ITEM 1. CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
RAYTHEON COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Dec 31, 2018
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
2,173
|
|
|
$
|
3,608
|
|
Receivables, net
|
|
1,607
|
|
|
1,648
|
|
Contract assets
|
|
6,130
|
|
|
5,594
|
|
Inventories
|
|
932
|
|
|
758
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
684
|
|
|
529
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
11,526
|
|
|
12,137
|
|
Property, plant and equipment, net
|
|
2,982
|
|
|
2,840
|
|
Operating lease right-of-use assets
|
|
888
|
|
|
805
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
14,882
|
|
|
14,864
|
|
Other assets, net
|
|
1,908
|
|
|
2,024
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
32,186
|
|
|
$
|
32,670
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities, Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests and Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper and current portion of long-term debt
|
|
$
|
800
|
|
|
$
|
300
|
|
Contract liabilities
|
|
2,944
|
|
|
3,309
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
1,368
|
|
|
1,964
|
|
Accrued employee compensation
|
|
1,361
|
|
|
1,509
|
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
1,398
|
|
|
1,381
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
7,871
|
|
|
8,463
|
|
Accrued retiree benefits and other long-term liabilities
|
|
6,699
|
|
|
6,922
|
|
Long-term debt
|
|
4,257
|
|
|
4,755
|
|
Operating lease liabilities
|
|
720
|
|
|
647
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 13)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Redeemable noncontrolling interests
|
|
435
|
|
|
411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Raytheon Company stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, par value, $0.01 per share, 1,450 shares authorized, 278 and 282 shares outstanding at June 30, 2019 and December 31, 2018, respectively
|
|
3
|
|
|
3
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
(8,182
|
)
|
|
(8,618
|
)
|
Retained earnings
|
|
20,383
|
|
|
20,087
|
|
Total Raytheon Company stockholders’ equity
|
|
12,204
|
|
|
11,472
|
|
Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total equity
|
|
12,204
|
|
|
11,472
|
|
Total liabilities, redeemable noncontrolling interests and equity
|
|
$
|
32,186
|
|
|
$
|
32,670
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
RAYTHEON COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF OPERATIONS (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
(In millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
Net sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products
|
|
$
|
5,994
|
|
|
$
|
5,507
|
|
|
$
|
11,556
|
|
|
$
|
10,761
|
|
Services
|
|
1,165
|
|
|
1,118
|
|
|
2,332
|
|
|
2,131
|
|
Total net sales
|
|
7,159
|
|
|
6,625
|
|
|
13,888
|
|
|
12,892
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales—products
|
|
4,302
|
|
|
3,903
|
|
|
8,304
|
|
|
7,640
|
|
Cost of sales—services
|
|
903
|
|
|
874
|
|
|
1,778
|
|
|
1,669
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
778
|
|
|
748
|
|
|
1,517
|
|
|
1,442
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
5,983
|
|
|
5,525
|
|
|
11,599
|
|
|
10,751
|
|
Operating income
|
|
1,176
|
|
|
1,100
|
|
|
2,289
|
|
|
2,141
|
|
Non-operating (income) expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement benefits non-service expense
|
|
181
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
362
|
|
|
477
|
|
Interest expense
|
|
45
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
93
|
|
Interest income
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Other (income) expense, net
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
2
|
|
Total non-operating (income) expense, net
|
|
211
|
|
|
273
|
|
|
403
|
|
|
557
|
|
Income from continuing operations before taxes
|
|
965
|
|
|
827
|
|
|
1,886
|
|
|
1,584
|
|
Federal and foreign income taxes
|
|
152
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
170
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
813
|
|
|
790
|
|
|
1,588
|
|
|
1,414
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Net income
|
|
813
|
|
|
791
|
|
|
1,588
|
|
|
1,414
|
|
Less: Net income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
(19
|
)
|
Net income attributable to Raytheon Company
|
|
$
|
817
|
|
|
$
|
800
|
|
|
$
|
1,598
|
|
|
$
|
1,433
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic earnings per share attributable to Raytheon Company common stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
2.92
|
|
|
$
|
2.78
|
|
|
$
|
5.69
|
|
|
$
|
4.98
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Net income
|
|
2.92
|
|
|
2.78
|
|
|
5.69
|
|
|
4.98
|
|
Diluted earnings per share attributable to Raytheon Company common stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
2.92
|
|
|
$
|
2.78
|
|
|
$
|
5.69
|
|
|
$
|
4.98
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Net income
|
|
2.92
|
|
|
2.78
|
|
|
5.69
|
|
|
4.97
|
|
Amounts attributable to Raytheon Company common stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
817
|
|
|
$
|
799
|
|
|
$
|
1,598
|
|
|
$
|
1,433
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
817
|
|
|
$
|
800
|
|
|
$
|
1,598
|
|
|
$
|
1,433
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
RAYTHEON COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
(In millions)
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
Net income
|
$
|
813
|
|
|
$
|
791
|
|
|
$
|
1,588
|
|
|
$
|
1,414
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans, net:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
2
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
3
|
|
Amortization of net actuarial loss
|
274
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
550
|
|
|
693
|
|
Pension and other postretirement benefit plans, net
|
276
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
553
|
|
|
696
|
|
Foreign exchange translation
|
(6
|
)
|
|
(43
|
)
|
|
2
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
Cash flow hedges
|
8
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on investments and other, net
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), before tax
|
278
|
|
|
305
|
|
|
553
|
|
|
667
|
|
Income tax benefit (expense) related to items of other comprehensive income (loss)
|
(61
|
)
|
|
(73
|
)
|
|
(117
|
)
|
|
(144
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
|
217
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
436
|
|
|
523
|
|
Reclassification of stranded tax effects
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1,451
|
)
|
Total comprehensive income (loss)
|
1,030
|
|
|
1,023
|
|
|
2,024
|
|
|
486
|
|
Less: Comprehensive income (loss) attributable to noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries
|
(4
|
)
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
(19
|
)
|
Comprehensive income attributable to Raytheon Company
|
$
|
1,034
|
|
|
$
|
1,032
|
|
|
$
|
2,034
|
|
|
$
|
505
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
RAYTHEON COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
Total Raytheon Company stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries
(1)
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2019
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(8,399
|
)
|
|
$
|
20,104
|
|
|
$
|
11,708
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
11,708
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
817
|
|
|
817
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
817
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
Adjustment of redeemable noncontrolling interests to redemption value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
Dividends declared
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
(264
|
)
|
|
(264
|
)
|
|
|
|
(264
|
)
|
Common stock plans activity
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
33
|
|
Share repurchases
|
|
|
|
(33
|
)
|
|
|
|
(267
|
)
|
|
(300
|
)
|
|
|
|
(300
|
)
|
Balance at June 30, 2019
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(8,182
|
)
|
|
$
|
20,383
|
|
|
$
|
12,204
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
12,204
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2018
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(8,618
|
)
|
|
$
|
20,087
|
|
|
$
|
11,472
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
11,472
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,598
|
|
|
1,598
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,598
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
436
|
|
|
|
|
436
|
|
|
|
|
436
|
|
Adjustment of redeemable noncontrolling interests to redemption value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Dividends declared
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
(529
|
)
|
|
(528
|
)
|
|
|
|
(528
|
)
|
Common stock plans activity
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
94
|
|
Share repurchases
|
|
|
|
(95
|
)
|
|
|
|
(771
|
)
|
|
(866
|
)
|
|
|
|
(866
|
)
|
Balance at June 30, 2019
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(8,182
|
)
|
|
$
|
20,383
|
|
|
$
|
12,204
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
12,204
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Excludes redeemable noncontrolling interests which are not considered equity. See “Note 14: Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests” for additional information.
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
RAYTHEON COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF EQUITY (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Common stock
|
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive income (loss)
|
|
|
Retained earnings
|
|
|
Total Raytheon Company stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
Noncontrolling interests in subsidiaries
(1)
|
|
|
Total equity
|
|
Balance at April 1, 2018
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(9,095
|
)
|
|
$
|
19,329
|
|
|
$
|
10,237
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
10,237
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
800
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
|
|
|
232
|
|
Adjustment of redeemable noncontrolling interests to redemption value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
|
|
(30
|
)
|
Dividends declared
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
(248
|
)
|
|
(248
|
)
|
|
|
|
(248
|
)
|
Common stock plans activity
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
|
|
35
|
|
Share repurchases
|
|
|
|
(35
|
)
|
|
|
|
(384
|
)
|
|
(419
|
)
|
|
|
|
(419
|
)
|
Balance at July 1, 2018
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(8,863
|
)
|
|
$
|
19,467
|
|
|
$
|
10,607
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
10,607
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2017
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(7,935
|
)
|
|
$
|
17,895
|
|
|
$
|
9,963
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
9,963
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1,433
|
|
|
1,433
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,433
|
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
|
|
523
|
|
|
|
|
523
|
|
Reclassification of stranded tax effects
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1,451
|
)
|
|
1,451
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Adjustment of redeemable noncontrolling interests to redemption value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
Dividends declared
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
(500
|
)
|
|
(499
|
)
|
|
|
|
(499
|
)
|
Common stock plans activity
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
|
97
|
|
Share repurchases
|
|
|
|
(98
|
)
|
|
|
|
(793
|
)
|
|
(891
|
)
|
|
|
|
(891
|
)
|
Balance at July 1, 2018
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(8,863
|
)
|
|
$
|
19,467
|
|
|
$
|
10,607
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
10,607
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Excludes redeemable noncontrolling interests which are not considered equity. See “Note 14: Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests” for additional information.
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
RAYTHEON COMPANY
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH FLOWS (UNAUDITED)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
(In millions)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
Net income
|
|
$
|
1,588
|
|
|
$
|
1,414
|
|
(Income) loss from discontinued operations, net of tax
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Income from continuing operations
|
|
1,588
|
|
|
1,414
|
|
Adjustments to reconcile to net cash provided by (used in) operating activities from continuing operations, net of the effect of acquisitions and divestitures
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
291
|
|
|
274
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
91
|
|
|
101
|
|
Deferred income taxes
|
|
3
|
|
|
8
|
|
Changes in assets and liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables, net
|
|
53
|
|
|
7
|
|
Contract assets and contract liabilities
|
|
(865
|
)
|
|
(442
|
)
|
Inventories
|
|
(174
|
)
|
|
(133
|
)
|
Prepaid expenses and other current assets
|
|
(17
|
)
|
|
62
|
|
Income taxes receivable/payable
|
|
(203
|
)
|
|
168
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
(502
|
)
|
|
(73
|
)
|
Accrued employee compensation
|
|
(157
|
)
|
|
(98
|
)
|
Other current liabilities
|
|
17
|
|
|
(70
|
)
|
Accrued retiree benefits
|
|
365
|
|
|
239
|
|
Other, net
|
|
(78
|
)
|
|
(18
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities from continuing operations
|
|
412
|
|
|
1,439
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities from discontinued operations
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
412
|
|
|
1,440
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
Additions to property, plant and equipment
|
|
(438
|
)
|
|
(366
|
)
|
Additions to capitalized internal-use software
|
|
(25
|
)
|
|
(28
|
)
|
Maturities of short-term investments
|
|
—
|
|
|
309
|
|
Payments for purchases of acquired companies, net of cash received
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
Proceeds from sale of business, net of transaction costs
|
|
—
|
|
|
11
|
|
Other
|
|
2
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
(469
|
)
|
|
(77
|
)
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
Dividends paid
|
|
(510
|
)
|
|
(480
|
)
|
Net borrowings (payments) on commercial paper
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Repurchases of common stock under share repurchase programs
|
|
(800
|
)
|
|
(800
|
)
|
Repurchases of common stock to satisfy tax withholding obligations
|
|
(66
|
)
|
|
(91
|
)
|
Other
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
(5
|
)
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
(1,381
|
)
|
|
(1,376
|
)
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash
|
|
(1,438
|
)
|
|
(13
|
)
|
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at beginning of the year
|
|
3,624
|
|
|
3,115
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash at end of period
|
|
$
|
2,186
|
|
|
$
|
3,102
|
|
The accompanying notes are an integral part of the unaudited consolidated financial statements.
RAYTHEON COMPANY
NOTES TO CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS (UNAUDITED)
Note 1: Basis of Presentation
We prepared the accompanying unaudited consolidated financial statements of Raytheon Company and all wholly-owned, majority-owned or otherwise controlled subsidiaries on the same basis as our annual audited financial statements. We condensed or omitted certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in our annual audited financial statements, which we prepared in accordance with U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP). Our quarterly financial statements should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2018
. As used in this report, the terms “we,” “us,” “our,” “Raytheon” and the “Company” mean Raytheon Company and its subsidiaries, unless the context indicates another meaning.
In the opinion of management, our financial statements reflect all adjustments, which are of a normal recurring nature, necessary for presentation of financial statements for interim periods in accordance with U.S. GAAP and with the instructions to Form 10-Q in Article 10 of Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) Regulation S-X. The preparation of financial statements in conformity with U.S. GAAP requires management to make estimates and assumptions about future events that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities, the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of our financial statements and the reported amounts of revenue and expenses during the reporting periods. Actual results could differ from those estimates, and any such differences may be material to our financial statements.
Effective January 1, 2019, we adopted the requirements of Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-02,
Leases (Topic 842)
using the modified retrospective approach as discussed below in “Note 3: Accounting Standards.” We reclassified certain balance sheet amounts to conform to our current period presentation. All amounts disclosed in this Form 10-Q reflect these changes.
Note 2: Proposed Merger with United Technologies Corporation (UTC)
On June 9, 2019, Raytheon, United Technologies Corporation, a Delaware corporation (UTC), and Light Merger Sub Corp., a Delaware corporation and wholly-owned subsidiary of UTC (Merger Sub), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the Merger Agreement). The Merger Agreement provides for, among other things and subject to the satisfaction or waiver of specified conditions, the merger of Merger Sub with and into Raytheon (the Merger), with Raytheon surviving the Merger as a wholly-owned subsidiary of UTC.
At the effective time of the Merger (the Effective Time), each share of common stock of Raytheon issued and outstanding immediately prior to the Effective Time (except for shares held by Raytheon as treasury stock) will be converted into the right to receive
2.3348
shares of common stock of UTC (and, if applicable, cash in lieu of fractional shares), less any applicable withholding taxes. At the Effective Time, Raytheon’s stockholders will hold approximately
43%
,
and UTC’s stockholders will hold approximately
57%
,
of the outstanding shares of common stock of UTC.
The Merger Agreement also provides that, prior to the consummation of the Merger, UTC will complete the previously announced separation of its commercial businesses, Otis and Carrier, from its other businesses (the Separation), and the pro rata distributions to its stockholders of
100%
of the common stock of the entity holding the Otis business and
100%
of the common stock of the entity holding the Carrier business (the Distributions).
The parties’ obligations to consummate the Separation, the Distributions and the Merger are subject to customary conditions, including the approval of the Merger by Raytheon’s stockholders, the approval of the issuance of shares of UTC Common Stock in connection with the Merger by UTC’s stockholders, the expiration or termination of the applicable waiting period under the Hart-Scott-Rodino Antitrust Improvements Act of 1976, as amended (HSR Act), and the receipt of other required regulatory approvals. In addition, the parties’ obligations to consummate the Merger are subject to the prior completion of the Separation and the Distributions.
The Merger Agreement includes customary representations, warranties and covenants of Raytheon and UTC (generally excluding the Otis business and the Carrier business). Between the date of execution of the Merger Agreement and the Effective Time, each of Raytheon and UTC (generally with respect to its aerospace business) has agreed to use reasonable best efforts to conduct its businesses in all material respects in the ordinary course consistent with past practice and to comply with certain operating covenants. In addition, the Merger Agreement generally restricts certain actions by both Raytheon and UTC, including the incurrence or issuance of new debt in excess of
$1 billion
in the aggregate (unless used to refinance existing debt), acquisitions or divestitures in excess of
$500 million
in the aggregate, and repurchases or issuances of shares other than in accordance with our existing equity award programs. In addition, the Merger Agreement provides that, immediately prior to the consummation of
the Merger, the adjusted net indebtedness of UTC’s aerospace business will not exceed an amount as provided for under the Merger Agreement.
Subject to certain exceptions, each of Raytheon and UTC has agreed to use reasonable best efforts to cause the Merger to be completed. The Merger Agreement includes certain termination provisions for both UTC and Raytheon and provides that, in connection with a termination of the Merger Agreement under specified circumstances, Raytheon will be required to pay UTC a termination fee of
$1.785 billion
, or UTC will be required to pay Raytheon a termination fee of
$2.365 billion
.
The Merger is expected to close in the first half of 2020, subject to and following completion by UTC of the Separation and Distributions.
Note 3: Accounting Standards
In February 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ASU 2016-02,
Leases (Topic 842)
, which requires lessees to recognize a right-of-use asset and lease liability for most lease arrangements. Effective January 1, 2019, we adopted the requirements of the new lease standard using the modified retrospective approach, applying the new lease requirements at the beginning of the earliest period presented. In addition, we elected the package of practical expedients permitted under the transition guidance within the new standard, which, among other things, allows us to carry forward the historical lease classification. We did not elect the practical expedient to use hindsight in determining the lease term and in assessing impairment of right-of-use assets. The standard resulted in the recognition of operating lease right-of-use assets of
$805 million
and operating lease liabilities of
$841 million
, of which
$194 million
was classified as current and is included in other current liabilities in our consolidated balance sheet,
as of December 31, 2018, with immaterial changes to other balance sheet accounts. The standard had no impact on our results of operations or cash flows. In addition, new disclosures are provided to enable users to assess the amount, timing and uncertainty of cash flows arising from leases.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-13,
Fair Value Measurement: Disclosure Framework - Changes to the Disclosure Requirements for Fair Value Measurement (Topic 820)
, which eliminates the disclosure requirement of the amount of and reasons for transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy and modifies certain disclosure requirements related to Level 3 recurring and nonrecurring fair value measurements. The new standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. Effective January 1, 2019, we elected to early adopt the requirements of the new standard on a prospective basis. The standard did not have an impact on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
In August 2018, the FASB issued ASU 2018-15,
Intangibles - Goodwill and Other - Internal-Use Software (Subtopic 350-24): Customer’s Accounting for Implementation Costs Incurred in a Cloud Computing Arrangement that is a Service Contract
, which aligns the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred in a hosting arrangement that is a service contract with the requirements for capitalizing implementation costs incurred to develop or obtain internal-use software. The new standard is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15, 2019, with early adoption permitted. Effective January 1, 2019, we elected to early adopt the requirements of the new standard on a prospective basis. The standard did not have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
Other new pronouncements adopted and issued but not effective until after
June 30, 2019
did not and are not expected to have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
Note 4: Significant Accounting Policies Update
Our significant accounting policies are detailed in “Note 1: Summary of Significant Accounting Policies” within Item 8 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2018. Significant changes to our accounting policies as a result of adopting Topic 842 are discussed below:
Leases
—
We determine if an arrangement is a lease or contains an embedded lease at inception. For lease agreements with both lease and nonlease components (e.g., common-area maintenance costs), we account for the nonlease components separately. Consideration is allocated to the lease and nonlease components based on the estimated standalone prices.
All of our leases are operating leases. Operating lease right-of-use assets and operating lease liabilities are recognized based on the present value of the future lease payments over the lease term at the commencement date. The current portion of operating lease liabilities is included in other current liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets. For the majority of our leases, the discount rate used to determine the present value of the lease payments is our incremental borrowing rate as of the lease commencement date, as the implicit rate is not readily determinable. The operating lease right-of-use assets also includes any initial direct costs and any lease payments made at or before the commencement date, and is reduced for any unrestricted incentives received at or before the commencement date.
Some of our leases include options to extend or terminate the lease. We include these options in the recognition of our right-of-use assets and lease liabilities when it is reasonably certain that we will exercise the option. Very few of our leases include variable lease-related payments, such as escalation clauses based on consumer price index (CPI) rates, or residual guarantees. Variable payments that are based on an index or a rate are included in the recognition of our right-of-use assets and lease liabilities using the index or rate at lease commencement; however, changes to these lease payments due to rate or index updates are recorded as lease expense in the period incurred. Amounts probable of payment under residual guarantees are also included in the recognition of our right-of-use assets and lease liabilities.
Note 5: Changes in Estimates under Percentage of Completion Contract Accounting
We have a companywide standard and disciplined quarterly Estimate at Completion (EAC) process in which management reviews the progress and execution of our performance obligations. As part of this process, management reviews information including, but not limited to, any outstanding key contract matters, progress towards completion and the related program schedule, identified risks and opportunities and the related changes in estimates of revenues and costs. The risks and opportunities include management’s judgment about the ability and cost to achieve the schedule (e.g., the number and type of milestone events), technical requirements (e.g., a newly-developed product versus a mature product) and other contract requirements. Management must make assumptions and estimates regarding labor productivity and availability, the complexity of the work to be performed, the availability of materials, the length of time to complete the performance obligation (e.g., to estimate increases in wages and prices for materials and related support cost allocations), execution by our subcontractors, the availability and timing of funding from our customer, and overhead cost rates, among other variables. These estimates also include the estimated cost of satisfying our industrial cooperation agreements, sometimes in the form of either offset obligations or in-country industrial participation (ICIP) agreements, required under certain contracts. These obligations may or may not be distinct depending on their nature.
Based on this analysis, any quarterly adjustments to net sales, cost of sales and the related impact to operating income are recognized as necessary in the period they become known. These adjustments may result from positive program performance, and may result in an increase in operating income during the performance of individual performance obligations, if we determine we will be successful in mitigating risks surrounding the technical, schedule and cost aspects of those performance obligations or realizing related opportunities. Likewise, these adjustments may result in a decrease in operating income if we determine we will not be successful in mitigating these risks or realizing related opportunities. Changes in estimates of net sales, cost of sales and the related impact to operating income are recognized quarterly on a cumulative catch-up basis, which recognizes in the current period the cumulative effect of the changes on current and prior periods based on a performance obligation’s percentage of completion.
A significant change in one or more of these estimates could affect the profitability of one or more of our performance obligations. When estimates of total costs to be incurred exceed total estimates of revenue to be earned on a performance obligation related to complex aerospace or defense equipment or related services, or product maintenance or separately priced extended warranty, a provision for the entire loss on the performance obligation is recognized in the period the loss is identified.
Net EAC adjustments had the following impact on our operating results:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
(In millions, except per share amounts)
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
Operating income
|
$
|
123
|
|
|
$
|
129
|
|
|
$
|
246
|
|
|
$
|
244
|
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to Raytheon Company
|
97
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
194
|
|
|
193
|
|
Diluted earnings per share (EPS) from continuing operations attributable to Raytheon Company
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
$
|
0.35
|
|
|
$
|
0.69
|
|
|
$
|
0.67
|
|
In addition, net revenue recognized from our performance obligations satisfied in previous periods was
$171 million
and
$162 million
in the
second quarters of 2019 and 2018
, respectively, and
$329 million
and
$300 million
in the
first six months of 2019 and 2018
, respectively.
This primarily relates to EAC adjustments that impacted revenue.
Note 6: Earnings Per Share (EPS)
We compute basic and diluted EPS using actual income from continuing operations attributable to Raytheon Company common stockholders, income (loss) from discontinued operations attributable to Raytheon Company common stockholders and net income attributable to Raytheon Company, and our actual weighted-average shares outstanding rather than the numbers presented within our
unaudited
consolidated financial statements, which are rounded to the nearest million. As a result, it may not be possible to recalculate EPS as presented in our
unaudited
consolidated financial statements. Furthermore, it may not be possible to recalculate EPS attributable to Raytheon Company common stockholders by adjusting EPS from continuing operations by EPS from discontinued operations.
We include all unvested stock awards that contain non-forfeitable rights to dividends or dividend equivalents, whether paid or unpaid, in the number of shares outstanding in our basic EPS calculation as they are considered participating securities. As a result, we have included all of our outstanding unvested awards of restricted stock, as well as restricted stock units (RSUs) and Long-term Performance Plan (LTPP) awards that meet the retirement eligible criteria in our calculation of basic EPS. We disclose EPS for common stock and unvested stock-based payment awards, and separately disclose distributed and undistributed earnings. Distributed earnings represent common stock dividends and dividends earned on unvested awards of restricted stock and stock-based payment awards of retirement eligible employees. Undistributed earnings represent earnings that were available for distribution but were not distributed. Common stock and unvested stock-based payment awards earn dividends equally.
As described in “Note 14: Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests,” we record redeemable noncontrolling interest related to Vista Equity Partners’ interest in Forcepoint.
We reflect the redemption value adjustments related to this redeemable noncontrolling interest in both the basic and diluted EPS calculation for the portion of redemption value that is in excess of the fair value of noncontrolling interest.
There was
no
impact to basic or diluted EPS in the
second
quarter or
first six months of 2019
or
2018
related to the redemption value adjustments.
EPS from continuing operations attributable to Raytheon Company common stockholders and unvested stock-based payment awards was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
Basic EPS attributable to Raytheon Company common stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributed earnings
|
|
$
|
0.94
|
|
|
$
|
0.86
|
|
|
$
|
1.88
|
|
|
$
|
1.73
|
|
Undistributed earnings
|
|
1.98
|
|
|
1.92
|
|
|
3.81
|
|
|
3.25
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2.92
|
|
|
$
|
2.78
|
|
|
$
|
5.69
|
|
|
$
|
4.98
|
|
Diluted EPS attributable to Raytheon Company common stockholders:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Distributed earnings
|
|
$
|
0.94
|
|
|
$
|
0.86
|
|
|
$
|
1.88
|
|
|
$
|
1.73
|
|
Undistributed earnings
|
|
1.98
|
|
|
1.92
|
|
|
3.81
|
|
|
3.25
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
2.92
|
|
|
$
|
2.78
|
|
|
$
|
5.69
|
|
|
$
|
4.98
|
|
Income attributable to participating securities was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
(In millions)
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to participating securities
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
Income (loss) from discontinued operations, net of tax attributable to participating securities
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Net income attributable to participating securities
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
8
|
|
|
$
|
16
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
The weighted-average shares outstanding for basic and diluted EPS were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
(In millions)
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
Shares for basic EPS
(1)
|
279.7
|
|
|
287.3
|
|
|
280.8
|
|
|
287.9
|
|
Effect of dilutive securities
|
0.2
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
|
0.2
|
|
|
0.3
|
|
Shares for diluted EPS
|
279.9
|
|
|
287.6
|
|
|
281.0
|
|
|
288.2
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Includes
2.7 million
and
2.9 million
participating securities in the
second quarters of 2019 and 2018
, respectively, and
2.7 million
and
3.0 million
participating securities in the
first six months of 2019 and 2018
, respectively.
|
Note 7: Inventories
Inventories consisted of the following
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Dec 31, 2018
|
Materials and purchased parts
|
|
$
|
76
|
|
|
$
|
75
|
|
Work in process
|
|
834
|
|
|
662
|
|
Finished goods
|
|
22
|
|
|
21
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
932
|
|
|
$
|
758
|
|
Precontract costs are costs incurred to fulfill a contract prior to contract award. Precontract costs, including general and administrative expenses that are specifically chargeable to the customer, are deferred in inventories if we determine that the costs are probable of recovery under a specific anticipated contract. All other precontract costs, including start-up costs, are expensed as incurred. Costs that are deferred are recognized as contract costs upon the receipt of the anticipated contract. We included deferred precontract costs
of
$298 million
and
$163 million
in inventories as work in process at
June 30, 2019
and
December 31, 2018
, respectively.
Note 8: Contract Assets and Contract Liabilities
Our contract assets consist of unbilled amounts typically resulting from sales under long-term contracts when the cost-to-cost method of revenue recognition is utilized and revenue recognized exceeds the amount billed to the customer. Our contract liabilities consist of advance payments and billings in excess of costs incurred and deferred revenue. The noncurrent portion of deferred revenue is included in accrued retiree benefits and other long-term liabilities in our consolidated balance sheets.
Net contract assets (liabilities) consisted of the following
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Dec 31, 2018
|
|
$ Change
|
|
% Change
|
Contract assets
|
|
$
|
6,130
|
|
|
$
|
5,594
|
|
|
$
|
536
|
|
|
10
|
%
|
Contract liabilities—current
|
|
(2,944
|
)
|
|
(3,309
|
)
|
|
365
|
|
|
11
|
%
|
Contract liabilities—noncurrent
|
|
(139
|
)
|
|
(150
|
)
|
|
11
|
|
|
7
|
%
|
Net contract assets (liabilities)
|
|
$
|
3,047
|
|
|
$
|
2,135
|
|
|
$
|
912
|
|
|
43
|
%
|
The
$912 million
increase
in our net contract assets (liabilities) from
December 31, 2018
to
June 30, 2019
was primarily due to a
$536 million
increase
in our contract assets, principally due to contractual billing terms on U.S. government and foreign military sales contracts and the timing of approvals on direct commercial sales contracts for precision guided munitions to certain Middle Eastern customers.
On May 24, 2019, the Administration announced an emergency certification authorizing the immediate export of 22 pending arms sales to Jordan, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and
the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA)
, waiving the requirement of Congressional Notification of these arms sales.
As a result, we were able to obtain the necessary regulatory approvals and licenses for contracts, which had approximately
$1.2 billion
of total contract value, and for which we have recognized approximately
$950 million
of sales for work performed to date and received approximately
$350 million
in advances as of
June 30, 2019
. On a contract-by-contract basis, and excluding advances billed but not received, we had
$600 million
of net contract assets related to these contracts.
For those contracts for which we have not yet obtained the regulatory approval and licenses and that are not subject to the emergency certification, we had approximately
$1.1 billion
of total contract value, recognized approximately
$300 million
of sales for work performed to date and received approximately
$500 million
in advances as of
June 30, 2019
. On a contract-by-contract basis, and excluding advances billed but not received, we had
$100 million
and
$300 million
of net contract assets and net contract liabilities, respectively, related to the contracts pending approval.
In the
second quarter and first six months of 2019
, we recognized revenue of
$496 million
and
$1,390 million
, respectively,
related to our contract liabilities at
January 1,
2019
. In the
second quarter and first six months of 2018
, we recognized revenue of
$311 million
and
$963 million
, respectively,
related to our contract liabilities at
January 1,
2018
.
Impairment losses recognized on our receivables and contract assets were de minimis
in the
second
quarters and
first six months of 2019 and 2018
.
Note 9: Deferred Commissions
Our incremental direct costs of obtaining a contract, which consist of sales commissions primarily for our security software sales at Forcepoint, are deferred and amortized over the period of contract performance or a longer period, generally the estimated life of the customer relationship, if renewals are expected and the renewal commission is not commensurate with the initial commission. We classify deferred commissions as current or noncurrent based on the timing of when we expect to recognize the expense. The current and noncurrent portions of deferred commissions are included in prepaid expenses and other current assets, and other assets, net, respectively, in our consolidated balance sheets.
At
June 30, 2019
and
December 31, 2018
,
we had deferred commissions of
$50 million
and
$55 million
, respectively.
Amortization expense related to deferred commissions was
$9 million
and
$7 million
in the
second quarters of 2019 and 2018
, respectively, and
$13 million
and
$15 million
in the
first six months of 2019 and 2018
, respectively.
Note 10: Acquisitions, Divestitures and Goodwill
In pursuing our business strategies, we acquire and make investments in certain businesses that meet strategic and financial criteria
, and divest of certain non-core businesses, investments and assets when appropriate.
We did
no
t have any divestitures in the
first six months of 2019
.
In 2013, we formed the Range Generation Next LLC (RGNext) joint venture with General Dynamics Information Technology (GDIT) through our Intelligence, Information and Services (IIS) segment, in which we held a
50%
equity ownership that was accounted for using the equity method. On February 8, 2019, we amended and restated the RGNext joint venture agreement and acquired an additional
10%
equity ownership in the joint venture, increasing our equity ownership to
60%
and giving us control of the operations of RGNext. Effective as of February 8, 2019, we consolidate the results of RGNext in our consolidated financial statements and report its results in our IIS segment. We also remeasured our equity method investment in RGNext to fair value, which resulted in a non-cash gain of
$21 million
that was recorded in operating income through a reduction to cost of sales at our IIS segment; recognized redeemable noncontrolling interest for GDIT’s interest in RGNext at a fair value of
$32 million
; and recognized
$90 million
of net assets, including cash acquired, at fair value. As part of our purchase price allocation, we recorded
$19 million
of goodwill, primarily related to the value of the existing workforce, and
$34 million
of intangible assets, primarily related to customer relationships with a weighted-average life of
7 years
.
Pro forma financial information and revenue from the date of acquisition has not been provided as it is not material.
A rollforward of goodwill by segment was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Integrated Defense Systems
|
|
|
Intelligence, Information and Services
|
|
|
Missile Systems
|
|
|
Space and Airborne Systems
|
|
|
Forcepoint
(1)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2018
|
|
$
|
1,704
|
|
|
$
|
2,965
|
|
|
$
|
4,154
|
|
|
$
|
4,103
|
|
|
$
|
1,938
|
|
|
$
|
14,864
|
|
Acquisitions
|
|
—
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
19
|
|
Effect of foreign exchange rates and other
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Balance at June 30, 2019
|
|
$
|
1,703
|
|
|
$
|
2,984
|
|
|
$
|
4,154
|
|
|
$
|
4,103
|
|
|
$
|
1,938
|
|
|
$
|
14,882
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
At
June 30, 2019
, Forcepoint’s fair value was estimated to exceed its net book value by approximately
$900 million
. As discussed in “Note 14: Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests,” we are required to determine Forcepoint’s fair value on a quarterly basis due to the accounting related to the redeemable noncontrolling interest.
|
Note 11: Derivatives and Other Financial Instruments
Derivatives
—Our primary market exposures are to foreign exchange rates and interest rates, and we use certain derivative financial instruments to help manage these exposures.
We execute these instruments with financial institutions that we judge to be credit-worthy. The majority of our foreign currency forward contracts are denominated in currencies of major industrial countries. We do not hold or issue derivative financial instruments for trading or speculative purposes.
We use foreign currency forward contracts to fix the functional currency value of specific commitments, payments and receipts denominated in foreign currencies. The
aggregate notional amount of our outstanding foreign currency forward contracts was
$1,737 million
and
$1,772 million
at
June 30, 2019
and
December 31, 2018
, respectively.
The net notional exposure of these contracts was
$757 million
and
$840 million
at
June 30, 2019
and
December 31, 2018
, respectively.
We may also enter into and designate treasury rate lock contracts as cash flow hedges to reduce variability in cash flows due to changes in interest payments attributable to increases or decreases in the benchmark interest rate during the period leading up to the probable issuance of long-term debt. Cash flows associated with these instruments are presented in the same category as the cash flows from the hedged item. In May 2019, we entered into treasury rate lock contracts with a notional amount of
$375 million
,
which will mature in the fourth quarter of 2019, in anticipation of the probable issuance of debt. These treasury rate lock contracts were designated as cash flow hedges and are included in the assessment of effectiveness. There were
no
treasury rate lock contracts outstanding at
December 31, 2018
.
The fair value of asset derivatives included in
other assets, net
and liability derivatives included in
other current liabilities
in our consolidated balance sheets related to foreign currency forward contracts and treasury rate lock contracts were
as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Dec 31, 2018
|
Asset derivatives related to foreign currency forward contracts
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
|
$
|
26
|
|
Liability derivatives related to foreign currency forward contracts
|
|
30
|
|
|
34
|
|
Liability derivatives related to treasury rate lock contracts
|
|
7
|
|
|
—
|
|
The fair value of these derivatives is Level 2 in the fair value hierarchy
because they are determined based on a market approach utilizing externally quoted foreign currency forward rates and treasury rates for similar contracts.
Our foreign currency forward contracts and treasury rate lock contracts contain offset or netting provisions to mitigate credit risk in the event of counterparty default, including payment default and cross default. We measure and record the impact of counterparty credit risk into our valuation and at
June 30, 2019
and
December 31, 2018
,
the fair value of our counterparty default exposure was
less than
$1 million
and was spread across numerous highly rated counterparties.
Other Financial Instruments
—
We hold financial instruments, including cash and cash equivalents, commercial paper and long-term debt. The carrying amounts for cash and cash equivalents and commercial paper approximated their fair values. The carrying value of long-term debt was recorded at amortized cost. The estimated fair value of long-term debt was determined based on quoted prices in inactive markets, which falls within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
The carrying value and estimated fair value of long-term debt were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Dec 31, 2018
|
Carrying value of long-term debt
(1)
|
|
$
|
4,757
|
|
|
$
|
4,755
|
|
Fair value of long-term debt
(2)
|
|
5,256
|
|
|
5,063
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Carrying value of long-term debt at
June 30, 2019
includes current portion of long-term debt carrying value of
$500 million
.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Fair value of long-term debt at
June 30, 2019
includes current portion of long-term debt fair value of
$507 million
.
|
At
June 30, 2019
,
short-term commercial paper borrowings outstanding were
$300 million
,
which had a weighted-average interest rate and original maturity period of
2.502%
and
12 days
, respectively. At
December 31, 2018
,
short-term commercial paper borrowings outstanding
were
$300 million
,
which had a weighted-average interest rate and original maturity period of
2.954%
and
16 days
, respectively.
The commercial paper notes outstanding have original maturities of not more than
90 days
from the date of issuance.
Supplemental Cash Flow Information—
Cash and cash equivalents reported within our consolidated balance sheets excludes restricted cash of
$13 million
and
$16 million
at
June 30, 2019
and
December 31, 2018
, respectively, which for purposes of our consolidated statements of cash flows, is included in cash, cash equivalents and restricted cash.
Note 12: Leases
We enter into operating leases primarily for: real estate, including for manufacturing, engineering, research, administration, sales and warehousing facilities; information technology (IT) equipment; and other equipment. At
June 30, 2019
and
December 31, 2018
, we did
no
t have any finance leases. Approximately
90%
of our future lease commitments, and related lease liability, relate to our real estate leases. Some of our leases also include options to extend the lease or terminate the lease. A small portion of our leases include variable escalation clauses, which are typically based on CPI rates, or other variable lease-related payments.
The components of lease expense were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
(In millions)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
Operating lease cost
|
|
$
|
60
|
|
|
$
|
58
|
|
|
$
|
113
|
|
|
$
|
116
|
|
Variable lease cost
(1)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Sublease income
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
(2
|
)
|
Total lease cost
|
|
$
|
59
|
|
|
$
|
56
|
|
|
$
|
112
|
|
|
$
|
114
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Variable lease cost was expense of less than
$1 million
in the
second
quarters and
first six months of 2019 and 2018
.
|
Gains and losses on sale and leaseback transactions were de minimis in the
second
quarters and
first six months of 2019 and 2018
.
At
June 30, 2019
, our future lease payments under non-cancellable leases were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
2019 (excluding the six months ended June 30, 2019)
|
$
|
118
|
|
2020
|
212
|
|
2021
|
190
|
|
2022
|
145
|
|
2023
|
103
|
|
Thereafter
|
286
|
|
Total future lease payments
(1)
|
1,054
|
|
Imputed interest
|
(127
|
)
|
Total lease liabilities
|
$
|
927
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Total future lease payments excluded
$20 million
of future lease payments related to leases that were signed but had not yet commenced as of
June 30, 2019
.
|
Our lease liabilities recognized in our consolidated balance sheet at
June 30, 2019
were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
Operating lease liabilities—current
|
|
$
|
207
|
|
Operating lease liabilities—noncurrent
|
|
720
|
|
Total lease liabilities
|
|
$
|
927
|
|
The weighted-average remaining lease term related to our operating leases was
8 years
and
7 years
as of
June 30, 2019
and
December 31, 2018
, respectively. The weighted-average discount rate related to our operating leases was
3.1%
as of
June 30, 2019
and
December 31, 2018
.
Other information related to leases was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
(In millions)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement of operating lease liabilities
|
|
$
|
122
|
|
|
$
|
124
|
|
Right-of-use assets obtained in exchange for new operating lease obligations
|
|
173
|
|
|
106
|
|
There were no material restrictions or covenants imposed by our leases at
June 30, 2019
or
December 31, 2018
. In addition, we do not have any related party leases and our sublease transactions are de minimis.
Note 13: Commitments and Contingencies
Environmental Matters
—
We are involved in various stages of investigation and cleanup related to remediation of various environmental sites. Our estimate of the liability of total environmental remediation costs includes the use of a discount rate and takes into account that a portion of these costs is eligible for future recovery through the pricing of our products and services to the U.S. government. We regularly assess the probability of recovery of these costs, which requires us to make assumptions about the extent of cost recovery under our contracts and the amount of future contract activity. We consider such recovery probable based on government contracting regulations and our long history of receiving reimbursement for such costs, and accordingly have recorded the estimated future recovery of these costs from the U.S. government within prepaid expenses and other current assets in our consolidated balance sheets.
Our estimates regarding remediation costs to be incurred were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Dec 31, 2018
|
Total remediation costs—undiscounted
|
|
$
|
193
|
|
|
$
|
193
|
|
Weighted-average discount rate
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
Total remediation costs—discounted
|
|
$
|
131
|
|
|
$
|
128
|
|
Recoverable portion
|
|
86
|
|
|
82
|
|
We also lease certain government-owned properties and generally are not liable for remediation of preexisting environmental contamination at these sites. As a result, we generally do not provide for these costs in our consolidated financial statements.
Due to the complexity of environmental laws and regulations, the varying costs and effectiveness of alternative cleanup methods and technologies, the uncertainty of insurance coverage, and the unresolved extent of our responsibility, it is difficult to determine the ultimate outcome of environmental matters. However, we do not expect any additional liability to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
Financing Arrangements
and Other—
We issue guarantees, and banks and surety companies issue, on our behalf, letters of credit and surety bonds, to meet various bid, performance, warranty, retention and advance payment obligations for us or our affiliates. These instruments expire on various dates through 2028. Additional guarantees of project performance for which there is no stated value also remain outstanding.
The stated values outstanding consisted of the following
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Dec 31, 2018
|
Guarantees
|
|
$
|
222
|
|
|
$
|
201
|
|
Letters of credit
|
|
2,260
|
|
|
2,503
|
|
Surety bonds
|
|
74
|
|
|
166
|
|
All guarantees at
June 30, 2019
and
December 31, 2018
related to our joint venture in Thales-Raytheon Systems Air and Missile Defense Command and Control S.A.S. (TRS AMDC2).
We provide these guarantees, as well as letters of credit, to TRS AMDC2 and other affiliates to assist these entities in obtaining financing on more favorable terms, making bids on contracts and performing their contractual obligations. While we expect these entities to satisfy their loans and meet their project performance and other contractual obligations, their failure to do so may result in a future obligation to us. We periodically evaluate the risk of these entities failing to meet their obligations described above.
At
June 30, 2019
,
we believe the risk that these entities will not be able to meet their obligations is minimal for the foreseeable future based on their current financial condition. All obligations were current at
June 30, 2019
. We had an estimated liability of
$2 million
and
$3 million
at
June 30, 2019
and
December 31, 2018
, respectively, related to these guarantees.
As discussed in “Note 14: Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests,” under the joint venture agreement between Raytheon Company and Vista Equity Partners, Raytheon may be required to purchase Vista Equity Partners’ interest in Forcepoint.
We have entered into industrial cooperation agreements, sometimes in the form of either offset agreements or in-country industrial participation (ICIP) agreements, as a condition to obtaining orders for our products and services from certain customers in foreign countries.
At
June 30, 2019
,
the aggregate amount of our offset agreements, both agreed to and anticipated to be agreed to, had an outstanding notional value of approximately
$9.6 billion
.
These agreements are designed to return economic value to the foreign country by requiring us to engage in activities supporting local defense or commercial industries, promoting a balance of trade, developing in-country technology capabilities or addressing other local development priorities. Offset agreements may be satisfied through activities that do not require a direct cash payment, including transferring technology, providing manufacturing, training and other consulting support to in-country projects, and the purchase by third parties (e.g., our vendors) of supplies from in-country vendors. These agreements may also be satisfied through our use of cash for activities such as subcontracting with local partners, purchasing supplies from in-country vendors, providing financial support for in-country projects and making investments in local
ventures. Such activities may also vary by country depending upon requirements as dictated by their governments. We typically do not commit to offset agreements until orders for our products or services are definitive. The amounts ultimately applied against our offset agreements are based on negotiations with the customers and typically require cash outlays that represent only a fraction of the notional value in the offset agreements. Offset programs usually extend over several or more years and may provide for penalties in the event we fail to perform in accordance with offset requirements. Historically, we have not been required to pay any penalties of significance.
As a U.S. government contractor, we are subject to many levels of audit and investigation by the U.S. government relating to our contract performance and compliance with applicable rules and regulations. Agencies that oversee contract performance include: the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA); the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA); the Inspectors General of the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) and other departments and agencies; the Government Accountability Office (GAO); the Department of Justice (DOJ); and Congressional Committees. Other areas of our business operations may also be subject to audit and investigation by these and/or other agencies. From time to time, agencies investigate or conduct audits to determine whether our operations are being conducted in accordance with applicable requirements. Such investigations and audits may be initiated due to a number of reasons, including as a result of a whistleblower complaint. Such investigations and audits could result in administrative, civil or criminal liabilities, including repayments, fines or penalties being imposed upon us, the suspension of government export licenses or the suspension or debarment from future U.S. government contracting. U.S. government investigations often take years to complete and many result in no adverse action against us. Our final allowable incurred costs for each year are also subject to audit and have, from time to time, resulted in disputes between us and the U.S. government, with litigation resulting at the Court of Federal Claims (COFC) or the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA) or their related courts of appeals. In addition, the DOJ has, from time to time, convened grand juries to investigate possible irregularities by us. We also provide products and services to customers outside of the U.S., and those sales are subject to local government laws, regulations and procurement policies and practices. Our compliance with such local government regulations or any applicable U.S. government regulations (e.g., the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR)) may also be investigated or audited.
Other than as specifically disclosed herein, we do not expect these audits, investigations or disputes to have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity, either individually or in the aggregate.
In addition, various other claims and legal proceedings generally incidental to the normal course of business are pending or threatened against, or initiated by, us. We do not expect any of these proceedings to result in any additional liability or gains that would materially affect our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
In connection with certain of our legal matters, we may be entitled to insurance recovery for qualified legal costs or other incurred costs. We do not expect any insurance recovery to have a material impact on the financial exposure that could result from these matters.
Note 14: Redeemable Noncontrolling Interests
Forcepoint is a cybersecurity joint venture company with Vista Equity Partners.
The joint venture agreement between Raytheon and Vista Equity Partners provides Vista Equity Partners with certain rights to require Forcepoint to pursue an initial public offering at any time after four years and three months following the closing date of May 29, 2015, or pursue a sale of the company at any time after five years following the closing date. In either of these events, Raytheon has the option to purchase all, but not less than all, of Vista Equity Partners’ interest in Forcepoint for cash at a price equal to fair value as determined under the joint venture agreement. Additionally, Vista Equity Partners has the ability to liquidate its ownership through a put option. The put option allows Vista Equity Partners to require Raytheon to purchase all, but not less than all, of Vista Equity Partners’ interest in Forcepoint for cash at a price equal to fair value as determined under the joint venture agreement. Lastly, Raytheon has the option to purchase all, but not less than all, of Vista Equity Partners’ interest in Forcepoint at a price equal to fair value as determined under the joint venture agreement. The joint venture agreement provides for the process under which the parties would determine the fair value of the interest and could result in a payment by Raytheon shortly after the exercise of Vista Equity Partners’ put option or Raytheon’s purchase option; however, the ultimate timing will depend on the actions of the parties and other factors.
The estimate of fair value for purposes of presenting the redeemable noncontrolling interest in our consolidated balance sheets could differ from the parties’ determination of fair value for the interest under the joint venture agreement.
Vista Equity Partners’ adjusted equity interest in the Forcepoint joint venture was
19.5%
at
June 30, 2019
.
Vista Equity Partners’ interest in Forcepoint is presented as redeemable noncontrolling interest, outside of stockholders’ equity, in our consolidated balance sheets.
The redeemable noncontrolling interest is recognized at the greater of the estimated redemption value as of the balance sheet date, which was
$401 million
at
June 30, 2019
,
or the carrying value, defined as the initial value adjusted for Vista Equity Partners’ share of the cumulative impact of net income (loss), other changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) and additional contributions, which was
$269 million
at
June 30, 2019
.
Adjustments to the redemption value over the period from the date of acquisition to the redemption date are immediately recorded to retained earnings.
As discussed in “Note 10: Acquisitions, Divestitures and Goodwill,” in February 2019, we amended and restated the RGNext joint venture agreement and acquired an additional
10%
equity ownership in the joint venture, increasing our equity ownership to
60%
and giving us control of the operations, with GDIT obtaining only protective rights. As a result, we now consolidate the results of RGNext in our consolidated financial statements. The amendment to the RGNext joint venture agreement provides GDIT with
the ability to liquidate its ownership
and receive an amount equal to its contributed capital (the redemption value). As such, GDIT’s interest in RGNext is presented as redeemable noncontrolling interest, outside of stockholders’ equity, in our consolidated balance sheets, and is recorded at the greater of its carrying value or the redemption value.
A rollforward of redeemable noncontrolling interests was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Forcepoint
|
|
|
RGNext
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Balance at March 31, 2019
|
|
$
|
399
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
$
|
432
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
1
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
(1)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Adjustment of noncontrolling interests to redemption value
|
|
7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
7
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2019
|
|
$
|
401
|
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2018
|
|
$
|
411
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
411
|
|
RGNext initial recognition
|
|
—
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
32
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
2
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
(1)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Adjustment of noncontrolling interests to redemption value
|
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2019
|
|
$
|
401
|
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
$
|
435
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at April 1, 2018
|
|
$
|
492
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
492
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
Adjustment of noncontrolling interests to redemption value
|
|
30
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
30
|
|
Balance at July 1, 2018
|
|
$
|
512
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2017
|
|
$
|
512
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
512
|
|
Net income (loss)
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax
(1)
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Adjustment of noncontrolling interests to redemption value
|
|
19
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
19
|
|
Balance at July 1, 2018
|
|
$
|
512
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
512
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Other comprehensive income (loss), net of tax, related to Forcepoint was a loss of less than
$1 million
and income of less than
$1 million
for the
second quarter and first six months of 2019
, respectively, and a loss of less than
$1 million
for the
first six months of 2018
.
|
Note 15: Stockholders’ Equity
The changes in shares of our common stock outstanding were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
(In millions)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
Beginning balance
|
|
280.1
|
|
|
287.2
|
|
|
282.1
|
|
|
288.4
|
|
Stock plans activity
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
Share repurchases
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
(4.8
|
)
|
|
(4.2
|
)
|
Ending balance
|
|
278.4
|
|
|
285.2
|
|
|
278.4
|
|
|
285.2
|
|
From time to time, our Board of Directors authorizes the repurchase of shares of our common stock.
In November 2015, our Board authorized the repurchase of up to
$2.0 billion
of our outstanding common stock.
In November 2017, our Board also authorized the repurchase of up to an additional
$2.0 billion
of our outstanding common stock.
At
June 30, 2019
, we had approximately
$0.7 billion
available under the 2017 repurchase program.
H
owever, the merger agreement restricts us from repurchasing shares other than to satisfy tax withholding obligations. For more information refer to “Note 2: Proposed Merger with United Technologies Corporation (UTC)
.”
Share repurchases also include shares surrendered by employees to satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with
restricted stock, RSUs and LTPP
awards issued to employees.
Our share repurchases were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
(In millions)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
|
$
|
Shares
|
|
|
$
|
Shares
|
|
Shares repurchased under our share repurchase programs
|
|
$
|
300
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
$
|
400
|
|
1.9
|
|
Shares repurchased to satisfy tax withholding obligations
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
|
19
|
|
0.1
|
|
Total share repurchases
|
|
$
|
300
|
|
1.7
|
|
|
$
|
419
|
|
2.0
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
(In millions)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
|
$
|
Shares
|
|
|
$
|
Shares
|
|
Shares repurchased under our share repurchase programs
|
|
$
|
800
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
$
|
800
|
|
3.8
|
|
Shares repurchased to satisfy tax withholding obligations
|
|
66
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
91
|
|
0.4
|
|
Total share repurchases
|
|
$
|
866
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
$
|
891
|
|
4.2
|
|
In March
2019
, our Board of Directors authorized an
8.6%
increase to our annual dividend payout rate from
$3.47
to
$3.77
per share. Our Board of Directors also declared dividends of
$0.9425
and
$1.885
per share during the
second quarter and first six months of 2019
, respectively, compared to dividends of
$0.8675
and
$1.735
per share during the
second quarter and first six months of 2018
, respectively.
Dividends are subject to quarterly approval by our Board of Directors.
Stock-based Compensation Plans
On May 30, 2019 our stockholders approved the Raytheon 2019 Stock Plan. The 2019 Stock Plan provides for stock-based awards to be issued as restricted stock, RSUs, stock grants, stock options or stock appreciation rights, including awards based on performance criteria. The plan authorizes the issuance of
2.7 million
shares in addition to shares remaining available for awards under the Raytheon 2010 Stock Plan as of December 31, 2018. The total maximum number of shares originally authorized for issuance under the 2019 Stock Plan, the 2010 Stock Plan and other prior Raytheon plans is
44.5 million
. The 2019 Stock Plan provides that awards to our officers, employees and consultants are generally granted by the Management Development and Compensation Committee (MDCC) of our Board of Directors and are compensatory in nature, while awards to our non-employee directors are granted by the Board’s Governance and Nominating Committee. At
June 30, 2019
, there were
7.9 million
shares available for new awards and
2.9 million
shares outstanding under the 2019 Stock Plan, the 2010 Stock Plan and other prior Raytheon plans.
Restricted Stock and RSUs—
During the
first six months of 2019
, we granted
0.1 million
combined shares of restricted stock and RSUs with a weighted-average grant-date fair value of
$179.87
per share
, calculated under the intrinsic value method. These awards generally vest in equal installments on each of the second, third and fourth anniversary dates of the award’s grant date.
LTPP—
During the
first six months of 2019
, we granted RSUs subject to the 2019–2021 LTPP with an aggregate target award of
0.1 million
units and a weighted-average grant-date fair value of
$175.93
per share.
The performance goals for the 2019–2021 LTPP awards are
independent of each other and based on three metrics, as defined in the LTPP award agreements: return on invested capital (ROIC), weighted at
50%
;
total shareholder return (TSR) relative to a peer group, weighted at
25%
;
and cumulative free cash flow from continuing operations (CFCF), weighted at
25%
.
The ultimate award, which is determined at the end of the three-year cycle, can range from
zero
to
200%
of the target award and includes dividend equivalents, which are not included in the aggregate target award numbers. The grant-date fair value is based upon the value determined under the intrinsic value method for the CFCF and ROIC portions of the award and the Monte Carlo simulation method for the TSR portion of the award.
Forcepoint Plans—
Forcepoint unit appreciation rights and profits interests vest over a specified period of time and settlement is subject to a liquidity event defined as either a change in control or an initial public offering of the joint venture. In certain limited circumstances other vesting conditions may apply.
The impact attributable to these other vesting conditions was
income
of
$2 million
and
expense
of
$3 million
in the
second quarters of 2019 and 2018
, respectively, and
income
of
$4 million
and
expense
of
$4 million
in the
first six months of 2019 and 2018
, respectively. At
June 30, 2019
, there were
174 thousand
combined units and/or profits interests authorized for award under these plans.
Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
Accumulated other
comprehensive income (loss) includes gains and losses associated with pension and
other postretirement benefit (PRB) plans
, foreign exchange translation adjustments, gains and losses on derivative instruments qualified as cash flow hedges included in the assessment of effectiveness, and unrealized gains (losses) on available-for-sale investments
.
The computation of other comprehensive income (loss) and its components are presented in the consolidated statements of comprehensive income.
A rollforward of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pension and PRB plans, net
(1)
|
|
|
Foreign exchange translation
|
|
|
Cash flow hedges
(2)
|
|
|
Unrealized gains (losses) on investments and other, net
(3)
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2018
|
$
|
(8,483
|
)
|
|
$
|
(131
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,618
|
)
|
Before tax amount
|
553
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
553
|
|
Tax (expense) or benefit
|
(116
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
(117
|
)
|
Net of tax amount
|
437
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
436
|
|
Balance at June 30, 2019
|
$
|
(8,046
|
)
|
|
$
|
(129
|
)
|
|
$
|
(5
|
)
|
|
$
|
(2
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,182
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance at December 31, 2017
|
$
|
(7,843
|
)
|
|
$
|
(95
|
)
|
|
$
|
6
|
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(7,935
|
)
|
Before tax amount
|
696
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
667
|
|
Tax (expense) or benefit
|
(146
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(144
|
)
|
Net of tax amount
|
550
|
|
|
(19
|
)
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
523
|
|
Reclassification of stranded tax effects
|
(1,452
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1,451
|
)
|
Balance at July 1, 2018
|
$
|
(8,745
|
)
|
|
$
|
(114
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,863
|
)
|
(1) Pension and PRB plans, net is shown net of cumulative tax benefits of
$2,139 million
and
$2,255 million
at
June 30, 2019
and
December 31, 2018
, respectively.
(2) Cash flow hedges are shown net of cumulative tax benefits of
zero
and
$1 million
at
June 30, 2019
and
December 31, 2018
, respectively.
(3) Unrealized gains (losses) on investments and other, net are shown net of cumulative tax expense of
$1 million
at
June 30, 2019
and
December 31, 2018
.
In the first quarter of 2018, we reclassified the stranded tax effects related to the enactment of the Tax Cuts and Jobs Act of 2017 (2017 Act) from accumulated other comprehensive loss (AOCL) to retained earnings in accordance with ASU 2018-02,
Income Statement - Reporting Comprehensive Income (Topic 220): Reclassification of Certain Tax Effects from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income
. These stranded tax effects related to the deferred tax amounts at December 31, 2017 recorded through other comprehensive income prior to the enactment date using the prior 35% statutory tax rate that remained in other comprehensive income despite the fact that the related deferred tax assets and liabilities were remeasured to reflect the newly enacted tax rate of 21%.
Other material amounts reclassified out of AOCL related to the amortization of net actuarial loss associated with our pension plans were
$546 million
and
$688 million
before tax in the
first six months of 2019 and 2018
, respectively.
This component of AOCL is included in the calculation of net periodic pension expense (income).
See “Note 16: Pension and Other Employee Benefits” for additional details.
We expect
$2 million
net of tax of net unrealized losses on our cash flow hedges at
June 30, 2019
to be reclassified into earnings at then-current values over the next 12 months as the underlying hedged transactions occur.
Note 16: Pension and Other Employee Benefits
We have pension plans covering the majority of our employees hired prior to January 1, 2007, including certain employees in foreign countries (Pension Benefits).
Our primary pension obligations relate to our domestic Internal Revenue Service (IRS) qualified pension plans. In addition, we provide certain health care and life insurance benefits to retired employees and to eligible employees upon retirement through
PRB plans.
We also sponsor nonqualified defined benefit and defined contribution plans to provide benefits in excess of qualified plan limits. We have set aside certain assets in a separate trust, which we expect to be used to pay for trust obligations.
The fair value of marketable securities held in trust, which are considered Level 1 assets under the fair value hierarchy, consisted of the following
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Dec 31, 2018
|
Marketable securities held in trust
|
|
$
|
686
|
|
|
$
|
642
|
|
Included in marketable securities held in trust in the table above was
$429 million
and
$420 million
at
June 30, 2019
and
December 31, 2018
, respectively, related to the nonqualified defined contribution plans. The liabilities related to the nonqualified defined contribution plans were
$438 million
and
$431 million
at
June 30, 2019
and
December 31, 2018
, respectively.
The components of net periodic pension expense (income) were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
(In millions)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
Operating expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service cost
|
|
$
|
104
|
|
|
$
|
128
|
|
|
$
|
209
|
|
|
$
|
255
|
|
Non-operating expense
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest cost
|
|
261
|
|
|
252
|
|
|
522
|
|
|
505
|
|
Expected return on plan assets
|
|
(360
|
)
|
|
(363
|
)
|
|
(719
|
)
|
|
(726
|
)
|
Amortization of prior service cost
|
|
2
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
3
|
|
Amortization of net actuarial loss
|
|
273
|
|
|
344
|
|
|
546
|
|
|
688
|
|
Total pension non-service expense
|
|
176
|
|
|
235
|
|
|
352
|
|
|
470
|
|
Net periodic pension expense (income)
|
|
$
|
280
|
|
|
$
|
363
|
|
|
$
|
561
|
|
|
$
|
725
|
|
Net periodic pension expense (income) includes
income of
$1 million
and
$2 million
from foreign Pension Benefits plans in the
second quarters of 2019 and 2018
, respectively, and income of
$2 million
and
$4 million
in the
first six months of 2019 and 2018
, respectively.
Net periodic PRB expense was
$5 million
in both the
second quarters of 2019 and 2018
, and
$11 million
and
$10 million
in the
first six months of 2019 and 2018
, respectively.
Long-term pension and PRB liabilities consisted of the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Dec 31, 2018
|
Long-term pension liabilities
|
|
$
|
5,922
|
|
|
$
|
6,111
|
|
Long-term PRB liabilities
|
|
352
|
|
|
354
|
|
Total long-term pension and PRB liabilities
|
|
$
|
6,274
|
|
|
$
|
6,465
|
|
We made the following contributions to our pension and PRB plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
(In millions)
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
Required pension contributions
|
$
|
196
|
|
|
$
|
488
|
|
PRB contributions
|
11
|
|
|
9
|
|
Total
|
$
|
207
|
|
|
$
|
497
|
|
We did
no
t make any discretionary contributions to our pension plans during the
first six months of 2019 or 2018
; however,
we periodically evaluate whether to make discretionary contributions.
Note 17: Income Taxes
We are subject to income taxes in the U.S. and numerous foreign jurisdictions.
With the exception of one matter related to the 2015 tax year, all IRS examinations related to originally filed returns are closed through the 2016 tax year. No amount related to the 2015 matter is reflected in unrecognized tax benefits as of
June 30, 2019
. In 2018 we amended tax returns for tax years 2014–2016 to reflect refund claims related to increased Research and Development tax credits (R&D tax credits), which will be subject to audit.
We are also under audit by multiple state and foreign tax authorities.
In the second quarter of 2018, we determined we would make a
$1.25 billion
contribution to our pension plans in the third quarter of 2018, and as a result recorded a net tax benefit of
$95 million
in the second quarter of 2018. This was primarily due to the remeasurement of the related deferred tax asset balance at the 2017 tax rate of 35% versus the 2018 tax rate of 21% since the discretionary contribution was deductible on our 2017 tax return.
This decreased our effective tax rate by
11.5%
and
6.0%
in the
second
quarter and
first six months of 2018
, respectively.
The balance of our unrecognized tax benefits, exclusive of interest, was
$203 million
and
$92 million
at
June 30, 2019
and
December 31, 2018
, respectively, the majority of which would affect our earnings if recognized. The increase in the balance of our unrecognized tax benefits during the
first six months of 2019
is related to positions we expect to take on amended state tax returns.
We accrue interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits in tax expense. Interest and penalties recognized during the
second
quarter and
first six months of 2019 and 2018
and accrued as of
June 30, 2019
and
December 31, 2018
were de minimis.
Note 18: Business Segment Reporting
Our reportable segments, organized based on capabilities and technologies, are: Integrated Defense Systems (IDS); Intelligence, Information and Services (IIS); Missile Systems (MS); Space and Airborne Systems (SAS); and Forcepoint.
Segment total net sales and operating income include intersegment sales and profit generally recorded at cost-plus a specified fee, which may differ from what the selling entity would be able to obtain on sales to external customers. Eliminations include intersegment sales and profit eliminations. Corporate operating income includes expenses that represent unallocated costs and certain other corporate costs not considered part of management’s evaluation of reportable segment operating performance. Acquisition Accounting Adjustments include the adjustments to record acquired deferred revenue at fair value as part of our purchase price allocation process and the amortization of acquired intangible assets related to historical acquisitions.
Segment financial results were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
Total Net Sales
(in millions)
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
Integrated Defense Systems
|
$
|
1,641
|
|
|
$
|
1,514
|
|
|
$
|
3,191
|
|
|
$
|
3,003
|
|
Intelligence, Information and Services
|
1,777
|
|
|
1,687
|
|
|
3,554
|
|
|
3,269
|
|
Missile Systems
|
2,210
|
|
|
2,051
|
|
|
4,216
|
|
|
3,899
|
|
Space and Airborne Systems
|
1,817
|
|
|
1,605
|
|
|
3,470
|
|
|
3,173
|
|
Forcepoint
|
156
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
289
|
|
Eliminations
|
(442
|
)
|
|
(376
|
)
|
|
(856
|
)
|
|
(733
|
)
|
Total business segment sales
|
7,159
|
|
|
6,629
|
|
|
13,889
|
|
|
12,900
|
|
Acquisition Accounting Adjustments
|
—
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Total
|
$
|
7,159
|
|
|
$
|
6,625
|
|
|
$
|
13,888
|
|
|
$
|
12,892
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
Intersegment Sales
(in millions)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
Integrated Defense Systems
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
$
|
15
|
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
Intelligence, Information and Services
|
|
183
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
329
|
|
Missile Systems
|
|
58
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
77
|
|
Space and Airborne Systems
|
|
173
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
287
|
|
Forcepoint
|
|
6
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
10
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
442
|
|
|
$
|
376
|
|
|
$
|
856
|
|
|
$
|
733
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
Operating Income
(in millions)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
Integrated Defense Systems
|
|
$
|
264
|
|
|
$
|
262
|
|
|
$
|
522
|
|
|
$
|
535
|
|
Intelligence, Information and Services
|
|
161
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
245
|
|
Missile Systems
|
|
253
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
443
|
|
Space and Airborne Systems
|
|
229
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
441
|
|
|
399
|
|
Forcepoint
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Eliminations
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
(81
|
)
|
Total business segment operating income
|
|
858
|
|
|
778
|
|
|
1,649
|
|
|
1,526
|
|
Acquisition Accounting Adjustments
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
(67
|
)
|
FAS/CAS Operating Adjustment
|
|
363
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
729
|
|
|
707
|
|
Corporate
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
3
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
(25
|
)
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,176
|
|
|
$
|
1,100
|
|
|
$
|
2,289
|
|
|
$
|
2,141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
Intersegment Operating Income
(in millions)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
Integrated Defense Systems
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
4
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
Intelligence, Information and Services
|
|
18
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
34
|
|
Missile Systems
|
|
5
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
7
|
|
Space and Airborne Systems
|
|
17
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
34
|
|
|
29
|
|
Forcepoint
|
|
4
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
8
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
46
|
|
|
$
|
41
|
|
|
$
|
93
|
|
|
$
|
81
|
|
The FAS/CAS Operating Adjustment, which is reported as a separate line in our segment results above, represents the difference between the service cost component of our pension and PRB expense or income under
Financial Accounting Standards (FAS) in accordance with U.S. GAAP and our pension and PRB expense under U.S. government Cost Accounting Standards (CAS).
The results of each segment only include pension and PRB expense under CAS that we generally recover through the pricing of our products and services to the U.S. government.
The pension and PRB components of the FAS/CAS Operating Adjustment were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
(In millions)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
FAS/CAS Pension Operating Adjustment
|
|
$
|
361
|
|
|
$
|
350
|
|
|
$
|
723
|
|
|
$
|
701
|
|
FAS/CAS PRB Operating Adjustment
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
6
|
|
FAS/CAS Operating Adjustment
|
|
$
|
363
|
|
|
$
|
353
|
|
|
$
|
729
|
|
|
$
|
707
|
|
Total assets for each of our business segments were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Assets
(in millions)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Dec 31, 2018
(2)
|
Integrated Defense Systems
(1)
|
|
$
|
4,965
|
|
|
$
|
4,826
|
|
Intelligence, Information and Services
(1)
|
|
4,372
|
|
|
4,238
|
|
Missile Systems
(1)
|
|
8,769
|
|
|
8,229
|
|
Space and Airborne Systems
(1)
|
|
6,897
|
|
|
6,740
|
|
Forcepoint
(1)
|
|
2,422
|
|
|
2,529
|
|
Corporate
|
|
4,761
|
|
|
6,108
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
32,186
|
|
|
$
|
32,670
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Total assets includes intangible assets. Related amortization expense is included in Acquisition Accounting Adjustments.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Amounts have been recast to reflect the adoption of ASU 2016-02,
Leases (Topic 842)
. Operating lease right-of-use assets are all recorded at Corporate.
|
We disaggregate our revenue from contracts with customers by geographic location, customer-type and contract-type for each of our segments, as we believe it best depicts how the nature, amount, timing and uncertainty of our revenue and cash flows are affected by economic factors. See details in the tables below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2019
|
Disaggregation of Total Net Sales
(in millions)
|
|
Integrated Defense Systems
|
|
|
Intelligence, Information and Services
|
|
|
Missile Systems
|
|
|
Space and Airborne Systems
|
|
|
Forcepoint
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales to the U.S. government
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-price contracts
|
|
$
|
206
|
|
|
$
|
224
|
|
|
$
|
715
|
|
|
$
|
632
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,817
|
|
Cost-type contracts
|
|
466
|
|
|
1,132
|
|
|
794
|
|
|
713
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3,109
|
|
Direct commercial sales and other U.S. sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-price contracts
|
|
1
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
117
|
|
Cost-type contracts
|
|
—
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5
|
|
Asia/Pacific
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign military sales through the U.S. government
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-price contracts
|
|
45
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
270
|
|
Cost-type contracts
|
|
16
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
40
|
|
Direct commercial sales and other foreign sales
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-price contracts
|
|
187
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
358
|
|
Cost-type contracts
|
|
19
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
20
|
|
Middle East and North Africa
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign military sales through the U.S. government
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-price contracts
|
|
171
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
83
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
451
|
|
Cost-type contracts
|
|
52
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
83
|
|
Direct commercial sales and other foreign sales
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-price contracts
|
|
262
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
430
|
|
Cost-type contracts
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
18
|
|
All other (principally Europe)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign military sales through the U.S. government
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-price contracts
|
|
132
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
189
|
|
Cost-type contracts
|
|
12
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
24
|
|
Direct commercial sales and other foreign sales
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-price contracts
|
|
47
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
214
|
|
Cost-type contracts
|
|
3
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
14
|
|
Total net sales
|
|
1,619
|
|
|
1,594
|
|
|
2,152
|
|
|
1,644
|
|
|
150
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
7,159
|
|
Intersegment sales
|
|
22
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
(442
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
Acquisition Accounting Adjustments
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Reconciliation to business segment sales
|
|
$
|
1,641
|
|
|
$
|
1,777
|
|
|
$
|
2,210
|
|
|
$
|
1,817
|
|
|
$
|
156
|
|
|
$
|
(442
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,159
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Excludes foreign military sales through the U.S. government.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2019
|
Total Net Sales by Geographic Area
(in millions)
|
|
Integrated Defense Systems
|
|
|
Intelligence, Information and Services
|
|
|
Missile Systems
|
|
|
Space and Airborne Systems
|
|
|
Forcepoint
|
|
|
Total
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
673
|
|
|
$
|
1,392
|
|
|
$
|
1,517
|
|
|
$
|
1,377
|
|
|
$
|
89
|
|
|
$
|
5,048
|
|
Asia/Pacific
|
|
267
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
185
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
688
|
|
Middle East and North Africa
|
|
485
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
363
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
982
|
|
All other (principally Europe)
|
|
194
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
441
|
|
Total net sales
|
|
$
|
1,619
|
|
|
$
|
1,594
|
|
|
$
|
2,152
|
|
|
$
|
1,644
|
|
|
$
|
150
|
|
|
$
|
7,159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2019
|
Total Net Sales by Major Customer
(in millions)
|
|
Integrated Defense Systems
|
|
|
Intelligence, Information and Services
|
|
|
Missile Systems
|
|
|
Space and Airborne Systems
|
|
|
Forcepoint
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Sales to the U.S. government
(1)
|
|
$
|
672
|
|
|
$
|
1,356
|
|
|
$
|
1,509
|
|
|
$
|
1,345
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
4,926
|
|
U.S. direct commercial sales and other U.S. sales
|
|
1
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
45
|
|
|
122
|
|
Foreign military sales through the U.S. government
|
|
428
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
377
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,057
|
|
Foreign direct commercial sales and other foreign sales
(1)
|
|
518
|
|
|
121
|
|
|
258
|
|
|
96
|
|
|
61
|
|
|
1,054
|
|
Total net sales
|
|
$
|
1,619
|
|
|
$
|
1,594
|
|
|
$
|
2,152
|
|
|
$
|
1,644
|
|
|
$
|
150
|
|
|
$
|
7,159
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Excludes foreign military sales through the U.S. government.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended June 30, 2019
|
Total Net Sales by Contract-Type
(in millions)
|
|
Integrated Defense Systems
|
|
|
Intelligence, Information and Services
|
|
|
Missile Systems
|
|
|
Space and Airborne Systems
|
|
|
Forcepoint
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Fixed-price contracts
|
|
$
|
1,051
|
|
|
$
|
432
|
|
|
$
|
1,318
|
|
|
$
|
899
|
|
|
$
|
146
|
|
|
$
|
3,846
|
|
Cost-type contracts
|
|
568
|
|
|
1,162
|
|
|
834
|
|
|
745
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
3,313
|
|
Total net sales
|
|
$
|
1,619
|
|
|
$
|
1,594
|
|
|
$
|
2,152
|
|
|
$
|
1,644
|
|
|
$
|
150
|
|
|
$
|
7,159
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended July 1, 2018
|
Disaggregation of Total Net Sales
(in millions)
|
|
Integrated Defense Systems
|
|
|
Intelligence, Information and Services
|
|
|
Missile Systems
|
|
|
Space and Airborne Systems
|
|
|
Forcepoint
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales to the U.S. government
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-price contracts
|
|
$
|
198
|
|
|
$
|
250
|
|
|
$
|
651
|
|
|
$
|
525
|
|
|
$
|
21
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,645
|
|
Cost-type contracts
|
|
411
|
|
|
1,043
|
|
|
685
|
|
|
642
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,785
|
|
Direct commercial sales and other U.S. sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-price contracts
|
|
2
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
123
|
|
Cost-type contracts
|
|
—
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
8
|
|
Asia/Pacific
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign military sales through the U.S. government
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-price contracts
|
|
50
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
113
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
251
|
|
Cost-type contracts
|
|
22
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
5
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
59
|
|
Direct commercial sales and other foreign sales
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-price contracts
|
|
191
|
|
|
53
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
356
|
|
Cost-type contracts
|
|
42
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
42
|
|
Middle East and North Africa
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign military sales through the U.S. government
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-price contracts
|
|
243
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
439
|
|
Cost-type contracts
|
|
38
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
63
|
|
Direct commercial sales and other foreign sales
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-price contracts
|
|
227
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
240
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
514
|
|
Cost-type contracts
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
All other (principally Europe)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign military sales through the U.S. government
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-price contracts
|
|
28
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
72
|
|
Cost-type contracts
|
|
7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
28
|
|
Direct commercial sales and other foreign sales
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-price contracts
|
|
37
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
228
|
|
Cost-type contracts
|
|
3
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
12
|
|
Total net sales
|
|
1,499
|
|
|
1,520
|
|
|
2,009
|
|
|
1,457
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
6,625
|
|
Intersegment sales
|
|
15
|
|
|
167
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
(376
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
Acquisition Accounting Adjustments
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
Reconciliation to business segment sales
|
|
$
|
1,514
|
|
|
$
|
1,687
|
|
|
$
|
2,051
|
|
|
$
|
1,605
|
|
|
$
|
148
|
|
|
$
|
(380
|
)
|
|
$
|
6,625
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Excludes foreign military sales through the U.S. government.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended July 1, 2018
|
Total Net Sales by Geographic Area
(in millions)
|
|
Integrated Defense Systems
|
|
|
Intelligence, Information and Services
|
|
|
Missile Systems
|
|
|
Space and Airborne Systems
|
|
|
Forcepoint
|
|
|
Total
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
611
|
|
|
$
|
1,328
|
|
|
$
|
1,347
|
|
|
$
|
1,199
|
|
|
$
|
76
|
|
|
$
|
4,561
|
|
Asia/Pacific
|
|
305
|
|
|
115
|
|
|
178
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
708
|
|
Middle East and North Africa
|
|
508
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
373
|
|
|
116
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
1,016
|
|
All other (principally Europe)
|
|
75
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
340
|
|
Total net sales
|
|
$
|
1,499
|
|
|
$
|
1,520
|
|
|
$
|
2,009
|
|
|
$
|
1,457
|
|
|
$
|
140
|
|
|
$
|
6,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended July 1, 2018
|
Total Net Sales by Major Customer
(in millions)
|
|
Integrated Defense Systems
|
|
|
Intelligence, Information and Services
|
|
|
Missile Systems
|
|
|
Space and Airborne Systems
|
|
|
Forcepoint
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Sales to the U.S. government
(1)
|
|
$
|
609
|
|
|
$
|
1,293
|
|
|
$
|
1,336
|
|
|
$
|
1,167
|
|
|
$
|
25
|
|
|
$
|
4,430
|
|
U.S. direct commercial sales and other U.S. sales
|
|
2
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
131
|
|
Foreign military sales through the U.S. government
|
|
388
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
319
|
|
|
136
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
912
|
|
Foreign direct commercial sales and other foreign sales
(1)
|
|
500
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
343
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
1,152
|
|
Total net sales
|
|
$
|
1,499
|
|
|
$
|
1,520
|
|
|
$
|
2,009
|
|
|
$
|
1,457
|
|
|
$
|
140
|
|
|
$
|
6,625
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Excludes foreign military sales through the U.S. government.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended July 1, 2018
|
Total Net Sales by Contract-Type
(in millions)
|
|
Integrated Defense Systems
|
|
|
Intelligence, Information and Services
|
|
|
Missile Systems
|
|
|
Space and Airborne Systems
|
|
|
Forcepoint
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Fixed-price contracts
|
|
$
|
976
|
|
|
$
|
451
|
|
|
$
|
1,274
|
|
|
$
|
791
|
|
|
$
|
136
|
|
|
$
|
3,628
|
|
Cost-type contracts
|
|
523
|
|
|
1,069
|
|
|
735
|
|
|
666
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
2,997
|
|
Total net sales
|
|
$
|
1,499
|
|
|
$
|
1,520
|
|
|
$
|
2,009
|
|
|
$
|
1,457
|
|
|
$
|
140
|
|
|
$
|
6,625
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2019
|
Disaggregation of Total Net Sales
(in millions)
|
|
Integrated Defense Systems
|
|
|
Intelligence, Information and Services
|
|
|
Missile Systems
|
|
|
Space and Airborne Systems
|
|
|
Forcepoint
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales to the U.S. government
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-price contracts
|
|
$
|
427
|
|
|
$
|
449
|
|
|
$
|
1,423
|
|
|
$
|
1,181
|
|
|
$
|
76
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
3,556
|
|
Cost-type contracts
|
|
891
|
|
|
2,283
|
|
|
1,492
|
|
|
1,372
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
6,046
|
|
Direct commercial sales and other U.S. sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-price contracts
|
|
2
|
|
|
64
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
229
|
|
Cost-type contracts
|
|
—
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
11
|
|
Asia/Pacific
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign military sales through the U.S. government
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-price contracts
|
|
85
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
538
|
|
Cost-type contracts
|
|
34
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
93
|
|
Direct commercial sales and other foreign sales
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-price contracts
|
|
355
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
81
|
|
|
106
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
663
|
|
Cost-type contracts
|
|
36
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
37
|
|
Middle East and North Africa
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign military sales through the U.S. government
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-price contracts
|
|
439
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
307
|
|
|
157
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
912
|
|
Cost-type contracts
|
|
100
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
161
|
|
Direct commercial sales and other foreign sales
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-price contracts
|
|
458
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
19
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
804
|
|
Cost-type contracts
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
37
|
|
All other (principally Europe)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign military sales through the U.S. government
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-price contracts
|
|
212
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
71
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
320
|
|
Cost-type contracts
|
|
23
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
51
|
|
Direct commercial sales and other foreign sales
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-price contracts
|
|
81
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
82
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
407
|
|
Cost-type contracts
|
|
5
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
23
|
|
Total net sales
|
|
3,148
|
|
|
3,203
|
|
|
4,115
|
|
|
3,124
|
|
|
298
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
13,888
|
|
Intersegment sales
|
|
43
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
346
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
(856
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
Acquisition Accounting Adjustments
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
Reconciliation to business segment sales
|
|
$
|
3,191
|
|
|
$
|
3,554
|
|
|
$
|
4,216
|
|
|
$
|
3,470
|
|
|
$
|
314
|
|
|
$
|
(857
|
)
|
|
$
|
13,888
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Excludes foreign military sales through the U.S. government.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2019
|
Total Net Sales by Geographic Area
(in millions)
|
|
Integrated Defense Systems
|
|
|
Intelligence, Information and Services
|
|
|
Missile Systems
|
|
|
Space and Airborne Systems
|
|
|
Forcepoint
|
|
|
Total
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
1,320
|
|
|
$
|
2,805
|
|
|
$
|
2,931
|
|
|
$
|
2,612
|
|
|
$
|
174
|
|
|
$
|
9,842
|
|
Asia/Pacific
|
|
510
|
|
|
243
|
|
|
356
|
|
|
190
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
1,331
|
|
Middle East and North Africa
|
|
997
|
|
|
35
|
|
|
648
|
|
|
218
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
1,914
|
|
All other (principally Europe)
|
|
321
|
|
|
120
|
|
|
180
|
|
|
104
|
|
|
76
|
|
|
801
|
|
Total net sales
|
|
$
|
3,148
|
|
|
$
|
3,203
|
|
|
$
|
4,115
|
|
|
$
|
3,124
|
|
|
$
|
298
|
|
|
$
|
13,888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2019
|
Total Net Sales by Major Customer
(in millions)
|
|
Integrated Defense Systems
|
|
|
Intelligence, Information and Services
|
|
|
Missile Systems
|
|
|
Space and Airborne Systems
|
|
|
Forcepoint
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Sales to the U.S. government
(1)
|
|
$
|
1,318
|
|
|
$
|
2,732
|
|
|
$
|
2,915
|
|
|
$
|
2,553
|
|
|
$
|
84
|
|
|
$
|
9,602
|
|
U.S. direct commercial sales and other U.S. sales
|
|
2
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
59
|
|
|
90
|
|
|
240
|
|
Foreign military sales through the U.S. government
|
|
893
|
|
|
174
|
|
|
687
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,075
|
|
Foreign direct commercial sales and other foreign sales
(1)
|
|
935
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
497
|
|
|
191
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
1,971
|
|
Total net sales
|
|
$
|
3,148
|
|
|
$
|
3,203
|
|
|
$
|
4,115
|
|
|
$
|
3,124
|
|
|
$
|
298
|
|
|
$
|
13,888
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Excludes foreign military sales through the U.S. government.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended June 30, 2019
|
Total Net Sales by Contract-Type
(in millions)
|
|
Integrated Defense Systems
|
|
|
Intelligence, Information and Services
|
|
|
Missile Systems
|
|
|
Space and Airborne Systems
|
|
|
Forcepoint
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Fixed-price contracts
|
|
$
|
2,059
|
|
|
$
|
864
|
|
|
$
|
2,526
|
|
|
$
|
1,691
|
|
|
$
|
289
|
|
|
$
|
7,429
|
|
Cost-type contracts
|
|
1,089
|
|
|
2,339
|
|
|
1,589
|
|
|
1,433
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
6,459
|
|
Total net sales
|
|
$
|
3,148
|
|
|
$
|
3,203
|
|
|
$
|
4,115
|
|
|
$
|
3,124
|
|
|
$
|
298
|
|
|
$
|
13,888
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended July 1, 2018
|
Disaggregation of Total Net Sales
(in millions)
|
|
Integrated Defense Systems
|
|
|
Intelligence, Information and Services
|
|
|
Missile Systems
|
|
|
Space and Airborne Systems
|
|
|
Forcepoint
|
|
|
Other
|
|
|
Total
|
|
United States
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sales to the U.S. government
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-price contracts
|
|
$
|
425
|
|
|
$
|
502
|
|
|
$
|
1,234
|
|
|
$
|
1,070
|
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
3,273
|
|
Cost-type contracts
|
|
813
|
|
|
1,999
|
|
|
1,313
|
|
|
1,286
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5,418
|
|
Direct commercial sales and other U.S. sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-price contracts
|
|
4
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
240
|
|
Cost-type contracts
|
|
1
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
11
|
|
Asia/Pacific
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign military sales through the U.S. government
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-price contracts
|
|
80
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
209
|
|
|
66
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
457
|
|
Cost-type contracts
|
|
47
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
117
|
|
Direct commercial sales and other foreign sales
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-price contracts
|
|
337
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
87
|
|
|
101
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
654
|
|
Cost-type contracts
|
|
69
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
70
|
|
Middle East and North Africa
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign military sales through the U.S. government
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-price contracts
|
|
438
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
118
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
772
|
|
Cost-type contracts
|
|
70
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
117
|
|
Direct commercial sales and other foreign sales
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-price contracts
|
|
574
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
470
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,124
|
|
Cost-type contracts
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
All other (principally Europe)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Foreign military sales through the U.S. government
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-price contracts
|
|
25
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
105
|
|
Cost-type contracts
|
|
15
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
61
|
|
Direct commercial sales and other foreign sales
(1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fixed-price contracts
|
|
70
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
123
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
447
|
|
Cost-type contracts
|
|
5
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
26
|
|
Total net sales
|
|
2,973
|
|
|
2,940
|
|
|
3,822
|
|
|
2,886
|
|
|
271
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
12,892
|
|
Intersegment sales
|
|
30
|
|
|
329
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
287
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
(733
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
Acquisition Accounting Adjustments
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
8
|
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
—
|
|
Reconciliation to business segment sales
|
|
$
|
3,003
|
|
|
$
|
3,269
|
|
|
$
|
3,899
|
|
|
$
|
3,173
|
|
|
$
|
289
|
|
|
$
|
(741
|
)
|
|
$
|
12,892
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Excludes foreign military sales through the U.S. government.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended July 1, 2018
|
Total Net Sales by Geographic Area
(in millions)
|
|
Integrated Defense Systems
|
|
|
Intelligence, Information and Services
|
|
|
Missile Systems
|
|
|
Space and Airborne Systems
|
|
|
Forcepoint
|
|
|
Total
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
1,243
|
|
|
$
|
2,566
|
|
|
$
|
2,570
|
|
|
$
|
2,414
|
|
|
$
|
149
|
|
|
$
|
8,942
|
|
Asia/Pacific
|
|
533
|
|
|
224
|
|
|
336
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
1,298
|
|
Middle East and North Africa
|
|
1,082
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
690
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
2,013
|
|
All other (principally Europe)
|
|
115
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
93
|
|
|
75
|
|
|
639
|
|
Total net sales
|
|
$
|
2,973
|
|
|
$
|
2,940
|
|
|
$
|
3,822
|
|
|
$
|
2,886
|
|
|
$
|
271
|
|
|
$
|
12,892
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended July 1, 2018
|
Total Net Sales by Major Customer
(in millions)
|
|
Integrated Defense Systems
|
|
|
Intelligence, Information and Services
|
|
|
Missile Systems
|
|
|
Space and Airborne Systems
|
|
|
Forcepoint
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Sales to the U.S. government
(1)
|
|
$
|
1,238
|
|
|
$
|
2,501
|
|
|
$
|
2,547
|
|
|
$
|
2,356
|
|
|
$
|
49
|
|
|
$
|
8,691
|
|
U.S. direct commercial sales and other U.S. sales
|
|
5
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
58
|
|
|
100
|
|
|
251
|
|
Foreign military sales through the U.S. government
|
|
675
|
|
|
138
|
|
|
570
|
|
|
246
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,629
|
|
Foreign direct commercial sales and other foreign sales
(1)
|
|
1,055
|
|
|
236
|
|
|
682
|
|
|
226
|
|
|
122
|
|
|
2,321
|
|
Total net sales
|
|
$
|
2,973
|
|
|
$
|
2,940
|
|
|
$
|
3,822
|
|
|
$
|
2,886
|
|
|
$
|
271
|
|
|
$
|
12,892
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Excludes foreign military sales through the U.S. government.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended July 1, 2018
|
Total Net Sales by Contract-Type
(in millions)
|
|
Integrated Defense Systems
|
|
|
Intelligence, Information and Services
|
|
|
Missile Systems
|
|
|
Space and Airborne Systems
|
|
|
Forcepoint
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Fixed-price contracts
|
|
$
|
1,953
|
|
|
$
|
886
|
|
|
$
|
2,410
|
|
|
$
|
1,559
|
|
|
$
|
264
|
|
|
$
|
7,072
|
|
Cost-type contracts
|
|
1,020
|
|
|
2,054
|
|
|
1,412
|
|
|
1,327
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
5,820
|
|
Total net sales
|
|
$
|
2,973
|
|
|
$
|
2,940
|
|
|
$
|
3,822
|
|
|
$
|
2,886
|
|
|
$
|
271
|
|
|
$
|
12,892
|
|
Note 19: Remaining Performance Obligations
Remaining performance obligations represents the transaction price of firm orders for which work has not been performed and excludes unexercised contract options and potential orders under ordering-type contracts (e.g., indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ)).
As of
June 30, 2019
,
the aggregate amount of the transaction price allocated to remaining performance obligations was
$43,131 million
.
We expect to recognize revenue on approximately half and three-quarters of the remaining performance obligations over the next 12 and 24 months, respectively, with the remainder recognized thereafter.
Recent events have caused increased attention on U.S. defense sales to KSA. KSA represents less than
5%
of our sales and
$2.4 billion
of our remaining performance obligations at
June 30, 2019
. Although we currently do not expect to be prevented from doing business in KSA, if government action impairs our ability to fulfill our contractual obligations or otherwise to continue to do business in KSA, it would have a material adverse effect on our financial results.
With respect to the unaudited consolidated financial information of Raytheon Company for the
six
months ended
June 30, 2019
and
July 1, 2018
, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP (PricewaterhouseCoopers) reported that it has applied limited procedures in accordance with professional standards for a review of such information. Its report dated
July 25, 2019
, appearing below, states that the firm did not audit and does not express an opinion on that unaudited consolidated financial information. Accordingly, the degree of reliance on its report on such information should be restricted in light of the limited nature of the review procedures applied. PricewaterhouseCoopers is not subject to the liability provisions of Section 11 of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended (Securities Act) for its report on the unaudited consolidated financial information because that report is not a “report” or a “part” of a registration statement prepared or certified by PricewaterhouseCoopers within the meaning of Sections 7 and 11 of the Securities Act.
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors and Stockholders of Raytheon Company
Results of Review of Interim Financial Statements
We have reviewed the accompanying consolidated balance sheet of Raytheon Company and its subsidiaries (the “Company”) as of
June 30, 2019
, and the related consolidated statements of operations, of comprehensive income and of equity for the three-month and
six
-month periods ended
June 30, 2019
and
July 1, 2018
, and the consolidated statements of cash flows for the
six
-month periods ended
June 30, 2019
and
July 1, 2018
,
including the related notes (collectively referred to as the “interim financial statements”). Based on our reviews, we are not aware of any material modifications that should be made to the accompanying interim financial statements for them to be in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
We have previously audited, in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheet of the Company as of
December 31, 2018
, and the related consolidated statements of operations, of comprehensive income, of equity and of cash flows for the year then ended (not presented herein), and in our report dated
February 13, 2019
, which included a paragraph describing a change in the manner in which it accounts for certain stranded tax effects impacting accumulated other comprehensive income and the manner in which it presents and discloses certain net periodic pension and postretirement benefit costs in the Company’s statements of operations, we expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated financial statements. As discussed in Note 3 to the accompanying consolidated interim financial statements, the Company changed its method of accounting for leases. The accompanying
December 31, 2018
consolidated balance sheet reflects this change.
Basis for Review Results
These interim financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. We are a public accounting firm registered with the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States) (PCAOB) and are required to be independent with respect to the Company in accordance with the U.S. federal securities laws and the applicable rules and regulations of the Securities and Exchange Commission and the PCAOB. We conducted our review in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB. A review of interim financial information consists principally of applying analytical procedures and making inquiries of persons responsible for financial and accounting matters. It is substantially less in scope than an audit conducted in accordance with the standards of the PCAOB, the objective of which is the expression of an opinion regarding the financial statements taken as a whole. Accordingly, we do not express such an opinion.
/s/ PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP
Boston, Massachusetts
July 25, 2019
ITEM 2. MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
OVERVIEW
We develop
technologically advanced and integrated products, services and solutions in our core markets: integrated air and missile defense; electronic warfare; command, control, communications, computers, cyber, intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance; space systems; effects; and cyber. We serve both domestic and international customers primarily as a prime contractor or subcontractor on a broad portfolio of defense and related programs for government customers.
We operate in five segments: Integrated Defense Systems (IDS); Intelligence, Information and Services (IIS); Missile Systems (MS); Space and Airborne Systems (SAS); and Forcepoint. For a more detailed description of our segments, see “Business Segments” within Item 1 of our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2018
.
Effective January 1, 2019, we adopted the requirements of Accounting Standards Update (ASU) 2016-02,
Leases (Topic 842)
using the modified retrospective approach as discussed in “Note 3: Accounting Standards” within Item 1 of this Form 10-Q. We reclassified certain balance sheet amounts to conform to our current period presentation. All amounts disclosed in this Form 10-Q reflect these changes.
On June 9, 2019, Raytheon and United Technologies Corporation (UTC) entered into an agreement to combine in an all-stock merger of equals. The merger is expected to close in the first half of 2020, subject to and following completion by UTC of the separations and distributions of its Otis and Carrier businesses. Under the terms of the agreement, Raytheon stockholders will receive 2.3348 shares of UTC common stock for each Raytheon share. The agreement provides that upon completion of the merger, UTC stockholders will own approximately 57% and Raytheon stockholders will own approximately 43%
of the outstanding shares of common stock of UTC.
In addition, the agreement generally restricts certain actions by both Raytheon and UTC. For additional information refer to “Note 2: Proposed Merger with United Technologies Corporation (UTC)” within Item 1 of this Form 10-Q.
The following discussion should be read in conjunction with our Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended
December 31, 2018
and our unaudited consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q.
CONSOLIDATED RESULTS OF OPERATIONS
As described in our “Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements” in this Form 10-Q, our interim period results of operations and period-to-period comparisons of such results, particularly at a segment level, may not be indicative of our future operating results. Additionally, we use a fiscal calendar, which may result in differences in the number of work days in the current and comparable prior interim period and could affect period-to-period comparisons. The following discussions of comparative results among periods, including the discussion of segment results, should be viewed in this context.
Total Net Sales
The composition of external net sales by products and services for each segment in the
second
quarter and
first six months of 2019
was approximately the following:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IDS
|
|
IIS
|
|
MS
|
|
SAS
|
|
Forcepoint
|
|
Products
|
90
|
%
|
45
|
%
|
95
|
%
|
100
|
%
|
90
|
%
|
Services
|
10
|
%
|
55
|
%
|
5
|
%
|
—
|
%
|
10
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
% of Total Net Sales
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
Net sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products
|
$
|
5,994
|
|
|
$
|
5,507
|
|
|
83.7
|
%
|
|
83.1
|
%
|
Services
|
1,165
|
|
|
1,118
|
|
|
16.3
|
%
|
|
16.9
|
%
|
Total net sales
|
$
|
7,159
|
|
|
$
|
6,625
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Total Net Sales -
Second Quarter of 2019 vs. Second Quarter of 2018
—
The
increase
in total net sales of
$534 million
in the
second quarter of 2019
compared to the
second quarter of 2018
was primarily due to higher external net sales of
$187 million
at SAS and
$143 million
at MS. The
increase
in net sales at SAS was primarily due to higher net sales on classified programs principally driven by 2018 awards, higher net sales on the Next Generation Overhead Persistent Infrared (Next Gen OPIR) program for the U.S. Air Force awarded in the third quarter of 2018 and higher net sales on an international tactical radar systems program principally due to scheduled increases in program activity with the remaining change spread across numerous programs with no individual
or common significant driver. The
increase
in net sales at MS was primarily due to higher net sales on classified programs, higher net sales on the High-speed Anti-Radiation Missile (HARM®) program awarded in the second quarter of 2019 and higher net sales on the Phalanx® program primarily due to planned increases in production and contract definitization on a performance based logistics contract in the second quarter of 2019, partially offset by lower net sales on the Paveway™ program due to planned decreases in production, with the remaining change spread across numerous programs with no individual or common significant driver.
Products and Services Net Sales -
Second Quarter of 2019 vs. Second Quarter of 2018
—
The
increase
in products net sales of
$487 million
in the
second quarter of 2019
compared to the
second quarter of 2018
was primarily due to higher external products net sales of
$190 million
at SAS and
$139 million
at MS. The
increase
in products net sales at SAS was primarily due to higher products net sales on certain classified programs and higher products net sales on the international tactical radar systems program and Next Gen OPIR program described above in Total Net Sales. The
increase
in products net sales at MS was primarily due to higher products net sales on the programs described above in Total Net Sales. Services net sales in the
second quarter of 2019
were relatively consistent with the
second quarter of 2018
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
% of Total Net Sales
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
Net sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products
|
$
|
11,556
|
|
|
$
|
10,761
|
|
|
83.2
|
%
|
|
83.5
|
%
|
Services
|
2,332
|
|
|
2,131
|
|
|
16.8
|
%
|
|
16.5
|
%
|
Total net sales
|
$
|
13,888
|
|
|
$
|
12,892
|
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
|
100.0
|
%
|
Total Net Sales -
First Six Months of 2019 vs. First Six Months of 2018
—
The
increase
in total net sales of
$996 million
in the
first six months of 2019
compared to the
first six months of 2018
was primarily due to higher external net sales of
$293 million
at MS,
$263 million
at IIS and
$238 million
at SAS. The increase in net sales at MS was spread across numerous programs with no individual or common significant driver. Included in the change in net sales at MS was lower net sales on the Paveway program due to planned decreases in production and higher net sales on classified programs. The
increase
in net sales at IIS was primarily due to higher net sales on classified programs in both cyber and space and higher net sales from the consolidation of Range Generation Next LLC (RGNext) in the first quarter of 2019, partially offset by lower net sales on programs in support of the U.S. Army’s Warfighter Field Operations Customer Support (Warfighter FOCUS) activities, which continue to transition to a number of competitively-awarded replacement programs. In the first quarter of 2019, we amended and restated the RGNext joint venture agreement and acquired an additional 10% equity ownership in the joint venture, increasing our equity ownership to 60% and giving us control of the operations of RGNext with the partner having only protective rights. The results of RGNext are included in IIS’s segment results effective as of the February 8, 2019 consolidation date. See “Note 10: Acquisitions, Divestitures and Goodwill” within Item 1 of this Form 10-Q for additional detail. The
increase
in net sales at SAS was primarily due to higher net sales on classified programs principally driven by 2018 awards, higher net sales on the Next Gen OPIR program for the U.S. Air Force awarded in third quarter of 2018, and higher net sales on an international tactical radar systems program principally due to scheduled increases in program activity.
Products and Services Net Sales -
First Six Months of 2019 vs. First Six Months of 2018
—
The
increase
in products net sales of
$795 million
in the
first six months of 2019
compared to the
first six months of 2018
was primarily due to higher external products net sales of
$286 million
at MS and
$255 million
at SAS. The increase in products net sales at MS was spread across numerous programs with no individual or common significant driver. The increase in products net sales at SAS was primarily due to higher products net sales on certain classified programs. The
increase
in services net sales of
$201 million
in the
first six months of 2019
compared to the
first six months of 2018
was primarily due to higher external services net sales of
$154 million
at IIS principally due to higher services net sales on certain classified programs and higher services net sales from the consolidation of RGNext in the first quarter of 2019 described above in Total Net Sales, partially offset by lower services net sales on programs in support of the Warfighter FOCUS activities described above in Total Net Sales.
Sales to Major Customers -
Second Quarter of 2019 vs. Second Quarter of 2018
and
First Six Months of 2019 vs. First Six Months of 2018
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
% of Total Net Sales
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
Sales to the U.S. government
(1)(2)
|
$
|
4,926
|
|
|
$
|
4,430
|
|
|
69
|
%
|
|
67
|
%
|
U.S. direct commercial sales and other U.S. sales
|
122
|
|
|
131
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
2
|
%
|
Foreign military sales through the U.S. government
|
1,057
|
|
|
912
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
14
|
%
|
Foreign direct commercial sales and other foreign sales
(1)
|
1,054
|
|
|
1,152
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
17
|
%
|
Total net sales
|
$
|
7,159
|
|
|
$
|
6,625
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
(1)
|
Excludes foreign military sales through the U.S. government.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Includes sales to the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) of
$4,697 million
, or
66%
of total net sales, in the
second quarter of 2019
and
$4,229 million
, or
64%
of total net sales, in the
second quarter of 2018
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
% of Total Net Sales
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
Sales to the U.S. government
(1)(2)
|
$
|
9,602
|
|
|
$
|
8,691
|
|
|
69
|
%
|
|
67
|
%
|
U.S. direct commercial sales and other U.S. sales
|
240
|
|
|
251
|
|
|
2
|
%
|
|
2
|
%
|
Foreign military sales through the U.S. government
|
2,075
|
|
|
1,629
|
|
|
15
|
%
|
|
13
|
%
|
Foreign direct commercial sales and other foreign sales
(1)
|
1,971
|
|
|
2,321
|
|
|
14
|
%
|
|
18
|
%
|
Total net sales
|
$
|
13,888
|
|
|
$
|
12,892
|
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
100
|
%
|
|
|
(1)
|
Excludes foreign military sales through the U.S. government.
|
|
|
(2)
|
Includes sales to the U.S. DoD of
$9,148 million
, or
66%
of total net sales, in the
first six months of 2019
and
$8,304 million
, or
64%
of total net sales, in the
first six months of 2018
.
|
Total Cost of Sales
Cost of sales, for both products and services, consists of labor, materials and subcontractors costs, as well as related allocated costs. For each of our contracts, we manage the nature and amount of direct costs at the contract level, and manage indirect costs through cost pools as required by government accounting regulations. The estimate of the actual amount of direct and indirect costs forms the basis for estimating our total costs at completion of the contract.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
% of Total Net Sales
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products
|
$
|
4,302
|
|
|
$
|
3,903
|
|
|
60.1
|
%
|
|
58.9
|
%
|
Services
|
903
|
|
|
874
|
|
|
12.6
|
%
|
|
13.2
|
%
|
Total cost of sales
|
$
|
5,205
|
|
|
$
|
4,777
|
|
|
72.7
|
%
|
|
72.1
|
%
|
Total Cost of Sales -
Second Quarter of 2019 vs. Second Quarter of 2018
—
The
increase
in total cost of sales of
$428 million
in the
second quarter of 2019
compared to the
second quarter of 2018
was primarily due to higher external cost of sales at SAS and MS. The increase in costs of sales at SAS was primarily due to the programs described above in Total Net Sales. The increase in costs of sales at MS was primarily due to the classified and HARM programs described above in Total Net Sales, partially offset by the Paveway program described above in Total Net Sales, with the remaining change spread across numerous programs with no individual or common significant driver.
Products and Services Cost of Sales -
Second Quarter of 2019 vs. Second Quarter of 2018
—
The
increase
in products cost of sales of
$399 million
in the
second quarter of 2019
compared to the
second quarter of 2018
was primarily due to higher external products cost of sales at SAS and MS. The increase in products cost of sales at SAS was principally due to the programs described above in Total Net Sales. The increase in products cost of sales at MS was spread across numerous programs with no individual or common significant driver. Services cost of sales in the
second quarter of 2019
were relatively consistent with the
second quarter of 2018
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
% of Total Net Sales
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
Cost of sales
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Products
|
$
|
8,304
|
|
|
$
|
7,640
|
|
|
59.8
|
%
|
|
59.3
|
%
|
Services
|
1,778
|
|
|
1,669
|
|
|
12.8
|
%
|
|
12.9
|
%
|
Total cost of sales
|
$
|
10,082
|
|
|
$
|
9,309
|
|
|
72.6
|
%
|
|
72.2
|
%
|
Total Cost of Sales -
First Six Months of 2019 vs. First Six Months of 2018
—
The
increase
in total cost of sales of
$773 million
in the
first six months of 2019
compared to the
first six months of 2018
was primarily due to higher external cost of sales at MS, SAS and IIS. Included in the change in cost of sales at MS was lower cost of sales on the Paveway program described above in Total Net Sales and higher cost of sales on the classified programs described above in Total Net Sales. The remaining change at MS was spread across numerous programs with no individual or common significant driver. The increase in costs of sales at SAS and IIS was primarily due to the programs described above in Total Net Sales.
Products and Services Cost of Sales -
First Six Months of 2019 vs. First Six Months of 2018
—
The
increase
in products cost of sales of
$664 million
in the
first six months of 2019
compared to the
first six months of 2018
was primarily due to higher external products cost of sales at MS and SAS. The increase in products cost of sales at MS was spread across numerous programs with no individual or common significant driver. The increase in products cost of sales at SAS was primarily due to the programs described above in Total Net Sales. The
increase
in services cost of sales of
$109 million
in the
first six months of 2019
compared to the
first six months of 2018
was primarily due to higher external services cost of sales at IIS primarily due to the programs described above in Total Net Sales.
General and Administrative Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
% of Total Net Sales
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
Administrative and selling expenses
|
$
|
578
|
|
|
$
|
540
|
|
|
8.1
|
%
|
|
8.2
|
%
|
Research and development expenses
|
200
|
|
|
208
|
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
3.1
|
%
|
Total general and administrative expenses
|
$
|
778
|
|
|
$
|
748
|
|
|
10.9
|
%
|
|
11.3
|
%
|
The
increase
in administrative and selling expenses of
$38 million
in the
second quarter of 2019
compared to the
second quarter of 2018
was primarily due to
$23 million
of transaction costs related to the proposed merger with UTC and higher administrative and selling expenses at IDS related to activities to support an advanced radar pursuit.
Included in administrative and selling expenses is the provision for state income taxes, which generally can be recovered through the pricing of products and services to the U.S. government. Net state income taxes allocated to our contracts were
$10 million
and
$7 million
in the
second quarters of 2019 and 2018
, respectively.
Research and development expenses in the
second quarter of 2019
were relatively consistent with the
second quarter of 2018
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
|
% of Total Net Sales
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
Administrative and selling expenses
|
$
|
1,122
|
|
|
$
|
1,068
|
|
|
8.1
|
%
|
|
8.3
|
%
|
Research and development expenses
|
395
|
|
|
374
|
|
|
2.8
|
%
|
|
2.9
|
%
|
Total general and administrative expenses
|
$
|
1,517
|
|
|
$
|
1,442
|
|
|
10.9
|
%
|
|
11.2
|
%
|
The
increase
in administrative and selling expenses of
$54 million
in the
first six months of 2019
compared to the
first six months of 2018
was primarily due to
$23 million
of transaction costs related to the proposed merger with UTC and higher administrative and selling expenses at IDS related to activities to support an advanced radar pursuit.
Net state income taxes allocated to our contracts were
$20 million
and
$17 million
in the
first six months of 2019 and 2018
, respectively.
The
increase
in research and development expenses of
$21 million
in the
first six months of 2019
compared to the
first six months of 2018
was primarily due to higher independent research and development activity at IDS related to next-generation technologies.
Total Operating Expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
Total operating expenses
|
$
|
5,983
|
|
|
$
|
5,525
|
|
|
$
|
11,599
|
|
|
$
|
10,751
|
|
% of Total Net Sales
|
83.6
|
%
|
|
83.4
|
%
|
|
83.5
|
%
|
|
83.4
|
%
|
The
increase
in total operating expenses of
$458 million
in the
second quarter of 2019
compared to the
second quarter of 2018
was primarily due to the
increase
in total cost of sales of
$428 million
, the primary drivers of which are described above in Total Cost of Sales.
The
increase
in total operating expenses of
$848 million
in the
first six months of 2019
compared to the
first six months of 2018
was due to the
increase
in total cost of sales of
$773 million
, the primary drivers of which are described above in Total Cost of Sales.
Operating Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
Operating income
|
$
|
1,176
|
|
|
$
|
1,100
|
|
|
$
|
2,289
|
|
|
$
|
2,141
|
|
% of Total Net Sales
|
16.4
|
%
|
|
16.6
|
%
|
|
16.5
|
%
|
|
16.6
|
%
|
The
increase
in operating income of
$76 million
in the
second quarter of 2019
compared to the
second quarter of 2018
was due to the
increase
in total net sales of
$534 million
, the primary drivers of which are described above in Total Net Sales, partially offset by the
increase
in total operating expenses of
$458 million
, the primary drivers of which are described above in Total Operating Expenses.
The
increase
in operating income of
$148 million
in the
first six months of 2019
compared to the
first six months of 2018
was due to the
increase
in total net sales of
$996 million
, the primary drivers of which are described above in Total Net Sales, partially offset by the
increase
in total operating expenses of
$848 million
, the primary drivers of which are described above in Total Operating Expenses.
Total Non-Operating (Income) Expense, Net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
(In millions)
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
Non-operating (income) expense, net
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retirement benefits non-service expense
|
$
|
181
|
|
|
$
|
238
|
|
|
$
|
362
|
|
|
$
|
477
|
|
Interest expense
|
45
|
|
|
46
|
|
|
89
|
|
|
93
|
|
Interest income
|
(7
|
)
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
(20
|
)
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Other (income) expense, net
|
(8
|
)
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
(28
|
)
|
|
2
|
|
Total non-operating (income) expense, net
|
$
|
211
|
|
|
$
|
273
|
|
|
$
|
403
|
|
|
$
|
557
|
|
The
decrease
in total non-operating (income) expense, net of
$62 million
in the
second quarter of 2019
compared to the
second quarter of 2018
was primarily due to a
decrease
in retirement benefits non-service expense of
$57 million
principally driven by a decrease in the amortization of net actuarial loss in the
second quarter of 2019
compared to the
second quarter of 2018
due to a decrease in the unamortized loss at December 31, 2018 compared to December 31, 2017, and the higher discount rate at December 31, 2018 compared to the discount rate at December 31, 2017, partially offset by unfavorable asset performance during 2018.
The
decrease
in total non-operating (income) expense, net of
$154 million
in the
first six months of 2019
compared to the
first six months of 2018
was primarily due to a
decrease
in retirement benefits non-service expense of
$115 million
and a change in other (income) expense, net of
$30 million
. The
decrease
in retirement benefits non-service expense was principally driven by a decrease in the amortization of net actuarial loss in the
second quarter of 2019
compared to the
second quarter of 2018
due to a decrease in the unamortized loss at December 31, 2018 compared to December 31, 2017, and the higher discount rate at December 31, 2018 compared to the discount rate at December 31, 2017, partially offset by unfavorable asset performance during 2018. The change in other (income) expense, net was principally driven by a $30 million change in the mark-to-market of marketable securities held in trust associated with certain of our nonqualified deferred compensation and employee benefit plans, due to net gains of $30 million in the
first six months of 2019
compared to net gains of less than $1 million in the
first six months of 2018
.
Federal and Foreign Income Taxes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
Federal and foreign income taxes
|
$
|
152
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
$
|
298
|
|
|
$
|
170
|
|
Effective tax rate
|
15.8
|
%
|
|
4.5
|
%
|
|
15.8
|
%
|
|
10.7
|
%
|
On March 4, 2019, the Treasury Department and the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) issued proposed regulations providing guidance for the determination of the deduction amount of foreign-derived intangible income (FDII) and global intangible low-taxed income. Although these rules would affect amounts recorded or amounts expected to be recorded and could increase our income tax expense, we do not expect any material changes to our financial statements if the regulations are finalized as currently drafted.
In the second quarter of 2018, we determined we would make a discretionary contribution to our pension plans of $1.25 billion in the third quarter of 2018. As a result, we recorded a net tax benefit of $95 million in the second quarter of 2018, primarily due to the remeasurement of the related deferred tax asset balance at the 2017 tax rate of 35% versus the 2018 tax rate of 21%, as the discretionary contribution was deductible on our 2017 tax return.
Our effective tax rate in the
second quarter of 2019
was
15.8%
compared to
4.5%
in the
second quarter of 2018
. The
increase
of
11.3%
was primarily due to the tax benefit recognized related to the discretionary pension contribution, which decreased the second quarter of 2018 tax rate by 11.5% and FDII, which increased the rate by 1.1%, partially offset by the Research and Development tax credit (R&D tax credit), which decreased the rate by 1.4%. The remaining increase of 0.1% is composed of various items which individually and collectively are not significant.
Our effective tax rate in the
second quarter of 2019
was
5.2%
lower than the statutory federal rate primarily due to FDII, which decreased the rate by 3.4% and the R&D tax credit, which decreased the rate by 3.1%. The offsetting increase of 1.3% is composed of various items which individually and collectively are not significant.
Our effective tax rate in the
second quarter of 2018
was
16.5%
lower than the statutory federal rate primarily due to the tax benefit recognized related to the discretionary pension contribution, which decreased the rate by 11.5%, FDII, which decreased the rate by 4.5%, the R&D tax credit, which decreased the rate by 1.7% and the tax benefit recognized upon settlement of equity awards, which decreased the rate by 0.8%, partially offset by the foreign rate differential, which increased the rate by 0.8%. The offsetting increase of 1.2% is composed of various items which individually or collectively are not significant.
Our effective tax rate in the
first six months of 2019
was
15.8%
compared to
10.7%
in the
first six months of 2018
. The
increase
of
5.1%
was primarily due to the tax benefit recognized related to the discretionary pension contribution, which decreased the rate in the first six months of 2018 by 6.0%. The offsetting decrease of 0.9% is composed of various items which individually and collectively are not significant.
Our effective tax rate in the
first six months of 2019
was
5.2%
lower than the statutory federal rate primarily due to FDII, which decreased the rate by 3.4% and the R&D tax credit, which decreased the rate by 2.4%. The offsetting increase of 0.6% is composed of various items which individually and collectively are not significant.
Our effective tax rate in the
first six months of 2018
was
10.3%
lower than the statutory federal rate primarily due to the tax benefit recognized related to the discretionary pension contribution, which decreased the rate by 6.0%, FDII, which decreased the rate by 3.8%, the tax benefit recognized upon settlement of equity awards, which decreased the rate by 2.0% and the R&D tax credit, which decreased the rate by 1.7%, partially offset by the foreign rate differential, which increased the rate by 1.3% and the one-time transition tax on undistributed foreign earnings, which increased the rate by 0.7%. The offsetting increase of 1.2% is composed of various items which individually or collectively are not significant.
Income from Continuing Operations
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
(In millions)
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
Income from continuing operations
|
$
|
813
|
|
|
$
|
790
|
|
|
$
|
1,588
|
|
|
$
|
1,414
|
|
The
increase
in income from continuing operations of
$23 million
in the
second quarter of 2019
compared to the
second quarter of 2018
was primarily due to an
increase
of
$76 million
in operating income, the primary drivers of which are described above in Operating Income, and a
decrease
of
$62 million
in non-operating (income) expense, net, related to the
decrease
in retirement benefits non-service expense described above in Total Non-Operating (Income) Expense, Net, partially offset by an
increase
of
$115 million
in federal and foreign income taxes related to the
increase
in our effective tax rate described above in Federal and Foreign Income Taxes.
The
increase
in income from continuing operations of
$174 million
in the
first six months of 2019
compared to the
first six months of 2018
was primarily due to a
decrease
of
$154 million
in non-operating (income) expense, net, primarily related to the
decrease
in retirement benefits non-service expense described above in Total Non-Operating (Income) Expense, Net and an
increase
of
$148 million
in operating income, the primary drivers of which are described above in Operating Income, partially offset by an
increase
of
$128 million
in federal and foreign income taxes related to the
increase
in our effective tax rate described above in Federal and Foreign Income Taxes.
Net Income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
(In millions)
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
Net income
|
$
|
813
|
|
|
$
|
791
|
|
|
$
|
1,588
|
|
|
$
|
1,414
|
|
The
increase
in net income of
$22 million
in the
second quarter of 2019
compared to the
second quarter of 2018
was primarily due to the
$23 million
increase
in income from continuing operations, the primary drivers of which are described above in Income from Continuing Operations.
The
increase
in net income of
$174 million
in the
first six months of 2019
compared to the
first six months of 2018
was due to the
$174 million
increase
in income from continuing operations, the primary drivers of which are described above in Income from Continuing Operations.
Diluted Earnings Per Share (EPS) from Continuing Operations Attributable to Raytheon Company Common Stockholders
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
(In millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
Income from continuing operations attributable to Raytheon Company
|
|
$
|
817
|
|
|
$
|
799
|
|
|
$
|
1,598
|
|
|
$
|
1,433
|
|
Diluted weighted-average shares outstanding
|
|
279.9
|
|
|
287.6
|
|
|
281.0
|
|
|
288.2
|
|
Diluted EPS from continuing operations attributable to Raytheon Company
|
|
$
|
2.92
|
|
|
$
|
2.78
|
|
|
$
|
5.69
|
|
|
$
|
4.98
|
|
The
increase
in diluted EPS from continuing operations attributable to Raytheon Company common stockholders of
$0.14
in the
second quarter of 2019
compared to the
second quarter of 2018
was primarily due to the
increase
in income from continuing operations described above in Income from Continuing Operations and a decrease in weighted-average shares outstanding, which was affected by the common stock share activity shown in the table below.
The
increase
in diluted EPS from continuing operations attributable to Raytheon Company common stockholders of
$0.71
in the
first six months of 2019
compared to the
first six months of 2018
was primarily due to the
increase
in income from continuing operations described above in Income from Continuing Operations and a decrease in weighted-average shares outstanding, which was affected by the common stock share activity shown in the table below.
Our common stock share activity was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
(In millions)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
Beginning balance
|
|
280.1
|
|
|
287.2
|
|
|
282.1
|
|
|
288.4
|
|
Stock plans activity
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1.1
|
|
|
1.0
|
|
Share repurchases
|
|
(1.7
|
)
|
|
(2.0
|
)
|
|
(4.8
|
)
|
|
(4.2
|
)
|
Ending balance
|
|
278.4
|
|
|
285.2
|
|
|
278.4
|
|
|
285.2
|
|
SEGMENT RESULTS
We report our results in the following segments: IDS; IIS; MS; SAS; and Forcepoint.
The following provides some context for viewing our segment performance through the eyes of management.
Given the nature of our business, bookings, total net sales and operating income (and the related operating margin percentage), which we disclose and discuss at the segment level, are most relevant to an understanding of management’s view of our segment performance, and often these measures have significant interrelated effects, as described below. In addition, we disclose and discuss backlog, which represents future sales that we expect to recognize over the remaining contract period, which is generally several years. We also disclose total operating expenses and the components of total operating expenses within our segment disclosures.
Bookings
—We disclose the amount of bookings and notable contract awards for each segment. Bookings generally represent the dollar value of new external contracts awarded to us during the reporting period and include firm orders for which funding has not been appropriated. We believe bookings are an important measure of future performance and are an indicator of potential future changes in total net sales, because we cannot record revenues under a new contract without first having a booking in the current or a preceding period.
Bookings are impacted by the timing and amounts of awards in a given period, which are subject to numerous factors, including: (1) the desired capability by the customer and urgency of customer needs; (2) customer budgets and other fiscal constraints; (3) political and economic and other environmental factors; (4) the timing of customer negotiations; (5) the timing of governmental approvals and notifications; and (6) the timing of option exercises or increases in scope.
In addition, due to these factors, quarterly bookings tend to fluctuate from period to period, particularly on a segment basis. As a result, we believe comparing bookings on a quarterly basis or for periods less than one year is less meaningful than for longer periods and that shorter term changes in bookings may not necessarily indicate a material trend.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
Bookings
(in millions)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
Integrated Defense Systems
|
|
$
|
2,549
|
|
|
$
|
1,661
|
|
|
$
|
3,923
|
|
|
$
|
4,136
|
|
Intelligence, Information and Services
|
|
1,920
|
|
|
1,724
|
|
|
3,554
|
|
|
2,798
|
|
Missile Systems
|
|
2,351
|
|
|
2,916
|
|
|
3,057
|
|
|
4,306
|
|
Space and Airborne Systems
|
|
2,507
|
|
|
2,245
|
|
|
4,037
|
|
|
3,517
|
|
Forcepoint
|
|
148
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
272
|
|
|
248
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
9,475
|
|
|
$
|
8,694
|
|
|
$
|
14,843
|
|
|
$
|
15,005
|
|
Included in bookings were international bookings of
$3,100 million
and
$1,821 million
in the
second quarters of 2019 and 2018
, respectively, and
$3,763 million
and
$4,669 million
in the
first six months of 2019 and 2018
, respectively, which included foreign military bookings through the U.S. government. International bookings amounted to
33%
and
21%
of total bookings in the
second quarters of 2019 and 2018
, respectively, and
25%
and
31%
of total bookings in the
first six months of 2019 and 2018
, respectively.
We record bookings for not-to-exceed contract awards (e.g., undefinitized contract awards, binding letter agreements) based on reasonable estimates of the expected contract definitization. We subsequently adjust bookings to reflect the actual amounts definitized, or prior to definitization when facts and circumstances indicate that our previously estimated amounts are no longer reasonable. The timing of awards that may cover multiple fiscal years influences the size of bookings in each year. Bookings exclude unexercised contract options and potential orders under ordering-type contracts (e.g., indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) type contracts), and are reduced for contract cancellations and terminations of bookings recognized in the current year. We reflect contract cancellations and terminations from prior year bookings, as well as the impact of changes in foreign
exchange rates, directly as an adjustment to backlog in the period in which the cancellation or termination occurs and the impact is determinable. Contract cancellations and terminations include contract underruns on cost-type programs.
Backlog
—We disclose period-end backlog for each segment.
Backlog, which is equivalent to our remaining performance obligations, represents the dollar value of firm orders for which work has not been performed. Backlog generally increases with bookings and generally converts into sales as we incur costs under the related contractual commitments. Therefore, we discuss changes in backlog, including any individually significant cancellations, for each of our segments, as we believe such discussion provides an understanding of the awarded but not executed portions of our contracts. Backlog excludes unexercised contract options and potential orders under ordering-type contracts (e.g., IDIQ). Backlog is affected by changes in foreign exchange rates.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Backlog
(in millions)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Dec 31, 2018
|
Integrated Defense Systems
|
|
$
|
12,260
|
|
|
$
|
11,557
|
|
Intelligence, Information and Services
|
|
6,652
|
|
|
6,233
|
|
Missile Systems
|
|
12,778
|
|
|
13,976
|
|
Space and Airborne Systems
|
|
10,947
|
|
|
10,126
|
|
Forcepoint
(1)
|
|
494
|
|
|
528
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
43,131
|
|
|
$
|
42,420
|
|
|
|
(1)
|
Forcepoint backlog excludes the unfavorable impact of
$1 million
and
$2 million
at
June 30, 2019
and
December 31, 2018
, respectively, related to the Acquisition Accounting Adjustments to record acquired deferred revenue at fair value.
|
Total Net Sales
—We generally express changes in total net sales in terms of volume. Volume generally refers to increases or decreases in revenues related to varying amounts of total operating expenses incurred on individual contracts (i.e., from performance against contractual commitments on our bookings related to engineering, production or service activity). Therefore, we discuss volume changes attributable principally to individual programs or product lines unless there is a discrete event (e.g., a major contract termination, natural disaster or major labor strike), or some other unusual item that has a material effect on changes in a segment’s volume for a reported period. Due to the nature of our contracts, the amount of costs incurred and related revenues will naturally fluctuate over the lives of our contracts. As a result, in any reporting period, the changes in volume on numerous contracts are likely to be due to normal fluctuations in our engineering, production or service activities, depending on the phase of the contracts’ lifecycle.
Total net sales by segment were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
Total Net Sales
(in millions)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
Integrated Defense Systems
|
|
$
|
1,641
|
|
|
$
|
1,514
|
|
|
$
|
3,191
|
|
|
$
|
3,003
|
|
Intelligence, Information and Services
|
|
1,777
|
|
|
1,687
|
|
|
3,554
|
|
|
3,269
|
|
Missile Systems
|
|
2,210
|
|
|
2,051
|
|
|
4,216
|
|
|
3,899
|
|
Space and Airborne Systems
|
|
1,817
|
|
|
1,605
|
|
|
3,470
|
|
|
3,173
|
|
Forcepoint
|
|
156
|
|
|
148
|
|
|
314
|
|
|
289
|
|
Eliminations
|
|
(442
|
)
|
|
(376
|
)
|
|
(856
|
)
|
|
(733
|
)
|
Total business segment sales
|
|
7,159
|
|
|
6,629
|
|
|
13,889
|
|
|
12,900
|
|
Acquisition Accounting Adjustments
|
|
—
|
|
|
(4
|
)
|
|
(1
|
)
|
|
(8
|
)
|
Total
|
|
$
|
7,159
|
|
|
$
|
6,625
|
|
|
$
|
13,888
|
|
|
$
|
12,892
|
|
Total Operating Expenses
—We generally disclose operating expenses for each segment in terms of the following: (1) cost of sales—labor; (2) cost of sales—materials and subcontractors; and (3) other costs of sales and other operating expenses. Included in cost of sales—labor is the incurred direct labor costs associated with the performance of contracts in the current period and any applicable overhead and fringe costs. Included in cost of sales—materials and subcontractors is the incurred direct materials costs, subcontractor costs (which could include effort performed by other Raytheon segments or locations) and applicable overhead allocations in the current period. Included in other costs of sales and other operating expenses is other direct costs not captured in labor or materials and subcontractors costs, such as previously deferred precontract costs recognized in the period, applicable overhead allocations, general and administrative expenses, which include administrative and selling expenses (including bid and proposal costs) and research and development expenses, other direct costs (such as ancillary services and travel expenses) and adjustments for loss contracts.
Operating Income (and the related operating margin percentage)
—We generally express changes in segment operating income in terms of volume, net changes in
Estimate at Completion (EAC)
adjustments or changes in contract mix and other program performance.
The impact of changes in volume on operating income excludes the impact of net EAC adjustments and the impact of changes in contract mix and other program performance and is calculated based on changes in costs on individual programs at an overall margin for the segment. As such, changes in volume do not impact operating margins.
Changes in net EAC adjustments relate to changes in operating income and margin due to revisions to total estimated revenues and costs at completion. These changes reflect improved or deteriorated operating performance or award fee rates.
For a full description of our EAC process, refer to “Note 5: Changes in Estimates under Percentage of Completion Contract Accounting” within Item 1 of this Form 10-Q.
Given that we have thousands of
individual contracts and the types and complexity of the assumptions and estimates we must make on an on-going basis, we have both favorable and unfavorable EAC adjustments. We had the following aggregate EAC adjustments for the periods presented:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
EAC Adjustments
(in millions)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
Gross favorable
|
|
$
|
324
|
|
|
$
|
263
|
|
|
$
|
566
|
|
|
$
|
469
|
|
Gross unfavorable
|
|
(201
|
)
|
|
(134
|
)
|
|
(320
|
)
|
|
(225
|
)
|
Total net EAC adjustments
|
|
$
|
123
|
|
|
$
|
129
|
|
|
$
|
246
|
|
|
$
|
244
|
|
Significant EAC adjustments in
the
second
quarters and
first six months of 2019 and 2018
are discussed in the Operating Income and Margin section of each business segment’s discussion below.
The
decrease
in net EAC adjustments of
$6 million
in the
second quarter of 2019
compared to the
second quarter of 2018
was primarily due to the decreases in net EAC adjustments at IDS and MS, partially offset by the increase in net EAC adjustments at IIS. Net EAC adjustments in the
first six months of 2019
were relatively consistent with the
first six months of 2018
. Refer to the individual segment results for further information.
Changes in contract mix and other program performance refer to changes in operating income and margin due to a change in the relative volume of contracts with higher or lower fee rates such that the overall average margin rate for the segment changes, and other drivers of program performance including margin rate increases or decreases due to EAC adjustments in prior periods. A higher or lower expected fee rate at the initial award of a contract typically correlates to the contract’s risk profile, which is often specifically driven by the type of customer and related procurement regulations, the type of contract (e.g., fixed-price vs. cost-plus), the maturity of the product or service and the scope of work. Changes in contract mix and other performance also include all other items which are not related to volume or EAC adjustments (e.g., real estate transactions).
Operating income by segment was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
Operating Income
(in millions)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
Integrated Defense Systems
|
|
$
|
264
|
|
|
$
|
262
|
|
|
$
|
522
|
|
|
$
|
535
|
|
Intelligence, Information and Services
|
|
161
|
|
|
128
|
|
|
348
|
|
|
245
|
|
Missile Systems
|
|
253
|
|
|
231
|
|
|
443
|
|
|
443
|
|
Space and Airborne Systems
|
|
229
|
|
|
206
|
|
|
441
|
|
|
399
|
|
Forcepoint
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
(8
|
)
|
|
(12
|
)
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Eliminations
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
(41
|
)
|
|
(93
|
)
|
|
(81
|
)
|
Total business segment operating income
|
|
858
|
|
|
778
|
|
|
1,649
|
|
|
1,526
|
|
Acquisition Accounting Adjustments
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
(55
|
)
|
|
(67
|
)
|
FAS/CAS Operating Adjustment
|
|
363
|
|
|
353
|
|
|
729
|
|
|
707
|
|
Corporate
|
|
(18
|
)
|
|
3
|
|
|
(34
|
)
|
|
(25
|
)
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,176
|
|
|
$
|
1,100
|
|
|
$
|
2,289
|
|
|
$
|
2,141
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Integrated Defense Systems
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
% Change
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
% Change
|
Total net sales
|
|
$
|
1,641
|
|
|
$
|
1,514
|
|
|
8.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,191
|
|
|
$
|
3,003
|
|
|
6.3
|
%
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales—labor
|
|
591
|
|
|
540
|
|
|
9.4
|
%
|
|
1,134
|
|
|
1,093
|
|
|
3.8
|
%
|
Cost of sales—materials and subcontractors
|
|
545
|
|
|
478
|
|
|
14.0
|
%
|
|
1,048
|
|
|
944
|
|
|
11.0
|
%
|
Other cost of sales and other operating expenses
|
|
241
|
|
|
234
|
|
|
3.0
|
%
|
|
487
|
|
|
431
|
|
|
13.0
|
%
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
1,377
|
|
|
1,252
|
|
|
10.0
|
%
|
|
2,669
|
|
|
2,468
|
|
|
8.1
|
%
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
264
|
|
|
$
|
262
|
|
|
0.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
522
|
|
|
$
|
535
|
|
|
(2.4
|
)%
|
Operating margin
|
|
16.1
|
%
|
|
17.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
16.4
|
%
|
|
17.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Operating Income
(in millions)
|
|
Three Months Ended Jun 30, 2019 Versus Three Months Ended Jul 1, 2018
|
|
Six Months Ended Jun 30, 2019 Versus Six Months Ended Jul 1, 2018
|
Volume
|
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
38
|
|
|
|
Net change in EAC adjustments
|
|
|
|
(21
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(5
|
)
|
|
|
Mix and other performance
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(46
|
)
|
|
|
Total change in operating income
|
|
|
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
% Change
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
% Change
|
Bookings
|
|
$
|
2,549
|
|
|
$
|
1,661
|
|
|
53.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,923
|
|
|
$
|
4,136
|
|
|
(5.1
|
)%
|
Total Net Sales—
The
increase
in total net sales of
$127 million
in the
second quarter of 2019
compared to the
second quarter of 2018
was primarily due to higher net sales of $110 million on certain European Patriot® programs mostly awarded in 2018 and higher net sales of $86 million on an international Patriot program awarded in the second quarter of 2019 driven by the recognition of previously inventoried costs, partially offset by lower net sales of $109 million on certain international Patriot programs due to the scheduled completion of certain production phases of the programs.
The
increase
in total net sales of
$188 million
in the
first six months of 2019
compared to the
first six months of 2018
was primarily due to higher net sales of $197 million on the certain European Patriot programs mostly awarded in 2018, higher net sales of $110 million on various Patriot programs for a Middle East and North Africa (MENA) customer from the completion of a transaction to satisfy all of our existing offset obligations on the programs, higher net sales of $86 million on an international Patriot program awarded in the second quarter of 2019 driven by the recognition of previously inventoried costs, higher net sales of $54 million on a naval radar program driven by awards in the first quarter of 2019 and higher net sales of $52 million on an international Patriot program awarded in the fourth quarter of 2018, partially offset by lower net sales of $182 million on an international Patriot program awarded in the first quarter of 2018 and lower net sales of $145 million on certain international Patriot programs, both due to the scheduled completion of certain production phases of the programs. Included in the lower net sales of $182 million on the international Patriot program awarded in the first quarter of 2018 was an estimated $90 million of net sales recognized in the first quarter of 2018 from previously inventoried costs.
Total Operating Expenses—
The
increase
in total operating expenses of
$125 million
in the
second quarter of 2019
compared to the
second quarter of 2018
was primarily due to an
increase
in materials and subcontractors costs of
$67 million
and an
increase
in labor costs of
$51 million
. The
increase
in materials and subcontractors costs was primarily due to activity on the programs described above in Total Net Sales with the remaining change spread across numerous programs with no individual or common significant driver. The
increase
in labor costs was primarily due to activity on the programs described above in Total Net Sales.
The
increase
in total operating expenses of
$201 million
in the
first six months of 2019
compared to the
first six months of 2018
was primarily due to an
increase
in materials and subcontractors costs of
$104 million
and an
increase
in other cost of sales and other operating expenses of
$56 million
. The
increase
in materials and subcontractors costs was primarily due to the completion of the offset transaction on various Patriot programs for a MENA customer described above in Total Net Sales, higher activity on the certain European Patriot programs described above in Total Net Sales, higher activity on the international Patriot program awarded in the second quarter of 2019 described above in Total Net Sales, higher activity on an international air and missile defense
system program due to planned increases in production, higher activity on the international Patriot program awarded in the fourth quarter of 2018 described above in Total Net Sales and higher activity on the naval radar program described above in Total Net Sales, partially offset by lower activity on the international Patriot program awarded in the first quarter of 2018 and on the certain international Patriot programs, both described above in Total Net Sales. The
increase
in other cost of sales and other operating expenses was primarily due to higher general and administrative expenses driven by higher independent research and development costs principally related to next-generation radars.
Operating Income and Margin—
Operating income in the
second quarter of 2019
was relatively consistent with the
second quarter of 2018
. The
increase
in volume of
$23 million
was primarily due to activity on the programs described above in Total Net Sales. The net change in EAC adjustments of
$21 million
was primarily driven by higher program efficiencies in the second quarter of 2018 on an international Patriot program. The decrease in operating margin in the
second quarter of 2019
compared to the
second quarter of 2018
was due to the net change in EAC adjustments.
The
decrease
in operating income of
$13 million
in the
first six months of 2019
compared to the
first six months of 2018
was primarily due to a change in mix and other performance of
$46 million
, partially offset by an
increase
in volume of
$38 million
. The change in mix and other performance was principally driven by lower sales on the international Patriot program awarded in the first quarter of 2018 described above in Total Net Sales. Included in the change in mix and other performance was a $6 million gain on a real estate transaction in the first quarter of 2019. The
increase
in volume was primarily due to the activity on the programs described above in Total Net Sales and included $14 million related to the offset transaction described above. Included in the net change in EAC adjustments was $30 million of favorable profit adjustments in the first quarter of 2019 related to the offset transaction discussed above in Total Net Sales due to a reduction of expected costs to fulfill our offset obligations on several contracts. In total, the offset transaction resulted in $44 million of operating income in the first quarter of 2019. The decrease in operating margin in the
first six months of 2019
compared to the
first six months of 2018
was primarily due to the change in mix and other performance.
Backlog and Bookings—
Backlog was
$12,260 million
at
June 30, 2019
compared to
$11,557 million
at
December 31, 2018
. The
increase
in backlog of
$703 million
at
June 30, 2019
compared to
December 31, 2018
was primarily due to bookings in excess of sales at our Integrated Air and Missile Defense (IAMD) and Mission Systems and Sensors (MSS) product lines. Bookings
increased
by
$888 million
in the
second quarter of 2019
compared to the
second quarter of 2018
. In the
second quarter of 2019
, IDS booked $485 million and $375 million to provide advanced Patriot air and missile defense capability for Romania and the State of Qatar, respectively. IDS also booked $506 million on National Advanced Surface-to-Air Missile System (NASAMS™) for Australia, $344 million on the Army Navy/Transportable Radar Surveillance-Model 2 (AN/TPY-2) radar program for the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA); $206 million on the Multi-Function Radio Frequency System (MFRFS) program for the U.S. Army and $93 million to provide engineering support services for an international customer. In the
second quarter of 2018
, IDS booked $329 million to provide advanced Patriot air and missile defense capabilities for Romania, $274 million for the Collins class submarine program for the Royal Australian Navy, $148 million on the Air and Missile Defense Radar (AMDR) program for the U.S. Navy, $95 million on the MFRFS program for the U.S. Army, and $83 million for the Barracuda mine neutralization system for the U.S. Navy.
Bookings
decrease
d by
$213 million
in the
first six months of 2019
compared to the
first six months of 2018
. In addition to the bookings noted above, in the
first six months of 2019
, IDS booked $452 million on the AMDR program for the U.S. Navy, $331 million to provide Patriot engineering services support for the U.S. Army and international customers and $103 million to provide advanced Patriot air and missile defense capability for the U.S. Army and international customers. In addition to the bookings noted above, in the
first six months of 2018
, IDS booked $1.6 billion to provide advanced Patriot air and missile defense capability to an international customer, $270 million to provide Patriot engineering services support for U.S. and international customers, $143 million to provide Patriot depot support for an international customer and $142 million to provide Patriot spares for an international customer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Intelligence, Information and Services
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
% Change
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
% Change
|
Total net sales
|
|
$
|
1,777
|
|
|
$
|
1,687
|
|
|
5.3
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,554
|
|
|
$
|
3,269
|
|
|
8.7
|
%
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales—labor
|
|
725
|
|
|
688
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
|
1,450
|
|
|
1,381
|
|
|
5.0
|
%
|
Cost of sales—materials and subcontractors
|
|
672
|
|
|
656
|
|
|
2.4
|
%
|
|
1,370
|
|
|
1,234
|
|
|
11.0
|
%
|
Other cost of sales and other operating expenses
|
|
219
|
|
|
215
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
386
|
|
|
409
|
|
|
(5.6
|
)%
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
1,616
|
|
|
1,559
|
|
|
3.7
|
%
|
|
3,206
|
|
|
3,024
|
|
|
6.0
|
%
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
161
|
|
|
$
|
128
|
|
|
25.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
348
|
|
|
$
|
245
|
|
|
42.0
|
%
|
Operating margin
|
|
9.1
|
%
|
|
7.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
9.8
|
%
|
|
7.5
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Operating Income
(in millions)
|
|
Three Months Ended Jun 30, 2019 Versus Three Months Ended Jul 1, 2018
|
|
Six Months Ended Jun 30, 2019 Versus Six Months Ended Jul 1, 2018
|
Volume
|
|
|
|
$
|
5
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
19
|
|
|
|
Net change in EAC adjustments
|
|
|
|
25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
Mix and other performance
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
47
|
|
|
|
Total change in operating income
|
|
|
|
$
|
33
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
103
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
% Change
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
% Change
|
Bookings
|
|
$
|
1,920
|
|
|
$
|
1,724
|
|
|
11.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,554
|
|
|
$
|
2,798
|
|
|
27.0
|
%
|
Total Net Sales—
The
increase
in total net sales of
$90 million
in the
second quarter of 2019
compared to the
second quarter of 2018
was primarily due to higher net sales of $77 million on classified programs in both cyber and space and higher net sales of $48 million from the consolidation of RGNext in the first quarter of 2019, partially offset by lower net sales of $76 million on programs in support of the U.S. Army’s Warfighter FOCUS activities, which continue to transition to a number of competitively-awarded replacement programs. In the first quarter of 2019, we amended and restated the RGNext joint venture agreement and acquired an additional 10% equity ownership in the joint venture, increasing our equity ownership to 60% and giving us control of the operations of RGNext with the partner having only protective rights. The results of RGNext are included in IIS’s segment results effective as of the February 8, 2019 consolidation date. See “Note 10: Acquisitions, Divestitures and Goodwill” within Item 1 of this Form 10-Q for additional detail.
The
increase
in total net sales of
$285 million
in the
first six months of 2019
compared to the
first six months of 2018
was primarily due to higher net sales of $227 million on classified programs in both cyber and space and higher net sales of $86 million from the consolidation of RGNext in the first quarter of 2019 described above, partially offset by lower net sales of $129 million on programs in support of the U.S. Army’s Warfighter FOCUS activities, which continue to transition to a number of competitively-awarded replacement programs.
Total Operating Expenses—
The
increase
in total operating expenses of
$57 million
in the
second quarter of 2019
compared to the
second quarter of 2018
was primarily due to an
increase
in labor costs of
$37 million
driven principally by the consolidation of RGNext in the first quarter of 2019 described above in Total Net Sales.
The
increase
in total operating expenses of
$182 million
in the
first six months of 2019
compared to the
first six months of 2018
was primarily due to an
increase
in materials and subcontractors costs of
$136 million
and an
increase
in labor costs of
$69 million
, partially offset by a
decrease
in other cost of sales and other operating expenses of
$23 million
. The
increase
in materials and subcontractors costs was driven principally by higher activity on the classified programs described above in Total Net Sales and higher activity in support of the Development, Operations and Maintenance (DOMino) cyber program for the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) due to planned program schedule requirements, partially offset by lower activity on the programs in support of the U.S. Army’s Warfighter FOCUS activities described above in Total Net Sales. The
increase
in labor costs was driven principally by the consolidation of RGNext in the first quarter of 2019 described above in Total Net Sales. The
decrease
in other cost of sales and other operating expenses was driven primarily by a non-cash gain of $21 million from the remeasurement of our equity method investment in RGNext to fair value in the first quarter of 2019, which was recorded as a reduction to cost of sales.
As discussed above in Total Net Sales, in the first quarter of 2019, we acquired additional equity ownership in the RGNext joint venture.
Operating Income and Margin—
The
increase
in operating income of
$33 million
and the related increase in operating margin in the
second quarter of 2019
compared to the
second quarter of 2018
was primarily due to a net change in EAC adjustments of
$25 million
spread across numerous programs with no individual or common significant driver.
The
increase
in operating income of
$103 million
and the related increase in operating margin in the
first six months of 2019
compared to the
first six months of 2018
was primarily due to a change in mix and other performance of
$47 million
and a net change in EAC adjustments of
$37 million
. The change in mix and other performance was primarily due to the non-cash gain of $21 million from the remeasurement of our equity method investment in RGNext in the first quarter of 2019 described above in Total Operating Expenses and a $13 million gain in the first quarter of 2019 on the sale of residual materials and supplies previously used to support the Warfighter FOCUS programs. The net change in EAC adjustments was spread across numerous programs with no individual or common significant driver.
Backlog and Bookings—
Backlog was
$6,652 million
at
June 30, 2019
compared to
$6,233 million
at
December 31, 2018
. The
increase
in backlog of
$419 million
at
June 30, 2019
compared to
December 31, 2018
was primarily due to the consolidation of RGNext, as described above in Total Net Sales. Bookings
increased
by
$196 million
in the
second quarter of 2019
compared to the
second quarter of 2018
. In the
second quarter of 2019
, IIS booked $146 million on domestic and foreign training programs in support of Warfighter FOCUS activities and $105 million to provide cybersecurity support for an international customer. IIS also booked $821 million on a number of classified contracts. In the
second quarter of 2018
, IIS booked $227 million on domestic training programs and $71 million on foreign training programs in support of Warfighter FOCUS activities. IIS also booked $802 million on a number of classified contracts.
Bookings
increase
d by
$756 million
in the
first six months of 2019
compared to the
first six months of 2018
. In addition to the bookings above, in the
first six months of 2019
, IIS booked $148 million on domestic and foreign training programs in support of Warfighter FOCUS activities and $92 million to provide support for the North Warning System for the Canadian government. IIS also booked $744 million on a number of classified contracts. In addition to the bookings above, in the
first six months of 2018
, IIS booked $80 million on domestic and foreign training programs in support of Warfighter FOCUS activities. IIS also booked $514 million on a number of classified contracts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Missile Systems
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
% Change
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
% Change
|
Total net sales
|
|
$
|
2,210
|
|
|
$
|
2,051
|
|
|
7.8
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,216
|
|
|
$
|
3,899
|
|
|
8.1
|
%
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales—labor
|
|
710
|
|
|
637
|
|
|
11.5
|
%
|
|
1,395
|
|
|
1,259
|
|
|
10.8
|
%
|
Cost of sales—materials and subcontractors
|
|
971
|
|
|
888
|
|
|
9.3
|
%
|
|
1,854
|
|
|
1,714
|
|
|
8.2
|
%
|
Other cost of sales and other operating expenses
|
|
276
|
|
|
295
|
|
|
(6.4
|
)%
|
|
524
|
|
|
483
|
|
|
8.5
|
%
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
1,957
|
|
|
1,820
|
|
|
7.5
|
%
|
|
3,773
|
|
|
3,456
|
|
|
9.2
|
%
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
253
|
|
|
$
|
231
|
|
|
9.5
|
%
|
|
$
|
443
|
|
|
$
|
443
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
Operating margin
|
|
11.4
|
%
|
|
11.3
|
%
|
|
|
|
10.5
|
%
|
|
11.4
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Operating Income
(in millions)
|
|
Three Months Ended Jun 30, 2019 Versus Three Months Ended Jul 1, 2018
|
|
Six Months Ended Jun 30, 2019 Versus Six Months Ended Jul 1, 2018
|
Volume
|
|
|
|
$
|
17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
40
|
|
|
|
Net change in EAC adjustments
|
|
|
|
(13
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
(37
|
)
|
|
|
Mix and other performance
|
|
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(3
|
)
|
|
|
Total change in operating income
|
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
% Change
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
% Change
|
Bookings
|
|
$
|
2,351
|
|
|
$
|
2,916
|
|
|
(19.4
|
)%
|
|
$
|
3,057
|
|
|
$
|
4,306
|
|
|
(29.0
|
)%
|
Total Net Sales—
The
increase
in total net sales of
$159 million
in the
second quarter of 2019
compared to the
second quarter of 2018
was primarily due to higher net sales of $79 million on classified programs, higher net sales of $54 million on the HARM program awarded in the second quarter of 2019 and higher net sales of $48 million on the Phalanx program primarily due to planned increases in production and contract definitization on a performance based logistics contract in the second quarter of 2019, partially offset by lower net sales of $104 million on the Paveway program due to planned decreases in production, with the remaining change spread across numerous programs with no individual or common significant driver.
The
increase
in total net sales of
$317 million
in the
first six months of 2019
compared to the
first six months of 2018
was spread across numerous programs with no individual or common significant driver. Included in the change in total net sales were lower net sales of $170 million on the Paveway program due to planned decreases in production and higher net sales of $131 million on classified programs.
Total Operating Expenses—
The
increase
in total operating expenses of
$137 million
in the
second quarter of 2019
compared to the
second quarter of 2018
was primarily due to an
increase
in materials and subcontractors costs of
$83 million
and an
increase
in labor costs of
$73 million
, partially offset by a
decrease
in other cost of sales and other operating expenses of
$19 million
. The
increase
in materials and subcontractors costs was primarily due to increased activity on the classified programs described above in Total Net Sales. Almost half of the
increase
in labor costs was driven by increased activity on the classified programs described above in Total Net Sales, with the remaining change spread across numerous programs with no individual or common significant driver. The
decrease
in other cost of sales and other operating expenses was driven principally by lower general and administrative expenses primarily due to the timing of independent research and development costs, partially offset by the timing of costs applied to contracts through rates.
The
increase
in total operating expenses of
$317 million
in the
first six months of 2019
compared to the
first six months of 2018
was primarily due to an
increase
in materials and subcontractors costs of
$140 million
, an
increase
in labor costs of
$136 million
and an
increase
in other cost of sales and other operating expenses of
$41 million
. The
increase
in materials and subcontractors costs was spread across numerous programs with no individual or common significant driver and included increased activity on the classified programs described above in Total Net Sales and decreased activity on the Paveway program described above in Total Net Sales. Almost half of the
increase
in labor costs was driven by increased activity on the classified programs described above in Total Net Sales, with the remaining change spread across numerous programs with no individual or common significant driver. The
increase
in other cost of sales and other operating expenses was driven principally by the cost of exchange credits granted to the customer in return for transferring material to us to be refurbished on the HARM program awarded in the second quarter of 2019.
Operating Income and Margin—
The
increase
of
$22 million
in operating income in the
second quarter of 2019
compared to the
second quarter of 2018
was primarily due to a change in mix and other performance of
$18 million
and an
increase
in volume of
$17 million
, partially offset by a net change in EAC adjustments of
$13 million
. The change in mix and other performance was spread across numerous programs with no individual or common significant driver. The
increase
in volume was spread across numerous programs with no individual or common significant driver. The net change in EAC adjustments was primarily driven by a $39 million loss reserve recorded in the second quarter of 2019 for a potential termination for default on a U.S. customer program, as we determined we would not be able to execute the technical scope and other requirements, partially due to conditions outside our control, as discussed further in Commitments and Contingencies, partially offset by a $31 million favorable net change in EAC adjustments on the Phalanx program primarily due to improved net performance on refurbishment contracts and contract definitization on a performance based logistics contract in the second quarter of 2019. Included in the net change in EAC adjustments was a total adjustment of $26 million on two contracts in the second quarter of 2019 primarily driven by reductions of expected costs to fulfill industrial cooperation agreements for an international customer due to a favorable change in requirements. Operating margin in the
second quarter of 2019
was relatively consistent with the
second quarter of 2018
.
Operating income in the
first six months of 2019
was relatively consistent with the
first six months of 2018
. The
increase
in volume of
$40 million
was spread across numerous programs with no individual or common significant driver. The net change in EAC adjustments of
$37 million
was principally driven by a $39 million loss reserve recorded in the second quarter of 2019 for a potential termination for default on a U.S. customer program, as we determined we would not be able to execute the technical scope and other requirements partially due to conditions outside our control. Included in the net change in EAC adjustments was a total adjustment of $26 million on two contracts in the second quarter of 2019 primarily driven by reductions of expected costs to fulfill industrial cooperation agreements for an international customer due to a favorable change in requirements. The decrease in operating margin in the
first six months of 2019
compared to the
first six months of 2018
was primarily due to the net change in EAC adjustments.
Backlog and Bookings—
Backlog was
$12,778 million
at
June 30, 2019
compared to
$13,976 million
at
December 31, 2018
. The
decrease
in backlog of
$1,198 million
at
June 30, 2019
compared to
December 31, 2018
was primarily due to sales in excess of bookings within our Strategic and Naval Systems (SNS) product line. Bookings
decreased
by
$565 million
in the
second quarter of 2019
compared to the
second quarter of 2018
. In the
second quarter of 2019
, MS booked
$477 million for AIM-9X Sidewinder short-range air-to-air missiles for the U.S. Navy, U.S. Air Force and international customers, $232 million for Tube-launched, Optically-tracked, Wireless-guided (TOW®) missiles for the U.S. Army, U.S. Marine Corps and international customers, $200 million for Excalibur® for the U.S. Army, $190 million for the Coyote® Rapid Development Program (CRDP) for a U.S. customer, $120 million for StormBreaker™ for the U.S. Air Force and $101 million for HARM for the U.S Air Force and international customers. MS also booked $448 million on a number of classified contracts. In the
second quarter of 2018
, MS booked $933 million for Standard Missile-3 (SM-3®) for the Missile Defense Agency (MDA) and an international customer, $237 million for Rolling Airframe Missile (RAM™) for the U.S. Navy and international customers, $205 million for TOW missiles for the U.S. Army, U.S. Marine Corps and international customers, $167 million for Tomahawk for the U.S. Navy, U.S. Air Force and international customers, $109 million for Miniature Air Launched Decoy (MALD®) for the U.S. Air Force, $99 million for Excalibur for the U.S. Army and $78 million for Evolved Seasparrow Missile (ESSM®) for the U.S. Navy and international customers. MS also booked $707 million on a number of classified contracts, including $127 million on a major contract.
Bookings
decrease
d by
$1,249 million
in the
first six months of 2019
compared to the
first six months of 2018
. In addition to the bookings above, in the
first six months of 2019
, MS booked $131 million for ESSM for the U.S. Navy and an international customer and $160 million for RAM for the U.S. Navy and international customers. MS also booked $154 million on a number of classified contracts. In addition to the bookings above, in the
first six months of 2018
, MS booked $601 million for Advanced Medium-Range Air-to-Air Missile (AMRAAM®) for the U.S. Air Force, U.S. Navy and international customers, $255 million for StormBreaker, for the U.S. Air Force and $114 million for Commander’s Independent Thermal Viewers (CITV) for the U.S. Army and an international customer. MS also booked $130 million on a number of classified contracts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Space and Airborne Systems
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
% Change
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
% Change
|
Total net sales
|
|
$
|
1,817
|
|
|
$
|
1,605
|
|
|
13.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
3,470
|
|
|
$
|
3,173
|
|
|
9.4
|
%
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales—labor
|
|
795
|
|
|
680
|
|
|
16.9
|
%
|
|
1,548
|
|
|
1,368
|
|
|
13.2
|
%
|
Cost of sales—materials and subcontractors
|
|
487
|
|
|
435
|
|
|
12.0
|
%
|
|
911
|
|
|
826
|
|
|
10.3
|
%
|
Other cost of sales and other operating expenses
|
|
306
|
|
|
284
|
|
|
7.7
|
%
|
|
570
|
|
|
580
|
|
|
(1.7
|
)%
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
1,588
|
|
|
1,399
|
|
|
13.5
|
%
|
|
3,029
|
|
|
2,774
|
|
|
9.2
|
%
|
Operating income
|
|
$
|
229
|
|
|
$
|
206
|
|
|
11.2
|
%
|
|
$
|
441
|
|
|
$
|
399
|
|
|
10.5
|
%
|
Operating margin
|
|
12.6
|
%
|
|
12.8
|
%
|
|
|
|
12.7
|
%
|
|
12.6
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in Operating Income
(in millions)
|
|
Three Months Ended Jun 30, 2019 Versus Three Months Ended Jul 1, 2018
|
|
Six Months Ended Jun 30, 2019 Versus Six Months Ended Jul 1, 2018
|
Volume
|
|
|
|
$
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
29
|
|
|
|
Net change in EAC adjustments
|
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7
|
|
|
|
Mix and other performance
|
|
|
|
(2
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
Total change in operating income
|
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
% Change
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
% Change
|
Bookings
|
|
$
|
2,507
|
|
|
$
|
2,245
|
|
|
11.7
|
%
|
|
$
|
4,037
|
|
|
$
|
3,517
|
|
|
14.8
|
%
|
Total Net Sales—
The
increase
in total net sales of
$212 million
in the
second quarter of 2019
compared to the
second quarter of 2018
was primarily due to higher net sales of $51 million on classified programs principally driven by 2018 awards, higher net sales of $24 million on the Next Gen OPIR program for the U.S. Air Force awarded in third quarter of 2018 and higher net sales of $20 million on an international tactical radar systems program principally due to scheduled increases in program activity with the remaining change spread across numerous programs with no individual or common significant driver.
The
increase
in total net sales of
$297 million
in the
first six months of 2019
compared to the
first six months of 2018
was primarily due to higher net sales of $104 million on classified programs principally driven by 2018 awards, higher net sales of $40 million on the Next Gen OPIR program for the U.S. Air Force awarded in third quarter of 2018, and higher net sales of $31 million on an international tactical radar systems program principally due to scheduled increases in program activity.
Total Operating Expenses—
The
increase
in total operating expenses of
$189 million
in the
second quarter of 2019
compared to the
second quarter of 2018
was principally driven by an
increase
in labor costs of
$115 million
, an
increase
in materials and subcontractors costs of
$52 million
and an
increase
in other costs of sales and other operating expenses of
$22 million
. The
increase
in labor costs was primarily due to activity on the programs described above in Total Net Sales. The
increase
in materials and subcontractors costs was spread across numerous programs with no individual or common significant driver. The
increase
in other costs of sales and other operating expenses was principally due to a $16 million change in the amount of previously deferred precontract costs recognized based on contract awards.
The
increase
in total operating expenses of
$255 million
in the
first six months of 2019
compared to the
first six months of 2018
was primarily due to an
increase
in labor costs of
$180 million
and an
increase
in materials and subcontractors costs of
$85 million
. The
increase
in labor costs was primarily due to activity on the programs described above in Total Net Sales. The
increase
in materials and subcontractors costs was primarily due to activity on the classified programs described above in Total Net Sales and on a surveillance and targeting systems production program for the U.S. Air Force awarded in the third quarter of 2018.
Operating Income and Margin—
The
increase
in operating income of
$23 million
in the
second quarter of 2019
compared to the
second quarter of 2018
was principally due to an
increase
in volume of
$22 million
primarily driven by activity on the programs described above in Total Net Sales. Included in mix and other performance was a gain of $8 million in the second quarter of 2018 from the sale of our commercial cloud-based call center analytics business, which was recorded as a reduction to cost of sales. Operating margin in the
second quarter of 2019
was relatively consistent with the
second quarter of 2018
.
The
increase
in operating income of
$42 million
in the
first six months of 2019
compared to the
first six months of 2018
was principally due to an
increase
in volume of
$29 million
primarily driven by activity on the programs described above in Total Net Sales. Included in mix and other performance was a gain of $8 million in the second quarter of 2018 from the sale of our commercial cloud-based call center analytics business. Operating margin in the
first six months of 2019
was relatively consistent with the
first six months of 2018
.
Backlog and Bookings—
Backlog was
$10,947 million
at
June 30, 2019
compared to
$10,126 million
at
December 31, 2018
. The
increase
in backlog of
$821 million
at
June 30, 2019
compared to
December 31, 2018
was primarily driven by bookings in excess of sales principally within our Secure Sensor Solutions (S
3
) and Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Systems (ISRS) product lines. Bookings
increased
by
$262 million
in the
second quarter of 2019
compared to the
second quarter of 2018
. In the
second quarter of 2019
, SAS booked $218 million for radar components for the U.S. Navy, $93 million for the Multi-Spectral Targeting System (MTS) for the U.S. Air Force, $88 million for radar warning receivers for the U.S. Air Force, and $77 million for missile seekers for the U.S. Navy and an international customer. SAS also booked $876 million on a number of classified contracts. In the
second quarter of 2018
, SAS booked $1,121 million on a number of classified contracts, including $441 million for a major domestic classified program.
Bookings
increase
d by
$520 million
in the
first six months of 2019
compared to the
first six months of 2018
. In addition to the bookings noted above, in the
first six months of 2019
, SAS booked $302 million on the Advanced Synthetic Aperture Radar System (ASARS) program for the U.S. Air Force and $93 million for the Next Gen OPIR program for the U.S. Air Force. SAS also booked $451 million on a number of classified contracts. In addition to the bookings noted above, in the
first six months of 2018
, SAS booked $87 million for the next-generation MTS for the U.S. Air Force and $85 million for radar components for the U.S. Navy. SAS also booked $356 million on a number of classified contracts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forcepoint
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
% Change
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
% Change
|
Total net sales
|
|
$
|
156
|
|
|
$
|
148
|
|
|
5.4
|
%
|
|
$
|
314
|
|
|
$
|
289
|
|
|
8.7
|
%
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales
|
|
35
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
20.7
|
%
|
|
75
|
|
|
56
|
|
|
33.9
|
%
|
Selling and marketing
|
|
73
|
|
|
70
|
|
|
4.3
|
%
|
|
146
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
9.0
|
%
|
Research and development
|
|
30
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
(16.7
|
)%
|
|
60
|
|
|
73
|
|
|
(17.8
|
)%
|
General and administrative
|
|
21
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
45
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
9.8
|
%
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
159
|
|
|
156
|
|
|
1.9
|
%
|
|
326
|
|
|
304
|
|
|
7.2
|
%
|
Operating income (loss)
|
|
$
|
(3
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
|
(62.5
|
)%
|
|
$
|
(12
|
)
|
|
$
|
(15
|
)
|
|
(20.0
|
)%
|
Operating margin
|
|
(1.9
|
)%
|
|
(5.4
|
)%
|
|
|
|
(3.8
|
)%
|
|
(5.2
|
)%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
% Change
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
% Change
|
Bookings
|
|
$
|
148
|
|
|
$
|
148
|
|
|
—
|
%
|
|
$
|
272
|
|
|
$
|
248
|
|
|
9.7
|
%
|
Total Net Sales—
The
increase
in total net sales of
$8 million
in the
second quarter of 2019
compared to the
second quarter of 2018
was principally due to $10 million of higher Global Government and Critical Infrastructure sales primarily due to a higher volume of product bookings. Total net sales excluded the unfavorable impact related to the deferred revenue acquisition accounting adjustments described below in Acquisition Accounting Adjustments.
The
increase
in total net sales of
$25 million
in the
first six months of 2019
compared to the
first six months of 2018
was principally due to $24 million of higher Global Government and Critical Infrastructure sales primarily due to a higher volume of product bookings. Total net sales excluded the unfavorable impact related to the deferred revenue acquisition accounting adjustments described below in Acquisition Accounting Adjustments.
Total Operating Expenses—
We disclose our operating expenses for the segment, which excludes amortization of acquired intangible assets and certain other acquisition and acquisition related expenses, in terms of the following:
|
|
–
|
Cost of sales—labor and overhead costs associated with analytic and technical support services; infrastructure costs associated with maintaining our databases; and labor, materials and overhead costs associated with providing our product offerings;
|
|
|
–
|
Selling and marketing—labor costs related to personnel engaged in selling and marketing and customer support functions; costs related to public relations, advertising, promotions and travel; and related overhead costs;
|
|
|
–
|
Research and development—labor costs for the development and management of new and existing products; and related overhead costs; and
|
|
|
–
|
General and administrative—labor costs for our executive, finance and administrative personnel; third party professional service fees; and related overhead costs.
|
Total operating expenses in the
second quarter of 2019
were relatively consistent with the
second quarter of 2018
. The
increase
in cost of sales of
$6 million
was principally due to staffing to support fulfillment of higher services sales. The
decrease
in research and development expenses of
$6 million
was principally driven by optimization of our research and development labor force, including headcount reductions and an increase in capitalized labor costs related to the development of our Software as a Service (SaaS) platform. Total operating expenses excluded amortization of acquired intangible assets as described below in Acquisition Accounting Adjustments and certain unallocated costs which are included in Corporate.
Total operating expenses in the
first six months of 2019
increased
$22 million
compared to the
first six months of 2018
primarily due to an
increase
in cost of sales of
$19 million
and an
increase
in selling and marketing expenses of
$12 million
, partially offset
by a
decrease
in research and development expenses of
$13 million
. The
increase
in cost of sales was principally due to staffing to support fulfillment of higher services sales and increased hardware sales. The
increase
in selling and marketing expense was principally driven by higher costs for the sales organization due to increased staffing and training. The
decrease
in research and development expenses was principally driven by optimization of our research and development labor force, including headcount reductions and an increase in capitalized labor costs related to the development of our SaaS platform. Total operating expenses excluded amortization of acquired intangible assets as described below in Acquisition Accounting Adjustments and certain unallocated costs which are included in Corporate.
Operating Income (Loss) and Margin—
The change in operating income (loss) of
$5 million
and the related change in operating margin in the
second quarter of 2019
compared to the
second quarter of 2018
was primarily due to the increase in total net sales described above in Total Net Sales.
The change in operating income (loss) of
$3 million
and the related change in operating margin in the
first six months of 2019
compared to the
first six months of 2018
was primarily due to the increase in total net sales described above in Total Net Sales, partially offset by the increase in total operating expenses described above in Total Operating Expenses.
Backlog and Bookings—
Backlog was
$494 million
at
June 30, 2019
,
$528 million
at
December 31, 2018
and
$454 million
at
July 1, 2018
. The
decrease
in backlog of
$34 million
at
June 30, 2019
compared to
December 31, 2018
was primarily due to the seasonality of the Enterprise Security products experiencing higher bookings in the fourth quarter of each year.
Bookings in the
second quarter of 2019
were relatively consistent with the
second quarter of 2018
. Bookings
increased
by
$24 million
in the
first six months of 2019
compared to the
first six months of 2018
primarily due to the volume of Global Government and Critical Infrastructure awards.
Acquisition Accounting Adjustments
Acquisition Accounting Adjustments include the adjustments to record acquired deferred revenue at fair value as part of our purchase price allocation process, referred to as the deferred revenue adjustment, and the amortization of acquired intangible assets related to historical acquisitions. These adjustments are not considered part of management’s evaluation of segment results.
The components of Acquisition Accounting Adjustments were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
(In millions)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
Deferred revenue adjustment
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(4
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8
|
)
|
Amortization of acquired intangibles
|
|
(27
|
)
|
|
(30
|
)
|
|
(54
|
)
|
|
(59
|
)
|
Total Acquisition Accounting Adjustments
|
|
$
|
(27
|
)
|
|
$
|
(34
|
)
|
|
$
|
(55
|
)
|
|
$
|
(67
|
)
|
The deferred revenue adjustment
related to acquisitions in the Forcepoint segment.
Amortization of acquired intangibles related to acquisitions in the segments was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
(In millions)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
Integrated Defense Systems
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Intelligence, Information and Services
|
|
6
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
11
|
|
Missile Systems
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
Space and Airborne Systems
|
|
1
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
4
|
|
Forcepoint
|
|
20
|
|
|
21
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
43
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
54
|
|
|
$
|
59
|
|
The change in our Acquisition Accounting Adjustments of
$7 million
in the
second quarter of 2019
compared to the
second quarter of 2018
was due to a
$4 million
decrease in the deferred revenue adjustment, principally driven by lower amounts recognized related to the Stonesoft acquisition in the first quarter of 2016.
The change in our Acquisition Accounting Adjustments of
$12 million
in the
first six months of 2019
compared to the
first six months of 2018
was due to a
$7 million
decrease in the deferred revenue adjustment, principally driven by lower amounts recognized related to the Stonesoft acquisition in the first quarter of 2016.
FAS/CAS Operating Adjustment
The FAS/CAS Operating Adjustment represents the difference between the service cost component of our pension and
other postretirement benefit (PRB) expense or income under Financial Accounting Standards (FAS) requirements under U.S. Generally Accepted Accounting Principles (GAAP) and our pension and PRB expense under U.S. government Cost Accounting Standards (CAS).
The results of each segment only include pension and PRB expense under CAS that we generally recover through the pricing of our products and services to the U.S. government.
The pension and PRB components of the FAS/CAS Operating Adjustment were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
(In millions)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
FAS/CAS Pension Operating Adjustment
|
|
$
|
361
|
|
|
$
|
350
|
|
|
$
|
723
|
|
|
$
|
701
|
|
FAS/CAS PRB Operating Adjustment
|
|
2
|
|
|
3
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
6
|
|
FAS/CAS Operating Adjustment
|
|
$
|
363
|
|
|
$
|
353
|
|
|
$
|
729
|
|
|
$
|
707
|
|
The components of the FAS/CAS Operating Adjustment were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
(In millions)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
FAS service cost (expense)
|
|
$
|
(104
|
)
|
|
$
|
(130
|
)
|
|
$
|
(210
|
)
|
|
$
|
(258
|
)
|
CAS expense
|
|
467
|
|
|
483
|
|
|
939
|
|
|
965
|
|
FAS/CAS Operating Adjustment
|
|
$
|
363
|
|
|
$
|
353
|
|
|
$
|
729
|
|
|
$
|
707
|
|
The change in our FAS/CAS Operating Adjustment of
$10 million
in the
second quarter of 2019
compared to the
second quarter of 2018
was driven by a
$26 million
decrease
in our FAS service cost, partially offset by a
$16 million
decrease
in our CAS expense. The
decrease
in our FAS service cost was primarily due to the higher discount rate at December 31, 2018 compared to the discount rate at December 31, 2017. The
decrease
in our CAS expense was primarily due to unfavorable asset performance during 2018.
The change in our FAS/CAS Operating Adjustment of
$22 million
in the
first six months of 2019
compared to the
first six months of 2018
was driven by a
$48 million
decrease
in our FAS service cost, partially offset by a
$26 million
decrease
in our CAS expense. The
decrease
in our FAS service cost was principally driven by the higher discount rate at December 31, 2018 compared to the discount rate at December 31, 2017. The
decrease
in our CAS expense was primarily due to unfavorable asset performance during 2018.
Corporate
Corporate operating income consists of unallocated costs and certain other corporate costs not considered part of management’s evaluation of reportable segment operating performance.
Operating income related to Corporate was as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
(In millions)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
Corporate
|
|
$
|
(18
|
)
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
(34
|
)
|
|
$
|
(25
|
)
|
The change in operating income related to Corporate of
$21 million
in the
second
quarter of
2019
compared to the
second
quarter of
2018
was primarily due to
$23 million
of transaction costs related to the proposed merger with UTC.
Operating income related to Corporate in the
first six months of 2019
included
$23 million
of transaction costs related to the proposed merger with UTC and miscellaneous favorable items not allocated to segments results, and was relatively consistent with the
first six months of 2018
.
FINANCIAL CONDITION AND LIQUIDITY
Overview
We pursue a capital deployment strategy that balances funding for growing our business, including: (1) capital expenditures, acquisitions and research and development; (2) prudently managing our balance sheet, including debt repayments and pension contributions; and (3) returning cash to our shareholders, including dividend payments and share repurchases
, as outlined below. Our need for, cost of and access to funds are dependent on future operating results, as well as other external conditions. We currently expect that cash and cash equivalents, cash flow from operations and other available financing resources will be sufficient to meet anticipated operating, capital expenditure, investment, debt service and other financing requirements during the next 12 months and for the foreseeable future.
In addition, the following table highlights selected measures of our liquidity and capital resources
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Dec 31, 2018
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
2,173
|
|
|
$
|
3,608
|
|
Working capital
(1)
|
|
3,655
|
|
|
3,674
|
|
Amount available under credit facilities
|
|
950
|
|
|
950
|
|
(1) Amounts have been recast to reflect the adoption of ASU 2016-02,
Leases (Topic 842).
Operating Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
(In millions)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities from continuing operations
|
|
$
|
412
|
|
|
$
|
1,439
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) operating activities
|
|
412
|
|
|
1,440
|
|
The
decrease
in net cash provided by (used in) operating activities of
$1,028 million
in the
first six months of 2019
compared to the
first six months of 2018
, was primarily due to higher net tax payments as discussed below in Tax Payments and Refunds, an unfavorable change in contract assets and contract liabilities principally driven by the timing of collections on certain international contracts, and the timing of vendor payments.
Pension Plan Contributions—
We made the following contributions to our pension and PRB plans:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
(In millions)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
Required pension contributions
|
|
$
|
196
|
|
|
$
|
488
|
|
PRB contributions
|
|
11
|
|
|
9
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
207
|
|
|
$
|
497
|
|
Tax Payments and Refunds—
We made (received) the following net tax payments (refunds):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
(In millions)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
Federal
|
|
$
|
404
|
|
|
$
|
(185
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
20
|
|
|
34
|
|
State
|
|
24
|
|
|
12
|
|
We expect full-year net federal, foreign and state tax payments to be approximately
$920 million
in
2019
.
Interest Payments
—We made interest payments on our outstanding debt of
$97 million
in both the
first six months of 2019 and 2018
.
Investing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
(In millions)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
$
|
(469
|
)
|
|
$
|
(77
|
)
|
The change in net cash provided by (used in) investing activities of
$392 million
in the
first six months of 2019
compared to the
first six months of 2018
was primarily due to our short-term investments activity, as described below in Short-term Investments Activity, and an increase in additions to property, plant and equipment as described below in Additions to Property, Plant and Equipment and Capitalized Internal-Use Software.
Additions to Property, Plant and Equipment and Capitalized Internal-Use Software
—Additions to property, plant and equipment and capitalized internal-use software were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
(In millions)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
Additions to property, plant and equipment
|
|
$
|
438
|
|
|
$
|
366
|
|
Additions to capitalized internal-use software
|
|
25
|
|
|
28
|
|
The
increase
in additions to property, plant and equipment of
$72 million
in the
first six months of 2019
compared to the
first six months of 2018
was primarily driven by program related requirements, due to recent and anticipated growth, and investment in productivity initiatives, including high-technology production facilities and continuing factory automation upgrades.
We expect full-year property, plant and equipment and capitalized internal-use software expenditures to be between approximately
$1,050–$1,125 million
and
$70–$95 million
, respectively, in
2019
, consistent with the anticipated needs of our business and for specific investments including capital assets and facility improvements.
Short-term Investments Activity—
We may invest in marketable securities in accordance with our short-term investment policy and cash management strategy. Marketable securities are classified as available-for-sale and are recorded at fair value as short-term investments in our consolidated balance sheets.
There was no activity on short-term investments in the
first six months of 2019
. In the
first six months of 2018
, maturities of short-term investments were
$309 million
.
Acquisitions and Divestitures—
In pursuing our business strategies, we acquire and make investments in certain businesses that meet strategic and financial criteria
, and divest of certain non-core businesses, investments and assets when appropriate.
In the first quarter of 2019, we amended and restated the RGNext joint venture agreement and acquired an additional 10% equity ownership in the joint venture increasing our equity ownership to 60%. See “Note 10: Acquisitions, Divestitures and Goodwill” within Item 1 of this Form 10-Q for additional detail.
In May 2018, we completed the sale of our commercial cloud-based call center analytics solutions business for
$11 million
in cash, net of transaction-related costs.
Financing Activities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
(In millions)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
Net cash provided by (used in) financing activities
|
|
$
|
(1,381
|
)
|
|
$
|
(1,376
|
)
|
We generally use cash provided by operating activities and proceeds from the issuance of new debt as our primary source for the repayment of debt, payment of dividends, pension contributions and the repurchase of our common stock.
The change in net cash provided by (used in) financing activities of
$5 million
in the
first six months of 2019
compared to the
first six months of 2018
was primarily due to an increase in the dividends paid as described below in Cash Dividends, partially offset by the activity on our share repurchases to satisfy our tax withholding obligations, as discussed below in Share Repurchases.
Share Repurchases—
From time to time, our Board of Directors authorizes the repurchase of shares of our common stock.
In November 2015, our Board authorized the repurchase of up to
$2.0 billion
of our outstanding common stock.
In November 2017, our Board also authorized the repurchase of up to an additional
$2.0 billion
of our outstanding common stock.
At
June 30, 2019
, we had approximately
$0.7 billion
available under the 2017 repurchase program.
H
owever, the merger agreement restricts us from repurchasing shares other than to satisfy tax withholding obligations. For more information refer to “Note 2: Proposed Merger with United Technologies Corporation (UTC)
” within Item 1 of this Form 10-Q.
Share repurchases also include shares surrendered by employees to satisfy tax withholding obligations in connection with
restricted stock, restricted stock units (RSUs) and Long-term Performance Plan (LTPP)
awards issued to employees.
Our share repurchases were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
(In millions)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
|
|
$
|
Shares
|
|
|
$
|
Shares
|
|
Shares repurchased under our share repurchase programs
|
|
$
|
800
|
|
4.4
|
|
|
$
|
800
|
|
3.8
|
|
Shares repurchased to satisfy tax withholding obligations
|
|
66
|
|
0.4
|
|
|
91
|
|
0.4
|
|
Total share repurchases
|
|
$
|
866
|
|
4.8
|
|
|
$
|
891
|
|
4.2
|
|
Cash Dividends—
Our Board of Directors authorized the following cash dividends:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Six Months Ended
|
(In millions, except per share amounts)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Jul 1, 2018
|
Cash dividends declared per share
|
|
$
|
1.885
|
|
|
$
|
1.735
|
|
Total dividends paid
|
|
510
|
|
|
480
|
|
In March
2019
, our Board of Directors authorized an
8.6%
increase to our annual dividend payout rate from
$3.47
to
$3.77
per share.
Dividends are subject to quarterly approval by our Board of Directors.
In May 2019, we entered into treasury rate lock contracts with a notional amount of
$375 million
, which will mature in the fourth quarter of 2019, in anticipation of the probable issuance of debt.
CAPITAL RESOURCES
Long-term Debt—
Total long-term debt, including the current portion of long-term debt, was
$4.8 billion
at both
June 30, 2019
and
December 31, 2018
. Our outstanding debt bears contractual interest at fixed interest rates ranging from 2.5% to 7.2% and matures at various dates from 2020 through 2044.
Cash and Cash Equivalents—
Cash and cash equivalents were
$2.2 billion
and
$3.6 billion
at
June 30, 2019
and
December 31, 2018
, respectively.
We may invest in: U.S. Treasuries; AAA/Aaa rated money market funds; certificates of deposit, time deposits and commercial paper of banks with a minimum long-term debt rating of A or A2 and minimum short-term debt rating of A-1 and P-1; and commercial paper of corporations with a minimum long-term debt rating of A- or A3 and minimum short-term debt rating of A-2 and P-2.
Cash and cash equivalents balances held at our foreign subsidiaries were approximately
$321 million
and
$326 million
at
June 30, 2019
and
December 31, 2018
, respectively.
Our undistributed earnings of our foreign subsidiaries are not permanently reinvested.
We continuously evaluate our liquidity needs and ability to meet global cash requirements as a part of our overall capital deployment strategy. Factors that affect our global capital deployment strategy include anticipated cash flows, the ability to repatriate cash in a tax efficient manner, funding requirements for operations and investment activities, acquisitions and divestitures, and capital market conditions.
Commercial Paper—
The Company may issue up to
$1.25 billion
of unsecured commercial paper notes, as the commercial paper is backed by our credit facility. At
June 30, 2019
,
short-term commercial paper borrowings outstanding were
$300 million
,
which had a weighted-average interest rate and original maturity period of
2.502%
and
12 days
, respectively. The maximum amount of short-term commercial paper borrowings outstanding during the
first six months of 2019
was
$300 million
. At
December 31, 2018
,
short-term commercial paper borrowings outstanding
were
$300 million
,
which had a weighted-average interest rate and original maturity period of
2.954%
and
16 days
, respectively.
Credit Facilities—
In November 2015, we entered into a
$1.25 billion
revolving credit facility maturing in November 2020.
Under the
$1.25 billion
credit facility, we can borrow, issue letters of credit and backstop commercial paper. Borrowings under this facility bear interest at various rate options, including LIBOR plus a margin based on our credit ratings. Based on our credit ratings at
June 30, 2019
, borrowings would generally bear interest at LIBOR plus
80.5
basis points. The credit facility is composed of commitments from approximately
20
separate highly rated lenders, each committing no more than
10%
of the facility. As of
June 30, 2019
and
December 31, 2018
, there were no borrowings or letters of credit outstanding under this credit facility. The
$300 million
of commercial paper outstanding at
June 30, 2019
reduced the amount available under our credit facility to
$950 million
.
Under the
$1.25 billion
credit facility we must comply with certain covenants, including a ratio of total debt to total capitalization of no more than
60%
.
We were in compliance with the credit facility covenants as of
June 30, 2019
.
Our ratio of total debt to total capitalization, as those terms are defined in the credit facility, was
29.3%
at
June 30, 2019
.
We are providing this ratio as this metric is used by our lenders to monitor our leverage and is also a threshold that could limit our ability to utilize this facility.
Shelf Registrations—
We have an effective shelf registration statement with the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), filed in March 2019, which covers the registration of debt securities, common stock, preferred stock and warrants.
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Environmental Matters
—
We are involved in various stages of investigation and cleanup related to remediation of various environmental sites. Our estimate of the liability of total environmental remediation costs includes the use of a discount rate and takes into account that a portion of these costs is eligible for future recovery through the pricing of our products and services to the U.S. government. We regularly assess the probability of recovery of these costs, which requires us to make assumptions about the extent of cost recovery under our contracts and the amount of future contract activity. We consider such recovery probable based on government contracting regulations and our long history of receiving reimbursement for such costs, and accordingly have recorded the estimated future recovery of these costs from the U.S. government within prepaid expenses and other current assets in our consolidated balance sheets.
Our estimates regarding remediation costs to be incurred were as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions, except percentages)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Dec 31, 2018
|
Total remediation costs—undiscounted
|
|
$
|
193
|
|
|
$
|
193
|
|
Weighted-average discount rate
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
|
5.1
|
%
|
Total remediation costs—discounted
|
|
$
|
131
|
|
|
$
|
128
|
|
Recoverable portion
|
|
86
|
|
|
82
|
|
We also lease certain government-owned properties and generally are not liable for remediation of preexisting environmental contamination at these sites. As a result, we generally do not provide for these costs in our consolidated financial statements.
Due to the complexity of environmental laws and regulations, the varying costs and effectiveness of alternative cleanup methods and technologies, the uncertainty of insurance coverage, and the unresolved extent of our responsibility, it is difficult to determine the ultimate outcome of environmental matters. However, we do not expect any additional liability to have a material adverse effect on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
Financing Arrangements
and Other—
We issue guarantees, and banks and surety companies issue, on our behalf, letters of credit and surety bonds, to meet various bid, performance, warranty, retention and advance payment obligations for us or our affiliates. These instruments expire on various dates through 2028. Additional guarantees of project performance for which there is no stated value also remain outstanding.
The stated values outstanding consisted of the following
:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(In millions)
|
|
Jun 30, 2019
|
|
Dec 31, 2018
|
Guarantees
|
|
$
|
222
|
|
|
$
|
201
|
|
Letters of credit
|
|
2,260
|
|
|
2,503
|
|
Surety bonds
|
|
74
|
|
|
166
|
|
All guarantees at
June 30, 2019
and
December 31, 2018
related to our joint venture in Thales-Raytheon Systems Air and Missile Defense Command and Control S.A.S. (TRS AMDC2).
We provide these guarantees, as well as letters of credit, to TRS AMDC2 and other affiliates to assist these entities in obtaining financing on more favorable terms, making bids on contracts and performing their contractual obligations. While we expect these entities to satisfy their loans and meet their project performance and other contractual obligations, their failure to do so may result in a future obligation to us. We periodically evaluate the risk of these entities failing to meet their obligations described above.
At
June 30, 2019
,
we believe the risk that these entities will not be able to meet their obligations is minimal for the foreseeable future based on their current financial condition. All obligations were current at
June 30, 2019
. We had an estimated liability of
$2 million
and
$3 million
at
June 30, 2019
and
December 31, 2018
, respectively, related to these guarantees.
The joint venture agreement between Raytheon and Vista Equity Partners relating to Forcepoint provides Vista Equity Partners with certain rights to require Forcepoint to pursue an initial public offering at any time after four years and three months following the closing date of May 29, 2015, or pursue a sale of the company at any time after five years following the closing date. In either of these events, Raytheon has the option to purchase all, but not less than all, of Vista Equity Partners’ interest in Forcepoint for cash at a price equal to fair value as determined under the joint venture agreement. Additionally, Vista Equity Partners has the
ability to liquidate its ownership through a put option. The put option allows Vista Equity Partners to require Raytheon to purchase all, but not less than all, of Vista Equity Partners’ interest in Forcepoint for cash at a price equal to fair value as determined under the joint venture agreement. Lastly, Raytheon has the option, to purchase all, but not less than all, of Vista Equity Partners’ interest in Forcepoint at a price equal to fair value as determined under the joint venture agreement. The joint venture agreement provides for the process under which the parties would determine the fair value of the interest and could result in a payment by Raytheon shortly after the exercise of Vista Equity Partners’ put option or Raytheon’s purchase option; however, the ultimate timing will depend on the actions of the parties and other factors. At
June 30, 2019
, the fair value of the noncontrolling interest was estimated at
$401 million
and is subject to change based upon market conditions and business performance. The estimate of fair value for purposes of presenting the redeemable noncontrolling interest, outside of stockholders’ equity, in our consolidated balance sheets could differ from the parties’ determination of fair value for the interest under the joint venture agreement.
We have entered into industrial cooperation agreements, sometimes in the form of either offset agreements or in-country industrial participation (ICIP) agreements, as a condition to obtaining orders for our products and services from certain customers in foreign countries.
At
June 30, 2019
,
the aggregate amount of our offset agreements, both agreed to and anticipated to be agreed to, had an outstanding notional value of approximately
$9.6 billion
.
These agreements are designed to return economic value to the foreign country by requiring us to engage in activities supporting local defense or commercial industries, promoting a balance of trade, developing in-country technology capabilities or addressing other local development priorities. Offset agreements may be satisfied through activities that do not require a direct cash payment, including transferring technology, providing manufacturing, training and other consulting support to in-country projects, and the purchase by third parties (e.g., our vendors) of supplies from in-country vendors. These agreements may also be satisfied through our use of cash for activities such as subcontracting with local partners, purchasing supplies from in-country vendors, providing financial support for in-country projects and making investments in local ventures. Such activities may also vary by country depending upon requirements as dictated by their governments. We typically do not commit to offset agreements until orders for our products or services are definitive. The amounts ultimately applied against our offset agreements are based on negotiations with the customers and typically require cash outlays that represent only a fraction of the notional value in the offset agreements. Offset programs usually extend over several or more years and may provide for penalties in the event we fail to perform in accordance with offset requirements. Historically, we have not been required to pay any penalties of significance.
As a U.S. government contractor, we are subject to many levels of audit and investigation by the U.S. government relating to our contract performance and compliance with applicable rules and regulations. Agencies that oversee contract performance include: the Defense Contract Audit Agency (DCAA); the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA); the Inspectors General of the U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) and other departments and agencies; the Government Accountability Office (GAO); the Department of Justice (DOJ); and Congressional Committees. Other areas of our business operations may also be subject to audit and investigation by these and/or other agencies. From time to time, agencies investigate or conduct audits to determine whether our operations are being conducted in accordance with applicable requirements. Such investigations and audits may be initiated due to a number of reasons, including as a result of a whistleblower complaint. Such investigations and audits could result in administrative, civil or criminal liabilities, including repayments, fines or penalties being imposed upon us, the suspension of government export licenses or the suspension or debarment from future U.S. government contracting. U.S. government investigations often take years to complete and many result in no adverse action against us. Our final allowable incurred costs for each year are also subject to audit and have, from time to time, resulted in disputes between us and the U.S. government, with litigation resulting at the Court of Federal Claims (COFC) or the Armed Services Board of Contract Appeals (ASBCA) or their related courts of appeals. In addition, the DOJ has, from time to time, convened grand juries to investigate possible irregularities by us. We also provide products and services to customers outside of the U.S., and those sales are subject to local government laws, regulations and procurement policies and practices. Our compliance with such local government regulations or any applicable U.S. government regulations (e.g., the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) and International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR)) may also be investigated or audited.
Other than as specifically disclosed herein, we do not expect these audits, investigations or disputes to have a material effect on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity, either individually or in the aggregate.
We do not expect any material impact on our financial results from regional developments regarding Qatar. Most of our contracts in Qatar are foreign military sales contracts through the U.S. government and represent less than 5% of our backlog at
June 30, 2019
.
Recent events have caused increased attention on U.S. defense sales to the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA). KSA represents less than
5%
of our sales and
$2.4 billion
of our backlog at
June 30, 2019
.
This includes the majority of the precision guided munitions described below, integrated air and missile defense systems, as well as other products and services
. Although we currently do not expect to be prevented from doing business in KSA, if government action impairs our ability to fulfill our contractual obligations or otherwise to continue to do business in KSA, it would have a material adverse effect on our financial results.
We have several direct commercial sales contracts for precision guided munitions with certain Middle Eastern customers for which U.S. government approvals from the State Department and Congress through the Congressional Notification process were previously delayed.
On May 24, 2019, the Administration announced an emergency certification authorizing the immediate export of 22 pending arms sales to Jordan, the United Arab Emirates (UAE) and
KSA
, waiving the requirement of Congressional Notification of these arms sales.
As a result, we were able to obtain the necessary regulatory approvals and licenses for contracts, which had approximately
$1.2 billion
of total contract value, and for which we have recognized approximately
$950 million
of sales for work performed to date and received approximately
$350 million
in advances as of
June 30, 2019
.
For those contracts for which we have not yet obtained the regulatory approval and licenses and that are not subject to the emergency certification, we had approximately
$1.1 billion
of total contract value, recognized approximately
$300 million
of sales for work performed to date and received approximately
$500 million
in advances as of
June 30, 2019
. Additionally, one of those contracts, which has a contract value of $810 million, also requires U.K. government approval. In June 2019, the U.K.’s Court of Appeal determined that the U.K. government was not fully compliant with the legal requirements in issuing export licenses for weapons to KSA. While the U.K.’s Court of Appeal did not prohibit the issuance of licenses in the future, the U.K. government will need to comply with the ruling before issuing licenses or obtain a reversal of the decision on appeal. As a result, there may be additional delays in obtaining regulatory approvals.
Certain members of Congress continue to oppose the Administration’s actions. In June and July 2019, the Senate and House, respectively, voted to pass joint resolutions of disapproval to block the Administration from approving arms sales through the emergency notification, but failed to receive the threshold needed to overcome a veto by the Administration. The Administration vetoed the joint resolutions of disapproval in July 2019 and sent them back to Congress. We do not expect Congress to have the votes necessary to override the veto. If we ultimately do not receive all of the regulatory approvals and licenses, it would have a material effect on our financial results.
In the second quarter of 2019, we identified and notified a U.S. customer that we determined we would not be able to execute on the technical scope and other requirements of an $85 million Missile Systems fixed-price program, partially due to conditions outside our control. As a result, although we continue to work with the customer to determine changes to the contract that would be mutually acceptable, we accrued a loss of $39 million at Missile Systems for a potential termination for default on the program. Our estimate of the loss was based on progress payments received to date, firm commitments to suppliers on the program and administrative costs of the customer. We believe it is remote that we will ultimately be liable for damages or the customer’s potential excess reprocurement costs, and we are unable to estimate these amounts for which we could be liable given the complexities of determining such costs under the applicable regulations.
On June 23, 2016, the U.K. held a referendum in which British citizens approved an exit from the European Union (EU), commonly referred to as “Brexit.” As a result of the referendum, there has been volatility in exchange rates versus the U.S. dollar. The British pound is the functional currency for approximately
2%
of our sales. In addition, for any contracts that are not denominated in the same currency as the functional currency (for example, contracts denominated in British pounds where the functional currency is the U.S. dollar), we enter into foreign currency forward contracts to hedge our risk related to foreign currency exchange rate fluctuations. As a result, we currently do not expect the U.K.’s exit from the EU to have a material impact on our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
In addition, various other claims and legal proceedings generally incidental to the normal course of business are pending or threatened against, or initiated by, us. We do not expect any of these proceedings to result in any additional liability or gains that would materially affect our financial position, results of operations or liquidity.
In connection with certain of our legal matters, we may be entitled to insurance recovery for qualified legal costs or other incurred costs. We do not expect any insurance recovery to have a material impact on the financial exposure that could result from these matters.
Accounting Standards
For a discussion of recent accounting pronouncements, see “Note 3: Accounting Standards” within Item 1 of this Form 10-Q.