VANCOUVER, BC, Jan. 15,
2024 /CNW/ - Panoro Minerals Ltd. (TSXV: PML)
(Lima: PML) (Frankfurt: PZM) ("Panoro", the "Company") Panoro is
pleased to announce that it has received the mineral resource
estimate for its 100% owned Cotabambas porphyry copper-gold-silver
Project located in southern Peru
from AGP Mining Consultants, based in Toronto, Canada. The updated mineral
resources at a 0.15%CuEq cut-off grade include:
- An Indicated mineral resource of 507.3 million tonnes at
0.34%Cu, 0.20 g/t Au, 2.42 g/t Ag and 0.0021%Mo, and 0.43%CuEq
grade.
- An Inferred mineral resource of 496.0 million tonnes at 0.27%
Cu, 0.17 g/t Au, 2.53 g/t Ag and 0.0027%Mo, and 0.36%CuEq
grade.
- A higher grade component within the optimized pit constraint,
demonstrating the potential for a high grade starter pit for the
project start up.
Highlights
- A Higher Grade Component of Indicated resource delineated:
- 129.0 million tonnes at 0.70% Cu, 0.44 g/t Au, 4.12 g/t Ag
and 0.0014%Mo, and 0.91% CuEq grade, at a cut-off of
0.5% CuEq;
- The higher grade component is present within the optimized pit
constraint. Tables 5 and 6 show the Mineral Resources at a
0.5% CuEq cut-off grade.
- Indicated mineral resources has increased by 333%
- Increased from 117.1 million tonnes to 507.4 million tonnes;
and
- constitutes 51% of total resources
- Inferred mineral resources has reduced by 18%
- Decreased from 605.3 million tonnes to 496.0 million tonnes;
and
- constitutes 49% of total resources
- Contained Metals have increased:
- 6.7 billion pounds Copper, 29% increase;
- 6.0 million ounces Gold, 43% increase;
- 79.8 million ounces Silver, 43% increase; and
- 53.7 million pounds Molybdenum, 85% increase
- Waste:Mineral ratio reduced
- from 2:1 to 0.65:1 for the Base Case
- Resource remains open to northeast and southwest and at
depth
- Multiple new exploration targets identified into
the Cotabambas property.
- Strong Community relations demonstrated over more than a
decade.
- Current environmental permit allows an additional 450 drilling
platforms.
Luquman Shaheen, President & CEO, states, "The Cotabambas
Project resource has achieved many important milestones. The
South Pit now has the potential to be a high grade starter pit for
the project. The high grade component of the resource, at
0.91% Cueq, is included in the South Pit. Most of the added
high grade at the South Pit is located outside the open pit
modelled in the 2015 PEA. An updated PEA will incorporate the
additional high grade resource into the mine plan. The
updated PEA will also incorporate a number of the already completed
trade-off studies and serve as a snap-shot of the prefeasibility
study. The high grade in the South Pit is open to the
southwest and to the northeast in the area between the North and
South Pit. The potential to further expand the high grade
along strike and at depth looks very promising. In addition,
the South Pit resource has a higher component of precious metals,
both Gold and Silver. The Gold resource of 6.0 million ounces
is already significant. A significant reduction in the
waste:ore ratio will also have a meaningful impact on the project
economics. Now with over 500 million tonnes at indicated category,
the project is ready for the prefeasibility study to incorporate
the new resource and completed trade-off studies which will first
be incorporated into an update on the Preliminary Economic
Assessment. The Cotabambas Project has more total, indicated
and high-grade resource, lower waste:ore ratio and expanded
exploration potential for high grade. The precious metals'
grades have the potential to grow with added resource from the
South Pit potential. The current achievements in the project
resources, together with planned improvements to the metallurgical
recoveries, infrastructure and increased commodity prices have the
potential to significantly enhance the projects economics. We
look forward to continuing to advance the Cotabambas
Project."
Mineral Resource Estimate
AGP Mining Consulting discloses a new resource estimate for the
Cotabambas copper and gold deposit, prepared in accordance with the
CIM Best Practices and disclosed in accordance with NI 43-101. The
mineral resource estimate utilized all drill and assay results
available to June 23, 2023, including
73,938 meters of drilling by Panoro distributed in 148 drillholes
and 9,923 meters of drilling from legacy campaigns distributed in
27 drillholes. The mineral resource estimate includes hypogene and
supergene sulphides and mixed/oxide copper-gold and oxide gold
mineralization contained within a single conceptual pit shell that
has been modelled to include that portion of the mineral resource
block model having a reasonable prospect for economic
extraction.
The wireframes for the Cotabambas deposit were developed based
on mineralization to constrain the interpreted mineralized domains.
Latite dikes were clipped from the principal mineralized domains
and separated into latite oxide and latite sulfide domains.
The mineral resource estimate in the Indicated and Inferred
Categories are summarized in Tables 1 and 2 below. See links to
following Figures for illustration:
- Plan 1 - North Pit, South Pit and Expansion Targets' Plan
- Section 1a - North Pit Lithology
- Section 1b - North Pit Block
Model
- Section 2a - South Pit Lithology
- Section 2b - South Pit Block
Model
Mineral Resource Statement
The Mineral Resources for the Cotabambas deposit are reported by
copper equivalent cut-off grade of 0.15 %CuEq within an optimized
pit constraint. The effective date of the Mineral Resources is
20 November 2023.
The principal metals grades were estimated by the ordinary
kriging interpolation method on capped composite copper, gold,
silver and molybdenum grades. No recoveries have been applied
to the interpolated in-situ estimated grades.
Tables 1 and 2 present the mineral resources by domain for
Indicated and Inferred mineral resources, respectively, within the
optimized pit constraint.
Table 1: Mineral Resource in Indicated Category Classified by
Mineralization Type
Zone
|
Cut-Off
Grade
% CuEq
|
Million
Tonnes
|
Cu
(%)
|
Au
(g/t)
|
Ag
(g/t)
|
Mo
(%)
|
CuEq
(%)
|
Cu
(Mlb)
|
Au
(Moz)
|
Ag
(Moz)
|
Mo
(Mlb)
|
Leach
|
0.15
|
17.0
|
0.19
|
0.22
|
1.80
|
0.0017
|
0.28
|
71
|
0.12
|
0.98
|
0.64
|
Oxide Cu*
|
0.15
|
24.7
|
0.31
|
0.22
|
2.26
|
0.0014
|
0.41
|
169
|
0.17
|
1.79
|
0.76
|
Oxide Cu-Au*
|
0.15
|
17.3
|
0.43
|
0.15
|
1.79
|
0.0015
|
0.50
|
164
|
0.08
|
1.00
|
0.57
|
Mixed
|
0.15
|
32.3
|
0.46
|
0.22
|
2.29
|
0.0014
|
0.58
|
330
|
0.23
|
2.38
|
1.00
|
Supergene
|
0.15
|
3.6
|
1.36
|
0.34
|
3.51
|
0.0015
|
1.53
|
109
|
0.04
|
0.41
|
0.12
|
Hypogene
|
0.15
|
412.5
|
0.32
|
0.20
|
2.48
|
0.0023
|
0.42
|
2,910
|
2.65
|
32.89
|
20.92
|
Total
|
0.15
|
507.3
|
0.33
|
0.20
|
2.42
|
0.0021
|
0.43
|
3,753
|
3.29
|
39.45
|
24.02
|
Note: Base case in
bold. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have
demonstrated economic viability. Summation errors may occur due to
rounding. Open pit mineral resources are reported within optimized
constraining shell. Reported open pit cut-off grade is 0.15%CuEq.
Breakeven open pit cut-off grade is 0.07% CuEq. Mineral Resources
have an effective date of November 20, 2023. The Qualified
Person responsible for this resource statement is Paul Daigle,
P.Geo. (APGO, 1592). . Copper equivalent ( CuEq)
is calculated using the equations: Oxide: CuEq = Cu + 0.4126*Au +
0.0038*Ag + 0.000*Mo; Mixed: CuEq = Cu + 0.5819*Au + 0.0063*Ag +
0.0003*Mo; Supergene: CuEq = Cu + 0.4498*Au + 0.0054*Ag +
0.0002*Mo; and Hypogene: CuEq = Cu + 0.4373*Au+0.0053*Ag+0.0002*Mo,
based on the differentials of long range metal prices net of
selling costs and metallurgical recoveries for gold and copper and
silver. Metal prices for the CuEq formulas are: US$ 4.25/lb Cu, US$
1,850 /Oz Au; US$ 23.00 /Oz Ag; and US$ 20.00 /lb Mo. Metal
recoveries for the CuEq formulas are for Oxide: 0.0% Cu, 65% Au,
48% Ag, and 0.0% Mo; for Mixed: 60% Cu, 55% Au, 48% Ag, 40% Mo; for
Supergene: 87.5% Cu, 62% Au, 60.4% Ag, 40% Mo; and for Hypogene:
90% Cu, 62% Au, 60.4% Ag and 40% Mo. Capping of grades varied
between 0.50 %Cu and 3.7%Cu, 0.33 g/t Au and 2.3 g/t Au, and
between 0.029%Mo and 0.060%Mo; on 6m composites by domain. The
density varies between 2.20 g/cm3 and 2.66 g/cm3. Mineralization
would be mined from open pit and treated using conventional
flotation. Rounding in accordance with reporting guidelines may
result in summation differences. *Oxide Cu - amenable to
leaching; Oxide Cu-Au amenable to blending with sulphides (Au
>0.25 g/t).
|
|
Table 2: Mineral Resource in Inferred Category Classified by
Mineralization Type
Zone
|
Cut-Off
Grade
% Cueq
|
Million
Tonnes
|
Cu
(%)
|
Au
(g/t)
|
Ag
(g/t)
|
Mo
(%)
|
CuEq
(%)
|
Cu
(Mlb)
|
Au
(Moz)
|
Ag
(Moz)
|
Mo
(Mlb)
|
Leach
|
0.15
|
5.1
|
0.15
|
0.10
|
1.72
|
0.0016
|
0.19
|
17
|
0.02
|
0.28
|
0.18
|
Oxide Cu*
|
0.15
|
12.6
|
0.24
|
0.12
|
1.82
|
0.0015
|
0.30
|
67
|
0.05
|
0.74
|
0.42
|
Oxide Cu-Au*
|
0.15
|
8.7
|
0.37
|
0.10
|
1.59
|
0.0018
|
0.42
|
71
|
0.03
|
0.44
|
0.34
|
Mixed
|
0.15
|
7.1
|
0.18
|
0.15
|
4.57
|
0.0013
|
0.29
|
29
|
0.04
|
1.04
|
0.20
|
Supergene
|
0.15
|
1.90
|
0.82
|
0.46
|
3.95
|
0.0018
|
1.05
|
35
|
0.03
|
0.24
|
0.08
|
Hypogene
|
0.15
|
460.6
|
0.27
|
0.17
|
2.54
|
0.0028
|
0.36
|
2,742
|
2.52
|
37.61
|
28.43
|
Total
|
0.15
|
496.0
|
0.27
|
0.17
|
2.53
|
0.0027
|
0.36
|
2,961
|
2.69
|
40.86
|
29.49
|
Note: Base case in
bold. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have
demonstrated economic viability. Summation errors may occur due to
rounding. Open pit mineral resources are reported within optimized
constraining shell. Reported open pit cut-off grade is 0.15%CuEq.
Breakeven Open pit cut-off grade is 0.07% CuEq. Mineral Resources
have an effective date of November 20, 2023. The Qualified Person
responsible for this resource statement is Paul Daigle, P.Geo.
(APGO, 1592). Copper equivalent ( CuEq) is calculated
using the equations: Oxide: CuEq = Cu + 0.4126*Au + 0.0038*Ag +
0.000*Mo; Mixed: CuEq = Cu + 0.5819*Au + 0.0063*Ag + 0.0003*Mo;
Supergene: CuEq = Cu + 0.4498*Au + 0.0054*Ag + 0.0002*Mo; and
Hypogene: CuEq = Cu + 0.4373*Au+0.0053*Ag+0.0002*Mo, based on the
differentials of long range metal prices net of selling costs and
metallurgical recoveries for gold and copper and silver. Metal
prices for the CuEq formulas are: US$ 4.25/lb Cu, US$ 1,850 /Oz Au;
US$ 23.00 /Oz Ag; and US$ 20.00 /lb Mo. Metal recoveries for the
CuEq formulas are for Oxide: 0.0% Cu, 65% Au, 48% Ag, and 0.0% Mo;
for Mixed: 60% Cu, 55% Au, 48% Ag, 40% Mo; for Supergene: 87.5% Cu,
62% Au, 60.4% Ag, 40% Mo; and for Hypogene: 90% Cu, 62% Au, 60.4%
Ag and 40% Mo. Capping of grades varied between 0.50 %Cu and
3.7%Cu, 0.33 g/t Au and 2.3 g/t Au, and between 0.029%Mo and
0.060%Mo; on 6m composites by domain. The density varies between
2.20 g/cm3 and 2.66 g/cm3. Mineralization would be mined from open
pit and treated using conventional flotation. Rounding in
accordance with reporting guidelines may result in summation
differences. *Oxide Cu - amenable to leaching; Oxide Cu-Au amenable
to blending with sulphides (Au >0.25 g/t).
|
|
Grade Sensitivity
The Mineral Resources of the Project are also reported to
demonstrate the sensitivity to various copper equivalent cut-off
grades within the optimized pit constraint. The domains have not
been separated and the following is for comparison only.
The mineral resources estimation was constrained by a Break-even
pit with a cut-off grade of 0.07%CuEq with a stripping ratio
(waste: resources) of 1.02:1; however, the Base Case open pit is
reported at a cut-off grade of 0.15%CuEq with a stripping ratio
(waste: resources) of 0.65:1. This represents a significant
improvement compared with the previous resources estimation where
the stripping ratio was 2:1 (waste: resources).
Tables 3 and 4 present the mineral resources within the
optimized pit constraint for Indicated and Inferred Mineral
Resources, respectively.
Table 3: Sensitivity of Indicated Mineral Resource to Cut-off
Grade
Cut-Off Grade
% Cueq
|
Million
Tonnes
|
Cu
(%)
|
Au
(g/t)
|
Ag
(g/t)
|
Mo
(%)
|
CuEq
(%)
|
Cu
(Mlb)
|
Au
(Moz)
|
Ag
(Moz)
|
Mo
(Mlb)
|
0.07
|
648.3
|
0.28
|
0.16
|
2.18
|
0.0021
|
0.36
|
4,023
|
3.39
|
45.37
|
29.42
|
0.10
|
579.5
|
0.30
|
0.18
|
2.29
|
0.0022
|
0.39
|
3,882
|
3.41
|
42.62
|
27.47
|
0.15
|
507.3
|
0.34
|
0.20
|
2.42
|
0.0021
|
0.43
|
3,753
|
3.29
|
39.45
|
24.02
|
0.20
|
417.7
|
0.38
|
0.23
|
2.61
|
0.0020
|
0.49
|
3,468
|
3.09
|
35.00
|
18.13
|
0.30
|
254.0
|
0.49
|
0.32
|
3.14
|
0.0017
|
0.65
|
2,745
|
2.60
|
25.62
|
9.50
|
0.40
|
166.9
|
0.61
|
0.39
|
3.72
|
0.0014
|
0.81
|
2,250
|
2.10
|
19.97
|
5.15
|
0.50
|
129.0
|
0.70
|
0.44
|
4.12
|
0.0014
|
0.91
|
1,985
|
1.83
|
17.09
|
3.96
|
Note: Base case in
bold. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have
demonstrated economic viability. Summation errors may occur due to
rounding.
|
|
The previous mineral resources (Tetra Tech, 2014) contained 46.3
Million tonnes averaging 0.70%Cu, 0.38 Au g/t, 3.82 Ag g/t and
0.0002%Mo at 0.50%CuEq cut-off. At similar grades, the new
resource demonstrates a 296% increase in high-grade resource,
including higher gold and silver grades, reflecting the high
precious metals content in the South pit.
Table 4: Sensitivity of Inferred Mineral Resource to Cut-off
Grade
Cut-Off Grade
% Cueq
|
Million
Tonnes
|
Cu
(%)
|
Au
(g/t)
|
Ag
(g/t)
|
Mo
(%)
|
CuEq
(%)
|
Cu
(Mlb)
|
Au
(Moz)
|
Ag
(Moz)
|
Mo
(Mlb)
|
0.07
|
1,101.2
|
0.16
|
0.10
|
1.87
|
0.0023
|
0.22
|
3,841
|
3.45
|
66.10
|
55.87
|
0.10
|
760.4
|
0.21
|
0.13
|
2.13
|
0.0026
|
0.28
|
3,492
|
3.12
|
52.15
|
43.54
|
0.15
|
496.0
|
0.27
|
0.17
|
2.53
|
0.0027
|
0.36
|
2,961
|
2.69
|
40.35
|
29.65
|
0.20
|
362.9
|
0.32
|
0.21
|
2.86
|
0.0028
|
0.42
|
2,569
|
2.40
|
33.33
|
22.47
|
0.30
|
202.1
|
0.42
|
0.28
|
3.68
|
0.0029
|
0.56
|
1,869
|
1.82
|
23.88
|
12.86
|
0.40
|
118.1
|
0.54
|
0.37
|
4.73
|
0.0026
|
0.72
|
1,403
|
1.39
|
17.95
|
6.83
|
0.50
|
93.1
|
0.59
|
0.41
|
5.31
|
0.0025
|
0.80
|
1,217
|
1.23
|
15.90
|
5.23
|
Note: Base case in
bold. Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have
demonstrated economic viability. Summation errors may occur due to
rounding.
|
|
Higher Grade Component of Mineral
Resources
The new Mineral Resource Estimate demonstrates the presence of
an increase in the higher grade component mineralization within the
base case conceptual pit shell. Tables 5 and 6 show the Mineral
Resources at a 0.5 %CuEq cut-off grade classified by mineralization
type.
Table 5: Indicated Mineral Resources at a 0.5 %CuEq Cut-off
Grade by Mineralization Domain within optimized pit
constraint
Zone
|
Cut-Off
Grade
% CuEq
|
Million
Tonnes
|
Cu
(%)
|
Au
(g/t)
|
Ag
(g/t)
|
Mo
(%)
|
CuEq
(%)
|
Cu
(Mlb)
|
Au
(Moz)
|
Ag
(Moz)
|
Mo
(Mlb)
|
Leach
|
0.5
|
1.4
|
0.48
|
0.33
|
2.50
|
0.0014
|
0.62
|
15
|
0.02
|
0.11
|
0.04
|
Oxide Cu
|
0.5
|
6.1
|
0.62
|
0.32
|
3.36
|
0.0012
|
0.77
|
83
|
0.06
|
0.65
|
0.16
|
Oxide Cu-Au
|
0.5
|
6.4
|
0.66
|
0.15
|
1.80
|
0.0015
|
0.74
|
93
|
0.03
|
0.37
|
0.21
|
Mixed
|
0.5
|
16.8
|
0.66
|
0.30
|
2.79
|
0.0014
|
0.82
|
245
|
0.16
|
1.51
|
0.50
|
Supergene
|
0.5
|
3.6
|
1.36
|
0.34
|
3.51
|
0.0015
|
1.53
|
109
|
0.04
|
0.41
|
0.12
|
Hypogene
|
0.5
|
94.7
|
0.69
|
0.50
|
4.61
|
0.0014
|
0.93
|
1,440
|
1.52
|
14.03
|
2.92
|
Total
|
0.5
|
129.0
|
0.70
|
0.44
|
4.12
|
0.0014
|
0.91
|
1,985
|
1.83
|
17.09
|
3.96
|
Note: Summation
errors may occur due to rounding. Higher Grade Mineral Resources
are included within the Indicated Mineral Resources
listed in Table 2.
|
|
Table 6: Inferred Mineral Resources at a 0.5 %CuEq Cut-off
Grade by Mineralization Domain within optimized pit
constraint
Zone
|
Cut-Off
Grade
% CuEq
|
Million
Tonnes
|
Cu
(%)
|
Au
(g/t)
|
Ag
(g/t)
|
Mo
(%)
|
CuEq
(%)
|
Cu
(Mlb)
|
Au
(Moz)
|
Ag
(Moz)
|
Mo
(Mlb)
|
Leach
|
0.5
|
0.06
|
0.44
|
0.30
|
2.58
|
0.0015
|
0.58
|
1
|
0.001
|
0.01
|
0.002
|
Cu
|
0.5
|
1.0
|
0.53
|
0.15
|
2.24
|
0.0016
|
0.60
|
12
|
0.005
|
0.07
|
0.04
|
Oxide Cu-Au
|
0.5
|
1.8
|
0.57
|
0.10
|
1.53
|
0.0018
|
0.61
|
23
|
0.01
|
0.09
|
0.07
|
Mixed
|
0.5
|
0.4
|
0.44
|
0.25
|
2.77
|
0.0011
|
0.57
|
4
|
0.003
|
0.04
|
0.01
|
Supergene
|
0.5
|
1.9
|
0.82
|
0.46
|
3.97
|
0.0018
|
1.05
|
35
|
0.03
|
0.24
|
0.08
|
Hypogene
|
0.5
|
87.8
|
0.59
|
0.42
|
5.47
|
0.0026
|
0.80
|
1,143
|
1.19
|
15.45
|
5.04
|
Total
|
0.5
|
93.1
|
0.59
|
0.41
|
5.31
|
0.0025
|
0.80
|
1,217
|
1.23
|
15.90
|
5.23
|
Note: Summation
errors may occur due to rounding. Higher Grade Mineral Resources
are included within the Inferred Mineral Resources listed in
Table 4.
|
|
Reasonable Prospects for Eventual
Economic Extraction
In order to satisfy reasonable prospects for eventual economic
extraction, the Mineral Resources are reported within a
constraining shell. The block model was imported into Datamine
NPV Scheduler software where AGP generated the optimized pit
constraint. Table 7 summarizes the parameters that were applied to
develop the optimized pit constraint.
Table 7: Optimized Pit Parameters for the Cotabambas
Deposit
Parameters
|
Units
|
Oxide, Leach
Domain
|
Mix
Domain
|
Supergene
Domain
|
Hypogene
Domains
|
Metal
Prices
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper
|
$US/lb
|
4.25
|
4.25
|
4.25
|
4.25
|
Gold
|
$US/oz
|
1850
|
1850
|
1850
|
1850
|
Silver
|
$US/oz
|
23
|
23
|
23
|
23
|
Molybdenum
|
$US/lb
|
20
|
20
|
20
|
20
|
Metal
Recoveries
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper
|
%
|
-
|
60
|
87.5
|
90
|
Gold
|
%
|
65
|
55
|
62
|
62
|
Silver
|
%
|
48
|
48
|
60.4
|
60.4
|
Molybdenum
|
%
|
-
|
40
|
40
|
40
|
Other
Costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mining Cost
|
$US/t
|
2.00
|
2.00
|
2.00
|
2.00
|
Processing Cost
|
$US/t
|
4.79
|
4.79
|
4.79
|
4.79
|
G&A Cost
|
$US/t
|
0.41
|
0.41
|
0.41
|
0.41
|
Pit
Slope
|
|
|
|
|
|
Overall Slope Angle
|
degrees
|
47
|
47
|
47
|
47
|
Dilution
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mine Dilution
|
%
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
Ore Loss
|
%
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
3
|
Exploration at the Cotabambas
Project
The property hosts a number of Copper-Gold porphyry/skarn type
deposits aligned into 3 structural corridors crossing the property
in the Southwest-Northeast direction as shown on Plan 2. The most
studied corridor is located to the east part of the property. Along
strike from the South pit to the North pit and including the Maria
Jose targets, over 6 km of mineralization have been identified and
drilled with the first two targets hosting the mineral
resources.
The drilling results of 2022-2023 have delineated the existence
of two individualized Cu-Au Porphyries into the mineral resources
area. The porphyry stock in the North Pit is emplaced from depth to
surface from east to west, developing in the cupula a quartz
stockwork with Potassic alteration hosting >1.0 %CuEq which
extends to 800 m depth along plunge,
with 250m width and along
700m strike following the structural
control in the Northeast direction. In the South pit, the porphyry
demonstrates a feeder shape hosting a body of 0.80 %CuEq sizing
some 600m at depth and 150m width and striking 400m along the structural corridor, where the
stock is hope open to the east and at depth.
The average copper:gold ratio, in terms of contained metal
value, in the South Pit is 1:1 demonstrating a higher gold
content than in the North Pit, where the average ratio is 2.7:1.
The silver:gold ratio in the South pit is 6:1 while in the North
pit it is 14:1.
Exploration Potential
The Cotabambas Project has a number of areas with significant
exploration potential:
- Local scale. The stated Mineral Resources at
0.15% CuEq cut-off are a pit-constrained subset of the
mineralization block model, where substantial mineralization with
higher grades targets extends in different directions. See Plan 1:
-
- NE pit target: the high grades at the
North Pit (>1.0 %CuEq) make up a corridor of 250m width by 800m
length in the northeast direction, which is displaced by an
east-west fault. To the north of this fault the area is covered by
colluvium representing a promising potential for future drilling
and its 2km continuity may connect with the Maria Jose target.
- SW pit target: the high grades into
the South pit (>1.0 %CuEq) make up a structural corridor of
150m width by 350m length, elongated in southwest direction and
open for additional drilling. The geology at surface is composed of
a mix of quartz monzonite and latite dikes in the same direction,
outcropping along 1.5km.
- Intermedium Zone target: located in
the area between the North and South pits at the convergence of two
main faulting systems in North-South and East-West direction. This
structural complexity displaces the mineralization down to the
north side and indicates a favorable direction to continue drilling
the high-grade body.
- Ccalla East target: this is another porphyry
located between 150m to 450m next to the East side of the mineral
resources of the North pit, intersected by some drillholes hide
some 150m below the diorite host rock
outcroppings. The hole CB-68 intersected 194m of hypogene sulfides averaging 0.60%Cu, 0.24
Au g/t and 4.10 Ag g/t. The mineral of this target remains outside
of the limits of the new mineral resources pit shell and may
represent a split of the Intermedium zone target.
- NW pit target: located between 400m to 1.5km to the Northwest of the North Pit,
grouping the areas of Petra/David drilled in 2017-2018 and the
Guaclle Skarn drilled in 2023, accumulating 2,760m of drilling in this target. In Petra-David
there are a swarm of quartz-monzonite porphyry dikes with drill
intersections up to 79m of copper
oxides averaging 0.32%Cu, 0.08 Au g/t, and in Guaclle Skarn two
holes intersecting hypogene sulfides of 28m length grading 1.50%Cu, 5,79 Ag g/t and
70m length averaging 0.47%Cu, 2.46 Ag
g/t.
- Deep Continuity: under the conceptual pit shell
constraining the new mineral resources the high grade blocks
continue open at depth, following the contact between the porphyry
stock and the diorite host rock, but mainly inside the porphyry
domain; representing attractive potential to grow the current
resources with additional drilling.
- District scale. All the targets described
in the "Local Scale" make up a cluster of 3km width by 6 km
length, where two other targets are incorporated to the north,
Buenavista and the Maria Jose Targets (see Plan 1). The
mineralization in both targets were identified at surface with
mapping and sampling. At Maria Jose geophysics and
5,119m of drilling in 2017-2018
identified intersections in hypogene sulfides of 195m averaging 0.34%Cu, 0.06 Au g/t, 1.60 Ag g/t
and 128m grading 0.41%Cu, 0.06 Au
g/t, 2.0 Ag g/t, both related with porphyry feeders. Also
identified were a swarm of porphyry dikes generating 5 mineral
bodies varying from 11 to 19m width
and grading between 0.41%Cu to 1.03%Cu. The Maria Jose target is
located 1.5km to the North-Northeast side of the mineral resources
pit shell and is conform by two mineralized porphyry feeders and a
swarm of mineralized dikes intruding the andesite host
rock.
- Property scale. Elsewhere on the property, stream
sediment geochemistry and surface mapping have identified six new
exploration targets with anomalous levels of copper, gold,
molybdenum, lead and/or zinc. The most important were identified
over the ridges in the southern areas of the property, such as the
porphyry/skarn-style mineralization of Jean
Louis, Chaupec and Tamburo targets (See Plan 2). Jean Louis Skarn prospect was
mapped in 2014 over an area of 2.8km by 1.6km, based on surface
mapping, 433 rock samples and 46 Km of IP/Mag/SP. The Chaupec Skarn
was mapped in 2016-2018 over an area of 1km by 3km, based on
mapping, 1,997 rock samples, 64km IP, 88km Mag, and 46 km SP.
Tamburo target is a new high-grade Skarn body of 60mx30m size
exposed in underground workings and remains open in different
directions, requires detailed exploration.
Social Relationship
The exploration programs in the area of the mineral resources
and at the other targets identified on the property, are supported
always by constant collaboration with the local communities under a
spirit of respect and mutual respect. Over more than one
decade, five drilling campaigns have been completed
which continue to demonstrate a strengthening relationship with the
local communities and the Company.
Plan and Next steps
The Company's plan is complete a Prefeasibility Study for the
Cotabambas Project. The updated resource estimate will be
used to update the mine plan, prioritizing the mining of the
high-grade component of the resource within a starter pit.
The updated mine plan will illustrate if any additional infill
drilling is required to upgrade additional high-grade resource to
indicated category. The completed trade-off studies related
to process, infrastructure and waste storage will be incorporated
into an updated PEA which will serve as a snapshot of the
Prefeasibility study targets and identify priority areas to
optimize the prefeasibiity study
CAUTION REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS:
Information and statements contained in this news
release that are not historical facts are "forward-looking
information" within the meaning of applicable Canadian securities
legislation and involve risks and uncertainties.
Examples of forward-looking information and statements contained
in this news release include information and statements with
respect to:
- Panoro delineating growth potential at the Cotabambas Project,
while optimizing project economics.
- mineral resource estimates and assumptions; and
- the PEAs, including, but not limited to, base case
parameters and assumptions, forecasts of net present value,
internal rate of return and payback.
Various assumptions or factors are typically applied in drawing
conclusions or making the forecasts or projections set out in
forward-looking information. In some instances, material
assumptions and factors are presented or discussed in this news
release in connection with the statements or disclosure containing
the forward-looking information and statements. You are cautioned
that the following list of material factors and assumptions is not
exhaustive. The factors and assumptions include, but are not
limited to, assumptions concerning: metal prices and by-product
credits; cut-off grades; short and long term power prices;
processing recovery rates; mine plans and production scheduling;
process and infrastructure design and implementation; accuracy of
the estimation of operating and capital costs; applicable tax and
royalty rates; open-pit design; accuracy of mineral reserve and
resource estimates and reserve and resource modeling; reliability
of sampling and assay data; representativeness of mineralization;
accuracy of metallurgical test work; and amenability of upgrading
and blending mineralization.
Forward-looking statements are subject to a variety of known and
unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which could cause
actual events or results to differ materially from those expressed
or implied by the forward-looking statements, including, without
limitation:
- risks relating to metal price fluctuations
- risks relating to estimates of mineral resources, production,
capital and operating costs, decommissioning, or reclamation
expenses, proving to be inaccurate
- the inherent operational risks associated with mining and
mineral exploration, development, mine construction and operating
activities, many of which are beyond Panoro's control
- risks relating to Panoro's or its partners' ability to
enforce legal rights under permits or licenses or risk that Panoro
or its partners will become subject to litigation or arbitration
that has an adverse outcome
- risks relating to Panoro's or its partners' projects
being in Peru, including
political, economic, and regulatory instability
- risks relating to the uncertainty of applications to obtain,
extend or renew licenses and permits
- risks relating to potential challenges to Panoro's or its
partners' right to explore or develop projects
- risks relating to mineral resource estimates being based on
interpretations and assumptions which may result in less mineral
production under actual circumstances
- risks relating to Panoro's or its partners' operations
being subject to environmental and remediation requirements, which
may increase the cost of doing business and restrict
operations
- risks relating to being adversely affected by environmental,
safety and regulatory risks, including increased regulatory burdens
or delays and changes of law
- risks relating to inadequate insurance or inability to obtain
insurance
- risks relating to the fact that Panoro's and its partners'
properties are not yet in commercial production;
- risks relating to fluctuations in foreign currency exchange
rates, interest rates and tax rates
- risks relating to Panoro's ability to raise funding to
continue its exploration, development, and mining activities;
and
- counterparty risk under Panoro's agreements.
This list is not exhaustive of the factors that may affect the
forward-looking information and statements contained in this news
release. Should one or more of these risks and uncertainties
materialize, or should underlying assumptions prove incorrect,
actual results may vary materially from those described in the
forward-looking information. The forward-looking information
contained in this news release is based on beliefs, expectations,
and opinions as of the date of this news release. For the
reasons set forth above, readers are cautioned not to place undue
reliance on forward-looking information. Panoro does not
undertake to update any forward-looking information and statements
included herein, except in accordance with applicable securities
laws.
Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services
Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX
Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or
accuracy of this release.
SOURCE Panoro Minerals Ltd.