Table of Contents

 

 

UNITED STATES

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION

Washington, DC 20549

 

 

FORM 10-K

 

 

(Mark one)

x ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2012

OR

 

¨ TRANSITION REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13 OR 15(d) OF THE SECURITIES EXCHANGE ACT OF 1934

For the transition period from                      to                      

Commission File Number: 001-35279

 

 

ASB BANCORP, INC.

(Exact name of registrant as specified in its charter)

 

 

 

North Carolina   45-2463413

(State or other jurisdiction of

incorporation or organization)

 

(I.R.S. Employer

Identification Number)

 

11 Church Street, Asheville, North Carolina   28801
(Address of principle executive offices)   (Zip code)

(828) 254-7411

(Registrant’s telephone number, including area code)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(b) of the Act:

 

Common Stock, par value $0.01 per share   The NASDAQ Global Market
(Title of each class)   (Name of each exchange on which registered)

Securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Act: None

 

 

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined by Rule 405 of the Securities Act.    Yes   ¨     No   x

Indicate by check mark if the Registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or Section 15(d) of the Exchange Act.    Yes   ¨     No   x

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days.    Yes   x     No   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or such shorter period that the Registrant was required to submit and post such files)    Yes   x     No   ¨

Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in the definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.   x

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer, or a smaller reporting company. See the definitions of “large accelerated filer,” “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one)

 

Large accelerated filer   ¨    Accelerated filer   x
Non-accelerated filer   ¨   (Do not check if a smaller reporting company)    Smaller reporting company   ¨

Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act).    Yes   ¨     No   x

As of June 30, 2012, the aggregate market value of the voting and non-voting common equity held by non-affiliates was $77,297,159.

There were 5,363,851 shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.01 per share, issued and outstanding as of February 28, 2013.

Documents Incorporated by Reference:

Portions of the proxy statement for the registrant’s 2013 annual meeting of shareholders are incorporated by reference into Part III of this Form 10-K.

 

 

 


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC.

FORM 10-K

Table of Contents

 

           Begins  on
Page
 

Item

      
  Part I   

Item 1.

 

Business

     2   

Item 1A.

 

Risk Factors

     21   

Item 1B.

 

Unresolved Staff Comments

     26   

Item 2.

 

Properties

     27   

Item 3.

 

Legal Proceedings

     28   

Item 4.

 

Mine Safety Disclosures

     28   
  Part II   

Item 5.

 

Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

     28   

Item 6.

 

Selected Financial Data

     30   

Item 7.

 

Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

     31   

Item 7A.

 

Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk

     68   

Item 8.

 

Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

     70   

Item 9.

 

Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

     126   

Item 9A.

 

Controls and Procedures

     127   

Item 9B.

 

Other Information

     129   
  Part III   

Item 10.

 

Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

     129   

Item 11.

 

Executive Compensation

     130   

Item 12.

 

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

     130   

Item 13.

 

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

     131   

Item 14.

 

Principal Accountant Fees and Services

     131   
  Part IV   

Item 15.

 

Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

     132   

Signatures

       133   


Table of Contents

A Caution About Forward-Looking Statements

This annual report on Form 10-K contains forward-looking statements, which can be identified by the use of words such as “believes,” “expects,” “anticipates,” “estimates” or similar expressions. Forward-looking statements include, but are not limited to:

 

   

statements of our goals, intentions and expectations;

 

   

statements regarding our business plans, prospects, growth and operating strategies;

 

   

statements regarding the quality of our loan and investment portfolios; and

 

   

estimates of our risks and future costs and benefits.

These forward-looking statements are subject to significant risks and uncertainties. Actual results may differ materially from those contemplated by the forward-looking statements due to, among others, the following factors:

 

   

general economic conditions, either nationally or in our primary market area, that are worse than expected;

 

   

a continued decline in real estate values;

 

   

changes in the interest rate environment that reduce our interest margins or reduce the fair value of financial instruments;

 

   

increased competitive pressures among financial services companies;

 

   

changes in consumer spending, borrowing and savings habits;

 

   

legislative, regulatory or supervisory changes that adversely affect our business;

 

   

adverse changes in the securities markets; and

 

   

changes in accounting policies and practices, as may be adopted by the bank regulatory agencies, the Financial Accounting Standards Board or the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board.

Any of the forward-looking statements that we make in this annual report and in other public statements we make may later prove incorrect because of inaccurate assumptions, the factors illustrated above or other factors that we cannot foresee. Consequently, no forward-looking statement can be guaranteed.

Additional factors that may affect our results are discussed below in Item 1A. “Risk Factors” and in other reports filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission. These risks and uncertainties should be considered in evaluating forward-looking statements and undue reliance should not be placed on such statements. Except as required by applicable law or regulation, ASB Bancorp, Inc. does not undertake, and specifically disclaims any obligation, to release publicly the result of any revisions that may be made to any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances after the date of the statements or to reflect the occurrence of anticipated or unanticipated events.

 

1


Table of Contents

Part I

 

Item 1. Business

General

ASB Bancorp, Inc. – ASB Bancorp, Inc. (“ASB Bancorp” or the “Company”), a North Carolina corporation, was incorporated in May 2011 to be the holding company for Asheville Savings Bank (“Asheville Savings” or the “Bank”) upon the completion of the Bank’s conversion from the mutual to the stock form of ownership. Before the completion of the conversion, the Company did not engage in any significant activities other than organizational activities. On October 11, 2011, the mutual to stock conversion was completed and the Bank became the wholly owned subsidiary of the Company. Also on that date, the Company sold and issued 5,584,551 shares of its common stock at a price of $10.00 per share, through which the Company received net offering proceeds of $53.9 million. Additionally, the Company loaned $4.5 million to the Bank’s newly formed employee stock ownership plan (the “ESOP”) to purchase 446,764 shares of the Company’s stock issued in the public offering. The Company’s principal business activity is the ownership of the outstanding shares of common stock of the Bank. The Company does not own or lease any real property, but instead uses the premises, equipment and other property of the Bank, with the payment of appropriate rental fees, as required by applicable laws and regulations, under the terms of an expense allocation agreement entered into with the Bank. The Company and the Bank also entered into an income tax allocation agreement that provides for the filing of a consolidated federal income tax return and formalizes procedures for the payment and allocation of federal income taxes between the Company and the Bank.

Asheville Savings Bank – Founded in 1936, the Bank is a North Carolina chartered savings bank headquartered in Asheville, North Carolina. We operate as a community-oriented financial institution offering traditional financial services to consumers and businesses in our primary market area. We attract deposits from the general public and use those funds to originate primarily one-to four-family residential mortgage loans and commercial real estate loans, and, to a lesser extent, home equity loans and lines of credit, consumer loans, construction and land development loans, and commercial and industrial loans. We conduct our lending and deposit activities primarily with individuals and small businesses in our primary market area.

Our primary market area is Asheville, North Carolina and the rest of Buncombe County where we have eight branch offices, as well as Henderson, Madison, McDowell and Transylvania Counties where we have five branch offices.

Availability of Information

The Company’s Annual Reports on Form 10-K, Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q, Current Reports on Form 8-K and any amendments to such reports filed or furnished pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, are made available free of charge on the Company’s website, http://ir.ashevillesavingsbank.com, as soon as reasonably practicable after the Company electronically files such reports with, or furnishes them to, the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”). The information on the Company’s website shall not be considered as incorporated by reference into this Form 10-K.

Personnel

At December 31, 2012, the Company had 162 full-time and 12 part-time employees, none of whom is represented by a collective bargaining unit. We believe our relationships with our employees are good.

 

2


Table of Contents

Market Area

We are headquartered in Asheville, North Carolina, which is the county seat of Buncombe County, North Carolina and consider Buncombe, Madison, McDowell, Henderson and Transylvania Counties in western North Carolina and the surrounding areas to be our primary market area. Asheville is situated in the Blue Ridge Mountains at the confluence of the Swannanoa River and French Broad River and is known for its natural beauty and scenic surroundings. The nearby Great Smoky Mountains National Park and Blue Ridge Parkway are among the more visited parks in the United States. In addition, the Asheville metropolitan area has a vibrant cultural and arts community that parallels that of many larger cities in the United States and is home to a number of historical attractions, the most prominent of which is the Biltmore Estate, a historic mansion with gardens and a winery that draws more than a million tourists each year. Due to its scenic location and diverse cultural and historical offerings, the Asheville metropolitan area has become a popular destination for tourists, which has historically positively impacted our local economy. In addition, affordable housing prices, combined with the region’s favorable climate, scenic surroundings and cultural attractions, have also made the Asheville metropolitan area an increasingly attractive destination for retirees seeking to relocate from other parts of the United States. In January 2012, AARP ranked the Asheville area as one of “10 Great Sunny Places to Retire,” and in February 2012, Top Retirements named the area as number one on the 2012 list of “Best Places to Retire.”

The Asheville metropolitan area benefits from a diverse economy, and there is no single employer or industry upon which a significant number of our customers are dependent. In addition to the tourism industry, Western North Carolina is also home to a number of manufacturing and technology companies, including Wilsonart International, Inc., Eaton Corporation, Thermo Fischer Scientific and Arvato Digital Services. Plasticard-Locktech and Linamar recently announced additional expansion in the Asheville area. New industries are also moving to the area, including American Recycling and brewers New Belgium and Sierra Nevada, which are in the process of building their facilities and hiring their work forces. Furthermore, the region is home to a number of educational organizations, private colleges and large public universities, such as the University of North Carolina at Asheville. Mission Health System, a leading employer in the Asheville metropolitan area, has been nationally recognized as a top hospital network for cardiovascular and orthopedic medicine.

Over the course of the past year, the tourism industry in the Asheville metropolitan area has largely recovered, which has positively impacted the economy in a number of our local markets, such as Buncombe and Henderson counties, that directly benefit from this industry and has caused the overall unemployment rate in the Asheville metropolitan area to decrease to 7.5% in December 2012 from its recent high of 10.2% in February 2010 according to statistics published by the Employment Security Commission of North Carolina (“ESCNC”). For comparative purposes, the ESCNC reported seasonally adjusted unemployment rates of 9.2% for North Carolina and 7.8% for the United States for December 2012. The Company also considers McDowell County and Transylvania County, which are not included in the unemployment statistics for the Asheville metropolitan area, as part of its primary market area. The December 2012 unemployment rates were 11.0% for McDowell County and 10.1% for Transylvania County.

 

3


Table of Contents

Competition

We face significant competition for the attraction of deposits and origination of loans. Our most direct competition for deposits has historically come from several financial institutions operating in our primary market area and from other financial service companies such as securities brokerage firms, credit unions and insurance companies. We also face competition for investors’ funds from money market funds, mutual funds and other corporate and government securities. At June 30, 2012, which is the most recent date for which deposit market share data is available from the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, we held approximately 10.02% of the deposits in Buncombe County, North Carolina, 24.62% of the deposits in Madison County, North Carolina, 15.79% of the deposits in McDowell County, North Carolina, 3.50% of the deposits in Henderson County, North Carolina and 5.16% of the deposits in Transylvania County, North Carolina. This data does not reflect deposits held by credit unions with which we also compete. In addition, banks owned by large national and regional holding companies and other community-based banks also operate in our primary market area. Some of these institutions are larger than us and, therefore, have greater resources.

Our competition for loans comes primarily from financial institutions, including credit unions, in our primary market area and from other financial service providers, such as mortgage companies, mortgage brokers and private investors. Competition for loans also comes from non-depository financial service companies entering the mortgage market, such as insurance companies, securities companies and specialty finance companies.

We expect competition to increase in the future as a result of legislative, regulatory and technological changes and the continuing trend of consolidation in the financial services industry. Technological advances, for example, have lowered barriers to entry, allowed banks to expand their geographic reach by providing services over the Internet, and made it possible for non-depository institutions to offer products and services that traditionally have been provided by banks. Competition for deposits and the origination of loans could limit our growth in the future.

Lending Activities

General. The largest component of our loan portfolio is real estate mortgage loans, primarily one- to four-family residential mortgage loans and commercial mortgage loans, and to a lesser extent, revolving mortgage loans (which consist of home equity loans and lines of credit), consumer loans, construction and land development loans, and commercial and industrial loans. We originate loans for investment purposes, although we generally sell our fixed-rate residential mortgage loans into the secondary market with servicing released.

We intend to continue to emphasize residential and commercial mortgage lending, while also concentrating on ways to expand our commercial and industrial lending activities with a focus on serving small businesses and emphasizing relationship banking in our primary market area. We do not offer Alt-A, sub-prime or no-documentation mortgage loans.

 

4


Table of Contents

Our emphasis on commercial mortgage, and commercial construction and land development loans exposed us to losses as the recent economic recession, whose adverse effects were delayed in impacting western North Carolina, adversely affected businesses and developers in our market area. While our charge-offs declined in 2012 compared to 2011, low demand for real estate continued to place pressure on real estate values. In 2012, we charged off $2.7 million of our commercial construction and land development loan portfolio, $593,000 of our commercial mortgage portfolio and $203,000 of our commercial and industrial loan portfolio. We also charged off $304,000 of our non-commercial mortgage loan portfolio and $244,000 of our consumer loan portfolio. In 2011, we charged off $1.9 million of our commercial construction and land development loan portfolio, $1.1 million of our commercial mortgage portfolio and $1.0 million of our commercial and industrial loan portfolio. We also charged off $1.7 million of our non-commercial mortgage loan portfolio and $400,000 of our consumer loan portfolio in 2011. The losses in our consumer loan portfolio were related primarily to our indirect financing of automobile loans. We continue to emphasize our commercial mortgage lending activities; however, due to recent economic conditions, we have suspended most financing of the construction of any properties built on a speculative basis. Our current focus is to originate commercial mortgage loans secured by owner-occupied properties and small business loans.

One-to Four-Family Residential Loans. At December 31, 2012, we had $163.6 million in one- to four-family residential loans, which represented 42.1% of our total loan portfolio. Our origination of residential mortgage loans enables borrowers to purchase or refinance existing homes located in our primary market area.

Our residential lending policies and procedures conform to the secondary market guidelines. We offer a mix of adjustable rate mortgage loans and fixed-rate mortgage loans with terms of up to 30 years. Borrower demand for adjustable-rate loans compared to fixed-rate loans is a function of the level of interest rates, the expectations of changes in the level of interest rates, and the difference between the interest rates and loan fees offered for fixed-rate mortgage loans as compared to an initially discounted interest rate and loan fees for multi-year adjustable-rate mortgages. The relative amount of fixed-rate mortgage loans and adjustable-rate mortgage loans that can be originated at any time is largely determined by the demand for each in a competitive environment. We sell most of the fixed-rate mortgages we originate, which reduces our balances of adjustable rate mortgages as they are refinanced into fixed-rate mortgages during periods of low interest rates. We determine the loan fees, interest rates and other provisions of mortgage loans based on our own pricing criteria and competitive market conditions.

Interest rates and payments on our adjustable-rate mortgage loans adjust at intervals of one to five years after an initial fixed period that ranges from one to seven years. Interest rates on our adjustable-rate loans generally are indexed to the US Treasury Constant Maturity Index for the applicable periods. However, in some limited situations, these loans are indexed to the one year London Interbank Offered Rate (LIBOR).

While one-to four-family residential real estate loans are normally originated with up to 30-year terms, such loans typically remain outstanding for substantially shorter periods because borrowers often prepay their loans in full either upon sale of the property pledged as security or upon refinancing the original loan. Therefore, average loan maturity is a function of, among other factors, the level of purchase and sale activity in the real estate market, prevailing interest rates and the interest rates payable on outstanding loans on a regular basis. We do not offer residential mortgage loans with negative amortization and do not currently offer interest-only residential mortgage loans. In the past, we have made interest-only residential mortgages in limited situations involving extremely well qualified borrowers.

We do not make owner occupied one- to four-family residential real estate loans with loan-to-value ratios exceeding 95%, unless the loan is federally guaranteed. Loans with loan-to-value ratios in excess of 80% typically require private mortgage insurance. In addition, we do not make non-owner occupied one- to four-family residential real estate loans with loan-to-value ratios exceeding 85% unless we are able to sell the loan on the secondary market. We require all properties securing mortgage loans to be appraised by a board-approved independent appraiser. We also require title insurance on all mortgage loans. Borrowers must obtain hazard insurance, and flood insurance is required for all loans located in flood hazard areas.

 

5


Table of Contents

At December 31, 2012, our largest residential mortgage loan had an outstanding balance of $4.8 million and was performing in accordance with its original terms.

Commercial Mortgage Loans. We offer fixed- and adjustable-rate mortgage loans secured by non-residential real estate and multi-family properties. At December 31, 2012, commercial mortgage loans totaled $138.8 million, or 35.8% of our total loan portfolio, all of which were performing. Our commercial mortgage loans are generally secured by commercial, industrial and manufacturing, small to moderately-sized office and retail properties, hotels, multi-family properties and hospitals and churches located in our primary market area. Although we have historically made commercial mortgage loans that are secured by both owner-occupied and nonowner-occupied properties, we are currently emphasizing the origination of commercial mortgage loans that are secured by owner-occupied properties. At December 31, 2012, $37.1 million or 26.7% of our commercial real estate loans were secured by owner-occupied properties.

We originate fixed-rate and adjustable-rate commercial mortgage loans, generally with terms of three to five years and payments based on an amortization schedule of up to 30 years, resulting in “balloon” balances at maturity. For our adjustable-rate commercial mortgage loans, interest rates are typically equal to the prime lending rate as reported in The Wall Street Journal plus an applicable margin. Currently, our adjustable-rate commercial mortgage loans typically provide for an interest rate floor. Loans are secured by first mortgages, generally are originated with a maximum loan-to-value ratio of 85% and may require specified debt service coverage ratios depending on the characteristics of the project. Rates and other terms on such loans generally depend on our assessment of credit risk after considering such factors as the borrower’s financial condition, credit history, loan-to-value ratio, debt service coverage ratio and other factors, including whether the property securing the loan will be owner occupied.

At December 31, 2012, our largest commercial mortgage loan relationship consisted of two loans that had a total outstanding balance of $7.6 million. The loans were originated in March 2008 and June 2009 and are secured by a multi-use property, including office, manufacturing and warehouse space, located in Asheville, North Carolina. Both loans are currently performing in accordance with their original terms.

Construction and Land Development Loans. We have originated construction and land development loans for commercial properties, such as retail shops and office units, and multi-family properties, and construction and land development loans for one- to four-family homes. At December 31, 2012, commercial construction and land development loans totaled $5.2 million, which represented 1.3% of our total loan portfolio, substantially all of which were performing, and residential construction and land development loans totaled $3.7 million, which represented 1.0% of our total loan portfolio, all of which were performing. Residential construction loans are typically for a term of 12 months with monthly interest only payments, and generally are followed by an automatic conversion to a 15-year to 30-year permanent loan with monthly payments of principal and interest. Except for speculative loans, discussed below, residential construction loans are generally only made to homeowners and the repayment of such loans generally comes from the proceeds of a permanent mortgage loan for which a commitment is typically in place when the construction loan is originated. Interest rates on construction loans are generally tied to an index plus an applicable margin. We generally require a maximum loan-to-value ratio of 80% for all construction loans. We generally disburse funds on a percentage-of-completion basis following an inspection by a third party inspector.

In the past, we have originated speculative construction loans to builders who have not identified a buyer for the completed property at the time of origination. However, due to recent economic conditions, we are no longer emphasizing the origination of speculative construction loans. At December 31, 2012, we had one speculative residential construction loan with a balance of $139,000 and no speculative commercial construction loans.

 

6


Table of Contents

We also selectively originate loans to individuals and developers for the purpose of developing vacant land in our primary market area, typically for building an individual’s future residence or, in the case of a developer, residential subdivisions. Land development loans, which are offered for terms of up to 18 months, are generally indexed to the prime rate as reported in The Wall Street Journal plus an applicable margin. We generally require a maximum loan-to-value ratio of 75% of the discounted market value based upon expected cash flows upon completion of the project. We also originate loans to individuals secured by undeveloped land held for investment purposes. These loans are typically amortized for no more than fifteen years with a three- or five-year balloon payment. At December 31, 2012, our largest commercial land development loan had an outstanding balance of $430,000, which was performing.

Revolving Mortgages and Consumer Loans. We offer revolving mortgage loans, which consist of home equity loans and lines of credit, and various consumer loans, including automobile loans and loans secured by deposits. At December 31, 2012, revolving mortgage loans totaled $48.2 million, or 12.4% of our total loan portfolio, of which $48.1 million were performing, and consumer loans totaled $17.6 million, or 4.5% of our total loan portfolio, of which $17.5 million were performing. Our revolving mortgage loans consist of both home equity loans with fixed-rate amortizing terms of up to 15 years and adjustable rate lines of credit with interest rates indexed to the prime rate, as published in The Wall Street Journal, plus an applicable margin. At December 31, 2012, our largest outstanding revolving mortgage loan balance was $443,000, which was performing. Consumer loans typically have shorter maturities and higher interest rates than traditional one- to four-family lending. We typically do not originate home equity loans with loan-to-value ratios exceeding 80%, including any first mortgage loan balance. The procedures for underwriting consumer loans include an assessment of the applicant’s payment history on other debts and ability to meet existing obligations and payments on the proposed loan.

Commercial and Industrial Loans. We typically offer commercial and industrial loans to small businesses located in our primary market area. At December 31, 2012, commercial and industrial loans totaled $11.1 million, which represented 2.9% of our total loan portfolio. Commercial and industrial loans consist of floating rate loans indexed to the prime rate as published in The Wall Street Journal plus an applicable margin and fixed rate loans for terms of up to 10 years, depending on the useful life and type of collateral. Our commercial and industrial loan portfolio consists primarily of loans that are secured by equipment, accounts receivable and inventory, but also includes a smaller amount of unsecured loans for purposes of financing expansion or providing working capital for general business purposes. Key loan terms vary depending on the collateral, the borrower’s financial condition, credit history and other relevant factors.

At December 31, 2012, our largest commercial and industrial relationship had an aggregate outstanding balance of $1.6 million, was secured by business assets and was performing in accordance with its original terms.

Loan Underwriting

Adjustable-Rate Loans. While we anticipate that adjustable-rate loans will better offset the adverse effects of an increase in interest rates as compared to fixed-rate mortgages, an increased monthly mortgage payment required of adjustable-rate loan borrowers in a rising interest rate environment could cause an increase in delinquencies and defaults. The marketability of the underlying property also may be adversely affected in a high interest rate environment. In addition, although adjustable-rate mortgage loans make our asset base more responsive to changes in interest rates, the extent of this interest sensitivity is limited by the annual and lifetime interest rate adjustment limits.

 

7


Table of Contents

Commercial Mortgage Loans. Loans secured by commercial real estate generally have larger balances and involve a greater degree of risk than one- to four-family residential mortgage loans. Of primary concern in commercial mortgage lending is the borrower’s creditworthiness and the feasibility and cash flow potential of the project. Payments on loans secured by income producing properties often depend on successful operation and management of the properties. As a result, repayment of such loans may be subject to adverse conditions in the real estate market or the economy. We apply what we believe to be conservative underwriting standards when originating commercial mortgage loans and seek to limit our exposure to lending concentrations to related borrowers, types of business and geographies, as well as seeking to participate with other banks in both buying and selling larger loans of this nature. Management has hired additional experienced lending officers and credit management personnel over the past several years in order to continue to safely manage this type of lending. To monitor cash flows on income producing properties, we require borrowers and loan guarantors, if any, to provide annual financial statements on commercial real estate loans. In reaching a decision on whether to make a commercial real estate loan, we consider and review a global cash flow analysis of the borrower and consider the net operating income of the property, the borrower’s expertise, credit history and profitability, and the value of the underlying property. An environmental survey is obtained when the possibility exists that hazardous materials may have existed on the site, or the site may have been impacted by adjoining properties that handled hazardous materials.

Construction and Land Development Loans. Construction financing is generally considered to involve a higher degree of risk of loss than long-term financing on improved, occupied real estate. Risk of loss on a construction loan depends largely upon the accuracy of the initial estimate of the property’s value at completion of construction and the estimated cost of construction. During the construction phase, a number of factors could result in delays and cost overruns. If the estimate of construction costs proves to be inaccurate, we may be required to advance funds beyond the amount originally committed to permit completion of the building. If the estimate of value proves to be inaccurate, we may be confronted, at or before the maturity of the loan, with a building having a value which is insufficient to assure full repayment if liquidation is required. If we are forced to foreclose on a building before or at completion due to a default, we may be unable to recover all of the unpaid balance of, and accrued interest on, the loan as well as related foreclosure and holding costs. In addition, speculative construction loans, which are loans made to home builders who, at the time of loan origination, have not yet secured an end buyer for the home under construction, typically carry higher risks than those associated with traditional construction loans. These increased risks arise because of the risk that there will be inadequate demand to ensure the sale of the property within an acceptable time. As a result, in addition to the risks associated with traditional construction loans, speculative construction loans carry the added risk that the builder will have to pay the property taxes and other carrying costs of the property until an end buyer is found. Land development loans have substantially similar risks to speculative construction loans. To monitor cash flows on construction properties, we require borrowers and loan guarantors, if any, to provide annual financial statements and, in reaching a decision on whether to make a construction or land development loan, we consider and review a global cash flow analysis of the borrower and consider the borrower’s expertise, credit history and profitability. We also generally disburse funds on a percentage-of-completion basis following an inspection by a third party inspector.

Revolving Mortgages and Consumer Loans. Consumer loans may entail greater risk than do residential mortgage loans, particularly in the case of consumer loans that are secured by assets that depreciate rapidly, such as motor vehicles. In such cases, repossessed collateral for a defaulted consumer loan may not provide an adequate source of repayment for the outstanding loan and a small remaining deficiency often does not warrant further substantial collection efforts against the borrower. In the case of home equity loans, real estate values may be reduced to a level that is insufficient to cover the outstanding loan balance after accounting for the first mortgage loan balance. Consumer loan collections depend on the borrower’s continuing financial stability, and therefore are likely to be adversely affected by various factors, including job loss, divorce, illness or personal bankruptcy. Furthermore, the application of various federal and state laws, including federal and state bankruptcy and insolvency laws, may limit the amount that can be recovered on such loans.

 

8


Table of Contents

Commercial and Industrial Loans. Unlike residential mortgage loans, which generally are made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayment from his or her employment income or other income, and which are secured by real property whose value tends to be more easily ascertainable, commercial and industrial loans are of higher risk and typically are made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayment from the cash flow of the borrower’s business. As a result, the availability of funds for the repayment of commercial and industrial loans may depend substantially on the success of the business itself. Further, any collateral securing such loans may depreciate over time, may be difficult to appraise and may fluctuate in value.

Loan Approval Procedures and Authority. Our lending activities follow written, non-discriminatory underwriting standards and loan origination procedures established by our board of directors and management. Selected employees have been granted individual lending limits, which vary depending on the individual, the type of loan and whether the loan is secured or unsecured. Currently, our Executive Vice President and Chief Lending Officer and our President and Chief Executive Officer each have aggregate secured lending authority up to $750,000 per loan and unsecured lending authority up to $250,000 per loan. Any single transaction of $250,000 or less, when the total relationship exposure is greater than $1.5 million, can be approved by either our Executive Vice President and Chief Lending Officer or our President and Chief Executive Officer. In addition, our Senior Vice President and Senior Credit Manager has secured lending authority up to $500,000 and unsecured lending authority up to $150,000. Our Executive Vice President and Chief Retail Officer has consumer lending authority up to $150,000 if secured by real estate, $50,000 in other secured lending, and $50,000 in unsecured lending. Our Vice President of Retail and Small Business Lending has consumer and small business lending authority up to $150,000 if secured by real estate, $100,000 in other secured lending, and $25,000 in unsecured lending and has small business lending authority up to $250,000 if secured by real estate, $150,000 in other secured lending, and $50,000 in unsecured lending. Other lending personnel have various smaller lending authorities based on experience and job knowledge. Our Vice President and Mortgage Sales Manager has secured mortgage lending authority up to $350,000. Loan requests between $750,000 and $1.5 million may be approved jointly by our Executive Vice President and Chief Lending Officer and our President and Chief Executive Officer. For loans in excess of $1.5 million, the Bank’s Loan Committee has final approval authority.

Loans to One Borrower. The maximum amount that we may lend to one borrower and the borrower’s related entities is generally limited by regulation to 15% of the Bank’s unimpaired capital and surplus, as defined. At December 31, 2012, our regulatory limit on loans to one borrower was $14.8 million. At that date, our largest lending relationship was two loans to one borrower totaling $7.6 million that was secured by a multi-use property, including office, manufacturing, and warehouse space, located in Asheville, North Carolina. The loans are currently performing in accordance with their original terms.

Loan Commitments. We typically issue commitments for most loans conditioned upon the occurrence of certain events. Commitments to originate loans are legally binding agreements to lend to our customers. Generally, our loan commitments expire after 45 to 60 days. See note 13 to the consolidated financial statements included in this annual report.

Investment Activities

We have legal authority to invest in various types of liquid assets, including U.S. Treasury obligations, securities of various government-sponsored agencies and of state and municipal governments, mortgage-backed securities and certificates of deposit of federally insured institutions. Within certain regulatory limits, we also may invest a portion of our assets in other permissible securities. As a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta, we also are required to maintain an investment in Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta stock, which is not publicly traded.

At December 31, 2012, our investment portfolio consisted primarily of mortgage-backed securities, U.S. government and agency securities, securities issued by government sponsored enterprises and municipal securities. We do not currently invest in trading account securities.

 

9


Table of Contents

Our investment objectives are: (i) to provide and maintain liquidity within the guidelines of North Carolina banking law and the regulations of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and (ii) to manage interest rate risk. Our board of directors has the overall responsibility for the investment portfolio, including approval of the investment policy. Our President and Chief Executive Officer, our Chief Financial Officer and our Treasurer are responsible for implementation of the investment policy and monitoring our investment performance. Our board of directors reviews the status of our investment portfolio on a monthly basis.

Deposit Activities and Other Sources of Funds

General. Deposits, borrowings and loan repayments are the major sources of our funds for lending and other investment purposes. Scheduled loan repayments are a relatively stable source of funds, while deposit inflows and outflows and loan prepayments are significantly influenced by general interest rates and money market conditions.

Deposit Accounts. Deposits are attracted from within our primary market area through the offering of a broad selection of deposit instruments, including noninterest-bearing demand deposits (such as checking accounts), interest-bearing demand accounts (such as NOW and money market accounts), regular savings accounts and certificates of deposit. Deposit account terms vary according to the minimum balance required, the time periods the funds must remain on deposit and the interest rate, among other factors. In determining the terms of our deposit accounts, we consider the rates offered by our competition, our liquidity needs, profitability to us, matching deposit and loan products and customer preferences and concerns. We generally review our deposit mix and pricing weekly. Our deposit pricing strategy has typically been to offer competitive rates on all types of deposit products, and to periodically offer special rates in order to attract deposits of a specific type or term.

Borrowings. We use advances from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta to supplement our investable funds. The Federal Home Loan Bank functions as a central reserve bank providing credit for member financial institutions. As a member, we are required to own capital stock in the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta and are authorized to apply for advances on the security of such stock and certain of our mortgage loans and other assets (principally securities which are obligations of, or guaranteed by, the United States), provided certain standards related to creditworthiness have been met. Advances are made under several different programs, each having its own interest rate, range of maturities and prepayment penalties. Depending on the program, limitations on the amount of advances are based either on a fixed percentage of an institution’s net worth, the Federal Home Loan Bank’s assessment of the institution’s creditworthiness, collateral value and level of Federal Home Loan Bank stock ownership. We also utilize securities sold under agreements to repurchase and overnight repurchase agreements to supplement our supply of investable funds and to meet deposit withdrawal requirements.

Financial Services

The Bank has an agreement with a third-party registered broker-dealer, LPL Financial LLC (“LPL”), through which the Bank offers its customers a complete range of nondeposit investment products, including mutual funds, debt, equity and government securities, retirement accounts, insurance products and fixed and variable annuities. For the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010, pursuant to the Bank’s agreement with LPL, the Bank received fees of $242,000, $275,000 and $232,000, respectively.

Subsidiaries

The Bank is the Company’s sole wholly owned subsidiary. The Bank has two subsidiaries, Appalachian Financial Services, Inc., which was formed to engage in investment activities, and Wenoca, Inc., which serves as the Bank’s trustee regarding deeds of trust. Both subsidiaries are organized as North Carolina corporations.

 

10


Table of Contents

REGULATION AND SUPERVISION

The Bank is a North Carolina chartered savings bank and the wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, which is a North Carolina corporation and registered bank holding company. The Bank’s deposits are insured up to applicable limits by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (the “FDIC”). The Bank is subject to extensive regulation by the North Carolina Commissioner of Banks (the “NCCoB”), as its chartering agency, and by the FDIC, as its deposit insurer. The Bank is required to file reports with, and is periodically examined by, the FDIC and the NCCoB concerning its activities and financial condition and must obtain regulatory approvals prior to entering into certain transactions, including, but not limited to, mergers with or acquisitions of other financial institutions. This regulation and supervision establishes a comprehensive framework of activities in which an institution can engage and is intended primarily for the protection of depositors and, for purposes of the FDIC, the protection of the insurance fund. The regulatory structure also gives the regulatory authorities extensive discretion in connection with their supervisory and enforcement activities and examination policies, including policies with respect to the classification of assets and the establishment of adequate loan loss reserves for regulatory purposes. The Bank is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta (the “FHLB of Atlanta” or “FHLB”). The Company is regulated as a bank holding company by the Federal Reserve Board (the “FRB”) and the NCCoB. Any change in such regulatory requirements and policies, whether by the North Carolina legislature, the FDIC, the FRB or Congress, could have a material adverse impact on the Company, the Bank and their operations.

Certain regulatory requirements applicable to the Company and the Bank are referred to below or elsewhere herein. This description of statutes and regulations is intended to be a summary of the material provisions of such statutes and regulations and their effects on the Company and the Bank. You are encouraged to reference the actual statutes and regulations for additional information.

Recent Regulatory Reform

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”), which was enacted on July 21, 2010, significantly changed the current bank regulatory structure and affected the lending, investment, trading and operating activities of financial institutions and their holding companies. The Dodd-Frank Act eliminated the Office of Thrift Supervision and required that federal savings associations be regulated by the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (the primary federal regulator for national banks). The Dodd-Frank Act also authorized the FRB to supervise and regulate all savings and loan holding companies.

The Dodd-Frank Act required the FRB to set minimum capital levels for bank holding companies that are as stringent as those required for insured depository institutions, and the components of Tier 1 capital are restricted to capital instruments that are currently considered to be Tier 1 capital for insured depository institutions. In addition, the proceeds of trust preferred securities will be excluded from Tier 1 capital unless such securities were issued prior to May 19, 2010 by bank or savings and loan holding companies with less than $15 billion of assets. The legislation also establishes a floor for capital of insured depository institutions that cannot be lower than the standards in effect today, and directs the federal banking regulators to implement new leverage and capital requirements within 18 months. These new leverage and capital requirements must take into account off-balance sheet activities and other risks, including risks relating to securitized products and derivatives.

The Dodd-Frank Act also created a new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau with broad powers to supervise and enforce consumer protection laws. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has broad rulemaking authority for a wide range of consumer protection laws that apply to all banks and savings institutions, including the authority to prohibit “unfair, deceptive or abusive” acts and practices. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has examination and enforcement authority over all banks and savings institutions with more than $10.0 billion in assets. Banks and savings institutions with $10.0 billion or less in assets are examined by their applicable bank regulators. The new legislation also weakens the federal preemption available for national banks and federal savings associations, and gives the state attorneys general the ability to enforce applicable federal consumer protection laws.

 

11


Table of Contents

The Dodd Frank Act also broadened the base for FDIC insurance assessments, permanently increased the maximum amount of deposit insurance for banks, savings institutions and credit unions to $250,000 per depositor, retroactive to January 1, 2008, and provided that noninterest-bearing transaction accounts have unlimited deposit insurance through December 31, 2012, which had no significant impact on liquidity when it expired on December 31, 2012.. Lastly, the Dodd-Frank Act increased shareholder influence over boards of directors by requiring companies to give shareholders a non-binding vote on executive compensation and so-called “golden parachute” payments, and by authorizing the Securities and Exchange Commission to promulgate rules that would allow shareholders to nominate and solicit votes for their own candidates using a company’s proxy materials. The legislation also directs the FRB to promulgate rules prohibiting excessive compensation paid to bank holding company executives, regardless of whether the company is publicly traded.

It remains difficult to predict what impact the new legislation and implementing regulations will have on community banks such as Asheville Savings, including the lending and credit practices of such banks. Moreover, significant provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act are not yet effective, and the legislation requires various federal agencies to promulgate numerous and extensive implementing regulations over the next several years. Although the substance and scope of these regulations cannot be determined at this time, it is expected that the legislation and implementing regulations may increase our operating and compliance costs in the future.

North Carolina Banking Laws and Supervision

General. As a North Carolina savings bank, Asheville Savings is subject to supervision, regulation and examination by the NCCoB and to various North Carolina statutes and regulations which govern, among other things, investment powers, lending and deposit taking activities, borrowings, maintenance of surplus and reserve accounts, distributions of earnings and payment of dividends. In addition, Asheville Savings is also subject to North Carolina consumer protection and civil rights laws and regulations. The approval of the NCCoB is required for a North Carolina savings bank to establish or relocate branches, merge with other financial institutions, organize a holding company, issue stock and undertake certain other activities.

Net Worth Requirement. North Carolina law requires that a North Carolina savings bank maintain a net worth of not less than 5% of its total assets. Intangible assets must be deducted from net worth and assets when computing compliance with this requirement.

Investment Activities. Subject to limitation by the NCCoB, North Carolina savings banks may make any loan or investment or engage in any activity that is permitted to federally chartered institutions. In addition to such lending authority, North Carolina savings banks are generally authorized to invest funds in certain statutorily permitted investments, including but not limited to (i) obligations of the United States, or those guaranteed by it; (ii) obligations of the State of North Carolina; (iii) bank demand or time deposits; (iv) stock or obligations of the federal deposit insurance fund or a Federal Home Loan Bank; (v) savings accounts of any savings institution as approved by the board of directors; and (vi) stock or obligations of any agency of the State of North Carolina or of the United States or of any corporation doing business in North Carolina whose principal business is to make education loans. However, a North Carolina savings bank cannot invest more than 15% of its total assets in business, commercial, corporate and agricultural loans, and cannot directly or indirectly acquire or retain any corporate debt security that is not of investment grade.

 

12


Table of Contents

Loans to One Borrower Limitations. North Carolina law provides state savings banks with broad lending authority. However, subject to certain limited exceptions, no loans and extensions of credit to any borrower outstanding at one time and not fully secured by readily marketable collateral shall exceed 15% of the net worth of the savings bank, as defined. In addition, loans and extensions of credit fully secured by readily marketable collateral may not exceed 10% of the net worth of the savings bank. These limitations do not apply to loans or obligations made: (i) for any purpose otherwise permitted under North Carolina law in an amount not to exceed $500,000; (ii) to develop domestic residential housing units, not to exceed the lesser of $30.0 million or 30% of the savings bank’s net worth, provided that the purchase price of each single-family dwelling in the development does not exceed $500,000 and the aggregate amount of loans made pursuant to this authority does not exceed 150% of the savings bank’s net worth; or (iii) to finance the sale of real property acquired in satisfaction of debts in an amount up to 50% of the savings bank’s net worth.

Dividends. A North Carolina stock savings bank may not declare or pay a cash dividend on, or repurchase any of, its capital stock if after making such distribution, the institution would become, or if it already is, “undercapitalized” (as such term is defined under applicable law and regulations) or such transaction would reduce the net worth of the institution to an amount which is less than the minimum amount required by applicable federal and state regulations.

Regulatory Enforcement Authority. Any North Carolina savings bank that does not operate in accordance with the regulations, policies and directives of the NCCoB may be subject to sanctions for noncompliance, including revocation of its articles of incorporation. The NCCoB may, under certain circumstances, suspend or remove officers or directors of a state savings bank who have violated the law or conducted the bank’s business in a manner which is unsafe or unsound. Upon finding that a state savings bank has engaged in an unsafe, unsound or discriminatory manner, the NCCoB may issue an order to cease and desist and impose civil monetary penalties on the institution.

Federal Banking Regulations

Capital Requirements. Under the FDIC’s regulations, federally insured state-chartered banks that are not members of the Federal Reserve System (“state non-member banks”), such as Asheville Savings, are required to comply with minimum leverage capital requirements. For an institution determined by the FDIC to not be anticipating or experiencing significant growth and to be, in general, a strong banking organization rated composite 1 under the Uniform Financial Institutions Ranking System established by the Federal Financial Institutions Examination Council, the minimum capital leverage requirement is a ratio of Tier 1 capital to total assets of 3.0%. For all other institutions, the minimum leverage capital ratio is not less than 4.0%. Tier 1 capital is the sum of common shareholders’ equity, noncumulative perpetual preferred stock (including any related surplus) and minority investments in certain subsidiaries, less intangible assets (except for certain servicing rights and credit card relationships) and certain other specified items.

In addition, FDIC regulations require state non-member banks to maintain certain ratios of regulatory capital to regulatory risk-weighted assets, or “risk-based capital ratios.” Risk-based capital ratios are determined by allocating assets and specified off-balance sheet items to four risk-weighted categories ranging from 0.0% to 100.0%. State nonmember banks must maintain a minimum ratio of total capital to risk-weighted assets of at least 8.0%, of which at least one-half must be Tier 1 capital. Total capital consists of Tier 1 capital plus Tier 2 or supplementary capital items, which include allowances for loan losses in an amount of up to 1.25% of risk-weighted assets, cumulative preferred stock and certain other capital instruments, and a portion of the net unrealized gain on equity securities. The includable amount of Tier 2 capital cannot exceed the amount of the institution’s Tier 1 capital.

 

13


Table of Contents

Standards for Safety and Soundness. As required by statute, the federal banking agencies adopted final regulations and Interagency Guidelines Establishing Standards for Safety and Soundness to implement safety and soundness standards. The guidelines set forth the safety and soundness standards that the federal banking agencies use to identify and address problems at insured depository institutions before capital becomes impaired. The guidelines address internal controls and information systems, internal audit system, credit underwriting, loan documentation, interest rate exposure, asset growth, asset quality, earnings and compensation, fees and benefits. Most recently, the agencies have established standards for safeguarding customer information. If the appropriate federal banking agency determines that an institution fails to meet any standard prescribed by the guidelines, the agency may require the institution to submit to the agency an acceptable plan to achieve compliance with the standard.

Investment Activities. Since the enactment of Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Improvement Act (the “FDICIA”), all state-chartered federally insured banks, including savings banks, have generally been limited in their investment activities to principal and equity investments of the type and in the amount authorized for national banks, notwithstanding state law. The FDICIA and the FDIC regulations promulgated thereunder permit exceptions to these limitations. For example, state chartered banks may, with FDIC approval, continue to exercise state authority to invest in common or preferred stocks listed on a national securities exchange or the Nasdaq Global Market and in the shares of an investment company registered under the Investment Company Act of 1940, as amended. The maximum permissible investment is 100% of Tier 1 Capital, as specified by the FDIC’s regulations, or the maximum amount permitted by North Carolina law, whichever is less. In addition, the FDIC is authorized to permit such institutions to engage in state authorized activities or investments not permissible for national banks (other than non-subsidiary equity investments) if they meet all applicable capital requirements and it is determined that such activities or investments do not pose a significant risk to the Deposit Insurance Fund. The FDIC has adopted regulations governing the procedures for institutions seeking approval to engage in such activities or investments. The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 specifies that a non-member bank may control a subsidiary that engages in activities as principal that would only be permitted for a national bank to conduct in a “financial subsidiary” if a bank meets specified conditions and deducts its investment in the subsidiary for regulatory capital purposes.

Prompt Corrective Regulatory Action. Federal law requires, among other things, that federal bank regulatory authorities take “prompt corrective action” with respect to banks that do not meet minimum capital requirements. For these purposes, the law establishes five capital categories: well capitalized, adequately capitalized, undercapitalized, significantly undercapitalized and critically undercapitalized.

The FDIC has adopted regulations to implement the prompt corrective action legislation. An institution is deemed to be “well capitalized” if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of 10.0% or greater, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 6.0% or greater and a leverage ratio of 5.0% or greater. An institution is “adequately capitalized” if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of 8.0% or greater, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of 4.0% or greater, and generally a leverage ratio of 4.0% or greater. An institution is “undercapitalized” if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of less than 8.0%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of less than 4.0%, or generally a leverage ratio of less than 4.0%. An institution is deemed to be “significantly undercapitalized” if it has a total risk-based capital ratio of less than 6.0%, a Tier 1 risk-based capital ratio of less than 3.0%, or a leverage ratio of less than 3.0%. An institution is considered to be “critically undercapitalized” if it has a ratio of tangible equity (as defined in the regulations) to total assets that is equal to or less than 2.0%.

 

14


Table of Contents

“Undercapitalized” banks must adhere to growth, capital distribution (including dividend) and other limitations and are required to submit a capital restoration plan. A bank’s compliance with such a plan is required to be guaranteed by any company that controls the undercapitalized institution in an amount equal to the lesser of 5.0% of the institution’s total assets when deemed undercapitalized or the amount necessary to achieve the status of adequately capitalized. If an “undercapitalized” bank fails to submit an acceptable plan, it is treated as if it is “significantly undercapitalized.” “Significantly undercapitalized” banks must comply with one or more of a number of additional restrictions, including but not limited to an order by the FDIC to sell sufficient voting stock to become adequately capitalized, requirements to reduce total assets, cease receipt of deposits from correspondent banks or dismiss directors or officers, and restrictions on interest rates paid on deposits, compensation of executive officers and capital distributions by the parent holding company. “Critically undercapitalized” institutions are subject to additional measures including, subject to a narrow exception, the appointment of a receiver or conservator within 270 days after it obtains such status.

Transactions with Affiliates. Transactions between banks and their related parties or affiliates are limited by Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act. An affiliate of a bank is any company or entity that controls, is controlled by or is under common control with the bank. In a holding company context, the parent bank holding company and any companies which are controlled by such parent holding company are affiliates of the bank. Generally, Sections 23A and 23B of the Federal Reserve Act and Regulation W (i) limit the extent to which the bank or its subsidiaries may engage in “covered transactions” with any one affiliate to an amount equal to 10% of such institution’s capital stock and surplus, and contain an aggregate limit on all such transactions with all affiliates to an amount equal to 20% of such institution’s capital stock and surplus and (ii) require that all such transactions be on terms substantially the same, or at least as favorable, to the institution or subsidiary as those provided to non-affiliates. The term “covered transaction” includes the making of loans, purchase of assets, issuance of a guarantee and other similar transactions. In addition, loans or other extensions of credit by the financial institution to the affiliate are required to be collateralized in accordance with the requirements set forth in Section 23A of the Federal Reserve Act. The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 generally prohibits loans by a company to its executive officers and directors. However, the law contains a specific exception for loans by a depository institution to its executive officers and directors in compliance with federal banking laws assuming such loans are also permitted under the law of the institution’s chartering state. Under such laws, the Bank’s authority to extend credit to executive officers, directors and 10% shareholders (“insiders”), as well as entities such person’s control, is limited. The law limits both the individual and aggregate amount of loans the Bank may make to insiders based, in part, on the Bank’s capital position and requires certain board approval procedures to be followed. Such loans are required to be made on terms substantially the same as those offered to unaffiliated individuals and not involve more than the normal risk of repayment. There is an exception for loans made pursuant to a benefit or compensation program that is widely available to all employees of the institution and does not give preference to insiders over other employees. Loans to executive officers are further limited by specific categories.

Enforcement. The FDIC has extensive enforcement authority over insured state-chartered savings banks, including Asheville Savings. This enforcement authority includes, among other things, the ability to assess civil money penalties, issue cease and desist orders and remove directors and officers. In general, these enforcement actions may be initiated in response to violations of laws and regulations and unsafe or unsound practices. The FDIC has authority under federal law to appoint a conservator or receiver for an insured bank under limited circumstances. The FDIC is required, with certain exceptions, to appoint a receiver or conservator for an insured state non-member bank if that bank was “critically undercapitalized” on average during the calendar quarter beginning 270 days after the date on which the institution became “critically undercapitalized.” The FDIC may also appoint itself as conservator or receiver for an insured state non-member institution under specific circumstances on the basis of the institution’s financial condition or upon the occurrence of other events, including: (1) insolvency; (2) substantial dissipation of assets or earnings through violations of law or unsafe or unsound practices; (3) existence of an unsafe or unsound condition to transact business; and (4) insufficient capital, or the incurring of losses that will deplete substantially all of the institution’s capital with no reasonable prospect of replenishment without federal assistance.

 

15


Table of Contents

Insurance of Deposit Accounts. The FDIC insures deposits at FDIC insured financial institutions such as Asheville Savings. Deposit accounts at the Bank are insured by the FDIC generally up to a maximum of $250,000 per separately insured depositor and up to a maximum of $250,000 for self-directed retirement accounts. Certain accounts were 100% insured through the end of 2012. By federal law, as of January 1, 2013, funds in a noninterest-bearing transaction account (including an Interest on Lawyer Trust Account (“IOLTA”)) no longer receive unlimited deposit insurance coverage, but are FDIC-insured to the legal maximum of $250,000 for each ownership category. The FDIC charges the insured financial institutions premiums to maintain the Deposit Insurance Fund.

As part of its plan to restore the Deposit Insurance Fund in the wake of the large number of bank failures following the financial crisis, the FDIC imposed a special assessment of 5 basis points for the second quarter of 2009. In addition, the FDIC has required all insured institutions to prepay their quarterly risk-based assessments for the fourth quarter of 2009, and for all of 2010, 2011 and 2012. As part of this prepayment, the FDIC assumed a 5% annual growth in the assessment base and applied a 3 basis point increase in assessment rates effective January 1, 2011.

Effective April 1, 2011, FDIC deposit assessments are based on an institution’s average consolidated total assets minus average tangible equity as opposed to total deposits. Since the new base is much larger than the previous base, the FDIC also lowered assessment rates so that the total amount of revenue collected from the industry would not be significantly altered. The rule is expected to benefit smaller financial institutions, which typically rely more on deposits for funding, and shift more of the burden for supporting the insurance fund to larger institutions, which have greater access to non-deposit sources of funding. The Bank’s 2012 FDIC insurance cost decreased approximately $104,000 primarily as a result of these changes.

Federal Home Loan Bank System. Asheville Savings is a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank System, which consists of twelve regional Federal Home Loan Banks. The FHLB provides a central credit facility primarily for member institutions. Asheville Savings, as a member of the FHLB of Atlanta, is required to acquire and hold shares of capital stock in that Federal Home Loan Bank. At December 31, 2012, Asheville Savings complied with this requirement with an investment in FHLB of Atlanta stock of $3.4 million.

The Federal Home Loan Banks were required to provide funds for the resolution of insolvent thrifts in the late 1980s and to contribute funds for affordable housing programs. These requirements, or general results of operations, could reduce or eliminate the dividends that the Federal Home Loan Banks pay to their members and result in the Federal Home Loan Banks imposing a higher rate of interest on advances to their members. If dividends were reduced, or interest on future Federal Home Loan Bank advances increased, our net interest income would likely also be reduced.

Community Reinvestment Act. Under the Community Reinvestment Act, as implemented by FDIC regulations, a savings association has a continuing and affirmative obligation consistent with its safe and sound operation to help meet the credit needs of its entire community, including low and moderate income neighborhoods. The Community Reinvestment Act does not establish specific lending requirements or programs for financial institutions nor does it limit an institution’s discretion to develop the types of products and services that it believes are best suited to its particular community. The Community Reinvestment Act requires the FDIC, in connection with its examination of a savings institution, to assess the institution’s record of meeting the credit needs of its community and to take such record into account in its evaluation of certain applications by such institution.

The Community Reinvestment Act requires public disclosure of an institution’s rating and requires the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation to provide a written evaluation of an association’s Community Reinvestment Act performance utilizing a four-tiered descriptive rating system.

 

16


Table of Contents

Asheville Savings received a “satisfactory” rating as a result of its most recent Community Reinvestment Act assessment.

Other Regulations

Interest and other charges collected or contracted for by Asheville Savings are subject to state usury laws and federal laws concerning interest rates. The Bank’s operations are also subject to federal laws applicable to credit transactions, such as the:

 

 

Truth-In-Lending Act, governing disclosures of credit terms to consumer borrowers;

 

 

Home Mortgage Disclosure Act of 1975, requiring financial institutions to provide information to enable the public and public officials to determine whether a financial institution is fulfilling its obligation to help meet the housing needs of the community it serves;

 

 

Equal Credit Opportunity Act, prohibiting discrimination on the basis of race, creed or other prohibited factors in extending credit;

 

 

Fair Credit Reporting Act of 1978, governing the use and provision of information to credit reporting agencies;

 

 

Fair Debt Collection Act, governing the manner in which consumer debts may be collected by collection agencies; and

 

 

Rules and regulations of the various federal agencies charged with the responsibility of implementing such federal laws.

The operations of Asheville Savings also are subject to, among other things, the:

 

 

Right to Financial Privacy Act, which imposes a duty to maintain confidentiality of consumer financial records and prescribes procedures for complying with administrative subpoenas of financial records;

 

 

Electronic Funds Transfer Act and Regulation E promulgated thereunder, which governs automatic deposits to and withdrawals from deposit accounts and customers’ rights and liabilities arising from the use of automated teller machines and other electronic banking services;

 

 

Check Clearing for the 21st Century Act (also known as “Check 21”), which gives “substitute checks,” such as digital check images and copies made from that image, the same legal standing as the original paper check;

 

 

Title III of the Uniting and Strengthening America by Providing Appropriate Tools Required to Intercept and Obstruct Terrorism Act of 2001 (referred to as the “USA PATRIOT Act”), which significantly expands the responsibilities of financial institutions in preventing the use of the U.S. financial system to fund terrorist activities. Among other provisions, it requires financial institutions operating in the United States to develop new anti-money laundering compliance programs, due diligence policies and controls to ensure the detection and reporting of money laundering. Such required compliance programs are intended to supplement existing compliance requirements, also applicable to financial institutions, under the Bank Secrecy Act and the Office of Foreign Assets Control Regulations; and

 

 

The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act, which places limitations on the sharing of consumer financial information with unaffiliated third parties. Specifically, the Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act requires all financial institutions offering financial products or services to retail customers to provide such customers with the financial institution’s privacy policy and provide such customers the opportunity to “opt out” of the sharing of personal financial information with unaffiliated third parties.

 

17


Table of Contents

Federal Reserve System

The FRB regulations require savings institutions to maintain noninterest earning reserves against their transaction accounts (primarily Negotiable Order of Withdrawal (“NOW”) and regular checking accounts). The regulations generally provide that reserves be maintained against aggregate transaction accounts as follows: a 3% reserve ratio is assessed on net transaction accounts up to and including $67.1 million; a 10% reserve ratio is applied above $67.1 million. The first $12.4 million of otherwise reservable balances (subject to adjustments by the FRB) are exempted from the reserve requirements. The amounts are adjusted annually. Asheville Savings complies with the foregoing requirements.

Holding Company Regulation

The Company is subject to examination, regulation and periodic reporting under the Bank Holding Company Act of 1956, as amended, as administered by the FRB. As a result, prior FRB approval would be required for the Company to acquire direct or indirect ownership or control of any voting securities of any bank or bank holding company if, after such acquisition, it would, directly or indirectly, own or control more than 5% of any class of voting shares of the bank or bank holding company. In addition to the approval of the FRB, before any bank acquisition can be completed, prior approval may also be required to be obtained from other agencies having supervisory jurisdiction over the bank to be acquired.

A bank holding company is generally prohibited from engaging in, or acquiring, direct or indirect control of more than 5% of the voting securities of any company engaged in non-banking activities. One of the principal exceptions to this prohibition is for activities found by the FRB to be so closely related to banking or managing or controlling banks as to be a proper incident thereto. Some of the principal activities that the FRB has determined by regulation to be so closely related to banking are: (i) making or servicing loans; (ii) performing certain data processing services; (iii) providing discount brokerage services; (iv) acting as fiduciary, investment or financial advisor; (v) leasing personal or real property; (vi) making investments in corporations or projects designed primarily to promote community welfare; and (vii) acquiring a savings and loan association.

The Gramm-Leach-Bliley Act of 1999 authorizes a bank holding company that meets specified conditions, including being “well capitalized” and “well managed,” to opt to become a “financial holding company” and thereby engage in a broader array of financial activities than previously permitted. Such activities can include insurance underwriting and investment banking.

The Company is also subject to the FRB’s capital adequacy guidelines for bank holding companies (on a consolidated basis) substantially similar to those of the FDIC for Asheville Savings.

A bank holding company is generally required to give the FRB prior written notice of any purchase or redemption of then outstanding equity securities if the gross consideration for the purchase or redemption, when combined with the net consideration paid for all such purchases or redemptions during the preceding 12 months, is equal to 10% or more of the company’s consolidated net worth. The FRB may disapprove such a purchase or redemption if it determines that the proposal would constitute an unsafe and unsound practice, or would violate any law, regulation, FRB order or directive, or any condition imposed by, or written agreement with, the FRB. The FRB has adopted an exception to this approval requirement for well-capitalized bank holding companies that meet certain other conditions.

 

18


Table of Contents

The FRB has issued a policy statement regarding the payment of dividends by bank holding companies. In general, the FRB’s policies provide that dividends should be paid only out of current earnings and only if the prospective rate of earnings retention by the bank holding company appears consistent with the organization’s capital needs, asset quality and overall financial condition. The FRB’s policies also require that a bank holding company serve as a source of financial strength to its subsidiary banks by standing ready to use available resources to provide adequate capital funds to those banks during periods of financial stress or adversity and by maintaining the financial flexibility and capital-raising capacity to obtain additional resources for assisting its subsidiary banks where necessary. Under the prompt corrective action laws, the ability of a bank holding company to pay dividends may be restricted if a subsidiary bank becomes undercapitalized. These regulatory policies could affect the ability of the Company to pay dividends or otherwise engage in capital distributions.

Under the Federal Deposit Insurance Act, depository institutions are liable to the FDIC for losses suffered or anticipated by the FDIC in connection with the default of a commonly controlled depository institution or any assistance provided by the FDIC to such an institution in danger of default. This law would have potential applicability if the Company ever held as a separate subsidiary a depository institution in addition to Asheville Savings.

The Company and the Bank will be affected by the monetary and fiscal policies of various agencies of the United States Government, including the Federal Reserve System. In view of changing conditions in the national economy and in the money markets, it is impossible for management to accurately predict future changes in monetary policy or the effect of such changes on the business or financial condition of the Company or the Bank.

The status of the Company as a registered bank holding company under the Bank Holding Company Act will not exempt it from certain federal and state laws and regulations applicable to corporations generally, including, without limitation, certain provisions of the federal securities laws.

Federal Securities Laws

The Company’s common stock is registered with the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended. As a result, the Company is subject to the information, proxy solicitation, insider trading restrictions and other requirements under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended.

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

The Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 addresses, among other issues, corporate governance, auditing and accounting, executive compensation, and enhanced and timely disclosure of corporate information. As directed by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial and accounting officer each are required to certify that the Company’s quarterly and annual reports do not contain any untrue statement of a material fact. The rules adopted by the Securities and Exchange Commission under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 have several requirements, including having these officers certify that: they are responsible for establishing, maintaining and regularly evaluating the effectiveness of our internal controls; they have made certain disclosures to our auditors and the audit committee of the board of directors about our internal controls; and they have included information in our quarterly and annual reports about their evaluation and whether there have been significant changes in our internal controls or in other factors that could significantly affect internal controls.

 

19


Table of Contents

FEDERAL AND STATE TAXATION

Federal Income Taxation

General. We report our income on a calendar year basis using the accrual method of accounting. The federal income tax laws apply to us in the same manner as to other corporations with some exceptions, including particularly our reserve for bad debts discussed below. The following discussion of tax matters is intended only as a summary and does not purport to be a comprehensive description of the tax rules applicable to us. Our federal income tax returns have not been audited during the last five years. For its 2012 and 2011 calendar years, the Company’s maximum marginal federal income tax rate was 34%.

The Company and the Bank have entered into a tax allocation agreement. Because the Company owns 100% of the issued and outstanding capital stock of the Bank, the Company and the Bank are members of an affiliated group within the meaning of Section 1504(a) of the Internal Revenue Code, of which group the Company is the common parent corporation. As a result of this affiliation, the Bank may be included in the filing of a consolidated federal income tax return with the Company and, if a decision to file a consolidated tax return is made, the parties agree to compensate each other for their individual share of the consolidated tax liability and/or any tax benefits provided by them in the filing of the consolidated federal income tax return.

Bad Debt Reserves. For fiscal years beginning before June 30, 1996, thrift institutions that qualified under certain definitional tests and other conditions of the Internal Revenue Code were permitted to use certain favorable provisions to calculate their deductions from taxable income for annual additions to their bad debt reserve. A reserve could be established for bad debts on qualifying real property loans, generally secured by interests in real property improved or to be improved, under the percentage of taxable income method or the experience method. The reserve for nonqualifying loans was computed using the experience method. Federal legislation enacted in 1996 repealed the reserve method of accounting for bad debts and the percentage of taxable income method for tax years beginning after 1995 and require savings institutions to recapture or take into income certain portions of their accumulated bad debt reserves.

Distributions. If Asheville Savings makes “non-dividend distributions” to the Company, the distributions will be considered to have been made from the Bank’s unrecaptured tax bad debt reserves, including the balance of its reserves as of December 31, 1987, to the extent of the “non-dividend distributions,” and then from the Bank’s supplemental reserve for losses on loans, to the extent of those reserves, and an amount based on the amount distributed, but not more than the amount of those reserves, will be included in the Bank’s taxable income. Non-dividend distributions include distributions in excess of the Bank’s current and accumulated earnings and profits, as calculated for federal income tax purposes, distributions in redemption of stock, and distributions in partial or complete liquidation. Dividends paid out of the Bank’s current or accumulated earnings and profits will not be so included in the Bank’s taxable income.

The amount of additional taxable income triggered by a non-dividend is an amount that, when reduced by the tax attributable to the income, is equal to the amount of the distribution. Therefore, if Asheville Savings makes a non-dividend distribution to the Company, approximately one and one-half times the amount of the distribution not in excess of the amount of the reserves would be includable in income for federal income tax purposes, assuming a 34% federal corporate income tax rate. Asheville Savings does not intend to pay dividends that would result in a recapture of any portion of its bad debt reserves.

 

20


Table of Contents

State Taxation

North Carolina. North Carolina imposes corporate income and franchise taxes. North Carolina’s corporate income tax is 6.9% of the portion of a corporation’s net income allocable to the state. If a corporation in North Carolina does business in North Carolina and in one or more other states, North Carolina taxes a fraction of the corporation’s income based on the amount of sales, payroll and property it maintains within North Carolina. North Carolina franchise tax is levied on business corporations at the rate of $1.50 per $1,000 of the largest of the following three alternate bases: (i) the amount of the corporation’s capital stock, surplus and undivided profits apportionable to the state; (ii) 55% of the appraised value of the corporation’s property in the state subject to local taxation; or (iii) the book value of the corporation’s real and tangible personal property in the state less any outstanding debt that was created to acquire or improve real property in the state.

Any cash dividends, in excess of a certain exempt amount, that would be paid with respect to ASB Bancorp, Inc. common stock to a shareholder (including a partnership and certain other entities) who is a resident of North Carolina will be subject to the North Carolina income tax. Any distribution by a corporation from earnings according to percentage ownership is considered a dividend, and the definition of a dividend for North Carolina income tax purposes may not be the same as the definition of a dividend for federal income tax purposes. A corporate distribution may be treated as a dividend for North Carolina income tax purposes if it is paid from funds that exceed the corporation’s earned surplus and profits under certain circumstances.

 

Item 1A. Risk Factors

Risks Related to Our Business

Significant loan losses could require us to increase our allowance for loan losses through a charge to earnings.

When we loan money we incur the risk that our borrowers will not repay their loans. We provide for loan losses by establishing an allowance through a charge to earnings. The amount of this allowance is based on our assessment of loan losses inherent in our loan portfolio. The process for determining the amount of the allowance is critical to our financial condition and results of operations. It requires subjective and complex judgments about the future, including forecasts of economic or market conditions that might impair the ability of our borrowers to repay their loans. We might underestimate the loan losses inherent in our loan portfolio and have loan losses in excess of the amount recorded in our allowance for loan losses. In addition, we might increase the allowance because of changing economic conditions. For example, in a rising interest rate environment, borrowers with adjustable-rate loans could see their payments increase. There may be a significant increase in the number of borrowers who are unable or unwilling to repay their loans, resulting in our charging off more loans and increasing our allowance. Furthermore, when real estate values decline, the potential severity of loss on a real estate-secured loan can increase significantly, especially in the case of loans with high combined loan-to-value ratios. The recent decline in the national economy and the local economies of the areas in which our loans are concentrated could result in an increase in loan delinquencies, foreclosures or repossessions resulting in increased charge-off amounts and the need for additional loan loss allowances in future periods. In addition, our determination as to the amount of our allowance for loan losses is subject to review by our primary regulators, the FDIC and the NCCoB, as part of their examination process, which may result in the establishment of an additional allowance based upon the judgment of the FDIC and/or the NCCoB after a review of the information available at the time of their examination. Our allowance for loan losses amounted to $8.5 million and $10.6 million, or 2.20% and 2.45% of total loans outstanding and 739.62% and 51.53% of nonperforming loans, at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively. A large loss could deplete the allowance and require increased provisions to replenish the allowance, which would decrease our earnings. In addition, at December 31, 2012, we had fifty-two loan relationships with outstanding balances that exceeded $1.0 million, all of which were performing according to their original terms. The deterioration of one or more of these loan relationships could result in a significant increase in our nonperforming loans and our provision for loan losses, which would negatively impact our results of operations.

 

21


Table of Contents

Our commercial lending activities have exposed us to losses in recent periods and our continued emphasis on commercial lending may expose us to future lending risks.

Our emphasis on commercial mortgage, commercial construction and commercial land development loans has exposed us to losses as the recent economic recession has adversely affected many businesses and developers in our market area. We are continuing to emphasize our commercial mortgage and commercial and industrial lending activities. At December 31, 2012, 26.7% of our commercial real estate loans were secured by owner-occupied properties.

At December 31, 2012, our loan portfolio included $138.8 million, or 35.8% of total loans, of commercial mortgage loans, $5.2 million, or 1.3% of total loans, of commercial construction and land development loans, and $11.1 million, or 2.9% of total loans, of commercial and industrial loans. Commercial mortgage loans, commercial construction and land development loans and commercial and industrial loans generally expose a lender to greater risk of nonpayment and loss than one- to four-family residential mortgage loans because repayment of these loans often depends on the successful operation of the property and the income stream of the borrowers, and in the case of commercial construction and land development loans, the successful completion and sale of the project. Such loans typically involve larger loan balances to single borrowers or groups of related borrowers compared to one- to four-family residential mortgage loans. Commercial and industrial loans also expose us to additional risks since they typically are made on the basis of the borrower’s ability to make repayments from the cash flow of the borrower’s business and are secured by non-real estate collateral that may depreciate over time. In addition, since such loans generally entail greater risk than one- to four-family residential mortgage loans, we may need to increase our allowance for loan losses in the future to account for the likely increase in probable credit losses associated with the growth of such loans. Also, many of our commercial borrowers have more than one loan outstanding with us. Consequently, an adverse development with respect to one loan or one credit relationship can expose us to a significantly greater risk of loss compared to an adverse development with respect to a one- to four-family residential mortgage loan.

A slowing or declining of national and local economic conditions could result in increases in our level of nonperforming loans and/or reduce demand for our products and services, which may negatively impact our financial condition and results of operations.

Our business activities and earnings are affected by general business conditions in the United States and in our primary market area. These conditions include short-term and long-term interest rates, inflation, unemployment levels, monetary supply, consumer confidence and spending, fluctuations in both debt and equity capital markets and the strength of the economy in the United States generally and in our primary market area in particular. In recent years, the national economy has experienced recessionary conditions that have resulted in general economic downturns, with rising unemployment levels, declines in real estate values and an erosion in consumer confidence. Over the course of the past year, the tourism industry in the Asheville metropolitan area has largely recovered, which positively impacted the economy in a number of our local markets, such as Buncombe and Henderson Counties, that directly benefit from this industry, and the overall unemployment rate in the Asheville metropolitan area decreased to 7.5% in December 2012 from 8.1% in December 2011. McDowell County, which is located in our primary market area, continued to experience unemployment rates that exceeded both the national and state unemployment rates. As of December 2012, the unemployment rate for McDowell County was 11.0%, while the national and state unemployment rates were 7.8% and 9.2%, respectively. In addition, our primary market area has experienced a softening of the local real estate market, including reductions in local property values, and a decline in the local manufacturing industry, which employs many of our borrowers. A prolonged or more severe economic downturn, continued elevated levels of unemployment, further declines in the values of real estate, or other events that affect household and/or corporate incomes could impair the ability of our borrowers to repay their loans in accordance with their terms. Continued or further deterioration in local economic conditions could also drive the level of loan losses beyond the level we have provided for in our allowance for loan and lease losses, which could necessitate increasing our provision for loans losses and reduce our earnings. Additionally, the demand for our products and services could be reduced, which would adversely impact our liquidity and the level of revenues we generate.

 

22


Table of Contents

Further declines in real estate values may cause us to incur losses in our portfolio of foreclosed real estate.

Our portfolio of foreclosed real estate includes parcels of unimproved land, land with completed structures and land with structures in various stages of completion. We may have to incur additional costs to complete certain parcels of our foreclosed properties in order to market and sell the parcels, which may not fully recover upon the sale of the parcel thereby causing us to incur additional losses. In addition, general declines in the values of real estate in our market areas may cause us to recognize further write-downs on our foreclosed real estate or to incur losses when we sell our foreclosed real estate.

The geographic concentration of our loan portfolio and lending activities makes us vulnerable to a downturn in the local economy.

Nearly all of our loans are secured by real estate or made to businesses in our primary market area, which consists of Buncombe, Madison, McDowell, Henderson and Transylvania Counties in North Carolina and the surrounding areas. This concentration makes us vulnerable to a downturn in the local economy and real estate markets. Adverse conditions in the local economy such as inflation, unemployment, recession or other factors beyond our control could impact the ability of our borrowers to repay their loans, which could impact our net interest income. Decreases in local real estate values could adversely affect the value of the property used as collateral for our loans, which could cause us to realize a loss in the event of a foreclosure.

Changes in interest rates may hurt our profits and investment securities values.

Our net interest income is the interest we earn on loans and investments less the interest we pay on our deposits and borrowings. Our interest rate spread is the difference between the yield we earn on our assets and the interest rate we pay for deposits and our borrowings. Changes in interest rates could adversely affect our interest rate spread and, as a result, our net interest income. Although the yield we earn on our assets and our funding costs tend to move in the same direction in response to changes in interest rates, one can rise or fall faster than the other, causing our interest rate spread to expand or contract. Our liabilities are shorter in duration than our assets, so they will adjust faster in response to changes in interest rates. As a result, when interest rates rise, our funding costs will rise faster than the yield we earn on our assets, causing our interest rate spread to contract until the yield catches up. Changes in the slope of the “yield curve”—or the spread between short-term and long-term interest rates—will also reduce our interest rate spread. Normally, the yield curve is upward sloping, meaning short-term rates are lower than long-term rates. Because our liabilities are shorter in duration than our assets, when the yield curve flattens or even inverts, we will experience pressure on our interest rate spread as our cost of funds increases relative to the yield we can earn on our assets.

 

23


Table of Contents

The Standard & Poor’s downgrade in the U.S. government’s sovereign credit rating, and in the credit ratings of instruments issued, insured or guaranteed by certain related institutions, agencies and instrumentalities, could result in risks to the Company and the Bank and general economic conditions that we are not able to predict.

On August 5, 2011, Standard & Poor’s downgraded the United States long-term debt rating from its AAA rating to AA+. On August 8, 2011, Standard & Poor’s downgraded the credit ratings of certain long-term debt instruments issued by Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and other U.S. government agencies linked to long-term U.S. debt. Instruments of this nature are key assets on the balance sheets of financial institutions, including the Bank. While the impact of these downgrades has not resulted in any material volatility in the global and domestic financial markets during the past several months, primarily due to the relative strength of United States debt compared to that of other countries, these Standard & Poor’s downgrades, combined with the negative outlook placed on United States long-term debt by Moody’s and Fitch subsequent to the Standard & Poor’s downgrades, still have the potential of resulting in an adverse effect in the market value of such instruments, and could adversely impact our ability to obtain funding that is collateralized by affected instruments, as well as affecting the pricing of that funding when it is available. In addition, and particularly considering the current political climate in Washington, D.C., these downgrades and negative outlooks continue to create an environment that could materially affect global and domestic financial markets and economic conditions, which in turn might affect the Company’s and the Bank’s business, financial condition and liquidity and possibly result in future changes in capital requirements or a rebalancing of investment portfolios in response to management’s assessment of the related risk weightings. We cannot predict if, when or how these changes to the credit ratings and/or negative outlooks will affect economic conditions. As a result, the changes to the credit ratings and/or negative outlooks could result in a significant adverse impact to the Company, and could exacerbate the other risks to which the Company is subject.

Our business strategy includes moderate growth plans, and our financial condition and results of operations could be negatively affected if we fail to grow or fail to manage our growth effectively.

Over the long term, we expect to experience growth in our assets, our deposits and the scale of our operations, whether through organic growth or acquisitions. However, achieving our growth targets requires us to successfully execute our business strategies. Our business strategies include continuing to diversify our loan portfolio by increasing our commercial and industrial lending activities and introducing new and competitive deposit products. Our ability to successfully grow will also depend on the continued availability of loan opportunities that meet our stringent underwriting standards. If we do not manage our growth effectively, we may not be able to achieve our business plan, and our business and prospects could be adversely affected.

Financial reform legislation recently enacted by Congress has, among other things, tightened capital standards, created a new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau and resulted in new laws and regulations that are expected to increase our costs of operations.

The Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (the “Dodd-Frank Act”) enacted in 2010 has significantly changed the current bank regulatory structure and affected the lending, investment, trading and operating activities of financial institutions and their holding companies. The Dodd-Frank Act requires the Federal Reserve Board to set minimum capital levels for bank holding companies that are as stringent as those required for insured depository institutions, and the components of Tier 1 capital would be restricted to capital instruments that are currently considered to be Tier 1 capital for insured depository institutions. The legislation also established a floor for capital of insured depository institutions that cannot be lower than the standards in effect today, and directed the federal banking regulators to implement new leverage and capital requirements within 18 months that take into account off-balance sheet activities and other risks, including risks relating to securitized products and derivatives.

 

24


Table of Contents

The Dodd-Frank Act also created a new Consumer Financial Protection Bureau with broad powers to supervise and enforce consumer protection laws. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has broad rule-making authority for a wide range of consumer protection laws that apply to all banks and savings institutions such as Asheville Savings, including the authority to prohibit “unfair, deceptive or abusive” acts and practices. The Consumer Financial Protection Bureau has examination and enforcement authority over all banks and savings institutions with more than $10.0 billion in assets. Banks and savings institutions with $10.0 billion or less in assets, such as the Bank, will be examined by their applicable bank regulators.

In addition, the Dodd-Frank Act increased shareholder influence over boards of directors by requiring certain public companies to give shareholders a non-binding vote on executive compensation and so-called “golden parachute” payments, and by authorizing the Securities and Exchange Commission to promulgate rules that would allow shareholders to nominate and solicit votes for their own candidates using a company’s proxy materials.

We operate in a highly regulated environment and we may be adversely affected by changes in laws and regulations.

Asheville Savings is subject to extensive government regulation, supervision and examination by the FDIC and the NCCoB and the Company is subject to regulation and supervision by the FRB. Such regulation, supervision and examination govern the activities in which we may engage, and is intended primarily for the protection of the deposit insurance fund and our depositors. Regulatory authorities have extensive discretion in their supervisory and enforcement activities, including the imposition of restrictions on our operations, the classification of our assets and determination of the level of our allowance for loan losses. Any change in such regulation and oversight, whether in the form of regulatory policy, regulations, legislation or supervisory action, may have a material impact on our operations, including the potential for increased compliance costs.

On June 6, 2012, the FDIC and the other federal bank regulatory agencies issued a series of proposed rules that would revise their risk-based and leverage capital requirements and their method for calculating risk-weighted assets to make them consistent with the agreements that were reached by the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision in “Basel III: A Global Regulatory Framework for More Resilient Banks and Banking Systems” and certain provisions of the Dodd-Frank Act. The proposed rules would apply to all depository institutions, top-tier bank holding companies with total consolidated assets of $500 million or more and top-tier savings and loan holding companies (“banking organizations”). Among other things, the proposed rules establish a new common equity tier 1 minimum capital requirement (4.5% of risk-weighted assets) and a higher minimum tier 1 risk-based capital requirement (6% of risk-weighted assets) and assign higher risk weightings to exposures that are more than 90 days past due or are on nonaccrual status and certain commercial real estate facilities that finance the acquisition, development or construction of real property. The proposed rules also required unrealized gains and losses on certain securities holdings to be included for purposes of calculating regulatory capital requirements. The proposed rules limit a banking organization’s capital distributions and certain discretionary bonus payments if the banking organization does not hold a “capital conservation buffer” consisting of a specified amount of common equity tier 1 capital in addition to the amount necessary to meet its minimum risk-based capital requirements. The proposed rules indicated that the final rule would become effective on January 1, 2013, and the changes set forth in the final rules will be phased in from January 1, 2013 through January 1, 2019. However, due to the volume of public comments received, the agencies did not make the final rule effective on January 1, 2013. Management will continue to monitor these and any future proposals submitted by our regulators.

We may have credit risk in our investment and mortgage-backed securities portfolio.

At December 31, 2012, $243.4 million, or 32.5% of our assets, consisted of investment and mortgage-backed securities, $83.7 million, or 34.4% of which were issued by, or have principal and interest payments guaranteed by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac. On September 7, 2008, the Federal Housing Finance

 

25


Table of Contents

Agency placed Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac into federal conservatorship. Although the federal government has committed substantial capital to Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, these credit facilities and other capital infusions may not be adequate for their needs. If the financial support is inadequate, or if additional support is not provided when needed, these companies could continue to suffer losses and could fail to honor their guarantees and other obligations. As a result, the future roles of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac could be significantly altered. Failure by Fannie Mae or Freddie Mac to honor their guarantees or obligations, or a significant restructuring of their roles, could have a significant adverse affect on the market value and cash flows of the investment and mortgage-backed securities we hold, resulting in substantial losses. We also maintain an investment in FHLB of Atlanta stock, which totaled $3.4 million at December 31, 2012. In response to unprecedented market conditions and potential future losses, the FHLB of Atlanta has implemented an initiative to preserve capital by significantly reducing the amount of its cash dividend payments, which has adversely affected our income; however, we note that such payments have recently shown an increasing trend. If the FHLB of Atlanta is unable to meet minimum regulatory capital requirements or is required to aid the remaining Federal Home Loan Banks, our holding of FHLB of Atlanta stock may be determined to be other than temporarily impaired and may require a charge to earnings.

If we continue to experience reduced loan demand, we will be required to invest a significant percentage of our assets in investment securities, which typically have a lower yield than our loan portfolio.

In recent years, the struggling economy has resulted in weak loan demand in our primary market area. If we continue to experience reduced loan demand, we will be required to invest a larger percentage of our assets in investment securities, which generally yield substantially less than the loans we hold in our portfolio. This would negatively impact our results of operations, which are substantially dependent on our net interest income, or the difference between the interest income earned on our interest-earning assets and the interest expense paid on our interest-bearing liabilities.

Increased and/or special FDIC assessments will hurt our earnings.

The recent economic recession has caused a high level of bank failures, which has dramatically increased FDIC resolution costs and led to a significant reduction in the balance of the deposit insurance fund. As a result, the FDIC has significantly increased the initial base assessment rates paid by financial institutions for deposit insurance. Increases in the base assessment rate have increased our deposit insurance costs and negatively impacted our earnings. In addition, in May 2009, the FDIC imposed a special assessment on all insured institutions. In December 2009, in lieu of imposing an additional special assessment, the FDIC required all institutions to prepay their assessments for all of 2010, 2011 and 2012, which for us totaled $3.6 million. Additional increases in the base assessment rate or additional special assessments would negatively impact our earnings.

Strong competition within our market area could hurt our profits and slow growth.

Although we consider ourselves competitive in our primary market area of Buncombe, Madison, McDowell, Henderson and Transylvania Counties in North Carolina and the surrounding areas, we face intense competition both in making loans and attracting deposits. Price competition for loans and deposits might result in us earning less on our loans and paying more on our deposits, which reduces net interest income. Some of the institutions with which we compete have substantially greater resources and lending limits than we have and may offer services that we do not provide. We expect competition to increase in the future as a result of legislative, regulatory and technological changes and the continuing trend of consolidation in the financial services industry. Our profitability depends upon our continued ability to compete successfully in our market area.

 

Item 1B. Unresolved Staff Comments

None.

 

26


Table of Contents
Item 2. Properties

We conduct our business through our main office, banking centers and other offices. The following table sets forth certain information relating to these facilities as of December 31, 2012.

 

(dollars in thousands)    Year
Opened
   Square
Footage
     Owned/
Leased
   Lease
Expiration
Date
   Net Book
Value at
December 31,
2012
 

Banking Centers:

              

Downtown Asheville (Main Office)

   1936      24,124       Owned       $ 3,435   

11 Church Street

              

Asheville, NC 28801

              

Black Mountain

   1960      4,500       Owned         293   

300 West State Street

              

Black Mountain, NC 28711

              

Mars Hill

   1974      2,500       Owned         1,309   

105 North Main Street

              

Mars Hill, NC 28754

              

Skyland

   1976      3,108       Owned         658   

1879 Hendersonville Road

              

Asheville, NC 28803

              

East Asheville

   1978      3,570       Owned         132   

10 South Tunnel Road

              

Asheville, NC 28805

              

North Asheville

   1979      9,846       Owned         421   

778 Merrimon Avenue

              

Asheville, NC 28804

              

West Asheville

   1981      3,670       Owned         372   

1012 Patton Avenue

              

Asheville, NC 28806

              

Marion

   1981      6,000       Owned         182   

162 North Main Street

              

Marion, NC 28752

              

Hendersonville

   1992      4,000       Owned         619   

601 North Main Street

              

Hendersonville, NC 28792

              

Brevard

   1995      2,100       Owned         838   

2 Market Street

              

Straus Park

              

Brevard, NC 28712

              

Reynolds

   2001      3,500       Owned         1,029   

5 Olde Eastwood Village Boulevard

              

US 74 East

              

Asheville, NC 28803

              

Enka-Candler

   2003      3,500       Owned         1,040   

907 Smoky Park Highway

              

Candler, NC 28715

              

 

27


Table of Contents
(dollars in thousands)    Year
Opened
   Square
Footage
     Owned/
Leased
   Lease
Expiration
Date
   Net Book
Value at
December 31,
2012
 

Fletcher

   2008      3,415       Lot Leased    1/31/2027    $ 954   

3551 Hendersonville Road

         Structure      

Fletcher, NC 28732

         Owned      

Other Offices:

              

Operations and Administration

   2003      46,000       Leased    4/30/2017      386   

901 Smoky Park Highway

              

Candler, NC 28715

              

Commercial Lending

   1998      1,940       Owned         (1) 

11 Church Street

              

Asheville, NC 28801

              

 

(1) Net book value is reflected in net book value for our main office located at 11 Church Street, Asheville, North Carolina.

 

Item 3. Legal Proceedings

Periodically, there have been various claims and lawsuits against us, such as claims to enforce liens, condemnation proceedings on properties in which we hold security interests, claims involving the making and servicing of real property loans and other issues incident to our business. We are not a party to any pending legal proceedings that we believe would have a material adverse effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

 

Item 4. Mine Safety Disclosures

Not applicable.

Part II

 

Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities

The Company’s common stock is listed on the Nasdaq Global Market under the symbol “ASBB.” The common stock was issued at a price of $10.00 per share in connection with the Bank’s mutual-to-stock conversion and the initial public offering of the Company’s common stock. The common stock commenced trading on the Nasdaq Global Market on October 12, 2011. As of the close of business on December 31, 2012, there were 5,584,551 shares of common stock outstanding held by 546 holders of record.

The following table sets forth the high and low closing sales prices of the Company’s common stock as reported by the Nasdaq Global Market for the periods indicated. As stated above, the Company completed its initial public offering on October 11, 2011 and commenced trading on the Nasdaq Global Market on October 12, 2011. Accordingly, there is no information for high and low sale prices for the first three quarters of the year ended December 31, 2011.

 

28


Table of Contents
     Market Price Per Share  
Quarter ended:    High Close      Low Close      Last Close  

December 31, 2012

   $ 16.40       $ 14.67       $ 15.32   

September 30, 2012

     16.00         13.56         15.50   

June 30, 2012

     14.60         12.67         14.25   

March 31, 2012

     13.11         11.40         13.10   

December 31, 2011

   $ 11.99       $ 11.30       $ 11.70   

September 30, 2011

     n/a         n/a         n/a   

June 30, 2011

     n/a         n/a         n/a   

March 31, 2011

     n/a         n/a         n/a   

The following graph and table provide a comparison of the cumulative total returns for the common stock of the Company, the NASDAQ Composite Index and the SNL Financial Southeastern Bank and Thrift Index for the periods indicated. The graph assumes that an investor originally invested $100 in shares of our common stock at its closing price on October 12, 2011, the first day that our shares were traded. The stock price information below is not necessarily indicative of future price performance.

LOGO

 

     Period Ended  
     10/12/2011      12/31/2011      3/31/2012      6/30/2012      9/30/2012      12/31/2012  

ASB Bancorp, Inc.

     100.00         100.51         112.54         122.42         133.16         131.62   

NASDAQ Composite

     100.00         100.32         119.36         113.68         121.12         118.14   

SNL SE Thrift Index

     100.00         105.47         111.84         131.68         156.82         165.42   

The Company did not declare any dividends to its stockholders during the years ended December 31, 2012 or 2011. See Item 1, “Business—Regulation and Supervision,” for more information regarding the restrictions on the Company’s and the Bank’s abilities to pay dividends.

On September 19, 2012, the Company authorized the funding of a trust that purchased 223,382 shares of its stock during 2012 to be available for issuance under its 2012 Equity Incentive Plan. Of the total shares purchased, 220,782 shares were purchased during the fourth quarter of 2012. As of December 31, 2012, no awards were granted under the Plan. The awards were granted during the first quarter of 2013.

The Company did not repurchase any shares of its common stock for retirement during the quarter ended December 31, 2011. Under current FDIC regulations, the Company could not repurchase shares of its common stock during the first year following the Company’s initial public offering, except to fund shareholder-approved equity benefit plans or, with prior regulatory approval, when extraordinary circumstances exist.

 

29


Table of Contents
Item 6. Selected Financial Data

The summary financial data presented below at December 31, 2012 and 2011 and for the years ended December 31, 2012, 2011 and 2010 are derived in part from the audited consolidated financial statements that appear in this annual report. The following is only a summary and should be read in conjunction with the audited consolidated financial statements and notes included in this annual report.

 

     December 31,  
(in thousands)            2012                     2011                     2010                     2009                     2008          

Selected Financial Condition Data:

          

Balances at end of period:

          

Total assets

   $ 749,354      $ 790,868      $ 749,965      $ 749,307      $ 705,095   

Cash and cash equivalents

     47,390        72,327        24,234        23,176        39,384   

Securities available for sale

     238,736        243,863        175,445        90,057        37,362   

Securities held to maturity

     4,649        5,218        5,948        6,958        5,442   

Federal Home Loan Bank stock

     3,429        3,870        3,970        3,993        5,020   

Loans held for sale

     9,759        6,590        8,386        3,890        2,926   

Loans receivable, net of deferred fees

     387,721        432,883        500,003        597,601        590,095   

Allowance for loan losses

     (8,513     (10,627     (12,676     (8,994     (6,403

Foreclosed real estate

     19,411        8,125        10,650        3,699        6,272   

Deposits

     578,299        608,236        619,757        608,538        535,640   

Overnight and short-term borrowings

     411        758        1,008        1,694        31,219   

Federal Home Loan Bank advances

     50,000        60,000        60,000        60,000        60,000   

Total equity

     111,529        115,571        62,881        73,649        69,921   

Average balances for period:

          

Average total assets

     781,666        766,149        759,576        731,351        663,126   

Average loans

     418,569        471,260        563,013        606,995        556,542   

Average interest-earning assets

     749,036        724,409        727,338        701,709        633,502   

Average deposits

     595,183        617,735        620,518        587,457        519,498   

Average interest-bearing liabilities

     594,908        626,562        638,837        616,244        549,073   

Average total equity

     116,208           82,151           72,684           71,555           73,018      

 

(in thousands except    Year Ended December 31,  
per share data)            2012                     2011                     2010                     2009                     2008          

Selected Operating Data:

          

Interest and dividend income

   $   24,992      $   28,851      $   32,959      $   35,808      $   36,811   

Interest expense

     6,492        8,642        11,444        14,772        16,745   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net interest income

     18,500        20,209        21,515        21,036        20,066   

Provision for loan losses

     1,700        3,785        22,419        4,655        3,049   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net interest income (loss) after provision for loan losses

     16,800        16,424        (904     16,381        17,017   

Noninterest income

     9,456        7,422        7,468        7,032        5,158   

Noninterest expense

     25,092        22,071        22,096        21,091        18,361   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income (loss) before income tax provision

     1,164        1,775        (15,532     2,322        3,814   

Income tax provision (benefit)

     302        588        (6,074     791        1,382   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

   $ 862      $ 1,187      $ (9,458   $ 1,531      $ 2,432   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Selected Per Share Data:

          

Earnings per share – basic

   $ 0.17      $ 0.23        n/a        n/a        n/a   

Earnings per share – diluted

     0.17        0.23        n/a        n/a        n/a   

Tangible book value per share

     19.97        20.69        n/a        n/a        n/a   

Stock price High

     16.40        11.99        n/a        n/a        n/a   

Low

     11.40        11.30        n/a        n/a        n/a   

Close

     15.32           11.70           n/a           n/a           n/a      

 

30


Table of Contents
     Year Ended December 31,  
             2012                     2011                     2010                     2009                     2008          

Performance Ratios:

          

Return on average assets

             0.11             0.15            -1.25             0.21             0.37

Return on average equity

     0.74     1.44     -13.01     2.14     3.33

Yield on average interest-earning assets

     3.36     4.00     4.54     5.10     5.81

Cost of average interest-bearing liabilities

     1.09     1.38     1.79     2.40     3.05

Interest rate spread (1)

     2.27     2.62     2.75     2.70     2.76

Net interest margin (2)

     2.50     2.80     2.96     3.00     3.17

Noninterest expense to average assets

     3.21     2.88     2.91     2.88     2.77

Efficiency ratio (3)

     89.08     79.60     76.12     75.14     72.79

Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities

     125.91     115.62     113.85     113.87     115.38

Average equity to average assets

     14.87     10.72     9.57     9.78     11.01

Capital Ratios:

          

Tier 1 risk-based capital to adjusted average assets

     14.69     14.30     8.36     10.13     10.98

Tier 1 risk-based capital to risk-weighted assets

     27.72     27.52     13.04     13.72     13.84

Total risk-based capital to risk-weighted assets

     28.98     28.79     14.31     14.98     15.03

Tangible capital to tangible assets

     14.88     14.61     8.38     9.83     9.92

Asset Quality Ratios:

          

Allowance for loan losses as a percent of total loans

     2.20     2.45     2.54     1.51     1.09

Allowance for loan losses as a percent of nonperforming loans

     739.62     51.53     94.43     54.23     180.32

Net charge-offs to average loans outstanding during period

     0.91     1.24     3.33     0.34     0.31

Nonperforming loans as a percent of total loans

     0.30     4.76     2.68     2.77     0.60

Nonperforming assets as a percent of total assets

     2.74     3.63     3.21     2.71     1.39

Other Data:

          

Banking centers

     13        13        13        13        13   

Full-time equivalent employees

     168        167        165        163        174   

 

(1) Represents the difference between the weighted average yield on average interest-earning assets and the weighted average cost on average interest-bearing liabilities. Tax exempt income is reported on a tax equivalent basis using a federal marginal tax rate of 34%.
(2) Represents net interest income as a percent of average interest-earning assets. Tax exempt income is reported on a tax equivalent basis using a federal marginal tax rate of 34%.
(3) Represents noninterest expenses divided by the sum of net interest income on a tax equivalent basis using a federal marginal tax rate of 34% and noninterest income.

 

Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations

The objective of this section is to help readers understand our views on our results of operations and financial condition. You should read this discussion in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements and the notes to consolidated financial statements that appear at the end of this annual report.

 

31


Table of Contents

Operating Strategy

Our primary objective is to operate and grow a profitable community-oriented financial institution serving customers in our primary market areas. We have sought to achieve this through the adoption of a business strategy designed to maintain a strong capital position and high asset quality. We continue to execute our plan to resolve our asset quality problems. In recent years, we have hired senior management with substantial experience in consumer and commercial banking to help us diversify our product offerings and expand our consumer and commercial deposit and lending products, while emphasizing high asset quality standards. Our operating strategies include the following:

 

 

continuing to provide products and services to individuals and businesses in the communities served by our branch offices;

 

 

continuing to originate residential and commercial mortgage loans;

 

 

expanding our commercial and industrial lending activities and emphasizing the origination of small business loans;

 

 

emphasizing lower cost core deposits to maintain low funding costs;

 

 

expanding our market share within our primary market area; and

 

 

seeking to enhance fee income through providing investment advisory services.

Continuing to provide products and services to individuals and businesses in the communities served by our branch offices.

We have continually operated as a community-oriented financial institution since we were established in 1936. We are committed to meeting the financial needs of the communities in which we operate, and we are dedicated to providing quality personal service to our customers. We provide a broad range of consumer and business financial services through our network of banking center offices and will remain steadfast in our pursuit of ways to improve convenience, safety, and service through our product offerings.

Continuing to originate residential and commercial mortgage loans.

Our primary lending focus has been, and will continue to be, on operating as a residential and commercial mortgage lender. We originate fixed and adjustable-rate residential and commercial mortgage loans that are retained in our loan portfolio. However, most of the fixed-rate residential mortgage loans that we originate are sold into the secondary market with servicing released as part of our efforts to reduce our interest rate risk. At December 31, 2012, residential mortgage loans totaled $163.6 million, or 42.1% of our total loan portfolio, and commercial mortgage loans totaled $138.8 million, or 35.8% of our total loan portfolio. Our total residential and commercial mortgage loans decreased to $302.4 million at December 31, 2012 from $315.8 million at December 31, 2011 as we managed our problem loans and experienced lower loan demand throughout this period, but we intend to continue to emphasize our residential and commercial mortgage lending activities.

Expanding our commercial and industrial lending activities and emphasizing the origination of small business loans.

We intend to expand our commercial and industrial lending activities and to originate an increased number of small business loans. Management has hired additional experienced lending officers and credit management personnel over the past several years in order to continue to safely manage this type of lending. Although commercial and industrial lending has decreased recently as we have managed our problem loans and experienced low loan demand, our goal is to increase this portion of our portfolio using conservative underwriting practices to increase the yield in our loan portfolio.

 

32


Table of Contents

Emphasizing lower cost core deposits to maintain low funding costs.

We seek to increase our net interest income by controlling our costs of funding. As a traditional thrift institution, a greater percentage of our deposit accounts has historically been higher balance, higher cost certificates of deposits. Over the past several years, we have worked to reduce our dependence on traditional higher cost deposits in favor of stable lower cost core deposits. We have used additional product offerings, technology, and a focus on customer service in working toward this goal. In addition, we intend to seek demand deposits by growing commercial banking relationships.

Expanding our market share within our primary market area.

We intend to expand our market share in our primary market area by evaluating additional branch expansion opportunities. Subject to favorable market conditions, our goal is to continue to open additional branch offices in our primary market area. In addition, we are interested in pursuing opportunities to acquire other financial institutions, including through Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation assisted transactions, and branches of other financial institutions in our primary market area and surrounding areas, although we currently have no definitive plans or commitments regarding potential acquisition opportunities.

Seeking to enhance fee income through providing investment advisory services.

Through a relationship with LPL Financial LLC, we currently provide a full array of investment services for individuals and small businesses, including full access to financial market instruments such as mutual funds. As of December 31, 2012 and 2011, commission income relating to our investment advisory services totaled $242,000 and $275,000, respectively. In the future, we intend to continue to enhance our fee income by providing investment advisory services to our customers through our relationship with LPL.

Overview

Income. Our primary source of pre-tax income is net interest income. Net interest income is the difference between interest income, which is the income that we earn on our loans and securities, and interest expense, which is the interest that we pay on our deposits and borrowings. Other significant sources of pre-tax income are deposit and other service charge income, mortgage banking income derived from the sale of loans in the secondary market, income from debit card services, and income from the sale of securities.

Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses is a valuation allowance for probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. We evaluate the need to establish allowances against losses on loans on a monthly basis. When additional allowances are necessary, a provision for loan losses is charged to earnings.

Expenses. The noninterest expense we incur in operating our business consists of salaries and employee benefits expenses, occupancy expenses, federal deposit insurance premiums and assessments, data processing expenses and various other miscellaneous expenses. Our noninterest expenses also include expenses related to shareholder communications and meetings, stock exchange listing fees, the employee stock ownership plan, stock compensation plans, and legal and accounting services.

Salaries and employee benefits expenses consist primarily of salaries, wages and bonuses paid to our employees, payroll taxes, and expenses for health insurance, retirement plans and other employee benefits. We anticipate recognizing additional future employee compensation expenses stemming from our adoption of new equity-based benefit plans. We are in the process of determining the actual amount of future compensation expense that will result from these new proposed equity-based benefit plans because applicable accounting guidance requires that the compensation expense recognized on the shares of common stock granted under these plans be based on the fair market value of the common shares measured at specific points in the future.

 

33


Table of Contents

Occupancy expenses, which are the fixed and variable costs of buildings and equipment, consist primarily of depreciation charges, rental expenses, furniture and equipment expenses, maintenance, real estate taxes and costs of utilities. Depreciation of premises and equipment is computed using the straight-line method based on the useful lives of the related assets, which range from three to forty years.

Data processing expenses are the fees we pay to third parties for processing customer information, deposits and loans.

Federal deposit insurance premiums and assessments are payments we make to the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation for insurance of our deposit accounts.

Other expenses include expenses for professional services, advertising, office supplies, postage, telephone, foreclosed properties, insurance and other miscellaneous operating expenses.

Critical Accounting Policies

We consider accounting policies involving significant judgments and assumptions by management that have, or could have, a material impact on the carrying value of certain assets or on income to be critical accounting policies. The following represent our critical accounting policies:

Allowance for Loan Losses. The allowance for loan losses is the amount estimated by management as necessary to cover losses inherent in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date. The allowance is established through the provision for loan losses, which is charged to earnings. Management’s estimates of the allowance for loan losses necessarily involves a high degree of judgment. Among the material estimates required to establish the allowance are: loss exposure at default; the amount and timing of future cash flows on impaired loans; value of collateral; and determination of loss factors to be applied to the various elements of the portfolio. All of these estimates are susceptible to significant change. Management reviews the level of the allowance monthly and establishes the provision for loan losses based upon an evaluation of the portfolio, past loss experience, current economic conditions and other factors related to the collectability of the loan portfolio. Although we believe that we use the best information available to establish the allowance for loan losses, future adjustments to the allowance may be necessary if economic or other conditions differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the evaluation. In addition, the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation and the North Carolina Commissioner of Banks, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review our allowance for loan losses and may require us to recognize adjustments to the allowance based on their judgments about information available to them at the time of their examination. A large loss could deplete the allowance and require increased provisions to replenish the allowance, which would adversely affect our earnings. See notes 1 and 5 included in the notes to consolidated financial statements included in this annual report.

Fair Value of Investments. Securities are characterized as available for sale or held to maturity based on management’s ability and intent regarding such investment at acquisition. On an ongoing basis, management estimates the fair value of its investment securities based on information and assumptions it deems reliable and reasonable, which may be quoted market prices or if quoted market prices are not available, fair values extrapolated from the quoted prices of similar instruments. Based on this information, an assessment must be made as to whether any decline in the fair value of an investment security should be considered as an other than temporary impairment and recorded in noninterest income as a loss on investments. The determination of such impairment is subject to a variety of factors, including management’s judgment and experience. See notes 3 and 14 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in this annual report.

 

34


Table of Contents

Deferred Tax Assets. We use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the future tax consequences attributable to differences between the financial statement carrying amounts of existing assets and liabilities and their respective tax bases. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when it is more likely than not that some portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized. We exercise significant judgment in evaluating the amount and timing of recognition of the resulting tax liabilities and assets. These judgments require us to make projections of future taxable income. The judgments and estimates we make in determining our deferred tax assets, which are inherently subjective, are reviewed on a continual basis as regulatory and business factors change. A reduction in estimated future taxable income may require us to record a valuation allowance against our deferred tax assets. See notes 1 and 10 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in this annual report.

Pension Plan. The Company has a noncontributory defined benefit pension plan. This plan is accounted for under the provisions of ASC Topic 715: Compensation-Retirement Benefits, which requires an employer to recognize the overfunded or underfunded status of a defined benefit postretirement plan as an asset or liability in its statement of financial position and to recognize changes in that funded status in the year in which the changes occur through comprehensive income. The funded status of a benefit plan is measured as the difference between plan assets at fair value and the benefit obligation. For a pension plan, the benefit obligation is the projected benefit obligation. ASC Topic 715 also requires an employer to measure the funded status of a plan as of the date of its year-end statement of financial position. Management must make certain estimates and assumptions when determining the projected benefit obligation. These estimates and assumptions include the expected return on plan assets, the rate of compensation increases over time, and the appropriate discount rate to be used in determining the present value of the obligation. See note 12 of the notes to the consolidated financial statements included in this annual report.

Comparison of Financial Condition at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011

General. Total assets decreased $41.5 million, or 5.2%, to $749.4 million at December 31, 2012 from $790.9 million at December 31, 2011. Investment securities decreased $5.7 million, or 2.3%, to $243.4 million at December 31, 2012 from $249.1 million at December 31, 2011, primarily due to securities sold in late December the proceeds from which were not reinvested until January, partially offset by the reinvestment into investment securities of proceeds from loan repayments and prepayments. Loans receivable, net of deferred fees, decreased $45.2 million, or 10.4%, to $387.7 million at December 31, 2012 from $432.9 million at December 31, 2011 as loan repayments, prepayments, and foreclosures continued to outpace new loan originations. In December of 2012, the Bank completed the foreclosure on the collateral of its largest nonperforming loan in the amount of $9.8 million, net of write-downs, which was moved into foreclosed properties.

Loans. Loan originations totaled $207.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to $140.3 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. Residential mortgage loan originations totaled $110.7 million in 2012 compared to $81.7 million in 2011, while residential construction and land development loan originations totaled $11.0 million in 2012 compared to $10.7 million in 2011. Originations of commercial mortgage, commercial construction and land development, and commercial and industrial loans totaled $61.9 million, $1.1 million and $5.9 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to $32.7 million, $1.1 million and $7.2 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2011. Revolving mortgage originations totaled $7.1 million in 2012 compared to $6.4 million in 2011, while consumer loan originations totaled $9.8 million in 2012 compared to $483,000 in 2011. The increase in consumer loan originations during 2012 was attributable to management’s decision to re-enter the market for indirect automobile loan financing that was suspended in 2009. Origination activity was significantly offset by $139.9 million of normal loan repayments and prepayments and $91.0 million in loan sales for the year ended December 31, 2012, compared to $131.4 million and $68.9 million, respectively, for the year ended December 31, 2011.

 

35


Table of Contents

Loan Portfolio Composition

The following table sets forth the composition of our loan portfolio at the dates indicated.

 

     December 31,  
     2012     2011     2010  
(dollars in thousands)    Amount      Percent     Amount      Percent     Amount      Percent  

Commercial:

               

Commercial mortgage

   $ 138,804         35.76   $ 139,947         32.30   $ 164,553         32.88

Commercial construction and land development

     5,161         1.34     22,375         5.17     28,473         5.69

Commercial and industrial

     11,093         2.86     17,540         4.05     17,656         3.53
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     155,058         39.96     179,862         41.52     210,682         42.10
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Non-commercial:

               

Residential mortgage

     163,571         42.14     175,866         40.59     180,439         36.06

Residential construction and land development

     3,729         0.96     3,907         0.90     8,670         1.73

Revolving mortgage

     48,221         12.42     51,044         11.78     53,432         10.68

Consumer

     17,552         4.52     22,588         5.21     47,212         9.43
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     233,073         60.04     253,405         58.48     289,753         57.90
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total loans

     388,131         100.00     433,267         100.00     500,435         100.00
     

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

 

Less: net deferred loan origination fees

     410           384           432      

Less: allowance for loan losses

     8,513           10,627           12,676      
  

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

    

Loans receivable, net

   $ 379,208         $ 422,256         $ 487,327      
  

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

    

 

     December 31,  
     2009     2008  
(dollars in thousands)    Amount      Percent     Amount      Percent  

Commercial:

          

Commercial mortgage

   $ 197,239         32.98   $ 141,565         23.97

Commercial construction and land development

     30,158         5.04     28,998         4.91

Commercial and industrial

     22,794         3.81     27,367         4.63
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     250,191         41.83     197,930         33.51
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Non-commercial:

          

Residential mortgage

     190,965         31.93     201,160         34.06

Residential construction and land development

     15,141         2.53     23,491         3.98

Revolving mortgage

     55,038         9.20     53,834         9.10

Consumer

     86,768         14.51     114,268         19.35
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     347,912         58.17     392,753         66.49
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total loans

     598,103         100.00     590,683         100.00
     

 

 

      

 

 

 

Less: net deferred loan origination fees

     502           588      

Less: allowance for loan losses

     8,994           6,403      
  

 

 

      

 

 

    

Loans receivable, net

   $ 588,607         $ 583,692      
  

 

 

      

 

 

    

 

36


Table of Contents

Loan Portfolio Maturities

The following tables set forth certain information at December 31, 2012 regarding the dollar amount of loan principal repayments becoming due during the periods indicated. The tables do not include any estimate of prepayments that significantly shorten the average life of our loans and may cause our actual repayment experience to differ from that shown below. Demand loans, which are loans having no stated schedule of repayments and no stated maturity, are reported as due in one year or less.

 

     December 31, 2012  
(in thousands)    Commercial
Mortgages
     Commercial
Construction
and Land
Development
     Commercial
and
Industrial
     Total
Commercial
 

Amounts due in:

           

One year or less

   $ 32,501       $ 1,552       $ 2,729       $ 36,782   

More than one year through two years

     26,127         1,082         1,702         28,911   

More than two years through three years

     11,774         778         807         13,359   

More than three years through five years

     42,494         981         2,984         46,459   

More than five years through ten years

     14,862         590         2,871         18,323   

More than ten years through fifteen years

     11,046         178         —           11,224   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 138,804       $ 5,161       $ 11,093       $ 155,058   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

     December 31, 2012  
(in thousands)    Residential
Mortgages
     Residential
Construction
and Land
Development
     Revolving
Mortgages
     Consumer      Total Non-
Commercial
     Total
Loans
 

Amounts due in:

                 

One year or less

   $ 7,985       $ 128       $ 259       $ 2,410       $ 10,782       $ 47,564   

More than one year through two years

     1,246         —           273         4,342         5,861         34,772   

More than two years through three years

     2,606         —           286         2,960         5,852         19,211   

More than three years through five years

     6,109         —           2,428         2,728         11,265         57,724   

More than five years through ten years

     11,190         —           27,055         5,112         43,357         61,680   

More than ten years through fifteen years

     14,213         —           17,920         —           32,133         43,357   

More than fifteen years

     120,222         3,601         —           —           123,823         123,823   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 163,571       $ 3,729       $ 48,221       $ 17,552       $ 233,073       $ 388,131   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

37


Table of Contents

Fixed vs. Adjustable Rate Loans

The following table sets forth the dollar amount of all loans at December 31, 2012 that have contractual maturities after December 31, 2013 and have either fixed interest rates or floating or adjustable interest rates. The amounts shown below exclude unearned loan origination fees.

 

     Due After December 31, 2013  
            Floating or         
     Fixed      Adjustable         
(in thousands)    Rates      Rates      Total  

Commercial:

        

Commercial mortgage

   $ 55,314       $ 50,989       $ 106,303   

Commercial construction and land development

     2,031         1,578         3,609   

Commercial and industrial

     6,664         1,700         8,364   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total commercial

     64,009         54,267         118,276   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Non-commercial:

        

Residential mortgage

     72,311         83,275         155,586   

Residential construction and land development

     1,360         2,241         3,601   

Revolving mortgage

     55         47,907         47,962   

Consumer

     15,142         —           15,142   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total non-commercial

     88,868         133,423         222,291   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total loans receivable

   $ 152,877       $ 187,690       $ 340,567   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Some of our adjustable rate loans contain rate floors that are equal to the initial interest rate on the loan. When market interest rates fall below the rate floor, as has occurred in recent months, loan rates do not adjust further downward. As market interest rates rise in the future, the interest rates on these loans may rise based on the contract rate (index plus the margin) exceeding the initial interest rate floor; however, contract interest rates will only increase when the index plus margin exceed the imposed rate floor.

 

38


Table of Contents

Loan Activity

The following table shows loans originated, purchased and sold during the periods indicated, including residential mortgage loans intended for sale in the secondary market.

 

     Year Ended December 31,  
(in thousands)    2012     2011     2010     2009      2008  

Total loans at beginning of period

   $ 428,846      $ 495,713      $ 592,497      $ 586,618       $ 518,628   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Loans originated:

           

Commercial:

           

Commercial mortgage

     61,910        32,688        43,547        74,382         92,923   

Construction and land development

     1,050        1,068        —          —           5,109   

Commercial and industrial

     5,853        7,199        7,737        10,742         15,255   

Non-commercial:

           

Residential mortgage

     110,682        81,705        121,439        131,017         97,731   

Construction and land development

     10,986        10,734        15,845        12,142         7,546   

Revolving mortgage

     7,107        6,385        7,966        20,524         32,010   

Consumer

     9,830        483        523        26,248         70,014   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total loans originated

     207,418        140,262        197,057        275,055         320,588   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Loans purchased:

           

Commercial:

           

Commercial mortgage

     2,909        125        2,191        6,209         2,120   

Construction and land development

     —          560        41           939   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total loans purchased

     2,909        685        2,232        6,209         3,059   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total loans originated and purchased

     210,327        140,947        199,289        281,264         323,647   

Deduct:

           

Loan principal repayments

     139,879        131,393        163,910        151,368         196,007   

Loan sales

     90,955        68,850        97,103        116,352         50,053   

Foreclosed loans transferred to foreclosed properties

     17,464        3,533        12,585        2,968         6,272   

Charge-offs

     3,995        6,134        18,863        2,193         1,893   

Deductions (additions) for other items (1)

     (2,087     (2,096     3,612        2,504         1,432   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net loan activity during the period

     (39,879     (66,867     (96,784     5,879         67,990   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total loans at end of period

   $ 388,967      $ 428,846      $ 495,713      $ 592,497       $ 586,618   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1) Other items consist of deferred loan fees, the allowance for loan losses and loans in process.

Loan originations come from a number of sources. The primary sources of loan originations are existing customers, walk-in traffic, advertising and referrals from customers. We generally sell in the secondary market long-term fixed-rate residential mortgage loans that we originate. Our decision to sell loans is based on prevailing market interest rate conditions, interest rate management and liquidity needs.

 

39


Table of Contents

Investment Security Portfolio

At December 31, 2012, our securities portfolio consisted of mortgage-backed securities issued by Freddie Mac, Fannie Mae and Ginnie Mae, securities of U.S. government agencies and corporations, securities of various government sponsored entities and securities of state and local governments. Our securities portfolio is used to invest excess funds for increased yield, manage interest rate risk and as collateralization for public unit deposits.

At December 31, 2012, our securities portfolio represented 32.5% of total assets, compared to 31.5% at December 31, 2011, primarily as a result of the $41.5 million decrease in total assets to $749.4 million at December 31, 2012. Securities classified as available for sale were $238.7 million of our securities portfolio at December 31, 2012, while $4.6 million of our securities portfolio was classified as held to maturity. Securities classified as held to maturity are United States government sponsored entity, mortgage-backed and state and local government securities. In addition, at December 31, 2012, we had $3.4 million of other investments, at cost, which consisted solely of Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta common stock. Securities decreased by $5.7 million, or 2.3%, to $243.4 million at December 31, 2012 from $249.1 million at December 31, 2011, primarily due to the prepayment of a $10.0 million of FHLB advance during the fourth quarter of 2012.

The following table sets forth the amortized costs and fair values of our investment securities at the dates indicated. For all periods presented, our mortgage-backed and related securities did not include any private label issues or real estate mortgage investment conduits, but do include securities backed by the U.S. Small Business Administration (“SBA”).

 

     December 31,  
     2012      2011      2010  
(dollars in thousands)    Amortized
Cost
     Fair Value      Amortized
Cost
     Fair Value      Amortized
Cost
     Fair Value  

Securities available for sale:

                 

U.S. government agencies and corporations

   $ 12,025       $ 12,247       $ 41,305       $ 42,367       $ 50,254       $ 50,043   

Mortgage-backed and similar securities

     174,686         177,098         186,011         188,870         121,896         121,449   

State and local government

     48,183         48,652         11,359         11,914         3,379         3,287   

Other equity securities

     711         739         689         712         664         666   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total available for sale

     235,605         238,736         239,364         243,863         176,193         175,445   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Securities held to maturity:

                 

U.S. government agencies and corporations

     1,065         1,209         1,078         1,218         1,090         1,168   

Mortgage-backed and similar securities

     1,166         1,249         1,726         1,847         2,449         2,598   

State and local government

     2,418         2,724         2,414         2,688         2,409         2,432   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total held to maturity

     4,649         5,182         5,218         5,753         5,948         6,198   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total securities

   $ 240,254       $ 243,918       $ 244,582       $ 249,616       $ 182,141       $ 181,643   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

40


Table of Contents

The following table sets forth the stated maturities and weighted average yields of investment securities at December 31, 2012. Weighted average yields on tax-exempt securities are presented on a taxable equivalent basis using a federal marginal tax rate of 34%. Certain mortgage-backed securities have adjustable interest rates and will reprice annually within the various maturity ranges. These repricing schedules are not reflected in the table below. Weighted average yield calculations on investments available for sale do not give effect to changes in fair value that are reflected as a component of equity.

 

                  More than One Year     More than Five Years  
     One Year or Less     To Five Years     To Ten Years  
            Weighted            Weighted            Weighted  
     Carrying      Average     Carrying      Average     Carrying      Average  
(dollars in thousands)    Value (1)      Yield     Value (1)      Yield     Value (1)      Yield  

Securities available for sale:

               

U.S. government agencies and corporations

   $ —           0.00   $ 10,825         1.31   $ 1,422         0.94

Mortgage-backed and similar securities

     59         3.26     3,306         2.35     26,258         1.24

State and local government

     —           0.00     —           0.00     7,995         3.00
  

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

    

Total available for sale

     59         3.26     14,131         1.55     35,675         1.62
  

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

    

Securities held to maturity:

               

U.S. government agencies and corporations

     —           0.00     1,065         3.98     —           0.00

Mortgage-backed and similar securities

     —           0.00     56         5.73     1,110         4.68

State and local government

     —           0.00     —           0.00     951         5.60
  

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

    

Total held to maturity

     —           0.00     1,121         4.07     2,061         5.10
  

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

    

Total securities

   $ 59         3.26   $ 15,252         1.74   $ 37,736         1.81
  

 

 

      

 

 

      

 

 

    

 

     More than Ten Years     Total  
            Weighted            Weighted  
     Carrying      Average     Carrying      Average  
(dollars in thousands)    Value (1)      Yield     Value (1)      Yield  

Securities available for sale:

          

U.S. government agencies and corporations

   $ —           0.00   $ 12,247         1.27

Mortgage-backed and similar securities

     147,475         1.76     177,098         1.69

State and local government

     40,657         2.93     48,652         2.94

Other equity securities

     739         0.00     739         0.00
  

 

 

      

 

 

    

Total available for sale

     188,871         2.00     238,736         1.92
  

 

 

      

 

 

    

Securities held to maturity:

          

U.S. government agencies and corporations

     —           0.00     1,065         3.98

Mortgage-backed and similar securities

     —           0.00     1,166         4.73

State and local government

     1,467         5.39     2,418         5.47
  

 

 

      

 

 

    

Total held to maturity

     1,467         5.39     4,649         4.94
  

 

 

      

 

 

    

Total securities

   $ 190,338         2.03   $ 243,385         1.98
  

 

 

      

 

 

    

 

(1) Carrying value is fair value for securities available for sale and amortized cost for securities held to maturity.

 

41


Table of Contents

Deposits

We accept deposits primarily from individuals and businesses who are located in our primary market area or who have a preexisting lending relationship with us. We rely on competitive pricing, customer service, account features and the location of our branch offices to attract and retain deposits. Deposits serve as the primary source of funds for our lending and investment activities. Deposit accounts offered include individual and business checking accounts, money market accounts, individual NOW accounts, savings accounts and certificates of deposit. Noninterest-bearing accounts consist of free checking and commercial checking accounts.

The following table sets forth the balances of our deposit accounts at the dates indicated.

 

     December 31,  
     2012     2011     2010  
(dollars in thousands)    Total      Percent     Total      Percent     Total      Percent  

Non-interest-bearing accounts

   $ 65,295         11.29   $ 54,102         8.89   $ 44,996         7.26

NOW accounts

     141,276         24.43     132,812         21.84     134,836         21.76

Money market accounts

     152,838         26.43     137,901         22.67     131,138         21.16

Savings accounts

     29,686         5.13     24,880         4.09     21,384         3.45
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Core deposits

     389,095         67.28     349,695         57.49     332,354         53.63

Certificates of deposit

     189,204         32.72     258,541         42.51     287,403         46.37
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 578,299         100.00   $ 608,236         100.00   $ 619,757         100.00
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Core deposits, which exclude certificates of deposit, increased $39.4 million, or 11.3%, to $389.1 million at December 31, 2012 from $349.7 million at December 31, 2011. Also during 2012, non-interest-bearing deposits, NOW deposits, money market deposits, and savings deposits increased $11.2 million, $8.5 million, $14.9 million, and $4.8 million, respectively. While we continued to place greater emphasis on attracting lower cost core deposits, our core deposit growth was also significantly affected by sustained low deposit rates in our competitive markets as the spread between core deposits and certificate time deposits remained narrow throughout 2012.

Certificates of deposit decreased $69.3 million, or 26.8%, to $189.2 million at December 31, 2012 from $258.5 million at December 31, 2011. The decrease reflects management’s continued focus on reducing deposit interest rates to improve the Bank’s net interest margin. A portion of these funds moved into our other types of interest-bearing deposits, including money market accounts. Our need for loan funding, ability to invest these funds for a positive return and consideration of other customer relationships influences our willingness to match competitors’ rates to retain these accounts.

The following table indicates the amount of jumbo certificates of deposit by time remaining until maturity at December 31, 2012. Jumbo certificates of deposit require minimum deposits of $100,000.

 

(in thousands)    Amount  

Maturity period:

  

Three months or less

   $ 7,887   

Over three through six months

     5,108   

Over six through twelve months

     11,770   

Over twelve months

     33,573   
  

 

 

 

Total

   $ 58,338   
  

 

 

 

 

42


Table of Contents

The following table sets forth time deposits classified by rates at the dates indicated.

 

     December 31,  
(in thousands)    2012      2011      2010  

0.00 – 1.00%

   $ 108,421       $ 79,693       $ 55,780   

1.01 – 2.00%

     63,426         95,151         129,173   

2.01 – 3.00%

     15,949         79,163         91,623   

3.01 – 4.00%

     1,171         3,282         8,684   

4.01 – 5.00%

     237         1,252         2,143   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 189,204       $ 258,541       $ 287,403   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The following table sets forth the amount and maturities of time deposits at December 31, 2012.

 

     Amount Due                
            More Than      More Than                    Percent of  
     Less Than      One Year to      Two Years to      More Than             Total Time  
(dollars in thousands)    One Year      Two Years      Three Years      Three Years      Total      Deposits  

0.00 – 1.00%

   $ 66,557       $ 27,127       $ 14,596       $ 141       $ 108,421         57.30

1.01 – 2.00%

     20,516         19,099         16,483         7,328         63,426         33.52

2.01 – 3.00%

     10,841         1,326         1,937         1,845         15,949         8.43

3.01 – 4.00%

     664         507         —           —           1,171         0.62

4.01 – 5.00%

     237         —           —           —           237         0.13
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 98,815       $ 48,059       $ 33,016       $ 9,314       $ 189,204         100.00
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The following table sets forth deposit activity for the periods indicated.

 

     Year Ended December 31,  
(in thousands)    2012     2011     2010  

Beginning balance

   $ 608,236      $ 619,757      $ 608,538   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Increase (decrease) before interest credited

     (34,040     (17,743     2,195   

Interest credited

     4,103        6,222        9,024   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in deposits

     (29,937     (11,521     11,219   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Ending balance

   $ 578,299      $ 608,236      $ 619,757   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

43


Table of Contents

Borrowings

We use borrowings from the FHLB of Atlanta, federal funds purchased and other short-term borrowings to supplement our supply of funds for loans and investments and for interest rate risk management, which are summarized in the following table.

 

     Year Ended December 31,  
(dollars in thousands)    2012     2011     2010  

Maximum balance outstanding at any month-end during period:

      

FHLB advances

   $ 60,000      $ 60,000      $ 60,000   

Overnight and short-term borrowings

     984        1,617        1,638   

Average balance outstanding during period:

      

FHLB advances

   $ 59,208      $ 60,245      $ 60,000   

Overnight and short-term borrowings

     616        1,049        1,189   

Weighted average interest rate during period:

      

FHLB advances

     4.03     4.01     4.03

Overnight and short-term borrowings

     0.32     0.29     0.25

Balance outstanding at end of period:

      

FHLB advances

   $ 50,000      $ 60,000      $ 60,000   

Overnight and short-term borrowings

     411        758        1,008   

Weighted average interest rate at end of period:

      

FHLB advances

     0.00     3.97     4.03

Overnight and short-term borrowings

     0.27     0.52     0.33

Our FHLB advances are fixed-rate borrowings that, at the option of the FHLB of Atlanta, can be converted to variable rates. If the FHLB of Atlanta exercises its options to convert the fixed-rate advances to variable rates, then the Bank can accept the new terms or repay the advance without any prepayment penalty. Had the Bank elected to prepay the advances at December 31, 2012, the prepayment penalties were estimated at approximately $6.9 million.

During the fourth quarter of 2012, a FHLB advance for $10.0 million at a rate of 4.46% that would have matured in June of 2017 was prepaid incurring a prepayment penalty of $1.7 million. The interest expense savings will be approximately $445,000 per annum over the remaining term.

 

44


Table of Contents

Average Balances and Yields

The following tables present information regarding average balances of assets and liabilities, the total dollar amounts of interest income and dividends from average interest-earning assets, the total dollar amounts of interest expense on average interest-bearing liabilities, and the resulting annualized average yields and costs. The yields and costs for the periods indicated are derived by dividing income or expense for twelve-month periods by the average balances of assets or liabilities, respectively, for the periods presented. Average balances have been calculated using daily balances. Nonaccrual loans are included in average balances only. Loan fees are included in interest income on loans and are not material. Tax-exempt income on loans and on investment securities has been calculated on a tax-equivalent basis using a federal marginal tax rate of 34%.

 

     For the Year Ended December 31,  
     2012     2011  
           Interest                  Interest         
     Average     and      Yield/     Average     and      Yield/  
(dollars in thousands)    Balance     Dividends      Cost     Balance     Dividends      Cost  

Assets

              

Interest-earning deposits with banks

   $ 57,361      $ 203         0.35   $ 33,089      $ 85         0.26

Loans receivable

     418,569        19,553         4.67     471,260        23,538         4.99

Investment securities

     70,222        1,322         2.19     70,327        1,681         2.53

Mortgage-backed and similar securities

     199,042        3,835         1.93     145,806        3,507         2.41

Other interest-earning assets

     3,842        79         2.06     3,927        40         1.02
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

   

 

 

    

Total interest-earning assets

     749,036        24,992         3.36     724,409        28,851         4.00
    

 

 

        

 

 

    

Allowance for loan losses

     (10,451          (12,083     

Noninterest-earning assets

     43,081             53,823        
  

 

 

        

 

 

      

Total assets

   $ 781,666           $ 766,149        
  

 

 

        

 

 

      

Liabilities and equity

              

NOW accounts

   $ 135,441        525         0.39   $ 132,903        934         0.70

Money market accounts

     143,622        473         0.33     134,672        721         0.54

Savings accounts

     27,463        45         0.16     23,853        72         0.30

Certificates of deposit

     228,558        3,060         1.34     273,840        4,495         1.64
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

   

 

 

    

Total interest-bearing deposits

     535,084        4,103         0.77     565,268        6,222         1.10

Overnight and short-term borrowings

     616        2         0.32     1,049        3         0.29

Federal Home Loan Bank advances

     59,208        2,387         4.03     60,245        2,417         4.01
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

   

 

 

    

Total interest-bearing liabilities

     594,908        6,492         1.09     626,562        8,642         1.38
    

 

 

        

 

 

    

Noninterest-bearing deposits

     60,099             52,467        

Other noninterest-bearing liabilities

     10,451             4,969        
  

 

 

        

 

 

      

Total liabilities

     665,458             683,998        

Total equity

     116,208             82,151        
  

 

 

        

 

 

      

Total liabilities and equity

   $ 781,666           $ 766,149        
  

 

 

        

 

 

      

Net interest income

     $ 18,500           $ 20,209      
    

 

 

        

 

 

    

Interest rate spread

          2.27          2.62

Net interest margin

          2.50          2.80

Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities

     125.91          115.62     

 

45


Table of Contents
     For the Year Ended December 31,  
     2011     2010  
           Interest                  Interest         
     Average     and      Yield/     Average     and      Yield/  
(dollars in thousands)    Balance     Dividends      Cost     Balance     Dividends      Cost  

Assets

              

Interest-earning deposits with banks

   $ 33,089      $ 85         0.26   $ 21,997      $ 59         0.27

Loans receivable

     471,260        23,538         4.99     563,013        28,666         5.09

Investment securities

     70,327        1,681         2.53     50,872        1,545         3.13

Mortgage-backed and similar securities

     145,806        3,507         2.41     87,474        2,674         3.06

Other interest-earning assets

     3,927        40         1.02     3,982        15         0.38
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

   

 

 

    

Total interest-earning assets

     724,409        28,851         4.00     727,338        32,959         4.54
    

 

 

        

 

 

    

Allowance for loan losses

     (12,083          (11,847     

Noninterest-earning assets

     53,823             44,085        
  

 

 

        

 

 

      

Total assets

   $ 766,149           $ 759,576        
  

 

 

        

 

 

      

Liabilities and equity

              

NOW accounts

   $ 132,903        934         0.70   $ 127,879        1,780         1.39

Money market accounts

     134,672        721         0.54     123,952        1,046         0.84

Savings accounts

     23,853        72         0.30     19,994        70         0.35

Certificates of deposit

     273,840        4,495         1.64     305,823        6,128         2.00
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

   

 

 

    

Total interest-bearing deposits

     565,268        6,222         1.10     577,648        9,024         1.56

Overnight and short-term borrowings

     1,049        3         0.29     1,189        3         0.25

Federal Home Loan Bank advances

     60,245        2,417         4.01     60,000        2,417         4.03
  

 

 

   

 

 

      

 

 

   

 

 

    

Total interest-bearing liabilities

     626,562        8,642         1.38     638,837        11,444         1.79
    

 

 

        

 

 

    

Noninterest-bearing deposits

     52,467             42,870        

Other noninterest-bearing liabilities

     4,969             5,185        
  

 

 

        

 

 

      

Total liabilities

     683,998             686,892        

Total equity

     82,151             72,684        
  

 

 

        

 

 

      

Total liabilities and equity

   $ 766,149           $ 759,576        
  

 

 

        

 

 

      

Net interest income

     $ 20,209           $ 21,515      
    

 

 

        

 

 

    

Interest rate spread

          2.62          2.75

Net interest margin

          2.80          2.96

Average interest-earning assets to average interest-bearing liabilities

     115.62          113.85     

 

46


Table of Contents

Rate/Volume Analysis . The following table sets forth the effects of changing rates and volumes on our net interest income. The rate column shows the effects attributable to changes in rate (changes in rate multiplied by prior volume). The volume column shows the effects attributable to changes in volume (changes in volume multiplied by prior rate). The net column represents the sum of the volume and rate columns. Changes attributable to changes in both rate and volume have been allocated proportionally based on the absolute dollar amounts of change in each.

 

     Year Ended December 31, 2012
Compared to the

Year Ended December 31, 2011
    Year Ended December 31, 2011
Compared to the

Year Ended December 31, 2010
 
     Increase (Decrease)
Due to:
          Increase (Decrease)
Due to:
       
(in thousands)    Volume     Rate     Net     Volume     Rate     Net  

Interest income:

            

Interest-earning deposits with banks

   $ 78      $ 40      $ 118      $ 29      $ (3   $ 26   

Loans receivable

     (2,524     (1,461     (3,985     (4,592     (536     (5,128

Investment securities

     (3     (356     (359     510        (374     136   

Mortgage-backed and similar securities

     1,116        (788     328        1,495        (662     833   

Other interest-earning assets

     (1     40        39        —          25        25   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total interest-earning assets

     (1,334     (2,525     (3,859     (2,558     (1,550     (4,108
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Interest expense:

            

NOW accounts

     18        (427     (409     67        (913     (846

Money market accounts

     45        (293     (248     84        (409     (325

Savings accounts

     10        (37     (27     12        (10     2   

Certificates of deposit

     (678     (757     (1,435     (598     (1,035     (1,633
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total interest-bearing deposits

     (605     (1,514     (2,119     (435     (2,367     (2,802

Overnight and short-term borrowings

     (1     —          (1     —          —          —     

Federal Home Loan Bank advances

     (42     12        (30     10        (10     —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total interest-bearing liabilities

     (648     (1,502     (2,150     (425     (2,377     (2,802
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in net interest income

   $ (686   $ (1,023   $ (1,709   $ (2,133   $ 827      $ (1,306
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Comparison of Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2012 and 2011

Overview. Net income was $862,000, or $0.17 per share, for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to net income of $1.2 million, or $0.23 per share, for the year ended December 31, 2011 primarily due to a decrease in net interest income and an increase in noninterest expenses, partially offset by a decrease in the provision for loan losses and an increase in noninterest income. Our primary source of income is net interest income, which decreased to $18.5 million for 2012 from $20.2 million for 2011. The provision for loan losses decreased $2.1 million to $1.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to $3.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. The significant decrease in the provision for loan losses was due to a decrease of $2.0 million in net loan charge-offs to $3.8 million in 2012 from $5.8 million in 2011. Noninterest income increased $2.0 million during the year ended December 31, 2012, while noninterest expenses increased by $3.0 million during 2012.

 

47


Table of Contents

Net Interest Income. Net interest income decreased by $1.7 million, or 8.5%, for the year ended December 31, 2012 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2011, primarily due to a decrease in interest on loans. Total interest income decreased by $3.9 million, or 13.4%, as loan interest income decreased by $4.0 million, or 17.0%, during the year ended December 31, 2012, primarily due to a decrease in average loan balances of $52.7 million, or 11.2%, because loan repayments and charge-offs were not replaced by new loan originations, and a 32 basis point decrease in the yield earned on loans during 2012. Income from securities decreased by $31,000 primarily due to a decrease in the yield earned on investment securities and mortgage-backed and related securities of 34 basis points and 48 basis points, respectively, and a decrease in the average balance of investment securities of $105,000, offset by a increase of $53.2 million in the average balance of mortgage-backed and related securities. The increased average balances of mortgage-backed and related securities were primarily due to the reinvestment into securities of proceeds from loan repayments and from the issuance of common stock in connection with the Bank’s mutual to stock conversion during the fourth quarter of 2011. Total interest expense decreased by $2.1 million, or 24.9%, during the year ended December 31, 2012, primarily resulting from a 29 basis point decrease in the rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities as well as a decrease of $31.7 million, or 5.1%, in the average balances of interest-bearing liabilities. Interest-bearing liabilities decreased primarily due to a decrease in average deposit balances of $30.2 million, or 5.3%, reflecting a decline in average certificates of deposit that was partially offset by growth in average balances of NOW, money market, and savings accounts. The lower cost of interest-bearing liabilities resulted primarily from a decrease of 33 basis points in the cost of deposits. The decrease in the cost of deposits was due primarily to our continued focus on reducing deposit interest rates by not aggressively competing for certificates of deposit. The average balances of Federal Home Loan Bank advances and overnight and short-term borrowings for the year ended December 31, 2012 decreased $1.5 million due to the repayment of $10.0 million in FHLB advances during the fourth quarter of 2012.

Provision for Loan Losses. The provision for loan losses was $1.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to $3.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. The decrease in the provision was a result of a decrease in net loan charge-offs in 2012, as well as a $1.6 million reduction in the Bank’s general loan loss reserves related to its historical loss rates from certain high risk commercial construction and land development loans and from commercial real estate loan participations purchased, both of which carry no current impaired balances. Net loan charge-offs were $3.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to $5.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. The provision for loan losses was also affected by the overall $45.0 million contraction of the loan portfolio during 2012.

Noninterest Income. During the year ended December 31, 2012, total noninterest income increased $2.0 million, or 27.4%, to $9.4 million from $7.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase in noninterest income was primarily the result of a $1.8 million increase in gains realized from sales of investment securities, as certain securities were replaced by securities that are expected to perform better under rising rates, a $600,000 increase in gains from sales of residential mortgage loans, a $152,000 increase in income from debit card services due to increased transactions, which were partially offset by a $472,000 decrease in other deposit service fees, mainly related to reduced overdraft fees.

Noninterest Expenses. Noninterest expenses increased by $3.0 million, or 13.7%, to $25.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to $22.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. The increase was primarily attributable to a $1.7 million FHLB prepayment penalty, and a $1.3 million increase in salaries and employee benefits, primarily due to increased staffing and increases in expenses for the Bank’s pension plan and ESOP.

 

48


Table of Contents

In January of 2013, the Bank approved the curtailment of benefits under its qualified and nonqualified defined benefit pension plans. While the action had no effect on the 2012 financial position and results of operations, the Bank’s annual expenses related to its pension plans are expected to decline by approximately $536,000 before income taxes in 2013 due to a one-time curtailment credit of approximately $465,000, and by a minimum of $100,000 before income taxes in subsequent periods based on current actuarial estimates.

Income Tax Expense. We recorded a provision for income tax expense of $302,000 for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to $588,000 for the year ended December 31, 2011, primarily due to pre-tax income of $1.2 million in 2012 compared to pre-tax income of $1.8 million in 2011. The effective tax rate was 25.9% for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to 33.1% for the year ended December 31, 2011, with the decrease primarily resulting from the increase in favorable permanent tax differences relative to the size of the pre-tax income in 2012 compared to 2011.

Total Comprehensive Income (Loss). Total comprehensive income or loss for the periods presented consists of net income, the change in unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale, and certain changes in our benefit obligations under our retirement plans, net of tax. We reported a total comprehensive loss of $876,000 for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to total comprehensive income of $3.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2011. The changes in the components of comprehensive income were net income of $862,000 in 2012 compared to a net income of $1.2 million in 2011, an $821,000 decrease in unrealized gains on securities available for sale in 2012 compared to a $3.1 million increase in unrealized gains on securities available for sale in 2011, and a $917,000 increase in defined benefit pension plan obligations in 2012 compared to a $837,000 increase in 2011. The increase in defined benefit obligations primarily resulted from a decrease in the assumed discount rate.

Comparison of Results of Operations for the Years Ended December 31, 2011 and 2010

Overview. Net income was $1.2 million, or $0.23 per share, for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to net loss of $9.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2010 primarily due to a $18.6 million decrease in the provision for loan losses to $3.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $22.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. The significant decrease in the provision for loan losses was due to a decrease of $12.9 million in net loan charge-offs to $5.8 million in 2011 from $18.7 million in 2010. Our primary source of income is net interest income, which decreased to $20.2 million for 2011 from $21.5 million for 2010. Noninterest income decreased $46,000 during the year ended December 31, 2011, while noninterest expenses increased by $25,000 during 2011.

 

49


Table of Contents

Net Interest Income. Net interest income decreased by $1.3 million, or 6.0%, for the year ended December 31, 2011 as compared to the year ended December 31, 2010, primarily due to a decrease in interest on loans, which was partially offset by an increase in income from securities, as well as a decrease in interest expense. Total interest income decreased by $4.1 million, or 12.4%, as loan interest income decreased by $5.1 million, or 17.9%, during the year ended December 31, 2011, due primarily to a decrease in average loan balances of $91.8 million, or 16.3%, primarily because loan repayments and charge-offs were not replaced by new loan originations, and a 10 basis point decrease in the yield earned on loans during 2011. Income from securities increased by $1.0 million primarily due to an increase in the average balance of investment securities and mortgage-backed and related securities of $19.5 million and $58.3 million, respectively, the effect of which was partially offset by a decrease in the yield earned on investment securities and mortgage-backed and related securities of 60 basis points and 65 basis points, respectively. The increased average balances of investment securities and mortgage-backed and related securities were primarily due to the reinvestment into securities of proceeds from loan repayments and from the issuance of common stock in connection with the Bank’s mutual to stock conversion. Total interest expense decreased by $2.8 million, or 24.5%, during the year ended December 31, 2011, primarily resulting from a 41 basis point decrease in the rates paid on interest-bearing liabilities as well as a decrease of $12.3 million, or 1.9%, in the average balances of interest-bearing liabilities. Interest-bearing liabilities decreased primarily due primarily to a decrease in average deposit balances of $12.4 million, or 2.1%, reflecting a decline in average certificates of deposit that was partially offset by growth in average balances of NOW, money market, and savings accounts. The lower cost of interest-bearing liabilities resulted primarily from a decrease of 46 basis points in the cost of deposits. The decrease in the cost of deposits was due primarily to our continued focus on reducing deposit interest rates by not aggressively competing for certificates of deposit. The average balances of Federal Home Loan Bank advances and overnight and short-term borrowings for the year ended December 31, 2011 did not change significantly from the 2010 levels.

Provision for Loan Losses. The provision for loan losses was $3.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $22.4 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. The decrease in the provision was a result of a decrease in net loan charge-offs in 2011, as well as management’s efforts to maintain the allowance for loan losses at adequate levels. Net loan charge-offs were $5.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to $18.7 million for the year ended December 31, 2010.

Noninterest Income. During the year ended December 31, 2011, total noninterest income decreased $46,000, or 0.6%, to $7.4 million from $7.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. The decrease in noninterest income was primarily the result of a $600,000 increase in gains realized from sales of investment securities, and a $55,000 increase in income from debit card services due to increased transactions, which were partially offset by a $350,000 decrease in other deposit service fees, mainly related to reduced overdraft fees, a $322,000 decrease in mortgage banking income due to lower volume, and a $29,000 decrease in other noninterest income.

Noninterest Expenses. Noninterest expenses decreased by $25,000, or 0.1%, to $22.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to the year ended December 31, 2010. The decrease was primarily attributable to a $513,000 increase in salaries and employee benefits due primarily to increased staffing, a $181,000 increase in professional expenses, a $135,000 increase in data processing fees resulting from additional core processor fees, and a $94,000 increase in consulting services, which were partially offset by a $280,000 decrease in federal deposit insurance premiums due to a reduction in deposit balances and a new FDIC assessment methodology, a $133,000 decrease in expenses related to indirect automobile lending, a $132,000 decrease in advertising expense, a $195,000 decrease in foreclosed property expenses, a $139,000 decrease in other noninterest expenses, and a $69,000 decrease in occupancy expense as a result of fewer building repairs.

 

50


Table of Contents

Income Tax Expense. We recorded a provision for income tax expense of $588,000 for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to an income tax benefit of $6.1 million for the year ended December 31, 2010, primarily due to a pre-tax income of $1.8 million in 2011 compared to pre-tax loss of $15.5 million in 2010. The effective tax rate was 33.1% for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to 39.1% for the year ended December 31, 2010, with the decrease primarily resulting from the increase in favorable permanent tax differences relative to the size of the pre-tax income in 2011 and the pre-tax loss in 2010.

Total Comprehensive Income (Loss). Total comprehensive income or loss for the periods presented consists of net income, the change in unrealized gains and losses on securities available for sale, and certain changes in our benefit obligations under our retirement plans, net of tax. We reported total comprehensive income of $3.5 million for the year ended December 31, 2011 compared to a total comprehensive loss of $10.8 million for the year ended December 31, 2010. The changes in the components of comprehensive income were net income of $1.2 million in 2011 compared to a net loss of $9.5 million in 2010, a $3.1 million increase in unrealized gains on securities available for sale in 2011 compared to a $683 increase in unrealized losses on securities available for sale in 2010, and a $837,000 increase in retirement plan benefit obligations in 2011 compared to a $627,000 increase in retirement plan benefit obligations in 2010.

Risk Management

Overview . Managing risk is an essential part of successfully managing a financial institution. Our most prominent risk exposures are credit risk, interest rate risk and market risk. Credit risk is the risk of not collecting the interest and/or the principal balance of a loan or investment when it is due. Interest rate risk is the potential reduction of interest income as a result of changes in interest rates. Market risk arises from fluctuations in interest rates that may result in changes in the values of financial instruments, such as available-for-sale securities that are accounted for on a mark-to-market basis. Other risks that we face are operational risk, liquidity risks and reputation risk. Operational risks include risks related to fraud, regulatory compliance, processing errors, technology and disaster recovery. Liquidity risk is the possible inability to fund obligations to depositors, lenders or borrowers. Reputation risk is the risk that negative publicity or press, whether true or not, could cause a decline in our customer base or revenue.

Credit Risk Management. Our strategy for credit risk management focuses on having well-defined credit policies and uniform underwriting criteria and providing prompt attention to potential problem loans. We do not offer Alt-A, sub-prime or no-documentation mortgage loans.

When a borrower fails to make a required loan payment, we take a number of steps to have the borrower cure the delinquency and restore the loan to current status. When the loan becomes 15 days past due, a late notice is sent to the borrower. When the loan becomes 30 days past due, a more formal letter is sent. Between 15 and 30 days past due, telephone calls are also made to the borrower. After 30 days, we regard the borrower in default. At 60 days delinquent, the borrower may be sent a letter from our attorney and we may commence collection proceedings. If a foreclosure action is instituted and the loan is not brought current, paid in full, or refinanced before the foreclosure sale, the real property securing the loan generally is sold at foreclosure. Generally, when a consumer loan becomes 60 days past due, we institute collection proceedings and attempt to repossess any personal property that secures the loan. Management informs the board of directors monthly of the amount of loans delinquent more than 30 days, all loans in foreclosure and repossessed property that we own.

Analysis of Nonperforming Assets and Classified Assets. We consider repossessed assets and loans that are 90 days or more past due and certain loans that are less than 90 days past due, but that we will not be able to collect the full amount of, to be nonperforming assets. Loans are generally placed on nonaccrual status when they become 90 days delinquent, or sooner if the facts and circumstances indicate that we will not be able to collect the full amount of the loan, at which time the accrual of interest ceases and accrued interest is reversed and deducted from income. Typically, payments received on a nonaccrual loan are first applied to the outstanding principal balance to the extent that principal is due and then recognized as interest income.

 

51


Table of Contents

Real estate that we acquire as a result of foreclosure or by deed-in-lieu of foreclosure is classified as real estate owned until it is sold. Property acquired through foreclosure is recorded at the lower of its cost or fair market value at the date of foreclosure. Any holding costs and declines in fair value after acquisition of the property result in charges against income.

The following table provides information with respect to our nonperforming assets at the dates indicated.

 

     At December 31,  
(dollars in thousands)    2012     2011     2010     2009     2008  

Nonaccruing loans (1):

          

Commercial:

          

Commercial mortgage

   $ —        $ 833      $ 3,810      $ 6,666      $ —     

Construction and land development

     40        14,695        5,205        438        —     

Commercial and industrial

     114        2,595        377        1,408        —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total nonaccruing commercial loans

     154        18,123        9,392        8,512        —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-commercial:

          

Residential mortgage

     808        1,922        3,194        5,558        —     

Construction and land development

     —          110        553        456        —     

Revolving mortgage

     155        440        191        489        —     

Consumer

     34        27        94        1,463        —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total nonaccruing non-commercial loans

     997        2,499        4,032        7,966        —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total nonaccruing loans

     1,151        20,622        13,424        16,478        —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Accruing loans past due 90 days or more:

          

Commercial:

          

Construction and land development

     —          —          —          —          12   

Commercial and industrial

     —          —          —          —          68   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total accruing commercial loans past due 90 days or more

     —          —          —          —          80   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-commercial:

          

Residential mortgage

     —          —          —          91        1,790   

Construction and land development

     —          —          —          —          374   

Revolving mortgage

     —          —          —          —          525   

Consumer

     —          —          —          15        782   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total accruing non-commercial loans past due 90 days or more

     —          —          —          106        3,471   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total accruing loans past due 90 days or more

     —          —          —          106        3,551   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total nonperforming loans (nonaccruing and 90 days or more past due)

     1,151        20,622        13,424        16,584        3,551   

Foreclosed properties

     19,411        8,125        10,650        3,699        6,272   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total nonperforming assets

     20,562        28,747        24,074        20,283        9,823   

Performing troubled debt restructurings (2)

     5,065        1,142        15,233        19,113        —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Performing troubled debt restructurings and total nonperforming assets

   $ 25,627      $ 29,889      $ 39,307      $ 39,396      $ 9,823   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total nonperforming loans to total loans

     0.30     4.76     2.68     2.77     0.60

Total nonperforming loans to total assets

     0.15     2.61     1.79     2.21     0.50

Total nonperforming assets to total assets

     2.74     3.63     3.21     2.71     1.39

Performing troubled debt restructurings and total nonperforming assets to total assets

     3.42     3.78     5.24     5.26     1.39

 

(1) Troubled debt restructurings do not include troubled debt restructurings that remain on nonaccrual status and are included in nonaccrual loans above.
(2) Performing troubled debt restructurings exclude nonaccrual troubled debt restructurings.

 

52


Table of Contents

The following table provides information with respect to changes in our nonperforming assets.

 

     At December 31,               
(dollars in thousands)    2012      2011      $ change     % change  

Nonperforming Loans:

          

Nonaccruing Loans (1)

          

Commercial:

          

Commercial mortgage

   $ —         $ 833       $ (833     -100.0

Commercial construction and land development

     40         14,695         (14,655     -99.7

Commercial and industrial

     114         2,595         (2,481     -95.6
  

 

 

    

 

 

      

Total nonaccruing commercial

     154         18,123         (17,969     -99.2
  

 

 

    

 

 

      

Non-commercial:

          

Residential mortgage

     808         1,922         (1,114     -58.0

Non-commercial construction and land development

     —           110         (110     -100.0

Revolving mortgage

     155         440         (285     -64.8

Consumer

     34         27         7        25.9
  

 

 

    

 

 

      

Total nonaccruing non-commercial loans

     997         2,499         (1,502     -60.1
  

 

 

    

 

 

      

Total nonaccruing loans

     1,151         20,622         (19,471     -94.4
  

 

 

    

 

 

      

Accruing loans past due 90 days or more:

          

Total accruing loans past due 90 days or more

     —           —           —          0.0
  

 

 

    

 

 

      

Total nonperforming loans

     1,151         20,622         (19,471     -94.4

Foreclosed properties

     19,411         8,125         11,286        138.9
  

 

 

    

 

 

      

Total nonperforming assets

     20,562         28,747         (8,185     -28.5

Performing troubled debt restructurings (2)

     5,065         1,142         3,923        343.5
  

 

 

    

 

 

      

Performing troubled debt restructurings and total nonperforming assets

   $ 25,627       $ 29,889         (4,262     -14.3
  

 

 

    

 

 

      

 

(1) Troubled debt restructurings do not include troubled debt restructurings that remain on nonaccrual status and are included in nonaccrual loans above.
(2) Performing troubled debt restructurings exclude nonaccrual troubled debt restructurings.

Nonperforming loans decreased $19.5 million, or 94.4%, to $1.2 million at December 31, 2012 from $20.6 million at December 31, 2011, as $17.5 million in collateral on nonperforming loans were moved into foreclosed real estate, while performing troubled debt restructurings increased $3.9 million, or 343.5%, when comparing the same periods. Performing troubled debt restructurings and nonperforming assets decreased $4.3 million, or 14.3%, to $25.6 million, or 3.42% of total assets, at December 31, 2012, compared to $29.9 million, or 3.78% of total assets, at December 31, 2011. Nonperforming assets decreased $8.2 million, or 28.5%, to $20.6 million, or 2.74% of total assets, at December 31, 2012, compared to $28.7 million, or 3.63% of total assets, at December 31, 2011. Nonperforming assets included $1.2 million in nonperforming loans and $19.4 million in foreclosed real estate at December 31, 2012, compared to $20.6 million and $8.1 million, respectively, at December 31, 2011. During 2012, nonperforming loans decreased $19.5 million, while foreclosed properties increased $11.3 million. As of December 31, 2012, nonperforming loans included one commercial land development loan that totaled $39,000, one commercial and industrial loan that totaled $114,000, ten residential mortgages that totaled $808,000, and three home equity loans that totaled $155,000. As of December 31, 2012, the nonperforming loans had specific reserves of $135,000. Foreclosed real estate at December 31, 2012 included eighteen properties with a total carrying value of $19.4 million.

 

53


Table of Contents

During the fourth quarter of 2012, the Bank completed foreclosure on the collateral securing its largest nonperforming loan relationship that had an original purpose of constructing a mixed-use retail, commercial office, and residential condominium project located in western North Carolina. As a result of this foreclosure, the Bank acquired forty-four of the forty-eight condominium units in the building including all eight of the retail units (three of which are leased), eight of the eleven commercial office condominiums (three were sold by the developer prior to the foreclosure) and twenty-eight of the twenty-nine residential units (one was sold by the developer prior to the foreclosure). Following an additional write-down of approximately $630,000 on the loans secured by this collateral in the fourth quarter of 2012, the Bank recorded this foreclosed property in the amount of $9.8 million.

We periodically modify loans to extend the term or make other concessions to help borrowers stay current on their loan and to avoid foreclosure. At December 31, 2012, we had $5.2 million of these modified loans, which are also referred to as troubled debt restructurings, of which $5.1 million were performing in accordance with their restructured terms, compared to $14.2 million at December 31, 2011, of which $1.1 million were performing in accordance with their restructured terms. The decrease in troubled debt restructurings since December 31, 2011 was primarily the result of fewer newly restructured loans during 2012, loan repayments, loans for which the collateral was transferred to foreclosed properties, loans charged off, and loans meeting sustained performance and other criteria to no longer be disclosed as a troubled debt restructuring. All troubled debt restructurings were restructured in order to help the borrowers remain current on their debt obligation. At December 31, 2012, $114,000 of the total $5.2 million of troubled debt restructurings were not performing according to their restructured terms and were included in the nonperforming asset table above as nonaccruing loans.

Interest income that would have been recorded had nonaccruing loans been current according to their original terms amounted to $849,000 for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to $712,000 for the year ended December 31, 2011. Interest income recognized on nonperforming loans was $231,000 for the year ended December 31, 2012 compared to $596,000 for the year ended December 31, 2011.

At December 31, 2012, our nonaccruing loans included the following:

 

 

Residential Mortgage Loans

 

   

Ten loans to multiple borrowers on one- to four-family residential properties with an aggregate balance of $808,000 as of December 31, 2012.

At December 31, 2012, our performing troubled debt restructurings included the following:

 

 

Commercial Mortgage Loans

 

   

One loan for the purchase of an existing mobile home park to be used for future development secured by nonowner-occupied commercial real estate located in coastal South Carolina. The loan was modified in the second quarter of 2012, which extended the terms of the loan and required scheduled principal payments. The future performance of the loan is dependent upon the guarantor group’s willingness and ability to service the debt. Such willingness and ability was demonstrated by the fact that, as of December 31, 2012, the loan was a performing troubled debt restructuring with a balance of $3.1 million that matures in May of 2014. As of December 31, 2012, the loan was considered impaired and had a specific reserve of $633,000.

 

 

Residential Mortgage Loans

 

   

Eight loans to multiple unrelated borrowers on one- to four-family residential properties with an aggregate balance of $1.9 million as of December 31, 2012.

 

54


Table of Contents

Foreclosed properties consisted of the following at the dates indicated.

 

     At December 31,  
     2012      2011      2010  
(dollars in thousands)    Number      Amount      Number      Amount      Number      Amount  

By foreclosed loan type:

                 

Commercial mortgage

     2       $ 1,709         3       $ 3,045         3       $ 4,135   

Commercial construction and land development

     10         16,642         2         1,683         2         1,967   

Residential mortgage

     5         944         10         1,660         9         1,711   

Residential construction and land development

     1         116         3         1,737         5         2,837   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     18       $ 19,411         18       $ 8,125         19       $ 10,650   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

An analysis of foreclosed real estate follows:

 

     Year Ended December 31,  
(dollars in thousands)    2012     2011     2010  

Beginning balance

   $ 8,125      $ 10,650      $ 3,699   

Transfers from loans

     17,464        3,533        12,585   

Capitalized cost

     22        41        72   

Loss provisions

     (1,308     (1,574     (1,780

Net loss on sale of foreclosed properties

     (176     (410     (69

Net proceeds from sales of foreclosed properties

     (4,716     (4,115     (3,719

Sales of properties funded by loans

     —          —          (138
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Ending balance

   $ 19,411      $ 8,125      $ 10,650   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Federal regulations require us to review and classify our assets on a regular basis. In addition, the FDIC and the NCCoB have the authority to identify problem assets and, if appropriate, require them to be classified. There are three classifications for problem assets; substandard, doubtful, and loss. “Substandard assets” must have one or more defined weaknesses and are characterized by the distinct possibility that we will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. “Doubtful assets” have the weaknesses of substandard assets with the additional characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full questionable on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values, and there is a high possibility of loss. Assets classified “loss” are considered uncollectible and of such little value that continued recognition as an asset of the institution is not warranted. The regulations also provide for a “special mention” category, described as assets which do not currently expose an institution to a sufficient degree of risk to warrant classification but do possess credit deficiencies or potential weaknesses deserving close attention. When we classify an asset as substandard or doubtful we may establish a specific allowance for loan losses. If we classify an asset as loss, we charge off an amount equal to 100% of the portion of the asset classified loss.

 

55


Table of Contents

The following table shows the aggregate amounts of our classified and special mention assets at the dates indicated.

 

     At December 31,  
(dollars in thousands)    2012      2011      2010      2009      2008  

Classified loans

              

Substandard loans

   $ 3,969       $ 23,972       $ 31,854       $ 34,329       $ 3,145   

Doubtful loans

     —           2         —           —           —     

Loss loans

     4         569         265         197         —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total classified loans

     3,973         24,543         32,119         34,526         3,145   

Special mention loans

     35,149         34,584         30,490         34,432         8,555   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total classified and special mention loans

     39,122         59,127         62,609         68,958         11,700   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total other classified and special mention assets

     —           —           —           —           —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total classified and special mention assets

   $ 39,122       $ 59,127       $ 62,609       $ 68,958       $ 11,700   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The following table shows the aggregate amounts of our classified loans at the dates indicated and the related changes in our classified loans.

 

     At December 31,               
(dollars in thousands)    2012      2011      $ change     % change  

Classified loans:

          

Substandard loans

   $ 3,969       $ 23,972       $ (20,003     -83.4

Doubtful loans

     —           2         (2     -100.0

Loss loans

     4         569         (565     -99.3
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

Total classified loans

     3,973         24,543         (20,570     -83.8

Special mention loans

     35,149         34,584         565        1.6
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

Total classified and special mention loans

   $ 39,122       $ 59,127       $ (20,005     -33.8
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

Other than as disclosed in the above tables, there are no other loans where management has serious doubts about the ability of the borrowers to comply with the present loan repayment terms.

At December 31, 2012, classified loans totaling $4.0 million included $1.2 million in nonaccruing loans that were previously discussed as nonperforming loans. The remaining $2.8 million in performing classified loans primarily included the following:

 

 

Commercial Mortgage Loans

 

   

One loan on commercial retail property located in western North Carolina. As of December 31, 2012, the loan was performing with a balance of $527,000.

 

56


Table of Contents
 

Residential Mortgage Loans

 

   

Fourteen loans to multiple unrelated borrowers for one- to- four-family residential properties with an aggregate balance of $1.5 million as of December 31, 2012.

Classified assets include loans that are classified due to factors other than payment delinquencies, such as lack of current financial statements and other required documentation, insufficient cash flows or other deficiencies, and, therefore are not included as nonperforming assets.

At December 31, 2012, special mention loans included the following large potentially problematic loan:

 

 

Commercial Mortgage Loans

 

   

One loan for the purchase of an existing mobile home park to be used for future development secured by nonowner-occupied commercial real estate located in coastal South Carolina. The loan was modified in the second quarter of 2012, which extended the terms of the loan and required scheduled principal payments. The future performance of the loan is dependent upon the guarantor group’s willingness and ability to service the debt. Such willingness and ability was demonstrated by the fact that, as of December 31, 2012, the loan was a performing troubled debt restructuring with a balance of $3.1 million that matures in May of 2014. As of December 31, 2012, the loan was considered impaired and had a specific reserve of $633,000.

 

57


Table of Contents

The following table provides information about delinquencies, including nonaccruing loans, in our loan portfolio at the dates indicated.

 

     Delinquent 31-89 Days      Delinquent 90 Days or More  
(dollars in thousands)    Number
of
Loans
     Principal
Balance
of Loans
     Number of
of Loans
     Principal
Balance
of Loans
 

At December 31, 2012

           

Commercial:

           

Commercial mortgage

     1       $ 393         —         $ —     

Commercial construction and land development

     1         16         1         40   

Commercial and industrial

     7         135         1         114   

Non-commercial:

           

Residential mortgage

     9         875         10         808   

Revolving mortgage

     4         203         2         60   

Consumer

     158         492         4         28   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total delinquent loans

     180       $ 2,114         18       $ 1,050   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

At December 31, 2011

           

Commercial:

           

Commercial mortgage

     —         $ —           1       $ 833   

Commercial construction and land development

     1         363         7         6,251   

Commercial and industrial

     9         2,177         4         506   

Non-commercial:

           

Residential mortgage

     12         1,426         11         1,922   

Residential construction and land development

     —           —           1         110   

Revolving mortgage

     11         751         4         407   

Consumer

     213         939         7         27   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total delinquent loans

     246       $ 5,656         35       $ 10,056   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

At December 31, 2010

           

Commercial:

           

Commercial mortgage

     3       $ 2,298         3       $ 3,363   

Commercial construction and land development

     4         462         4         3,451   

Commercial and industrial

     20         288         2         290   

Non-commercial:

           

Residential mortgage

     48         4,996         20         2,878   

Residential construction and land development

     2         282         3         553   

Revolving mortgage

     19         576         7         191   

Consumer

     165         1,387         9         94   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total delinquent loans

     261       $ 10,289         48       $ 10,820   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

58


Table of Contents
     Delinquent 31-89 Days      Delinquent 90 Days or More  
(dollars in thousands)    Number
of
Loans
     Principal
Balance
of Loans
     Number of
of Loans
     Principal
Balance of
Loans
 

At December 31, 2009

           

Commercial:

           

Commercial mortgage

     3       $ 2,226         3       $ 6,293   

Commercial construction and land development

     3         95         3         438   

Commercial and industrial

     39         1,689         9         210   

Non-commercial:

           

Residential mortgage

     58         7,024         27         4,707   

Residential construction and land development

     3         569         4         456   

Revolving mortgage

     35         1,318         10         589   

Consumer

     297         3,254         118         1,512   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total delinquent loans

     438       $ 16,175         174       $ 14,205   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

At December 31, 2008

           

Commercial:

           

Commercial mortgage

     6       $ 4,920         4       $ 1,201   

Commercial construction and land development

     1         142         3         1,082   

Commercial and industrial

     46         1,036         19         432   

Non-commercial:

           

Residential mortgage

     12         384         4         89   

Revolving mortgage

     47         1,754         28         1,057   

Consumer

     326         3,611         116         1,719   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total delinquent loans

     438       $ 11,847         174       $ 5,580   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

59


Table of Contents

The following table provides information about changes in our delinquencies, including nonaccruing loans, in our loan portfolio at the dates indicated.

 

     At December 31,               
(dollars in thousands)    2012      2011      $ change     % change  

Delinquent 31-89 Days

          

Commercial:

          

Commercial mortgage

   $ 393       $ —         $ 393        n/a   

Commercial construction and land development

     16         363         (347     -95.6

Commercial and industrial

     135         2,177         (2,042     -93.8

Non-commercial:

          

Residential mortgage

     875         1,426         (551     -38.6

Revolving mortgage

     203         751         (548     -73.0

Consumer

     492         939         (447     -47.6
  

 

 

    

 

 

      

Total loans delinquent 31-89 days

     2,114         5,656         (3,542     -62.6
  

 

 

    

 

 

      

Delinquent 90 Days or More

          

Commercial:

          

Commercial mortgage

     —           833       $ (833     -100.0

Commercial construction and land development

     40         6,251         (6,211     -99.4

Commercial and industrial

     114         506         (392     -77.5

Non-commercial:

          

Residential mortgage

     808         1,922         (1,114     -58.0

Residential construction and land development

     —           110         (110     -100.0

Revolving mortgage

     60         407         (347     -85.3

Consumer

     28         27         1        3.7
  

 

 

    

 

 

      

Total loans delinquent 90 days or more

     1,050         10,056         (9,006     -89.6
  

 

 

    

 

 

      

Total delinquent loans

   $ 3,164       $ 15,712         (12,548     -79.9
  

 

 

    

 

 

      

The $3.5 million decrease in loans 31 to 89 days past due to December 31, 2012 from December 31, 2011 was primarily due to a $2.0 million decrease in commercial and industrial loans. The $2.1 million in loans 31 to 89 days past due at December 31, 2012 was comprised of 98 loans with an average balance of approximately $21,000, the largest of which had a balance of $396,000.

The $9.0 million decrease in loans 90 days or more past due to December 31, 2012 from December 31, 2011 was primarily due to a $6.2 million decrease in commercial construction and land development loans. The $1.1 million in loans 90 days or more past due at December 31, 2012 was comprised of 18 loans with an average balance of approximately $58,000, the largest of which had a balance of $275,000.

 

60


Table of Contents

Analysis and Determination of the Allowance for Loan Losses

The allowance for loan losses is a valuation allowance for probable losses inherent in the loan portfolio. On a monthly basis, we evaluate the need to establish allowances for probable losses on loans. When additional allowances are necessary, a provision for loan losses is charged to earnings. Our methodology for assessing the appropriateness of the allowance for loan losses is reviewed periodically by the board of directors. The board of directors also reviews the allowance for loan losses established on a quarterly basis.

General Valuation Allowance. We establish a general valuation allowance for loans that should be adequate to reserve for the estimated credit losses inherent in each segment of our loan portfolio, given the facts and circumstances as of the valuation date for all loans in the portfolio that have not been classified. Estimated loss percentages are assigned to loans based upon factors that include historical loan losses, delinquency trends, volume and interest rate trends, bank policy changes, and national, regional and local economic conditions. These loss factors will be evaluated at least annually by our Asset Quality Committee, which consists of our President and Chief Executive Officer, our Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, our Executive Vice President and Chief Lending Officer, and other key personnel from our credit, finance, and risk management departments, and documentation of this review is maintained in the Asset Quality Committee minutes. The Asset Quality Committee may also determine that certain events or circumstances have taken place that would impact the loan portfolio for the time period being reviewed, such as a natural disaster. In such cases, methodologies should be based on events that might not yet be recognized in the loan grading or performance of the loan groupings. The Asset Quality Committee reports to the audit committee of our board of directors on a quarterly basis.

Specific Valuation Allowance. The allowance for loan losses takes into consideration that specific losses on loans deemed to be impaired are recognized in accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (the “FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) Topic 310. Pursuant to ASC Topic 310, we deem a loan to be impaired when it is probable that we will not be able to collect all amounts due, including principal and interest, according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement. Generally, all classified loans (loans classified substandard, doubtful, and loss) are considered impaired and are measured for impairment under ASC Topic 310 in order to determine if an impairment reserve is required. In addition, loans that are deemed to be troubled debt restructurings are considered impaired and evaluated for an impairment reserve under ASC Topic 310. Further, any non-accrual loan is considered impaired unless there is strong and credible evidence that the loan will begin performing according to the contractual terms of the loan agreement within a reasonable period of time. Such evidence must be well documented in a credit memorandum for the loan file. Any impaired loan, when evaluated for an impairment reserve under ASC Topic 310 and no requirement for such reserve is determined, will still be deemed impaired and will not be analyzed with respect to a general valuation allowance. Rather, such loan will continue to be included in impaired loans under ASC Topic 310 with a zero reserve.

ASC Topic 310 requires that impaired loans be measured based on the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or, for collateral dependent loans, the fair value of the collateral, net of estimated costs of disposal. Since full collection of principal and interest is not expected for impaired loans, income accrual is normally discontinued on such loans at the time they first become impaired.

 

61


Table of Contents

Unallocated Valuation Allowance. Our allowance for loan losses methodology may also include an unallocated component to reflect the margin of imprecision inherent in the underlying assumptions used in the methodologies for estimating specific and general losses in the loan portfolio.

Methodology change – In the fourth quarter, the Bank modified its loan loss methodology for unimpaired commercial construction and land development and its unimpaired commercial mortgage loans. This change resulted in further segmentation of these classes of loans and the related historical charge-off rates. The purpose was to allocate the substantial historical charge-offs rates, created by two segments of these loan classes, against the significantly diminished credit exposure to the Bank within these same classes. Specifically, additional sub segments of loans on large tracts of unimproved land or land development loans in excess of $1 million and purchased participations from a failed bank in out of market commercial mortgage loans were created. This change in methodology resulted in a nonrecurring reduction of approximately $1.6 million in the Bank’s reserves on loans not considered impaired.

The following table sets forth the allowance for loan losses by loan class at the dates indicated.

 

     At December 31,  
     2012     2011  
(dollars in thousands)        Amount          % of
    Allowance    
to Total
Allowance
    % of
    Loans in    
Class to
Total Loans
        Amount          % of
    Allowance    
to Total
Allowance
    % of
    Loans in    
Class to
Total Loans
 

Commercial:

              

Commercial mortgage

   $ 4,110         48.28     35.76   $ 4,496         42.31     32.30

Commercial construction and land development

     160         1.88     1.34     1,399         13.16     5.17

Commercial and industrial

     590         6.93     2.86     730         6.87     4.05
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total commercial

     4,860         57.09     39.96     6,625         62.34     41.52
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-commercial:

              

Residential mortgage

     1,841         21.63     42.14     2,125         20.00     40.59

Residential construction and land development

     243         2.85     0.96     189         1.78     0.90

Revolving mortgage

     1,123         13.19     12.42     1,092         10.27     11.78

Consumer

     446         5.24     4.52     596         5.61     5.21
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total non-commercial

     3,653         42.91     60.04     4,002         37.66     58.48
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total allowance for loan losses

   $ 8,513         100.00     100.00   $ 10,627         100.00     100.00
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

62


Table of Contents
     At December 31,  
     2010     2009  
(dollars in thousands)        Amount          % of
Allowance

to Total
    Allowance    
    % of
    Loans in    
Class to
Total Loans
        Amount          % of
    Allowance    

to Total
Allowance
    % of
    Loans in    
Class to
Total Loans
 

Commercial:

              

Commercial mortgage

   $ 5,486         43.28     32.88   $ 3,432         38.16     32.98

Commercial construction and land development

     1,232         9.72     5.69     494         5.49     5.04

Commercial and industrial

     782         6.17     3.53     381         4.24     3.81
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total commercial

     7,500         59.17     42.10     4,307         47.89     41.83
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-commercial:

              

Residential mortgage

     2,207         17.41     36.06     1,489         16.56     31.93

Residential construction and land development

     749         5.91     1.73     242         2.69     2.53

Revolving mortgage

     1,021         8.05     10.68     688         7.65     9.20

Consumer

     1,041         8.21     9.43     2,069         23.00     14.51
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total non-commercial

     5,018         39.58     57.90     4,488         49.90     58.17
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

     12,518         98.75     100.00     8,795         97.79     100.00

Unallocated

     158         1.25     0.00     199         2.21     0.00
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total allowance for loan losses

   $ 12,676         100.00     100.00   $ 8,994         100.00     100.00
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

     At December 31,  
     2008  
(dollars in thousands)    Amount      % of
Allowance
to Total
Allowance
    % of
Loans in
Class to
Total
Loans
 

Commercial:

       

Commercial mortgage

   $ 1,921         30.00     23.97

Commercial construction and land development

     370         5.78     4.91

Commercial and industrial

     376         5.87     4.63
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total commercial

     2,667         41.65     33.51
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-commercial:

       

Residential mortgage

     869         13.57     34.06

Residential construction and land development

     247         3.86     3.98

Revolving mortgage

     431         6.73     9.10

Consumer

     1,721         26.88     19.35
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total non-commercial

     3,268         51.04     66.49
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

     5,935         92.69     100.00

Unallocated

     468         7.31     0.00
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total allowance for loan losses

   $ 6,403         100.00     100.00
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

63


Table of Contents

Although we believe that we use the best information available to establish the allowance for loan losses, future adjustments to the allowance for loan losses may be necessary and our results of operations could be adversely affected if circumstances differ substantially from the assumptions used in making the determinations. Furthermore, while we believe we have established our allowance for loan losses in conformity with generally accepted accounting principles, there can be no assurance that the FDIC and the NCCoB, in reviewing our loan portfolio, will not require us to increase our allowance for loan losses. The FDIC and the NCCoB may require us to increase our allowance for loan losses based on judgments different from ours. In addition, because future events affecting borrowers and collateral value cannot be predicted with certainty, there can be no assurance that the existing allowance for loan losses is adequate or that increases will not be necessary should the quality of any loans deteriorate as a result of the factors discussed above. Any material increase in the allowance for loan losses may adversely affect our financial condition and results of operation.

Analysis of Loan Loss Experience. The following table sets forth an analysis of the allowance for loan losses for the periods indicated.

 

     At or For the Years Ended December 31,  
(dollars in thousands)    2012      2011      2010      2009      2008  

Balance at beginning of period

   $ 10,627       $ 12,676       $ 8,994       $ 6,403       $ 5,074   

Provision for loan losses

     1,700         3,785         22,419         4,655         3,049   

Charge offs:

              

Commercial:

              

Commercial mortgage

     593         1,121         6,074         —           —     

Commercial construction and land development

     2,651         1,959         7,926         —           488   

Commercial and industrial

     203         953         692         214         —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total commercial charge-offs

     3,447         4,033         14,692         214         488   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Non-commercial:

              

Residential mortgage

     224         604         1,767         82         —     

Residential construction and land development

     24         551         351         94         —     

Revolving mortgage

     56         504         919         199         —     

Consumer

     244         442         1,135         1,605         1,405   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total non-commercial charge-offs

     548         2,101         4,172         1,980         1,405   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total charge-offs

     3,995         6,134         18,864         2,194         1,893   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Recoveries:

              

Commercial:

              

Commercial mortgage

     2         7         —           —           —     

Commercial construction and land development

     8         1         —           —           31   

Commercial and industrial

     11         86         12         9         —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total commercial recoveries

     21         94         12         9         31   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Non-commercial:

              

Residential mortgage

     66         37         —           —           —     

Revolving mortgage

     6         69         —           1         —     

Consumer

     88         100         115         120         142   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total non-commercial recoveries

     160         206         115         121         142   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total recoveries

     181         300         127         130         173   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net charge-offs

     3,814         5,834         18,737         2,064         1,720   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Balance at end of period

   $ 8,513       $ 10,627       $ 12,676       $ 8,994       $ 6,403   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

64


Table of Contents
     At or For the Years Ended December 31,  
(dollars in thousands)    2012     2011     2010     2009     2008  

Allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans

     739.62     51.53     94.43     54.23     180.32

Allowance for loan losses to total loans outstanding at the end of the period

     2.20     2.45     2.54     1.51     1.09

Net charge-offs to average loans outstanding during the period

     0.93     1.27     3.40     0.34     0.31

The increase in the ratio of the allowance for loan losses to nonperforming loans for the year ended December 31, 2012 was primarily because the Bank completed foreclosure during the fourth quarter of 2012 on the collateral securing its largest nonperforming commercial construction and land development loan relationship, which following an additional write-down of approximately $630,000 was recorded as a foreclosed property in the amount of $9.8 million.

Liquidity Management. Liquidity is the ability to meet current and future financial obligations of a short-term nature. Our primary sources of funds consist of deposit inflows, loan repayments, maturities and sales of investment securities and borrowings from the Federal Home Loan Bank of Atlanta. While maturities and scheduled amortization of loans and securities are predictable sources of funds, deposit flows and mortgage prepayments are greatly influenced by general interest rates, economic conditions and competition.

We regularly adjust our investments in liquid assets based upon our assessment of (i) expected loan demand, (ii) expected deposit flows, (iii) yields available on securities and interest-earning deposits we place with other banks; and (iv) the objectives of our asset-liability management policy.

Our most liquid assets are cash and cash equivalents and interest-bearing deposits. The level of these assets depends on our operating, financing, lending and investing activities during any given period. At December 31, 2012, cash and cash equivalents totaled $47.4 million, including $37.0 million in interest-bearing deposits in other banks, of which $21.6 million was on deposit with the Federal Reserve Bank. Securities totaling $238.7 million classified as available-for-sale also provided an additional source of liquidity at December 31, 2012. In addition, at December 31, 2012, we had the ability to borrow a total of approximately $56.3 million from the FHLB of Atlanta and approximately $3.1 million from the Federal Reserve Bank’s discount window. At December 31, 2012, we had $50.0 million in Federal Home Loan Bank advances outstanding and $2.0 million in letters of credit to secure public funds deposits.

A significant use of our liquidity is the funding of loan originations. At December 31, 2012, we had $144.7 million in commitments to extend credit outstanding. Certificates of deposit due within one year of December 31, 2012 totaled $98.8 million, or 52.2% of certificates of deposit. We believe the large percentage of certificates of deposit that mature within one year reflects customers’ hesitancy to invest their funds for long periods due to the recent low interest rate environment and local competitive pressure. If these maturing deposits do not remain with us, we will be required to seek other sources of funds, including other certificates of deposit and borrowings. Depending on market conditions, we may be required to pay higher rates on such deposits or other borrowings than we currently pay on the certificates of deposit due within one year of December 31, 2012. Based on past experience, we believe that a significant portion of our certificates of deposit will remain with us. We believe we have the ability to attract and retain deposits by adjusting the interest rates offered.

In addition, we believe that our branch network, which is presently comprised of 13 full-service branch offices located throughout our primary market area, and the general cash flows from our existing lending and investment activities will afford us sufficient long-term liquidity.

 

65


Table of Contents

The following tables present our contractual obligations as of the dates indicated.

 

            Payments due by period  
(in thousands)    Total      Less than
One Year
     One to
Three Years
    

Three to

Five Years

     More than
Five Years
 

At December 31, 2012

              

Long-term debt obligations

   $ 50,000       $  —         $  —         $ 40,000       $ 10,000   

Operating lease obligations

     2,159         362         724         523         550   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 52,159       $ 362       $ 724       $ 40,523       $ 10,550   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

At December 31, 2011

              

Long-term debt obligations

   $ 60,000       $ —         $ —         $ —         $ 60,000   

Operating lease obligations

     2,421         355         710         710         646   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 62,421       $ 355       $ 710       $ 710       $ 60,646   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Capital Management. We are subject to various regulatory capital requirements administered by the FDIC and the NCCoB, including a risk-based capital measure. The risk-based capital guidelines include both a definition of capital and a framework for calculating risk-weighted assets by assigning balance sheet assets and off-balance sheet items to broad risk categories. At December 31, 2012, we exceeded all of our regulatory capital requirements and were considered “well capitalized” under regulatory guidelines.

We strive to manage our capital for maximum shareholder benefit. The capital from our stock offering significantly increased our liquidity and capital resources. Over time, the initial level of liquidity will be reduced as net proceeds from the stock offering are used for general corporate purposes, including the funding of lending activities. Our financial condition and results of operations will be enhanced by the capital from the offering, resulting over time in increased net interest-earning assets and net income. However, the large increase in equity resulting from the capital raised in the offering will, initially, have an adverse impact on our return on equity. To help us better manage our capital, we may consider the use of such tools as common share repurchases and cash dividends as regulations permit. However, under FDIC regulations, we were not allowed to repurchase any shares during the first year following the offering, except to fund the restricted stock awards under the equity benefit plan after its approval by shareholders, unless extraordinary circumstances existed and we had received prior regulatory approval.

The Company had the following actual and required regulatory capital amounts as of the periods indicated:

 

                  Regulatory Requirements  
     Actual     Minimum for Capital
Adequacy Purposes
    Minimum to Be
Well Capitalized
 

(dollars in thousands)

   Amount      Ratio     Amount      Ratio     Amount      Ratio  

ASB Bancorp, Inc.

               

December 31, 2012

               

Tier I leverage capital

   $ 112,508         14.69   $ 30,632         4.00   $ 38,290         5.00

Tier I risk-based capital

     112,508         27.72     16,237         4.00     24,356         6.00

Total risk-based capital

     117,638         28.98     32,475         8.00     40,594         10.00

December 31, 2011

               

Tier I leverage capital

   $ 114,757         14.30   $ 32,098         4.00   $ 40,122         5.00

Tier I risk-based capital

     114,757         27.52     16,678         4.00     25,017         6.00

Total risk-based capital

     120,050         28.79     33,356         8.00     41,694         10.00

 

66


Table of Contents

The Bank had the following actual and required regulatory capital amounts as of the periods indicated:

 

                  Regulatory Requirements  
     Actual     Minimum for Capital
Adequacy Purposes
    Minimum to Be
Well Capitalized
 
(dollars in thousands)    Amount      Ratio     Amount      Ratio     Amount      Ratio  

Asheville Savings Bank, S.S.B.

  

         

December 31, 2012

               

Tier I leverage capital

   $ 90,388         12.06   $ 29,983         4.00   $ 37,479         5.00

Tier I risk-based capital

     90,388         22.35     16,174         4.00     24,262         6.00

Total risk-based capital

     95,498         23.62     32,349         8.00     40,436         10.00

NC Savings Bank capital

     98,914         13.48     36,680         5.00     n/a         n/a   

December 31, 2011

               

Tier I leverage capital

     88,897         11.09     32,063         4.00     40,079         5.00

Tier I risk-based capital

     88,897         21.35     16,658         4.00     24,988         6.00

Total risk-based capital

     94,193         22.62     33,317         8.00     41,646         10.00

NC Savings Bank capital

     99,538         12.67     39,292         5.00     n/a         n/a   

A reconciliation of equity under generally accepted accounting principles and regulatory capital amounts follows:

 

     ASB Bancorp
December 31,
    Asheville Savings Bank
December 31,
 
(in thousands)    2012     2011     2012     2011  

Total GAAP equity

   $ 111,529      $ 115,571      $ 89,372      $ 89,721   

Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax

     3,067        1,329        3,104        1,319   

Disallowed deferred tax assets

     (2,088     (2,143     (2,088     (2,143
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Tier I capital

     112,508        114,757        90,388        88,897   

Unrealized gains on available for sale equity securities

     13        14        13        14   

Allowable portion of allowance for loan losses

     5,117        5,279        5,097        5,282   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total risk-based capital

   $ 117,638      $ 120,050        95,498        94,193   
  

 

 

   

 

 

     

Disallowed portion of allowance for loan losses

     n/a        n/a        3,416        5,345   
      

 

 

   

 

 

 

NC Savings Bank capital

     n/a        n/a      $ 98,914      $ 99,538   
      

 

 

   

 

 

 

There were no dividends declared by the Bank to the Company in the year ended December 31, 2012.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements. In the normal course of operations, we engage in a variety of financial transactions that, in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, are not recorded in our financial statements. These transactions involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit, interest rate and liquidity risk. Such transactions are used primarily to manage customers’ requests for funding and take the form of loan commitments, unused lines of credit and letters of credit.

For the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011, we did not engage in any off-balance sheet transactions reasonably likely to have a material effect on our financial condition, results of operations or cash flows.

 

67


Table of Contents
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosure About Market Risk

Interest Rate Risk Management . We manage the interest rate sensitivity of our interest-bearing liabilities and interest- earning assets in an effort to minimize the adverse effects of changes in the interest rate environment. Deposit accounts typically react more quickly to changes in market interest rates than mortgage loans because of the shorter maturities of deposits. As a result, sharp increases in interest rates may adversely affect our earnings while decreases in interest rates may beneficially affect our earnings. To reduce the potential volatility of our earnings, we have sought to improve the match between asset and liability maturities and rates, while maintaining an acceptable interest rate spread. Our strategy for managing interest rate risk emphasizes: adjusting the maturities of borrowings; adjusting the investment portfolio mix and duration and generally selling in the secondary market substantially all newly originated fixed rate one-to-four-family residential real estate loans. We currently do not participate in hedging programs, interest rate swaps or other activities involving the use of derivative financial instruments.

We have an Asset-Liability Management Committee, which includes our Chairman of the Board, who is an independent director, and members of management, to communicate, coordinate and control all aspects involving asset-liability management. The committee meets quarterly to establish and monitor the volume, maturities, pricing and mix of assets and funding sources with the objective of managing assets and funding sources to provide results that are consistent with liquidity, growth, risk limits and profitability goals.

Our goal is to manage asset and liability positions to moderate the effects of interest rate fluctuations on net interest and net income.

Interest Rate Risk Analysis . Our profitability depends to a large extent on our net interest income, which is the difference between interest income from loans and investments and interest expense on deposits and borrowings. Like most financial institutions, our interest income and interest expense are significantly affected by changes in market interest rates and other economic factors beyond our control. Our interest-earning assets consist primarily of long-term, fixed-rate mortgage loans, adjustable rate mortgage loans and investments that typically adjust more slowly to changes in interest rates than our interest-bearing liabilities, which are primarily term deposits. Accordingly, our earnings are usually adversely affected during periods of rising interest rates and positively impacted during periods of declining interest rates. The recent periods of sustained historically low interest rates have also reduced our net interest margins as we could not lower our cost of interest-bearing liabilities commensurate with the reductions in the yields on our interest-earning assets.

We implement an interest rate risk simulation model to determine our possible adverse exposure to net interest income and economic value of equity due to changes in interest rates, repricing risk, yield curve risk and basis risk. Our internal simulation model evaluates our projected future net interest income and economic value of equity under various interest rate scenarios and applies certain contractual and behavioral assumptions to calculate results in an increasing rate scenario, in a decreasing rate scenario and in a constant rate scenario. The major assumptions applied to our internal simulation model include, but are not limited to, the present value discounting method, calculated and reported rate shock and rate ramp scenarios, key rates, curves and spreads, internal rate restrictions (such as rate floors and caps and teaser rates), prepay and decay tables and interest rate exposure limits.

 

68


Table of Contents

Based on the results of internal simulation model, which management believes accurately reflects the extraordinary stress currently existing in the financial markets with respect to potential margin compression resulting from our difficulty in reducing our costs of funds further in the current competitive pricing environment, our earnings may be adversely affected if interest rates were to further decline. Such a decline could result from, among other things, the Federal Reserve Board’s purchase of government securities and/or mortgage-backed securities in an effort to further stimulate the national economy. Although the current rate environment remains stable, we continue to carefully monitor, through our Asset/Liability Committee management process, the competitive landscape related to interest rates as well as various economic indicators in order to best position ourselves with respect to changing interest rates.

The following table reflects the estimated effects of changes in interest rates on the present value of our equity and on our projected net interest income over the next twelve months.

Rate Sensitivity Summary

 

                        Over the Next Twelve Months  
     As of December 31, 2012     Ending December 31, 2013  
     Present Value of Equity     Projected Net Interest Income  
     Market                  Net Interest               
(dollars in thousands)    Value      $ change     % change     Income      $ change     % change  

Change in Rates (in basis points “bp”):

              

300 bp

   $ 103,076       $ (18,778     -15.41   $ 17,896       $ (228     -1.26

200

     108,380         (13,474     -11.06     17,763         (361     -1.99

100

     115,287         (6,567     -5.39     17,938         (186     -1.03

0

     121,854         —          0.00     18,124         —          0.00

(100)

     122,083         229        0.19     16,486         (1,638     -9.04

 

69


Table of Contents
Item 8. Financial Statements and Supplementary Data

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders

ASB Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of ASB Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary (the “Company”) as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the related consolidated statements of income (loss), comprehensive income (loss), changes in stockholders’ equity and cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2012. These consolidated financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these consolidated financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. An audit includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements. An audit also includes assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of ASB Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary as of December 31, 2012 and 2011, and the results of their operations and their cash flows for each of the years in the three-year period ended December 31, 2012, in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.

We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission, and our report dated March 15, 2013 expressed an unqualified opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

/s/ DIXON HUGHES GOODMAN LLP

March 15, 2013

Asheville, North Carolina

 

70


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS

 

 

     December 31,  
(dollars in thousands)    2012     2011  

Assets

    

Cash and due from banks

   $ 10,361      $ 10,480   

Interest-earning deposits with banks

     37,029        61,847   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total cash and cash equivalents

     47,390        72,327   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Securities available for sale (amortized cost of $235,605 at December 31, 2012 and $239,364 at December 31, 2011)

     238,736        243,863   

Securities held to maturity (estimated fair value of $5,182 at December 31, 2012 and $5,753 at December 31, 2011)

     4,649        5,218   

Investment in Federal Home Loan Bank stock, at cost

     3,429        3,870   

Loans held for sale

     9,759        6,590   

Loans receivable (net of deferred loan fees of $410 at December 31, 2012 and $384 at December 31, 2011)

     387,721        432,883   

Allowance for loan losses

     (8,513     (10,627
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Loans receivable, net

     379,208        422,256   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Premises and equipment, net

     13,306        14,053   

Foreclosed real estate (net of loss reserves of $3,114 at December 31, 2012 and $1,712 at December 31, 2011)

     19,411        8,125   

Deferred income tax assets, net

     5,450        4,605   

Securities sold but not settled

     21,260        —     

Other assets

     6,756        9,961   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total assets

   $ 749,354      $ 790,868   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

    

Liabilities

    

Noninterest-bearing deposits

   $ 65,295      $ 54,102   

Interest-bearing deposits

     513,004        554,134   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total deposits

     578,299        608,236   

Overnight and short-term borrowings

     411        758   

Federal Home Loan Bank advances

     50,000        60,000   

Accounts payable and other liabilities

     9,115        6,303   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities

     637,825        675,297   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)

    

Stockholders’ Equity

    

Preferred stock, $0.01 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; none issued

     —          —     

Common stock, $0.01 par value; 60,000,000 shares authorized; 5,584,551 shares issued at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011

     56        56   

Additional paid-in capital

     53,994        53,869   

Retained earnings

     68,570        67,708   

Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax

     (3,067     (1,329

Unearned Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP) shares

     (4,080     (4,394

Unearned equity incentive plan shares

     (3,601     —     

Stock-based deferral plan shares

     (343     (339
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total stockholders’ equity

     111,529        115,571   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

   $ 749,354      $ 790,868   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

71


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF INCOME (LOSS)

 

 

     Year Ended December 31,  
(in thousands, except per share data)    2012      2011      2010  

Interest and dividend income

        

Loans, including fees

   $ 19,553       $ 23,538       $ 28,666   

Securities

     5,157         5,188         4,219   

Other earning assets

     282         125         74   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total interest and dividend income

     24,992         28,851         32,959   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Interest expense

        

Deposits

     4,103         6,222         9,024   

Overnight and short-term borrowings

     2         3         3   

Federal Home Loan Bank advances

     2,387         2,417         2,417   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total interest expense

     6,492         8,642         11,444   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net interest income

     18,500         20,209         21,515   

Provision for loan losses

     1,700         3,785         22,419   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net interest income (loss) after provision for loan losses

     16,800         16,424         (904
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Noninterest income

        

Mortgage banking income

     1,697         1,097         1,419   

Deposit and other service charge income

     2,866         3,338         3,688   

Income from debit card services

     1,383         1,231         1,176   

Gain on sale of investment securities

     3,190         1,398         798   

Other noninterest income

     320         358         387   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total noninterest income

     9,456         7,422         7,468   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Noninterest expenses

        

Salaries and employee benefits

     11,495         10,165         9,652   

Occupancy expense, net

     2,181         2,226         2,295   

Foreclosed property expenses

     1,530         1,750         1,945   

Data processing fees

     2,475         2,443         2,308   

Federal deposit insurance premiums

     653         757         1,037   

Advertising

     651         673         805   

Professional and outside services

     997         959         778   

Penalty to prepay FHLB borrowing

     1,722         —           —     

Other noninterest expenses

     3,388         3,098         3,276   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total noninterest expenses

     25,092         22,071         22,096   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Income (loss) before income tax provision

     1,164         1,775         (15,532

Income tax provision (benefit)

     302         588         (6,074
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

   $ 862       $ 1,187       $ (9,458
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net income per common share – Basic

   $ 0.17       $ 0.23         n/a   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net income per common share – Diluted

   $ 0.17       $ 0.23         n/a   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

72


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)

 

 

     Year Ended December 31,  
(in thousands)    2012     2011     2010  

Comprehensive Income

      

Net income (loss)

   $ 862      $ 1,187      $ (9,458
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Other comprehensive income (loss):

      

Unrealized holding gains (losses) on securities available for sale:

      

Reclassification of securities gains recognized in net income

     (3,190     (1,398     (798

Deferred income tax benefit

     1,276        559        319   

Gains (losses) arising during the period

     1,822        6,645        (342

Deferred income tax benefit (expense)

     (729     (2,658     138   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Unrealized holding gains (losses) adjustment, net of tax

     (821     3,148        (683
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Defined Benefit Pension Plans:

      

Net periodic pension cost

     (666     (562     (455

Net pension loss

     (826     (800     (564

Deferred income tax benefit

     575        525        392   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Defined benefit pension plan adjustment, net of tax

     (917     (837     (627
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total other comprehensive income (loss)

     (1,738     2,311        (1,310
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Comprehensive income (loss)

   $ (876   $ 3,498      $ (10,768
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

73


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF CHANGES IN STOCKHOLDERS’ EQUITY

 

 

     Year Ended December 31,  
(in thousands)    2012     2011     2010  

Common stock

      

Beginning of year

   $ 56      $ —        $ —     

Issuance of common stock

     —          56        —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

End of year

   $ 56      $ 56      $ —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Additional paid-in capital

      

Beginning of year

   $ 53,869      $ —        $ —     

Issuance of common stock

     —          55,790        —     

Common stock issuance cost

     —          (1,933     —     

ESOP shares allocated

     125        12        —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

End of year

   $ 53,994      $ 53,869      $ —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Retained earnings

      

Beginning of year

   $ 67,708      $ 66,521      $ 75,979   

Net income (loss)

     862        1,187        (9,458
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

End of year

   $ 68,570      $ 67,708      $ 66,521   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax

      

Beginning of year

   $ (1,329   $ (3,640   $ (2,330

Other comprehensive income (loss)

     (1,738     2,311        (1,310
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

End of year

   $ (3,067   $ (1,329   $ (3,640
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Unearned ESOP shares

      

Beginning of year

   $ (4,394   $ —        $ —     

ESOP shares purchased

     —          (4,468     —     

ESOP shares allocated

     314        74        —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

End of year

   $ (4,080   $ (4,394   $ —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Unearned equity incentive plan shares

      

Beginning of year

   $ —        $ —        $ —     

Equity incentive plan shares purchased

     (3,601     —          —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

End of year

   $ (3,601   $ —        $ —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Stock-based deferral plan shares

      

Beginning of year

   $ (339   $ —        $ —     

Stock-based deferral plan shares purchased

     (4     (339     —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

End of year

   $ (343   $ (339   $ —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total stockholders’ equity

      

Beginning of year

   $ 115,571      $ 62,881      $ 73,649   

Issuance of common stock

     —          55,846        —     

Common stock issuance cost

     —          (1,933     —     

Net income (loss)

     862        1,187        (9,458

Other comprehensive income (loss)

     (1,738     2,311        (1,310

ESOP shares purchased

     —          (4,468     —     

ESOP shares allocated

     439        86        —     

Equity incentive plan shares purchased

     (3,601     —          —     

Stock-based deferral plan shares purchased

     (4     (339     —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

End of year

   $ 111,529      $ 115,571      $ 62,881   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

74


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS

 

 

     Year Ended December 31,  
(in thousands)    2012     2011     2010  

Operating Activities

      

Net income (loss)

   $ 862      $ 1,187      $ (9,458

Adjustments to reconcile net income (loss) to net cash provided by operating activities:

      

Provision for loan losses

     1,700        3,785        22,419   

Provision for losses on foreclosed properties

     1,308        1,574        1,780   

Depreciation

     1,192        1,225        1,231   

Gain on sale of fixed and other assets

     (8     —          —     

Net loss on sale of foreclosed real estate

     176        410        69   

Deferred income tax expense (benefit)

     277        462        (3,546

Net amortization of premiums on securities

     3,489        2,045        833   

Gain on sale of securities

     (3,190     (1,398     (798

Net accretion of deferred fees on loans

     (96     (147     (134

Mortgage loans originated for sale

     (92,429     (65,959     (100,181

Proceeds from sale of mortgage loans

     90,955        68,850        97,103   

Gain on sale of mortgage loans

     (1,695     (1,095     (1,418

ESOP compensation expense

     439        86        —     

Decrease (increase) in income tax receivable

     2,528        722        (3,962

Decrease (increase) in interest receivable

     (225     (20     124   

Decrease in interest payable

     (26     (17     (59

Net change in other assets and liabilities

     2,248        496        2,952   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash provided by operating activities

     7,505        12,206        6,955   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Investing Activities

      

Securities available for sale:

      

Purchases

     (245,443     (178,775     (178,988

Proceeds from sales

     160,301        46,444        18,908   

Proceeds from maturities and/or calls

     23,994        38,240        51,104   

Principal repayments on mortgage-backed and asset-backed securities

     43,917        31,003        23,423   

Redemption of FHLB stock

     441        100        23   

Net decrease in loans receivable

     26,875        57,900        66,548   

Purchase of credit impaired loan

     (2,895     —          —     

Foreclosed real estate:

      

Capital expenses

     (22     (41     (72

Net proceeds from sales

     4,716        4,115        3,719   

Purchases of premises and equipment

     (530     (434     (1,095

Net proceeds from sales of fixed and other assets

     93        —          —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities

     11,447        (1,448     (16,430
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

75


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (Continued)

 

 

     Year Ended December 31,  
(in thousands)    2012     2011     2010  

Financing Activities

      

Net increase (decrease) in deposits

   $ (29,937   $ (11,521   $ 11,219   

Net repayments of Federal Home Loan Bank advances

     (10,000     —          —     

Net repayments of repurchase agreements

     (347     (250     (686

Proceeds from the issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs

     —          53,913        —     

Stock-based deferral plan shares purchased

     (4     (339     —     

Common stock purchased by ESOP

     —          (4,468     —     

Equity incentive plan shares purchased

     (3,601     —          —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

     (43,889     37,335        10,533   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

     (24,937     48,093        1,058   

Cash and Cash Equivalents:

      

Beginning of period

     72,327        24,234        23,176   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

End of period

   $ 47,390      $ 72,327      $ 24,234   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES:

      

Cash paid (received) for:

      

Interest on deposits, advances and other borrowings

   $ 6,518      $ 8,659      $ 11,503   

Income taxes

     (2,226     (134     1,434   

Non-cash investing and financing transactions:

      

Transfers from loans to foreclosed real estate

     17,464        3,533        12,585   

Loans to finance the purchase of foreclosed properties

     —          —          138   

Change in unrealized gain on securities available for sale

     (1,368     5,247        (1,140

Change in deferred income taxes resulting from other comprehensive income

     1,122        (1,574     849   

Change in deferred benefit pension plans

     (1,492     (1,362     (1,019

Securities not settled

     21,260        —          —     

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.

 

76


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

Organization – ASB Bancorp, Inc. (the “Parent”) was incorporated on May 12, 2011 by Asheville Savings Bank, S.S.B. (the “Bank”) to be the Bank’s holding company upon completion of the Bank’s conversion from the mutual to stock form of organization. The conversion was completed on October 11, 2011 and the Parent contributed $28.0 million in capital to the Bank on that date from the conversion proceeds.

The Bank is headquartered in Asheville, North Carolina and provides mortgage, consumer and commercial banking services primarily in Buncombe, Henderson, McDowell, Transylvania, and Madison counties in North Carolina. The Bank is regulated by the Office of the North Carolina Commissioner of Banks (“NCCoB”) and the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”). The Company is regulated by the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve System (the “FRB”) and the NCCoB.

Principles of Consolidation – The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Parent and its wholly owned subsidiary, the Bank (collectively, the “Company”). The Bank has two wholly owned subsidiaries, Appalachian Financial Services, Inc., which has on occasion managed the Bank’s real estate acquired through debt default but is currently inactive, and Wenoca, Inc., which serves as the Bank’s trustee regarding deeds of trust. Both subsidiaries are organized as North Carolina corporations. For purposes of the consolidated financial statements, all significant intercompany accounts and transactions have been eliminated. The accounting and reporting policies of the Company conform to accounting principals generally accepted in the United States of America (“GAAP”).

Use of Estimates – The preparation of financial statements in conformity with GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period. Actual results could differ from those estimates.

Cash and Cash Equivalents – Cash equivalents include demand and time deposits (with original maturities of 90 days or less) at other financial institutions and federal funds sold.

Investment Securities – The Company classifies investment securities into three categories. Debt securities that the Company has the positive intent and ability to hold to maturity are classified as “held to maturity securities” and reported at amortized cost. Debt and equity securities that are bought and held principally for the purpose of selling in the near term are classified as “trading securities” and reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses included in earnings. Debt securities not classified as either held to maturity securities or trading securities and equity securities not classified as trading securities are classified as “available for sale securities” and reported at fair value, with unrealized gains and losses excluded from earnings and reported as a separate component of equity. The Company classified no securities as trading securities as of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

Realized gains and losses on sales of investment securities are recognized at the time of sale (“trade date”) based upon the specific identification method.

Interest income includes amortization of purchase premiums and discounts. Realized gains and losses are derived from the amortized cost of the security sold. Declines in the fair value of held to maturity and available for sale debt securities below their cost that are deemed to be other than temporary because of credit risk impairment are reflected in earnings as realized losses. In estimating other-than-temporary impairment losses, management considers, among other issues, (i) the length of time and the extent to which the fair value has been less than cost, (ii) the financial condition and near-term prospects of the issuer, (iii) the intent of the Company to retain its investment in the issuer for a period of time sufficient to allow for any anticipated recovery in fair value, and (iv) whether it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the investment prior to a recovery.

 

77


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

 

Investments Held at Cost – The Bank, as a member of the Federal Home Loan Bank system (the “FHLB”), is required to maintain an investment in capital stock of the FHLB in an amount equal to the greater of 1% of its outstanding home loans or 5% of advances from the FHLB. This investment is carried at cost. Due to the redemption provisions of the FHLB, the Bank estimated that fair value equals cost and that this investment was not impaired at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

Loans – Loans that management has the intent and ability to hold for the foreseeable future are reported at their outstanding principal balances net of any unearned income, charge-offs, unamortized fees and costs on originated loans. The net amount of nonrefundable loan origination fees and certain direct costs associated with the lending processes are deferred and amortized to interest income over the contractual lives of the loans.

Loan Segments and Classes

The Bank’s portfolio segments and classes within those segments are subject to risks that could have an adverse impact on the credit quality of the loan portfolio. Management identified the risks described below as significant risks that are generally similar among the loan segments and classes.

Commercial loan segment

The Bank’s commercial loans are centrally underwritten based primarily on the customer’s ability to generate the required cash flow to service the debt in accordance with the contractual terms and conditions of the loan agreement. The Bank’s commercial lenders and underwriters work to understand the borrower’s businesses and management experiences. The majority of the Bank’s commercial loans are secured by collateral, so collateral values are important to the transaction. In commercial loan transactions where the principals or other parties provide personal guarantees, the Bank’s commercial lenders and underwriters analyze the relative financial strength and liquidity of each guarantor. Risks that are common to the Bank’s commercial loan classes include general economic conditions, demand for the borrowers’ products and services, the personal circumstances of the principals, and reductions in collateral values.

In addition to these common risks for the Bank’s commercial loans, the various commercial loan classes also have certain risks specific to them.

Commercial construction and land development loans are highly dependent on the supply and demand for commercial real estate in the Bank’s markets as well as the demand for the newly constructed residential homes and lots being developed by the Bank’s commercial loan customers. Prolonged deterioration in demand could result in significant decreases in the underlying collateral values and make repayment of the outstanding loans more difficult for the Bank’s commercial borrowers.

Commercial mortgage and commercial and industrial loans are primarily dependent on the ability of the Bank’s commercial loan customers to achieve business results consistent with those projected at loan origination resulting in cash flow sufficient to service the debt. To the extent that a borrower’s actual business results significantly underperform the original projections, the ability of that borrower to service the Bank’s loan on a basis consistent with the contractual terms may be at risk. While these loans and leases are generally secured by real property, personal property, or business assets such as inventory or accounts receivable, it is possible that the liquidation of the collateral will not fully satisfy the obligation.

 

78


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

 

Other commercial real estate loans consist primarily of loans secured by multifamily housing. The primary risk associated with multifamily loans is the ability of the income producing property that collateralizes the loan to produce adequate cash flow to service the debt. High unemployment or generally weak economic conditions may result in the borrower having to provide rental rate concessions to achieve adequate occupancy rates.

Non-commercial loan segment

The Bank underwrites its non-commercial loans using automated credit scoring and analysis tools. These credit scoring tools take into account factors such as payment history, credit utilization, length of credit history, types of credit currently in use, and recent credit inquiries. To the extent that the loan is secured by collateral, the value of the collateral is also evaluated. Common risks to each class of non-commercial loans include general economic conditions within the Bank’s markets, such as unemployment and potential declines in collateral values, and the personal circumstances of the borrowers.

In addition to these common risks for the Bank’s non-commercial loans, various non-commercial loan classes may also have certain risks specific to them.

Residential mortgage and non-commercial construction and land development loans are to individuals and are typically secured by 1-4 family residential property, undeveloped land, and partially developed land in anticipation of pending construction of a personal residence. Significant and rapid declines in real estate values can result in residential mortgage loan borrowers having debt levels in excess of the current market value of the collateral. Recent declines in value have led to unprecedented levels of foreclosures and losses within the banking industry. Non-commercial construction and land development loans can experience delays in completion and cost overruns that exceed the borrower’s financial ability to complete the project. Such cost overruns can result in foreclosure of partially completed and unmarketable collateral.

Revolving mortgage loans are often secured by second liens on residential real estate, thereby making such loans particularly susceptible to declining collateral values. A substantial decline in collateral value could render the Bank’s second lien position to be effectively unsecured. Additional risks include lien perfection inaccuracies and disputes with first lien holders that may further weaken collateral positions. Further, the open-end structure of these loans creates the risk that customers may draw on the lines in excess of the collateral value if there have been significant declines since origination.

Consumer loans include loans secured by personal property such as automobiles, marketable securities, other titled recreational vehicles including boats and motorcycles, as well as unsecured consumer debt. The value of underlying collateral within this class is especially volatile due to potential rapid depreciation in values since date of loan origination in excess of principal repayment.

Credit Quality Indicators

Loans are monitored for credit quality on a recurring basis and the composition of the loans outstanding by credit quality indicator is provided below.

Loan credit quality indicators are developed through review of individual borrowers on an ongoing basis, although certain non-commercial loans, including residential mortgage, revolving mortgage and consumer loans, are evaluated upon origination and are reevaluated upon a change in delinquency status. Most commercial loans are evaluated at least annually with more frequent evaluation of more severely criticized loans or leases. The indicators represent the rating for loans as of the date presented based on the most recent assessment performed. These credit quality indicators are defined as follows:

 

79


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

 

Pass – A pass rated asset is not adversely classified because it does not display any of the characteristics for adverse classification.

Special mention – A special mention asset has potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, such potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects or collateral position at some future date. Special mention assets are not adversely classified and do not warrant adverse classification.

Substandard – A substandard asset is inadequately protected by the current net worth and paying capacity of the obligor or of the collateral pledged, if any. Assets classified as substandard generally have a well-defined weakness, or weaknesses, that jeopardize the liquidation of the debt. These assets are characterized by the distinct possibility of loss if the deficiencies are not corrected.

Doubtful – An asset classified doubtful has all the weaknesses inherent in an asset classified substandard with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full highly questionable and improbable, on the basis of currently existing facts, conditions, and values.

Loss – Assets classified loss are considered uncollectible and of such little value that their continuing to be carried as an asset is not warranted. This classification is not necessarily equivalent to no potential for recovery or salvage value, but rather that it is not appropriate to defer a full write-off even though partial recovery may be effected in the future.

Loans Held for Sale – Loans held for sale are residential mortgages carried at the lower of cost or market value. The market values of loans held for sale are based on what mortgage buyers are currently offering the Bank on a “best efforts” basis to buy the loans.

Allowance for Loan Losses – The allowance for loan losses is management’s estimate of probable credit losses that are inherent in the Bank’s loan portfolios at the balance sheet date. The allowance increases when the Bank provides for loan losses through charges to operating earnings and when the Bank recovers amounts from loans previously written down or charged off. The allowance decreases when the Bank writes down or charges off loans amounts that are deemed uncollectible.

Management determines the allowance for loan losses based on periodic evaluations that are inherently subjective and require substantial judgment because the evaluations require the use of material estimates that are susceptible to significant change. The Bank generally uses two allowance methodologies that are primarily based on management’s determination as to whether or not a loan is considered to be impaired.

Commercial loans, as well as non-commercial loans that are classified as substandard and secured by real estate, are evaluated for impairment on a loan-by-loan basis and are considered impaired when it is probable, based on current information, that the borrower will be unable to pay contractual interest or principal as required by the loan agreement. Loans that experience insignificant payment delays and payment shortfalls are not necessarily considered impaired. Management determines the significance of payment delays and payment shortfalls on a case-by-case basis, taking into consideration all of the circumstances surrounding the loan and the borrower, including the length of the delay, the reasons for the delay, the borrower’s prior payment history, and the amount of the shortfall relative to the principal and interest owed. Loans that are deemed to be troubled debt restructurings are also included as impaired loans. Impaired loans are measured at their estimated fair value based on either the value of the loan’s expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate or on the collateral value, net of the estimated costs of disposal, if the loan is collateral dependent. For loans considered impaired, an individual allowance for loan losses is recorded when the loan principal balance exceeds the estimated fair value.

 

80


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

 

For loans not considered impaired, management determines the allowance for loan losses based on estimated loss percentages that are determined by and applied to the various classes of loans that comprise the segments of the Bank’s loan portfolio. The estimated loss percentages by loan class are based on a number of factors that include by class (i) average historical losses over the past three years, (ii) levels and trends in delinquencies, impairments, and net charge-offs, (iii) trends in the volume and direction of loan balances within that class, terms, and concentrations, (iv) trends in interest rates, (v) effects of changes in the Bank’s risk tolerance, underwriting standards, lending policies, procedures, and practices, and (vi) national and local business and economic conditions.

Methodology change – In the fourth quarter, the Bank modified its loan loss methodology for unimpaired commercial construction and land development and its unimpaired commercial mortgage loans. This change resulted in further segmentation of these classes of loans and the related historical charge-off rates. The purpose was to allocate the substantial historical charge-offs rates, created by two segments of these loan classes, against the significantly diminished credit exposure to the Bank within these same classes. Specifically, additional sub segments of loans on large tracts of unimproved land or land development loans in excess of $1 million and purchased participations from a failed bank in out of market commercial mortgage loans were created. This change in methodology resulted in a nonrecurring reduction of approximately $1.6 million in the Bank’s reserves on loans not considered impaired.

Future material adjustments to the allowance for loan losses may be necessary due to changing economic conditions or declining collateral values. In addition, regulatory agencies, as an integral part of their examination process, periodically review the Bank’s allowance for loan losses and may require the Bank to make adjustments to the allowance for loan losses based upon judgments that differ significantly from those of management.

Nonperforming Assets – Nonperforming assets can include loans that are past due 90 days or more and continue to accrue interest, loans on which interest is not being accrued, and foreclosed real estate.

Loans Past Due 90 Days or More, Nonaccruing, Impaired, or Restructured – The Bank’s policies related to when loans are placed on nonaccruing status conform to guidelines prescribed by bank regulatory authorities. Generally, the Bank suspends the accrual of interest on loans (i) that are maintained on a cash basis because of the deterioration of the financial condition of the borrower, (ii) for which payment in full of principal or interest is not expected, or (iii) on which principal or interest has been in default for a period of 90 days or more, unless the loan is both well secured and in the process of collection. While a loan is on nonaccruing status, the Bank recognizes interest income only to the extent cash payments are received in excess of collection of the principal portion of the payment on the loan. Loans are returned to accruing status when all principal and interest amounts contractually due are brought current and concern no longer exists as to the future collectability of principal and interest, which is generally confirmed when the loan demonstrates performance for six consecutive months or payment cycles.

 

81


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

 

A troubled debt restructuring (“TDR”) occurs when a borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and the Bank grants a concession to provide the borrower relief from one or more of the contractual loan conditions. Concessions that the Bank might consider include the allowance of interest-only payments on a temporary basis, the reduction of interest rates, the extension of the loan term, the forgiveness of principal, or a combination of these. The Bank rarely reduces interest rates below market rates or forgives principal as concessions. The Bank might require additional collateral or additional guarantors as conditions to modifying loans as TDRs.

The Bank might consider modifying both accruing or nonaccruing loans as TDRs. When a modification includes a reduction of principal that resulted from a partial charge off of the loan, the Bank typically accounts for the TDR as a nonaccruing loan.

The Bank classifies TDR’s as impaired loans and evaluates the need for an allowance for loan loss on a loan-by-loan basis consistent with its evaluation of impaired loans that have not been modified as TDRs. An allowance is based on either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s observable market price or the estimated fair value of the underlying collateral less any selling costs, if the loan is deemed to be collateral dependent.

The Bank’s policy for recognition of interest income on loans considered to be impaired, including restructured loans, is the same as its interest income recognition policy for loans not considered to be impaired.

Loan Charge-offs – The Bank charges off loan balances, in whole or in part, when available, verifiable, and documentable information confirms that specific loans, or portions of specific loans, are uncollectible or unrecoverable. For unsecured loans, losses are confirmed when it can be determined that the borrower, or any guarantor, is unwilling or unable to pay the amounts as agreed. When the borrower, or any guarantors, are unwilling or unable to pay the amounts as agreed on a loan secured by collateral and any recovery is dependent upon the sale of the collateral, the loan is deemed to be collateral dependent. Repayments or recoveries for collateral dependent loans are directly affected by the value of the collateral at liquidation. As such, loan repayment can be affected by factors that influence the amount recoverable, the timing of the recovery, or a combination of the two. Such factors include economic conditions that affect the markets in which the loan or its collateral is sold, bankruptcy, repossession and foreclosure laws, and consumer banking regulations. Losses are also confirmed when the loan, or a portion of the loan, is classified as loss resulting from loan reviews conducted by the Bank.

Charge-offs of loans in the commercial loan segment are recognized when the uncollectibility of the loan balance and the inability to recover sufficient value from the sale of any collateral securing the loan is confirmed. The uncollectibility of the loan balance is evidenced by the inability of the commercial borrower to generate cash flows sufficient to repay the loan as agreed causing the loan to become delinquent. For collateral dependent commercial loans, the Bank determines the fair value of the collateral based on appraisals, current market conditions, and estimated costs to sell the collateral. For collateral dependent commercial loans where the loan balance, including any accrued interest, net deferred fees or costs, and unamortized premiums or discounts, exceeds the fair value of the collateral securing the loan, the deficiency is identified as unrecoverable, is deemed to be a confirmed loss, and is charged off.

 

82


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

 

Charge-offs of loans in the non-commercial loan segment are generally confirmed and recognized in a manner similar to loans in the commercial loan segment. Secured non-commercial loans that are identified as uncollectible and are deemed to be collateral dependent are confirmed as loss to the extent the fair value of the collateral is insufficient to recover the loan balance. Closed-end consumer loans that become 120 cumulative days past due and open-end consumer loans that become 180 cumulative days past due are charged off to the extent that the fair value of any collateral, less estimated costs to sell the collateral, is insufficient to recover the loan balance. Closed-end and open-end loans secured by residential real estate that become 180 days past due are charged off to the extent that the fair value of the residential real estate securing the loan, less estimated costs to sell the collateral, is insufficient to recover the loan balance. Loans determined to be fraudulent are charged off within 90 days of discovery. Loans to borrowers in bankruptcy are subject to modification by the bankruptcy court and are charged off to the extent that the fair value of any collateral securing the loan, less estimated costs to sell the collateral, is insufficient to recover the loan balance, unless the Bank expects repayment is likely to occur. Such loans are charged off within 60 days of the receipt of notification from a bankruptcy court or when the loans become 120 days past due, whichever is shorter.

Foreclosed Real Estate – Nonperforming assets also include foreclosed real estate, which consists of real estate and other assets acquired as a result of customers’ loan defaults. Foreclosed real estate is stated at the lower of the related loan balance or the fair value of the property net of the estimated costs of disposal with a charge to the allowance for loan losses upon foreclosure. Any write-downs subsequent to foreclosure are charged against operating earnings. To the extent recoverable, costs relating to the development and improvement of property are capitalized, whereas those costs relating to holding the property are charged to expense.

Premises and Equipment – Premises and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation. Major additions and improvements are capitalized, and repairs which do not improve or extend the life of the respective assets are expensed in the period incurred. Gains and losses on dispositions are reflected in current operations.

Depreciation of premises and equipment is provided over the estimated useful lives of the related assets on the straight-line method for financial statement purposes and on a combination of straight-line and accelerated methods for income tax purposes. Estimated lives are 10 to 40 years for buildings, building components and improvements, 5 to 10 years for furniture, fixtures and equipment and 3 years for computers.

Long-lived assets are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying amount of an asset may not be recoverable. In performing the review for recoverability, the Bank estimates the future cash flows expected to result from the use of the asset and its eventual disposition, and recognizes an impairment loss if the expected future cash flows are less than the carrying amount of the asset.

Deferred Loan Fees – The Bank defers loan origination fees, net of certain direct loan origination costs. Such costs and fees for loans held for investment are recognized as an adjustment to yield over the lives of the related loans utilizing a method of amortization that approximates the level-yield method. When a loan is prepaid or sold, the related unamortized net origination fee is included in income. Net deferred fees for loans held for sale are deferred until the loan is sold and included as part of the gain or loss on the sale.

Commitment fees to originate or purchase loans are deferred and, if the commitment is exercised, recognized over the life of the loan as an adjustment of yield. If the commitment expires unexercised, commitment fees are recognized in income upon expiration of the commitment.

 

83


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

 

Comprehensive Income – Comprehensive income is defined as the change in equity of an enterprise during a period from transactions and other events and circumstances from non-owner sources and, accordingly, includes both net income and amounts referred to as other comprehensive income. The items of other comprehensive income are included in the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income (Loss). The accumulated balance of other comprehensive income is included in the equity section of the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company’s components of accumulated other comprehensive income include unrealized gains and/or losses on investment securities classified as available for sale and certain changes in the Company’s benefit obligations under its retirement plans. The Company adjusts the level of accumulated comprehensive income related to its retirement plans on an annual basis, consistent with the receipt of its annual actuarial studies.

The components of the Company’s accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of income taxes, are as follows:

 

     December 31,  
(in thousands)    2012     2011  

Unrealized gain on securities

   $ 1,879      $ 2,700   

Benefit plan liability

     (4,946     (4,029
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss, net of tax

   $ (3,067   $ (1,329
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income Taxes – The establishment of provisions for federal and state income taxes is a complex area of accounting, which involves the use of significant judgments and estimates in applying relevant tax statutes. The Company is subject to audit by federal and state tax authorities, the results of which may produce tax liabilities that differ from the Company’s tax estimates and provisions. The Company continually evaluates its exposure to possible tax assessments arising from audits and it records its estimate of possible exposure based on current facts and circumstances. The Parent and the Bank have entered into a formal agreement that will allow them, if so elected, to file consolidated federal and state income tax returns, where permitted, and each to pay its respective share of income taxes due.

Deferred tax assets and liabilities are recognized for the tax effects of differing carrying values of assets and liabilities for tax and financial statement purposes that will reverse in future periods. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are reflected at currently enacted income tax rates applicable to the period in which the deferred tax assets or liabilities are expected to be realized or settled. As changes in tax laws or rates are enacted, deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted through the provision for income taxes. When uncertainty exists concerning the recoverability of a deferred tax asset, the carrying value of the asset may be reduced by a valuation allowance. The amount of any valuation allowance established is based upon an estimate of the deferred tax asset that is more likely than not to be recovered. Increases or decreases in the valuation allowance result in increases or decreases to the provision for income taxes.

 

84


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

 

A significant portion of the recorded deferred tax assets relate to a loan loss allowance on which the realization of income tax benefits is dependent on the Bank’s ability to generate future taxable income. Because of this dependency, the Bank’s management considered the need for a valuation allowance, but determined there was sufficient positive evidence to support their conclusion not to record a valuation allowance. The positive evidence that led the Bank’s management to conclude that the income tax benefits of the Bank’s deferred tax assets would be realized included (1) the Bank has a sustained history of generating taxable income and realizing the income tax benefits of its deferred tax assets and income tax credits, (2) the Bank’s management believes that, based on certain credit quality indicators, the credit quality issues that resulted in the 2010 net loss and caused the net operating loss carry forward and deferred tax asset related to the loan loss allowance have significantly improved, (3) the Bank generated pretax income in 2012 and 2011, (4) the Bank’s management is aware of one or more strategies that, if implemented, could generate future taxable income, and (5) the net operating loss carry forward does not expire in the near term and the Bank has not experienced expiring loss carry forwards in its past. The Bank’s loss carry forward periods under applicable federal and North Carolina income tax laws are 20 years and 15 years, respectively, with remaining loss carry forward periods of 18 years and 13 years, respectively.

The Bank includes interest and penalties related to income tax liabilities in noninterest expense. The Bank’s tax filings for the years ended December 31, 2008 through 2011 are currently open to audit under statutes of limitations by the Internal Revenue Service and the North Carolina Department of Revenue.

Pension Plan – The Bank has two noncontributory, defined benefit pension plans. The Bank recognizes the overfunded or underfunded status of the plans as an asset or liability in its consolidated statement of financial position and recognizes changes in the funded status in the year in which the change occurs through comprehensive income. The funded status of a benefit plan is measured as the difference between plan assets at fair value and the benefit obligation. For a pension plan, the benefit obligation is the projected benefit obligation. GAAP also requires an employer to measure the funded status of a plan as of the date of its year-end statement of financial position. GAAP also requires additional disclosure in the notes to financial statements about certain effects on net periodic benefit cost for the next fiscal year that arise from delayed recognition of the gains or losses, prior service costs or credits, and transition asset or obligation.

Employee Stock Ownership Plan (“ESOP”) – In connection with the mutual-to-stock conversion discussed in note 2 below, the Bank established an ESOP for the benefit of all of its eligible employees. Full-time employees of the Bank who have been credited with at least 1,000 hours of service during a 12-month period and who have attained age 21 are eligible to participate in the ESOP. Shares allocated under the ESOP vest at the rate of 20% per year of service beginning with the completion of two years of service and fully vesting with the completion of six years of service. The Bank anticipates it will make contributions to the ESOP in amounts necessary to amortize the ESOP loan payable to the Company over a period of 15 years.

Unallocated ESOP shares are not considered outstanding (including for the calculation of net income per common share as discussed below) and are shown as a reduction of stockholders’ equity. Dividends on unallocated ESOP shares, if paid, will be considered to be compensation expense. The Company will recognize compensation cost equal to the fair value of the ESOP shares during the periods in which they become committed to be released. The fair value of the annual share allocations are recorded on a monthly basis with fair value determined by calculating the average closing stock price for each day during the month. To the extent that the fair value of the Company’s ESOP shares differs from the cost of such shares, the differential will be recognized in stockholders’ equity. The Company will recognize a tax deduction equal to the cost of the shares released. Because the ESOP is internally leveraged through a loan from the Company to the ESOP, the loan receivable by the Company from the ESOP is not reported as an asset nor is the debt of the ESOP shown as a liability in the consolidated financial statements.

 

85


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

 

Equity Incentive Plan – The Company plans to issue restricted stock and stock options under the 2012 Equity Incentive Plan to key officers and outside directors. In accordance with the requirements of ASC 718, Compensation – Stock Compensation, the Company plans to follow a fair value based method of accounting for employee stock compensation plans, whereby compensation cost is measured based on the fair value of the award as of the grant date and recognized over the vesting period.

Net Income Per Common Share – Where presented, basic net income per common share is the Company’s net income available to common stockholders, which represents net income less dividends paid or payable to preferred stock shareholders, if any, divided by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding during the period. In calculating the weighted average number of common shares outstanding, shares held by the ESOP are not considered to be outstanding until they are committed to be released for allocation.

For diluted income per common share, net income available to common shareholders is divided by the weighted average number of common shares issued and outstanding for each period plus amounts representing the dilutive effect of stock options and restricted stock, as well as any adjustment to income that would result from the assumed issuance. The effects of restricted stock and stock options are excluded from the computation of diluted income per common share in periods in which the effect would be antidilutive. Potential common shares that might be issued by the Company relate solely to outstanding stock options and restricted stock and are determined using the treasury stock method. At December 31, 2012, the Company had no stock options or restricted stock that would cause a dilutive effect on net income per common share.

For the year ended December 31, 2011, weighted average shares outstanding used in the calculation of basic and diluted net income per share were the weighted average of shares outstanding, which include ESOP shares held by the trustee, from October 12, 2011, the date on which the Company’s common stock began trading on the Nasdaq Global Market, to December 31, 2011.

Net income per common share has been computed based on the following:

 

     Year Ended December 31,  
(dollars in thousands, except per share data)    2012      2011  

Numerator:

     

Net income (loss)

   $ 862       $ 1,187   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Denominator:

     

Weighted average common shares issued

     5,584,551         5,584,551   

Less: Weighted average unallocated ESOP shares

     423,721         443,089   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares used to compute net income per common share – basic

     5,160,830         5,141,462   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Weighted average common shares used to compute net income per common share – diluted

     5,160,830         5,141,462   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net income per common share – Basic

   $ 0.17       $ 0.23   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net income per common share – Diluted

   $ 0.17       $ 0.23   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Reclassifications – Certain amounts in the prior years’ financial statements have been reclassified to conform to the December 31, 2012 presentation. The reclassifications had no effect on net income or stockholders’ equity as previously reported.

 

86


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

1. SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

 

Recent Accounting Pronouncements

Accounting Standards Update ASU 2011-11 – In December, 2011, the FASB issued ASU 2011-11, Disclosures about Offsetting Assets and Liabilities , in an effort to improve comparability between U.S. GAAP and IFRS financial statements with regard to the presentation of offsetting assets and liabilities on the statement of financial position arising from financial and derivative instruments, and repurchase agreements. The ASU establishes additional disclosures presenting the gross amounts of recognized assets and liabilities, offsetting amounts, and the net balance reflected in the statement of financial position. Descriptive information regarding the nature and rights of the offset must also be disclosed. The amendments are effective for annual reporting periods beginning on or after January 1, 2013. The adoption of the new guidance is not expected to have an impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Accounting Standards Update ASU 2012-02 – In July, 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-02, Testing Indefinite-Lived Intangible Assets for Impairment, which amends the guidance in ASC 350-30 on testing indefinite-lived intangible assets, other than goodwill, for impairment. The FASB amended the impairment testing requirements by allowing an entity to perform a qualitative impairment assessment before calculating the fair value of the asset. ASU 2012-02 is effective for annual and interim impairment tests performed for fiscal years beginning after September 15, 2012. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of the new guidance is not expected to have an impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Accounting Standards Update ASU 2012-03 – In August, 2012, the FASB issued ASU 2012-03, Technical Amendments and Corrections to SEC Sections, which amends a number of SEC sections in the FASB Accounting Standards Codification as a result of (1) the issuance of SAB 114, (2) the issuance of SEC Final Rule 33-9250, and (3) corrections related to ASU 2010-22. ASU 2012-03 is effective for all entities upon issuance. The adopting of the new guidance did not have a significant impact on the Company’s financial statements.

Accounting Standards Update ASU 2013-02 – In February, 2013, the FASB issued ASU 2013-02, Reporting of Amounts Reclassified Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income, which adds new disclosure requirements for items reclassified out of accumulated other comprehensive income (AOCI). The ASU is intended to help entities improve the transparency of changes in other comprehensive income (OCI) and items reclassified out of AOCI in their financial statements. It does not amend any existing requirements for reporting net income or OCI in the financial statements. Both public and nonpublic entities that report items of OCI are affected by the ASU. ASU 2013-02 is effective for public entities for fiscal years, and interim periods within those years, beginning after December 15, 2012. Early adoption is permitted. The amendments in the ASU should be applied prospectively. The adoption of the new guidance is not expected to have an impact on the Company’s financial statements.

 

87


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

2. STOCK CONVERSION AND CHANGE IN CORPORATE FORM

The Company completed its initial public stock offering in connection with the Bank’s conversion from the mutual to the stock form of organization on October 11, 2011. The Company sold a total of 5,584,551 shares of its common stock at an offering price of $10.00 per share. This included 446,764 shares purchased by the ESOP pursuant to a loan from the Company in the amount of $4.5 million. Trading of the Company’s common stock commenced on the Nasdaq Global Market on October 12, 2011 under the symbol “ASBB.” The conversion was accounted for as a change in corporate form and, as a result, the historic basis of the Bank’s assets, liabilities and equity remained unchanged. Including the additional $4.5 million in ESOP share purchases, gross proceeds were $55.8 million. After payment of conversion expenses of approximately $1.9 million, the net proceeds of $53.9 million received in the offering, as reduced for the unearned ESOP shares of $4.5 million, was reflected in the stockholders’ equity accounts of the Company in its December 31, 2011 consolidated balance sheet. On October 11, 2011, the Company contributed $28.0 million in capital to the Bank from the proceeds received in the offering.

On October 11, 2011, liquidation accounts were established by the Company and the Bank for the benefit of eligible account holders and supplemental eligible account holders (collectively, “eligible depositors”) of the Bank as defined in the Bank’s Amended and Restated Plan of Conversion (the “Plan of Conversion”). Each eligible depositor will have a pro rata interest in the liquidation accounts for each of his or her deposit accounts based upon the proportion that the balance of each such account bears to the balance of all deposit accounts of the Bank as of the dates defined in the Plan of Conversion. The liquidation accounts will be maintained for the benefit of eligible depositors who continue to maintain their deposit accounts in the Bank after the conversion. The liquidation accounts will be reduced annually to the extent that eligible depositors have reduced their qualifying deposits. In the unlikely event of a complete liquidation of the Bank or the Company or both, and only in such event, eligible depositors who continue to maintain accounts will be entitled to receive a distribution from the liquidation accounts before any liquidation may be made with respect to common stock. Neither the Company nor the Bank may declare or pay a cash dividend if the effect thereof would cause its equity to be reduced below either the amount required for the liquidation accounts or the regulatory capital requirements imposed by the Company’s or the Bank’s regulators.

 

88


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

3. INVESTMENT SECURITIES

Securities Available for Sale – The maturities, amortized cost, unrealized gains, unrealized losses and fair values of securities available for sale are as follows:

 

Type and Maturity Group    Amortized      Unrealized      Unrealized     Fair  
(in thousands)    Cost      Gains      Losses     Value  

December 31, 2012

          

U.S. Government Sponsored Entity (GSE) and agency securities due –

          

After 1 year but within 5 years

   $ 10,609       $ 232       $ (16   $ 10,825   

After 5 years but within 10 years

     1,416         6         —          1,422   

Asset-backed securities issued by the Small Business Administration (SBA)

     69,088         1,387         (64     70,411   

Residential mortgage-backed securities issued by GSE’s (1)

     105,598         1,386         (297     106,687   

State and local government securities due –

          

After 5 years but within 10 years

     7,613         388         (6     7,995   

After 10 years

     40,570         529         (442     40,657   

Mutual funds

     711         28         —          739   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   $ 235,605       $ 3,956       $ (825   $ 238,736   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

December 31, 2011

          

U.S. GSE and agency securities due –

          

After 1 year but within 5 years

   $ 33,174       $ 895       $ (4   $ 34,065   

After 5 years but within 10 years

     6,131         165         —          6,296   

After 10 years

     2,000         6         —          2,006   

Asset-backed securities issued by the SBA

     30,736         760         (4     31,492   

Residential mortgage-backed securities issued by GSE’s (1)

     155,275         2,207         (104     157,378   

State and local government securities due –

          

After 5 years but within 10 years

     2,831         175         —          3,006   

After 10 years

     8,528         389         (9     8,908   

Mutual funds

     689         23         —          712   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   $ 239,364       $ 4,620       $ (121   $ 243,863   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

(1) Residential mortgage-backed securities were issued by United States government sponsored entities including the Federal National Mortgage Association, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, or Government National Mortgage Association. The Company held no private label residential mortgage-backed securities at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 or during the periods then ended.

 

89


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

3. INVESTMENT SECURITIES (Continued)

 

Securities Held to Maturity – The maturities, amortized cost, unrealized gains, unrealized losses and fair values of securities classified as held to maturity are as follows:

 

Type and Maturity Group    Amortized      Unrealized      Unrealized      Fair  
(in thousands)    Cost      Gains      Losses      Value  

December 31, 2012

           

U.S. GSE and agency securities due –

           

After 5 years but within 10 years

   $ 1,065       $ 144       $ —         $ 1,209   

Residential mortgage-backed securities issued by GSE’s (1)

     1,166         83         —           1,249   

State and local government securities due –

           

After 5 years but within 10 years

     951         141         —           1,092   

After 10 years

     1,467         165         —           1,632   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 4,649       $ 533       $ —         $ 5,182   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

December 31, 2011

           

U.S. GSE and agency securities due –

           

After 5 years but within 10 years

   $ 1,078       $ 140       $ —         $ 1,218   

Residential mortgage-backed securities issued by GSE’s (1)

     1,726         121         —           1,847   

State and local government securities due –

           

After 10 years

     2,414         274         —           2,688   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 5,218       $ 535       $ —         $ 5,753   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1) Residential mortgage-backed securities were issued by United States government sponsored entities including the Federal National Mortgage Association, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, or Government National Mortgage Association. The Company held no private label residential mortgage-backed securities at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 or during the periods then ended.

 

90


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

3. INVESTMENT SECURITIES (Continued)

 

The following tables show investment gross unrealized losses and fair value, aggregated by investment category and length of time that individual securities have been in a continuous unrealized loss position, at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011. The total number of securities with unrealized losses at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 were 54 and 11, respectively. The unrealized losses relate to debt securities that have incurred fair value reductions due to higher market interest rates since the securities were purchased. The unrealized losses are not likely to reverse unless and until market interest rates decline to the levels that existed when the securities were purchased. Management has the ability and intent to hold securities with unrealized losses until a recovery of the market value occurs. Management has determined that it is more likely than not that the Company will not be required to sell any of the securities with unrealized losses prior to a recovery of market value sufficient to negate the unrealized loss. Management has analyzed the creditworthiness of the underlying issuers and determined that the Company will collect all contractual cash flows, therefore all impairment is considered to be temporary.

 

     December 31, 2012  
     Less Than 12 Months     12 Months or More     Total  
(in thousands)    Fair
value
     Unrealized
losses
    Fair
value
     Unrealized
losses
    Fair
value
     Unrealized
losses
 

Securities Available for Sale

               

US GSE and agency

   $ 1,984       $ (16   $ —         $ —        $ 1,984       $ (16

Asset-backed SBA

     13,381         (63     390         (1     13,771         (64

Residential mortgage- backed GSE (1)

     35,995         (297     —           —          35,995         (297

State and local government

     24,018         (448     —           —          24,018         (448
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Temporarily impaired securities available for sale

     75,378         (824     390         (1     75,768         (825
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total temporarily impaired securities

   $ 75,378       $ (824   $ 390       $ (1   $ 75,768       $ (825
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1) Residential mortgage-backed securities were issued by United States government sponsored entities including the Federal National Mortgage Association, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, or Government National Mortgage Association. The Company held no private label residential mortgage-backed securities at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 or during the periods then ended.

 

91


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

3. INVESTMENT SECURITIES (Continued)

 

     December 31, 2011  
     Less Than 12 Months     12 Months or More      Total  
(in thousands)    Fair
value
     Unrealized
losses
    Fair
value
     Unrealized
losses
     Fair
value
     Unrealized
losses
 

Securities Available for Sale

                

US GSE and agency

   $ 3,996       $ (4   $ —         $ —         $ 3,996       $ (4

Asset-backed SBA

     2,254         (4     —           —           2,254         (4

Residential mortgage- backed GSE (1)

     16,378         (104     —           —           16,378         (104

State and local government

     581         (9     —           —           581         (9
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Temporarily impaired securities available for sale

     23,209         (121     —           —           23,209         (121
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total temporarily impaired securities

   $ 23,209       $ (121   $ —         $ —         $ 23,209       $ (121
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1) Residential mortgage-backed securities were issued by United States government sponsored entities including the Federal National Mortgage Association, Federal Home Loan Mortgage Corporation, or Government National Mortgage Association. The Company held no private label residential mortgage-backed securities at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011 or during the periods then ended.

The fair value of investment securities pledged as collateral follow:

 

     December 31,  
(in thousands)    2012      2011  

Pledged to Federal Reserve Discount Window

   $ 3,301       $ 10,835   

Pledged to Federal funds purchased lines of credit

     —           1,218   

Pledged to repurchase agreements for commercial customers

     922         758   

Interest income from taxable and tax-exempt securities recognized in interest and dividend income follow:

 

     Year Ended December 31,  
(in thousands)    2012      2011      2010  

Interest income from taxable securities

   $ 4,532       $ 4,904       $ 4,085   

Interest income from tax-exempt securities

     625         284         134   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total interest income from securities

   $ 5,157       $ 5,188       $ 4,219   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

92


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

3. INVESTMENT SECURITIES (Continued)

 

Gross proceeds and gross realized gains from sales of securities recognized in net income follow:

 

     Year Ended December 31,  
(in thousands)    2012      2011      2010  

Proceeds from sales of securities

   $ 160,301       $ 46,444       $ 18,908   

Realized gains from sales of securities

     3,190         1,398         798   

4. LOANS RECEIVABLE

The composition of loans receivable by segment and class follow:

 

     December 31,  
(in thousands)    2012     2011  

Commercial:

    

Commercial construction and land development

   $ 5,161      $ 22,375   

Commercial mortgage

     138,804        139,947   

Commercial and industrial

     11,093        17,540   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total commercial

     155,058        179,862   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Non-commercial:

    

Non-commercial construction and land development

     3,729        3,907   

Residential mortgage

     163,571        175,866   

Revolving mortgage

     48,221        51,044   

Consumer

     17,552        22,588   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total non-commercial

     233,073        253,405   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total loans receivable

     388,131        433,267   

Less: Deferred loan fees

     (410     (384
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total loans receivable net of deferred loan fees

     387,721        432,883   

Less: Allowance for loan losses

     (8,513     (10,627
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Loans receivable, net

   $ 379,208      $ 422,256   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

93


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

4. LOANS RECEIVABLE (Continued)

 

Loans receivable by segment, class, and grade follow:

 

(in thousands)

   Pass      Special
Mention
     Substandard      Doubtful      Loss*      Total
Loans
 

December 31, 2012

                 

Commercial:

                 

Commercial construction and land development

   $ 4,516       $ 450       $ 195       $ —         $ —         $ 5,161   

Commercial mortgage

     117,046         21,231         527         —           —           138,804   

Commercial and industrial

     10,239         694         160         —           —           11,093   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total commercial

     131,801         22,375         882         —           —           155,058   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Non-commercial:

                 

Non-commercial construction and land development

     3,729         —           —           —           —           3,729   

Residential mortgage

     151,617         9,797         2,153         —           4         163,571   

Revolving mortgage

     45,140         2,294         787         —           —           48,221   

Consumer

     16,722         683         147         —           —           17,552   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total non-commercial

     217,208         12,774         3,087         —           4         233,073   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total loans receivable

   $ 349,009       $ 35,149       $ 3,969       $ —         $ 4       $ 388,131   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

December 31, 2011

                 

Commercial:

                 

Commercial construction and land development

   $ 6,394       $ 1,002       $ 14,410       $ —         $ 569       $ 22,375   

Commercial mortgage

     118,735         19,858         1,354         —           —           139,947   

Commercial and industrial

     12,834         2,058         2,647         1         —           17,540   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total commercial

     137,963         22,918         18,411         1         569         179,862   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Non-commercial:

                 

Non-commercial construction and land development

     3,797         —           109         1         —           3,907   

Residential mortgage

     163,134         8,417         4,315         —           —           175,866   

Revolving mortgage

     48,057         2,003         984         —           —           51,044   

Consumer

     21,189         1,246         153         —           —           22,588   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total non-commercial

     236,177         11,666         5,561         1         —           253,405   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total loans receivable

   $ 374,140       $ 34,584       $ 23,972       $ 2       $ 569       $ 433,267   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

* Items included in the “Loss” column are fully reserved.

 

94


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

4. LOANS RECEIVABLE (Continued)

 

Loans receivable by segment, class, and delinquency status follow:

 

     Past Due                
(in thousands)    31-89 Days      90 Days
or More
     Total      Current      Total
Loans
 

December 31, 2012

              

Commercial:

              

Commercial construction and land development

   $ 16       $ 40       $ 56       $ 5,105       $ 5,161   

Commercial mortgage

     393         —           393         138,411         138,804   

Commercial and industrial

     135         114         249         10,844         11,093   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total commercial

     544         154         698         154,360         155,058   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Non-commercial:

              

Non-commercial construction and land development

     —           —           —           3,729         3,729   

Residential mortgage

     875         808         1,683         161,888         163,571   

Revolving mortgage

     203         60         263         47,958         48,221   

Consumer

     492         28         520         17,032         17,552   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total non-commercial

     1,570         896         2,466         230,607         233,073   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total loans receivable

   $ 2,114       $ 1,050       $ 3,164       $ 384,967       $ 388,131   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

December 31, 2011

              

Commercial:

              

Commercial construction and land development

   $ 363       $ 6,251       $ 6,614       $ 15,761       $ 22,375   

Commercial mortgage

     —           833         833         139,114         139,947   

Commercial and industrial

     2,177         506         2,683         14,857         17,540   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total commercial

     2,540         7,590         10,130         169,732         179,862   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Non-commercial:

              

Non-commercial construction and land development

     —           110         110         3,797         3,907   

Residential mortgage

     1,426         1,922         3,348         172,518         175,866   

Revolving mortgage

     751         407         1,158         49,886         51,044   

Consumer

     939         27         966         21,622         22,588   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total non-commercial

     3,116         2,466         5,582         247,823         253,405   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total loans receivable

   $ 5,656       $ 10,056       $ 15,712       $ 417,555       $ 433,267   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

95


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

4. LOANS RECEIVABLE (Continued)

 

The recorded investment in loans, by segment and class, that are not accruing interest or are 90 days or more past due and still accruing interest follow:

 

     December 31, 2012      December 31, 2011  
(in thousands)    Nonaccruing      Past Due
90 Days
or More
and Still
Accruing
     Nonaccruing      Past Due
90 Days
or More
and Still
Accruing
 

Commercial:

           

Commercial construction and land development

   $ 40       $ —         $ 14,695       $ —     

Commercial mortgage

     —           —           833         —     

Commercial and industrial

     114         —           2,595         —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total commercial

     154         —           18,123         —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Non-commercial:

           

Non-commercial construction and land development

     —           —           110         —     

Residential mortgage

     808         —           1,922         —     

Revolving mortgage

     155         —           440         —     

Consumer

     34         —           27         —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total non-commercial

     997         —           2,499         —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total loans receivable

   $ 1,151       $ —         $ 20,622       $ —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The Bank services loans for Habitat for Humanity of Western North Carolina as an in kind donation. The balances of these loans were $13.3 million and $12.3 million at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively.

 

96


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

5. ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES

An analysis of the allowance for loan losses by segment follows:

 

(in thousands)    Commercial     Non-
Commercial
    Total  

Year Ended December 31, 2012

      

Balance at beginning of period

   $ 6,625      $ 4,002      $ 10,627   

Provision for loan losses

     1,661        39        1,700   

Charge-offs

     (3,447     (548     (3,995

Recoveries

     21        160        181   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at end of period

   $ 4,860      $ 3,653      $ 8,513   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Year Ended December 31, 2011

      

Balance at beginning of period

   $ 7,658      $ 5,018      $ 12,676   

Provision for loan losses

     2,906        879        3,785   

Charge-offs

     (4,033     (2,101     (6,134

Recoveries

     94        206        300   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Balance at end of period

   $ 6,625      $ 4,002      $ 10,627   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

An analysis of the allowance for loan losses follows:

 

(in thousands)       

Year Ended December 31, 2010

  

Balance at beginning of period

   $ 8,994   

Provision for loan losses

     22,419   

Charge-offs

     (18,864

Recoveries

     127   
  

 

 

 

Balance at end of period

   $ 12,676   
  

 

 

 

 

97


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

5. ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES (Continued)

 

The ending balances of loans and the related allowance, by segment and class, follows:

 

     Allowance for Loan Losses      Total Loans Receivable  
(in thousands)    Loans
Individually
Evaluated
for
Impairment
     Loans
Collectively
Evaluated
     Total      Loans
Individually
Evaluated
for
Impairment
     Loans
Collectively
Evaluated
     Total  

December 31, 2012

                 

Commercial:

                 

Commercial construction and land development

   $ 14       $ 146       $ 160       $ 184       $ 4,977       $ 5,161   

Commercial mortgage

     633         3,477         4,110         3,673         135,131         138,804   

Commercial and industrial

     84         506         590         375         10,718         11,093   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total commercial

     731         4,129         4,860         4,232         150,826         155,058   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Non-commercial:

                 

Non-commercial construction and land development

     —           243         243         —           3,729         3,729   

Residential mortgage

     150         1,691         1,841         2,836         160,735         163,571   

Revolving mortgage

     114         1,009         1,123         208         48,013         48,221   

Consumer

     —           446         446         —           17,552         17,552   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total non-commercial

     264         3,389         3,653         3,044         230,029         233,073   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total loans receivable

   $ 995       $ 7,518       $ 8,513       $ 7,276       $ 380,855       $ 388,131   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

December 31, 2011

                 

Commercial:

                 

Commercial construction and land development

   $ 709       $ 690       $ 1,399       $ 17,305       $ 5,070       $ 22,375   

Commercial mortgage

     70         4,426         4,496         1,426         138,521         139,947   

Commercial and industrial

     1         729         730         507         17,033         17,540   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total commercial

     780         5,845         6,625         19,238         160,624         179,862   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Non-commercial:

                 

Non-commercial construction and land development

     1         188         189         116         3,791         3,907   

Residential mortgage

     231         1,894         2,125         4,378         171,488         175,866   

Revolving mortgage

     —           1,092         1,092         300         50,744         51,044   

Consumer

     —           596         596         —           22,588         22,588   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total non-commercial

     232         3,770         4,002         4,794         248,611         253,405   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total loans receivable

   $ 1,012       $ 9,615       $ 10,627       $ 24,032       $ 409,235       $ 433,267   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

98


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

5. ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES (Continued)

 

Impaired loans and the related allowance, by segment and class, follows:

 

            Recorded Investment         
(in thousands)    Unpaid
Principal
Balance
     With a
Recorded
Allowance
     With No
Recorded
Allowance
     Total      Related
Recorded
Allowance
 

December 31, 2012

              

Commercial:

              

Commercial construction and land development

   $ 225       $ 144       $ 40       $ 184       $ 14   

Commercial mortgage

     3,673         3,146         527         3,673         633   

Commercial and industrial

     748         249         126         375         84   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total commercial

     4,646         3,539         693         4,232         731   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Non-commercial:

              

Residential mortgage

     2,978         1,747         1,089         2,836         150   

Revolving mortgage

     211         208         —           208         114   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total non-commercial

     3,189         1,955         1,089         3,044         264   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total impaired loans

   $ 7,835       $ 5,494       $ 1,782       $ 7,276       $ 995   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

December 31, 2011

              

Commercial:

              

Commercial construction and land development

   $ 19,183       $ 12,868       $ 4,437       $ 17,305       $ 709   

Commercial mortgage

     2,124         521         905         1,426         70   

Commercial and industrial

     1,509         147         360         507         1   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total commercial

     22,816         13,536         5,702         19,238         780   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Non-commercial:

              

Non-commercial construction and land development

     195         116         —           116         1   

Residential mortgage

     4,888         2,977         1,401         4,378         231   

Revolving mortgage

     300         —           300         300         —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total non-commercial

     5,383         3,093         1,701         4,794         232   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total impaired loans

   $ 28,199       $ 16,629       $ 7,403       $ 24,032       $ 1,012   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

99


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

5. ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES (Continued)

 

The average recorded investment in impaired loans and interest income recognized on impaired loans follows:

 

     Year Ended December 31,  
     2012      2011      2010  
(in thousands)    Average
Recorded
Investment
     Interest
Income
Recognized
     Average
Recorded
Investment
     Interest
Income
Recognized
     Average
Recorded
Investment
     Interest
Income
Recognized
 

Commercial:

                 

Commercial construction and land development

   $ 12,496       $ 3       $ 16,668       $ 303       $ 17,171       $ 195   

Commercial mortgage

     4,422         118         4,108         78         12,674         322   

Commercial and industrial

     363         1         1,114         11         1,477         67   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total commercial

     17,281         122         21,890         392         31,322         584   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Non-commercial:

                 

Non-commercial construction and land development

     19         —           2,308         63         1,414         32   

Residential mortgage

     3,520         101         5,655         141         7,967         236   

Revolving mortgage

     305         8         154         —           33         16   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total non-commercial

     3,844         109         8,117         204         9,414         284   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total loans receivable

   $ 21,125       $ 231       $ 30,007       $ 596       $ 40,736       $ 868   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

100


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

5. ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES (Continued)

 

The following table summarizes the Bank’s recorded investment in TDRs before and after their modifications during the periods indicated. The Bank did not restructure any loans during the three months ended December 31, 2012. The payment terms on two loans were extended during the year ended December 31, 2012, and the Bank reduced the interest rate below market levels on three loans during the year ended December 31, 2012. The Bank extended payment terms on no loans during the three months ended December 31, 2011 and on five loans during the year ended December 31, 2011 and allowed the payments on one loan to be reduced based on the principal remaining after a partial charge-off during the year ended December 31, 2011.

 

     Year Ended December 31, 2012      Year Ended December 31, 2011  
(dollars in thousands)    Number
of
Loans
     Pre-
Modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
     Post-
Modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
     Number
of
Loans
     Pre-
Modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
     Post-
Modification
Outstanding
Recorded
Investment
 

Below market interest rate

                 

Non-commercial:

                 

Residential mortgage

     3       $ 897       $ 893         —         $ —         $ —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total non-commercial

     3         897         893         —           —           —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     3       $ 897       $ 893         —         $ —         $ —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Extended payment terms

                 

Commercial:

                 

Commercial construction and land development

     1       $ 234       $ —           —         $ —         $ —     

Commercial mortgage

     1         3,196         3,146         —           —           —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total commercial

     2         3,430         3,146         —           —           —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Non-commercial:

                 

Non-commercial construction and land development

     —           —           —           1         1,750         —     

Residential mortgage

     —           —           —           4         622         620   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total non-commercial

     —           —           —           5         2,372         620   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     2       $ 3,430       $ 3,146         5       $ 2,372       $ 620   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Forgiveness of principal

                 

Commercial:

                 

Commercial and industrial

     —         $ —         $ —           1       $ 503       $ 139   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total commercial

     —           —           —           1         503         139   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     —         $ —         $ —           1       $ 503       $ 139   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     5       $ 4,327       $ 4,039         6       $ 2,875       $ 759   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

The following table presents loans that were modified as TDRs within the years ended December 31, 2012 and 2011 that stopped performing in accordance with their modified terms during the periods indicated. During the year ended December 31, 2012, one loan modified as a TDR stopped performing and its collateral was moved into foreclosed properties. No loans stopped performing during the fourth quarter of 2012. During the year ended December 31, 2011, one loan modified as a TDR stopped performing and its collateral was moved into foreclosed properties. No loans stopped performing during the fourth quarter of 2011.

 

101


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

5. ALLOWANCE FOR LOAN LOSSES (Continued)

 

     Year Ended
December 31, 2012
     Year Ended
December 31, 2011
 
(dollars in thousands)    Number
of
Loans
     Recorded
Investment
     Number
of
Loans
     Recorded
Investment
 

Extended payment terms

           

Commercial:

           

Commercial construction and land development

     1       $ —           —         $ —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total commercial

     1         —           —           —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     1       $ —           —         $ —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Forgiveness of principal

           

Commercial:

           

Commercial and industrial

     —         $ —           1       $ 139   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total commercial

     —           —           1         139   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

     —         $ —           1       $ 139   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

In the determination of the allowance for loan losses, management considers TDRs on commercial loans, and the subsequent nonperformance in accordance with their modified terms, by measuring impairment on a loan-by-loan basis based on either the present value of expected future cash flows discounted at the loan’s effective interest rate, the loan’s obtainable market price, or the fair value of the collateral if the loan is collateral dependent.

The Bank’s loans that were considered to be troubled debt restructurings follow:

 

     December 31,  
(in thousands)    2012      2011  

Nonperforming restructured loans

   $ 114       $ 13,097   

Performing restructured loans

     5,065         1,142   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 5,179       $ 14,239   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

6. PREMISES AND EQUIPMENT

A summary of Bank premises and equipment, and related depreciation expense, follows:

 

     December 31,  
(in thousands)    2012     2011  

Land

   $ 3,395      $ 3,407   

Office buildings and improvements

     15,409        15,732   

Furniture, fixtures, equipment and auto

     7,684        8,386   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

     26,488        27,525   

Less – accumulated depreciation

     (13,182     (13,472
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Premises and equipment, net

   $ 13,306      $ 14,053   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

     Year Ended December 31,  
(in thousands)    2012      2011      2010  

Depreciation expense

   $ 1,192       $ 1,225       $ 1,231   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

102


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

7. DEPOSIT ACCOUNTS

The Bank’s deposit accounts are summarized as follows:

 

     December 31,  
(in thousands)    2012      2011  

Noninterest-bearing demand accounts

   $ 65,295       $ 54,102   

NOW accounts

     141,276         132,812   

Money market accounts

     152,838         137,901   

Savings accounts

     29,686         24,880   

Certificate accounts

     189,204         258,541   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total deposits

   $ 578,299       $ 608,236   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

The scheduled maturities of certificate of deposit accounts follow:

 

     December 31,  
(in thousands)    2012      2011  

2012

   $ —         $ 187,225   

2013

     98,815         46,616   

2014

     48,059         18,446   

2015

     33,016         3,194   

2016

     4,657         3,036   

2017

     4,657         24   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 189,204       $ 258,541   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Additional certificate of deposit information (amounts included in the preceding tables)

                                      

Aggregate certificate of deposit accounts of $100,000 or more

   $ 58,338       $ 89,098                                    
  

 

 

    

 

 

                                  

Brokered certificate of deposit accounts

   $ 16,376       $ 15,359                                    
  

 

 

    

 

 

                                  

Deposit interest expense follows for the periods indicated:

 

     Year Ended December 31,  
(in thousands)    2012      2011      2010  

NOW accounts

   $ 526       $ 934       $ 1,780   

Savings accounts

     45         72         70   

Money market accounts

     473         721         1,046   

Certificate accounts

     3,059         4,495         6,128   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total deposits

   $ 4,103       $ 6,222       $ 9,024   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

103


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

8. OVERNIGHT AND SHORT-TERM BORROWINGS

Overnight and short-term borrowings follow:

 

     December 31,  
(in thousands)    2012      2011  

Securities sold under agreements to repurchase

   $ 411       $ 758   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total overnight and short-term borrowings

   $ 411       $ 758   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total available credit under federal funds borrowing agreements

   $ 49,636       $ 55,335   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

The Bank has a federal funds borrowing agreement with the Federal Reserve Bank whereby any borrowings under the agreement are secured by qualifying assets pledged by the Bank.

9. ADVANCES FROM THE FEDERAL HOME LOAN BANK

The Bank has established a line of credit borrowing arrangement with the FHLB of Atlanta. Available credit under this commitment was $56.3 million at December 31, 2012 and $50.9 million at December 31, 2011. As security for advances, the Bank, under a blanket-floating lien, is required to maintain qualifying mortgages with unpaid principal balances, when discounted at 75% of the unpaid principal balances, equal to at least 100% of its outstanding advances. All stock in the FHLB of Atlanta is also pledged to secure these advances.

Maturities, conversion dates, and interest rates on outstanding FHLB of Atlanta advances follow:

 

(dollars in thousands)                         

Maturity Date

  

Date Convertible by

FHLB to Variable Rate

   Interest
Rate
    December 31,  
        2012      2011  

March 13, 2017

   March 13, 2013 (1)      4.09   $ 10,000       $ 10,000   

March 13, 2017

   March 13, 2013 (1)      4.20     10,000         10,000   

March 20, 2017

   March 20, 2013 (1)      3.99     10,000         10,000   

June 29, 2017

   March 29, 2012 (1)      4.46     —           10,000   

September 11, 2017

   March 12, 2013 (1)      3.45     10,000         10,000   

September 17, 2018

   September 17, 2013 (2)      3.65     10,000         10,000   
       

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total FHLB advances

        $ 50,000       $ 60,000   
       

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

(1) FHLB has the option to convert the advance to a variable rate each quarter until maturity.
(2) FHLB has the option to convert the advance to a variable rate only on the date indicated.

If the FHLB of Atlanta exercises its conversion option, the Bank can accept the new terms or repay the advance without any prepayment penalty. These advance agreements also contain prepayment penalty provisions for early repayments if current advance rates are lower than the interest rates on the advances being repaid.

The Bank had outstanding irrevocable letters of credit totaling $2.0 million and $1.5 million from the FHLB of Atlanta at December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011, respectively, used to secure uninsured deposits placed with the Bank by state and local governments and their political subdivisions, to the extent required by law.

 

104


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

10. INCOME TAXES

Components of the income tax provision follows:

 

     Year Ended December 31,  
(in thousands)    2012      2011     2010  

Current:

       

Federal

   $ 25       $ 126      $ (2,528
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total current expense (benefit)

     25         126        (2,528
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Deferred:

       

Federal

     172         337        (2,424

State

     105         125        (1,122
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total deferred expense (benefit)

     277         462        (3,546
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total income tax provision (benefit)

   $ 302       $ 588      $ (6,074
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Increases (decreases) in deferred tax assets (liabilities) allocated to other comprehensive income related to:

       

Unrealized (gains) losses on securities available for sale

   $ 547       $ (2,099   $ 457   

Qualified and non-qualified pension plan liability adjustments

     575         525        392   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   $ 1,122       $ (1,574   $ 849   
  

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

105


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

10. INCOME TAXES (Continued)

 

The approximate tax effects of each type of temporary difference that gave rise to the Bank’s deferred income tax assets and liabilities follows:

 

     December 31,  
(in thousands)    2012     2011  

Deferred tax assets relating to:

    

Deferred loan fees

   $ 158      $ 148   

Deferred compensation

     418        376   

Non-accrual interest, book versus tax

     9        11   

Accrued vacation

     219        203   

Allowance for loan losses

     3,282        4,097   

Pension liabilities and prepayments

     3,103        2,528   

Net operating/net economic loss carry forward

     1,150        1,212   

Loss reserve on foreclosed real estate

     1,201        806   

Deferred gain on sale of foreclosed real estate

     4        4   

Other

     152        296   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total deferred tax assets

     9,696        9,681   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Deferred tax liabilities relating to:

    

Original issue discount - loan fees

     (531     (556

Property

     (300     (387

Pension liabilities and prepayments

     (1,287     (1,462

FHLB stock

     (761     (761

Unrealized gain on securities available for sale

     (1,253     (1,800

Other

     (114     (110
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total deferred tax liabilities

     (4,246     (5,076
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net recorded deferred tax assets

   $ 5,450      $ 4,605   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

106


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

10. INCOME TAXES (Continued)

 

Income taxes computed by applying the federal statutory income tax rate of 34% to income before income taxes differs from the actual income tax provision because of the following:

 

     Year Ended December 31,  
(in thousands)    2012     2011     2010  

Income tax provision at statutory rate

   $ 396      $ 604      $ (5,281

Increase (decrease) in income taxes resulting from:

      

State taxes, net of federal effect

     69        82        (741

Other, net

     (163     (98     (52
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total

   $ 302      $ 588      $ (6,074
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Retained earnings include approximately $7.2 million representing pre-1988 tax bad debt reserve base year amounts for which no deferred income tax liability has been provided since these reserves are not expected to reverse and may never reverse. Circumstances that would require an accrual of a portion or all of this unrecorded tax liability are a reduction in qualifying loan levels relative to the end of 1987, failure to meet the definition of a bank, dividend payments in excess of accumulated tax earnings and profits, or other distributions, dissolution or liquidation of the Bank’s equity.

11. REGULATORY CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS

Capital Levels – The Company is a bank holding company regulated by the FRB and the NCCoB. The Bank is a state-chartered savings bank regulated by the FDIC and the NCCoB. Federal regulations require the maintenance of a minimum leverage ratio of qualifying total capital to total assets of four percent and a minimum ratio of qualifying total capital to risk-weighted assets of eight percent, of which at least four percent must be in the form of core capital. In addition, North Carolina regulations require North Carolina savings banks to maintain a ratio of qualifying total capital to total adjusted assets of five percent.

Failure to meet minimum capital requirements can initiate certain mandatory – and possibly additional discretionary – actions by regulators that, if undertaken, could have a direct material effect on the Company’s and the Bank’s financial statements. Under capital adequacy guidelines and the regulatory framework for prompt corrective action, the Bank must meet specific capital guidelines that involve quantitative measures of assets, liabilities, and certain off-balance sheet items as calculated under regulatory accounting practices. Capital amounts and classification also are subject to qualitative judgments by the regulators about components, risk weightings and other factors.

As of December 31, 2012, the most recent regulatory reporting period, the Bank was well capitalized under the current regulatory framework. To be categorized as well capitalized, the Bank must maintain minimum total risk-based capital, Tier I leverage ratio, and Tier I risk adjusted capital as set forth in the table below.

 

107


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

11. REGULATORY CAPITAL REQUIREMENTS (Continued)

 

The following tables set forth actual and required regulatory capital amounts as of the periods indicated:

 

           Regulatory Requirements  
     Actual     Minimum for Capital
Adequacy Purposes
    Minimum to Be
Well Capitalized
 
(dollars in thousands)    Amount      Ratio     Amount      Ratio     Amount      Ratio  

ASB Bancorp, Inc.

               

December 31, 2012

               

Tier I leverage capital

   $ 112,508         14.69   $ 30,632         4.00   $ 38,290         5.00

Tier I risk-based capital

     112,508         27.72     16,237         4.00     24,356         6.00

Total risk-based capital

     117,638         28.98     32,475         8.00     40,594         10.00

December 31, 2011

               

Tier I leverage capital

   $ 114,757         14.30   $ 32,098         4.00   $ 40,122         5.00

Tier I risk-based capital

     114,757         27.52     16,678         4.00     25,017         6.00

Total risk-based capital

     120,050         28.79     33,356         8.00     41,694         10.00

Asheville Savings Bank, S.S.B.

               

December 31, 2012

               

Tier I leverage capital

   $ 90,388         12.06   $ 29,983         4.00   $ 37,479         5.00

Tier I risk-based capital

     90,388         22.35     16,174         4.00     24,262         6.00

Total risk-based capital

     95,498         23.62     32,349         8.00     40,436         10.00

NC Savings Bank capital

     98,914         13.48     36,680         5.00     n/a         n/a   

December 31, 2011

               

Tier I leverage capital

   $ 88,897         11.09   $ 32,063         4.00   $ 40,079         5.00

Tier I risk-based capital

     88,897         21.35     16,658         4.00     24,988         6.00

Total risk-based capital

     94,193         22.62     33,317         8.00     41,646         10.00

NC Savings Bank capital

     99,538         12.67     39,292         5.00     n/a         n/a   

A reconciliation of GAAP equity and regulatory capital amounts follows:

 

     ASB Bancorp
December 31,
    Asheville Savings Bank
December 31,
 
(in thousands)    2012     2011     2012     2011  

Total GAAP equity

   $ 111,529      $ 115,571      $ 89,372      $ 89,721   

Accumulated other comprehensive income, net of tax

     3,067        1,329        3,104        1,319   

Disallowed deferred tax assets

     (2,088     (2,143     (2,088     (2,143
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Tier I capital

     112,508        114,757        90,388        88,897   

Unrealized gains on available for sale equity securities

     13        14        13        14   

Allowable portion of allowance for loan losses

     5,117        5,279        5,097        5,282   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Total risk-based capital

   $ 117,638      $ 120,050        95,498        94,193   
  

 

 

   

 

 

     

Disallowed portion of allowance for loan losses

     n/a        n/a        3,416        5,345   
      

 

 

   

 

 

 

NC Savings Bank capital

     n/a        n/a      $ 98,914      $ 99,538   
      

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

108


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

12. BENEFIT PLANS

Defined Benefit Plans – The Bank has a Qualified defined benefit pension plan covering substantially all of its employees. The benefits are based on years of service and the employee’s compensation during employment. The Bank’s funding policy is based on actuarially determined amounts. Prior service costs are amortized using the straight line method. Contributions are intended to provide for not only benefits attributed to service to date but also for those expected to be earned in the future. In addition, the Bank also has a Non-qualified plan covering certain officers whose benefit under the Qualified plan would be reduced as a result of Internal Revenue Code limitations. The Non-qualified plan is an unfunded plan and any benefits payable shall be paid from the general assets of the Bank.

Effective April 1, 2013, the Board of Directors amended the Bank’s Qualified and Non-qualified pension plans (the “Plans”) to curtail or eliminate benefits under the plans for services to be performed in future periods.

Effective January 1, 2010, the Board of Directors amended the Bank’s Qualified and Non-qualified pension plans to reduce the projected benefit obligations under the plans for services to be performed in future periods.

Effective December 31, 2009, benefits under the Bank’s Plans were reduced with respect to existing employees and no new participants were allowed to enter the Plans after the effective date.

The following tables set forth the status of both the Qualified and the Non-qualified Plans using measurement dates of December 31, 2012 and 2011:

 

     Non-qualified     Qualified  
(in thousands)    2012     2011     2012     2011  

Change in Benefit Obligation

        

Projected benefit obligation at beginning of year

   $ 1,196      $ 1,152      $ 18,772      $ 17,042   

Service cost

     3        5        135        169   

Interest cost

     54        58        946        922   

Actuarial loss

     140        49        2,312        1,244   

Benefits paid

     (68     (68     (616     (605
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Projected benefit obligation at end of year

   $  1,325      $  1,196      $ 21,549      $ 18,772   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Change in Plan Assets

        

Fair value of plan assets at beginning of year

   $ —        $ —        $ 17,197      $ 17,279   

Actual return on plan assets

     —          —          1,431        523   

Employer contribution

     68        68        145        —     

Benefits paid

     (68     (68     (616     (605
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Fair value of plan assets at end of year

   $ —        $ —        $ 18,157      $ 17,197   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

109


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

12. BENEFIT PLANS (Continued)

 

     Non-qualified     Qualified  
(in thousands)    2012     2011     2012     2011  

Net Amount Recognized

        

Funded status

   $ (1,576   $ (1,196   $ (3,393   $ (1,575

Unrecognized net actuarial loss

     495        374        8,053        6,760   

Unrecognized prior service credit

     (34     (46     (465     (531
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net amount recognized

   $ (1,115   $ (868   $ 4,195      $ 4,654   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Amounts Recognized in Balance Sheets Pension obligation

   $ (1,576   $ (1,196   $ (3,393   $ (1,575
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Amounts Recognized in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income

        

Net actuarial loss

   $ 495      $ 374      $ 8,053      $ 6,760   

Prior service credit

     (34     (46     (465     (531
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Accumulated other comprehensive loss

   $ 461      $ 328      $ 7,588      $ 6,229   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Expected to be Amortized from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income Over Next Twelve Months

        

Net actuarial loss

   $ 37      $ 24      $ 621      $ 508   

Prior service credit

     (11     (11     (66     (66

Net periodic benefit cost related to defined benefit plans included the following components for the periods indicated:

 

     Year Ended December 31,  
(in thousands)    2012     2011     2010  

Non-Qualified Defined Benefit Plan

      

Components of Net Periodic Benefit Costs

      

Service cost

   $ 3      $ 5      $ 5   

Interest cost

     54        58        61   

Amortization of prior service credit

     (11     (11     (11

Amortization of net loss

     18        22        31   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net periodic benefit cost

   $ 64      $ 74      $ 86   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Qualified Defined Benefit Plan

      

Components of Net Periodic Benefit Costs

      

Service cost

   $ 135      $ 169      $ 156   

Interest cost

     946        922        906   

Expected return on plan assets

     (932     (933     (896

Amortization of prior service credit

     (66     (66     (66

Amortization of net loss

     519        396        269   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net periodic benefit cost

   $ 602      $ 488      $ 369   
  

 

 

   

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

110


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

12. BENEFIT PLANS (Continued)

 

     Non-qualified      Qualified  
(in thousands)    2012      2011      2012      2011  

Additional Information

           

Accumulated benefit obligation

   $ 1,322       $ 1,194       $ 21,470       $ 18,725   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Increase in minimum liability included in other comprehensive income

   $ —         $ —         $ —         $ —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Assumptions used in accounting for the defined benefit plans follow:

 

     Non-qualified     Qualified  
     2012     2011     2012     2011  

Weighted Average Assumptions

        

Used to Determine Benefit

        

Obligations at Year-End

        

Discount rate

     3.98     4.91     4.34     5.11

Rate of compensation increase

     3.50     3.50     3.50     3.50

Weighted Average Assumptions

        

Used to Determine Net Period

        

Benefit Cost for the Year

        

Discount rate

     4.91     5.20     5.11     5.50

Expected long-term return on plan assets

     n/a        n/a        5.50     5.50

Rate of compensation increase

     3.50     6.00     3.50     6.00

 

     Qualified  
     2012     2011  

Asset Allocation

    

Actual Percentage of Plan Assets

    

Equity securities

     0     0

Debt securities

     100     100

Total

     100     100

Target Allocation

    

Equity securities

     20     0

Debt securities

     80     100

Total

     100     100

 

111


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

12. BENEFIT PLANS (Continued)

 

Investment Policy and Strategy – Qualified Plan

The policy, as established by the Pension Committee, is to provide for preservation of capital by investing assets per the target allocations stated above, which from time to time may be amended to include investments in equity securities. The assets will be reallocated quarterly to meet the above target allocations. The investment policy will be reviewed on a quarterly basis, under the advisement of a certified investment advisor, to determine if the policy should be changed.

Determination of Expected Long-Term Rate of Return

The expected long-term rate of return for the plan’s total assets is based on the expected return of each of the above categories, weighted based on the median of the target allocation for each class. Equity securities are expected to return 7% to 9% over a full market cycle of 5-7 years, while cash and fixed income securities are expected to return 1% to 7%. Based on historical experience, the Pension Committee expects that the Plan’s asset managers will provide a premium of approximately 0.40% per annum to their respective market benchmark indices.

Cash Flows

The expected contribution to the Non-qualified Plan for the year ending December 31, 2013 is $70,492. The Bank does not expect to make a Qualified Plan contribution in 2013.

The following benefit payments reflecting expected future service are expected to be paid as follows:

 

(in thousands)    Non-
Qualified
     Qualified  

Fiscal Year Ending December 31,

     

2013

   $ 70       $ 747   

2014

     70         840   

2015

     70         880   

2016

     70         914   

2017

     70         979   

2018 – 2022

     377         5,535   

401(k) Plan – The Bank sponsors an employee savings plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code, and the Plan covers substantially all employees. The Bank’s matching contribution is equal to 100% of the first 3% of each employee’s compensation for the plan year, plus 50% of the employee’s deferral contributions in excess of 3% but not in excess of 5% of the employee’s compensation for the plan year.

Matching contributions to the Bank’s defined contribution plan under Section 401(k) of the Internal Revenue Code were as follows for the periods indicated:

 

     Year Ended December 31,  
(in thousands)    2012      2011      2010  

Contributions to defined contribution plan

   $ 209       $ 190       $ 178   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

112


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

12. BENEFIT PLANS (Continued)

 

Deferred Compensation Plan – The Bank has adopted a non-qualified Directors and Officers Deferral Plan (the “D&O Plan”) under which designated executive officers and directors can defer compensation and board/committee meeting fees into the D&O Plan which contains certain investment elections approved by the Bank’s Compensation Committee and selected by the D&O Plan’s Participants, including the option to invest in the Company’s common stock. All D&O Plan Participants are 100% vested in their account balances at all times. Executive officers must first maximize their participation in the Bank’s qualified 401K Plan and can defer no less than five percent (5%) of compensation. No Participant may defer more than one hundred percent (100%) of fees and compensation. The Bank may, at its discretion, make matching contributions to the D&O Plan but has heretofore not elected to do so. The D&O Plan has been amended to comply with Section 409A of the Internal Revenue Code. The Bank’s assets under the D&O Plan equal its liabilities, which were $1,081,000 at December 31, 2012 and $972,000 at December 31, 2011.

Stock-Based Deferral Plan – The Bank adopted a non-qualified Stock-Based Deferral Plan to facilitate the investment of D&O Plan funds in the Company’s common stock as elected by D&O Plan participants.

Employee Stock Ownership Plan – In conjunction with the initial public offering, the Company established an ESOP to provide eligible employees the opportunity to own Company stock. The Company provided a loan to the ESOP in the amount of $4,468,000, which was used to purchase 446,764 shares of the Company’s common stock at a price of $10.00 per share in the Company’s initial public offering. The loan bears a fixed interest rate of 3.25% and provides for annual payments of interest and principal over the 15 year term of the loan.

At December 31, 2012, the remaining principal balance on the ESOP debt is payable as follows:

 

(in thousands)    Amount  

Principal amounts due on December 31,

  

2013

   $ 262   

2014

     270   

2015

     279   

2016

     288   

2017

     298   

Thereafter

     2,757   
  

 

 

 

Total

   $ 4,154   
  

 

 

 

The Bank is committed to make contributions to the ESOP sufficient to support the debt service of the loan. The loan is secured by the shares purchased, which are held in a suspense account until released for allocation to the participants, as principal and interest payments are made by the ESOP to the Company.

Shares released are allocated to each eligible participant based on the ratio of each participant’s compensation, as defined in the ESOP, to the total compensation of all eligible plan participants. Forfeited shares shall be reallocated among other participants in the Plan. At the discretion of the Bank, cash dividends, when paid on allocated shares, will be distributed to participants’ accounts or used to repay the principal and interest on the ESOP loan used to acquire Company stock on which dividends were paid. Cash dividends on unallocated shares will be used to repay the outstanding debt of the ESOP.

 

113


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

12. BENEFIT PLANS (Continued)

 

Shares held by the ESOP include the following:

 

     December 31,  
(dollars in thousands)    2012      2011  

Allocated ESOP shares

     7,350         7,350   

ESOP shares committed to be released

     31,387         —     

Unallocated ESOP shares

     408,027         439,414   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total ESOP shares

     446,764         446,764   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Fair value of unallocated ESOP shares

   $ 6,251       $ 5,141   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

As ESOP shares are earned by the participants, the Company recognizes compensation expense equal to the fair value of the earned ESOP shares during the periods in which they become committed to be released. Total expense recognized in connection with the ESOP was as follows:

 

     Year Ended December 31,  
(in thousands)    2012      2011      2010  

ESOP expense

   $ 439       $ 86       $ —     
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

13. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES

Loan Commitments – The Bank is party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. These instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recorded in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets. Such financial instruments are recorded when they are funded.

The Bank’s exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the counterparty to the financial instruments for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual amount of those instruments. The Bank uses the same credit policies in making such commitments as it does for instruments that are included in the balance sheet.

Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are expected to expire without being drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. The Bank evaluates each customer’s creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. The amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by the Bank upon extension of credit, is based on management’s credit evaluation. Collateral held varies but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property and equipment, and income-producing commercial real estate.

Standby letters of credit are conditional commitments issued by the Bank to guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Standby letters of credit generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. The credit risk involved in issuing letters of credit is essentially the same as that involved in extending loan facilities to customers. The Bank’s policy for obtaining collateral, and the nature of such collateral, is essentially the same as that involved in making commitments to extend credit.

 

114


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

13. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)

 

The Bank’s commitments to extend or originate credit and under standby letters of credit follow:

 

     December 31,  
(in thousands)    2012      2011  

Financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk:

     

Commitments to extend or originate credit

   $ 144,733       $ 117,446   

Commitments under standby letters of credit

     156         135   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 144,889       $ 117,581   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

The Bank renegotiated the operating lease for the operations center location to include additional space. This lease commenced May 1, 2007 with an original term of ten years. The lease has four five-year renewal options with predetermined rates per square foot rented. The Bank also renegotiated an operating lease for a parking lot for a three-year term, with no renewal options. A new lease for land in Fletcher, North Carolina commenced on February 1, 2007 with an initial term of 20 years. The lease has renewal options of four consecutive renewal periods of five years each. The monthly payments are subject to adjustment every 60 months based on the increase of the Consumer Price Index.

Future minimum lease payments under these leases are as follows:

 

     December 31,  
(in thousands)    2012  

2013

   $ 362   

2014

     362   

2015

     362   

2016

     362   

2017

     161   

Thereafter

     550   
  

 

 

 

Total

   $ 2,159   
  

 

 

 

Total rental expense related to operating leases follows:

 

     Year Ended December 31,  
(in thousands)    2012      2011      2010  

Rental expense

   $ 361       $ 355       $ 364   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Concentrations of Credit Risk – The Bank’s primary market area consists of Buncombe, Henderson, McDowell, Transylvania and Madison counties of North Carolina. The majority of the Bank’s loans are residential mortgage loans and commercial real estate loans. The Bank’s policy generally will allow residential mortgage loans up to 80% of the value of the real estate that is pledged as collateral or up to 95% with private mortgage insurance and commercial real estate loans up to 85% of the value of the real estate that serves as collateral to secure the loan.

 

115


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

13. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (Continued)

 

Interest Rate Risk – The Bank’s profitability depends to a large extent on its net interest income, which is the difference between interest income from loans and investments and interest expense on deposits and borrowings. Like most financial institutions, the Bank’s interest income and interest expense are significantly affected by changes in market interest rates and other economic factors beyond its control. The Bank’s interest-earning assets consist primarily of long-term, fixed-rate mortgage loans, adjustable rate mortgage loans and investments that typically adjust more slowly to changes in interest rates than its interest-bearing liabilities, which are primarily term deposits. Accordingly, the Bank’s earnings are usually adversely affected during periods of rising interest rates and positively impacted during periods of declining interest rates. However, based on the results of the Bank’s interest rate risk simulation model, which management believes accurately reflects the extraordinary stress currently existing in the financial markets with respect to potential margin compression resulting from the Bank’s difficulty in reducing its cost of funds further in this competitive pricing environment, the Bank’s earnings may well be adversely affected if interest rates decline further. Such a decline in rates could result from, among other things, the Federal Reserve Board’s purchase of government securities and/or mortgage-backed securities in an effort to further stimulate the economy. Accordingly, the Bank is currently the beneficiary of a stable rate environment and is carefully monitoring, through its Asset/Liability management process, the competitive landscape related to interest rates as well as various economic indicators in order to optimally position the Bank in terms of changes in interest rates.

Litigation – The Bank is periodically involved in legal actions in the normal course of business. The Bank is not a party to any pending legal proceedings that the Bank’s management believes would have a material adverse effect on the Bank’s financial condition, results of operations, or cash flows.

Investment Commitments – During 2012, the Bank indicated its intent to enter into an agreement to invest $2.0 million as a limited partner in a Small Business Investment Company. The Bank anticipates its first capital investment will be in 2013. This investment will be recognized using the cost method and will be included in “other assets” on the balance sheet.

 

116


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

14. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS

FASB ASC Topic 820: Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“FASB ASC Topic 820”) requires disclosure of the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities, including those financial assets and financial liabilities that are not measured and reported at fair value on a recurring basis or non-recurring basis. The methodologies for estimating the fair value of financial assets and financial liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring or non- recurring basis are discussed below. The estimated fair value amounts shown below have been determined by the Bank using available market information and appropriate valuation methodologies. However, considerable judgment is required to interpret market data to develop the estimates of fair value. Accordingly, the estimates presented herein are not necessarily indicative of the amounts the Bank could realize in a current market exchange. The use of different market assumptions and/or valuation methodologies could have a material effect on the estimated fair value amounts.

Fair value estimates are made at a specific point in time, based on relevant market information and information about the financial instrument. These estimates do not reflect any premium or discount that could result from offering for sale at one time the entire holdings of a particular financial instrument. Because no highly liquid market exists for a significant portion of the Company’s financial instruments, fair value estimates are based on judgments regarding future expected loss experience, current economic conditions, risk characteristics of various financial instruments, and other factors. These estimates are subjective in nature and involve uncertainties and matters of significant judgment and therefore cannot be determined with precision.

The fair value estimates presented below are based on pertinent information available to management as of December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011. Although management is not aware of any factors that would significantly affect the estimated fair value amounts, such amounts have not been comprehensively revalued since the dates presented herein and, therefore, current estimates of fair value may differ significantly from the amounts presented.

The fair value measurement and disclosure guidance contained in FASB ASC Topic 820 defines fair value as the exchange price that would be received for an asset or paid to transfer a liability (an exit price) in the principal or most advantageous market for the asset or liability in an orderly transaction between market participants on the measurement date. The guidance also establishes a fair value hierarchy which requires an entity to maximize the use of observable inputs and minimize the use of unobservable inputs when measuring fair value. The standard describes three levels of inputs that may be used to measure fair value.

Level 1

The fair values of Level 1 assets are determined by quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities. Level 1 assets and liabilities include debt and equity securities that are traded in an active exchange market, as well as certain U.S. Treasury debt securities.

Level 2

Observable inputs other than Level 1 prices, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities; quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other inputs that are observable or can be corroborated by observable market data for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities. Level 2 assets and liabilities include debt securities with quoted prices that are traded less frequently than exchange-traded instruments whose value is determined using a pricing model with inputs that are observable in the market or can be derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data. This category generally includes certain U.S. Government and agency mortgage-backed debt securities, SBA asset-backed securities, securities issued by state and local governments, and corporate debt securities.

 

117


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

14. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)

 

Level 3

Unobservable inputs that are supported by little or no market activity and that are significant to the fair value of the assets or liabilities. Level 3 assets and liabilities include financial instruments whose value is determined using pricing models, discounted cash flow methodologies, or similar techniques, as well as instruments for which the determination of fair value requires significant management judgment or estimation. This category generally includes certain private equity investments, mortgage loans held for sale, loans receivable held for investment, accrued interest receivable and payable, time deposits, repurchase agreements, and FHLB advances.

The methodologies for estimating fair values of financial assets and financial liabilities were determined as discussed below. The estimated fair value approximates carrying value for cash and cash equivalents, accrued interest, Federal Home Loan Bank Stock and demand deposits.

Investment Securities – Investment securities available for sale are recorded at fair value on a recurring basis. Fair value measurement is primarily based upon quoted prices of like or similar securities, if available. If quoted prices are not available, fair values are measured using independent pricing models or other model-based valuation techniques such as the present value of future cash flows, adjusted for the security’s credit rating, prepayment assumptions and other factors such as credit loss assumptions. The fair values of investments in mutual funds are determined by quoted prices and are included as recurring Level 1 assets. The fair values of investments in securities issued by U.S. GSE’s, asset-backed securities issued by the SBA, residential mortgage-backed securities issued by U.S. GSE’s, and securities issued by state and local governments are measured using independent pricing models or other model-based valuation techniques such as the present value of future cash flows, adjusted for the security’s credit rating, prepayment assumptions and other factors such as credit loss assumptions and are included as recurring Level 2 assets.

Loans Held for Sale – Loans held for sale are residential mortgages carried at the lower of cost or market value. The market values of loans held for sale are based on what mortgage buyers are currently offering on a “best efforts” basis to buy the loans. As such, mortgages held for sale are classified as nonrecurring Level 2 assets.

Loans Receivable – For variable rate loans, carrying value is a reasonable estimate of fair value. For fixed rate loans, fair values are estimated based on discounted future cash flows using the current interest rates at which loans with similar terms would be made to borrowers of similar credit quality. Valuation adjustments are made for credit risk, which are represented by the allowance for loan losses, but do not include adjustments for illiquidity or other market risks.

The Bank does not record loans at fair value on a recurring basis. However, from time to time, a loan is considered impaired and an allowance for loan losses is established. Loans for which it is probable that payment of interest and principal will not be made in accordance with the contractual terms of the loan agreement are considered impaired. Once a loan is identified as individually impaired, management measures impairment in accordance with the accounting guidance contained in FASB ASC Topic 310: Receivables (“FASB ASC Topic 310”). The fair value of impaired loans is estimated using one of several methods, including collateral value, market value of similar debt, enterprise value, liquidation value, or discounted cash flows. Those impaired loans not requiring an allowance represent loans for which the fair value of the expected repayments or collateral exceed the recorded investments in such loans. Substantially all of the total impaired loans were evaluated based on the fair value of the collateral. In accordance with the fair value measurement and disclosure guidance contained in FASB ASC Topic 820, impaired loans where an allowance is established based on the fair value of collateral require classification in the fair value hierarchy.

 

118


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

14. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)

 

When the fair value of the collateral is based on an observable market price or a current appraised value, the impaired loan is recorded as nonrecurring Level 2 assets. When an appraised value is not available or management determines the fair value of the collateral is further impaired below the appraised value and there is no observable market price, the Bank records the impaired loan as nonrecurring Level 3 assets.

Accrued Interest Receivable and Payable – The carrying amount is a reasonable estimate of fair value.

Deferred Compensation Assets – Assets include debt and equity securities that are traded in an active exchange market. Fair values are obtained from quoted prices in active markets for identical assets.

Demand and Savings Deposits – By definition, the carrying values are equal to the fair values.

Time Deposits and Repurchase Agreements – Fair value of fixed maturity certificates of deposit is estimated using the FHLB Rate Curve for similar remaining maturities. Fair value of repurchase agreements is estimated using the borrowing rate for overnight borrowings.

Federal Home Loan Bank Advances – The fair value of Federal Home Loan Bank advances is estimated using the rates currently offered for advances of similar remaining maturities.

Deferred Compensation Liabilities – Fair values are measured based on the fair values of the related deferred compensation assets.

Defined Benefit Plan Assets – The Nonqualified Defined Benefit Plan had no plan assets because it was not funded. The assets of the Qualified Defined Benefit Plan, which are invested in interest-bearing depository accounts and money market and debt security mutual funds, are included at fair value in the Qualified Plan’s separate financial statements. Fair value measurement is based upon quoted prices of like or similar securities. The fair values of the Plan’s investments in interest-bearing depository accounts and money market and debt security mutual funds are determined by quoted prices and are included as recurring Level 1 assets.

Foreclosed Properties – Foreclosed properties are measured and recorded at the lower of cost or estimated fair value. The fair value of foreclosed properties is measured using the current appraised value of the property less the estimated expenses necessary to sell the property. Foreclosed properties are classified as nonrecurring Level 3 assets.

 

119


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

14. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)

 

The estimated fair values and carrying amounts of financial instruments follow:

 

     Fair Value Measurement Using      Total
Carrying
Amount in
Balance
Sheet
 
(in thousands)    Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Estimated
Fair Value
    

December 31, 2012

              

Financial assets:

              

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 47,390       $ —         $ —         $ 47,390       $ 47,390   

Securities available for sale

     739         237,997         —           238,736         238,736   

Securities held to maturity

     —           5,182         —           5,182         4,649   

Investments in FHLB stock

     —           —           3,429         3,429         3,429   

Loans held for sale

     —           9,905         —           9,905         9,759   

Loans receivable, net

     —           —           382,428         382,428         379,208   

Accrued interest receivable

     —           —           2,764         2,764         2,764   

Deferred compensation assets

     1,081         —           —           1,081         1,081   

Financial liabilities:

              

Demand deposits

     —           —           389,095         389,095         389,095   

Time deposits

     —           —           189,755         189,755         189,204   

Repurchase agreements

     —           —           409         409         411   

Federal Home Loan Bank Advances

     —           —           56,905         56,905         50,000   

Deferred compensation liabilities

     1,081         —           —           1,081         1,081   

Accrued interest payable

     —           —           127         127         127   

Financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk:

              

Commitments to extend or originate credit

     —           —           —           —           —     

Commitments under standby letters of credit

     —           —           —           —           —     

 

120


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

14. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)

 

     Fair Value Measurement Using      Total
Carrying
Amount in
Balance
Sheet
 
(in thousands)    Level 1      Level 2      Level 3      Estimated
Fair Value
    

December 31, 2011

              

Financial assets:

              

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 72,327       $ —         $ —         $ 72,327       $ 72,327   

Securities available for sale

     712         243,151         —           243,863         243,863   

Securities held to maturity

     —           5,753         —           5,753         5,218   

Investments in FHLB stock

     —           —           3,870         3,870         3,870   

Loans held for sale

     —           6,689         —           6,689         6,590   

Loans receivable, net

     —           —           428,876         428,876         422,256   

Accrued interest receivable

     —           —           2,539         2,539         2,539   

Deferred compensation assets

     972         —           —           972         972   

Financial liabilities:

              

Demand deposits

     —           —           349,695         349,695         349,695   

Time deposits

     —           —           260,466         260,466         258,541   

Repurchase agreements

     —           —           756         756         758   

Federal Home Loan Bank Advances

     —           —           68,641         68,641         60,000   

Deferred compensation liabilities

     972         —           —           972         972   

Accrued interest payable

     —           —           153         153         153   

Financial instruments whose contract amounts represent credit risk:

              

Commitments to extend or originate credit

     —           —           —           —           —     

Commitments under standby letters of credit

     —           —           —           —           —     

 

121


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

14. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)

 

Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis

Below is a table that presents information about certain assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis. There were no transfers to or from Levels 1 and 2 during the years ended December 31, 2012 and December 31, 2011.

 

(in thousands)    Fair Value Measurement Using      Total
Carrying
Amount in
Statement
of Financial
Position
        

Description

   Level 1      Level 2      Level 3         Assets/
Liabilities
Measured at
Fair Value
 

December 31, 2012

              

Securities available for sale:

              

U.S. GSE and agency securities

   $ —         $ 12,247       $  —         $ 12,247       $ 12,247   

Asset-backed SBA securities

     —           70,411         —           70,411         70,411   

Residential mortgage-backed securities issued by GSE’s

     —           106,687         —           106,687         106,687   

State and local government securities

     —           48,652         —           48,652         48,652   

Mutual funds

     739         —           —           739         739   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 739       $ 237,997       $ —         $ 238,736       $ 238,736   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Defined benefit plan assets:

              

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 5,837       $ —         $ —           

Money market mutual funds

     225         —           —           

Debt security mutual funds

     12,095         —           —           
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

       

Total

   $ 18,157       $ —         $ —           
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

       

December 31, 2011

              

Securities available for sale:

              

U.S. GSE and agency securities

   $ —         $ 42,367       $ —         $ 42,367       $ 42,367   

Asset-backed SBA securities

     —           31,492         —           31,492         31,492   

Residential mortgage-backed securities issued by GSE’s

     —           157,378         —           157,378         157,378   

State and local government securities

     —           11,914         —           11,914         11,914   

Mutual funds

     712         —           —           712         712   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total

   $ 712       $ 243,151       $ —         $ 243,863       $ 243,863   
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Defined benefit plan assets:

              

Cash and cash equivalents

   $ 173       $ —         $ —           

Money market mutual funds

     264         —           —           

Debt security mutual funds

     16,760         —           —           
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

       

Total

   $ 17,197       $ —         $ —           
  

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

       

 

122


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

14. FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS (Continued)

 

Assets and Liabilities Recorded at Fair Value on a Nonrecurring Basis

As may be required from time to time, certain assets may be recorded at fair value on a nonrecurring basis in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Assets measured at fair value on a nonrecurring basis are included in the table below.

 

(in thousands)    Fair Value Measurement Using      Total
Carrying
Amount  in
Statement
of Financial
Position
        

Description

   Level 1      Level 2      Level 3         Assets/
Liabilities
Measured at
Fair Value
 

December 31, 2012

              

Impaired loans

   $  —         $  —         $ 4,686       $ 4,686       $ 4,686   

Foreclosed properties

     —           —           19,411         19,411         19,411   

December 31, 2011

              

Impaired loans

   $ —         $ —         $ 21,858       $ 21,858       $ 21,858   

Foreclosed properties

     —           —           8,125         8,125         8,125   

15. CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PARENT COMPANY

The following financial information pertains to ASB Bancorp, Inc. (parent company only), and should be read in conjunction with the consolidated financial statements of the Company.

Condensed Balance Sheets

 

     December 31,  
(in thousands)    2012      2011  

Assets

     

Cash on deposit with bank subsidiary

   $ 1,997       $ 16,297   

Interest-earning deposits with other financial institutions

     8,345         2,998   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total cash and cash equivalents

     10,342         19,295   

Securities available for sale at fair value

     7,576         2,080   

ESOP loan receivable

     4,154         4,407   

Investment in bank subsidiary

     89,372         89,721   

Other assets

     115         78   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total assets

   $ 111,559       $ 115,581   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity

     

Other liabilities

   $ 30       $ 10   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total liabilities

     30         10   

Total stockholders’ equity

     111,529         115,571   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity

   $ 111,559       $ 115,581   
  

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

123


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

15. CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PARENT COMPANY (Continued)

 

Condensed Statements of Net Income

 

     Year Ended December 31,  
(in thousands)    2012     2011  

Interest and dividend income

   $ 304      $ 33   

Interest expense

     —          —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net interest income

     304        33   

Noninterest income

     —          —     

Noninterest expenses

     516        118   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Loss before income taxes and equity in undistributed income of bank subsidiary

     (212     (85

Income tax benefit

     (72     (33
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net loss before equity in undistributed income of bank subsidiary

     (140     (52

Equity in undistributed income of bank subsidiary

     1,002        1,239   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income

   $ 862      $ 1,187   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

124


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

15. CONDENSED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS OF PARENT COMPANY (Continued)

 

Condensed Statements of Cash Flows

 

     Year Ended December 31,  
(in thousands)    2012     2011  

Operating Activities

    

Net income

   $ 862      $ 1,187   

Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash used in operating activities:

    

Equity in undistributed income of bank subsidiary

     (1,002     (1,239

Net amortization of premiums on securities

     133        —     

Increase in income tax receivable

     (72     (33

Increase in interest receivable

     (25     (6

Net change in other assets and liabilities

     49        (22
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash used in operating activities

     (55     (113
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Investing Activities

    

Securities available for sale:

    

Purchases

     (7,615     (2,098

Principal repayments on mortgage-backed backed and asset-backed securities

     2,065        —     

Investment in bank subsidiary’s common stock

     —          (28,000

ESOP loan

     —          (4,468

ESOP principal payments received

     253        61   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash used in investing activities

     (5,297     (34,505
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Financing Activities

    

Proceeds from issuance of common stock, net of issuance costs

     —          53,913   

Equity incentive plan shares purchased

     (3,601     —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities

     (3,601     53,913   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net increase (decrease) in cash and cash equivalents

     (8,953     19,295   

Cash and cash equivalents:

    

Beginning of period

     19,295        —     
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

End of period

   $ 10,342      $ 19,295   
  

 

 

   

 

 

 

SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES:

    

Non-cash investing and financing transactions:

    

Change in unrealized gain on securities available for sale

   $ 79      $ (18

Change in deferred income taxes resulting from other comprehensive income

     (32     7   

 

125


Table of Contents

ASB BANCORP, INC. AND SUBSIDIARY

NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

 

 

16. UNAUDITED INTERIM FINANCIAL INFORMATION

The unaudited condensed statements of income (loss) for each of the quarters are summarized below for the periods indicated.

 

     Three Months Ended  
     December 31,
2012
    September 30,
2012
     June 30,
2012
    March 31,
2012
 

Interest and dividend income

   $ 5,967      $ 6,088       $ 6,398      $ 6,539   

Interest expense

     1,303        1,527         1,743        1,919   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net interest income before provision for loan losses

     4,664        4,561         4,655        4,620   

Provision for (recovery of) loan losses

     (733     542         1,293        598   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

     5,397        4,019         3,362        4,022   

Noninterest income

     3,083        2,416         1,999        1,958   

Noninterest expenses

     8,178        5,760         5,588        5,566   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Income (loss) before income tax provision (benefit)

     302        675         (227     414   

Income tax provision (benefit)

     67        218         (113     130   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

   $ 235      $ 457       $ (114   $ 284   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income (loss) per common share – Basic

   $ 0.05      $ 0.09       $ (0.02   $ 0.06   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

Net income (loss) per common share – Diluted

   $ 0.05      $ 0.09       $ (0.02   $ 0.06   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

   

 

 

 

 

     Three Months Ended  
     December 31,
2011
    September 30,
2011
     June 30,
2011
     March 31,
2011
 

Interest and dividend income

   $ 6,784      $ 7,112       $ 7,540       $ 7,415   

Interest expense

     2,013        2,120         2,205         2,304   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net interest income before provision for loan losses

     4,771        4,992         5,335         5,111   

Provision for loan losses

     1,974        730         424         657   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net interest income after provision for loan losses

     2,797        4,262         4,911         4,454   

Noninterest income

     1,912        1,973         1,890         1,647   

Noninterest expenses

     5,896        5,313         5,630         5,232   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Income (loss) before income tax provision (benefit)

     (1,187     922         1,171         869   

Income tax provision (benefit)

     (476     351         429         284   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net income (loss)

   $ (711   $ 571       $ 742       $ 585   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net income (loss) per common share – Basic

   $ (0.14     n/a         n/a         n/a   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

Net income (loss) per common share – Diluted

   $ (0.14     n/a         n/a         n/a   
  

 

 

   

 

 

    

 

 

    

 

 

 

 

Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements with Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure

None.

 

126


Table of Contents
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures

The Company’s management has carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, of the effectiveness of the “disclosure controls and procedures,” as such term is defined in Rule 13a-15(e) promulgated under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”). Based on this evaluation, the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer concluded that, as of the end of the period covered by this report, the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures were effective for the purpose of ensuring that information required to be disclosed by the Company in reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act (1) is recorded, processed, summarized and reported, within the time periods specified in the Securities and Exchange Commission’s rules and forms, and (2) is accumulated and communicated to the Company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure.

Changes in Internal Control over Financial Reporting

Management of the Company has evaluated, with the participation of the Company’s principal executive officer and principal financial officer, changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) of the Exchange Act during the quarter ended December 31, 2012. In connection with the above evaluation of the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls and procedures, no changes in its internal control over financial reporting were identified as having occurred during the quarter ended December 31, 2012 that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

MANAGEMENT’S ANNUAL REPORT ON INTERNAL CONTROL OVER FINANCIAL REPORTING

The management of ASB Bancorp, Inc. is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. ASB Bancorp, Inc.’s internal control system was designed to provide reasonable assurance to the Company’s management and Board of Directors regarding the preparation and fair presentation of published financial statements. Management assessed the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012. In making this assessment, it used criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO) in Internal Control-Integrated Framework. Based on that assessment, ASB Bancorp, Inc.’s management believes that the Company maintained effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012.

All internal control systems, no matter how well designed, have inherent limitations. Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance with respect to financial statement preparation and presentation. A control deficiency exists when the design or operation of a control does not allow management or employees, in the normal course of performing their assigned functions, to prevent or detect misstatements on a timely basis. A significant deficiency is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting that is less severe than a material weakness, yet important enough to merit attention by those responsible for oversight of the company’s financial reporting. A material weakness in internal control over financial reporting is a control deficiency, or combination of control deficiencies, in internal control over financial reporting such that there is a reasonable possibility that a material misstatement of a company’s annual or interim financial statements will not be prevented or detected on a timely basis.

The Company’s independent registered public accounting firm that audited the Company’s consolidated financial statements included in this annual report has issued an audit report on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.

 

/s/ SUZANNE S. DEFERIE         /s/ KIRBY A. TYNDALL
President and Chief Executive Officer         Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

 

127


Table of Contents

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders

ASB Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary

We have audited ASB Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary (the “Company”)’s internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission. The Company’s management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting, included in the accompanying Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control over Financial Reporting. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Company’s internal control over financial reporting based on our audit.

We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.

A company’s internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A company’s internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use, or disposition of the company’s assets that could have a material effect on the financial statements.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.

In our opinion, ASB Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary maintained, in all material respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2012, based on criteria established in Internal Control-Integrated Framework issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission.

We have also audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated financial statements of ASB Bancorp, Inc. and Subsidiary as of and for the year ended December 31, 2012, and our report, dated March 15, 2013, expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements.

/s/ DIXON HUGHES GOODMAN LLP

Asheville, North Carolina

March 15, 2013

 

128


Table of Contents
Item 9B. Other Information

Not applicable.

Part III

 

Item 10. Directors, Executive Officers and Corporate Governance

Board of Directors

For information relating to the directors of the Company, the section captioned “Items to be Voted on by Stockholders—Item 1—Election of Directors” in the Company’s Proxy Statement for the 2013 Annual Meeting of Stockholders (the “Proxy Statement”) is incorporated herein by reference.

Executive Officers

The executive officers of the Company are:

 

Name

  

Position

Suzanne S. DeFerie

   President and Chief Executive Officer

Kirby A. Tyndall

   Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer

David A. Kozak

   Executive Vice President and Chief Lending Officer

Fred A. Martin

   Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer

Vikki D. Bailey

   Executive Vice President and Chief Retail Officer

Since the formation of ASB Bancorp, Inc., none of the Company executive officers, directors or other personnel have received remuneration from ASB Bancorp, Inc.

Below is information regarding our other executive officers who are not also directors. Ages presented are as of December 31, 2012.

Kirby A. Tyndall has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer of Asheville Savings Bank since September 2010. Mr. Tyndall was Vice President and Finance Special Projects Coordinator at Asheville Savings Bank from November 2009 to September 2010. Prior to joining Asheville Savings Bank in November 2009, Mr. Tyndall served as Executive Vice President, Chief Financial Officer, Secretary and Treasurer of Bank of Granite, located in Granite Falls, North Carolina, from June 1997 to July 2009. Age 57.

David A. Kozak has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Lending Officer of Asheville Savings Bank since July 2010. Mr. Kozak was Executive Vice President and Senior Lending Officer of Asheville Savings Bank from April 2008 to July 2010. Prior to joining Asheville Savings Bank in April 2008, Mr. Kozak served as First Vice President, Commercial Lending Manager at SunTrust Bank from December 2005 to April 2008. Age 51.

Fred A. Martin joined Asheville Savings Bank in 2006 and has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Information Officer of Asheville Savings Bank since June 2007. Prior to joining Asheville Savings Bank, Mr. Martin served as North Carolina Lead Network Engineer and Assistant Director of Information Technology for SouthTrust Bank. Age 41.

Vikki D. Bailey has served as Executive Vice President and Chief Retail Officer of Asheville Savings Bank since December 1, 2012. Ms. Bailey was Senior Vice President and Regional Manager at Asheville Savings Bank from September 2011 to December 2012. Prior to September 2011, Ms. Bailey served in various capacities since she joined Asheville Savings Bank in 1976. Age 54.

 

129


Table of Contents

Compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934

For information regarding compliance with Section 16(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the cover page to this Annual Report on Form 10-K and the section captioned “Other Information Relating to Directors and Executive Officers—Section 16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance” in the Proxy Statement are incorporated herein by reference.

Disclosure of Code of Ethics

For information concerning the Company’s Code of Ethics, the information contained under the section captioned “Corporate Governance—Code of Ethics and Business Conduct” in the Proxy Statement is incorporated by reference. A copy of the Code of Ethics and Business Conduct is available to stockholders on the Company’s website at http://ir.ashevillesavings bank.com .

Corporate Governance

For information regarding the Audit Committee and its composition and the audit committee financial expert, the section captioned “Corporate Governance — Committees of the Board of Directors — Audit Committee” in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Item 11. Executive Compensation

For information regarding executive compensation, the sections captioned “Executive Compensation,” “Compensation Discussion and Analysis,” “Compensation Committee Report,” and “Director Compensation” in the Proxy Statement are incorporated herein by reference.

 

Item 12. Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management and Related Stockholder Matters

 

(a) Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners.

Information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the section of the Proxy Statement captioned “Stock Ownership.”

 

(b) Security Ownership of Management

Information required by this item is incorporated herein by reference to the section of the Proxy Statement captioned “Stock Ownership.”

 

(c) Changes in Control

Management of the Company knows of no arrangements, including any pledge by any person or securities of the Company, the operation of which may at a subsequent date result in a change in control of the registrant.

 

(d) Equity Compensation Plan Information

Not applicable.

 

130


Table of Contents
Item 13. Certain Relationships and Related Transactions, and Director Independence

Certain Relationships and Related Transactions

For information regarding certain relationships and related transactions, the section captioned “Other Information Relating to Directors and Executive Officers—Transactions with Related Persons” in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

Corporate Governance

For information regarding director independence, the section captioned “Corporate Governance—Director Independence” in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

 

Item 14. Principal Accountant Fees and Services

For information regarding the principal accountant fees and expenses, the section captioned “Items to Be Voted on By Stockholders—Item 3—Ratification of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm” in the Proxy Statement is incorporated herein by reference.

 

131


Table of Contents

Part IV

 

Item 15. Exhibits and Financial Statement Schedules

 

(1) The financial statements required in response to this item are incorporated herein by reference from Item 8 of this Annual Report on Form 10-K.

 

(2) All financial statement schedules are omitted because they are not required or applicable, or the required information is shown in the consolidated financial statements or the notes thereto.

 

(3) Exhibits

 

    3.1    Articles of Incorporation of ASB Bancorp, Inc. (1)
    3.2    Bylaws of ASB Bancorp, Inc. (1)
    4.1    Form of Common Stock Certificate of ASB Bancorp, Inc. (1)
  10.1    Employment Agreement, dated as of October 18, 2011, by and between ASB Bancorp, Inc., Asheville Savings Bank, S.S.B. and Suzanne S. DeFerie * (2)
  10.2    Employment Agreement, dated as of October 18, 2011, by and between ASB Bancorp, Inc., Asheville Savings Bank, S.S.B. and Kirby A. Tyndall * (2)
  10.3    Employment Agreement, dated as of October 18, 2011, by and between ASB Bancorp, Inc., Asheville Savings Bank, S.S.B. and David A. Kozak * (2)
  10.4    Employment Agreement, dated as of October 18, 2011, by and between ASB Bancorp, Inc., Asheville Savings Bank, S.S.B. and Fred A. Martin * (2)
  10.5    Employment Agreement, dated as of December 18, 2012, by and between Asheville Savings Bank, S.S.B. and Vikki D. Bailey * (5)
  10.6    Asheville Savings Bank, S.S.B. Change In Control Severance Plan * (3)
  10.7    ASB Bancorp, Inc. Stock-Based Deferral Plan * (3)
  10.8    ASB Bancorp, Inc. 2012 Equity Incentive Plan * (4)
  21.0    Subsidiaries of ASB Bancorp, Inc.
  23.0    Consent of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
  31.1    Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Executive Officer
  31.2    Rule 13a-14(a) Certification of Chief Financial Officer
  32.0    Section 1350 Certifications
101.0    The following materials from the Company’s Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2012, formatted in XBRL (Extensible Business Reporting Language): (i) the Consolidated Balance Sheets, (ii) the Consolidated Statements of Income, (iii) the Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Income, (iv) the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Stockholders’ Equity, (v) the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows and (vi) the Notes to the Consolidated Financial Statements. **

 

* Management contract or compensatory plan, contract or arrangement.
** Furnished, not filed.
(1) Incorporated herein by reference to the exhibits to ASB Bancorp, Inc.’s Registration Statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-174527), filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on May 26, 2011.
(2) Incorporated herein by reference to the exhibits to ASB Bancorp, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on October 21, 2011.
(3) Incorporated herein by reference to the exhibits to ASB Bancorp, Inc.’s Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on November 10, 2011.
(4) Incorporated herein by reference to Appendix A to ASB Bancorp, Inc.’s definitive proxy statement on Form DEF14A filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on April 12, 2012.
(5) Incorporated herein by reference to the exhibits to ASB Bancorp, Inc.’s Current Report on Form 8-K filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on December 21, 2012.

 

132


Table of Contents

Signatures

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, the registrant has duly caused this report to be signed on its behalf by the undersigned, thereunto duly authorized.

 

    ASB BANCORP, INC.
By:  

/s/ SUZANNE S. DEFERIE

  Suzanne S. DeFerie
  President and Chief Executive Officer
  (duly authorized representative)

Pursuant to the requirements of Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, this report has been signed by the following persons on behalf of the registrant and in the capacities and on the dates indicated.

 

Name

  

Title

 

Date

/s/ SUZANNE S. DEFERIE

Suzanne S. DeFerie

  

President and Chief Executive Officer (principal executive officer)

  March 15, 2013

/s/ KIRBY A. TYNDALL

  

Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer (principal financial and accounting officer)

  March 15, 2013
Kirby A. Tyndall     

/s/ PATRICIA S. SMITH

  

Chairman of the Board of Directors

  March 15, 2013
Patricia S. Smith     

/s/ JOHN B. GOULD

  

Vice Chairman of the Board of Directors

  March 15, 2013
John B. Gould     

/s/ JOHN B. DICKSON

  

Director

  March 15, 2013
John B. Dickson     

/s/ LESLIE D. GREEN

  

Director

  March 15, 2013
Leslie D. Green     

/s/ KENNETH E. HORNOWSKI

  

Director

  March 15, 2013
Kenneth E. Hornowski     

/s/ STEPHEN P. MILLER

  

Director

  March 15, 2013
Stephen P. Miller     

/s/ WYATT S. STEVENS

  

Director

  March 15, 2013
Wyatt S. Stevens     

 

133

Asb Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ:ASBB)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jun 2024 to Jul 2024 Click Here for more Asb Bancorp, Inc. Charts.
Asb Bancorp, Inc. (NASDAQ:ASBB)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jul 2023 to Jul 2024 Click Here for more Asb Bancorp, Inc. Charts.