By Bradley Olson and Rebecca Elliott
The rapid decline of U.S. oil prices will test the claim of
fracking companies that they can now prosper at $50 a barrel or
less, a price level they have found challenging in the past.
For years, the companies behind the U.S. oil and gas boom,
including Noble Energy Inc. and Whiting Petroleum Corp., have
promised shareholders that they have thousands of prospective wells
that they can drill profitably even at $40 a barrel. Some have even
said they can generate returns on investment of 30%.
But most shale drillers haven't made much, if any, money at
those prices. From 2012 to 2017, the 30 biggest shale producers
lost more than $50 billion. Last year, when oil prices averaged
about $50 a barrel, the group as a whole was barely in the black,
with profits of about $1.7 billion, or roughly 1.3% of revenue,
according to FactSet.
The disconnect between the figures cited by companies and their
corporate returns lies in the widespread use of a metric called a
break-even, often defined as the selling price frackers say they
need to generate a small profit on individual wells or projects.
While the figure can be quite low for some companies in certain hot
spots, it can be a misleading measure of their overall
profitability in periods of lower prices.
For one, break-evens generally exclude such key costs as land,
overhead and even at times transportation. Companies also
frequently tout the low break-even price point of a portion of
their holdings, without citing the higher price for crude needed to
profitably exploit the rest, or adjusting for the inflated cost for
drilling contractors and other services that come with rising oil
prices.
Estimates by consulting firm R.S. Energy Group peg break-evens
excluding land costs and overhead at about $37 for the Permian
Basin of West Texas and New Mexico, $42 for the Eagle Ford in South
Texas and $47 for the Bakken in North Dakota.
But companies require much higher oil prices in order to come
out ahead if more of those necessary expenses are taken into
account, the consulting firm's data show. All-inclusive break-evens
are about $51 in the Permian, $57 in the Eagle Ford and $64 in the
Bakken, according to R.S. Energy.
U.S. oil prices traded below $50 last week and closed Monday at
$52.95.
Chris Duncan, an energy analyst at Brandes Investment Partners
who helps manage $28 billion in diversified assets, said he usually
ignores companies' claims about the price at which their wells
break even.
"You always scratch your head as to how they can have these well
economics that can have double-digit returns on investment, but it
never flows through to the total company returns," he said.
Historically, the break-even number is rooted in an industry
benchmark used to help executives decide whether to drill a well.
Given that funds may already have been invested in land,
infrastructure or overhead, it helps companies evaluate what price
is needed for a new well to make economic sense.
After oil prices crashed earlier this decade, shale companies
often touted the figure to help explain why they continued drilling
even when prices had fallen so much. Generally, because of sunk
costs, drilling additional wells made sense. But many of the
companies curtailed drilling to their choicest acreage, which
caused the break-even figures to fall significantly in 2016, and
helped create the impression that shale companies could generate
overall profits even at lower prices.
"There was a retreat to sweet spots," said Robert Kleinberg, a
senior research scholar at Columbia University's Center on Global
Energy Policy. "They went to the best areas, with the best crews
and used the best equipment because they were under pressure to
keep the lights on."
Still, the perception that break-even prices reflect
profitability levels for shale drillers has lingered -- and now
many have to contend with higher logistics costs and other
challenges that have made it more expensive for them to operate in
the black as many companies ramp up production at once.
Companies certainly have gotten better at producing at lower
prices. In 2015, when crude averaged about $49 a barrel, the 30
biggest shale producers lost more than $80 billion.
Yet even as their overall operations have improved, many have
struggled to deliver consistent profits across the board.
Noble Energy Chief Executive David Stover said last year that at
$40 oil and $2 natural gas, the company would break even on more
than 70% of its domestic inventory, or thousands of well locations.
Still, the company wasn't profitable overall in 2017, losing more
than $1 billion, due in part to a loss on the sale of assets in the
Marcellus Shale drilling region in the Eastern U.S.
Noble, which has turned a $758 million profit with higher prices
this year, noted that it would have made money absent the one-time
charge related to its Marcellus sale.
Brad McMillan, chief investment officer for brokerage
Commonwealth Financial Network, said he treats companies'
break-even claims with a grain of salt.
"We look to history," Mr. McMillan said. "What did you do the
last time prices were at this level? I think that's the best
indicator."
Write to Bradley Olson at Bradley.Olson@wsj.com and Rebecca
Elliott at rebecca.elliott@wsj.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
December 04, 2018 05:44 ET (10:44 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2018 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Noble Energy (NYSE:NBL)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2024 to May 2024
Noble Energy (NYSE:NBL)
Historical Stock Chart
From May 2023 to May 2024