA and Solutia, Inc., the primary potentially responsible party for Sauget Area 2, which limits Ameren Missouri’s cleanup obligation to the site it owns. Remediation efforts at the site are expected to occur in 2019. As of
June 30, 2018
, Ameren Missouri estimated its obligation related to Sauget Area 2 at
$1 million
to
$2.5 million
. Ameren Missouri recorded a liability of
$1 million
to represent its estimated minimum obligation for this site, as no other amount within the range was a better estimate.
Our operations or those of our predecessor companies involve the use of, disposal of, and, in appropriate circumstances, the cleanup of substances regulated under environmental laws. We are unable to determine whether such practices will result in future environmental commitments or will affect our results of operations, financial position, or liquidity.
NOTE 10 – CALLAWAY ENERGY CENTER
Spent Nuclear Fuel
Under the NWPA, the DOE is responsible for disposing of spent nuclear fuel from the Callaway energy center and other commercial nuclear energy centers. The NWPA established the fee paid by Ameren Missouri and other utilities that own and operate those energy centers to the federal government for disposing of the spent nuclear fuel at
one
mill, or one-tenth of one cent, for each kilowatthour generated and sold by those plants. The NWPA also requires the DOE to review the nuclear waste fee annually against the cost of the nuclear waste disposal program and to propose to the United States Congress any fee adjustment necessary to offset the costs of the program. As required by the NWPA, Ameren Missouri and other utilities have entered into standard contracts with the DOE. Consistent with the NWPA and its standard contract, which stated that the DOE would begin to dispose of spent nuclear fuel by 1998, Ameren Missouri had historically collected
one
mill from its electric customers for each kilowatthour of electricity that it generated and sold from its Callaway energy center. Because the federal government is not meeting its disposal obligation, the collection of this fee was suspended in 2014.
As a result of the DOE's failure to fulfill its contractual obligations, Ameren Missouri and other nuclear energy center owners sued the DOE to recover costs incurred for ongoing storage of their spent fuel. Ameren Missouri’s lawsuit against the DOE resulted in a settlement agreement that provides for annual reimbursement of additional spent fuel storage and related costs. For the
six months ended June 30, 2018
and
2017
, Ameren Missouri did not receive any such reimbursements. Ameren Missouri will continue to apply for reimbursement from the DOE for allowable costs associated with the ongoing storage of spent fuel. The DOE’s delay in carrying out its obligation to dispose of spent nuclear fuel from the Callaway energy center is not expected to adversely affect the continued operations of the energy center.
Supplier of Fuel Assemblies
The Callaway energy center uses nuclear fuel assemblies fabricated by Westinghouse, which is the only NRC-licensed supplier authorized to provide fuel assemblies to the Callaway energy center. During the first quarter of 2017, Westinghouse filed voluntary petitions for a court-supervised restructuring process under Chapter 11 of the United States Bankruptcy Code. As part of its bankruptcy plan, Westinghouse filed a schedule of assumed contracts, which includes all current contracts between Westinghouse and Ameren Missouri, including the contract for fabrication of fuel assemblies for the Callaway energy center. In April 2018, the bankruptcy court approved Westinghouse’s bankruptcy plan, which included the assumption of its contracts with Ameren Missouri. The plan is expected to become effective in the third quarter of 2018. At this time, Ameren and Ameren Missouri believe the remainder of the restructuring proceeding will not affect Westinghouse’s performance under the terms of its existing contracts with Ameren Missouri, and therefore do not expect any material impact to Ameren Missouri’s operations. A change of fuel suppliers or a change in the type of fuel assembly design that is currently licensed for use at the Callaway energy center could take an estimated three years of analysis and NRC licensing efforts to implement.
Decommissioning
Electric rates charged to customers provide for the recovery of the Callaway energy center’s decommissioning costs, which include decontamination, dismantling, and site restoration costs, over the expected life of the nuclear energy center. Amounts collected from customers are deposited into the external nuclear decommissioning trust fund to provide for the Callaway energy center’s decommissioning. It is assumed that the Callaway energy center site will be decommissioned through the immediate dismantlement method and removed from service. Ameren and Ameren Missouri have recorded an ARO for the Callaway energy center decommissioning costs at fair value, which represents the present value of estimated future cash outflows. Annual decommissioning costs of
$7 million
are included in the costs used to establish electric rates for Ameren Missouri’s customers. Every three years, the MoPSC requires Ameren Missouri to file an updated cost study and funding analysis for decommissioning its Callaway energy center. An updated cost study and funding analysis was filed with the MoPSC in September 2017 and reflected within the ARO. In January 2018, the MoPSC approved no change in electric rates for decommissioning costs based on Ameren Missouri’s updated cost study and funding analysis.
The fair value of the trust fund for Ameren Missouri’s Callaway energy center is reported as “Nuclear decommissioning trust fund” in Ameren’s and Ameren Missouri’s balance sheets. This amount is legally restricted and may be used only to fund the costs of nuclear decommissioning. Changes in the fair value of the trust fund are recorded as an increase or decrease to the nuclear decommissioning trust fund, with an offsetting adjustment to the related regulatory liability. If the assumed return on trust assets is not earned, Ameren Missouri believes that it is probable that any such earnings deficiency will be recovered in rates.
Insurance
The following table presents insurance coverage at Ameren Missouri’s Callaway energy center as of
June 30, 2018
. The property coverage and the nuclear liability coverage renewal dates are April 1 and January 1, respectively, of each year. Both coverages were renewed in 2018.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Type and Source of Coverage
|
Maximum Coverages
|
|
Maximum Assessments
for Single Incidents
|
|
Public liability and nuclear worker liability:
|
|
|
|
|
American Nuclear Insurers
|
$
|
450
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
Pool participation
|
12,604
|
|
(a)
|
127
|
|
(b)
|
|
$
|
13,054
|
|
(c)
|
$
|
127
|
|
|
Property damage:
|
|
|
|
|
NEIL and EMANI
|
$
|
3,200
|
|
(d)
|
$
|
27
|
|
(e)
|
Replacement power:
|
|
|
|
|
NEIL
|
$
|
490
|
|
(f)
|
$
|
7
|
|
(e)
|
|
|
(a)
|
Provided through mandatory participation in an industrywide retrospective premium assessment program. The maximum coverage available is dependent on the number of United States commercial reactors participating in the program.
|
|
|
(b)
|
Retrospective premium under the Price-Anderson Act. This is subject to retrospective assessment with respect to a covered loss in excess of
$450 million
in the event of an incident at any licensed United States commercial reactor, payable at
$19 million
per year.
|
|
|
(c)
|
Limit of liability for each incident under the Price-Anderson liability provisions of the Atomic Energy Act of 1954, as amended. This limit is subject to change to account for the effects of inflation and changes in the number of licensed reactors.
|
|
|
(d)
|
NEIL provides
$2.7 billion
in property damage, stabilization, decontamination, and premature decommissioning insurance for radiation events and
$2.3 billion
in property damage insurance for nonradiation events. EMANI provides
$490 million
in property damage insurance for both radiation and nonradiation events.
|
|
|
(e)
|
All NEIL insured plants could be subject to assessments should losses exceed the accumulated funds from NEIL.
|
|
|
(f)
|
Provides replacement power cost insurance in the event of a prolonged accidental outage. Weekly indemnity up to
$4.5 million
for 52 weeks, which commences after the first twelve weeks of an outage, plus up to
$3.6 million
per week for a minimum of 71 weeks thereafter for a total not exceeding the policy limit of
$490 million
. Nonradiation events are limited to
$328 million
.
|
The Price-Anderson Act is a federal law that limits the liability for claims from an incident involving any licensed United States commercial nuclear energy center. The limit is based on the number of licensed reactors. The limit of liability and the maximum potential annual payments are adjusted at least every
five
years for inflation to reflect changes in the Consumer Price Index. The most recent five-year inflationary adjustment became effective in September 2013. Owners of a nuclear reactor cover this exposure through a combination of private insurance and mandatory participation in a financial protection pool, as established by the Price-Anderson Act.
Losses resulting from terrorist attacks on nuclear facilities are subject to industrywide aggregates, such that terrorist acts against one or more commercial nuclear power plants insured by NEIL or EMANI within a stated time period would be treated as a single event, and the owners of the nuclear power plants would share one full limit of liability. NEIL policies have an aggregate limit of
$3.2 billion
within a 12-month period for radiation events, or
$1.8 billion
for events not involving radiation contamination. The EMANI policies have an aggregate limit of
€600 million
for radiation and nonradiation events within a period of 72 hours.
If losses from a nuclear incident at the Callaway energy center exceed the limits of, or are not covered by insurance, or if coverage is unavailable, Ameren Missouri is at risk for any uninsured losses. If a serious nuclear incident were to occur, it could have a material adverse effect on Ameren’s and Ameren Missouri’s results of operations, financial position, or liquidity.
NOTE 11 – RETIREMENT BENEFITS
In March 2017, the FASB issued authoritative guidance that requires an entity to report, including on a retrospective basis, the non-service cost or income components of net periodic benefit cost separately from the service cost component and outside of operating income. The Ameren Companies adopted this guidance, effective January 1, 2018, and as a result,
$22 million
,
$12 million
, and
$4 million
of net benefit income has been retrospectively reclassified from "Operating Expenses – Other operations and maintenance" to “Other Income, Net” on Ameren's, Ameren Missouri's, and Ameren Illinois' respective statements of income for the
six months ended June 30, 2017
. Net benefit income of
$10 million
,
$6 million
, and
$1 million
has been similarly retrospectively reclassified on Ameren's, Ameren Missouri's, and Ameren Illinois' respective statements of income for the
three months ended June 30, 2017
.
The guidance also requires an entity to capitalize only the service cost component as part of an asset, such as inventory or property, plant, and equipment, on a prospective basis. Previously all of the net benefit cost components were eligible for capitalization. This change in the capitalization of net benefit costs is not expected to affect our ability to recover total net benefit cost through customer rates.
The following table presents the components of the net periodic benefit cost (income), prior to capitalization, incurred for Ameren’s pension and postretirement benefit plans for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2018
and
2017
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
Postretirement Benefits
|
|
Three Months
|
|
Six Months
|
|
Three Months
|
|
Six Months
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
Service cost
(a)
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
$
|
50
|
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
10
|
|
Non-service cost components:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
42
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
23
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
(69
|
)
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
(138
|
)
|
|
(131
|
)
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
(38
|
)
|
|
(37
|
)
|
Amortization of:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prior service benefit
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Actuarial loss (gain)
|
18
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Total non-service cost components
(b)
|
(9
|
)
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
(14
|
)
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
(23
|
)
|
|
(19
|
)
|
Net periodic benefit cost (income)
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(a)
|
Service cost, net of capitalization, is reflected in “Operating Expenses – Other operations and maintenance” on Ameren’s statement of income.
|
|
|
(b)
|
2018 amounts and the non-capitalized portion of 2017’s non-service cost components, as discussed above, are reflected in “Other Income, Net” on Ameren’s statement of income. See Note 5 – Other Income, Net for additional information.
|
Ameren Missouri and Ameren Illinois are responsible for their respective shares of Ameren’s pension and postretirement costs. The following table presents the respective share of net periodic pension and other postretirement benefit costs (income) incurred for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2018
and
2017
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension Benefits
|
|
Postretirement Benefits
|
|
Three Months
|
|
Six Months
|
|
Three Months
|
|
Six Months
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
|
2018
|
|
2017
|
Ameren Missouri
(a)
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
11
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
Ameren Illinois
|
10
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Ameren
(a)
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
(13
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
(a)
|
Does not include the impact of the regulatory tracking mechanism for the difference between the level of pension and postretirement benefit costs incurred by Ameren Missouri under GAAP and the level of such costs included in rates.
|
NOTE 12 – SEGMENT INFORMATION
Ameren has
four
segments: Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution, Ameren Illinois Natural Gas, and Ameren Transmission. The Ameren Missouri segment includes all of the operations of Ameren Missouri. Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution consists of the electric distribution business of Ameren Illinois. Ameren Illinois Natural Gas consists of the natural gas business of Ameren Illinois. Ameren Transmission primarily comprises the aggregated electric transmission businesses of Ameren Illinois and ATXI. The category called Other primarily includes Ameren (parent) activities and Ameren Services.
Ameren Missouri has
one
segment. Ameren Illinois has
three
segments: Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution, Ameren Illinois Natural Gas, and Ameren Illinois Transmission. See Note 1 – Summary of Significant Accounting Policies for additional information regarding the operations of Ameren Missouri, Ameren Illinois, and ATXI.
Segment operating revenues and a majority of operating expenses are directly recognized and incurred by Ameren Illinois at each Ameren Illinois segment. Common operating expenses, miscellaneous income and expenses, interest charges, and income tax expense are allocated by Ameren Illinois to each Ameren Illinois segment based on certain factors, which primarily relate to the nature of the cost. Additionally, Ameren Illinois Transmission earns revenue from transmission service provided to Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution, other retail electric suppliers, and wholesale customers. The transmission expense for Illinois customers who have elected to purchase their power from Ameren Illinois is recovered through a cost recovery mechanism with no net effect on Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution earnings, as costs are offset by corresponding revenues. Transmission revenues from these transactions are reflected in Ameren Transmission’s and Ameren Illinois Transmission’s operating revenues. An intersegment elimination at Ameren and Ameren Illinois occurs to eliminate these transmission revenues and expenses.
The following tables present revenues, net income attributable to common shareholders, and capital expenditures by segment at Ameren and Ameren Illinois for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2018
and
2017
. Ameren, Ameren Missouri, and Ameren Illinois management review segment capital expenditure information rather than any individual or total asset amount.
Ameren
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
Ameren
Missouri
|
|
Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution
|
|
Ameren Illinois Natural Gas
|
|
Ameren Transmission
|
|
Other
|
|
Intersegment
Eliminations
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External revenues
|
$
|
946
|
|
|
$
|
386
|
|
|
$
|
142
|
|
|
$
|
89
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,563
|
|
|
Intersegment revenues
|
9
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Ameren common shareholders
|
168
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
36
|
|
(a)
|
(5
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
239
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
205
|
|
|
132
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
2
|
|
|
533
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External revenues
|
$
|
922
|
|
|
$
|
387
|
|
|
$
|
134
|
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,537
|
|
|
Intersegment revenues
|
12
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Ameren common shareholders
|
120
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
34
|
|
(a)
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
193
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
159
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
494
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External revenues
|
$
|
1,730
|
|
|
$
|
785
|
|
|
$
|
453
|
|
|
$
|
180
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
3,148
|
|
|
Intersegment revenues
|
17
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Ameren common shareholders
|
206
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
73
|
|
(a)
|
(4
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
390
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
454
|
|
|
254
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
275
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
1,112
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External revenues
|
$
|
1,695
|
|
|
$
|
771
|
|
|
$
|
398
|
|
|
$
|
188
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
3,052
|
|
|
Intersegment revenues
|
30
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(52
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
Net income attributable to Ameren common shareholders
|
125
|
|
|
63
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
68
|
|
(a)
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
355
|
|
|
242
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
998
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Ameren Transmission earnings include an allocation of financing costs from Ameren (parent).
|
Ameren Illinois
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution
|
|
Ameren Illinois Natural Gas
|
|
Ameren Illinois Transmission
|
|
Intersegment
Eliminations
|
|
Total
Ameren Illinois
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External revenues
|
$
|
387
|
|
|
$
|
142
|
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
578
|
|
Intersegment revenues
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
Net income available to common shareholder
|
33
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
62
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
132
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
302
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External revenues
|
$
|
389
|
|
|
$
|
134
|
|
|
$
|
53
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
576
|
|
Intersegment revenues
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
Net income available to common shareholder
|
33
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
57
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
122
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
257
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External revenues
|
$
|
787
|
|
|
$
|
453
|
|
|
$
|
98
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,338
|
|
Intersegment revenues
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
Net income available to common shareholder
|
66
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
157
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
254
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
222
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
602
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
External revenues
|
$
|
774
|
|
|
$
|
398
|
|
|
$
|
107
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,279
|
|
Intersegment revenues
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
Net income available to common shareholder
|
63
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
136
|
|
Capital expenditures
|
242
|
|
|
109
|
|
|
133
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
484
|
|
The following tables present disaggregated revenues by segment at Ameren and Ameren Illinois for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2018
and
2017
. Economic factors affect the nature, timing, amount, and uncertainty of revenues and cash flows in a similar manner across customer classes. Revenues from alternative revenue programs have a similar distribution among customer classes as revenues from contracts with customers. Other revenues not associated with contracts with customers are presented in the Other customer classification, along with electric transmission and off-system revenues.
Ameren
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
Ameren
Missouri
|
|
Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution
|
|
Ameren Illinois Natural Gas
|
|
Ameren Transmission
|
|
Other
|
|
Intersegment
Eliminations
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
$
|
432
|
|
|
$
|
221
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
653
|
|
|
Commercial
|
364
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
490
|
|
|
Industrial
|
87
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
Other
|
47
|
|
(a)
|
7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
103
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(24
|
)
|
|
133
|
|
(a)
|
Total electric revenues
|
$
|
930
|
|
|
$
|
387
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
103
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(24
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,396
|
|
|
Residential
|
$
|
13
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
97
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
110
|
|
|
Commercial
|
6
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
Industrial
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
Other
|
6
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
Total gas revenues
|
25
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
142
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
Total revenues
(b)
|
$
|
955
|
|
|
$
|
387
|
|
|
$
|
142
|
|
|
$
|
103
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(24
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,563
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
$
|
358
|
|
|
$
|
208
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
566
|
|
|
Commercial
|
332
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
461
|
|
|
Industrial
|
84
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
112
|
|
|
Other
|
138
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
105
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
243
|
|
|
Total electric revenues
|
$
|
912
|
|
|
$
|
389
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
105
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
(26
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,382
|
|
|
Residential
|
$
|
10
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
84
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
94
|
|
|
Commercial
|
4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
Industrial
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
Other
|
7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
30
|
|
|
Total gas revenues
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
134
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
155
|
|
|
Total revenues
(b)
|
$
|
934
|
|
|
$
|
389
|
|
|
$
|
134
|
|
|
$
|
105
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
(27
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,537
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
$
|
764
|
|
|
$
|
440
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,204
|
|
|
Commercial
|
616
|
|
|
250
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
866
|
|
|
Industrial
|
148
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
216
|
|
|
Other
|
143
|
|
(a)
|
29
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
333
|
|
(a)
|
Total electric revenues
|
$
|
1,671
|
|
|
$
|
787
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
207
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(46
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,619
|
|
|
Residential
|
$
|
54
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
340
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
394
|
|
|
Commercial
|
22
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
Industrial
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
Other
|
(2
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
Total gas revenues
|
$
|
76
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
453
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
529
|
|
|
Total revenues
(b)
|
$
|
1,747
|
|
|
$
|
787
|
|
|
$
|
453
|
|
|
$
|
207
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(46
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,148
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
$
|
644
|
|
|
$
|
427
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,071
|
|
|
Commercial
|
562
|
|
|
262
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
824
|
|
|
Industrial
|
142
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
198
|
|
|
Other
|
311
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
207
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(51
|
)
|
|
496
|
|
|
Total electric revenues
|
$
|
1,659
|
|
|
$
|
774
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
207
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(51
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,589
|
|
|
Residential
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
287
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
327
|
|
|
Commercial
|
16
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
Industrial
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
Other
|
8
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
34
|
|
|
Total gas revenues
|
$
|
66
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
398
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
463
|
|
|
Total revenues
(b)
|
$
|
1,725
|
|
|
$
|
774
|
|
|
$
|
398
|
|
|
$
|
207
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(52
|
)
|
|
$
|
3,052
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
Includes
$37 million
and
$47 million
for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2018
, respectively, for the reduction to revenue for the excess amounts collected in rates related to the TCJA from January 1, 2018, through June 30, 2018. See Note 2 – Rate and Regulatory Matters for additional information.
|
|
|
(b)
|
The following table presents revenues from alternative revenue programs and other revenues not from contracts with customers for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2018
and
2017
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
Ameren
Missouri
|
|
Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution
|
|
Ameren Illinois Natural Gas
|
|
Ameren Transmission
|
|
Consolidated
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from alternative revenue programs
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Other revenues not from contracts with customers
|
5
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
8
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from alternative revenue programs
|
$
|
(7
|
)
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
Other revenues not from contracts with customers
|
3
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from alternative revenue programs
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
$
|
20
|
|
Other revenues not from contracts with customers
|
19
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
33
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from alternative revenue programs
|
$
|
(14
|
)
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
7
|
|
|
$
|
54
|
|
Other revenues not from contracts with customers
|
7
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
12
|
|
Ameren Illinois
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution
|
|
Ameren Illinois Natural Gas
|
|
Ameren Illinois Transmission
|
|
Intersegment Eliminations
|
|
Total Ameren Illinois
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
$
|
221
|
|
|
$
|
97
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
318
|
|
|
Commercial
|
126
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
152
|
|
|
Industrial
|
33
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
38
|
|
|
Other
|
7
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
70
|
|
|
Total revenues
(a)
|
$
|
387
|
|
|
$
|
142
|
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
|
$
|
(13
|
)
|
|
$
|
578
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
$
|
208
|
|
|
$
|
84
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
292
|
|
|
Commercial
|
129
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
153
|
|
|
Industrial
|
28
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
30
|
|
|
Other
|
24
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
101
|
|
|
Total revenues
(a)
|
$
|
389
|
|
|
$
|
134
|
|
|
$
|
65
|
|
|
$
|
(12
|
)
|
|
$
|
576
|
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
$
|
440
|
|
|
$
|
340
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
780
|
|
|
Commercial
|
250
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
343
|
|
|
Industrial
|
68
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
Other
|
29
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
(26
|
)
|
|
136
|
|
|
Total revenues
(a)
|
$
|
787
|
|
|
$
|
453
|
|
|
$
|
124
|
|
|
$
|
(26
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,338
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential
|
$
|
427
|
|
|
$
|
287
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
714
|
|
|
Commercial
|
262
|
|
|
79
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
341
|
|
|
Industrial
|
56
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
Other
|
29
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
125
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
163
|
|
|
Total revenues
(a)
|
$
|
774
|
|
|
$
|
398
|
|
|
$
|
125
|
|
|
$
|
(18
|
)
|
|
$
|
1,279
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
The following table presents revenues from alternative revenue programs and other revenues not from contracts with customers for the Ameren Illinois segments for the
three and six months ended June 30, 2018
and
2017
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months
|
Ameren Illinois Electric Distribution
|
|
Ameren Illinois Natural Gas
|
|
Ameren Illinois Transmission
|
|
Consolidated
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from alternative revenue programs
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
Other revenues not from contracts with customers
|
3
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from alternative revenue programs
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
Other revenues not from contracts with customers
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2
|
|
Six Months
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from alternative revenue programs
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
|
$
|
(9
|
)
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
Other revenues not from contracts with customers
|
13
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
14
|
|
2017
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenues from alternative revenue programs
|
$
|
49
|
|
|
$
|
12
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
$
|
66
|
|
Other revenues not from contracts with customers
|
3
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5
|
|