determinations with respect to our executive officers. Instead, in
making recommendations and determinations, the Compensation
Committee reviews information summarizing the compensation paid at
a representative group of peer companies, to the extent that the
executive positions at these companies are considered comparable to
our positions and informative of the competitive environment, and
more broad-based compensation surveys to gain a general
understanding of market compensation levels.
In addition, the Compensation Committee does not weight the
foregoing factors in any predetermined manner, nor does it apply
formulas in making its compensation determinations. The members of
the Compensation Committee consider all of this information in
light of their individual experience, knowledge of the Company and
its business results, knowledge of the competitive market,
knowledge of each executive officer, the advice of their
compensation consultant and their business judgment in making their
recommendations and determinations.
As part of its oversight function, our Board and our Compensation
Committee, in particular, along with our management team, considers
potential risks when reviewing and approving various compensation
programs, including executive compensation. Based on this review,
our Compensation Committee believes that our compensation programs,
including executive compensation, do not encourage risk taking to a
degree that is reasonably likely to have a materially adverse
impact on us or our operations.
Role of Management
In discharging its responsibilities, the Compensation Committee
works with our CEO, who assists the Compensation Committee by
providing information on corporate and individual performance,
perspectives on performance issues and recommendations on
compensation matters.
Typically, our CEO will make recommendations to the Compensation
Committee regarding compensation matters, including adjustments to
annual cash compensation, long-term incentive compensation
opportunities, and program structures, for our executive officers,
including our other Named Executive Officers. At the beginning of
each year, our CEO reviews the performance of our executive
officers based on each such individual’s level of success in
accomplishing the business objectives established for him or her
for the prior year and his or her overall performance during that
year, and then shares these evaluations with, and makes
recommendations to, the Compensation Committee for each element of
compensation as described above. The Compensation Committee reviews
and discusses these recommendations and proposals with our CEO.
Our CEO attends meetings of the Compensation Committee at which
executive compensation matters are addressed, but does not
participate in the Compensation Committee’s deliberations involving
his own compensation.
Role of Compensation
Consultant
The Compensation Committee has, from time to time, engaged an
external compensation consultant to assist it by providing
information, analysis, and other advice relating to our executive
compensation program. When engaged, the compensation consultant
reports directly to the Compensation Committee and its chair, and
serves at the discretion of the Compensation Committee, which
reviews the engagement on a periodic basis.
Our Compensation Committee has selected Compensia, Inc.
(“Compensia”), a national compensation consulting firm, to serve as
its compensation advisor to advise on executive compensation
matters. During 2022, we engaged Compensia to assess the
competitiveness of our current executive compensation levels,
including with respect to executive non-equity and equity
compensation. Compensia did not provide any services to our company
other than the consulting services provided to the Compensation
Committee.
The Compensation Committee reviews the objectivity and independence
of the advice provided by Compensia on executive compensation
matters in the years in which it engages Compensia. With respect to
the
-23-