PART
I
ITEM
1 – BUSINESS
Overview
We
are a holding company incorporated under the laws of the State of Florida. We have three direct wholly-owned subsidiaries: DigiPay
FinTech Limited (“DigiPay FinTech”), formally known as Belkin Foods Holdings Group Co., Ltd., (“Belkin”),
a company incorporated under the laws of the British Virgin Islands, Digital Online Marketing Limited (“Digital Online”)
, formally known as FullMart Holding Limited (“FullMart”), a company organized under the laws of the British Virgin
Islands, and SkyPeople Foods Holding Limited (“SkyPeople BVI”), a company organized under the laws of the British
Virgin Islands. SkyPeople BVI holds 100% of the equity interest of HeDeTang Holding (HK) Ltd. (“HeDeTang Holding (HK)”),
a company organized under the laws of the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region of the People’s Republic of China (“Hong
Kong”), and HeDeTang Holding (HK) holds 73.42% of the equity interests of SkyPeople Juice Group Co., Ltd., (“SkyPeople
(China)”), a company incorporated under the laws of the PRC. SkyPeople (China) has eleven subsidiaries, all limited liability
companies organized under the laws of the PRC: (i) Shaanxi Qiyiwangguo Modern Organic Agriculture Co., Ltd. (“Shaanxi Qiyiwangguo”);
(ii) Huludao Wonder Fruit Co., Ltd. (“Huludao Wonder”); (iii) Yingkou Trusty Fruits Co., Ltd. (“Yingkou”);
(iv) Hedetang Foods Industry (Yidu) Co. Ltd. (“Food Industry Yidu”); (v) Shaanxi Heying Trading Co. Ltd (“Shaanxi
Heying”); (vi) Hedetang Agricultural Plantation (Yidu) Co. Ltd. (“Agricultural Plantation Yidu”); (vii) Xi’an
Hedetang Nutritious Food Research Institute Co., Ltd. (“Hedetang Reseach”); (viii) Xi’an Cornucopia International
Co., Ltd. (“Xi’an Cornucopia”); (ix) Xi’an Hedetang E-commerce Co. Ltd. (“Hedetang E-commerce”);
(x) Hedetang Foods Industry (Zhouzhi) Co. Ltd (“Foods Industry Zhouzhi”); and (xi) Hedetang Foods Industry (Jingyang)
Co. Ltd. (“Foods Industry (Jingyang”). Shenzhen TianShunDa Equity Investment Fund Management Co., Ltd. (the “TSD”),
a limited liability corporation registered in China, holds another 26.36% of the equity interest of SkyPoeple (China). HeDeTang
Holdings (HK) also holds 100% of the equity interests of HeDeJiaChuan Holding Group Co. Ltd., (“HeDeJiaChuan Holding”),
a company incorporated under the laws of the PRC, which holds 100% of the equity interests of HeDeJiaChuan Foods (Xi’an)
Co. Ltd., (“HeDeJiaChuan Xi’an”), both companies incorporated under the laws of the PRC. HeDeJiaChuan Xi’an”
has three subsidiaries: (i) SkyPeople (Suizhong) Fruit and Vegetable Products Co., Ltd. (“SkyPeople Suizhong”); (ii)
HedeJiachuan Foods (Yichang) Co. Ltd (“Hedejiachuan Yichang”); and (iii) Shaanxi Guo Wei Mei Kiwi Deep Processing
Co., Ltd. (“Guo Wei Mei”).
On
January 19, 2018, the Company filed a definitive Schedule 14A (the “Proxy”) to solicit shareholders’ proxies
for a special meeting of the Company’s shareholders in connection with proposals to (i) spin-off the Company’s wholly-owned
subsidiaries, SkyPeople BVI and Digital Online, through a pro rata distribution of the ordinary shares of each of SkyPeople BVI
and Digital Online to holders of the Company’s common stock at the close of business on January 22, 2018, the record date
(the “Spin Offs”); (ii) to approve an amendment to the Company’s Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation,
which would increase the amount of authorized shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of the Company from 8,333,333
to 60,000,000; (iii) to adopt and approve the Future FinTech Group Inc. 2017 Omnibus Equity Plan; (iv) to approve the issuance
of an aggregate 7,111,599 shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to certain Creditor’s Rights Transfer Agreements
between a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company and sellers of such creditor’s rights; and (v) to approve the issuance
of an aggregate 11,362,159 shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to a Share Purchase Agreement between the Company
and a certain investor. On March 13, 2018, the Company held the Special Meeting of Shareholders and the above proposals were approved
by the shareholders of the Company. The Company anticipates completing the Spin Offs in the third quarter of 2018.
Following
the completion of the Spin Offs, the main business operations of Future FinTech will be focused on (i) the online sales of fruit
juice products and beverages, and consumer and health-related products, through GlobalKey Supply Chain Limited (formerly known
as Shaanxi Quangoutong E-Commerce Inc.) (“GlobalKey Supply Chain”); (ii) the design, development, testing, deployment
and maintenance of a blockchain-based Globally Shared Shopping Mall and other related software systems (iii) the operation of
a supply chain, logistics and trading business for fruit juice products, foods and other consumer and agricultural products through
Hedetang Farm Products Trading Market (Mei County) Co., Ltd.; (iv) bulk agricultural products spot trading business and financial
technology businesses, including software development and information services for the financial leasing and project finance industries
through intelligent investment advisory and blockchain technology; (v) related asset and equity investment management; and (vi)
the development and operation of a blockchain platform for cyptocurrency conversion, payment and other services (“DCON”).
The Company will use blockchain technology to develop its use in different business segments, including online sales and internet
distribution businesses. The Company will also use the application blockchain technology in agricultural products trading, to
facilitate financial payments and transactions, and intend to use both blockchain and artificial intelligence technologies to
create new opportunities. The Company anticipates generating revenues from our finance leasing business, the acquisition and disposal
of financial assets and the application of block-chain technology for online sales of products.
Products
and Market
Through
our indirect subsidiaries in the PRC, we are currently engaged in the production and sale of (1) fruit juice concentrates (including
fruit purees, concentrated fruit purees and concentrated fruit juices); (2) fruit beverages (including fruit juice beverages and
fruit cider beverages); and (3) other fruit-related products (including primarily organic and non-organic fresh fruits, dried
fruit, preserved fruit, fructose) in and from the PRC.
In
2017, sales of our fruit concentrates, fruit beverages, and other fruit related products represented 30%, 69%, and 1% of our revenue,
respectively, compared to 51%, 43%, and 6%, respectively, in 2016.
Our
Huludao Wonder operation, a subsidiary which produces concentrated apple juice, suffered continued operating losses in the three
fiscal years ended December 31, 2016 and the cash flows were minimal during the same three fiscal years. Thus, in December 2016,
we established a restructuring plan to close Huludao Wonder Operation. In fiscal years of 2017 and 2016, this discontinued operation
reported a loss of $11.52 million and $4.79 million, respectively.
In
the management’s discussion and analysis of our financial condition and result of operations, for the basis of comparison,
the amounts used in comparison have been reclassified to exclude the amounts from discontinued operations, which have been discussed
as a separate line item listed on the statement of income.
Specialty
fruit juices, or “small breed” fruit juices, are juices squeezed from fruits that are grown in relatively small quantities
such as kiwi juice, mulberry juice, turnjujube juice and pomegranate juice. Currently, our specialty juice beverage offerings
include pear juice, kiwi juice and mulberry juice. At the end of 2017, we possessed 21 patents and proprietary technologies in
the processing technology of specialty fruit juice and gained a number of honors and qualifications in the fruit juice industry.
Organizational
Structure
Our
current organizational structure is set forth in the diagram below:
(1)
|
Xi’an
Qinmei Food Co., Ltd., an entity not affiliated with the Company, owns the remaining 8.85% of the equity interest in Shaanxi
Qiyiwangguo.
|
(2)
|
Formerly
known as Shaanxi Tianren Organic Food Co. Ltd.
|
(3)
|
Hedetang
Foods Industry (Yidu) Co., Ltd. (“Foods Industry Yidu”), formerly known as SkyPeople Juice Group Yidu Orange Products
Co., Ltd., was established on March 13, 2012. Its scope of business includes deep processing and sales of oranges.
|
(4)
|
Hedetang
Agricultural Plantations (Yidu) Co., Ltd., formerly known as Hedetang Fruit Juice Beverages (Yidu) Co., Ltd., was established
on March 13, 2012. Its scope of business includes the planting, acquisition and sales of vegetables, fruits, flowers, farm
products; fresh fruit picking; research, training and promotion of planting and breeding technology.
|
(5)
|
SkyPeople
(Suizhong) Fruit and Vegetable Products Co., Ltd. was established on April 26, 2012. Its scope of business includes the initial
processing, quick-freezing and sales of agricultural products and related by-products.
|
(6)
|
Hedetang
Farm Products Trading Market (Mei County) Co., Ltd., formerly known as SkyPeople Juice Group (Mei County) Kiwi Fruit and Farm
Products Trading Market Co., Ltd. (“Kiwi Fruit & Farm Products”) was established on April 19, 2013. Its scope
of business includes preliminary processing of agricultural and subsidiary products, establishment of trading markets for
agriculture products, and similar activities.
|
(7)
|
Shaanxi
Guo Wei Mei Kiwi Deep Processing Co., Ltd. was established on April 19, 2013. Its scope of business includes producing kiwi
fruit juice, kiwi puree, cider beverages, and similar products.
|
(8)
|
Xi’an
Hedetang Fruit Juice Beverages Co., Ltd. (“Xi’an Hedetang”) was established on March 31, 2014. Its scope
of business includes the production and sales of fruit juice beverages. On August 10, 2017, it changed its name to Xi’an
Hedetang Nutritious Food Research Institute Co., Ltd.
|
(9)
|
Xi’an
Cornucopia International Co., Ltd. (“Cornucopia”) was established on July 2, 2014. Its scope of business includes
the retail and wholesale of pre-packaged food.
|
(10)
|
Shaanxi
Fruitee Fun Co., Ltd. (“Fruitee Fun”) was established on July 3, 2014. Its scope of business includes retail and
wholesale of pre-packaged food. Shaanxi Fruitee Fun Co., Ltd. (also known as Shaanxi Guoweiduomei Beverage Co., Limited) changed
its name to Hedetang Foods Industry (Xi’an) Co., Ltd. (“Foods Industry Xi’an”) on July 5, 2016.
On June 6, 2017, it again changed its name to HedeJiachuan Foods (Xi’an) Co. Ltd.
|
(11)
|
Hedetang
Holding Group Co., Ltd., formerly known as Hedetang Holding Co., Ltd., (“Hedetang Holding”) was established on
July 21, 2014. Its scope of business includes corporate investment consulting, corporate management consulting, corporate
image design and corporate marketing planning. On June 14, 2017, it changed its name to HedeJiachuan Holding Group Co. Ltd.
|
(12)
|
The
Company acquired Huludao Wonder Co. Ltd. (“Huludao”) on September 10, 2008. Its scope of business mainly includes
the manufacture and sale of concentrated fruit juice and fruit juice beverages.
|
(13)
|
The
Company acquired Yingkou Trusty Fruits Co., Ltd. (“Yingkou”) on November 25, 2009. Its scope of business mainly
includes the manufacture of concentrated fruit juice.
|
(14)
|
Hedetang
Foods Industry (Jingyang) Co., Ltd. (“Foods Industry Jingyang”) was established on September 7, 2016. Its scope
of business includes processing, storage and sales of farm products, fruits, tea and snacks; as well as research and promotion
of processing technology of organic agriculture, fruit industry and agricultural products.
|
(15)
|
HedeJiachuan
Foods (Yichang) Co. Ltd (“Hedejiachuan Yichang”), formerly known as Hedetang Farm Products Trading Market (Yidu)
Co., Ltd., and Hedetang Foods Industry (Yichang) Co., Ltd, was established on March 23, 2016. Its scope of business includes
construction, operation, and property management of a farm products trading market; e-commerce services forfarm products;
and construction and operation management of an e-commerce information platform.
|
(16)
|
Xi’an
Hedetang E-Commerce Co., Ltd. was established on April 21, 2016. Its scope of business includes online sales of pre-packaged
foods and bulk foods.
|
(17)
|
The
Company acquired Hedetang Foods (China) Co., Ltd. (“Hedetang Foods China”) on May 18, 2016 through the
acquisition of DigiPay FinTech Limited (formerly known as Belking Foods Holdings Group Co., Ltd., the 100% indirect
shareholder of Hedetang Foods China, on the same date. The scope of business of Hedetang Foods China includes wholesale
and retail of food and beverages; import and export trade of fruit, vegetables, and dried fruit; packaging; logistics and
distribution; online sales; and business management consulting services.
|
(18)
|
Hedetang
Agricultural Plantations (Mei County) Co., Ltd. was established on September 2, 2016. Its scope of business includes the planting,
acquisition and sales of vegetables, fruits, flowers, Chinese herbal medicine, and farm products; fresh fruit picking; research,
training and promotion of planting and breeding technology, development and training for E-commerce and online sales of agricultural
and sideline products. On September 6, 2017, it changed its name to Shaanxi China Agricultural Silk Road Farm Products Trading
Center Co., Ltd.
|
(19)
|
Hedetang
Foods Industry (Zhouzhi) Co., Ltd. (“Foods Industry Zhouzhi”) was established on November 29, 2016. Its scope
of business includes production, processing and sales of kiwifruit wine, juice, puree and beverages; storage and sales of
fresh fruits; and import and export of a variety of products and technology.
|
(20)
|
Future
FinTech (HongKong) Limited (“FintTech HK”), formerly known as Future World Trading (Hong Kong) and SkyPeople International
Trading (HK) Limited, was first established on July 27, 2016. It mainly engages in the import and export of food products.
|
(21)
|
GlobalKey
Supply Chain Limited, formerly known as Shaanxi Quangoutong E-commerce Inc., was acquired on May 27, 2017. Its main business
scope includes computer hardware and software development and sales, electronic products and communication equipment, computer
network engineering design, business information consultation, online sales and online marketing, and investment management.
|
(22)
|
Shaanxi
Heying Trading Co. Ltd was established on December 17, 2009. Its main business scope includes the sales of pre-packaged food
and bulk food; import and export of goods and technology; food technology research and development; business management and
consulting, and corporate planning services.
|
(23)
|
Zhonglian
Hengxin Assets Management Co., Ltd. (“Zhonglian Hengxin”) was established in Xi’an. Its main business scope
includes asset management (except for financial, securities, futures and other restricted items); asset acquisition, asset
disposal and asset operation (except for financial, securities, futures and other restricted items); planning and advisory
for corporate restructure and merger and acquisition; equity and real estate investment (no public offerings, restricted to
investment through assets of the company itself ); financial business process outsourcing entrusted by financial institutions;
financial information technology outsourcing entrusted by financial institutions; financial knowledge process outsourcing.
Businesses that require approval by government agencies shall only operate within the scope of such approval.
|
(24)
|
DigiPay FinTech Limited (DigiPay FinTech), formerly known as Belking Foods Holdings Group Co., Ltd., was
established on May 3, 2016.
|
(25)
|
GlobalKey Holdings Limited (“GlobalKey Holdings”), formerly known as
Hedejiachuan (HK) Holdings Limited, and SkyPeople Foods International Holdings (HK) Limited and later Hedetang Holdings (Asia-Pacific)
Limited, was established on January 13, 2012. It was established mainly to engage in the import and export of food products.
|
Competitive
Advantages
We
believe our competitive advantages include the modern equipment and technology employed at our production factories in Shaanxi
Province and the strategic locations of our manufacturing facilities. Our equipment and technology help us to ensure product quality,
control costs and allow us to meet international fruit juice production standards such as ISO9001, HACCP, and Kosher certifications,
and those imposed by the United States Food and Drug Administration. In addition, our manufacturing facilities are strategically
located near regional fruit production centers. For example, Shaanxi Province, where two of our manufacturing facilities are located,
is known in the PRC for pear and kiwi production. Our orange manufacturing facilities are located in Hubei Province, which is
a strong region of production for oranges. Our proximity to regional fruit production centers enables us to purchase fresh fruits
directly from farmers, avoid the need of transporting fresh fruit over long distances to processing facilities, reduce our transportation
expenses and damage to fresh fruit during transportation and helps us maintain high quality of finished products by preserving
freshness.
We
own and operate four manufacturing facilities in the PRC. To take advantage of economies of scale and to enhance our production
efficiency, each of our manufacturing facilities focuses on juice products centering around one particular fruit based on the
proximity of each facility to the supply center of that fruit. All concentrated juice products are manufactured using the same
type of production line with slight variations in processing methods. We operate our pear juice products business out of our Foods
Industry Jingyang. Our business involving apple juice products is operated out of Huludao Wonder and Yingkou, and our business
involving kiwi products is operated out of Shaanxi Qiyiwangguo, in which we have held a 91.15% ownership interest since June 2006. As
our Huludao Wonder operation suffered continued operating losses in the three fiscal years ended December 31, 2016 and the cash
flows were minimal during the same three fiscal years, in December 2016, we established a restructuring plan to close Hudludao
Wonder Operation.
Corporate
History
We
were initially incorporated in 1998 in Florida as Cyber Public Relations, Inc. for the purpose of providing internet electronic
commerce consulting services to small and medium sized businesses and did not have any material operations or revenue. On January
21, 2004, we purchased all of the outstanding share capital of Environmental Technologies, Inc., (“Environmental Technologies”),
a Nevada corporation, in exchange for approximately 29,051 shares of the Company’s common stock (“Common Stock”).
As a result, Environmental Technologies became our wholly-owned subsidiary and the Environmental Technologies shareholders acquired
approximately 97% of our issued and outstanding Common Stock, and we changed our name to Entech Environmental Technologies, Inc.
After
our acquisition of Environmental Technologies, we operated through our wholly-owned subsidiary, H.B. Covey, Inc. (“H.B.
Covey”), a business providing construction and maintenance services to petroleum service stations in the southwestern part
of the United States and installation services for consumer home products in Southern California. In July 2007, we entered into
and consummated a Stock Sale and Purchase Agreement pursuant to which we sold H.B. Covey.
We
were a shell company with no significant business operations after we sold H.B. Covey. As a result of the consummation of a reverse
merger transaction, on February 26, 2008 we ceased being a shell company and became an indirect holding company for SkyPeople
(China) through Pacific Industry Holdings Group Co., Ltd. (“Pacific”). Pacific was incorporated under the laws of the
Republic of Vanuatu, and was a holding company for our operating subsidiary, SkyPeople (China). We closed Pacific in the second
quarter of 2017. In May 2008, we changed our name to SkyPeople Fruit Juice, Inc.
On
June 10, 2008, we acquired Huludao Wonder from Shaanxi Hede Investment Management Co., Ltd., (“Hede”), for a total
purchase price of RMB 48,250,000, or approximately $6,308,591, based on the exchange rate on June 1, 2007. The payment was made
through the offset of related party receivables. Prior to that, we operated our apple concentrate business out of the facilities
of Huludao Wonder under a one-year lease agreement with Hede.
On
June 17, 2009, we incorporated a new Delaware corporation called Harmony to be a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company with offices
initially in California to act as a sales company for the Company. The total number of shares of capital stock that Harmony has
authority to issue is 3,000 shares, all of which are Common Stock with a par value of $1.00 per share. On June 20, 2009, HMN was
registered in the State of California to transact business in such state. HMN did not commence operations and the Company closed
this dormant subsidiary in the second quarter of 2017.
On
November 25, 2009, we acquired Yingkou for a purchase price of RMB 22,700,000 (or $3,325,569 based on the exchange rate of December
31, 2009), pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement that SkyPeople (China) entered into with Shaanxi Boai Pharmaceutical &
Scientific Development Co., Ltd. (“Shaanxi Boai”, formerly known as “Xi’an Dehao Investment & Consultation
Co., Ltd.”), on November 18, 2009. Yingkou commenced operating activities in the fourth quarter of 2010.
On
March 13, 2012, we established Foods Industry Yidu (formerly known as SkyPeople Juice Group Yidu Orange Products Co., Ltd.) to
engage in the business of deep processing and sales of oranges.
On
March 13, 2012, we established Agricultural Plantations Yidu, (formerly known as Hedetang Fruit Juice Beverages (Yidu) Co., Ltd.)
to engage the business of production and sales of fruit juice beverages.
On
April 26, 2012, we established SkyPeople Suizhong to engage in the business of initial processing, quick-frozen and sales of agricultural
products and related by-products.
On
May 28, 2012, we acquired Hededetang Holdings (Asia-Pacific) to engage in the store and sales of pre-packed foods, production and
sales of fruit juice beverages through its controlling of its subsidiaries.
On
April 19, 2013, we established Trading Market Mei County (formerly known as SkyPeople Juice Group (Mei County) Kiwi Fruit and
Farm Products Trading Market Co., Ltd.) to engage in preliminary processing of agricultural and subsidiary products, and agricultural
products trading and similar activities.
On
April 19, 2013, we established Guo Wei Mei to engage in the business of producing kiwi fruit juice, kiwi puree and cider beverages,
and similar products.
On
March 31, 2014, we established Xi’an Hedetang to engage in the business of production and sales of fruit juice beverages.
On
July 2, 2014, we established Xi’an Cornucopia to engage in the business of the retail and wholesale of pre-packaged food.
On
July 3, 2014, we established Foods Industry Xi’an (formerly known as Shaanxi Fruitee Fun Co., Ltd.) to engage in the business
of the retail and wholesale of pre-packaged food.
On
July 21, 2014, we established Hedetang Holding to engage in the business of the retail and wholesale of pre-packaged food, research
and development regarding pre-packaged food, bio-tech, machinery and packages, export of manufactured products and technology,
business consulting and marketing planning.
On
October 16, 2015, SkyPeople signed a Share Purchase Agreement with SkyPeople International Holdings Group Limited to sell 5,321,600
shares of its common stock at $1.50 per share to SkyPeople International Holdings Group Limited. The purchase price of $7,928,400
was paid by the cancellation of the loan from SkyPeople International Holdings Group Limited to SkyPeople under the loan agreement
dated February 18, 2013, and renewed on February 18, 2014, in its principle amount. The remaining loan amount and interest owed
was paid in cash.
On
November 16, 2015, Agricultural Plantations Yidu (formerly known as Hedetang Fruit Juice Beverages (Yidu) Co., Ltd.) signed a
construction agreement with China Yi Ye Group Co. Ltd. to engage China Yi Zhi Group Co. Ltd. to establish an orange comprehensive
deep processing zone in Yidu. On November 23, 2015, construction began on the agricultural products trading market. As the Chinese
government recently tightened environment regulations, the Company is in the process of adapting to the new standards and the
project has been delayed. Since the Company’s current cash cannot support the future input requirements of this project
and there is no forecasted cash flow from this project, the Company recorded an impairment cost of $16.80 million with respect
to construction in progress and fixed assets of this project, and an impairment cost of $0.62 million with respect to the orange
plantation.
The
Yidu project includes the establishment of:
|
1.
|
one
modern orange distribution and sales center (the “distribution center”);
|
|
2.
|
one
orange comprehensive utilization deep processing zone (the “deep processing zone”), including:
|
a) one
45 ton/hour concentrated orange juice and byproduct deep processing production line;
b)
one bottled juice drink production line with a capacity to produce 6,000 glass bottles per hour;
c)
one storage freezer facility with a capacity to store 20,000 tons of concentrated orange juice; and
d)
general purpose facilities within the zone, office space, general research and development facilities, service area, living quarters
and other ancillary support areas.
On
March 11, 2016, SkyPeople China entered into a Share Transfer Agreement and a Capital Contribution (the “Agreements”)
with Shenzhen TianShunDa Equity Investment Fund Management Co., Ltd. (the “TSD”), a limited liability corporation
registered in China. Pursuant to the Agreements, TSD shall acquire 112,809,100 shares of SkyPeople China from SkyPeople HK and
shall make a total capital contribution RMB 131,761,028.80 (approximately $20,270,928) to SkyPeople China, which is calculated
based upon 8 times of SkyPeople China’s net profit per share for 2014 (about RMB 0.146 per share) multiplied by 112,809,100
shares. On March 18, 2016, TSD made a capital contribution of RMB 112,809,100 out of the RMB 131,761,029 (the “Capital Contributions”)
as payment for the outstanding capital contribution due to SkyPeople China by SkyPeople HK. On May 9, 2016, TSD made a capital
contribution of the remaining RMB 18,951,929 (approximately $2,915,681) as an additional capital contribution to SkyPeople China,
which was deposited into SkyPeople China’s capital surplus account. Following SkyPeople China’s receipt of the full
Capital Contributions, the shares were transferred, resulting in TSD owning 112,809,100 shares, or 26.36%, of SkyPeople China.
On
March 23, 2016, we established Hedejiachuan Yichang (formerly known as “Trading Market Yidu”) to construct, operate,
and manage property of the farm products trading market.
On
April 21, 2016, we established Hedetang E-Commerce Co., Ltd. to sale pre-packaged foods and bulk foods online.
On
May 18, 2016, we acquired Hedetang Foods China through the acquisition of Belkin to wholesale and retail of foods and beverages,
import and export fruit, vegetables and dried fruit.
On
June 7, 2016, we established Foods Industry Jingyang to engage in the business of processing, storage and sales of farm products,
fruits, tea and snacks. Foods Industry Jingyang began operations in April 2017.
On
September 2, 2016, we established Agricultural Plantations Mei County to plant, acquire and sale vegetables, fruits, flowers,
Chinese herbal medicine and other farm products.
On
November 4, 2016, we acquired Future World Trading (HK) to engage in the import and export of food products.
On
November May 128, 2016, we acquired SkyPeople Hedetang Foods China, formerly known as SkyPeople Foods China to engage in the production
and sale of foods and beverages through its subsidiaries.
On
November 29, 2016, we established Foods Industry Zhouzhi to produce, process and sale kiwifruit wine, juice, puree and beverages.
This company has not commenced operations as of this report date.
On
November 30, 2016, we acquired FullMart to engage in foods trading business through its subsidiaries.
In
December 2016, we established a restructuring plan to close Huludao Wonder Operation.
On
April 12, 2017, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with certain purchasers (the “Purchasers”),
pursuant to which the Company offered and sold to the Purchasers, in a registered direct offering, an aggregate of 862,097 shares
of common stock, par value $0.001 per share. The Shares were sold to the Purchasers at a negotiated purchase price of $3.10 per
share, for aggregate gross proceeds to the Company of $2,672,500, before deducting fees to the placement agent and other
estimated offering expenses payable by the Company.
In
a concurrent private placement, the Company also issued to the each of the Purchasers a warrant to purchase one (1) share of the
Company’s Common Stock for each share purchased under the Purchase Agreement, pursuant to that certain Common Stock Purchase
Warrant, by and between the Company and each Purchaser (each, a “Warrant”, and collectively, the “Warrants”).
The Warrants will be exercisable beginning on the six month anniversary of the date of issuance at an initial exercise price of
$5.20 per share and will expire on the five and a half year anniversary of the date of issuance.
On
May 27, 2017, the Company acquired GlobalKey Supply Chain Limited, formerly known as Shaanxi Quangoutong E-commerce Inc. Its main
business scope includes computer hardware and software development and sales, electronic products and communication equipment
development and sales, computer network engineering design, business information consultation, online sales and online marketing,
and investment management.
On
June 6, 2017, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment with the Secretary of State for the State of Florida to amend and restate
its articles of incorporation to change its name from SkyPeople Fruit Juice, Inc. to Future FinTech Group Inc., effective immediately
(“the Name Change”). The Name Change was approved by the Company’s Board of Directors on March 30, 2017 and
by shareholders holding a majority of the Company’s issued and outstanding capital stock on March 31, 2017. In addition,
effective as of June 6, 2017, the Company’s bylaws were amended and restated to reflect the Name Change.
On
September 29, 2017, the Company established Shenzhen Hedetang Industrial Co., Ltd. (Shenzhen Hedetang). Its main business scope
includes industrial projects; domestic trade; and import and export businesses.
On
November 2, 2017, a wholly-owned indirect subsidiary of the Company, Hedetang Foods (China) Co., Ltd. (“Hedetang”),
entered into a series of Creditor’s Rights Transfer Agreements (collectively, the “Acquisition Agreements”)
with each of Shaanxi Chunlv Ecological Agriculture Co. Ltd., Shaanxi Boai Medical Technology Development Co., Ltd., and Shaanxi
Fu Chen Venture Capital Management Co. Ltd. (collectively, the “Sellers”). Pursuant to the Acquisition Agreements,
Hedetang agreed to purchase certain creditor’s rights of associated with companies located in the PRC for an aggregate purchase
price of RMB 181,006,980 (approximately $27,344,096), of which RMB 108,604,188 (approximately $16,437,248.50) will be paid in
cash and RMB 72,402,792 (approximately $10,937,638.50) will be paid in shares of common stock of the Company (the “Share
Payment”) based on the average of the closing prices of Future FinTech’s common stock over the five trading days preceding
the date of the Acquisition Agreements. The Share Payment was contingent on Future FinTech receiving shareholder approval at a
Special Shareholders Meeting to increase its authorized common stock to 60,000,000 shares and to approve the Share Payment issuance
under Acquisition Agreements. On March 13, 2018, the Company held a Special Meeting of shareholders, and the shareholders approved
an amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the Company (the “Articles Amendment”),
which increased the amount of authorized shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of the Company from 8,333,333 to
60,000,000, as well as the Share Payment.
In
connection with the Acquisition Agreements and to provide funding for their consummation, on November 3, 2017, the Company entered
into a Share Purchase Agreement (the “Share Purchase Agreement”) with Mr. Zeyao Xue (“Xue”) pursuant to
which Future FinTech agreed to sell 11,362,159 shares of its common stock (the “Shares”) to Xue for an aggregate purchase
price of $16,437,248.50. The per share price for the Shares was determined using the average closing price quoted on the NASDAQ
Global Market for the common stock of the Company over the three (3) trading days prior to the date of the Share Purchase Agreement
(the “Purchase Price”). Under the terms of the Share Purchase Agreement, the Purchase Price may be adjusted upward
if, on the third business day following the later of (i) the public disclosure of the execution of the Acquisition Agreements
and (ii) the Company’s filing of its Form 10-Q for the quarter ended September 30, 2017 (in each case, counting the date
of disclosure as the first such day, provided that the applicable public disclosure is made prior to the close of trading on such
date), the per share closing price of the Company’s common stock quoted on the NASDAQ Global Market (the “Disclosure
Price”) is higher than the Purchase Price, in which case the Purchase Price shall be adjusted to the Disclosure Price (the
“Adjusted Price”), and Xue shall pay to the Future FinTech an amount equal to (x) the difference between the Purchase
Price and the Adjusted Price (y) multiplied by the number of Shares (the “Additional Amount”). If the Disclosure Price
is lower than Purchase Price, no adjustment of the Purchase Price shall be made. The consummation of the Share Purchase Agreement
was contingent on Future FinTech receiving shareholder approval at a Special Shareholders Meeting for the Articles Amendment and
the approval of Shares issuance under the Share Purchase Agreement by the shareholders of the Company. At the Special Meeting
of shareholders held on March 13, 2018, and the shareholders approved the Articles Amendment and the consummation of the Share
Purchase Agreement.
Principal
Products
There
are two general categories of fruit and vegetable juices available in the market. One is fresh juice that is canned directly upon
filtering and sterilization after being squeezed out of fresh fruits or vegetables. The other general category is juice drinks
made out of concentrated fruit and vegetable juices. Concentrated fruit and vegetable juices are produced through the pressing,
filtering, sterilization and evaporation of fresh fruits or vegetables. Concentrated juices are not drinkable. Instead, they are
used as a basic ingredient for manufacturing juice drinks and as an additive to fruit wine, fruit jam, cosmetics and medicines.
Our
core products are (1) fruit juice concentrates, mainly including concentrated apple, pear, and kiwi juices; (2) fruit beverages,
including pure fruit beverages and fruit cider beverages; and (3) other fruit-related products, including, for example, fresh
fruits, vegetables and fructose.
Fruit
Juice Concentrate
Our
family of fruit juice concentrate products mainly includes concentrated apple, pear, and kiwi juices. Fruit juice concentrates
can only be produced during the “squeezing season” of a year, when fresh fruits are available in the market. Generally,
the squeezing season for apples is from August through January or February of the following year, the squeezing season for pears
is from July or August through April of the following year, and the squeezing season for kiwifruits is from September through
December or January of the following year.
Fruit
juice concentrates are manufactured through a multi-stage process, which includes pressing, filtering, sterilizing and evaporating
fresh fruits and fruit juices.
Fruit
juice concentrates are used as the base ingredient in fruit juice beverages and are also used in other products such as ice cream,
fruit wine and, to a lesser extent, cosmetics and medicine.
We
currently sell apple, pear, and kiwifruit concentrates. Our fruit juice concentrate products include concentrated apple and pear
juice. Our concentrated kiwifruits are made of three different categories: kiwifruit puree, concentrated kiwifruit puree and concentrated
kiwifruit juice.
Kiwifruit
puree is prepared from clean, sound kiwifruits that have been washed and sorted prior to processing. The kiwifruits are crushed
and pressed and the pulp of the kiwifruit is kept. All of the water and some of the pulp are then removed from the kiwifruit puree
and the sugar level is increased in order to produce concentrated kiwifruit puree. We use advanced technologies to maintain the
natural flavors and nutrients of the kiwifruit puree. Kiwifruit puree and concentrated kiwifruit puree are ideal raw materials
used in the production of concentrated kiwifruit juices, kiwifruit beverages, kiwifruit flavored ice creams, smoothies and health
care products. Concentrated kiwifruit juice is made from concentrated kiwifruit puree by removing all of the remaining pulp.
Our
production line at the Shaanxi Qiyiwangguo factory can only produce puree and concentrated puree. We use the production line that
produces concentrated apple and pear juice in the facility of the Jingyang branch of SkyPeople (China) to produce concentrated
clear kiwifruit juice.
Concentrated
apple juice and concentrated pear juice are prepared from fresh fruits. Fruit juice concentrates can also be combined with other
fruit juices for the production of blended fruit juices, canned foods, confectionaries, fruit cider beverages and other beverage
products.
Fruit
Juice Beverages
As
compared to our fruit juice concentrate products, which experience seasonality, fruit juice beverages can be produced and sold
year-round. We plan to focus on developing new beverages with higher margins.
The
manufacturing process for fruit juice beverages involves further processing of fruit juice concentrates. Our fruit juice beverages
are divided into two categories: pure fruit juice and fruit cider beverages. The gross margins for our fruit beverages were 20%
and 34% in fiscal years 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Currently
we produce five flavors of fruit beverages in 236 ml glass bottles, 258 ml glass bottles, 280 ml glass bottles, 418 ml glass and
500 ml glass bottles, 888 ml glass bottles, 1.21 L glass bottles and BIB (bag in box) packages, including kiwifruit juice, mulberry
juice, peach juice, pomegranate juice and fruit and vegetable juice. We also produce two flavors of lactobacillus fruit beverages
in 268 ml glass bottles, including lactobacillus kiwifruit juice and lactobacillus mulberry juice, as well as three beverages
with rich dietary fiber in 330 ml glass bottles, including kumquat and grapefruit juice, kiwifruit juice and mulberry juice. We
currently sell our fruit beverages to over 100 distributors and more than 20,000 retail stores in approximately 20 provinces.
Our products are sold through distributors in stores such as Hualian Supermarket in Beijing, RT-Mart in Shenyang, WOWO in Chengdu,
the Quanjia convenient store chain, Vanguard in Xi’an, Carrefour in Chongqing and Shenyang and Lianhua Supermarket in Shanghai.
Other
Products
We
also generally sell fresh fruits and vegetables, fructose and other products.
The
fruit processing capacity of our fructose production line is 10 tons of fresh apples or pears per hour. Fructose is often used
as an ingredient to make beverages and other food products. Although we currently plan to use the new fructose production line
to produce pear fructose, this production may also be used to produce apple fructose from apple juice concentrates.
The
gross margin for our other fruit-related products was 25% and 19% in fiscal year 2017 and 2016, respectively. Given the relatively
low amount of production and sales of other products, their gross margin is expected to be unstable.
On
September 20, 2017, GlobalKey Supply Chain Ltd. (“GlobalKey”), a limited liability company incorporated in China and
a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, Xi’an Hedetang Nutritious Food Research Co. Ltd., (“Nutritious Food”),
entered into a License Agreement of Sales Agent and Platform of IB-LIVE (the “Agreement”) with Shaanxi Entai Bio-Technology
Co. Ltd, a limited liability company incorporated in China (“Shaanxi Entai”).
Under
the Agreement, Shaanxi Entai appointed Nutritious Food as its sole global agent of Shaanxi Entai’s IB-LIVE series of products,
a new generation of nutritious and healthy products for improving male sexual health. Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement,
GlobalKey shall be the sole global general distributor and operating platform of the IB-LIVE products, and shall be responsible
for actual product marketing and promotion, the identification and development of sales channels, and similar business activities
in relation to its worldwide sale of IB-LIVE products to distributors. During the term of the Agreement, GlobalKey must meet certain
monthly sales targets, which such completion will be evaluated on a quarterly basis. The failure to meet at least 70% of the sales
volume of such targets will authorize Shaanxi Entai to reduce the authorized areas of GlobalKey’s distribution or terminate
the license with GlobalKey. In the event that GlobalKey fails to take scheduled deliveries of the IB-LIVE products for two consecutive
months, GlobalKey will be deemed to have waived its sales management rights under the Agreement. Nutritious Food and GlobalKey
shall pay deposits to Shaanxi Entai in the amounts of RMB5,000,000 and RMB 10,000,000, respectively (approximately $759,414 and
$1,518,818, respectively) within the first year of the Agreement as a security deposit. We expect to receive the deposits in September
2018.
Production
Capacity
The
following table sets forth our current production capacity.
Subsidiary/branch
|
|
Location
|
|
Products
|
|
Production
capacity
|
|
Notes
|
Shaanxi
Qiyiwangguo
|
|
Zhouzhi
county, Shaanxi province
|
|
Kiwi
puree,
concentrated kiwi puree and fruit beverages
|
|
(1)
(2)
(3)
|
Sorting
fresh fruits: 10 tons fresh fruits per hour;
Puree/concentrated
puree: processing 20 tons of fresh fruits per hour;
Fruit
beverages: producing 6,000 bottles per hour
|
|
Approximately
1.5 tons of fresh fruits are used to produce 1 ton of puree; 4 to 4.5 tons of fresh fruits are used to produce 1 ton of concentrated
puree
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Jingyang
branch of SkyPeople (China)
|
|
Jingyang
County, Xianyang City,
Shaanxi Province
|
|
Concentrated
apple and pear juice, concentrated kiwifruit juice and fruit-related products
|
|
(1)
(2)
|
Concentrated
apple/kiwi/pear juice: processing 40 tons of fresh fruits per hour;
Fructose:
processing 10 tons of fresh fruits per hour
|
|
All
concentrated juice products are manufactured using the same type of production line with slight variations in processing methods
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Huludao
Wonder*
|
|
Suizhong
County, Huludao, Liaoning Province
|
|
Concentrated
apple/pear juice Fruit juice beverages
|
|
(1)
|
Concentrated
fruit juice:
|
|
All
concentrated juice products are manufactured using the same type of production line with slight variations in processing methods
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2)
|
processing
30 tons of fresh fruits per hour Fruit juice beverages: producing 6,000 bottles/hour
|
|
On
April 25, 2012, “China Food Production License” for production of Beverage (including fruit juice and vegetable
juice) has been granted to Huludao Wonder by Liaoning Bureau of Quality and Technical Supervision. Huludao Wonder commenced
operation of fruit juice beverages production line on April 28, 2012.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yingkou
|
|
Gaotai
Town, Gaizhou, Liaoning Province
|
|
Concentrated
apple juice
|
|
(1)
|
Processing
20 tons of fresh fruits per hour
|
|
All
concentrated juice products are manufactured using the same type of production line with slight variations in processing methods.
|
*
In December 2016, we established a restructuring plan to close Huludao Wonder Operation.
Industry
and Principal Markets
Global
Market
The
fruit juice processing industry is an emerging industry in the PRC. Consumption of fruit juice beverages has grown and sales have
increased rapidly in recent years due to the increasing health consciousness of consumers and the natural and healthy qualities
of fruit juice beverages. According to Information Management Research Centre, the global market for fruit juice and nectars has
grown at a Compound Annual Growth Rate of around 1.6% during the period between 2009 and 2016, reaching a volume of 43.6 billion
litres in 2016.
In
the past ten years, the quantity and revenue of exported concentrated apple juice from China has continued to drop. In 2007, China
exported 1.031 million tons of concentrated apple juice with a value of $1.233 billion, which accounted for 51.2% of the world
total. In 2016, China exported only 506,563 tons of concentrated apple juice with a value of $0.546 billion. In 2016, the revenue
of concentrated apply juice exported from China reduced by 2.55% compared with the previous year, and the volume of concentrated
apply juice exported from China reduced by 6.91% compared with the previous year. The reduction of exported concentrated apple
juice from China is mainly due to heavy competition in Europe. However, in 2017, due to lower material costs in China, the exported
concentrated apple juice from China increased to 660,000 tons, an increase of 29.2% as compared to 2016, and the unit price reduced
by 5.1% as compared to 2016.
The
PRC Market
The
PRC has the world’s largest population, but the consumption of fruit juice beverages is relatively low. According to the
report “China Fruit Juice Beverages Business and Market Analysis” published by the PRC Food and Agriculture Export
Association, www.Chinajuice.org, the annual per capita consumption of fruit beverages in the PRC in 2009 was approximately 1 kilogram,
which accounted for only 13% of the average world per capita consumption and 4% of the average per capita consumption in industrialized
countries. In 2010, Chinese fruit juice production reached 17 million tons, an increase of 20.6% compared to 2009. In 2016, fruit
juice consumption was RMB100.9 billion, an increase of 1.88% as compared to the previous year. We believe that the increasing
health consciousness of consumers and the quality of living powered by the PRC’s economic growth will continue to fuel the
demand for our fruit juice products. However, the production of fruit juice in China reduced by 4.78% in 2016 as compared to 2015,
which was largely the result of an increase in imported fruit juice and heavy competition in China consumer market.
Marketing,
Sales and Distribution
We
market our products through three primary methods: direct contact with foreign businesses, attendance at international exhibitions
and sales made through trade websites. Our marketing and sales teams work closely together to maintain a consistent message to
our customers.
The
sales team is divided into three subdivisions, focusing on the sales of fruit juice concentrates, fruit beverage products
and derivative products, respectively.
We
sell our fruit juice concentrates both domestically and internationally, while we have only sold our fruit beverages domestically.
We sell our products either indirectly through distributors with good credit history or directly to end-users.
Our
export business is primarily comprised of fruit juice concentrates. The export of our fruit juice concentrates is handled internally
by our international trade department, which has 6 employees.
The
North American and European markets represent a large portion of apple and pear concentrate consumption. The U.S. market is a
highly mature market with stable growth for apple concentrate. The European market has been a target market since our inception.
Apple concentrate is used to produce many beverages and wines consumed by Europeans. The Middle East is also a target market for
our apple juice concentrate. Our sales of concentrated apple and pear juice in these markets have declined in the past few years,
mainly due to the heavy competition in the international market.
The
Chinese market drives our fruit beverage sales, with most beverages sold through provincial, city and county-level agents. We
also sell directly to hotels, supermarkets and similar outlets in smaller quantities. Our fruit beverage sales are carried out
by a team of 56 employees. Historically, we have only sold our fruit beverages regionally in Shaanxi Province and some neighboring
cities in the PRC. We currently sell our fruit beverages to over 100 distributors and more than 20,000 retail stores in approximately
20 provinces.
Our
kiwifruit products are targeted at the European, Southeast Asian, South Korean, Japanese, Middle Eastern, Mainland Chinese and
Taiwanese markets. The growth of our kiwifruit concentrate and kiwifruit beverages has exceeded the growth rate of any other product
we offer.
Competition
The
markets in which we operate are competitive, rapidly evolving and subject to shifting customer demands and expectations. We believe
that a number of companies are producing products that compete directly with our product offerings and some of our competitors
have significantly more financial resources than we possess.
Our
apple juice concentrate competitors include Sdic Zhounglu Fruit Juice Co., Ltd., Yantai North Andre (Group) Juice Co., Ltd., Shaanxi
Hengxing Fruit Juice and Shaanxi Haisheng Juice Holdings Co., Ltd. We also compete with fruit juice companies such as Wahaha,
Huiyuan, Nongfu Guoyuan, Tongyi and Meizhiyuan.
We
believe our competitive advantages include our modern equipment and our proprietary processes for the production of specialty
fruit juices or small breed fruit juices. Among the twenty one proprietary technologies, we have obtained ten design patents,
nine invention patents for production and two Utility Model Patents for equipment. Our current specialty fruit juice offering
includes kiwifruit and mulberry related juice products. We also have technologies to produce concentrated persimmon, turnjujube,
apricot, cherry, cherry tomato, sea-buckthorn, strawberry and wolfberry juices. Our technology allows us to develop and produce
beverages, such as our new mulberry and kiwifruit cider beverages, which we introduced in the Chinese market in the first quarter
of 2009. Our research indicates that these new beverages have higher gross margins than that of the industry average.
We
believe the proximity of our manufacturing facilities to fruit farms is also one of our competitive advantages. It allows us to
purchase fruit directly from fruit farmers, avoid the need for long distance transportation, minimize damages to the fruits and
maximize the freshness of the fruits.
We
produce fruit beverages from our fruit juice concentrates, which allows us to better control the quality of our beverages.
Raw
Materials and Other Supplies
Fresh
fruits, including apples, pears and kiwifruits are the primary raw materials for our products. The continuous supply of high quality
fresh fruit is necessary for our current operations and our future business growth.
The
PRC has the largest planting area of kiwifruit and apples in the world. Shaanxi Province, the location of two of our factories,
has the largest planting area of kiwifruit and apples in the PRC. According to “Statistical Bulletin of Development of Fruit
Industry in Shaanxi Province 2010,” in 2010, the kiwifruit planting area in Shaanxi Province was over 114,226 acres.
In 2015, the kiwifruit planting area in Shaanxi Province was about 164,737 acres, with an output of 12.3 million tons, which
is 20% of the world output and 33% of China’s total output. In 2016, the production of kiwifruit was 1.31 million tons,
an increase of 5.5% as compared to the previous year. Pomegranate, strawberry, peach and cherry yields are also high in Shaanxi
Province. Liaoning Province in the PRC, the location of our Huludao Wonder and Yingkou factories, abounds with high acidity apples.
Other raw materials used in our business include pectic enzyme, amylase, auxiliary power fuels and other power sources such as
coal, electricity and water.
We
purchase raw materials from local markets and fruit growers that deliver directly to our plants. We have implemented a fruit purchasing
program in areas surrounding our factories. In addition, we organize purchasing centers in rich fruit production areas, helping
farmers deliver fruit to our purchasing agents easily and in a timely manner. We are then able to deliver the fruit directly to
our factory for production.
We have assisted local farmers in their development of kiwifruit fields to help ensure
a high quality product throughout the production channel. Our raw material supply chain is highly fragmented and raw fruit prices
are highly volatile.
Shaanxi
Province is a large agricultural and fruit producing province with sufficient resources to satisfy our raw material needs. Shaanxi
Province is also the main pear-producing province in the PRC and its pear supply can generally meet our production requirements.
Liaoning Province, the PRC’s center for high acidity apples, can generally supply enough apples to meet our Liaoning Province
factory’s production needs.
In
addition to raw materials, we purchase various ingredients and packaging materials such as sweeteners, glass and plastic bottles,
cans and packing barrels. We generally purchase our materials or supplies from multiple suppliers. We are not dependent on any
one supplier or group of suppliers.
On
August 3, 2016, Shaanxi Guoweimei Kiwi Deep Processing Company, an indirectly wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, signed a
lease agreement for 20,000 mu (approximately 3,300 square acres) of kiwifruits orchard located in Mei County, Shaanxi Province,
with the Di’erpo Committe of Jinqu Village, Mei County, Shaanxi for a term of 30 years, from August 5, 2016 to August 4, 2046.
On August 15, 2016, Hedetang Agricultural Plantations (Yidu) Co., Ltd., an indirectly wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company,
signed a lease agreement for 8000 mu (approximately 1,320 square acres) of orange orchard located in the city of Yidu, Hubei Province,
with the Yidu Sichang Farmers Association, Hubei Province, for a term of 20 years, from September 22, 2016 to September 21, 2036.
The Company believes that the leasing of the orchards will help ensure the quality and safety of its products and lower its costs.
Seasonality
We
can only produce fruit juice concentrates during the squeezing season generally from July or August through April of the following
year, while our fruit juice beverages can be produced year round. Annual capacity of our production lines varies based on the
availability of the fresh fruit and is ultimately contingent on weather and other climatic conditions leading up to and through
the harvest seasons. As a result, our fruit juice business is highly seasonal as sales of our products are generally higher during
the squeezing season. Sales of our products during the months from March through July, or the non-squeezing season, generally
tend to be lower due to a shortage of fresh fruit and a lower level of production activity. As such, our results of operations
for the first and fourth quarters are generally stronger than those for our second and third quarters. We can produce fruit juice
beverages year round.
We
plan to broaden our fruit product offerings to expand into fruits with harvesting seasons complementary to our current fruits.
This will enable us to lengthen our squeezing season, thus increasing our annual production of fruit concentrate and fruit juice
beverages.
Government
Regulation
Our
products are subject to central government regulation as well as provincial government regulation in Shaanxi, Hubei and Liaoning
Provinces. Business and product licenses must be obtained through application to the central, provincial and local governments.
We have obtained our business licenses to operate domestically and export products under the laws and regulations of the PRC.
We obtained business licenses to conduct businesses, including an operating license to sell packaged foods such as concentrated
fruit and vegetable juices, fruit sugar, fruit pectin, frozen and freeze dried fruits and vegetables, dehydrated fruits and vegetables,
fruit and vegetable juice drinks, fruit cider and organic food. Business, company and product registrations are certified on a
regular basis and we must comply with the laws and regulations of the PRC, provincial and local governments and industry agencies.
In
accordance with PRC laws and regulations, we are required to comply with applicable hygiene and food safety standards in relation
to our production processes. Failure to pass these inspections, or the loss of or failure to renew our licenses and permits, could
require us to temporarily or permanently suspend some or all of our production activities, which could disrupt our operations
and adversely affect our business.
Chinese
government recently tightened environment regulations, the Company is in the process of adapting the new standards and lots of
our construction projects have been delayed.
Intellectual
Property
We
hold twenty-one active patents granted by the State Intellectual Property Office of the PRC, (“SIPO”). These include
the following:
A
crushing and peeling device (Patent No. ZL 201120445624.6)
A
peeling and dirt removal device (Patent No. ZL 201120445621.2)
A
kiwifruit cider beverage and its production method (Patent No. ZL 2009 1 0022739.1)
A
production technology for strawberry juice concentrates (Patent No. ZL 2010 1 0209900.9)
A
production technology for turnjujube juice concentrates (Patent No. ZL 2010 1 0108318.3)
A
production technology for cherry juice concentrates (Patent No. ZL 2010 1 0209899.X)
A
production technology for persimmon juice concentrates (Patent No. ZL 2010 1 0013613.0) (granted to SkyPeople (China) on January 16, 2013)
A
production technology for medlar juice concentrates (Patent No. ZL 2010 1 0227315.1) (granted to SkyPeople (China) on April 24,
2013)
A
production technology for sea-buckthorn juice concentrates (Patent No. ZL 2010 1 0227303.9) (granted to SkyPeople (China) on April 24, 2013)
A
production technology for tomato cherry juice concentrates (Patent No. ZL 2010 1 0207254.2) (granted to SkyPeople (China) on March 6, 2013)
A
production technology for apricot juice concentrates (Patent No. ZL 2010 1 0207253.8) (granted to SkyPeople (China) on April 9,
2014)
500
ml Hedetang-branded fruit juice beverages in glass bottle label (Patent No. ZL 2012302099757) (granted to SkyPeople
(China) on May 30, 2012)
418
ml Hedetang-branded fruit juice beverages in glass bottle label (Patent No. ZL 2012302099935) (granted to SkyPeople (China)
on May 30, 2012)
280
ml Hedetang-branded fruit juice beverages in glass bottle (Patent No. ZL 2012 3 0557344.4) (granted to SkyPeople (China)
on April 24, 2013)
418
ml Hedetang-branded fruit juice beverages in glass bottle (Patent No. ZL 2012 3 0557424.X) (granted to SkyPeople (China)
on April 3, 2013)
500
ml Hedetang-branded fruit juice beverages in glass bottle (Patent No. ZL 2012 3 0557301.6) (granted to SkyPeople (China)
on March 20, 2013)
236
ml Hedetang-branded fruit juice beverages in glass bottle (Patent No. ZL 2014302060578) (granted to SkyPeople (China) on
December 17, 2014)
888
ml fruit juice beverages in glass bottle (Patent No. ZL 2014 3 0206022.4) (granted to SkyPeople (China) on February 18, 2015)
Kiwifruits
packing box (Patent No. ZL 2012 3 0561124.9) (granted to SkyPeople (China) on April 24, 2013)
418
ml fruits juice beverage packing box (Patent No. ZL 2012 3 0557226.3) (granted to SkyPeople (China) on April 3, 2013)
500
ml fruits juice beverage packing box (Patent No. ZL 2012 3 0557346.3) (granted to SkyPeople (China) on April 24, 2013)
We
believe that these technologies are leading technologies in our industry.
In
addition, using our proprietary technologies, we have developed flow-through capacitor membrane, reverse osmosis concentration
and composite biological enzymolysis technology to clarify and remove murkiness from fruit juice. We believe that such are leading
technologies in our industry.
We
believe that our continued success and competitive status depend largely on our proprietary technology and ability to innovate.
We have taken the required measures to protect the confidentiality of our proprietary technologies and processes. We rely on a
combination of know-how, patent and trade secret laws, as well as confidentiality agreements to protect our proprietary rights.
We will take the necessary action to seek remuneration if we believe our intellectual property rights have been infringed upon.
As of December 31, 2017, we held twenty-one active patents granted by SIPO related to breaking up and separating fruit peel; removing
fruit peel and fruit hair; production of various concentrated fruit juice; and bottle tags, respectively. These patents have a
duration of 10 years. However, we do not have patents on certain other intellectual property that we possess.
We
also hold registered trademarks for our “Hedetang” brand with the Trademark Bureau of the State Administration for
Industry and Commerce (“SAIC”) granted on September 14, 2008 in Category 29, Category 30, Category 31 and Category
32, and on April 21, 2009 in Category 5. The trademarks expire on September 13, 2018 and April 20, 2019, respectively, and can
be extended upon expiration.
We
hold registered trademarks for our “SkyPeople” brand with the Trademark Bureau of the SAIC in Category 30 and Category
32 with period of validity from May 14, 2011 to May 13, 2021, and in Category 31 with period of validity from September 7, 2011
to September 6, 2021. The registration of such trademarks can be extended upon expiration.
Employees
As
of December 31, 2017, we had approximately 205 full-time employees and approximately 3 part-time employees, all of whom are located
in the PRC. None of our employees are covered by a collective bargaining agreement.
ITEM
1A – RISK FACTORS
An
investment in the Company’s common stock involves a high degree of risk. In addition to the following risk factors, you
should carefully consider the risks, uncertainties and assumptions discussed herein, and in other documents that the Company subsequently
files with the Securities and Exchange Commission, (the “Commission” or the “SEC”), that update,
supplement or supersede such information for which documents are incorporated by reference into this Report. Additional risks
not presently known to the Company, or which the Company considers immaterial based on information currently available, may also
materially adversely affect the Company’s business. If any of the events anticipated by the risks described herein occur,
the Company’s business, cash flow, results of operations and financial condition could be adversely affected, which could
result in a decline in the market price of the Company’s common stock, causing you to lose all or part of your investment.
Risks
Related to Our Business
Our
revenue and profitability are heavily dependent on prevailing prices for our products and raw materials, and if we are unable
to effectively offset cost increases by adjusting the pricing of our products, our margins and operating income may decrease.
As
a producer of commodities, our revenue, gross margins and cash flows from operations are substantially dependent on the prevailing
prices we receive for our products and the cost of our raw materials, neither of which we control. The factors influencing the
sales price of concentrated fruit juice include the supply price of fresh fruit, supply and demand of our products in international
and domestic markets and competition in the fruit juice industry.
The
price of our principal raw materials, fresh fruit, is subject to market volatility as a result of numerous factors including,
but not limited to, general economic conditions, governmental regulations, weather, transportation delays and other uncertainties
that are beyond our control. Due to such market volatility, we generally do not, nor do we expect to, have long-term contracts
with our fresh fruit suppliers. Other significant raw materials used in our business include packing barrels, pectic enzyme, amylase
and auxiliary materials such as coal, electricity and water. Prices for these items may be volatile as well and we may experience
shortages in these items from time to time. As a result, we cannot guarantee that the necessary raw materials to produce our products
will continue to be available to us at prices currently in effect or acceptable to us. In the event raw material prices increase
materially, we may not be able to adjust our product prices, especially in the short term, to recover such cost increases. If
we are not able to effectively offset these cost increases by adjusting the price of our products, our margins will decrease and
earnings will suffer accordingly.
Weather
and other environmental factors affect our raw material supply and a reduction in the quality or quantity of our fresh fruit supplies
may have material adverse consequences on our financial results.
Our
business may be adversely affected by weather and environmental factors beyond our control, such as adverse weather conditions
during the growing or squeezing seasons. A significant reduction in the quantity or quality of fresh fruit harvested resulting
from adverse weather conditions, disease or other factors could result in increased per unit processing costs and decreased production,
with adverse financial consequences to us.
We
sell our products
primarily through distributors and delays in delivery or poor handling by distributors may
affect our sales and damage our reputation.
We
primarily sell our products through our distributors and rely on these distributors for the distribution of our products. These
distributors are not obligated to continue to sell our products. Any disruptions in our relationships with our distributors could
cause interruption to the supply of our products to retailers, which would harm our revenue and results of operations. In addition,
delivery disruptions may occur for various reasons beyond our control, including poor handling by distributors or third party
transport operators, transportation bottlenecks, natural disasters and labor strikes, and could lead to delayed or lost deliveries.
Some of our products are perishable and poor handling by distributors and third party transport operators could also result in
damage to our products that would make them unfit for sale. If our products are not delivered to retailers on time, or are delivered
damaged, we may have to pay compensation, we could lose business and our reputation could be harmed.
Because
we experience seasonal fluctuations in our sales, our quarterly results will fluctuate and our annual performance will depend
largely on results from our first and fourth quarters.
Our
fruit juice business is highly seasonal, reflecting the harvest season of our primary source fruits from July or August of a year
to April the following year. Typically, a substantial portion of our revenue is earned during our first and fourth quarters. We
generally experience lower revenue during our second and third quarters. Generally, sales in the first and fourth quarters accounted
for approximately 65% to 72% of our revenue of the whole year. If sales in our first and fourth quarters are lower than expected,
our operating results would be adversely affected and it would have a disproportionately large impact on our annual operating
results.
If
we are unable to gain market acceptance or significant market share for the new products we introduce, our results of operations
and profitability could be adversely impacted.
Our
future business and financial performance depends, in part, on our ability to successfully respond to consumer preferences by
introducing new products and improving existing products. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to gain market acceptance or
significant market share for our new products. Consumer preferences change, and any new products that we introduce may fail to
meet the particular tastes or requirements of consumers, or may be unable to replace their existing preferences. Our failure to
anticipate, identify or react to these particular tastes or changes could result in reduced demand for our products, which could
in turn cause us to be unable to recover our development, production and marketing costs, thereby leading to a decline in our
profitability.
The
development and introduction of new products is key to our expansion strategy. We incur significant development and marketing
costs in connection with the introduction of new products. Successfully launching and selling new products puts pressure on our
sales and marketing resources, and we may fail to invest sufficient funds in order to market and sell a new product effectively.
If we are not successful in marketing and selling new products, our results of operations could be materially adversely affected.
Economic
conditions have had and may continue to have an adverse effect on consumer spending on our products.
The
worldwide economy remains volatile and may contract in the near future. The adverse effect of a sustained international economic
downturn, including sustained periods of decreased consumer spending, high unemployment levels, declining consumer or business
confidence and continued volatility and disruption in the credit and capital markets, would likely result in reduced demand for
our products as consumers turn to less expensive substitute goods or forego certain purchases altogether. To the extent an international
economic downturn develops, we could experience a reduction in sales volume. If we are unable to reduce our operating costs and
expenses proportionately, many of which are fixed, our results of operations would be adversely affected.
Concerns
over food safety and public health may affect our operations by increasing our costs and negatively impacting demand for our products.
We
could be adversely affected by diminishing confidence in the safety and quality of certain food products or ingredients. As a
result, we may elect or be required to incur additional costs aimed at increasing consumer confidence in the safety of our products.
For example, a crisis in the PRC over melamine contaminated milk in 2008 has adversely impacted Chinese food exports since October
2008, as reported by the Chinese General Administration of Customs, although most foods exported from the PRC were not significantly
affected by the melamine contamination. In addition, our concentrated fruit juices exported to foreign countries must comply with
quality standards in those countries. Our success depends on our ability to maintain the quality of our existing and new products.
Product quality issues, real or imagined, or allegations of product contamination, even if false or unfounded, could tarnish the
image of our brands and may cause consumers to choose other products.
We
face increasing competition from both domestic and foreign companies, and any failure by us to compete effectively could adversely
affect our results of operations.
The
juice beverage industry is highly competitive, and we expect it to continue to become even more competitive. Our ability to compete
in the industry depends, to a significant extent, on our ability to distinguish our products from those of our competitors by
providing high quality products at reasonable prices that appeal to consumers’ tastes and preferences. There are currently
a number of well-established companies producing products that compete directly with ours. Some of our competitors may have been
in business longer than we have, may have substantially greater financial and other resources than we have and may be better established
in their markets. We anticipate that our competitors will continue to improve their products and introduce new products with competitive
price and performance characteristics.
We
cannot guarantee that our current or potential competitors will not provide products comparable or superior to those we provide
or adapt more quickly than we do to evolving industry trends or changing market requirements. It is also possible that there will
be significant consolidation in the juice beverage industry among our competitors, and alliances may develop among competitors.
These alliances may rapidly acquire significant market share, and some of our distributors may commence production of products
similar to those we sell to them. Increased competition may result in price reductions, reduced margins and loss of market share,
any of which could materially adversely affect our profit margins. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to compete effectively
against current and future competitors. Aggressive marketing or pricing by our competitors or the entrance of new competitors
into our markets could have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations and financial condition.
We
may engage in future acquisitions involving significant expenditures of cash, the incurrence of debt or the issuance of stock,
all of which could have a materially adverse effect on our operating results.
As
part of our business strategy, we review acquisition and strategic investment prospects that we believe would complement our current
product offerings, augment our market coverage, enhance our technological capabilities or otherwise offer growth opportunities.
From time to time, we review investments in new businesses and we expect to make investments in, and to acquire, businesses, products
or technologies in the future. In the event of any future acquisitions, we may expend significant cash, incur substantial debt
and/or issue equity securities and dilute the percentage ownership of current shareholders, all of which could have a material
adverse effect on our operating results and the price of our Common Stock. We cannot guarantee that we will be able to successfully
integrate any businesses, products, technologies or personnel that we may acquire in the future, and our failure to do so could
have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and financial condition.
We
require various licenses and permits to operate our business, and the loss of or failure to renew any or all of these licenses
and permits could materially adversely affect our business.
In
accordance with PRC laws and regulations, we have been required to maintain various licenses and permits in order to operate our
business at the relevant manufacturing facilities including, without limitation, industrial product production permits. We are
required to comply with applicable hygiene and food safety standards in relation to our production processes. Our premises and
transportation vehicles are subject to regular inspections by the regulatory authorities for compliance with the Detailed Rules
for Administration and Supervision of Quality and Safety in Food Producing and Processing Enterprises. Failure to pass these inspections,
or the loss of or failure to renew our licenses and permits, could require us to temporarily or permanently suspend some or all
of our production activities, which could disrupt our operations and adversely affect our business.
Governmental
regulations affecting the import or export of products could negatively affect our revenue.
The
United States and various other governments have imposed controls, export license requirements and restrictions on the export
of some of our products. Governmental regulation of exports, or our failure to obtain required export approval for our products,
could harm our international sales and adversely affect our revenue and profits. In addition, failure to comply with such regulations
could result in penalties, costs and restrictions on export privileges. Additionally, the new U.S. presidential administration
has indicated that it may seek changes to or withdraw the United States from various international treaties and trade arrangements.
Uncertainty regarding policies affecting global trade may make it difficult for our management to accurately forecast our business,
and increases in the duties, tariffs and other charges imposed on our products by the United States or other countries in which
on our products are sold, or other restraints on international trade, could negatively affect our business and the results of
our operations.
We
do not presently maintain product liability insurance, and our property and equipment insurance does not cover the full value
of our property and equipment, which leaves us with exposure in the event of loss or damage to our properties or claims filed
against us.
We
currently do not carry any product liability or other similar insurance. Product liability claims and lawsuits in the PRC generally
are still rare, unlike in some other countries. Product liability exposures and litigation, however, could become more commonplace
in the PRC. Moreover, we have product liability exposure in countries in which we sell our products, such as the United States,
where product liability claims are more prevalent. As we expand our international sales, our liability exposure will increase.
We
may be required from time to time to recall products entirely or from specific copackers, markets or batches. Although historically
we have not had any recall of our products, we cannot guarantee that circumstances or incidents will not occur that will require
us to recall our products. We do not maintain recall insurance. In the event we experience product liability claims or a product
recall, our business operations and financial condition could be materially adversely affected.
Our
business and operations may be subject to disruption from work stoppages, terrorism or natural disasters.
Our
operations may be subject to disruption for a variety of reasons, including work stoppages, acts of war, terrorism, pandemics,
fire, earthquake, flooding or other natural disasters. If a major incident were to occur in either of the regions where our facilities
or main offices are located, our facilities or offices or those of critical suppliers could be damaged or destroyed. Such a disruption
could result in a reduction in available raw materials, the temporary or permanent loss of critical data, suspension of operations,
delays in shipment of products and disruption of business generally, which would adversely affect our revenue and results of operations.
Our
success depends substantially on the continued retention of certain key personnel and our ability to hire and retain qualified
personnel in the future to support our growth.
If
one or more of our senior executives or other key personnel are unable or unwilling to continue in their present positions, our
business may be disrupted and our financial condition and results of operations may be materially and adversely affected. While
we depend on the abilities and participation of our current management team generally, we rely particularly upon Mr. Yongke Xue,
our chief executive officer (“CEO”); Mr. Hongke Xue, a member of the Company’s Board of Directors (the “Board”);
and Mr. Hanjun Zheng, our interim chief financial officer (“CFO”). The loss of the services of Messrs. Yongke Xue,
Hongke Xue or Hanjun Zheng for any reason could significantly adversely impact our business and results of operations. Competition
for senior management and senior technology personnel in the PRC is intense and the pool of qualified candidates is very limited.
Accordingly, we cannot guarantee that the services of our senior executives and other key personnel will continue to be available
to us, or that we will be able to find a suitable replacement for them if they were to leave.
The
relative lack of public company experience of our management team may put us at a competitive disadvantage.
Our
management team lacks public company experience, which could impair our ability to comply with legal and regulatory requirements
such as those imposed by the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, (“Sarbanes-Oxley”). Our senior management does not have much
experience managing a publicly traded company. Such responsibilities include complying with federal securities laws and making
required disclosures on a timely basis. Our senior management may be unable to implement programs and policies in an effective
and timely manner or that adequately respond to the increased legal, regulatory and reporting requirements associated with being
a publicly traded company. Our failure to comply with all applicable requirements could lead to the imposition of fines and penalties,
distract our management from attending to the management and growth of our business, result in a loss of investor confidence in
our financial reports and have an adverse effect on our business and stock price.
As
a public company, we are obligated to maintain effective internal controls over financial reporting. Our internal controls may
be determined not to be effective, which may adversely affect investor confidence in us and, as a result, decrease the value of
our Common Stock.
The
PRC has not adopted management and financial reporting concepts and practices similar to those in the United States. We may have
difficulty in hiring and retaining a sufficient number of qualified finance and management employees to work in the PRC. As a
result of these factors, we may experience difficulty in establishing and maintaining accounting and financial controls, collecting
financial data, budgeting, managing our funds and preparing financial statements, books of account and corporate records and instituting
business practices that meet investors’ expectations in the United States.
Rules
adopted by the SEC, or the Commission, pursuant to Sarbanes-Oxley Section 404 require annual assessment of our internal controls
over financial reporting. This requirement first applied to our annual report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2008. The standards that must be met for management to assess the internal controls over financial reporting as effective are
relatively new and complex, and they require significant documentation, testing and possible remediation to meet the detailed
standards. This assessment will need to include disclosure of any material weaknesses identified by our management in our
internal control over financial reporting. During the evaluation and testing process, if we identify one or more material weaknesses
in our internal control over financial reporting, we will be unable to assert that our internal controls are effective. If we
are unable to conclude that our internal control over financial reporting is effective, we could lose investor confidence in the
accuracy and completeness of our financial reports, which could harm our business and cause the price of our Common Stock to decline.
We
may need additional capital to fund our future operations and, if it is not available when needed, we may need to reduce our planned
development and marketing efforts, which may reduce our sales revenue.
We
believe that our existing working capital and cash available from operations will enable us to meet our working capital requirements
for at least the next 12 months. However, if cash from future operations is insufficient, or if cash is used for acquisitions
or other currently unanticipated uses, we may need additional capital. The development and marketing of new products and business
and the expansion of distribution channels and associated support personnel require a significant commitment of resources. In
addition, if the markets for our products develop more slowly than anticipated, or if we fail to establish significant market
share and achieve sufficient net revenues, we may continue to consume significant amounts of capital. As a result, we could be
required to raise additional capital. To the extent that we raise additional capital through the sale of equity or convertible
debt securities, the issuance of such securities could result in dilution of the shares held by existing stockholders. If additional
funds are raised through the issuance of debt securities, such securities may provide the holders certain rights, preferences,
and privileges senior to those of common stockholders, and the terms of such debt could impose restrictions on our operations.
We cannot guarantee that additional capital, if required, will be available on acceptable terms, or at all. If we are unable to
obtain sufficient amounts of additional capital, we may be required to reduce the scope of our planned product development and
marketing efforts, which could harm our business, financial condition and operating results.
We
may not be able to prevent others from unauthorized use of our patents, which could harm our business and competitive position.
Our
success depends, in part, on our ability to protect our proprietary technologies. We hold twenty one patents in the PRC covering
our fruit processing technology. The process of seeking patent protection can be lengthy and expensive and we cannot guarantee
that our existing or future issued patents will be sufficient to provide us with meaningful protection or commercial advantages.
We also cannot guarantee that our current or potential competitors do not have, and will not obtain, patents that will prevent,
limit or interfere with our ability to make or sell our products in the PRC or other countries.
The
implementation and enforcement of PRC intellectual property laws historically have not been vigorous or consistent. Accordingly,
intellectual property rights and confidentiality protections in the PRC are not as effective as those in the United States and
other countries. We may need to resort to litigation to enforce or defend patents issued to us or to determine the enforceability,
scope and validity of our proprietary rights or those of others. Such litigation will require significant expenditures of cash
and management efforts and could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. An adverse determination in
any such litigation will impair our intellectual property rights and may harm our business, competitive position, business prospects
and reputation.
Our
ecommerce business depends on the continued use of the Internet and the adequacy of the Internet infrastructure.
Our
ecommerce business depends upon the widespread use of the Internet and ecommerce. Factors which could reduce the widespread use
of the Internet for ecommerce include actual or perceived lack of security of information or privacy protection, cyberattacks
or other disruptions or damage to the Internet or to users’ computers, significant increases in the costs of transportation
of goods, and taxation and governmental regulation.
Our
ecommerce business depends on our Website, network infrastructure and transaction-processing systems.
Our
ecommerce business is completely dependent on our infrastructure. Any system interruption that results in the unavailability of
our Website or reduced performance of our transaction systems could reduce our ability to conduct our business. We use internally
and externally developed systems for our Website and our transaction processing systems. We expect to experience system interruptions
due to software failure. We may also experience temporary capacity constraints due to sharply increased traffic during sales or
other promotions and during the holiday shopping season. Capacity constraints can cause system disruptions, slower response times,
delayed page presentation, degradation in levels of customer service and other problems. We may also experience difficulties with
our infrastructure upgrades. Any future difficulties with our transaction processing systems or difficulties upgrading, expanding
or integrating aspects of our systems may cause system disruptions, slower response times, and degradation in levels of customer
service, additional expense, impaired quality and speed of order fulfillment or other problems.
If
the location where all of our computer and communications hardware is located is compromised, our business, prospects, financial
condition and results of operations could be harmed. If we suffer an interruption or degradation of services at the location for
any reason, our business could be harmed. Our success, and in particular, our ability to successfully receive and fulfill orders
and provide high-quality customer service, largely depends on the efficient and uninterrupted operation of our computer and communications
systems. These limitations could have an adverse effect on our conversion rate and sales. Our disaster recovery plan may be inadequate,
and we do not carry business interruption insurance to compensate us for the losses that could occur. Despite our implementation
of network security measures, our servers are vulnerable to computer viruses, physical or electronic break-ins and similar disruptions,
the occurrence of any of which could lead to interruptions, delays, loss of critical data or the inability to accept and fulfill
customer orders. The occurrence of any of the foregoing risks could harm our business.
Our
platform requires frequent updates on pricing from our vendors. If these updates are inaccurate or do not occur, there could be
a negative influence on our business.
We
update the prices of products listed on our site frequently through a third party vendor. If we are unable to obtain, or are not
provided updated pricing information from our third party vendor, or if we fail to act on information provided by our third party
vendor, then it could cause us to remedy the pricing difference to complete the transaction, or source the product from an alternative
vendor at their price.
We
are subject to cyber security risks and may incur increasing costs in an effort to minimize those risks and to respond to cyber
incidents.
Our
ecommerce business is entirely dependent on the secure operation of our website and systems as well as the operation of the Internet
generally. Our business involves the storage and transmission of users’ proprietary information, and security breaches could
expose us to a risk of loss or misuse of this information, litigation, and potential liability. A number of large Internet companies
have suffered security breaches, some of which have involved intentional attacks. From time to time we and many other Internet
businesses also may be subject to a denial of service attacks wherein attackers attempt to block customers’ access to our
Website. If we are unable to avert a denial of service attack for any significant period, we could sustain substantial revenue
loss from lost sales and customer dissatisfaction. We may not have the resources or technical sophistication to anticipate or
prevent rapidly evolving types of cyber-attacks.
Cyberattacks
may target us, our customers, our suppliers, banks, payment processors, ecommerce in general or the communication infrastructure
on which we depend. If an actual or perceived attack or breach of our security occurs, customer and/or supplier perception of
the effectiveness of our security measures could be harmed and we could lose customers, suppliers or both. Actual or anticipated
attacks and risks may cause us to incur increasing costs, including costs to deploy additional personnel and protection technologies,
train employees, and engage third party experts and consultants. A person who is able to circumvent our security measures might
be able to misappropriate our or our users’ proprietary information, cause interruption in our operations, damage our computers
or those of our users, or otherwise damage our reputation and business. Any compromise of our security could result in a violation
of applicable privacy and other laws, significant legal and financial exposure, damage to our reputation, and a loss of confidence
in our security measures, which could harm our business.
Our
shift in focus towards the development of blockchain-based applications and technologies could have a material adverse effect
on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
We
recently announced our intention to pursue a strategy to embrace the growth potential and technological capabilities of blockchain
technology, a rapidly evolving technology in which we have limited operational history or experience. Our focus on blockchain
technology subjects us to risks associated with the use of new and novel technologies, including technical, operational, financial,
regulatory, legal and reputational risks, as well as the risk that we may be unable to timely develop our blockchain-based applications
or technologies or market, license or sell our blockchain-based applications or technologies successfully or profitably. We cannot
provide any assurance that we will be able to hire or retain well-qualified individuals with experience in the blockchain industry
or that our assessment of individuals we retain will be correct. These individuals may be unfamiliar with the requirements of
being involved in a public company which could cause us to have to expend time and resources helping them become familiar with
such requirements. This could be expensive and time-consuming and could lead to various regulatory issues which may adversely
affect our operations.
The
blockchain related products and services that we are developing have the potential to be used in ways we do not intend, including
for criminal or other illegal activities.
Blockchain-related
products and services, in particular cryptocurrencies, have the potential to be used for financial crimes or other illegal activities.
Because the blockchain platform that we are developing is novel, there are uncertainties regarding any legal and regulatory requirements
for preventing blockchain-related products and services from being put to such uses, and there are uncertainties regarding the
liabilities and risks to the Company if we are unable to prevent such uses. Even if we comply with all laws and regulations regarding
financial and blockchain related products and services, we have no ability to ensure that our customers, partners or others to
whom we license or sell our products and services comply with all laws and regulations applicable to them and their transactions.
Any negative publicity we receive regarding any allegations of unlawful uses of our blockchain platform could damage our reputation.
More generally, any negative publicity regarding unlawful uses of blockchain technology in the marketplace could reduce the demand
for our products and services. The occurrence of any of the foregoing could have a material adverse effect on our financial results
and business.
The
regulatory regime governing blockchain technologies, cryptocurrencies, digital assets, and offerings of digital assets is uncertain,
and new regulations or policies may materially adversely affect the development and the value of such cryptocurrencies and assets.
Regulation
of digital assets, cryptocurrencies, blockchain technologies, cryptocurrency exchanges and the blockchain platform we are developing
is currently undeveloped and likely to rapidly evolve as government agencies take greater interest in them. Regulation also varies
significantly among international, federal, state and local jurisdictions and is subject to significant uncertainty. Various legislative
and executive bodies in the United States and in other countries may in the future adopt laws, regulations, or guidance, or take
other actions, which may severely impact the permissibility of tokens generally and the technology behind them or the means of
transaction or in transferring them. Failure by our subsidiaries to comply with any laws, rules and regulations, some of which
may not exist yet or are subject to interpretation and may be subject to change, could result in a variety of adverse consequences,
including civil penalties and fines.
The
further development and acceptance of blockchain trading platforms, which are part of a new and rapidly changing industry, are
subject to a variety of factors that are difficult to evaluate. The slowing or stopping of the development or acceptance of blockchain
trading platforms would have a material adverse effect on our business plans and could have a material adverse effect on us.
The
growth of the blockchain industry in general is subject to a high degree of uncertainty. The factors affecting the further development
of the cryptocurrency and cryptosecurity industry, as well as blockchain trading platforms, include, without limitation:
|
●
|
worldwide
growth in the adoption and use of cryptocurrencies, cryptosecurities, and other blockchain technologies;
|
|
●
|
government
and quasi-government regulation of cryptocurrencies, cryptosecurities, and other blockchain assets and their use, or restrictions
on or regulation of access to and operation of blockchain networks or similar systems;
|
|
●
|
the
maintenance and development of the open-source software protocol of cryptocurrency or cryptosecurities networks;
|
|
●
|
changes
in consumer demographics and public tastes and preferences;
|
|
●
|
the
availability and popularity of other forms or methods of buying and selling goods and services, or trading assets including
new means of using government-backed currencies or existing networks;
|
|
●
|
general
economic conditions and the regulatory environment relating to cryptocurrencies and cryptosecurities; and
|
|
●
|
a
decline in the popularity or acceptance of cryptocurrencies or other blockchain-based tokens.
|
The
cryptocurrency and cryptosecurities industries as a whole have been characterized by rapid changes and innovations and are constantly
evolving. Although it has experienced significant growth in recent years, the slowing or stopping of the development, general
acceptance and adoption and usage of blockchain networks and blockchain assets may materially adversely affect our business plans.
Intellectual
property infringement claims may adversely impact our results of operations.
As
we develop and introduce new products, we may be increasingly subject to claims of infringement of another party’s intellectual
property. If a claim for infringement is brought against us, such claim may require us to modify our products, cease selling certain
products or engage in litigation to determine the validity and scope of such claims. Any of these events may harm our business
and results of operations.
If
our costs and demands upon management increase disproportionately to the growth of our business and revenue as a result of complying
with the laws and regulations affecting public companies, our operating results could be harmed.
As
a public company, we do and will continue to incur significant legal, accounting, investor relations and other expenses, including
costs associated with public company reporting requirements. We also have incurred and will incur costs associated with current
corporate governance requirements, including requirements under Section 404 and other provisions of Sarbanes-Oxley, as well
as rules implemented by the SEC and the stock exchange on which our Common Stock is traded. The expenses incurred by public companies
for reporting and corporate governance purposes have increased dramatically over the past several years. These rules and regulations
have increased our legal and financial compliance costs substantially and make some activities more time consuming and costly.
If our costs and demands upon management increase disproportionately to the growth of our business and revenue, our operating
results could be harmed.
There
are inherent uncertainties involved in estimates, judgments and assumptions used in the preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles in the United States, or U.S. GAAP. Any changes in estimates, judgments
and assumptions could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.
The
preparation of financial statements in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (“U.S. GAAP”)
involves making estimates, judgments and assumptions that affect reported amounts of assets (including intangible assets), liabilities
and related reserves, revenue, expenses and income. Estimates, judgments and assumptions are inherently subject to change in the
future, and any such changes could result in corresponding changes to the amounts of assets, liabilities, revenue, expenses and
income. Any such changes could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition and operating results.
We
are subject to the risk of increased income taxes, which could harm our business, financial condition and operating results.
We
base our tax position upon the anticipated nature and conduct of our business and upon our understanding of the tax laws of the
various countries in which we have assets or conduct activities. However, our tax position is subject to review and possible challenge
by tax authorities and to possible changes in law, which may have retroactive effect. We currently operate through Pacific, a
wholly-owned subsidiary organized under the laws of Vanuatu and SkyPeople (China), a 73.42% owned subsidiary of Pacific organized
under the laws of the PRC, and we maintain manufacturing operations in the PRC. Any of these jurisdictions could assert tax claims
against us. We cannot determine in advance the extent to which some jurisdictions may require us to pay taxes or make payments
in lieu of taxes. If we become subject to additional taxes in any jurisdiction, such tax treatment could materially and adversely
affect our business, financial condition and operating results.
Increases
in income tax rates, changes in income tax laws or disagreements with tax authorities could adversely affect our business, financial
condition or results of operations.
We
are subject to income taxes in the United States and in certain foreign jurisdictions in which we operate. Increases in income
tax rates or other changes in income tax laws that apply to our business could reduce our after-tax income from such jurisdiction
and could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations. Our operations outside the United States
generate a significant portion of our income. In addition, the United States and many of the other countries in which our products
are distributed or sold, including countries in which we have significant operations, have recently made or are actively considering
changes to existing tax laws. For example, the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act (the “TCJ Act”) was recently signed into law
in the United States. The changes in the TCJ Act are broad and complex and we are continuing to examine the impact the TCJ Act
may have on our business and financial results. In accordance with applicable SEC guidance, we recorded a provisional net tax
expense in the fourth quarter of 2017 resulting from the enactment of the TCJ Act. This provisional expense is subject to change,
possibly materially, due to, among other things, changes in estimates, interpretations and assumptions we have made, changes in
Internal Revenue Service (IRS) interpretations, the issuance of new guidance, legislative actions, changes in accounting standards
or related interpretations in response to the TCJ Act and future actions by states within the United States that have not yet
adopted state-level laws similar to the TCJ Act.
Additional
changes in the U.S. tax regime or in how U.S. multinational corporations are taxed on foreign earnings, including changes in how
existing tax laws are interpreted or enforced, could adversely affect our business, financial condition or results of operations.
We
are also subject to regular reviews, examinations and audits by the IRS and other taxing authorities with respect to income and
non-income based taxes both within and outside the United States. Economic and political pressures to increase tax revenues in
jurisdictions in which we operate, or the adoption of new or reformed tax legislation or regulation, may make resolving tax disputes
more difficult and the final resolution of tax audits and any related litigation could differ from our historical provisions and
accruals, resulting in an adverse impact on our business, financial condition or results of operations. In addition, in connection
with the Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development Base Erosion and Profit Shifting project, companies are required
to disclose more information to tax authorities on operations around the world, which may lead to greater audit scrutiny of profits
earned in various countries.
Risks
Related to Doing Business in the PRC
Inflation
in the PRC could negatively affect our profitability and growth.
The
rapid growth of China’s economy has been uneven among economic sectors and geographic regions of the country. China’s
economy grew at an annual rate of 6.9% in 2017, as measured by the year-over-year change in gross domestic product, or GDP, according
to the National Bureau of Statistics of China. Rapid economic growth can lead to growth in the money supply and rising inflation.
The inflation rate in China was approximately 7.5% in 2017 as reported by National Bureau of Statistics, and is expected to increase.
If prices for our products and services fail to rise at a rate sufficient to compensate for the increased costs of supplies, such
as raw materials, due to inflation, it may have an adverse effect on our profitability.
Furthermore,
in order to control inflation in the past, the PRC government has imposed controls on bank credits, limits on loans for property,
plant and equipment and restrictions on state bank lending. The implementation of such policies may impede future economic growth.
The People’s Bank of China has effected increases in interest rates in response to inflationary concerns in the China’s
economy. If the central bank again raises interest rates from current levels, economic activity in China could further slow and,
in turn, materially increase our costs and reduce demand for our products and services.
We
face the risk that changes in the policies of the PRC government could have a significant impact upon the business we may be able
to conduct in the PRC and the profitability of such business.
We
conduct substantially all of our operations and generate most of our revenue in the PRC. Accordingly, economic, political and
legal developments in the PRC will significantly affect our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects.
The PRC economy is in transition from a planned economy to a market oriented economy subject to plans adopted by the government
that set national economic development goals. Policies of the PRC government can have significant effects on economic conditions
in the PRC. While we believe that the PRC will continue to strengthen its economic and trading relationships with foreign countries
and that business development in the PRC will continue to follow market forces, we cannot guarantee that this will be the case.
Our interests may be adversely affected by changes in policies by the PRC government, including:
|
●
|
changes
in laws, regulations or their interpretation;
|
|
●
|
confiscatory
taxation;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
restrictions
on currency conversion, imports or sources of supplies;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
expropriation
or nationalization of private enterprises; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
the
allocation of resources.
|
Although
the PRC government has been pursuing economic reform policies for more than two decades, the PRC government continues to exercise
significant control over economic growth in the PRC through the allocation of resources, controlling payments of foreign currency,
setting monetary policy and imposing policies that impact particular industries in different ways. We cannot guarantee that the
PRC government will continue to pursue policies favoring a market oriented economy or that existing policies will not be significantly
altered, especially in the event of a change in leadership, social or political disruption, or other circumstances affecting political,
economic and social life in the PRC.
The
original incorporation of SkyPeople (China) as a joint stock company in 2001 did not obtain all required approvals from the PRC
government authorities pursuant to the relevant PRC law effective at the time, and we may be subject to various penalties under
the law retroactively.
The
original incorporation of SkyPeople (China) (under the original name of Xi’an Zhonglv Ecology Science and Technology Industry
Co., Ltd.) as a joint stock company in 2001 was approved by the Xi’an Municipal People’s Government. However, according
to the applicable PRC Company Law that was in force in 2001, the incorporation of SkyPeople (China) as a joint stock company shall
be subject to the approval by the government authority of Shaanxi Province. Pursuant to the PRC Company Law which was in force
in 2001, if company stocks is arbitrarily issued without obtaining the approval of the relevant competent authorities stipulated
under the law, the parties concerned may be ordered to cease the issuance of the stock, refund the raised capital and the interests
accrued therefrom, and may be subject to a fine of no less than one percent but no more than five percent of the amount of the
raised capital. As such, SkyPeople (China) may be subject to any or all of the foregoing penalties as provided under the PRC Company
Law effective in 2001 should the relevant government authorities choose to enforce the law retroactively.
However,
we believe that the regulatory authorities may consider the following factors as mitigating factors if such authorities choose
to enforce the applicable laws:
(i)
the incorporation of SkyPeople (China) obtained the approval by the Xi’an local government. As general practice in
approval procedures, the applicants may only be able to first approach the Xi’an local government authority in order to
acquire the approval by a higher level government authority, and would generally rely on the Xi’an local government to then
submit the application to a higher level authority for its final approval; and
(ii)
the trend of the PRC Company Law is to deregulate the approvals on the incorporation of joint stock companies in China. In particular,
the current PRC Company Law, effective since January 1, 2006, has eliminated the relevant approval requirement relating to the
incorporation of joint stock companies. Instead, the current PRC Company Law merely requires a registration with the competent
Administration for Industry and Commerce in connection with the incorporation of joint stock companies in the PRC as long as the
stock is not issued to the public.
In
addition, if needed in the future, we may make efforts to seek a written confirmation from the Shaanxi Provencal People’s
Government regarding its ratification of the original incorporation of SkyPeople (China) as a joint stock company.
Our
current manufacturing operations are subject to various environmental protection laws and regulations issued by the central and
local governmental authorities, and we cannot guarantee that we have fully complied with all such laws and regulations. In addition,
changes in the existing laws and regulations or additional or stricter laws and regulations on environmental protection in the
PRC may cause us to incur significant capital expenditures, and we cannot guarantee that we will be able to comply with any such
laws and regulations.
We
carry out our business in an industry that is subject to PRC environmental protection laws and regulations. These laws and regulations
require enterprises engaged in manufacturing and construction that may cause environmental waste to adopt effective measures to
control and properly dispose of waste gases, waste water, industrial waste, dust and other environmental waste materials, as well
as fee payments from producers discharging waste substances. Fines may be levied against producers causing pollution. Although
we have made efforts to comply with such laws and regulations, we cannot guarantee that we have fully complied with all such laws
and regulations. Except for Yingkou, all of our operating facilities hold a Pollution Emission Permit. The failure of complying
with such laws or regulations may subject us to various administrative penalties such as fines. If the circumstances of the breach
are serious, the central government of the PRC, including all governmental subdivisions, has the discretion to cease or close
any operations failing to comply with such laws or regulations. There can also be no assurance that the PRC government will not
change the existing laws or regulations or impose additional or stricter laws or regulations, compliance with which may cause
us to incur significant capital expenditure, which we may be unable to pass on to our customers through higher prices for our
products. In addition, we cannot guarantee that we will be able to comply with any such laws and regulations.
Changes
in existing PRC food hygiene and safety laws may cause us to incur additional costs to comply with the more stringent laws and
regulations, which could have an adverse impact on our financial position.
Manufacturers
within the PRC beverage industry are subject to compliance with PRC food hygiene laws and regulations. These food hygiene and
safety laws require all enterprises engaged in the production of juice and other beverages to obtain a food production license
for each of their production facilities. They also set out hygiene and safety standards with respect to food and food additives,
packaging and containers, information to be disclosed on packaging as well as hygiene requirements for food production and sites,
facilities and equipment used for the transportation and sale of food. Failure to comply with PRC food hygiene and safety laws
may result in fines, suspension of operations, loss of business licenses and, in more extreme cases, criminal proceedings against
an enterprise and its management. Although we comply with current food hygiene laws, in the event that the PRC government increases
the stringency of such laws, our production and distribution costs may increase, which could adversely impact our financial position.
We
benefit from various forms of government subsidies and grants, the withdrawal of which could affect our operations.
Certain
of our subsidiaries have received government subsidies from local governments. We recognized $0.19 million and $0.03 million in
government subsidies for fiscal years 2017 and 2016, respectively. Past government grants or subsidies are not indicative of what
we will obtain in the future. We cannot guarantee that we will continue to be eligible for government grants or other forms of
government support. In the event that we are no longer eligible for grants, subsidies or other government support, our business
and financial condition could be adversely affected.
PRC
laws and regulations governing our current business operations are sometimes vague and uncertain and any changes in such laws
and regulations may harm our business.
There
are substantial uncertainties regarding the interpretation and application of PRC laws and regulations including, but not limited
to, the laws and regulations governing our business and the enforcement and performance of our arrangements with customers in
certain circumstances. We are considered foreign persons or foreign funded enterprises under PRC laws and, as a result, we are
required to comply with PRC laws and regulations related to foreign persons and foreign funded enterprises. These laws and regulations
are sometimes vague and may be subject to future changes, and their official interpretation and enforcement may involve substantial
uncertainty. The effectiveness of newly enacted laws, regulations or amendments may be delayed, resulting in detrimental reliance.
New laws and regulations that affect existing and proposed future businesses may also be applied retroactively. We cannot predict
what effect the interpretation of existing or new PRC laws or regulations may have on our business.
We
could be restricted from paying dividends to shareholders due to PRC laws and other contractual requirements.
We
are a holding company incorporated in the State of Florida and do not have any assets or conduct any business operations other
than our investments in our subsidiaries and affiliates. As a result of our holding company structure, we rely entirely
on dividend payments from SkyPeople (China). PRC accounting standards and regulations currently permit payment of dividends
only out of accumulated profits, a portion of which is required to be set aside for certain reserve funds. Furthermore,
if SkyPeople (China) incurs debt on its own in the future, the instruments governing the debt may restrict its ability to pay
dividends or make other payments. Although we do not intend to pay dividends in the future, our inability to receive
all of the revenue from SkyPeople (China)’s operations may provide an additional obstacle to our ability to pay dividends
if we so decide in the future.
Governmental
control of currency conversion may affect the value of shareholder investments.
The
PRC government imposes controls on the convertibility of RMB into foreign currencies and, in certain cases, the remittance of
currency out of the PRC. RMB is currently not a freely convertible currency. Shortages in the availability
of foreign currency may restrict our ability to remit sufficient foreign currency to satisfy foreign currency obligations. Under
existing PRC foreign exchange regulations, payments of current account items, including profit distributions, interest payments
and expenditures from the transaction, can be made in foreign currencies without prior approval by complying with certain procedural
requirements. Approval from appropriate governmental authorities, however, is required where RMB is to be converted
into foreign currency and remitted out of the PRC to pay capital expenses such as the repayment of bank loans denominated in foreign
currencies. In addition, the PRC government could restrict access to foreign currencies for current account transactions
in the future. If the foreign exchange control system prevents us from obtaining sufficient foreign currency to satisfy
our currency demands, we may not be able to pay certain of our expenses as they come due.
The
fluctuation of the RMB may harm shareholder investments.
The
value of the RMB against the U.S. dollar and other currencies may fluctuate and is affected by, among other things, changes in
the PRC’s political and economic conditions. Any significant revaluation of the RMB may materially and adversely
affect our cash flows, revenue and financial condition. For example, to the extent that we need to convert U.S. dollars
we receive from an offering of our securities into RMB for our operations, appreciation of the RMB against the U.S. dollar would
diminish the value of the proceeds of the offering and could harm our business, financial condition and results of operations. Conversely,
if we decide to convert our RMB into U.S. dollars for business purposes and the U.S. dollar appreciates against the RMB, the U.S.
dollar equivalent of the RMB we convert would be reduced. In addition, the depreciation of significant U.S. dollar
denominated assets could result in a charge to our income statement and a reduction in the value of these assets.
PRC
regulations relating to mergers and the establishment of offshore special purpose companies by PRC residents, if applied to us,
may limit our ability to operate our business as we see fit.
On
August 8, 2006, six Chinese regulatory agencies, namely, MOFCOM, the State Assets Supervision and Administration Commission, the
State Administration for Taxation (“SAT”), SAIC, the Securities Regulatory Commission (“CSRC”) and the
State Administration of Foreign Exchange (“SAFE”), jointly promulgated the Regulation on Mergers and Acquisitions
of Domestic Companies by Foreign Investors, generally referred to as the 2006 M&A Rules, which became effective on September
8, 2006. The 2006 M&A Rules, among other things, govern the approval process by which an offshore investor may participate
in an acquisition of assets or equity interests of a Chinese domestic company. Depending on the structure of the transaction,
the 2006 M&A Rules require the transaction parties to make a series of applications to the government agencies. In some instances,
the application process may require the presentation of economic data concerning a transaction, including appraisals of the target
business and evaluations of the acquirer, which are designed to allow the government to assess the transaction. Under certain
circumstances, government approvals will have expiration dates by which a transaction must be completed and reported to the government
agencies. Compliance with the 2006 M&A Rules will be more time consuming and expensive than in the past, and the government
can exert more control over the combination of two businesses under the 2006 M&A Rules. As a result of any potential application
of the 2006 M&A Rules, our ability to engage in business combination transactions in the PRC has become significantly more
complicated, time consuming and expensive, and we may not be able to negotiate a transaction that is acceptable to us or sufficiently
protective of our interests in a transaction.
In
October 2005, SAFE issued the Notice on Relevant Issues in the Foreign Exchange Control over Financing and Return Investment Through
Special Purpose Companies by Residents Inside the PRC, generally referred to as Circular 75. Circular 75 requires Chinese residents
to register with an applicable branch of SAFE before establishing or acquiring control over an offshore special purpose company
for the purpose of engaging in an equity financing outside of the PRC that is supported by domestic Chinese assets originally
held by those residents. Following the issuance of Circular 75, SAFE issued internal implementing guidelines for Circular 75 in
June 2007. These implementing guidelines, known as Notice 106, effectively expanded the reach of Circular 75 by:
|
●
|
purporting
to regulate the establishment or acquisition of control by Chinese residents of offshore entities which merely acquire “control”
over domestic companies or assets, even in the absence of legal ownership;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
adding
requirements relating to the source of the Chinese resident’s funds used to establish or acquire the offshore entity;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
regulating
the use of existing offshore entities for offshore financings;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
purporting
to regulate situations in which an offshore entity establishes a new subsidiary in the PRC or acquires an unrelated company
or unrelated assets in the PRC;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
making
the domestic affiliate of the offshore entity responsible for the accuracy of certain documents which must be filed in connection
with any such registration, notably, the business plan which describes the overseas financing and the use of proceeds; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
requiring
that the registrant establish that all foreign exchange transactions undertaken by the offshore entity and its affiliates
were in compliance with applicable laws and regulations.
|
In
July 2014, SAFE promulgated the Notice of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on the Administration of Foreign Exchange
Involved in Overseas Investment, Financing and Return on Investment Conducted by Residents in China via Special-Purpose Companies,
or Circular 37, which replaced the former circular commonly known as Circular 75 promulgated by SAFE in October 2005.
Circular 37 requires PRC residents to register with local branches of SAFE in connection with their direct establishment
or indirect control of an offshore entity, for the purpose of overseas investment and financing, with such PRC residents’ legally
owned assets or equity interests in domestic enterprises or offshore assets or interests, referred to in Circular 37 as a
“special purpose vehicle.” Circular 37 further requires amendment to the registration in the event of any significant
changes with respect to the special purpose vehicle, such as an increase or decrease of capital contributed by PRC individuals,
share transfer or exchange, merger, division or other material event. In the event that a PRC shareholder holding interests in
a special purpose vehicle fails to fulfill the required SAFE registration, the PRC subsidiaries of that special purpose vehicle
may be prohibited from making profit distributions to the offshore parent and from carrying out subsequent cross-border foreign
exchange activities, and the special purpose vehicle may be restricted in its ability to contribute additional capital into its
PRC subsidiary. Furthermore, failure to comply with the various SAFE registration requirements described above could result in
liability under PRC law for evasion of foreign exchange controls.
In
February 2015, SAFE released the Notice of the State Administration of Foreign Exchange on Further Simplifying and Improving
the Policies of Foreign Exchange Administration Applicable to Direct Investment, or Circular 13, which has amended Circular 37
by requiring PRC residents or entities to register with qualified banks rather than SAFE or its local branch in connection with
their establishment or control of an offshore entity established for the purpose of overseas investment or financing.
No
assurance can be given that our shareholders who are the residents as defined in Circular 37 and who own or owned our shares have
fully complied with, and will continue to comply with, all applicable registration and approval requirements of Circular 37 in
connection with their equity interests in us and our acquisition of equity interests in our PRC based subsidiaries by virtue of
our acquisition of Pacific. Moreover, because of uncertainty over how Circular 37 will be interpreted and implemented, and how
or whether SAFE will apply it to us following the Pacific acquisition, we cannot predict how it will affect our business operations
or future strategies. For example, the ability of our present and prospective PRC subsidiaries to conduct foreign exchange activities,
such as the remittance of dividends and foreign currency denominated borrowings, may be subject to compliance with Circular 37
by our Chinese resident beneficial holders. In addition, such Chinese residents may not always be able to complete the necessary
registration procedures required by Circular 37. We have little control over our present or prospective direct or indirect shareholders
/beneficial owners or the outcome of such registration procedures. If our Chinese shareholders/beneficial owners or the Chinese
shareholders/beneficial owners of the target companies we acquired in the past or will acquire in the future fail to comply with
Circular 37 and related regulations, and if SAFE requires it, they may be subject to fines or legal sanctions, and Chinese authorities
could restrict our investment activities in the PRC, limit our subsidiaries’ ability to make distributions or pay dividends,
or affect the ownership structure, which could adversely affect business and prospects.
Our
acquisition of SkyPeople (China) could constitute a Round-trip Investment under the 2006 M&A Rules.
Prior
to obtaining the MOFCOM approval on September 3, 2007 and Xi’an AIC approval on October 18, 2007, and prior to the full
payment of the purchase price by Pacific for 99% of SkyPeople (China)’s capital stock, SkyPeople (China) was a PRC business
some of whose shareholders were PRC individuals including Hongke Xue, chairman of SkyPeople (China). When Pacific was incorporated
on November 30, 2006 and when the SkyPeople (China) acquisition was approved, none of the shareholders of Pacific were PRC citizens.
Immediately after the consummation of the share exchange, shareholders of Pacific became our shareholders, including Fancylight,
our controlling shareholder. To incentivize Mr. Hongke Xue in connection with the continuous development of SkyPeople (China)’s
business, a call option agreement was entered into between Fancylight and Mr. Hongke Xue on February 25, 2008 pursuant to which
Mr. Xue had the opportunity to acquire a majority of our Common Stock held by Fancylight. Mr. Xue and Fancylight also entered
into a voting trust agreement pursuant to which Mr. Xue has the right to vote such shares on Fancylight’s behalf.
The
PRC regulatory authorities may take the view that the SkyPeople (China) acquisition, the share exchange transaction and the call
option and voting trust arrangements are part of an overall series of arrangements which constitute a round-trip investment regulated
by the 2006 M&A Rules, because at the end of these transactions the same PRC individual who controlled SkyPeople (China) became
the effective controlling party of a foreign entity that acquired ownership of SkyPeople (China). The PRC regulatory authorities
may also take the view that the approval of the SkyPeople (China) acquisition by the MOFCOM and the registration of such acquisition
with the AIC in Xi’an AIC may not be evidence that the SkyPeople (China) acquisition has been properly approved because
the relevant parties did not fully disclose to the MOFCOM or AIC the overall restructuring arrangements. If the PRC regulatory
authorities take the view that the SkyPeople (China) acquisition constitutes a round-trip investment under the 2006 M&A Rules,
we cannot guarantee that we will be able to obtain the required MOFCOM approval.
If
the PRC regulatory authorities take the view that the SkyPeople (China) acquisition constitutes a round-trip investment without
MOFCOM approval on such round-trip investment, they could invalidate our acquisition and ownership of SkyPeople (China).
Additionally,
the 2006 M&A Rules also purport to require that an offshore special purpose vehicle (” SPV”) formed for listing
purposes and controlled directly or indirectly by PRC companies or individuals shall obtain the approval of the CSRC prior to
the listing and trading of such SPV’s securities on an overseas stock exchange. On September 21, 2006, the CSRC published
on its official website procedures specifying documents and materials required to be submitted to it by SPVs seeking CSRC approval
of their overseas listings. However, the application of this PRC regulation remains unclear, with no consensus currently existing
regarding the scope and applicability of the CSRC approval requirement. Given that we established our PRC subsidiaries by means
of direct investments, we believe that these regulations do not require an application to be submitted to the CSRC for the approval
of the listing and trading of our stock on the NASDQ Global Market, unless we are clearly required to do so by subsequently promulgated
rules of the CSRC. If the CSRC or another PRC regulatory agency subsequently determines that CSRC approval was required for the
offerings, we may need to apply for a remedial approval from the CSRC and may be subject to certain administrative punishments
or other sanctions from these regulatory agencies. The regulatory agencies may take actions that could have a material adverse
effect on our business, financial condition, results of operations, reputation and prospects, as well as the trading price of
our stock.
We
believe that if this takes place, we may be able to find a way to reestablish control of SkyPeople (China)’s business operations
through a series of contractual arrangements rather than an outright purchase of SkyPeople (China). But we cannot guarantee that
such contractual arrangements will be protected by PRC law or that we can receive as complete or effective economic benefit and
overall control of SkyPeople (China)’s business than if we had direct ownership of SkyPeople (China). In addition, we cannot
guarantee that such contractual arrangements can be successfully implemented under PRC law. If we cannot obtain approval from
MOFCOM and/or CSRC if required by the PRC regulatory authorities to do so, and if we cannot put in place or enforce relevant contractual
arrangements as an alternative and equivalent means of control of SkyPeople (China), our business and financial performance will
be materially adversely affected.
Because
our principal assets are located outside of the United States, it may be difficult for investors to use U.S. securities laws
to enforce their rights against us, our officers and some of our directors in the United States or to enforce judgments of United
States courts against us or them in the PRC.
All
of our present officers and directors reside outside of the United States. In addition, SkyPeople (China) is located in the PRC
and substantially all of its assets are located outside of the United States. Therefore, it may be difficult for investors in
the United States to enforce their legal rights based on the civil liability provisions of the U.S. securities laws against us
in the courts of either the United States or the PRC and, even if civil judgments are obtained in courts of the United States,
to enforce such judgments in the PRC courts. Further, it is unclear if extradition treaties now in effect between the United States
and the PRC would permit effective enforcement against us or our officers and directors of criminal penalties under the U.S. Federal
securities laws or otherwise.
Risks
Related to Our Common Stock
We
are authorized to issue blank check preferred stock, which may be issued without shareholder approval and which may adversely
affect the rights of holders of our Common Stock.
We
are authorized to issue 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock. The Board is authorized under our articles of incorporation, as
amended, to provide for the issuance of shares of preferred stock by resolution and by filing a certificate of designations under
Florida law, to fix the designation, powers, preferences and rights of the shares of each such series of preferred stock and the
qualifications, limitations or restrictions thereof without any further vote or action by the shareholders. The Board previously
designated and issued 1,000,000 shares of Series A preferred stock which were automatically converted into our Common Stock upon
the effective date of our two-for-three reverse split and returned to the status of authorized and unissued shares of preferred
stock following the reverse split. As of December 31, 2017 there were no shares of Series A preferred stock issued and outstanding.
Any shares of preferred stock that are issued are likely to have priority over our Common Stock with respect to dividend or liquidation
rights. In the event of issuance, the preferred stock could be utilized under certain circumstances as a method of discouraging,
delaying or preventing a change in control, which could have the effect of discouraging bids to acquire us and thereby prevent
shareholders from receiving the maximum value for their shares. We have no present intention to issue any additional shares of
preferred stock in order to discourage or delay a change of control or for any other reason. However, there can be no assurance
that preferred stock will not be issued at some time in the future.
Zeyao
Xue has control over key decision making as a result of his control of a substantial amount of our voting stock.
Zeyao
Xue, the son of our Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors, indirectly and directly beneficially owns
13,699,314 shares, or approximately 53.9%, of our outstanding common stock as of the date of this report. Mr. Zeyao Xue’s
beneficial ownership of 53.9% of Future FinTech’s issued and outstanding common stock will give him the ability to control
the outcome of matters submitted to shareholders for approval, including but not limited to the election of directors and any
merger, consolidation, or sale of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets. This concentrated control could delay,
defer, or prevent a change of control, merger, consolidation, or sale of all or substantially all of the Company’s assets
that other shareholders support, or conversely this concentrated control could result in the consummation of such a transaction
that other shareholders do not support. This concentrated control could also discourage a potential investor from acquiring the
common stock of the Company due to the limited voting power of such shares. As a shareholder, even a controlling shareholder,
Mr. Zeyao Xue is entitled to vote his shares, and shares over which he has voting control, in his own interests, which may not
always be in the interests of our shareholders generally.
Anti-takeover
provisions in our charter documents and under Florida law could discourage, delay or prevent a change in control of our Company
and may affect the trading price of our Common Stock.
We
are a Florida corporation and the anti-takeover provisions of the Florida Business Corporation Act may discourage, delay or prevent
certain changes in control unless such change in control is approved by a majority of our disinterested shareholders. In addition,
the terms of our articles of incorporation and bylaws may discourage, delay or prevent a change in our management or control over
us that shareholders may consider favorable. Our articles of incorporation and bylaws:
|
●
|
authorize
the issuance of “blank check” preferred stock that could be issued by the Board to thwart a takeover attempt;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
require
that directors only be removed from office upon a majority shareholder vote;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
provide
that vacancies on the board of directors, including newly created directorships, may be filled only by a majority vote of
directors then in office;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
limit
who may call special meetings of shareholders; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
prohibit
shareholder action by written consent, requiring certain actions to be taken at a meeting of the shareholders.
|
For more information regarding these and other provisions, see the section titled “Description of Our Securities —
Anti-Takeover Effects of Florida Law and Provisions of Our Articles of Incorporation and Bylaws.”
In
the past, our Common Stock has been in danger of being delisted from the NASDAQ Stock Market (“NASDAQ”).
On
each of April 20, 2016, May 24, 2016 and August 17, 2016, the Company received a notification letter from the staff of the Listing
Qualifications Department of NASDAQ (the “Staff”) indicating that the Company was not in compliance with NASDAQ’s
continued listing requirements because the Company was not in compliance with the NASDAQ Listing Rule 5250(c)(1) (the “Rule”)
with respect to certain of its annual and current reports.
On
October 12, 2016, the Company received a delisting determination letter (the “Determination Letter”) from the Staff
notifying the Company that because the Company had not filed its Annual Report on Form 10-K for the fiscal year ended December
31, 2015 (the “Form 10-K”) and its Quarterly Reports on Form 10-Q for the quarterly periods ended March 31, 2016 and
June 30, 2016, (together, the “Reports”) by October 11, 2016, the deadline by which the Company was to file all Reports
in order to regain compliance with the Rule, the Company’s common stock was subject to delisting from the NASDAQ Global
Market. The Determination Letter further noted that unless the Company requested an appeal of the Staff’s determination
no later than 4:00 pm Eastern Time on October 19, 2016, trading of the Company’s common stock on the NASDAQ Global Market
would be suspended at the opening of business on October 21, 2016, and a Form 25-NSE would be filed with the Securities and Exchange
Commission (the “SEC”) removing the Company’s securities from listing and registration on the NASDAQ Global
Market.
On
October 19, 2016, the Company requested a hearing before the NASDAQ Hearings Panel (the “Panel”) under Listing Rule
5815(a) to appeal the delisting determination from the Staff. On November 2, 2016, the Company was granted an extended stay as
to the suspension of the Company’s shares from trading by the Panel until the Company’s scheduled hearing before the Panel on
December 15, 2016 and issuance of a final Panel decision. Following a hearing, the Panel required that the Company regain compliance
by January 31, 2017. By letter dated February 2, 2017, the Panel notified the Company that (i) the Company had regained compliance,
(ii) the Company’s Common Stock would continue to be listed on the NASDAQ Global Market, and (iii) the Panel was closing
the matter.
On
December 1, 2017, the Company received written notice from NASDAQ stating that the Company was not in compliance with the requirement
of the minimum Market Value of Publicly Held Shares (“MVPHS”) of $5,000,000 for continued listing on The NASDAQ Global
Market, as set forth in NASDAQ Listing Rule 5450(b)(1)(C). The notice had no immediate effect on the listing of the Company’s
common stock, and its common stock continued to trade on The NASDAQ Global Market under the symbol “FTFT”. In accordance
with NASDAQ Listing Rule 5810(c)(3)(D), the Company had a grace period of 180 calendar days, or until May 30, 2018, to regain
compliance with the minimum MVPHS requirement. To regain compliance, the minimum MVPHS of the Company’s common stock needed to
meet or exceed $5,000,000 for at least ten consecutive business days during this 180-day grace period. The Company received notice
that it had regained compliance on January 4, 2018.
ITEM
1B – UNRESOLVED STAFF COMMENTS
Not
applicable.
ITEM
2 – PROPERTIES
Our
principal executive offices are located at 23/F, China Development Bank Tower, No. 2 Gaoxin 1st Road, Hi-Tech Industrial
Zone, Xi’an, Shaanxi Province, PRC 710065, and our telephone number is 86-29-88377161. The area of our office is approximately
1,400 square meters.
We
operate four factories through a branch office of SkyPeople (China) and three subsidiaries of SkyPeople (China). In each of these
factories, we own all the factory facilities except for land with regard to which we own land use rights. There is no private
ownership of land in the PRC. All land ownership is held by the government of the PRC. Land use rights can be transferred upon
approval by the land administrative authorities of the PRC (State Land Administration Bureau) upon payment of the required land
transfer fee. The chart summarizes the information of the facilities and the four factories that we operate:
Location
|
|
Products
|
|
Operator
|
|
Size
|
|
Land Use Rights Expiration Date
|
23th Floor, China Development Bank Tower, No. 2 Gaoxin 1st Road, Hi-Tech Industrial Zone, Xi’an, Shaanxi Province
|
|
Headquarters
|
|
N/A
|
|
1,425.96 square meters
|
|
*
|
Sanqu Town, Jingyang County, Xianyang City, Shaanxi Province
|
|
Concentrated apple and pear juice and concentrated kiwifruit juice
|
|
SkyPeople (China)
|
|
34,476.04 square meters
|
|
December 27, 2056
|
Siqun Village, Mazhao Town, Zhouzhi County, Xi’an City, Shaanxi Province
|
|
Kiwifruit puree, concentrated kiwifruit puree, and fruit beverages
|
|
Shaanxi Qiyiwangguo
|
|
23,599.78 square meters and 34,335.05 square meters
|
|
December 5, 2048 November 14, 2048
|
Hujia Village, Gaotai Town, Suizhong County, Huludao, Liaoning Province
|
|
Concentrated apple and pear juice and apple aroma, fruit juice beverages
|
|
Huludao Wonder**
|
|
86,325 square meters
|
|
April 20, 2054
|
Yuton Village, Shizijie Town, Gaizhou, Liaoning Province
|
|
Concentrated apple juice and apple aroma
|
|
Yingkou
|
|
20,732 square meters
|
|
April 5, 2055
|
*
|
Our
certificate of this facility does not indicate any expiration date, although the usage of this property shall not exceed 50
years under the PRC law.
|
**
|
In
December 2016, the Company established a winding-down plan to close Huludao Wonder operation. In accordance with the restructuring
plan, the Company would transfer the concentrated fruit juice production equipment in Huludao Wonder to another subsidiary
and sell the land and facilities when there is a favorable opportunity. As the Company does not expect to sale the assets
of Huludao Wonder in the near future, the assets are not recorded as assets held for sale as of December 31, 2017.
|
We
believe that our current offices and facilities are adequate to meet our needs, and that additional facilities will be available
for lease, if necessary, to meet our future needs.
ITEM
3 – LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
In
April 2015, China Cinda Asset Management Co., Ltd. Shaanxi Branch (“Cinda Shaanxi Branch”) filed two enforcement proceedings
with Xi’an Intermediate People’s Court (the “Court”) against the Company for alleged defaults pursuant
to guarantees by the Company to its suppliers for a total amount of RMB 39,596,250 or approximately $6.0 million.
In
September 2014, two long term suppliers of pear, mulberry, and kiwi fruits to the Company requested that the Company provide guarantees
for their loans with Cinda Shaanxi Branch. Considering the long term business relationship and to ensure the timely supply of
raw materials, the Company agreed to provide guarantees upon the value of the raw materials supplied to the Company. Because Cinda
Shaanxi Branch is not a bank authorized to provide loans, it eventually provided financing to the two suppliers through the purchase
of accounts receivables of the two suppliers with the Company. In July, 2014, the parties entered into two agreements –
an Accounts Receivables Purchase and Debt Restructure Agreement, and Guarantee Agreements for Accounts Receivables Purchase and
Debt Restructure. Pursuant to the agreements, Cinda Shaanxi Branch agreed to provide a RMB 100 million credit line on a rolling
basis to the two suppliers and the Company agreed to pay its accounts payables to the two suppliers directly to Cinda Shaanxi
Branch and provided guarantees for the two suppliers. In April 2015, Cinda Shaanxi Branch stopped providing financing to the two
suppliers and the two suppliers were unable to continue the supply of raw materials to the Company. Consequently, the Company
stopped making any payment to Cinda Shaanxi Branch.
The
Company has responded to the Court and taken the position that the financings under the agreements are essentially the loans from
Cinda Shaanxi Branch to the two suppliers, and because Cinda Shaanxi Branch does not have permits to make loans in China, the
agreements are invalid, void and had no legal effect from the beginning. Therefore, the Company has no obligation to repay the
debts owed by the two suppliers to Cinda Shaanxi Branch.
Upon
the Court’s suggestion, parties agreed to a settlement discussion in April 2017. As a part of the settlement discussion,
on April 18, 2017, the Company withdrew its non-enforcement request with the Court without prejudice. Both parties are still in
the process of settlement negotiations. If the parties cannot reach a settlement agreement, the Company has the right to refile
the non-enforcement request with the Court. As the Company may still be liable for this loan, the Company recorded expenses and
liability of $6.0 million as the result of these two enforcement proceedings in the third quarter of 2017.
Between
October, 2013 and January, 2014, Xuzhou Jinkaifeng Glass Co. Ltd. (“JKF”) supplied glass bottles to SkyPeople China.
SkyPeople China believed that the glass bottles supplied by JKF had quality issues and did not pay for the bottles delivered.
In November, 2016, JKF filed a lawsuit against SkyPeople China with Xuzhou Tongshan District People’s Court. On July 27,
2017, SkyPeople China received judgment from Xuzhou Tongshan District People’s Court that SkyPeople China must pay JKF RMB
365,292 (approximately $55,040) for the glass bottles. SkyPeople China currently is in discussions with JKF on the payment terms
and final amount in connection with the enforcement of the judgment.
In
April 2015, SkyPeople China entered into a loan agreement with Shaanxi Fangtian Decoration Co. Ltd. (“Fangtian”).
Pursuant to the loan agreement, SkyPeople China borrowed RMB 3.5 million (approximately $527,355) from Fangtian. SkyPeople China
has not repaid the loan and Fangtian filed a lawsuit with Xi’an Yanta District People’s Court (“Yanta District
Court”). On August 10, 2017, Yanta District Court ruled against SkyPeople China and determined that SkyPeople China must
repay the loan of RMB 3.5 million plus interest RMB of 402,500 (approximately $588,000). SkyPeople China currently is in discussions
with Fangtian on the payment terms and the final amount.
Shaanxi
Hengtong Development Co. Ltd. (“Hengtong”) is a coal supplier to SkyPeople China’s Jingyang Branch (“SkyPeople
Jingyang”). In November, 2016, Hengtong filed a lawsuit against SkyPeople Jingyang for unpaid coal deliveries and interest
for a total amount of RMB 3,133,916 (approximately $482,141). On March 13, 2017, SkyPeople Jingyang received judgment from
Jingyang County People’s Court ordering SkyPeople Jingyang to repay RMB 1.78 million (approximately $268,788) to Hengtong.
SkyPeople Jingyang appealed the judgement to Xianyang Intermediate People’s Court, and on August 29, 2017, Xiangyang Intermediate
Court affirmed the lower court’s decision. SkyPeople Jingyang currently is in discussions with Hengtong on payment terms
and the final amount.
In
September 2016, the Suizhong Branch of Huludao Banking Co. Ltd. (“Suizhong Branch”) filed a lawsuit with Huludao Intermediate
People’s Court (the “Huludao Court”) against the Company’s indirectly wholly-owned subsidiary Huludao
Wonder Fruit Co., Ltd. (“Wonder Fruit”) and requested that Wonder Fruit repay a RMB 40 million (approximately $6.35
million) bank loan, plus interest. The loan became due on its maturity date of December 9, 2016. On December 19, 2016, the Huludao
Court accepted the case. The Company has been disputing the interest rate of the loan with Suizhong Branch, and has not repaid
the loan to date. Wonder Fruit believes that the interest charged by Suizhong Branch is 100% higher than the base rate set by
People’s Bank of China and is not in consistent with the China People’s Bank’s base interest and floating rate.
The Huludao Court has seized land use rights, buildings and equipment of Wonder Fruit that were pledged as guarantee for the loan
and has organized two auction sales for these assets in January and February of 2018, but both auction sales have been unsuccessful
in finding a buyer. Wonder Fruit is currently in discussions with the Suizhong Branch on repayment of the bank loan and a reduction
of the interest due thereon.
On June 29, 2015, SkyPeople China entered into a loan agreement with Beijing Bank. Pursuant
to the loan agreement, SkyPeople China borrowed RMB 30 million (approximately $4.59 million) from Beijng Bank. Hongke Xue, Yongke
Xue and Xiujun Wang provided guarantees for the loan and Shaanxi Boai Medical Technology Development Co., Ltd. provided certain
real estate property as a pledge for the loan. SkyPeople China did not repay the loan on time and Beijing Bank filed an enforcement
request with Xi’an Intermediate People's Court (the “Court”) in June 2017. SkyPeople China received the enforcement
notice from the Court on November 27, 2017. The Xi’an Intermediate People’s Court has not yet taken any action. SkyPeople
China currently is in discussions with Beijing Bank on the payment terms and the final amount.
On March 8, 2016, SkyPeople China entered
into a loan agreement with Ningxia Bank. Pursuant to the loan agreement, SkyPeople China borrowed RMB 25 million (approximately
$3.83 million) from Ningxia Bank. Hongke Xue, Yongke Xue, Lake Chen, Shaanxi Boai Medical Technology Development Co., Ltd. and
Shaanxi Qiyiwangguo provided guarantees for the loan. SkyPeople China also pledged 37 equipment and its trademarks to Ningxia Bank
for the loan. SkyPeople China has not repaid the loan and Ningxia Bank filed enforcement action with Xi’an Intermediate people's
court in August 2017. In January, 2018, SkyPeople China received the enforcement notice from the Court. The Court has frozen the
assets of SkyPeople China that were pledged as guarantee for the loan from being transferred to any third-party, but the freeze
does not limit or affect the use of these properties by SkyPeople China for its business. SkyPeople China currently is in discussions
with Ningxia Bank on the payment terms and the final amount.
On December 23, 2015, SkyPeople China
entered into two loan agreements with China Construction Bank. Pursuant to the loan agreements, SkyPeople China borrowed RMB 13.90
million (approximately $2.13 million), and RMB 30 million (approximately $4.59 million) from China Construction Bank, respectively.
Shaanxi Boai Medical Technology Development Co., Ltd. (“Boai”), Hongke Xue, Yongke Xue, Xiujun Wang and Yingkou Trusty
Fruits Co., Ltd. (“Yingkou”) provided pledges for the loans. SkyPeople China has not repaid the loans and China Construction
Bank filed an enforcement action with Xi’an Intermediate People's Court in March 2017. In December, 2017, SkyPeople China
received the enforcement notice from the Court. The Court has seized and sold by auction certain park space and land use rights
pledged by Xiujun Wang and Boai for approximately RMB 25,000,000. The Court also seized certain land use rights pledged by Yingkou
Trusty Fruits Co., Ltd., but the auction sale for those rights was not successful. SkyPeople China currently is in discussions
with China Construction Bank on the payment terms and the final amount.
On May 9, 2016, SkyPeople China entered
into loan agreements with China Construction Bank. Pursuant to the loan agreements, SkyPeople China borrowed RMB 22.9 million (approximately
$3.50 million) from China Construction Bank. Shaanxi Province Credit Reassurance Company (“Credit Reassurance Company”)
provided a guarantee to China Construction Bank for the loan, Hongke Xue and Yongke Xue provided their guarantees, and SkyPeople
China provided an office space that it owned to Credit Reassurance Company as a pledge. SkyPeople China has not repaid the loan
and Credit Reassurance Company repaid the loan for SkyPeople China. In June 2017, Credit Reassurance filed an enforcement action
request with Xi’an Intermediate People’s Court (the “Court”) in June 2017. In December 2017, SkyPeople
China received the enforcement notice from the Court. The Court issued verdict to seize the office space of SkyPeople China for
auction sale on December 26, 2017. In February 2018, the auction sale was conducted but not successful. SkyPeople China currently
is in discussions with Credit Reassurance Company on the payment terms and the final amount.
In August 2017, Cinda Capital Financing Co.
Ltd. (“Cinda”) filed a lawsuit with Beijing 2
nd
Intermediate People’s Court (the “Beijing Intermediate
Court”) against the Company’s indirectly wholly-owned subsidiaries Shaanxi Guoweimei Kiwi Deep Processing Company,
Ltd. (“Guoweimei”) and Hedetang Farm Products Trading Market (Mei County) Co., Ltd. (“Trading Market Mei County
Co”, and together with Guoweimei, “Leasees”) requested that Leasees repay RMB 50 million (approximately $7.65
million) in capital lease fees, plus interest. The Leasees received subpoena in mail served by Beijing Intermediate Court in November,
2017. Cinda has purchased or paid for refrigerant warehouse and trading hall to the suppliers and vendors and agreed to lease them
to the Leasees for a leasing fee of RMB 50 million in December, 2016. The capital leasing fee became due on its maturity date of
June 2017, with certain land use rights of Leasees in Mei County and equity of Guoweimei as a pledge. The Company has disputed
that the land use rights for the refrigerant warehouse and trading hall were never sold to or transferred to Cinda, therefore it
is loan agreement and not capital lease agreement among the parties. Leasees have taken the position that Cinda is not a bank and
does not have government permits required to make loans in China, and the agreements including pledge agreement were invalid, void
and without legal effect from the beginning. Therefore, the Company only has the obligations to repay principal but not the interest.
In November 2017, Beijing Intermediate Court ruled in favor of Cinda and the Leasees have appealed the case to Beijing Supreme
Court. Beijing Supreme Court has not scheduled hearings yet. As the Company may still be liable for this loan, the Company recorded
expenses and liability of $7.66 million as the result of the enforcement proceeding in the third quarter of 2017.
In August, 2017, Cinda Capital Financing
Co. Ltd. (“Cinda”) filed another lawsuit at Beijing Intermediate Court against the Company’s indirectly wholly-owned
subsidiaries Guoweimei and SkyPeople China for repayment of leasing fee of RMB 84,970,959 (approximately $13 million) plus interest.
In January 2014, Guoweimei and SkyPeople China (the “Equipment Leasees”) signed an Equipment Financial Lease Purchase
Agreement with Cinda and an equipment supplier pursuant to which Cinda would provide funds to purchase equipment and the Equipment
Leasees would lease the equipment from Cinda. Guoweimei pledged certain land use rights in Mei County to Cinda and Xi’an
Hedetang and Hedetang Holding pledged their equities in Guoweimei to Cinda to secure the repayment. In December, 2017, Equipment
Leasees received subpoena in mail served by by Beijing Intermediate Court in December, 2017. Beijing Intermediate Court had two
hearings of the case and has not yet ruled on it.
In September, 2017, Andrew Chien, a former
consultant of SkyPeople China, brought a lawsuit against the Company and Mr. Hongke Xue in the District Court of Connecticut.
The complaint was not properly served and the Company learned of the litigation in December 2017. In the complaint, Mr. Chien has
made several claims, most of which attempt to hold the Company liable under novel legal theories that relate back to an alleged
breach of a consulting agreement between SkyPeople China and Chien from August, 2006. Mr. Chien claimed for approximately
$257,000 damages and interest plus 2% of the Company’s then-outstanding shares. Mr. Chien has unsuccessfully attempted to
sue the Company on the breach of the same consulting agreement several times in the courts of Connecticut and New York and these
cases have been dismissed in the past. The Company has filed a motion to dismiss (“MTD”) and all proceedings
are stayed pending determination of the MTD. The Company will vigorously defend this lawsuit and expects to obtain early
dismissal of Mr. Chien’s claims.
In the past couple years, to expand our
production and diversify our products and businesses, our subsidiaries in China borrowed loans from certain banks for our new construction
projects. Because the business environment for manufacture industries and financing for non-stated owned companies in China have
deteriorated, banks started to collect loans before their maturity dates for their own capital security consideration which has
interrupted our business plan. In June 2017, one of the banks that we had loan with made the early payment request and applied
for the enforcement action with local court which caused chain reactions for other banks that we had loan with and they all declared
their loans due and applied for enforcement actions. Because the run on us by the banks at the same time, our subsidiaries can’t
repay all the loans in a short period of time. Our subsidiaries have been in discussion with the banks to find solutions for the
outstanding loans. The enforcement actions made by the banks are the usual practices used by the banks which don’t cause
actual impact to our daily business operation. After the discussion and negotiation with the banks, we will cooperate with each
party to solve the loan issues.
From
time to time we may be a party to various litigation proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business, none of which,
in the opinion of management, is likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
ITEM
4 – MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES
Not
applicable.
PART
II
ITEM
5 – MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES
Our
Common Stock has been listed on the Nasdaq Global market since October 18, 2010. Immediately prior to that, our Common Stock was
traded on the NYSE Amex. The following table sets forth the high and low inter-dealer prices, without mark-up, mark-down or commission,
involving our Common Stock during each calendar quarter, and may not represent actual transactions.
2017
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
7.07
|
|
|
$
|
5.03
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
$
|
5.93
|
|
|
$
|
2.32
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
$
|
2.49
|
|
|
$
|
1.49
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
$
|
6.24
|
|
|
$
|
1.35
|
|
2016
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
First quarter
|
|
$
|
5.36
|
|
|
$
|
2.65
|
|
Second quarter
|
|
$
|
2.83
|
|
|
$
|
1.70
|
|
Third quarter
|
|
$
|
18.22
|
|
|
$
|
2.12
|
|
Fourth quarter
|
|
$
|
9.09
|
|
|
$
|
5.75
|
|
Reports
to Stockholders
We
plan on furnishing stockholders with an annual report for each fiscal year ending December 31 containing financial statements
audited by its independent certified public accountants. The Company intends to maintain compliance with the periodic reporting
requirements of the Exchange Act.
Stockholders
As
of April 12, 2018, there were 25,417,083 shares of our Common Stock issued and outstanding, and we had approximately 80 record
holders of our Common Stock, not including holders who hold their shares under street name.
Dividend
Policy
We
have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our Common Stock. The payment of dividends is at the discretion of the Board
and is contingent on our revenues and earnings, capital requirements, financial condition and the ability of our operating subsidiary,
SkyPeople (China), to obtain governmental approval to send funds out of the PRC. We currently intend to retain all earnings, if
any, for use in business operations. Accordingly, we do not anticipate declaring any dividends in the near future.
The
PRC’s national currency, the RMB or yuan, is not a freely-convertible currency. Please refer to the risk factors “Governmental
control of currency conversion may affect the value of shareholder investment,” “The fluctuation of the RMB may harm
shareholder investments” and “PRC regulations relating to mergers and the establishment of offshore special purpose
companies by PRC residents, if applied to us, may limit our ability to operate our business as we see fit.”
Recent
Sales of Unregistered Securities and Use of Proceeds
The
Company did not make any sales of unregistered securities during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017 that were not previously
disclosed in a quarterly report on Form 10-Q or a current report on Form 8-K.
On
August 30, 2010, we closed the public offering of 5,181,285 shares of our Common Stock at a price of $5.00 per share for approximately
$25.9 million. We received an aggregate of approximately $24 million as net proceeds after deducting underwriting discounts and
commissions and offering expenses. As of December 31, 2017, we had spent approximately $18.6 million on various capital projects
in Huludao Wonder and the remaining $24 million on various capital projects in SkyPeople Suizhong. For more details related to
the use of proceeds in 2016 from the public offering in 2010, please see the section entitled “Capital Projects” under
“Item 7, Management Discussion and Analysis of Financial Conditions and Results of Operations”.
Securities
Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
The
following table sets forth information as of December 31, 2017, with respect to our equity compensation plans previously approved
by stockholders and equity compensation plans not previously approved by stockholders.
|
|
Equity Compensation Plan Information
|
|
Plan Category
|
|
Number
of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights
|
|
|
Weighted
average exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights
|
|
|
Number
of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected
in column (a))
|
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
Equity
compensation plans approved by stockholders (1)
|
|
|
62,500
|
|
|
$
|
$3.57
|
(2)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Equity
compensation plans not approved by stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Consists
of equity incentive plans, which was approved by the Company’s shareholders at its annual meetings on August 18, 2011
and November 19, 2015.
On February 28,
2017, the Company issued options to purchase 62,500 shares of the Company’s common stock with an exercise price equal
to the fair market value of the Company’s Common Stock (as defined under the 2011 Stock Incentive Plan in conformity
with Regulation 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended) at the date of grant to three of the Company’s
employees pursuant to the 2011 Stock Incentive Plan, which was approved by the Company’s shareholders at the annual
stockholders meeting on August 18, 2011. These options vested immediately on the grant date with a fair market value of
$223,375 based on the fair value of $3.57 per share, which was determined by using the Black Scholes option pricing model.
The Company recognized stock-based compensation expense of $223,375 in the first quarter of fiscal year 2017 under the 2011
Stock Incentive Plan.
As of December 31, 2017, there were no shares available for issuance under either of the two
stock incentive plans.
|
(2)
|
The
exercise price of options granted and stock appreciation rights under the Plan may be no less than the fair market value of
the Company’s Stock on the date of grant.
|
On
March 29, 2017, the Company issued 250,000 shares of the Company’s unrestricted common stock to six of the Company’s
employees pursuant to our Omnibus Equity Plan, which was approved by the Company’s shareholders at the annual stockholders
meeting on November 19, 2015. The Company recorded an expense of $250 in the first quarter of fiscal year 2017 under the 2015
Omnibus Equity Plan, reflecting a par value of $0.001 per share of the Company’s common stock.
ITEM
6 – SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA
Not
Applicable.
ITEM
7 – MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
The
following discussion and analysis of the consolidated financial condition and results of operations should be read in conjunction
with our consolidated financial statements and related notes appearing elsewhere in this report. This discussion and analysis
contains forward-looking statements that involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions. Our actual results could differ materially
from the results described in or implied by these forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those discussed
below and elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, particularly under the heading “Risk Factors.”
Overview
We
are engaged in the production and sales of fruit juice concentrates (including fruit purees, concentrated fruit purees and concentrated
fruit juices), fruit beverages (including fruit juice beverages and fruit cider beverages), other fruit related products (including
organic and non-organic fresh fruits), and the sales of the IB-LIVE series of products online and offline in and from the PRC.
Our fruit juice concentrates, which include apple, pear and kiwifruit concentrates, are sold to domestic customers and exported
directly or via distributors. We sell our Hedetang branded bottled fruit beverages domestically primarily to supermarkets in the
PRC. In 2017, sales of our fruit concentrates, fruit beverages, and other fruit-related products represented 30%, 69%, and
1% of our revenue, respectively, compared to sales of 51%, 43%, and 6%, respectively, in 2016.
We
export our products as well as sell them domestically. We sell our products either through distributors with good credit or to
end-users directly. Our main export markets are Asia, North America, Europe, Russia and the Middle East. We sell our Hedetang
brand bottled fruit beverages domestically, primarily to supermarkets in the PRC. We also sell our other fruit-related products
to domestic customers.
We
currently market our Hedetang brand fruit beverages in only certain regions of the PRC. We plan to expand the market presence
of Hedetang over a broader geographic area in the PRC. In particular, we plan to expand our glass bottle high margin portable
fruit juice beverages targeting consumers in more populated Chinese cities. Currently we produce five flavors of fruit beverages
in 236 ml glass bottles, 258 ml glass bottles, 280 ml glass bottles, 418 ml glass and 500 ml glass bottles, 888 ml glass bottles,
1.21 L glass bottles and BIB (bag in box) packages, including kiwifruit juice, mulberry juice, peach juice, pomegranate juice
and fruit and vegetable juice. We also produce two flavors of lactobacillus fruit beverages in 268 ml glass bottles, including
lactobacillus kiwifruit juice and lactobacillus mulberry juice, as well as three beverages with rich dietary fiber in 330 ml glass
bottles, including kumquat and grapefruit juice, kiwifruit juice and mulberry juice. We currently sell our fruit beverages to
over 100 distributors and more than 20,000 retail stores in approximately 20 provinces. Our products are sold through distributors
in stores such as Hualian Supermarket in Beijing, RT-Mart in Shenyang, WOWO in Chengdu, the Quanjia convenient store chain, Vanguard
in Xi’an, Carrefour in Chongqing and Shenyang and Lianhua Supermarket in Shanghai.
Our
fruit juice business is highly seasonal and can be greatly affected by weather because of the seasonal nature of growing and harvesting
of fruits and vegetables. Our core products are apple, pear and kiwifruit juice concentrates, which are produced from July or
August to April of the following year. The squeezing season for (i) apples is from August to January or February; (ii) pears is
from July or August until April of next year; and (iii) kiwifruit is from September through December. Typically, a substantial
portion of our revenues is earned during our first and fourth quarters. To minimize the seasonality of our business, we make continued
efforts in identifying new products with harvesting seasons complementary to our current product mix. In the first quarter of
2009, we introduced mulberry and kiwifruit cider beverages in the Chinese market. Unlike fruit juice concentrates, which can only
be produced during the squeezing season, such fruit beverages are made out of fruit juice concentrates and can be produced and
sold in all seasons. With continuous efforts in marketing of our beverages in domestic market, we believe that our seasonality
will be reduced.
Fresh
fruits are the primary raw materials needed for the production of our products. Our raw materials mainly consist of apples, pears
and kiwifruits. Other raw materials used in our business include pectic enzyme, amylase, auxiliary power fuels and other power
sources such as coal, electricity and water.
We
purchase raw materials from local markets and fruit growers that deliver directly to our plants. We have implemented a fruit-purchasing
program in areas surrounding our factories. In addition, we organize purchasing centers in rich fruit production areas, helping
farmers deliver fruit to our purchasing agents easily and in a timely manner. We are then able to deliver the fruit directly to
our factory for production. We have assisted local farmers in their development of kiwifruit fields to help ensure a high quality
product throughout the production channel. Our raw material supply chain is highly fragmented and raw fruit prices are highly
volatile in China. Fruit concentrate and fruit juice beverage companies generally do not enter into purchasing agreements.
In
addition to raw materials, we purchase various ingredients and packaging materials such as sweeteners, glass and plastic bottles,
cans and packing barrels. We generally purchase our materials or supplies from multiple suppliers. We are not dependent on any
one supplier or group of suppliers.
Shaanxi
and Liaoning Provinces, where our manufacturing facilities are located, are large fruit producing provinces. We own and operate
four manufacturing facilities in the PRC, all of which are strategically located near fruit growing centers so that we can better
preserve the freshness of the fruits and lower our transportation costs. To take advantage of economies of scale and to enhance
our production efficiency, generally, each of our manufacturing facilities has a focus on products made from one particular fruit
according to the proximity of such manufacturing to the sources of supply for that fruit. Our kiwifruit processing
facilities are located in Zhouzhi County of Shaanxi Province, which has the largest planting area of apples and kiwifruit in the
PRC. Our pear processing facilities are located in Shaanxi Province, which is the main pear-producing province in the PRC. Our
apple processing facilities are located in Liaoning Province, a region that abounds with high acidity apples. As we use the same
production line for concentrated apple juice and concentrated pear juice and both Shaanxi Province and Liaoning Province are rich
in fresh apple and pear production, our Liaoning facilities also produced concentrated apple juice and our Shaanxi Province facilities
also produced concentrated apple juice based on customer need. We believe that these regions provide adequate supply of raw materials
for our production needs in the foreseeable future.
Our
Huludao Wonder operation, a subsidiary which produces concentrated apple juice, suffered continued operating losses in the three
fiscal years prior to 2016 and the cash flow was minimal for these three years. In December 2016, the Company established a winding-down
plan to close this operation. Based on the restructuring plan and in accordance with EITF 03-13, the Company presented the operation
results from Huludao Wonder as a discontinued operation, as the Company believed that no continued cash flow would be generated
by the disposed component (Huludao Wonder) and that the Company would have no significant continuing involvement in the operation
of the discontinued component. Management of the Company initiated a plan to sell the property located in Huludao in December
2016 and ceased the depreciation of the property in accordance with SFAS No. 144. In fiscal year 2017 and 2016, the Company’s
recorded an impairment loss of $11.76 million and $2.4 million with respect to the concentrated fruit juice production equipment
in Huludao Wonder, respectively. In accordance with the restructuring plan, the Company would transfer the concentrated fruit
juice production equipment in Huludao Wonder to another of our subsidiaries and sell the land and facilities upon favorable circumstances.
As the Company does not expect to sale the assets of Huludao Wonder in the near future, the assets are not recorded as assets
held for sale as of December 31, 2017. The book value of the land usage right was $4,463,889 and the book value of the building
was $851,666 as of December 31, 2017. The Company believes the assets’ book value was lower than its fair value, less the
cost to sell.
On
June 6, 2017, the Company filed a Certificate of Amendment with the Secretary of State for the State of Florida to amend and restate
its articles of incorporation to change its name from SkyPeople Fruit Juice, Inc. to Future FinTech Group Inc., effective immediately
(“the Name Change”). The Name Change was approved by the Company’s Board of Directors on March 30, 2017 and
by shareholders holding a majority of the Company’s issued and outstanding capital stock on March 31, 2017. In addition,
effective as of June 6, 2017, the Company’s bylaws were amended and restated to reflect the Name Change.
Capital
Projects
Investment/Service
Agreement with Yidu Municipal People’s Government
On
October 29, 2012, SkyPeople (China) entered into an investment/service agreement (the “Investment Agreement”) with
Yidu Municipal People’s Government in Hubei Province of China.
Under
the Investment Agreement, the parties agreed to invest and establish an orange comprehensive deep processing zone in Yidu.
The
Company is responsible for the establishment, construction and financing of the project with a total investment of RMB 300 million
(approximately $48 million), in fixed assets and the purchase of land use rights, while the Yidu government agreed to provide
a parcel of land for the project that is approximately 280 mu (approximately 46 acres) in size located at Gaobazhou Town of Yidu
for a fee payable by the Company. The consideration for transferring the land use right for the project land shall be RMB 0.3
million per mu.
The
main scope of the Yidu project includes the establishment of:
1.
|
one
modern orange distribution and sales center (the “distribution center”);
|
|
|
2.
|
one
orange comprehensive utilization deep processing zone (the “deep processing zone”), including:
|
|
a)
|
one
45 ton/hour concentrated orange juice and byproduct deep processing production line;
|
|
|
|
|
b)
|
one juice
drink bottling production line with a capacity to produce 6,000 glass-bottle drinks per hour;
|
|
|
|
|
c)
|
one
storage freezer facility with a capacity to store 20,000 tons of concentrated orange juice; and
|
|
|
|
|
d)
|
general
purpose facilities within the zone, office space, general research and development facilities, service area, living quarters
and other ancillary support areas
|
3.
|
one
research and development center for orange varietal improvement and engineering technology (the “R&D center”)
and
|
|
|
4.
|
one
standardized orange plantation (the “orange plantation”).
|
The
total amount of RMB 300 million (approximately $48 million) will mainly be used to establish the distribution center and the deep
processing zone on the project land of approximately 280 mu. The Company and Yidu Municipal People’s Government agreed to
discuss the investment amount and location for establishing the R&D center and the orange plantation in the future.
On
November 23, 2015, the Company started the construction of the Yidu project. As the Chinese government recently tightened environment
regulations, the Company is in the process of adapting the new standards and the project has been delayed. Since the Company’s
current cash cannot support the future input of this project and there is no forecasted cash flow from this project, the Company
recorded an impairment cost of $16.80 million with respect to construction in progress and fixed assets of this project, and an
impairment cost of $0.62 million with respect to the orange plantation in the fourth quarter of fiscal year 2017.
Investment/Service
Agreement with Mei County National Kiwi Fruit Wholesale Trading Center
On
April 3, 2013, SkyPeople (China) entered into an Investment Agreement (the “Agreement”) with the Managing Committee
of Mei County National Kiwi Fruit Wholesale Trading Center (the “Committee”). The Committee has been authorized by
the People’s Government of Mei County to be responsible for the construction and administration of the Mei County National
Kiwi Fruit Wholesale Trading Center (the “Trading Center”).
Under
the Agreement, the parties agreed to invest and establish a kiwi fruit comprehensive deep processing zone and kiwi fruit and fruit-related
materials trading zone in Yangjia Village, Changxing Town of Mei County with a total planned area of total planned area of 286
mu (approximately 47 acres) (the “Project”).
Pursuant
to the Agreement, the Company is responsible for the construction and financing of the Project with a total investment of RMB
445.6 million (approximately $71.9 million) in buildings and equipment, which also includes a fee for the land use rights for
the Project land in the amount of RMB 0.3 million per mu. The Committee is responsible for financing and constructing the basic
infrastructure surrounding the Project, such as the main water supply, main water drainage, natural gas, electricity, sewage,
access roads to the Project, natural gas and communications networks. As the Company’s current cash flow is not enough to
support the construction of this project, the project is temporary suspended, and the Company will assume the construction once
it has enough capital.
As
of the date of this report, Mei County National Kiwi Fruit Wholesale Trading Center has started normal operations. There are a
number of enterprises operating in the trading center including 12 express delivery companies, 4 logistic companies, four on-line
sales companies, two packing companies and three agriculture companies. In addition, all government departments that are relevant
to the operations of the Mei County National Kiwi Fruit Wholesale Trading Center have moved into the trading center. Currently,
Mei County National Kiwi Fruit Wholesale Trading Center is building a data platform for agricultural products in the western part
of China, an agricultural business incubator, and an online-to-offline agricultural products trading center. To meet this requirement,
the Company is upgrading its software and the project has been delayed. The Company expects to complete its investment in the
trading center in the third quarter of 2018, and believes that it will generate income from the trading center through various
means, such as rental income from cold storage and shops, and income from logistic services.
As
part of the Mei County National Kiwi Fruit Wholesale Trading Center project, on April 19, 2013, we established Shaanxi Guoweimei
Kiwi Deep Processing Co., Ltd. (“Guo Wei Mei”) to engage in the business of producing kiwi fruit juice, kiwi puree,
cider beverages, and related products. The total estimated investment was RMB 294 million. As of the date of this report, the
Company has finished the building of an R&D center and an office building with a total investment of RMB 76.2 million (approximately
$11.24 million), the Company has also purchased a fruit juice production line of RMB 129 million (approximately $19.02 million).
As the Chinese government recently tightened environmental regulations, the Company is in the process of adapting to the new standards
and the project has been delayed and the construction was stopped since early 2017. Since the Company’s current cash cannot
support the future input of this project and there is no forecasted cash flow from this project, the Company recorded an impairment
cost of $30.26 million with respect to construction in progress and fixed assets of this project.
Suizhong
Project
On
July 15, 2011, the Company entered into a Letter of Intent with the People’s Government of Suizhong County, Liaoning Province,
to establish a fruit and vegetable industry chain and further processing demonstration zone in Suizhong County, Liaoning Province
(the “Suizhong Project”).
The
Suizhong Project was intended to include one or more of the following: the construction and operation of fruit juice production
lines, a vegetable and fruit flash freeze facility, a refrigeration storage facility and warehouse, a world class food safety
testing center, a fruit and vegetable modern supply chain and e-commerce platform, and a fruit and vegetable finished products
processing center and exhibition center.
The
Company has made partial payment to acquire land use rights from the local government, purchase equipment and build facilities.
As of date of this report, the Company has finished construction of an office building, dormitory, refrigeration storage facility
and warehouse. However, due to heavy competition in the concentrated apple juice business in China, our Huludao Wonder and Yingkou
facilities in Liaoning have had no production in the past two years, and the construction work on Suizhong project is also currently
suspended. Since the Company’s current cash cannot support the future input of this project and there is no forecasted cash
flow from this project, the Company recorded an impairment cost of $25.06 million with respect to construction in progress and
fixed assets of this project.
Letter
of Intent for Purchase of Biological Assets
In
April 2016, the Company signed a letter of intent with Mei County Kiwifruits Investment and Development Corporation to purchase
833.5 mu (approximately 137 acres) of kiwifruits orchard in Mei County. The purchase price will be determined by a third party
valuation company appointed by both parties. As of the date of this report, the valuation has not been completed and the purchase
price has not been settled. The Company paid RMB 200 million (approximately $30 million) as a deposit in the second quarter of
2016. The purchase is subject to government approval, approval by the Company’s Board of Directors and a definitive agreement
negotiated and signed by the parties. Pursuant to the letter of intent, the Deposit shall be returned to the Company within 10
working days upon the request of the Company if the kiwifruits orchard cannot be transferred to the Company according to the schedule.
The Company expects to complete the purchase process in the second quarter of 2018. This deposit is recorded as deposits in the
company’s balance sheet as of December 31, 2017.
Leasing
of Orchard
On
August 3, 2016, Shaanxi Guoweimei Kiwi Deep Processing Company, an indirectly wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, signed a
lease agreement for 20,000 mu (approximately 3,292 square acres) of a kiwifruits orchard located in Mei County, Shaanxi Province,
with the Di’erpo Committe of Jinqu Village, Mei County, Shaanxi for a term of 30 years, from August 5, 2016 to August 4,
2046. The annual leasing fee is RMB 1,250 (approximately $189) per mu, and payment of 10 years’ of leasing fees shall be
made on each of September 25, 2016, 2026 and 2036. The Company made a payment of RMB 250 million (approximately $37.4 million)
for the first 10 years’ leasing fees on August 15, 2016, which is recorded as deposits in the Company’s balance sheet.
On
August 15, 2016, Hedetang Agricultural Plantations (Yidu) Co., Ltd., an indirectly wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, signed
a lease agreement for 8,000 mu (approximately 1,317 square acres) of an orange orchard located in city of Yidu, Hubei Province,
with the Yidu Sichang Farmers Association, Hubei Province, for a term of 20 years, from September 22, 2016 to September 21, 2036.
The annual leasing fee is RMB 2,000 (approximately $306) per mu, and payment of 10 years’ of leasing fees shall be made
on each of September 25, 2016 and 2026. The Company made a payment of RMB 160 million (approximately $24.0 million) for the first
10 years’ of leasing fees on September 20, 2016, which is recorded as deposits in the Company’s balance sheet.
Key
Components of Operating Results
Sources
of Revenue
We
derive our revenue primarily from the sales of fruit juice concentrates, fruit beverages and other fruit related products in and
from the PRC.
Our
fruit juice concentrates, which include apple, pear and kiwifruit, are sold directly or indirectly to domestic juice manufacturers
and exported primarily via distributors to Asia, North America, Europe and the Middle East. Our general sales agreement with distributors
requires that the distributors pay us after we deliver our products to them, which is not contingent on resale to end users. Our
credit terms for distributors with good credit history are from 30 days to 90 days. Distributors have no contractual right to
return our products and we are not required to rebate or credit any amounts paid if we subsequently reduce the price of our products.
We
sell our Hedetang branded bottled fruit juice beverages and fruit cider beverages domestically primarily to supermarkets in the
PRC through distributors, and we also export some of our Hedetang branded bottled fruit juice beverages outside of China directly
or indirectly through distributors.
In
addition to concentrated juice products and juice beverages, we generate other revenue from sales of apple spice, kiwifruit seeds
and fresh kiwifruit, and sales of IB-LIVE products online and offline. These products are mainly sold to Chinese customers.
Cost
of Sales
Our
cost of sales consists primarily of the cost for raw materials, including various fresh fruit, packing barrels, pectic enzyme,
amylase, auxiliary power fuels and other power sources such as coal, electricity and water, bottles, packaging materials, and
expenses associated with the operations of our manufacturing facilities.
We
determine cost of sales on the basis of the average cost of inventory methods. For purposes of determining our cost of sales of
kiwifruit seeds, we apply
the relative sales value costing method. In calculating the gross margin of kiwifruit seeds,
we applied the weighted average method to simplify the calculation. In applying this method, we first calculated the average revenue
of kiwifruit seeds and kiwifruit juice that can be produced from one ton of kiwifruit,
based on our estimate in a
normal production situation in the applicable period. This percentage is then applied to actual cost for the production of kiwifruit
juice to calculate the actual cost of sales for kiwifruit seeds and concentrated kiwifruit juice in the period covered by the
financial statements.
The
shipping and handling expenses of $338,261 and $1,180,328 for fiscal years 2017 and 2016, respectively, are reported in the Consolidated
Statement of Comprehensive Income as a component of selling expenses. The decrease in shipping and handling expenses was mainly
due to a decrease in customer orders.
The
largest component of our cost of sales is the cost for fresh fruit. We purchase fresh fruit and other raw materials from local
markets and fruit growers that deliver directly to our plants. Our raw material supply chain is highly fragmented and raw fruit
prices are highly volatile. We generally do not enter into long-term purchase agreements for fresh fruit.
Operating
Expenses
We
classify our operating expenses into three categories: general and administrative, selling, and research and development. Our
operating expenses consist primarily of personnel costs, which include salaries, bonuses, payroll taxes and employee benefit costs.
Other expenses include advertising and promotional costs, shipping and handling costs not billed to customers, facilities costs
and legal, audit, tax, consulting and other professional service fees.
The
government owns all of the land in the PRC. Companies or individuals are authorized to possess and use the land only
through land use rights granted by the PRC government. Accordingly, we pay for land use rights in advance and such
prepayments are being amortized and recorded as expenses using the straight-line method over the use terms of the lease, which
are 40 to 50 years. The amortization expenses were $353,050 and $1,222,079 for 2017 and 2016, respectively.
General
and Administrative
General
and administrative expenses consist primarily of personnel costs for our executive, finance, human resources and administrative
personnel, legal, audit, tax and other professional fees, depreciation expenses, insurance and other corporate expenses.
Selling
Expenses
Selling
expenses consist primarily of freight and transportation expenses, advertising and promotional costs and personnel costs for our
sales team.
Research
and Development
Since
2014, the Company has suspended four research and development agreements with research institutions. We are now conducting our
research and development in house and related expenses are recorded in the general and administrative expenses.
Other
Income (Expense)
Other
income (expense) consists of interest we earn on our cash and cash equivalents, interest expenses on our short-term bank loans
from Chinese local banks, government subsidies and other miscellaneous income or expenses.
Provision
for Income Taxes
Our
provision for income taxes primarily consists of corporate income taxes related to profits earned in the PRC from sales of our
products. All our Chinese subsidiaries were subject to a tax rate of 25%. Our consolidated income tax rate was negative 0.3% and
44% in 2017 and 2016, respectively. Some of our subsidiaries generated income and we accrued income tax according to the Chinese
corporate income tax rate, but some had a loss and no tax provision was made.
Our
income tax expenses are comprised of U.S. and China tax accrual as computed using the tax rules and regulations for such jurisdictions.
In accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”),
Topic 740, we evaluate material tax positions asserted on every income tax return for the technical merits as to the tax supportability
under examination or tax litigation. When we determine that a tax position is uncertain, our policy is to record a liability
based on whether the tax position’s facts and circumstances on a “more likely than not” basis are supportable
under tax laws and regulations. We have had no material adjustments to the unrecognized income tax benefits since our adoption
of FASB ASC 740.
Critical
Accounting Policies
Management’s
discussion and analysis of our financial condition and results of operations is based upon our consolidated financial statements,
which have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Our financial statements reflect the selection and application of accounting
policies, which require management to make significant estimates and judgments. Management bases its estimates on historical experience
and on various other assumptions that are believed to be reasonable under the circumstances. Actual results may differ from these
estimates under different assumptions or conditions. We believe that the following reflects the more critical accounting policies
that currently affect our financial condition and results of operations.
Use
of Estimates
The
Company’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP and this requires management
to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure at contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and reported amounts of revenue and expenses during
the reporting period. The significant areas requiring the use of management estimates include the allowance for doubtful accounts
receivable, estimated useful life and residual value of property, plant and equipment, provision for staff benefit, valuation
of change in fair value of warrant liability, recognition and measurement of deferred income taxes and valuation allowance for
deferred tax assets. Although these estimates are based on management’s knowledge of current events and actions management
may undertake in the future, actual results may ultimately differ from those estimates.
Principles
of Consolidation
Our
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. All material intercompany accounts
and transactions have been eliminated in consolidation.
The
consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP. This basis differs from that used in the statutory
accounts of SkyPeople (China), Hedetang Food (China), Hedetang Holding, Huludao Wonder, Xi’an Cornucopia, Xi’an Hedetang
Juice Beverages, Yingkou, Shaanxi Qiyiwangguo, Hedetang E-commerce, SkyPeople Suizhong, Agricultural Plantation Mei Counting,
Food Industry Yidu, Food Industry Jingyang, Guo Wei Mei, Agriculture Plantation Yidu, Trading Market Yidu, Trading Market Mei
County and Hedetang Plantations, which were prepared in accordance with the accounting principles and relevant financial regulations
applicable to enterprises in the PRC. All necessary adjustments have been made to present the financial statements in accordance
with U.S. GAAP.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
On
January 1, 2009, the Company adopted FASB Accounting Standard Codification Topic on Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC
820”), which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP, and expands disclosures about
fair value measurements. ASC 820 does not require any new fair value measurements, but provides guidance on how to measure fair
value by providing a fair value hierarchy used to classify the source of the information. In February 2008, FASB deferred the
effective date of ASC 820 by one year for certain non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities, except those that are recognized
or disclosed at fair value in the financial statements on a recurring basis (at least annually). The Company adopted the provisions
of ASC 820, except as it applies to those non-financial assets and non-financial liabilities for which the effective date has
been delayed by one year.
ASC
820 establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy of valuation techniques based on observable and unobservable input, which may
be used to measure fair value and include the following:
Level
1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level
2 - Input other than Level 1 that is observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities;
quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other input that is observable or can be corroborated by observable market data
for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
Level
3 - Unobservable input that is supported by little or no market activity and that is significant to the fair value of the assets
or liabilities.
Classification
within the hierarchy is determined based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement.
Revenue Recognition
The
Company recognizes revenue in accordance with ASC 605, Revenue Recognition. Revenue from sales of products is recognized upon
shipment or delivery to customers, provided that persuasive evidence of sales arrangements exist, title and risk of loss have
been transferred to the customers, the sales amounts are fixed and determinable and collection of the revenue is reasonably assured.
Customers have no contractual right to return products. Historically, the Company has not had any returned products. Accordingly,
no provision has been made for returnable goods. The Company is not required to rebate or credit a portion of the original fee
if it subsequently reduces the price of its product and the distributor still has rights with respect to that product.
Foreign
Currency and Other Comprehensive Income
The
financial statements of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries are measured using the local currency as the functional currency; however,
the reporting currency of the Company is the United States dollar (“USD”). Assets and liabilities of the Company’s
foreign subsidiaries have been translated into USD using the exchange rate at the balance sheet date, while equity accounts are
translated using historical exchange rate. The average exchange rate for the period has been used to translate revenues and expenses.
Translation adjustments are reported separately and accumulated in a separate component of equity (cumulative translation adjustment).
Other
comprehensive income for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 represented foreign currency translation adjustments and were
included in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.
There
is no guarantee the RMB amounts could have been, or could be, converted into USD at rates used in translation.
Income
Taxes
Income
taxes are provided on an asset and liability approach for financial accounting and reporting of income taxes. Any tax paid by
subsidiaries during the year is recorded. Current tax is based on the profit or loss from ordinary activities adjusted for items
that are non-assessable or disallowable for income tax purpose and is calculated using tax rates that have been enacted at the
balance sheet date. Deferred income tax liabilities or assets are recorded to reflect the tax consequences in future years of
differences between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and the financial reporting amounts at each period end. A valuation
allowance is recognized if it is more likely than not that some portion, or all, of a deferred tax asset will not be realized.
ASC
740 provides guidance for recognizing and measuring uncertain tax positions, and it prescribes a threshold condition that a tax
position must meet for any of the benefits of the uncertain tax position to be recognized in the financial statements. ASC 740
also provides accounting guidance on derecognizing, classification and disclosure of these uncertain tax positions. The adoption
of ASC 740 did not have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
In
accordance with the FASB ASC 360-10,
Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets
, long-lived assets,
such as property, plant and equipment and purchased intangibles subject to amortization are reviewed for impairment whenever events
or changes in circumstances indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable. It is reasonably possible that
these assets could become impaired as a result of technological or other industrial changes. Determination of recoverability of
assets to be held and used is by comparing the carrying amount of an asset to future net undiscounted cash flows to be generated
by the assets.
If
such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount
of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount
or fair value less costs to sell.
During
the fiscal years 2017 and 2016, the Company’s subsidiary Yingkou had no production because it had difficulty in remaining
competitive in the apple juice market. In fiscal years 2017 and 2016, the Company’s recorded an impairment loss of $2.1
and $0 million with respect to the concentrated fruit juice production equipment in Yingkou.
The
Company’s Huludao Wonder operation, a subsidiary which produces concentrated apple juice, suffered continued operating losses
in the three fiscal years ended December 31, 2016 and the cash flows were minimal during the same three fiscal years. Thus, in
December 2016, we established a restructuring plan to close Huludao Wonder Operation. In fiscal year 2016, the Company’s
recorded an impairment loss of $2.4 million with respect to the concentrated fruit juice production equipment in Huludao Wonder.
The Company plans to sell the assets of Huludao Wonder to a third party upon favorable circumstances.
Accounts
Receivable
Accounts
receivable are recognized and carried at the original invoice amount less an allowance for any uncollectible amount. We have a
policy of reserving for uncollectible accounts based on our best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in our existing
accounts receivable. We extend credit to our customers based on an evaluation of their financial condition and other factors.
We generally do not require collateral or other security to support accounts receivable. We perform ongoing credit evaluations
of our customers and maintain an allowance for potential bad debts if required.
We
determine whether an allowance for doubtful accounts is required by evaluating specific accounts where information indicates the
customers may have an inability to meet financial obligations. In these cases, we use assumptions and judgment, based on the best
available facts and circumstances, to record a specific allowance for those customers against amounts due to reduce the receivable
to the amount expected to be collected. These specific allowances are re-evaluated and adjusted as additional information is received.
The amounts calculated are analyzed to determine the total amount of the allowance. We may also record a general allowance as
necessary.
Direct
write-offs are taken in the period when we have exhausted our efforts to collect overdue and unpaid receivables or otherwise evaluate
other circumstances that indicate that we should abandon such efforts.
The
Company has not experienced any significant difficulty in collecting its accounts receivable in the past and is not aware of any
financial difficulties being experienced by its major customers. Bad debt expense was $424,672 and $115,880 during the years ended
December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Our credit term for distributors with good credit history is from 30 days to 120 days.
As of December 31, 2017 and 2016, accounts receivables of $2,738,767 and $2,130,747 have been outstanding for over 120 days.
Government
Subsidies
A
government subsidy is recognized only when the Company complies with any conditions attached to the grant and there is reasonable
assurance that the grant will be received.
The
government subsidies recognized were $193,781 and $16,738 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 respectively, and are
included in other income. Subsidy income for 2017 was mainly for our agriculture projects in Yidu and Meixian. Subsidy income
for 2016 mainly represents the value-added tax rebates provided on our exports. The subsidy income decreased in 2017 as we had
fewer exports in 2016 as compared to the previous year.
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, “Clarifying the Definition of a Business,” which clarifies the definition
of a business in ASC 805. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods
within those fiscal years. Early application is permitted. Currently, there is no impact to our consolidated financial statements
and related disclosures, but we will adopt on January 1, 2018 for any business combinations and will consider adopting early for
any acquisitions prior to January 1, 2018.
In
May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, “Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting”,
which amends the scope of modification accounting for share-based payment arrangements. The ASU provides guidance on the types
of changes to the terms or conditions of share-based payment awards to which we would be required to apply modification accounting
under ASC 718. Specifically, we would not apply modification accounting if the fair value, vesting conditions, and classification
of the awards are the same immediately before and after the modification. The guidance is effective for annual reporting periods,
including interim period within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted, including
adoption in any interim period. We are currently evaluating the impact the standard may have on our consolidated financial statements
and related disclosures should we have a modification to our share-based payment awards in the future.
In
August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12. ASU 2017-12 amends the hedge accounting model in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”)
815 to enable entities to better portray the economics of their risk management activities in the financial statements and enhance
the transparency and understandability of hedge results. ASU 2017-12 expands an entity’s ability to hedge non-financial
and financial risk components and reduce complexity in fair value hedges of interest rate risk. The guidance eliminates the requirement
to separately measure and report hedge ineffectiveness and generally requires the entire change in the fair value of a hedging
instrument to be presented in the same income statement line as the hedged item. The guidance also eases certain documentation
and assessment requirements and modifies the accounting for components excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness. The
guidance in ASU 2017-12 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those
fiscal years, and is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2019. Early adoption is permitted in any interim period or fiscal
year before the effective date. Adoption of ASU 2017-12 did not have any other material effect on the results of operations, financial
position or cash flows of the Company.
Other
accounting standards that have been issued or proposed by the FASB or other standards-setting bodies that do not require adoption
until a future date are not expected to have a material impact on the Company’s consolidated financial statements upon adoption.
Comparison
of Operation Results of years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016
Revenue
The
following table presents our consolidated revenues for our main products for the fiscal years 2017 and 2016, respectively, (in
thousands):
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
% of
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
Change
|
|
Concentrated apple juice and apple aroma
|
|
$
|
1,845
|
|
|
$
|
7,708
|
|
|
|
(76
|
%)
|
Concentrated kiwifruit juice and kiwifruit puree
|
|
|
536
|
|
|
|
725
|
|
|
|
(26
|
%)
|
Concentrated pear juice
|
|
|
1,128
|
|
|
|
9,262
|
|
|
|
(88
|
%)
|
Fruit juice beverages
|
|
|
6,868
|
|
|
|
14,768
|
|
|
|
(53
|
%)
|
Other
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
|
1,944
|
|
|
|
(96
|
%)
|
Total
|
|
$
|
10,463
|
|
|
$
|
34,407
|
|
|
|
(70
|
%)
|
Revenue
decreased from $34.41 million in 2016 to $10.46 million in 2017, representing a decrease of 70%, or $23.95 million. This decrease
was due to a decrease in sales for all of our products.
Sales
generated from apple related products decreased from $7.71 million in 2016 to $1.85 million in 2017, representing a decrease of
76%. During 2017 and 2016, we sold 6,259 and 7,705 tons of concentrated apple juice and apple aroma, representing a decrease of
18.8% in the amount of apple-related products sold. Most of our concentrated apple juice was sold directly or indirectly to the
international market. Because of the negative trends in the international market and estimated lower margins in previous years,
our Yingkou and Huludao Wonder factories did not operate their concentrated apple juice production facilities in 2016 and 2017,
which caused a lower inventory of concentrated apple juice and required us to purchase supply from third-party manufacturers to
meet the demand from our customers. In December 2016, the Company established a winding-down plan to close the Huludao Wonder
operation, as it suffered continued operating losses in the three fiscal years prior to 2016 and the cash flow was minimal for
these three years. Based on the restructuring plan and in accordance with EITF 03-13, the Company presented the operation results
from Huludao Wonder as a discontinued operation, as the Company believed that no continued cash flow would be generated by the
disposed component (Huludao Wonder) and that the Company would have no significant continuing involvement in the operation of
the discontinued component. In fiscal years 2017 and 2016, the Company’s recorded an impairment loss of $11.3 million and
$2.4 million, respectively, with respect to the concentrated fruit juice production equipment and fixed assets in Huludao Wonder.
According
to the data provided by Chinese Customs, the amount of exported concentrated apple juice from China increased by 14.7% in year
2017 as compared to 2016, but the unit price of exported concentrated apple juice from China declined by 5.1% in 2017 as compared
to 2016. If the international concentrated apple juice demand continues to improve in future, the Company may resume the operation
of Yingkou factory in 2018.
Sales
from concentrated kiwifruit juice and kiwifruit puree decreased by 26%, from $0.73 million in 2016 to $0.54 million in 2017. The
decrease was primarily a result of the decreased volume of products sold in 2017 as compared to 2016 as a result of a decrease
in market demand of our products. During 2017 and 2016, we sold 259 and 327 tons of concentrated kiwifruit juice and kiwifruit
puree, respectively.
Sales
of concentrated pear juice decreased by 88%, from $9.26 million in 2016 to $1.13 million in 2017. During 2017 and 2016, we sold
3,043 and 11,107 tons of concentrated pear juice, respectively, representing a decrease of 73%. The decrease of revenue generated
from concentrated pear juice was mainly because of a decrease in the amount of products sold due to a decrease in customer demand.
Sales
from our fruit juice beverages decreased from $14.77 million in 2016 to $6.87 million for 2017, representing a decrease of 53%.
The decline in revenues during 2017 was primarily due to a decrease in the in-store demand of our products as a result of heavy
competition in the Chinese market as consumers increased their fruit juice beverage purchases through on-line home delivery of
groceries instead of through the traditional in-store supermarkets in which we sell our products.
Sales
from our other products were $0.09 million and $1.9 million in 2017 and 2016, respectively. The amount of sales of other products
is expected to be unstable and is generally not indicative of our future sales of other products.
G
ross
Margin
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
Gross
margin
|
|
|
Gross
profit
|
|
|
Gross
margin
|
|
Concentrated apple juice and apple aroma
|
|
$
|
88
|
|
|
|
5
|
%
|
|
$
|
1,985
|
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
Concentrated kiwifruit juice and kiwifruit puree
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
62
|
|
|
|
9
|
%
|
Concentrated pear juice
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
13
|
%
|
|
|
2,101
|
|
|
|
23
|
%
|
Fruit juice beverages
|
|
|
1,341
|
|
|
|
20
|
%
|
|
|
4,692
|
|
|
|
32
|
%
|
Others
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
26
|
%
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,734
|
|
|
|
17
|
%
|
|
$
|
9,173
|
|
|
|
27
|
%
|
Gross
profit decreased from $9.17 million in 2016 to $1.73 million in 2017 mainly due to a decrease in revenue. The gross profit margin
was 17% and 27% for 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Gross
margin for concentrated apple juice and apple aroma were 5% and 26% for 2017 and 2016, respectively. The decrease in gross margin
was mainly due to a decrease in the sales price of concentrated apple juice in the international market.
Gross
margin for concentrated kiwifruit juice and kiwifruit puree increased from 9% for 2016 to 26% for 2017, primarily due to a decrease
in the purchase prices of fresh kiwi purchased in the last squeezing season
Gross margin for concentrated pear juice decreased
from 23% for 2016 to 13% for 2017 primarily due to the higher costs of raw material and the lower unit price.
Gross
margin of fruit juice beverages decreased from 32% in 2016 to 20% in 2017. The decrease in profit margin was primarily due
to the decrease of unit selling prices of our products in 2017 as compared 2016 as a result of heavy market competition.
Gross
margin for other products was 25% in 2017 and 17% in 2016. Given the relatively low amount of production and sales of other products,
their gross margin is expected to be unstable.
Operating
Expenses
The
following table presents consolidated operating expenses and operating expenses as a percentage of revenue for 2017 and 2016,
respectively:
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
% of revenue
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
% of revenue
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
$
|
10,416,244
|
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
$
|
5,010,222
|
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
Selling expenses
|
|
|
719,452
|
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
|
|
1,932,148
|
|
|
|
6
|
%
|
Impairment loss
|
|
|
89,685,890
|
|
|
|
857
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
$
|
100,821,586
|
|
|
|
964
|
%
|
|
$
|
6,942,370
|
|
|
|
21
|
%
|
General
and administrative expenses increased by $5.41 million from $5.01 million in 2016 to $10.42 million in 2017. The increase in general
and administrative expenses was mainly due to an increase in depreciation expenses and legal expenses.
Selling
expenses decreased to $0.72 million in 2017 as compared to $1.93 million for 2016, a decrease of 63%, or $1.21 million, mainly
due to the reduced amount of sales generated during 2017.
In
2017, the Company recorded an impairment loss of $89.82 million related to its fixed assets. Among this amount, $16.80 million
was with respect to the construction in progress and fixed assets of Food Industry Yidu; an impairment loss of $25.06 million
with respect to the construction in progress and fixed assets of SkyPeople Suizhong; an impairment loss of $6.24 million with
respect to the construction in progress of Hedetang Agricultural Plantations (Yidu) Co., Ltd.; and an impairment loss of $11.34
million with respect to fixed assets of Huludao Wonder. The construction of the these operations has been stopped for more than
2 years due to a shortage of capital, and the Company cannot forecast the possible cash flow from these assets, and as a result,
the Company recorded the impairment of assets for these assets.
Loss
from Operations
Loss
from operations increased to $99.09 million for 2017 from an operating income of $2.23 million in 2016, representing an increased
loss of $101.32 million. The increase in loss from operations as mainly due to a 79% decrease in revenue, and an increase of $93.88
million in total operating expenses.
Other
Expense, Net
Other
expense, net was $2.95 million for 2017, compared to $1.27 million for 2016. Subsidy income increased from $16,738 in 2016 to
$554,553 for 2017. Subsidy income for 2017 and 2016 mainly represents the value-added tax rebates provided on our exports. Interest
expense for 2017 was $3.08 million, representing an increase of $1.42 million or 86%, as compared to interest expense of $1.66
million for 2016. The increase was primarily due to higher interest rates on our bank loans in 2017 as compared to 2016. Other
expenses was $428,611 for 2017 as other income was $207,386 for 2016. Other expenses for 2017 was mainly for other taxes related
with transfer to land between subsidiaries. Other income for 2016 was mainly consisted of translation income from export business.
Income
Taxes
Our
provision for income taxes decreased from $1.60 in 2016 to $0.27 million in 2017. The decrease in income tax provision was mainly
due to the reduced amount of income before tax generated in 2017 as compared to that in 2016. Some of our subsidiaries generated
income and we accrued income tax according to the Chinese corporate income tax rate, but some subsidiaries recorded a loss and
no tax provision was made.
Noncontrolling
Interests
As
of December 31, 2017, SkyPeople (China) held a 91.15% interest in Shaanxi Qiyiwangguo, and Hedetang Holding (HK) held a 73.42%
interest in SkyPeople (China). TSD held a 26.36% interest in SkyPeople (China). Net income attributable to non-controlling interests
increased mainly due to the increase in the net income generated from Shaanxi Qiyiwangguo and SkyPeople (China).
Loss
from Discontinued Operations
Loss
from discontinued operations was $14.66 million, an increase of $9.87 million as compared to a loss of $4.79 million for fiscal
year 2016, which was mainly due to an increase in impairment loss of fixed assets related to the Company’s operation in
Huludao, which was wound down in 2016.
Loss
from Continuing Operations before Minority Interest and Net Income
Loss
from continuing operations before minority interest increased by $101.07 million from $0.97 million in 2016 to $102.04 million
in 2017 as the result of a decrease in income from operations and an increase in operating expenses, which was partially offset
by a decrease in income provision, as previously discussed. Net loss for fiscal 2017 was $102.58 million, an increase of 97.29
million compared to a loss of $5.29 million fiscal 2016.
Earnings
per Share
Basic
and diluted loss per share from continuing operations were $18.09 in fiscal 2017, as compared to a loss of $0.19 for fiscal year
2016. Basic and diluted loss per share attributable to discontinued operations was $3.02 and $1.22 for fiscal year 2017 and 2016,
respectively.
Liquidity
and Capital Resources
As
of December 31, 2017, we had cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash of $4.59 million, an increase of $3.44 million, from $1.14
million as of December 31, 2016. The increase in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash was mainly due to cash received in
our direct registered offering. On April 12, 2017, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement with certain purchasers
(the “Purchasers”), pursuant to which the Company offered and sold to the Purchasers, in a registered direct offering,
an aggregate of 862,097 shares of common stock for aggregate gross proceeds to the Company of $2,672,500,
before deducting
fees to the placement agent and other estimated offering expenses payable by the Company. We expect that the projected cash flows
from operations, anticipated cash receipts, cash on hand, and trade credit to provide sufficient capital to meet our projected
operating cash requirements at least for the next 12 months, which does not take into account any potential expenditures related
to the possible expansions of our current production capacity. On April 18, 2017, our investor exercised warrants according to
the Securities Purchase Agreement that the Company entered with certain purchasers on April 12, 2017, and received an amount of
$1,024,701 for 197,058 shares of the Company’s common stock issued.
Our
working capital has historically been generated from our operating cash flows, advances from our customers and loans from bank
facilities. Our working capital was negative $55.98 million as of December 31, 2017, a decrease of $80.63 million from working
capital of $24.65 million as of December 31, 2016 mainly due to a decrease in current assets and an increase in current liabilities.
In 2017, net cash provided by our operating activities was $23.66 million compared to cash outflow $34.44 million in 2016. The
increase was primarily due to an increase in impairment loss and an increase in change in other receivables and accrued expenses,
which was partially offset by a decrease in net income. The net loss of the Company was $102.58 million in 2017. Among this amount,
$101.38 million was not loss in cash.
In
2017 and 2016, our investing activities used net cash of $0 and $21.04 million, respectively. In 2016, we made a refundable deposit
about $30 million pursuant to the letter of intent to purchase the kiwifruits orchard, $37.4 million for the lease of the kiwifruits
orchard in Mei County and $24 million for the lease of the orange orchard in Yidu city.
In
2017, cash used in our financing activities was $19.91 million as compared to $24.10 million in 2016. The decrease in cash outflow
from financing activities was mainly due to a decrease in capital contributions.
On
March 11, 2016, SkyPeople HK, a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company and a 99.78% owner of SkyPeople China entered into a Share
Transfer Agreement and a Capital Contribution (the “Agreements”) with TSD, a limited liability corporation registered
in China. Pursuant to the Agreements, TSD paid $16,641,291 and acquired 112,809,100 shares of SkyPeople China from SkyPeople HK,
resulting in TSD owning 112,809,100 shares, or 26.36%, of SkyPeople China.
Off-Balance
Sheet Arrangements
As
of December 31, 2017, we did not have any off-balance sheet arrangements.
ITEM
7A – QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK
Not
applicable.
ITEM
8 – FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA
The
information called for by this item is included in the Company’s consolidated financial statements beginning on page F-1 of this
Annual Report on Form 10-K.
ITEM
9 – CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE
Not
applicable.
ITEM
9A – CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES
Evaluation
of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
Our
management, with the participation of our CEO and CFO, has evaluated the effectiveness of the Company’s disclosure controls
and procedures, as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) of the Exchange Act, as of December 31, 2017.
The
term “disclosure controls and procedures” as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) means controls and other procedures
of the Company that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in reports, such as this report,
that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified
in the SEC rules and forms. Disclosure controls and procedures include, without limitation, controls and procedures designed to
ensure that information required to be disclosed by a company in the reports that it files or submits under the Exchange Act is
accumulated and communicated to the company’s management, including its principal executive and principal financial officers,
as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. Management recognizes that any controls and procedures,
no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their objectives, and management
necessarily applies its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures.
Based
on that evaluation, our CEO and CFO concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective as of December 31, 2017.
Management’s
Report on Internal Controls Over Financial Reporting
Our
management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting. Our internal control
over financial reporting is designed to provide reasonable assurances regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the
preparation of our consolidated financial statements in accordance with U.S. GAAP. Our accounting policies and internal controls
over financial reporting, established and maintained by management, are under the general oversight of the Board’s audit
committee.
Our
internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and procedures that:
|
●
|
pertain
to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions
of our assets;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
provide
reasonable assurance that transactions are recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in accordance
with U.S. GAAP, and that receipts and expenditures are being made only in accordance with authorizations of our management
and directors; and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized acquisition, use or disposition of assets that
could have a material effect on the financial statements.
|
Because
of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections
of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that controls may become inadequate because of changes
in conditions, or that the degree or compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management
assessed our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017. The standard measures adopted by management in
making its evaluation are the measures in the Internal-Control Integrated Framework published by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations
of the Treadway Commission.
Based
on that assessment, our CEO and CFO concluded that our internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2017 was effective.
The
Company continues to make efforts to implementing our existing and newly adopted procedures to improve our disclosure controls
and internal controls over financing reporting.
Changes
to Internal Control over Financial Reporting
There
has been no change to our internal control over financial reporting that has materially affected, or is reasonably likely to materially
affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
ITEM
9B – OTHER INFORMATION
None.
PART
III
ITEM
10 – DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Directors
and Executive Officers
The
following table sets forth as of April 12, 2018 the names, positions and ages of our current executive officers and directors.
Our directors serve until the next annual meeting of shareholders or until their successors are elected and qualified. Our officers
are elected by the Board and their terms of office are, except to the extent governed by an employment contract, at the discretion
of the Board.
Name
of Current Director and/or Executive Officer
|
|
Age
|
|
Position(s)
|
Hongke
Xue (1)
|
|
45
|
|
Director
|
Yongke
Xue (2)
|
|
50
|
|
Chairman
of Board of Directors, Chief Executive Officer
|
Hanjun
Zheng
|
|
45
|
|
Interim
Chief Financial Officer
|
Guolin
Wang (3)(6)
|
|
54
|
|
Director
|
Johnson
Lau (3)(4)
|
|
44
|
|
Director
|
Fuyou
Li (3)(5)
|
|
64
|
|
Director
|
(1)
|
On
September 2, 2016, the Board appointed Hongke Xue to serve as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Chairman of the
Board. Mr. Hongke Xue previously served as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer from February 18, 2013 to December
24, 2014. Mr. Hongke was reappointed as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer on September 2, 2016.On January
5, 2018, Hongke Xue notified the Board his resignation from his position as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company and
Chairman of the Board, effective on January 31, 2018.
|
(2)
|
On
September 2, 2016, Mr. Yongke Xue resigned from his position as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Chairman of
the Board of the Directors of the Company. Mr. Yongke Xue was appointed Chief Executive Officer on December 24, 2014, and
resigned as Chief Executive Officer of the Company on September 2, 2016.On January 5, 2018, Mr. Yongke Xue was reappointed
as the Company’s Chief Executive Officer effective on January 31, 2018.
|
(3)
|
Member
of the audit committee and compensation committee.
|
(4)
|
Johnson
Lau was appointed a member of the Board of Directors of the Company on December 23, 2014.
|
(5)
(6)
|
Fuyou
Li was appointed a member of the Board of Directors of the Company on May 8, 2015.
Guolin
Wang was appointed a member of the Board of Directors of the Company on April 7, 2008.
|
Yongke
Xue, Director and Chief Executive Officer
Mr.
Yongke Xue served as our Chief Executive Officer since January 31, 2018. Mr. Xue also served in that positions from February 26,
2008 to February 18, 2013, and from December 24, 2014 to September 2, 2016. Mr. Yongke Xue also serves as the Chairman of the
Board. Mr. Yongke Xue has served as the director of SkyPeople (China) since December 2005. Mr. Xue served as the general
manager of Hede from December 2005 to June 2007. Prior to that, he served as the business director of the investment banking division
of Hualong Securities Co., Ltd. from April 2001 to December 2005. He also acted as the vice general manager of Shaanxi Huaye Foods
Co., Ltd. from July 1998 to March 2001. Mr. Xue graduated from Xi’an Jiaotong University with an MBA in 2000. Mr. Xue
graduated with a Bachelor’s degree in Metal Material & Heat Treatment from National University of Defense Technology
in July 1989. The Board believes that Mr. Xue’s vision, leadership and extensive knowledge of the Company is essential to
the development of its strategic vision.
Hongke
Xue
,
Director
Mr.
Hongke Xue is a brother of Mr. Yongke Xue. Mr Xue has served as a director since February 2013, and previously served as our
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board from February 18, 2013 to December 24, 2014, and from September 2, 2016 to
January 31, 2018. Mr. Xue has also served as the Chief Executive Officer of SkyPeople (China) since 2003. Prior to that, Mr.
Hongke Xue served as the Chief Executive Officer of Tangshan Fengyuan Metal Products, a sino-foreign joint venture, from
March 2002 to March 2003. Prior to that, he served as the general manager of Baoji Industrial Products Co., Ltd., a wholly
foreign owned enterprise, from April 2001 to March 2002, and deputy general manager of Shaanxi DePu Industry and Trade Co.,
Ltd. from October 1997 to April 2001. H. K. Xue received a bachelor degree in business management from Lanzhou University of
Finance and Economics in July 1995. H. K. Xue’s experience in management and corporate development and his experience
with fruit juice industry, the development and sale of products will enable him to provide effective leadership to continue
to grow the Company’s business. The Board believes that Mr. Hongke Xue’s experience in the Company’s
business operations are crucial to the success of the Company.
Hanjun
Zheng, Interim Chief Financial Officer
Mr.
Hanjun Zheng was appointed by the Board as Interim Chief Financial Officer on November 27, 2015. Since December, 2009, Mr.
Zheng has been serving as the Chief Financial Officer of SkyPeople China. Mr. Zheng was the deputy general manager at
Jingyang Branch of SkyPeople Juice Group Co., Ltd. from March, 2006 to November 2009. From May, 1994 to February, 2006, Mr.
Zheng was the Financial Accounting Manager at Shaanxi Provincial Fruit Juice Processing Factory, a state-owned enterprise in
Shaanxi, China. Mr. Zheng earned his bachelor degree in accounting by passing Chinese National Self-Examination in Financial
Accounting in 1996. Mr. Zheng graduated from Shaanxi Technical College of Finance and Economics and received his junior
college degree in Financial Accounting in 1994. Mr. Zheng received additional training in Advanced Business Management and
Advanced Financial and Accounting Management at Jiaotong University in March, 2011 and July, 2012, respectively. There is no
family relationship between Mr. Zheng and any of the Company’s directors and officers. The Board believes that Mr.
Zheng’s strong experience in accounting and financial reporting is important to the Company since the Company is listed
in the United States.
Guolin
Wang, Director
Mr. Wang
has been serving as one of our directors since April 7, 2008. Mr. Wang has served as a director of SkyPeople (China) since October
2005. Since 1996 he has been a professor in the Finance Department of the Management School and in the Economics and Finance School
of Xi’an Jiaotong University. He previously served as the director and chairman of Xi’an Changtian Environmental Protection
Engineering Co., Ltd. from February 2006 to June 2007. Mr. Wang graduated with a Bachelor of Science in Electronics &
Telecommunication from Xi’an Jiaotong University in July 1983. In July 1983, he attained a Master’s degree in Management
Science and Engineering from Xian Jiaotong University. He graduated with a Doctorate degree in Management and Science and Engineering
from Xi’an Jiaotong University’s School of Economics & Finance in 2006. The Board believes that Mr. Wang’s
strong experience in engineering is important to the Company’s business operations.
Johnson
Lau
,
Director
On
December 23, 2014, the Board appointed Johnson Lau as a member of the Board of Directors of the Company and also the Chairman
of Audit committee. Mr. Lau is entitled for US$25,000 per annum as compensation for his service as a director of the Company and
audit committee Chair of the Board.
Mr.
Lau is the Chief Financial Officer of China Golden Classic Group Limited (“China Golden”), a company listed in Hong
Kong Stock Exchange Limited (HKEX: 8281.HK) since 2015. Mr. Lau is a Certified Public Accountant of the Hong Kong Institute of
Certified Public Accountants and CPA Australia. Mr. Lau has over 20 years of experience in the accounting profession. Mr. Lau
started his career in Deloitte in Hong Kong and Beijing from 1997 to 2004. Prior to joining China Golden in July 2015, Mr. Lau
worked in various public companies in the United States and England as Director of Finance and CFO for over ten years. He holds
a bachelor degree in commerce from Monash University, Australia. The Board believes that Mr. Lau’s extensive knowledge and
experience in accounting and his public company experience is important to the Company’s internal controls and financial
reporting and its status as a US traded public company. During the period between 2004 and 2013, Mr. Lau worked in various public
companies listed in the United States and England as director of finance and chief financial officer. Mr. Lau was the chief financial
officer and was subsequently an executive director of Haike Chemical Group Limited, a company listed on the London Stock Exchange
(LSE code: HAIK), from December 2006 to March 2009. Mr. Lau subsequently resigned as chief financial officer and was redesignated
as a non-executive director of Haike Chemical Group Limited in March 2009. He retired as a non-executive director in January 2010.
From April 2009, Mr. Lau was employed by Auto China International Limited, a company listed on the NASDAQ Capital Market and subsequently
quoted on the OTC Bulletin Board (NASDAQ/OTC code: AUTCF) as chief financial officer. He was redesignated as the director of finance
in July 2009 and subsequently departed in June 2013. From June 2010 to January 2013, Mr. Lau was an independent director of Lizhan
Environmental Corporation (NASDAQ code: LZEN). Mr. Lau was the chief financial officer of SGOCO Group, Ltd., a company listed
on the NASDAQ Capital Market (NASDAQ code: SGOC), from July 2013 to June 2015.
Fuyou
Li
,
Director
On
May 8, 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors appointed Mr. Fuyou Li as a member of the Company’s Board of Directors
effective as of that date. The Board of Directors also appointed Mr. Li as a member of both audit committee and compensation committee.
Mr. Li, age 62, graduated from Xi’an Jiaotong University with a doctor’s degree in economics. He has taught international
finance as a professor in Xi’an Jiaotong University for the past 6 years. In determining that Mr. Li should serve on
the Company’s Board of Directors, the Board considered, among other qualifications, his professional background and expertise
in international finance.
Section
16(a) Beneficial Ownership Reporting Compliance
Section 16(a)
of the Exchange Act requires that directors, certain officers of the Company and ten percent shareholders file reports of ownership
and changes in ownership with the Commission as to the Company’s securities beneficially owned by them. Such persons are
also required by SEC rules to furnish the Company with copies of all Section 16(a) forms they file.
Based
solely on its review of copies of such forms received by the Company, or on written representations from certain reporting persons,
the Company believes that, other than as described above, all Section 16(a) filing requirements applicable to its officers, directors
and greater than ten percent shareholders were complied with during the fiscal year ended December 31, 2017, except for the following:
Zeyao Xue did not report his acquisition of indirect shared beneficial ownership of 2,337,155 shares of the Company’s common
stock on September 27, 2017.
Code
of Ethics
We
have adopted a code of business conduct and ethics that applies to all of our employees, officers and directors, including those
officers responsible for financial reporting. Our code of business conduct and ethics is available on our website at www.ftft.top
and may be found by first clicking on “Investors,” then “Corporate Governance” and then “Governance
Documents.” We intend to disclose any amendments to the code, or any waivers of its requirements, on our website.
Committees
of the Company’s Board of Directors
The
Board held 22 regularly scheduled and special meetings during fiscal year 2017. All of the directors attended (in person or by
telephone) all of the Board meetings and any committees of the Board on which they served during the fiscal year. Directors are
expected to use their best efforts to be present at the shareholders annual meeting. All of our directors attended the December
28, 2017 shareholders annual meeting by tele-conference.
Audit
Committee
On
April 25, 2008, the Board formed an audit committee. Messrs. Lau, Li and Wang currently serve on the audit committee, which is
chaired by Mr. Lau. Each member of the audit committee is “independent” as that term is defined in the rules of the
SEC and within the meaning of such term as defined under the rules of the NASDAQ Global Market. The Board has determined that
each audit committee member has sufficient knowledge in financial and auditing matters to serve on the audit committee. The audit
committee held seven meetings during fiscal year 2017, and all audit committee members attended each of those meetings. Our Board
has determined that Mr. Lau is an “audit committee financial expert,” as defined under the applicable SEC rules.
Compensation
Committee
On
April 25, 2008, the Board formed a compensation committee. Messrs. Lau, Li and Wang currently serve on the compensation committee,
which is chaired by Mr. Lau. Each member of the compensation committee is “independent” as that term is
defined in the SEC rules and within the meaning of such term as defined under the rules of the NASDAQ Global Market, a “nonemployee
director” for purposes of Section 16 of the Exchange Act and an “outside director” for purposes of Section 162(m)
of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended. No interlocking relationship exists between the Board or the compensation committee
and the Board or compensation committee of any other company, nor has any interlocking relationship existed during the last
fiscal year. The compensation committee held two meetings during fiscal year 2017, and all compensation committee members attended
those meeting.
Other
Committees
The
Board may on occasion establish other committees, as it deems necessary or required. We do not currently have a standing nominating
committee, or a committee performing similar functions. The full Board currently serves this function. Our directors believe that
it is not necessary to have such committees, at this time, because the functions of such committees can be adequately performed
by the Board. The Board will assess all candidates, whether submitted by management or shareholders, and make recommendations
for election or appointment. There have been no material changes to the procedures by which security holders may recommend nominees
to the Board.
Compensation
Committee Interlocks and Insider Participation
None
of the Company’s executive officers has served as a member of a compensation committee, or other committee serving an equivalent
function, of any other entity whose executive officers serve as a director of the Company or member of the Company’s compensation
committee.
Family
Relationships
Mr.
Yongke Xue, the chairman of our Board and our Chief Executive Officer, is the brother of Mr. Hongke Xue, a member of the Board.
ITEM
11 – EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION
Compensation
Discussion and Analysis
Compensation
Objectives
We
operate in a highly competitive and rapidly changing industry. The key objectives of our executive compensation programs are to:
|
●
|
attract,
motivate and retain executives who drive our success and industry leadership; and provide each executive, from vice president
to CEO, with a base salary on the market value of that role, and
|
|
●
|
the
individual’s demonstrated ability to perform that role.
|
2011
Stock Incentive Plan
On
August 18, 2011, upon board recommendation, at the annual meeting of the shareholders, our shareholder approved a Stock Incentive
Plan (the “2011 Plan”). The purpose of the Plan is to provide an additional inducement for selected employees, consultants
and non-employee directors who provide services to the Company, to reward such selected individuals by providing an opportunity
to acquire incentive awards, and to provide a means through which we may attract able persons to enter the employment of, or engagement,
with the Company. Up to 1,000,000 shares of Common Stock (subject to adjustment in the event of stock splits and other similar
events) may be issued pursuant to awards granted under the Plan.
The
Plan provides for the grant of stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, stock appreciation rights and incentive
compensation awards paid in cash or Stock to selected employees, consultants and non-employee directors of the Company. Options
granted under the Plan may be “incentive stock options” as defined in Section 422 of the Internal Revenue Code of
1986, as amended (the “Code”), or nonqualified options, and will be designated as such. At present, there are approximately
205 employees and consultants and three non-employee directors eligible to participate in the Plan. The Plan will be administered
by the Board of Directors or compensation committee of the Board. The administrator will have complete discretion to select the
optionees and to establish the terms and conditions of each option, subject to the provisions of the Plan.
On
November 19, 2015, the Company’s shareholders approved Omnibus Equity Plan at the annual stockholders meeting, which permits
the grant of incentive stock options (“ISOs”), nonqualified stock options (“NQSOs”), stock appreciation
rights (“SARs”), restricted stock, unrestricted stock and restricted stock units (“RSUs”) to its employees
of up to 250,000 shares of Common Stock.
On
March 13, 2018, the Company’s shareholders approved Omnibus Equity Plan at the annual stockholders meeting, which permits
the grant of incentive stock options (“ISOs”), nonqualified stock options (“NQSOs”), stock appreciation
rights (“SARs”), restricted stock, unrestricted stock and restricted stock units (“RSUs”) to its employees
of up to1,300,000 shares of Common Stock.
We
believe that the future success of the Company depends, in large part, upon the ability of the Company to maintain a competitive
position in attracting, retaining and motivating key personnel. As of the date of this report, all the shares have been granted
and issued under 2011 Plan.
What
Our Compensation Program is Designed to Reward
Our
compensation program is designed to reward each individually named executive officer’s contribution to the advancement of
our overall performance and execution of our goals, ideas and objectives. It is designed to reward and encourage exceptional
performance at the individual level in the areas of organization, creativity and responsibility while supporting our core values
and ambitions. This in turn aligns the interest of our executive officers with the interests of our shareholders, and thus with
our interests.
Determining
Executive Compensation
The
Board’s compensation committee reviews and approves the compensation program for executive officers annually after the close
of each year. Reviewing the compensation program at such time allows the compensation committee to consider the overall performance
of the past year and the financial and operating plans for the upcoming year in determining the compensation program for the upcoming
year.
A
named executive officer’s base salary is determined by an assessment of his sustained performance against individual job
responsibilities, including, where appropriate, the impact of his performance on our business results, current salary in relation
to the salary range designated for the job, experience and mastery, and potential for advancement. The compensation
committee also annually reviews market compensation levels with comparable jobs in the industry to determine whether the total
compensation for our officers remains in the targeted median pay range.
Role
of Executive Officers in Determining Executive Compensation
The
compensation committee determines the compensation for the CEO, which is based on various factors, such as level of responsibility
and contributions to our performance. The CFO recommends the compensation for our executive officers (other than the compensation
of the CEO) to the compensation committee. The compensation committee reviews the recommendations made by the CEO and determines
the compensation of the CFO and the other executive officers.
Employment
Agreements
We
do not currently have an employment agreement with any of our CEO and CFO.
On
February 8, 2018, the Company entered into an Employment agreement with the Chief Technology Officer for a period of one year
from the signing date.
Summary
Compensation of Named Executive Officers
Our
executive officers do not receive any compensation for serving as executive officers of the Company. However, except for our former
CEO, the remaining executive officers are compensated by and through SkyPeople (China). Our former CEO, Yongke Xue, has not received
any compensation from us or any of our subsidiaries for his services in the past three years. The following table sets forth information
concerning cash and non-cash compensation paid by the Company or SkyPeople (China) to our named executive officers for 2017 and
2016, respectively.
Name and Principal
Position
|
|
Year
Ended
|
|
|
Salary
($)
|
|
|
Bonus
($)
|
|
|
Stock Awards
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation
($)
|
|
|
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings
($)
|
|
|
All Other Compensation
($)
|
|
|
Total
($)
|
|
Yongke Xue (1)
|
|
|
12/31/2017
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Yongke Xue (1)
|
|
|
12/31/2016
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hongke Xue (1)
|
|
|
12/31/2017
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Hongke Xue (1)
|
|
|
12/31/2016
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Hanjun Zheng(2)
|
|
|
12/31/2017
|
|
|
$
|
12,863
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
12,863
|
|
|
|
|
12/31/2016
|
|
|
$
|
12,352
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
11,662
|
|
(1)
|
On
January 5, 2018, Hongke Xue notified the Board his resignation from his position as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company
and Chairman of the Board, effective on January 31, 2018. On January 5, 2018, Mr. Yongke Xue was reappointed as the Company’s
Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board effective on January 31, 2018.
|
(2)
|
Mr.
Hanjun Zheng was appointed by the Board as Interim Chief Financial Officer on November 27, 2015.
|
Outstanding
Equity Awards at December 31, 2017
The
following table presents certain information concerning outstanding equity awards held by each of our named executive officers
at December 31, 2017.
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
Name
|
|
|
Number of securities underlying unexercised options (#) exercisable
|
|
|
|
Number of securities underlying unexercised options (#) unexercisable
|
|
|
|
Equity incentive plan awards: number of securities underlying unexercised unearned options (#)
|
|
|
|
Option exercise price
($)
|
|
|
|
Option expiration date
|
|
Yongke Xue
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Hongke Xue
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Hanjun Zheng
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
On
February 28, 2017, the Company issued options to purchase 62,500 shares of the Company’s common stock with an exercise price
equal to the fair market value of the Company’s Common Stock (as defined under the 2011 Stock Incentive Plan in conformity
with Regulation 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended) at the date of grant to three of the Company’s employees
pursuant to the 2011 Stock Incentive Plan, which was approved by the Company’s shareholders at the annual stockholders meeting
on August 18, 2011. These options vested immediately on the grant date with a fair market value of $223,375 based on the fair
value of $3.57 per share, which was determined by using the Black Scholes option pricing model. The Company recognized stock-based
compensation expense of $223,375 in the first quarter of fiscal year 2017 under the 2011 Stock Incentive Plan.
The
Company’s 2015 Omnibus Equity Plan permits the grant of incentive stock options (“ISOs”), nonqualified stock
options (“NQSOs”), stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), restricted stock, unrestricted stock and restricted
stock units (“RSUs”) to its employees of up to 250,000 shares of Common Stock.
On
March 29, 2017, the Company issued 250,000 shares of the Company’s unrestricted common stock to six of the Company’s
employees pursuant to our 2015 Omnibus Equity Plan, which was approved by the Company’s shareholders at the annual stockholders
meeting on November 19, 2015. The Company recorded an expense of $250 in the first quarter of fiscal year 2017 under the 2015
Omnibus Equity Plan, reflecting a par value of $0.001 per share of the Company’s common stock.
On
April 12, 2017, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with certain purchasers
(the “Purchasers”), pursuant to which the Company offered and sold to the Purchasers, in a registered direct offering,
an aggregate of 862,097 shares (the “Shares”) of common stock, par value $0.001 per share (“Common Stock”).
The Shares were sold to the Purchasers at a negotiated purchase price of $3.10 per share, for aggregate gross proceeds to the
Company of $2,672,500,
before deducting fees to the placement agent and other estimated offering expenses payable
by the Company. The Shares were offered pursuant to an effective shelf registration statement on Form S-3, which was originally
filed with the SEC on August 3, 2015, amended on February 17, 2017, and was declared effective on February 23, 2017 (File No.
333-206353) (the “Registration Statement”).
In
a concurrent private placement, the Company also issued to each of the Purchasers a warrant to purchase one (1) share of the Company’s
Common Stock for each share purchased under the Purchase Agreement, pursuant to that certain Common Stock Purchase Warrant, by
and between the Company and each Purchaser (each, a “Warrant”, and collectively, the “Warrants”). The
Warrants will be exercisable beginning on the six month anniversary of the date of issuance at an initial exercise price of $5.20
per share and will expire on the five and a half year anniversary of the date of issuance.
The
Warrants and the shares of the Company’s Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of the Warrants (the “Warrant Shares”)
are not being registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), pursuant to the Company’s
Registration Statement, and were instead offered pursuant to the exemption provided in Section 4(a)(2) under the Securities
Act. Each Purchaser was either (i) an “accredited investor” as defined in Rule 501(a)(1), (a)(2), (a)(3), (a)(7) or
(a)(8) under the Securities Act or (ii) a “qualified institutional buyer” as defined in Rule 144A(a) under the Securities
Act.
On
April 18, 2017, our investor exercised warrants according to the Securities Purchase Agreement that the Company entered with certain
purchasers on April 12, 2017, and received an amount of $1,024,701 for 197,058 shares of the Company’s common stock issued/
In
connection with the private placement and in accordance with the Purchase Agreement, the Company was required to file a registration
statement on Form S-1 within 45 calendar days after the date of the Purchase Agreement to provide for the resale of the Warrant
Shares. The Company filed a registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-218276) on May 26, 2017, which was declared effective
on June 12, 2017.
Rodman &
Renshaw, a unit of H.C. Wainwright & Co., served as our placement agent in connection with the offering under the Purchase
Agreement and received warrants to purchase our Common Stock in an amount equal to 4% of our Shares sold to the Purchasers in
the offering on substantially the same terms as the Warrants, with an initial exercise price of $5.20 per share, except that the
termination date shall be April 12, 2022 and the warrants have certain transfer restrictions pursuant to FINRA Rule 5110 (the
“Placement Agent Warrants”).
Per
the terms of the Purchase Agreement, the Company and the Purchasers agreed to the following: (i) that subject to certain exceptions,
the Company will not, within the ninety day period immediately following the closing of the offering, enter into any agreement
to issue or announce the issuance or proposed issuance of any securities; (ii) the Company will not, during the period in which
the Warrants are outstanding, enter into an agreement to effect a “Variable Rate Transaction,” as that term is defined
in the Purchase Agreement; and (iii) until the one-year
anniversary of the closing of the offering, the Company will
not undertake a reverse or forward stock split or reclassification of the Common Stock without the prior written consent of the
Purchasers holding a majority in interest of the Shares then outstanding and still held by them, subject to certain exceptions.
The
Company also agreed to indemnify each of the Purchasers against certain losses resulting from its breach of any representations,
warranties or covenants under agreements with each of the Purchasers, as well as under certain other circumstances described in
the Purchase Agreement.
Compensation
of Directors
Since
2008, we have (i) paid each of our nonemployee directors residing in the United States an annual fee of $25,000, (ii) reimbursed
our directors for actual, reasonable and customary expenses incurred in connection with the performance of their duties as board
members and (iii) paid the chairman of our audit committee a fee of $25,000 for his or her service as chairman.
There
was no change to the compensation to our directors in 2017. The following table sets forth information concerning cash and non-cash
compensation paid by us to our directors during 2017.
Name
|
|
Fees Paid in Cash
($)
|
|
|
Stock
Awards
|
|
|
Option Awards
|
|
|
Non-Equity Incentive Plan Compensation
($)
|
|
|
Non-Qualified Deferred Compensation Earnings
($)
|
|
|
All Other Compensation ($)
|
|
|
Total
($)
|
|
Yongke Xue
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Hongke Xue
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Guolin Wang (1)
|
|
$
|
8,850
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
8,850
|
|
Fuyou Li (2)
|
|
$
|
8,850
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
8,850
|
|
Johnson Lau (3)
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
25,000
|
|
(1)
|
On
April 7, 2008, the Company’s Board of Directors appointed Mr. Guolin Wang as a member of the Board of Directors and
a member of both the audit committee and compensation committee. Mr. Wang is entitled to US$8,850 per annum as
compensation for his services as a director of the Company.
|
(2)
|
On
May 8, 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors appointed Mr. Fuyou Li as a member of the Board of Directors and a member
of both the audit committee and compensation committee. Mr. Li is entitled for US$8,850 per annum as compensation for his
service as director of the Company.
|
(3)
|
On
December 23, 2014, the Board appointed Johnson Lau as a member of the Board of Directors of the Company and also the Chairman
of audit committee and a member of compensation committee. Mr. Lau is entitled for US$25,000 per annum as compensation for
his services as a director of the Company and chair of compensation committee.
|
ITEM
12 – SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS
Set
forth below is our equity compensation plan information:
Plan
category
|
|
Number
of securities to be issued upon exercise of outstanding options, warrants and rights
|
|
|
Weighted-average
exercise price of outstanding options, warrants and rights
|
|
|
Number
of securities remaining available for future issuance under equity compensation plans (excluding securities reflected in column
(a))
|
|
|
|
(a)
|
|
|
(b)
|
|
|
(c)
|
|
Equity
compensation plans approved by security holders (1)
|
|
|
62,500
|
|
|
$
|
3.57
|
(2)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Equity
compensation plans not approved by security holders
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
N/A
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
(1)
|
Consists
of equity incentive plans, which were approved by the Company’s shareholders at its annual meetings
on August 18, 2011 and November 19, 2015. On February 28, 2017, the Company issued options to purchase 62,500 shares of the Company’s common stock
with an exercise price equal to the fair market value of the Company’s Common Stock (as defined under the 2011 Stock Incentive
Plan in conformity with Regulation 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended) at the date of grant to three of the
Company’s employees pursuant to the 2011 Stock Incentive Plan, which was approved by the Company’s shareholders at
the annual stockholders meeting on August 18, 2011. These options vested immediately on the grant date with a fair market value
of $223,375 based on the fair value of $3.57 per share, which was determined by using the Black Scholes option pricing model. The
Company recognized stock-based compensation expense of $223,375 in the first quarter of fiscal year 2017 under the 2011 Stock Incentive
Plan. As of December 31, 2017, there were no shares available for issuance under either of the two stock incentive plans.
|
(2)
|
The
exercise price of options granted and stock appreciation rights under the Plan may be no less than the fair market value of
the Company’s Stock on the date of grant.
|
|
|
|
On
March 29, 2017, the Company issued 250,000 shares of the Company’s unrestricted common stock to six of the Company’s
employees pursuant to our Omnibus Equity Plan, which was approved by the Company’s shareholders at the annual stockholders
meeting on November 19, 2015. The Company recorded an expense of $250 in the first quarter of fiscal year 2017 under the 2015
Omnibus Equity Plan, reflecting a par value of $0.001 per share of the Company’s common stock.
|
Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners and Management
The
following table provides information concerning beneficial ownership of our capital stock as of April 12, 2018 by:
|
●
|
each
shareholder or group of affiliated shareholders who owns more than 5% of our outstanding capital stock;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
each
of our named executive officers;
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
each
of our directors; and all of our directors and
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
executive
officers as a group.
|
The
following table lists the number of shares and percentage of shares beneficially owned based on 25,417,083 shares of our Common
Stock outstanding as of April 12, 2018.
Beneficial
ownership is determined in accordance with the SEC rules, and generally includes voting power and/or investment power with respect
to the securities held. Shares of Common Stock subject to options and warrants currently exercisable or exercisable within 60
days of April 12, 2018 or issuable upon conversion of convertible securities which are currently convertible or convertible within
60 days of April 12, 2018 are deemed outstanding and beneficially owned by the person holding those options, warrants or convertible
securities for purposes of computing the number of shares and percentage of shares beneficially owned by that person, but are
not deemed outstanding for purposes of computing the percentage beneficially owned by any other person. Except as indicated in
the footnotes to this table, and subject to applicable community property laws, the persons or entities named have sole voting
and investment power with respect to all shares of our Common Stock shown as beneficially owned by them.
Unless
otherwise indicated in the footnotes, the principal address of each of the shareholders below is c/o Future FinTech Group Inc.,
23/F, China Development Bank Tower, No. 2 Gaoxin 1st Road, Xi’an, Shaanxi Province, PRC 710075.
Shares Beneficially Owned
|
|
Name of Beneficial Owner
|
|
Number
|
|
|
Percent
|
|
Directors, Named Executive Officers and 5% Shareholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Yongke Xue (1)
|
|
|
2,337,155
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
%
|
Hongke Xue
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Guolin Wang
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Hanjun Zheng
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Fuyou Li
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Johnson Lau
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
All current directors and executive officers as a group (6 persons)
|
|
|
2,337,155
|
|
|
|
9.2
|
%
|
Zeyao Xue (2)
|
|
|
13,699,314
|
|
|
|
53.9
|
%
|
Mengyao Chen (3)
|
|
|
3,323,225
|
|
|
|
13.1
|
%
|
Shuiliang Xiao (4)
|
|
|
3,409,466
|
|
|
|
13.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
20,432,005
|
|
|
|
80.4
|
%
|
(1)
|
Consists
of (i) 665,200 shares owned by directly by SkyPeople International Holdings Group Limited (“SP International”),
a Cayman Islands company, (ii) 1,488,570 shares owned directly by Golden Dawn International Limited, a British Virgin Islands
company, (iii) 183,385 shares owned directly by China Tianren Organic Food Holding. Each of SP International, Golden
Dawn International Limited and China Tianren Organic Good Holding are indirect subsidiaries of V.X. Fortune Capital Limited,
a British Virgin Islands company. Yongke Xue is the sole director of each of (i) SP International and (ii) V.X. Fortune
Capital Limited.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Mr.
Zeyao Xue, the son of Yongke Xue, holds all of the issued and outstanding capital stock of Fancylight Limited, which is the
indirect owner of those shares held by SP International, Golden Dawn International Limited and China Tianren Organic Food
Holding. As such, Mr. Zeyao Xue shares beneficial ownership of 2,337,155 of his shares with Mr. Yongke Xue.
|
|
|
(3)
|
The shares were issued to Mengyao Chen, pursuant to a Creditor’s
Rights Transfer Agreement between Hedetang Foods (China) Co., Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company and Shaanxi Fu Chen
Venture Capital Management Co., Ltd., dated November 2, 2017, which was filed with SEC in a Form 8-K dated November 6, 2017.
|
(4)
|
The shares were issued to Shuiliang Xiao, pursuant to two
Creditor’s Rights Transfer Agreements between Hedetang Foods (China) Co., Ltd., a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company
and Shaanxi Chunlv Ecological Agriculture Co., Ltd. and Hedetang Foods (China) Co., Ltd, dated November 2, 2017, which was filed
with SEC in a Form 8-K dated November 6, 2017.
|
ITEM
13 – CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTOR INDEPENDENCE
For
details of related party transactions, see Note 11 “Related Party Transaction” to our consolidated financial statements.
Director
Independence
We
currently have five directors. Three of our current directors, Messrs. Guolin Wang, Johnson Lau and Fuyou Li, are determined by
our Board to be “independent directors” as defined under the rules of the NASDAQ Global Market, constituting a majority
of independent directors of the Board as required by the rules of the NASDAQ Global Market.
ITEM
14 – PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTING FEES AND SERVICES
The
following table shows the fees that we paid or accrued for audit and other services for fiscal years 2017 and 2016. All of the
services described in the following fee table were approved in conformity with the audit committee’s pre-approval process.
Audit
Fees
The
amounts set forth opposite “Audit Fees” above reflect the aggregate fees billed or billable by Wang Certified Public
Accountant, P.C.
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Audit Fees
|
|
$
|
200,000
|
|
|
$
|
205,000
|
|
Tax Fees
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
|
|
6,000
|
|
All Other Fees
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
206,000
|
|
|
$
|
211,000
|
|
Audit
Fees
The
amounts set forth opposite “Audit Fees” above reflect the aggregate fees billed or billable by Wang Certified Public
Accountant, P.C. (“Wang”).
Wang
Certified Public Accountant, P.C. succeeded to the registration status of predecessor firm named as Jia Roger Qian Wang, CPA in
PCAOB in March, 2017. Wang has provided professional services for the audit of our fiscal 2017 and 2016 annual financial statements,
respectively.
Wang
provided professional services for the audit of our fiscal year 2017 financial statements and $140,000 was billed for the audit
of consolidated financial statements for fiscal 2017, the quarterly review fees $60,000 was billed for 2017 quarterly financial
reports.
Wang
provided professional services for the audit of our fiscal year 2016 financial statements and $160,000 was billed for the audit
of consolidated financial statements for fiscal 2016, the quarterly review fees $45,000 was billed for 2016 quarterly financial
reports.
Tax
Fees
The
amounts set forth opposite “Tax Fees” above reflect the aggregate fees billed for fiscal 2017 and 2016 for professional
services rendered for tax compliance and return preparation. The compliance and return preparation services consisted of the preparation
of original and amended tax returns and support during the income tax audit or inquiries.
The
Board audit committee’s policy is to pre-approve all audit services and all non-audit services that our independent accountants
are permitted to perform for us under applicable federal securities regulations. The audit committee’s policy utilizes an
annual review and general pre-approval of certain categories of specified services that may be provided by the independent accountant,
up to pre-determined fee levels. Any proposed services not qualifying as a pre-approved specified service, and pre-approved services
exceeding the pre-determined fee levels, require further specific pre-approval by the audit committee. The audit committee has
delegated to the Chairman of the audit committee the authority to pre-approve audit and non-audit services proposed to be performed
by the independent accountants. Our audit committee was established in April 2008. Therefore, all the services provided by our
auditors in fiscal years 2017 and 2016 were pre-approved by the audit committee.
Changes
in Registrant’s Certified Accountant
On
April 12, 2016, the Board of Directors of the Company dismissed Armanino LLP (“Armanino”) as the Company’s independent
registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2015, effectively immediately. During the Company’s fiscal
years ended December 31, 2014 and the subsequent periods through the effective date of the dismissal of Armanino, there were no
disagreements on any matter of accounting principles or practices, financial statement disclosure or auditing scope of procedure,
which disagreement, if not resolved to the satisfaction of Armanino, would have caused Armanino to make reference thereto in its
reports on the Company’s consolidated financial statements for such periods. There have been no reportable events as provided
in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K during the Company’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2014 and any subsequent interim
period, including the interim period up to and including the effective date of the dismissal of Armanino.
On
April 12, 2016, the Audit Committee approved the engagement of Wei, Wei & Co., LLP (“Wei & Wei”) as the
Company’s independent registered public accounting firm, effective immediately. The Audit Committee also approved Wei & Wei
to act as the Company’s independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal year ending December 31, 2015 and December
31, 2016.
On
September 19, 2016, the Company received a letter from Wei & Wei stating that it would cease its services as the independent
registered public accounting firm of the Company, effective from September 19, 2016. During the period of Wei & Wei’s
engagement, there were no disagreements between the Company and Wei & Wei on matters of accounting principles or practices,
financial statement disclosure or auditing scope or procedure, which disagreements, if not resolved to satisfaction of Wei &
Wei, would have caused Wei & Wei to make reference thereto in its reports on the Company’s consolidated financial statements
for such periods. There were no reportable events as provided in Item 304(a)(1)(v) of Regulation S-K during the term of the engagement.
On
September 22, 2016, the Audit Committee of Board of Directors of the Company approved the engagement of Wang as the Company’s
independent registered public accounting firm, effectively immediately. The Audit Committee also approved Wang to act as the Company’s
independent registered public accounting firm for the fiscal years ending December 31, 2015 and 2016.
FUTURE
FINTECH GROUP INC.
CONSOLIDATED
BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
4,586,757
|
|
|
$
|
1,143,585
|
|
Accounts receivable, net of allowance of $3,081,437 and
$4,843,809 as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively
|
|
|
17,156,130
|
|
|
|
7,325,773
|
|
Other receivables
|
|
|
36,709,486
|
|
|
|
28,417,194
|
|
Inventories
|
|
|
2,097,307
|
|
|
|
3,041,300
|
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,566,442
|
|
Advances to suppliers and other current assets
|
|
|
1,437,657
|
|
|
|
58,132,189
|
|
TOTAL CURRENT ASSETS
|
|
|
61,987,337
|
|
|
|
101,626,483
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT, NET
|
|
|
28,065,460
|
|
|
|
81,523,569
|
|
LAND USE RIGHT, NET
|
|
|
33,118,454
|
|
|
|
31,854,360
|
|
LONG TERM ASSETS
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,789,390
|
|
DEPOSITS
|
|
|
67,509,002
|
|
|
|
43,867,228
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$
|
190,680,253
|
|
|
$
|
261,661,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
11,277,706
|
|
|
$
|
16,569,988
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
99,910,577
|
|
|
|
27,449,664
|
|
Income tax payable
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,590,084
|
|
Advances from customers
|
|
|
655,938
|
|
|
|
696
|
|
Short-term bank loans
|
|
|
6,121,637
|
|
|
|
29,364,279
|
|
TOTAL CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
117,965,858
|
|
|
|
76,974,711
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
|
22,252,150
|
|
|
|
|
|
Obligations under capital leases
|
|
|
17,512,402
|
|
|
|
14,494,003
|
|
TOTAL NON-CURRENT LIABILITIES
|
|
|
39,764,552
|
|
|
|
14,494,003
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES
|
|
|
157,730,410
|
|
|
|
91,468,714
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EQUITY
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future FinTech Group Inc. Stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Series B Preferred stock, $0.001 par value; 10,000,000 shares authorized; None issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value; 8,333,333 shares
authorized; 5,370,245 and 4,061,090 shares issued and outstanding as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively
|
|
|
5,173
|
|
|
|
4,061
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
109,090,782
|
|
|
|
105,366,887
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
(2,346,689
|
)
|
|
|
100,237,011
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
(94,142,481
|
)
|
|
|
(70,579,747
|
|
Total Future FinTech Group Inc. stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
12,606,785
|
|
|
|
135,028,212
|
|
Non-controlling interests
|
|
|
20,343,058
|
|
|
|
35,164,104
|
|
TOTAL EQUITY
|
|
|
32,949,843
|
|
|
|
170,192,316
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES AND EQUITY
|
|
$
|
190,680,253
|
|
|
$
|
261,661,030
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
FUTURE
FINTECH GROUP INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS AND COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS)
|
|
For the Year Ended
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
10,463,135
|
|
|
$
|
34,407,422
|
|
Cost of goods sold
|
|
|
8,728,754
|
|
|
|
25,233,950
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
1,734,381
|
|
|
|
9,173,472
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
10,416,244
|
|
|
|
5,010,222
|
|
Selling expenses
|
|
|
719,452
|
|
|
|
1,932,148
|
|
Impairment loss
|
|
|
89,685,890
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
100,821,586
|
|
|
|
6,942,370
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss) from operations
|
|
|
(99,087,205
|
)
|
|
|
2,231,102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other income (expenses)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investment income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
13,475
|
|
Interest income
|
|
|
1,880
|
|
|
|
158,730
|
|
Subsidy income
|
|
|
554,553
|
|
|
|
16,738
|
|
Interest expenses
|
|
|
(3,076,051
|
)
|
|
|
(1,659,300
|
)
|
Other income (expenses)
|
|
|
(428,611
|
)
|
|
|
207,386
|
|
Total other expenses
|
|
|
(2,948,229
|
)
|
|
|
(1,262,971
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income(loss) from Continuing Operations before Income Tax
|
|
|
(102,035,434
|
)
|
|
|
968,131
|
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
266,120
|
|
|
|
1,601,967
|
|
Loss from Continuing Operations before Minority Interest
|
|
|
(102,301,554
|
)
|
|
|
(633,836
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less: Net loss attributable to non-controlling interests
|
|
|
(14,380,800
|
)
|
|
|
(126,448
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from Continuing Operations
|
|
|
(87,920,754
|
)
|
|
|
(507,388
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discontinued Operations (Note 16)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(14,662,946
|
)
|
|
|
(4,785,187
|
|
NET LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO FUTURE FINTECH GROUP INC. STOCKHOLDERS
|
|
$
|
(102,583,700
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,292,575
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
$
|
(13,181,405
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,599,934
|
)
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(130,145,905
|
)
|
|
|
(10,018,957
|
)
|
Comprehensive expense attributable to non-controlling interests
|
|
|
9,633,680
|
|
|
|
(19,674,513
|
)
|
COMPREHENSIVE LOSS ATTRIBUTABLE TO FUTURE FINTECH GROUP
INC. STOCKHOLDERS
|
|
$
|
(120,512,225
|
)
|
|
$
|
(29,693,470
|
)
|
Loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic loss per share from continued operations
|
|
$
|
(18.09
|
)
|
|
|
$ (0.19
|
)
|
Basic loss per share from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(3.02
|
)
|
|
|
(1.22
|
)
|
Basic loss per share from net income
|
|
|
(21.11
|
)
|
|
|
(1.41
|
)
|
Diluted loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted loss per share from continued operations
|
|
|
(15.72
|
)
|
|
|
(
0.19
|
)
|
Diluted loss per share from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(2.62
|
)
|
|
|
(1.22
|
)
|
Diluted loss per share from net income
|
|
|
(18.34
|
)
|
|
|
(1.41
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average number of shares outstanding
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic
|
|
|
4,859,954
|
|
|
|
3,933,999
|
|
Diluted
|
|
|
5,591,977
|
|
|
|
3,933,999
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
FUTURE
FINTECH GROUP INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CHANGES IN EQUITY
|
|
Common
Stock
Shares*
|
|
|
Common
Stock
|
|
|
Additional
Paid in
Capital
|
|
|
Retained
Earnings
|
|
|
Other
Comprehensive
Income
|
|
|
Non-Controlling Interest
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2015
|
|
|
27,161,499
|
|
|
|
27,161
|
|
|
|
59,189,860
|
|
|
|
105,782,482
|
|
|
|
13,069,031
|
|
|
|
4,895,622
|
|
|
$
|
182,964,156
|
|
Share split during 2016
|
|
|
(23,766,312
|
)
|
|
|
(23,766
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(23,766
|
)
|
Common Stocks issued during 2016
|
|
|
665,950
|
|
|
|
666
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
666
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(5,545,471
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(126,448
|
)
|
|
|
(5,671,91
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
46,177,027
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(83,648,778
|
)
|
|
$
|
30,394,930
|
|
|
$
|
(7,076,821
|
)
|
Balance at December 31, 2016
|
|
|
4,061,137
|
|
|
|
4,061
|
|
|
|
105,366,887
|
|
|
|
100,237,011
|
|
|
|
(70,579,747
|
)
|
|
|
35,164,104
|
|
|
|
170,192,316
|
|
Common Stocks issued during 2017
|
|
|
1,112,097
|
|
|
|
1,112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(102,583,700
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(14,380,800
|
)
|
|
|
(116,964,500
|
)
|
Foreign currency translation adjustment
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,723,895
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(23,562,734
|
)
|
|
$
|
(440,246
|
)
|
|
$
|
(20,279,085
|
)
|
Balance at December 31, 2017
|
|
|
5,173,234
|
|
|
|
5,173
|
|
|
|
109,090,782
|
|
|
|
(2,346,689
|
|
|
|
(94,142,481
|
)
|
|
|
20,343,058
|
|
|
|
32,949,843
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
FUTURE
FINTECH GROUP INC.
CONSOLIDATED
STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS
|
|
For the fiscal year
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM OPERATING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(102,583,700
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,419,023
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net income to net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
674,277
|
|
|
|
5,426,089
|
|
Deferred income tax assets
|
|
|
3,566,442
|
|
|
|
(1,240,248
|
)
|
Bad debt provision
|
|
|
5,583,194
|
|
|
|
3,070,944
|
|
Inventory markdown
|
|
|
1,868,900
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Impairment loss
|
|
|
89,685,890
|
|
|
|
3,203,523
|
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
9,830,357
|
|
|
|
35,449,683
|
|
Other receivable
|
|
|
8,292,292
|
|
|
|
(29,268,821
|
)
|
Advances to suppliers and other current assets
|
|
|
(56,622,590
|
)
|
|
|
(56,580,699
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
|
(943,933
|
)
|
|
|
190,337
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
|
(5,220,700
|
)
|
|
|
8,114,987
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
72,460,913
|
|
|
|
2,038,938
|
|
Income tax payable
|
|
|
(3,590,084
|
)
|
|
|
937,915
|
|
Advances from customers
|
|
|
655,242
|
|
|
|
(358,999
|
)
|
Net cash provided by operating activities
|
|
|
23,656,500
|
|
|
|
(34,435,374
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM INVESTING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to property, plant and equipment
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(8,730,051
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of intangible assets
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(9,329,762
|
)
|
Prepayment for other assets
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(2,977,045
|
)
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(21,036,858
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CASH FLOWS FROM FINANCING ACTIVITIES
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issue of common stock
|
|
|
3,337,340
|
|
|
|
17,355,246
|
|
Reverse split of common stock
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(40,884,860
|
)
|
Decrease (Increased) in restricted cash
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,994,460
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from related party loan
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(8,269,592
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of short-term bank loans
|
|
|
(23,242,642
|
)
|
|
|
(2,078,155
|
)
|
Proceeds (repayments) long term debt
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(1,202,289
|
)
|
Payment for capital lease
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7,982,400
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
|
(19,905,302
|
)
|
|
|
(24,102,790
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Effect of change in exchange rate
|
|
|
(308,025
|
)
|
|
|
30,711,693
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NET INCREASE (DECREASE) IN CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS
|
|
|
3,443,173
|
|
|
|
(48,863,329
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of year
|
|
|
1,143,585
|
|
|
|
50,006,914
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of year
|
|
$
|
4,586,757
|
|
|
$
|
1,143,585
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES OF CASH FLOW INFORMATION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for interest
|
|
$
|
796,178
|
|
|
$
|
833,690
|
|
Cash paid for income taxes
|
|
$
|
266,120
|
|
|
$
|
2,707,227
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SUPPLEMENTARY DISCLOSURE OF SIGNIFICANT NON-CASH TRANSACTION
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Transferred from other assets to property, plant and equipment and construction in process
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
60,838,131
|
|
Equipment acquired by capital lease
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
The
accompanying notes are an integral part of these consolidated financial statements.
FUTURE
FINTECH GROUP INC.
NOTES
TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
FOR
YEARS ENDED DECEMBER 31, 2017 AND 2016
1.
CORPORATE INFORMATION
Future
FinTech Group Inc. (“Future FinTech” or the “Company”), formerly known as SkyPeople Fruit Juice, Inc (’SkyPeople”),
Entech Environmental Technologies, Inc. (“Entech”) and Cyber Public Relations, Inc. (“Cyber Public Relations”),
was initially incorporated on June 29, 1998 under the laws of the State of Florida.
The
principal activities of Future Fintech Group Inc. (“Future FinTech”) (together with our direct or indirect subsidiaries,
“we,” “us,” “our” or “the Company”) consist of production and sales of fruit juice
concentrates, fruit juice beverages, and other fruit-related products in the People’s Republic of China (“PRC”,
or “China”), and overseas markets. All activities of the Company are principally conducted by subsidiaries operating
in the PRC.
2.
SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Basis
of Preparation
These
financial statements have been prepared in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America,
or US GAAP.
The
Company’s functional currency is the Chinese Renminbi (RMB); however, the accompanying consolidated financial statements
have been translated and presented in United States Dollars (USD).
The
consolidated financial statements include the accounts of the Company and its subsidiaries. All significant inter-company accounts
and transactions have been eliminated.
Certain
amounts of prior year were reclassified to conform with current year presentation.
Use
of Estimates
The
Company’s consolidated financial statements have been prepared in accordance with US GAAP and this requires management to
make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets
and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting
period. The significant areas requiring the use of management estimates include, but not limited to, the allowance for doubtful
accounts receivable, estimated useful life and residual value of property, plant and equipment, provision for staff benefit, valuation
of change in fair value of warrant liability, recognition and measurement of deferred income taxes and valuation allowance for
deferred tax assets. Although these estimates are based on management’s knowledge of current events and actions management
may undertake in the future, actual results may ultimately differ from those estimates and such differences may be material to
our consolidated financial statements.
Impairment
of Long-Lived Assets
In
accordance with the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”)
360-10,
Accounting for the Impairment or Disposal of Long-Lived Assets
, long-lived assets, such as property, plant
and equipment and purchased intangibles subject to amortization are reviewed for impairment whenever events or changes in circumstances
indicate that the carrying value of an asset may not be recoverable, or it is reasonably possible that these assets could become
impaired as a result of technological or other industrial changes. The determination of recoverability of assets to be held and
used is made by comparing the carrying amount of an asset to future undiscounted cash flows to be generated by the assets.
If
such assets are considered to be impaired, the impairment to be recognized is measured as the amount by which the carrying amount
of the assets exceeds the fair value of the assets. Assets to be disposed of are reported at the lower of the carrying amount
or fair value less cost to sell.
During
fiscal year 2015, the Company’s subsidiary Yingkou had no production activities due to a market demand decline for concentrated
apple juice, and Yingkou also had no production in year 2016 and 2017 since it had difficulty in remaining competitive in apple
juice market. The Company decided to recognize an impairment loss of $2.38 million with respect to the concentrated fruit juice
production equipment in Yingkou, which has not operated in the past two years. In fiscal year 2017, the Company’s recorded
an impairment loss of $2.1 million with respect to the concentrated fruit juice production equipment in Yingkou.
The Company’s Huludao Wonder operation,
a subsidiary which produces concentrated apple juice, suffered continued operating losses in the three fiscal years ended December
31, 2016 and the cash flows were minimal during the same three fiscal years. Thus, in December 2016, we established a restructuring
plan to close Huludao Wonder Operation. In fiscal year 2017 and 2016, the Company’s recorded an impairment loss of $11.33
million and $2.4 million, respectively with respect to the concentrated fruit juice production equipment in Huludao Wonder.
The Company plan to sale the assets of Huludao Wonder to a third party in the near future.
In 2017, we recorded an impairment loss of
$89.69 million regarding Company’s fixed assets and construction in progress. Among this amount, $30.26 million was related
with Shaanxi Guoweimei Kiwi Deep Processing Co., Ltd. (“Guo Wei Mei”). On April 19, 2013, we established Guo Wei Mei
to engage in the business of producing kiwi fruit juice, kiwi puree, cider beverages, and related products. The total estimated
investment was RMB 294 million. As of the date of this report, the Company has finished the building of an R&D center and an
office building with a total investment of RMB 76.2 million (approximately $11.24 million), the Company has also purchased a fruit
juice production line of RMB 129 million (approximately $19.02 million). As the Chinese government recently tightened environmental
regulations, the Company is in the process of adapting to the new standards and the project has been delayed and the construction
was stopped since early 2017. Since the Company’s current cash cannot support the future input of this project and there
is no forecasted cash flow from this project, the Company recorded an impairment cost of $30.26 million with respect to construction
in progress and fixed assets of this project.
An
impairment loss of $25.06 million recorded in 2017 was related with our Suizhong project in Liaoning Province, which was to establish
a fruit and vegetable industry chain and further processing demonstration zone in Suizhong County, Liaoning Province (the “Suizhong
Project”). We started the Suizhong project in August 2013. The Company has made partial payment to acquire land use rights
from the local government, purchase equipment and build facilities. As of date of this report, the Company has finished construction
of an office building, dormitory, refrigeration storage facility and warehouse. However, due to heavy competition in the concentrated
apple juice business in China, our Huludao Wonder and Yingkou facilities in Liaoning have had no production in the past two years,
and the construction work on Suizhong project is also currently suspended. Since the Company’s current cash cannot support
the future input of this project and there is no forecasted cash flow from this project, the Company recorded an impairment cost
of $25.06 million with respect to construction in progress and fixed assets of this project.
An impairment loss of $23.04 million recorded
in 2017 was related with our Yidu project. On November 23, 2015, the Company started the construction of the Yidu project, which
was to establish the distribution center and the deep processing zone on the project land of approximately 280 mu. As the Chinese
government recently tightened environment regulations, the Company is in the process of adapting the new standards and the project
has been delayed. Since the Company’s current cash cannot support the future input of this project and there is no forecasted
cash flow from this project, the Company recorded an impairment cost of $16.80 million with respect to construction in progress
and fixed assets of this project, and an impairment cost of $6.24 million with respect to the orange plantation.
Fair
Value of Financial Instruments
The
Company has adopted FASB Accounting Standard Codification Topic on Fair Value Measurements and Disclosures (“ASC 820”),
which defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP, and expands disclosures about fair value measurements.
ASC 820 establishes a three-level valuation hierarchy of valuation techniques based on observable and unobservable input, which
may be used to measure fair value and include the following:
Level
1 - Quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level
2 - Input other than Level 1 that is observable, either directly or indirectly, such as quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities;
quoted prices in markets that are not active; or other input that is observable or can be corroborated by observable market data
for substantially the full term of the assets or liabilities.
Level
3 - Unobservable input that is supported by little or no market activity and that is significant to the fair value of the assets
or liabilities.
Our
cash and cash equivalents and restricted cash are classified within level 1of the fair value hierarchy because they are value
using quoted market price.
Earnings
Per Share
Under
ASC 260-10,
Earnings Per Share
, basic EPS excludes dilution for Common Stock equivalents and is calculated by dividing
net income available to common stockholders by the weighted-average number of Common Stock outstanding for the period. Our Series
B Convertible Preferred Stock is a participating security. Consequently, the two-class method of income allocation is used in
determining net income available to common stockholders.
Diluted
EPS is calculated by using the treasury stock method, assuming conversion of all potentially dilutive securities, such as stock
options and warrants. Under this method, (i) exercise of options and warrants is assumed at the beginning of the period and shares
of Common Stock are assumed to be issued, (ii) the proceeds from exercise are assumed to be used to purchase Common Stock at the
average market price during the period, and (iii) the incremental shares (the difference between the number of shares assumed
issued and the number of shares assumed purchased) are included in the denominator of the diluted EPS computation. The numerators
and denominators used in the computations of basic and diluted EPS are presented in the following table.
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
NUMERATOR FOR BASIC AND DILUTED EPS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income (loss)from continuing operations (numerator for Diluted EPS)
|
|
$
|
(87,920,754
|
)
|
|
$
|
(760,284
|
)
|
Loss from discontinued operations (numerator for Diluted EPS)
|
|
|
(14,662,946
|
)
|
|
|
(4,785,187
|
)
|
|
|
|
(102,583,700
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net income (loss) (numerator for Diluted EPS)
|
|
$
|
(14,662,946
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,545,471
|
)
|
Net income (loss)allocated to Common Stock holders
|
|
$
|
(14,662,946
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5,545,471
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic loss per share from continued operations
|
|
|
(18.09
|
)
|
|
|
(0.19
|
)
|
Basic loss per share from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(3.02
|
)
|
|
|
(1.22
|
)
|
Basic loss per share from net income
|
|
|
(21.11
|
)
|
|
|
(1.41
|
)
|
Diluted loss per share:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted loss per share from continued operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted loss per share from discontinued operations
|
|
|
(15.72
|
)
|
|
|
(0.19
|
)
|
Diluted loss per share from net income
|
|
|
(2.62
|
)
|
|
|
(1.22
|
)
|
Loss per share:
|
|
|
(18.34
|
)
|
|
|
(1.41
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average Common Stock outstanding
|
|
|
4,859,954
|
|
|
|
|
|
DENOMINATOR FOR BASIC AND DILUTIVED EPS
|
|
|
5,591,977
|
|
|
|
3,933,999
|
|
*.
Cash
and Cash Equivalents
Cash
and cash equivalents included cash on hand and demand deposits placed with banks or other financial institutions, which are unrestricted
as to withdrawal and use and with an original maturity of three months or less.
Deposits
in banks in the PRC are not insured by any government entity or agency, and are consequently exposed to risk of loss. The Company
believes the probability of a bank failure, causing loss to the Company, is remote.
Restricted
Cash
Restricted
cash consists of cash equivalents used as collateral to secure short-term notes payable.
Accounts
Receivable and Allowances
Accounts
receivable are recognized and carried at the original invoice amounts less an allowance for any uncollectible amount. We have
a policy of reserving for uncollectible accounts based on our best estimate of the amount of probable credit losses in our existing
accounts receivable. We extend credit to our customers based on an evaluation of their financial condition and other factors.
We generally do not require collateral or other security to support accounts receivable. We perform ongoing credit evaluations
of our customers and maintain an allowance for potential bad debts if required.
We
determine whether an allowance for doubtful accounts is required by evaluating specific accounts where information indicates the
customers may have an inability to meet financial obligations. In these cases, we use assumptions and judgment, based on the best
available facts and circumstances, to record a specific allowance for those customers against amounts due to reduce the receivable
to the amount expected to be collected. These specific allowances are re-evaluated and adjusted as additional information is received.
The amounts calculated are analyzed to determine the total amount of the allowance. We may also record a general allowance as
necessary.
Direct
write-offs are taken in the period when we have exhausted our efforts to collect overdue and unpaid receivables or otherwise evaluate
other circumstances that indicate that we should abandon such efforts.
The
Company has not experienced any significant difficulty in collecting its accounts receivable in the past and is not aware of any
financial difficulties being experienced by its major customers. Bad debt expense was $424,672and $4,843,809 during the years
ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Our credit term for distributors with good credit history is from 30 days to 120
days. As of December 31, 2017 and 2016 accounts receivables of $2,130,746.95 and $2,130,746.95 have been outstanding for over
120 days, the increase is due to the growth of sales in concentrated apply juice which had longer credit period to distributors.
Inventories
Inventories
consist of raw materials, packaging materials (which include ingredients and supplies) and finished goods (which include finished
juice in the bottling and canning operations). Inventories are valued at the lower of cost or market. We determine cost on the
basis of the weighted average method. The Company periodically reviews inventories for obsolescence and any inventories identified
as obsolete are reserved or written off. Although we believe that the assumptions we use in estimate inventory write downs are
reasonable, future changes in these assumptions could provide a significantly different result. The Company recorded inventory
markdown allowance of $ 1,800,508 and $0 the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Revenue
Recognition
The
Company recognizes revenue in accordance with ASC 605,
Revenue Recognition
. Revenue from sales of products is recognized
upon shipment or delivery to customers, provided that persuasive evidence of sales arrangements exist, title and risk of loss
have been transferred to the customers, the sales amounts are fixed and determinable and collection of the revenue is reasonably
assured. Customers have no contractual right to return products. Historically, the Company has not had any returned products.
Accordingly, no provision has been made for returnable goods. The Company is not required to rebate or credit a portion of the
original fee if it subsequently reduces the price of its product and the distributor still has rights with respect to that product.
Shipping
and Handling Costs
Shipping
and handling amounts billed to customers in sales transactions are included in sales revenues and shipping expenses incurred by
the Company are reported as a component of selling expenses. The shipping and handling expenses of $338,261 and $1,180,328 for
2017 and 2016, respectively, are reported in the Consolidated Statements of Income and Comprehensive Income as a component of
selling expenses. The decrease in shipping and handling costs in fiscal year 2017 was mainly due to a decrease in sales quantity
of our products.
Government
Subsidies
A
government subsidy is recognized only when the Company complies with any conditions attached to the grant and there is reasonable
assurance that the grant will be received.
The
government subsidies recognized were $193,781 and $30,213 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively, and are
included in other income of the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.
Advertising
and Promotional Expense
Advertising
and promotional costs are expensed as incurred and are included in selling expenses. The Company incurred $0 and $50,230 in advertising
and promotional costs for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Property,
Plant and Equipment
Property,
plant and equipment are stated at cost less accumulated depreciation and any impairment losses. Depreciation is computed using
the straight-line method over the useful lives of the assets. Major renewals and betterments are capitalized and depreciated;
maintenance and repairs that do not extend the life of the respective assets are expensed as incurred. Upon disposal of assets,
the cost and related accumulated depreciation are removed from the accounts and any gain or loss is included in the consolidated
statements of income and comprehensive income.
Construction
in progress primarily represents the construction or the renovation costs of plant, machinery and equipment stated at cost less
any accumulated impairment loss, which is not depreciated. Costs and interest on borrowings incurred are capitalized
and transferred to property and equipment upon completion, at which time depreciation commences. Cost of repairs and
maintenance is expensed as incurred.
Depreciation
related to property, plant and equipment used in production is reported in cost of sales, and includes amortized amounts
related to capital leases. We estimated that the residual value of the Company’s property and equipment ranges from 3% to
5%. Property, plant and equipment are depreciated over their estimated useful lives as follows:
Buildings
|
|
|
20-30 years
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
|
5-10 years
|
|
Furniture and office equipment
|
|
|
3-5 years
|
|
Motor vehicles
|
|
|
5 years
|
|
Foreign
Currency and Other Comprehensive Income
The
financial statements of the Company’s foreign subsidiaries are measured using the local currency as the functional currency;
however, the reporting currency of the Company is the United States dollar (“USD”). Assets and liabilities of the
Company’s foreign subsidiaries have been translated into USD using the exchange rate at the balance sheet date, while equity
accounts are translated using historical exchange rate. The average exchange rate for the period has been used to translate revenues
and expenses. Translation adjustments are reported separately and accumulated in a separate component of equity (cumulative translation
adjustment).
Other
comprehensive loss for the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 represented foreign currency translation adjustments loss of
$13.18 million and $4.60 million, respectively, and were included in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.
Income
Taxes
We
use the asset and liability method of accounting for income taxes in accordance with ASC Topic 740, “Income Taxes.”
Under this method, income tax expense is recognized for the amount of: (i) taxes payable or refundable for the current year and
(ii) deferred tax consequences of temporary differences resulting from matters that have been recognized in an entity’s
financial statements or tax returns. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are measured using enacted tax rates expected to apply
to taxable income in the years in which those temporary differences are expected to be recovered or settled. The effect on deferred
tax assets and liabilities of a change in tax rates is recognized in the results of operations in the period that includes the
enactment date. A valuation allowance is provided to reduce the deferred tax assets reported if based on the weight of the available
positive and negative evidence, it is more likely than not some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.
ASC
Topic 740.10.30 clarifies the accounting for uncertainty in income taxes recognized in an enterprise’s financial statements
and prescribes a recognition threshold and measurement attribute for the financial statement recognition and measurement of a
tax position taken or expected to be taken in a tax return. ASC Topic 740.10.40 provides guidance on derecognition, classification,
interest and penalties, accounting in interim periods, disclosure, and transition. We have no material uncertain tax positions
for any of the reporting periods presented.
Leases
Leases
are reviewed and classified as capital or operating at their inception in accordance with ASC Topic 840, Accounting for Leases.
For leases that contain rent escalations, the Company records monthly rent expense equal to the total amount of the payments due
in the reporting period over the lease term. The difference between rent expense recorded and the amount paid is credited or charged
to deferred rent account.
Land
Use Right
The
Company paid in advance for land use rights according to Chinese law. Prepaid land use rights are being amortized and recorded
as lease expenses using the straight-line method over the use terms of the lease, which are 40 to 50 years.
Reportable
Segments
We
have six operating segments for financial reporting purposes for all periods presented in our consolidated financial statements
in accordance with FASB ASC 280 “Segment Reporting.”
Research
and Development
Research
and development costs are expensed when incurred and are included in operating expenses.
New
Accounting Pronouncements
In
January 2017, the FASB issued ASU No. 2017-01, “Clarifying the Definition of a Business,” which clarifies the definition
of a business in ASC 805. The guidance is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017, including interim periods
within those fiscal years. Early application is permitted. Currently, there is no impact to our consolidated financial statements
and related disclosures, but we will adopt on January 1, 2018 for any business combinations and will consider adopting early for
any acquisitions prior to January 1, 2018.
In
May 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-09, “Compensation – Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Scope of Modification Accounting”,
which amends the scope of modification accounting for share-based payment arrangements. The ASU provides guidance on the types
of changes to the terms or conditions of share-based payment awards to which we would be required to apply modification accounting
under ASC 718. Specifically, we would not apply modification accounting if the fair value, vesting conditions, and classification
of the awards are the same immediately before and after the modification. The guidance is effective for annual reporting periods,
including interim period within those annual periods, beginning after December 15, 2017. Early adoption is permitted, including
adoption in any interim period. We are currently evaluating the impact the standard may have on our consolidated financial statements
and related disclosures should we have a modification to our share-based payment awards in the future.
In
August 2017, the FASB issued ASU 2017-12. ASU 2017-12 amends the hedge accounting model in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”)
815 to enable entities to better portray the economics of their risk management activities in the financial statements and enhance
the transparency and understandability of hedge results. ASU 2017-12 expands an entity’s ability to hedge non-financial
and financial risk components and reduce complexity in fair value hedges of interest rate risk. The guidance eliminates the requirement
to separately measure and report hedge ineffectiveness and generally requires the entire change in the fair value of a hedging
instrument to be presented in the same income statement line as the hedged item. The guidance also eases certain documentation
and assessment requirements and modifies the accounting for components excluded from the assessment of hedge effectiveness. The
guidance in ASU 2017-12 is effective for annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, including interim periods within those
fiscal years, and is effective for the Company beginning July 1, 2019. Early adoption is permitted in any interim period or fiscal
year before the effective date. Adoption of ASU 2017-12 did not have any other material effect on the results of operations, financial
position or cash flows of the Company.
There
were no other recent accounting pronouncements or changes in accounting pronouncements during the fiscal year ended December 31,
2017, that are of significance or potential significance to us.
3.
INVENTORIES
Inventories
by major categories are summarized as follows:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Raw materials and packaging
|
|
$
|
837,613
|
|
|
$
|
1,107,857
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
|
1,259,694
|
|
|
|
1,933,443
|
|
Inventories
|
|
$
|
2,097,307
|
|
|
$
|
3,041,300
|
|
4.
PROPERTY, PLANT AND EQUIPMENT
Property,
plant and equipment consist of the following:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Machinery and equipment
|
|
$
|
49,217,042
|
|
|
$
|
28,125,109
|
|
Furniture and office equipment
|
|
|
566,579
|
|
|
|
566,348
|
|
Motor vehicles
|
|
|
498,033
|
|
|
|
497,024
|
|
Buildings
|
|
|
76,770,087
|
|
|
|
50,758,428
|
|
Construction in progress
|
|
|
30,819,849
|
|
|
|
35,979,862
|
|
Subtotal
|
|
|
157,971,590
|
|
|
|
115,920,500
|
|
Less: accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(40,220,240
|
)
|
|
|
(34,403,200
|
)
|
Less: Impairment loss
|
|
|
(89,685,890
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Net property and equipment
|
|
$
|
28,065,460
|
|
|
$
|
81,523,569
|
|
In 2017, the Company recognized impairment
loss of 89.69 million, mainly related to the fixed assets and construction in progress in Huludao factory and Shaanxi Guoweimei
Kiwi Deep Processing Co., Ltd. Huludao Wonder factory has not operated in the past two years due to unfavorable market conditions,
which has not operated in the past two years due to unfavorable market conditions. As the Chinese government recently tightened
environmental regulations, the Company is in the process of adapting to the new standards and the project of Guoweimei has been
delayed and the construction of was stopped since early 2017.
The Company recorded an impairment loss of
$30.62 million related to the construction in progress in Agricultural Plantations Yidu, Shaanxi Guoweimei Kiwi Deep Processing
Co., Ltd. and the Suizhong project.
In 2017, the Company recognized impairment
loss of $59.06 million, mainly related to the concentrated fruit juice production equipment in Huludao Wonder factory, Yingkou and
Huludao, which has not operated in the past two years due to unfavorable market conditions.
Depreciation expense included in general and
administration expenses for the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $1,987,920 and $3,599,276, respectively. Depreciation
expense included in cost of sales for the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 was $851,966 and $604,734 and respectively.
5.
Other Receivables
As
of December, 2017, the balance of other receivables was $36.79 million, which mainly consisted of a deposit of approximately $30.61
million for the purchase of a kiwi orchard in Mei County.
In
April 2016, the Company signed a letter of intent with Mei County Kiwifruits Investment and Development Corporation to purchase
833.5 mu (approximately 137.3 acres) of kiwifruits orchard in Mei County. The purchase price will be determined by a third party
valuation company appointed by both parties. As of the date of this report, the valuation has not been completed. The Company
paid RMB 200 million (approximately $30 million) as a deposit (the “Deposit”) in the second quarter of 2016. The purchase
is subject to government approval, approval by the Company’s Board of Directors and a definitive agreement negotiated and
signed by the parties. As Mei County is in the process of governmental personnel change, the approval was delayed. Pursuant to
the letter of intent, the Deposit shall be returned to the Company within 10 working days upon the request of the Company if the
kiwifruits orchard cannot be transferred to the Company according to the schedule. The Company expects to complete the purchase
process in the second quarter of 2018. As the transaction is not completed, the Company recorded this deposit as other receivables
in its balance sheet.
6.
DEPOSITS
As
of December 31, 2017, the balance of deposits was $46.29 million, which mainly consisted of a balance of approximately $27.27
million for the leasing fee for the kiwifruits orchard in Mei County and a balance of approximately $17.45 million for the leasing
fee for the orange orchard in Yidu city.
On
August 3, 2016, Shaanxi Guoweimei Kiwi Deep Processing Company, an indirectly wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, signed a
lease agreement for 20,000 mu (approximately 3,292 acres) of a kiwifruits orchard located in Mei County, Shaanxi Province, with
the Di’ErPo Committee of Jinqu Village, Mei County, Shaanxi for a term of 30 years, from August 5, 2016 to August 4, 2046.
The annual leasing fee is RMB 1,250 (approximately $189) per mu, and payment of 10 years’ of leasing fees shall be made
on each of September 25, 2016, 2026 and 2036. The Company made a payment of RMB 250 million (approximately $36.2 million) for
the first 10 years’ leasing fees on August 15, 2016, which is recorded as deposit in the Company’s balance sheet.
The Company has amortized $3.69 million as expenses during fiscal year 2017.
On
August 15, 2016, Hedetang Agricultural Plantations (Yidu) Co., Ltd., an indirectly wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company, signed
a lease agreement for 8,000 mu (approximately 1,317 acres) of an orange orchard located in the city of Yidu, Hubei Province, with
the Yidu Sichang Farmers Association, Hubei Province, for a term of 20 years, from September 22, 2016 to September 21, 2036. The
annual leasing fee is RMB 2,000 (approximately $306) per mu, and payment of 10 years’ of leasing fees shall be made on each
of September 25, 2016 and 2026. The Company made a payment of RMB 160 million (approximately $23.2 million) for the first 10 years’
of leasing fees on September 20, 2016, which is recorded as deposits in the Company’s balance sheet. The Company has amortized
$2.36 million as expenses during fiscal year 2017.
7.
LONG TERM ASSETS
Long
term assets were $0 and $2,979,857 for the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. It represents the capital lease
risk deposits made by the Company’s fully owned subsidiary, Shaanxi Guoweimei Kiwi Deep Processing Co., Ltd. (“Guo
Wei Mei”) to Cinda Financial Leasing Co., LTD in terms of capital lease agreement.
As
the Chinese government recently tightened environmental regulations, the Company is in the process of adapting to the new standards
and the project has been delayed and the construction of Guoweimei was stopped since early 2017. Since the Company’s current
cash cannot support the future input of this project and there is no forecasted cash flow from this project, the Company recorded
an impairment cost of $2.85 million related with the assets under the capital lease agreement.
8.
LAND USAGE RIGHTS
According
to the laws of the PRC, the government owns all of the land in the PRC. The government of the PRC, its agencies and collectives
hold all land ownership. Companies or individuals are authorized to use the land only through land usage rights granted
by the PRC government. Land usage rights can be transferred upon approval by the land administrative authorities of the PRC (State
Land Administration Bureau) upon payment of the required land transfer fee. Accordingly, the Company paid in advance for land
usage rights. Prepaid land usage rights are being amortized and recorded as lease expenses using the straight-line method over
the terms of the leases, which range from 40 to 50 years. The amortization expense was $353,050 and 1,222,079 and for fiscal years
2017 and 2016, respectively. The following table sets forth land usage rights of the Company as of December 31, 2017 and 2016,
respectively.
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Cost
|
|
$
|
36,103,714
|
|
|
$
|
34,321,098
|
|
Less: Accumulated amortization
|
|
|
(2,985,360
|
)
|
|
|
(2,466,738
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
33,118,454
|
|
|
$
|
31,854,360
|
|
9.
SHORT-TERM BANK LOANS
Short-term
bank loans consist of the following loans collateralized by assets of the Company:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan payable to Huludao Bank, Suizhong branch due on December 9, 2016, bearing interest at 9.6% per annum, collateralized by the buildings, machinery and land use rights of Huludao Wonder
|
|
|
6,121,637
|
|
|
|
5,766,181
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan payable to China Construction Bank due on January 10, 2018, bearing interest at 5.84% per annum, collateralized by the buildings and land use rights of Yingkou.*
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,003,748
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan payable to Bank of Xi’an due on November 15, 2017, bearing interest at 4.71% per annum, guaranteed by a third party Shaanxi Bo Ai Medical Science & Technology Development Co., Ltd*
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
2,162,318
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan payable to Shanghai Pudong Development Bank due on May 3, 2018, bearing interest at 6.16% per annum, collateralized by the buildings of SkyPeople (China)*
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,877,757
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan payable to Bank of Beijing due on June 30, 2018, bearing interest at 7.28% per annum, collateralized by the buildings of a third party, Shaanxi Jiu Chang Medical Science & Technology Development Co., Ltd.*
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,324,636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan payable to China Construction Bank due on May 3, 2018 bearing interest at 4.99% per annum, guaranteed by a third party guarantee company.*
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,301,139
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan payable to China Construction Bank due on May 13, 2018, bearing interest at 5.6% per annum, collateralized by the buildings and land use rights of Yingkou.*
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,324,636
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan payable to The Bank of Ningxia Xi’an branch due on March 14, 2017, bearing interest at 0.47% per annum, collateralized by the fixed assets and brand name of SkyPeople (China).*
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
3,603,863
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
6,121,637
|
|
|
|
29,364,279
|
|
|
●
|
The
Company did not pay back the premium or the interest on these short term loans when they
were due in 2017. Those banks filed lawsuits against the company in 2017, the Company
is in the process of legal proceedings with the related banks for loan default, and those
short term loans which the amount is 22,252,150 USD were recorded as long –term
debt in the Company’s balance sheet as of December 31, 2017.
|
10.
LEASE OBLIGATION PAYABLE
As of December 31, 2017, the Company recorded
lease obligation payable of $17.51 million for the Company’s capital equipment under the lease contracts with Cinda Financial
Leasing Co., Ltd, entered into in January of 2014 and December of 2016. The Company’s obligations under the finance lease
are secured by the lessees’ title to the leased assets, land use rights and equity interest of our subsidiaries. The leases
have interest rates as 7.36% and 5.0025% for the 2014 and 2016 agreements, respectively.
In August, 2017, Cinda Capital Financing
Co. Ltd. (“Cinda”) filed a lawsuit at Beijing 2
nd
Intermediate People’s Court (the “Beijing
Intermediate Court”) against the Company’s indirectly wholly-owned subsidiaries Guoweimei and SkyPeople China for
repayment of leasing fee of RMB 84,970,959 (approximately $13 million) plus interest. In January 2014, Guoweimei and SkyPeople
China (the “Equipment Leasees”) signed an Equipment Financial Lease Purchase Agreement with Cinda and an equipment
supplier pursuant to which Cinda would provide funds to purchase equipment and the Equipment Leasees would lease the equipment
from Cinda. Guoweimei pledged certain land use rights in Mei County to Cinda and Xi’an Hedetang and Hedetang Holding pledged
their equities in Guoweimei to Cinda to secure the repayment. Beijing Intermediate Court had two hearings of the case and has
not yet ruled on it.
In August 2017, Cinda Capital Financing Co.
Ltd. (“Cinda”) filed another lawsuit with Beijing Intermediate Court against the Company’s indirectly wholly-owned
subsidiaries Shaanxi Guoweimei Kiwi Deep Processing Company, Ltd. (“Guoweimei”) and Hedetang Farm Products Trading
Market (Mei County) Co., Ltd. (“Trading Market Mei County Co”, and together with Guoweimei, “Leasees”)
requested that Leasees repay RMB 50 million (approximately $7.65 million) in capital lease fees, plus interest. Cinda has purchased
or paid for refrigerant warehouse and trading hall to the suppliers and vendors and agreed to lease them to the Leasees for a leasing
fee of RMB 50 million in December, 2016. The capital leasing fee became due on its maturity date of June 2017, with certain land
use rights of Leasees in Mei County and equity of Guoweimei as a pledge. The Company has disputed that the land use rights for
the refrigerant warehouse and trading hall were never sold to or transferred to Cinda, therefore it is loan agreement and not capital
lease agreement among the parties. Leasees have taken the position that Cinda is not a bank and does not have government permits
required to make loans in China, and the agreements including pledge agreement were invalid, void and without legal effect from
the beginning. Therefore, the Company only has the obligations to repay principal but not the interest. In November 2017, Beijing
Intermediate Court ruled in favor of Cinda and the Leasees have appealed the case to Beijing Supreme Court. Beijing Supreme Court
has not scheduled hearings yet. As the Company may still be liable for this loan, the Company recorded expenses and liability of
$7.66 million as the result of the enforcement proceeding in the third quarter of 2017.
From
time to time we may be a party to various litigation proceedings arising in the ordinary course of our business, none of which,
in the opinion of management, is likely to have a material adverse effect on our financial condition or results of operations.
11.
RELATED PARTY TRANSACTION
Sales
The
company’s subsidiary sold fruit beverages to a related entity, Shaanxi Fullmart Convenient Chain Supermarket Co., Ltd. (“Fullmart”)
for approximately $62,000 and $360,184 for the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. The sales to this related
party were consistent with pricing and terms offered to third parties. The remained accounts receivable balances were $0 and $308,304
as of December 31, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Fullmart is a company indirectly owned by our Chairman and CEO, Mr. Yongke Xue.
Long-term
loan – related party
There
were no short-term loans to a related party as of December 31, 2017.
On February 18, 2013, SkyPeople (China) entered into a loan agreement with SkyPeople International Holdings Group Limited (the
“Lender”). The Lender indirectly holds 50.2% interest in the Company. Mr. Yongke Xue (“Y. K. Xue”), then
the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer (“CEO”) of the Company and currently a Member of the Company’s Board
of Directors (the “Board”) and Mr. Hongke Xue, our Chairman and CEO, indirectly and beneficially own 80.0% and 9.4%
of the equity interest in the Lender, respectively. Pursuant to the Agreement, the Lender agreed to extend to the Company a one-year
unsecured term loan with a principal amount of $8.0 million at an interest rate of 6% per annum. During 2013, the Company received
$8.0 million from the Lender. In February 2014, both parties extended this loan for another two years under the original terms
of the agreement.
On
October 16, 2015, the Company entered into a Share Purchase Agreement with the Lender to sell 5,321,600 shares of the common stock
of the Company at the price of $7,982,400, and which was paid by cancellation of the loan by the Lender. On March 10, 2016, the
Lender canceled the loan and the shares were issued to the Lender.
12.
INCOME TAX
The
Company is incorporated in the United States of America and is subject to United States federal taxation. No provisions for income
taxes have been made, as the Company had no U.S. taxable income for the year ended December 31, 2017 and 2016. The effective income
tax rate for the Company for both of the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016 were negative 0.3% and 44%, respectively. Some
of our subsidiaries generated income and we accrued income tax according to the Chinese corporate income tax rate, but some had
a loss and no tax provision was made.
The
amount of unrecognized deferred tax liabilities for temporary differences related to the dividend from foreign subsidiaries is
not determined because such determination is not practical.
The
Company has not provided deferred taxes on undistributed earnings attributable to its PRC subsidiaries as they are to be permanently
reinvested. On February 22, 2008, MOFCOM, and SAT, jointly issued Cai Shui 2008 Circular 1, “Circular 1.” According
to Article 4 of Circular 1, distributions of accumulated profits earned by foreign investment enterprises, (“FIE”)
prior to January 1, 2008 to their foreign investors will be exempt from withholding tax, (“WHT”) while distribution
of the profits earned by a FIE after January 1, 2008 to its foreign investors shall be subject to WHT.
Dividend
payments by PRC subsidiaries are limited by certain statutory regulations in the PRC. No dividends may be paid by PRC subsidiaries
without first receiving prior approval from SAFE. Dividend payments are restricted to 90% of after tax profits.
The
Company had no material adjustments to its liabilities for unrecognized income tax benefits according to the provisions of ASC
Topic 740,
Income Taxes
. Since SkyPeople (China) intends to reinvest its earnings to further expand its businesses
in mainland China, its PRC subsidiaries do not intend to declare dividends to their immediate foreign holding companies in the
foreseeable future. Accordingly, the Company has not recorded any deferred taxes in relation to US tax on the cumulative amount
of undistributed retained earnings since January 1, 2008.
Effective
on January 1, 2008, the PRC Enterprise Income Tax Law, EIT Law, and Implementing Rules imposed a unified enterprise income tax
rate of 25% on all domestic-invested enterprises and foreign-invested enterprises in the PRC, unless they qualify under certain
limited exceptions. All of the Companies’ Chinese subsidiaries were subject to an enterprise income tax rate of 25%.
The
reconciliation of income tax expense at the U.S. statutory rate of 35% in 2017 and 2016, to the Company’s effective tax
rate is as follows:
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expected income tax expenses at U.S. statutory rate
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
|
$
|
--
|
|
Tax rate difference between China and U.S.
|
|
|
(77,126,982
|
)
|
|
|
(325,658
|
)
|
Change in Valuation Allowance
|
|
|
29,072,310
|
|
|
|
195,934
|
|
Permanent difference
|
|
|
(47,788,552
|
)
|
|
|
1,731,691
|
|
Income tax expense at effective tax rate
|
|
$
|
266,120
|
|
|
$
|
1,601,967
|
|
The
provisions for income taxes are summarized as follows:
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Current
|
|
$
|
266,120
|
|
|
$
|
2,442,904
|
|
Deferred
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(840,937
|
)
|
Total
|
|
$
|
266,120
|
|
|
$
|
1,601,967
|
|
In
assessing the reliability of deferred tax assets, management considers whether it is more likely than not that some portion or
all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. The ultimate realization of deferred tax assets is dependent upon the generation
of future taxable income during the periods in which those temporary differences become deductible or are utilized. Management
believes that the deferred tax assets amounting to $ 29,976,186 as of December 31, 2017, respectively, are not more likely than
not to be realized. Accordingly the Company provided a valuation allowance amounting to $29,976,186 against the deferred tax assets
as of December 31, 2017. The tax effects of temporary differences that give rise to the Company’s net deferred tax asset
as of December 31, 2017 and 2016 are as follows:
|
|
Year ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Net operating loss carry forward
|
|
$
|
29,508,961
|
|
|
$
|
3,973,803
|
|
Inventory markdown
|
|
|
467,225
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Bad debt provision
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
496,515
|
|
Startup costs
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Others
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
29,976,186
|
|
|
|
4,470,318
|
|
Less: valuation allowance
|
|
|
(29,976,186
|
)
|
|
|
(903,876
|
)
|
Deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
3,566,442
|
|
13.
CONCENTRATIONS
There
was no customer who accounted for 10% of the Company’s sales for the year ended December 31, 2017 and the year ended December
31, 2016.
Sales
to our five largest customers accounted for approximately 12% and 18% of our net sales during the years ended December 31, 2017
and 2016, respectively.
Two
suppliers accounted for 26% and 19% of our purchases for the year ended December 31, 2017, respectively, and one supplier accounted
for 62% of our purchases for the year ended December 31, 2016,
14.
Issuance of Common Stock and Warrants
On
February 28, 2017, the Company issued options to purchase 62,500 shares of the Company’s common stock with an exercise price
equal to the fair market value of the Company’s Common Stock (as defined under the 2011 Stock Incentive Plan in conformity
with Regulation 409A of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended) at the date of grant to three of the Company’s employees
pursuant to the 2011 Stock Incentive Plan, which was approved by the Company’s shareholders at the annual stockholders meeting
on August 18, 2011. These options vested immediately on the grant date with a fair market value of $223,375 based on the fair
value of $3.57 per share, which was determined by using the Black Scholes option pricing model. The Company recognized stock-based
compensation expense of $223,375 in the first quarter of fiscal year 2017 under the 2011 Stock Incentive Plan.
On
March 29, 2017, the Company issued 250,000 shares of the Company’s unrestricted common stock to six of the Company’s
employees pursuant to our 2015 Omnibus Equity Plan, which was approved by the Company’s shareholders at the annual stockholders
meeting on November 19, 2015. The Company recorded an expense of $250 in the first quarter of fiscal year 2017 under the 2015
Omnibus Equity Plan, reflecting a par value of $0.001 per share of the Company’s common stock.
The
Company’s 2015 Omnibus Equity Plan permits the grant of incentive stock options (“ISOs”), nonqualified stock
options (“NQSOs”), stock appreciation rights (“SARs”), restricted stock, unrestricted stock and restricted
stock units (“RSUs”) to its employees of up to 250,000 shares of Common Stock.
On
April 12, 2017, the Company entered into a Securities Purchase Agreement (the “Purchase Agreement”) with certain purchasers
(the “Purchasers”), pursuant to which the Company offered and sold to the Purchasers, in a registered direct offering,
an aggregate of 862,097 shares (the “Shares”) of common stock, par value $0.001 per share (“Common Stock”).
The Shares were sold to the Purchasers at a negotiated purchase price of $3.10 per share, for aggregate gross proceeds to the
Company of $2,672,500,
before deducting fees to the placement agent and other estimated offering expenses payable
by the Company. The Shares were offered pursuant to an effective shelf registration statement on Form S-3, which was originally
filed with the SEC on August 3, 2015, amended on February 17, 2017, and was declared effective on February 23, 2017 (File No.
333-206353) (the “Registration Statement”).
In
a concurrent private placement, the Company also issued to each of the Purchasers a warrant to purchase one (1) share of the Company’s
Common Stock for each share purchased under the Purchase Agreement, pursuant to that certain Common Stock Purchase Warrant, by
and between the Company and each Purchaser (each, a “Warrant”, and collectively, the “Warrants”). The
Warrants will be exercisable beginning on the six month anniversary of the date of issuance at an initial exercise price of $5.20
per share and will expire on the five and a half year anniversary of the date of issuance.
The
Warrants and the shares of the Company’s Common Stock issuable upon the exercise of the Warrants (the “Warrant Shares”)
are not being registered under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (the “Securities Act”), pursuant to the Company’s
Registration Statement, and were instead offered pursuant to the exemption provided in Section 4(a)(2) under the Securities
Act. Each Purchaser was either (i) an “accredited investor” as defined in Rule 501(a)(1), (a)(2), (a)(3), (a)(7) or
(a)(8) under the Securities Act or (ii) a “qualified institutional buyer” as defined in Rule 144A(a) under the Securities
Act.
In
connection with the private placement and in accordance with the Purchase Agreement, the Company was required to file a registration
statement on Form S-1 within 45 calendar days after the date of the Purchase Agreement to provide for the resale of the Warrant
Shares. The Company filed a registration statement on Form S-1 (File No. 333-218276) on May 26, 2017, which was declared effective
on June 12, 2017.
Rodman &
Renshaw, a unit of H.C. Wainwright & Co., served as our placement agent in connection with the offering under the Purchase
Agreement and received warrants to purchase our Common Stock in an amount equal to 4% of our Shares sold to the Purchasers in
the offering on substantially the same terms as the Warrants, with an initial exercise price of $5.20 per share, except that the
termination date shall be April 12, 2022 and the warrants have certain transfer restrictions pursuant to FINRA Rule 5110 (the
“Placement Agent Warrants”).
Per
the terms of the Purchase Agreement, the Company and the Purchasers agreed to the following: (i) that subject to certain exceptions,
the Company will not, within the ninety day period immediately following the closing of the offering, enter into any agreement
to issue or announce the issuance or proposed issuance of any securities; (ii) the Company will not, during the period in which
the Warrants are outstanding, enter into an agreement to effect a “Variable Rate Transaction,” as that term is defined
in the Purchase Agreement; and (iii) until the one-year
anniversary of the closing of the offering, the Company will
not undertake a reverse or forward stock split or reclassification of the Common Stock without the prior written consent of the
Purchasers holding a majority in interest of the Shares then outstanding and still held by them, subject to certain exceptions.
The
Company also agreed to indemnify each of the Purchasers against certain losses resulting from its breach of any representations,
warranties or covenants under agreements with each of the Purchasers, as well as under certain other circumstances described in
the Purchase Agreement.
On
April 18, 2017, our investor exercised warrants according to the Securities Purchase Agreement that the Company entered with certain
purchasers on April 12, 2017, and received an amount of $1,024,701 for 197,058 shares of the Company’s common stock issued
15.
Share Split
On
March 10, 2016, the Company filed with the Florida Secretary of State’s office an amendment to its Articles of Incorporation
(the “Articles of Amendment”). As a result of the Articles of Amendment, the Company authorized and approved a 1-for-8
reverse stock split of the Company’s authorized shares of common stock from 66,666,666 shares to 8,333,333 shares, accompanied
by a corresponding decrease in the Company’s issued and outstanding shares of common stock (the “Reverse Stock Split”).
The common stock remains at a par value of $0.001. No changes were made to the number of authorized preferred shares of the Company,
which remains at 10,000,000, none of which have been issued. The amendment to the Articles of Incorporation of the Company took
effect on March 16, 2016.
16.
Transfer of Shares
On
March 11, 2016, SkyPeople Juice International Holding (HK) Limited (“SkyPeople HK”), a wholly owned subsidiary of
SkyPeople Fruit Juice, Inc. (the “Company”) and a 99.78% owner of SkyPeople Juice Group Co., Ltd. (“SkyPeople
China”) entered into a Share Transfer Agreement and a Capital Contribution (the “Agreements”) with Shenzhen
TianShunDa Equity Investment Fund Management Co., Ltd. (the “TSD”), a limited liability corporation registered in
China.
SkyPeople HK incorporated SkyPeople China
in Shaanxi Province, China on March 13, 2012 and pursuant to the approval certificate and business license of SkyPeople China,
SkyPeople HK was required to contribute RMB 427,000,000 (approximately $65,698,308) and Hongke Xue, currently the Chairman of the
Board of Directors of the Company and our Chief Executive Officer (“Xue”), was required to contribute RMB 1,000,000
(approximately $153,846) to SkyPeople China, and SkyPeople HK and Xue as a result would own 427,000,000 shares (99.78%) and 1,000,000
shares (0.22%) of SkyPeople China, respectively. As of March 10, 2016, SkyPeople HK had contributed RMB 314,190,900 (approximately
$48,337,062) to SkyPeople China but had not contributed the remaining RMB 112,809,100 (approximately $17,355,246) as the payment
for 112,809,100 shares of SkyPeople China.
Pursuant to the Agreements, TSD shall
acquire 112,809,100 shares of SkyPeople China from SkyPeople HK and shall make a total capital contribution of RMB 131,761,028.80
(approximately $20,270,928) to SkyPeople China, which is calculated based upon 8 times of SkyPeople China’s net profit per
share for 2014 (about RMB 0.146 per share) multiplied by 112,809,100 shares. RMB 112,809,100 out of the RMB 131,761,028.80 (the
“Capital Contributions”) shall be used as payment for outstanding capital contributions due to SkyPeople China by
SkyPeople HK and the remaining RMB 18,951,928.80 (approximately $2,915,681) shall be used as additional capital contribution to
SkyPeople China and shall be deposited into SkyPeople China’s capital surplus account. On March 18, 2016, TSD paid the full
Capital Contributions to SkyPeople China and the shares were transferred, resulting in TSD owning 112,809,100 shares, or 26.36%,
of SkyPeople China.
On
June 15, 2016, Hedetang Holdings Co., Ltd. (“Hedetang”), a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company, entered into a
Share Transfer Agreement (the “Agreement”) with Shaanxi New Silk Road Kiwifruit Group Inc. (“NSR”), a
limited liability corporation registered in China. Pursuant to the Agreement, NSR was to acquire 51% of the equity shares of Shaanxi
Guoweiduomei Beverage Co, Limited, a wholly owned subsidiary of Hedetang (the “Shares”). The tentative total transfer
price for the Shares was 300 million RMB (approximately $46 million). NSR was to pay the total transfer price to Hedetang within
six months of the effective date of the Agreement.
On
July 5, 2016, Hedetang completed the registration of 51% of its shares in Shaanxi Guoweiduomei Beverage Co., Limited under the
name of NSR with China’s State Administration for Industry and Commerce. Pursuant to the terms of the Agreement, the transferred
shares were still under the control of Hedetang until it receives full payment from NSR. On January 20, 2017, the Company’s
Board of Directors approved the termination of the Agreement with NSR because the local government authority had not approved
the transaction contemplated thereby and the Company had not received the required payment within six months of the effective
date of the Agreement. On January 26, 2017, Hedetang executed a Termination Agreement for the Share Transfer Agreement with NSR.
Pursuant to the Termination Agreement, Hedetang agreed not to claim any compensation or penalty against NSR under the Agreement
and NSR agreed to cooperate with Hedetang to complete the process to transfer share ownership back to the Hedetang within 60 days
of the date of the Termination Agreement. On March 15, 2017, NSR transferred the share ownership back to Hedetang.
17.
DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
The
Company’s Huludao Wonder operation, a subsidiary which produces concentrated apple juice, suffered continued operating losses
in the three fiscal years prior to 2016 and its cash flow was minimal for these three years. In December 2016, the Company established
a winding-down plan to close this operation. Based on the restructuring plan and in accordance with EITF 03-13, the Company presented
the operating results from Huludao Wonder as a discontinued operation, as the Company believed that no continued cash flow would
be generated by the disposed component (Huludao Wonder) and that the Company would have no significant continuing involvement
in the operation of the discontinued component. Management of the Company initiated a plan to sell the property located in Huludao
in December 2016, and ceased the depreciation of the property in accordance with SFAS No. 144. In fiscal year 2017 and 2016,
the Company recorded an impairment loss of $11.3 million and $2.4 million, respectively with respect to the concentrated fruit
juice production equipment in Huludao Wonder. In accordance with the restructuring plan, the Company intends to transfer the concentrated
fruit juice production equipment in Huludao Wonder to another subsidiary and to sell the land and facilities upon favorable circumstances.
As the Company does not expect to sell the assets of Huludao Wonder in the near future, the assets were not recorded as assets
held for sale as of December 31, 2017. The book value of the land usage right was $4,463,889 and the book value of the building
was $851,666 as of December 31, 2017. The Company believes that the assets’ book value was lower than its fair value at
such time, less the anticipated cost to sell such assets.
As
of December 31, 2017, there was an outstanding bank loan of $6.12 million owed by Huludao Wonder to a lending bank. Huludao Wonder
has disputed the interest rate on this loan with the bank, and stopped payment of interest on this loan during 2016. The bank
sued Huludao Wonder and asked Huludao Wonder to pay back the loan principal and the outstanding interest. As of the date of this
report, the Company has not yet reached an agreement with the bank. The Company expects to pay back the outstanding principal
and interest of this loan after the Huludao Wonder assets are sold.
During
the process of winding down the Company’s Huludao Wonder operation, the Company incurred general and administrative expenses
of approximately $2.46 million, and $2.73 million during 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Loss
from discontinued operations for fiscal 2017 and 2016 was as follows:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
REVENUES
|
|
$
|
7,372
|
|
|
$
|
14,972
|
|
COST OF SALES
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,613,661
|
|
GROSS PROFIT (LOSS)
|
|
|
7,372
|
|
|
|
(1,598,688
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING EXPENSES:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
(2,459,220
|
)
|
|
|
(2,727,359
|
)
|
Selling expenses
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Impairment loss
|
|
|
(11,335,303
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
(13,794,523
|
)
|
|
|
(2,727,359
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OTHER INCOME (EXPENSE)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
|
(875,796
|
)
|
|
|
(459,753
|
)
|
Interest income
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
284
|
)
|
Total
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(459,468
|
)
|
(Loss) Income from discontinued operations before income tax
|
|
|
(14,662,946
|
)
|
|
|
(459,468
|
)
|
Income tax provision
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOSS FROM DISCONTINUED OPERATIONS
|
|
$
|
(14,662,946
|
)
|
|
$
|
(4,785,187
|
)
|
The
loss from discontinued operations was $14.62 million and $4.79 million for fiscal year 2017 and 2016, respectively. The Company
does not provide a separate cash flow statement for the discontinued operation. The loss from discontinued operations was deemed
as cash outflow from operating activities of the discontinued operation. The impact of this discontinued operation was immaterial,
because the total revenues for fiscal years 2017 and 2016 were approximately $10.46 million and $34.41 million, respectively.
The Company believes there will not be any future significant cash flows from the discontinued operation, as the outstanding accounts
receivable and accounts payable are immaterial to the Company’s financial position and liquidity.
18.
SEGMENT REPORTING
The
Company operates in five segments: concentrated apple juice and apple aroma, concentrated kiwifruit juice and kiwifruit puree,
concentrated pear juice, fruit juice beverages, and others. Our concentrated apple juice and apple aroma is primarily produced
by the Company’s Jingyang factory and concentrated pear juice is primarily produced by the Company’s Jingyang factory.
However, the Company uses the same production line to manufacture concentrated apple juice and concentrated pear juice. In addition,
both Shaanxi Province, where the factory of Jingyang factory is located, and Liaoning Province, where the factory of Huludao Wonder
is located, are rich in fresh apple and pear supplies. Jingyang factory also produces concentrated apple juice. Concentrated kiwifruit
juice and kiwifruit puree is primarily produced by the Company’s Qiyiwangguo factory, and fruit juice beverages are primarily
produced by the Company’s Qiyiwangguo factory. The Company’s other products include fructose, concentrated turnjujube
juice, and other by products, such as kiwifruit seeds.
Concentrated
fruit juice is used as a basic ingredient for manufacturing juice drinks and as an additive to fruit wine and fruit jam, cosmetics
and medicines. The Company sells its concentrated fruit juice to domestic customers and exported directly or via distributors.
The Company believes that its main export markets are the North America, Europe, Russia, South Korea and the Middle East. The
Company sells its Hedetang branded bottled fruit beverages domestically primarily to supermarkets in the PRC. The Company sells
its fresh fruit and vegetables to supermarkets and whole sellers in the PRC.
Some
of these product segments might never individually meet the quantitative thresholds for determining reportable segments and we
determine the reportable segments based on the discrete financial information provided to the chief operating decision maker.
The chief operating decision maker evaluates the results of each segment in assessing performance and allocating resources among
the segments. Since there is an overlap of services provided and products manufactured between different subsidiaries of the Company,
the Company does not allocate operating expenses and assets based on the product segments. Therefore, operating expenses and assets
information by segment are not presented. Segment profit represents the gross profit of each reportable segment.
(In Thousand)
For the Year Ended
December 31, 2017
|
|
Concentrated
apple juice
and apple
aroma
|
|
|
Concentrated
kiwifruit
juice and
kiwifruit
puree
|
|
|
Concentrated pear juice
|
|
|
Fruit juice beverages
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Reportable segment Revenue
|
|
$
|
4,928
|
|
|
$
|
641
|
|
|
$
|
2,110
|
|
|
$
|
9,621
|
|
|
$
|
116
|
|
|
$
|
17,418
|
|
Inter-segment revenue
|
|
|
(3,083
|
)
|
|
|
(106
|
)
|
|
|
(983
|
)
|
|
|
(2,753
|
)
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
(6,955
|
)
|
Revenue from external Customers
|
|
|
1,845
|
|
|
|
536
|
|
|
|
1,127
|
|
|
|
6,868
|
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
10,463
|
|
Segment gross profit
|
|
$
|
87
|
|
|
$
|
140
|
|
|
$
|
143
|
|
|
$
|
1,341
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
1,734
|
|
(In Thousand)
For the Year Ended
December 31, 2016
|
|
Concentrated
apple juice
and apple
aroma
|
|
|
Concentrated
kiwifruit
juice and
kiwifruit
puree
|
|
|
Concentrated pear juice
|
|
|
Fruit juice beverages
|
|
|
Others
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Reportable segment Revenue
|
|
$
|
8,855
|
|
|
$
|
790
|
|
|
$
|
11,503
|
|
|
$
|
21,767
|
|
|
$
|
2,000
|
|
|
$
|
44,915
|
|
Inter-segment revenue
|
|
|
(1,147
|
)
|
|
|
(65
|
)
|
|
|
(2,241
|
)
|
|
|
(6,999
|
)
|
|
|
(56
|
)
|
|
|
(10,508
|
)
|
Revenue from external Customers
|
|
|
7,708
|
|
|
|
725
|
|
|
|
9,262
|
|
|
|
14,768
|
|
|
|
1,944
|
|
|
|
34,407
|
|
Segment gross profit
|
|
$
|
1,985
|
|
|
$
|
62
|
|
|
$
|
2,101
|
|
|
$
|
4,692
|
|
|
$
|
333
|
|
|
$
|
9,173
|
|
The
following table reconciles reportable segment profit to the Company’s consolidated income before income tax provision for
the years ended December 31, 2017 and 2016:
|
|
2017
|
|
|
2016
|
|
Segment profit
|
|
$
|
1,734,381
|
|
|
$
|
9,173,472
|
|
Unallocated amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
(100,821,586
|
)
|
|
|
(6,942,370
|
)
|
Other expenses
|
|
|
(2,948,229
|
)
|
|
|
(1,262,972
|
)
|
(Loss) Income before tax provision
|
|
$
|
(102,035,434
|
)
|
|
$
|
968,131
|
|
The
Company’s export business is primarily comprised of fruit juice concentrates. As most of the export sales are through distributors
and therefore we are not certain exactly where the Company’s products are ultimately sold, revenue by geographical location
is not presented. However, the Company estimates that our main export markets are the United States, the European Union, South
Korea, Russia and the Middle East.
19
.
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Litigation
In April 2015, China Cinda Asset Management
Co., Ltd. Shaanxi Branch (“Cinda Shaanxi Branch”) filed two enforcement proceedings with Xi’an Intermediate People’s
Court (the “Court”) against the Company for alleged defaults pursuant to guarantees by the Company to its suppliers
for a total amount of RMB 39,596,250 or approximately $6.0 million.
In September 2014, two long term suppliers
of pear, mulberry, and kiwi fruits to the Company requested that the Company provide guarantees for their loans with Cinda Shaanxi
Branch. Considering the long term business relationship and to ensure the timely supply of raw materials, the Company agreed to
provide guarantees upon the value of the raw materials supplied to the Company. Because Cinda Shaanxi Branch is not a bank authorized
to provide loans, it eventually provided financing to the two suppliers through the purchase of accounts receivables of the two
suppliers with the Company. In July, 2014, the parties entered into two agreements – an Accounts Receivables Purchase and
Debt Restructure Agreement, and Guarantee Agreements for Accounts Receivables Purchase and Debt Restructure. Pursuant to the agreements,
Cinda Shaanxi Branch agreed to provide a RMB 100 million credit line on a rolling basis to the two suppliers and the Company agreed
to pay its accounts payables to the two suppliers directly to Cinda Shaanxi Branch and provided guarantees for the two suppliers.
In April 2015, Cinda Shaanxi Branch stopped providing financing to the two suppliers and the two suppliers were unable to continue
the supply of raw materials to the Company. Consequently, the Company stopped making any payment to Cinda Shaanxi Branch.
The Company has responded to the Court
and taken the position that the financings under the agreements are essentially the loans from Cinda Shaanxi Branch to the two
suppliers, and because Cinda Shaanxi Branch does not have permits to make loans in China, the agreements are invalid, void and
had no legal effect from the beginning. Therefore, the Company has no obligation to repay the debts owed by the two suppliers
to Cinda Shaanxi Branch.
Upon the Court’s suggestion, parties agreed to a settlement discussion in April 2017. As a part
of the settlement discussion, on April 18, 2017, the Company withdrew its non-enforcement request with the Court without prejudice.
Both parties are still in the process of settlement negotiations. If the parties cannot reach a settlement agreement, the Company
has the right to refile the non-enforcement request with the Court. As the Company may still be liable for this loan, the Company
recorded expenses and liability of $6.0 million as the result of these two enforcement proceedings in the third quarter of 2017.
Between October, 2013 and January, 2014,
Xuzhou Jinkaifeng Glass Co. Ltd. (“JKF”) supplied glass bottles to SkyPeople China. SkyPeople China believed that the
glass bottles supplied by JKF had quality issues and did not pay for the bottles delivered. In November, 2016, JKF filed a lawsuit
against SkyPeople China with Xuzhou Tongshan District People’s Court. On July 27, 2017, SkyPeople China received judgment
from Xuzhou Tongshan District People’s Court that SkyPeople China must pay JKF RMB 365,292 (approximately $55,040) for the
glass bottles. SkyPeople China currently is in discussions with JKF on the payment terms and final amount in connection with the
enforcement of the judgment.
In April 2015, SkyPeople China entered
into a loan agreement with Shaanxi Fangtian Decoration Co. Ltd. (“Fangtian”). Pursuant to the loan agreement, SkyPeople
China borrowed RMB 3.5 million (approximately $527,355) from Fangtian. SkyPeople China has not repaid the loan and Fangtian filed
a lawsuit with Xi’an Yanta District People’s Court (“Yanta District Court”). On August 10, 2017, Yanta
District Court ruled against SkyPeople China and determined that SkyPeople China must repay the loan of RMB 3.5 million plus interest
RMB of 402,500 (approximately $588,000). SkyPeople China currently is in discussions with Fangtian on the payment terms and the
final amount.
Shaanxi
Hengtong Development Co. Ltd. (“Hengtong”) is a coal supplier to SkyPeople China’s Jingyang Branch (“SkyPeople
Jingyang”). In November, 2016, Hengtong filed a lawsuit against SkyPeople Jingyang for unpaid coal deliveries and interest
for a total amount of RMB 3,133,916 (approximately $482,141). On
March
13, 2017, SkyPeople Jingyang received judgment from Jingyang County People’s Court ordering SkyPeople Jingyang to repay RMB
1.78 million (approximately $268,788) to Hengtong. SkyPeople Jingyang appealed the judgement to Xianyang Intermediate People’s
Court, and on August 29, 2017, Xiangyang Intermediate Court affirmed the lower court’s decision. SkyPeople Jingyang currently
is in discussions with Hengtong on payment terms and the final amount.
In September 2016, the Suizhong Branch
of Huludao Banking Co. Ltd. (“Suizhong Branch”) filed a lawsuit with Huludao Intermediate People’s Court (the
“Huludao Court”) against the Company’s indirectly wholly-owned subsidiary Huludao Wonder Fruit Co., Ltd. (“Wonder
Fruit”) and requested that Wonder Fruit repay a RMB 40 million (approximately $6.35 million) bank loan, plus interest. The
loan became due on its maturity date of December 9, 2016. On December 19, 2016, the Huludao Court accepted the case. The Company
has been disputing the interest rate of the loan with Suizhong Branch, and has not repaid the loan to date. Wonder Fruit believes
that the interest charged by Suizhong Branch is 100% higher than the base rate set by People’s Bank of China and is not in
consistent with the China People’s Bank’s base interest and floating rate. The Huludao Court has seized land use rights,
buildings and equipment of Wonder Fruit that were pledged as guarantee for the loan and has organized two auction sales for these
assets in January and February of 2018, but both auction sales have been unsuccessful in finding a buyer. Wonder Fruit is currently
in discussions with the Suizhong Branch on repayment of the bank loan and a reduction of the interest due thereon.
On June 29, 2015, SkyPeople China entered
into a loan agreement with Beijing Bank. Pursuant to the loan agreement, SkyPeople China borrowed RMB 30 million (approximately
$4.59 million) from Beijng Bank. Hongke Xue, Yongke Xue and Xiujun Wang provided guarantees for the loan and Shaanxi Boai Medical
Technology Development Co., Ltd. provided certain real estate property as a pledge for the loan. SkyPeople China did not repay
the loan on time and Beijing Bank filed an enforcement request with Xi’an Intermediate People's Court in June 2017. The Xi’an
Intermediate People’s Court has not yet taken any action. SkyPeople China currently is in discussions with Beijing Bank on
the payment terms and the final amount.
On March 8, 2016, SkyPeople China entered
into a loan agreement with Ningxia Bank. Pursuant to the loan agreement, SkyPeople China borrowed RMB 25 million (approximately
$3.83 million) from Ningxia Bank. Hongke Xue, Yongke Xue, Lake Chen, Shaanxi Boai Medical Technology Development Co., Ltd. and
Shaanxi Qiyiwangguo provided guarantees for the loan. SkyPeople China also pledged 37 equipment and its trademarks to Ningxia Bank
for the loan. SkyPeople China has not repaid the loan and Ningxia Bank filed enforcement action with Xi’an Intermediate
people's court in August 2017. The Court has frozen the assets of SkyPeople China that were pledged as guarantee for the loan
from being transferred to any third-party, but the freeze does not limit or affect the use of these properties by SkyPeople China
for its business. SkyPeople China currently is in discussions with Ningxia Bank on the payment terms and the final amount.
On December 23, 2015, SkyPeople China entered
into two loan agreements with China Construction Bank. Pursuant to the loan agreements, SkyPeople China borrowed RMB 13.90 million
(approximately $2.13 million), and RMB 30 million (approximately $4.59 million) from China Construction Bank, respectively. Shaanxi
Boai Medical Technology Development Co., Ltd. (“Boai”), Hongke Xue, Yongke Xue, Xiujun Wang and Yingkou Trusty Fruits
Co., Ltd. (“Yingkou”) provided pledges for the loans. SkyPeople China has not repaid the loans and China Construction
Bank filed an enforcement action with Xi’an Intermediate People's Court in March 2017. The Court has seized and sold by auction
certain park space and land use rights pledged by Xiujun Wang and Boai for approximately RMB 25,000,000. The Court also seized
certain land use rights pledged by Yingkou Trusty Fruits Co., Ltd., but the auction sale for those rights was not successful. SkyPeople
China currently is in discussions with China Construction Bank on the payment terms and the final amount.
On May 9, 2016, SkyPeople China entered
into loan agreements with China Construction Bank. Pursuant to the loan agreements, SkyPeople China borrowed RMB 22.9 million (approximately
$3.50 million) from China Construction Bank. Shaan xi Province Credit Reassurance Company (“Credit Reassurance Company”)
provided a guarantee to China Construction Bank for the loan, Hongke Xue and Yongke Xue provided their guarantees, and SkyPeople
China provided an office space that it owned to Credit Reassurance Company as a pledge. SkyPeople China has not repaid the loan
and Credit Reassurance Company repaid the loan for SkyPeople China. In June 2017, Credit Reassurance filed an enforcement action
request with Xi’an Intermediate People’s Court in June 2017. In December 2017, the Xi’an Intermediate People’s
Court seized the office space of SkyPeople China for auction sale in February 2018 but the sale was not successful. SkyPeople China
currently is in discussions with Credit Reassurance Company on the payment terms and the final amount.
In August 2017, Cinda Capital Financing Co.
Ltd. (“Cinda”) filed a lawsuit with Beijing 2
nd
Intermediate People’s Court (the “Beijing Intermediate
Court”) against the Company’s indirectly wholly-owned subsidiaries Shaanxi Guoweimei Kiwi Deep Processing Company,
Ltd. (“Guoweimei”) and Hedetang Farm Products Trading Market (Mei County) Co., Ltd. (“Trading Market Mei County
Co”, and together with Guoweimei, “Leasees”) requested that Leasees repay RMB 50 million (approximately $7.65
million) in capital lease fees, plus interest. Cinda has purchased or paid for refrigerant warehouse and trading hall to the suppliers
and vendors and agreed to lease them to the Leasees for a leasing fee of RMB 50 million in December, 2016. The capital leasing
fee became due on its maturity date of June 2017, with certain land use rights of Leasees in Mei County and equity of Guoweimei
as a pledge. The Company has disputed that the land use rights for the refrigerant warehouse and trading hall were never sold to
or transferred to Cinda, therefore it is loan agreement and not capital lease agreement among the parties. Leasees have taken the
position that Cinda is not a bank and does not have government permits required to make loans in China, and the agreements including
pledge agreement were invalid, void and without legal effect from the beginning. Therefore, the Company only has the obligations
to repay principal but not the interest. In November 2017, Beijing Intermediate Court ruled in favor of Cinda and the Leasees have
appealed the case to Beijing Supreme Court. Beijing Supreme Court has not scheduled hearings yet. As the Company may still be liable
for this loan, the Company recorded expenses and liability of $7.66 million as the result of the enforcement proceeding in the
third quarter of 2017.
In August, 2017, Cinda Capital Financing
Co. Ltd. (“Cinda”) filed another lawsuit at Beijing Intermediate Court against the Company’s indirectly wholly-owned
subsidiaries Guoweimei and SkyPeople China for repayment of leasing fee of RMB 84,970,959 (approximately $13 million) plus interest.
In January 2014, Guoweimei and SkyPeople China (the “Equipment Leasees”) signed an Equipment Financial Lease Purchase
Agreement with Cinda and an equipment supplier pursuant to which Cinda would provide funds to purchase equipment and the Equipment
Leasees would lease the equipment from Cinda. Guoweimei pledged certain land use rights in Mei County to Cinda and Xi’an
Hedetang and Hedetang Holding pledged their equities in Guoweimei to Cinda to secure the repayment. Beijing Intermediate Court
had two hearings of the case and has not yet ruled on it.
In September, 2017, Andrew Chien, a former
consultant of SkyPeople China, brought a lawsuit against the Company and Mr. Hongke Xue in the District Court of Connecticut.
The complaint was not properly served and the Company learned of the litigation in December 2017. In the complaint, Mr. Chien
has made several claims, most of which attempt to hold the Company liable under novel legal theories that relate back to an alleged
breach of a consulting agreement between SkyPeople China and Chien from August, 2006. Mr. Chien claimed for approximately
$257,000 damages and interest plus 2% of the Company’s then-outstanding shares. Mr. Chien has unsuccessfully attempted to
sue the Company on the breach of the same consulting agreement several times in the courts of Connecticut and New York and these
cases have been dismissed in the past. The Company has filed a motion to dismiss (“MTD”) and all proceedings
are stayed pending determination of the MTD. The Company will vigorously defend this lawsuit and expects to obtain early
dismissal of Mr. Chien’s claims.
In the past couple years, to expand our
production and diversify our products and businesses, our subsidiaries in China borrowed loans from certain banks for our new
construction projects. Because the business environment for manufacture industries and financing for non-stated owned companies
in China have deteriorated, banks started to collect loans before their maturity dates for their own capital security consideration
which has interrupted our business plan. In June 2017, one of the banks that we had loan with made the early payment request and
applied for the enforcement action with local court which caused chain reactions for other banks that we had loan with and they
all declared their loans due and applied for enforcement actions. Because the run on us by the banks at the same time, our subsidiaries
can’t repay all the loans in a short period of time. Our subsidiaries have been in discussion with the banks to find solutions
for the outstanding loans. The enforcement actions made by the banks are the usual practices used by the banks which don’t
cause actual impact to our daily business operation. After the discussion and negotiation with the banks, we will cooperate with
each party to solve the loan issues.
20.
Acquisition of a Business
On
December 2, 2016, the Company’s wholly owned subsidiary, Xi’an Cornucopia International Co., Ltd. (“Cornucopia”)
entered an Equity Investment Agreement (the “Agreement”) with two shareholders of Shaanxi Heying Trading Co. Ltd (“Heying”
and formerly known as Xi’an Yingxin Business Consulting Co., Ltd.) who own 100% of Heying. The main business of Heying includes
the sales of pre-packaged food and bulk food; import and export of goods and technology; food technology research and development;
business management and consulting, and corporate planning services.
Under
the terms of the Agreement, the Company agreed to increase Heying’s registered capital from RMB 50,000 (approximately $7,380)
to RMB 10 million (approximately $1.5 million) to satisfy its future operating cash flow needs, and Heying agreed to issue new
shares to Cornucopia so that it will hold 99.5% of the issued and outstanding shares of Heying. The increased registered capital
can be contributed before December 31, 2046. As Heying did not finish the change of registration process with State Administration
of Industry and Commerce (“SAIC”) and the local Tax Bureau in China after the Agreement was signed, Heying’s
original Board of Directors was not changed and the Company did not gain control over Heying at that time.
After
Heying changed the registration with SAIC and the local Tax Bureau in China, on April 3, 2017, the parties signed a supplement
agreement to the Agreement to confirm that Cornucopia is the 99.5% shareholder of Heying and enjoys all the rights and benefits
as the 99.5% shareholder, effective on April 3, 2017.
As
a result of the contractual arrangements, Cornucopia became the 99.5% beneficiary and actual owner of Heying. Accordingly, the
Company adopted the provisions of FIN 46R and consolidated the financial results of Heying from April 1, 2017.
The
Company used the purchase method to consolidate Heying with the current assets and liabilities recorded at fair value. The fair
value of the acquired net assets of Heying was RMB 15,260 (approximately $2,212).
The
following table summarizes the fair value of Heying’s assets and liabilities as of April 1, 2017 (based on the exchange
rate of April 1, 2017):
ASSETS
|
|
|
|
Cash
|
|
$
|
4,274
|
|
Accounts receivable, net
|
|
|
1,015
|
|
TOTAL ASSETS
|
|
$
|
5,289
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
3,077
|
|
TOTAL LIABILITIES
|
|
$
|
3,077
|
|
21.
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
On
January 4, 2018, the Company received a written notification from the NASDAQ Stock Market Listing Qualifications Staff indicating
that the Company has regained compliance with the minimum market value of publicly held shares (“MVPHS”) of $5,000,000
requirement for continued listing on the NASDAQ Global Market pursuant to NASDAQ Listing Rule 5450(b)(1)(C) (the “MVPHS
Requirement”) and that the matter is now closed.
The
minimum market value of publicly held shares of the Company’s common stock has been at $5,000,000 or greater for at least
10 consecutive business days. Accordingly, the Company has regained compliance with the MVPHS Requirement.
On
January 5, 2018, Hongke Xue, the Chief Executive Officer and Chairman of the Board of Directors (the “Board”) of the
Company, notified the Board his resignation from his position as the Chief Executive Officer of the Company and Chairman of the
Board of the Directors of the Company (the “Board”), effective on January 31, 2018. Hongke Xue will remain as a director
of the Board. Hongke Xue’s decision to resign was not a result of any disagreement with the Company, the Board or its management
on any matter relating to the Company’s operations, policies or practices.
On
January 5, 2018, the Board appointed Yongke Xue, a current board member of the Company, to serve as the Chief Executive Officer
of the Company and Chairman of the Board, effective on January 31, 2018, to fill the vacancy created by the resignation of Mr.
Hongke Xue.
On
January 19, 2018, the Company filed a definitive Schedule 14A (the “Proxy”) to solicit shareholders’ proxies
for a special meeting of the Company’s shareholders in connection with proposals to (i) spin-off the Company’s wholly-owned
subsidiaries, SkyPeople BVI and Digital Online, through a pro rata distribution of the ordinary shares of each of SkyPeople BVI
and Digital Online to holders of the Company’s common stock at the close of business on January 22, 2018, the record date
(the “Spin Offs”); (ii) to approve an amendment to the Company’s Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation,
which would increase the amount of authorized shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of the Company from 8,333,333
to 60,000,000; (iii) to adopt and approve the Future FinTech Group Inc. 2017 Omnibus Equity Plan; (iv) to approve the issuance
of an aggregate 7,111,599 shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to certain Creditor’s Rights Transfer Agreements
between a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company and sellers of such creditor’s rights; and (v) to approve the issuance
of an aggregate 11,362,159 shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to a Share Purchase Agreement between the Company
and a certain investor. On March 13, 2018, the Company held the Special Meeting of Shareholders and the above proposals were approved
by the shareholders of the Company. The Company anticipates completing the Spin Offs in the third quarter of 2018.
On
January 23, 2018, DigiPay FinTech Limited (“DigiPay”), a limited liability company incorporated in British Virgin
Islands and a wholly-owned subsidiary of the Company”, and Peng Youwang (“Peng”), a Chinese citizen, entered
into a DCON Digital Assets Transfer Agreement (the “Agreement”).
Under
the terms of the Agreement, Peng shall transfer to DigiPay a 60% ownership interest in certain digital assets of DCON, a blockchain
platform for cyptocurrency conversion, payment and other services (“DCON”), including but not limited to its business
plan and white papers, business models, software, codes, architectures, codes, software, applications, technologies, patents,
copyrights, trade secrets, customer lists, business points, trading platforms, digital rights, authentication systems, agreements
and contracts, intellectual property, token and the DCON communities established on Nova Realm City (the “Transfer Assets”)
for an aggregate purchase price of $9,600,000 (the “Purchase Price”). The Company will pay the Purchase Price by issuing
to Peng 1,200,000 shares of the Company’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share (the “Common Stock”), equaling
a per share sale price of $8.00 (the “Share Payment”). Half of the shares of Common Stock subject to the Share Payment
shall be issued within 30 days of the date of the Agreement, and the remaining Shares Payment shares shall be issued within 90
days of the date of the Agreement. The shares of Common Stock to be issued by the Company pursuant to the Share Payment under
the Agreement shall be sold and issued pursuant to the exemption from registration provided by Regulation S promulgated under
the Securities Act of 1933, as amended.
The
Agreement also contains customary representations and warranties regarding the Transfer Assets and the ownership thereof, and
covenants regarding the parties’ cooperation. DigiPay and Peng further agreed to establish a Japanese operating company
for the Transfer Assets, of which DigiPay will hold a 60% ownership interest and Peng’s designee will hold a 40% ownership
interest.
On
March 13, 2018, the Company held a Special Meeting of shareholders (the “Special Meeting”). A quorum was present
at the Special Meeting. At the Special Meeting, the Company’s shareholders approved the following proposal
(i) approved the spin-off of the Company’s wholly-owned subsidiaries, SkyPeople Foods Holdings Limited and Digital
Online Marketing Limited (formerly known as FullMart Holding Limited), through a pro rata distribution of such
entities’ ordinary shares to the holders of the Company’s common stock at the close of business on January 22,
2018, the record date; (ii) approved an amendment to the Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation of the
Company, which would increase the amount of authorized shares of common stock, par value $0.001 per share, of Future FinTech
from 8,333,333 to 60,000,000; (iii) approved and adopted the Future FinTech Group Inc. 2017 Omnibus Equity Plan; (iv)
approved the issuance of an aggregate 7,111,599 shares of the Company’s common stock pursuant to certain
Creditor’s Rights Transfer Agreements between a wholly owned subsidiary of the Company and sellers of such
creditor’s rights; (v) approved the issuance of an aggregate 11,362,159 shares of the Company’s common stock
pursuant to a Share Purchase Agreement between the Company and a certain investor; and (vi) approved a proposal to grant the
Company’s Chief Executive Officer discretionary authority to adjourn the Special Meeting for the purpose of
soliciting additional proxies to approve proposals (i) through (v).
On
March 14, 2018, the Company filed Articles of Amendment (the “Amendment”) with the Secretary of State for the State
of Florida to amend its Second Amended and Restated Articles of Incorporation to increase the amount of authorized shares of its
common stock, par value $0.001 per share, from 8,333,333 to 60,000,000. The Amendment was approved by the Company’s Board
of Directors (the “Board”) on August 27, 2017 and by shareholders holding a majority of the Company’s issued
and outstanding capital stock at a special meeting of the Company’s shareholders held on March 13, 2018. The Amendment does
not affect the rights of the Company’s shareholders and was effective immediately upon filing.
F-28
Future FinTech (NASDAQ:FTFT)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2024 to May 2024
Future FinTech (NASDAQ:FTFT)
Historical Stock Chart
From May 2023 to May 2024