NOTES TO INTERIM CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
Note 1. ACCOUNTING POLICIES
In the opinion of the management of Arrow Financial Corporation (Arrow, the Company, we, or us), the accompanying unaudited interim consolidated financial statements contain all of the adjustments necessary to present fairly the financial position as of September 30, 2021, December 31, 2020 and September 30, 2020; the results of operations for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2021 and 2020; the consolidated statements of comprehensive income for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2021 and 2020; the changes in stockholders' equity for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2021 and 2020; and the cash flows for the nine month periods ended September 30, 2021 and 2020. All such adjustments are of a normal recurring nature. The unaudited interim consolidated financial statements should be read in conjunction with the audited annual consolidated financial statements of Arrow for the year ended December 31, 2020 included in Arrow's Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2020.
Management’s Use of Estimates
The preparation of the consolidated financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America (US GAAP) requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the consolidated financial statements and the reported amounts of income and expenses during the reporting period. Due to the uncertainty regarding the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic, management utilized estimates and assumptions in its evaluation of potential impairment of Arrow's right-of-use lease assets, goodwill and intangible assets. Our most significant estimate is the allowance for credit losses. Other estimates include the fair value of financial statements, evaluation of pension and other post-retirement liabilities, an analysis of a need for a valuation allowance for deferred tax assets and a reserve for unfunded loan commitments recorded as an other liability. Actual results could differ from those estimates.
A material estimate that is particularly susceptible to significant change in the near term is the allowance for credit losses. In connection with the determination of the allowance for credit losses management obtains economic forecasts from reliable sources and appraisals for properties. The allowance for credit losses is management’s best estimate of the life of loan losses as of the balance sheet date. While management uses available information to recognize losses on loans, future adjustments to the allowance for credit losses may be necessary based on changes in economic conditions.
Allowance for Credit Losses – Loans
Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments (CECL) approach requires an estimate of the credit losses expected over the life of a loan (or pool of loans). It replaces the incurred loss approach’s threshold that required the recognition of a credit loss when it was probable a loss event was incurred. The allowance for credit losses is a valuation account that is deducted from, or added to, the loans’ amortized cost basis to present the net, lifetime amount expected to be collected on the loans. Loan losses are charged off against the allowance when management believes a loan balance is confirmed to be uncollectible. Expected recoveries do not exceed the aggregate of amounts previously charged off and expected to be charged off.
Management estimates the allowance balance using relevant available information from internal and external sources related to past events, current conditions, and a reasonable and supportable forecast. Historical credit loss experience provides the basis for the estimation of expected credit losses. Arrow's historical loss experience was supplemented with peer information when there was insufficient loss data for Arrow. Peer selection was based on a review of institutions with comparable loss experience as well as loan yield, bank size, portfolio concentration and geography. Adjustments to historical loss information are made for differences in current loan-specific risk characteristics such as differences in credit concentrations, delinquency level, collateral values and underwriting standards as well as changes in economic conditions or other relevant factors. Management judgment is required at each point in the measurement process.
Portfolio segment is defined as the level at which an entity develops and documents a systematic methodology to determine its allowance for credit losses. Upon adoption of CECL, management revised the manner in which loans were pooled for similar risk characteristics. Management developed portfolio segments for estimating loss based on type of borrower and collateral as follows:
Commercial Loans
Commercial Real Estate Loans
Consumer Loans
Residential Loans
Further details related to loan portfolio segments is included in Note 4 Loans.
Historical credit loss experience for both Arrow and segment-specific peers provides the basis for the estimation of expected credit losses. Arrow utilized regression analyses of peer data, of which Arrow is included, where observed credit losses and selected economic factors were utilized to determine suitable loss drivers for modeling lifetime probability of default (PD) rates. Arrow uses the discounted cash flow (DCF) method to estimate expected credit losses for the commercial, commercial real estate, and residential segments. For each of these loan segments, Arrow generates cash flow projections at the instrument level wherein payment expectations are adjusted for estimated prepayment speed, curtailments, time to recovery, PD, and segment-specific loss given default (LGD) risk factors. The modeling of expected prepayment speeds, curtailment rates, and time to recovery are based on historical internal data and adjusted, if necessary, based on the reasonable and supportable forecast of economic conditions.
For the loan segments utilizing the DCF method, (commercial, commercial real estate, and residential) management utilizes externally developed economic forecasts of the following economic factors as loss drivers: national unemployment, gross domestic product and home price index (HPI). The economic forecast is applied over a reasonable and supportable forecast period. Arrow utilizes a six quarter reasonable and supportable forecast period with an eight quarter reversion to the historic mean on a straight-line basis.
The combination of adjustments for credit expectations (default and loss) and timing expectations (prepayment, curtailment, and time to recovery) produces an expected cash flow stream at the instrument level. Instrument effective yield is calculated, net of the impacts of prepayment assumptions, and the instrument expected cash flows are then discounted at that effective yield to produce an instrument-level net present value of expected cash flows (NPV). An allowance for credit loss is established for the difference between the instrument’s NPV and amortized cost basis. The contractual term excludes expected extensions, renewals, and modifications unless either of the following applies: management has a reasonable expectation at the reporting date that a troubled debt restructuring (TDR) will be executed with an individual borrower or the extension or renewal options are included in the original or modified contract at the reporting date and are not unconditionally cancellable by Arrow.
Arrow uses the vintage analysis method to estimate expected credit losses for the consumer loan segment. The vintage method was selected since the loans within the consumer loan segment are homogeneous, not just by risk characteristic, but loan structure. The loss rate is applied to the loan origination amounts. Arrow maintains, over the life of the loan, the loss curve by vintage year. If estimated losses computed by the vintage method need to be adjusted based on current conditions and the reasonable and supportable economic forecast, these adjustments may be incorporated over a six quarter reasonable and supportable forecast period, reverting to historical losses using a straight-line method over an eight quarter period.
The vintage and DCF models also consider the need to qualitatively adjust expected loss estimates for information not already captured in the quantitative loss estimation process. Qualitative considerations include limitations inherent in the quantitative model; trends experienced in nonperforming and delinquent loans; changes in value of underlying collateral; changes in lending policies and procedures; nature and composition of loans; portfolio concentrations that may affect loss experience across one or more components or the portfolio; the experience, ability and depth of lending management and staff; Arrow's credit review system; and the effect of external factors such as competition, legal and regulatory requirements. These qualitative factor adjustments may increase or decrease Arrow's estimate of expected credit losses so that the allowance for credit loss is reflective of the estimate of lifetime losses that exist in the loan portfolio at the balance sheet date.
All loans not included in the vintage analysis method that exceed $250,000 which are on nonaccrual, are evaluated on an individual basis. For collateral dependent financial assets where Arrow has determined that foreclosure of the collateral is probable, or where the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and Arrow expects repayment of the financial asset to be provided substantially through the operation or sale of the collateral, Arrow has elected a practical expedient to measure the allowance for credit loss as the difference between the fair value of the collateral less cost to sell, and the amortized cost basis of the asset as of the measurement date. In the event where the repayment of a collateral dependent financial asset is expected to be provided substantially through the operating of the collateral, Arrow will use fair value of the collateral at the reporting date when recording the net carrying amount of the asset and determining the allowance for credit losses. When repayment is expected to be from the sale of the collateral, expected credit losses are calculated as the amount by which the amortized cost basis of the financial asset exceeds the fair value of the underlying collateral less estimated cost to sell. The allowance for credit losses may be zero if the fair value of the collateral at the measurement date exceeds the amortized cost basis of the financial asset.
Except as set forth below, a loan that has been modified or renewed is considered a TDR when two conditions are met:
•The borrower is experiencing financial difficulty, and
•Concessions are made for the borrower's benefit that would not otherwise be considered for a borrower or transaction with similar credit risk characteristics.
Arrow's allowance for credit losses reflects all effects of a TDR when an individual asset is specifically identified as a reasonably expected TDR. Arrow has determined that a TDR is reasonably expected no later than the point it is determined that modification is the best course of action and it is at least reasonably possible that the troubled borrower will accept some form of concession to avoid a default. Reasonably expected TDRs and executed non-performing TDRs are evaluated individually to determine the required allowance for credit losses. TDRs performing in accordance with their modified contractual terms for a reasonable period of time may be included in Arrow's existing pools based on the underlying risk characteristics of the loan to measure the allowance for credit losses. In accordance with the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act and ASC Subtopic 310-40, as extended by the Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021, if a qualifying loan modification was made for a borrower as the result of the COVID-19 pandemic, this modification was not considered a TDR.
Estimated Credit Losses on Off-Balance Sheet Credit Exposures Recognized as Other Liabilities
Arrow estimates expected credit losses over the contractual period in which Arrow has exposure to credit risk via a contractual obligation to extend credit, unless that obligation is unconditionally cancellable by Arrow. The allowance for credit losses on off-balance sheet credit exposures recognized in other liabilities, is adjusted as an expense in other noninterest expense. The estimate includes consideration of the likelihood that funding will occur and an estimate of expected credit losses on commitments expected to be funded over their estimated lives. Estimating credit losses on unfunded commitments requires the Bank to consider the following categories of off-balance sheet credit exposure: unfunded commitments to extend credit, unfunded lines of credit, and standby letters of credit. Each of these unfunded commitments is then analyzed for a probability of funding to calculate a probable funding amount. The life of loan loss factor by related portfolio segment from the loan allowance for credit loss calculation is then applied to the probable funding amount to calculate the estimated credit losses on off-balance sheet credit exposures recognized as other liabilities.
Allowance for Credit Losses – Held to Maturity (HTM) Debt Securities
Arrow's HTM debt securities are also required to utilize the CECL approach to estimate expected credit losses. Management measures expected credit losses on HTM debt securities on a collective basis by major security types that share similar risk characteristics, such as financial asset type and collateral type adjusted for current conditions and reasonable and supportable
forecasts. Management classifies the HTM portfolio into the following major security types: U.S. government agency or U.S. government sponsored mortgage-backed and collateralized mortgage obligations securities, and state and municipal debt securities.
The mortgage-backed and collateralized mortgage obligations HTM securities are issued by U.S. government entities and agencies. These securities are either explicitly or implicitly guaranteed by the U.S. government as to timely repayment of principal and interest, are highly rated by major rating agencies, and have a long history of no credit losses. Therefore, Arrow did not record a credit loss for these securities.
State and municipal bonds carry an investment grade from an accredited ratings agency, primarily with an investment grade rating. In addition, Arrow has a limited amount of New York state local municipal bonds that are not rated. The estimate of expected credit losses on the HTM portfolio is based on the expected cash flows of each individual CUSIP over its contractual life and utilized a municipal loss forecast model for determining PD and LGD rates. Management may exercise discretion to make adjustments based on environmental factors. A calculated expected credit loss for individual securities was determined using the PD and LGD rates. Arrow determined that the expected credit loss on its municipal bond portfolio was de minimis, and therefore, an allowance for credit losses was not recorded.
Allowance for Credit Losses – Available for Sale (AFS) Debt Securities
The impairment model for AFS debt securities differs from the CECL approach utilized by HTM debt securities since AFS debt securities are measured at fair value rather than amortized cost. For AFS debt securities in an unrealized loss position, the Bank first assesses whether it intends to sell, or it is more likely than not that it will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis. If either of the criteria regarding intent or requirement to sell is met, the security’s amortized cost basis is written down to fair value through income. For AFS debt securities that do not meet the aforementioned criteria, in making this assessment, management considers the extent to which fair value is less than amortized cost, any changes to the rating of the security by a rating agency, adverse conditions specifically related to the security, failure of the issuer of the debt security to make scheduled interest or principal payments, among other factors. If this assessment indicates that a credit loss exists, the present value of cash flows expected to be collected from the security are compared to the amortized cost basis of the security. The cash flows are estimated using information relevant to the collectability of the security, including information about past events, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts. If the present value of cash flows expected to be collected is less than the amortized cost basis, a credit loss exists and an allowance for credit losses is recorded for the credit loss, limited by the amount that the fair value is less than the amortized cost basis. Any impairment that has not been recorded through an allowance for credit losses is recognized in other comprehensive income.
Accrued Interest Receivable
Upon adoption of CECL on January 1, 2021, Arrow made the following elections regarding accrued interest receivable: (1) presented accrued interest receivable balances separately within the other assets balance sheet line item; (2) excluded interest receivable that is included in amortized cost of financing receivables from related disclosures requirements and (3) continued Arrow's policy to write off accrued interest receivable by reversing interest income. For loans, write off typically occurs upon becoming over 90 to 120 days past due and therefore the amount of such write offs are immaterial. Historically, Arrow has not experienced uncollectible accrued interest receivable on investment securities.
The following accounting standards have been adopted in the first nine months of 2021:
In June 2016, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued ASU 2016-13, Financial Instruments - Credit Losses (Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments and all related subsequent amendments thereto. ASU 2016-13 introduces new guidance that make substantive changes to the accounting for credit losses. ASU 2016-13 introduces the CECL model, which applies to financial assets subject to credit losses and measured at amortized cost, as well as certain off-balance sheet credit exposures. This includes loans, loan commitments, standby letters of credit, net investments in leases recognized by a lessor and HTM debt securities. The CECL model requires an entity to estimate credit losses expected over the life of an exposure, considering information about historical events, current conditions and reasonable and supportable forecasts and is generally expected to result in earlier recognition of credit losses. ASU 2016-13 also modifies certain provisions of the current other-than-temporary impairment model for AFS debt securities. Credit losses on AFS debt securities will be limited to the difference between the security’s amortized cost basis and its fair value and will be recognized through an allowance for credit losses rather than as a direct reduction in amortized cost basis. ASU 2016-13 also provides for a simplified accounting model for purchased financial assets with more than insignificant credit deterioration since their origination. ASU 2016-13 requires expanded disclosures including, but not limited to, (1) information about the methods and assumptions used to estimate expected credit losses, including changes in the factors that influenced management’s estimate and the reasons for those changes, (2) financing receivables and net investment in leases measured at amortized cost, further disaggregation of information about the credit quality of those assets and (3) a rollforward of the allowance for credit losses for HTM and AFS securities. The standard also changes the accounting for purchased credit-impaired debt securities and loans. ASU 2016-13 was effective for Arrow on January 1, 2020. As permitted by the CARES Act, Arrow deferred the adoption of the CECL methodology in determining credit losses until January 1, 2021. Management expects that the CECL model may create more volatility in the level of our allowance for loan losses from quarter to quarter as changes in the level of allowance for loan losses will be dependent upon, among other things, macroeconomic forecasts and conditions, loan portfolio volumes and credit quality.
Arrow adopted CECL on January 1, 2021 (“Day 1”) using the modified retrospective method for all financial assets measured at amortized cost and off-balance-sheet credit exposures recognized as other liabilities. Results for reporting periods beginning after January 1, 2021 are presented under Accounting Standards Codification (ASC) 326 while prior period amounts continue to be reported in accordance with previously applicable GAAP. Arrow recorded a net increase to retained earnings of $120,000 as of January 1, 2021 for the cumulative effect of adopting ASC 326. The transition adjustment includes a $1.3 million decrease to the allowance for credit losses on loans, a $1.1 million increase to the estimated credit losses on off-balance sheet credit exposures recorded as other liabilities, and a $41,000 impact to the deferred tax liability. Arrow did not record an allowance for HTM debt securities on January 1, 2021 as the amount of credit risk was deemed immaterial. Arrow did not record an allowance for credit losses on its AFS debt securities under the
newly codified AFS debt security impairment model, as the majority of these securities are government agency-backed securities for which the risk of loss is minimal. Refer to Note 3 Investment Securities and Note 4 Loans (under the captions "Allowance for Credit Losses" and "Loan Credit Quality Indicators") to the Company’s unaudited interim consolidated financial statements included in this Form 10-Q for more information.
In December 2019, the FASB issued ASU 2019-12 "Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes" (Topic 740), which removes certain exceptions to the general principles in Topic 740 and improves consistent application of and simplifies GAAP for other areas of Topic 740 by clarifying and amending existing guidance. This ASU is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020 and interim periods within those fiscal years, with early adoption permitted. Arrow adopted this standard on January 1, 2021. Arrow does not expect that the adoption of this standard will have a material impact on its financial position or the results of operations in periods subsequent to its adoption.
Note 2. CASH AND CASH EQUIVALENTS (In Thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table is the schedule of Cash and Cash Equivalents at September 30, 2021, December 31, 2020 and September 30, 2020.
|
|
September 30, 2021
|
|
December 31, 2020
|
|
September 30, 2020
|
Cash and Due From Banks
|
$
|
49,430
|
|
|
$
|
42,116
|
|
|
$
|
54,286
|
|
Interest-Bearing Deposits at Banks
|
548,936
|
|
|
338,875
|
|
|
396,380
|
|
Total Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
$
|
598,366
|
|
|
380,991
|
|
|
450,666
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted cash pledged as collateral related to swap agreements and included in Cash and Due From Banks
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
500
|
|
|
$
|
2,350
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 3. INVESTMENT SECURITIES (In Thousands)
The following table is the schedule of Available-For-Sale Securities at September 30, 2021, December 31, 2020 and September 30, 2020:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-For-Sale Securities
|
|
|
U.S. Government & Agency
Obligations
|
|
State and
Municipal
Obligations
|
|
Mortgage-
Backed
Securities
|
|
Corporate
and Other
Debt
Securities
|
|
|
|
Total
Available-
For-Sale
Securities
|
September 30, 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-For-Sale Securities,
at Amortized Cost
|
|
$
|
110,001
|
|
|
$
|
400
|
|
|
$
|
373,042
|
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
484,443
|
|
Gross Unrealized Gains
|
|
96
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5,225
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
5,321
|
|
Gross Unrealized Losses
|
|
(792)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1,872)
|
|
|
(200)
|
|
|
|
|
(2,864)
|
|
Available-For-Sale Securities,
at Fair Value
|
|
109,305
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
376,395
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
|
486,900
|
|
Available-For-Sale Securities,
Pledged as Collateral, at Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
361,014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities of Debt Securities,
at Amortized Cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within One Year
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
125
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
125
|
|
From 1 - 5 Years
|
|
110,001
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
368,296
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
478,337
|
|
From 5 - 10 Years
|
|
—
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
4,621
|
|
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
5,981
|
|
Over 10 Years
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities of Debt Securities,
at Fair Value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within One Year
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
132
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
132
|
|
From 1 - 5 Years
|
|
109,305
|
|
|
40
|
|
|
371,649
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
480,994
|
|
From 5 - 10 Years
|
|
—
|
|
|
360
|
|
|
4,614
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
|
5,774
|
|
Over 10 Years
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities in a Continuous
Loss Position, at Fair Value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months
|
|
$
|
74,695
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
190,532
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
265,227
|
|
12 Months or Longer
|
|
29,513
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
|
30,313
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
104,208
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
190,532
|
|
|
$
|
800
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
295,540
|
|
Number of Securities in a
Continuous Loss Position
|
|
14
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
27
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized Losses on
Securities in a Continuous
Loss Position:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months
|
|
$
|
305
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,872
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,177
|
|
12 Months or Longer
|
|
487
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
|
687
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
792
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,872
|
|
|
$
|
200
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,864
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disaggregated Details:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Agency Obligations,
at Amortized Cost
|
|
$
|
110,001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Agency Obligations,
at Fair Value
|
|
109,305
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Government Agency
Securities, at Amortized Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,119
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Government Agency
Securities, at Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
10,165
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government Sponsored Entity
Securities, at Amortized Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
362,923
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government Sponsored Entity
Securities, at Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
366,230
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-For-Sale Securities
|
|
|
U.S. Government & Agency
Obligations
|
|
State and
Municipal
Obligations
|
|
Mortgage-
Backed
Securities
|
|
Corporate
and Other
Debt
Securities
|
|
|
|
Total
Available-
For-Sale
Securities
|
December 31, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-For-Sale Securities,
at Amortized Cost
|
|
$
|
65,002
|
|
|
$
|
528
|
|
|
$
|
290,967
|
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
357,497
|
|
Gross Unrealized Gains
|
|
184
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
7,934
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
8,118
|
|
Gross Unrealized Losses
|
|
(74)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(54)
|
|
|
(200)
|
|
|
|
|
(328)
|
|
Available-For-Sale Securities,
at Fair Value
|
|
65,112
|
|
|
528
|
|
|
298,847
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
|
365,287
|
|
Available-For-Sale Securities,
Pledged as Collateral,
at Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
244,411
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities in a Continuous
Loss Position, at Fair Value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months
|
|
$
|
29,926
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
29,926
|
|
12 Months or Longer
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
4,882
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
|
5,682
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
29,926
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
4,882
|
|
|
$
|
800
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
35,608
|
|
Number of Securities in a
Continuous Loss Position
|
|
4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized Losses on
Securities in a Continuous
Loss Position:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
12 Months or Longer
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
54
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
|
254
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
74
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
54
|
|
|
$
|
200
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
328
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disaggregated Details:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Agency Obligations,
at Amortized Cost
|
|
$
|
65,002
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Agency Obligations,
at Fair Value
|
|
65,112
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Government Agency
Securities, at Amortized Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
12,696
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Government Agency
Securities, at Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
12,683
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government Sponsored Entity
Securities, at Amortized Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
278,271
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government Sponsored Entity
Securities, at Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
286,164
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-For-Sale Securities
|
|
|
U.S. Government & Agency
Obligations
|
|
State and
Municipal
Obligations
|
|
Mortgage-
Backed
Securities
|
|
Corporate
and Other
Debt
Securities
|
|
|
|
Total
Available-
For-Sale
Securities
|
September 30, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Available-For-Sale Securities,
at Amortized Cost
|
|
$
|
35,001
|
|
|
$
|
593
|
|
|
$
|
329,887
|
|
|
$
|
1,000
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
366,481
|
|
Gross Unrealized Gains
|
|
184
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
8,700
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
8,884
|
|
Gross Unrealized Losses
|
|
(18)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(219)
|
|
|
(200)
|
|
|
|
|
(437)
|
|
Available-For-Sale Securities,
at Fair Value
|
|
35,167
|
|
|
593
|
|
|
338,368
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
|
374,928
|
|
Available-For-Sale Securities,
Pledged as Collateral, at Fair
Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
308,879
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities in a Continuous
Loss Position, at Fair Value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months
|
|
$
|
29,982
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
13,847
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
43,829
|
|
12 Months or Longer
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
54,239
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
|
|
55,039
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
29,982
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
68,086
|
|
|
$
|
800
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
98,868
|
|
Number of Securities in a
Continuous Loss Position
|
|
4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
26
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
|
31
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized Losses on Securities
in a Continuous Loss Position:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
36
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
54
|
|
12 Months or Longer
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
200
|
|
|
|
|
383
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
18
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
219
|
|
|
$
|
200
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
437
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disaggregated Details:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Agency Obligations,
at Amortized Cost
|
|
$
|
35,001
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Agency Obligations,
at Fair Value
|
|
35,167
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Government Agency
Securities, at Amortized Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
69,575
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Government Agency
Securities, at Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
69,407
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government Sponsored Entity
Securities, at Amortized Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
260,312
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government Sponsored Entity
Securities, at Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
268,961
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At September 30, 2021, there was no allowance for credit losses for the available for sale securities portfolio.
The following table is the schedule of Held-To-Maturity Securities at September 30, 2021, December 31, 2020 and September 30, 2020:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held-To-Maturity Securities
|
|
|
State and
Municipal
Obligations
|
|
Mortgage-
Backed
Securities
|
|
|
|
Total
Held-To
Maturity
Securities
|
September 30, 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held-To-Maturity Securities,
at Amortized Cost
|
|
$
|
179,952
|
|
|
$
|
18,385
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
198,337
|
|
Gross Unrealized Gains
|
|
4,834
|
|
|
765
|
|
|
|
|
5,599
|
|
Gross Unrealized Losses
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Held-To-Maturity Securities,
at Fair Value
|
|
184,786
|
|
|
19,150
|
|
|
|
|
203,936
|
|
Held-To-Maturity Securities,
Pledged as Collateral, at Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
192,929
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities of Debt Securities,
at Amortized Cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within One Year
|
|
$
|
23,281
|
|
|
$
|
940
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
24,221
|
|
From 1 - 5 Years
|
|
140,014
|
|
|
17,445
|
|
|
|
|
157,459
|
|
From 5 - 10 Years
|
|
15,791
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
15,791
|
|
Over 10 Years
|
|
866
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
866
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Maturities of Debt Securities,
at Fair Value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Within One Year
|
|
$
|
23,448
|
|
|
$
|
959
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
24,407
|
|
From 1 - 5 Years
|
|
143,994
|
|
|
18,191
|
|
|
|
|
162,185
|
|
From 5 - 10 Years
|
|
16,473
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
16,473
|
|
Over 10 Years
|
|
871
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
871
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities in a Continuous
Loss Position, at Fair Value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
12 Months or Longer
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Securities in a
Continuous Loss Position
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized Losses on Securities
in a Continuous Loss Position:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
12 Months or Longer
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disaggregated Details:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Government Agency
Securities, at Amortized Cost
|
|
|
|
$
|
6,302
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Government Agency
Securities, at Fair Value
|
|
|
|
6,506
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government Sponsored Entity
Securities, at Amortized Cost
|
|
|
|
12,083
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government Sponsored Entity
Securities, at Fair Value
|
|
|
|
12,644
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held-To-Maturity Securities
|
|
|
State and
Municipal
Obligations
|
|
Mortgage-
Backed
Securities
|
|
|
|
Total
Held-To
Maturity
Securities
|
December 31, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held-To-Maturity Securities,
at Amortized Cost
|
|
$
|
192,352
|
|
|
$
|
26,053
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
218,405
|
|
Gross Unrealized Gains
|
|
7,080
|
|
|
1,094
|
|
|
|
|
8,174
|
|
Gross Unrealized Losses
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
Held-To-Maturity Securities,
at Fair Value
|
|
199,429
|
|
|
27,147
|
|
|
|
|
226,576
|
|
Held-To-Maturity Securities,
Pledged as Collateral, at Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
211,176
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities in a Continuous
Loss Position, at Fair Value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months
|
|
$
|
1,513
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,513
|
|
12 Months or Longer
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,513
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,513
|
|
Number of Securities in a
Continuous Loss Position
|
|
4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized Losses on
Securities in a Continuous
Loss Position:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
12 Months or Longer
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disaggregated Details:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Government Agency
Securities, at Amortized Cost
|
|
|
|
$
|
9,440
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Government Agency
Securities, at Fair Value
|
|
|
|
9,762
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government Sponsored Entity
Securities, at Amortized Cost
|
|
|
|
16,613
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government Sponsored Entity
Securities, at Fair Value
|
|
|
|
17,385
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held-To-Maturity Securities
|
|
|
State and
Municipal
Obligations
|
|
Mortgage-
Backed
Securities
|
|
|
|
Total
Held-To
Maturity
Securities
|
September 30, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Held-To-Maturity Securities,
at Amortized Cost
|
|
$
|
195,735
|
|
|
$
|
29,064
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
224,799
|
|
Gross Unrealized Gains
|
|
7,488
|
|
|
1,257
|
|
|
|
|
8,745
|
|
Gross Unrealized Losses
|
|
(43)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
(43)
|
|
Held-To-Maturity Securities,
at Fair Value
|
|
203,180
|
|
|
30,321
|
|
|
|
|
233,501
|
|
Held-To-Maturity Securities,
Pledged as Collateral, at Fair Value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
221,844
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities in a Continuous
Loss Position, at Fair Value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months
|
|
$
|
1,476
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,476
|
|
12 Months or Longer
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
1,476
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
1,476
|
|
Number of Securities in a
Continuous Loss Position
|
|
4
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized Losses on
Securities in a Continuous
Loss Position:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Less than 12 Months
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
42
|
|
12 Months or Longer
|
|
1
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Disaggregated Details:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Government Agency
Securities, at Amortized Cost
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,669
|
|
|
|
|
|
US Government Agency
Securities, at Fair Value
|
|
|
|
11,049
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government Sponsored Entity
Securities, at Amortized Cost
|
|
|
|
18,392
|
|
|
|
|
|
Government Sponsored Entity
Securities, at Fair Value
|
|
|
|
19,272
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the tables above, maturities of mortgage-backed securities are included based on their expected average lives. Actual maturities will differ because issuers may have the right to call or prepay obligations with or without prepayment penalties.
Securities in a continuous loss position, in the tables above for September 30, 2021, December 31, 2020 and September 30, 2020, do not reflect any deterioration of the credit worthiness of the issuing entities.
Arrow evaluates available-for-sale debt securities in unrealized loss positions at each measurement date to determine whether the decline in the fair value below the amortized cost basis (impairment) is due to credit-related factors or noncredit-related factors. Any impairment that is not credit related is recognized in other comprehensive income, net of applicable taxes. Credit-related impairment is recognized within the allowance for credit losses on the balance sheet, limited to the amount by which the amortized cost basis exceeds the fair value, with a corresponding adjustment to earnings via credit loss expense. Arrow determined that at September 30, 2021, gross unrealized losses were primarily attributable to changes in interest rates, relative to when the investment securities were purchased, and not due to the credit quality of the investment securities. Arrow does not intend to sell, nor is it more likely than not that Arrow will be required to sell the security before recovery of its amortized cost basis, which may be at maturity. Therefore, Arrow carried no allowance for credit loss at September 30, 2021 and there was no credit loss expense recognized by Arrow with respect to the securities portfolio during the three months ended September 30, 2021.
Arrow's held to maturity debt securities are comprised of U.S. government agencies, U.S. government-sponsored enterprises or state and municipal obligations. U.S. government agencies and U.S. government-sponsored enterprise securities carry the explicit and/or implicit guarantee of the U.S. government, are widely recognized as “risk free,” and have a long history of zero credit loss. Arrow determined that the expected credit loss on its held to maturity debt portfolio was immaterial and therefore no allowance for credit loss was recorded as of September 30, 2021.
The following table is the schedule of Equity Securities at September 30, 2021, December 31, 2020 and September 30, 2020:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Securities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2021
|
December 31, 2020
|
September 30, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity Securities, at Fair Value
|
|
$1,886
|
$1,636
|
$1,511
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following is a summary of realized and unrealized gains and losses recognized in net income on equity securities during the three and nine month period ended September 30, 2021 and 2020:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
2021
|
|
|
|
2020
|
|
2021
|
|
2020
|
|
|
Net (Loss) Gain on Equity Securities
|
$
|
(106)
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(72)
|
|
|
$
|
250
|
|
|
$
|
(552)
|
|
|
|
Less: Net (loss) gain recognized during the reporting period on equity securities sold during the period
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
Unrealized net (loss) gain recognized during the reporting period on equity securities still held at the reporting date
|
$
|
(106)
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(72)
|
|
|
$
|
250
|
|
|
$
|
(552)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 4. LOANS (In Thousands)
Loan Categories and Past Due Loans
The following two tables present loan balances outstanding as of September 30, 2021, and an analysis of the recorded investment in loans that are past due at these dates. Generally, Arrow considers a loan past due 30 or more days when the borrower is two payments past due. Loans held-for-sale of $2,169, $11,085 and $10,580 as of September 30, 2021, December 31, 2020 and September 30, 2020, respectively, are included in the residential real estate balances for current loans.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Past Due Loans by Loan Category
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Residential
|
|
Total
|
September 30, 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans Past Due 30-59 Days
|
$
|
729
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
4,809
|
|
|
$
|
368
|
|
|
$
|
5,906
|
|
Loans Past Due 60-89 Days
|
63
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,543
|
|
|
1,295
|
|
|
3,901
|
|
Loans Past Due 90 or more Days
|
75
|
|
|
1,641
|
|
|
1,010
|
|
|
1,951
|
|
|
4,677
|
|
Total Loans Past Due
|
867
|
|
|
1,641
|
|
|
8,362
|
|
|
3,614
|
|
|
14,484
|
|
Current Loans
|
187,324
|
|
|
613,440
|
|
|
912,827
|
|
|
926,676
|
|
|
2,640,267
|
|
Total Loans
|
$
|
188,191
|
|
|
$
|
615,081
|
|
|
$
|
921,189
|
|
|
$
|
930,290
|
|
|
$
|
2,654,751
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans Past Due 30-59 Days
|
$
|
102
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
4,976
|
|
|
$
|
261
|
|
|
$
|
5,339
|
|
Loans Past Due 60-89 Days
|
113
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,713
|
|
|
1,279
|
|
|
4,105
|
|
Loans Past Due 90 or more Days
|
78
|
|
|
1,658
|
|
|
1,379
|
|
|
1,224
|
|
|
4,339
|
|
Total Loans Past Due
|
293
|
|
|
1,658
|
|
|
9,068
|
|
|
2,764
|
|
|
13,783
|
|
Current Loans
|
240,261
|
|
|
570,129
|
|
|
850,700
|
|
|
920,157
|
|
|
2,581,247
|
|
Total Loans
|
$
|
240,554
|
|
|
$
|
571,787
|
|
|
$
|
859,768
|
|
|
$
|
922,921
|
|
|
$
|
2,595,030
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans Past Due 30-59 Days
|
$
|
43
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
4,238
|
|
|
$
|
428
|
|
|
$
|
4,709
|
|
Loans Past Due 60-89 Days
|
79
|
|
|
85
|
|
|
2,853
|
|
|
765
|
|
|
3,782
|
|
Loans Past Due 90 or more Days
|
22
|
|
|
1,475
|
|
|
1,303
|
|
|
1,517
|
|
|
4,317
|
|
Total Loans Past Due
|
144
|
|
|
1,560
|
|
|
8,394
|
|
|
2,710
|
|
|
12,808
|
|
Current Loans
|
275,777
|
|
|
539,673
|
|
|
841,132
|
|
|
923,065
|
|
|
2,579,647
|
|
Total Loans
|
$
|
275,921
|
|
|
$
|
541,233
|
|
|
$
|
849,526
|
|
|
$
|
925,775
|
|
|
$
|
2,592,455
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Non Accrual Loans by Category
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2021
|
Commercial
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Residential
|
|
Total
|
Loans 90 or More Days Past Due
and Still Accruing Interest
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
555
|
|
|
$
|
555
|
|
Nonaccrual Loans
|
91
|
|
|
7,766
|
|
|
1,101
|
|
|
1,765
|
|
|
10,723
|
|
Nonaccrual With No Allowance for Credit Loss
|
91
|
|
|
4,983
|
|
|
1,101
|
|
|
1,765
|
|
|
7,940
|
|
Interest Income on Nonaccrual Loans
|
—
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans 90 or More Days Past Due
and Still Accruing Interest
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
184
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
228
|
|
Nonaccrual Loans
|
78
|
|
|
1,475
|
|
|
1,470
|
|
|
3,010
|
|
|
6,033
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans 90 or More Days Past Due
and Still Accruing Interest
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
121
|
|
|
$
|
121
|
|
Nonaccrual Loans
|
72
|
|
|
1,475
|
|
|
1,559
|
|
|
2,898
|
|
|
6,004
|
|
Arrow disaggregates its loan portfolio into the following four categories:
Commercial - The Company offers a variety of loan options to meet the specific needs of our commercial customers including term loans, time notes and lines of credit. Such loans are made available to businesses for working capital needs such as inventory and receivables, business expansion and equipment purchases. Generally, a collateral lien is placed on equipment or other assets owned by the borrower. Generally, these loans carry a higher risk than commercial real estate loans due to the nature of the underlying collateral, which can be business assets such as equipment and accounts receivable and generally have a lower liquidation value than real estate. In the event of default by the borrower, the Company may be required to liquidate collateral at deeply discounted values. To reduce the risk, management usually obtains personal guarantees to support the borrowing, as permitted by applicable law.
Commercial Real Estate - The Company offers commercial real estate loans to finance real estate purchases, refinancings, expansions and improvements to commercial properties. Commercial real estate loans are made to finance the purchases of real property which generally consists of real estate with completed structures. These commercial real estate loans are typically secured by first liens on the real estate, which may include apartments, commercial structures, housing businesses, healthcare facilities, and both owner and non owner-occupied facilities. These loans are typically less risky than commercial loans, since they are secured by real estate and buildings, and are generally originated in amounts of no more than 80% of the appraised value of the property. However, the Company also offers commercial construction and land development loans to finance projects. Many projects will ultimately be used by the borrowers' businesses, while others are developed for resale. These real estate loans are also typically secured by first liens on the real estate, which may include apartments, commercial structures, housing businesses, healthcare facilities and both owner-occupied and non-owner-occupied facilities. There is enhanced risk during the construction period, since the loan is secured by an incomplete project.
Consumer Loans - This category is primarily comprised of automobile loans. Arrow primarily finances the purchases of automobiles indirectly through dealer relationships located throughout upstate New York and Vermont. Most automobile loans carry a fixed rate of interest with principal repayment terms typically ranging from three to seven years. Automobile loans are underwritten on a secured basis using the underlying collateral being financed. Arrow also offers a variety of consumer installment loans to finance personal expenditures. Most of these loans carry a fixed rate of interest with principal repayment terms typically ranging from one to five years, based upon the nature of the collateral and the size of the loan. In addition to installment loans, Arrow also offers personal lines of credit and overdraft protection. Several of these consumer loans are unsecured, which carry a higher risk of loss.
Residential - Residential real estate loans consist primarily of loans secured by first or second mortgages on primary residences. Arrow originates fixed-rate and adjustable-rate one-to-four-family residential real estate loans for the construction, purchase of real estate or refinancing of an existing mortgage. These loans are collateralized primarily by owner-occupied properties generally located in Arrow's market area. Loans on one-to-four-family residential real estate are generally originated in amounts of no more than 80% of the purchase price or appraised value (whichever is lower), or have private mortgage insurance. Arrow’s underwriting analysis for residential mortgage loans typically includes credit verification, independent appraisals, and a review of the borrower’s financial condition. Mortgage title insurance and hazard insurance are normally required. It is Arrow's general practice to underwrite residential real estate loans to secondary market standards. Construction loans have a unique risk, because they are secured by an incomplete dwelling. This risk is reduced through periodic site inspections, including one at each loan draw period. In addition, the Company offers fixed home equity loans, as well as home equity lines of credit to consumers to finance home improvements, debt consolidation, education and other uses. Arrow's policy allows for a maximum loan to value ratio of 80%, although periodically higher advances are allowed. Arrow originates home equity lines of credit and second mortgage loans (loans secured by a second junior lien position on one-to-four-family residential real estate). Risk is generally reduced through underwriting criteria, which include credit verification, appraisals, a review of the borrower's financial condition, and personal cash flows. A security interest, with title insurance when necessary, is taken in the underlying real estate.
The following tables present the amortized cost basis of collateral-dependent loans by class of loans as of September 30, 2021:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2021
|
Collateral Type -Residential Real Estate
|
|
Collateral Type - Commercial Real Estate
|
|
Total Loans
|
Commercial
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Commercial Real Estate
|
—
|
|
|
7,254
|
|
|
7,254
|
|
Consumer
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Residential
|
676
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
676
|
|
Total
|
$
|
676
|
|
|
$
|
7,254
|
|
|
$
|
7,930
|
|
Allowance for Credit Losses
As mentioned in Note 1 Accounting Policies, Arrow adopted CECL on January 1, 2021.
Loan segments were selected by class code and application code to ensure each segment is comprised of loans with homogenous loan characteristics and similar risk profiles. The resulting loan segments are commercial - non-PPP, commercial PPP, commercial real estate, consumer and residential real estate loans. The consumer segment is mainly comprised of automobile loans, and since they are relatively short-term in nature, with similar dollar amounts and collateral, the vintage analysis method was selected to determine the credit loss reserve. The vintage method utilizes Arrow loan data exclusively as the method calculates a loss rate based on the total
origination balance of the loans by year and the charge-off and recovery rate of the same origination year. Arrow maintains, over the life of the loan, the loss curve by vintage year. The discounted cash flow method (DCF) is used to calculate the reserve for credit losses for the commercial, commercial real estate and residential real estate segments. Please see Note 1 for a full explanation.
The September 30, 2021 allowance for credit losses calculation incorporated a reasonable and supportable forecast period to account for economic conditions utilized in the measurement. The quantitative model utilized an economic forecast sourced from reputable third-parties that reflected economic improvement with a reduction of approximately 0.2% in the national unemployment rate during the six-quarter forecast period, while forecasted gross domestic product declined approximately 1.0%. The home price index forecast increased approximately 2.2% from the previous quarter level. Key assumptions utilized in the CECL calculation include loan segmentation, loan loss regression analysis, reasonable and supportable forecast period, reversion period, discounted cash flow inputs including economic forecast data and prepayment and curtailment speeds and qualitative factors. Key assumptions are reviewed and approved on a quarterly basis. Driven by current economic forecasts, loan growth and net charge offs during the quarter, the third quarter provision for credit losses was $99 thousand. The provision is directionally consistent with both the latest economic forecasts as well as third quarter activity. Management's evaluation considers the allowance for credit losses for loans to be appropriate as of September 30, 2021.
The following table details activity in the allowance for credit losses on loans for the three and nine months ended September 30, 2021 and September 30, 2020. Arrow adopted ASU 2016-13 on January 1, 2021. Results for the periods beginning after January 1, 2021 are presented under ASC 326 and prior periods continue to be reported in accordance with previously applicable US GAAP.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for Credit Losses
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Commercial Real Estate
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
|
Total
|
Rollforward of the Allowance for Credit Losses for the Quarterly Period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2021
|
$
|
2,241
|
|
|
$
|
13,606
|
|
|
$
|
2,443
|
|
|
$
|
8,720
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
27,010
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Charge-offs
|
(17)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(427)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
(444)
|
|
Recoveries
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
291
|
|
Provision
|
200
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
(19)
|
|
|
(147)
|
|
|
|
|
99
|
|
September 30, 2021
|
$
|
2,424
|
|
|
$
|
13,671
|
|
|
$
|
2,288
|
|
|
$
|
8,573
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
26,956
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2020
|
$
|
2,173
|
|
|
$
|
9,990
|
|
|
$
|
11,562
|
|
|
$
|
5,507
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
29,232
|
|
Impact of Adoption ASC 326
|
2,084
|
|
|
2,064
|
|
|
(9,383)
|
|
|
3,935
|
|
|
|
|
(1,300)
|
|
Balance as of January 1, 2021 as adjusted for ASU 2016-13
|
4,257
|
|
|
12,054
|
|
|
2,179
|
|
|
9,442
|
|
|
|
|
27,932
|
|
Charge-offs
|
(37)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1,480)
|
|
|
(3)
|
|
|
|
|
(1,520)
|
|
Recoveries
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
830
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
830
|
|
Provision
|
(1,796)
|
|
|
1,617
|
|
|
759
|
|
|
(866)
|
|
|
|
|
(286)
|
|
September 30, 2021
|
$
|
2,424
|
|
|
$
|
13,671
|
|
|
$
|
2,288
|
|
|
$
|
8,573
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
26,956
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for Loan Losses
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Commercial Real Estate
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
|
Total
|
Rollforward of the Allowance for Loan Losses for the Quarterly Period:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2020
|
$
|
1,917
|
|
|
$
|
8,361
|
|
|
$
|
10,639
|
|
|
$
|
5,383
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
26,300
|
|
Charge-offs
|
(17)
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
|
(370)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
(392)
|
|
Recoveries
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
267
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
267
|
|
Provision
|
419
|
|
|
1,013
|
|
|
609
|
|
|
230
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,271
|
|
September 30, 2020
|
$
|
2,319
|
|
|
$
|
9,369
|
|
|
$
|
11,145
|
|
|
$
|
5,613
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
28,446
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Credit Losses on Off-Balance Sheet Credit Exposures Recognized as Other Liabilities
Financial instrument credit losses apply to off-balance sheet credit exposures such as unfunded loan commitments and standby letters of credit. A liability for expected credit losses for off-balance sheet exposures is recognized if the entity has a present contractual obligation to extend the credit and the obligation is not unconditionally cancellable by the entity. The Day 1 adoption of ASU 2016-13, created an allowance for credit loss on off-balance sheet exposures recognized as other liabilities of $1.1 million. Subsequent changes in this allowance are reflected in other operating expenses within the non-interest expense category. As of September 30, 2021, the total unfunded commitment off-balance sheet credit exposure was $1.8 million.
Individually Evaluated Loans
All loans not included in the vintage analysis method that exceed $250,000, which are on nonaccrual status, are evaluated on an individual basis. Arrow made the policy election to apply a practical expedient for collateral dependent financial assets when the borrower is experiencing financial difficulty and the repayment is expected through the sale of the collateral. This allows Arrow to use fair value of the collateral at the reporting date adjusted for estimated cost to sell when recording the net carrying amount of the asset and determining the allowance for credit losses for a financial asset. In the event where the repayment of a collateral dependent financial asset is expected to be provided substantially through the operating of the collateral, Arrow will use fair value of the collateral at the reporting date when recording the net carrying amount of the asset and determining the allowance for credit losses. As of September 30, 2021, there were six total relationships identified to be evaluated for loss on an individual basis which had an amortized cost basis of $7.9 million and only one loan had an allowance for credit loss of $616 thousand.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for Credit Losses - Collectively and Individually Evaluated
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Commercial Real Estate
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
|
Total
|
September 30, 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Loan Balance - Collectively Evaluated
|
$
|
188,191
|
|
|
$
|
607,827
|
|
|
$
|
921,189
|
|
|
$
|
929,614
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,646,821
|
|
Allowance for Credit Losses - Loans Collectively Evaluated
|
2,424
|
|
|
13,055
|
|
|
2,288
|
|
|
8,573
|
|
|
|
|
26,340
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Loan Balance - Individually Evaluated
|
—
|
|
|
7,254
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
676
|
|
|
|
|
7,930
|
|
Allowance for Credit Losses - Loans Individually Evaluated
|
—
|
|
|
616
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
616
|
|
The following table presents information pertaining to the allowance for loan losses as of December 31, 2020 and September 30, 2020, as determined in accordance with ASC 310, prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-13:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Allowance for Loan Losses - Collectively and Individually Evaluated for Impairment
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Commercial Real Estate
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Residential
|
|
|
|
Total
|
December 31, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Loan Balance - Collectively Evaluated for Impairment
|
$
|
240,507
|
|
|
$
|
570,659
|
|
|
$
|
859,657
|
|
|
$
|
921,504
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,592,327
|
|
Allowance for Loan Losses - Loans Collectively Evaluated for Impairment
|
2,154
|
|
|
9,990
|
|
|
11,562
|
|
|
5,485
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
29,191
|
|
Ending Loan Balance - Individually Evaluated for Impairment
|
47
|
|
|
1,128
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
1,417
|
|
|
|
|
2,703
|
|
Allowance for Loan Losses - Loans Individually Evaluated for Impairment
|
19
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
22
|
|
|
|
|
41
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ending Loan Balance - Collectively Evaluated for Impairment
|
$
|
275,874
|
|
|
$
|
540,105
|
|
|
$
|
849,402
|
|
|
$
|
924,348
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
2,589,729
|
|
Allowance for Loan Losses - Loans Collectively Evaluated for Impairment
|
2,301
|
|
|
9,369
|
|
|
11,145
|
|
|
5,585
|
|
|
|
|
28,400
|
|
Ending Loan Balance - Individually Evaluated for Impairment
|
47
|
|
|
1,128
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
1,427
|
|
|
|
|
2,726
|
|
Allowance for Loan Losses - Loans Individually Evaluated for Impairment
|
18
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
|
|
46
|
|
Through the provision for credit losses, an allowance for credit losses is maintained that reflects the best estimate of the calculated expected credit losses in the Company’s loan portfolio as of the balance sheet date. Additions are made to the allowance for credit losses through a periodic provision for credit losses. Actual credit losses are charged against the allowance for credit losses when loans are deemed uncollectible and recoveries of amounts previously charged off are recorded as credits to the allowance for credit losses.
Arrow's loan officers and risk managers meet at least quarterly to discuss and review the conditions and risks associated with certain criticized and classified commercial-related relationships. In addition, the independent internal loan review department performs periodic reviews of the credit quality indicators on individual loans in the commercial loan portfolio.
Management considers the need to qualitatively adjust expected credit loss estimates for information not already captured in the loss estimation process. These qualitative factor adjustments may increase or decrease management’s estimate of expected credit losses. Adjustments are not made for information that has already been considered and included in the loss estimation process.
Management considers the qualitative factors that are relevant to Arrow as of the reporting date, which may include, but are not limited to the following factors:
•The nature and volume of Arrow's financial assets;
•The existence, growth, and effect of any concentrations of credit;
•The volume and severity of past due loans, the volume of nonaccrual loans, and the volume and severity of adversely classified or graded loans;
•The value of the underlying collateral for loans that are not collateral-dependent;
•Arrow's lending policies and procedures, including changes in underwriting standards and practices for collections, write-offs, and recoveries;
•The quality of Arrow's loan review function;
•The experience, ability, and depth of Arrow's lending, investment, collection, and other relevant management/staff;
•The effect of other external factors such as the regulatory, legal and technological environments; competition; and events such as natural disasters;
•Actual and expected changes in international, national, regional, and local economic and business conditions and developments in which the institution operates that affect the collectability of financial assets; and
•Other qualitative factors not reflected in quantitative loss rate calculations.
Loan Credit Quality Indicators
The following table presents credit quality indicators by total loans amortized cost basis by origination year as of September 30, 2021.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Term Loans Amortized Cost Basis by Origination Year
|
Revolving Loans Amortized Cost Basis
|
Revolving Loan Converted to Term
|
Total
|
September 30, 2021
|
2021
|
2020
|
2019
|
2018
|
2017
|
Prior
|
Commercial:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk rating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Satisfactory
|
$
|
81,914
|
|
$
|
38,970
|
|
$
|
13,966
|
|
$
|
12,860
|
|
$
|
8,511
|
|
$
|
3,917
|
|
$
|
12,796
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
172,934
|
|
Special mention
|
—
|
|
652
|
|
51
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
5,499
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
6,202
|
|
Substandard
|
3,575
|
|
4,496
|
|
636
|
|
—
|
|
31
|
|
295
|
|
22
|
|
—
|
|
9,055
|
|
Doubtful
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Total Commercial Loans
|
$
|
85,489
|
|
$
|
44,118
|
|
$
|
14,653
|
|
$
|
12,860
|
|
$
|
8,542
|
|
$
|
9,711
|
|
$
|
12,818
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
188,191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial Real Estate:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk rating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Satisfactory
|
$
|
96,419
|
|
$
|
290,785
|
|
$
|
47,605
|
|
$
|
41,215
|
|
$
|
22,661
|
|
$
|
62,203
|
|
$
|
2,935
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
563,823
|
|
Special mention
|
—
|
|
16,829
|
|
1,227
|
|
—
|
|
139
|
|
1,976
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
20,171
|
|
Substandard
|
7,248
|
|
10,359
|
|
3,950
|
|
146
|
|
—
|
|
9,384
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
31,087
|
|
Doubtful
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
Total Commercial Real Estate Loans
|
$
|
103,667
|
|
$
|
317,973
|
|
$
|
52,782
|
|
$
|
41,361
|
|
$
|
22,800
|
|
$
|
73,563
|
|
$
|
2,935
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
615,081
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consumer:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk rating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performing
|
$
|
330,952
|
|
$
|
264,963
|
|
$
|
175,448
|
|
$
|
97,563
|
|
$
|
37,112
|
|
$
|
13,572
|
|
$
|
477
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
920,087
|
|
Nonperforming
|
203
|
|
319
|
|
332
|
|
160
|
|
30
|
|
58
|
|
—
|
|
—
|
|
1,102
|
|
Total Consumer Loans
|
$
|
331,155
|
|
$
|
265,282
|
|
$
|
175,780
|
|
$
|
97,723
|
|
$
|
37,142
|
|
$
|
13,630
|
|
$
|
477
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
921,189
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Residential:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Risk rating
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performing
|
$
|
124,536
|
|
$
|
154,071
|
|
$
|
101,678
|
|
$
|
94,621
|
|
$
|
97,457
|
|
$
|
231,375
|
|
$
|
124,231
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
927,969
|
|
Nonperforming
|
—
|
|
336
|
|
—
|
|
155
|
|
213
|
|
1,586
|
|
31
|
|
—
|
|
2,321
|
|
Total Residential Loans
|
$
|
124,536
|
|
$
|
154,407
|
|
$
|
101,678
|
|
$
|
94,776
|
|
$
|
97,670
|
|
$
|
232,961
|
|
$
|
124,262
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
930,290
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total Loans
|
$
|
644,847
|
|
$
|
781,780
|
|
$
|
344,893
|
|
$
|
246,720
|
|
$
|
166,154
|
|
$
|
329,865
|
|
$
|
140,492
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
$
|
2,654,751
|
|
For the purposes of the table above, nonperforming consumer and residential loans were those loans on nonaccrual status or are 90 days or more past due and still accruing interest.
The recorded investment of consumer mortgage loans secured by residential real estate properties for which formal foreclosure proceedings are in process is $1.3 million.
For the allowance calculation, an internally developed system of five credit quality indicators is used to rate the credit worthiness of each commercial loan defined as follows:
1) Satisfactory - "Satisfactory" borrowers have acceptable financial condition with satisfactory record of earnings and sufficient historical and projected cash flow to service the debt. Borrowers have satisfactory repayment histories and primary and secondary sources of repayment can be clearly identified;
2) Special Mention - Loans in this category have potential weaknesses that deserve management’s close attention. If left uncorrected, these potential weaknesses may result in deterioration of the repayment prospects for the asset or in the institution’s credit position at some future date. "Special mention" assets are not adversely classified and do not expose an institution to sufficient risk to warrant adverse classification. Loans which might be assigned this credit quality indicator include loans to borrowers with deteriorating financial strength and/or earnings record and loans with potential for problems due to weakening economic or market conditions;
3) Substandard - Loans classified as “substandard” are inadequately protected by the current sound net worth or paying capacity of the borrower or the collateral pledged, if any. Loans in this category have well defined weaknesses that jeopardize the repayment. They are characterized by the distinct possibility that the Company will sustain some loss if the deficiencies are not corrected. “Substandard” loans may include loans which are likely to require liquidation of collateral to effect repayment, and other loans where
character or ability to repay has become suspect. Loss potential, while existing in the aggregate amount of substandard assets, does not have to exist in individual assets classified substandard;
4) Doubtful - Loans classified as “doubtful” have all of the weaknesses inherent in those classified as “substandard” with the added characteristic that the weaknesses make collection or liquidation in full, on the basis of current existing facts, conditions, and values, highly questionable and improbable. Although possibility of loss is extremely high, classification of these loans as “loss” has been deferred due to specific pending factors or events which may strengthen the value (e.g. possibility of additional collateral, injection of capital, collateral liquidation, debt restructure, economic recovery, etc). Loans classified as “doubtful” need to be placed on non-accrual; and
5) Loss - Loans classified as “loss” are considered uncollectible with collateral of such little value that their continuance as bankable assets is not warranted. As of the date of the balance sheet, all loans in this category have been charged-off to the allowance for loan losses.
Commercial loans are generally evaluated on an annual basis depending on the size and complexity of the loan relationship, unless the credit related quality indicator falls to a level of "special mention" or below, when the loan is evaluated quarterly. The credit quality indicator is one of the factors used in assessing the level of incurred risk of loss in our commercial related loan portfolios.
The following table presents information pertaining to loan credit quality indicators as of December 31, 2020 and September 30, 2020, as determined in accordance with ASC 310, prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-13:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loan Credit Quality Indicators
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Residential
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Risk Profile by Creditworthiness Category:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Satisfactory
|
$
|
229,351
|
|
|
$
|
525,609
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
754,960
|
|
Special Mention
|
1,574
|
|
|
16,213
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17,787
|
|
Substandard
|
9,629
|
|
|
29,965
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
39,594
|
|
Doubtful
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performing
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
858,298
|
|
|
$
|
919,867
|
|
|
$
|
1,778,165
|
|
Nonperforming
|
|
|
|
|
1,470
|
|
|
3,054
|
|
|
4,524
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Credit Risk Profile by Creditworthiness Category:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Satisfactory
|
$
|
264,094
|
|
|
$
|
493,982
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
758,076
|
|
Special Mention
|
1,485
|
|
|
12,620
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
14,105
|
|
Substandard
|
10,342
|
|
|
34,631
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
44,973
|
|
Doubtful
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Credit Risk Profile Based on Payment Activity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Performing
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
847,967
|
|
|
$
|
922,756
|
|
|
$
|
1,770,723
|
|
Nonperforming
|
|
|
|
|
1,559
|
|
|
3,019
|
|
|
4,578
|
|
Impaired Loans
The following table presents information on impaired loans as of December 31, 2020 and September 30, 2020 based on whether the impaired loan has a recorded related allowance or has no recorded related allowance, as determined in accordance with ASC 310, prior to the adoption of ASU 2016-13:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Impaired Loans
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Residential
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded Investment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With No Related Allowance
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,124
|
|
|
$
|
112
|
|
|
$
|
1,174
|
|
|
$
|
2,410
|
|
With a Related Allowance
|
46
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
290
|
|
Unpaid Principal Balance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With No Related Allowance
|
—
|
|
|
1,128
|
|
|
111
|
|
|
1,174
|
|
|
2,413
|
|
With a Related Allowance
|
47
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
244
|
|
|
291
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recorded Investment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With No Related Allowance
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
1,124
|
|
|
$
|
124
|
|
|
$
|
1,178
|
|
|
$
|
2,426
|
|
With a Related Allowance
|
46
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
295
|
|
Unpaid Principal Balance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With No Related Allowance
|
—
|
|
|
1,128
|
|
|
124
|
|
|
1,178
|
|
|
$
|
2,430
|
|
With a Related Allowance
|
47
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
249
|
|
|
296
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Recorded Balance:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With No Related Allowance
|
$
|
2
|
|
|
$
|
1,127
|
|
|
$
|
120
|
|
|
$
|
938
|
|
|
$
|
2,187
|
|
With a Related Allowance
|
46
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
253
|
|
|
299
|
|
Interest Income Recognized:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With No Related Allowance
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
With a Related Allowance
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Cash Basis Income:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With No Related Allowance
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
With a Related Allowance
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2020 and September 30, 2020, all impaired loans were considered to be collateral dependent and were therefore evaluated for impairment based on the fair value of collateral less estimated cost to sell. Interest income recognized in the table above represents income earned after the loan became impaired and includes restructured loans in compliance with their modified terms and nonaccrual loans where interest income was recognized on a cash basis.
Loans Modified in Trouble Debt Restructurings
The following table presents information on loans modified in trouble debt restructurings during the periods indicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loans Modified in Trouble Debt Restructurings During the Period
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial
|
|
Real Estate
|
|
Consumer
|
|
Residential
|
|
Total
|
For the Quarter Ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Loans
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Subsequent Default, Number of Contracts
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Subsequent Default, Recorded Investment
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Loans
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Subsequent Default, Number of Contracts
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Subsequent Default, Recorded Investment
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year-To-Date Period Ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Loans
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Subsequent Default, Number of Contracts
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Subsequent Default, Recorded Investment
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Number of Loans
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2
|
|
Pre-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
Post-Modification Outstanding Recorded Investment
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
32
|
|
Subsequent Default, Number of Contracts
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Subsequent Default, Recorded Investment
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
In general, prior to the novel coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic, loans requiring modification are restructured to accommodate the projected cash-flows of the borrower. Such modifications may involve a reduction of the interest rate, a significant deferral of payments or forgiveness of a portion of the outstanding principal balance. As indicated in the table above, no loans modified during the preceding twelve months subsequently defaulted as of September 30, 2021. The Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2021 extended certain provisions of the CARES Act including, if a short-term loan modification (e.g. six months) is made for a borrower as the result of the COVID-19 pandemic, and who was current on contractual payments as of December 31, 2019, this modification is not considered a TDR.
Note 5. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES (In Thousands)
The following table presents the notional amount and fair value of Arrow's off-balance sheet commitments to extend credit and commitments under standby letters of credit as of September 30, 2021, December 31, 2020 and September 30, 2020:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to Extend Credit and Letters of Credit
|
|
September 30, 2021
|
|
December 31, 2020
|
|
September 30, 2020
|
Notional Amount:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to Extend Credit
|
$
|
431,452
|
|
|
$
|
399,882
|
|
|
$
|
364,861
|
|
Standby Letters of Credit
|
3,392
|
|
|
3,703
|
|
|
3,330
|
|
Fair Value:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments to Extend Credit
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Standby Letters of Credit
|
21
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
30
|
|
Arrow is party to financial instruments with off-balance sheet risk in the normal course of business to meet the financing needs of its customers. These financial instruments include commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit. Commitments to extend credit include home equity lines of credit, commitments for residential and commercial construction loans and other personal and commercial lines of credit. Those instruments involve, to varying degrees, elements of credit and interest rate risk in excess of the amount recognized in the consolidated balance sheets. The contract or notional amounts of those instruments reflect the extent of the involvement Arrow has in particular classes of financial instruments.
Arrow's exposure to credit loss in the event of nonperformance by the other party to the financial instrument for commitments to extend credit and standby letters of credit is represented by the contractual notional amount of those instruments. Arrow uses the same credit policies in making commitments and conditional obligations as it does for on-balance sheet instruments.
Commitments to extend credit are agreements to lend to a customer as long as there is no violation of any condition established in the contract. Commitments generally have fixed expiration dates or other termination clauses and may require payment of a fee. Since many of the commitments are not expected to be fully drawn upon, the total commitment amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Arrow evaluates each customer's creditworthiness on a case-by-case basis. Home equity lines of credit are secured by residential real estate. Construction lines of credit are secured by underlying real estate. For other lines of credit, the amount of collateral obtained, if deemed necessary by Arrow upon extension of credit, is based on management's credit evaluation of the counterparty. Collateral held varies, but may include accounts receivable, inventory, property, plant and equipment, and income-producing commercial properties. Most of the commitments are variable rate instruments.
Arrow does not issue any guarantees that would require liability-recognition or disclosure, other than its standby letters of credit. Arrow has issued conditional commitments in the form of standby letters of credit to guarantee payment on behalf of a customer and guarantee the performance of a customer to a third party. Standby letters of credit generally arise in connection with commercial lending relationships. The credit risk involved in issuing these instruments is essentially the same as that involved in extending loans to customers. Contingent obligations under standby letters of credit at September 30, 2021, December 31, 2020 and September 30, 2020 represent the maximum potential future payments Arrow could be required to make. Typically, these instruments have terms of 12 months or less and expire unused; therefore, the total amounts do not necessarily represent future cash requirements. Each customer is evaluated individually for creditworthiness under the same underwriting standards used for commitments to extend credit and on-balance sheet instruments. Company policies governing loan collateral apply to standby letters of credit at the time of credit extension. Loan-to-value ratios will generally range from 50% for movable assets, such as inventory, to 100% for liquid assets, such as bank CD's. Fees for standby letters of credit range from 1% to 3% of the notional amount. Fees are collected upfront and amortized over the life of the commitment. The carrying amount and fair value of Arrow's standby letters of credit at September 30, 2021, December 31, 2020 and September 30, 2020, were insignificant. The fair value of standby letters of credit is based on the fees currently charged for similar agreements or the cost to terminate the arrangement with the counterparties.
The fair value of commitments to extend credit is determined by estimating the fees to enter into similar agreements, taking into account the remaining terms and present creditworthiness of the counterparties, and for fixed rate loan commitments, the difference between the current and committed interest rates. Arrow provides several types of commercial lines of credit and standby letters of credit to its commercial customers. The pricing of these services is not isolated as Arrow considers the customer's complete deposit and borrowing relationship in pricing individual products and services. The commitments to extend credit also include commitments under home equity lines of credit, for which Arrow charges no fee. The carrying value and fair value of commitments to extend credit are not material and Arrow does not expect to incur any material loss as a result of these commitments.
In the normal course of business, Arrow and its subsidiary banks become involved in a variety of routine legal proceedings. At present, there are no legal proceedings pending or threatened, which in the opinion of management and counsel, would result in a material loss to Arrow, except as noted below.
Except as noted below, Arrow, including its subsidiary banks, is not currently the subject of any material pending legal proceedings, other than ordinary routine litigation occurring in the normal course of their business. On an ongoing basis, Arrow is often the subject of, or a party to, various legal claims by other parties against Arrow, by Arrow against other parties, or involving Arrow, which arise in the normal course of business. Except as noted below, the various pending legal claims against Arrow will not, in the opinion of management based upon consultation with counsel, result in any material liability.
On July 1, 2020, Daphne Richard, a customer of GFNB filed a putative class action complaint against GFNB in the United States District Court for the Northern District of New York. The complaint alleges that GFNB assessed overdraft fees on certain transactions drawn on her checking account without having sufficiently disclosed its overdraft-fee practices in its account agreement. Ms. Richard, on behalf of two purported classes, seeks compensatory damages, disgorgement of profits, statutory damages, treble damages, enjoinment of the conduct complained of, and costs and fees. The complaint is similar to complaints filed against other financial
institutions pertaining to overdraft fees. Arrow denies any wrongdoing. The parties engaged in an initial mediation session in September 2021. Settlement discussions are ongoing.
Note 6. COMPREHENSIVE INCOME (LOSS) (In Thousands)
The following table presents the components of other comprehensive income (loss) for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2021 and 2020:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Comprehensive (Loss) Income
|
|
Three Months Ended September 30
|
|
Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tax
|
|
|
|
Before-Tax
|
|
(Expense)
|
|
Net-of-Tax
|
|
Before-Tax
|
|
Benefit
|
|
Net-of-Tax
|
|
Amount
|
|
Benefit
|
|
Amount
|
|
Amount
|
|
(Expense)
|
|
Amount
|
2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Unrealized Securities Holding Loss on Securities Available-for-Sale Arising During the Period
|
$
|
(1,719)
|
|
|
$
|
440
|
|
|
$
|
(1,279)
|
|
|
$
|
(5,333)
|
|
|
$
|
1,364
|
|
|
$
|
(3,969)
|
|
Net Unrealized Gain on Cash Flow Swap
|
245
|
|
|
(62)
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
1,281
|
|
|
(327)
|
|
|
954
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of Net Unrealized Gain on Cash Flow Hedge Agreements to Interest Expense
|
(34)
|
|
|
9
|
|
|
(25)
|
|
|
(92)
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
(68)
|
|
Amortization of Net Retirement Plan Actuarial Loss
|
22
|
|
|
(5)
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
68
|
|
|
(17)
|
|
|
51
|
|
Amortization of Net Retirement Plan Prior Service Cost
|
59
|
|
|
(16)
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
175
|
|
|
(46)
|
|
|
129
|
|
Other Comprehensive Loss
|
$
|
(1,427)
|
|
|
$
|
366
|
|
|
$
|
(1,061)
|
|
|
$
|
(3,901)
|
|
|
$
|
998
|
|
|
$
|
(2,903)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Unrealized Securities Holding (Loss) Gain on Securities Available-for-Sale Arising During the Period
|
$
|
(397)
|
|
|
$
|
101
|
|
|
$
|
(296)
|
|
|
$
|
7,823
|
|
|
$
|
(2,000)
|
|
|
$
|
5,823
|
|
Net Unrealized Gain on Cash Flow Swap
|
317
|
|
|
(79)
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
(11)
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of Net Retirement Plan Actuarial Loss
|
57
|
|
|
(15)
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
171
|
|
|
(44)
|
|
|
127
|
|
Amortization of Net Retirement Plan Prior Service Cost
|
53
|
|
|
(14)
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
159
|
|
|
(42)
|
|
|
117
|
|
Other Comprehensive Income
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
(7)
|
|
|
$
|
23
|
|
|
$
|
8,201
|
|
|
$
|
(2,097)
|
|
|
$
|
6,104
|
|
The following table presents the changes in accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) by component:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Changes in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) by Component (1)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized (Loss) and Gain on Available-for-Sale Securities
|
|
Unrealized Gain (Loss) on Cash Flow Swap
|
|
Defined Benefit Plan Items
|
|
Total
|
|
|
|
Net Actuarial Loss
|
|
Net Prior Service Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Quarter-To-Date periods ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2021
|
$
|
3,109
|
|
|
$
|
1,213
|
|
|
$
|
(5,895)
|
|
|
$
|
(1,085)
|
|
|
$
|
(2,658)
|
|
Other comprehensive income or loss before reclassifications
|
(1,279)
|
|
|
183
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(1,096)
|
|
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income
|
—
|
|
|
(25)
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
35
|
|
Net current-period other comprehensive income
|
(1,279)
|
|
|
158
|
|
|
17
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
(1,061)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2021
|
$
|
1,830
|
|
|
$
|
1,371
|
|
|
$
|
(5,878)
|
|
|
$
|
(1,042)
|
|
|
$
|
(3,719)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
June 30, 2020
|
$
|
6,584
|
|
|
$
|
(201)
|
|
|
$
|
(5,762)
|
|
|
$
|
(897)
|
|
|
$
|
(276)
|
|
Other comprehensive income or loss before reclassifications
|
(296)
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(58)
|
|
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
81
|
|
Net current-period other comprehensive income
|
(296)
|
|
|
238
|
|
|
42
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
23
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2020
|
$
|
6,288
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
$
|
(5,720)
|
|
|
$
|
(858)
|
|
|
$
|
(253)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year-To-Date periods ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2020
|
$
|
5,799
|
|
|
$
|
485
|
|
|
$
|
(5,929)
|
|
|
$
|
(1,171)
|
|
|
$
|
(816)
|
|
Other comprehensive income or loss before reclassifications
|
(3,969)
|
|
|
954
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
(3,015)
|
|
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income
|
—
|
|
|
(68)
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
112
|
|
Net current-period other comprehensive income
|
(3,969)
|
|
|
886
|
|
|
51
|
|
|
129
|
|
|
(2,903)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2021
|
$
|
1,830
|
|
|
$
|
1,371
|
|
|
$
|
(5,878)
|
|
|
$
|
(1,042)
|
|
|
$
|
(3,719)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2019
|
$
|
465
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(5,847)
|
|
|
$
|
(975)
|
|
|
$
|
(6,357)
|
|
Other comprehensive income or loss before reclassifications
|
5,823
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5,860
|
|
Amounts reclassified from accumulated other comprehensive income
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
244
|
|
Net current-period other comprehensive income
|
5,823
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
127
|
|
|
117
|
|
|
6,104
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2020
|
$
|
6,288
|
|
|
$
|
37
|
|
|
$
|
(5,720)
|
|
|
$
|
(858)
|
|
|
$
|
(253)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) All amounts are net of tax.
The following table presents the reclassifications out of accumulated other comprehensive income (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassifications Out of Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
|
Details about Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss) Components
|
|
Amounts Reclassified from Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income (Loss)
|
|
Affected Line Item in the Statement Where Net Income Is Presented
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Quarter-to-date periods ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of Net Unrealized Gain on Cash Flow Hedge Agreements to Interest Expense
|
|
$
|
34
|
|
|
Interest expense
|
Amortization of defined benefit pension items:
|
|
|
|
|
Prior-service costs
|
|
(59)
|
|
(1)
|
Salaries and Employee Benefits
|
Actuarial loss
|
|
(22)
|
|
(1)
|
Salaries and Employee Benefits
|
|
|
(47)
|
|
|
Total before Tax
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
Provision for Income Taxes
|
Total reclassifications for the period
|
|
$
|
(35)
|
|
|
Net of Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of defined benefit pension items:
|
|
|
|
|
Prior-service costs
|
|
$
|
(53)
|
|
(1)
|
Salaries and Employee Benefits
|
Actuarial loss
|
|
(57)
|
|
(1)
|
Salaries and Employee Benefits
|
|
|
(110)
|
|
|
Total before Tax
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
Provision for Income Taxes
|
Total reclassifications for the period
|
|
$
|
(81)
|
|
|
Net of Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Year-to-date periods ended:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reclassification of Net Unrealized Gain on Cash Flow Hedge Agreements to Interest Expense
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
|
|
Amortization of defined benefit pension items:
|
|
|
|
|
Prior-service costs
|
|
(175)
|
|
(1)
|
Salaries and Employee Benefits
|
Actuarial loss
|
|
(68)
|
|
(1)
|
Salaries and Employee Benefits
|
|
|
(151)
|
|
|
Total before Tax
|
|
|
39
|
|
|
Provision for Income Taxes
|
Total reclassifications for the period
|
|
$
|
(112)
|
|
|
Net of Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total reclassifications for the period
|
|
$
|
(112)
|
|
|
Net of Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Amortization of defined benefit pension items:
|
|
|
|
|
Prior-service costs
|
|
$
|
(159)
|
|
(1)
|
Salaries and Employee Benefits
|
Actuarial loss
|
|
(171)
|
|
(1)
|
Salaries and Employee Benefits
|
|
|
(330)
|
|
|
Total before Tax
|
|
|
86
|
|
|
Provision for Income Taxes
|
Total reclassifications for the period
|
|
$
|
(244)
|
|
|
Net of Tax
|
|
|
|
|
|
(1) These accumulated other comprehensive income (loss) components are included in the computation of net periodic pension cost.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 7. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION (Dollars In Thousands, Except Share and Per Share Amounts)
Arrow has established three stock-based compensation plans: a Long Term Incentive Plan, an Employee Stock Purchase Plan (ESPP) and an Employee Stock Ownership Plan (ESOP). All share and per share data have been adjusted for the September 24, 2021 3% stock dividend.
Long Term Incentive Plan
The Long Term Incentive Plan provides for the grant of incentive stock options, non-qualified stock options, restricted stock, restricted stock units, performance units and performance shares. The Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors administers the Long Term Incentive Plan.
Stock Options - Options may be granted at a price no less than the greater of the par value or fair market value of such shares on the date on which such option is granted, and generally expire ten years from the date of grant. The options usually vest over a four-year period.
The following table summarizes information about stock option activity for the year to date period ended September 30, 2021.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
Weighted Average Exercise Price
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding at January 1, 2021
|
272,024
|
|
|
$
|
28.00
|
|
Granted
|
57,165
|
|
|
28.69
|
|
Exercised
|
(54,189)
|
|
|
28.81
|
|
Forfeited
|
(1,580)
|
|
|
22.25
|
|
Outstanding at September 30, 2021
|
273,420
|
|
|
28.42
|
|
|
|
|
|
Vested at Period-End
|
140,690
|
|
|
26.77
|
|
Expected to Vest
|
132,730
|
|
|
30.16
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stock Options Granted
|
|
|
|
Weighted Average Grant Date Information:
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of Options Granted
|
$
|
4.71
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Assumptions:
|
|
|
|
Dividend Yield
|
3.41
|
%
|
|
|
Expected Volatility
|
26.53
|
%
|
|
|
Risk Free Interest Rate
|
0.49
|
%
|
|
|
Expected Lives (in years)
|
8.75
|
|
|
The following table presents information on the amounts expensed related to stock options for the three and nine month periods ended September 30, 2021 and 2020:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
2021
|
|
2020
|
|
2021
|
|
2020
|
Amount expensed
|
|
$
|
71
|
|
|
$
|
76
|
|
|
$
|
212
|
|
|
$
|
227
|
|
Restricted Stock Units - The Company grants restricted stock units which gives the recipient the right to receive shares of Company stock upon vesting. The fair value of each restricted stock unit is the market value of Company stock on the date of grant. 100% of the restricted stock unit awards vest three years from the grant date. Once vested, the restricted stock units become vested units and are no longer forfeitable. Vested units settle upon retirement of the recipient. Unvested restricted stock unit awards will generally be forfeited if the recipient ceases to be employed by the Company, with limited exceptions.
The following table summarizes information about restricted stock unit activity for the periods ended September 30, 2021 and 2020.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restricted Stock Units
|
|
Weighted Average Grant Date Fair Value
|
Non-vested at January 1, 2021
|
12,012
|
|
|
$
|
30.70
|
|
Granted
|
4,880
|
|
|
28.54
|
|
Vested
|
(3,689)
|
|
|
29.82
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at September 30, 2021
|
13,203
|
|
|
30.15
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at January 1, 2020
|
7,952
|
|
|
29.39
|
|
Granted
|
4,060
|
|
|
33.25
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-vested at September 30, 2020
|
12,012
|
|
|
30.70
|
|
|
|
|
|
The following table presents information on the amounts expensed related to restricted stock units for the periods ended September 30, 2021 and 2020:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended September 30,
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30,
|
|
|
2021
|
|
2020
|
|
2021
|
|
2020
|
Amount expensed
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
|
$
|
98
|
|
|
$
|
88
|
|
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
Arrow sponsors an ESPP under which employees may purchase Arrow's common stock at a discount below market price. The current amount of the discount is 5%. Under current accounting guidance, a stock purchase plan with a discount of 5% or less is not considered a compensatory plan.
Employee Stock Ownership Plan
Arrow maintains an ESOP, pursuant to which substantially all employees of Arrow and its subsidiaries are eligible to participate upon satisfaction of applicable service requirements. The Company makes cash contributions to the ESOP each year.
Note 8. RETIREMENT BENEFIT PLANS (Dollars in Thousands)
Arrow sponsors qualified and non-qualified defined benefit pension plans and other postretirement benefit plans for its employees. Arrow maintains a non-contributory pension plan, which covers substantially all employees. Effective December 1, 2002, all active participants in the qualified defined benefit pension plan were given a one-time irrevocable election to continue participating in the traditional plan design, for which benefits were based on years of service and the participant’s final compensation (as defined), or to begin participating in the new cash balance plan design. All employees who first participate in the plan after December 1, 2002 automatically participate in the cash balance plan design. The interest credits under the cash balance plan are based on the 30-year U.S. Treasury rate in effect for November of the prior year with a minimum interest credit of 3%. The service credits under the cash balance plan are equal to 6.0% of eligible salaries for employees who become participants on or after January 1, 2003. For employees in the plan prior to January 1, 2003, the service credits are scaled based on the age of the participant, and range from 6.0% to 12.0%. The funding policy is to contribute up to the maximum amount that can be deducted for federal income tax purposes and to make all payments required under The Employee Retirement Income Security Act (ERISA). Arrow also maintains a supplemental non-qualified unfunded retirement plan to provide eligible employees of Arrow and its subsidiaries with benefits in excess of qualified plan limits imposed by federal tax law.
Arrow has multiple non-pension postretirement benefit plans. The health care, dental and life insurance plans are contributory, with participants’ contributions adjusted annually. Arrow’s policy is to fund the cost of postretirement benefits based on the current cost of the underlying policies. However, the health care plan provision allows for grandfathered participants to receive automatic increases of Company contributions each year based on the increase in inflation, limited to a maximum of 5%.
As of December 31, 2020, Arrow used the sex-distinct amount-weighted Pri-2012 mortality tables for employees, healthy annuitants and contingent survivors, adjusted for mortality improvements with the Scale MP-2020 mortality improvement scale on a generational basis for the Pension Plan and the sex-distinct amount-weighted White Collar tables for employees and healthy annuitants, adjusted for mortality improvements with the scale MP-2020 mortality improvement scale on a generational basis for the Select Executive Retirement Plan. As of December 31, 2020, Arrow updated its mortality assumption used for the Postretirement Plan to the sex-distinct Pri.H-2012 headcount-weighted mortality tables for employees and healthy annuitants, adjusted for mortality improvements with the Scale MP-2020 mortality improvement scale on a generational basis. The change in mortality tables resulted in a decrease in liabilities for the Employees' Pension Plan, the Select Executive Retirement Plan and the Postretirement Benefit Plan.
The interest rates used in determining the present value of a lump sum payment/annuitizing cash balance accounts were changed to the segment rates in effect for the January 1, 2020 plan year (0.53%, 2.31%, 3.09%) as of December 31, 2020.
The Arrow Financial Corporation Employees' Pension Plan was amended effective January 1, 2021. The plan change was adopted January 1, 2021 and the amendment was valued as of December 31, 2020. The plan amendment included the following:
Effective January 1, 2021, the benefit payable to or on behalf of each participant:
• whose employment with the employer (or any predecessor employer, except as noted below) terminated on or before
January 1, 2016;
• who satisfied the requirements for early, normal, or late retirement as of such termination;
• who never participated in the United Vermont Bancorporation Plan and;
• who is, or whose beneficiary is, receiving monthly benefit payments from the Plan as of January 1, 2021 (including a
participant or beneficiary who shall commence receiving benefits from the Plan as of January 1, 2021), shall be increased
by three percent (3%).
The foregoing increase was applied to the monthly benefit actually payable to the participant, or to the participant's beneficiary, as of January 1, 2021, determined after all applicable adjustments, regardless of whether such benefit had been determined under the Company's plan or the plan of a predecessor employer that had been merged into the Plan.
The plan amendment caused a $351,638 increase in the projected benefit obligation creating a positive service cost which will be amortized over 9.70 years (the average expected future service of active plan participants.)
The Arrow Financial Corporation Employees' Select Executive Retirement Plan was amended effective January 1, 2021. The plan change was adopted January 1, 2021 and the amendment was valued as of December 31, 2020. The plan amendment provides a special adjustment to the monthly benefit payment for certain retirees. The plan amendment caused a $122,797 increase in the projected benefit obligation creating a positive prior service cost which will be amortized over 12.5 years.
The following tables provide the components of net periodic benefit costs for the three- and nine-month periods ended September 30, 2021 and 2020.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Employees'
|
|
Select Executive
|
|
Postretirement
|
|
|
Pension
|
|
Retirement
|
|
Benefit
|
|
|
Plan
|
|
Plan
|
|
Plans
|
Net Periodic (Benefit) Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2021:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service Cost 1
|
|
$
|
484
|
|
|
$
|
146
|
|
|
$
|
27
|
|
Interest Cost 2
|
|
340
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
62
|
|
Expected Return on Plan Assets 2
|
|
(945)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Amortization of Prior Service Cost 2
|
|
20
|
|
|
12
|
|
|
27
|
|
Amortization of Net Loss (Gain) 2
|
|
—
|
|
|
44
|
|
|
(22)
|
|
Net Periodic (Benefit) Cost
|
|
$
|
(101)
|
|
|
$
|
250
|
|
|
$
|
94
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Contributions During the Period
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
118
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Three Months Ended September 30, 2020:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service Cost 1
|
|
$
|
416
|
|
|
$
|
102
|
|
|
$
|
30
|
|
Interest Cost 2
|
|
387
|
|
|
48
|
|
|
78
|
|
Expected Return on Plan Assets 2
|
|
(902)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Amortization of Prior Service Cost 2
|
|
15
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
27
|
|
Amortization of Net Loss 2
|
|
20
|
|
|
37
|
|
|
—
|
|
Net Periodic (Benefit) Cost
|
|
$
|
(64)
|
|
|
$
|
198
|
|
|
$
|
135
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Contributions During the Period
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
116
|
|
|
$
|
54
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Periodic Benefit Cost
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2021:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service Cost 1
|
|
$
|
1,451
|
|
|
$
|
437
|
|
|
$
|
82
|
|
Interest Cost 2
|
|
1,023
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
186
|
|
Expected Return on Plan Assets 2
|
|
(2,835)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Amortization of Prior Service Cost 2
|
|
59
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
80
|
|
Amortization of Net Loss (Gain) 2
|
|
—
|
|
|
134
|
|
|
(66)
|
|
Net Periodic (Benefit) Cost
|
|
$
|
(302)
|
|
|
$
|
750
|
|
|
$
|
282
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Contributions During the Period
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
354
|
|
|
$
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Estimated Future Contributions in the Current Fiscal Year
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
118
|
|
|
$
|
32
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the Nine Months Ended September 30, 2020:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Service Cost 1
|
|
$
|
1,247
|
|
|
$
|
306
|
|
|
$
|
92
|
|
Interest Cost 2
|
|
1,159
|
|
|
144
|
|
|
233
|
|
Expected Return on Plan Assets 2
|
|
(2,706)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Amortization of Prior Service Cost 2
|
|
47
|
|
|
32
|
|
|
80
|
|
Amortization of Net Loss 2
|
|
61
|
|
|
110
|
|
|
—
|
|
Net Periodic (Benefit) Cost
|
|
$
|
(192)
|
|
|
$
|
592
|
|
|
$
|
405
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plan Contributions During the Period
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
349
|
|
|
$
|
191
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Footnotes:
1. Included in Salaries and Employee Benefits on the Consolidated Statements of Income
2. Included in Other Operating Expense on the Consolidated Statements of Income
A contribution to the qualified pension plan was not required during the period ended September 30, 2021 and currently, additional contributions in 2021 are not expected. Arrow makes contributions to its other post-retirement benefit plans in an amount equal to benefit payments for the year.
Note 9. EARNINGS PER COMMON SHARE (In Thousands, Except Per Share Amounts)
The following table presents a reconciliation of the numerator and denominator used in the calculation of basic and diluted earnings per common share (“EPS”) for periods ended September 30, 2021 and 2020. All share and per share amounts have been adjusted for the September 24, 2021, 3% stock dividend.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Per Share
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Year-to-Date Period Ended:
|
|
|
September 30, 2021
|
|
September 30, 2020
|
|
September 30, 2021
|
|
September 30, 2020
|
|
Earnings Per Share - Basic:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
$
|
12,989
|
|
|
$
|
11,046
|
|
|
$
|
39,548
|
|
|
$
|
28,332
|
|
|
Weighted Average Shares - Basic
|
16,027
|
|
|
15,936
|
|
|
16,015
|
|
|
15,917
|
|
|
Earnings Per Share - Basic
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
|
$
|
0.69
|
|
|
$
|
2.47
|
|
|
$
|
1.78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Earnings Per Share - Diluted:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Income
|
$
|
12,989
|
|
|
$
|
11,046
|
|
|
$
|
39,548
|
|
|
$
|
28,332
|
|
|
Weighted Average Shares - Basic
|
16,027
|
|
|
15,936
|
|
|
16,015
|
|
|
15,917
|
|
|
Dilutive Average Shares Attributable to Stock Options
|
58
|
|
|
10
|
|
|
57
|
|
|
14
|
|
|
Weighted Average Shares - Diluted
|
16,085
|
|
|
15,946
|
|
|
16,072
|
|
15,931
|
|
|
Earnings Per Share - Diluted
|
$
|
0.81
|
|
|
$
|
0.69
|
|
|
$
|
2.46
|
|
|
$
|
1.78
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note 10. FAIR VALUES (Dollars In Thousands)
FASB ASC Subtopic 820-10 defines fair value, establishes a framework for measuring fair value in GAAP and requires certain disclosures about fair value measurements. There are no nonfinancial assets or liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis. The only assets or liabilities that Arrow measured at fair value on a recurring basis at September 30, 2021, December 31, 2020 and September 30, 2020 were securities available-for-sale, equity securities and derivatives. Arrow held no securities or liabilities for trading on such dates.
The table below presents the financial instrument's fair value and the amounts within the fair value hierarchy based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using:
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Quoted Prices
In Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
|
|
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
|
|
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Available-for Sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government & Agency Obligations
|
$
|
109,305
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
109,305
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
State and Municipal Obligations
|
400
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
400
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mortgage-Backed Securities
|
376,395
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
376,395
|
|
|
—
|
|
Corporate and Other Debt Securities
|
800
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total Securities Available-for-Sale
|
486,900
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
486,900
|
|
|
—
|
|
Equity Securities
|
1,886
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,886
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total Securities Measured on a Recurring Basis
|
488,786
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
488,786
|
|
|
—
|
|
Derivatives, included in other assets
|
2,287
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,287
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total Measured on a Recurring Basis
|
$
|
491,073
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
491,073
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives, included in other liabilities
|
2,287
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,287
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total Measured on a Recurring Basis
|
$
|
2,287
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2,287
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
December 31, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Available-for Sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government & Agency Obligations
|
$
|
65,112
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
65,112
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
State and Municipal Obligations
|
528
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
528
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mortgage-Backed Securities
|
298,847
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
298,847
|
|
|
—
|
|
Corporate and Other Debt Securities
|
800
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total Securities Available-for-Sale
|
365,287
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
365,287
|
|
|
—
|
|
Equity Securities
|
1,636
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,636
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Recurring and Nonrecurring Basis
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements at Reporting Date Using:
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Quoted Prices
In Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
|
|
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
|
|
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
|
Total Securities Measured on a Recurring Basis
|
366,923
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
366,923
|
|
|
—
|
|
Derivatives, included in other liabilities
|
5,080
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5,080
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total Measured on a Recurring Basis
|
$
|
372,003
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
372,003
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives, included in other liabilities
|
5,080
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5,080
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total Measured on a Recurring Basis
|
$
|
5,080
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
5,080
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
September 30, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Securities Available-for Sale:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
U.S. Government & Agency Obligations
|
$
|
35,167
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
35,167
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
State and Municipal Obligations
|
593
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
593
|
|
|
—
|
|
Mortgage-Backed Securities
|
338,368
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
338,368
|
|
|
—
|
|
Corporate and Other Debt Securities
|
800
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
800
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total Securities Available-for-Sale
|
374,928
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
374,928
|
|
|
—
|
|
Equity Securities
|
1,511
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,511
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total Securities Measured on a Recurring Basis
|
$
|
376,439
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
376,439
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Derivatives, included in other assets
|
6,366
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
6,366
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total Measured on a Recurring Basis
|
$
|
382,805
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
382,805
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives, included in other liabilities
|
6,366
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
6,366
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total Measured on a Recurring Basis
|
$
|
6,366
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
6,366
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Quoted Prices
In Active Markets for Identical Assets
(Level 1)
|
|
Significant Other
Observable Inputs
(Level 2)
|
|
Significant Unobservable Inputs
(Level 3)
|
|
Gains (Losses) Recognized in Earnings
|
Fair Value of Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Nonrecurring Basis:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateral Dependent Evaluated Loans
|
$
|
2,456
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2,456
|
|
|
|
Other Real Estate Owned and Repossessed Assets, Net
|
351
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
351
|
|
|
13
|
|
December 31, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateral Dependent Impaired Loans
|
$
|
594
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
594
|
|
|
|
Other Real Estate Owned and Repossessed Assets, Net
|
155
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
155
|
|
|
—
|
|
September 30, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Collateral Dependent Impaired Loans
|
$
|
594
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
594
|
|
|
|
Other Real Estate Owned and Repossessed Assets, Net
|
126
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
126
|
|
|
—
|
|
The fair value of financial instruments is determined under the following hierarchy:
•Level 1 - Unadjusted quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical, unrestricted assets or liabilities;
•Level 2 - Quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets, quoted prices for identical or similar assets or liabilities in markets that are not active, or inputs that are observable, either directly or indirectly, for substantially the full term of the asset or liability;
•Level 3 - Prices or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e., supported by little or no market activity).
Fair Value Methodology for Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Recurring Basis
The fair value of Level 1 securities available-for-sale are based on unadjusted, quoted market prices from exchanges in active markets. The fair value of Level 2 securities available-for-sale are based on an independent bond and equity pricing service for identical assets or significantly similar securities and an independent equity pricing service for equity securities not actively traded. The pricing services use a variety of techniques to arrive at fair value including market maker bids, quotes and pricing models. Inputs to the pricing models include recent trades, benchmark interest rates, spreads and actual and projected cash flows. The fair value of Level 2 derivatives is determined using inputs that are observable in the market place obtained from third parties including yield curves, publicly available volatilities, and floating indexes.
Fair Value Methodology for Assets and Liabilities Measured on a Nonrecurring Basis
The fair value of collateral dependent evaluated loans and other real estate owned was based on third-party appraisals less estimated cost to sell. The appraisals may be adjusted by management for qualitative factors such as economic conditions and estimated liquidation expenses. Other assets which might have been included in this table include mortgage servicing rights, goodwill and other intangible assets. Arrow evaluates each of these assets for impairment at least annually, with no impairment recognized for these assets at September 30, 2021, December 31, 2020 and September 30, 2020.
Fair Value Methodology for Financial Instruments Not Measured on a Recurring or Nonrecurring Basis
The fair value for securities held-to-maturity is determined utilizing an independent bond pricing service for identical assets or significantly similar securities. The pricing service uses a variety of techniques to arrive at fair value including market maker bids, quotes and pricing models. Inputs to the pricing models include recent trades, benchmark interest rates, spreads and actual and projected cash flows.
ASU 2016-01 "Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities" requires that the fair value for loans must be disclosed using the "exit price" notion which is a reasonable estimate of what another party might pay in an orderly transaction. Fair values for loans are calculated for portfolios of loans with similar financial characteristics. Loans are segregated by type such as commercial, commercial real estate, residential mortgage, indirect auto and other consumer loans. Each loan category is further segmented into fixed and adjustable interest rate terms and by performing and nonperforming categories. The fair value of performing loans is calculated by determining the estimated future cash flow, which is the contractual cash flow adjusted for estimated prepayments. The discount rate is determined by starting with current market yields, and first adjusting for a liquidity premium. This premium is separately determined for each loan type. Then a credit loss component is determined utilizing the credit loss assumptions used in the allowance for credit loss model. Finally, a discount spread is applied separately for consumer loans vs. commercial loans based on market information and utilization of the swap curve.
The fair value of time deposits is based on the discounted value of contractual cash flows, except that the fair value is limited to the extent that the customer could redeem the certificate after imposition of a premature withdrawal penalty. The discount rates are estimated using the Federal Home Loan Bank of New York ("FHLBNY") yield curve, which is considered representative of Arrow’s time deposit rates. The fair value of all other deposits is equal to the carrying value.
The fair value of FHLBNY advances is calculated by the FHLBNY.
The carrying amount of FHLBNY and FRB stock approximates fair value. If the stock was redeemed, the Company will receive an amount equal to the par value of the stock.
The book value of the outstanding trust preferred securities (Junior Subordinated Obligations Issued to Unconsolidated Subsidiary Trusts) are considered to approximate fair value since the interest rates are variable (indexed to LIBOR) and Arrow is well-capitalized.
Fair Value by Balance Sheet Grouping
The following table presents a summary of the carrying amount, the fair value or an amount approximating fair value and the fair value hierarchy of Arrow’s financial instruments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Fair Values by Balance Sheet Grouping
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Hierarchy
|
|
Carrying Value
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
September 30, 2021
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
$
|
598,366
|
|
|
$
|
598,366
|
|
|
$
|
598,366
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Securities Available-for-Sale
|
486,900
|
|
|
486,900
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
486,900
|
|
|
—
|
|
Securities Held-to-Maturity
|
198,337
|
|
|
203,936
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
203,936
|
|
|
—
|
|
Equity Securities
|
1,886
|
|
|
1,886
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,886
|
|
|
—
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal
Reserve Bank Stock
|
5,380
|
|
|
5,380
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5,380
|
|
|
—
|
|
Net Loans
|
2,627,795
|
|
|
2,632,843
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,632,843
|
|
Accrued Interest Receivable
|
7,899
|
|
|
7,899
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
7,899
|
|
|
—
|
|
Derivatives, included in other assets
|
2,287
|
|
|
2,287
|
|
|
|
|
2,287
|
|
|
|
Deposits
|
3,605,563
|
|
|
3,604,271
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3,604,271
|
|
|
—
|
|
Federal Funds Purchased and Securities
Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase
|
2,426
|
|
|
2,426
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,426
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Term Advances
|
45,000
|
|
|
45,906
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
45,906
|
|
|
—
|
|
Junior Subordinated Obligations Issued
to Unconsolidated Subsidiary Trusts
|
20,000
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
—
|
|
Accrued Interest Payable
|
137
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
137
|
|
|
—
|
|
Derivatives, included in other liabilities
|
2,287
|
|
|
2,287
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,287
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Schedule of Fair Values by Balance Sheet Grouping
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Hierarchy
|
|
Carrying Value
|
|
Fair Value
|
|
Level 1
|
|
Level 2
|
|
Level 3
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
$
|
380,991
|
|
|
$
|
380,991
|
|
|
$
|
380,991
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Securities Available-for-Sale
|
365,287
|
|
|
365,287
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
365,287
|
|
|
—
|
|
Securities Held-to-Maturity
|
218,405
|
|
|
226,576
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
226,576
|
|
|
—
|
|
Equity Securities
|
1,636
|
|
|
1,636
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,636
|
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal
Reserve Bank Stock
|
5,349
|
|
|
5,349
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5,349
|
|
|
—
|
|
Net Loans
|
2,565,798
|
|
|
2,558,903
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,558,903
|
|
Accrued Interest Receivable
|
7,495
|
|
|
7,495
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
7,495
|
|
|
—
|
|
Derivatives, included in other assets
|
5,080
|
|
|
5,080
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5,080
|
|
|
—
|
|
Deposits
|
3,234,726
|
|
|
3,234,387
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3,234,387
|
|
|
—
|
|
Federal Funds Purchased and Securities
Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase
|
17,486
|
|
|
17,486
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
17,486
|
|
|
—
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Term Advances
|
45,000
|
|
|
46,474
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
46,474
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Junior Subordinated Obligations Issued
to Unconsolidated Subsidiary Trusts
|
20,000
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
—
|
|
Accrued Interest Payable
|
326
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
326
|
|
|
—
|
|
Derivatives, included in other liabilities
|
5,080
|
|
|
5,080
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5,080
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
September 30, 2020
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
$
|
450,666
|
|
|
$
|
450,666
|
|
|
$
|
450,666
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Securities Available-for-Sale
|
374,928
|
|
|
374,928
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
374,928
|
|
|
—
|
|
Securities Held-to-Maturity
|
224,799
|
|
|
233,501
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
233,501
|
|
|
—
|
|
Equity Securities
|
1,511
|
|
|
1,511
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
1,511
|
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank and Federal
Reserve Bank Stock
|
5,574
|
|
|
5,574
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
5,574
|
|
|
—
|
|
Net Loans
|
2,564,009
|
|
|
2,560,043
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
2,560,043
|
|
Accrued Interest Receivable
|
7,962
|
|
|
7,962
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
7,962
|
|
|
—
|
|
Derivatives, included in other assets
|
6,366
|
|
|
6,366
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
6,366
|
|
|
—
|
|
Deposits
|
3,264,858
|
|
|
3,265,208
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
3,265,208
|
|
|
—
|
|
Federal Funds Purchased and Securities
Sold Under Agreements to Repurchase
|
73,949
|
|
|
73,949
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
73,949
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal Home Loan Bank Term Advances
|
50,000
|
|
|
51,576
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
51,576
|
|
|
—
|
|
Junior Subordinated Obligations Issued
to Unconsolidated Subsidiary Trusts
|
20,000
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
20,000
|
|
|
—
|
|
Accrued Interest Payable
|
841
|
|
|
841
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
841
|
|
|
—
|
|
Derivatives, included in other liabilities
|
6,366
|
|
|
6,366
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
6,366
|
|
|
—
|
|
Note 11. LEASES (Dollars In Thousands)
The Company is a lessee in its leases, which are mainly for financial services locations in addition to leases for corporate vehicles. These leases generally require the Company to pay third-party expenses on behalf of the Lessor, which are referred to as variable payments. Under some leases, the Company pays the variable payments to the lessor, and in other leases, the Company pays the variable payments directly to the applicable third party. None of the Company's current leases include any residual value guarantees or any subleases, and there are no significant rights and obligations of the Company for leases that have not commenced as of the reporting date.
Arrow leases four of its branch offices, at market rates, from Stewart’s Shops Corp. Mr. Gary C. Dake, President of Stewart’s Shops Corp., serves as a director on the board of directors of each of Arrow and Saratoga National. Arrow also leases one administrative office from an entity controlled by Elizabeth Miller, who serves as a director on the board of directors of each of Arrow and Glens Falls National Bank and Trust Company.
The following includes quantitative data related to the Company's leases as of and for the nine months ended September 30, 2021 and September 30, 2020:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
Finance Lease Amounts:
|
Classification
|
September 30, 2021
|
|
September 30, 2020
|
Right-of-Use Assets
|
Premises and Equipment, Net
|
$
|
4,859
|
|
|
$
|
5,036
|
|
Lease Liabilities
|
Finance Leases
|
5,181
|
|
|
5,228
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating Lease Amounts:
|
|
|
|
|
Right-of-Use Assets
|
Other Assets
|
$
|
6,786
|
|
|
$
|
5,496
|
|
Lease Liabilities
|
Other Liabilities
|
6,965
|
|
|
5,577
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other Information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash Paid For Amounts Included In The Measurement Of Lease Liabilities:
|
|
|
|
Operating Outgoing Cash Flows From Finance Leases
|
|
$
|
146
|
|
|
$
|
148
|
|
Operating Outgoing Cash Flows From Operating Leases
|
|
571
|
|
|
567
|
|
Financing Outgoing Cash Flows From Finance Leases
|
|
36
|
|
|
26
|
|
Right-of-Use Assets Obtained In Exchange For New Finance Lease Liabilities
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Right-of-Use Assets Obtained In Exchange For New Operating Lease Liabilities
|
2,126
|
|
|
294
|
|
Weighted-average Remaining Lease Term - Finance Leases (Yrs.)
|
|
28.46
|
|
29.40
|
Weighted-average Remaining Lease Term - Operating Leases (Yrs.)
|
|
11.76
|
|
13.10
|
Weighted-average Discount Rate—Finance Leases
|
|
3.75
|
%
|
|
3.75
|
%
|
Weighted-average Discount Rate—Operating Leases
|
|
2.85
|
%
|
|
3.27
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lease cost information for the Company's leases is as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
September 30, 2021
|
|
September 30, 2020
|
|
September 30, 2021
|
|
September 30, 2020
|
Lease Cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance Lease Cost:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reduction of Right-of-Use Assets
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
44
|
|
|
$
|
133
|
|
|
$
|
133
|
|
Interest on Lease Liabilities
|
48
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
146
|
|
|
148
|
|
Operating Lease Cost
|
238
|
|
|
214
|
|
|
737
|
|
|
624
|
|
Short-term Lease Cost
|
15
|
|
|
11
|
|
|
28
|
|
|
32
|
|
Variable Lease Cost
|
69
|
|
|
77
|
|
|
203
|
|
|
165
|
|
Total Lease Cost
|
$
|
414
|
|
|
$
|
395
|
|
|
$
|
1,247
|
|
|
$
|
1,102
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Future Lease Payments at September 30, 2021 are as follows:
|
|
Operating
Leases
|
|
Financing
Leases
|
Twelve Months Ended:
|
|
|
|
9/30/2022
|
$
|
964
|
|
|
$
|
243
|
|
9/30/2023
|
928
|
|
|
243
|
|
9/30/2024
|
780
|
|
|
247
|
|
9/30/2025
|
705
|
|
|
259
|
|
9/30/2026
|
648
|
|
|
268
|
|
Thereafter
|
4,359
|
|
|
7,599
|
|
Total Undiscounted Cash Flows
|
$
|
8,384
|
|
|
$
|
8,859
|
|
Less: Net Present Value Adjustment
|
1,419
|
|
|
3,678
|
|
Lease Liability
|
$
|
6,965
|
|
|
$
|
5,181
|
|
Note 12. DERIVATIVE INSTRUMENTS AND HEDGING ACTIVITIES (In Thousands)
Arrow is exposed to certain risks arising from both its business operations and economic conditions. Arrow principally manages its exposures to a wide variety of business and operational risks through management of its core business activities. Arrow manages economic risks, including interest rate, primarily by managing the amount, sources and duration of its assets and liabilities and through the use of derivative instruments. Specifically, Arrow enters into derivative financial instruments to manage exposures that arise from business activities that result in the receipt or payment of future known and uncertain cash amounts, the value of which are determined by interest rates. Arrow's derivative financial instruments are used to manage differences in the amount, timing and duration of known or expected cash receipts and its known or expected cash payments principally related to certain fixed rate borrowings. Arrow also has interest rate derivatives that result from a service provided to certain qualifying customers and, therefore, are not used to manage interest rate risk in the Company’s assets or liabilities. The Company manages a matched book with respect to its derivative instruments in order to minimize its net risk exposure resulting from such transactions.
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments
Arrow enters into interest rate swap agreements with its commercial customers to provide them with a long-term fixed rate, while simultaneously entering into offsetting interest rate swap agreements with a counterparty to swap the fixed rate to a variable rate to manage interest rate exposure.
These interest rate swap agreements are not designated as a hedge for accounting purposes. As the interest rate swap agreements have substantially equivalent and offsetting terms, they do not present any material exposure to the Arrow's consolidated statements of income. Arrow records its interest rate swap agreements at fair value and is presented on a gross basis within other assets and other liabilities on the consolidated balance sheets. Changes in the fair value of assets and liabilities arising from these derivatives are included, net, in other income in the consolidated statement of income.
The following table depicts the fair value adjustment recorded related to the notional amount of derivatives outstanding as well as the notional amount of the interest rate swap agreements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives Not Designated as Hedging Instruments - Interest Rate Swap Agreements
|
|
September 30, 2021
|
|
December 31, 2020
|
|
September 30, 2020
|
Fair value adjustment included in other assets
|
$
|
2,287
|
|
|
$
|
5,080
|
|
|
$
|
6,366
|
|
Fair value adjustment included in other liabilities
|
2,287
|
|
|
5,080
|
|
|
6,366
|
|
Notional amount
|
172,026
|
|
|
176,637
|
|
|
166,329
|
|
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments
Arrow has entered into interest rate swaps to synthetically fix the variable rate interest payments associated with $20 million in outstanding subordinated trust securities. These agreements are designated as cash flow hedges.
For derivatives designated and that qualify as cash flow hedges of interest rate risk, the gain or loss on the derivative is recorded in Accumulated Other Comprehensive Income ("AOCI") and subsequently reclassified into interest expense in the same period during which the hedge transaction affects earnings. Amounts reported in AOCI related to derivatives will be reclassified to interest expense as interest payments are made on Arrow's Junior Subordinated Obligations Issued to Unconsolidated Subsidiary Trusts borrowings.
The following table indicates the effect of cash flow hedge accounting on AOCI and on the unaudited interim consolidated statement of income.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Derivatives Designated as Hedging Instruments - Cash Flow Hedge Agreements
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
Twelve Months Ended
|
|
Nine Months Ended
|
|
September 30, 2021
|
|
December 31, 2020
|
|
September 30, 2020
|
Amount of gain recognized in AOCI
|
$
|
1,281
|
|
|
$
|
651
|
|
|
$
|
48
|
|
Amount of gain reclassified from AOCI to interest expense
|
92
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
—
|
|
Note 13. COVID-19 PANDEMIC
The COVID-19 pandemic caused significant disruptions in the United States economy, which impacted the activities and operations of Arrow and its customers. The pandemic also caused disruption in the financial markets both globally and in the United States.
Arrow continues to monitor the impact of the pandemic, both during recovery as well as any potential setbacks, including emerging variants, and continues to mitigate the risk of harm to its employees and customers and to its operations from the pandemic. Arrow encourages customers to use contact-free alternatives such as digital banking and ATMs.