TIDMORM
RNS Number : 7597K
Ormonde Mining PLC
06 September 2021
This announcement contains inside information
6 September 2021
Ormonde Mi n i ng p lc
("Or m onde" or "the C o m pany ")
Reconvening of AGM and Letter from the Executive Chair
The Company announces the reconvening of its adjourned Annual
General Meeting ("AGM") on Thursday, 30 September 2021 at 11 a.m.
IST/BST, at the Carlton Hotel Blanchardstown, Dublin 15,
Ireland.
A Letter from the Executive Chair, Notice of AGM and Form of
Proxy are being posted to shareholders today, along with a letter
from Mr. Thomas Anderson, a shareholder of the Company, and are
also available on the Company's website www.ormondemining.com .
Shareholders are urged to read the note section of the Notice of
AGM for important information pertaining to voting, attending the
meeting and associated Covid-19 safety measures. Some high-level
information in this regard is provided at the end of this the
release.
The letter from the Executive Chair, Jonathan Henry, is provided
below which explains the resolutions to be proposed at the AGM and
the Board's recommendations thereon.
LETTER FROM THE CHAIR
Dear Shareholder,
I am writing to you to explain the resolutions to be proposed at
the forthcoming Annual General Meeting of the Company ("AGM") which
is to be reconvened on Thursday 30 September 2021 at 11 a .m.
IST/BST at the Carlton Hotel Blanchardstown, Church Road,
Tyrrelstown, Blanchardstown, Dublin 15, Ireland . A copy of the
Notice of AGM is enclosed with this letter which provides details
on how shareholders can vote and/or attend the meeting.
This letter contains some important background and explanatory
notes in relation to the resolutions being proposed at the AGM and
to the Board's recommendations thereon, which are set out in
conclusion at the end of this letter. Please read this letter in
its entirety to ensure that you, as a shareholder, are well
informed on the issues at hand, together with the consequences of
your voting, and are able to exercise that vote based on such
material information.
As announced on 29 June 2021, Mr. Thomas Anderson, who has
informed the Company that he has a beneficial interest of 23.02% of
the Company's voting shares, requested that two new ordinary
resolutions relating to new director appointments be added to the
AGM agenda. One of the proposed directors subsequently withdrew his
nomination and, as announced on 31 August 2021, an updated
requisition was received nominating Mr. Brendan McMorrow and Mr.
Keith O'Donnell as Mr. Anderson's two new nominee directors.
Having regard to the substance of the matters addressed in this
letter, Mr. Brian Timmons, who was appointed as a director of
Ormonde in June 2020 to represent Mr. Anderson, recused himself
from the Board's discussions in relation to, and the decision to
issue this letter. Mr Timmons has indicated to the Board that he
supports the new board nominations and is recommending the
associated resolutions to shareholders.
This letter and the recommendations contained within have been
agreed unanimously by the other board members, being myself and Mr.
Tim Livesey and Mr. Richard Brown, who are both deemed independent
by the entire Board.
I would like to advise all shareholders to carefully consider
the two new director nominations, in addition to Mr. Timmons,
recently requisitioned by Mr. Anderson, especially in relation to
the matters summarised below and explained further in the body of
this letter:
-- if these nominations are approved by shareholders at the AGM,
then three of the six directors on the revised board of directors,
and possibly three of five in the circumstances where Mr. Tim
Livesey is not re-elected, would be Mr. Anderson's appointees. The
Board considers 50% or higher board representation by a 23%
shareholder to be disproportionate and potentially unfair to the
interests of the remaining shareholders;
-- while Mr. Anderson has indicated that his proposal should
find favour as the Chair has a casting vote should there be
deadlock of voting at a meeting of an enlarged board, there is no
guarantee that Mr. Anderson will not exercise his right to vote
against a director being re-elected on retirement by rotation
(including Mr. Livesey at the AGM) thereby giving rise to his
representatives on the Board being able to cast a majority of the
votes;
-- your Board therefore strongly believes such nominations to be
indicative of an attempt to exert a level of influence whereby Mr.
Anderson is seeking to ultimately obtain control of the Board
without paying shareholders a fair price for obtaining de facto
control of the Company and its assets;
-- Mr. Anderson maintains that his strategy for Ormonde is to
continue the search for opportunities in the mining sector.
However, despite repeated requests for clarification, your Board
believes that Mr. Anderson has not been fully transparent in
relation to his future intentions and strategy for the Company. The
Board also believes that neither of Mr. Anderson's board nominees
bring specific attributes which would further the Company's ability
to attract or assess projects in the mining sector which are not
already available within the existing Board's expertise;
-- over the last year, Mr. Anderson has not supported the Board
in the pursuit of its strategy, and has made it clear to the Board
that if this strategy does not succeed, the Company will have to
reconsider an alternative strategy and it is for this reason it
should have directors with a wider viewpoint;
-- Mr Anderson has sought to have the Company make investments
that the Board could not execute for technical, commercial or
regulatory reasons and he has represented that he is aware of
possible projects for investment by Ormonde, which he plans to
table, but not until the appointments of his nominee directors have
been approved. The Board believes that the approval of his nominees
would provide Mr. Anderson with a level of influence that could
adversely affect the impartiality, or perceived impartiality, of
the Board to make recommendations in the best interests of the
majority of shareholders;
-- Mr. Anderson has been offered a compromise position which
would have seen one additional director proposed (bringing his
appointees to 40% of the enlarged board), and for that board to
adopt a mandate to assess a change in strategy and/or a change to
the appropriate skills necessary at board and management level that
could be needed to implement that revised strategy. However, Mr.
Anderson has insisted upon two additional appointees;
-- Mr. Anderson has informed the Board that, should resolutions
to appoint his two nominees not be included in the notice of the
AGM, he will requisition an extraordinary general meeting for the
appointment of three new directors which would, if those proposals
are adopted, ensure that a majority of the resultant Ormonde board
are his nominees; and
-- given the difficulties encountered with obtaining Mr.
Anderson's support and decreasing cash resources, earlier this year
the Board considered the option of winding up the Company with the
goal of returning as much cash as possible to shareholders.
However, the Board was informed that Mr. Anderson would not support
this option.
In the context of the above, and for the reasons set out below,
the Board recommends that shareholders vote AGAINST Resolutions 7
and 8, being the resolutions proposed by Mr. Anderson
With regard to the resolutions relating to an increase to the
authorised share capital of the Company, share allotment authority
and disapplication of pre-emptive rights, the Board wishes to
highlight the following points:
-- following Mr. Anderson submitting proxy votes against the
standard form resolutions (which he had not opposed in prior years)
relating to the issuance of shares at the Company's 2020 AGM,
Ormonde has been severely restricted in its ability to complete any
material transaction, due to an inability to use its shares as part
or full consideration for an acquisition;
-- given the consequent uncertainty caused to counterparties to
potential transactions the Board is now also seeking support for an
increase in the Company's authorised share capital from 650 million
to 950 million
ordinary shares. If passed, this would enable the Company to issue a greater number of shares as consideration in a potential transaction, should the Board believe it to be in the interest of all shareholders. Importantly, this would remove the current uncertainty for potential counterparties in relation to the Board's ability to transact, and potentially increase the number of possible opportunities but would not empower the directors to allot shares for cash otherwise than on a pre-emptive basis and would be subject to the usual AIM and Euronext Growth Market Rule requirements, including in relation to reverse takeover shareholder approval and related party transactions; and
-- should shareholders not support these resolutions at the
upcoming AGM, the Board's ability to engage effectively with
counterparties in regard to possible projects and complete any
transaction will continue to be severely limited. The consequences
of such an outcome may be far reaching, including the continued
inability to negotiate and conclude an acquisition, cash resources
depletion and ultimately endangering Ormonde's continued
suitability for listing.
The Board recommends that shareholders vote IN FAVOUR of
Resolutions 1 to 6
Company strategy
Your Board has been pursuing a clear strategy to acquire,
explore and develop mining projects in which it has a controlling
interest. The Company has spent considerable time and resources
identifying and evaluating new opportunities for the deployment of
the Company's capital and enhancement of shareholder value through
the acquisition of a transformative project for the Company.
However, progress in this regard was slowed, and has ultimately
stalled, in the opinion of the Board, following interactions with
Mr. Anderson, as summarised in this letter, together with the share
allotment authority resolutions not being passed at the last AGM.
Such flexibility would, for example, allow Ormonde to utilise
shares as initial consideration for an earn-in to a project,
enabling the Company to protect its cash balances for utilisation
in moving any such project forward, and to assess the potential of
that project ahead of taking control (having obtained any necessary
Ormonde shareholder approval) at a later stage.
Prior to the 2020 AGM your Board believed it had the support of
Mr. Anderson for this strategy and had some success initiating
promising transactions on that basis. However, due to the
circumstances described herein, your Board currently has an
extremely limited ability to progress negotiations on such
transactions.
Proposed nomination of directors by Mr. Anderson
As announced on 29 June 2021, Mr. Anderson proposed the
nomination of two new directors to the Board, and if these
nominations are approved by shareholders at the AGM then three of
the six directors, and possibly three of five in the circumstances
where Mr. Tim Livesey is not re-elected, on the revised board would
be Mr. Anderson's appointees (including his existing appointee, Mr.
Timmons). The Board considers 50% or higher board representation by
a 23% shareholder to be disproportionate and potentially unfair to
the interests of the remaining shareholders.
Since that date, one of the proposed directors withdrew his
nomination. A replacement for this nominee has now been tabled by
Mr. Anderson, with Mr. Brendan McMorrow and Mr. Keith O'Donnell now
the two nominated directors.
The Board has conducted limited due diligence on both nominees
and is of the view that, notwithstanding the Board has no reason to
believe that they would not be suitable for board appointments
generally, absent the requisition by Mr. Anderson and given the
scale, activity and cost base of the Company, neither are
appropriate or necessary candidates to add to the Board at this
juncture. Your Board believes that they bring no specific
attributes not already available within the existing Board which
would further the Company's ability to attract or assess projects
in the mining sector and would not be considered by the Board to be
independent (given their nomination by, and/or the Company's
understanding of their personal or professional association with,
Mr. Anderson and each other).
Whilst Mr. Anderson has represented that new directors with
substantial corporate experience would bring a completely new
breadth of experience and depth of knowledge to Ormonde, the view
of the Board differs if the future strategy of the Company is to
remain in the exploration and development of mining projects. As
noted above, Mr. Anderson has made it clear to the Board that if
this strategy does not succeed, the Company will have to reconsider
an alternative strategy and it is for this reason it should have
directors with a wider viewpoint.
The Board, therefore, does not see the incremental value such
nominees would bring to Ormonde's current strategy, and whilst
Ormonde continues to search for opportunities in mining exploration
and development the Board believes that its current composition and
structure is appropriate, being four directors - one executive, Mr.
Jonathan Henry, and three non-executives. The non-executive
directors currently comprise two independent directors, Mr. Richard
Brown and Mr. Tim Livesey, and one non-independent director (i.e.,
25% of the Board), Mr. Timmons, who was appointed to represent the
interests of Mr. Anderson and who already brings wide corporate
experience across several sectors.
In an attempt to address this, Mr. Anderson was offered a
compromise position whereby Ormonde would potentially accept one
new director, with relevant skills and experience so as to enhance
the current board and with a strong preference for a female
candidate so that the Board may meet an immediate diversity target
set by the Secretariat of the Balance for Better Business, Gender
Equality Division, part of the Irish Department of Justice and
Equality that is becoming increasingly urgent and to which Ormonde
has committed. This would take Mr. Anderson's appointed nominees to
40% of the Board and allow the enlarged Board to work towards
agreeing a strategy and direction for the business in the interest
of all shareholders.
It was also made known to Mr. Anderson that the Board would be
open to assessing a change in strategy and/or a change to the
appropriate skills necessary at Board and management level that
could be needed to implement that revised strategy, were this
compromise to be accepted. This would have allowed the Board to
work with Mr. Anderson to agree and then transition to any changed
strategy and/or Board and management, while ensuring that all
shareholders interests were protected.
Despite these proposals, which the Board considers to be
reasonable, and numerous requests for clarification on his strategy
and intentions, it appears that Mr. Anderson is unwilling to accept
any position other than a representation on the Board of at least
three directors being at his nomination.
Board interactions with Mr. Anderson
The Board seeks to manage the Company's affairs in line with the
governance required of a company whose shares are traded on the AIM
Market and the Euronext Growth Market and the level of shareholder
consultation consistent with such governance. However, Mr. Anderson
has sought to become involved in the decision making of the Board,
including the assessment and rejection of project opportunities
under consideration, which the Board has made efforts within
governance practices to facilitate in an attempt to maintain a
healthy working relationship with its largest shareholder.
In addition, Mr. Anderson has proposed investments to the Board
for consideration, at a level without project or corporate control,
and some involving minority participation in existing public
company fundraisings . Mr. Anderson has been given objective and
reasoned appraisals outlining the technical, commercial or
regulatory reasons why the Board could not recommend such potential
investments as being in the interests of shareholders as a whole,
whereas it could progress assessment of other long-term
opportunities. Unfortunately, such other opportunities have so far
failed to garner his support.
Consequently, your Board has spent a vast amount of time in
consideration of the situation and communication with Mr. Anderson,
both through Mr. Timmons and in direct correspondence. Neither
avenue has elicited a clear strategy for the Company which Mr.
Anderson has indicated he would support unconditionally.
Ormonde has been severely restricted in its ability to continue
to attract the interest of potential counterparties with suitable
projects since the last AGM. Ultimately Ormonde remains unable to
attract project vendors and is without the power to structure any
deals or complete any significant transaction which the Board
believes would be in the best interests of all shareholders unless
it can obtain your favourable votes for Resolutions 1 to 6.
After due deliberation, Mr. Anderson has been advised that the
independent non-executive directors could not contemplate
supporting a major governance and oversight decision such as his
proposed Board changes, on behalf of the shareholders as a whole,
without a fundamental and detailed understanding of the strategic
intentions behind those proposals, including the nature of possible
projects for investment by Ormonde, which it is understood Mr.
Anderson plans to table but not until the appointments of his
nominee directors have been approved.
Given the situation, earlier this year the Board considered the
option of winding up the Company with the goal of returning as much
cash as possible to shareholders. However, the Board was informed
that Mr. Anderson would not support this option.
Mr. Anderson has requested his views be made clear to
shareholders and has recently submitted a letter to the Company for
the attention of its shareholders. The letter from Mr. Anderson
accompanies this letter. The Board strongly disagrees with a number
of Mr. Anderson's views and recollection of events, especially as
regards the number of opportunities shared with him by the Company
and his stated understanding of the facts pertaining to them.
Furthermore, Mr. Anderson has his own nominee on the Board
dedicated to representing his interests in Mr. Timmons, who, since
his appointment, has been present and supportive in the majority of
Board discussions and decisions including those relating to the
opportunities reviewed and pursued with Mr. Anderson.
AGM Resolutions
The Board believes it is in the best interests of shareholders
as a whole to have a vote on the future of the Company and not to
prolong this impasse and operational stasis any longer, not least
as the cash available to the Company reduces daily .
Accordingly, following receipt of an amended requisition for
nominee directors on behalf of Mr. Anderson, the Notice of AGM
enclosed with this letter will consider two resolutions for the
appointment of new directors (Resolutions 7 and 8). For all the
reasons given above, the Board (with the exception of Mr.
Anderson's current board representative, Mr. Timmons, who has
recused himself from this decision) is recommending that you vote
against these two resolutions.
The Notice of AGM also includes typical resolutions on approval
of accounts, non-executive director re-election (on rotation), and
authorisations to fix the auditors remuneration and issue shares
and dis-application of pre-emption rights, these being the standard
authorities to allow the Board and Company to function normally and
in the best interests of all shareholders, together with an
increase of authorised share capital. These are covered by
Resolutions 1 to 6. I would emphasise the importance of
shareholders voting in favour of these resolutions, which the Board
recommends regardless of the voting position to be taken with
respect to new Board nominees, as the successful passing of these
resolutions is essential to provide the Board with the flexibility
required to have a realistic opportunity to deliver a material
acquisition as a platform to enhance the long-term value of the
Company.
Should Resolutions 2, 4, 5 and 6 not be approved, the Board's
ability to engage seriously with counterparties in regard to
possible projects and complete any transaction will continue to be
severely limited. The consequences of such an outcome may be far
reaching, including the continued inability to negotiate and
conclude transactions due to the lack of confidence potential
counterparties would have in the ability of the Board to obtain
approval for any transaction, cash resources depletion and
ultimately a danger to Ormonde's continued suitability for
listing.
Resolutions 1 to 6 - Proposed by the Board
The Board recommends that you vote in favour of each of
Resolutions 1 to 6:
Resolution 1 - Receipt and Consideration of the Accounts
This is an ordinary resolution to receive and consider the
Company's financial statements for the financial year ended 31
December 2020.
Resolution 2 - Election of Director
Resolution 2 is an ordinary resolution to re-elect Mr. Timothy
Livesey as a Director, following his re-election to the Board at
the 2020 AGM. Under the provisions of the Articles of Association
of the Company at least one director is required to retire by
rotation at the AGM and offer themself for election by shareholders
(by separate resolution). Mr. Livesey, as senior independent
director, has agreed to retire by rotation and offer himself for
re-election.
Resolution 3 - Auditors' Remuneration
Resolution 3 is an ordinary resolution proposed each year to
permit the directors to fix the Auditors' remuneration. The
directors will have this authority no matter who is auditor.
Resolution 4 - Increase to Authorised Share Capital
Resolution 4 is an ordinary resolution to grant a general
authority to the directors to increase the authorised share capital
of the Company by the creation of 300 million Ordinary Shares of
EUR0.01 each, resulting in an increase in Ordinary Shares from 650
million to 950 million shares.
Resolution 5 - Allotment of Relevant Securities
Resolution 5 is an ordinary resolution to grant a general
authority to the directors to allot "relevant securities" of up to
an amount equal to the authorised but yet unissued share capital of
the Company. In practice, this is a public company resolution
sought annually and this right provides the directors with the
ability to use the Company's shares as part or full consideration
for a transaction. As noted above and repeated here, the Board
considers the passing of this resolution as being critical to
provide it with the minimum flexibility required to have a
realistic opportunity to deliver a material acquisition as a
platform to enhance the long-term value of the Company.
The Board considers the passing of Resolutions 4 and 5 as being
critical to provide it with the flexibility required to have a
realistic opportunity to deliver a material acquisition as a
platform to enhance the long-term value of the Company .
Resolution 6 - Allotment of Equity Securities
Resolution 6 is a special resolution to authorise the directors
to allot "equity securities", essentially non-pro-rata issues for
cash of ordinary shares of a nominal value equivalent of up to 10%
of the nominal value of the issued share capital and issues of
shares relating to the grant of any share options or share warrants
or the exercise thereof. This resolution also provides the Board
with an additional degree of flexibility as it works with
management to implement a value enhancing transaction.
The authorities provided by Resolution 5 and 6, if passed, would
expire 15 months after the passing of Resolutions 5 and 6
(respectively) or at the conclusion of the next AGM of the Company,
whichever occurs first.
Resolutions 7 and 8 - Proposed by Mr. Anderson
The Board recommends that you vote against Resolutions 7 and
8.
Resolution 7 - Election of Director
Resolution 7 is an ordinary resolution proposed by Mr. Thomas
Anderson to elect Mr. Keith O'Donnell as a director.
Resolution 8 - Election of Director
Resolution 8 is an ordinary resolution proposed by Mr. Thomas
Anderson to elect Mr. Brendan McMorrow as a director.
Recommendation
There is no guarantee that Mr. Anderson (and/or shareholders as
a whole) will vote in favour of the re-election of Mr. Livesey at
the forthcoming AGM. Should Mr. Livesey not be re-elected and Mr.
Anderson's resolutions for nominee directors are passed, Mr.
Anderson would have appointed a majority of the Board and hence
potentially have the ability through those directors to control the
destiny of the Company.
Taking into account all of the above, and based on the Board's
interaction with Mr. Anderson, the Board strongly believes such
nominations to be indicative of an attempt to exert a level of
influence whereby Mr. Anderson is seeking to ultimately obtain
control of the Board without paying shareholders a fair price for
obtaining de facto control of the Company and its assets. Thereby,
Mr. Anderson will not incur the usual premium to the current share
price, nor the significant advisory expenses and cash cost of
acquiring a controlling shareholding in a public company, as such
denying what would be fair compensation to other shareholders.
Shareholders are faced with an important choice, which can be
summarised as follows:
Either : to support your Board to progress Ormonde's stated
strategy of seeking a transformative transaction for the Company
(which has been severely hampered in the last year) through the
approval of resolutions providing the Board with additional
flexibility to negotiate such transactions;
Or : to accept that the future of the Company is unknown and at
risk of being put into the control and direction of a Board largely
appointed by Mr. Anderson and without any compensation to other
shareholders for the level of influence afforded to Mr.
Anderson.
Your Board believes that its current strategy is the right one,
and new opportunities will be identified if project vendors believe
that the Company can transact. This may only occur if the majority
of shareholders vote down resolutions to introduce Mr. Anderson's
nominees, and vote for the other resolutions described above,
thereby lifting the limitations since the prior AGM. Your Board
would then act immediately to work with Mr. Anderson, to ensure
that he recognises such vote, to understand his plans or projects
that he may wish to introduce and to assess any changes necessary
in order that his trust in the current Board and management is
reinstated.
There can be no assurance that, should a majority of
shareholders vote with the Board's recommendations, your Board will
be able to effect the strategy and succeed in reinstating a
positive working relationship with Mr. Anderson.
Furthermore, the Board believes that there can be no assurance
that the Company's management, which has been integral to both
maintenance of existing interests in the Spanish assets held by
Ormonde and identification, assessment, negotiation and
implementation of any transaction, and would be integral to an
orderly winding up of the Company's interests, will remain with the
Company without a clear actionable strategy for the business, or
that the management team will be willing to remain involved to
implement as yet unknown strategic proposals that may be proffered
by Mr. Anderson.
As stated above, Mr. Timmons has recused himself from the
Board's deliberations and is not participating in these
recommendations.
The other directors ("Directors") believe that the proposals set
out before the meeting in Resolutions 1 to 6 are in the best
interests of the Company and of shareholders as a whole and,
accordingly, the Directors recommend that you vote in favour of
each of these resolutions at the AGM.
The Directors believe that the proposals set out in Resolutions
7 and 8 are not in the best interests of the Company and of
shareholders as a whole and, accordingly, the Directors recommend
that you vote against each of these resolutions at the AGM.
Yours faithfully,
Jonathan Henry
Executive Chair
Enquiries to:
Ormonde Mining plc
Jonathan Henry, Executive Chair
Paul Carroll, Chief Financial Officer
Fraser Gardiner, Chief Operating Officer
Tel: +353 (0)1 8014184
Media enquiries - Buchanan
Bobby Morse / Ariadna Peretz / James Husband
Tel: +44 (0)20 7466 5000
Email: ormonde@buchanan.uk.com
Davy (Nomad, Euronext Growth Advisor and Joint Broker)
John Frain / Barry Murphy
Tel: +353 (0)1 679 6363
SP Angel Corporate Finance LLP (Joint Broker)
Ewan Leggat
Te l: +44 (0)20 3 470 0470
Note on Letter from the Chair:
Instructions on how to participate (including by appointing a
proxy) in the Annual General Meeting ("AGM") of Ormonde are set out
in the notes to the Notice of AGM which has been posted to all
certificated shareholders and which is available to view on the
Company's website at:
http://ormondemining.com/investors/investor-notices/ .
The Company continues to monitor the impact of COVID-19 and any
relevant updates regarding the AGM, including any changes to the
arrangements outlined in this letter, will also be made available
in the same location on the Company's website.
In the light of current and likely restrictions on public
gatherings, you may be asked to prove full vaccination against or
recovery from Covid-19 to gain attendance to the AGM and numbers of
attendees may be restricted. In the light of the foregoing and of
possible measures that may be introduced as referred to above, so
as to ensure that your vote is counted, we encourage all
shareholders to submit proxy instructions ahead of the meeting and
before the voting deadlines, detailed in the notes to the Notice of
AGM, to guarantee that you can vote and be represented at the AGM
whether capable of attending or not.
This information is provided by RNS, the news service of the
London Stock Exchange. RNS is approved by the Financial Conduct
Authority to act as a Primary Information Provider in the United
Kingdom. Terms and conditions relating to the use and distribution
of this information may apply. For further information, please
contact rns@lseg.com or visit www.rns.com.
RNS may use your IP address to confirm compliance with the terms
and conditions, to analyse how you engage with the information
contained in this communication, and to share such analysis on an
anonymised basis with others as part of our commercial services.
For further information about how RNS and the London Stock Exchange
use the personal data you provide us, please see our Privacy
Policy.
END
NOADBGDCIBGDGBU
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
September 06, 2021 02:00 ET (06:00 GMT)
Ormonde Mining (AQSE:ORM)
Historical Stock Chart
From Mar 2024 to Apr 2024
Ormonde Mining (AQSE:ORM)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2023 to Apr 2024