UNITED STATES
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.
20549
[_] REGISTRATION STATEMENT PURSUANT TO SECTION 12 OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
OR
[X] ANNUAL REPORT PURSUANT TO SECTION 13(a) OR 15(d) OF THE
SECURITIES EXCHANGE
ACT OF 1934
For the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014
Commission file number: 001-31739
|
AURICO GOLD INC.
(Exact Name of Registrant as Specified in its Charter)
Ontario, Canada |
1040 |
Not Applicable |
(Province or other jurisdiction of |
(Primary Standard |
(I.R.S. Employer Identification No.) |
incorporation or organization) |
Industrial Classification |
|
Code) |
110 Yonge Street, Suite 1601
Toronto, Ontario M5C
1T4
(647) 260-8880
(Address and Telephone Number of
Registrants Principal Executive Offices)
CT Corporation
111 Eighth Avenue,
13th Floor
New York, NY 10011
(212) 894-8800
(Name, address (including zip code) and
telephone number (including area code) of agent for service in the United
States)
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section
12(b) of the Act:
Title of Each Class: |
Name of Each Exchange On Which Registered:
|
Common shares, no par value |
New York Stock Exchange |
Securities registered or to be registered pursuant to Section
12(g) of the Act: None
Securities for which there is a reporting obligation pursuant
to Section 15(d) of the Act: None
For annual reports, indicate by check mark the information
filed with this form:
[X] Annual Information Form |
[X] Audited Annual Financial Statements
|
Indicate the number of outstanding shares of each of the
issuer's classes of capital or common stock as of the close of the period
covered by the Annual Report: 249,648,617 common shares
Indicate by check mark whether the Registrant (1) has filed all
reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act during
the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the Registrant was
required to file such reports) and (2) has been subject to such filing
requirements for the past 90 days.
[X] Yes
[_] No
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted
electronically and posted on its corporate website, if any, every Interactive
Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation
S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such
shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
[_]
Yes [X]
No
FORM 40-F
Principal Documents
The following documents, filed as Exhibits 99.1, 99.2, and
99.3 to this Annual Report on Form 40-F, are hereby incorporated by
reference into this Annual Report on Form 40-F:
|
(a) |
Annual Information Form for the fiscal year ended
December 31, 2014; |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
Managements Discussion and Analysis of Financial
Condition and Results of Operations for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2014; and |
|
|
|
|
(c) |
Consolidated Audited Financial Statements as at and for
the year ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, including the auditors report
thereon, prepared under International Financial Reporting Standards as
issued by the International Accounting Standards
Board. |
CAUTIONARY NOTE TO UNITED STATES INVESTORS CONCERNING
RESOURCE AND RESERVE ESTIMATES
The Annual Information Form of AuRico Gold Inc. (the
Corporation or the Registrant), filed as Exhibit 99.1 to this
Annual Report on Form 40-F, has been prepared in accordance with the
requirements of the securities laws in effect in Canada, which differ from the
requirements of United States securities laws. Unless otherwise indicated, all
reserve and resource estimates included in this Annual Report on Form 40-F have
been prepared in accordance with Canadian National Instrument 43-101 Standards
of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (NI 43-101) and the Canadian Institute of
Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum Classification System. The terms mineral
reserve, proven mineral reserve and probable mineral reserve are Canadian
mining terms as defined in accordance with NI 43-101. These definitions differ
from the definitions in the United States Securities and Exchange Commission
(SEC) Industry Guide 7 (SEC Industry Guide 7) under the United States
Securities Act of 1933, as amended. Under SEC Industry Guide 7 standards, a
final or bankable feasibility study is required to report reserves, the
three-year historical average price is used in any reserve or cash flow analysis
to designate reserves and the primary environmental analysis or report must be
filed with the appropriate governmental authority.
In addition, the terms mineral resource, measured mineral
resource, indicated mineral resource and inferred mineral resource are
defined in and required to be disclosed by NI 43-101. However, these terms are
not defined terms under SEC Industry Guide 7 and are normally not permitted to
be used in reports and registration statements filed with the SEC. Investors are
cautioned not to assume that any part or all of the mineral deposits in these
categories will ever be converted into reserves. Inferred mineral resources
have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence, and great uncertainty
as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or any
part of an inferred mineral resource will ever be upgraded to a higher category.
Under Canadian rules, estimates of inferred mineral resources may not form the
basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility studies, except in rare cases. Investors
are cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource
exists or is economically or legally mineable. Disclosure of contained ounces
in a resource is permitted disclosure under Canadian regulations; however, the
SEC normally only permits issuers to report mineralization that does not
constitute reserves by SEC standards as in place tonnage and grade without
reference to unit measures.
Accordingly, information contained in this report and the
documents incorporated by reference herein containing descriptions of our
mineral deposits may not be comparable to similar information made public by
U.S. companies subject to the reporting and disclosure requirements under the
United States federal securities laws and the rules and regulations thereunder.
3
CERTIFICATIONS AND DISCLOSURE REGARDING CONTROLS AND
PROCEDURES
(a) |
Certifications. See Exhibits 99.4 and 99.5
to this Annual Report on Form 40-F. |
|
|
(b) |
Disclosure Controls and
Procedures. |
As of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report on
Form 40-F, an evaluation was carried out under the supervision of and with the
participation of the Corporations management, including the Chief Executive
Officer (CEO) and Chief Financial Officer (CFO), of the effectiveness of the
design and operation of the Corporations disclosure controls and procedures (as
defined in Rule 13a 15(e) and Rule 15d 15(e) under the United States
Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended). Based on that evaluation, the CEO
and the CFO have concluded that as of the end of the period covered by this
Annual Report on Form 40-F, the Corporations disclosure controls and procedures
were effective in ensuring that: (i) information required to be disclosed by the
Corporation in reports that it files or submits to the SEC under the Exchange
Act is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods
specified in applicable rules and forms and (ii) material information required
to be disclosed in its reports filed under the Exchange Act is accumulated and
communicated to its management, including its CEO and CFO, as appropriate, to
allow for accurate and timely decisions regarding required disclosure.
It should be noted that while the CEO and CFO believe that the
Corporations disclosure controls and procedures provide a reasonable level of
assurance that they are effective, they do not expect that the Corporations
disclosure controls and procedures or internal control over financial reporting
will prevent all errors and fraud. A control system, no matter how well
conceived or operated, can provide only reasonable, not absolute, assurance that
the objectives of the control system are met.
(c) |
Managements Annual Report on Internal Control Over
Financial Reporting. |
The Corporation's management is responsible for establishing
and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as defined in
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) under the Exchange Act. The Corporations internal
control over financial reporting is a process designed by, or under the
supervision of, the Corporations principal executive officer and principal
financial officer and effected by the Corporations board of directors,
management and other personnel, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements
for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting
principles.
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Projections of any
evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk that
controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that the
degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
Management conducted an evaluation of the design and operation
of the Corporations internal control over financial reporting as of December
31, 2014, and the results are disclosed under the heading Controls and
Procedures in Management's Discussion & Analysis, filed as Exhibit 99.2 to this
Annual Report on Form 40-F.
The effectiveness of the Corporations internal control over
financial reporting as at December 31, 2014 has been audited by KPMG LLP, as
stated in their Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on the
Corporations internal control over financial reporting that accompanies the
Corporations Consolidated Audited Financial Statements for the fiscal year
ended December 31, 2014, filed as Exhibit 99.3 to this
Annual Report on Form 40-F.
4
(d) |
Attestation Report of the Registered Public Accounting
Firm. |
The required disclosure is included in the Report of
Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm on the Corporations internal
control over financial reporting that accompanies the Corporations Consolidated
Audited Financial Statements for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014, filed
as Exhibit 99.3 to this Annual Report on Form 40-F.
(e) |
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial
Reporting. |
During the period covered by this Annual Report on Form 40-F,
there have been no changes in internal control over financial
reporting that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially
affect, the Corporation's internal control over financial reporting.
NOTICES PURSUANT TO REGULATION BTR
There were no notices required by Rule 104 of Regulation BTR
that the Registrant sent during the year ended December 31, 2014 concerning any
equity security subject to a blackout period under Rule 101 of Regulation BTR.
AUDIT COMMITTEE FINANCIAL EXPERT
Ronald Smith has been determined by the Corporations Board of
Directors to qualify as an audit committee financial expert, within the
meaning of General Instruction B(8)(b) of Form 40-F and is independent within
the meaning of the rules of the New York Stock Exchange.
The SEC has indicated that the designation or identification of
a person as an audit committee financial expert does not make such person an
"expert" for any purpose, impose any duties, obligations or liability on such
person that are greater than those imposed on members of the audit committee and
the board of directors who do not carry this designation or identification, or
affect the duties, obligations or liability of any other member of the audit
committee or board of directors.
CODE OF ETHICS
The Corporation has adopted a written Code of Conduct and
Ethics that constitutes a code of ethics as defined in Form 40-F, and by which
it and all directors, officers and employees of the Corporation are required to
abide. The Corporations Code of Conduct and Ethics is available for viewing on
the Corporations website at http://www.auricogold.com/corporate-profile/governance/corporate-governance/corporate-policies/default.aspx,
and is available to any in print to any shareholder who requests a copy from the
Corporate Secretary of the Corporation by contacting the Company by phone at
647-260-8880 or e-mail at info@auricogold.com.
If any amendment to the Code of Conduct and Ethics is made, or
if any waiver from the provisions thereof is granted with respect to any of the
officers of the Corporation, the Corporation may elect to disclose the
information about such amendment or waiver required by Form 40-F to be
disclosed, by posting such disclosure on the Corporations website, which may be
accessed at www.auricogold.com.
PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES
The required tabular disclosure is included on page 60 of the
Companys Annual Information Form for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014,
filed as Exhibit 99.1 to this Annual Report on Form 40-F and is
incorporated herein by reference.
PRE-APPROVAL POLICIES AND PROCEDURES
The Audit Committee must pre-approve all audit and non-audit
services to be provided to the Corporation or its subsidiary entities by the
Corporations independent auditor. The Audit Committee has delegated to the
Chair of the Committee the authority to pre-approve the non-audit services, with
such pre-approval presented to the Audit Committee at the next scheduled Audit
Committee meeting following such pre-approval. For the fiscal year ended
5
December 31, 2014, all audit and non-audit services performed
by KPMG LLP were pre-approved by the Audit Committee.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS
The Corporation does not have any off-balance sheet financing
arrangements or relationships with unconsolidated special purpose entities that
have or are reasonably likely to have a current or future effect on its
financial condition, changes in financial condition, revenues, results of
operations, liquidity, capital expenditures or capital resources that is
material to investors.
TABULAR DISCLOSURE OF CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS
The required disclosure has been provided under the heading
Contractual Obligations in Managements Discussion and Analysis, filed as
Exhibit 99.2 to this Annual Report on Form 40-F.
IDENTIFICATION OF THE AUDIT COMMITTEE
The Corporations Board of Directors has a separately
designated standing Audit Committee established in accordance with Section
3(a)(58)(A) of the Exchange Act. The members of the Corporations Audit
Committee are identified under the heading Audit Committee Composition in
the Corporations Annual Information Form, attached hereto as Exhibit
99.1
MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURE
Not applicable.
NEW YORK STOCK EXCHANGE DISCLOSURE
The Corporations common shares are listed on the Toronto Stock
Exchange (TSX) and the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE) and the Corporation
also complies with the specific corporate governance requirements of the TSX and
NYSE, as they relate to the Corporation. The NYSE permits foreign private
issuers to elect not to comply with certain of its corporate governance rules,
but requires foreign private issuers to post on the issuers website, with a
cross-reference included in the issuers annual report filed with the SEC, a
summary of the significant differences between the NYSE Listed Company Manual
corporate governance standards and the practices of the applicable issuer under
its home jurisdiction rules. The Corporations disclosure of significant
corporate governance differences is available at http://www.auricogold.com/corporate-profile/governance/corporate-governance/nyse-statement-of-differences/default.aspx.
Presiding Director at Meetings of Non-Management
Directors
The Corporations Chairman of the Board is independent and runs
in camera sessions following each Board meeting with the other independent
directors.
Communication with Independent Directors
Shareholders may send communications to the registrant's
independent directors by writing to the Chairman of the Board:
- In Writing to:
Chairman of the Board
AuRico Gold Inc.
110
Yonge Street, Suite 1601
Toronto, Ontario M5C 1T4 Canada
6
Communications will be referred to the Chairman of the Board
for appropriate action. The status of all outstanding concerns addressed to the
Chairman of the Board will be reported to the Board of Directors as appropriate.
BOARD COMMITTEE MANDATES
The Mandates of the Corporations audit committee, human
resources committee, nominating and corporate governance committee and
sustainability committee are each available for viewing on the
Corporations website at www.auricogold.com, and are available in print to any
shareholder who requests them. Requests for copies of these documents should be
made by contacting the Corporation at info@auricogold.com.
UNDERTAKING
The Corporation undertakes to make available, in person or by
telephone, representatives to respond to inquiries made by the Commission staff,
and to furnish promptly, when requested to do so by the Commission staff,
information relating to the securities in relation to which the obligation to
file an Annual Report on Form 40-F arises or transactions in said securities.
CONSENT TO SERVICE OF PROCESS
The Corporation filed an Appointment of Agent for Service of
Process and Undertaking on Form F-X with respect to the class of securities in
relation to which the obligation to file the Form 40-F arises. Any change to the
name or address of the agent for service of process will be communicated
promptly to the Commission by amendment to Form F-X referencing the
Corporations file number.
SIGNATURES
Pursuant to the requirements of the Exchange Act, the
Registrant certifies that it meets all of the requirements for filing on Form
40-F and has duly caused this Annual Report to be signed on its behalf by the
undersigned, thereto duly authorized.
AURICO GOLD INC.
By: /s/ Scott Perry
Name: Scott Perry
Title: President and Chief Executive Officer
Date: February 19, 2015
7
EXHIBIT INDEX
8
Exhibit 99.1
|
|
|
Annual Information Form |
For the year ended December 31, 2014
February 19, 2015
TABLE OF CONTENTS
FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION |
3 |
|
|
CAUTIONARY NOTE TO U.S. INVESTORS
CONCERNING MEASURED, INDICATED AND INFERRED RESOURCES |
4 |
|
|
CURRENCY AND EXCHANGE RATE
INFORMATION |
4 |
|
|
TECHNICAL INFORMATION |
5 |
|
|
CORPORATE STRUCTURE |
5 |
|
|
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS
|
6 |
Three Year History |
6 |
|
|
DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS |
8 |
General |
8 |
Markets, Sales and Refining |
9 |
Competitive Conditions |
9 |
Operating Results |
9 |
Employees and Labour Relations |
10 |
Sustainability Practice |
10 |
Environmental Protection and Policies |
10 |
Social Policies |
11 |
|
|
MINERAL PROPERTIES |
11 |
Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource Estimates
|
12 |
Material Mineral Projects |
15 |
Young-Davidson Mine |
15 |
El Chanate Mine |
21 |
Kemess Underground Project |
27 |
Other Mineral Properties |
34 |
|
|
DIVIDENDS |
37 |
|
|
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE |
37 |
|
|
MARKET FOR SECURITIES |
38 |
|
|
RISK FACTORS |
39 |
|
|
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE |
53 |
Directors |
53 |
Officers |
55 |
Cease Trade Orders, Bankruptcies, Penalties or
Sanctions |
58 |
Conflicts of Interest |
58 |
Interest of Management & Others in Material
Transactions |
58 |
|
|
AUDIT COMMITTEE |
59 |
Audit Committee Mandate |
59 |
Composition |
59 |
Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures |
59 |
External Auditor Service Fees |
60 |
|
|
MATERIAL CONTRACTS |
60 |
|
|
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS |
60 |
|
|
TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR |
60 |
|
|
INTERESTS OF EXPERTS |
60 |
|
|
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION |
61 |
|
|
SCHEDULE A MANDATE OF THE AUDIT
COMMITTEE |
62
|
In this Annual Information Form (“AIF”), AuRico Gold Inc., together with its subsidiaries (as the context requires) is referred to as “AuRico”, “AuRico Gold” or the “Company”. All information contained
in this AIF is as at December 31, 2014, unless otherwise stated.
FORWARD-LOOKING INFORMATION
This AIF contains certain “forward-looking statements” and “forward-looking information” as defined under applicable Canadian and U.S. securities laws. All statements, other than statements of historical fact, are , or may be
deemed to be, forward-looking statements. The words "expect", "believe", "anticipate", "will", "intend", "estimate", "forecast", "budget", "schedule" and similar expressions identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements in this AIF
include, without limitation: information as to strategy, plans or future financial or operating performance, such as the Company’s expansion plans, project timelines, production plans, projected cash flows or capital expenditures, cost
estimates, mining or milling methods, projected exploration results, resource and reserve estimates and other statements that express management’s expectations or estimates of future performance.
Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number of factors and assumptions that, while considered reasonable by management, are inherently subject to significant business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies.
Known and unknown factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements. Such factors include, but are not limited to: uncertainty of production and cost estimates; fluctuations in the price
of gold; changes in foreign exchange rates (particularly the Canadian dollar, Mexican peso and U.S. dollar); the uncertainty of replacing depleted reserves; the risk that the Young-Davidson and El Chanate mine may not perform as planned; changes in
national and local government legislation in Canada, Mexico and other jurisdictions in which the Company may carry on business in the future; risks of obtaining necessary licenses, permits, authorizations and/or approvals from the appropriate
regulatory authorities for the Kemess Underground project; contests over title to properties; the speculative nature of mineral exploration and development; risks related to aboriginal title claims; compliance risks with respect to current and
future environmental laws and regulations; disruptions affecting operations; business opportunities that may be pursued by the Company; employee relations; availability of and increased costs associated with mining inputs and labor; uncertainty with
the Company's ability to secure capital to execute its business plans; volatility of the Company’s share price; any decision to declare a quarterly dividend; the effect of future financings; litigation; risk of loss due to sabotage and civil
disturbances; the impact of global liquidity and credit availability and the values of assets and liabilities based on projected future cash flows; risks arising from holding derivative instruments; risks arising from the absence of hedging;
adequacy of internal control over financial reporting; changes in our credit rating; and the impact of inflation.
Actual results and developments are likely to differ, and may differ materially, from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking statements contained in this AIF. Such statements are based on a number of assumptions which may prove to be
incorrect, including, but not limited to, assumptions about: general business and economic conditions; commodity prices and the price of key inputs such as labour, fuel and electricity; credit market conditions and conditions in financial markets
generally; production levels, development rates and the costs for each; our ability to procure equipment and supplies in sufficient quantities and on a timely basis; the timing of the receipt of permits and other regulatory and governmental
approvals for our projects and operations; our ability to obtain, comply with and renew permits in a timely manner; our ability to attract and retain skilled employees and contractors for our operations; the accuracy of our mineral reserve and
mineral resource estimates and the geological, development and operational decisions that are derived therefrom; the impact of changes in currency exchange rates on our costs and results; interest rates; tax benefits and tax rates; and our ongoing
relations with our employees and business partners.
In particular, forward-looking information included in this document includes, but is not limited to: (1) production estimates and production growth rates, which assume accuracy of projected ore grade, mining rates, recovery timing and recovery rate
estimates and may be impacted by unscheduled maintenance, labour and contractor availability; (2) capital expenditures and other cash costs, which assume foreign exchange rates and accuracy of production estimates, and may be impacted by unexpected
maintenance, the need to hire external resources and accelerated capital plans; (3) profits and free cash flow, which assume production and expenditure estimates and may be impacted by gold prices, production estimates, and the timing of payments,
and (4) reserves and resources which are forward looking statements by their nature involving implied
assessment, and may be impacted by metal prices, future drilling results,
operating costs, mining recoveries and dilution rates.
|
3 |
Readers are cautioned that forward-looking statements are not
guarantees of future performance. All of the forward-looking statements made in
this AIF qualified by these cautionary statements. The Company disclaims any
intention or obligation to update or revise any forward-looking statements
whether as a result of new information, future events or otherwise, except as
required by applicable law.
CAUTIONARY NOTE TO U.S. INVESTORS CONCERNING MEASURED,
INDICATED AND INFERRED RESOURCES
Unless otherwise indicated, all reserve and resource estimates
included in this AIF have been prepared in accordance with National Instrument
43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (NI 43-101) and
the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM)
classification system. NI 43-101 is a rule developed by the Canadian Securities
Administrators that establishes standards for all public disclosure an issuer
makes of scientific and technical information concerning mineral projects.
Canadian standards, including NI 43-101, differ significantly
from the requirements of the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) and
reserve and resource information included herein may not be comparable to
similar information disclosed by U.S. companies. In particular, and without
limiting the generality of the foregoing, this document uses the terms measured
resources, indicated resources and inferred resources. Investors are
advised that, while such terms are recognized and required by Canadian
securities laws, the SEC does not recognize them. The requirements of NI 43-101
for identification of reserves are also not the same as those of the SEC, and
reserves reported by the Company in compliance with NI 43-101 may not qualify as
reserves under SEC standards. Under U.S. standards, mineralization may not be
classified as a reserve unless the determination has been made that the
mineralization could be economically and legally produced or extracted at the
time the reserve determination is made. U.S. investors are cautioned not to
assume that any part of a measured resource or indicated resource will ever
be converted into a reserve. U.S. investors should also understand that
inferred resources have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence
and as to their economic and legal feasibility. It cannot be assumed that all or
any part of inferred resources exist, are economically or legally mineable or
will ever be upgraded to a higher category. Under Canadian rules, estimated
inferred resources may not form the basis of feasibility or pre-feasibility
studies except in rare cases. In addition, disclosure of contained ounces in a
mineral resource is permitted disclosure under Canadian regulations. However,
the SEC normally only permits issuers to report mineralization that does not
constitute reserves by SEC standards as in place tonnage and grade, without
reference to unit measures. Accordingly, information concerning mineral deposits
set forth in this AIF may not be comparable with information made public by
companies that report in accordance with U.S. standards.
CURRENCY AND EXCHANGE RATE INFORMATION
All currency amounts in this AIF for the financial year ended
December 31, 2014 are expressed in United States dollars (USD), unless
otherwise indicated. References to CAD are to Canadian dollars, and references
to Pesos are to Mexican Pesos. For CAD to USD, the average exchange rate for
2014 and the exchange rate at December 31, 2014 were 1.10 and 1.16 CAD per one
USD, respectively, calculated at the Bank of Canada daily noon rate. For Pesos
to USD, the average exchange rate for 2014 and the exchange rate at December 31,
2014, were 13.30 and 14.75 Pesos per one USD, respectively. The consolidated
financial statements of the Company for the financial year ended December 31,
2014 have been prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting
Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. The
consolidated financial statements for the financial year ended December 31, 2014
are available electronically from the Canadian System for Electronic Document
Analysis and Retrieval (SEDAR) at www.sedar.com
and from the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commissions (the
SEC) Electronic Document Gathering and Retrieval System at www.sec.gov.
|
4 |
TECHNICAL INFORMATION
Unless otherwise indicated, scientific or technical information
in this AIF relating to mineral reserves or mineral resources is based on
information prepared by employees of AuRico or its joint venture partners, as
applicable, and the scientific and technical information in this AIF has been
reviewed and approved by Chris Bostwick, FAusIMM,
Senior Vice President for AuRico Gold Inc. Mr. Bostwick is a Qualified Person under NI 43-101, but he is not “independent” of AuRico within the meaning of the instrument.
CORPORATE STRUCTURE
AuRico Gold Inc. has its registered and executive office located at 110 Yonge Street, Suite 1601, Toronto, Ontario, M5C 1T4. The Company’s common shares are listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX: AUQ) and the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE:
AUQ).
The Company is governed by the Business Corporations Act (Ontario) (the “OBCA”). The Company was incorporated under Part 1A of the Companies Act (Quebec) on February 25, 1986 under the name Golden Rock Explorations Inc. By
Articles of Amendment dated April 17, 1998, the Company changed its name to Gammon Lake Resources Inc., and consolidated its common shares on a 15:1 basis. By Articles of Amendment dated June 7, 2007, the Company changed its name to Gammon Gold Inc.
By Articles of Amendment dated June 9, 2011, the Company changed its name to its current name, AuRico Gold Inc., and by Articles of Continuance dated August 26, 2011, the Company changed its province of jurisdiction to Ontario. AuRico was
amalgamated with Northgate Minerals Corporation (“Northgate”) under the OBCA pursuant to Articles of Amalgamation dated October 31, 2011.
The following chart lists the Company’s material subsidiaries and assets. The percentage ownership is indicated for each entity.
|
5 |
GENERAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE BUSINESS
Three Year History
The following is a summary of key developments over the past three years:
2012
-
Credit Facility – On April 25, 2012, the Company increased its revolving credit facility to $250 million.
-
Sale of Stawell and Fosterville – In May 2012, the Company completed the sale of the Stawell and Fosterville mines to Crocodile Gold Corporation (“Crocodile”) for consideration consisting of CAD$55 million in cash,
CAD$10 million in shares of Crocodile and potential participation in future free cash flows from the mines.
-
Sale of El Cubo – In July 2012, the Company completed the sale of the El Cubo mine and the Guadalupe y Calvo project to Endeavour Silver Corporation (“Endeavour”) for consideration consisting of $100 million in cash,
$100 million in shares of Endeavour and up to $50 million in future contingent payments.
-
Commercial Production at Young-Davidson – On September 1, 2012, the Young-Davidson open pit mine declared commercial production, having achieved previously established commissioning thresholds. The commissioning thresholds included a
30-day period whereby the mill throughput averaged at least 5,100 tonnes per day (subsequent to the commissioning of the flotation and gravity circuits) and the open pit averaging 29,750 tonnes per day of ore and waste mining.
-
Litigation Settlement – On October 5, 2012, the Company reached an agreement to settle a class action initiated in 2008 by Edward J. McKenna. The settlement did not contain any admission of wrongdoing and provided for the payment by the
Company of $13.3 million which was largely offset by an insurance receivable.
-
Sale of Equity Interests – In October 2012, the Company sold its equity interests in Endeavour Silver Corporation and Crocodile Gold Corporation on a block trade basis for gross proceeds of $104.6 million.
-
Sale of Ocampo – On December 14, 2012, the Company completed the sale of the Ocampo mine and the Venus and Los Jarros exploration properties, as well as a 50% interest in the Orion development project, to Minera Frisco, S.A.B. de C.V.
(“Minera Frisco”), for cash consideration of $750 million. The Company retained a 50% interest over the Orion project and is now a joint venture partner with Minera Frisco with respect to this project.
2013
-
Substantial Issuer Bid – On January 29, 2013, the Company announced the successful repurchase and cancellation of 36,144,578 common shares at a price of $8.30 per share under the Company’s ‘modified Dutch auction’
substantial issuer bid, for a total purchase price of $300 million.
-
Credit Facility – On January 31, 2013, the Company completed an amendment to the revolving credit facility, which reduced the borrowing capacity from $250 million to $150 million. The amended credit facility carries the same
interest rate and terms as the previous facility.
-
Dividend Policy – On February 21, 2013, the Company announced an inaugural dividend policy, whereby the Company paid a dividend of $0.16 per share in 2013 (payable quarterly). Subsequent to 2013, the Company’s dividend is
linked to operating cash flow, whereby the Company pays a total dividend of 20% of the operating cash flow generated in the preceding quarter.
|
6 |
-
Kemess Underground Project – On March 25, 2013, the Company reported a 2012 Mineral Reserve & Mineral Resource update and the results of a feasibility study for the Kemess Underground Project, which added 1.8 million ounces to the
Company’s consolidated proven and probable gold reserves. The feasibility study outlined the development of an underground block cave operation with average annual
production of 105,000 ounces of gold and 44 million pounds of copper at cash costs of $213 per ounce of gold, net of by-product credits, over a mine-life of approximately 12 years.
-
Dividend Reinvestment Plan – On June 11, 2013, the Company announced that its Board of Directors had approved the introduction of a dividend reinvestment plan, effective June 10, 2013. Common shares issued under this plan are issued at
a 5% discount from the average market price of the common shares over the five day period preceding the relevant dividend payment date.
-
Appointment of Non-Executive Chairman – On June 27, 2013, the Company announced that Mr. Alan Edwards had been appointed as non-executive Chairman of the Board of Directors effective July 1, 2013. This appointment followed the
resignation, for health reasons, of Mr. Colin Benner as Executive Chairman.
-
Underground Commercial Production at Young-Davidson – On October 31, 2013, the Company announced that the Young-Davidson underground mine had achieved commercial production. Commissioning of the shaft hoisting infrastructure was a key
project milestone that unlocked the potential of the Young-Davidson underground mine by supporting increased underground productivities and favourable unit cost efficiencies over the life of the mine.
2014
-
Issuance of Senior Secured Notes – On March 27, 2014, the Company completed an offering of $315 million senior secured notes due in 2020. The notes were issued with a coupon of 7.75% and sold at 96.524% of par, resulting in net
proceeds to the Company of $304.1 million. The completion of this offering enabled the Company to extend the maturity date of outstanding debt and provided additional cash for general corporate purposes, which may include funding capital
expenditures to support organic growth.
-
Redemption of Convertible Senior Notes – On April 3, 2014, the Company paid $173 million to complete the cash tender offer initially announced on March 6, 2014 to redeem all of the outstanding convertible senior notes. The
consideration offered and paid was $1,040 per $1,000 note outstanding plus accrued and unpaid interest to the payment date. The Company received tender offers for $166.4 million of the $167 million principal amount outstanding.
-
Closure of Young-Davidson open pit mine – In June 2014, the Company ceased mining of the Young- Davidson open pit mine upon depletion of the in-situ reserve. While the mining of the open pit has ceased, the Company has established a
sizeable stockpile of open pit ore that will be used to augment underground production until the underground mine can provide the entire mill feed.
-
Investment in Carlisle Goldfield Limited – On November 20, 2014, the Company completed a private placement with Carlisle Goldfields Limited (“Carlisle”) in which the Company invested CAD $5.6 million in exchange for
19.9% of the outstanding common shares of Carlisle. In conjunction with the private placement, the Company entered into a joint venture agreement on November 11, 2014 with respect to Carlisle’s Lynn Lake Gold Camp, located in Lynn Lake,
Manitoba, pursuant to which the Company acquired a 25% interest in the project for an initial cash contribution of CAD $5.0 million.
|
7 |
2015
-
Amendment of Crocodile Purchase and Sale Agreement – On January 14, 2015, the Company finalized an agreement to terminate the deferred cash payment arrangement included as part of the consideration received upon the sale of the
Fosterville and Stawell mines in 2012 to Crocodile. As consideration for this termination, the Company received CAD $20 million in cash and net smelter royalties on future production from the Fosterville and Stawell mines of 2% and 1%,
respectively.
-
Kemess East Project – On January 21, 2015, the Company announced an initial NI 43-101 compliant indicated resource of 2.1 million gold equivalent ounces and an inferred resource of 3.4 million gold equivalent ounces at the Kemess East
deposit, located one kilometre east of the previously delineated Kemess Underground deposit and 6.5 kilometres north of the Kemess mill facility. The Kemess Property is located in north-central British Columbia, Canada, approximately 430 kilometres
northwest of Prince George.
DESCRIPTION OF THE BUSINESS
General
AuRico Gold Inc. is a Canadian gold producer with mines and projects in North America and a head office in Toronto, Ontario. The Company’s core operations include the Young-Davidson mine in Ontario, Canada, and the El Chanate mine in Sonora,
Mexico. The Company’s project pipeline also includes advanced exploration opportunities in Mexico and Canada.
AuRico Property Locations
The profitability and operating cash flow performance of the Company are affected by numerous factors, including the price of gold, foreign exchange rates, production levels, capital expenditures, and operating performance. While the Company
attempts to manage these and other risks, many of the factors affecting these risks are beyond the Company’s control. For additional information on factors that may affect the Company, see the Forward-Looking Information disclosure at the
beginning of this document and the discussion of risks and uncertainties under the heading entitled “Risk Factors”.
|
8 |
Product fabrication and bullion investment are the two principal uses of gold. The introduction of more readily accessible and more liquid gold investment vehicles (such as gold exchange traded funds) has further facilitated investment in gold.
Within the fabrication category, there are a wide variety of end uses, the largest of which is the manufacture of jewelry. Other fabrication purposes include coins, electronics, miscellaneous industrial and decorative uses, dentistry, medals, and
medallions.
Markets, Sales and Refining
The Company produces doré bars at its mine sites, which are sent to third parties for refining. Gold can be readily sold on markets throughout the world and market price can be easily ascertained at any particular time. The Company is not
dependent upon any one customer or group of customers for the sale of gold. During 2014, the price of gold averaged $1,266 per ounce, a 10% decrease from the London PM Fix average of $1,411 during 2013. During 2014, daily London PM Fix
prices ranged between $1,142 and $1,385 per ounce.
Competitive Conditions
Competition in the precious metals mining industry is primarily
for: (i) mineral properties that can be developed and produced economically;
(ii) technical experts that can find, develop, and mine such properties; (iii)
labour to operate the properties; and (iv) capital to finance operations.
The Company competes with other mining and exploration
companies in the acquisition of mining claims and leases and in connection with
the recruitment and retention of qualified employees. There is significant
competition for mining claims and leases. Many larger competitors conduct
business globally and thus have greater financial and technical resources
available to them.
Operating Results
The following table is a summary of the Companys annual
financial and operating results for the fiscal year ended December 31, 2014:
(in thousands, except ounces, per share amounts, total cash
costs and total all-in sustaining costs) |
|
|
Year Ended |
|
|
|
December 31, 2014 |
|
Gold ounces produced |
|
224,032 |
|
Gold
ounces sold |
|
227,966 |
|
Revenue from mining operations |
$ |
291,182 |
|
Loss from operations (3) |
$ |
(154,705 |
) |
Net loss (3) |
$ |
(169,648 |
) |
Net
loss per share, basic |
$ |
(0.68 |
) |
Total cash |
$ |
89,031 |
|
Operating cash flow |
$ |
60,414 |
|
Net
free cash flow(1) |
$ |
(128,415 |
) |
Cash
costs per gold ounce sold, net of by-product revenues and NRV
adjustments(1)(2) |
$ |
779 |
|
All-in sustaining costs per gold ounce sold, net of by-product
revenues and NRV adjustments(1)(2) |
$ |
1,200 |
|
Notes: |
1. |
See the Non-GAAP Measures section on page
22 of the Managements Discussion and Analysis for the year ended December 31,
2014.
|
2. |
For further discussion on the net realizable value (NRV)
adjustments recognized on ore in-process inventories at the El Chanate and
Young-Davidson mines during the year, refer to pages 7 and 9 of the Managements
Discussion and Analysis for the year ended December 31, 2014.
|
3. |
Loss from
operations and net loss include a $90 million impairment charge on the El Chanate cash generating unit for the year ended December 31, 2014.
|
|
9 |
Employees and Labour Relations
As at December 31, 2014, the Company had 704 direct
full-time employees, and 553 individuals employed on a contract basis.
The nature of the Companys business requires specialized
skills and knowledge. The Company operates large mining operations in Canada and
Mexico which requires technical expertise in the areas of geology, engineering,
mine planning, metallurgical processing, mine operations, and environmental
compliance. Despite generally good labour relations, competition for skilled
workers in the resource sector results in employee turnover at the Companys
operations and a need to constantly recruit and train new employees. This
competition for qualified employees occasionally results in workforce shortages,
which can often be supplemented with more costly contract labour.
Sustainability Practice
The Company has adopted a Sustainability Management System (“SMS”), which is a set of management processes aligned to recognized international standards to help AuRico continuously improve its environmental, economic and social
sustainability performance. The purpose of the SMS is to provide a consistent approach to sustainability management across all of the operations.
A central element to SMS is the AuRico Sustainability Charter, which establishes the overarching vision for sustainable management within AuRico and is supported by three core policies:
|
1. |
Health & Safety Policy
|
|
2. |
Environmental Policy
|
|
3. |
Corporate Social Responsibility Policy
|
Sustainable practices are important because they help ensure quality of life for the workforce, the communities in which the Company operates and future generations. AuRico also believes that sustainable business practices are a part of its social
license to operate.
Each mine site must develop and implement a SMS that is consistent with these policies and the Sustainability Charter and the principles contained within the framework. Once implemented, compliance with this standard is mandatory. Annual performance
reviews take into account the quality of a site’s SMS and steps taken to enhance compliance with both the processes and procedures in the SMS and the spirit of sustainable practices.
The Company’s Board of Directors has established a Technical and Sustainability Committee that, as part of its mandate, is responsible for reviewing sustainability, environmental, health and safety policies and programs of the Company and
overseeing AuRico’s performance in these areas. The Technical and Sustainability Committee reports to the Board of Directors on a regular basis.
Having a common set of principles to manage sustainable business practices helps reduce risks to the business. By tailoring these principles to the specific needs and issues facing each operation, the site SMS is flexible enough to meet local
requirements relating to health, safety, environment, and the community.
On an annual basis, the Company publishes a Sustainability Report on its website summarizing the Company’s environmental, health, safety, and social programs and performance at its operations, which can be accessed at the following link:
http://www.auricogold.com/responsibility/sustainability-reports/default.aspx.
Environmental Protection and Policies
The Company’s mining and exploration activities are subject to various governmental laws and regulations relating to the protection of the environment. Environmental regulations are continually changing, and the Company continues to make the
necessary adjustments to comply with such laws and regulations.
|
10 |
The Company will be obliged to carry out site reclamation on its current properties at the end of their mine life and expects to be able to finance these activities from the revenue generated by such projects. In addition, as at December 31, 2014,
the Company had $16 million in restricted cash in place, relating to site closure and reclamation obligations at the former producing Kemess South property.
Reclamation provisions are recognized at the time an environmental disturbance occurs and are measured at the Company’s best estimate of the expected value of future cash flows required to reclaim the disturbance upon mine closure, which are
discounted to their present value for each mine operation.
Social Policies
With a total of 1,257 employees and contractors, the Company and its subsidiaries play an important role in the economic life of its stakeholders. Wages, taxes and royalties have a positive impact on the lives of the Company’s employees and in
the communities where the Company operates. AuRico sources goods and services used in operations from the local, regional and national business
communities in Mexico and Northern Ontario, Canada, which provides significant
economic benefit to the region.
The Company has a significant social impact on the communities
adjacent to its operations. AuRico strives to be a good neighbor and corporate
citizen by both actively contributing to local community life and by ensuring
that local stakeholders have an opportunity for input and dialogue. The Company
achieves this through continual community communications and the development of
healthy relationships between the site and the community personnel. Each site is
responsible for engaging with local stakeholders, identifying areas of concern,
and relaying those concerns to management.
The Company entered into Impact Benefit Agreements with the Matachewan First Nation on July 2, 2009 and with the Temagami First Nation /
Teme Augama Anishnabai on July 14, 2012, as the Young-Davidson mine is situated
in Ontario, Canada within the traditional territory of these two First Nations.
On June 22, 2012, the Company signed an Interim Measures Agreement with the Tse
Key Nay, a group comprised of three aboriginal groups whose traditional
territories overlap the Kemess project location in British Columbia, Canada: the
Kwadacha, Tsay Keh Dene, and Takla Lake. Among other things, the agreement
addresses project permitting, environmental studies, business opportunities,
employment, and training.
MINERAL PROPERTIES
At December 31, 2014, AuRicos total proven and probable gold
mineral reserves were 6.3 million gold ounces, a 0.2 million ounce decrease from
2013. This decrease in proven and probable mineral reserves is attributable to a
combination of depletion at the Companys operating mines and a reduction in
slope angles at the El Chanate open pit. Companys mineral reserve and mineral
resource estimates have been estimated as at December 31, 2014 in accordance
with definitions adopted by the Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and
Petroleum and incorporated into NI 43-101. U.S. readers should refer to the
Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors Concerning Measured, Indicated and Inferred
Resources on page 4 of this AIF.
The Companys normal data verification procedures have been
employed in connection with the calculations contained herein. Sampling,
analytical and test data underlying the stated mineral resources and reserves
have been verified by employees of AuRico or its joint venture partner, as
applicable, under the supervision of qualified persons, and/or independent
qualified person. Verification procedures include industry standard quality
control practices. For details of data verification and quality control
practices at each material property please see Mineral Properties.
Although the Company has carefully prepared and verified the
mineral reserve figures presented below and elsewhere in this AIF, such figures
are estimates, which are, in part, based on forward-looking information and
certain assumptions, and no assurance can be given that the indicated level of
mineral will be produced. Estimated reserves may have to be recalculated based
on actual production experience. Market price fluctuations of gold, copper and
silver, as well as increased production costs or reduced recovery rates and
other factors, may render the present proven and probable reserves unprofitable
to develop at a particular site or sites. See Risk Factors and
Forward-Looking Information for additional details concerning factors and
risks that could cause actual results to differ from those set out below.
|
11 |
Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource Estimates
The following tables set forth the estimated mineral reserves
and mineral resources attributable to interests held by AuRico for each of its
material and non-material properties as at December 31, 2014:
Mineral Reserve
Estimates - Gold |
|
|
Category |
Tonnes |
Grade |
Ounces |
|
|
(000s) |
(g/t) |
(000s) |
|
Surface |
Proven |
2,501 |
0.76 |
61 |
|
|
Probable |
- |
- |
- |
|
|
P&P |
2,501 |
0.76 |
61 |
Young-Davidson |
Underground |
Proven |
12,499 |
2.83 |
1,137 |
|
|
Probable |
30,274 |
2.70 |
2,626 |
|
|
P&P |
42,773 |
2.74 |
3,763 |
|
Total Young-Davidson |
P&P |
45,273 |
2.63 |
3,823 |
|
|
Proven |
18,255 |
0.80
|
472
|
El Chanate |
|
Probable |
8,958 |
0.60
|
174
|
|
Total El Chanate |
P&P |
27,213 |
0.74 |
646 |
|
|
Proven |
- |
- |
- |
Kemess Underground |
|
Probable |
100,373 |
0.56
|
1,805 |
|
Total Kemess |
P&P |
100,373 |
0.56 |
1,805 |
AuRico Total |
|
P&P
|
172,860
|
1.13
|
6,274 |
|
12 |
Mineral Resource Estimates - Gold |
|
|
Category |
Tonnes |
Grade |
Ounces |
|
|
(000s) |
(g/t) |
(000s) |
Young-Davidson |
Surface |
Measured |
496 |
1.13 |
18 |
Indicated |
1,242 |
1.28 |
51 |
M&I |
1,739 |
1.24 |
69 |
Underground |
Measured |
7,855 |
3.28 |
829 |
Indicated |
6,090 |
3.07 |
601 |
M&I |
13,946 |
3.19 |
1,430 |
Total Young-Davidson |
M&I |
15,684 |
2.97 |
1,499 |
Surface |
Inferred |
31 |
0.99 |
1 |
Underground |
Inferred |
3,608 |
2.76 |
320 |
Total Young-Davidson |
Inferred |
3,639 |
2.75 |
321 |
El Chanate |
|
Measured |
923 |
0.58 |
17 |
|
Indicated |
1,842 |
0.87 |
52 |
Total El Chanate |
M&I |
2,764 |
0.77 |
69 |
Inferred |
184 |
0.38 |
2 |
Kemess Underground |
|
Measured |
- |
- |
- |
|
Indicated |
65,432 |
0.41 |
854 |
Total Kemess
Underground |
M&I |
65,432 |
0.41 |
854 |
Inferred |
9,969 |
0.39 |
125 |
Kemess East |
|
Measured |
- |
- |
- |
|
Indicated |
55,864 |
0.52 |
939 |
Total Kemess East |
M&I |
55,864 |
0.52 |
939 |
Inferred |
117,152 |
0.38 |
1,424 |
Lynn Lake (25%) |
MacLellan |
Measured |
3,753 |
1.99 |
240 |
Indicated |
4,344 |
1.75 |
244 |
M&I |
8,096 |
1.86 |
484 |
Inferred |
475 |
2.01 |
31 |
Farley Lake |
Measured |
- |
- |
- |
Indicated |
1,479 |
3.21 |
153 |
M&I |
1,479 |
3.21 |
153 |
Inferred |
1,091 |
2.87 |
101 |
Burnt Timber |
Measured |
- |
- |
- |
Indicated |
255 |
1.40 |
11 |
M&I |
255 |
1.40 |
11 |
Inferred |
5,860 |
1.04 |
195 |
Linkwood |
Measured |
- |
- |
- |
Indicated |
246 |
1.16 |
9 |
M&I |
246 |
1.16 |
9 |
Inferred |
5,251 |
1.16 |
196 |
Total Lynn Lake |
M&I |
10,076 |
2.03 |
657 |
Inferred |
12,676 |
1.28 |
522 |
Orion (50%) |
|
Measured |
- |
- |
- |
|
Indicated |
554 |
3.66 |
65 |
Total Orion |
M&I |
554 |
3.65 |
65 |
Inferred |
91 |
3.33 |
10 |
AuRico Total
|
|
M&I |
150,373 |
0.84 |
4,083 |
|
Inferred |
143,711 |
0.52 |
2,404 |
Mineral Reserve and Resource Estimates - Copper
and Silver |
|
|
|
|
Grade |
Contained Metal |
|
|
Tonnes |
Cu |
Ag |
Cu |
Ag |
|
Category |
(000s) |
(%) |
(g/t) |
(000s) lbs |
(000s) oz |
Kemess Underground |
Probable Reserves |
100,373 |
0.28 |
2.0 |
619,151 |
6,608 |
Indicated Resources |
65,432 |
0.24 |
1.8 |
346,546 |
3,811 |
Inferred Resources |
9,969 |
0.21 |
1.6 |
46,101 |
503 |
Kemess East |
Indicated Resources |
55,864 |
0.41 |
2.0 |
503,663 |
3,601 |
Inferred Resources |
117,152 |
0.34 |
1.8 |
871,407 |
6,739 |
Orion (50%) |
Indicated Resources |
554 |
- |
309 |
- |
5,503 |
Inferred Resources |
91 |
- |
95 |
- |
275 |
|
13 |
Notes to Mineral Reserve and Resource tables:
|
Mineral Reserves and Resources have been stated as at
December 31, 2014. |
|
|
|
|
Mineral Resources are exclusive of Mineral Reserves.
Mineral Resources that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated
economic viability. |
|
|
|
|
El Chanate and Young-Davidson assumed a gold price of
$1,250 per ounce for reserves and $1,450 per ounce for
resources. |
|
|
|
|
Kemess Underground assumed a gold price of $1,300 per
ounce, a silver price of $23.00 per ounce for silver, and a copper price
of $3.00 per pound for reserves. Kemess Underground assumed a $13.00 NSR
cutoff for resources. Kemess East assumed a $15.00 NSR cutoff for
resources. |
|
|
|
|
Lynn Lake assumed a gold price of $1,555 per ounce for
resources. |
|
|
|
|
Orion assumed a gold price of $850 per ounce and a silver
price of $13.00 per ounce for resources. |
|
|
|
|
Mineral Reserves assume the following cutoff grades and
process recoveries: |
|
|
|
|
|
Young-Davidson: Surface: 0.50 grams per tonne cutoff, 91%
mill recovery |
|
|
|
|
|
Young-Davidson: Underground: 1.90 grams per tonne cutoff,
91% mill recovery |
|
|
|
|
|
El Chanate: 0.15 grams per tonne cutoff, 30%-65% leach
recovery |
|
|
|
|
|
Kemess Underground: $15 NSR cutoff, mill recovery of 72%
for gold and 91% for copper |
|
|
|
|
The Companys Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource
estimates are classified in accordance with CIMs CIM Definition
Standards For Mineral Resources and Mineral Reserves in accordance with
the requirements of NI 43-101, as required by Canadian securities
regulatory authorities. In addition, while the terms Measured,
Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resources are required pursuant to NI
43-101, the SEC does not recognize such terms. Canadian standards differ
significantly from the requirements of the SEC, and mineral resource
information contained herein is not comparable to similar information
regarding mineral reserves disclosed in accordance with the requirements
of the SEC. Investors should understand that Inferred Mineral Resources
have a great amount of uncertainty as to their existence and great
uncertainty as to their economic and legal feasibility. In addition,
investors are cautioned not to assume that any part or all of AuRicos
Mineral Resources constitute or will be converted into Reserves. |
|
|
|
|
Orion Mineral Resources are reflected on a 50% basis.
Minera Frisco, S.A.B. de C.V. has a 50% interest in the Orion
project. |
|
|
|
|
Lynn Lake Mineral Resources are reflected on a 25% basis.
Carlisle Goldfields Ltd. has a 75% interest in the Lynn Lake
project. |
|
|
|
|
Mineral Reserve and Resource tonnage and contained metal
have been rounded to reflect the accuracy of the estimate, and numbers may
not add due to rounding. |
|
|
|
|
Mineral Resources were prepared under the supervision of
Jeffrey Volk, CPG, FAusIMM, the Director of Reserves and Resources, for
AuRico Gold Inc. Mineral Reserves were prepared under the supervision of
Chris Bostwick, FAusIMM, the Senior Vice President Technical Services, for
AuRico Gold Inc. Both Messrs. Volk and Bostwick are Qualified Persons as
defined by NI 43-101. |
The following table presents a year-over-year reconciliation
of Mineral Reserves based on contained metal:
|
Mineral |
|
|
Mineral |
|
Reserves |
Processed
|
Increase /
|
Reserves
|
|
31-Dec-13
|
in 2014
|
(Decrease)
|
31-Dec-14 |
Gold (000s ounces) |
|
|
|
|
El Chanate |
1,023 |
143 |
(234) |
646 |
|
|
|
|
|
Young-Davidson - Surface |
140 |
51 |
(29) |
61 |
|
|
|
|
|
Young-Davidson - Underground |
3,556 |
127 |
334 |
3,763 |
|
|
|
|
|
Kemess
Underground |
1,805 |
0 |
0 |
1,805 |
|
|
|
|
|
Copper (000s lbs) |
|
|
|
|
Kemess
Underground |
619,151 |
0 |
0 |
619,151 |
|
14 |
Material Mineral Projects
For the purposes of this AIF, the Company has identified its Young-Davidson mine, El Chanate mine and Kemess Underground Project as material projects. The following is a description of these material projects.
Young-Davidson Mine
The Young-Davidson gold mine is located near the town of Matachewan, approximately 60 kilometres west of Kirkland Lake in Northern Ontario. The property consists of contiguous mineral leases and claims totalling 11,000 acres and is situated on the
site of two past producing mines that produced almost one million ounces from 1934-1957.
The Company owns 100% of the mineral rights to all of the mineral resource related claims at the former Young-Davidson mine and the adjoining Matachewan Consolidated Mines Limited Mine (the “MCM Mine”), which together comprise the modern
day Young-Davidson Mine. The Company also holds the mineral rights to 200 tenures from mining leases to exploration claims covering 4,734 hectares surrounding and including the Young-Davidson Mine. The contiguous claim block that covers the
Young-Davidson Mine, is hereinafter referred to as “Young-Davidson”.
Property Description and Location
Young-Davidson is located immediately west of the village of Matachewan, Ontario, and approximately 60 kilometres west of the town of Kirkland Lake, Ontario. Young-Davidson is comprised of 200 tenures related to mining claims, mining leases,
patents, and licenses of occupation that were acquired either through staking, application, or option agreements. Collectively, it is subject to nine separate agreements with different obligations and royalties for each agreement. Based on the
currently defined mineral reserves and resources, the only royalties to apply are:
|
(i) |
a sliding scale royalty held by Matachewan Consolidated Mines Limited that relates to the eastern portion of the open pit and a small portion of the underground resource, which together total approximately 1,000,000 tonnes; and
|
| | |
|
(ii) |
a per ton royalty held by the Welsh Estate that affects almost 424,000 tonnes.
|
Through these agreements the Company controls sufficient surface rights to cover the sites required for all project buildings and fixed installations for the life of mine. AuRico believes it has all of the necessary surface rights to dispose of
waste rock and tailings on additional areas of the property. AuRico’s land ownership and mineral tenures are registered with the Government of Ontario. All permits required to operate the mine are currently in place.
As Young-Davidson was the site of two former producing gold mines there is existing surface disturbance in the form of old workings, building foundations and tailings sites. Although there is no clean up order on these sites, AuRico designed
infrastructure to incorporate these sites where possible so that they are remediated as part of the mine closure plan.
Other than as described above, the Company is not aware of any rights, agreements or encumbrances to which Young-Davidson is subject, which would adversely affect the value of the property or AuRico’s ownership.
The Company entered into Impact Benefit Agreements with the Matachewan First Nation on July 2, 2009 and with the Temagami First Nation / Teme Augama Anishnabai on July 14, 2012, as the Young-Davidson mine is situated within the traditional territory
of these two First Nations.
|
15 |
Young-Davidson Property Location
Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography
Young-Davidson is located in northern Ontario, Canada, centrally located between Timmins, Kirkland Lake, North Bay and Sudbury, each of which have businesses that service the mining industry. The property is accessed by paved Highway 566, 5
kilometres west of the town of Matachewan.
The daily average mean temperature in nearby Kirkland Lake, Ontario is 1.7°C. The extreme maximum recorded temperature is 38.9°C and the extreme minimum temperature is -47°C. The average annual precipitation is 884 millimetres,
comprising 590 millimetres as rainfall and 294 millimetres as snowfall. Given this climate, exploration and mining development activities can be carried out at all times of the year.
The surface rights possessed by the Company are sufficient for mining operations, availability of sources of power, water, mining personnel, potential tailings storage areas, potential waste disposal areas and potential processing plant sites.
Electricity is provided from the provincial grid through a transmission line that was upgraded by the Company prior to commercial production.
The property is typical of northern Ontario with forest covered low rolling hills, small lakes and wetlands with numerous gravel roads providing access to all areas of the property. Average elevation on the property is 330 metres above sea level.
History
The initial discovery of gold in the project area was made by prospector Jake Davidson in 1916 on what became the former Young-Davidson mine. This sparked a staking rush that resulted in a second discovery by Samuel Otisse on what became the MCM
Mine property. Surface prospecting, trenching and outcrop stripping continued intermittently for the next seventeen years on both properties. During this time a joint venture was established between Hollinger Corporation and Young-Davidson Mines
Limited and underground mine production was initiated in 1934 and continued until 1957, over which time a total of 5.6 million tonnes were mined producing 585,690 ounces of gold (3.22 g/t recovered grade). Production from the MCM Mine property over
the period 1934-1954 totaled 3.2 million tonnes, and 378,101 ounces of gold (3.67 g/t recovered grade). Following closure of the mines, the properties remained dormant until 1980 at which time Pamour Mines concluded option/joint venture agreements
on both properties with the aim of establishing an open pit operation. Approximately 96,000 tonnes of ore were mined and trucked to the Pamour mill facility east of Timmins.
|
16 |
In 1995, Royal Oak Mines Inc. (“Royal Oak”), a successor company to Pamour Mines, initiated extensive diamond drilling to define an open pit resource, initiated shaft dewatering with a view to underground exploration, conducted shaft
rehabilitation as well as engineering studies and environmental assessment studies with a view to re-opening the mines. Following the bankruptcy of Royal Oak Mines, the property was dormant for several years before being acquired by a private
company in 2000. This private company undertook limited exploration and, in 2002, vended the asset into Young-Davidson Mines Limited, the same company that had discovered the property. Young-Davidson Mines Limited re-initiated exploration with 9,312
metres of drilling in 58 diamond drill holes.
In late 2005, Northgate Minerals Corporation (“Northgate”) amalgamated with Young-Davidson Mines Limited through a Plan of Arrangement, and proceeded with surface exploration, particularly diamond drilling, environmental and engineering
studies and underground exploration and development.
In 2011, AuRico acquired Northgate, which included Young-Davidson.
Geological Setting and Mineralization
Young-Davidson is situated within the southwestern part of the Abitibi Greenstone Belt. The Abitibi Greenstone Belt consists of a complex and diverse array of volcanic, sedimentary, and plutonic rocks typically metamorphosed to greenschist facies
grade, but locally attaining amphibolite facies grade. Volcanic rocks range in composition from rhyolitic to komatiitic and commonly occur as mafic to felsic volcanic cycles. Sedimentary rocks consist of both chemical and clastic varieties and
occur as both intravolcanic sequences and as uncomformably overlying sequences. A wide spectrum of mafic to felsic, pre-tectonic, syn-tectonic and post-tectonic intrusive rocks are present. All lithologies are cut by late, generally
northeast-trending proterozoic diabase dikes.
The Abitibi Greenstone Belt rocks have undergone a complex sequence of deformation events ranging from early folding and faulting through later upright folding, faulting and ductile shearing resulting in the development of large, dominantly
east-west trending, crustal-scale structures that form a lozenge-like pattern. The regional Larder Lake-Cadillac Fault Zone (“LLCFZ”) cuts across the Young-Davidson project area. The LLCFZ has a sub-vertical dip and generally strikes
east-west. The LLCFZ is characterized by chlorite-talc-carbonate schist and the deformation zone can be followed for over 120 miles from west of Kirkland Lake to Val d’Or.
There are three important groups of archean sedimentary rocks in the district. The oldest are Pontiac Group quartz greywacke and argillite, which occur as thick assemblages in Québec, while interbedded within the Larder Lake Group volcanic
rocks are turbiditic siltstones and greywackes of the Porcupine Group. Uncomformably overlying is Timiskiming Group Conglomerate, turbidite and iron formation with minor interbedded alkalic volcaniclastic units.
Archean intrusive rocks are numerous in the district but are largely manifested as small stocks, dikes and plugs of augite syenite, syenite and feldspar porphyry occurring in close temporal and spatial association with the distribution of
Timiskiming Group sediments. The main syenite mass, which hosts most of the gold mineralization on Young-Davidson, measures almost 3,000 ft. east-west by 1,000 ft. north-south.
Huronian proterozoic sedimentary rocks onlap and define the southern limit of the Abitibi in Ontario. In the project area these rocks are correlative to the Gowganda Formation tillite. Post-Archean dike rocks include Matachewan diabase and younger
Nipissing diabase, which respectively bracket the Huronian unconformity in the project area.
|
17 |
Essentially all of the historical production at the former Young-Davidson Mine and approximately 60% of the production from the MCM Mine was from syenite-hosted gold mineralization. Most of the current open pit and underground resources are also
related to syenite-hosted gold. The syenite-hosted gold mineralization consists of a stockwork of quartz veinlets and narrow quartz veins, rarely greater than a few inches in thickness, situated within a broader halo of disseminated pyrite and
potassic alteration. Visible gold is common in the narrower, glassy-textured quartz veinlets. In general, gold grades increase with quartz veinlet abundance, pyrite abundance, and alteration intensity. Mineralized areas are visually distinctive and
are characterized by brick red to pink K-feldspar-rich
syenite containing two to three percent disseminated pyrite and several orientations of quartz extension veinlets and veins. The quartz veins and veinlets commonly contain accessory carbonate, pyrite, and feldspar.
Drilling
Since the discovery of gold in the project area until October 14, 2008 a total of 293,774 metres of surface and underground diamond drill holes were completed. With the exception of the holes pre-dating 1980 (324 holes, 20,236 metres), all of the
drill logs have been preserved. All holes have been plotted on historic records and these hole traces and assays have now been entered into the database. All holes since 1988 have been surveyed for their collar co-ordinates and it is assumed that
all pre-1988 underground hole collars were surveyed as per industry practice at the time of production. Since 1980 all holes have been down hole surveyed using a tropari instrument or acid test and since 2006 all drill holes have been surveyed using
FLEXIT and/or a gyroscopic instrument in order to measure down hole deviation.
Underground drill holes were AQ core (27 mm diameter) as was the practice of the day, surface holes pre-dating the Company were, with one exception, BQ core (36.5 mm diameter) and all holes by the Company (and the one exception) have been NQ core
(47.6 mm diameter) except where a reduction to BQ (36.5 mm diameter) has been required to complete the hole in problematic ground conditions. Core recovery and rock quality designations have not been noted in historic drill logs, however in all the
holes by the Company core recovery has been excellent and the rock quality designation (“RQD”) factor has been very high indicating very competent rock.
From 2009 to 2014, the Company has drilled a total of 267 surface drill holes for a total of 135,193 metres.
Sampling Method and Approach
Drill core is transported directly from the drill rigs to the secure core logging facility. Core is logged with geological information being recorded, including rock type, degree of alteration, estimated percentage of sulfide minerals and vein
intensity. Zones of interest are marked out and assigned a sample number and assay tags are stapled into the box as well as being inserted into the sample base. Most of the core has been split with a hydraulic splitter, with a small number of
samples cut with a diamond bladed core saw. The majority of the samples are 1.5 metres in core length and most of the historic samples are in five foot lengths. Assay procedures were not well documented prior to 2003, but it is assumed that
conventional crushing, pulverizing and classical fire assay techniques were used.
Sample Preparation, Analyses and Security
Prior to sample shipment, a number of measures have been implemented which were designed to maintain a high level of security at the core logging facility, at the mine property and while the samples are in transit.
Upon arrival at the ALS Global laboratory, samples were logged into the laboratory tracking system and weighed. Each core sample was entirely crushed to better than 70% -2 millimetre (minus 10 mesh). A 250 gram split of crushed material was taken
and pulverized. Certified reference material and blanks were inserted with samples prior to analysis. Fifty gram aliquots were weighed for fire assay. Fire assay fusion was by lead flux with a silver collector and atomic absorption finish. Each
sample was also submitted for a 34 element analysis, by aqua-regia acid digestion and ICP-AES. This process quantitatively dissolves base metals for the majority of geological materials. Major rock forming elements and more resistive metals are
only partially dissolved. All sample batches were subjected to the laboratory’s internal quality control procedures.
|
18 |
All mine samples, including blasthole, underground channel, and drill core are assayed at the on-site laboratory operated the Company. We have been advised by ALS Global that the laboratory is well-equipped, fully ventilated, and staffed by
experienced personnel. Samples are prepared and analyzed as described above. The mine laboratory is externally audited on a periodic basis. A check assay program and participation in an international round robin was initiated in 2014.
Quality Control and Quality Assurance
No information has been compiled that describes the quality control (“QC”) and quality assurance (“QA”) procedures for the pre-2003 drilling, however it is unlikely that blanks and CRM’s were used as this did not become
standard industry practice until the early 2000’s. The main form of QA/QC would have been periodic re-assaying of anomalous samples with introduction of blanks in the early 1980s and 1990s.
The QA/QC for the 2006, 2007 and 2008 programs is documented in the technical documents filed on the Canadian System for Electronic Document Analysis and Retrieval (“SEDAR”) website at www.sedar.com. In essence this amounted to
four percent of the entire population of samples submitted for analysis, including blanks, standards, and duplicates. Additionally, about 15-20% of pulp replicates and 2.5% of reject duplicates were analyzed and incorporated into final assay grade
to improve overall precision. The QA/QC data is monitored as the samples are being processed at the laboratories and where analytical problems are identified the laboratory is required to reanalyze the samples.
Based on this work it was concluded that the data is reliable and suitable for supporting mineral resource and mineral reserve estimation work in the opinion of the Qualified Person.
Data Verification
The project data base has been subject to verification or audit by Micon International Inc. (2004), Scott Wilson Roscoe Postle Associates Inc. (2006), AMEC plc (2008) and Company geologists (2006, 2007 and 2008) who had no direct involvement with
the project. Collar co-ordinates, down hole survey tests and assay intervals were verified against a variety of supporting documentation. Where errors have been identified these were corrected and procedures put in place to prevent re-occurrence and
to expedite future data verification programs. In each case the third party audit has concluded that the database is valid and acceptable for supporting resource estimation work on the project.
Mine Development and Mine Plan
The Company commenced mining from the open pit in November 2011, and ceased mining in June 2014, upon depletion of the in-situ reserve. While the mining of the open pit has ceased, the Company has established a sizeable stockpile of open pit ore
that will be used to augment underground production until the underground mine can provide the entire mill feed. Over the life of the open pit, approximately 20.9 Mt of waste rock was generated by the open pit and placed in the waste dump to the
north of the pit.
The underground deposit is located approximately 210 metres to 1,500 metres below surface. During 2013, the Company completed the sinking of the Northgate shaft down to the mid-shaft loading pocket, which accesses the first eight years of mine
production. The Company continues to work on developing vertical access in the underground mine below that of the mid-shaft loading pocket, to an eventual depth of 1,500 metres. The existing MCM #3 shaft is being extended to a depth of 1,500 metres
to provide for the hoisting of personnel, materials, ore and waste. The mine will also be accessed by a ramp, which will be extended to the bottom of the mine from the existing exploration ramp, currently at a depth of 900 metres below surface. The
mine design has taken into consideration the existing MCM #3 and the Young-Davidson shafts and other existing openings for ventilation.
|
19 |
The underground mine has been designed for low operating costs through the use of large modern equipment, gravity movement of ore and waste through raises, shaft hoisting, minimal ore and waste re-handling, high productivity bulk mining methods and
paste backfill. The mine operates scooptrams to load, haul and transfer stope production to the ore pass system from where it is hoisted to the surface via 18 tonne skips.
At the current design production rates of 2.92 million tonnes per year (8,000 tonnes per day) at full production, the underground will have a mine life of approximately 16 years based on the current reserve. Production from the underground mine will
be complemented by stockpiled open pit ore until it can provide the entire mill feed. For the last 14 years of the currently projected underground mine life, mill feed will be provided almost exclusively from the underground mine.
Lateral development of the underground mine will average approximately 12,000 metres per year including capital, operating and ore categories for the first 10 years of the underground mine operation. In the last 8 years of the underground mine life,
the development requirements drop off sharply as the mine is close to being fully developed.
The average underground personnel requirements at 8,000 tonnes per day are estimated to be approximately 300 persons. The mine will operate seven days a week with two 10.5 hour shifts per day working a five days on and four days off followed by four
days on five days off schedule. Once in full production, the mine will be owner operated with only diamond drilling and raising being contracted.
Exploration and Development
The Young-Davidson open pit mine and mill declared commercial production effective September 1, 2012. Commercial production was declared once the mine achieved previously established commissioning thresholds. The commissioning thresholds included a
30-day period whereby the mill throughput averaged at least 5,100 tonnes per day (subsequent to the commissioning of the flotation and gravity circuits) and the open pit averaged 29,750 tonnes per day of ore and waste mining.
In October 2013, the Company commissioned the mid-shaft loading pocket and shaft hoisting infrastructure, and began hoisting underground ore to surface. Prior to October 2013, the Company was trucking ore to surface through the exploration ramp. On
October 31, 2013, the Company declared commercial production at the Young-Davidson underground mine.
The 2014 capital budget focused primarily on the continued lateral and vertical development of the underground mine, and the construction and sinking of the MCM shaft. The Company also completed an expansion of its carbon-in-leach circuit in the
mill and purchased additional mobile equipment as underground mining rates increased during the year. The carbon-in-leach circuit expansion increased the number of tanks and was designed to increase residence time and aid in increasing overall mill
recoveries. Underground lateral development and the sinking of the MCM shaft will continue in 2015. The Company will also add to its underground mobile equipment fleet and complete a raise of its tailings dam. Total lateral and vertical development
are expected to be 14,700 metres and 1,100 metres respectively. Lateral development will consist of continuing to establish the levels spaced every 30 metres in the orebody consisting of footwall drives, drawpoints and stope development. Main ramp
development will also continue from the 9590 level towards the eventual bottom of the mine at the 8900 level. Vertical development will consist of sinking the MCM shaft to mine bottom and various ventilation raises.
Milling Operations
The metallurgical testwork programs considered for feasibility study were completed in 2008 and early 2009 at SGS Lakefield. Results of these tests provided the data used for the design criteria.
The tests were conducted on samples from 32 holes selected across the mineralization from which five zone composites and a master composite were prepared. Flowsheet optimization was conducted on the master composite. Once the metallurgical
parameters were optimized, the five zone composite and 32 individual samples were tested used for variability testing.
|
20 |
The grinding characteristics of the design mineralized material, an equal mixture of Upper Boundary Zone, Lower Boundary Zone and Pit Zone material as combined material for pilot plant feed gives an average Bond Work Index of 15.6 kilowatt hours per
tonne (“kWh/t”) at 100 mesh (106 micrometer (“µm”)) of grind. The selected six zone samples work index ranged from 14.7 to 18.3 kWh/t or an average of 16.5 kWh/t. Most samples tested fell in the medium to hard range of
hardness with respect to impact breakage and Bond rod mill/ball mill grindability work indices while there was one waste sample which fell in the very hard range of hardness. All samples have been classified as abrasive or very abrasive.
The gravity recoverable gold was determined to be about 25% of the gold contained in the composite sample tested when cleaning of the primary centrifugal concentrator product on a Mozley table was completed to a target 0.05% weight recovery of the
initial feed material.
The metallurgical test programs supported the selection of single stage semi-autogenous grinding circuit with a gravity circuit followed by flotation. The flotation concentrate is further ground and leached in a conventional carbon-in-leach. The
flotation tailings are also leached in a carbon-in-leach circuit. The gold is recovered from the carbon followed by electro-winning and pouring doré bars.
The combined leach tailings were used for the cyanide destruction testwork. The Young-Davidson carbon-in-leach tailings are treated with the SO2/Air cyanide destruction method.
In January 2014 a paste backfill plant was commissioned and is capable of supplying paste fill to the underground voids at a rate in excess of 8,000 tonnes per day.
El Chanate Mine
The El Chanate Mine is located 37 kilometres northeast of Caborca in Sonora State, Mexico. The mine consists of an open pit, crusher, heap leach pads, process plant and supporting infrastructure located on 4,618 hectares encompassed within 22
mineral concessions.
The Company acquired El Chanate through the acquisition of Capital Gold Corporation in April 2011. Hereinafter, references to work completed by the Company with respect to El Chanate, includes work completed by Capital Gold Corporation.
Property Description and Location
El Chanate is located in northern Mexico in the northwest corner of the State of Sonora, Municipality of Altar (see map below). The mine site is 37 kilometres northeast of Caborca, 280 kilometres northwest of Hermosillo, 150 kilometres southeast of
Sonoyta, and 170 kilometres southwest of Tucson, Arizona at UTM geographical coordinates of 412,150E, 3,407,880N (Lat 30°48’10”N, Long 111°55’00”W). Caborca, with a population of 100,000, is the largest town in the
area. Pitiquito and Altar are smaller nearby towns located off Highway 2 west and east of the El Chanate, respectively. All permits required to operate the mine are currently in place.
|
21 |
El Chanate Property Location
Minimum Investment and Mining Duty
All concessions are subject to an annual minimum investment and an annual mining tax that must be paid to keep the concessions in good standing. The amount of the minimum investment or assessment work varies based on the size, age and type of the
concession, and changes each year with the Department of Mines publishing a new list at the beginning of the year and varies with the consumer price index. The rate of the mining duty depends on the concession type and the age of the concession. The
rate changes bi-annually with the Department of Mines publishing the new rates in January and July. The mining duty is due in both January and July. The total mining duty required annually to keep El Chanate’s five titled concessions (4,618
hectares) is approximately 500,000 pesos.
Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography
Geographically, El Chanate is on the south-eastern margin of the NW-SE mountain range formed by Sierras La Gloria, El Alamo, Batamote and El Chanate. Locally, El Chanate resides on the Escalante cattle ranch ground.
The project is located on the north west corner of the state of Sonora, in the Altar desert (a subset of the Sonoran Desert). Topography is typical of the Basin and Range province with Sierra El Batamote and Sierra El Chanate as prominent steep
mountain ranges emerging from the flat basin. Elevation at the project area is 500 metres above sea level; the El Chanate Range is 900 metres high and El Batamote 850 metres high.
The working area lies on the southern pediment of El Chanate Range, a flat plateau covered by thin layers of unconsolidated gravel and dissected by sharp shallow creeks, gently dipping into the gravel filled valley of the Sásabe (dry) and
Altar rivers.
From Hermosillo, the property can be accessed by driving 173 kilometres north to Santa Ana on Highway 15, then approximately 95 kilometres west on Highway 2 to Caborca. The mine access road is approximately 13 kilometres east of Caborca on Highway
2. The project area is easily accessible from Mexican Highway 2 by driving north 11 kilometres on a nearly level dirt road through the Ejido 16 de Septiembre and onto the Escalante cattle ranch where the El Chanate mine is located.
|
22 |
Vegetation consists of typical Mexican desert species composed primarily of various cacti, shrubs and brush.
According to the Köppen climate classification system, the project is described as having a BWh, or desert climate where the coldest month has an average high temperature above 0°C. The average annual temperature is 21.5°C.
July is the hottest month with an average maximum temperature of 44.6°C. The hottest month on record was July 1998 with an average temperature of 48.0°C. January is the coldest month with an average low temperature of -2.2°C. The coldest
month on record was January 1971 with an average temperature of -11.0°C. The mine operates year round.
Annual average precipitation as measured at the nearby Pitiquito station (about 15 kilometres away) is 259 millimetres. Rainfall occurs due to the normal “monsoon” rains and the effects of Pacific storms.
Equipment and infrastructure include: a three stage crushing plant, a leach pad and solution holding ponds, four Adsorption, Desorption, Refinery (“ADR”) processing plants, a refinery, a fleet of haul trucks, loaders and mining support
equipment. In addition, there are numerous ancillary support facilities including warehouses, maintenance shops, roadways, administrative offices, power and water supply systems, and a fully equipped assay and metallurgical laboratory. The open pit
operations are conducted by a local mining contractor.
History
Historical workings suggest the area has been mined for gold since the early 19th century. The current open pit mine has now been developed below the level of those historical small-scale mine workings. The open pit mine plan covers an area
approximately 1,700 metres long, 845 metres wide, and 300 metres deep. El Chanate utilizes conventional three stage crushing and heap leaching, with gold bearing solutions being processed in an ADR plant, followed by electro-winning and refining.
Geological Setting and Mineralization
El Chanate is located between the northern flank of Sierra El Batamote and the southern flank of Sierra El Chanate. These ranges are tectonic blocks derived from Late Mesozoic compressional events modified by Early Cenozoic extension. The area is
underlain by Mesozoic, meta-sedimentary rocks intruded by Late Cretaceous andesites. All of these units are cut by Tertiary felsic to mafic rocks. The post mineral San Jacinto andesite flow located north of the mine is the youngest bedrock unit
dated at 51Ma. The dominant controls on gold mineralization are structural channeling along faults and development of veins by dilation and hydraulic fracturing. Gold precipitation is dependent on a chemically favorable environment but is not
strongly influenced by rock composition. Relatively deep seated regional structures appear to have been active at the time of mineralization and have played a vital role in the structural preparation of the host rocks and channeling of the
mineralizing fluids. The fluids and their contained metals are believed to have been derived either from a deeper magmatic source rock or from deep metamorphic processes associated with the Laramide Orogeny.
Drilling
From 2001 to 2009, the Company conducted surface mapping, surface sampling, geophysics, diamond drilling and reverse circulation drilling on the property. The results of this work delineated anomalous gold mineralization along a northwest striking
fault zone traceable for 4.5 kilometres on strike and still open at depth. The mineralized zone had been drill tested by 819 holes for a total of 140,224 metres. There are 754 reverse circulation holes and 65 core holes. The deposit remains open in
several directions.
From 2010 to 2014, the Company has drilled 796 reverse circulation holes totaling approximately 124,320 metres and 47 core holes for 16,019 metres.
|
23 |
Sampling, Analysis, Quality Control and Quality Assurance
An analytical quality assurance program has been established for all of the Company’s mineral properties to control and assure the analytical quality of assays in all of the Company’s exploration programs. This program includes the
systematic addition of blank samples, duplicate samples and certified standards to each batch of samples sent for analysis to commercial accredited laboratories. Blank samples are used to check for possible contamination in laboratories, duplicate
samples quantify overall precision, while certified standards determine the analytical accuracy. The split core samples are sent directly from the project sites within Mexico to ALS Global, an ISO-17025 accredited laboratory with facilities in
Hermosillo that performs gold and silver analyses at its laboratory in Vancouver, British Columbia.
For reverse circulation drill holes one standard and one blank are included in each batch of 20 samples. For core holes, duplicates (1%), blanks (4%) and standards (5%) are inserted into the sample intervals.
ALS Global performed well on inserted blanks and standards in 2014. We have been advised by ALS Global that there is no evidence of systematic contamination and accuracy is acceptable based on standards in the grade range 0.2 to 2.6 g/t gold.
Blasthole samples are assayed at the on-site mine laboratory operated by the Company. The laboratory is well-ventilated, procedures are fully documented, and there are 25 employees to cover operations 24 hours a day and analyze 12,000 samples per
month. The mine laboratory is externally audited on a periodic basis.
Samples are crushed to 85% passing ¼ inch and a 250 gram split is pulverized to 80% passing 106 microns.
Gold is determined by industry-standard fire assay on a 30 gram aliquot with an atomic absorption finish. Silver is analyzed on the same solution and the final silver assays are adjusted for both silver losses in cupellation and for the silver added
to improve gold collection. A laboratory review in October 2013 by Analytical Solutions Ltd. recommended changes to the silver assay method to improve precision of the results.
The onsite mine laboratory includes 15% blanks, standards and duplicates for gold determinations. We have been advised by ALS Global that there is no indication of systematic contamination, and accuracy is acceptable for the mine operations. A check
assay program and participation in an international round robin was initiated in 2014.
Data Verification
The project database has been subject to verification by independent sources, primarily Independent Mining Consultants (“IMC”) and SRK Consulting (“SRK”). The electronic database was first verified by IMC in 2003. The IMC
drill hole database has incorporated substantial verification procedures for the data in most of the critical areas. IMC reported that they found that the assay database was consistent with assay certificates. They also reported that there was no
evidence of significant contamination of reverse circulation samples during drilling. In 2007, IMC compared the 2007 drilling database with Chemex assay certificates for about 25% of new holes and noted no significant errors. In 2009, IMC was
provided with a database of the Company’s 2008 analytical results and the original Chemex assay certificates. The database was validated to the certificates and no problems were noted.
In preparation of the feasibility study, SRK also received the electronic database from the Company which included all of the data verification procedures conducted by IMC, as mentioned previously. SRK performed spot checks on the 2009 drill hole
assays by comparing them to the original Chemex assay certificates and noted no exceptions.
|
24 |
Exploration and Development
The 2014 exploration program at El Chanate focused on drill testing of magnetic trends identified from an aeromagnetic survey conducted in January as well as targets within and below the current pit. During 2014 the Company completed 20,946 metres
of reverse circulation drilling and 4,918 metres of core drilling.
On June 28, 2013, the Company completed an option/joint venture agreement with Highvista Gold Inc. to explore approximately 11,600 hectares of claims located to the northwest of the open pit that provides access to an additional 15 to 20 kilometres
of the El Chanate fault. The agreement grants AuRico the option to earn a 51% undivided interest in the El Chanate Extension by incurring an aggregate of $3 million in exploration expenditures over the next three years. The Company can earn a
further 19% interest (bringing its aggregate interest to 70%) by funding the preparation of a feasibility study or prefeasibility study on the property.
Exploration in 2014 continued with mapping and geochemical sampling along the trend of aeromagnetic trends identified during this survey. Drill targets have been identified and the Company intends to drill test these targets in 2015.
Mining Operations
El Chanate is an open pit mining and heap leach processing operation. Ore is hauled, via a mining contractor, by truck from the pit to the crushing plant. The recovery of gold is achieved through the heap leaching process. Under this method, ore is
placed on impermeable leach pads where it is treated with an alkaline cyanide bearing solution, which dissolves gold and silver contained within the ore. The resulting “pregnant” solution is further processed in a plant where the gold
and silver is recovered. The processing is a closed circuit, zero-discharge operation where solution is continuously re-used. The smaller of the four ADR processing plants was purchased used and refurbished by the Company. Recent mobile equipment
additions and all other equipment and infrastructure at El Chanate were new when procured. Management continuously analyzes production results and considers improvements and modernizations as deemed necessary.
In April 2011, after the acquisition by AuRico, an expansion plan was executed which included the following improvements:
-
Changing the crusher liners from fine to medium coarse resulting in lower power consumption, and higher crushing capacity, while the 3/8” crush size obtained an average P80 of 0.24 to 0.29”. The further installation of programmable logic
controls resulted in approximately a 40% increase in the crushed tonnage.
-
Belts were sped up by 20% to allow adequate conveying, while a heavy duty conversion of the entire conveying system resulted in an additional 25% productivity improvement and higher reliability. The newly installed programmable logic controls
included an automated start and stop capability which together with a new stacker and its 10 metre high stacking capability greatly reduced the duration of any occurring production interruptions.
-
New leach pads were added as well as a third ADR plant to accommodate the higher productivity rates while pumped solution volume was augmented to ensure that the incremental tonnage deposited on the leach pads could be leached with identical or
better cyanide solution to ore ratios ensuring leach kinetics and recovery in 2012.
-
As area and pumped volume increased, an intermediate pond was added to improve cyanide solution to ore ratios and improving the head grade to the ADRs.
-
In order to leach the increased tonnages deposited on the leach pads, the original single 8” water supply piping was replaced with 16” piping in 2012, thus doubling available water volume and reducing power consumption per m3
by 50%. Prior to this, the Company had procured additional water rights that enabled the drilling of another water supply well.
|
25 |
During 2013, the Company expanded its leach pad capacity, completing phase 7 of its leach pad expansion, while during the fourth quarter, a new set of 5 CIC columns each with 6 tons of carbon were added to the circuit, to reduce the gold in heap
solution inventory, improving efficiency and redundancy in the operation and maintenance of the ADR process plant.
The focus during 2015 will be leach pad recoveries, cost reductions and minimizing capital expenditures. In addition, the site will focus on continuous improvement initiatives relating to ore fragmentation, screening, crushing and conveying
reliability and availability, ADR process control, leach pad irrigation management, as well as a number of cost reduction initiatives.
Leach Pad Process
|
26 |
Kemess Underground Project
The Kemess Underground project is a gold and copper project located in northern British Columbia, Canada. The project is located six kilometres north of the former Kemess South open pit mine, which was in operation from 1998 to 2011. Previously
called Kemess North, it has been renamed Kemess Underground to distinguish from the project that was previously proposed. On March 25, 2013, the Company released the results of a feasibility study on the Kemess Underground Project which added 1.8
million gold ounces and 619 million pounds of copper to mineral reserves. Hereinafter, references to work completed by the Company with respect to Kemess includes work completed by Northgate prior to the acquisition by AuRico in October 2011.
Kemess Property Location
Property Description and Location
The Kemess property is situated in north-central British Columbia approximately 430 kilometres northwest of Prince George at 57°02' north latitude, 126°47' west longitude on National Topographic Map 94/E2. The Kemess property consists of
four mining leases (Numbers 354991, 410732, 410741 and 524240), 57 cell and legacy mineral claims (located under the Mineral Tenure Act (British Columbia) and regulations relating thereto) and one surface rights license, collectively covering
32,610 hectares (80,580 acres). The Kemess South Mining Lease #354991 is valid until September 15, 2027 at which time it may be renewed for another 15 years. Leases #410732 and #410741 are valid until September 29, 2034 and renewable at that time.
Lease #524240 is valid until December 22, 2035, and is renewable at that time. Collectively these surface and mineral rights are
sufficient for conducting all mining operations, processing facilities and ancillary infrastructure at Kemess,
as evidenced by the history of operations since 1998.
|
27 |
The Kemess site is in compliance in all material respects with applicable provincial and federal environmental requirements. With respect to future site reclamation and closure costs, the Company regularly updates its estimates of future
expenditures. The exact nature of environmental control concerns, if any, that may be encountered in the future cannot be predicted with certainty, as current environmental regulations and requirements may change. As at December 31, 2014, a
$15.6 million accrued reclamation obligation remained.
Permits
Most of the permits previously in place for the Kemess South operation are still in good standing including road use, power line, explosives, camp related and mill related such as nuclear gauge and boiler permits. Some of the key permits to be
obtained include a new mining permit, and an amendment to the existing permit to deposit tailings into the exhausted open pit, PE 15335, to allow the construction of a tailings dam to increase the tailings capacity. The mining permit covers the
operation of the facility during production as well as the eventual closure and reclamation of the site.
Accessibility, Climate, Local Resources, Infrastructure and Physiography
The Kemess mining and milling complex is located in the mountains of north-central British Columbia at an elevation of 1,350 metres. Personnel access the mine by plane via Prince George (approximately 430 kilometres to the southeast), Smithers,
Williams Lake, Kelowna, Kamloops and Vancouver with flight service available from Monday through Thursday. Road access to the mine is from Mackenzie, BC, and this is the means by which supplies and concentrates were hauled to and from the mine.
Power at the site is available directly from the BC Hydro grid, the British Columbia power authority, via a 380 kilometre power line owned by the Company. Adequate water for the mine is available from local surface and ground water.
The climate is generally moderate, although snow can occur during any month. Temperatures range from -35° to 30°C and average annual precipitation amounts to 890 millimetres. The Kemess mine belongs to the following physiographic subdivision
of British Columbia, arranged in ascending hierarchy of units: Swannell Ranges, Omineca Mountains, Central Plateau and Mountain Area, Interior System and Canadian Cordillera. Two biogeoclimatic zones occur in the Kemess mine area, according to
biogeoclimatic maps of the Toodoggone River 94E and McConnell Creek 94D map sheets. The mild, cool Spruce-Willow-Birch zone occupies the lower elevations between 1,200 metres and 1,500 metres. Most of the mine is within this zone. The Alpine Tundra
parkland subzone occupies the higher elevations in the mine area.
History
Pacific Ridge Resources Ltd. (“Pacific Ridge”) staked the area of the Kemess South deposit in 1983. Exploration programs were subsequently carried out by Pacific Ridge and Anaconda Canada Ltd. (“Anaconda”) in 1984; St.
Philips Resources Inc. (“St. Philips”) in 1988 and the Kemess South Joint Venture between El Condor Resources Ltd. (“El Condor”) and St. Philips from 1990 to 1993. In 1991, Rio Algom Explorations Inc. (“Rio
Algom”) acquired claims adjoining the west and south sides of the Kemess South Joint Venture claim holdings.
The initial work on the property by Pacific Ridge and Anaconda consisted of a limited diamond drilling program to test a gold-copper-molybdenum soil geochemical anomaly. This drilling identified porphyry style gold-copper-molybdenum mineralization,
but grades were considered too low and the property was dropped. St. Philips carried out IP surveys, geochemical surveys and reverse circulation drilling, which marginally expanded the mineralized area. The Kemess South Joint Venture completed a
major delineation diamond drilling program and various ancillary works, including IP and geochemical surveys. In 1992, Rio Algom drilled five holes totaling 1,745 metres to further delineate the deeply buried western extension of the Kemess deposit.
In late 1993 the Kemess South Joint Venture acquired the claims held by Rio Algom. By the end of 1993 a total of 26,314 metres of diamond drilling in 156 holes had outlined a substantial gold-copper deposit that was amenable to open pit development.
|
28 |
In 1994 the Kemess South Joint Venture conducted a 9-hole, 1,867 metres in-filling drilling program. In
1996, Royal Oak Mines Inc. (“Royal Oak”) acquired the Kemess property and drilled 22 due diligence holes totaling 3,316 metres. In 1998 Royal Oak commenced operations from the Kemess ore body. These operations went into receivership in
1999. In 2000, the Company bought the property out of receivership and has operated the property since that time.
Geological Setting
Kemess occurs at the southern end of the Toodoggone mining camp, which describes a collection of occurrences and deposits found in Mesozoic volcanic rocks. The area is known for its copper-gold porphyry deposits and low sulphidation epithermal
gold-silver vein deposits.
The oldest rocks in the belt are Permian marine and volcanic rocks, which are disconformably overlain by basalt dominated volcanic rocks of the middle Triassic Takla Group, which are in turn unconformably overlain by lower-middle Jurassic Hazelton
Group volcanic rocks.
Intrusive rocks are prevalent in the area and have been categorized as late Triassic Alaskan type ultramafics such as pyroxene diorite, hornblende gabbro, and pyroxenite. Economically more significant are the early Jurassic intrusives of the Black
Lake suite, which are granodiorite, hornblende diorite, pyroxene quartz diorite, quartz monzonite, and quartz monzodiorite.
The Mesozoic volcanic assemblages form upright, shallowly dipping to flat-lying sequences crosscut by high angle north to northwest trending faults. Significant dextral strike-slip features bound the eastern margin of the belt.
More local to Kemess Underground are north-northwest normal block fault structures. Thrust faulting is present in the district and is interpreted as Eocene or younger.
The district represents the results of three superimposed volcanic arc building stages that began in the upper Paleozoic. Marine volcanic and sedimentary successions dominated until the lower-middle Jurassic, when continental, quartz normative
volcanism began with the deposition of the Hazelton Group-Toodoggone Formation sequences. The plutonic rocks of the Black Lake suite are coeval with the Toodoggone sequence and are likely co-magmatic. Block faulting has juxtaposed panels of varying
depth into the magmatic and volcanic systems.
The Kemess Underground area is underlain by upper Triassic (Takla Group) andesite/basaltic volcanics and to a lesser extent lower Jurassic (Toodoggone Formation) dacitic fragmental volcanics.
Stocks, dykes, and possible sills of quartz monzonite/quartz diorite composition have intruded the Takla succession and are also lower Jurassic in age. The deposit area is transected by steeply dipping north to northwest trending normal faults. A
laterally extensive, shallow dipping to flat lying, highly fractured, and altered broken zone occurs at or close to the surface in the area of the deposit. The figure below shows the district geology, major intrusive masses, and disposition of the
district’s deposits.
|
29 |
Kemess Underground Geology
Exploration
The early exploration work in the area identified a porphyry target, but it wasn’t until deep drilling in 2001 that significant gold and copper grades were located. Since 2001 exploration has been directed at expanding the resource base in
what was historically viewed as an open pit project.
Because the target is deep, surface geological mapping and surface geochemical techniques add little geological understanding. Since the last work by El Condor in 1992, there were no surface soil or rock sampling or trenching at Kemess Underground.
Surface work has been confined to access road and drill site construction.
|
30 |
The procedures followed in the field and through the interpretation stage of exploration have met professional standards. From 2001 to the present day, there has been continuity in personnel both in the field, in the laboratories, and with the data
interpretation.
Mineralization
Gold-copper mineralization forms an inclined tabular zone that is centred on the East Cirque porphyritic monzodiorite, which from structural contours, strikes east-west and dips 20° to the south. The quartz diorite/quartz monzonite intrusive
exhibits an irregular upper contact with various peaks and troughs. The general east west strike and shallow south dip geometry is consistent for over 400 m (10660E to 10180E). Between 10260E and 10160E the tabular morphology disappears and the
monzonite occurs as wide dykes (10–100 m) within the Takla volcanics. The change in geometry for the monzonite could be due to the effects of cross faulting that have down dropped the tabular upper contact present in the East Cirque, or the
rheologic conditions during intrusion changed going towards the west whereby steep fracture infilling was preferred over stopping.
Alteration and mineralization is associated with and zoned both vertically and laterally from the quartz diorite/quartz monzonite intrusive and its associated dykes intersected at depth beneath the Central and East Cirques.
Drilling
Since May 2000, there have been ten summer drill programs completed in the Kemess Underground area. Various diamond drilling contractors based out of Smithers, British Columbia completed this work.
At peak activity up to four drill rigs were used on the property; three on skids and one helicopter portable. Three Hy-Tech diamond drills completed the most recent program in 2011, which accounted for 19 drill holes and 6,169 m.
The Kemess Underground project is approximately 1,050 m in an east-west direction and 610 m north-south and over 600 m vertical. For the most part, the drill hole spacing is less than 100 m and became quite well covered with the additional 2010 and
2011 holes.
The current Kemess Underground resource database contains 146 drill holes for a total of 67,157 metres and an average length of 460 metres, with the majority in the 200–600 metres range. There are a few short holes less than 100 metres, while
the deepest hole is 1,206 metres.
The broken zone, which presents challenging drilling conditions, covers much of the property. Historically, drilling an HQ diameter hole (63.5 mm core) to act as a casing for NQ (47.6 mm core), which usually was used to complete the hole, solved the
problem. In rare instances reduction to BQ (36.5 mm core) was necessary to reach target depth. The core recovery is very high with an average of approximately 70% in the broken zone and approximately 100% in the remainder.
In 2004, a test was conducted to compare assay results from holes with steep angles to holes with shallow angles. At that time, 29 holes were drilled at shallow angles (less than –60º) so that oriented core could be obtained to assist
with the geotechnical program. It was found that there is no significant grade variation between the two data sets. Because the shallow angle holes tested various different directions, it appears likely that there is no preferred vein orientation in
the deposit that could be missed with steep drilling.
|
31 |
Sampling Method and Approach
Pre-2001 drilling was not deep enough to test the higher-grade zones under consideration for Kemess Underground project. Consequently, since 2001, drilling is the most important exploration activity carried out at Kemess Underground and forms the
basis of the mineral resource. More than 75% of the assays have been completed since 2001.
Samples from the Kemess Underground project are totally drill core based; there are no trench or grab samples in the database.
A sampling program for the project was developed prior to the 2002 exploration season. The same program was carried forward to the 2003 and 2004 seasons, and continued into the 2010 program. The QA/QC program established in 2002, and continued in
subsequent seasons, included at site insertion of blind duplicate, blank, and standard samples.
Sample intervals were determined by a staff geologist according to lithology, and ranged from 0.3 to 2.0 metres, with the average length of samples being 1.92 metres. Because of the low-grade nature of the mineralization and difficulty determining
potential ore from non-ore material, the entire length of the drill hole is sampled. Once in a uniform rock type, sample spacing was generally 2.0 metres. The maximum 2.0 metres sample length was seleceted so that more detail could be gained
concerning the local variability of grade. As well, the 2.0 metre core length provides a representative sample weight for NQ core (47.6 mm diameter). For HQ core (63.5 mm diameter), a maximum sample length of 1.5 metres was applied.
Drill core was logged by a small team of geologists and split using a rock saw or hydraulic splitter. Samples were collected by staff technicians and then passed through a primary crusher. During the 2002 program, a portable sample preparation lab
was leased from ALS Minerals, formerly ALS Chemex (“ALS”). For the 2003 program, a sample-bucking facility was built near the camp area and run under supervision of Kemess’ Chief Assayer during the subsequent programs.
Sample Preparation, Analyses and Security
Core samples were dried and then crushed to 80% passing 10 mesh at the mine site. Each sample was riffled twice with one split being retained at the mine, and a 250 g sample sent by air and courier to ALS analytical laboratory in North Vancouver.
The remainder of the sample was discarded. In 2008 a pulverizer was added to the preparation process at Kemess and pulps were submitted for analysis for both the 2008 and 2010 programs.
At ALS, the –10 mesh samples (pre-2008) were pulverized to 85% passing 75 µm (PUL-22) prior to assay. Both Kemess and ALS prepared pulps were assayed for a suite of 35 elements including iron using an aqua regia digestion and inductively
coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES; ME-ICP61, ME-ICP41) on a one gram sub-sample. Copper analysis was completed by atomic absorption spectrometry, following a triple acid digestion. Gold analysis was completed by standard one assay
ton fire assay with atomic absorption finish.
In total, excluding quality control samples, 32,506 samples comprise the entire Kemess Underground database. Since 2000, 28,498 samples have been submitted to ALS for copper and gold analyses which represent more than 87% of all the analyses. Since
2003, silver has been analyzed for by multi-element Inductively Coupled Plasma (“ICP”) package provided by ALS. There are 16,016 silver assays in the Kemess Underground database.
The remaining 12% of the assay work was carried out by various labs. Historical records of the sampling, analysis, and security of this earlier work are not available. Most of this work is for shallow drilling and is not particularly relevant to the
Kemess Underground project.
|
32 |
ALS laboratories are accredited ISO 9001-2008 by QMI and the North Vancouver Laboratory is accredited ISO 17025-2005 by the Standards Council of Canada for a number of specific test procedures, including the method used to assay samples submitted by
AuRico. ALS also participates in a number of international proficiency tests, such as those managed by CANMET and Geostats.
The portion of sample retained at the mine site was kept in a plastic bag with a sample tag and stored in a plastic pail. The portion of the sample sent to the laboratory was placed in a plastic bag with a sample tag, shipped in a plastic pail with
two security tags and the pail top was sealed and taped. A submission sheet was sent along with each pail of samples that included the name of the sample preparation person, the date, the sample numbers, the number of samples, and the numbers of the
security tags.
There is a core storage site near Kemess Lake that serves to archive all the drilling on the project. The remaining half cores are still in core boxes and are available for geology reviews as well as check assays. In addition all coarse rejects are
stored at the same site in plastic pails while pulps are stored in sea containers near the exploration office above camp.
Work completed by Kemess employees included core logging, sample layout, sample splitting, and preliminary sample preparation. A professional geologist oversaw all of the work from core logging to sample splitting, while the Chief Assayer at the
mine oversaw the preliminary sample preparation and shipping.
Quality Control and Quality Assurance
Blank samples, material with very low concentrations of copper and gold, were used to test for contamination of samples. Rocklabs Certified Reference Materials were used as quality control standard samples to monitor accuracy. Duplicate samples were
used to monitor and measure preparation and analytical precision. In total, 1,536 samples were submitted for quality control purposes as blind blanks, standards, or duplicates. This represents approximately one in every 26 samples, or 3.9% of the
samples collected from 2002 through 2011 from all areas of exploration drilling on the Kemess property. Quality control information was recorded by geologists, core samplers, and sample preparation staff. This triple-redundancy data capture was used
to identify and eliminate data entry errors.
Evaluation of gold and copper analyses of quality control blanks of barren looking Hazelton rocks indicates that no significant or systematic contamination or laboratory error occurred during the course of the 2002–2011 programs.
Evaluation of 2002-2011 quality control samples indicates that the gold and copper assay results for the Kemess Underground drilling programs are sound and accurate and in the Company’s opinion are therefore suitable for use in resource and
reserve estimations.
Data Verification
In late June 2011, the Company completed a 5% audit of the Kemess Underground resource database to verify that analytical results have been entered correctly into the drill hole database used to prepare the February 2011 mineral resource estimate.
The audit process and results identified no material issues.
The 5% audit showed no significant errors from the resource area regarding the recording of tabulated analytical data. The analytical database for the 2011 resource has been verified and can be relied upon for resource estimation
Mine Development and Mine Plan
There is currently no mine development on site. The 2013 feasibility study undertaken by SRK Consulting (Canada) Inc., determined positive economics for a 9.0 million tonne per annum block cave underground mine. A technical report in compliance
with NI 43-101 dated April 1, 2013 has been filed on SEDAR. The envisaged Kemess Underground block cave operation would leverage the existing infrastructure and mill facilities at the Kemess South mine, including a permitted area for tailings
storage in the Kemess South open pit.
|
33 |
The Kemess Underground Project is currently undergoing a Substituted Environmental Assessment led by the British Columbia Environmental Assessment Office (“EAO”) on behalf of both the province of British Columbia and the Canadian
Environmental Assessment Agency (“CEAA”), the latter of which is on behalf of the Federal Government of Canada. This review is currently in the pre-Application stage (second of three phases) of the environmental assessment process and
AuRico anticipates receiving the Application Information Requirements (“AIR”) at the end of February 2015, a key milestone in the environmental assessment process.
The Company continues to pursue strategies at Kemess that enhance intrinsic value, such as permitting and additional exploration outside existing reserves, to further develop the optionality of this asset.
Mining Operations
There are currently no mining operations at site and on site activities are restricted to care and maintenance until a time at which a decision is made to proceed with the development and production of the Kemess Underground mine.
Other Mineral Properties
The following descriptions relate to the Company’s other non-material properties in Canada and Mexico:
Kemess East Project
The Kemess East discovery is an early stage exploration project located one kilometer east of the Kemess Underground deposit and 6.5 kilometers north of the Kemess mill facility. Prior to 2005, regional exploration was restricted to shallow targets
on the Kemess Property. In 2005 the discovery of deep mineralization immediately east of the Kemess North deposit, the Offset Zone, led to subsequent geophysical surveys and drilling programs targeting deep mineralization. As AuRico was completing
the 2013 Kemess Underground Feasibility Study it decided to recommence an exploration program in the Kemess East area of the Kemess property.
Kemess East is a large copper-gold-silver-molybdenum porphyry deposit and is typical of calc-alkaline porphyry copper-gold deposits in the western cordillera. The deposit is deeply burried and mineralization starts at an average depth of 900 metres below
surface and extends to 1500 metres below surface. The Kemess Underground deposit mineralization starts at 300–550 metres. Unlike Kemess Underground, there is no siginificant low grade mineralization associated with Kemess East. At Kemess East there is
siginificant continuity of mineralization within the deposit. Kemess East is mostly hosted by potassic altered Black Lake plutonic rocks. In the eastern portion of the deposit, Kemess East is hosted minorly within potassic altered Takla Volcanics,
but still largely within the Black Lake plutonic rocks. From recent whole rock analysis it is evident that the deposit is centered on a mineralized porphyritic diorite pluton. This in contrast to the Kemess Underground
deposit which is centered on
a mineralized porphyritic monzondiorite/diorite pluton. Due to the present state of drilling it is difficult to gauge the orientation of the host diorite, but presenty it appears to be nearly flat lying and slightly dipping to the south. The
alteration within the mineralized zone is mostly characterized by secondary chlorite with lesser secondary biotite and quartz within the plutonic host rocks. Higher grade copper-gold mineralization is characterized by strong secondary biotite
alteration in the plutonic rocks.
Porphyry style copper-gold mineralization occurs within the Takla volcanic rocks and intermediate intrusive rocks associated with weak to pervasive propyllitic, phyllic, and potassic (biotitic) alteration assemblages. The latter is associated with
better copper and gold grades. Alteration of Toodoggone assemblages range from fresh to weak propyllitic and are generally barren of significant sulphides and ore grade mineralization.
|
34 |
Following up the discovery holes KH-07-04, 10, and 24, the 2013-2014 drilling at Kemess East resulted in extension of the known mineralized zone to the north, east, west, and at depth. Major faults were intersected in several drill holes giving
insight into a complex system of horst and graben style faulting leading up to the main NNW trending structure, which defines the eastern boundary of the mineralization. These intercepts provide greater understanding of structural constraints,
movement, and controls on the location, shape, and size of the mineralized body. A greater understanding of the copper-gold-silver-molybdenum mineralization habit and the defining characteristics of the porphyry system were also delineated by the
drilling programs. To date, 85,505 metres in 131 drill holes have been drilled in the Kemess East area.
In 2014 AuRico initiated a mineralogical examination and preliminary metallurgical test program at ALS Metallurgy in Kamloops, BC on samples from the Kemess East deposit. Like the Kemess Underground deposit, Kemess East is a potential block caving
oportunity. It is expected that resource delineation drilling will continue in 2015.
Lynn Lake Project
The Lynn Lake project is a joint venture between AuRico and Carlisle that was formed in November 2014 when the Company acquired a 25% interest in the project for an initial cash contribution of CAD $5 million. The Company has the option to earn
up to an additional 35% interest by funding CAD $20 million towards a feasibility study on the project over a three-year period and delivering a feasibility study within that timeframe.
The project consists of two primary deposits; the MacLellan Mine and the Farley Lake Mine, which were the subject of the preliminary economic assessment released by Carlisle on February 27, 2014. These two mines are situated in the North belt of the
Lynn Lake Greenstone Belt within the Churchill Structural Province of the Canadian Shield. The North belt is a north-facing homocline and consists of rhyolites, overlain by andesite and basalt, sedimentary rocks and an upper balaltic unit. Both
deposits are located within this belt, which has been termed the “Rainbow Trend”.
Lynn Lake has an annual average temperature of -3oC. The average summer temperature is 22oC with an average winter temperature of -20oC. Annual precipitation averages 530 millimetres. Exploration can be conducted on a year round basis.
Access to the MacLellan Mine project is via an all-weather gravel road running to the former mine site from the town of Lynn Lake, located nine kilometres southwest of the project. The MacLellan Mine project comprises 6 claims and 1 mining lease
covering an area of 866 hectares. Past production for the MacLellan Mine is reported as 900,000 tonnes grading 5.4 grams per tonne of gold at an average milling rate of 900 tonnes per day in the period from 1986-1989. This material was processed at
a facility in Lynn Lake that has since been dismantled.
The mineralized system is hosted within a unique stratigraphic sequence known as the Agassiz Metallotect within the Wasekwan Group rocks of the North belt. The Agassiz Metallotect comprises interlayered siltstones, basalts, iron formations and minor
felsic volcanics. The MacLellan Mine is hosted by an interbedded sequence of biotite-rich to siliceous siltstone and high magnesium basaltic flows and minor tuffs. Overlying and underlying this mine sequence are massive and fragmental mafic volcanic
rocks. The mine is subdivided longitudinally into three mineralized deposits, from west to east they are the Rainbow-Dot deposit, the MacLellan deposit and the Nisku deposit. All of these deposits are located south of a major east-west trending
fault structure known as the North Shear Zone.
Access to the Farley Lake Mine project is via the paved Provincial Highway 391 with a 17 kilometre all-weather road north to the mine site. The Farley Lake Mine project comprises 70 claims and 4 mining leases covering an area of 12,915 hectares. The
Farley Lake open pit produced 214,800 ounces from 1.7 million tonnes of ore from 1996 to 1997. This material was processed at a facility in Lynn Lake that has since been dismantled.
|
35 |
The deposit is hosted in a Pre-Cambrian sedimentary iron formation. The iron formation in the Farley Lake area is 6 kilometres long by 600 metres wide and is predominantly composed of an oxide facies iron formation that is intercalated with clastic
sediments. Mineralization is in discordant sulphide lenses within silicified, chloritized and sulphidized oxide facies iron formation. The Farley Lake deposit is thought to be an epigenetic iron-formation hosted gold deposit.
Orion Project
The Orion project is a joint venture between AuRico and Minera Frisco S.A. de C.V. (“Minera Frisco”) that was formed in 2012 when AuRico sold the Ocampo mine to Minera Frisco. Prior to this transaction, the property was held on a 100%
basis by AuRico, subsequent to the acquisition of Capital Gold.
The project is located in the Motaje mining district in the Municipality of Acaponeta, Nayarit, Mexico at 22°25’ north latitude; 105°16’ west longitude. Geologically, it lies in the prolific Sierra Madre Occidental, which hosts
numerous multi-million ounce gold-silver deposits. With a total area in excess of 110,000 hectares the Project is one of the larger contiguous concessions in the Sierra Madre.
Orion is well situated having excellent infrastructure including a railroad, major power transmission line and the Pan American Highway crossing through the property. The topography is characterized by moderate relief with a series of northwest
trending ridges the elevation of which vary between 100 metres above sea level and 300 metres above sea level. The general climate in the region is warm and sub-humid with a distinct rainy season between June and September, which commonly extends
through October. Exploration work can be carried out year round.
The area has a documented history of exploration and small scale mining that can be traced back to the early 1800’s. Recent work on the property defined a gold and silver mineral resource estimate that is documented in a NI 43-101 Preliminary
Economic Assessment dated February 1, 2010 and available on SEDAR. Resources estimated from that report are included in AuRico’s Mineral Reserve and Mineral Resource table under the Mineral Properties section of this AIF.
The mineralized system is a low sulfidation epithermal vein system that is partially exposed along east-west fracture systems. Mineralized veins form two discrete mineralized corridors separated by about two kilometres. The southern mineralized
corridor includes the Animas/Del Norte veins and the Pantaleona, San Francisco and La Estrella veins, which generally dip to the north. The La Estrella structure is a northwest striking splay off the Del Norte vein. The northern corridor includes
the El Rey, La Escondida, El Carmen, Bonanza 1 veins, which generally dip to the south and includes the previously producing Bonanza mine, which is in a mining concession internal to the Company’s land package.
Grassroots Exploration and Corporate Development
On June 13, 2013, the Company signed an option agreement with Minera Goldzone S.A. de C.V. to acquire a 100% interest in the Las Lajas Project, an 8,145 hectare property consisting of 6 contiguous mining concessions located in southern Sonora State,
Mexico. Field work during 2014 consisted of 10 reverse circulation drill holes (1,329 m), an aeromagnetic survey, trenching mapping and geochemical sampling. Additional mapping and sampling is planned for 2015.
In addition to its operating mines and advanced exploration projects described above, grassroots exploration is an important part of the Company’s growth strategy. As part of its development strategy, the Company will consider staking or
acquiring additional mining claims and properties, where such transactions are economically and strategically justified. From time to time, the Company also enters into confidentiality agreements with mining companies or individual prospectors to
assess potential business relationships.
|
36 |
DIVIDENDS
The Company’s dividend policy is linked to operating cash flow, whereby the Company pays out 20% of the operating cash flow generated in the preceding quarter. The payment of any dividends will be reviewed periodically by the Company’s
directors and will depend upon, among other things, conditions then existing, including earnings, financial condition and capital requirements, restrictions in financing agreements, business opportunities and conditions and other factors.
On February 19, 2015, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a dividend of $0.023 per share, which will be paid on March 16, 2015 to shareholders of record at the close of business on March 2, 2015.
On November 6, 2014, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a dividend of $0.00225 per share, which was paid on December 1, 2014 to shareholders of record at the close of business on November 17, 2014.
On August 7, 2014, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a dividend of $0.00375 per share, which was paid on September 2, 2014 to shareholders of record at the close of business on August 18, 2014.
On May 8, 2014, the Company’s Board of Directors approved a dividend of $0.02 per share, which was paid on June 3, 2014 to shareholders of record at the close of business on May 20, 2014.
On January 4, 2014, the Company announced the declaration of a dividend of $0.04 per share, which was paid on January 29, 2014 to shareholders of record at the close of business on January 14, 2014.
Common shares issued under the Company’s dividend reinvestment plan are issued at a 5% discount from the average market price of the common shares over the five day period preceding the relevant dividend payment date. The discount may be
adjusted at a future date, but cannot exceed 5%.
DESCRIPTION OF CAPITAL STRUCTURE
Set forth below is a description of the Company’s share capital. The following statements are brief summaries of, and are subject to the provisions of, the articles of amalgamation and by-laws of the Company and the relevant provisions of the
OBCA.
The Company’s authorized capital consists of an unlimited number of common shares without nominal or par value. A total of 249,978,342 common shares are issued and outstanding (264,520,045 common shares on a fully diluted basis) as at the date
of this AIF.
Each common share ranks equally with all other common shares with respect to dissolution, liquidation or winding-up of the Company and payment of dividends. The holders of common shares are entitled to one vote for each share of record on all
matters to be voted on by such holders and are entitled to receive pro-rata, such dividends as may be declared by the directors of the Company out of funds legally available therefore and to receive, pro-rata, the remaining property of the Company
on dissolution. Common shares do not provide holders pre-emptive or conversion rights. The rights attaching to the common shares can only be modified by the affirmative vote of at least two-thirds of the votes cast at a meeting of shareholders
called for that purpose.
The Company also has stock options, restricted share units, deferred share units, performance share units and convertible senior notes outstanding. See the notes to the Company’s audited consolidated financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2014 for additional information regarding these securities.
On August 19, 2010, the Company implemented a shareholder rights plan to provide the Board of Directors with more time to consider alternatives in the event of a takeover bid for the common shares of AuRico. Once put in place, Canadian securities
law requires that the rights plan be reconfirmed by shareholders every 3 years. On May 13, 2013, shareholders extended this shareholder rights plan for another 3 year term. A copy of the rights plan is available under the Company’s profile on
SEDAR at www.sedar.com.
|
37 |
MARKET FOR SECURITIES
The common shares of the Company have been listed and posted for trading on the Toronto Stock Exchange (the “TSX”) since February 18, 2000. The common shares of the Company have been listed and posted for trading on the New York Stock
Exchange (the “NYSE”) since October 13, 2008.
The common shares trade under the trading symbol “AUQ”. The following table sets forth the high and low trading prices and trading volume of the common shares as reported by the TSX and NYSE for the periods indicated:
Trading Price and Volume
|
TSX |
NYSE |
|
High |
Low |
Volume |
High |
Low |
Volume |
|
Price |
Price |
|
Price |
Price |
|
|
(CAD$) |
(CAD$) |
|
(USD$) |
(USD$) |
|
February 1-13, 2015 |
4.99 |
4.46 |
4,197,861 |
3.96 |
3.58 |
22,141,165 |
January, 2015 |
5.04 |
3.98 |
20,739,218 |
4.19 |
3.38 |
78,982,516 |
December, 2014 |
4.32 |
3.46 |
22,371,446 |
3.83 |
2.98 |
123,436,132 |
November, 2014 |
4.69 |
3.37 |
17,466,030 |
4.15 |
2.95 |
60,474,719 |
October, 2014 |
4.36 |
3.61 |
13,200,109 |
3.88 |
3.21 |
41,420,676 |
September, 2014 |
4.71 |
3.81 |
7,860,722 |
4.32 |
3.45 |
31,959,568 |
August, 2014 |
4.96 |
4.42 |
6,885,991 |
4.55 |
3.98 |
26,751,984 |
July, 2014 |
4.60 |
4.17 |
11,101,592 |
4.32 |
3.87 |
29,875,752 |
June, 2014 |
4.81 |
3.71 |
10,637,854 |
4.44 |
3.40 |
35,741,077 |
May, 2014 |
4.72 |
3.75 |
8,106,093 |
4.31 |
3.47 |
27,825,029 |
April, 2014 |
4.91 |
4.41 |
16,614,286 |
4.48 |
4.04 |
41,889,230 |
March, 2014 |
5.75 |
4.55 |
13,054,610 |
5.19 |
4.12 |
50,863,613 |
February, 2014 |
5.79 |
4.97 |
12,444,420 |
5.22 |
4.48 |
47,237,046 |
January, 2014 |
5.40 |
3.90 |
20,021,479 |
4.83 |
3.66 |
64,413,349 |
At December 31, 2014, the Company had 833,334 common shares
that were subject to a contractual restriction on transfer. These shares were
issued as part of a flow-through financing arrangement completed on September
17, 2014. The restriction on transfer of these shares was lifted on January 19,
2015.
Unlisted securities of the Company that were issued in 2014
were options to purchase common shares in the Company, Deferred Share Units
(DSUs), Performance Share Units (PSUs), and Restricted Share Units (RSUs).
Each vested unit entitles the holder to one common share of the Company. The
number of options, issue dates, and exercise prices were as follows:
Date of Grant |
Exercise Price
per Security
(CAD$)
|
Number of
Options
|
January 2, 2014 |
3.80 |
20,000 |
August 7, 2014 |
4.50 |
15,000 |
December 12, 2014
|
4.03
|
3,314,645 |
|
38 |
The number of DSUs, PSUs, and RSUs, grant dates, and market price at time of grant were as follows:
Date of Grant
|
Award Type
|
Market Price
at Grant
Date
(CAD$)
|
Number of
Units
|
April 4, 2014
|
Deferred Share Units
|
4.84
|
45,495
|
September 17, 2014
|
Deferred Share Units
|
4.22
|
7,104
|
|
|
|
|
April 4, 2014
|
Restricted Share Units
|
4.84
|
97,189
|
September 17, 2014
|
Restricted Share Units
|
4.22
|
16,575
|
December 12, 2014
|
Restricted Share Units
|
4.03
|
279,000
|
|
|
|
|
January 6, 2014
|
Performance Share Units
|
3.97
|
80,000
|
December 12, 2014
|
Performance Share Units
|
4.03
|
190,082
|
RISK FACTORS
You should carefully consider the risks and uncertainties described below as well as the other information contained and incorporated by reference in this AIF. These risks and uncertainties are not the only ones faced by the Company. Additional
risks and uncertainties not presently known to us or that we currently consider immaterial may also impair our business operations. If any of these events actually occur, our business, prospects, financial condition, cash flows and operating results
could be materially harmed. Before deciding to invest in securities of the Company, investors should consider carefully such risks and uncertainties.
Forecasts of future production are estimates based on interpretation and assumptions and actual production may be less than estimated.
The Company prepares estimates of future production for its operating mines. The Company cannot give any assurance that it will achieve its production estimates. The failure of the Company to achieve its production estimates could have a material
and adverse effect on future cash flows, profitability, results of operations and financial condition. These production estimates are dependent on, among other things, the accuracy of mineral reserve estimates, the accuracy of assumptions regarding
ore grades and recovery rates, ground conditions, physical characteristics, of ores, such as hardness and the presence or absence of particular metallurgical characteristics and the accuracy of estimated rates and costs of mining and processing.
The Company’s actual production may vary from its estimates for a variety of reasons, including: actual ore mined varying from estimates of grade, tonnage, dilution and metallurgical and other characteristics; short-term operating factors such
as the need for sequential development of orebodies and the processing of new or different ore grades from those planned; mine failures, slope failures or equipment failures; industrial accidents; natural phenomena such as inclement weather
conditions, floods, droughts, rock slides and earthquakes; encountering unusual or unexpected geological conditions; changes in power costs and potential power shortages; shortages of principal supplies needed for operation, including explosives,
fuels, chemical reagents, water, equipment parts and lubricants; labour shortages or strikes; civil disobedience and protests; and restrictions or regulations imposed by government agencies or other changes in the regulatory environments. Such
occurrences could result in damage to mineral properties, interruptions in production, injury or death to persons, damage to property of the Company or others, monetary losses and legal liabilities. These factors may cause a mineral deposit that has
been mined profitably in the past to become unprofitable, forcing the Company to cease production. It is not unusual in new mining operations to experience unexpected problems during the start-up phase. Depending on the price of gold or other
minerals, the Company may determine that it is impractical to commence or, if commenced, to continue commercial production at a particular site.
|
39 |
The Company prepares estimates of operating and capital costs for each operation and project and no assurance can be given that such estimates will be achieved.
The Company prepares estimates of operating costs and/or capital costs for each operation and project. No assurance can be given that such estimates will be achieved. Failure to achieve cost estimates or material increases in costs could have an
adverse impact on future cash flows, profitability, results of operations and financial condition.
AuRico’s actual costs may vary from estimates for a variety of reasons, including: actual ore mined varying from estimates of grade, tonnage, dilution and metallurgical and other characteristics; short-term operating factors relating to the
ore reserves, such as the need for sequential development of orebodies and the processing of new or different ore grades; revisions to mine plans; risks and hazards associated with mining; natural phenomena, such as inclement weather conditions,
water availability, floods, and earthquakes; and unexpected labor shortages or strikes. Costs of production may also be affected by a variety of factors, including: changing waste-to-ore ratios, ore grade metallurgy, labor costs, cost of
commodities, general inflationary pressures and currency exchange rates.
Changes in the market price of gold and, to a lesser extent, silver and copper, which in the past have fluctuated widely, may affect the profitability of the Company’s operations and financial condition.
The Company’s profitability and long-term viability depend, in large part, upon the market price of gold and other metals that may be produced from its properties. The market price of gold and other metals is volatile and is impacted by
numerous factors beyond the Company’s control, including:
-
expectations with respect to the rate of inflation;
-
the relative strength of the U.S. dollar and certain other currencies;
-
interest rates;
-
global or regional political or economic conditions;
-
supply and demand for jewellery and industrial products containing metals;
-
costs of substitutes;
-
changes in global or regional investment or consumption patterns;
-
inventory carrying costs;
-
increased production due to new mine developments and improved mining and production methods;
-
metal stock levels maintained by producers and others; and
-
sales by central banks and other holders, speculators and producers of gold and silver and other metals in response to any of the above factors.
There can be no assurance that the market price of gold and other metals will remain at current levels or that such prices will improve. A decrease in the market prices could adversely affect the profitability of the Company’s existing mines
and projects as well as its ability to finance the exploration and development of additional properties, which would have a material adverse effect on the financial condition and results of operations. If the Company’s exploration activities
are curtailed or suspended as a result of a decrease in metal prices, the result will be that depleted reserves are not replaced. A decline in the market prices of gold, silver or copper may require the Company to write-down mineral reserve and
resource estimates and revise life-of-mine plans, which could result in material write-downs of investments in mining properties. Any of these factors could result in a material adverse effect on the results of operations and financial condition.
Further, if revenue from gold bullion sales declines, the Company may experience liquidity difficulties. The cash flow generated from mining operations may be insufficient to meet the Company’s operating needs, and as a result it could be
forced to discontinue production and could lose its interest in, or be forced to sell, some or all of its properties.
In addition to adversely affecting the Company’s reserve and resource estimates and financial condition, declining metal prices can impact operations by requiring a reassessment of the feasibility of a particular project, and the Company may
determine that it is not feasible to continue commercial production at some of all of its current projects. Even if a project is ultimately determined to be economically viable, the need to conduct such a reassessment may cause substantial delays
and/or may interrupt operations until the reassessment can be completed, which may have a material adverse effect on the results of operations and financial condition.
|
40 |
From time to time the Company may engage in commodity hedging transactions intended to reduce the risk associated with fluctuations in commodity prices, but there is no assurance that any such commodity-hedging transactions designed to reduce the
risk associated with fluctuations in metal prices will be successful. Hedging may not protect adequately against declines in the price of the hedged metal. Furthermore, although hedging may protect
the Company from a decline in the price of the metal being hedged, it may also prevent it from benefiting from price increases.
Fluctuations in foreign currency exchange rates could significantly affect the Company’s business, financial condition, results of operations and liquidity.
The Company’s operating results and cash flow are significantly affected by changes in the US/Canadian dollar and US/Mexican peso exchange rates. Revenues are denominated in U.S. dollars, while most expenses are currently denominated in
Canadian dollars and Mexican pesos. Exchange rate movements can therefore have a significant impact on most of the Company’s costs. The appreciation of non-U.S. dollar currencies against the U.S. dollar can increase the costs of production at
AuRico’s mines, making these mines less profitable.
From time to time the Company may engage in foreign exchange hedging
transactions intended to reduce the risk associated with fluctuations in foreign
exchange rates, but there is no assurance that any such hedging transactions
designed to reduce the risk associated with fluctuations in exchange rates will
be successful. Hedging may not protect adequately against the strengthening of
the Canadian dollar and Mexican peso and, therefore, operating costs and capital
expenditures may be adversely impacted. Furthermore, although hedging may
protect the Company from strengthening Canadian dollar and Mexican peso exchange
rates, it may also prevent the Company from benefitting from the weakening of these currencies.
The Company must continually replace and expand mineral reserves and mineral resources.
The Company must continually replace reserves depleted by production to maintain production levels over the long term. Reserves can be replaced by expanding known orebodies, locating new deposits or making acquisitions. Exploration is highly
speculative in nature. AuRico’s exploration projects involve many risks and are frequently unsuccessful. Once a site with mineralization is discovered, it may take several years from the initial phases of drilling until production is possible,
during which time the economic feasibility of production may change. Substantial expenditures are required to establish proven and probable reserves and to construct mining and processing facilities. As a result, there is no assurance that current
or future exploration programs will be successful. There is a risk that depletion of reserves will not be offset by discoveries or acquisitions. The mineral base of AuRico may decline if reserves are mined without adequate replacement and the
Company may not be able to sustain production beyond the current mine lives, based on current production rates.
Changes in the cost of energy and in the prices of commodities used in operations may adversely affect the profitability of the Company’s operations and financial condition.
Mining operations and facilities are intensive users of electricity and carbon-based fuels. Energy prices can be affected by numerous factors beyond the Company’s control, including global and regional supply and demand, political and
economic conditions, and applicable regulatory regimes. The prices of various sources of energy may increase significantly from current levels. An increase in energy prices for which the Company is not hedged could materially adversely affect the
results of operations and financial condition.
The Company’s production costs are also affected by the prices of commodities consumed or used in operations, such as lime, cyanide and explosives. The prices of such commodities are influenced by supply and demand trends affecting the mining
industry in general and other factors outside the Company’s control. Increases in the price for materials consumed in mining and production activities could materially adversely affect the Company’s results of operations and financial
condition.
|
41 |
The figures for the Company’s reserves and resources are estimates based on interpretation and assumptions and may yield less mineral production under actual conditions than is currently estimated.
The Company’s mineral reserve and mineral resource estimates are estimates only and no assurance can be given that any particular level of recovery of gold or other minerals from mineral resources or mineral reserves will in fact be realized.
There can also be no assurance that an identified mineral deposit will ever qualify as a commercially mineable (or viable) ore body which can be economically exploited. Additionally, no assurance can be given that the anticipated tonnages and grades
will be achieved or that the indicated level of recovery will be realized. These
estimates may require adjustments or downward revisions based upon further exploration or development work or actual production experience.
Estimates of mineral resources and mineral reserves can also be affected by such factors as environmental permitting regulations and requirements, weather, environmental factors, unforeseen technical difficulties, unusual or unexpected geological
formations and work interruptions. In addition, the grade of ore ultimately mined may differ dramatically from that indicated by results of drilling, sampling and other similar examinations. Short term factors relating to mineral resources and
mineral reserves, such as the need for orderly development of ore bodies or the processing of new or different grades, may also have an adverse effect on mining operations and on the results of operations. Material changes in mineral resources and
mineral reserves, grades, stripping ratios or recovery rates may affect the economic viability of projects. Mineral resources and mineral reserves are reported as general indicators of mine life. Mineral resources and mineral reserves should not be
interpreted as assurances of mine life or of the profitability of current or future operations. There is a degree of uncertainty attributable to the calculation and estimation of mineral resources and mineral reserves and corresponding grades being
mined or dedicated to future production. Until ore is actually mined and processed, mineral reserves and grades must be considered as estimates only.
In addition, the quantity of mineral resources and mineral reserves may vary depending on mineral prices. Extended declines in market prices for gold, silver and copper may render portions of the Company’s mineralization uneconomic and result
in reduced reported mineralization. Any material change in mineral resources and mineral reserves, grades or stripping ratios may affect the economic viability of the Company’s projects.
Mineral resources that are not mineral reserves do not have demonstrated economic viability. The SEC does not permit mining companies in their filings with the SEC to disclose estimates other than mineral reserves. However, because the Company
prepares its reserve and resource estimates in accordance with Canadian disclosure requirements, it contains resource estimates, which are required by NI 43-101. Mineral resource estimates for properties that have not commenced production are based,
in many instances, on limited and widely spaced drill hole information, which is not necessarily indicative of the conditions between and around drill holes. Accordingly, such mineral resource estimates may require revision as more drilling
information becomes available or as actual production experience is gained. No assurance can be given that any part or all of mineral resources constitute or will be converted into reserves.
The Company’s operations across different countries subject it to various political, economic and other risks that could negatively impact AuRico’s operations and financial condition.
The Company’s mining operations are currently conducted in Canada and Mexico. As a result of activities in multiple jurisdictions, the Company is exposed to various levels of political, economic and other risks and uncertainties.
Some of the Company’s property interests are located in Mexico and are subject to Mexican federal and state laws and regulations. As a result, the Company’s mining investments are subject to the risks normally associated with the conduct
of business in foreign countries. The Company believes the current governments of Mexico and the State of Sonora (where El Chanate is located) are favorably inclined towards foreign investment and mining generally, however, investors should assess
the political risks of investing in a foreign country. Any significant changes to the current regulatory, economic and political climate could adversely impact the affairs of the Company.
|
42 |
The risks of conducting business in a foreign country may include, among others, labor disputes, invalidation of governmental orders and permits, uncertain political and economic environments, sovereign risk, civil disturbances, terrorist actions,
war, arbitrary changes in laws or policies, the failure of foreign parties to honor contractual relations, corruption, delays in obtaining or the inability to obtain necessary governmental permits, opposition to mining from environmental or other
non-governmental organizations, limitations on foreign ownership, limitations on the repatriation of earnings, limitations on gold exports, instability due to economic uncertainty or inadequate infrastructure, difficulties enforcing judgments
obtained in Canadian or United States courts against assets located outside of those jurisdictions, changes to royalty and tax regimes, difficulty complying with the regulatory and legal framework respecting the ownership and maintenance of mineral
properties, mines and mining operations, difficulty obtaining key equipment and components for equipment and increased financing costs. In addition, the enforcement of the Company’s legal rights to exploit its properties may not be recognized
by a foreign court system. These risks
may limit or disrupt the Company’s operations, restrict the movement of funds or result in the deprivation of contractual or property rights. Any variation from the current regulatory, economic and political climate could have an adverse
effect on the affairs of the Company.
The Company is, and expects to continue to be, dependent on two mines for all of its commercial production.
The Young-Davidson and the El Chanate mines accounted for all of the Company’s commercial production in 2014 and are expected to continue to account for all of its commercial production for the foreseeable future. Any adverse condition
affecting mining or processing conditions at Young-Davidson or El Chanate could have a material adverse effect on the Company’s financial performance and results of operations.
The Company requires licenses, permits and approvals from various governmental authorities to conduct its operations, any loss of which could have a material adverse effect on its business.
The Company’s business activities, including mining operations, exploration, development and expansions, require numerous permits and licenses from various levels of governmental authorities. The Company may also be required to obtain certain
property rights to access or use certain of its properties. There can be no assurance that all required licenses, permits or property rights which the Company requires for its business activities and mining operations will be obtainable on
reasonable terms or in a timely manner, or at all, that such terms may not be adversely changed, that required extension will be granted, or that the issuance of such licenses, permits or property rights will not be challenged by third parties.
Delays in obtaining or a failure to obtain such licenses, permits, property rights or extensions thereto, challenges to the issuance of such licenses, permits or property rights, whether successful or unsuccessful, changes to the terms of such
licenses, permits or property rights, or a failure to comply with the terms of any such licenses, permits or property rights that the Company has obtained, could have a material adverse impact on the Company.
In order for the Company to carry out its mining activities, the Company's exploitation licences must be kept current. There is no guarantee that the Company's exploitation licences will be extended or that new exploitation licences will be granted.
In addition, such exploitation licences could be changed and there can be no assurances that any application to renew any existing licences will be approved. The Company will also have to obtain and comply with permits and licences which may contain
specific conditions concerning operating procedures, water use, waste disposal, spills, environmental studies, abandonment and restoration plans and financial assurances. There can be no assurance that the Company will be able to comply with any
such conditions.
|
43 |
The Company cannot guarantee that title to its properties will not be challenged.
Title insurance is generally not available for mineral properties and the Company’s ability to ensure that it has obtained secure claim to individual mineral properties or mining concessions may be severely constrained. The Company’s
mineral properties may be subject to prior unregistered agreements, transfers or claims, and title may be affected by, among other things, undetected defects. A successful challenge to the precise area and location of these claims could result in
the Company being unable to operate on its properties as permitted or being unable to enforce its rights with respect to its properties.
Exploration and development projects are uncertain and consequently capital cost estimates as well as projected operating costs and economic returns may differ significantly from those estimated for a project.
Few properties which are explored are ultimately developed into producing mines. Major expenses may be required to establish mineral reserves by drilling and to construct mining and processing facilities at a particular site. It is impossible to
ensure that the current exploration and development programs of the Company will result in profitable commercial mining operations. The profitability of the Company’s operations will be, in part, directly related to the cost and success of its
exploration and development programs which may be affected by a number of factors.
Mineral resource exploration and development is a highly speculative business, characterized by a number of significant risks including, among other things, unprofitable efforts resulting not only from the failure to discover mineral deposits but
also from finding mineral deposits that, though present, are insufficient in tonnage, grade or continuity to return a profit from production.
Development projects are subject to, among other things, the completion of positive economic analyses and environmental assessments, issuance of necessary governmental permits and availability of adequate financing. Development projects typically
require several years and significant expenditures during the development phase before production is possible. The economic feasibility of development projects is based on many factors such as:
-
Estimation of mineral reserves;
-
Anticipated metallurgical recoveries;
-
Environmental considerations and permitting;
-
Future commodity prices; and
-
Anticipated capital and operating costs.
Capital and operating cost estimates are, to a large extent, based upon feasibility studies, which derive estimates from anticipated tonnage and grades of ore to be mined and processed, the configuration of the orebody, expected recovery rates of
metals from the ore, estimated operating costs and other factors. As a result, it is possible that actual costs and returns will differ significantly from those initially estimated for a project prior to production.
Any of the following events, among others, could affect the profitability or economic feasibility of a project:
-
Unanticipated changes in grade and tonnage of ore to be mined and processed;
-
Unanticipated adverse geotechnical conditions;
-
Incorrect data on which engineering assumptions are made;
-
Costs of constructing and operating a mine;
-
Availability and costs of processing facilities;
-
Availability of economic sources of power;
-
Adequacy of water supply;
-
Adequate infrastructure;
-
Government actions and regulations;
-
Title claims, including aboriginal or ejido land claims;
-
Fluctuations in prices of precious metals; and
-
Accidents, labor actions and force majeure events.
|
44 |
Anticipated capital and operating costs, production and economic returns, and other estimates contained in technical and economic analyses may differ significantly from the Company’s actual capital and operating costs, production and economic
returns and such other estimates. Delays to construction schedules may negatively impact the net present value and internal rates of return of the Company’s mineral properties as set forth in the applicable feasibility studies.
The costs, timing and complexities of mine construction, development and expansion are magnified by the remote location of some properties. It is not unusual in new mining operations to experience unexpected problems and delays during the
construction and development of a mine. In addition, delays in the commencement or expansion of mineral production often occur and once commenced or expanded, production may not meet expectations or estimates set forth in feasibility or other
studies. Accordingly, there are no assurances that the Company will successfully develop and expand mining operations or profitably produce precious metals at its properties.
Aboriginal title claims, rights to consultation/accommodation, and the Company’s relationship with local communities may affect the Company’s existing operations and development projects.
Governments in many jurisdictions must consult with Aboriginal peoples with respect to grants of mineral rights and the issuance or amendment of project authorizations. Consultation and other rights of Aboriginal people may require accommodations,
including undertakings regarding employment, royalty payments and other matters. This may affect the Company’s ability to acquire, within a reasonable time frame, effective mineral titles in these jurisdictions, including in some parts of
Canada, in which Aboriginal title is claimed, and may affect the timetable and costs of development of mineral properties in these jurisdictions. The risk of unforeseen Aboriginal title claims also could affect existing operations as well as
development projects. These legal requirements may also affect the Company’s ability to expand or transfer existing operations or to develop new projects.
The Company’s relationship with the communities in which it operates are critical to ensure the future success of its existing operations and the construction and development of its projects. There is an increasing level of public concern
relating to the perceived effect of mining activities on the environment and on communities impacted by such activities. Adverse publicity relating to the mining industry generated by non-governmental organizations and others could have an adverse
effect on the Company’s reputation or financial condition and may impact its relationship with the communities in which it operates. While the Company is committed to operating in a socially responsible manner, there is no guarantee that the
Company’s efforts in this regard will mitigate this potential risk
Regulatory requirements significantly affect the Company’s mining operations and may have a material adverse impact on its future cash flow, results of operations and financial condition.
Mining operations, development and exploration activities are subject to extensive laws and regulations governing prospecting, development, production, exports, taxes, labor standards, occupational health and safety, waste disposal, environmental
protection and remediation, protection of endangered and protected species, mine safety, toxic substances and other matters. Mining is subject to potential risks and liabilities associated with pollution of the environment and the disposal of waste
products occurring as a result of mineral exploration, development and production. The costs of discovering, evaluating, planning, designing, developing, constructing, operating and closing mines and other facilities in compliance with such laws and
regulations are significant.
Failure to comply with applicable laws and regulations may result in enforcement actions thereunder, and may include corrective measures requiring capital expenditures, installation of additional equipment or remedial actions. Parties engaged in
mining operations may be required to compensate those claiming loss or damage by reason of the mining activities and may have civil or criminal fines or penalties imposed for alleged violations of applicable laws or regulations.
|
45 |
New laws and regulations, amendments to existing laws and regulations, administrative interpretation of existing laws and regulations, or more stringent enforcement of existing laws and regulations, could have a material adverse impact on the
Company’s future cash flow, results of operations and financial condition. In addition, changes in accounting rules or the interpretation of such rules may adversely impact on the presentation of Company’s financial performance.
The Company’s activities are subject to environmental laws and regulations that may increase its costs of doing business and restrict its operations.
The Company’s exploration and production activities in Canada and Mexico are subject to regulation by governmental agencies under various environmental laws. These laws address noise, emissions, water discharges, waste management, management
of hazardous substances, protection of natural resources, antiquities and endangered species and reclamation of lands disturbed by mining operations. Environmental legislation in many countries is evolving and the trend has been towards stricter
standards and enforcement, increased fines, penalties and potential for facilities to be shut-down for non-compliance, more stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects and increasing responsibility for companies and their officers,
directors and employees. Compliance with environmental laws and regulations may require significant capital outlays on behalf of the Company and may cause material changes or delays in the Company’s intended activities. There can be no
assurance that future changes in environmental regulations will not adversely affect the Company’s business, and it is possible that future changes in these laws or regulations could have a significant adverse impact on some portion of the
Company’s business, causing the Company to re-evaluate those activities at that time.
Failure to comply with such laws and regulations can have serious consequences, including damage to the Company’s reputation, stopping the
Company from proceeding with the development of a project, negatively impacting the operation or further
development of a mine, increasing the cost of development or production and litigation and regulatory actions against the Company. The Company cannot give any assurance that, notwithstanding its precautions, breaches of environmental laws (whether
inadvertent or not) or environmental pollution will not materially and adversely affect its financial condition and its results from operations. There is no assurance that future changes in environmental regulation, if any, will not adversely affect
the Company’s operations. Environmental hazards may exist on the properties on which the Company holds interests which are unknown to the Company at present and which have been caused by previous or existing owners or operators of the
properties. The Company may also acquire properties with known or undiscovered environmental risks. Any indemnification from the entity from which the Company has acquired such properties may not be adequate to pay all the fines, penalties and
costs (such as clean-up and restoration costs) incurred related to such properties. Some of the Company’s properties also have been used for mining and related operations for many years before acquisition and were acquired as is or with
assumed environmental liabilities from previous owners or operators.
The Company’s failure to comply with applicable laws, regulations and permitting requirements may result in enforcement actions, including orders issued by regulatory or judicial authorities causing operations to cease or be curtailed, and may
include corrective measures requiring capital expenditures, installation of additional equipment, or remedial actions. The Company may be required to compensate those suffering loss or damage by reason of its operations and may have civil or
criminal fines or penalties imposed for violations of applicable laws or regulations.
Production at certain of the Company’s mines involves the use of various chemicals, including cyanide, which is a toxic material. Should cyanide or other toxic chemicals leak or otherwise be discharged from the containment system, the Company
may become subject to liability for cleanup work that may not be insured. While appropriate steps will be taken to prevent discharges of pollutants into the ground water and the environment, the Company may become subject to liability for hazards
that it may not be insured against and such liability could be material.
|
46 |
Actual costs of reclamation are uncertain, and higher than expected costs could negatively impact the results of operations and financial position.
Land reclamation requirements are generally imposed on mineral exploration companies (as well as companies with mining operations) in order to minimize long term effects of land disturbance, and the Company is subject to such requirements at its
mineral properties. Reclamation obligations include requirements to:
In order to carry out reclamation obligations arising from exploration and potential development activities, the Company must allocate financial resources that might otherwise be spent on further exploration and development programs. Reclamation
costs are uncertain and planned expenditures may differ from the actual expenditures required. If the Company is required to carry out unanticipated reclamation work, its financial position could be adversely affected.
The Company may not be able to obtain the external financing necessary to continue its exploration and development activities on its mineral properties.
The ability of the Company to continue the exploration and development of its property interests will be dependent upon its ability to increase revenues from its existing production and planned expansions, and potentially raise significant
additional financing thereafter. The sources of external financing that the Company may use for these purposes may include project debt, corporate debt or equity offerings. There is no assurance that the financing alternative chosen by the Company
will be available to the Company, on favourable terms or at all. Depending on the alternative chosen, the Company may have less control over the management of its projects. There is no assurance that the Company will successfully increase revenues
from existing and expanded production. Should the Company not be able to obtain such financing and increase its revenues, it may become unable to acquire and retain its exploration properties and carry out exploration and development on such
properties, and its title interests in such properties may be adversely affected or lost entirely.
In order to finance future operations, the Company may raise funds through the issuance of shares or the issuance of debt instruments or other securities convertible into shares.
The Company cannot predict the potential need or size of future issuances of common shares or the issuance of debt instruments or other securities convertible into shares or the effect, if any, that this would have on the market price of the
Company’s common shares. Any transaction involving the issuance of shares, or securities convertible into shares, could result in dilution, possibly substantial, to present and prospective security holders.
The Company’s level of indebtedness could have material and adverse consequences to the Company’s security holders.
The Company has a significant amount of secured indebtedness. The Company’s high level of indebtedness, including the secured notes issued on March 27, 2014, could have material and adverse consequences to the Company and the Company’s
securityholders, including:
-
making it more difficult for the Company to satisfy its obligations to pay interest and to pay principal when due;
-
limiting the Company’s ability to obtain additional financing to repay existing indebtedness, fund future working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions or other general corporate requirements, or requiring the Company to make
non-strategic divestitures;
-
requiring a substantial portion of the Company’s cash flows to be dedicated to debt service payments instead of other purposes, thereby reducing the amount of cash flows available for payment of cash dividends, working capital, capital
expenditures, acquisitions and other general corporate purposes;
|
47 |
-
increasing the Companys
vulnerability to general adverse economic and industry conditions;
-
limiting the Companys flexibility in
planning for and reacting to changes in the industry in which it competes;
-
placing the Company at a disadvantage
compared to other, less leveraged competitors; and
-
increasing the Companys cost of
borrowing.
The Company may not be able to generate sufficient cash to service all of its indebtedness, including the secured notes, and may be forced to take other actions to satisfy its obligations under such indebtedness, which may not be successful. The
Company’s ability to make scheduled payments on or refinance its debt obligations depends on its financial condition and operating performance, which are subject to prevailing economic and competitive conditions and to certain financial,
business, legislative, regulatory and other factors beyond its control. The Company may be unable to maintain a level of cash flows from operating activities sufficient to permit it to pay the principal, premium, if any, and interest on the
Company’s indebtedness.
If the Company’s cash flows and capital resources are insufficient to fund its debt service obligations, it could face substantial liquidity problems and could be forced to reduce or delay investments and capital expenditures or to dispose of
material assets or operations, seek additional debt or equity capital or restructure or refinance its indebtedness. The Company may not be able to effect any such alternative measures on commercially reasonable terms or at all and, even if
successful, those alternatives may not allow the Company to meet its scheduled debt service obligations. The Company’s revolving credit facility and the indenture governing the secured notes will restrict its ability to dispose of assets and
use the proceeds from those dispositions and may also restrict its ability to raise debt or equity capital to be used to repay other indebtedness when it becomes due. The Company may not be able to consummate those dispositions or to obtain proceeds
in an amount sufficient to meet any debt service obligations then due.
Should the Company incur additional debt, this could increase the risks to its financial condition described above.
The Company’s revolving credit facility and the indenture governing the secured notes contain a number of restrictive covenants that impose significant operating and financial restrictions on the Company and may limit its ability to
engage in acts that may be in the Company’s long-term best interest.
The Company’s failure to comply with covenants in its revolving credit facility and senior secured notes indenture could result in an event of default which, if not cured or waived, could result in a cross-default under other debt instruments
and the acceleration of all its debt. The restrictions include, without limitation, restrictions on its ability to:
-
incur additional indebtedness;
-
pay dividends or make other distributions or repurchase or redeem its capital stock;
-
prepay, redeem or repurchase certain debt;
-
make loans and investments;
-
sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of assets;
-
incur or permit to exist certain liens;
-
enter into transactions with affiliates;
-
enter into agreements restricting its subsidiaries’ ability to pay dividends; and
-
consolidate, amalgamate, merge or sell all or substantially all of the Company’s assets.
The Company’s ability to raise funds through the issuance of debt instruments could be adversely impacted by the credit rating of the Company’s existing debt.
The Company’s debt currently has a non-investment grade rating, and any rating assigned could be lowered or withdrawn entirely by a rating agency, if, in that rating agency’s judgment, future circumstances relating to the basis of the
rating, such as adverse changes, so warrant. Any future lowering of the Company’s ratings likely would make it more difficult or more expensive for it to obtain additional debt financing.
|
48 |
The Company depends on key management and qualified operating personnel and may not be able to attract and retain such persons in the future.
The Company’s success is heavily dependent on its key personnel and on the ability to motivate, retain and attract highly skilled persons. The competition for qualified personnel in the mining industry is currently intense.
In addition, the Company anticipates that as it expands its existing production and brings additional properties into production, and as the Company acquires additional mineral rights, the Company may experience significant growth in its operations.
This growth may create new positions and responsibilities for management personnel and increase demands on its operating and financial systems, as well as require the hiring of a significant number of additional operations personnel. There can be
no assurance that the Company will successfully meet these demands and effectively attract and retain any such additional qualified personnel. The failure to attract and retain such qualified personnel to manage growth effectively could have a
material adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial condition or results of operations.
Exploration, development and production at the Company’s mining operations are dependent upon the efforts of its employees and its relations with the employees and any labor unions that represent employees.
Relations between the Company and its employees may be affected by changes in the scheme of labour relations that may be introduced by Mexican or Canadian governmental authorities in whose jurisdictions the Company carries on business. Changes in
such legislation or in the relationship between the Company and its employees may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s business, results of operations and financial condition.
The Company may be unable to compete successfully with other mining companies.
Competition in the mining industry is intense and could adversely affect the Company’s ability to acquire suitable producing properties or prospects for mineral exploration in the future. The international mining industry is highly
competitive. The Company’s ability to acquire properties and add mineral reserves in the future will depend not only on its ability to develop its present properties, but also on its ability to select and acquire suitable producing properties
or prospects for mineral exploration. The Company may be at a competitive disadvantage in acquiring additional mining properties because it must compete with companies that have greater financial resources, operational experience and technical
capabilities. Increased competition could also adversely affect the Company’s ability to attract necessary capital funding in the future.
Over the past several years there have been increases in mining exploration, development and construction activities, which have resulted in increased demand for, and cost of, exploration, development and construction services and equipment.
Increased demand for services and equipment could cause project costs to increase materially, resulting in delays if services or equipment cannot be obtained in a timely or cost-effective manner due to inadequate availability or unreasonable costs.
Potential scheduling difficulties and additional costs may also arise due to the need to coordinate the availability of services and/or equipment. If any of the foregoing were to occur, it could materially increase project exploration, development
or construction costs, result in project delays or both.
The Company’s directors and officers may have interests that conflict with the Company’s interests.
Certain of the Company’s directors and officers serve as directors or officers of other public companies and as such it is possible that a conflict may arise between their duties as the Company’s directors or officers and their duties as
a directors or officers of these other companies.
|
49 |
The trading price of the Company’s common shares may be subject to large fluctuations and may increase or decrease in response to a number of events and factors.
These factors may include:
-
The price of gold and other metals;
-
The Company’s operating performance and the performance of competitors and other similar companies;
-
The public’s reaction to the Company’s press releases, other public announcements and the Company’s filings with the various securities regulatory authorities;
-
Changes in earnings estimates or recommendations by research analysts who track the Company’s common shares or the shares of other companies in the resource sector;
-
Changes in general economic conditions;
-
The number of the Company’s common shares to be publicly traded after an offering;
-
The arrival or departure of key personnel; and
-
Acquisitions, strategic alliances or joint ventures involving the Company or its competitors.
In addition, the market price of the Company’s shares are affected by many variables not directly related to the Company’s success and are therefore not within the Company’s control, including other developments that affect the
market for all resource sector shares, the breadth of the public market for the Company’s shares, and the attractiveness of alternative investments. In addition, securities markets have recently experienced an extreme level of price and volume
volatility, and the market price of securities of many companies has experienced wide fluctuations which have not necessarily been related to the operating performance, underlying asset values or prospects of such companies. The effect of these and
other factors on the market price of the common shares on the exchanges in which the Company trades has historically made the Company’s share price volatile and suggests that the Company’s share price will continue to be volatile in the
future.
Mining is inherently dangerous and subject to conditions or events beyond the Company’s control, which could have a material adverse effect on its business and which conditions and events may not be insurable.
Mining involves various types of risks and hazards, including, but not limited to:
-
Environmental hazards;
-
Industrial accidents;
-
Metallurgical and other processing problems;
-
Unusual or unexpected rock formations;
-
Rock falls, pit wall failures and cave-ins;
-
Seismic activity;
-
Flooding;
-
Fires;
-
Periodic interruptions due to inclement or hazardous weather conditions;
-
Variations in grade, deposit size, continuity and other geological problems;
-
Mechanical equipment performance problems;
-
Unavailability of materials and equipment;
-
Theft of equipment, supplies and bullion;
-
Labour force disruptions;
-
Civil strife; and
-
Unanticipated or significant changes in the costs of supplies.
Most of these risks are beyond the Company’s control and could result in damage to, or destruction of, mineral properties, production facilities or other properties, personal injury or death, loss of key employees, environmental damage, delays
in mining, increased production costs, monetary losses and possible legal liability.
|
50 |
Some risks facing the Company are uninsured and/or uninsurable. Where considered practical to do so, the Company maintains insurance to cover insurable risks in the operation of its business in amounts which it believes to be reasonable in the
circumstances. Such insurance, however, contains exclusions and limitations on coverage. There can be no assurance that such insurance will continue to be available, will be available at economically acceptable premiums or will be adequate to cover
any resulting liability. Insurance against certain environmental risks, including potential liability for pollution or other hazards as a result of the disposal of waste products occurring from production, is not generally available to the Company
or to other companies within the mining industry. The Company may suffer a material adverse effect on its business if it incurs losses related to any significant events that are not covered by its insurance policies. Payment of such liabilities
would reduce funds available for acquisition of mineral prospects or exploration and development and would have a material adverse effect on the financial position of the Company.
Litigation could be brought against the Company and the resolution of legal proceedings or disputes may have a material adverse effect on the Company’s future cash flows, results of operations or financial condition.
The Company could be subject to legal claims and/or complaints and disputes with other parties that result in litigation, including unexpected environmental remediation costs, arising out of the normal course of business. The results of litigation
cannot be predicted with certainty. The costs of defending and settling litigation can be significant, even for claims that have no merit. There is a risk that if such claims are determined adversely to the Company, they could have a material
adverse effect on the Company’s financial performance, cash flow and results of operations.
The Company may fail to maintain the adequacy of internal control over financial reporting as per the requirements of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002 (“SOX”).
The Company has documented and tested, during its most recent fiscal year, its internal control procedures in order to satisfy the requirements of Section 404 of SOX. Both SOX and Canadian legislation require an annual assessment by management of
the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
The Company may fail to maintain the adequacy of its internal control over financial reporting as such standards are modified, supplemented, or amended from time to time, and the Company may not be able to ensure that it can conclude on an ongoing
basis that it has effective internal controls over financial reporting. The Company’s failure to satisfy the requirements of Section 404 of SOX and equivalent Canadian legislation on an ongoing, timely basis could result in the loss of
investor confidence in the reliability of its financial statements, which in turn could harm the Company’s business and negatively impact the trading price of the Company’s common shares or market value of its other securities. In
addition, any failure to implement required new or improved controls, or difficulties encountered in their implementation, could harm the Company’s operating results or cause it to fail to meet its reporting obligations.
The Company is subject to taxation in multiple jurisdictions and adverse changes to the taxation laws of such jurisdictions could have a material adverse effect on its profitability.
The Company has operations and conducts business in multiple jurisdictions and it is subject to the taxation laws of each such jurisdiction. These taxation laws are complicated and subject to change, as well the Company may be subject to review and
assessment in the ordinary course. Any such changes in taxation law or reviews and assessments could result in higher taxes being payable, which could adversely affect the Company’s profitability. Taxes may also adversely affect the
Company’s ability to repatriate earnings and otherwise deploy its assets.
|
51 |
The Company may be unable to identify opportunities to grow its business or replace depleted reserves, and it may be unsuccessful in integrating new businesses and assets that it may acquire in the future.
As part of the Company’s business strategy, it has sought and will continue to seek new operating, development and exploration opportunities in the mining industry. In pursuit of such opportunities, the Company may fail to select appropriate
acquisition candidates or negotiate acceptable arrangements, including arrangements to finance acquisitions or integrate the acquired businesses into its business. The Company cannot provide assurance that it can complete any acquisition or business
arrangement that it pursues, or are pursuing, on favorable terms, if at all, or that any acquisitions or business arrangements completed will ultimately benefit its business. Further, any acquisition the Company makes will require a significant
amount of time and attention of its management, as well as resources that otherwise could be spent on the operation and development of its existing business.
Any future acquisitions would be accompanied by risks, such as a significant decline in the relevant metal price after the Company commits to complete an acquisition on certain terms; the quality of the mineral deposit acquired proving to be lower
than expected; the difficulty of assimilating the operations and personnel of any acquired companies; the potential disruption of its ongoing business; the inability of management to realize anticipated synergies and maximize its financial and
strategic position; the failure to maintain uniform standards, controls, procedures and policies; and the potential for unknown or unanticipated liabilities associated with acquired assets and businesses, including tax, environmental or other
liabilities. There can be no assurance that any business or assets acquired in the future will prove to be profitable, that the Company will be able to integrate the acquired businesses or assets successfully or that the Company will identify all
potential liabilities during the course of due diligence. Any of these factors could have a material adverse effect on its business, expansion, results of operations and financial condition.
The Company may be impacted by Anti-Bribery laws.
The Canadian Corruption of Foreign Public Officials Act and the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act and anti-bribery laws in other jurisdictions, generally prohibit companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments for the purposes of
obtaining or retaining business or other commercial advantage. The Company’s policies mandate compliance with these anti-bribery laws, which often carry substantial penalties. The Company operates in jurisdictions that have experienced
governmental and private sector corruption to some degree, and, in certain circumstances, strict compliance with anti-bribery laws may conflict with certain local customs and practices. There can be no assurances that the Company’s internal
control policies and procedures will always protect it from reckless or other inappropriate acts committed by the Company’s affiliates, employees or agents. Violations of these laws, or allegations of such violations, could have a material
adverse effect on the Company’s business, financial position and results of operations.
The Company may be impacted by the actions of Joint Venture participants
Certain of the properties in which the Company has an interest are operated through joint ventures with other mining companies. Any failure of such other mining companies to meet their obligations to the Company or to third parties, or any disputes
with respect to the parties’ respective rights and obligations, could have a material adverse effect on the joint ventures or their properties and/or could result in additional liabilities or claims against the Company.
The Company may be adversely affected by global economic conditions
In recent years financial conditions have been characterized by volatility, which in turn has resulted in volatility in commodity prices and foreign exchange rates, tightening of the credit market, increased counterparty risk, and volatility in the
prices of publicly traded entities. The volatility in commodity prices and foreign exchange rates directly impacts the Company’s revenues, earnings and cash flow. Global economic conditions may cause decreases in asset values that are deemed
to be other than temporary, which may result in impairment losses. Additionally, access to financing may be negatively impacted by global economic conditions and this may impact the Company’s ability to obtain equity or debt financing in the
future on terms favourable to the Company.
|
52 |
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE
Directors
Each of the Companys directors holds office until the next
annual meeting of shareholders or until a successor is appointed. The following
are the directors of the Company as at February 19, 2015:
RICHARD M.
COLTERJOHN
Ontario, Canada
Director
(Independent) since 2010
Member of:
-
Audit Committee
- Nominating & Corporate Governance Committee
Mr. Richard Colterjohn is an independent director with more
than 20 years of experience in the mining sector, as an investment banker,
director, and operator. Mr. Colterjohn is currently a Managing Partner of
Glencoban Capital Management Inc. He was founder and CEO of Centenario Copper
Corporation and previously served as a Managing Director of UBS Warburg and UBS
Bunting Warburg. Mr. Colterjohn holds a Bachelor of Commerce degree and an MBA.
MARK J. DANIEL
Ontario, Canada
Director (Independent) since 2011
Member of:
Mr. Mark Daniel is an independent director with more than 35
years of international experience. Most recently, Mr. Daniel was Vice President,
Human Resources for Vale Canada (formerly Inco Limited). Prior to that, he
worked with the Bank of Canada and a number of other federal agencies before
joining the Conference Board of Canada. Mr. Daniel holds a PhD in Economics.
PATRICK D. DOWNEY
Ontario, Canada
Director (Independent) since 2011
Member of:
-
Audit Committee
- Human Resources Committee
Mr. Patrick Downey, CPA, is a corporate director who has been
involved in the copper and gold mining industry throughout most of his 35 year
career. Mr. Downey was an executive and director for several public resource
companies and the Chief Financial Officer of Northgate Minerals Corporation for
four years, retiring as President and CEO in 1994. He is certified by the
Institute of Corporate Directors and a member of the Ontario Chapter of the
Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants. Mr. Downey holds an Honours
Bachelor of Commerce degree from Laurentian University.
|
53 |
ALAN R. EDWARDS
Arizona, USA
Director (Independent) since 2010, Chairman since 2013
Member of:
Mr. Alan Edwards has over 30 years of international mining
experience. Mr. Edwards was formerly the CEO of Oracle Mining Corporation and
was President and Chief Executive Officer and Director of Copper One Inc. Prior
to that, he held positions as Chief Executive Officer and Director of Frontera
Copper Corporation, and Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer of
Apex Silver Mines Corporation. Mr. Edwards holds a Bachelor of Science degree in
Mining Engineering and an MBA.
SCOTT G. PERRY
Ontario, Canada
Director since 2012
Member of:
Mr. Scott Perry is the President and Chief Executive Officer
and a Director of AuRico. Mr. Perry has held increasingly senior financial
positions in the mining industry over the past 15 years. Most recently, he
served as the Companys Executive Vice President and Chief Financial Officer for
over four years. Prior to joining the Company, Mr. Perry was the Chief Financial
Officer (seconded from Barrick Gold) for Highland Gold Mining, where he managed
the companys financial reporting and compliance commitments, as well as the
execution of its short and long-term financial and operational strategies. He
also led Highland Golds business and corporate development initiatives. Before
being seconded to Highland Gold, he held increasingly senior financial roles
with Barrick in Australia, the United States, and in Russia, Central Asia where
he was instrumental in establishing Barricks presence in Russia and assembling
a strong financial team. Mr. Perry holds a Bachelor of Commerce degree from
Curtin University, a post-graduate diploma in applied finance and investment, as
well as a CPA designation.
RONALD E. SMITH
Nova Scotia, Canada
Director (Independent) since 2009
Member of:
-
Audit Committee
- Human Resources Committee
Mr. Ronald Smith, BBA, FCA, ICD.D, is an independent director
with over 40 years of experience in the financial, telecommunications and energy
sectors. Most recently, Mr. Smith was Senior Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer of Emera Incorporated. Prior to that, he was Chief Financial Officer
with Maritime Tel and Tel Limited. Mr. Smith was formerly a Partner of Ernst
& Young and holds a CA designation.
|
54 |
JOSEPH G. SPITERI
Ontario, Canada
Director (Independent) from May 2010 to October
2011, and since 2012
Member of:
Mr. Joseph Spiteri is an independent director with over 35
years of international mining experience. Mr. Spiteri is an independent mining
consultant focused on advanced-stage exploration, feasibility, construction,
operations management and acquisitions. Prior to that, he held senior management
and executive
positions with Placer Dome Incorporated, Northgate Explorations Limited, Lac
Minerals Limited, and Campbell Resources Incorporated. Mr. Spiteri holds a
Bachelor of Science degree from the University of Toronto. He is a member of The
Canadian Institute of Mining and The Association of Professional Geoscientists
of Ontario.
JANICE STAIRS
Nova
Scotia, Canada
Director (Independent) since 2014
Member of:
Ms. Janice Stairs, LLB, MBA, has over 25 years of experience in
senior management and senior advisory roles with public and private companies
involved in the natural resource and other sectors. Ms. Stairs is also a
director of NovaCopper Inc., where she serves as a member of the Corporate
Governance and Compensation Committees and is a director and Chair of Nova
Scotia Business Inc. where she serves on the Investment Committee. Previously,
Ms. Stairs served as General Counsel to Endeavour Mining Corporation, was Vice
President and Corporate Counsel for Etruscan Resources Inc. and prior to 2004
was a partner with the law firm of McInnes Cooper where she continues to act as
counsel to the firm. Ms. Stairs practiced law in private practise for 19 years
specializing in corporate finance, securities and resource-related issues for
private and public companies. Ms. Stairs graduated from Dalhousie Law School and
holds a Masters of Business Administration degree from Queens University.
Officers
In addition to Scott G. Perry, as set out above, the following
are the officers of the Company as at February 19, 2015:
CHRIS J. BOSTWICK
Ontario, Canada
Senior Vice President, Technical Services
Mr. Chris Bostwick was appointed Senior Vice President,
Technical Services in January 2009. He holds over 25 years of experience in the
global mining industry, 19 of which were spent with Barrick Gold in various
roles. Mr. Bostwick has mining experience in operations, engineering,
maintenance, strategic planning, and project evaluation and development gained
in North and South America, Africa, and Russia. Prior to AuRico, he had been
seconded from Barrick to Highland Gold Mining, where he led the Capital Projects
and Technical Services groups for their development projects and one operating
mine in Russia. Prior to that, Mr. Bostwick served as Barrick's Director of
Evaluations and Capital Projects, working in the corporate development and
technical services groups on M&A and feasibility studies. He also spent nine
years at Barrick's flagship Goldstrike operation in Nevada. Mr. Bostwick has a
Bachelor of Science degree in Mining Engineering from Queens University.
|
55 |
ROBERT J. CHAUSSE
Ontario, Canada
Executive Vice President and
Chief Financial Officer
Mr. Robert Chausse joined the Company in January 2013. He
brings with him more than 20 years of international finance and mining
experience. Most recently, Mr. Chausse was the Vice President of Finance,
Operations and Projects for Kinross Gold Corporation, a position he held since
2009. Prior to that, he was Chief Financial Officer for Baffinland Iron Mines
Corporation from 2006 to 2009, and held increasingly senior positions with
Barrick Gold from 1998 to 2006. Mr. Chausse received his Chartered Accountant
designation in 1990.
LUIS M. CHAVEZ
San Luis Potosi, Mexico
Senior Vice President, Mexico
Dr. Luis Chavez is the Senior Vice President, Mexico. Prior to
this, he served as the Companys Director, Mexican Operations for over five
years and as a member of the Companys Board of Directors. Dr. Chavez has
considerable experience in all mining related areas. He served as General
Director of the Mexican Geological Survey (1994-2000), authored the National
Mapping Program, and created the largest geology and mining databank currently
in use by mining companies doing business in Mexico. In 2001, he was invited by
the Governor of Coahuila State to become Energy and Mines Director to design
sustainable development policies and strategies to maximize energy and mineral
resources value. From 2002 to 2006, Dr. Chavez was Secretary General for the
Mexican Mining Directors and was also President of the Mexican Institute for
Environmental Management. He holds a Master of Science degree in Mineral
Economics (1978) from Penn State University, a PhD degree in Energy and Mineral
Economics (1982) from the University of Arizona, and a Business Administration
degree (1989) from the Pan-American Business Institute in Monterrey, Mexico.
ANNE L. DAY
Ontario, Canada
Vice President, Investor Relations and
Communications
Ms. Anne Day is AuRicos Vice President of Investor Relations
and Communications. She brings over 17 years of experience in investor
relations, primarily in the mining sector. As part of the senior executive team,
Ms. Day leads the development and implementation of AuRicos global investor
relations strategies as well as internal and external communications programs of
the Company. Prior to joining AuRico, Ms. Day held senior IR roles with Nexient
Learning and Etruscan Resources. Ms. Day holds a BComm degree (Marketing) and an
MBA (Finance) from Saint Marys University.
PETER K.
MACPHAIL
Ontario, Canada
Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer
Mr. Peter MacPhail joined the AuRico team through the Northgate
transaction, where he was Chief Operating Officer for eight years. Mr. MacPhail
holds over 25 years of solid operational experience in both Canada and
Australia. While at Northgate, he had overall operations management
responsibility for the Kemess, Fosterville and Stawell mines, as well as the
Young-Davidson mine project. Prior to Northgate, Mr. MacPhail held increasingly
senior roles at Noranda, Teck Resources, Homestake Resource, and Barrick Gold.
He holds a Bachelor of Applied Science degree in Mineral Engineering from the
University of Toronto, and is a licensed professional engineer in Ontario.
|
56 |
CHARLENE K. MILNER
Nova Scotia, Canada
Senior Vice President, Finance
Ms. Charlene Milner joined the Company in January 2008 as the
Director, Financial Reporting. Since then, she held progressively senior
positions with the Company, namely Senior Director, Finance, followed by Vice
President, Finance in 2011. In 2012, she was appointed Senior Vice President,
Finance. Ms. Milner is responsible for internal and external financial
reporting, and the operations of the company-wide finance group. Prior to
joining AuRico, Ms. Milner worked for eight years at Grant Thornton LLP, where
she obtained her CA designation. Ms. Milner also holds a Bachelor of Commerce
degree from Dalhousie University.
CHRIS H. RICHTER
Ontario, Canada
Senior Vice President, Corporate Development
Mr. Chris Richter joined AuRico in May 2010 as Vice President,
Corporate Development, and has over 11 years of experience in the mining
industry leading M&A, strategy, and capital allocation efforts. Prior to
joining the Company, he spent seven years working at Barrick Gold. As part of
the Corporate Development team at Barrick, Mr. Richter advanced numerous
acquisitions, including the $10.4 billion acquisition of Placer Dome, and in
2009, he contributed to the design of their newly created Capital Allocation,
Strategy and Risk Group. At AuRico, he has played a key role in the acquisitions
of Capital Gold and Northgate Minerals, as well as the divestitures of the El
Cubo, Fosterville, Stawell, and Ocampo mines. Mr. Richter holds a Master of Arts
degree in Economics from the University of Toronto and a Bachelor of Arts degree
in Economics and Political Science from the University of Waterloo. He is also a
CFA charter holder.
CHRIS J.
ROCKINGHAM
Ontario, Canada
Vice President,
Exploration and Business Development
Mr. Chris Rockingham brings over 30 years of extensive
exploration experience, focused on precious and base-metal deposits in various
geological, geographic and cultural settings in North and South America. He held
the position of Vice President of Exploration and Business Development with
Northgate Minerals for eight years prior to its amalgamation with AuRico. In
this role, Mr. Rockingham identified Young-Davidson as a site with considerable
exploration potential, negotiated the terms of the acquisition, and assembled
the team that developed the project into one of the largest underground gold
reserves in Canada. He has a Master of Science degree in Geology from the
University of Western Ontario and an MBA (with distinction) from the Richard
Ivey School of Business.
As at the date of this AIF, the directors and executive
officers of the Company, as a group, beneficially own, directly or indirectly,
or exercise control or direction over an aggregate of 892,714 common shares
(7,995,050 common shares if all options, restricted share units,
performance share units and deferred share units held by them are exercised),
representing 0.36% of the currently outstanding common shares (3.20% current
outstanding common shares if all options, performance share units and deferred
share units held by them are exercised) and 0.34% of the common shares on
a fully diluted basis (3.02% current outstanding common shares on a fully
diluted basis if all options, performance share units and deferred share units
held by them are exercised).
|
57 |
Cease Trade Orders, Bankruptcies, Penalties or
Sanctions
To the knowledge of the Company, no director or executive
officer of the Company is, or within the ten years prior to the date hereof has
been, a director or executive officer of any company (including the Company)
that, while that person was acting in that capacity, was subject to:
(a) |
a cease trade order or similar order or an order that
denied the relevant company access to any exemptions under securities
legislation for a period of more than 30 consecutive days;
or |
|
|
(b) |
an event that resulted, after the director or executive officer ceased to be a director or executive officer, in the company being the subject of a cease trade or similar order or an order that denied the relevant company access
to any exemption under securities legislation for a period of more than 30 consecutive days.
|
To the knowledge of the Company, no director or executive officer of the Company, and no shareholder holding a sufficient number of securities of the Company to affect materially the control of AuRico, has been subject to:
(a) |
any penalties or sanctions imposed by a court relating to Canadian securities legislation or by a Canadian securities regulatory authority or has entered into a settlement agreement with a Canadian securities regulatory authority;
or
|
| |
(b) |
any other penalties or sanctions imposed by a court or regulatory body that would likely be considered important to a reasonable investor making an investment decision.
|
To the knowledge of the Company, no director or officer of the Company, and no shareholder holding a sufficient number of securities of the Company to affect materially the control of AuRico:
(a) |
is, as at the date hereof, or has been within the 10 years before the date hereof, a director or executive officer of any company (including AuRico) that, while such person was acting in that capacity or within a year of such
person ceasing to act in that capacity, became bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency, or was subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with creditors, or had a receiver,
receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold its assets; or
|
| |
(b) |
has, within the 10 years before the date hereof, become bankrupt, made a proposal under any legislation relating to bankruptcy or insolvency, or become subject to or instituted any proceedings, arrangement or compromise with
creditors, or had a receiver, receiver manager or trustee appointed to hold the assets of the director, executive officer or shareholder.
|
Conflicts of Interest
Certain of AuRico’s directors and officers serve as directors and/or officers of other natural resource companies and, consequently, there exists the possibility for such directors and officers to have interests that conflict with the
Company’s interests. The individuals concerned are governed in any conflict or potential conflict by applicable law and by AuRico’s Code of Conduct. To the best of AuRico’s knowledge, there are no known existing or potential
material conflicts of interest among directors or officers and AuRico or its subsidiaries.
Interest of Management & Others in Material Transactions
Other than noted below, no director or executive officer of the Company, or holder of securities of more than 10% of any class of outstanding voting securities or any associate or affiliate thereof of the Company has any interest, directly or
indirectly, in any material transaction with the Company or any of its direct or indirect wholly-owned subsidiaries.
|
58 |
The Company utilizes a Mexican corporation, Caborca Industrial S.A. de C.V. (“Caborca Industrial”), for mining support services at the El Chanate mine, including the payment of mining salaries and related costs. Caborca Industrial is
100% owned by the Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer. The Company’s Chief Executive Officer and Executive Vice President and Chief Operating Officer receive no financial benefits as
a result of their ownership of this entity.
AUDIT COMMITTEE
Audit Committee Mandate
The full text of the Audit Committee’s mandate is included as Schedule “A” to this AIF.
Composition
All of the members of the Audit Committee are independent and financially literate. The name, relevant education and experience of each Audit Committee member are as follows:
Ronald Smith (Chairman)
Mr. Smith is a Chartered Accountant with over 30 years of practical financial and management experience, primarily in the financial, telecommunications and energy sectors.
Patrick Downey
Mr. Downey is a member of the Canadian Institute of Chartered Accountants, the Ontario Institute of Chartered Accountants and the Ontario Chapter of the Institute of Corporate Directors. He has been involved in the gold and copper mining industry
throughout most of his career.
Richard Colterjohn
Mr. Colterjohn is a former investment banker with over 20 years of corporate finance experience in the mining sector and other industries.
There were five meetings of the Audit Committee in 2014. All of the members of the Committee attended all of the meetings held in 2014.
Pre-Approval Policies and Procedures
AuRico’s Audit Committee has adopted pre-approval policies and procedures with respect to permitted non-audit services. Specifically, the Audit Committee must pre-approve all permitted non-audit services to be provided to the Company or its
subsidiaries by the Company’s external auditor. The Audit Committee has delegated to the Chair of the Committee the authority to pre-approve permitted non-audit services, with such pre-approval presented to the Audit Committee at the next
scheduled Audit Committee meeting.
|
59 |
External Auditor Service Fees
KPMG LLP are the auditors of AuRicos Consolidated Financial
Statements. The following KPMG LLP fees (reported in Canadian dollars) were
incurred in each of the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 for professional
services rendered to AuRico:
Financial Year Ending |
Audit Fees (1)
|
Audit Related
Fees
(2) |
Tax Fees
(3) |
All Other Fees
|
December 31, 2014(4) |
$584,950 |
$135,000 |
$121,000 |
$Nil |
December 31, 2013(4) |
$630,250 |
$42,500 |
$132,450 |
$Nil |
Notes: |
|
1. |
The aggregate fees billed for audit services, including
fees relating to the completion of the year-end audit, review of interim
financial statements, and statutory audits of the Companys Mexican
subsidiaries. |
|
2. |
The aggregate fees billed for assurance and related
services are related to the performance of the audit of other supplemental
schedules, involvement in securities offerings, and other accounting
consultations. |
|
3. |
The aggregate fees billed for transfer pricing services,
analysis of new tax law, and other tax compliance services in
Mexico. |
|
4. |
For the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, none of
the Corporations audit-related fees, tax fees or all other fees described
in the table above made use of the de minimis exception to pre-approval
provisions contained in Rule 2-01 (c)(7)(i)(C) of SEC Regulation S-X or
Section 2.4 of NI 52-110. |
MATERIAL CONTRACTS
Except as otherwise disclosed in this AIF, and for contracts
entered into in the ordinary course of business, the Company has not entered
into any material contracts since the beginning of the financial year ended
December 31, 2014 and to the date of this AIF.
LEGAL PROCEEDINGS
From time to time, the Company is involved in other litigation,
investigations or proceedings related to claims arising out of its operations in
the ordinary course of business. In the opinion of the Companys management,
these claims and lawsuits individually and in the aggregate, even if adversely
settled, would not be expected to have a material effect on the results of
operations or financial condition of the Company and would not exceed ten
percent of the current assets of the Company.
TRANSFER AGENT AND REGISTRAR
The Companys transfer agent and registrar is Computershare
Investor Services Inc. Computershares register of transfers for the Companys
common shares is located at 100 University Avenue, 8th Floor, North
Tower, Toronto, Ontario, M5J 2Y1.
INTERESTS OF EXPERTS
The following persons and firms are named as having prepared or
certified a report, valuation, statement or opinion described or included in a
filing, or referred to in a filing, made under NI 51-102 by the Company during,
or related to, the Companys most recently completed financial year:
- Chris Bostwick, FAusIMM, Senior Vice President, Technical Services, AuRico
Gold Inc.;
- Jeff Volk, CPG, FAusIMM, Director Reserves and Resources, AuRico Gold
Inc.;
Other than as set out below, to the best of the Companys
knowledge, the aforementioned persons and firms, and any designated
professional, director, officer or employee of such firms, each hold less than
1% of any outstanding securities of the Company or of any associate or affiliate
of the Company.
|
60 |
None of the aforementioned persons or firms, nor any designated
professionals, directors, officers or employees of such firms, is currently
expected to be elected, appointed or employed as a director, officer or employee
of the Company or of any associate or affiliate of the Company, except as
disclosed above.
The Companys auditors, KPMG LLP, confirmed that they are
independent within the meaning of the relevant rules and related interpretations
prescribed by the relevant professional bodies in Canada and any applicable
legislation or regulation.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Additional information about AuRico may be found on SEDAR at
www.sedar.com.
Further additional information, including directors and
officers remuneration and indebtedness, principal holders of AuRicos
securities and securities authorized for issuance under equity compensation
plans is contained in AuRicos most recent management information circular,
which is filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.
Additional financial information can be found in AuRicos
financial statements and Managements Discussion and Analysis for the year ended
December 31, 2014, which are filed on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.
A copy of such documents may be obtained, upon request, from
the Company. The Company may require the payment of a reasonable charge from a
person or corporation who is not a holder of securities of the Company.
For additional copies of this AIF please contact:
Corporate Secretary |
Tel:647-260-8880 |
AuRico Gold Inc. |
Fax: 647-260-8881 |
110 Yonge Street, Suite 1601 |
Email: info@auricogold.com |
Toronto, Ontario M5C 1T4 Canada |
Website: www.auricogold.com |
|
61 |
SCHEDULE A
MANDATE OF THE AUDIT
COMMITTEE
PURPOSE
The Audit Committee (the Committee) is a committee of the
Board of Directors (the Board) charged with oversight of financial reporting
as well as related disclosure, internal controls, regulatory compliance and risk
management functions.
COMPOSITION
The members of the Committee shall be appointed annually by the
Board on the recommendation of the Nominating & Corporate Governance
Committee. The Chair shall be elected by the members of the Committee. The
Committee shall consist of a minimum of three directors of the Company, all of
whom must be independent directors. Independence is defined by applicable
Canadian and U.S. laws and regulations as well as the rules of relevant stock
exchanges (the Applicable Laws). At a minimum, each Committee member shall
have no direct or indirect relationship with the Company that could, in the
opinion of the Board, reasonably interfere with the exercise of a Committee
members independent judgment (except as otherwise permitted by Applicable
Laws).
QUALIFICATIONS & EXPERIENCE
Each member of the Committee must be financially literate,
meaning that the director has the ability to read and understand a set of
financial statements that present the breadth and level of complexity of
accounting issues that can reasonably be expected to be raised by the Companys
financial statements.
At least one member of the Committee shall be a financial
expert within the meaning of Applicable Laws. The financial expert should have
the following competencies:
-
An understanding of financial statements and accounting principles used by
the Company to prepare its financial statements;
-
The ability to assess the general application of such accounting
principles in connection with the accounting for estimates, accruals and
reserves;
-
Experience preparing, auditing, analyzing or evaluating financial
statements that present a breadth and level of complexity comparable to the
Companys financial statements, or experience actively supervising one or more
persons engaged in such activities;
-
An understanding of internal controls and procedures for financial
reporting; and
-
An understanding of audit committee functions.
RISK OVERSIGHT
In addition to the specific responsibilities enumerated below,
the Committee shall be responsible for reviewing financial risks of the business
and overseeing the implementation and evaluation of appropriate risk management
practices. This will involve inquiring with management regarding how financial
risks are managed and seeking opinions from management and the independent
auditor regarding the adequacy of risk mitigation strategies.
COMMITTEE RESPONSIBILITIES
In addition to such other duties as may be delegated by the
Board, the Committee shall:
1. |
Financial Statements: Review the Companys interim
and annual financial statements, MD&A and related press releases and
recommend Board approval of such documents. |
|
62 |
2. |
Variances: Obtain explanations from management for
significant variances between comparative reporting periods and question
management and the independent auditor regarding any significant financial
reporting issues raised during the fiscal period and the method of resolution. |
|
|
3. |
Internal Controls: Inquire as to the adequacy of the Company’s system of internal controls and review periodic reports from management regarding internal controls, which should include an assessment of risk with
respect to financial reporting.
|
| | |
4. |
Auditor: Recommend Board approval for the appointment of the Company’s independent auditor. Oversee the work of the independent auditor; ensure that the independent auditor reports directly to the Committee; and
ensure that any disagreements between management and the independent auditor regarding financial reporting are resolved.
|
| | |
5. |
Non-audit Services: Approve all audit and non-audit services to be provided to the Company and its subsidiaries by the independent auditor. The Chair of the Committee may pre-approve such services on behalf of the Committee
provided that such approvals are presented at the Committee meeting following such pre-approval. In order to obtain pre-approval, management should detail the work to be performed by the independent auditor and obtain the assurance from the
independent auditor that the proposed work will not impair their independence.
|
| | |
|
Certain de minimis non-audit services will satisfy the pre-approval requirement provided:
|
| | |
|
|
the aggregate amount of all these non-audit services that were not pre-approved is reasonably expected to constitute no more that 5% of the total audit fees paid by the Company and its subsidiaries to the independent auditor
during the fiscal year in which the services are provided;
|
| | |
|
|
the Company or its subsidiaries, did not recognize the services as non-audit services at the time of the engagement; and
|
| | |
|
|
the services are promptly brought to the attention of the Committee and approved prior to the completion of the annual audit.
|
| | |
6. |
Whistleblower: Oversee a Company whistleblower program that provides an opportunity for confidential and anonymous submissions of concerns regarding questionable accounting or auditing matters and other potential violations
of the Company’s Code of Conduct.
|
| | |
7. |
Internal Audit: Review and approve the annual internal audit plan as presented by the internal audit function to ensure that it is appropriate, risk-based and addresses all prioritized auditable entities. Review progress
towards completion of the annual plan and performance of the head of the internal audit function.
|
| | |
8. |
Hiring: Review and approve the Company’s policies regarding the hiring of current and past partners and employees of the Company’s present or former independent auditor.
|
| | |
9. |
Reporting: Report to the Board on a quarterly basis on the proceedings of Committee meetings.
|
| | |
10. |
Mandate: Annually review the Committee’s mandate and assess the Committee’s functioning and performance relative to the requirements set out within this mandate.
|
CHAIRMAN RESPONSIBILITIES
The Chairman of the Committee shall:
1. |
Convene and preside over Committee meetings and ensure they are conducted in an efficient, effective and focused manner.
|
| |
2. |
Assist management with the preparation of an agenda and ensure that meeting materials are prepared and disseminated in a timely manner.
|
| |
3. |
Ensure that the Committee has sufficient time and information to make informed decisions.
|
| |
4. |
Provide leadership to the Committee and management with respect to matters covered by this mandate.
|
|
63 |
AUTHORITY
The Committee has authority to:
1. |
Appoint, compensate, and oversee the work of any registered public accounting firm retained by the Company.
|
| |
2. |
Conduct or authorize investigations into any matters within its scope of responsibility, including with respect to whistleblower submissions.
|
| |
3. |
Retain, at the Company’s expense, independent legal, accounting or other advisors to assist the Committee in carrying out its duties or to assist in the conduct of an investigation.
|
| |
4. |
Meet with management, the independent auditor and other advisors, as necessary.
|
| |
5. |
Obtain full access to the books, records, facilities and personnel of the Company and its subsidiaries.
|
| |
6. |
Call a meeting of the Board to consider any matter of concern to the Committee.
|
MEETINGS
The Committee shall meet as often as it deems necessary, but not less frequently than quarterly. A quorum for the transaction of business at all meetings shall be a majority of members. Decisions shall be made by an affirmative vote of the majority
of members in attendance and the Committee Chair shall not have a deciding or casting vote.
An in-camera session of independent directors shall take place at least quarterly. The Committee may also request to meet separately with management, internal auditors, independent auditors or other advisors. Meeting minutes shall be recorded and
maintained, as directed by the Chair of the Committee.
|
64 |
Exhibit 99.2
|
|
|
Managements Discussion and Analysis
|
(in United States Dollars, unless otherwise
stated) |
For the year ended December 31, 2014
|
MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
FOR THE YEAR ENDED
DECEMBER 31, 2014 |
TABLE OF CONTENTS
OVERVIEW OF THE BUSINESS |
3
|
HIGHLIGHTS |
4 |
OUTLOOK AND STRATEGY |
5
|
YOUNG-DAVIDSON |
6 |
EL CHANATE |
8
|
EXPLORATION REVIEW |
10 |
SUMMARIZED FINANCIAL AND OPERATING RESULTS
|
11
|
SUMMARY OF QUARTERLY FINANCIAL AND OPERATING RESULTS |
15 |
CONSOLIDATED EXPENSES |
16
|
CONSOLIDATED INCOME TAX EXPENSE |
17 |
FINANCIAL CONDITION |
18
|
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL RESOURCES |
19 |
CONTRACTUAL OBLIGATIONS |
21
|
OUTSTANDING SHARE DATA |
21 |
OFF-BALANCE SHEET ARRANGEMENTS |
21
|
FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS |
21 |
TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED PARTIES |
22
|
EVENTS AFTER THE REPORTING PERIOD |
22 |
NON-GAAP MEASURES |
22
|
RISKS AND UNCERTAINTIES |
25 |
CRITICAL ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES, POLICIES AND
CHANGES |
29
|
CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES |
32 |
CAUTIONARY NOTE TO U.S. INVESTORS |
33
|
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS |
33
|
2014 ANNUAL MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
This Managements Discussion and Analysis (MD&A),
dated February 19, 2015, relates to the financial condition and results of the
consolidated operations of AuRico Gold Inc. (the Company), and should be read
in conjunction with the Companys consolidated financial statements for the years
ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, and notes thereto. The consolidated
financial statements for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 have been
prepared in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS
or GAAP). All results are presented in United States dollars (US dollar or
$), unless otherwise stated.
The first, second, third and fourth quarters of the
Companys fiscal year are referred to as Q1, Q2, Q3 and Q4,
respectively.
Statements are subject to the risks and uncertainties
identified in the Risks and Uncertainties and Cautionary Note regarding
Forward-Looking Statements sections of this document. U.S. investors are also
advised to refer to the section entitled Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors on
page 33.
AuRico Gold Inc. is a Canadian gold producer with mines and
projects in North America. The Companys operations include the Young-Davidson
mine in Ontario, Canada and the El Chanate mine in Sonora, Mexico. The Companys
project pipeline also includes exploration and development opportunities in
Canada and Mexico.
The Companys common shares are listed on the Toronto Stock
Exchange (TSX: AUQ) and the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE: AUQ). Further
information about AuRico Gold Inc. can be found in the Companys regulatory
filings, including the Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31,
2014, available on SEDAR at www.sedar.com, on
EDGAR at www.sec.gov, and on the Companys
website at www.auricogold.com.
The Companys performance is largely dependent on the price of
gold, which directly affects the Companys profitability and cash flow. The
price of gold is subject to volatile price movements during short periods of
time and is affected by numerous factors, such as the strength of the US dollar,
supply and demand, interest rates, and inflation rates, all of which are beyond
the Companys control. During 2014, the London PM Fix price of gold averaged
$1,266 per ounce, a 10% decrease from the London PM Fix average of $1,411 during
2013. During 2014, daily London PM Fix prices ranged between $1,142 and $1,385
per ounce.
At the Companys mine sites, a significant portion of the
operating costs and capital expenditures are denominated in foreign currencies,
including Mexican pesos and Canadian dollars. Therefore, fluctuations in these
foreign currencies against the US dollar can significantly impact the Companys
costs and cash flow. The Mexican peso and Canadian dollar averaged approximately
13.3 to 1.0 US dollar and 1.1 to 1.0 US dollar, respectively, in 2014, compared
to average rates of 12.8 to 1.0 US dollar and 1.03 to 1.0 US dollar,
respectively, in 2013.
For additional information on the factors that affect the
Company, see the discussion of Risks and Uncertainties on page 25.
|
3 |
2014 ANNUAL MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
(in thousands, except ounces, all-in
sustaining costs and total cash costs) |
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
Change
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold ounces produced(1) |
|
224,032 |
|
|
161,100 |
|
|
62,932 |
|
|
39% |
|
Pre-production gold ounces produced(1) |
|
- |
|
|
31,502 |
|
|
(31,502 |
) |
|
-100% |
|
Total gold ounces
produced |
|
224,032 |
|
|
192,602 |
|
|
31,430 |
|
|
16% |
|
Revenue from mining operations |
$ |
291,182 |
|
$ |
227,631 |
|
$ |
63,551 |
|
|
28% |
|
Loss from operations |
$ |
(154,705 |
) |
$ |
(178,087 |
) |
$ |
23,382 |
|
|
13% |
|
Net loss from operations |
$ |
(169,648 |
) |
$ |
(176,770 |
) |
$ |
7,122 |
|
|
4% |
|
Operating cash
flow |
$ |
60,414 |
|
$ |
63,266 |
|
$ |
(2,852 |
) |
|
-5% |
|
Cash costs per gold ounce, net of by-product revenues and
NRV adjustments(1)(2)(3)(4) |
$ |
779 |
|
$ |
676 |
|
$ |
103 |
|
|
15% |
|
All-in sustaining
costs per gold ounce sold, net of by-product revenues and NRV
adjustments(1)(2)(4) |
$ |
1,200 |
|
$ |
1,181 |
|
$ |
19 |
|
|
2% |
|
(1) |
The Young-Davidson underground mine declared
commercial production on October 31, 2013, and therefore, all underground
ounces are excluded from consolidated cash costs and consolidated all-in
sustaining costs prior to this date. Pre-production ounces produced and
sold are excluded from consolidated ounces produced and sold as the
revenue from these ounces was credited against capitalized project
costs. |
(2) |
See the Non-GAAP Measures section on page
22. |
(3) |
For 2014, cash costs per gold ounce are calculated
using gold ounces sold at the El Chanate and Young-Davidson mines. For
2013, cash costs per gold ounce were calculated using gold ounces sold at
the El Chanate mine and ounces produced at the Young-Davidson
mine. |
(4) |
For further discussion on the net realizable value
("NRV") adjustments recognized on ore inventories at the Young-Davidson
and El Chanate mines during the quarter and annual periods, refer to pages
7 and 9, respectively. |
ANNUAL DEVELOPMENTS
- |
On February 19, 2015, the Company reported proven and
probable reserves of 6.3 million gold ounces, a 0.2 million ounce decrease
from the 6.5 million gold ounces reported in 2013. The decrease is due to
mining depletion at all operating mines and a reduction in overall slope
angles at El Chanate, partially offset by an increase in underground
ounces at Young- Davidson. |
|
|
- |
On February 19, 2015, the Companys Board of Directors
approved a dividend of $0.023 per share, payable to shareholders of record
on March 2, 2015. |
|
|
- |
On January 21, 2015, the Company announced an initial
National Instrument 43-101 compliant indicated resource of 2.1 million
gold equivalent ounces and an inferred resource of 3.4 million gold
equivalent ounces at the Kemess East deposit, located one kilometre east
of the previously delineated Kemess Underground deposit and 6.5 kilometres
north of the Kemess mill facility. The Kemess Property is located in
north-central British Columbia, Canada, approximately 430 kilometres
northwest of Prince George. |
|
|
- |
On January 14, 2015, the Company finalized the agreement
to terminate the deferred cash payment arrangement (retained interest
royalty) with Crocodile Gold Corporation. As consideration for this
termination, the Company received $20 million Canadian dollars (CAD) in
cash and net smelter royalties on future production from the Fosterville
and Stawell mines of 2% and 1%, respectively. |
|
|
- |
On November 20, 2014, the Company completed a private placement with
Carlisle Goldfields Limited (Carlisle) in which the Company invested CAD
$5.6 million in exchange for 19.9% of the outstanding common shares of
Carlisle. In conjunction with the private placement, the Company entered
into an agreement on November 11, 2014 with respect to Carlisles Lynn
Lake Gold Camp (Lynn Lake Project), located in Lynn Lake, Manitoba,
pursuant to which the Company acquired a 25% interest in the Lynn Lake
Project for an initial cash contribution of CAD $5.0 million. |
|
|
- |
On November 6, 2014, the Companys Board of Directors
approved a dividend of $0.00225 per share, payable to shareholders of
record on November 17, 2014, and paid on December 1, 2014. On August 7,
2014, the Companys Board of Directors approved a dividend of $0.00375 per
share, payable to shareholders of record on August 18, 2014, and paid on
September 2, 2014. On May 8, 2014, the Companys Board of Directors
approved a dividend of $0.02 per share, payable to shareholders of record
on May 20, 2014, and paid on June 3, 2014. |
|
|
- |
On April 3, 2014, the Company paid $173.0 million,
including $0.03 million of accrued interest, to complete the cash tender
offer initially announced on March 6, 2014 to redeem the
outstanding convertible senior notes. The consideration offered and paid
was $1,040 per $1,000 note outstanding plus accrued and unpaid interest to
the payment date. The Company received tender offers for $166.4 million of
the $167.0 million principal amount outstanding. |
|
|
- |
On March 27, 2014, the Company completed an offering of
$315.0 million senior secured notes due 2020. The notes were issued with a
coupon of 7.75% and sold at 96.524% of par, resulting in net proceeds to
the Company of $304.1 million. The Company repaid the $75.0 million drawn against the credit
facility on March 28, 2014 after the completion of the senior secured notes
offering. The completion of this offering enabled the Company to extend the
maturity date of outstanding debt and provides additional cash for general
corporate purposes, which may include funding capital expenditures to support
organic growth. |
|
|
|
4 |
2014 ANNUAL MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
AuRico Gold Inc. is committed to being a leading low cost gold
producer focused on growth in North America. The Companys mission is to deliver
superior shareholder value by building a culture of excellence in every aspect
of what we do, through organic growth, exploration, accretive industry
consolidation, and commitment to socially responsible practices within the
communities in which we work. The Company will continue to optimize its
operations to deliver reliable, consistent and sustainable performance over the
life of its mining operations. The Companys focus is on the production of high
margin ounces combined with a disciplined approach to cost containment and
capital spending along with a commitment to shareholder value creation.
In 2014, the Company continued to advance underground
development at Young-Davidson to optimize the exploitation of ore reserves,
which is expected to position the mine for sustainable, period-over-period,
productivity increases in 2015 and beyond. The shaft hoisting system has, and
will continue to, facilitate significant increases in underground activities and
corresponding cost efficiencies. During the year, accelerated capital investment
initiatives supported higher than expected productivity throughout the
underground operation and resulted in Young-Davidson exceeding the year-end
target of 4,000 tonnes per day (TPD). With productivity remaining ahead of
schedule, the operation is well positioned to achieve the 2015 year-end target
of 6,000 TPD and an ultimate productivity level of 8,000 TPD at the end of 2016.
During 2015, Young-Davidson is anticipated to produce between 160,000 and
180,000 ounces, a 2% to 15% increase over 2014 production. Capital expenditures
are expected to decrease by up to 37% in 2015, and will continue to focus on
advancing underground development.
Young-Davidson open pit mining operations ceased during the
second quarter of 2014 as the short-life open pit was fully depleted. As of
December 31, 2014, approximately 2.5 million tonnes of open pit ore, at an
average grade of 0.75 grams per tonne, was stockpiled ahead of the mill facility
for future processing. Going forward, mill feed from the underground mine will
be supplemented by the stockpiled ore while underground mining levels ramp up to
mill capacity.
Production from the El Chanate mine is expected to be between
65,000 and 75,000 ounces in 2015, consistent with production in 2014. Capital
expenditures are anticipated to decrease by up to 33% in 2015, reflecting
reduced year-over-year open pit stripping requirements.
During 2015, the Company expects to produce 225,000 to 255,000
ounces of gold on a consolidated basis at all-in sustaining costs of
approximately $1,000 to $1,100 per gold ounce, representing up to a 14% increase
over 2014 production. Mine site
capital expenditures for 2015 are forecasted to be approximately $102.5 million
to $115.0 million, a decline of up to 36% from 2014. Consolidated operating cash
flows are expected to improve in 2015, mainly driven by forecasted margin
improvements at Young-Davidson due to the ramp up of the underground mine and a
weak Canadian dollar.
The Company expects to spend approximately $12.0 million to
$23.0 million on exploration during 2015. The exploration program will focus on
upgrading and increasing mineral resources at the Companys Kemess and Lynn Lake
projects, in addition to the Companys existing operations.
During 2014, the London PM Fix price of gold averaged $1,266
per ounce, a 10% decrease from the London PM Fix average of $1,411 during 2013.
At current gold prices, operating cash flow from the Companys operating mines
is forecasted to be sufficient to fund all capital expenditures and mine site
exploration. The Company has the ability to fund any shortfall with cash on
hand, and also has the full capacity available under its $150.0 million credit
facility.
On February 19, 2015, the Company provided 2015 guidance for
the El Chanate and Young-Davidson mines. The press release is available on SEDAR
at www.sedar.com, on EDGAR at www.sec.gov, and on the Companys website at www.auricogold.com.
|
5 |
2014 ANNUAL MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
The Company owns the Young-Davidson mine, located near the town
of Matachewan in Northern Ontario, Canada. The property consists of contiguous
mineral leases and claims totaling 4,733 hectares and is situated on the site of
two past producing mines that produced one million ounces during the 1930s
1950s. The Young-Davidson open pit mine achieved commercial production on
September 1, 2012, upon the completion of construction activities associated
with surface infrastructure and the processing plant, and upon achieving
sustained targeted daily tonnage rates in both the open pit and mill. On October
31, 2013, the Company declared commercial production at the Young-Davidson
underground mine following the commissioning of the shaft hoisting system.
In January 2014, the Young-Davidson paste backfill plant was
commissioned and completed its first pour. In 2012, the mine plan was
re-engineered to utilize paste backfill to allow for significantly improved
mining recovery and reduced dilution.
In February 2014, the Company received the necessary permits to
increase the daily processing limit of the Young-Davidson mill facility to
10,000 TPD from the previous 8,000 TPD. While the mill facility is expected to
average approximately 8,000 TPD in 2015, this future increase in throughput
capacity will provide considerable flexibility as the underground mine continues
ramping up to its target of 8,000 TPD at the end of 2016. This productivity
upgrade provides organic growth optionality that could permit early treatment of
the longer term stockpile inventory, and potentially enhance the Companys
future cash flow profile.
YOUNG-DAVIDSON
OPERATIONAL REVIEW
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Underground Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tonnes of ore mined |
|
380,922 |
|
|
238,321 |
|
|
1,288,295 |
|
|
616,961 |
|
Average grade of
gold(1) |
|
3.05 |
|
|
3.10 |
|
|
3.07 |
|
|
2.83 |
|
Metres developed |
|
3,438 |
|
|
2,986 |
|
|
14,024 |
|
|
9,992 |
|
Open Pit Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total tonnes mined |
|
- |
|
|
3,247,496 |
|
|
3,392,509 |
|
|
12,220,056 |
|
Tonnes of ore mined |
|
- |
|
|
730,677 |
|
|
1,343,083 |
|
|
3,202,358 |
|
Average grade of gold(1) |
|
- |
|
|
1.04 |
|
|
0.99 |
|
|
1.16 |
|
Tonnes stockpiled ahead of the
mill |
|
2,495,739 |
|
|
2,734,347 |
|
|
2,495,739 |
|
|
2,734,347 |
|
Average grade of gold(1) |
|
0.75 |
|
|
0.81 |
|
|
0.75 |
|
|
0.81 |
|
Mill Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tonnes of ore processed |
|
713,676 |
|
|
641,114 |
|
|
2,812,954 |
|
|
2,482,305 |
|
Average grade of
gold(1) |
|
1.97 |
|
|
2.04 |
|
|
1.97 |
|
|
1.79 |
|
Average gold recovery rate |
|
88% |
|
|
88% |
|
|
88% |
|
|
87% |
|
Gold ounces produced |
|
40,945 |
|
|
29,597 |
|
|
156,753 |
|
|
89,236 |
|
Pre-production gold ounces
produced(2) |
|
- |
|
|
3,509 |
|
|
- |
|
|
31,502 |
|
Total gold ounces produced |
|
40,945 |
|
|
33,106 |
|
|
156,753 |
|
|
120,738 |
|
Gold ounces sold |
|
42,143 |
|
|
24,831 |
|
|
161,591 |
|
|
88,878 |
|
Pre-production gold ounces sold(2)
|
|
- |
|
|
3,416 |
|
|
- |
|
|
31,839 |
|
Total gold ounces sold |
|
42,143 |
|
|
28,247 |
|
|
161,591 |
|
|
120,717 |
|
(1) |
Grams per tonne. |
(2) |
Includes all underground ounces produced and sold
prior to declaration of commercial production on October 31,
2013. |
The Company mined 380,922 ore tonnes, or 4,140 TPD, from the
Young-Davidson underground mine during Q4 2014, at a grade of 3.05 gold grams
per tonne, exceeding the year-end target of 4,000 TPD. During the year ended
December 31, 2014, the Company mined 1,288,295 ore tonnes, or 3,530 TPD, at a
grade of 3.07 gold grams per tonne. Mining rates increased significantly from
the 2,590 TPD and 1,690 TPD realized during the quarter and year ended December
31, 2013, respectively, due to the commissioning of the mid-shaft crushing and
hoisting system and the declaration of commercial production in the fourth
quarter of 2013, in addition to planned productivity improvements. Further
productivity improvements in 2015 are anticipated to position the Company to
achieve targets of 6,000 TPD by the end of 2015 and 8,000 TPD by the end of
2016.
The Young-Davidson open pit mine ceased operations in early
June 2014 when it reached the end of its planned life. Prior to ceasing
operations, the Company mined 1,343,083 ore tonnes in the open pit in 2014 at a
grade of 0.99 gold grams per tonne. At the end of Q4 2014, the Company had
2,495,739 tonnes of low grade open pit ore stockpiled ahead of the mill at an
average grade of 0.75 gold grams per tonne.
During Q4 2014, the Company processed 713,676 tonnes, or 7,757
TPD, at the Young-Davidson mill facility, with gold grades averaging 1.97 grams
per tonne, representing an 11% increase over the 641,114 tonnes processed in Q4
2013. The increased throughput resulted from continued operating efficiencies,
and was also enabled by the receipt of the 10,000 TPD permit. Mill recoveries
during the fourth quarter were 88%, consistent with the same period in the prior
year. During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company processed 2,812,954 tonnes, or
7,707 TPD, at the Young-Davidson mill facility, with gold grades averaging 1.97
grams per tonne. This represents a 13% increase over the 2,482,305 tonnes
processed in the same period of the prior year.
|
6 |
2014 ANNUAL MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
Young-Davidson produced 40,945 gold ounces during Q4 2014 compared to 33,106 total ounces produced in Q4 2013. This significant increase in production was due to the higher mill throughput as described above. The benefit of increased high grade underground ore processed was partially offset by a decrease in the grade of open pit stockpiled ore processed. Q4 2014 represents the eleventh consecutive quarterly increase in gold production at Young-Davidson. During the year ended December 31, 2014, Young-Davidson produced 156,753 gold ounces compared to 120,738 produced during the prior year. This result was consistent with the Company’s 2014 guidance for Young-Davidson of 140,000 to 160,000 gold ounces produced during the year.
YOUNG-DAVIDSON FINANCIAL
REVIEW
(in thousands, except total cash costs)
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Revenue from mining operations |
$ |
51,057 |
|
$ |
31,420 |
|
$ |
204,923 |
|
$ |
124,439 |
|
Production costs |
$ |
30,517 |
|
$ |
30,679 |
|
$ |
138,159 |
|
$ |
76,356 |
|
Refining costs |
$ |
73 |
|
$ |
52 |
|
$ |
195 |
|
$ |
159 |
|
Amortization and depletion |
$ |
20,153 |
|
$ |
22,133 |
|
$ |
97,820 |
|
$ |
47,385 |
|
Earnings / (loss) from operations |
$ |
79 |
|
$ |
(24,393 |
) |
$ |
(31,486 |
) |
$ |
(2,410 |
) |
Cash flow from operations |
$ |
32,038 |
|
$ |
10,063 |
|
$ |
63,062 |
|
$ |
56,442 |
|
Capital expenditures |
$ |
(22,913 |
) |
$ |
(48,737 |
) |
$ |
(137,174 |
) |
$ |
(195,233 |
) |
Net
free cash flow(1) |
$ |
9,125 |
|
$ |
(38,674 |
) |
$ |
(74,112 |
) |
$ |
(138,791 |
) |
Cash costs per gold ounce, net of by-product
revenues and NRV adjustments(1)(2) |
$ |
719 |
|
$ |
850 |
|
$ |
825 |
|
$ |
744 |
|
Cash
costs per gold ounce, net of by-product revenues(1)(2) |
$ |
719 |
|
$ |
1,179 |
|
$ |
845 |
|
$ |
857 |
|
(1) |
See the Non-GAAP Measures section on page
22. |
(2) |
For 2014, cash costs per gold ounce are calculated
based on ounces sold. For 2013, cash cost per gold ounces are calculated
based on ounces produced. |
During Q4 2014, Young-Davidson recognized revenue of $51.1
million and earnings from operations of $0.1 million compared to revenues of
$31.4 million and a loss from operations of $24.4 million in Q4 2013. Revenues
increased in Q4 2014 as a result of increased gold ounces sold, partially offset
by lower realized gold prices. In addition, in Q4 2013, revenue associated with
underground pre-production ounces sold prior to the declaration of commercial
production on October 31, 2013 was credited against capitalized costs. In 2014,
Young-Davidson recognized revenue of $204.9 million and a loss from operations
of $31.5 million.
Q4 2014 production costs were $30.5 million compared to $30.7
million in the fourth quarter of 2013. In addition, Q4 2014 cash costs per gold
ounce, net of by-product revenues and NRV adjustments, were $719, representing a
15% decrease from the same period in 2013. The decreased cost per ounce was due
primarily to the increase in the underground contribution to overall site
production, and the favourable weakening of the Canadian dollar in the current
quarter as compared to the prior year.
Production costs for the year ended December 31, 2014 were $138.2 million compared to $76.4 million in 2013. Production costs increased due to the addition of underground costs subsequent to the declaration of commercial production on October 31, 2013. Prior to that date, production costs related to underground ounces produced were capitalized. In 2014, cash costs per gold ounce, net of by-product revenues and NRV adjustments, were $825; an 11% increase from 2013 and 3% higher than the Company’s 2014 guidance of $800 per ounce. The increased cost per ounce was due primarily to a higher open pit operating strip ratio, higher open pit mining cost per tonne and lower grade of open pit ore processed, partially offset by the weakened Canadian dollar during the year.
During the year, the Company recognized net non-cash NRV
adjustments of $5.5 million on low grade long-term stockpile inventory due to a
decline in the price of gold. Of this amount, $3.3 million was recognized in
production costs and $2.2 million was recognized in amortization and depletion.
During 2013, as a result of a decrease in the gold price and higher estimated
future processing costs, the Company recognized an NRV adjustment of $16.6
million, of which $10.0 million was recognized in production costs and $6.6
million was recognized in amortization and depletion.
The loss from operations in the year ended December 31, 2014
resulted from higher production costs and amortization and depletion expense as
compared to the same period in 2013. Amortization and depletion expense
increased due to the addition of depletion expense from the underground mine,
and the depletion of stripping costs capitalized in prior periods as the open
pit approached the end of its mine life. Amortization and depletion expense per
ounce declined in the second half of 2014, subsequent to the cessation of mining
in the open pit.
The Company reported a $21.9 million quarter-over-quarter
increase in operating cash flow driven by the increased production noted
previously, and a decline in operating costs per ounce. During Q4 2014, the
Young-Davidson mine also generated net free cash flow of $9.1 million. Capital
expenditures in Q4 2014 included $9.6 million in site infrastructure, and $13.3
million in underground development. During the year ended December 31,
2014, capital expenditures at Young-Davidson of $137.2 million exceeded
operating cash flow of $63.1 million resulting in negative net free cash flow of
$74.1 million. Capital expenditures in the year ended December 31, 2014 included
$56.5 million in site infrastructure, $78.6 million in underground development,
and $2.1 million in capitalized borrowing costs. During 2014, $17.7 million of
construction-related accounts payable balances from 2013 were paid and included
in capital expenditures.
As a result of accelerated capital investment during the first
nine months of the year the Company increased its 2014 capital expenditure
forecast at Young-Davidson on August 7, 2014, from approximately $110 million to
approximately $135 million. Accelerated capital investment initiatives included
underground development rates exceeding plan and the sinking of the MCM shaft
being ahead of schedule. Full year capital expenditures, after adjusting for
$2.1 million of capitalized borrowing costs, were consistent with the revised
guidance.
|
7 |
2014 ANNUAL MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
The Company owns the El Chanate mine, located 37 kilometres
northeast of the town of Caborca in the state of Sonora, Mexico. El Chanate
consists of an open pit mine with heap leach processing facilities.
EL CHANATE OPERATIONAL
REVIEW
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Open Pit Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total tonnes mined |
|
8,243,372 |
|
|
9,060,830 |
|
|
34,073,324 |
|
|
35,666,946 |
|
Tonnes of ore mined |
|
1,765,835 |
|
|
2,213,858 |
|
|
8,683,292 |
|
|
9,111,448 |
|
Capitalized stripping tonnes |
|
4,752,524 |
|
|
4,348,728 |
|
|
14,582,767 |
|
|
17,297,066 |
|
Average grade of gold(1) |
|
0.59 |
|
|
0.56 |
|
|
0.50 |
|
|
0.56 |
|
Tonnes stockpiled ahead of the
heap leach pad |
|
31,466 |
|
|
194,688 |
|
|
31,466 |
|
|
194,688 |
|
Average grade of gold(1) |
|
0.70 |
|
|
0.60 |
|
|
0.70 |
|
|
0.60 |
|
Crushing and Heap Leach Operations |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tonnes of ore crushed and placed
on the heap leach pad |
|
1,532,859 |
|
|
1,623,098 |
|
|
6,788,223 |
|
|
6,725,081 |
|
Average grade of gold processed(1) |
|
0.64 |
|
|
0.69 |
|
|
0.60 |
|
|
0.70 |
|
Tonnes of low grade ore placed on the heap leach pad |
|
231,836 |
|
|
566,193 |
|
|
2,058,289 |
|
|
2,342,861 |
|
Average grade of gold processed(1) |
|
0.20 |
|
|
0.19 |
|
|
0.20 |
|
|
0.19 |
|
Total tonnes of ore processed
|
|
1,764,695 |
|
|
2,189,291 |
|
|
8,846,512 |
|
|
9,067,942 |
|
Average grade of gold processed(1) |
|
0.58 |
|
|
0.56 |
|
|
0.50 |
|
|
0.57 |
|
Gold ounces produced |
|
15,638 |
|
|
16,420 |
|
|
67,279 |
|
|
71,864 |
|
Gold
ounces sold |
|
16,506 |
|
|
15,024 |
|
|
66,375 |
|
|
72,035 |
|
During Q4 2014, the Company mined 8,243,372 tonnes at the El
Chanate open pit, including 1,765,835 ore tonnes, at an average grade of 0.59
gold grams per tonne. During 2014, the Company mined 34,073,324 tonnes,
including 8,683,292 ore tonnes, at an average grade of 0.50 gold grams per
tonne. While ore tonnes mined remained relatively consistent year-over-year, the
decrease in average grades during 2014 compared to the prior year was due to
mine sequencing.
Capitalized stripping activities totaled 4,752,524 and
14,582,767 tonnes during Q4 2014 and the year ended December 31, 2014,
respectively, compared to 4,348,728 and 17,297,066 tonnes during the same
periods in 2013, respectively. The decrease during 2014 was due to the
completion of the southeast push-back of the pit in 2013. Stripping activities
at El Chanate represented a capital investment of $7.6 million during the fourth
quarter of 2014, compared to an investment of $6.3 million in Q4 2013.
The Company crushed and placed 1,532,859 tonnes of open
pit ore on the heap leach pad in Q4 2014, at an average rate of 16,662 TPD,
compared to the average rate during Q4 2013 of 17,642 TPD. During Q4 2014, the
Company also placed 231,836 tonnes of low grade run-of-mine material on the heap
leach pad. Total tonnes processed in Q4 2014 of 1,764,695 tonnes, or 19,181 TPD,
were lower than total tonnes processed in Q4 2013 of 2,189,291, primarily due to
the decrease in low grade run-of-mine ore. During 2014, the Company crushed and
placed 6,788,223 tonnes of ore at an average rate of 18,598 TPD, consistent with
the 18,425 TPD stacking rate in 2013.
The grade of ore crushed and placed averaged 0.64 gold grams
per tonne during Q4 2014 compared to an average grade of 0.69 gold grams per
tonne in Q4 2013. Annual grades crushed and placed in 2014 averaged 0.60 gold
grams per tonne compared to an average grade of 0.70 gold grams per tonne in
2013. The variances in grades in the current year periods versus prior year
periods were largely due to the effects of mine sequencing. During Q4 2014, the
grade of all material processed, including run-of-mine material, averaged 0.58
grams per tonne placed compared to 0.56 grams per tonne placed in Q4 2013.
During the quarter and year-to-date, El Chanate produced 15,638
and 67,279 gold ounces, respectively, compared to production of 16,420 and
71,864 gold ounces in the same periods of the prior year. The decrease
period-over-period is primarily a result of the lower grade of crushed ore
placed in 2014 as compared to the prior year. Total 2014 production was slightly below the lower end of the Company’s 2014 guidance of 70,000 ounces produced.
|
8 |
2014 ANNUAL MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
EL CHANATE FINANCIAL
REVIEW
(in thousands, except total cash costs)
|
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Revenue from mining operations |
$ |
20,137 |
|
$ |
19,362 |
|
$ |
86,259 |
|
$ |
103,192 |
|
Production costs |
$ |
26,745 |
|
$ |
29,293 |
|
$ |
61,150 |
|
$ |
71,625 |
|
Refining costs |
$ |
107 |
|
$ |
87 |
|
$ |
400 |
|
$ |
367 |
|
Amortization and depletion |
$ |
9,868 |
|
$ |
5,451 |
|
$ |
23,262 |
|
$ |
17,836 |
|
Loss
from operations(1) |
$ |
(107,523 |
) |
$ |
(91,343 |
) |
$ |
(90,243 |
) |
$ |
(143,632 |
) |
Cash flow from operations |
$ |
3,176 |
|
$ |
4,794 |
|
$ |
15,737 |
|
$ |
33,425 |
|
Capital expenditures(2) |
$ |
(8,689 |
) |
$ |
(10,282 |
) |
$ |
(29,611 |
) |
$ |
(44,088 |
) |
Net
free cash flow(3) |
$ |
(5,513 |
) |
$ |
(5,488 |
) |
$ |
(13,874 |
) |
$ |
(10,663 |
) |
Cash costs per gold ounce, net of by-product
revenues and NRV adjustments(3) |
$ |
816 |
|
$ |
615 |
|
$ |
669 |
|
$ |
592 |
|
Cash
costs per gold ounce, net of by-product revenues(3) |
$ |
1,486 |
|
$ |
1,491 |
|
$ |
852 |
|
$ |
813 |
|
(1) |
Earnings from operations includes general and
administrative expenses and impairment charges. |
(2) |
Capital expenditures include $3.4 million and $5.1
million in exploration expenditures for the years ended December 31, 2014
and 2013, respectively. |
(3) |
See the Non-GAAP Measures section on page
22. |
The Company recognized revenue at El Chanate of $20.1 million
during Q4 2014, compared to revenue of $19.4 million in Q4 2013. During the year
ended December 31, 2014, the Company recognized revenue at El Chanate of $86.3
million, compared to revenue of $103.2 million during the year ended December
31, 2013. This annual decrease in revenue was due to a decline in ounces sold in
2014 and a lower average realized gold price.
The Company recognized a loss from operations at El Chanate of $107.5 million during Q4 2014, compared to a loss from operations of $91.3 million in Q4 2013. Included in the loss from operations in Q4 2014 was an impairment charge of $90.0 million that arose primarily from a decrease in gold reserve estimates, an increase in strip ratio, which indicates an increase in the amount of waste tonnes required to access a tonne of ore, and an increase in future processing costs on a per ounce basis. Reserve estimates decreased and the strip ratio increased primarily due to a reduction in overall slope angles. The reduction in planned slope angles came after an external geotechnical review of geotechnical drilling, mapping, and slope performance. The Company also recorded an impairment charge in Q4 2013 of $74.0 million. The loss from operations in Q4 2014 also included a non-cash NRV adjustment on ore inventory of $16.4 million at December 31, 2014, of which $12.7 million was recognized in production costs and $3.7 million was included in amortization and depletion. The NRV adjustment was caused by a decrease in estimated future gold prices and an increase in future estimated processing costs. In Q4 2013, El Chanate recorded an NRV adjustment of $21.0 million, of which $19.3 million was recognized in production costs and $1.7 million was included in amortization and depletion.
Losses from operations in the year ended December 31, 2014 were
$90.2 million, compared to prior year losses from operations of $143.6 million.
This reduction in losses resulted primarily from larger impairment charges and
NRV adjustments in 2013, offset by lower revenue and production costs. During
the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recorded total impairment charges
of $154.0 million at El Chanate. During the year ended December 31, 2014, the
Company recorded total NRV adjustments at El Chanate of $18.0 million, compared
to total NRV adjustments of $25.5 million recorded during the year ended
December 31, 2013. Earnings from operations before impairment charges and NRV
adjustments were $18.6 million in 2014 compared to $37.5 million in 2013. This
year-over-year decline is due to a decrease in gold ounces sold, a lower average
realized gold price, and an increase in amortization and depletion recorded
during 2014.
Cash costs per gold ounce, net of by-product revenues and NRV adjustments, were $816 in the fourth quarter of 2014, an increase of 33% over cash costs per gold ounce, net of by-product revenues and NRV adjustments, of $615 in the fourth quarter of 2013. The quarter-over-quarter increase was due to an increase in the average cost of ore inventories, which resulted from lower grades stacked in the first half of the year and an increase in the operating strip ratio. Cash costs per gold ounce, net of by-product revenues and NRV adjustments, were $669 in 2014, an increase of 13% over cash costs per gold ounce, net of by-product revenues and NRV adjustments, of $592 in the same period of prior year. El Chanate’s cash costs were consistent with the Company’s 2014 guidance of between $625 and $725 per ounce.
During Q4 2014, capital expenditures of $8.7 million at El Chanate exceeded operating cash flows of $3.2 million, resulting in negative net free cash flow of $5.5 million. Capital expenditures in Q4 2014 included $7.6 million in capitalized stripping activities, $0.4 million in other sustaining capital and optimization initiatives, and $0.7 million in exploration expenditures. During the year ended December 31, 2014, capital expenditures at El Chanate of $29.6 million exceeded operating cash flows of $15.7 million, resulting in negative free cash flow of $13.9 million. Operating cash flow in 2014 was impacted by a delay in the collection of $3.3 million related to 2013 income taxes receivable. Capital expenditures at El Chanate in 2014 included $23.5 million in capitalized stripping activities, $2.7 million in other sustaining capital and optimization initiatives, and $3.4 million in exploration expenditures. Excluding $3.4 million of exploration expenditures, total capital expenditures at El Chanate were $26.2 million, 5% higher than the Company’s 2014 guidance of approximately $25 million.
|
9 |
2014 ANNUAL MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
On February 19, 2015, the Company reported updated reserves and
resources as at December 31, 2014. Further details on the updated reserves and
resources by category can be found in the Companys February 19, 2015
press release or in the Companys Annual Information Form, both of which can
be found on the Companys website at www.auricogold.com.
KEMESS
During Q4 2014, the Company continued an exploration program at
Kemess East (located approximately one kilometre from the Kemess Underground
Project). In Q4 2014, the Company completed 251 metres of drilling and an
airborne geophysical survey totaling 1,111 line kilometres.
On January 21, 2015, the Company announced an initial National
Instrument 43-101 compliant indicated resource of 2.1 million gold equivalent
ounces and an inferred resource of 3.4 million gold equivalent ounces at the
Kemess East deposit. Further details can be found in the Companys January 21,
2015 and February 19, 2015 press releases, or in the Companys Annual
Information Form, all of which can be found on the Companys website at www.auricogold.com.
EL CHANATE
During Q4 2014, the Company completed 13 holes consisting of
1,836 metres of reverse circulation drilling, and 6 core holes consisting of
1,663 metres of drilling northwest and southeast of the open pit along the trend
of the El Chanate deposit.
During Q4 2014, geological field work continued on the El
Chanate extension. This work was conducted in connection with the Companys
option to earn a 70% interest in claims along the Chanate Fault to the northwest
of the mine.
LYNN LAKE
On November 11, 2014, the Company announced a strategic
partnership with Carlisle in the Lynn Lake Gold Camp (Lynn Lake Project).
Under the agreement the Company has acquired a 25% interest in the Lynn Lake
Project for an initial cash contribution of CAD $5.0 million and can earn up to
a 60% interest by funding CAD $20.0 million on the project over a three-year
period and delivering a feasibility study within that time period.
LAS LAJAS PROJECT
During Q4 2014, the Company continued geological mapping and
trenching.
SANTA FE PROJECT
During Q4 2014, the Company drilled 12 diamond drill holes
consisting of 1,983 metres. The target on this property is low sulfidation
epithermal gold and silver mineralization typical of this deposit type in the
Sierra Madre region of Mexico.
|
10 |
2014 ANNUAL MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
SUMMARIZED FINANCIAL AND
OPERATING RESULTS |
(in thousands, except ounces, per share
amounts, average realized prices, all-in sustaining costs and total cash
costs) |
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Continuing operations -
Young-Davidson mine, El Chanate mine, and Corporate and other |
|
Gold ounces
produced(1) |
|
224,032 |
|
|
161,100 |
|
|
100,284 |
|
Gold ounces sold(1) |
|
227,966 |
|
|
160,913 |
|
|
94,422 |
|
Pre-production gold ounces
produced(1) |
|
- |
|
|
31,502 |
|
|
26,999 |
|
Pre-production gold ounces sold(1) |
|
- |
|
|
31,839 |
|
|
17,505 |
|
Cash costs per gold ounce,
net of by-product revenues and NRV adjustments(1)(2)(3)(4) |
$ |
779 |
|
$ |
676 |
|
$ |
536 |
|
Cash costs per gold ounce, net
of by-product revenues(1)(2)(3)(4) |
$ |
847 |
|
$ |
837 |
|
$ |
536 |
|
All-in sustaining costs per
gold ounce sold, net of by-product revenues and NRV
adjustments(1)(3)(4) |
$ |
1,200 |
|
$ |
1,181 |
|
$ |
1,259 |
|
All-in sustaining costs per gold ounce sold,
net of by-product revenues(1)(3)(4) |
$ |
1,268 |
|
$ |
1,342 |
|
$ |
1,259 |
|
Revenue from mining operations
|
$ |
291,182 |
|
$ |
227,631 |
|
$ |
163,622 |
|
Production
costs(2)(5) |
$ |
199,309 |
|
$ |
147,981 |
|
$ |
61,599 |
|
Loss from
operations(2) |
$ |
(154,705 |
) |
$ |
(178,087 |
) |
$ |
(96,884 |
) |
Net loss(2) |
$ |
(169,648 |
) |
$ |
(176,770 |
) |
$ |
(99,779 |
) |
Net loss per share,
basic(2) |
$ |
(0.68 |
) |
$ |
(0.71 |
) |
$ |
(0.35 |
) |
Net loss per share,
diluted(2) |
$ |
(0.68 |
) |
$ |
(0.72 |
) |
$ |
(0.35 |
) |
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation, and
amortization(3) |
$ |
(43,960 |
) |
$ |
(109,213 |
) |
$ |
(80,043 |
) |
Operating cash
flow(2) |
$ |
60,414 |
|
$ |
63,266 |
|
$ |
(7,231 |
) |
Net free cash flow(3) |
$ |
(128,415 |
) |
$ |
(186,156 |
) |
$ |
(368,731 |
) |
Discontinued operations - Ocampo
mine, El Cubo mine, and Australian Operations(6) |
|
Gold ounces produced |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
123,201 |
|
Silver ounces produced |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
2,983,924 |
|
Gold ounces sold |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
123,313 |
|
Silver ounces sold |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
2,807,754 |
|
Cash costs per gold ounce, net
of by-product revenues, co-product revenues and NRV
adjustments(3) |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
478 |
|
Cash costs per gold ounce, net of by-product and
co-product revenues(3) |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
563 |
|
Revenue from mining operations
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
293,745 |
|
Production costs(5)
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
155,920 |
|
Earnings from operations |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
56,320 |
|
Net earnings |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
131,052 |
|
Net earnings per share, basic
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
Net earnings per share, diluted |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
0.46 |
|
Operating cash flow |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
79,071 |
|
Net free cash flow(3) |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
(64,449 |
) |
|
11 |
2014 ANNUAL MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Total |
|
Gold ounces produced(1) |
|
224,032 |
|
|
161,100 |
|
|
223,485 |
|
Silver ounces produced |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
2,983,924 |
|
Gold ounces sold(1) |
|
227,966 |
|
|
160,913 |
|
|
217,735 |
|
Silver ounces sold |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
2,807,754 |
|
Pre-production gold ounces
produced(1) |
|
- |
|
|
31,502 |
|
|
26,999 |
|
Pre-production gold ounces sold(1) |
|
- |
|
|
31,839 |
|
|
17,505 |
|
Average realized gold price per ounce |
$ |
1,265 |
|
$ |
1,395 |
|
$ |
1,678 |
|
Average realized silver price per ounce |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
31.16 |
|
Cash costs per gold ounce, net of by-product
revenues and NRV adjustments(1)(2)(3)(4) |
$ |
779 |
|
$ |
676 |
|
$ |
503 |
|
Cash
costs per gold ounce, net of by-product revenues(1)(2)(3)(4)
|
$ |
847 |
|
$ |
837 |
|
$ |
551 |
|
Revenue from mining operations |
$ |
291,182 |
|
$ |
227,631 |
|
$ |
457,367 |
|
Production costs(2)(5) |
$ |
199,309 |
|
$ |
147,981 |
|
$ |
217,519 |
|
Loss from operations(2) |
$ |
(154,705 |
) |
$ |
(178,087 |
) |
$ |
(40,564 |
) |
Net (loss) / earnings(2) |
$ |
(169,648 |
) |
$ |
(176,770 |
) |
$ |
31,273 |
|
Net (loss) / earnings per share,
basic(2) |
$ |
(0.68 |
) |
$ |
(0.71 |
) |
$ |
0.11 |
|
Net
(loss) / earnings per share, diluted(2) |
$ |
(0.68 |
) |
$ |
(0.72 |
) |
$ |
0.11 |
|
Operating cash flow(2) |
$ |
60,414 |
|
$ |
63,266 |
|
$ |
71,840 |
|
Net free cash flow(3) |
$ |
(128,415 |
) |
$ |
(186,156 |
) |
$ |
(433,180 |
) |
Total cash |
$ |
89,031 |
|
$ |
142,652 |
|
$ |
603,401 |
|
Cash
dividends per share, declared |
$ |
0.026 |
|
$ |
0.16 |
|
$ |
Nil |
|
(1) |
The Young-Davidson open pit mine declared commercial
production on September 1, 2012, and is therefore excluded from
consolidated cash costs and consolidated all-in sustaining costs prior to
this date. The Young-Davidson underground mine declared commercial
production on October 31, 2013, and therefore, all underground ounces are
excluded from consolidated cash costs and consolidated all-in sustaining
costs prior to this date. Pre-production ounces produced and sold are
excluded from consolidated ounces produced and sold as revenue from these
ounces was credited against capitalized project costs. |
(2) |
Certain 2012 information has been restated as a result
of the adoption of IFRIC 20, Stripping Costs in the Production Phase of a
Surface Mine, which was applied prospectively to production stripping
costs incurred on or after January 1, 2012. For further details, refer to
note 3(a) to the consolidated financial statements for the year ended
December 31, 2013. |
(3) |
See the Non-GAAP Measures section on page
22. |
(4) |
For the year ended December 31, 2014, cash costs per
gold ounce are calculated using gold ounces sold at the El Chanate and
Young-Davidson mines. For the year ended December 31, 2013, cash costs per
gold ounce are calculated using gold ounces sold at the El Chanate mine
and gold ounces produced at the Young-Davidson mine. For the year ended
December 31, 2012, cash costs per gold ounce are calculated using ounces
sold at the El Chanate, Ocampo, El Cubo, Fosterville and Stawell mines and
ounces produced at the Young-Davidson mine. |
(5) |
Production costs do not include amortization and
depletion or refining costs. |
(6) |
The Company disposed of the Ocampo, El Cubo,
Fosterville and Stawell mines in 2012, and reclassified the results from
these operations as discontinued
operations. |
|
12 |
2014 ANNUAL MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
REVIEW
OF ANNUAL FINANCIAL RESULTS
|
2014 versus 2013
During 2014, the Company sold 227,966 gold ounces at
Young-Davidson and El Chanate, compared to sales of 160,913 gold ounces in 2013.
Revenue during 2014 increased to $291.2 million, as compared to $227.6 million
in 2013. This $63.6 million increase in revenue was due to an increase in ounces
sold at the Young-Davidson mine, and was partially offset by lower realized gold
prices in 2014. The Company also sold 31,839 pre-production ounces at
Young-Davidson during 2013, however, the related revenue was credited against
capitalized costs.
The Company recognized a loss from operations of $154.7 million
in 2014, compared to a loss from operations of $178.1 million in 2013. During
the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company recorded an impairment charge of
$90.0 million on property, plant and equipment and mining interests at the El
Chanate mine. During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company recorded
impairment charges of $154.0 million on goodwill, property, plant and equipment
and mining interests at the El Chanate mine. In addition, the Company recognized
NRV adjustments of $23.5 million during the year ended December 31, 2014
compared to total NRV adjustments of $42.1 million during the year ended
December 31, 2013.
Before impairment charges and NRV adjustments, losses from
operations were $39.5 million in 2014, compared to earnings from operations of
$22.6 million in the same period of 2013. The year-over-year reduction in
earnings from operations resulted from increased cash costs, as discussed below,
and increased amortization and depletion expense during 2014. Amortization and
depletion expense increased due to the addition of depletion expense from the
Young-Davidson underground mine and the depletion of stripping costs capitalized
in prior periods as the Young-Davidson open pit approached the end of its mine
life.
During 2014, consolidated cash costs per gold ounce, net of
by-product revenues and NRV adjustments, were $779, representing a 15% increase
over cash costs per gold ounce of $676 in 2013. This year-over-year increase was
primarily due to a higher open pit operating strip ratio, higher open pit mining
cost per tonne, and lower grade of open pit ore processed at Young-Davidson. In
addition, an increase in the average cost of ore inventories at El Chanate also
contributed to the increased cash costs.
The Company reported a net loss of $169.6 million in 2014,
compared to a net loss from operations of $176.8 million in 2013. Included in
net loss for 2014 was a $28.1 million increase in income tax recovery compared
to 2013. This was offset by a $27.4 million increase in other losses, a $2.4
million increase in foreign exchange losses, and a $17.0 million increase in
finance costs due to interest on the senior secured notes issued in March 2014.
Other losses increased primarily due to a $15.6 million loss on the modification
of the Companys convertible senior notes, which resulted from the cash tender
offer announced during Q1 2014, and amortization on the retained interest
royalty of $13.3 million.
During 2014, consolidated all-in sustaining costs per gold
ounce, net of by-product revenues and NRV adjustments, were $1,200, representing
a 2% increase over all-in sustaining costs per gold ounce, net of by-product
revenues and NRV adjustments, of $1,181 in 2013. The increase was due to higher
Young-Davidson open pit cash costs noted above, partially offset by an increase
in gold ounces sold in 2014. The Company’s consolidated all-in sustaining costs per ounce were consistent with 2014 guidance.
In 2014, the Company reported EBITDA of negative $44.0 million,
compared to EBITDA of negative $109.2 million in 2013. This increase was
primarily due to lower impairment charges recorded in 2014, as discussed
previously, and a $63.6 million increase in revenue recorded in the current year
resulting from increased ounces sold at the Young-Davidson mine. These items
were offset by increased production costs at Young-Davidson and El Chanate in
2014, as discussed previously.
The Company reported operating cash flow of $60.4 million
during 2014, a decrease of $2.9 million from operating cash flow of $63.3
million in the same period in prior year. This decrease in operating cash flow
arose primarily as a result of a reduction in the operating cash flow contribution from El
Chanate. After deducting capital expenditures of $188.8 million, the Companys
net free cash flow from operations for 2014 was an outflow of $128.4 million.
|
13 |
2014 ANNUAL MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
2013 versus 2012
During 2013, the Company sold 160,913 gold ounces at
Young-Davidson and El Chanate, compared to sales of 94,422 gold ounces in 2012
when the Young-Davidson open pit mine contributed four months of sales
subsequent to the declaration of commercial production on September 1, 2012.
Revenues from continuing operations during 2013 increased to $227.6 million, as
compared to revenues from continuing operations of $163.6 million in 2012. This
$64.0 million increase in revenue was due to an increase in ounces sold at the
Young-Davidson mine, and was partially offset by lower realized gold prices in
2013. The Company sold 31,839 pre-production ounces at Young-Davidson during
2013, compared to 17,505 pre-production ounces sold during 2012. The related
revenues from pre-production ounces were credited against capitalized costs.
The Company recognized a loss from continuing operations of
$178.1 million in 2013, compared to a loss from continuing operations of $96.9
million in 2012. During 2013, primarily as a result of the impact of lower gold
prices, the Company recorded impairment charges of $154.0 million on goodwill,
property, plant and equipment and mining interests at the El Chanate mine. In
addition, the Company recognized NRV adjustments on ore inventories at El
Chanate and Young-Davidson of $25.5 million and $16.6 million, respectively. In
2012, the Company recorded an impairment charge related to the El Chanate mine
of $127.0 million. Before these impairment charges and NRV adjustments, earnings
from continuing operations were $18.0 million, a 40% decrease compared to 2012.
This decrease was primarily due to reduced realized gold prices during the year,
offset by earnings from a full year of operations at the Young-Davidson open pit
mine, which achieved commercial production on September 1, 2012, and two months
of commercial production from the underground mine which achieved commercial
production on October 31, 2013.
The Company reported a net loss from continuing operations of
$176.8 million in 2013, compared to a net loss from continuing operations of
$99.8 million in 2012. The increase in net loss was due to the higher losses
from continuing operations mentioned above and a $4.1 million increase in
foreign exchange losses, offset by a $10.2 million increase in income tax
recoveries. Foreign exchange gains resulted from the weakening of the Canadian
dollar and Mexican peso relative to the US dollar.
During 2013, consolidated cash costs per gold ounce from
continuing operations, net of by-product revenues and NRV adjustments were $676,
representing a 26% increase over 2012 cash costs per gold ounce of $536. This
year-over-year increase resulted from the addition of cash costs at the
Young-Davidson open pit mine for a full year and higher average ore inventory
costs at El Chanate. The higher costs at El Chanate were due to higher
quantities of solution applied to the leach pad and a reduction in capitalized
stripping costs associated with the adoption of a new accounting standard. In
2012, cash costs per gold ounce included cash costs from the Young-Davison open
pit mine subsequent to the declaration of commercial production on September 1,
2012.
During 2013, all-in sustaining costs per gold ounce from
continuing operations, net of by-product revenues and NRV adjustments, were
$1,181, representing a 6% decrease over 2012 all-in sustaining costs per gold
ounce of $1,259. The decrease is primarily due to decreased general and
administration expenditures per gold ounce sold, offset by the addition of cash
costs from the Young-Davidson open pit mine and increased cash costs at the El
Chanate mine.
In 2013, the Company reported EBITDA of negative $109.2 million
compared to EBITDA of negative $80.0 million in 2012. The decline in EBITDA is
primarily due to the increase in production costs, amortization and depletion
expense, and impairment charges mentioned above. These decreases in EBITDA were
partially offset by an increase in revenues that resulted from a full year of
operations at the Young-Davidson open pit mine.
The Company reported operating cash flow from continuing
operations of $63.3 million during 2013, an increase of $70.5 million from the
prior year cash outflow of $7.2 million. This increase in operating cash flow
arose primarily as a result of additional operating cash flow contributed from
the Young-Davidson mine, partially offset by lower operating cash flow at the El
Chanate mine due to lower realized prices and higher cash costs per ounce. After
deducting capital expenditures of $249.4 million, primarily related to
Young-Davidson, the Companys 2013 net free cash flow from continuing operations
was an outflow of $186.2 million.
|
14 |
2014 ANNUAL MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
SUMMARY
OF QUARTERLY FINANCIAL AND
OPERATING RESULTS |
(in thousands, except ounces, per share
amounts, average realized prices, all-in sustaining costs and total cash
costs) |
|
|
|
Q4 2014
|
|
|
Q3 2014
|
|
|
Q2 2014
|
|
|
Q1 2014
|
|
|
Q4 2013
|
|
|
Q3 2013
|
|
|
Q2 2013
|
|
|
Q1 2013
|
|
Gold
ounces produced |
|
56,583 |
|
|
57,037 |
|
|
56,198 |
|
|
54,214 |
|
|
46,017 |
|
|
38,456 |
|
|
38,186 |
|
|
38,441 |
|
Gold
ounces sold |
|
58,649 |
|
|
56,970 |
|
|
58,277 |
|
|
54,070 |
|
|
39,855 |
|
|
40,185 |
|
|
41,540 |
|
|
39,333 |
|
Average realized gold price |
$ |
1,202 |
|
$ |
1,280 |
|
$ |
1,283 |
|
$ |
1,297 |
|
$ |
1,257 |
|
$ |
1,332 |
|
$ |
1,369 |
|
$ |
1,627 |
|
Cash costs per gold ounce, net of by-product
revenues and NRV adjustments(1)(3) |
$ |
746 |
|
$ |
706 |
|
$ |
801 |
|
$ |
870 |
|
$ |
771 |
|
$ |
628 |
|
$ |
655 |
|
$ |
635 |
|
Cash costs per gold ounce, net of by-product
revenues(1)(3) |
$ |
935 |
|
$ |
784 |
|
$ |
801 |
|
$ |
870 |
|
$ |
1,284 |
|
$ |
497 |
|
$ |
848 |
|
$ |
635 |
|
All-in sustaining costs per gold ounce, sold,
net of by-product revenues and NRV adjustments(1) |
$ |
1,129 |
|
$ |
1,101 |
|
$ |
1,191 |
|
$ |
1,390 |
|
$ |
1,232 |
|
$ |
1,210 |
|
$ |
1,189 |
|
$ |
1,090 |
|
All-in sustaining costs per gold ounce, sold, net of by-product
revenues(1) |
$ |
1,317 |
|
$ |
1,179 |
|
$ |
1,191 |
|
$ |
1,390 |
|
$ |
1,807 |
|
$ |
1,087 |
|
$ |
1,382 |
|
$ |
1,090 |
|
Revenue from mining operations |
$ |
71,194 |
|
$ |
73,505 |
|
$ |
75,530 |
|
$ |
70,953 |
|
$ |
50,782 |
|
$ |
54,304 |
|
$ |
57,660 |
|
$ |
64,885 |
|
Production costs(2) |
$ |
57,262 |
|
$ |
45,463 |
|
$ |
48,691 |
|
$ |
47,893 |
|
$ |
59,972 |
|
$ |
21,079 |
|
$ |
39,055 |
|
$ |
27,875 |
|
(Loss) / earnings from operations |
$ |
(115,011 |
) |
$ |
(7,337 |
) |
$ |
(16,293 |
) |
$ |
(16,064 |
) |
$ |
(104,158 |
) |
$ |
12,230 |
|
$ |
(103,674 |
) |
$ |
17,515 |
|
Net (loss) / earnings |
$ |
(108,259 |
) |
$ |
(15,722 |
) |
$ |
(16,776 |
) |
$ |
(28,891 |
) |
$ |
(106,412 |
) |
$ |
14,859 |
|
$ |
(103,491 |
) |
$ |
18,274 |
|
Net (loss) / earnings per share |
$ |
(0.43 |
) |
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
$ |
(0.12 |
) |
$ |
(0.43 |
) |
$ |
0.06 |
|
$ |
(0.42 |
) |
$ |
0.07 |
|
Net (loss) / earnings per share, diluted |
$ |
(0.43 |
) |
$ |
(0.06 |
) |
$ |
(0.07 |
) |
$ |
(0.12 |
) |
$ |
(0.43 |
) |
$ |
0.04 |
|
$ |
(0.42 |
) |
$ |
0.04 |
|
Earnings before interest, taxes, depreciation and amortization
|
$ |
(87,309 |
) |
$ |
22,344 |
|
$ |
22,904 |
|
$ |
(1,899 |
) |
$ |
(80,069 |
) |
$ |
28,637 |
|
$ |
(91,432 |
) |
$ |
33,651 |
|
Operating cash flow |
$ |
28,486 |
|
$ |
2,788 |
|
$ |
4,649 |
|
$ |
24,491 |
|
$ |
11,954 |
|
$ |
24,338 |
|
$ |
13,875 |
|
$ |
13,099 |
|
Net
free cash flow(1) |
$ |
(12,938 |
) |
$ |
(47,889 |
) |
$ |
(36,467 |
) |
$ |
(31,121 |
) |
$ |
(51,618 |
) |
$ |
(55,734 |
) |
$ |
(46,399 |
) |
$ |
(32,405 |
) |
(1) |
See the Non-GAAP Measures section on page
22. |
(2) |
Production costs do not include amortization and
depletion or refining costs. |
(3) |
Gold ounces includes ounces sold at the El Chanate.
For the Young-Davidson mine, gold ounces includes ounces sold in 2014 and
ounces produced in 2013. |
REVIEW
OF FOURTH QUARTER FINANCIAL
RESULTS |
During the fourth quarter of 2014, the Company sold 58,649 gold
ounces at the El Chanate and Young-Davidson mines, a 47% increase over 39,855
gold ounces sold in Q4 2013. Revenue increased from $50.8 million in Q4 2013 to
$71.2 million in the fourth quarter of 2014. This $20.4 million increase in
revenue was largely due to the increase in gold ounces sold during Q4 2014,
partially offset by lower realized gold prices. The Company also sold 3,416
underground pre-production ounces at Young-Davidson during the fourth quarter of
2013, however, the related revenue from pre-production ounces sold was credited
against capitalized costs.
The Company recognized a loss from operations of $115.0 million
in the fourth quarter of 2014, compared to a loss from operations of $104.2
million in the same period of 2013. The increase in loss from operations in 2014
was due to impairment charges on the El Chanate mine of $90.0 million compared
to impairment charges of $74.0 million in Q4 2013. During the fourth quarter of
2014, the Company also recognized NRV adjustments on ore in process heap leach
inventory at El Chanate of $16.4 million. Comparatively, in Q4 2013 the Company
recognized NRV adjustments totaling $16.2 million on the low grade long-term
stockpile inventory at Young-Davidson and $21.0 million on the heap leach
inventory at El Chanate. In addition, the increase in loss from operations was
due to increased amortization and depletion costs which were higher in Q4 2014
as compared to Q4 2013 due to the addition of depletion expense from the
Young-Davidson underground mine.
Q4 2014 cash costs per gold ounce, net of by-product revenues
and NRV adjustments, were $746, a 3% decrease from Q4 2013. This
quarter-over-quarter decrease was primarily due to increased underground
contribution to overall site production at Young-Davidson and a weaker Canadian
dollar compared to prior year, partially offset by an increase in average cost
of ore inventories at El Chanate.
The Company reported a net loss of $108.3 million in the fourth
quarter of 2014, compared to a net loss of $106.4 million in Q4 2013. Net loss
increased in the current quarter as a result of the higher loss from operations
discussed previously. This increase was offset by a $14.7 million increase in
income tax recovery as discussed on page 17. In addition, contributing to net
loss in 2014 was a $3.8 million increase in financing costs due to interest
incurred on the senior secured notes issued in March 2014, and a $1.0 million
increase in foreign exchange loss quarter-over-quarter, primarily due to a
weaker Canadian dollar.
In the fourth quarter of 2014, all-in sustaining costs per gold
ounce, net of by-product revenues and NRV adjustments, decreased by 8% to
$1,129, as compared to all-in sustaining costs per gold ounce, net of by-product
revenues and NRV adjustments, of $1,232 in Q4 2013. This decrease was due to
lower general and administrative expenditures and increased gold ounces sold,
partially offset by the higher Young-Davidson open pit cash costs noted
previously.
|
15 |
2014 ANNUAL MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
The Company reported EBITDA of negative $87.3 million in Q4
2014, compared to EBITDA of negative $80.1 million in Q4 2013. This
quarter-over-quarter decrease in EBITDA is primarily due to higher impairment
charges recorded in Q4 2014, compared to Q4 2013, as discussed previously. These
items are offset by a $20.4 million quarter-over-quarter increase in revenue
largely due to the increase in gold ounces sold in Q4 2014.
The Company reported operating cash flow of $28.5 million
during the fourth quarter, an increase of $16.5 million over operating cash flow
of $12.0 million in Q4 2013. This increase in operating cash flow was primarily
due to increased gold ounces sold at Young-Davidson resulting in higher revenues
during the current quarter as compared to the prior year. After deducting
capital expenditures of $41.4 million, the Companys Q4 2014 net free cash flow
was negative $12.9 million.
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
2012 |
(1)
|
Reclamation, care and maintenance costs |
$ |
5,971 |
|
$ |
4,417 |
|
$ |
14,066 |
|
General and administrative(2) |
$ |
25,921 |
|
$ |
27,677 |
|
$ |
35,730 |
|
Exploration and business development |
$ |
1,001 |
|
$ |
1,014 |
|
$ |
1,385 |
|
Impairment charges |
$ |
91,622 |
|
$ |
158,574 |
|
$ |
128,537 |
|
Finance costs |
$ |
19,910 |
|
$ |
2,928 |
|
$ |
2,237 |
|
Foreign exchange loss(3) |
$ |
6,639 |
|
$ |
4,289 |
|
$ |
179 |
|
Other loss / (income) |
$ |
17,201 |
|
$ |
(10,167 |
) |
$ |
(8,762 |
) |
Equity in loss / (earnings) of associate and jointly-controlled
entity |
$ |
171 |
|
$ |
2,533 |
|
$ |
(83 |
) |
(1) |
Exclusive of discontinued operations as expenses
relating to discontinued operations are presented separately in the
Company's Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended
December 31, 2012. |
(2) |
General and administrative expense includes
share-based compensation expense. |
(3) |
Foreign exchange losses in 2013 and 2012 have been
restated as a result of the retrospective application of a voluntary
change in accounting policy related to the presentation of foreign
exchange gains and losses on deferred tax assets and liabilities. For
further details, refer to note 3 of the consolidated financial statements
for the year ended December 31, 2014. |
Reclamation, care and maintenance costs in 2014 and 2013 were
comprised of site overhead and other costs relating to activities at Kemess
South, a mine in the decommissioning stage. Facilities at the Kemess site are
being kept on care and maintenance pending the outcome of the Kemess Underground
Project and Kemess East.
General and administrative costs include expenses relating to
the overall management of the business that are not part of direct mine
operating costs. These costs are generally incurred at the corporate offices
located in Canada, but also include share-based compensation costs for key
employees at all locations. Share-based compensation costs for 2014 were $7.2
million, compared to $7.4 million in 2013. Overall, general and administrative
costs for 2014 decreased by $1.8 million over 2013, as the costs incurred in Q1
2014 related to the corporate restructuring were more than offset by lower
travel expenses and professional fees in 2014. After excluding share-based compensation costs of $7.2 million and corporate restructuring costs of $2.0 million, general administrative costs were $16.8 million, lower than the 2014 guidance of $20.0 million, primarily due to lower travel costs and professional fees than planned.
Exploration and business development costs in 2014 were largely
consistent with the same period in 2013.
During 2014, the Company recognized $91.6 million in
impairment charges, including the $90.0 million impairment charge on the El
Chanate mine, that was previously discussed, and a $1.6 million impairment
charge on exploration properties due to discontinuation of activity at these
properties. During 2013, the Company recognized $158.6 million in impairment
charges, including a $154.0 million impairment charge on the El Chanate mine,
and a $4.6 million impairment charge related to various exploration properties
due to discontinuation of exploration at these properties.
Finance costs increased by $17.0 million in 2014 as compared to
2013 primarily as a result of additional interest incurred by the Company on the
senior secured notes issued in March 2014, and lower capitalized interest due to
fewer ongoing capital projects in 2014.
During 2014, foreign exchange losses increased by $2.4 million
compared to 2013, primarily as a result of a weakening in the Canadian dollar
and Mexican peso during the year. The Company will continue to experience
non-cash foreign currency gains or losses on monetary assets and liabilities,
primarily as a result of fluctuations between the US dollar, and both the
Canadian dollar and Mexican peso.
During 2014, the Company recorded other losses of $17.2 million
compared to other income of $10.2 million in 2013. Other losses in the current
year are primarily due to a $15.6 million loss recognized in Q1 2014 on the
modification of convertible senior notes, amortization of $13.3 million on the
retained interest royalty, and a $2.5 million reclassification of accumulated
losses on available-for-sale investments from other comprehensive income to
earnings. These amounts were partially offset by $6.6 million in unrealized and realized gains on investments,
royalty income of $2.5 million from Crocodile Gold Corporation, and $3.2 million
in net proceeds received on the transfer of a litigation claim. In 2013, other
income was comprised of a $15.6 million unrealized gain on the fair value of the
option component of convertible notes, offset by a $7.4 million unrealized loss
on the fair value of contingent consideration.
|
16 |
2014 ANNUAL MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
During 2014, the Company recognized its share of losses
relating to the Lynn Lake and Orion exploration projects, which are accounted
for as an associate and jointly-controlled entity, respectively, using the
equity method.
CONSOLIDATED INCOME TAX
EXPENSE |
The Company is subject to tax in various jurisdictions,
including Mexico and Canada. There are a number of factors that can
significantly impact the Companys effective tax rate including the geographic
distribution of income, varying rates in different jurisdictions, the
non-recognition of tax assets, mining allowances, foreign currency exchange rate
movements, changes in tax laws and the impact of specific transactions and
assessments. Due to the number of factors that can potentially impact the
effective tax rate and the sensitivity of the tax provision to these factors, as
discussed above, it is expected that the Companys effective tax rate will
fluctuate in future periods.
During Q4 2014, the Company recognized a current tax recovery
of $3.1 million and a deferred tax recovery of $14.3 million, compared to a
current tax recovery of $3.7 million and a deferred tax expense of $1.1 million
in Q4 2013. The increase in deferred tax recovery during the quarter is due
primarily to a larger deferred tax recovery on impairment charges.
For the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company recognized a current tax
recovery of $2.7 million and a deferred tax recovery of $26.3 million, compared
to a current tax recovery of $0.1 million and a deferred tax recovery of $0.8
million in 2013. The current year tax recovery is due to the reversal of a
reserve in the current year. The increase in deferred tax recovery is due to a
larger deferred tax recovery on impairment charges, foreign exchange gains on
translation of Canadian dollar and Mexican peso denominated deferred income tax
liabilities, and the accounting amortization of property, plant and equipment
and mining interests exceeding the amortization recognized in the determination
of net income for tax purposes. These increases were offset by the weakening of
the Canadian dollar relative to the US dollar, which caused an increase in
taxable temporary differences.
|
17 |
2014 ANNUAL MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
As at
|
|
|
As at
|
|
|
As at
|
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2012
|
|
2014 versus
2013 |
Current assets |
$ |
183,954 |
|
$ |
291,939 |
|
$ |
743,654 |
|
Current assets decreased during 2014, primarily due to
the reduction in accounts receivable of $15.2 million, the collection of
$21.7 million in income taxes receivable, and a net decrease in cash of
$53.6 million. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term assets |
|
2,097,872 |
|
|
2,170,469 |
|
|
2,151,587 |
|
Long-term assets decreased due to impairment charges at
El Chanate, the sale of investments, and amortization of property, plant,
and equipment and intangible assets. These declines were offset by capital
expenditures incurred in 2014. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total assets |
$ |
2,281,826 |
|
$ |
2,462,408 |
|
$ |
2,895,241 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
$ |
52,121 |
|
$ |
114,159 |
|
$ |
95,381 |
|
Current liabilities have decreased due to a $34.9 million
decline in accounts payable and accrued liabilities outstanding at period
end, as well as the payment of dividends payable at December 31, 2013
and the settlement of the McKenna lawsuit in April 2014. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Long-term financial liabilities |
|
308,064 |
|
|
244,607 |
|
|
183,532 |
|
Long-term financial liabilities increased primarily due
to the completion of the senior secured notes offering, partially offset
by the repayment of amounts outstanding under the Company's credit
facility and convertible senior notes. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other long-term liabilities |
|
290,431 |
|
|
315,760 |
|
|
320,491 |
|
Other long-term liabilities decreased due to a decline in
deferred income tax liabilities at December 31, 2014. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total liabilities |
$ |
650,616 |
|
$ |
674,526 |
|
$ |
599,404 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Shareholders equity |
$ |
1,631,210 |
|
$ |
1,787,882 |
|
$ |
2,295,837 |
|
Shareholders' equity decreased primarily as a result of
the net loss recognized in 2014, and dividends declared in 2014.
|
|
18 |
2014 ANNUAL MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
LIQUIDITY AND CAPITAL
RESOURCES |
The Companys strategy for managing liquidity is based on
achieving positive cash flows from operations to internally fund operating and
capital requirements. Material increases or decreases in the Companys liquidity
and capital resources will be substantially determined by the success or failure
of the Companys operations, exploration, and development programs, the ability
to obtain equity or other sources of financing, the price of gold, and currency
exchange rates. The declaration and payment of dividends is at the discretion of
the Board of Directors and will depend on the Companys financial results, cash
requirements, future prospects, and other factors deemed relevant by the Board.
Refer to the Outlook and Strategy section on page 5 for near term factors that
could influence the Companys cash balance. Future commitments that could impact
the Companys liquidity are disclosed in the Contractual Obligations section on
page 21. Management believes that the working capital at December 31, 2014,
together with future cash flows from operations and the available credit
facility, is sufficient to support the Companys planned and foreseeable
commitments, and dividends, if declared.
CASH FLOW
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2012
|
|
Cash flow from / (used in) operating
activities(1)(2) |
$ |
60,414 |
|
$ |
63,266 |
|
$ |
(7,231 |
) |
Cash flow (used in) / from investing
activities(1)(2) |
|
(150,801 |
) |
|
(272,380 |
) |
|
554,287 |
|
Cash flow from / (used in) financing
activities(1) |
|
38,126 |
|
|
(250,745 |
) |
|
(53,198 |
) |
Effect of foreign exchange rates on cash(1) |
|
(1,360 |
) |
|
(890 |
) |
|
(1,109 |
) |
(Decrease) / increase in cash and cash
equivalents from continuing operations |
|
(53,621 |
) |
|
(460,749 |
) |
|
492,749 |
|
Decrease in cash from discontinued operations |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(68,792 |
) |
Total cash and cash equivalents, beginning of period |
|
142,652 |
|
|
603,401 |
|
|
179,444 |
|
Total cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ |
89,031 |
|
$ |
142,652 |
|
$ |
603,401 |
|
(1) |
Exclusive of discontinued operations as cash flows
from discontinued operations is presented separately in the Company's
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows for the year ended December 31,
2012. |
(2) |
Certain comparative information has been restated as a
result of the adoption of IFRIC 20, Stripping Costs in the Production
Phase of a Surface Mine, which was applied prospectively to production
stripping costs incurred on or after January 1, 2012. For further details,
refer to note 3(a) to the consolidated financial statements for the year
ended December 31, 2013. |
In 2014, operating activities contributed cash flows of $60.4
million, as compared to 2013 when operating activities contributed cash of $63.3
million. Operating cash flow decreased in the 2014 primarily as a result of
higher cash costs, interest payments made on the Companys senior secured notes,
the payment of accounts payable at Young-Davidson, and lower operating cash flow
at El Chanate, as discussed previously. These amounts were largely offset by
increased revenues due to higher production in 2014 as compared to the same
period in the prior year and collection of $21.7 million in income taxes
receivable in Q1 2014.
In 2014, investing activities used cash of $150.8 million
compared to $272.4 million used in 2013. Year-to-date, cash flow used in
investing activities was comprised of capital expenditures of $188.8 million,
which was partially offset by a $14.8 million decrease in restricted cash and
$23.3 million in proceeds received from the sale of investments. Cash flow used
in investing activities in 2013 included capital expenditures of $249.4 million
and the purchase of investments of $21.3 million.
In 2014, cash flow contributed by financing activities included
$304.1 million in proceeds from the senior secured notes offering, offset by
$14.4 million in dividend payments and $254.1 million in repayments of long term
debt and equipment financing leases, which included repayments of $75.0 million
on the outstanding credit facility and $173.0 million on the convertible senior
notes. Cash flow used in financing activities in 2013 was largely comprised of
$301.1 million paid to complete a substantial issuer bid and the payment of
$27.7 million in dividends. This was partially offset by proceeds of $75.0
million received on the Companys credit facility.
FLOW-THROUGH
SHARES
On September 17, 2014, the Company completed a flow-through
share issuance for gross proceeds of $4.6 million (CAD $5.0 million). As a
result, the Company issued 833,334 common shares at a price of CAD $6.00 per
share. Pursuant to the terms of the flow-through share agreement, the Company is
required to incur and renounce these expenditures to subscribers by December 31,
2015. All proceeds will be used to fund exploration expenditures at the
Companys Kemess property.
SENIOR SECURED
NOTES
On March 27, 2014, the Company completed an offering of $315.0
million senior secured notes (the secured notes), secured against the assets
of the Company. Proceeds from this offering were used to repay $166.4 million of the Company’s outstanding convertible senior notes, to repay $75.0 million drawn under the Company’s credit facility and for general corporate purposes. These secured notes were sold at 96.524% of par, resulting in
total proceeds of $304.1 million. The secured notes pay interest in semi-annual
installments on April 1 and October 1 of each year, commencing on October 1,
2014, at a rate of 7.75% per annum, and mature on April 1, 2020. No
principal payments are due until the maturity date. These notes contain
transaction-based restrictive covenants that limit the Companys ability to
incur additional indebtedness in certain circumstances. There are no covenants
that are based on the Companys historical financial performance.
|
19 |
2014 ANNUAL MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
The senior secured notes indenture grants the Company the
option to prepay the notes prior to the maturity of the instruments, and
specifies a premium during each applicable time period. These prepayment options
have been accounted for as embedded derivatives, and are outlined below:
− |
Subsequent to April 1, 2017, the secured notes
may be repurchased at 103.875% of par value |
− |
Subsequent to April 1, 2018, the secured notes
may be repurchased at 101.938% of par value |
− |
Subsequent to April 1, 2019, the secured notes
may be repurchased at 100% of par value |
The fair value of the prepayment option embedded derivative was
$6.7 million at December 31, 2014, and was offset against the carrying amount of
the secured notes.
CREDIT FACILITY
The Company has access to a $150.0 million revolving credit
facility, which carries an interest rate of LIBOR plus 2.25% to 3.50%, depending
on the net leverage ratio of the Company, and matures on April 25, 2016. No
principal payments are due until the maturity date, which may be extended upon
mutual agreement by all parties. During 2014, the Company repaid the $75.0
million drawn under this facility and, as a result, had no amounts drawn under
this revolving facility at December 31, 2014. The Company was in compliance with
all loan covenants at December 31, 2014.
CONVERTIBLE DEBT
On March 6, 2014, the Company announced a cash tender offer to
redeem all of the outstanding convertible senior notes. The consideration
offered was $1,040 per $1,000 note plus accrued and unpaid interest to the
payment date. On April 3, 2014, the Company paid $173.0 million to complete this
offer, resulting in the redemption of $166.4 million convertible senior notes.
The remaining $0.6 million of convertible senior notes remain outstanding.
At the end of 2014, the Company had $0.6 million in convertible
senior notes which pay interest semi-annually at a rate of 3.50% per annum, and
mature on October 1, 2016. The holders of the notes may, within specified time
periods, convert their notes prior to July 1, 2016 under the following
circumstances: (1) the closing sale price of the Companys shares exceeds 130%
of the conversion price for at least 20 trading days in the 30 consecutive
trading days ending on the last trading day of the immediately preceding
quarter; (2) the trading price per $1,000 principal amount of the convertible
note is equal to or less than 97% of the product of the closing sale price of
the Companys common shares and the applicable conversion rate; (3) the
convertible notes are called for redemption by the Company; (4) upon the
occurrence of specified corporate transactions; and (5) a delisted event
occurs and is continuing. In addition, the notes will be unconditionally
convertible at the option of the holder from July 1, 2016 to the business day
immediately preceding the maturity date of the notes. Following the payment of
dividends on December 1, 2014, the conversion rate is 94.3882 common shares per
$1,000 principal amount of notes, which represents a conversion price of
approximately $10.59 per common share.
INVESTMENTS
At December 31, 2014, the Company held investments with a fair
market value of $0.2 million, which consisted primarily of common shares of
publicly traded companies. Investments in common shares of publicly traded
companies are classified as available-for-sale investments. Realized and
unrealized gains on available-for-sale investments totaled $9.1 million for the
year ended December 31, 2014 (year ended December 31, 2013 - unrealized losses
of $5.3 million).
During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company sold
shares in various publicly listed entities for total proceeds of $23.3 million.
|
20 |
2014 ANNUAL MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
A summary of the Companys contractual obligations at December
31, 2014 is as follows:
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
Less
than 1 year |
|
|
1 3 years |
|
|
3 4 years |
|
|
4 5 years |
|
|
Greater
than 5 years |
|
Trade payables and accrued liabilities |
$ |
42,046 |
|
$ |
42,046 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
Debt |
|
450,429 |
|
|
24,685 |
|
|
49,712 |
|
|
24,413 |
|
|
24,413 |
|
|
327,206 |
|
Equipment financing obligations |
|
17,662 |
|
|
6,597 |
|
|
7,876 |
|
|
2,262 |
|
|
927 |
|
|
- |
|
Future purchase
commitments |
|
9,189 |
|
|
9,189 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Total |
$ |
519,326 |
|
$ |
82,517 |
|
$ |
57,588 |
|
$ |
26,675 |
|
$ |
25,340 |
|
$ |
327,206 |
|
The Companys share capital was comprised of the following as
at December 31, 2014:
|
|
December 31, 2014
|
|
|
December 31, 2013
|
|
Authorized: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unlimited number
of common shares |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issued: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common shares |
|
249,648,617 |
|
|
247,569,811 |
|
The following table sets out the common shares, stock options,
deferred share units, performance share units, and restricted share units
outstanding as at the date of this MD&A:
|
|
February 19, 2015 |
|
Common shares |
|
249,978,342 |
|
Stock options |
|
13,094,101 |
|
Deferred share units |
|
253,210 |
|
Performance share units |
|
565,216 |
|
Restricted share
units |
|
629,176 |
|
|
|
264,520,045 |
|
In addition, the Company had outstanding convertible notes with
an implied conversion price of $10.59 per share that could result in the
issuance of up to 60,974 common shares.
OFF-BALANCE SHEET
ARRANGEMENTS |
The Company does not have any off-balance sheet
arrangements.
During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company issued
$315.0 million of secured notes, redeemed $166.4 million of convertible notes
and sold investments for total proceeds of $23.3 million. Refer to the Liquidity
and Capital Resources section on page 19 for further information on these
financial instruments.
The Company seeks to manage its exposure to fluctuations in
commodity prices, interest rates and foreign exchange rates by entering into
derivative financial instruments from time to time.
As at December 31, 2014, the Company held option contracts to
protect against the risk of an increase in the value of the Canadian dollar and
Mexican peso versus the US dollar. Details of these option contracts for the
purchase of local currencies and sale of US dollars, which settle on a monthly
basis, are summarized in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
Local |
|
|
Local currency |
|
|
Local currency |
|
|
Call option |
|
|
Put option |
|
Period
covered |
|
Contract |
|
|
Currency |
|
|
per month |
|
|
total |
|
|
per USD |
|
|
per USD |
|
30-Jan-15 31-Dec-15 |
|
Collar |
|
|
CAD |
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
1.1111 |
|
|
1.2246 |
|
30-Jan-15 31-Dec-15 |
|
Collar |
|
|
MXN |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
360,000 |
|
|
14.00 |
|
|
15.71 |
|
|
21 |
2014 ANNUAL MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
These contracts had a negative fair value of $0.4 million at
December 31, 2014, all of which has been recognized in other (loss) / income
within the Consolidated Statements of Operations for the year ended December 31,
2014.
During 2013, the Company held forward contracts to protect
against the risk of an increase in the value of the Mexican peso versus the US
dollar. During the year ended December 31, 2013, a gain of $0.1 million was
recognized in net loss on settlement of these forward contracts.
TRANSACTIONS WITH RELATED
PARTIES |
The Company utilizes a Mexican corporation, Caborca Industrial
S.A. de C.V. (Caborca Industrial), for mining support services at the El
Chanate mine, including the payment of mining salaries and related costs.
Caborca Industrial is 100% owned by the Companys Chief Executive Officer and
Chief Operating Officer, and is consolidated in accordance with IFRS 10,
Consolidated Financial Statements. The Companys Chief Executive Officer
and Chief Operating Officer receive no financial benefits as a result of their
ownership of this entity.
Other than as discussed in the paragraph above, no director,
senior officer, principal holder of securities or any associate or affiliate
thereof of the Company has any interest, directly or indirectly, in material
transactions with the Company or any of its direct or indirect wholly-owned
subsidiaries.
The Company has a joint venture interest in the Orion
exploration project, located in Nayarit, Mexico. Nayarit Gold de Mexico, S.A. de
C.V., a company with ownership of this project, is 50% owned by the Company and
50% owned by Minera Frisco, S.A.B. de C.V., and is accounted for as a
jointly-controlled entity. The Company provides management services and may,
from time to time, contribute cash or other assets to the jointly-controlled
entity. At December 31, 2014, the Company had a receivable from the
jointly-controlled entity of $2.1 million (December 31, 2013 - $1.4 million).
As discussed previously, the Company completed a private
placement with Carlisle in which the Company invested CAD $5.6 million in
exchange for 19.9% of the outstanding common shares of Carlisle. In conjunction
with the private placement, the Company entered into an agreement on November
11, 2014 with respect to Carlisles Lynn Lake Gold Camp. Under the agreement,
the Company has acquired a 25% interest in the Lynn Lake Project and can earn up
to a 60% interest by funding CAD $20.0 million on the project over a three-year
period and delivering a feasibility study within that time period. The Company
will be managing exploration and technical work related to a future feasibility
study on the Lynn Lake Project. At December 31, 2014, the Company has included
an advance of $0.8 million in other long-term assets which relates to ongoing
work on the Lynn Lake Project.
EVENTS
AFTER THE REPORTING PERIOD
|
(a) Termination of retained interest
royalty
On January 14, 2015, the Company finalized the agreement to
terminate the retained interest royalty from Crocodile Gold and received CAD
$20.0 million in cash consideration, along with net smelter royalties on future
production from the Fosterville and Stawell mines of 2% and 1%, respectively.
(b) Declaration of dividend
On February 19, 2015, the Companys Board of Directors approved
a dividend of $0.023 per share, payable to shareholders of record on March 2,
2015.
The Company has included various non-GAAP measures throughout
this document. The Company believes that, in addition to conventional measures
prepared in accordance with GAAP, management, analysts and investors use this
information to evaluate the Companys operating and economic performance.
However, these non-GAAP measures do not have any standardized meaning, and
should not be considered in isolation from or as a substitute for performance
measures prepared in accordance with GAAP. Other companies may calculate these
measures differently.
CASH COST PER OUNCE
CALCULATION
Cash cost per ounce is a non-GAAP performance measure that
management uses to better assess the Companys performance for the current
period and its expected performance in the future. The Company believes that, in
addition to conventional measures prepared in accordance with GAAP, certain
investors use this measure to evaluate the Companys performance and cash
generating capabilities. This measure is calculated by adjusting production and
refining costs as recorded in the Companys consolidated financial statements
for by-product revenues and NRV adjustments, production costs associated with
unsold ounces, production costs unrelated to current period ounces sold,
production costs associated with acquisition-date fair value adjustments, and
production costs associated with NRV adjustments. The calculation of cash costs
per gold ounce measures the benefit of any by-product silver that is produced
in conjunction with gold as a credit against the cost of producing gold. A
number of other gold producers present their costs net of the contribution from
silver and other non-gold by-product sales. The Company believes that presenting
this measure on this basis allows management, analysts and investors to better
assess performance against other gold producers, and to better understand the
importance of non-gold revenue on the Companys cost structure.
|
22 |
2014 ANNUAL MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
The following provides a reconciliation of cash cost per ounce
to the consolidated financial statements:
(in thousands, except ounces and cash cost
per gold ounce) |
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Production costs |
$ |
57,262 |
|
$ |
59,972 |
|
$ |
199,309 |
|
$ |
147,981 |
|
Refining costs |
$ |
180 |
|
$ |
139 |
|
$ |
595 |
|
$ |
526 |
|
Inventory and other adjustments(1) |
$ |
(1,893 |
) |
$ |
(2,135 |
) |
$ |
(3,798 |
) |
$ |
(10,216 |
) |
Total cash costs |
$ |
55,549 |
|
$ |
57,976 |
|
$ |
196,106 |
|
$ |
138,291 |
|
Divided by gold equivalent ounces(2) |
|
59,244 |
|
|
45,150 |
|
|
230,270 |
|
|
163,599 |
|
Total cash cost per gold equivalent ounce |
$ |
938 |
|
$ |
1,284 |
|
$ |
852 |
|
$ |
845 |
|
Total cash costs (per above) |
$ |
55,549 |
|
$ |
57,976 |
|
$ |
196,106 |
|
$ |
138,291 |
|
By-product revenues(3) |
$ |
(715 |
) |
$ |
(665 |
) |
$ |
(2,915 |
) |
$ |
(3,272 |
) |
Total cash costs, net of by-product revenues
|
$ |
54,834 |
|
$ |
57,311 |
|
$ |
193,191 |
|
$ |
135,019 |
|
Divided by gold ounces(4) |
|
58,649 |
|
|
44,621 |
|
|
227,966 |
|
|
161,271 |
|
Total cash cost per gold ounce, net of by-product
revenues |
$ |
935 |
|
$ |
1,284 |
|
$ |
847 |
|
$ |
837 |
|
Total cash costs, net of by-product revenues
(per above) |
$ |
54,834 |
|
$ |
57,311 |
|
$ |
193,191 |
|
$ |
135,019 |
|
NRV
adjustments(5) |
$ |
(11,067 |
) |
$ |
(22,907 |
) |
$ |
(15,500 |
) |
$ |
(25,969 |
) |
Total cash costs, net of by-product revenues
and NRV adjustments |
$ |
43,767 |
|
$ |
34,404 |
|
$ |
177,691 |
|
$ |
109,050 |
|
Divided by gold ounces |
|
58,649 |
|
|
44,621 |
|
|
227,966 |
|
|
161,271 |
|
Total cash cost per gold ounce, net of by-product
revenues and NRV adjustments |
$ |
746 |
|
$ |
771 |
|
$ |
$779 |
|
$ |
$676 |
|
(1) |
Inventory and other adjustments include amortization
of the inventory fair value adjustments relating to the El Chanate
purchase price allocations, costs unrelated to current period ounces sold,
as well as the movement in costs associated with unsold gold ounces at
Young-Davidson. The total of these adjustments for the three months and
years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 were as
follows: |
|
El Chanate |
$ |
(1,893 |
) |
$ |
(6,415 |
) |
$ |
(2,720 |
) |
$ |
(10,560 |
) |
|
Young-Davidson |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
4,280 |
|
$ |
(1,078 |
) |
$ |
344 |
|
|
|
$ |
(1,893 |
) |
$ |
(2,135 |
) |
$ |
(3,798 |
) |
$ |
(10,216 |
) |
(2) |
Gold equivalent ounces include silver ounces produced
/ sold converted to gold equivalent based on the ratio of the realized
sales prices of the commodities. |
(3) |
By-product revenue is defined as the revenue from a
secondary metal or mineral that is recovered during processing, and is
included in revenue from mining operations in the Company's financial
statements. The total by-product silver revenues adjustments for the three
months and years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 were as
follows: |
|
El Chanate |
$ |
(430 |
) |
$ |
(562 |
) |
$ |
(2,248 |
) |
$ |
(2,881 |
) |
|
Young-Davidson |
$ |
(285 |
) |
$ |
(103 |
) |
$ |
(667 |
) |
$ |
(391 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(715 |
) |
$ |
(665 |
) |
$ |
(2,915 |
) |
$ |
(3,272 |
) |
(4) |
For the three months and year ended December 31, 2014,
cash costs per gold ounce are calculated using gold ounces sold at the El
Chanate and Young-Davidson mines. For the three months and year ended
December 31, 2013, cash costs per gold ounce are calculated using gold
ounces sold at the El Chanate mine and gold ounces produced at the
Young-Davidson mine. |
(5) |
The total NRV adjustments recognized during the three
months and years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 were as
follows: |
|
El Chanate |
$ |
(11,067 |
) |
$ |
(13,156 |
) |
$ |
(12,160 |
) |
$ |
(15,919 |
) |
|
Young-Davidson |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
(9,751 |
) |
$ |
(3,339 |
) |
$ |
(10,050 |
) |
|
|
$ |
(11,067 |
) |
$ |
(22,907 |
) |
$ |
(15,500 |
) |
$ |
(25,969 |
) |
ALL-IN SUSTAINING
COST PER OUNCE CALCULATION
All-in sustaining cost per ounce is a non-GAAP performance
measure developed by the World Gold Council that reflects all of the
expenditures that are required to produce an ounce of gold from current
operations. The World Gold Council is a non-regulatory, non-profit, market
development organization that was established in 1987 whose members include
global senior mining companies. The Company is not a member of the World Gold
Council, and was not involved in the development of the all-in sustaining cost
measure. However, the Company believes that this measure will be useful to
external users in assessing operating performance and the ability to generate
free cash flow from current operations. This measure uses cash costs per ounce
as its basis, and also includes sustaining capital expenditures, general and
administrative expenses, sustaining exploration and evaluation costs, and
accretion and depletion of reclamation provisions at operating sites. As this
measure seeks to reflect the full cost of producing gold at current
operations, it excludes capital expenditures to develop new operations and to
materially enhance production or reserves at existing operations. Certain other
cash expenditures, including tax payments, increases in inventory, dividends and
other financing costs, are also excluded.
|
23 |
2014 ANNUAL MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
The following provides a reconciliation of all-in sustaining
cost per ounce to the consolidated financial statements:
(in thousands, except ounces and all-in
sustaining cost per gold ounce) |
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
Year ended
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Total cash costs, net of by-product revenues (see above)
|
$ |
54,834 |
|
$ |
57,311 |
|
$ |
193,191 |
|
$ |
135,019 |
|
General and administrative |
$ |
5,338 |
|
$ |
6,909 |
|
$ |
25,921 |
|
$ |
27,677 |
|
Young-Davidson inventory adjustments |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
(4,280 |
) |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
(344 |
) |
Sustaining capital expenditures(1) |
$ |
16,799 |
|
$ |
11,799 |
|
$ |
68,649 |
|
$ |
52,697 |
|
Accretion and
depletion of reclamation provisions |
$ |
294 |
|
$ |
260 |
|
$ |
1,200 |
|
$ |
891 |
|
Total all-in sustaining costs, net of by-product revenues
|
$ |
77,265 |
|
$ |
71,999 |
|
$ |
288,961 |
|
$ |
215,940 |
|
Divided by gold
ounces sold |
|
58,649 |
|
|
39,855 |
|
|
227,966 |
|
|
160,913 |
|
All-in
sustaining cost per gold ounce sold, net of by-product revenues
|
$ |
1,317 |
|
$ |
1,807 |
|
$ |
1,268 |
|
$ |
1,342 |
|
Total all-in sustaining costs, net of by-product revenues
(per above) |
$ |
77,265 |
|
$ |
71,999 |
|
$ |
288,961 |
|
$ |
215,940 |
|
NRV adjustments
|
$ |
(11,067 |
) |
$ |
(22,907 |
) |
$ |
(15,500 |
) |
$ |
(25,969 |
) |
Total all-in sustaining costs, net of by-product revenues
and NRV adjustments |
$ |
66,198 |
|
$ |
49,092 |
|
$ |
273,461 |
|
$ |
189,971 |
|
Divided by gold
ounces sold |
|
58,649 |
|
|
39,855 |
|
|
227,966 |
|
|
160,913 |
|
All-in
sustaining cost per gold ounce sold, net of by-product revenues and
NRV adjustments |
$ |
1,129 |
|
$ |
1,232 |
|
$ |
1,200 |
|
$ |
1,181 |
|
(1) |
Sustaining capital expenditures are defined as those
expenditures which do not increase annual gold ounce production at a mine
site and exclude all expenditures at growth projects and certain
expenditures at operating sites which are deemed expansionary in nature.
Total sustaining capital for the three months and years ended December 31,
2014 and 2013 is calculated as follows: |
|
Capital expenditures per cash flow
statement |
$ |
41,424 |
|
$ |
63,572 |
|
$ |
188,829 |
|
$ |
249,422 |
|
|
Less: Young-Davidson non-sustaining
capital |
$ |
(14,900 |
) |
$ |
(38,195 |
) |
$ |
(97,282 |
) |
$ |
(151,917 |
) |
|
Less: El Chanate non-sustaining capital
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
(9,025 |
) |
$ |
(1,271 |
) |
$ |
(34,707 |
) |
|
Less: Corporate and other non-sustaining
capital |
$ |
(9,725 |
) |
$ |
(4,553 |
) |
$ |
(21,627 |
) |
$ |
(10,101 |
) |
|
|
$ |
16,799 |
|
$ |
11,799 |
|
$ |
68,649 |
|
$ |
52,697 |
|
Non-sustaining capital expenditures include Young-Davidson mine
development that is considered to be growth, expenditures associated with
sinking the MCM shaft, additional equipment and infrastructure as the Company
continues to ramp up production at Young-Davidson, and exploration expenditures
at El Chanate.
|
24 |
2014 ANNUAL MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
EARNINGS BEFORE
INTEREST, TAXES,
DEPRECIATION, AND AMORTIZATION
(EBITDA)
EBITDA represents net earnings before interest, taxes,
depreciation, and amortization. EBITDA is an indicator of the Companys ability
to generate liquidity by producing operating cash flow to fund working capital
needs, service debt obligations, and fund capital expenditures.
The following is a reconciliation of EBITDA to the consolidated
financial statements:
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Net loss |
$ |
(108,259 |
) |
$ |
(106,412 |
) |
$ |
(169,648 |
) |
$ |
(176,770 |
) |
Add back: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance costs |
$ |
5,175 |
|
$ |
1,352 |
|
$ |
19,910 |
|
$ |
2,928 |
|
Amortization and depletion |
$ |
30,092 |
|
$ |
27,649 |
|
$ |
121,468 |
|
$ |
65,529 |
|
Amortization included in other
(loss) / income |
$ |
3,033 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
13,288 |
|
$ |
- |
|
Deferred income tax (recovery) /
expense |
$ |
(14,263 |
) |
$ |
1,071 |
|
$ |
(26,278 |
) |
$ |
(760 |
) |
Current income tax recovery |
$ |
(3,087 |
) |
$ |
(3,729 |
) |
$ |
(2,700 |
) |
$ |
(140 |
) |
EBITDA |
$ |
(87,309 |
) |
$ |
(80,069 |
) |
$ |
(43,960 |
) |
$ |
(109,213 |
) |
NET FREE CASH
FLOW
Net free cash flow represents an indication of the Companys
continuing capacity to generate cash flow from operations, comprising cash flows
from operating activities net of total capital expenditures. It does not
necessarily represent the cash flow in the period available for management to
use at its discretion, which may be affected by other sources and
non-discretionary uses of cash.
The following is a reconciliation of net free cash flow to the
consolidated financial statements:
(in thousands) |
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Quarter Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
Year Ended
|
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
2013
|
|
Operating cash flow |
$ |
28,486 |
|
$ |
11,954 |
|
$ |
60,414 |
|
$ |
63,266 |
|
Less: Capital expenditures |
$ |
(41,424 |
) |
$ |
(63,572 |
) |
$ |
(188,829 |
) |
$ |
(249,422 |
) |
Net free cash flow |
$ |
(12,938 |
) |
$ |
(51,618 |
) |
$ |
(128,415 |
) |
$ |
(186,156 |
) |
The Companys business contains significant risk due to the
nature of mining, exploration, and development activities. Certain risk factors
listed below are related to the mining industry in general, while others are
specific to the Company. Included in the risk factors below are details on how
management seeks to mitigate these risks wherever possible. For additional
discussion of these and other risk factors, please refer to the Companys Annual
Information Form, which is available on the Companys website at www.auricogold.com, on SEDAR at www.sedar.com, and on EDGAR at www.sec.gov.
NATURE OF MINERAL
EXPLORATION AND MINING
Because mines have limited lives based on proven and probable
mineral reserves, the Company will be required to continually replace and expand
its mineral reserves as its mines produce gold and silver. The Companys ability
to maintain or increase its annual production of gold and silver in the future
will be dependent in significant part on its ability to identify and acquire
additional commercially viable mineral properties, bring new mines into
production, and expand mineral reserves at existing mines.
Mineral resource exploration and development is a highly
speculative business, characterized by a number of significant risks including,
among others, unprofitable efforts resulting not only from the failure to
discover mineral deposits but also from finding mineral deposits that, though
present, are insufficient in quantity and quality to return a profit from
production. There can be no assurance that the Company will successfully acquire
additional mineral rights. While the discovery of additional ore-bearing
structures may result in substantial rewards, few properties that are explored
are ultimately developed into producing mines. Major expenses may be required to
establish reserves by drilling and to construct mining and processing facilities
at a particular site. It is impossible to ensure that the current exploration
and development programs of the Company will result in profitable commercial
mining operations. The profitability of the Companys operations will be, in
part, directly related to the cost and success of its exploration and
development programs, which may be affected by a number of factors.
|
25 |
2014 ANNUAL MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
Mining is inherently dangerous and subject to conditions or
events beyond the Companys control, which could have a material adverse effect
on the Companys business. Mining involves various types of risks and hazards,
including, but not limited to: environmental hazards; industrial accidents;
metallurgical and other processing problems; unusual or unexpected rock
formations; structural cave-ins or slides; seismic activity; flooding; fires;
periodic interruptions due to inclement or hazardous weather conditions;
variations in grade, deposit size, density and other geological problems;
mechanical equipment performance problems; unavailability of materials and
equipment; labour force disruptions; unanticipated or significant changes in the
costs of supplies; and unanticipated transportation costs. Where considered
practical to do so, the Company maintains insurance against risks in the
operation of its business in amounts which it believes to be reasonable. Such
insurance, however, contains exclusions and limitations on coverage. The Company
may suffer a material adverse effect on its business if it incurs losses related
to any significant events that are not covered by its insurance policies.
RESERVE ESTIMATES
Mineral resource and reserve figures are based upon estimates
made by Company personnel and independent geologists. These estimates are
imprecise and depend upon geological interpretation and statistical inferences
drawn from drilling and sampling analysis, which may prove to be unreliable.
There can be no assurance that these estimates will be accurate; that reserves,
resources or other mineralization figures will be accurate; or that this
mineralization can be mined or processed profitably. Mineralization estimates
for the Companys properties may require adjustments or downward revisions based
upon further exploration or development work or actual production experience. In
addition, the grade of ore ultimately mined, if any, may differ from that
indicated by drilling results. There can be no assurance that minerals recovered
in small scale tests will be duplicated in large scale tests under on-site
conditions or in-production scale. The reserve and resource estimates have been
determined and valued based on assumed future prices, cut-off grades and
operating costs that may prove to be inaccurate. Extended declines in market
prices for gold and silver may render portions of the Companys mineralization
uneconomic and result in reduced reported mineralization. Any material
reductions in estimates of mineralization, or of the Companys ability to
extract this mineralization, could have a material adverse effect on the
Companys results of operations or financial condition.
EFFECT OF INDEBTEDNESS ON
FINANCIAL CONDITION
The Company has a significant amount of secured indebtedness.
The Companys level of indebtedness, including the secured notes issued on
March 27, 2014, could have material and adverse consequences to the Company and
the Companys securityholders, including:
- |
making it more difficult for the Company to satisfy its
obligations to pay interest and to pay principal when due; |
|
|
- |
limiting the Companys ability to obtain additional
financing to repay existing indebtedness, fund future working capital,
capital expenditures, acquisitions or other general corporate
requirements, or requiring the Company to make non- strategic
divestitures; |
|
|
- |
requiring a substantial portion of the Companys cash
flows to be dedicated to debt service payments instead of other purposes,
thereby reducing the amount of cash flows available for payment of cash
dividends, working capital, capital expenditures, acquisitions and other
general corporate purposes; |
|
|
- |
increasing the Companys vulnerability to general adverse
economic and industry conditions; |
|
|
- |
limiting the Companys flexibility in planning for and
reacting to changes in the industry in which it competes; |
|
|
- |
placing the Company at a disadvantage compared to other,
less leveraged competitors; and |
|
|
- |
increasing the Companys cost of borrowing.
|
The Company may not be able to generate sufficient cash to
service all of its indebtedness, including the secured notes, and may be forced
to take other actions to satisfy its obligations under such indebtedness, which
may not be successful. The Companys ability to make scheduled payments on or
refinance its debt obligations depends on its financial condition and operating
performance, which are subject to prevailing economic and competitive conditions
and to certain financial, business, legislative, regulatory and other factors
beyond its control. The Company may be unable to maintain a level of cash flows
from operating activities sufficient to permit it to pay the principal, premium,
if any, and interest on the Companys indebtedness.
If the Companys cash flows and capital resources are
insufficient to fund its debt service obligations, it could face substantial
liquidity problems and could be forced to reduce or delay investments and
capital expenditures or to dispose of material assets or operations, seek
additional debt or equity capital or restructure or refinance its indebtedness.
The Company may not be able to effect any such alternative measures on
commercially reasonable terms or at all and, even if successful, those
alternatives may not allow the Company to meet its scheduled debt service
obligations. The Companys revolving credit facility and the indenture governing
the secured notes will restrict its ability to dispose of assets and use the
proceeds from those dispositions and may also restrict its ability to raise debt
or equity capital to be used to repay other indebtedness when it becomes due.
The Company may not be able to consummate those dispositions or to
obtain proceeds in an amount sufficient to meet any debt service obligations
then due.
|
26 |
2014 ANNUAL MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
Should the Company incur additional debt, this could increase
the risks to its financial condition described above.
EFFECT OF INDEBTEDNESS ON THE
COMPANYS CURRENT AND
FUTURE OPERATIONS
The Companys revolving credit facility and the indenture
governing the secured notes contain a number of restrictive covenants that
impose significant operating and financial restrictions on the Company and may
limit its ability to engage in acts that may be in the Companys long-term best
interest. The Companys failure to comply with those covenants could result in
an event of default which, if not cured or waived, could result in a
cross-default under other debt instruments and the acceleration of all its debt.
The restrictions include, without limitation, restrictions on its ability to:
- |
incur additional indebtedness; |
|
|
- |
pay dividends or make other distributions or
repurchase or redeem its capital stock; |
|
|
- |
prepay, redeem or repurchase certain debt;
|
|
|
- |
make loans and investments; |
|
|
- |
sell, transfer or otherwise dispose of assets;
|
|
|
- |
incur or permit to exist certain liens; |
|
|
- |
enter into transactions with affiliates; |
|
|
- |
enter into agreements restricting its
subsidiaries ability to pay dividends; and |
|
|
- |
consolidate, amalgamate, merge or sell all or
substantially all of the Companys assets. |
RATING OF THE COMPANYS
DEBT SECURITIES
The Companys debt currently has a non-investment grade rating,
and any rating assigned could be lowered or withdrawn entirely by a rating
agency, if, in that rating agencys judgment, future circumstances relating to
the basis of the rating, such as adverse changes, so warrant. Any future
lowering of the Companys ratings likely would make it more difficult or more
expensive to obtain additional debt financing.
FOREIGN OPERATIONS
The Company has foreign property interests located in Mexico
are subject to the laws and regulations of that country. As a result, the
Companys mining investments are subject to the risks normally associated with
the conduct of business in foreign countries. The Company believes the present
attitude of the governments of the country and states in which the property
interests are located to foreign investment and mining to be favourable;
however, any variation from the current regulatory, economic and political
climate could have an adverse effect on the affairs of the Company.
The risks of conducting business in a foreign country may
include, among others, invalidation of governmental orders and permits,
corruption, uncertain political and economic environments, sovereign risk, war
(including in neighbouring states), civil disturbances and terrorist acts,
arbitrary changes in laws or policies of particular countries, the failure of
foreign parties to honour contractual relations, corruption, foreign taxation,
delays in obtaining or the inability to obtain necessary governmental permits,
opposition to mining from environmental or other non-governmental organizations,
limitations on foreign ownership, limitations on the repatriation of earnings,
limitations on gold exports, instability due to economic under-development,
inadequate infrastructure and increased financing costs. In addition, the
enforcement of the Companys legal rights to exploit its properties may not be
recognized by the government of Mexico by its court systems. These risks may
limit or disrupt the Companys operations, restrict the movement of funds or
result in the deprivation of contractual rights or the taking of property by
nationalization or expropriation without fair compensation.
ENVIRONMENTAL LAWS AND
REGULATIONS
The Companys exploration and production activities in Mexico
and Canada are subject to regulation by governmental agencies under various
environmental laws. These laws address emissions into the air, discharges into
water, management of waste, management of hazardous substances, protection of
natural resources, antiquities and endangered species and reclamation of lands
disturbed by mining operations. Environmental legislation in many countries is
evolving and the trend has been towards stricter standards and enforcement,
increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more stringent environmental
assessments of proposed projects and increasing responsibility for companies and
their officers, directors and employees. Compliance with environmental laws and
regulations may require significant capital outlays on behalf of the Company and
may cause material changes or delays in the Companys intended activities. There
can be no assurance that future changes in environmental regulations will not
adversely affect the Companys business.
|
27 |
2014 ANNUAL MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
PROPERTY RIGHTS,
PERMITS AND LICENSING
The Companys current and anticipated future operations,
including further exploration, development activities and expansion or
commencement of production on the Companys properties, require certain permits
and licenses from various levels of governmental authorities. The Company may
also be required to obtain certain property rights to access, or use, certain of
its properties in order to proceed to development. There can be no assurance
that all licenses, permits or property rights required for the expansion and
construction of mining facilities and the conduct of mining operations will be
obtainable on reasonable terms or in a timely manner, or at all, that such terms
may not be adversely changed, that required extension will be granted, or that
the issuance of such licenses, permits or property rights will not be challenged
by third parties. Delays in obtaining or a failure to obtain such licenses,
permits or property rights or extension thereto; challenges to the issuance of
such licenses, permits or property rights, whether successful or unsuccessful;
changes to the terms of such licenses, permits or property rights; or a failure
to comply with the terms of any such licenses, permits or property rights
obtained; could have a material adverse impact on the Company.
UNCERTAINTIES OF TITLE
The Company cannot guarantee that title to its properties will
not be challenged. Title insurance is generally not available for mineral
properties and the Companys ability to ensure that it has obtained secure claim
to individual mineral properties or mining concessions may be severely
constrained. The Companys mineral properties may be subject to prior
unregistered agreements, transfers or claims, and title may be affected by,
among other things, undetected defects. A successful challenge to the precise
area and location of these claims could result in the Company being unable to
operate on its properties as permitted or being unable to enforce its rights
with respect to its properties.
COMMODITY PRICE
RISK
The profitability of the Companys gold mining operations will
be significantly affected by changes in the market prices for gold. Gold prices
fluctuate on a daily basis and are affected by numerous factors beyond the
Companys control. The supply and demand for gold, the level of interest rates,
the rate of inflation, investment decisions by large holders of gold, including
governmental reserves, and stability of exchange rates can all cause significant
fluctuations in gold prices. Such external economic factors are in turn
influenced by changes in international investment patterns and monetary systems,
and political developments. The prices of gold have fluctuated widely and future
serious price declines could cause continued commercial production to be
impractical. Depending on the prices of gold, cash flow from mining operations
may not be sufficient to cover costs of production and capital expenditures. If,
as a result of a decline in gold prices, revenues from metal sales were to fall
below operating costs, production may be discontinued.
INTEREST RATE RISK
At December 31, 2014, the Company did not have any amount drawn
on its credit facility. If an amount is drawn, the Company is exposed to
interest rate risk on its variable rate debt. The applicable interest rate may
change depending on the Companys leverage ratio during the period, but would
range between LIBOR plus 2.25% to 3.50% for LIBOR loans. The Company has not
entered into any agreements to hedge against unfavourable changes in interest
rates, but may actively manage any exposure to interest rate risk in the future.
FOREIGN CURRENCY EXCHANGE
RATE RISK
Metal sales revenues for the Company are denominated in US
dollars. The Company is primarily exposed to currency fluctuations relative to
expenditures that are denominated in Canadian dollars and Mexican pesos, such as
payments for labour, operating supplies and property, plant and equipment. These
potential currency fluctuations could have a significant impact on production
costs and capital expenditures and thereby, the net free cash flow of the
Company. The Company is also exposed to the impact of currency fluctuations on
its monetary assets and liabilities.
CREDIT RISK
Credit risk relates to accounts receivable and other contracts,
and arises from the possibility that any counterparty to an instrument fails to
perform. The Company only transacts with highly-rated counterparties and a limit
on contingent exposure has been established for each counterparty based on the
counterpartys credit rating.
DERIVATIVE FINANCIAL
INSTRUMENTS
The Company may from time to time employ derivative products in
respect of commodities, interest rates and/or currencies. Derivative products
are generally used to manage the risks associated with, among other things,
changes in commodity prices and foreign currency exchange rates.
The use of derivative instruments involves certain inherent
risk including credit risk, market risk and liquidity risk. For derivatives,
credit risk is created when the fair value is positive. When the fair value of a
derivative is negative, no credit risk is assumed. The Company mitigates credit
risk by entering into derivatives with high quality counterparties, limiting the
amount of exposure to each counterparty, and monitoring the financial condition
of the counterparties. Market risk is the risk that the fair value of a
derivative might be adversely affected by a change in underlying commodity
prices or currency exchange rates, and that this in turn affects the Companys
financial condition. The Company manages market risk by establishing and
monitoring parameters that limit the types and degree of market risk that
may be undertaken. The Company generally mitigates liquidity risk by spreading
out the maturity or its derivatives over time.
|
28 |
2014 ANNUAL MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
CRITICAL
ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES, POLICIES
AND CHANGES |
ACCOUNTING ESTIMATES
The preparation of the Companys consolidated financial
statements in accordance with IFRS requires management to make estimates and
assumptions that affect the amounts reported in the consolidated financial
statements and accompanying notes. The following is a list of the accounting
policies that the Company believes are critical, due to the degree of
uncertainty regarding the estimates or assumptions involved and the magnitude of
the asset, liability, revenue or expense being reported.
Finished goods, work-in-process, heap leach ore and stockpile
ore are valued at the lower of the average cost or NRV. NRV is the difference
between the estimated future realizable gold prices based on prevailing and
long-term prices, less estimated costs to complete production into a saleable
form. The assumptions used in the valuation of work-in-process inventories
include estimates of gold ounces contained in the ore stacked on leach pads,
assumptions of the amount of gold ounces stacked that is expected to be
recovered from the leach pads, the amount of gold ounces in mill circuits and in
stockpiles, the costs to complete the processing of ore inventory, and an
assumption of the gold prices expected to be realized when the gold ounces are
recovered. Write-downs of ore in stockpiles, ore on leach pads, in-process and
finished metal inventories resulting from NRV impairments are reported as a
component of current period costs. The primary factors that influence the need
to record write-downs include prevailing and long-term gold prices and
prevailing costs for production inputs such as labour, fuel and energy, and
materials and supplies, as well as realized ore grades and actual production
levels. When the circumstances that previously caused inventories to be written
down below cost no longer exist or when there is clear evidence of an increase
in NRV because of changed economic circumstances, the amount of the write-down
or a portion thereof is reversed so that the new carrying amount is the lower of
the cost and the revised NRV. The reversal is limited to the amount of the
original write-down for inventory still on hand.
Ore on leach pads is ore that is placed on pads where it is
saturated with a chemical solution that dissolves the gold contained in the ore.
Costs are attributed to the leach pads based on current mining costs, including
applicable depletion and amortization relating to mining operations, incurred up
to the point of placing the ore on the pad. Costs are removed from the leach pad
based on the average cost per recoverable ounce of gold on the leach pad as the
gold is recovered. Estimates of recoverable gold ounces on the leach pads are
calculated from the quantities of ore placed on the pads, the grade of ore
placed on the leach pads and an estimated percentage of recovery. Timing and
ultimate recovery of gold ounces contained on leach pads can vary significantly
from the estimates. The ounces of recoverable gold placed on the leach pads are
reconciled to the balance of gold actually recovered (metallurgical balancing),
by comparing the grades of ore placed on the leach pads to actual ounces
recovered. The nature of the leaching process inherently limits the ability to
precisely monitor inventory levels. As a result, the metallurgical balancing
process is constantly monitored and the engineering estimates are refined based
on actual results over time. The ultimate recovery of gold ounces from a pad
will not be known until the leaching process is completed.
The allocation of costs to ore in stockpiles, ore on leach pads
and in-process inventories and the determination of NRV involve the use of
estimates. There is a high degree of judgement in estimating future costs,
future production levels, proven and probable mineral reserve estimates, gold
prices, and the ultimate estimated recovery of ore on leach pads. There can be
no assurance that actual results will not differ significantly from estimates
used in the determination of the carrying value of inventories.
(ii) |
Mineral reserves and resources used to measure
depletion and amortization |
The Company records depletion and amortization expense based on
the estimated useful economic lives of long-lived assets. Property, plant and
equipment are amortized on a straight-line basis over their estimated useful
lives. Mining interests are amortized using the units of production method over
proven and probable reserves of the mine and the portion of mineralization
expected to be classified as reserves. Changes in reserves and resources
estimates are generally calculated at the end of each year and cause
amortization expense to increase or decrease prospectively. The estimation of
quantities of reserves and resources is complex, requiring significant
subjective assumptions that arise from the evaluation of geological,
geophysical, engineering and economic data for a given ore body. This data could
change over time as a result of numerous factors, including new information
gained from development activities, evolving production history and a
reassessment of the viability of production under different economic conditions.
Changes in data and/or assumptions could cause reserves and resources estimates
to substantially change from period to period. Actual production could differ
from amounts expected based on reserves and resources, and an adverse change in
gold prices could make a reserve or resource uneconomic to mine. Variations from
estimates could also occur in actual ore grades and gold recovery rates. A key
trend that could reasonably impact reserves and resources estimates is rising
market mineral prices, because the mineral price assumption is closely related
to the trailing three-year average market price. As this assumption rises, it
could result in an upward revision to reserves and resources estimates as
mineralization not previously classified as a reserve or resource becomes
economic at higher gold prices.
|
29 |
2014 ANNUAL MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
(iii) |
Goodwill and non-financial
assets |
Goodwill and other non-financial assets are assessed for
impairment at the cash-generating unit level, on at least an annual basis, by
comparing the calculated recoverable amount to the cash-generating units
carrying amount. If the recoverable amount of the cash-generating unit exceeds
its carrying amount, goodwill is considered not to be impaired. If the carrying
amount of a cash-generating unit exceeds its recoverable amount, a potential
impairment exists. Significant estimates are made in calculating the recoverable
amount of a cash-generating unit, including estimates of future costs to produce
proven and probable reserves, future gold prices, foreign exchange rates,
recovery rates, and discount rates.
(iv) |
Amortization of property, plant and
equipment |
The Company amortizes property, plant and equipment, net of
residual value, over the estimated useful life of each asset, not to exceed the
life of the mine at which the asset is utilized. The physical life of these
assets, and related components, may differ from the Companys estimate.
(v) |
Deferred income taxes and valuation
allowances |
The Company is periodically required to estimate the tax basis
of assets and liabilities. Where applicable tax laws and regulations are either
unclear or subject to varying interpretations, it is possible that changes in
these estimates could occur that materially affect the amounts of deferred
income tax assets and liabilities recorded in the financial statements. Changes
in deferred tax assets and liabilities generally have a direct impact on
earnings in the period of the changes.
Each period, the Company evaluates the likelihood of whether or
not some portion or all of each deferred income tax asset and investment tax
credits will be realized. This evaluation is based on historic and future
expected levels of taxable income, the pattern and timing of reversals of
taxable temporary timing differences that give rise to deferred tax liabilities,
and tax planning initiatives. Levels of future taxable income are affected by,
among other things, market gold prices, production costs, quantities of proven
and probable gold reserves, interest rates and foreign currency exchange
rates.
(vi) |
Reclamation provisions |
Reclamation provisions arise from the acquisition, development,
construction and normal operation of mining property, plant and equipment, due
to government controls and regulations that protect the environment and public
safety on the closure and reclamation of mining properties. The Company records
the value of a reclamation obligation in the financial statements when it
is incurred, and either capitalizes this amount as an increase in the carrying
amount of the related asset or, if the mine is in the decommissioning stage,
records the amount as an expense. The fair values are measured by discounting
the best estimate of the expected value of future cash flows required to reclaim
the property upon mine closure, which are discounted to their present value for
each mine operation. The discount rate used is a pre-tax rate that reflects
current market assessments of the time value of money specific to the country in
which the mine is located. Significant estimates are involved in forming
expectations of future activities and the amount and timing of the associated
cash flows. The Company prepares estimates of the timing and expected value of
future cash flows when the liability is incurred, which are updated to reflect
changes in facts and circumstances. Future changes in regulations, laws or
enforcement could adversely affect operations; and any instances of
non-compliance with laws or regulations that result in fines or injunctions or
delays in projects, or any unforeseen environmental contamination at, or related
to, the mining properties could result in significant costs.
The principal factors that can cause the expected value of
future cash flows to change are: the construction of new processing facilities;
changes in the quantities of material in reserves and a corresponding change in
the life of mine plan; changing ore characteristics that ultimately impact the
environment; changes in water quality that impact the extent of water treatment
required; and changes in laws and regulations governing the protection of the
environment. In general, as the end of the mine life nears, the reliability of
estimates of expected cash flows increases, but earlier in the mine life, the
estimation of a reclamation provision is inherently more subjective. Significant
estimates are made in calculating the fair value of reclamation provisions.
Expected cash flows relating to reclamation provisions could occur over periods
up to twenty years and the assessment of the extent of any necessary
environmental remediation work is highly subjective. Considering all of these
factors that go into the determination of a reclamation provision, the fair
value of reclamation provisions can materially change over time.
|
30 |
2014 ANNUAL MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
(vii) |
Retained interest royalty |
The Company makes estimates of amounts receivable in order to
value the retained interest royalty. Future amounts receivable under these
arrangements will be impacted by future gold prices, future production from the
Fosterville and Stawell mines in Victoria, Australia, future foreign exchange
rates, as well as related operating and capital expenditures required to sustain
that production.
ACCOUNTING POLICIES AND
CHANGES
The accounting policies applied in the consolidated financial
statements for the year ended December 31, 2014 are consistent with those used
in the Companys Consolidated Financial Statements for the year ended December
31, 2013, with the exception of the following accounting policies adopted on
January 1, 2014:
Foreign exchange gains and losses on deferred tax assets and
liabilities
The consolidated financial statements reflect the retrospective
application of a voluntary change in accounting policy adopted in 2014 to
classify, in the Consolidated Statements of Operations, foreign exchange gains
and losses arising on the translation of deferred income tax assets and
liabilities within deferred income tax recovery instead of within foreign
exchange losses, as previously reported. The change in accounting policy has
been adopted in accordance with IAS 12, Income Taxes, which provides a
policy choice to classify exchange differences arising from translation of
deferred income tax assets and liabilities within deferred income tax expense /
(recovery). The Company considers the classification of these exchange
differences within deferred income tax recovery in the Consolidated Statements
of Operations to be the most useful to financial statement users and,
consequently, that this presentation results in reliable and more relevant
information.
The following table outlines the effect of this accounting
policy change for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013:
|
|
Prior to |
|
|
Restatement |
|
|
Subsequent to |
|
For the year ended December 31, 2014 (in millions): |
|
restatement |
|
|
Impact |
|
|
Restatement |
|
Foreign exchange gains / (losses) |
$ |
18.7 |
|
$ |
(25.4 |
) |
$ |
(6.6 |
) |
Deferred income tax recovery |
|
0.9 |
|
|
25.4 |
|
|
26.3 |
|
Net loss |
|
(169.6 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
(169.6 |
) |
For the year ended December 31, 2013 (in millions): |
|
Reported |
|
|
Restatement |
|
|
Restated |
|
Foreign exchange gains / (losses) |
$ |
10.9 |
|
$ |
(15.2 |
) |
$ |
(4.3 |
) |
Deferred income tax (expense) / recovery |
|
(14.5 |
) |
|
15.2 |
|
|
0.8 |
|
Net loss |
|
(176.8 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
(176.8 |
) |
Flow-through share financing
The Company may issue flow-through common shares to finance a
portion of its Canadian exploration program. Pursuant to the Canadian Income Tax
Act and the terms of the flow-through share agreements, these shares transfer
the tax deductibility of qualifying resource expenditures to investors. Proceeds
received from flow-through share agreements are separated into a liability and
share capital. The liability, which represents the obligation to renounce
flow-through exploration expenditures, is calculated as the excess of cash
consideration received over the market price of the Companys shares on the
agreements closing date. Upon qualifying exploration expenditures being
incurred, the Company derecognizes the liability and recognizes it as other
income. The related deferred tax expense is also recognized at the time the
expenditures are incurred.
The Company may also be subject to a Part XII.6 tax on
flow-through proceeds renounced, in accordance with the Canadian Income Tax Act
flow-through regulations. When applicable, the estimated tax payable is accrued
until paid.
Other changes in accounting policy
IFRIC 21, Levies, sets out criteria for the recognition
of liabilities for levies imposed by governments. IFRIC 21 identifies the
obligating event for the recognition of a liability as the activity that
triggers the payment of the levy in accordance with the relevant legislation.
There was no impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements upon the
adoption of this interpretation.
Amendments to IAS 32, Financial Instruments:
Presentation, clarify situations in which an entity has a legally
enforceable right to set-off a financial liability and financial asset. The
amendments to IAS 32 also clarify when a settlement mechanism provides for net
settlement or gross settlement that is equivalent to net settlement. There was
no impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements upon the adoption
of these amendments.
Amendments to IAS 36, Impairment of assets, address the
circumstances in which the recoverable amount of assets or cash-generating units
is required to be disclosed, clarify the disclosures required, and introduce a
requirement to disclose the discount rate used in determining impairment (or
reversals) where the recoverable amount (based on fair value less costs of disposal) is determined using a present value technique. There
was no impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements upon the
adoption of these amendments.
|
31 |
2014 ANNUAL MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
STANDARDS ISSUED BUT NOT
YET ADOPTED
For the purposes of preparing and presenting the Companys
consolidated financial statements, the Company has adopted all standards and
interpretations issued other than those discussed below. These standards have
not been adopted because they are not effective for the Company until subsequent
to December 31, 2014. Standards and interpretations issued, but not yet adopted,
include:
|
Effective for the Company |
Amendments to IAS 19, Employee Benefits |
January 1, 2015 |
Amendments to IAS 16, Property, Plant and Equipment |
January 1, 2016 |
Amendments to IAS 28, Investments in Associates and Joint
Ventures |
January 1, 2016 |
Amendments to IAS 38, Intangibles |
January 1, 2016 |
Amendments to IFRS 10, Consolidated Financial Statements
|
January 1, 2016 |
Amendments to IFRS 11, Joint Arrangements |
January 1, 2016 |
IFRS 15, Revenue from Contracts with Customers |
January 1, 2017 |
IFRS 9, Financial Instruments |
January 1, 2018 |
In November 2013, the IASB issued amendments to IAS 19,
Employee Benefits, which clarify benefit and medical cost actuarial
assumptions used in calculation of the present value of defined benefit
obligations and current service cost. These amendments are effective for annual
periods beginning on or after July 1, 2014. This amendment is not anticipated to
impact the Companys consolidated financial statements as there are no defined
benefit obligations.
In May 2014, the IASB issued amendments to IAS 16, Property,
Plant and Equipment and IAS 38, Intangibles. These amendments
prohibit the use of revenue-based depreciation methods for property, plant and
equipment and limit the use of revenue-based amortization for intangible assets.
These amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January
1, 2016 and are to be applied prospectively. These amendments are not
anticipated to impact the Companys consolidated financial statements as
revenue-based depreciation or amortization methods are not used.
In September 2014, the IASB issued amendments to IAS 28,
Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures, and IFRS 10,
Consolidated Financial Statements. These amendments address a conflict
between IAS 28 and IFRS 10 and clarify that in a transaction involving an
associate or joint venture the extent of gain or loss recognition depends on
whether the assets sold or contributed constitute a business. These amendments
are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2016. The
Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard on the consolidated
financial statements.
In May 2014, the IAS issued amendments to IFRS 11, Joint
Arrangements. The amendments clarify the accounting for acquisitions of an
interest in a joint operation when the operation constitutes a business. The
amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1,
2016, with earlier application being permitted. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact of this standard on the consolidated financial
statements.
In May 2014, the IASB issued IFRS 15, Revenue from Contracts
with Customers. The standard replaces IAS 11, Construction Contracts;
IAS 18, Revenue; IFRIC 13, Customer Loyalty Programmes; IFRIC
15, Agreements for the Construction of Real Estate; IFRIC 18, Transfer
of Assets from Customers; and SIC 31, Revenue Barter Transactions
Involving Advertising Services. This standard establishes principles for
reporting the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows
arising from an entitys contract with customers. This standard is effective for
annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2017, and permits early
adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard on the
consolidated financial statements.
In July 2014, the IASB issued IFRS 9, Financial
Instruments, which will replace IAS 39, Financial Instruments:
Recognition and Measurement. The replacement standard provides a new model
for the classification and measurement of financial instruments. The IASB has
determined the revised effective date for IFRS 9 will be for annual periods
beginning on or after January 1, 2018. The Company will evaluate the impact of
the change to the consolidated financial statements based on the characteristics
of financial instruments outstanding at the time of adoption.
(i) Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and
Procedures
The Company maintains disclosure controls and procedures
designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in annual filings,
interim filings or other reports filed or submitted under provincial and
territorial securities legislation or reports filed or submitted under the U.S.
Securities Exchange Act of 1934 is recorded, processed, summarized and reported
within the applicable time periods, and that such information is accumulated and
communicated to management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required
disclosures. As of December 31, 2014, an evaluation was carried out, under the
supervision of and with the participation of management, including the Chief
Executive Officer and the Chief Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of
disclosure controls and procedures as defined in Rule 13a-15(e) under the U.S. Securities Exchange Act of
1934 and in National Instrument 52-109 Certification of Disclosure in
Issuers Annual and Interim Filings under the Canadian Securities
Administrators Rules and Policies. Based on that evaluation, the Chief Executive
Officer and Chief Financial Officer concluded that as at December 31, 2014, the
Companys disclosure controls and procedures were effective in providing
reasonable assurance that the information required to be disclosed in reports
filed or submitted by the Company under United States and Canadian securities
legislation was recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time
periods specified by the legislation.
|
32 |
2014 ANNUAL MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
(ii) Managements Report on Internal
Control Over Financial Reporting
Management, including the Chief Executive Officer and Chief
Financial Officer, is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate
internal control over financial reporting, and used the 2013 Framework issued by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission to evaluate
the effectiveness of the Companys internal controls over financial reporting
for the year ended December 31, 2014. Based on this evaluation, management
concluded that the Companys internal control over financial reporting was
effective as at December 31, 2014, and provided reasonable assurance of the
reliability of the Companys financial reporting and preparation of the
financial statements. The Companys internal control over financial reporting is
a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with IFRS. Because of its inherent limitations, internal
control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.
There were no changes in the Company’s internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the three months ended December 31, 2014, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, the Company’s internal control over financial reporting.
KPMG LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, has
audited managements assessment of the effectiveness of internal control over
financial reporting, and have expressed their opinion in their report included
with the Companys annual consolidated financial statements.
|
33 |
2014 ANNUAL MANAGEMENTS DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS |
CAUTIONARY NOTE TO U.S.
INVESTORS |
Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors Concerning Measured,
Indicated and Inferred Resources: This MD&A uses the terms "measured",
"indicated" or "inferred resources. We advise investors that while those terms
are recognized and required by Canadian regulations, the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission does not recognize them. Under Canadian
rules, estimates of inferred mineral resources may not form the basis of
feasibility or other economic studies. United States investors are cautioned not
to assume that all or any part of measured or indicated mineral resources will
ever be converted into mineral reserves. United States investors are also
cautioned not to assume that all or any part of an inferred mineral resource
exists, or is economically or legally mineable.
Cautionary Note to U.S. Investors Concerning International
Financial Reporting Standards: The consolidated financial statements of the
Company have been prepared by management in accordance with International
Financial Reporting Standards, as issued by the International Accounting
Standards Board (see note 2 to the consolidated financial statements for the
year ended December 31, 2014). These accounting principles differ in certain
material respects from accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America. The Companys reporting currency is the United States dollar
unless otherwise noted.
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING
FORWARD-LOOKING STATEMENTS |
This MD&A contains forward-looking statements and
forward-looking information as defined under Canadian and U.S. securities laws.
All statements, other than statements of historical fact, are, or may be deemed
to be, forward-looking statements. The words "expect", "believe", "anticipate",
"will", "intend", "estimate", "forecast", "budget" and similar expressions
identify forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements include
information as to strategy, plans or future financial or operating performance,
such as the Companys expansion plans, project timelines, production plans and
expected sustainable productivity increases, expected increases in underground
activities and corresponding cost efficiencies, expected drilling targets,
expected sustaining costs, expected improvements in cashflows and margins,
expectations of changes in capital expenditures, forecasted cash shortfalls
and the Companys ability to fund them, cost estimates, projected exploration
results, reserve and resource estimates, expected mill production rates and use
of the stockpile inventory, expected mill recoveries, sufficiency of working
capital for future commitments and other statements that express managements
expectations or estimates of future performance.
Forward-looking statements are necessarily based upon a number
of factors and assumptions that, while considered reasonable by management at
the time of making such statements, are inherently subject to significant
business, economic and competitive uncertainties and contingencies. Known and
unknown factors could cause actual results to differ materially from those
projected in the forward-looking statements. Such factors and assumptions
underlying the forward-looking statements in this document include, but are not
limited to: changes to current estimates of mineral reserves and resources;
fluctuations in the price of gold; changes in foreign exchange rates
(particularly the Canadian dollar, Mexican peso and U.S. dollar); the impact of
inflation; changes in our credit rating; any decision to declare a quarterly
dividend; employee relations; litigation; disruptions affecting operations;
availability of and increased costs associated with mining inputs and labor;
development delays at the Young-Davidson mine; operating or technical
difficulties in connection with mining or development activities; inherent risks
associated with mining and mineral processing; the risk that the Young-Davidson
and El Chanate mines may not perform as planned; uncertainty with the Companys
ability to secure capital to execute its business plans; the speculative nature
of mineral exploration and development, including the risks of obtaining
necessary licenses and permits, including the necessary licenses, permits,
authorizations and/or approvals from the appropriate regulatory authorities for
the Kemess Underground project; contests over title to properties; changes in
national and local government legislation in Canada, Mexico and other
jurisdictions in which the Company does or may carry on business in the future;
risk of loss due to sabotage and civil disturbances; the impact of global
liquidity and credit availability and the values of assets and liabilities based
on projected future cash flows; risks arising from holding derivative
instruments; business opportunities that may be pursued by the Company, as well
as those factors discussed under Risk Factors in the Companys most recent
Annual Information Form.
Actual results and developments are likely to differ, and may
differ materially, from those expressed or implied by the forward-looking
statements contained herein. Such statements are based on a number of
assumptions which may prove to be incorrect, including assumptions about:
business and economic conditions; commodity prices and the price of key inputs
such as labour, fuel and electricity; credit market conditions and conditions in
financial markets generally; revenue and cash flow estimates, production levels,
development schedules and the associated costs; ability to procure equipment and
supplies and on a timely basis; the timing of the receipt of permits and other
approvals for projects and operations; the ability to attract and retain skilled
employees and contractors for the operations; the accuracy of reserve and
resource estimates; the impact of changes in currency exchange rates on costs
and results; interest rates; taxation; and ongoing relations with employees and
business partners.
In particular, forward-looking information included in this document includes, but is not limited to: (1) production estimates and production growth rates, which assume accuracy of projected ore grade, mining rates, recovery timing and recovery rate estimates and may be impacted by unscheduled maintenance, labour and contractor availability; (2) capital expenditures and other cash costs, which assume foreign exchange rates and accuracy of production estimates, and may be impacted by unexpected maintenance, the need to hire external resources and accelerated capital plans; (3) profits and free cash flow, which assume production and expenditure estimates and may be impacted by gold prices, production estimates, and the timing of payments, and (4) reserves and resources which are forward looking statements by their nature involving implied assessment, and may be impacted by metal prices, future drilling results, operating costs, mining recoveries and dilution rates.
The Company disclaims any intention or obligation to update
or revise any forward-looking statements whether as a result of new information,
future events or otherwise, except as required by applicable law. For additional
detail regarding risk factors affecting the Company, refer to the Companys
Annual Information Form for the year ended December 31, 2014.
|
34 |
Exhibit 99.3
Consolidated Financial
Statements
(in thousands of
United States Dollars, unless otherwise stated)
December 31, 2014
Managements Responsibility for Financial Reporting
The accompanying consolidated financial statements of AuRico Gold Inc.
(the Company) and the information in this annual report are the responsibility
of management and have been reviewed and approved by the Companys board of
directors (the Board of Directors). The consolidated financial statements have
been prepared by management in accordance with International Financial Reporting
Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board. In
preparation of these consolidated financial statements, estimates are sometimes
necessary when transactions affecting the current accounting period cannot be
finalized with certainty until future periods. Management believes that such
estimates, which have been properly reflected in the accompanying consolidated
financial statements, are based on the best estimates and judgements of
management. Management has prepared the financial information presented
elsewhere in the annual report and has ensured that it is consistent with that
in the consolidated financial statements.
To discharge its responsibilities for financial reporting and
safeguarding of assets, management depends on the Companys systems of internal
control over financial reporting. These systems are designed to provide
reasonable assurance that the financial records are reliable and form a proper
basis for the timely and accurate preparation of financial statements. The Chief
Executive Officer and Chief Financial Officer have assessed and concluded on the
design and operating effectiveness of internal control over financial reporting.
The Board of Directors oversees managements responsibilities
for the consolidated financial statements primarily through the activities of
its Audit Committee, which is composed solely of directors who are neither
officers nor employees of the Company. This Committee meets with management and
the Companys independent auditors, KPMG LLP, to ensure that management is
properly fulfilling its financial reporting responsibilities, review the
consolidated financial statements, and recommend approval by the Board of
Directors. The Audit Committee provides full and unrestricted access to the
independent auditors and also meets with the independent auditors, without the
presence of management, to discuss the scope and results of their audit, the
adequacy of internal control over financial reporting, and the quality of
financial reporting.
The consolidated financial statements have been audited by KPMG
LLP, an independent registered public accounting firm, in accordance with
Canadian generally accepted auditing standards and in accordance with the
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
|
|
Scott Perry |
Robert Chausse |
President and Chief Executive Officer |
Executive Vice President and Chief Financial
Officer |
|
|
February 19, 2015 |
|
|
|
|
|
KPMG LLP |
Telephone (416) 777-8500 |
|
Bay Adelaide Centre |
Fax (416) 777-8818 |
|
333 Bay Street Suite 4600 |
Internet www.kpmg.ca |
|
Toronto ON M5H 2S5 |
|
|
Canada |
|
INDEPENDENT AUDITORS REPORT OF
REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
To the Shareholders of AuRico Gold Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated financial
statements of AuRico Gold Inc., which comprise the consolidated balance sheets
as at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the consolidated statements of
operations, comprehensive income, shareholders equity and cash flows for the
years then ended, and notes, comprising a summary of significant accounting
policies and other explanatory information.
Managements Responsibility for the Consolidated
Financial Statements
Management is responsible for the preparation and fair
presentation of these consolidated financial statements in accordance with
International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the
International Accounting Standards Board, and for such internal control
as management determines is necessary to enable the preparation of consolidated
financial statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to
fraud or error.
Auditors Responsibility
Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these
consolidated financial statements based on our audits. We conducted our audits
in accordance with Canadian generally accepted auditing standards and the
standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States).
Those standards require that we comply with ethical requirements and plan and
perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the consolidated
financial statements are free from material misstatement.
An audit involves performing procedures to obtain audit
evidence about the amounts and disclosures in the consolidated financial
statements. The procedures selected depend on our judgment, including the
assessment of the risks of material misstatement of the consolidated
financial statements, whether due to fraud or error. In making those risk
assessments, we consider internal control relevant to the entitys preparation
and fair presentation of the consolidated financial statements in order to
design audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances. An audit also
includes evaluating the appropriateness of accounting policies used and the
reasonableness of accounting estimates made by management, as well as evaluating
the overall presentation of the consolidated financial statements.
We believe that the audit evidence we have obtained in our
audits is sufficient and appropriate to provide a basis for our audit opinion.
KPMG LLP is a Canadian limited liability partnership
and a member firm of the KPMG |
network of independent member firms affiliated with
KPMG International Cooperative |
(KPMG International), a Swiss entity. |
KPMG Canada provides services to KPMG LLP.
|
Page 2
Opinion
In our opinion, the consolidated financial statements present
fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of AuRico
Gold Inc. as at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, and its consolidated
financial performance and its consolidated cash flows for the years then ended
in accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards as issued by the International Accounting Standards
Board.
Comparative Information
Without modifying our opinion, we draw attention to Note 3 to
the consolidated financial statements which indicates that the comparative
information presented for the year ended December 31, 2013 has been restated.
Other Matter
We also have audited, in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States), AuRico Gold Inc.s
internal control over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on the
criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework (2013) issued by
the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO), and
our report dated February 19, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion on the
effectiveness of AuRico Gold Inc.s internal control over financial reporting.
Chartered Professional Accountants, Licensed Public
Accountants
Toronto, Canada
February 19, 2015
|
|
|
|
KPMG LLP |
Telephone (416) 777-8500 |
|
Bay Adelaide Centre |
Fax (416) 777-8818 |
|
333 Bay Street Suite 4600 |
Internet www.kpmg.ca |
|
Toronto ON M5H 2S5 |
|
|
Canada |
|
REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED
PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM
The Board of Directors and Shareholders of AuRico Gold Inc.
We have audited AuRico Gold Inc.s internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2014, based on criteria established in
Internal Control Integrated Framework (2013) issued by the Committee of
Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (COSO). AuRico Gold Inc.s
management is responsible for maintaining effective internal control over
financial reporting and for its assessment of the effectiveness of internal
control over financial reporting, appearing under the heading Controls and
Procedures in Managements Discussion and Analysis for the year ended December
31, 2014. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on the Companys internal
control over financial reporting based on our audit.
We conducted our audit in accordance with the standards of the
Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards
require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about
whether effective internal control over financial reporting was maintained in
all material respects. Our audit included obtaining an understanding of internal
control over financial reporting, assessing the risk that a material weakness
exists, and testing and evaluating the design and operating effectiveness of
internal control based on the assessed risk. Our audit also included performing
such other procedures as we considered necessary in the circumstances. We
believe that our audit provides a reasonable basis for our opinion.
A companys internal control over financial reporting is a
process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of
financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external
purposes in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles. A
companys internal control over financial reporting includes those policies and
procedures that (1) pertain to the maintenance of records that, in reasonable
detail, accurately and fairly reflect the transactions and dispositions of the
assets of the company; (2) provide reasonable assurance that transactions are
recorded as necessary to permit preparation of financial statements in
accordance with generally accepted accounting principles, and that receipts and
expenditures of the company are being made only in accordance with
authorizations of management and directors of the company; and (3) provide
reasonable assurance regarding prevention or timely detection of unauthorized
acquisition, use, or disposition of the companys assets that could have a
material effect on the financial statements.
KPMG LLP is a Canadian limited liability partnership
and a member firm of the KPMG |
network of independent member firms affiliated with
KPMG International Cooperative |
(KPMG International), a Swiss entity. |
KPMG Canada provides services to KPMG LLP.
|
Page 2
Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over
financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements. Also, projections
of any evaluation of effectiveness to future periods are subject to the risk
that controls may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or that
the degree of compliance with the policies or procedures may deteriorate.
In our opinion, AuRico Gold Inc. maintained, in all material
respects, effective internal control over financial reporting as of December 31,
2014, based on criteria established in Internal Control Integrated Framework
(2013) issued by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway
Commission (COSO).
We also have audited, in accordance with Canadian generally
accepted auditing standards and the standards of the Public Company Accounting
Oversight Board (United States), the consolidated balance sheets of AuRico Gold
Inc. as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related consolidated statements
of operations, comprehensive income, shareholders equity, and cash flows for
each of the years in the two-year period ended December 31, 2014, and our report
dated February 19, 2015 expressed an unqualified opinion on those consolidated
financial statements.
Chartered Professional Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants
Toronto, Canada
February 19, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONSOLIDATED BALANCE SHEETS
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands of United States dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
As
at |
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ASSETS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents (Note
25) |
$ |
89,031 |
|
$ |
142,652 |
|
Restricted cash (Note 16(b)) |
|
- |
|
|
2,204 |
|
Receivables (Note 6) |
|
14,076 |
|
|
29,254 |
|
Current income tax receivable
|
|
5,166 |
|
|
27,936 |
|
Inventories (Note 7) |
|
73,116 |
|
|
84,643 |
|
Prepaids and deposits |
|
2,565 |
|
|
5,250 |
|
|
|
183,954 |
|
|
291,939 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Investments (Note 8) |
|
184 |
|
|
15,551 |
|
Long-term inventories (Note 7)
|
|
103,156 |
|
|
93,696 |
|
Investments in associate and
joint venture (Note 9) |
|
23,434 |
|
|
17,930 |
|
Other long-term assets (Note 10)
|
|
51,042 |
|
|
71,988 |
|
Property, plant and equipment
& mining interests (Notes 11 and 13) |
|
1,638,730 |
|
|
1,675,955 |
|
Intangible assets (Notes 12 and
13) |
|
39,633 |
|
|
53,656 |
|
Goodwill (Notes 12 and 13) |
|
241,693 |
|
|
241,693 |
|
|
$ |
2,281,826 |
|
$ |
2,462,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LIABILITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Trade payables and accrued
liabilities |
$ |
42,046 |
|
$ |
76,923 |
|
Dividend payable (Note 18(b))
|
|
- |
|
|
9,960 |
|
Current income tax liability |
|
407 |
|
|
3,966 |
|
Derivative liabilities (Note 25)
|
|
447 |
|
|
- |
|
Current portion of debt and
equipment financing obligations (Note 14) |
|
6,308 |
|
|
7,355 |
|
Obligation to renounce
flow-through exploration expenditures (Note 15) |
|
857 |
|
|
- |
|
Current portion of provisions
(Note 16) |
|
2,056 |
|
|
15,955 |
|
|
|
52,121 |
|
|
114,159 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Non-current liabilities |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Debt and equipment financing
obligations (Note 14) |
|
308,064 |
|
|
244,194 |
|
Option component of convertible
senior notes (Note 14) |
|
- |
|
|
413 |
|
Provisions (Note 16) |
|
29,529 |
|
|
28,580 |
|
Deferred income tax liability
(Note 17) |
|
260,902 |
|
|
287,180 |
|
|
|
650,616 |
|
|
674,526 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SHAREHOLDERS' EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital stock (Note 18) |
|
2,029,991 |
|
|
2,021,837 |
|
Contributed surplus |
|
62,316 |
|
|
55,945 |
|
Deficit |
|
(460,848 |
) |
|
(284,632 |
) |
Accumulated other comprehensive loss |
|
(249 |
) |
|
(5,268 |
) |
|
|
1,631,210 |
|
|
1,787,882 |
|
|
$ |
2,281,826 |
|
$ |
2,462,408 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Notes 11 and 24)
Events
after the reporting period (Note 28)
Signed on behalf of the Board: |
/s/ Scott Perry |
|
/s/ Ronald Smith |
|
|
Scott Perry, Director |
|
Ronald Smith, Director |
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial
statements |
1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
OPERATIONS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands of United States dollars, except per share amounts) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Restated |
|
For
the years ended December 31 |
|
|
|
|
(Note 3 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from mining operations |
$ |
291,182 |
|
$ |
227,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cost of sales: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production costs (Note 7) |
|
199,309 |
|
|
147,981 |
|
Refining costs |
|
595 |
|
|
526 |
|
Amortization and depletion (Note
7) |
|
121,468 |
|
|
65,529 |
|
Reclamation, care and
maintenance costs |
|
5,971 |
|
|
4,417 |
|
Total cost of sales |
|
327,343 |
|
|
218,453 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General and administrative |
|
25,921 |
|
|
27,677 |
|
Exploration and business development |
|
1,001 |
|
|
1,014 |
|
Impairment charges (Note 13) |
|
91,622 |
|
|
158,574 |
|
Loss from operations (Note 19) |
|
(154,705 |
) |
|
(178,087 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Finance costs |
|
(19,910 |
) |
|
(2,928 |
) |
Foreign exchange loss |
|
(6,639 |
) |
|
(4,289 |
) |
Other (loss) / income (Note 20) |
|
(17,201 |
) |
|
10,167 |
|
Equity in loss of associate and joint venture
(Note 9) |
|
(171 |
) |
|
(2,533 |
) |
Loss before income taxes |
|
(198,626 |
) |
|
(177,670 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deferred income tax recovery (Note 17) |
|
(26,278 |
) |
|
(760 |
) |
Current income tax recovery (Note 17) |
|
(2,700 |
) |
|
(140 |
) |
|
|
(28,978 |
) |
|
(900 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net
loss |
$ |
(169,648 |
) |
$ |
(176,770 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss per share (Note 21) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic loss per share |
$ |
(0.68 |
) |
$ |
(0.71 |
) |
Diluted loss per share |
$ |
(0.68 |
) |
$ |
(0.72 |
) |
Weighted average shares outstanding (Note 21)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic |
|
248,889,636 |
|
|
250,398,043 |
|
Diluted |
|
248,889,636 |
|
|
265,729,061 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial
statements |
2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
COMPREHENSIVE INCOME |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands of United States dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
For
the years ended December 31 |
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
Net loss |
$ |
(169,648 |
) |
$ |
(176,770 |
) |
Items that may be reclassified subsequently
to net loss: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized gain / (loss) on
investments (Note 8) |
|
2,512 |
|
|
(5,331 |
) |
Reclassification of accumulated losses on
investments to net loss (Note 8) |
|
2,507 |
|
|
168 |
|
Total other comprehensive income / (loss) |
|
5,019 |
|
|
(5,163 |
) |
Comprehensive loss |
$ |
(164,629 |
) |
$ |
(181,933 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial
statements |
3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF CASH
FLOWS |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands of United States dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
For
the years ended December 31 |
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
OPERATING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss |
$ |
(169,648 |
) |
$ |
(176,770 |
) |
Proceeds from settlement of
derivative liabilities |
|
- |
|
|
(528 |
) |
Payments to settle other
liabilities |
|
- |
|
|
(2,750 |
) |
Payments to settle provisions
|
|
(3,924 |
) |
|
(3,628 |
) |
Non-cash adjustments to
reconcile net loss to operating cash flows (Note 22) |
|
238,281 |
|
|
261,755 |
|
Change in non-cash operating
working capital (Note 22) |
|
(4,295 |
) |
|
(14,813 |
) |
Operating cash flows |
|
60,414 |
|
|
63,266 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
INVESTING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expenditures on property, plant
and equipment, mining interests & intangible assets |
|
(188,829 |
) |
|
(249,422 |
) |
Proceeds from retained interest
royalty (Note 12) |
|
2,463 |
|
|
- |
|
Decrease / (increase) in
restricted cash |
|
14,778 |
|
|
(1,686 |
) |
Purchase of investments (Note 8)
|
|
- |
|
|
(21,272 |
) |
Sale of investments (Note 8) |
|
23,284 |
|
|
- |
|
Investment in associate (Note
9(b)) |
|
(5,674 |
) |
|
- |
|
Proceeds received on transfer of
litigation claim (Note 20(a)) |
|
3,177 |
|
|
- |
|
Investing cash flows |
|
(150,801 |
) |
|
(272,380 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
FINANCING ACTIVITIES |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Repayment of debt and equipment
financing obligations (Note 14) |
|
(254,143 |
) |
|
(4,866 |
) |
Proceeds from debt and equipment
financing obligations (Note 14) |
|
309,982 |
|
|
79,813 |
|
Payment of financing fees on
debt |
|
(7,838 |
) |
|
- |
|
Payment of dividends (Note
18(b)) |
|
(14,443 |
) |
|
(27,720 |
) |
Proceeds from exercise of stock
options |
|
2 |
|
|
3,094 |
|
Shares repurchased and cancelled
(Note 18(a)) |
|
- |
|
|
(301,066 |
) |
Proceeds from issuance of
flow-through shares (Note 15) |
|
4,566 |
|
|
- |
|
Financing cash flows |
|
38,126 |
|
|
(250,745 |
) |
Impact of foreign exchange on cash |
|
(1,360 |
) |
|
(890 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net decrease in cash |
|
(53,621 |
) |
|
(460,749 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents, beginning of
period |
|
142,652 |
|
|
603,401 |
|
Cash and cash equivalents, end of period |
$ |
89,031 |
|
$ |
142,652 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial
statements |
4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENTS OF
SHAREHOLDERS EQUITY |
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in
thousands of United States dollars) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
For
the years ended December 31 |
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capital stock |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period |
$ |
2,021,837 |
|
$ |
2,307,978 |
|
Shares repurchased and cancelled
(Note 18(a)) |
|
- |
|
|
(295,536 |
) |
Shares issued through dividend
reinvestment plan |
|
1,924 |
|
|
1,969 |
|
Shares issued on redemption of
restricted share units |
|
445 |
|
|
- |
|
Shares issued through employee
share purchase plan |
|
2,323 |
|
|
2,008 |
|
Shares issued on redemption of
deferred share units |
|
359 |
|
|
499 |
|
Shares issued for cash pursuant
to exercise of stock options |
|
2 |
|
|
3,094 |
|
Fair value of share-based
compensation on stock options exercised |
|
4 |
|
|
1,825 |
|
Shares issued through
flow-through share agreement (Note 15) |
|
3,097 |
|
|
- |
|
Balance, end of period |
$ |
2,029,991 |
|
$ |
2,021,837 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contributed surplus |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period |
$ |
55,945 |
|
$ |
50,881 |
|
Fair value of restricted share
units redeemed |
|
(445 |
) |
|
- |
|
Fair value of deferred share
units redeemed |
|
(359 |
) |
|
(499 |
) |
Fair value of share-based
compensation on stock options exercised |
|
(4 |
) |
|
(1,825 |
) |
Share-based compensation |
|
7,179 |
|
|
7,388 |
|
Balance, end of period |
$ |
62,316 |
|
$ |
55,945 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deficit |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period |
$ |
(284,632 |
) |
$ |
(62,917 |
) |
Dividends declared (Note 18(b))
|
|
(6,568 |
) |
|
(39,592 |
) |
Premium on shares repurchased
and cancelled (Note 18(a)) |
|
- |
|
|
(5,353 |
) |
Net loss |
|
(169,648 |
) |
|
(176,770 |
) |
Balance, end of period |
$ |
(460,848 |
) |
$ |
(284,632 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss from
available-for-sale investments |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance, beginning of period |
$ |
(5,268 |
) |
$ |
(105 |
) |
Other comprehensive income /
(loss) |
|
5,019 |
|
|
(5,163 |
) |
Balance, end of period |
$ |
(249 |
) |
$ |
(5,268 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total shareholders' equity |
$ |
1,631,210 |
|
$ |
1,787,882 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See accompanying notes to the consolidated financial
statements |
5 |
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
(in thousands of
United States dollars unless otherwise stated) |
AuRico Gold Inc. and its subsidiaries (collectively, the
Company or AuRico Gold) are engaged in the mining, development and
exploration of resource properties. AuRico Gold Inc. is a publicly traded
company with common shares listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange (TSX: AUQ) and
the New York Stock Exchange (NYSE: AUQ). The Company is incorporated and
domiciled in Canada and its head office and registered office is located at 110
Yonge Street, Suite 1601, Toronto, Ontario, M5C 1T4.
The consolidated financial statements of the Company and its
subsidiaries were authorized for issue in accordance with a resolution of the
Board of Directors dated February 19, 2015.
|
|
2. |
Basis of preparation and statement of
compliance |
These consolidated financial statements are prepared in
accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as issued
by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB), effective for the year
ended December 31, 2014.
These consolidated financial statements have been prepared
using the historical cost convention, other than for certain financial
instruments, which are measured in accordance with the policy disclosed in note
4(t).
|
|
3. |
Change in accounting policy and retrospective
restatement |
The consolidated financial statements reflect the retrospective
application of a voluntary change in accounting policy adopted in 2014 to
classify, in the Consolidated Statements of Operations, foreign exchange gains
and losses arising on the translation of deferred income tax assets and
liabilities within deferred income tax recovery instead of within foreign
exchange losses, as previously reported. The change in accounting policy has
been adopted in accordance with IAS 12, Income Taxes, which provides a
policy choice to classify exchange differences arising from translation of
deferred income tax assets and liabilities within deferred income tax expense /
(recovery). The Company considers the classification of these exchange
differences within deferred income tax recovery in the Consolidated Statements
of Operations to be the most useful to financial statement users and,
consequently, that this presentation results in reliable and more relevant
information.
The following table outlines the effect of this accounting
policy change for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013:
|
|
Prior to |
|
|
Restatement |
|
|
Subsequent to |
|
For the year ended December 31, 2014: |
|
restatement |
|
|
Impact |
|
|
Restatement |
|
Foreign exchange gains / (losses) |
$ |
18,729 |
|
$ |
(25, 368 |
) |
$ |
(6,639 |
) |
Deferred income tax recovery |
|
910 |
|
|
25, 368 |
|
|
26,278 |
|
Net loss |
|
(169,648 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
(169,648 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For the year ended December 31, 2013: |
|
Reported |
|
|
Restatement |
|
|
Restated |
|
Foreign exchange gains / (losses) |
$ |
10,927 |
|
$ |
(15,216 |
) |
$ |
(4,289 |
) |
Deferred income tax (expense) / recovery |
|
(14,456 |
) |
|
15,216 |
|
|
760 |
|
Net loss |
|
(176,770 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
(176,770 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. |
Summary of significant accounting policies
|
|
|
(a) |
Adoption of new accounting standards
|
The Company adopted the following accounting standards and
amendments to accounting standards, effective January 1, 2014:
IFRIC 21, Levies, sets out criteria for the recognition
of liabilities for levies imposed by governments. IFR IC 21 identifies the
obligating event for the recognition of a liability as the activity that
triggers the payment of the levy in accordance with the relevant legislation.
There was no impact on the Companys consolidated financial statements upon the
adoption of this interpretation.
Amendments to IAS 32, Financial Instruments: Presentation,
clarify situations in which an entity has a legally enforceable right to
set-off a financial liability and financial asset. The amendments to IAS 32 also
clarify when a settlement mechanism provides for net settlement or gross settlement that
is equivalent to net settlement. There was no impact on the Companys
consolidated financial statements upon the adoption of these amendments.
6
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
(in thousands of
United States dollars unless otherwise stated) |
Amendments to IAS 36, Impairment of assets, address the
circumstances in which the recoverable amount of assets or cash-generating units
is required to be disclosed, clarify the disclosures required, and introduce a
requirement to disclose the discount rate used in determining impairment (or
reversals) where the recoverable amount (based on fair value less costs of
disposal) is determined using a present value technique. There was no impact on
the Companys consolidated financial statements upon the adoption of these
amendments.
(b) |
Basis of consolidation |
These consolidated financial statements include the accounts of
the Company and the following subsidiaries:
Company |
|
Principal activity |
|
|
Country of incorporation |
AuRicoGold Chihuahua, S.A. de C.V., SOFOM
E.N.R. |
|
Administrative services |
|
|
Mexico |
AuRico Gold Holdings Inc. |
|
Holding company |
|
|
Canada |
AuRico Gold Nova Scotia Ltd. |
|
Administrative services |
|
|
Canada |
AuRico Gold (USA), Inc. |
|
Administrative services |
|
|
United States of America |
Capital Gold Corporation |
|
Holding company |
|
|
United States of America |
Leadville Mining & Milling Holding
Corporation |
|
Holding company |
|
|
United States of America |
Minera Santa Rita, S. de R.L. de C.V. |
|
Gold and silver mining |
|
|
Mexico |
Nayarit Gold Inc. |
|
Holding company |
|
|
Canada |
Oro de Altar, S.A. de C.V. |
|
Holding company |
|
|
Mexico |
These subsidiaries are controlled by the Company, and are
wholly-owned. Control exists when the Company is exposed, or has rights, to
variable returns from its involvement with the investee and has the ability to
affect those returns through its power over the investee.
The Company also consolidates the accounts of Caborca
Industrial S.A. de C.V., a Mexican corporation wholly-owned by two senior
officers of the Company, which provides mining support services to the Companys
El Chanate mine. This entity is consolidated in accordance with IFRS 10,
Consolidated Financial Statements.
All intra-group transactions, balances, income and expenses are
eliminated in full on consolidation.
(c) |
Investments in associates and joint
ventures |
The Company accounts for investments in associates and joint
ventures using the equity method of accounting. The carrying value of the
Companys investments in associates and joint ventures represents the cost of
the investment, including the Companys share of retained earnings and losses
subsequent to formation. At the end of each reporting period, the Company
assesses its investments for any indicators of impairment.
Functional and presentation currency
These consolidated financial statements are expressed in United
States dollars (US dollars), which is the functional currency of the Company
and the presentation currency of the consolidated financial statements. The
functional currency of all of the Companys subsidiaries is also the US
dollar.
Translation of transactions and balances into the
functional currency
Transactions in currencies other than an entitys functional
currency (foreign currencies) are recognized at the rates of exchange
prevailing at the dates of the transactions. At the end of each reporting
period, monetary assets and liabilities denominated in foreign currencies are
translated at the rates prevailing at that date. Foreign currency non-monetary
items that are measured in terms of historical cost are not retranslated.
Exchange differences are recognized in net loss in the period
in which they arise. Exchange differences on deferred foreign tax assets and
liabilities are presented as deferred tax expense / (recovery) on the
Consolidated Statements of Operations. Unrealized gains and losses due to
movements in exchange rates on cash and cash equivalents held in foreign
currencies are shown separately on the Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows.
Revenue from the sale of gold, silver and doré, including
by-product revenue, is recognized when persuasive evidence of a sale arrangement
exists, the risks and rewards of ownership pass to the purchaser, including
title risk, the selling price is measurable, and collectability is probable. The risks and
rewards of ownership are considered to have been transferred when title passes
to the customer. Revenue from the sale of gold, silver and doré is measured at
the fair value of the consideration received or receivable, and may be subject
to adjustment once final weights and assays are determined.
7
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
(in thousands of
United States dollars unless otherwise stated) |
(f) |
Cash and cash equivalents |
The Company considers deposits in banks, certificates of
deposits, and short-term investments with original maturities of three months or
less from the acquisition date as cash and cash equivalents.
Supplies inventory
Supplies inventory consists of mining supplies and consumables
used in the operation of the mines, and is valued at the lower of average cost
and net realizable value.
Ore stockpiles inventory
Stockpiles represent ore that has been mined and is available
for further processing. Stockpiles are measured by estimating the number of
tonnes added and removed from the stockpile, the number of contained ounces
(based on assay data) and the estimated metallurgical recovery rates (based on
the expected processing method). Stockpile ore tonnages are verified by periodic
surveys. Costs are allocated to stockpiles based on the current mining cost per
tonne incurred up to the point of stockpiling the ore, including applicable
overhead, depletion and amortization relating to mining operations, to the
extent determined recoverable, and are removed at the average cost per tonne.
Ore stockpiles inventory is measured at the lower of cost and net realizable
value.
Ore in process inventory
The recovery of gold and silver is achieved through milling and
heap leaching processes. Costs are added to ore on leach pads and in the mill
based on the current stockpiled mining cost and current processing cost,
including applicable overhead, depletion and amortization relating to mining and
processing operations. Costs are removed from ore on leach pads and in the mill
as ounces are recovered, based on the average cost per recoverable ounce of gold
and silver in ore in process inventory. Ore in process inventory is measured at
the lower of cost and net realizable value.
Finished goods inventory
Finished goods inventory consists of gold, silver and doré
bars, and is valued at the lower of cost and net realizable value.
For all classes of ore inventory, net realizable value is
calculated as the difference between the estimated future metal revenue based on
prevailing and / or long-term metal prices as appropriate, and estimated costs
to complete production into a saleable form.
Property, plant and equipment
Property, plant and equipment is recorded at cost less
accumulated amortization and accumulated impairment losses. The initial cost of
an asset is comprised of its purchase price or construction cost, any costs
directly attributable to bringing the asset into operation, the initial estimate
of any reclamation obligation, and for qualifying assets, borrowing costs. The
purchase price or construction cost is the aggregate amount paid and the fair
value of any other consideration given to acquire the asset. The capitalized
value of a finance lease is also included within property, plant and equipment,
and is measured at the lower of the present value of the minimum lease payments
and the fair value of the leased asset.
Subsequent costs are included in the assets carrying amount
when it is probable that future economic benefits associated with the asset will
flow to the Company, and the costs can be measured reliably. This would include
costs related to the refurbishment or replacement of major components of an
asset, when the refurbishment results in a significant extension in the physical
life of the component. All other repairs and maintenance costs are recognized in
net loss as incurred.
8
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
(in thousands of
United States dollars unless otherwise stated) |
The cost of property, plant and equipment, less any applicable
residual value, is allocated over the estimated useful life of the asset on a
straight-line basis, or on a unit-of-production basis if that method is more
reflective of the allocation of benefits among periods. Amortization commences
on an asset when it has been fully commissioned and is available for use.
Amortization rates applicable to each category of property, plant and equipment,
with the exception of land, are as follows:
Asset |
|
Useful life |
Leasehold improvements |
|
3 years |
Mobile equipment |
|
2-10 years |
Other equipment |
|
2-20 years |
Processing plant |
|
2-20 years |
Shaft and underground infrastructure |
|
Unit-of-production |
Vehicles |
|
3-6 years |
Buildings |
|
7-20 years |
Office equipment |
|
2-8 years |
When components of an item of property, plant and equipment
have different useful lives than those noted above, they are accounted for as
separate items of property, plant and equipment. Each asset or components
estimated useful life is determined considering its physical life limitations;
however this physical life cannot exceed the remaining life of the mine at which
the asset is utilized. Estimates of remaining useful lives and residual values
are reviewed annually. Any changes in estimates of useful lives are accounted
for prospectively from the date of the change.
Exploration and evaluation assets
Expenditures incurred prior to the Company obtaining the right
to explore are expensed in the period in which they are incurred.
Exploration and evaluation expenditures include costs such as
exploratory drilling, sample testing, costs of pre-feasibility studies, and for
qualifying assets, borrowing costs. Subsequent to obtaining the legal right to
explore, these costs are capitalized on a project-by-project basis pending
determination of the technical feasibility and commercial viability of the
project. All capitalized exploration and evaluation expenditures are monitored
for indications of impairment, to ensure that exploration activities related to
the property are continuing and/or planned for the future. If an exploration
property does not prove viable, all unrecoverable costs associated with the
project are expensed in the period in which that determination is made.
Exploration and evaluation assets are not depleted. These
amounts are reclassified from exploration and evaluation assets to mining
interests once the work completed to date supports the future development of the
property and management intends to develop the property. Prior to being
reclassified to mining interests, exploration and evaluation assets are assessed
for impairment.
Mining interests
All expenditures to ready the property for production are
capitalized within mining interests, other than those costs related to the
construction of related property, plant and equipment, which are capitalized
within construction in progress. Expenditures capitalized to mining interests
include all costs directly related to development activity and a proportion of
overhead costs related to development activity. Any proceeds from the sale of
metals during the development and commissioning phase of a project are netted
against the expenditures being capitalized. The development and commissioning
phase ceases upon the commencement of commercial production.
Subsequent to the commencement of commercial production,
further development expenditures incurred with respect to a mining interest are
capitalized as part of the mining interest, when it is probable that additional
future economic benefits associated with the expenditure will flow to the
Company. Otherwise, such expenditures are classified as a cost of production.
Upon commencement of commercial production, mining interests
are depleted over the life of the mine using the unit-of-production method based
on estimated proven and probable reserves of the mine and the portion of
mineralization from measured, indicated and inferred resources expected to be
classified as reserves. The Company determines the portion of mineralization
expected to be classified as reserves by considering the degree of confidence in
the economic extraction of the resource, which is affected by long-term metal
price assumptions, cut-off grade assumptions, and drilling results. These
assessments are made on a mine-by-mine basis.
9
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
(in thousands of
United States dollars unless otherwise stated) |
The expected useful lives used in depletion calculations are
determined based on the facts and circumstances associated with the mining
interest. Any changes in estimates of useful lives are accounted for
prospectively from the date of the change.
Commercial production
Commercial production is reached when an open pit or
underground mine is in the condition necessary for it to be capable of operating
in the manner intended by management. The Company considers a range of factors
when determining whether commercial production has been reached, which may
include the completion of all required major capital expenditures, the
demonstration of continuous production near the level required by the design
capacity of the processing facilities, and the demonstration of continuous
throughput levels at or above a target percentage of the design capacity. The
Company assesses the ability to sustain production and throughput over a period
of approximately one to three months, depending on the complexity of the
operation, prior to declaring that commercial production has been reached.
Capitalized stripping costs
Pre-production stripping costs are capitalized as part of the
cost of constructing a mine.
Mining costs associated with stripping activities during the
production phase of a mine are capitalized only if the Company can identify the
component of the ore body for which access is obtained, the costs associated
with the related stripping activities can be measured reliably, and the
activities represent a future benefit to the mining interest, in that access is
gained to sources of reserves and resources that will be produced in future
periods that would otherwise not have been accessible. Production stripping
costs are allocated between inventory and capital based on the expected volume
of waste extracted for a given volume of ore production. The expected volume of
waste to be allocated to inventory is determined with reference to the life of
mine stripping ratio of a particular mine or deposit, with the remaining amount
allocated to capital. The amount of waste capitalized is calculated by
multiplying the stripping tonnes mined during the period by the current mining
cost per tonne in the open pit.
Capitalized stripping costs are depleted over the expected
reserves and resources benefiting from the stripping activity using the
unit-of-production method based on estimated proven and probable reserves, and
the portion of mineralization expected to be classified as reserves.
Investment tax credits
Investment tax credits are earned as a result of incurring
eligible exploration and development expenses prior to commercial production.
Investment tax credits are accounted for as a reduction to property, plant and
equipment or mining interests. Investment tax credits also arise as a result of
incurring eligible research and development expenses and these credits are
recorded as a reduction to the related expenses.
Derecognition
Upon replacement of a major component, or upon disposal or
abandonment of a long-lived asset, the carrying amounts of the assets are
derecognized with any associated gains or losses recognized in net loss.
Identifiable intangible assets are recorded at fair value on
the date of acquisition. Subsequent to initial recognition, they are recorded at
cost less accumulated amortization and accumulated impairment losses.
Identifiable intangible assets with a finite useful life are amortized on a
straight-line basis over their expected useful life, unless another method
represents a more accurate allocation of the expense over their useful life.
Amortization of the retained interest royalty is determined using the
unit-of-production method based on the ounces of production that are expected to
generate the cash flows that will be attributable to the Company, and commenced
once the Company became entitled to receive cash flows. Amortization expense
resulting from intangible assets, other than the retained interest royalty, is
included in amortization and depletion expense on the Consolidated Statements of
Operations. Amortization and depletion for the retained interest royalty is
included in other (loss) / income on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
The estimated useful lives of the Companys intangible assets with a finite
useful life are as follows:
Asset |
|
Useful life |
Transmission rights |
|
7-20 years |
Software |
|
1-3 years |
Retained interest royalty |
|
Units of production |
10
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
(in thousands of
United States dollars unless otherwise stated) |
Goodwill represents the difference between the consideration
transferred in a business combination and the fair value of the identifiable net
assets acquired, and is not amortized. Goodwill, upon acquisition, is allocated
to the cash-generating unit (CGU) or group of CGUs expected to benefit from
the related business combination for the purposes of impairment testing. A CGU
is defined as the smallest identifiable group of assets that generates cash
inflows, which are largely independent of the cash inflows from other assets.
Each of the Companys operating mines is a CGU for purposes of goodwill
impairment testing.
(k) |
Impairment of non-financial assets and
goodwill |
The carrying amounts of non-financial assets, excluding
inventories and deferred income tax assets, are reviewed for impairment at each
reporting date, or whenever events or changes in circumstances indicate the
carrying amounts may not be recoverable. If there are indicators of impairment,
a review is undertaken to determine whether the carrying amounts are in excess
of their recoverable amounts. Reviews are undertaken on an asset-by-asset basis,
except where the recoverable amount for an individual asset cannot be
determined, in which case the review is undertaken at the CGU level.
On an annual basis, the Company evaluates the carrying amount
of CGUs to which goodwill has been allocated to determine whether such carrying
amount may be impaired. To accomplish this, the Company compares the recoverable
amount of a CGU to its carrying amount. This evaluation is performed more
frequently if there is an indication that a CGU may be impaired.
If the carrying amount of a CGU or non-financial asset exceeds
the recoverable amount, being the higher of its fair value less costs to sell
and its value-in-use, an impairment loss is recognized in net loss as the excess
of the carrying amount over the recoverable amount. With respect to CGUs,
impairment losses are allocated first to reduce the carrying amount of any
goodwill allocated to the CGUs, and then to reduce the carrying amounts of the
other assets in the CGU on a pro-rata basis.
Where the recoverable amount is assessed using discounted cash
flow techniques, the estimates are based on detailed mine or production plans.
The mine plan is the basis for forecasting production output in each future year
and for forecasting production costs. For value-in-use calculations, production
costs and output in the mine plan may be revised to reflect the continued use of
the asset in its present form.
Non-financial assets that have previously been impaired are
tested for a possible reversal of the impairment whenever events or changes in
circumstances indicate that the impairment may have reversed, or may have
partially reversed. In these instances, the impairment loss is reversed to the
recoverable amount but not beyond the carrying amount, net of amortization, that
would have arisen if the prior impairment loss had not been recognized. Goodwill
impairments are not reversed.
(l) |
Impairment of financial
assets |
At each reporting date, the Company assesses whether there is
any objective evidence that a financial asset or a group of financial assets,
other than those classified as fair value through profit or loss, is impaired.
Financial assets include receivables and investments. A financial asset or a
group of financial assets is deemed to be impaired if there is objective
evidence of impairment as a result of one or more events that have occurred
after the initial recognition of the asset that negatively impact the estimated
future cash flows of the financial asset or the group of financial assets.
(m) |
Impairment of investments in associate and joint
venture |
The carrying amounts of investments in associate and joint
venture are reviewed for impairment at each reporting date, or whenever events
or changes in circumstances indicate the carrying amounts may not be
recoverable. If there are indicators of impairment, a review is undertaken to
determine whether the carrying amounts are in excess of their recoverable
amounts. Indicators of impairment include observable data suggesting a
measurable decrease in the estimated future cash flows of the joint venture or
associate operations. If the carrying amount of an associate or joint venture
exceeds the recoverable amount, being the higher of its fair value less costs to
sell and its value-in-use, an impairment loss is recognized in net loss as the
excess of the carrying amount over the recoverable amount.
The Company may issue flow-through common shares to finance its
Canadian exploration program. Pursuant to the Canadian Income Tax Act and the
terms of the flow-through share agreements, these shares transfer the tax
deductibility of qualifying resource expenditures to investors. Proceeds
received from flow-through share agreements are separated into a liability and
share capital. The liability, which represents the obligation to renounce
flow-through exploration expenditures, is calculated as the excess of cash
consideration received over the market price of the Companys shares on the
agreements closing date. Upon qualifying exploration expenditures being
incurred, the Company derecognizes the liability and recognizes it as other
income. The related deferred tax expense is also recognized at the time the
expenditures are incurred.
The Company may also be subject to a Part XII.6 tax on
flow-through proceeds renounced, in accordance with the Canadian Income Tax Act
flow-through regulations. When applicable, the estimated tax payable is accrued
until paid.
11
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
(in thousands of
United States dollars unless otherwise stated) |
Reclamation provisions
The Companys mining and exploration activities are subject to
various governmental laws and regulations relating to the protection of the
environment. These environmental regulations are continually changing, and the
Company has made, and intends to make in the future, expenditures to comply with
such laws and regulations. The timing of these expenditures is dependent upon a
number of factors including the life of the mine, the operating licence
conditions, and the laws, regulations, and environment in which the mine
operates.
Reclamation provisions are recognized at the time an
environmental disturbance occurs and are measured at the Companys best estimate
of the expected future cash flows required to reclaim the disturbance for each
mine operation, which are adjusted to reflect inflation, and discounted to their
present value. The inflation rate used is determined based on external forecasts
for inflation in the country in which the related mine operates. Expected future
cash flows reflect the risks and probabilities that alternative estimates of
cash flows could be required to settle the obligation. The discount rate used is
a pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of
money specific to the currency in which the cash flows are expected to be paid.
The discount rate does not reflect risks for which the cash flows have been
adjusted. Significant estimates are involved in forming expectations of future
activities and the amount and timing of the associated cash flows. Those
expectations are based on existing environmental and regulatory requirements or,
if more stringent, Company policies that give rise to a constructive
obligation.
Upon initial recognition of a reclamation provision, the
corresponding cost is capitalized as an asset, representing part of the cost of
acquiring the future economic benefits of the operation. The capitalized cost of
reclamation and rehabilitation activities is recognized in mining interests and
depreciated in accordance with the Company's policy for the related asset. The
provision is progressively increased over the life of the operation as the
effect of discounting unwinds, creating an expense included in finance costs on
the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Reclamation provisions are adjusted for changes in estimates.
Such adjustments, which are not the result of the current production of
inventory, are accounted for as a change in the corresponding capitalized cost,
except where a reduction in the provision is greater than the unamortized
capitalized cost of the related assets. In instances where the capitalized cost
of the related assets is nil, or will be reduced to nil, the remaining
adjustment is recognized as a gain or loss in reclamation, care and maintenance
costs on the Consolidated Statements of Operations. If reclamation and
restoration costs are incurred as a consequence of the production of inventory,
the costs are recognized as a cost of that inventory. Factors influencing such
changes in estimates include revisions to estimated reserves, resources and
lives of mines; developments in technologies; regulatory requirements and
environmental management strategies; changes in estimated costs of anticipated
activities, including the effects of inflation and movements in foreign exchange
rates; and movements in interest rates affecting the discount rate applied.
Other provisions
Provisions are recognized when the Company has a present
obligation (legal or constructive), as a result of past events, and it is
probable that an outflow of resources that can be reliably estimated will be
required to settle the obligation. Provisions are measured at the present value
of the expenditures expected to be required to settle the obligation using a
pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of the time value of money
and the risks specific to the obligation. The increase in the provision due to
the passage of time is recognized as interest expense and included in finance
costs on the Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Short-term employee benefits
The Company accrues liabilities for short-term employee
benefits such as wages, salaries, bonuses, paid vacation, and other benefits
expected to be settled within 12 months from the end of the reporting period.
The liabilities for short-term benefits are measured on an undiscounted basis at
the amounts expected to be paid when the liabilities are settled. These amounts
are recognized in trade payables and accrued liabilities, with offsetting
charges to cost of sales (production costs) or general and administrative
expense.
12
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
(in thousands of
United States dollars unless otherwise stated) |
Termination benefits
The Company accrues liabilities for involuntary termination and
severance benefits when the termination has been communicated to the employee,
and the employee acknowledges receipt. The liabilities for termination benefits
are measured on an undiscounted basis at the amounts expected to be paid when
the liabilities are settled.
(q) |
Share-based compensation |
The Company measures all equity-settled share-based awards made
to employees and others providing similar services (collectively, employees)
based on the fair value of the options or units on the date of grant.
The grant date fair value of options is estimated using an
option pricing model and is recognized as compensation expense over the vesting
period, based on the number of options that are expected to vest. A
corresponding increase is recognized in equity. The fair values of the Companys
deferred share units, performance share units, and equity-settled restricted
share units are determined based on the market value of the Companys shares on
the date of grant, and is expensed over the vesting period based on the
estimated number of awards that are expected to vest.
The Company awards cash-settled share-based compensation to
certain employees in the form of restricted share units. In accounting for these
awards, the Company recognizes the fair value of the amount payable to employees
as compensation expense as they are earned, based on the estimated number of
units that are expected to vest. The corresponding liability is re-measured at
fair value on each reporting date and upon settlement, with changes in fair
value recognized in net loss for the period. The fair value of restricted share
units is determined by reference to the Companys share price when the units are
awarded or re-measured.
The Company also maintains an employee share purchase plan.
Under this plan, contributions by the Companys employees are matched to a
specific percentage by the Company and are recognized as an expense when the
Companys obligation to contribute arises.
Share-based arrangements in which the Company receives goods or
services as consideration for its own equity instruments are accounted for as
equity-settled share-based payment transactions regardless of how the equity
instruments are obtained by the Company. These share-based arrangements are
measured at the fair value of goods or services received unless the fair value
of the goods or services cannot be reliably measured, in which case they are
measured at the fair value of the equity instruments issued.
Income tax expense is comprised of current and deferred income
tax. Current and deferred income taxes are recognized in net loss except to the
extent that they relate to a business combination, or to items recognized
directly in equity or other comprehensive income.
Current income taxes
Current income tax expense represents the income tax expected
to be payable on the Companys taxable earnings for the year using rates that
are enacted or substantively enacted at the balance sheet date. Taxable earnings
differ from accounting earnings reported in the Consolidated Statements of
Operations due to differences in timing of amounts deductible or taxable for tax
purposes and due to exclusions of items that are not taxable or deductible.
Current income tax includes adjustments for tax expense expected to be payable
or recoverable in respect of previous periods.
Deferred income taxes
Deferred income tax assets and liabilities represent income
taxes expected to be payable or recoverable on differences between the carrying
amount of assets and liabilities in the Companys consolidated financial
statements and the corresponding tax basis used in the computation of taxable
earnings. Deferred income tax assets also represent income taxes expected to be
recoverable on unused tax losses and tax credits carried forward. Deferred
income tax is calculated using the liability method on temporary differences
between the tax basis of assets and liabilities and their carrying amounts for
financial reporting purposes at the reporting date.
Deferred income taxes are measured using the enacted or
substantively enacted tax rates at the balance sheet date that are expected to
be in effect when the differences reverse or when unclaimed losses are utilized.
Deferred income tax liabilities are generally recognized for all taxable
temporary differences, with some exceptions described below. Deferred income tax
assets are recognized to the extent that it is probable that taxable earnings
will be available against which deductible temporary differences, unused tax
losses and tax credits can be used. Neither deferred income tax liabilities, nor
deferred income tax assets, are recognized as a result of temporary differences
that arise from (a) the initial recognition of goodwill, (b) a transaction,
other than a business combination, that affects neither accounting earnings nor
taxable earnings, or (c) differences relating to investments in subsidiaries to
the extent that it is probable that they will not reverse in the foreseeable future. Deferred income tax assets and liabilities are offset
to the extent there is a legally enforceable right to offset current income tax
liabilities and assets, and they relate to income taxes levied by the same tax
authority on the same taxable entity, or on different tax entities, but the
entity intends to settle current income tax liabilities and assets on a net
basis or their tax assets and liabilities will be realized simultaneously.
13
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
(in thousands of
United States dollars unless otherwise stated) |
The carrying amount of deferred income tax assets is reviewed
at the end of each reporting period and adjusted to the extent that it is no
longer probable that sufficient taxable earnings will be available to allow the
benefit, or all or part of the asset, to be utilized. To the extent that an
asset not previously recognized fulfils the criteria for asset recognition, a
deferred income tax asset is recognized.
Basic loss per share is calculated based on the weighted
average number of common shares and common share equivalents outstanding for the
period. Diluted loss per share is calculated using the treasury method, except
when assessing the dilution impact of convertible senior notes, restricted share
units and performance shares units, where the if-converted method is used. The
treasury method assumes that outstanding stock options and warrants with an
average exercise price below the market price of the underlying shares, are
exercised and the assumed proceeds are used to repurchase common shares of the
Company at the average market price of the common shares for the period. The
if-converted method assumes that all convertible senior notes, restricted share
units, and performance share units have been converted in determining fully
diluted loss per share if they are in-the-money, except where such conversion
would be anti-dilutive.
(t) |
Financial instruments |
Financial instruments are measured at fair value on initial
recognition of the instrument. Measurement in subsequent periods depends on
whether the financial instrument has been classified as financial assets at
fair value through profit or loss, available-for-sale financial assets,
held-to-maturity investments, loans and receivables, financial liabilities
at fair value through profit or loss, or other financial liabilities.
The Companys financial instruments are classified and
subsequently measured as follows:
Asset / Liability
|
|
Classification |
|
Subsequent Measurement |
Cash and cash equivalents |
|
Fair value through profit or loss |
|
Fair value |
Receivables |
|
Loans and receivables |
|
Amortized cost |
Prepayment option embedded derivative |
|
Fair value through profit or loss |
|
Fair value |
Contingent consideration |
|
Fair value through profit or loss |
|
Fair value |
Investments |
|
Available-for-sale |
|
Fair value |
Warrants held |
|
Fair value through profit or loss |
|
Fair value |
Payables, provisions and other liabilities |
|
Other financial liabilities |
|
Amortized cost |
Debt and equipment financing obligations |
|
Other financial liabilities |
|
Amortized cost |
Option component of convertible senior notes |
|
Fair value through profit or loss |
|
Fair value |
Derivatives |
|
Fair value through profit or loss |
|
Fair value |
Financial assets and financial liabilities classified as fair
value through profit or loss are measured at fair value with changes in those
fair values recognized in net loss. Financial assets classified as
available-for-sale are measured at fair value, with changes in those fair values
recognized in other comprehensive income (OCI).
Investments in equity securities classified as
available-for-sale financial assets are accounted for at their fair value, which
is determined based on the last quoted market price. Changes in the market value
of available-for-sale equity securities as well as the related foreign exchange
and tax impact, if any, are accounted for in accumulated other comprehensive
income until the equity securities are sold or are determined to be
other-than-temporarily impaired. When available-for-sale equity securities are
sold or are determined to be other-than-temporarily impaired, the related
accumulated change in accumulated other comprehensive income is reclassified to
net loss.
The senior secured notes represent a financial liability with
an embedded derivative. The debt component of the senior secured notes is
presented within debt and equipment financing obligations on the Consolidated
Balance Sheets. The embedded derivative, which is an option that represents a
derivative asset to the Company, will be recognized as an offset to debt and
equipment financing obligations on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The debt
component is initially recognized as the difference between the fair value of
the financial instrument as a whole and the fair value of the embedded
derivative. Subsequently, the debt component is recognized at amortized cost
using the effective interest rate method. The embedded derivative represents the
prepayment option and is classified as a financial asset at fair value through
profit or loss. The embedded derivative is subsequently recognized at fair value
with changes in fair value recognized in net loss. Interest expense relating to the debt component is also recognized in
net loss, with the exception of interest expense capitalized as borrowing costs
in accordance with note 4(h).
14
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
(in thousands of
United States dollars unless otherwise stated) |
Convertible senior notes, under the terms of which the Company
has the right to settle all or part of the instrument in cash on the conversion
date, represent a financial liability with an embedded derivative. The debt
component of the convertible senior notes is presented within debt and equipment
financing obligations on the Consolidated Balance Sheets, and is initially
recognized as the difference between the fair value of the financial instrument
as a whole and the fair value of the embedded derivative. The debt component is
subsequently recognized at amortized cost using the effective interest rate
method. The embedded derivative represents the conversion feature and is
classified as a financial liability at fair value through profit or loss. The
embedded derivative is subsequently recognized at fair value with changes in
fair value recognized in net loss. Interest expense relating to the debt
component is also recognized in net loss, with the exception of interest expense
capitalized as borrowing costs in accordance with note 4(h).
Fair values are based on quoted market prices where available,
or where no active market exists, fair values are estimated using a variety of
valuation techniques and models. These valuation techniques and models include
recent arms length market transactions for similar instruments, reference to
current market value of another instrument which is substantially the same,
discounted cash flow analysis, and option pricing models.
Transaction costs, other than those related to financial
instruments classified as fair value through profit or loss, which are expensed
as incurred, are combined with the fair value of the financial asset or
financial liability on initial recognition and amortized using the effective
interest rate method. If modifications are made to a financial liability that
are not considered to be substantial, the transaction costs related to this
modification are combined with the carrying amount, and amortized over the life
of the instrument using the effective interest rate method. If modifications are
made that are considered to be substantial, the transaction costs related to the
modification are expensed.
All derivative instruments, including embedded derivatives, are
recorded on the balance sheet at fair value unless exempted from derivative
treatment as an own-use instrument. All changes in fair value are recorded in
net loss unless they are designated in a valid cash flow hedging relationship
(note 4(u)), in which case changes in fair value are recorded in accumulated
other comprehensive income.
Financial assets are derecognized when the rights to receive
cash flows from the asset have expired or have been transferred and the Company
has transferred substantially all of the risks and rewards of ownership.
Financial liabilities are derecognized when they have been settled by the
Company, or when an obligation expires. In instances where a financial liability
is replaced by another from the same lender on substantially different terms, or
the terms of the existing liability are substantially modified, such an exchange
or modification is treated as a derecognition of the original liability and the
recognition of a new liability, with any difference recognized in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations.
Financial assets and financial liabilities are offset and the
net amount reported in the Consolidated Balance Sheets only if there is an
enforceable legal right to offset the recognized amounts and the intention is to
settle on a net basis, or to realize the assets and settle the liabilities
simultaneously.
Hedging relationships that meet documentation requirements, and
that can be proven to be effective both at the inception and over the term of
the relationship qualify for hedge accounting. At the inception of the
transaction, the Company documents the relationship between hedging instruments
and hedged items, the method for assessing effectiveness, as well as its risk
management objective and strategy for undertaking various hedge transactions.
The Company makes an assessment, both at the inception of the hedge and on an
ongoing basis, of whether the derivatives that are used in hedging transactions
have been and will continue to be highly effective in offsetting changes in fair
values or cash flows of hedged items.
The effective portion of changes in the fair value of
derivatives that are designated and qualify as cash flow hedges are recognized
as other comprehensive income and are presented within equity as accumulated
other comprehensive income. The gain or loss relating to the ineffective portion
is recognized immediately in net loss. Amounts accumulated in equity are
recycled to net loss in the period in when the hedged item will affect net loss.
However, when the forecasted transaction that is hedged results in the
recognition of a non-financial asset or liability, the gains and losses
previously deferred in equity are transferred from equity and included in the
measurement of the initial cost or carrying amount of the related asset or
liability.
When a hedging instrument expires or is sold or terminated, or
when a hedge no longer meets the criteria for hedge accounting, any cumulative
gain or loss existing in equity at that time remains in equity and is recognized
when the forecasted transaction is ultimately recognized in net loss. When a
forecasted transaction is no longer expected to occur, the cumulative gain or
loss existing in accumulated other comprehensive income is immediately charged
to net loss.
15
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
(in thousands of
United States dollars unless otherwise stated) |
Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the
internal reporting provided to the chief operating decision-maker. The chief
operating decision-maker, who is responsible for allocating resources and
assessing performance of the operating segments, has been identified as the
Chief Executive Officer. The Companys operating segments, before aggregation,
have been identified as the Companys individual operating and development stage
mines. Aggregation of one or more operating segments into a single operating
segment is permitted if aggregation is consistent with the core principle of the
standard, the operating segments have similar economic characteristics, and the
operating segments have a number of other similarities, including similarities
in the nature of their products, production processes, and regulatory
environment. The Companys reportable segments are consistent with the
identified operating segments and consist of the geographical regions in which
the Company operates.
(w) |
Standards issued but not yet
adopted |
For the purposes of preparing and presenting the Companys
consolidated financial statements, the Company has adopted all applicable
standards and interpretations issued other than those discussed below. These
standards have not been adopted because they are not effective for the Company
until subsequent to December 31, 2014. Standards and interpretations issued, but
not yet adopted include:
|
Effective for the Company |
Amendments to IAS 19, Employee Benefits
|
January 1, 2015 |
Amendments to IAS 16, Property, Plant and
Equipment |
January 1, 2016 |
Amendments to IAS 28, Investments in
Associates and Joint Ventures |
January 1, 2016 |
Amendments to IAS 38, Intangibles |
January 1, 2016 |
Amendments to IFRS 10, Consolidated
Financial Statements |
January 1, 2016 |
Amendments to IFRS 11, Joint Arrangements
|
January 1, 2016 |
IFRS 15, Revenue from Contracts with
Customers |
January 1, 2017 |
IFRS 9, Financial Instruments |
January 1, 2018 |
In November 2013, the IASB issued amendments to IAS 19,
Employee Benefits, which clarify benefit and medical cost actuarial
assumptions used in calculation of the present value of defined benefit
obligations and current service cost. These amendments are effective for annual
periods beginning on or after July 1, 2014. This amendment is not anticipated to
impact the Companys consolidated financial statements as there are no defined
benefit obligations.
In May 2014, the IASB issued amendments to IAS 16, Property,
Plant and Equipment and IAS 38, Intangibles. These amendments
prohibit the use of revenue-based depreciation methods for property, plant and
equipment and limit the use of revenue-based amortization for intangible assets.
These amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January
1, 2016 and are to be applied prospectively. These amendments are not
anticipated to impact the Companys consolidated financial statements as
revenue-based depreciation or amortization methods are not used.
In September 2014, the IASB issued amendments to IAS 28,
Investments in Associates and Joint Ventures, and IFRS 10,
Consolidated Financial Statements. These amendments address a conflict
between IAS 28 and IFRS 10 and clarify that in a transaction involving an
associate or joint venture the extent of gain or loss recognition depends on
whether the assets sold or contributed constitute a business. These amendments
are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2016. The
Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard on the consolidated
financial statements.
In May 2014, the IAS issued amendments to IFRS 11, Joint
Arrangements. The amendments clarify the accounting for acquisitions of an
interest in a joint operation when the operation constitutes a business. The
amendments are effective for annual periods beginning on or after January 1,
2016, with earlier application being permitted. The Company is currently
evaluating the impact of this standard on the consolidated financial
statements.
In May 2014, the IASB issued IFRS 15, Revenue from Contracts
with Customers. The standard replaces IAS 11, Construction Contracts;
IAS 18, Revenue; IFRIC 13, Customer Loyalty Programmes; IFRIC
15, Agreements for the Construction of Real Estate; IFRIC 18, Transfer
of Assets from Customers; and SIC 31, Revenue Barter Transactions
Involving Advertising Services. This standard establishes principles for
reporting the nature, amount, timing, and uncertainty of revenue and cash flows
arising from an entitys contract with customers. This standard is effective for
annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2017, and permits early
adoption. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard on the
consolidated financial statements.
In July 2014, the IASB issued IFRS 9, Financial
Instruments, which will replace IAS 39, Financial Instruments:
Recognition and Measurement. The replacement standard provides a new model
for the classification and measurement of financial instruments. The IASB has determined the revised effective date
for IFRS 9 will be for annual periods beginning on or after January 1, 2018. The
Company will evaluate the impact of the change to the consolidated financial
statements based on the characteristics of financial instruments outstanding at
the time of adoption.
16
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
(in thousands of
United States dollars unless otherwise stated) |
|
|
5. |
Critical accounting estimates and
judgements |
Many of the amounts included in the Consolidated Balance Sheets
require management to make estimates and judgements. Accounting estimates and
assumptions are continually evaluated and are based on historical experience and
other factors, including expectations of future events that are believed to be
reasonable under the circumstances. Revisions to accounting estimates are
recognized in the period in which the estimates are revised.
Critical accounting estimates
The following is a list of the accounting estimates that the
Company believes are critical, due to the degree of uncertainty regarding the
estimates or assumptions involved and the magnitude of the asset, liabilities,
revenue or expense being reported. Actual results may differ from these
estimates.
− |
The Company makes estimates of gold and silver
recoverable from ore stacked on leach pads in the determination of ore in
process inventory. The quantities of recoverable gold and silver placed on
the leach pads are reconciled to the quantities of gold and silver
actually recovered (metallurgical balancing), by comparing the estimate of
contained ounces placed on the leach pads to actual ounces recovered. The
nature of the leaching process inherently limits the ability to precisely
monitor inventory levels. As a result, the metallurgical balancing process
is constantly monitored and the engineering estimates are refined based on
actual results over time. The ultimate recovery of gold and silver from a
pad will not be known until the leaching process is completed. Leach pad
recovery estimates are used in the determination of the Companys
inventories. |
|
|
|
|
− |
The Company values inventory at the lower of cost and net
realizable value. The calculation of net realizable value relies on
forecasted gold prices, estimated grades of ore on stockpiles and heap
leach pads, forecasted exchange rates, and estimated costs to complete the
processing of ore inventory. |
|
|
|
|
− |
The Company makes estimates of the quantities of proven
and probable reserves of the mine and the portion of mineralization
expected to be classified as reserves. The estimation of quantities of
reserves and resources is complex, requiring significant subjective
assumptions that arise from the evaluation of geological, geophysical,
engineering and economic data for a given ore body. This data could change
over time as a result of numerous factors, including new information
gained from development activities, evolving production history and a
reassessment of the viability of production under different economic
conditions. Reserve estimates are used in the calculation of depletion
expense and to calculate the recoverable amount of a CGU, and to forecast
the life of the mine. The Company has forecasted a mine life of 9 years
for El Chanate and 20 years for Young-Davidson. |
|
|
|
|
− |
The Company forecasts prices of commodities, exchange
rates, production costs, discount rates, and recovery rates. These
estimates may change the economic status of reserves and may result in
reserves and resources being revised. In addition, these estimates are
used to calculate the recoverable amount of a CGU for the purpose of
impairment testing. |
|
|
|
|
− |
The Company amortizes its property, plant and equipment,
net of residual value, over the estimated useful life of each asset, not
to exceed the life of the mine at which the asset is utilized. The
physical life of these assets, and related components, may differ from the
Companys estimate, which would impact amortization and depletion expense.
|
|
|
|
|
− |
The Company makes estimates of the likelihood of whether
or not all or some portion of each deferred income tax asset and
investment tax credits will be realized, which is impacted by
interpretation of tax laws and regulations, historic and future expected
levels of taxable income, timing of reversals of taxable temporary timing
differences, and tax planning initiatives. Levels of future taxable income
are affected by, among other things, market gold prices, production costs,
quantities of proven and probable gold reserves, interest rates, and
foreign currency exchange rates. |
|
|
|
|
− |
The Company makes estimates of the timing and amount of
expenditures required to settle the Companys reclamation provisions. The
principal factors that can cause expected future expenditures to change
are: the construction of new processing facilities; changes in the
quantities of material in reserves and a corresponding change in the life
of mine plan; changing ore characteristics that ultimately impact the
environment; changes in water quality that impact the extent of water
treatment required; and changes in laws and regulations governing the protection of the environment. In general, as the end of
the mine life nears, the reliability of expected cash flows increases, but
earlier in the mine life, the estimation of a reclamation provision is
inherently more subjective.
|
|
|
− |
The Company makes estimates of future cash flows in order
to calculate the recoverable amount of the retained interest royalty for
the purpose of impairment testing. Future cash flows are impacted by
future gold prices, future production from the Fosterville and Stawell
mines in Victoria, Australia, future foreign exchange rates, as well as
related operating and capital expenditures required to sustain that
production. |
17
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
(in thousands of
United States dollars unless otherwise stated) |
Critical accounting judgements
The following are critical judgements that management has made
in the process of applying accounting policies that may have a significant
impact on the amounts recognized in the consolidated financial statements.
− |
The Company makes judgements about whether or not
indicators of impairment, or indicators of a reversal of impairment, exist
at each reporting period. For all assets, this determination impacts
whether or not a detailed impairment assessment is performed at December
31, 2014 and 2013. These judgements did not impact cash generating units
that contain goodwill at December 31, 2014, or 2013, as these are required
to be tested for impairment regardless of whether or not an indicator
exists. |
|
|
− |
The Company is subject to income taxes in different
jurisdictions. Significant judgment is required in determining the
provision for income taxes, due to the complexity of legislation.
|
|
|
− |
The Company makes judgements about which indicators to
consider when evaluating whether a mine has reached commercial production,
which may impact the timing and amount of depreciation and depletion, the
amount of revenue recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations,
and the amount of costs capitalized to mine development during 2013.
|
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
Trade receivables |
$ |
396 |
|
$ |
1,012 |
|
Value-added tax receivable |
|
10,814 |
|
|
14,888 |
|
Advances |
|
767 |
|
|
1,658 |
|
Other |
|
2,099 |
|
|
11,696 |
|
|
$ |
14,076 |
|
$ |
29,254 |
|
Included in value-added tax receivable was $3,535 and $7,279
collectible from the Government of Canada and Government of Mexico,
respectively, at December 31, 2014 (December 31, 2013 - $7,340 and $7,548,
respectively).
Included in other receivables at December 31, 2014 is a
receivable from the Companys joint venture (see note 9) of $2,099 (December 31,
2013 - $1,442). In the prior year, other receivables also included an insurance
receivable of $10,254 relating to the settlement of a lawsuit (see note 16(b)).
The Company has not recorded a provision for doubtful trade
receivables as there is no indication that the debtors will not meet their
payment obligations.
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
Supplies |
$ |
20,286 |
|
$ |
17,391 |
|
Ore stockpiles |
|
22,025 |
|
|
35,122 |
|
Ore in process |
|
132,035 |
|
|
117,984 |
|
Finished goods |
|
1,926 |
|
|
7,842 |
|
|
|
176,272 |
|
|
178,339 |
|
Less: Long-term inventories |
|
(103,156 |
) |
|
(93,696 |
) |
|
$ |
73,116 |
|
$ |
84,643 |
|
During the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013, the carrying
value of the El Chanate ore in process heap leach inventory and the
Young-Davidson low grade stockpile inventory exceeded their net realizable
values. As a result, the Company recognized net realizable value adjustments, which
impacted production costs and amortization and depletion. Ore stockpile and ore
in process inventories include mining and processing costs, along with
amortization and depletion related to mining and processing operations. The net
realizable value adjustments totaling $23,534 for the year ended December 31,
2014 (2013 - $42,069) have been allocated on a pro-rata basis between production
costs and amortization and depletion based on their relative values at December
31, 2014 and 2013.
18
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
(in thousands of
United States dollars unless otherwise stated) |
The impact on production costs and amortization and depletion
is as follows:
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
Operating production costs |
$ |
182,085 |
|
$ |
114,555 |
|
Net realizable value adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
El Chanate |
|
13,885 |
|
|
23,376 |
|
Young-Davidson |
|
3,339 |
|
|
10,050 |
|
Production costs |
$ |
199,309 |
|
$ |
147,981 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating amortization and depletion |
$ |
115,158 |
|
$ |
56,886 |
|
Net realizable value adjustment |
|
|
|
|
|
|
El Chanate |
|
4,139 |
|
|
2,083 |
|
Young-Davidson |
|
2,171 |
|
|
6,560 |
|
Amortization and depletion |
$ |
121,468 |
|
$ |
65,529 |
|
Ore inventories carried at net realizable value totalled
$141,038 at December 31, 2014 (December 31, 2013 - $74,074).
Ore in process inventory at December 31, 2014 included
$3,383 (December 31, 2013 - $6,095) related to the excess of the fair
value of El Chanate inventory over its carrying value at the acquisition
date, which is being charged to net loss as the related inventory is sold.
|
|
19
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
(in thousands of
United States dollars unless otherwise stated) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized & |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains/(losses) |
|
|
gains/(losses) |
|
|
|
December 31, 2014 |
|
|
included in |
|
|
included in |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
OCI |
|
|
net loss |
|
Securities - available for sale |
$ |
1,964 |
|
$ |
184 |
|
$ |
2,512 |
|
$ |
6,631 |
|
Reclassification to net loss |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
2,507 |
|
|
(2,507 |
) |
|
$ |
1,964 |
|
$ |
184 |
|
$ |
5,019 |
|
$ |
4,124 |
|
Securities - fair value through profit or
loss |
|
235 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Warrants - fair value through profit or loss
|
|
494 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(42 |
) |
|
$ |
2,693 |
|
$ |
184 |
|
$ |
5,019 |
|
$ |
4,082 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Realized & |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unrealized |
|
|
unrealized |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
gains/(losses) |
|
|
gains/(losses) |
|
|
|
December 31, 2013 |
|
|
included in |
|
|
included in |
|
|
|
Cost |
|
|
Fair value |
|
|
OCI |
|
|
net loss |
|
Securities - available for sale |
$ |
20,948 |
|
$ |
15,510 |
|
$ |
(5,331 |
) |
$ |
- |
|
Reclassification to net loss |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
168 |
|
|
(168 |
) |
|
$ |
20,948 |
|
$ |
15,510 |
|
$ |
(5,163 |
) |
$ |
(168 |
) |
Securities - fair value through profit or
loss |
|
235 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(47 |
) |
Warrants - fair value through profit or loss
|
|
494 |
|
|
41 |
|
|
- |
|
|
(450 |
) |
|
$ |
21,677 |
|
$ |
15,551 |
|
$ |
(5,163 |
) |
$ |
(665 |
)
|
During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company sold
shares in various publicly listed entities for total proceeds of $23,284.
During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company
purchased shares and warrants with a total cost of $21,272. The cost of
the shares and warrants were determined based on their fair value on the
date of acquisition.
|
|
20
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
(in thousands of
United States dollars unless otherwise stated) |
9. |
Investments in associate and joint venture
|
|
|
(a) |
Orion development project
|
The Company and Minera Frisco S.A. de C.V. (Minera Frisco)
each own shares representing a 50% ownership interest in Nayarit Gold de Mexico,
S.A. de C.V., an entity with ownership of the Orion development project. The
Company and Minera Frisco have joint control over the joint venture company.
The following table contains selected financial information for
a 100% interest in the joint venture at December 31, 2014 and 2013:
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
December |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
Current assets |
|
338 |
|
|
308 |
|
Property, plant and equipment & mining
interests |
|
55,828 |
|
|
54,836 |
|
Total assets |
$ |
56,166 |
|
$ |
55,144 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities |
|
2,343 |
|
|
1,467 |
|
Deferred income tax liability |
|
18,219 |
|
|
17,817 |
|
Total liabilities |
$ |
20,562 |
|
$ |
19,284 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net assets of joint venture |
$ |
35,604 |
|
$ |
35,860 |
|
Ownership interest |
|
50% |
|
|
50% |
|
Net investment in joint venture |
$ |
17,802 |
|
$ |
17,930 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net investment, beginning of year |
$ |
17,930 |
|
$ |
20,463 |
|
Share of net loss during the period |
|
(128 |
) |
|
(2,533 |
) |
Net investment, end of year |
$ |
17,802 |
|
$ |
17,930 |
|
Included in current liabilities of the joint venture at
December 31, 2014 was a payable due to the Company of $2,099 (December
31, 2013 - $1,442). The Company has included a corresponding amount in
receivables on the Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2014 and 2013.
At December 31, 2014, the Company did not have any significant
commitments or contingent liabilities related to this joint venture.
(b) |
Investment in Carlisle Goldfields Limited
(Carlisle) |
On November 11, 2014, the Company announced that it had formed
a strategic partnership with Carlisle on properties within the Lynn Lake Gold
Camp in northern Manitoba, Canada. As part of this partnership, the Company
subscribed to 70,600,000 common shares of Carlisle, representing approximately
19.9% of the issued and outstanding common shares, for total consideration of
$4,993 (CAD $5,648). After including transaction fees, the total opening cost
base of the investment was $5,674. In addition, the Company entered into a
separate agreement with respect to the Lynn Lake development project, and
acquired a 25% interest in the project for $4,415 (CAD $5,000). These amounts
have been recognized within property, plant and equipment & mining interests
on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The Company has the option to earn up to an
additional 35% interest by funding CAD $20,000 on the development of the project
and delivering a feasibility study within a three-year time period.
21
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
(in thousands of
United States dollars unless otherwise stated) |
The Company has concluded that it has significant influence
over the financial and operating policy decisions of Carlisle and, therefore,
has used the equity method of accounting for this investment in associate. The
following table contains the continuity of the Companys investment in Carlisle
at December 31, 2014:
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
Net investment, beginning of year |
|
- |
|
Investment in associate during period |
|
5,674 |
|
Share of net loss during the period |
|
(42 |
) |
Net investment, end of year |
$ |
5,632 |
|
|
|
|
|
10. |
Other long-term assets |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
Restricted cash in closure bonds |
$ |
16,007 |
|
$ |
26,249 |
|
Other restricted cash |
|
717 |
|
|
5,230 |
|
Investment tax credits recoverable |
|
33,347 |
|
|
36,508 |
|
Deposits on property, plant and equipment,
and mining interests |
|
971 |
|
|
4,001 |
|
|
$ |
51,042 |
|
$ |
71,988 |
|
Restricted cash in closure bonds consists of cash and
short-term deposits pledged by the Company relating to site closure and
reclamation obligations at Kemess South, a mine in the decommissioning stage. At
December 31, 2013, restricted cash in closure bonds also included an amount
related to reclamation obligations at Young-Davidson (note 24).
At December 31, 2014, other restricted cash included amounts
relating to the repayment of the convertible senior notes (note 14(c)). At
December 31, 2013, other restricted cash consisted of letters of credit issued
against certain of the Companys bank accounts relating to site infrastructure,
site closure, and other mine activities. During the year ended December 31,
2014, the Company provided other forms of security against these letters of
credit.
The Companys investment tax credits (ITC) recoverable relate
to ITCs earned primarily on expenditures at Young-Davidson. These ITCs will be
used to reduce income taxes payable in the future and have been netted against
the cost of the related items of property, plant and equipment.
Included in deposits on property, plant, and equipment,
and mining interests at December 31, 2014 is an advance of $788 (December
31, 2013 - $nil) to Carlisle relating to ongoing work on the Lynn Lake
development project (see note 9). |
|
|
22
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
(in thousands of
United States dollars unless otherwise stated) |
11. |
Property, plant and equipment & mining
interests |
|
|
|
|
|
Mining interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
equipment |
|
|
Depletable |
|
|
depletable |
|
|
evaluation |
|
|
Total |
|
Cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2012 |
$ |
543,825 |
|
$ |
197,168 |
|
$ |
806,025 |
|
$ |
66,410 |
|
$ |
1,613,428 |
|
Additions |
|
123,133 |
|
|
62,516 |
|
|
71,238 |
|
|
6,237 |
|
|
263,124 |
|
Reclassifications |
|
- |
|
|
853,408 |
|
|
(853,408 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Disposals |
|
(5,792 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(5,792 |
) |
At December 31, 2013 |
$ |
661,166 |
|
$ |
1,113,092 |
|
$ |
23,855 |
|
$ |
72,647 |
|
$ |
1,870,760 |
|
Additions |
|
64,328 |
|
|
85,706 |
|
|
7,271 |
|
|
20,252 |
|
|
177,557 |
|
Reclassifications |
|
- |
|
|
11,775 |
|
|
(11,775 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Disposals |
|
(7,758 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(7,758 |
) |
At December 31, 2014 |
$ |
717,736 |
|
$ |
1,210,573 |
|
$ |
19,351 |
|
$ |
92,899 |
|
$ |
2,040,559 |
|
Accumulated amortization and
depletion and impairment charges |
|
At December 31, 2012 |
$ |
(18,462 |
) |
$ |
(36,260 |
) |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
(54,722 |
) |
Amortization and depletion |
|
(27,789 |
) |
|
(62,441 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(90,230 |
) |
Impairment charges |
|
(12,279 |
) |
|
(35,200 |
) |
|
(4,574 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
(52,053 |
) |
Disposals |
|
2,200 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
2,200 |
|
At December 31, 2013 |
$ |
(56,330 |
) |
$ |
(133,901 |
) |
$ |
(4,574 |
) |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
(194,805 |
) |
Amortization and depletion |
|
(32,798 |
) |
|
(86,808 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(119,606 |
) |
Impairment charges |
|
(22,316 |
) |
|
(67,684 |
) |
|
(1,006 |
) |
|
(616 |
) |
|
(91,622 |
) |
Disposals |
|
4,204 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
4,204 |
|
At December 31, 2014 |
$ |
(107,240 |
) |
$ |
(288,393 |
) |
$ |
(5,580 |
) |
$ |
(616 |
) |
$ |
(401,829 |
) |
Carrying value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2013 |
$ |
604,836 |
|
$ |
979,191 |
|
$ |
19,281 |
|
$ |
72,647 |
|
$ |
1,675,955 |
|
At December 31, 2014 |
$ |
610,496 |
|
$ |
922,180 |
|
$ |
13,771 |
|
$ |
92,283 |
|
$ |
1,638,730 |
|
The carrying values by component are as follows:
|
|
|
|
|
Mining interests |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exploration |
|
|
|
|
|
|
and |
|
|
|
|
|
Non- |
|
|
and |
|
|
|
|
|
|
equipment |
|
|
Depletable |
|
|
depletable |
|
|
evaluation |
|
|
Total |
|
El Chanate |
$ |
9,403 |
|
$ |
29,173 |
|
$ |
1,304 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
39,880 |
|
Young-Davidson |
|
573,485 |
|
|
893,007 |
|
|
12,467 |
|
|
- |
|
|
1,478,959 |
|
Corporate and other |
|
27,608 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
92,283 |
|
|
119,891 |
|
At December 31, 2014 |
$ |
610,496 |
|
$ |
922,180 |
|
$ |
13,771 |
|
$ |
92,283 |
|
$ |
1, 638,730 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
El Chanate |
$ |
35,307 |
|
$ |
84,975 |
|
$ |
10,945 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
131,227 |
|
Young-Davidson |
|
540,537 |
|
|
894,216 |
|
|
8,336 |
|
|
- |
|
|
1,443,089 |
|
Corporate and other |
|
28,992 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
72,647 |
|
|
101,639 |
|
At December 31, 2013 |
$ |
604,836 |
|
$ |
979,191 |
|
$ |
19,281 |
|
$ |
72,647 |
|
$ |
1,675,955 |
|
During the year ended December 31, 2014, $5,286 (year ended
December 31, 2013 - $8,409) of borrowing costs associated with capital projects
were capitalized within property, plant and equipment & mining interests on
the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The applicable capitalization rate for general
borrowings was 8.09% (year ended December 31, 2013 - 5.82%) .
23
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
(in thousands of
United States dollars unless otherwise stated) |
The carrying value of equipment pledged as security for related
equipment financing obligations at December 31, 2014 was $23,945 (December 31,
2013 - $22,175).
The carrying value of construction in progress at December 31,
2014 was $57,057 (December 31, 2013 - $70,025).
The Company has made commitments to acquire property, plant and
equipment totaling $9,189 at December 31, 2014 (December 31, 2013 - $10,981).
|
|
12. |
Intangible assets and
goodwill |
Included in intangible assets are the rights to use the
capacity of power lines connecting the El Chanate and Young-Davidson mines to
national / provincial electricity grids (transmission rights), software
assets, and the retained interest royalty.
|
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retained |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
interest |
|
|
Transmission |
|
|
|
|
|
intangible |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Goodwill |
|
|
royalty |
|
|
rights |
|
|
Software |
|
|
assets |
|
|
Total |
|
Cost |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2012 |
$ |
475,214 |
|
$ |
34,004 |
|
$ |
21,018 |
|
$ |
2,239 |
|
$ |
57,261 |
|
$ |
532,475 |
|
Additions |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
370 |
|
|
370 |
|
|
370 |
|
At December 31, 2013 |
|
475,214 |
|
|
34,004 |
|
|
21,018 |
|
|
2,609 |
|
|
57,631 |
|
|
532,845 |
|
Additions |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
254 |
|
|
321 |
|
|
575 |
|
|
575 |
|
At December 31, 2014 |
$ |
475,214 |
|
$ |
34,004 |
|
$ |
21,272 |
|
$ |
2,930 |
|
$ |
58,206 |
|
$ |
533,420 |
|
Accumulated amortization and
impairment charges |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2012 |
$ |
(127,000 |
) |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
(1,110 |
) |
$ |
(1,326 |
) |
$ |
(2,436 |
) |
$ |
(129,436 |
) |
Amortization |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(847 |
) |
|
(692 |
) |
|
(1,539 |
) |
|
(1,539 |
) |
Impairment charges |
|
(106,521 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(106,521 |
) |
At December 31, 2013 |
|
(233,521 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
(1,957 |
) |
|
(2,018 |
) |
|
(3,975 |
) |
|
(237,496 |
) |
Amortization |
|
- |
|
|
(13,288 |
) |
|
(1,044 |
) |
|
(266 |
) |
|
(14,598 |
) |
|
(14,598 |
) |
At December 31, 2014 |
$ |
(233,521 |
) |
$ |
(13,288 |
) |
$ |
(3,001 |
) |
$ |
(2,284 |
) |
$ |
(18,573 |
) |
$ |
(252,094 |
) |
Carrying value |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
At December 31, 2013 |
$ |
241,693 |
|
$ |
34,004 |
|
$ |
19,061 |
|
$ |
591 |
|
$ |
53,656 |
|
$ |
295,349 |
|
At December 31, 2014 |
$ |
241,693 |
|
$ |
20,716 |
|
$ |
18,271 |
|
$ |
646 |
|
$ |
39,633 |
|
$ |
281,326 |
|
As part of the consideration received from the sale of the
Fosterville and Stawell mines (collectively, the Australian Operations) on May
4, 2012 to Crocodile Gold Corporation (Crocodile Gold), the Company received a
retained interest royalty. Per the agreement, once the cumulative free cash flow
generated by the mines subsequent to closing reached CAD $60 million, the
Company would receive 100% of the next CAD $30 million of cumulative free cash
flow in excess of CAD $60 million, and 50% of the next CAD $30 million of
cumulative free cash flow in excess of CAD $90 million. In addition, the Company
would receive 20% of any cumulative free cash flow in excess of CAD $120
million.
During 2014, the Company was notified that the Australian
Operations had generated in excess of CAD $60 million and, as a result, received
proceeds of $2,463 from Crocodile Gold (year ended December 31, 2013 - $nil).
Consistent with the Companys accounting policy, amortization of the retained
interest royalty commenced once the Company became entitled to receive cash
flows under this arrangement. During the year ended December 31, 2014, the
Company recognized amortization expense of $13,288 on the retained interest
royalty, which reduced the carrying value of this asset to $20,716.
24
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
(in thousands of
United States dollars unless otherwise stated) |
On December 22, 2014, the Company announced that it had entered
into an agreement with Crocodile Gold to amend the original purchase and sale
agreement, subject to regulatory approvals, such that the retained interest
royalty intangible asset would be terminated. As consideration for the
termination of the retained interest royalty, the Company will receive a CAD $20
million payment in cash upon closing and will be granted a net smelter return
royalty of 2% from the Fosterville mine and 1% from the Stawell mine. The Fosterville royalty will commence
upon closing and the Stawell mine royalty will commence on the earlier of
January 1, 2016 or the date immediately following the production of 10,000
ounces from the Big Hill Project. The agreement was finalized on January 14,
2015 following the receipt of regulatory approval (see note 28).
Non-financial assets and CGUs are tested for impairment or a
reversal of impairment whenever there are indicators that an impairment has
occurred or should be reversed. CGUs containing goodwill are tested for
impairment each year at December 31. For the purpose of testing for impairment,
or a reversal of impairment, the recoverable amounts for non-financial assets
and CGUs are based on fair value less costs of disposal (FVLCD) calculations.
When observable market prices are not available for the asset, FVLCD is
calculated using a discounted cash flow methodology taking into account the
assumptions that would be made by market participants. Management projects cash
flows over the remaining life of each mine using forecasted production and costs
per the Companys life of mine plans and the long-term forecasted price of gold
to project future revenues. The Company does not use growth rates in determining
cash flow projections. The fair value of these non-financial assets are based on
unobservable inputs (level 3 of fair value hierarchy, refer to note 25).
The key assumptions used in determining FVLCD at December 31,
2014 were gold prices, discount rates, operating costs, capital expenditures,
foreign exchange rates and net asset value (NAV) multiples. Of these
assumptions, reasonably possible changes in gold prices, discount rates,
operating costs, and NAV multiples could have caused the carrying value of the
Companys Young-Davidson CGU to exceed their recoverable amounts, as outlined
below in (b).
The Company develops long-term gold price forecasts by
reference to numerous external analyst forecasts. The long-term gold pricing
used in the impairment tests approximated the mean of these forecasts, after
adjusting for outliers. The Company used a gold price range of $1,250 to $1,300
per ounce for all future production in its impairment tests (December 31, 2013 -
$1,300 per ounce).
The Company forecasts production, operating costs and capital
expenditures based on expected life of mine plans developed from technical
reports and historical experience.
The discount rates used by the Company in calculating FVLCD
were based on the weighted average cost of capital applicable to each property.
The rates chosen reflect a market participants view of the risk inherent in the
cash flows associated with each property.
The discount rates used for each test are summarized as
follows:
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
El Chanate CGU |
|
6.75% |
|
|
6.50% |
|
Young-Davidson CGU |
|
5.50% |
|
|
5.25% |
|
Gold companies can trade at a market capitalization greater
than their estimated discounted cash flows. This NAV multiple represents the
multiple applied to the estimated discounted cash flows to arrive at the trading
price. The NAV multiple is generally understood to take into account a variety
of additional value factors such as the exploration potential of the mineral
property, namely the ability to find and produce more metal than what is
currently included in the life of mine plan, and the benefit of gold price
optionality. A NAV multiple of 1.0 and 1.05 (December 31, 2013 1.0 and 1.05)
was applied to the estimated discounted cash flows for El Chanate and
Young-Davidson, respectively.
The results of impairment evaluations conducted are summarized
as follows:
The El Chanate CGU is comprised of all assets and liabilities related to the El Chanate mine. At December 31, 2014, the Company updated its mine plan at El Chanate. The revised mine plan contained a decrease in gold reserve estimates, an increase in strip ratio, which indicates an increase in the amount of waste tonnes required to access a tonne of ore, and an increase in future processing costs on a per ounce basis. Reserve estimates decreased and the strip ratio increased primarily due to a reduction in overall slope angles. The reduction in planned slope angles came after an external geotechnical review of geotechnical drilling, mapping, and slope performance. This change was considered an indicator of impairment and resulted in the Company performing an impairment test at December 31, 2014. At December 31, 2014, the carrying value of the El Chanate CGU exceeded its recoverable amount by $90,000, which resulted in an impairment charge. This charge consisted of a reduction in property, plant and equipment and mining interests of $90,000. The related income tax impact was a deferred tax recovery of $28,647.
25
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
(in thousands of
United States dollars unless otherwise stated) |
At December 31, 2013, the carrying value of the El Chanate CGU
exceeded its recoverable amount by $74,000, which resulted in an impairment
charge. This charge consisted of a reduction of goodwill of $26,521 and a
reduction in property, plant and equipment and mining interests of $47,479. The
related income tax impact was a deferred tax recovery of $15,373.
At June 30, 2013, the carrying value of the El Chanate CGU
exceeded its recoverable amount by $80,000, which resulted in recognizing an
impairment charge related entirely to goodwill. The primary contributors to the
impairment charges in 2013 were the revised short-term and long-term gold price
assumptions.
The total impairment charge recorded for the year ended
December 31, 2013 was $154,000.
The carrying value of goodwill resulting from the acquisition
of Northgate Minerals Corporation has been allocated to the Young-Davidson CGU,
which is comprised of all assets and liabilities related to the Young-Davidson
mine. At December 31, 2014, the recoverable amount of the Young-Davidson CGU
exceeded its carrying value by $194,793 (December 31, 2013 - $140,695).
It is estimated that the following reasonably possible changes
in key assumptions would cause the carrying value of the Young-Davidson CGU to
exceed its recoverable amount:
− |
Increase in discount rate to 6.96% |
− |
6.89% decline in gold price assumptions |
− |
14.68% strengthening of the Canadian dollar
|
− |
19.67% increase in operating costs |
− |
Decrease in NAV multiple to 0.93 |
(c) |
Retained interest royalty |
At December 31, 2014, there were no indicators of impairment of
the retained interest royalty held by the Company, and therefore, no impairment
test was performed.
At June 30, 2013, the carrying value of the retained interest
royalty exceeded its recoverable amount of $15,316 by $18,688, which resulted in
an impairment charge. As a result of the impairment charge, the Company also
recorded a deferred tax recovery of $2,186. The primary contributors to this
impairment charge were the revised short-term and long-term gold price
assumptions used in the June 30, 2013 test.
At December 31, 2013, due to the receipt of an updated life of
mine plan from Crocodile Gold, the Company determined that an indicator of
impairment reversal existed and conducted an impairment test at that date.
Utilizing the updated life of mine plan, adjusted for the Companys gold price
and foreign exchange rate assumptions, it was determined that the recoverable
amount of this asset exceeded its original carrying value of $34,004 and, as a
result, an impairment reversal of $18,688 was recorded. The Company also
recorded a deferred tax expense of $2,103 related to this reversal.
During the year ended December 31, 2013, the impairment charge
recognized on June 30, 2013 and its subsequent reversal did not have an impact
on net loss, other than the difference in deferred tax expense/recovery noted
above.
During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company
discontinued various brownfield exploration programs, and recognized an
impairment charge of $1,622 and a deferred tax recovery of $475.
During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company impaired
various brownfield exploration assets due to unsuccessful drilling results
during the year. As a result, the Company recognized an impairment charge of
$4,574 in the Consolidated Statements of Operations, which also impacted the
carrying value of non-depletable mining interests at December 31, 2013.
26
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
(in thousands of
United States dollars unless otherwise stated) |
14. |
Debt and equipment financing
obligations |
|
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
(a) |
Revolving credit facility |
$ |
- |
|
$ |
75,000 |
|
(b) |
Senior secured notes |
|
296,755 |
|
|
- |
|
(c) |
Convertible senior notes |
|
624 |
|
|
157,133 |
|
(d) |
Equipment financing obligations |
|
16,525 |
|
|
17,522 |
|
(e) |
Other |
|
468 |
|
|
1,894 |
|
|
|
|
314,372 |
|
|
251,549 |
|
|
Less: Current portion of debt and equipment
financing obligations |
|
(6,308 |
) |
|
(7,355 |
) |
|
|
$ |
308,064 |
|
$ |
244,194 |
|
The estimated future minimum payments under debt and equipment
financing obligations are as follows:
2015 |
$ |
31,282 |
|
2016 |
$ |
29,649 |
|
2017 |
$ |
27,939 |
|
2018 |
$ |
26,675 |
|
2019 |
$ |
25,339 |
|
2020 and thereafter |
$ |
327,206 |
|
(a) |
Revolving credit facility |
The Company has access to a $150,000 revolving credit facility
that carries an interest rate of LIBOR plus 2.25% to 3.50%, depending on the
leverage ratio of the Company. The facility matures on April 25, 2016 and may be
extended upon mutual agreement by all parties. No payments under the facility
are due until the maturity date.
The credit facility contains various covenants that include (a)
an interest coverage ratio of at least 3:1, (b) a leverage ratio of no more than
3:1, (c) a minimum tangible net worth, and (d) proven and probable reserves of
at least 2,000,000 ounces. The facility is secured by a first-ranking lien on
all present and future assets, property and undertaking of the Company. At
December 31, 2014, the Company was in compliance with all covenants.
During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company made a
repayment of $75,000 (year ended December 31, 2013 - $nil).
On March 27, 2014, the Company completed an offering of
$315,000 senior secured notes (the secured notes), secured by a second-ranking
lien on all present and future assets, property and undertaking of the Company.
These secured notes were sold at 96.524% of par, resulting in total proceeds of
$304,051. The secured notes pay interest in semi-annual installments on April 1
and October 1 of each year, commencing on October 1, 2014, at a rate of 7.75%
per annum, and mature on April 1, 2020. The Company incurred transaction costs
of $7,838, which have been offset against the carrying amount of the secured
notes and are amortized using the effective interest rate method. These notes
contain transaction-based restrictive covenants that limit the Companys ability
to incur additional indebtedness in certain circumstances. There are no
covenants that are based on the Companys historical financial performance.
The senior secured notes indenture grants the Company the
option to prepay the notes prior to the maturity of the instruments, and
specifies a premium during each applicable time period. These prepayment options
have been accounted for as embedded derivatives, and are outlined below:
− |
Subsequent to April 1, 2017, the secured notes
may be repurchased at 103.875% of par value |
− |
Subsequent to April 1, 2018, the secured notes
may be repurchased at 101.938% of par value |
− |
Subsequent to April 1, 2019, the secured notes
may be repurchased at 100% of par value |
27
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
(in thousands of
United States dollars unless otherwise stated) |
The fair value of the prepayment option embedded derivative was
$5,954 at March 27, 2014, and was offset against the carrying amount of the
secured notes. The model used to calculate this fair value is described in note
25. The initial fair value was calculated using the following assumptions:
|
|
March 27 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
Volatility |
|
32% |
|
Credit spreads |
|
5.54% |
|
Changes in these assumptions would have the following impact on
net loss for the year ended December 31, 2014:
|
|
March 27 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
2% increase in volatility |
$ |
567 |
|
2% decrease in volatility |
$ |
(567 |
) |
0.5% increase in credit spreads |
$ |
(756 |
) |
0.5% decrease in credit spreads |
$ |
851 |
|
At December 31, 2014, the fair value of the prepayment option
embedded derivatives of $6,741 (refer to note 25) was offset against the
carrying amount of the secured notes. The difference between the fair value at
December 31, 2014 and March 27, 2014 is recognized in in other (loss) / income
(refer to note 20).
(c) |
Convertible senior notes |
On March 6, 2014, the Company announced a cash tender offer to
redeem all of the outstanding convertible senior notes (convertible notes).
The consideration offered was $1.04 per $1.00 note plus accrued and unpaid
interest to the payment date. The Company received tender offers for $166,354 of
the $167,000 principal amount outstanding. This was considered a substantial
modification of the existing arrangement with the holders of the Companys
convertible notes. As a result, the Company de-recognized the convertible notes
on the date of substantial modification. The convertible notes were
re-recognized at their fair value on the same date. This resulted in a loss on
modification of $15,645, which has been included in other (loss) / income on the
Consolidated Statement of Operations for the year ended December 31, 2014 (refer
to note 20). On April 3, 2014, the Company paid $173,041 including $32 of
accrued interest, to complete the cash tender offer to redeem the outstanding
convertible notes tendered.
At December 31, 2014, convertible notes with a principal amount
of $646 (December 31, 2013 - $167,000) remained outstanding at a carrying value
of $624 (December 31, 2013 - $157,133) for the debt component and $nil (December
31, 2013 - $413) for the option component. These notes pay interest
semi-annually at a rate of 3.5% per annum, and mature on October 1, 2016.
The holders of the notes may, within specified time periods,
convert their notes prior to July 1, 2016 under the following circumstances: (1)
the closing sale price of the Companys shares exceeds 130% of the conversion
price for at least 20 trading days in the 30 consecutive trading days ending on
the last trading day of the immediately preceding quarter; (2) the trading price
per $1,000 principal amount of the convertible note is equal to or less than 97%
of the product of the closing sale price of the Companys common shares and the
applicable conversion rate; (3) the convertible notes are called for redemption
by the Company; (4) upon the occurrence of specified corporate transactions; and
(5) a delisted event occurs and is continuing. In addition, the notes will be
unconditionally convertible at the option of the holder from July 1, 2016 to the
business day immediately preceding the maturity date of the notes. Following the
payment of dividends on December 1, 2014, the conversion rate is 94.3882 common
shares per $1,000 principal amount of notes, which represents a conversion price
of approximately $10.59 per share. Upon conversion, the Company may settle the
obligation either in common shares, or in cash at an equivalent value.
As required by conditions surrounding the completion of the
secured notes offering, at December 31, 2014, the Company has restricted $680 of
proceeds from the secured notes offering for repayment of all principal and
interest relating to any convertible notes that were not tendered. These
restricted proceeds are included within other long-term assets on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets at December 31, 2014.
(d) |
Equipment financing
obligations |
The Company has entered into financing obligations for
equipment, which expire at various dates between 2015 and 2019 and that
are secured by the financed assets. Interest payable on the various
obligations ranges from fixed rates of 2.71% to 5.77%. During the year
ended December 31, 2014, the Company received proceeds of $5,931 (year
ended December 31, 2013 - $4,813) from equipment financing arrangements.
|
|
28
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
(in thousands of
United States dollars unless otherwise stated) |
During 2013, the Company purchased land near the El Chanate
mine and entered into loan agreements as part of the consideration. During the
year ended December 31, 2014, the Company made repayments of $1,426 on these
loan agreements (year ended December 31, 2013 - $nil).
On September 17, 2014, the Company completed a flow-through
financing for gross proceeds of $4,566 ($5,000 CAD). As a result, the Company
issued 833,334 common shares at a price of CAD $6.00 per share.
Pursuant to the terms of the flow-through agreement, the
Company is required to incur and renounce $5,000 CAD in qualifying Canadian
Exploration Expenses to subscribers by December 31, 2015. As at December 31,
2014, $3,091 CAD in exploration expenses are remaining to be incurred.
Of the $4,566 in proceeds received, $3,097 was recorded as
share capital and $1,469 was recorded as an obligation to renounce flow-through
exploration expenditures on the Consolidated Balance Sheets. The following is a
continuity schedule of the liability portion of the flow-through share issuance:
|
|
December 31, 2014 |
|
Obligation to renounce flow-through
exploration expenditures |
$ |
1,469 |
|
Reduction of obligation upon incurring
expenses |
|
(612 |
) |
Balance, end of year |
$ |
857 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
(a) |
Reclamation provisions |
$ |
29,178 |
|
$ |
28,245 |
|
(b) |
Provision for lawsuit |
|
- |
|
|
12,458 |
|
|
Other |
|
2,407 |
|
|
3,832 |
|
|
|
|
31,585 |
|
|
44,535 |
|
|
Less: Current portion of provisions |
|
(2,056 |
) |
|
(15,955 |
) |
|
|
$ |
29,529 |
|
$ |
28,580 |
|
(a) |
Reclamation provisions |
The Companys reclamation provisions consist of reclamation and
rehabilitation costs for each of the Companys operating mines and Kemess South.
The present value of the combined provision is currently estimated at $29,178
(December 31, 2013 - $28,245), reflecting ongoing payments relating to Kemess
South, and future payments that will commence in 9 - 20 years for the Companys
operating mines. The undiscounted value of the reclamation provision at December
31, 2014 is $38,903 (December 31, 2013 - $42,263). Significant reclamation
activities include land rehabilitation, demolition and decontamination of mine
facilities, monitoring, and other costs.
The Company estimates the costs to conduct significant
reclamation activities based on the most recent experience and cost data
available for the applicable mine. These expected expenditures are then
risk-adjusted by considering the time remaining until reclamation activities
commence, recent industry experience in the region, and other relevant factors.
This current cost estimate is then inflated to the estimated date of settlement
using the rate disclosed below, and then discounted to present value.
29
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
(in thousands of
United States dollars unless otherwise stated) |
The discount and inflation rates used are summarized as
follows:
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
Discount rates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
El Chanate |
|
5.90% |
|
|
6.33% |
|
Young-Davidson |
|
2.41% |
|
|
3.24% |
|
Kemess South |
|
1.34% |
|
|
1.95% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inflation rates |
|
|
|
|
|
|
El Chanate |
|
3.25% |
|
|
3.10% |
|
Young-Davidson |
|
2.00% |
|
|
2.00% |
|
Kemess South |
|
2.00% |
|
|
2.00% |
|
Changes to the reclamation and closure cost obligation balance
during the year were as follows:
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
Reclamation provisions, beginning of period
|
$ |
28,245 |
|
Obligations incurred and revisions to
estimates |
|
570 |
|
Accretion expense |
|
851 |
|
Reclamation expenditures |
|
(488 |
) |
Reclamation provisions, end of period |
|
29,178 |
|
Less: Current portion |
|
(424 |
) |
|
$ |
28,754 |
|
Of the $570 of adjustments made to reclamation provisions
during the year, $1,175 was capitalized and included in property, plant and
equipment & mining interests on the Consolidated Balance Sheets and $605 was
recognized as a recovery in reclamation, care and maintenance costs on the
Consolidated Statements of Operations.
(b) |
Provision for lawsuit |
The Company was named as a defendant in a claim
originally filed by Ed J. McKenna, which was certified as a class action
lawsuit with damages sought ranging from $80 million to $160 million. On
October 5, 2012, the Company reached an agreement to settle this class
action lawsuit, subject to approval of the court and the right of the
Company to terminate the agreement under certain circumstances. At
December 31, 2013, the net settlement amount was held in escrow pending
settlement of the lawsuit, and was included in restricted cash on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets. Following the completion of the claims
administration process which was conducted pursuant to a court-approved
settlement agreement, funds related to this lawsuit were distributed by an
administrator to eligible class members in April 2014. At the settlement
payment date, the Company reduced the current portion of provisions on the
Consolidated Balance Sheets by $12,016, which was partially offset by a
corresponding decrease in receivables of $9,890 and restricted cash of
$2,126, the latter of which represents the net settlement amount paid by
the Company. |
|
30
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
(in thousands of
United States dollars unless otherwise stated) |
The following table represents the major components of income
tax recovery recognized in the Consolidated Statements of Operations
for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013:
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
Restated |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
(Note 3 |
) |
Current income tax recovery |
$ |
(2,700 |
) |
$ |
(140 |
) |
Deferred income tax recovery |
|
(26,278 |
) |
|
(760 |
) |
Provision for income taxes |
$ |
(28,978 |
) |
$ |
(900 |
) |
Included within deferred income tax recovery for the year ended December 31, 2014 is a foreign exchange gain of $25,368 (year ended December 31, 2013 – foreign exchange gain of $15,216) that arose on the translation of deferred tax assets and liabilities.
The following table reconciles the expected income tax recovery at the statutory income tax rate to the amounts recognized in the
Consolidated Statements of Operations for the years ended December 31, 2014 and
2013:
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
Restated |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
(Note 3 |
) |
Loss before income taxes |
$ |
(198,626 |
) |
$ |
(177,670 |
) |
Income tax rate |
|
25.21% |
|
|
25.20% |
|
Expected income tax recovery based on above
rates |
|
(50,074 |
) |
|
(44,773 |
) |
Effect of higher tax rates in foreign
jurisdictions |
|
(5,413 |
) |
|
(14,643 |
) |
Non-deductible stock option expense |
|
1,470 |
|
|
1,583 |
|
Non-deductible loss on settlement of debt |
|
2,251 |
|
|
- |
|
Effect of non-deductible goodwill impairment
|
|
- |
|
|
37,513 |
|
Impact of local mining taxes |
|
(2,242 |
) |
|
7,037 |
|
Impact of changes in tax rates applicable to
temporary differences |
|
- |
|
|
3,207 |
|
Permanent differences |
|
(399 |
) |
|
(1,185 |
) |
Change in unrecognized temporary differences
|
|
959 |
|
|
- |
|
Impact of foreign exchange |
|
24,470 |
|
|
10,361 |
|
Provision for income taxes |
$ |
(28,978 |
) |
$ |
(900 |
)
|
The statutory tax rate for 2014 was 25.21% (2013 25.20%),
which is consistent with the prior year.
The following reflects the deferred income tax liability at
December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013:
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
Accounting value of mineral properties and
capital assets in excess of tax value |
$ |
251,49 |
|
$ |
281,457 |
|
Accounting value of inventories in excess of
tax value |
|
38,147 |
|
|
34,670 |
|
Unrealized foreign exchange loss |
|
- |
|
|
(619 |
) |
Other taxable temporary differences |
|
2,974 |
|
|
883 |
|
Non-capital losses carried forward |
|
(31,368 |
) |
|
(29,211 |
) |
Deferred income tax liability |
$ |
260,902 |
|
$ |
287,180 |
|
31
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
(in thousands of
United States dollars unless otherwise stated) |
The change in deferred income tax liability is explained as
follows:
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
Restated |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
(Note 3 |
) |
Balance, beginning of year |
$ |
287,180 |
|
$ |
288,131 |
|
Deferred income tax recovery recognized in
net loss |
|
(26,278 |
) |
|
(760 |
) |
Deferred income tax liability recognized in
retained earnings |
|
- |
|
|
(191 |
) |
Deferred income tax liability |
$ |
260,902 |
|
$ |
287,180 |
|
The Company has tax loss carryforwards expiring in the
following years:
|
|
Canada |
|
|
Mexico |
|
|
United States |
|
|
Total |
|
2023 |
|
- |
|
|
5,514 |
|
|
- |
|
|
5,514 |
|
2024 |
|
862 |
|
|
13,367 |
|
|
- |
|
|
14,229 |
|
2025 |
|
6,679 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
6,679 |
|
2026 |
|
14,388 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
14,388 |
|
2027 |
|
5,474 |
|
|
- |
|
|
1,448 |
|
|
6,922 |
|
2028 |
|
25,242 |
|
|
- |
|
|
5,760 |
|
|
31,002 |
|
2029 |
|
11,858 |
|
|
- |
|
|
7,831 |
|
|
19,689 |
|
2030 |
|
5,223 |
|
|
- |
|
|
5,248 |
|
|
10,471 |
|
2031 |
|
12,940 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
12,940 |
|
2032 |
|
26,417 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
26,417 |
|
At December 31, 2014 |
$ |
109,083 |
|
$ |
18,881 |
|
$ |
20,287 |
|
$ |
148,251 |
|
The Company has unrecognized deferred income tax assets in
respect of aggregate loss carryforwards, deductible temporary differences and
unused tax credits of $60,743 (December 31, 2013 - $28,649).
At December 31, 2014, the Company has unrecognized
deferred income tax liabilities on taxable temporary differences of
$167,919 (December 31, 2013 - $174,485) for taxes that would be payable on
the unremitted earnings of certain subsidiaries of the Company. |
|
32
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
(in thousands of
United States dollars unless otherwise stated) |
18. |
Shareholders equity |
|
|
(a) |
Capital stock |
Authorized:
Unlimited number of common shares.
The Companys shares
have no par value.
Issued and outstanding:
|
|
December 31, 2014 |
|
|
December 31, 2013 |
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
Number of |
|
|
|
|
|
|
common |
|
|
Ascribed |
|
|
common |
|
|
Ascribed |
|
|
|
shares |
|
|
value |
|
|
shares |
|
|
value |
|
Balance, beginning of period |
|
247,569,811 |
|
$ |
2,021,837 |
|
|
282,326,547 |
|
$ |
2,307,978 |
|
Shares repurchased and cancelled |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(36,144,578 |
) |
|
(295,536 |
) |
Shares issued through dividend reinvestment
plan |
|
488,253 |
|
|
1,924 |
|
|
467,797 |
|
|
1,969 |
|
Shares issued through employee share purchase
plan |
|
594,690 |
|
|
2,323 |
|
|
390,032 |
|
|
2,008 |
|
Shares issued on redemption of restricted
share units |
|
109,916 |
|
|
445 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Shares issued on redemption of deferred share
units |
|
52,065 |
|
|
359 |
|
|
71,845 |
|
|
499 |
|
Shares issued on exercise of stock options
|
|
548 |
|
|
2 |
|
|
458,168 |
|
|
3,094 |
|
Fair value of share-based compensation on
stock options exercised |
|
- |
|
|
4 |
|
|
- |
|
|
1,825 |
|
Shares issued through flow-through financing
(Note 15) |
|
833,334 |
|
|
3,097 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Balance, end of period |
|
249,648,617 |
|
$ |
2,029,991 |
|
|
247,569,811 |
|
$ |
2,021,837 |
|
During the year ended December 31, 2013, the Company
repurchased and cancelled 36,144,578 common shares under a modified Dutch
auction substantial issuer bid, for a total purchase price of $301,066,
including transaction costs. Of the $301,066 paid, $295,536 was recognized in
capital stock to reduce the book value of the shares repurchased, the premium
paid, including transaction costs, of $5,353 was recognized in deficit, and $177
was recognized as deferred tax.
Commencing in 2014, quarterly dividends representing 20% of
operating cash flow generated in the preceding quarter were declared and paid as
follows:
- |
On May 8, 2014, the Companys Board of Directors approved a dividend of
$0.02 per share, payable to shareholders of record on May 20, 2014, and paid
on June 3, 2014. |
|
|
- |
On August 7, 2014, the Companys Board of Directors approved a dividend of
$0.00375 per share, payable to shareholders of record on August 18, 2014, and
paid on September 2, 2014. |
|
|
- |
On November 6, 2014, the Companys Board of Directors approved a dividend
of $0.00225 per share, payable to shareholders of record on November 17, 2014,
and paid on December 1, 2014. |
The fourth quarter dividend was declared on February 19, 2015
(refer to note 28).
In 2013, the Company declared an annual dividend of $0.16 per
share ($0.04 paid quarterly).
(c) |
Stock options (in Canadian
dollars) |
The Company has a long-term incentive plan under which
share-based compensation, including stock options, deferred share units,
performance share units, and restricted share units may be granted to directors,
officers, employees, and consultants of the Company. The maximum number of
common shares that may be reserved and set aside for issuance under the plan is
6.5% of the common shares outstanding at the time of granting the award (on a
non-diluted basis). Stock options are generally exercisable for a maximum period
of five to seven years from the grant date, and have vesting periods of three to
four years or as determined by the Companys Board of Directors.
Stock option disclosures are in Canadian dollars as the
Canadian dollar is the source currency of the Companys stock option grants.
33
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
(in thousands of
United States dollars unless otherwise stated) |
The fair value of the options granted during the years ended
December 31, 2014 and 2013 were calculated using the Black-Scholes
option-pricing model with the following weighted average assumptions:
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
Dividend yield |
|
2.57% |
|
|
2.27% |
|
Expected volatility |
|
56.13% |
|
|
55.06% |
|
Risk free interest rate |
|
1.04% |
|
|
1.25% |
|
Expected life |
|
2.76 years |
|
|
2.98 years |
|
Exercise price |
$ |
4.03 |
|
$ |
4.90 |
|
Share price |
$ |
3.83 |
|
$ |
4.92 |
|
Grant date fair value |
$ |
1.14 |
|
$ |
1.62 |
|
Expected volatility was determined based on historical share
price volatility over the expected life of the option granted.
|
|
December 31, 2014 |
|
|
December 31, 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted |
|
|
|
Options |
|
|
average price |
|
|
Options |
|
|
average price |
|
Outstanding, beginning of period |
|
11,313,300 |
|
$ |
7.29 |
|
|
10,239,564 |
|
$ |
8.24 |
|
Granted |
|
3,349,645 |
|
$ |
4.03 |
|
|
3,251,179 |
|
$ |
4.90 |
|
Forfeited |
|
(117,917 |
) |
$ |
7.02 |
|
|
(167,500 |
) |
$ |
9.87 |
|
Expired |
|
(770,795 |
) |
$ |
10.73 |
|
|
(1,551,775 |
) |
$ |
8.39 |
|
Exercised |
|
(548 |
) |
$ |
2.85 |
|
|
(458,168 |
) |
$ |
6.76 |
|
Outstanding, end of period |
|
13,773,685 |
|
$ |
6.42 |
|
|
11,313,300 |
|
$ |
7.29 |
|
Options exercisable, end of period |
|
7,144,059 |
|
$ |
7.61 |
|
|
5,171,118 |
|
$ |
8.19 |
|
During the year ended December 31, 2014, employees,
consultants, officers and directors of the Company exercised 548 options (year
ended December 31, 2013 - 458,168) for total proceeds of $2 (year ended December
31, 2013 - $3,091). The weighted average share price at the date of exercise for
stock options exercised during the year ended December 31, 2014 was $5.05 (year
ended December 31, 2013 - $7.39) .
Set forth below is a summary of the outstanding options to
purchase common shares as at December 31, 2014:
|
|
|
Options outstanding |
|
|
Options exercisable |
|
|
|
|
Number Weighted
average |
|
|
Average life |
|
|
Number |
|
|
Weighted average |
|
|
Option Price |
|
outstanding |
|
|
exercise price |
|
|
(yrs) |
|
|
exercisable |
|
|
exercise price |
|
$ |
2.51 - 4.00 |
|
325,136 |
|
$ |
3.01 |
|
|
1.47 |
|
|
285,136 |
|
$ |
2.88 |
|
$ |
4.01 - 6.00 |
|
5,689,523 |
|
$ |
4.04 |
|
|
4.51 |
|
|
819,731 |
|
$ |
4.10 |
|
$ |
6.01 - 7.00 |
|
1,491,500 |
|
$ |
6.70 |
|
|
2.87 |
|
|
1,251,500 |
|
$ |
6.69 |
|
$ |
7.01 - 7.50 |
|
888,226 |
|
$ |
7.15 |
|
|
3.01 |
|
|
501,466 |
|
$ |
7.20 |
|
$ |
7.51 - 9.00 |
|
3,235,507 |
|
$ |
8.11 |
|
|
3.01 |
|
|
2,454,592 |
|
$ |
8.10 |
|
$ |
9.01 - 9.50 |
|
722,500 |
|
$ |
9.29 |
|
|
3.84 |
|
|
554,375 |
|
$ |
9.29 |
|
$ |
9.51 - 10.00 |
|
771,543 |
|
$ |
9.74 |
|
|
2.12 |
|
|
730,009 |
|
$ |
9.75 |
|
$ |
10.01 - 10.50 |
|
150,000 |
|
$ |
10.09 |
|
|
3.30 |
|
|
112,500 |
|
$ |
10.09 |
|
$ |
10.51 - 11.00 |
|
250,000 |
|
$ |
10.95 |
|
|
3.87 |
|
|
187,500 |
|
$ |
10.95 |
|
$ |
11.01 - 12.50 |
|
249,750 |
|
$ |
11.61 |
|
|
2.43 |
|
|
247,250 |
|
$ |
11.61 |
|
|
Total |
|
13,773,685 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
7,144,059 |
|
|
|
|
(d) |
Employee share purchase
plan |
The Company has an Employee Share Purchase Plan which enables
employees to purchase Company shares through payroll deduction. Employees can
contribute up to 10% of their annual base salary, and the Company will match 75%
of the employees contributions. The common shares are purchased based on the
volume weighted average closing price of the last five days prior to the end of
the quarter. During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company recognized
$1,061 as an expense (year ended December 31, 2013 - $781) related to this plan.
At December 31, 2014, $278 of the expense was payable by the Company (December
31, 2013 - $217).
34
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
(in thousands of
United States dollars unless otherwise stated) |
The following is a summary of the Deferred Share Units
(DSUs), Performance Share Units (PSUs), and share-settled Restricted Share
Units (RSUs) outstanding during the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013:
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
Deferred Share Units (e) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
52,599 |
|
|
61,683 |
|
Grant date fair value |
$ |
228 |
|
$ |
337 |
|
Dividend-equivalent units
granted |
|
4,080 |
|
|
6,112 |
|
Dividend-equivalent units grant
date fair value |
$ |
28 |
|
$ |
29 |
|
Redeemed |
|
52,065 |
|
|
71,845 |
|
Performance Share Units (f) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
270,082 |
|
|
345,089 |
|
Grant date fair value |
$ |
959 |
|
$ |
559 |
|
Dividend-equivalent units
granted |
|
7,107 |
|
|
2,951 |
|
Dividend-equivalent units grant
date fair value |
$ |
28 |
|
$ |
14 |
|
Expense |
$ |
546 |
|
$ |
44 |
|
Redeemed |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Restricted Share Units (g) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted |
|
392,764 |
|
|
353,580 |
|
Grant date fair value |
$ |
1,349 |
|
$ |
1,553 |
|
Dividend-equivalent units
granted |
|
6,590 |
|
|
2,575 |
|
Dividend-equivalent units grant
date fair value |
$ |
29 |
|
$ |
12 |
|
Expense |
$ |
1,076 |
|
$ |
472 |
|
Redeemed |
|
109,916 |
|
|
- |
|
(e) |
Deferred share unit plan |
The Company awards Deferred Share Units as an alternative form
of compensation for employees, officers, consultants, and members of the
Companys Board of Directors. Each unit entitles the participant to receive one
common share of the Company from treasury upon redemption. DSUs are measured on
the grant date using the volume weighed average closing share price of the last
five days prior to that date. At December 31, 2014, 253,210 DSUs were vested and
outstanding (December 31, 2013 - 248,596).
(f) |
Performance share unit
plan |
The Company awards Performance Share Units as an alternative
form of compensation for employees, officers, consultants, and members of the
Companys Board of Directors. Each unit entitles the participant to receive a
cash payment equal to the market price of one share as of the PSU vesting date,
one share, or any combination of cash and shares equal to the market price of
one share as of the PSU vesting date, assuming certain performance conditions
are met. PSUs are measured using the volume weighted average closing share price
of the last five days prior to granting of the units. At December 31, 2014,
625,223 PSUs were outstanding (December 31, 2013 - 348,040). At December 31,
2014, no outstanding PSUs had vested (December 31, 2013 - nil).
(g) |
Restricted share unit
plan |
The Company awards Restricted Share Units as an alternative
form of compensation for employees, officers, consultants, and members of
the Companys Board of Directors. Each unit entitles the participant to
receive a cash payment equal to the market price of one share as of the
RSU vesting date, one share, or any combination of cash and shares equal
to the market price of one share as of the RSU vesting date. The Company
records RSUs that will be cash-settled as liabilities and RSUs that will
be share-settled within shareholders equity. RSUs are measured using the
volume weighted average closing share price of the last five days prior to
granting of the units. At December 31, 2014, 636,769 RSUs were outstanding
(December 31, 2013 - 356,155). At December 31, 2014, 82,395 of the
outstanding RSUs had vested (December 31, 2013 - 35,843). |
|
35
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
(in thousands of
United States dollars unless otherwise stated) |
The Companys loss from operations includes the following
expenses presented by function:
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
Cost of sales |
$ |
417,343 |
|
$ |
372,453 |
|
General and administrative |
|
25,921 |
|
|
27,677 |
|
Exploration and business development |
|
2,623 |
|
|
5,588 |
|
|
$ |
445,887 |
|
$ |
405,718 |
|
Cost of sales for the year ended December 31, 2014 includes
impairment charges of $90,000 relating to the El Chanate mine (year ended
December 31, 2013 - $154,000). These impairment charges are discussed further in
note 13.
Included in general and administrative expense for the year
ended December 31, 2014 is $7,179 of share-based compensation expense (year
ended December 31, 2013 - $7,388).
Included in exploration and business development for the year
ended December 31, 2014 are impairment charges of $1,622 related to exploration
properties. Included in exploration and business development for the year ended
December 31, 2013 are impairment charges of $4,574 related to brownfield
exploration properties included in non-depletable mining interests. These
impairment charges are discussed further in note 13.
The following employee benefits expenses are included in cost
of sales, general and administrative, and exploration and business development
expenses:
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
Salaries and benefits |
$ |
42,021 |
|
$ |
26,821 |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
8,151 |
|
|
7,946 |
|
Other |
|
173 |
|
|
180 |
|
|
$ |
50,345 |
|
$ |
34,947 |
|
36
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
(in thousands of
United States dollars unless otherwise stated) |
20. |
Other (loss) / income |
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
Loss on modification of
convertible notes (Note 14(c)) |
$ |
(15,645 |
) |
$ |
- |
|
Amortization expense from
retained interest royalty (Note 12) |
|
(13,288 |
) |
|
- |
|
Income from retained
interest royalty (Note 12) |
|
2,463 |
|
|
- |
|
Unrealized and realized
gains / (losses) on investments (Note 8) |
|
6,589 |
|
|
(497 |
) |
Reclassification of
accumulated losses on available-for-sale investments (Note 8) |
|
(2,507 |
) |
|
(168 |
) |
Income from transfer of
litigation claim (a)
|
|
3,177 |
|
|
- |
|
Interest income |
|
1,063 |
|
|
951 |
|
Fair value adjustment on
option component of convertible senior notes (Note 25) |
|
413 |
|
|
15,622 |
|
Unrealized loss on
contingent consideration
|
|
- |
|
|
(7,395 |
) |
Unrealized and realized
losses / (gains) on derivative assets and liabilities (Note 25) |
|
(447 |
) |
|
2,183 |
|
Reduction of obligation to
renounce flow-through exploration expenditures (Note 15) |
|
612 |
|
|
- |
|
Fair value adjustment on
prepayment option embedded derivative (Note 25) |
|
788 |
|
|
- |
|
Other |
|
(419 |
) |
|
(529 |
) |
|
$ |
(17,201 |
) |
$ |
10,167 |
|
(a) |
Income from transfer of litigation
claim |
During the year ended December 31, 2014, the Company
transferred its claim in bankruptcy proceedings that resulted from past losses
on auction-rate securities for net proceeds of $3,177.
Net loss and basic weighted average shares outstanding are
reconciled to diluted net loss and diluted weighted average shares outstanding,
respectively, as follows:
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
Net loss |
$ |
(169,648 |
) |
$ |
(176,770 |
) |
Dilution adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible senior notes |
|
- |
|
|
(14,730 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Diluted net loss |
$ |
(169,648 |
) |
$ |
(191,500 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Basic weighted average shares outstanding |
|
248,889,636 |
|
|
250,398,043 |
|
Dilution adjustments: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Convertible senior notes |
|
- |
|
|
15,331,018 |
|
Diluted weighted average shares outstanding
|
|
248,889,636 |
|
|
265,729,061 |
|
The following items were excluded from the computation of
diluted weighted average shares outstanding for the years ended December 31,
2014 and 2013 because their effect would have been anti-dilutive:
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
Stock options |
|
13,773,685 |
|
|
11,007,616 |
|
Convertible senior notes |
|
60,974 |
|
|
- |
|
Restricted share units |
|
554,374 |
|
|
55,749 |
|
Performance share units |
|
625,223 |
|
|
6,328 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
(in thousands of
United States dollars unless otherwise stated) |
22. |
Supplemental cash flow
information |
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2013 |
|
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
Restated |
|
Non-cash adjustments to reconcile net loss to
operating cash flows: |
|
2014 |
|
|
(Note 3 |
) |
Impairment charges
|
$ |
91,622 |
|
$ |
158,574 |
|
Amortization and
depletion |
|
121,468 |
|
|
65,529 |
|
Loss on
modification of convertible notes |
|
15,645 |
|
|
- |
|
Amortization of
retained interest royalty |
|
13,288 |
|
|
- |
|
Unrealized foreign
exchange loss |
|
5,238 |
|
|
3,406 |
|
Unrealized and
realized (gains) / losses on investments |
|
(6,589 |
) |
|
497 |
|
Share-based
compensation, net of forfeitures |
|
7,179 |
|
|
7,388 |
|
Net realizable
value adjustments |
|
17,224 |
|
|
33,425 |
|
Reclassification
of accumulated losses on available-for-sale investments |
|
2,507 |
|
|
168 |
|
Income from
retained interest royalty |
|
(2,463 |
) |
|
- |
|
Deferred income
tax recovery |
|
(26,278 |
) |
|
(760 |
) |
Fair value
adjustment on option component of convertible senior notes |
|
(413 |
) |
|
(15,622 |
) |
Reduction of
obligation to renounce flow-through exploration expenditures |
|
(612 |
) |
|
- |
|
Equity in loss of
associate and joint venture |
|
171 |
|
|
2,533 |
|
Unrealized loss on
contingent consideration |
|
- |
|
|
7,395 |
|
Unrealized and
realized losses / (gains) on derivative assets and liabilities |
|
447 |
|
|
(2,183 |
) |
Fair value
adjustment on prepayment option embedded derivative |
|
(788 |
) |
|
- |
|
Other non-cash
items |
|
635 |
|
|
1,405 |
|
|
$ |
238,281 |
|
$ |
261,755 |
|
Change in non-cash operating working capital:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receivables |
$ |
2,176 |
|
$ |
(1,800 |
) |
Current income tax receivable
|
|
22,014 |
|
|
8,507 |
|
Prepaids and deposits |
|
2,359 |
|
|
(380 |
) |
Inventories |
|
(15,090 |
) |
|
(35,806 |
) |
Trade payables and accrued
liabilities |
|
(12,515 |
) |
|
19,696 |
|
Current income tax liability |
|
(3,239 |
) |
|
(5,030 |
) |
|
$ |
(4,295 |
) |
$ |
(14,813 |
) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental information: |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid |
$ |
17,048 |
|
$ |
7,104 |
|
Interest received |
$ |
870 |
|
$ |
994 |
|
Income taxes paid |
$ |
1,999 |
|
$ |
4,728 |
|
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
23. |
Related party disclosures |
Related party transactions in 2014 included the compensation of
the Companys key management personnel, a receivable from the joint venture that
holds the Orion development project, and an advance to the associate entity that
holds the Lynn Lake development project, as disclosed in notes 9 and 10.
Related party transactions in 2013 included the compensation of
the Companys key management personnel and a receivable from the joint venture
that holds the Orion development project.
38
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
(in thousands of
United States dollars unless otherwise stated) |
The Companys key management personnel include the Companys
executives and members of the Board of Directors. The compensation of key
management personnel was as follows:
|
|
Year ended |
|
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
Short-term employee benefits |
$ |
5,349 |
|
$ |
6,047 |
|
Long-term benefits |
|
101 |
|
|
39 |
|
Termination benefits |
|
1,306 |
|
|
- |
|
Share-based compensation |
|
4,746 |
|
|
4,497 |
|
|
$ |
11,502 |
|
$ |
10,583 |
|
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24. |
Commitments and
contingencies |
Commitments
Young-Davidson royalty agreements
The Company is subject to two royalty agreements on certain
claims on the Young-Davidson property. The first royalty agreement requires the
Company to pay a minimum of $1.50 per tonne of ore mined and processed. The
second royalty agreement requires the Company to pay $1.00 per tonne of ore
mined and processed, as well as an additional royalty of 5% of the increase in
gold price per ounce recovered above the base price of gold of $270.00 per ounce
for each ounce recovered. The Company recognized $1,377 and $870 relating to
these arrangements in the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013. Total royalties recognized during 2014 were based upon
400,886 ore tonnes processed.
Surety bond
The Company has indemnified a third-party company providing a
surety bond required as security for closure plans at Young-Davidson. The
Company is obligated to replace this security in an event of default, and is
obligated to repay any reclamation or closure costs due. The Companys guarantee
under the surety bond expires on completion of these closure obligations, which
is estimated to be in 20 years, consistent with the estimated remaining life of
the Young-Davidson mine.
Contingencies
The Company is also involved in legal proceedings arising
in the ordinary course of its business. In the opinion of management, the
ultimate liability with respect to these actions will not materially
affect the Companys financial position, results of operations or cash
flows. |
|
39
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
(in thousands of
United States dollars unless otherwise stated) |
25. |
Financial instruments and risk
management |
Fair values of financial instruments
The following table sets forth the Companys financial assets
and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis by level
within the fair value hierarchy. The Company does not have any non-recurring
fair value measurements other than those disclosed in note 13. Levels 1 to 3 are
defined based on the degree to which fair value inputs are observable or
unobservable, as follows:
- |
Level 1 inputs are quoted prices (unadjusted)
in active markets for identical assets or liabilities; |
- |
Level 2 inputs are based on inputs which have a
significant effect on fair value that are observable, either directly or
indirectly from market data; and |
- |
Level 3 inputs are unobservable (supported by
little or no market activity). |
|
|
December 31, 2014 |
|
|
December 31, 2013 |
|
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
|
Level 1 |
|
|
Level 2 |
|
Cash |
$ |
89,031 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
141,125 |
|
$ |
- |
|
Short term deposits |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
1,527 |
|
|
- |
|
Financial assets at fair value through profit
or loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Warrants held (a) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
41 |
|
Prepayment option embedded
derivative (b) |
|
- |
|
|
6,741 |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
Available-for-sale financial assets |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Equity investments (c) |
|
184 |
|
|
- |
|
|
15,510 |
|
|
- |
|
Financial liabilities at fair value through
profit or loss |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Option component of convertible
senior notes (d) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
(413 |
) |
Currency options (e) |
|
- |
|
|
(447 |
) |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
$ |
89,215 |
|
$ |
6,294 |
|
$ |
158,162 |
|
$ |
(372 |
)
|
The methods of measuring each of these financial assets and
liabilities have not changed during 2014. The Company does not have any
financial assets or liabilities measured at fair value based on unobservable
inputs (Level 3).
The fair values of financial instruments measured at amortized
cost, except for the senior secured notes, approximate their carrying amounts at
December 31, 2014. The fair value of the senior secured notes was $289,800 at
December 31, 2014 compared to a carrying value of $296,755, which includes the
value of the prepayment option embedded derivative included in the table above.
The fair value of this liability was determined using a market approach with
reference to observable market prices for identical assets traded in an active
market.
The fair value of warrants held that are not traded on an
active market is determined using a Black-Scholes pricing model based on
assumptions that are supported by observable current market conditions and as
such are classified within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy.
(b) |
Prepayment option embedded
derivative |
The secured notes (as discussed in note 14) contain prepayment
options which represent embedded derivatives that require bifurcation from the
host contract. The prepayment options are measured at fair value and offset
against the carrying value of the secured notes on the Consolidated Balance
Sheets, with changes in the fair value recognized as unrealized gains / (losses)
in other (loss) / income on the Consolidated Statements of Operations (note
20).
40
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
(in thousands of
United States dollars unless otherwise stated) |
The Company measures the fair value of the secured note
embedded derivative using the Black-Karasinski model of interest rate
uncertainty within a FinCAD callable / puttable bond model. Because the
valuation is dependent on inputs derived from observable market data, the
embedded derivative component of the secured notes is classified within Level 2
of the fair value hierarchy. The fair value was calculated using the following
assumptions:
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
Volatility |
|
41% |
|
Credit spreads |
|
6.78% |
|
Changes in these assumptions would have the following impact on
net loss for the year ended December 31, 2014:
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
2% increase in volatility |
$ |
473 |
|
2% decrease in volatility |
$ |
(473 |
) |
0.5% increase in credit spreads |
$ |
(693 |
) |
0.5% decrease in credit spreads |
$ |
788 |
|
The Companys available-for-sale equity investments are valued
using quoted market prices in active markets and as such are classified within
Level 1 of the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of investment securities is
calculated as the closing market price of the investment equity security
multiplied by the quantity of shares held by the Company.
(d) |
Option component of convertible senior
notes |
The Company calculates the fair value of the option component
of convertible senior notes using a convertible bond valuation model, which uses
inputs, including the Companys share price, volatility of the notes, and credit
spreads. Because the valuation is dependent on inputs derived from observable
market data, the option component of the convertible senior notes is classified
within Level 2 of the fair value hierarchy. The fair value of the option
component of convertible senior notes at December 31, 2014 is $nil. The fair
value at December 31, 2013 was calculated using the following assumptions:
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
2013 |
|
Volatility |
|
30% |
|
Credit spreads |
|
4.70% |
|
For the year ended December 31, 2013, changes in these
assumptions would have the following impact on net loss:
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
2013 |
|
5% increase in volatility |
$ |
(557 |
) |
5% decrease in volatility |
$ |
298 |
|
0.5% increase in credit spreads |
$ |
(29 |
) |
0.5% decrease in credit spreads |
$ |
27 |
|
The fair value of option contracts is determined using a market
approach with reference to observable market prices for identical assets traded
in an active market. These are classified within Level 2 of the fair value
hierarchy. The use of reasonably possible alternative assumptions would not
significantly affect the Companys results.
Risks
In the normal course of operations, the Company is exposed to
credit risk, liquidity risk and the following market risks: commodity price,
market price, interest rate and foreign currency exchange rate. The Company has
developed a risk management process to identify, analyze and assess these and
other risks, and has formed a Risk Committee to monitor all significant risks to
the Company. The Board of Directors has overall responsibility for the oversight
of the Companys risk management framework, and receives regular reports from
the Risk Committee.
41
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
(in thousands of
United States dollars unless otherwise stated) |
Commodity price risk
The profitability of the Companys mining operations will be
significantly affected by changes in the market price for gold. Gold prices
fluctuate on a daily basis and are affected by numerous factors beyond the
Companys control. The supply and demand for gold, the level of interest rates,
the rate of inflation, investment decisions by large holders of gold, including
governmental reserves, and the stability of exchange rates can all cause
significant fluctuations in gold prices. Such external economic factors are in
turn influenced by changes in international investment patterns and monetary
systems, and political developments. From time to time, the Company will enter
into zero cost collars or other financial instruments to manage short term
commodity price fluctuations. At December 31, 2014 and 2013, the Company did not
have any commodity-related financial instruments outstanding.
Market price risk
The Company is exposed to fluctuations in the fair value of
investments made in equity securities and warrants. A 10% increase or reduction
in each companys share price at December 31, 2014 would have increased or
reduced other comprehensive loss by $18 (December 31, 2013 - $1,555).
Interest rate risk
When amounts are drawn under its credit facility, the Company
is exposed to interest rate risk on this variable rate debt. At December 31,
2014, the Company had no variable rate debt outstanding. If interest rates had
been 0.5% higher during the year ended December 31, 2013, net loss would have
increased by $44. This analysis assumes that other variables remain constant (a
50 basis points decrease in interest rates would have had the equal but opposite
effect) and that none of the additional interest is capitalized to capital
projects.
The fair value of the prepayment option embedded derivative is
also impacted by fluctuations in interest rates. Refer to the previous
discussion on the fair value of these options for a sensitivity of the fair
value of these notes to changes in significant assumptions.
Foreign currency exchange rate risk
Metal sales revenues for the Company are denominated in US
dollars. The Company is exposed to currency fluctuations relative to the US
dollar on expenditures that are denominated in Canadian dollars and Mexican
pesos. These potential currency fluctuations could have a significant impact on
production costs and thereby, the profitability of the Company. The Company is
also exposed to the impact of currency fluctuations on its monetary assets and
liabilities.
At December 31, 2014, the Companys balance sheet exposure to
foreign currency exchange rate risk in Canadian dollars (CAD) and Mexican
pesos (MXN) was as follows:
|
|
CAD
|
|
|
MXN
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ |
29,135 |
|
$ |
3,862 |
|
Receivables |
|
4,559 |
|
|
112,067 |
|
Current income tax receivable |
|
815 |
|
|
65,839 |
|
Investments |
|
213 |
|
|
- |
|
Other long-term assets |
|
59,184 |
|
|
- |
|
Payables and accrued liabilities |
|
(33,760 |
) |
|
(39,990 |
) |
Current income tax liability |
|
(86 |
) |
|
(4,907 |
) |
Debt and equipment financing obligations |
|
(2,072 |
) |
|
(2,760 |
) |
Provisions |
|
(2,734 |
) |
|
(754 |
) |
Deferred income tax liability |
|
(266,493 |
) |
|
(460,091 |
) |
Net balance sheet exposure |
$ |
(211,239 |
) |
$ |
(326,734 |
) |
42
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
(in thousands of
United States dollars unless otherwise stated) |
At December 31, 2013, the Companys balance sheet exposure to
foreign currency exchange rate risk in Canadian dollars (CAD), Mexican pesos
(MXN) was as follows:
|
|
CAD |
|
|
MXN |
|
Cash and cash equivalents |
$ |
23,118 |
|
$ |
24,932 |
|
Restricted cash |
|
2,345 |
|
|
- |
|
Receivables |
|
18,954 |
|
|
101,094 |
|
Current income tax receivable |
|
25,899 |
|
|
46,977 |
|
Investments |
|
16,540 |
|
|
- |
|
Other long-term assets |
|
72,328 |
|
|
- |
|
Payables and accrued liabilities |
|
(72,787 |
) |
|
(34,063 |
) |
Dividend payable |
|
(2,236 |
) |
|
- |
|
Current income tax liability |
|
(3,351 |
) |
|
(5,549 |
) |
Debt and equipment financing obligations |
|
(13,519 |
) |
|
- |
|
Provisions |
|
(17,266 |
) |
|
(754 |
) |
Deferred income tax liability |
|
(242,720 |
) |
|
(772,525 |
) |
Net balance sheet exposure |
$ |
(192,695 |
) |
$ |
(639,888 |
) |
A 10% strengthening of these currencies against the US dollar
at each balance sheet date would have impacted net losses by the amounts shown
below. This analysis assumes that other variables, in particular interest rates,
remain constant.
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
Translation of net CAD exposure |
$ |
(18,209 |
) |
$ |
(18,117 |
) |
Translation of net MXN exposure |
|
(2,215 |
) |
|
(4,885 |
)
|
As at December 31, 2014, the Company held option contracts to
protect against the risk of an increase in the value of the Canadian dollar and
Mexican peso versus the US dollar. Details of these option contracts for the
purchase of local currencies and sale of US dollars, which settle on a monthly
basis, are summarized in the table below.
|
|
|
|
|
Local |
|
|
Local currency |
|
|
Local currency |
|
|
Call option |
|
|
Put option |
|
Period covered |
|
Contract |
|
|
Currency |
|
|
per month |
|
|
total |
|
|
per USD |
|
|
per USD |
|
30-Jan-15 31-Dec-15
|
|
Collar |
|
|
CAD |
|
|
7,500 |
|
|
90,000 |
|
|
1.1111 |
|
|
1.2246 |
|
30-Jan-15 31-Dec-15
|
|
Collar |
|
|
MXN |
|
|
30,000 |
|
|
360,000 |
|
|
14.00 |
|
|
15.71 |
|
These contracts had a negative fair value of $447 at December
31, 2014, all of which has been recognized in other (loss) / income within the
Consolidated Statements of Operations (note 20).
During 2013, the Company held forward contracts to protect
against the risk of an increase in the value of the Mexican peso versus the US
dollar. During the year ended December 31, 2013, a gain of $112 was recognized
in net loss on settlement of these forward contracts.
Credit risk
Credit risk relates to receivables and other contracts, and
arises from the possibility that any counterparty to an instrument fails to
perform. For cash and cash equivalents, restricted cash, and receivables, the
Companys credit risk is limited to the carrying amount on the balance sheet.
The Company manages credit risk by transacting with highly-rated counterparties
and establishing a limit on contingent exposure for each counterparty based on
the counterpartys credit rating. Exposure on receivables is limited as the
Company sells its products to a small number of organizations, on which the
historical level of defaults is minimal.
Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk is the risk that the Company will encounter
difficulty in meeting obligations associated with financial liabilities that are
settled by delivering cash or another financial asset. The Company manages this
risk through regular monitoring of its cash flow requirements to support ongoing
operations and expansionary plans. The Company ensures that there are sufficient
committed loan facilities to meet its business requirements, taking into account
anticipated cash flows from operations and holdings of cash and cash
equivalents.
43
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
(in thousands of
United States dollars unless otherwise stated) |
The contractual maturities of financial liabilities are
outlined in note 14. |
The primary objective of managing the Companys capital is to
ensure that there is sufficient available capital to support the long-term
growth strategy of the Company in a way that optimizes the cost of capital and
shareholder returns, and ensures that the Company remains in a sound financial
position. There were no changes to the Companys overall capital management
approach during the current year.
The capital of the Company consists of items included in
shareholders equity and debt and equipment financing obligations. The Company
manages and makes adjustments to the capital structure as opportunities arise in
the market place, as and when borrowings mature, or when funding is required.
This may take the form of raising equity or debt, or may result in the Company
repurchasing equity or debt.
The Company monitors capital through the gross debt to total
equity ratio, and targets a ratio of less than 25%. As at December 31, 2014, the
ratio of gross debt to total equity was 19.27% (December 31, 2013 - 14.07%),
calculated as follows:
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
Current portion of debt and equipment
financing obligations |
$ |
6,308 |
|
$ |
7,355 |
|
Debt and equipment financing obligations |
|
308,064 |
|
|
244,194 |
|
Gross debt |
|
314,372 |
|
|
251,549 |
|
Shareholders' equity |
$ |
1,631,210 |
|
$ |
1,787,882 |
|
Gross debt / Shareholders' equity |
|
19.27% |
|
|
14.07% |
|
.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
27. |
Segmented information |
The Companys reportable segments are consistent with the
Companys operating segments and consist of the geographical regions in which
the Company operates. In determining the Companys segment structure, the
Company considered the basis on which management, including the chief operating
decision maker, reviews the financial and operational performance of the
Company, and whether any of the Companys mining operations share similar
economic, operational and regulatory characteristics. The Company has two
reportable segments, as follows:
− |
Mexico: El Chanate mine |
− |
Canada: Young-Davidson mine
|
Corporate and other consists of the Companys corporate offices
and exploration properties.
The following are the operating results by reportable segment:
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2014 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mexico |
|
|
Canada |
|
|
and other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from mining operations |
$ |
86,259 |
|
$ |
204,923 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
291,182 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production costs |
|
61,150 |
|
|
138,159 |
|
|
- |
|
|
199,309 |
|
Refining costs |
|
400 |
|
|
195 |
|
|
- |
|
|
595 |
|
Amortization and depletion |
|
23,262 |
|
|
97,820 |
|
|
386 |
|
|
121,468 |
|
Reclamation, care and maintenance costs |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
5,971 |
|
|
5,971 |
|
General and administrative |
|
919 |
|
|
- |
|
|
25,002 |
|
|
25,921 |
|
Exploration and business development |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
1,001 |
|
|
1,001 |
|
Impairment charges |
|
90,771 |
|
|
235 |
|
|
616 |
|
|
91,622 |
|
|
|
176,502 |
|
|
236,409 |
|
|
32,976 |
|
|
445,887 |
|
Loss from operations |
$ |
(90,243 |
) |
$ |
(31,486 |
) |
$ |
(32,976 |
) |
$ |
(154,705 |
) |
Expenditures on property, plant and
equipment, mining interests & intangible assets |
$ |
29,611 |
|
$ |
137,174 |
|
$ |
22,044 |
|
$ |
188,829 |
|
44
|
NOTES TO THE CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
|
(in thousands of
United States dollars unless otherwise stated) |
|
|
Year ended December 31, 2013 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mexico |
|
|
Canada |
|
|
and other |
|
|
Total |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Revenue from mining operations |
$ |
103,192 |
|
$ |
124,439 |
|
$ |
- |
|
$ |
227,631 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production costs |
|
71,625 |
|
|
76,356 |
|
|
- |
|
|
147,981 |
|
Refining costs |
|
367 |
|
|
159 |
|
|
- |
|
|
526 |
|
Amortization and depletion |
|
17,836 |
|
|
47,385 |
|
|
308 |
|
|
65,529 |
|
Reclamation, care and maintenance costs |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
4,417 |
|
|
4,417 |
|
General and administrative |
|
1,371 |
|
|
- |
|
|
26,306 |
|
|
27,677 |
|
Exploration and business development |
|
- |
|
|
- |
|
|
1,014 |
|
|
1,014 |
|
Impairment charges |
|
155,625 |
|
|
2,949 |
|
|
- |
|
|
158,574 |
|
|
|
246,824 |
|
|
126,849 |
|
|
32,045 |
|
|
405,718 |
|
Loss from operations |
$ |
(143,632 |
) |
$ |
(2,410 |
) |
$ |
(32,045 |
) |
$ |
(178,087 |
) |
Expenditures on property, plant and
equipment, mining interests & intangible assets |
$ |
44,088 |
|
$ |
195,233 |
|
$ |
10,101 |
|
$ |
249,422 |
|
The following are total assets by reportable segment:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Corporate |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mexico |
|
|
Canada |
|
|
and other |
|
|
Total |
|
Total assets at December 31, 2014 |
$ |
183,075 |
|
$ |
1,833,404 |
|
$ |
265,347 |
|
$ |
2,281,826 |
|
Total assets at December 31, 2013 |
$ |
265,028 |
|
$ |
1,822,533 |
|
$ |
374,847 |
|
$ |
2,462,408 |
|
Total non-current assets, excluding long-term financial assets,
by geographical region, are as follows:
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
December 31 |
|
|
|
2014 |
|
|
2013 |
|
Mexico |
$ |
151,774 |
|
$ |
217,294 |
|
Canada |
|
1,889,240 |
|
|
1,865,636 |
|
|
$ |
2,041,014 |
|
$ |
2,082,930 |
|
Goodwill recognized in the Canada reportable segment totalled
$241,693 at December 31, 2014, and relates to the Young-Davidson CGU.
The Companys revenue is derived from the sale of gold and
silver in Mexico and Canada, as disclosed above. The Company sells all gold and
silver produced to two customers. The Company is not economically dependent on
these customers for the sale of its product because gold and silver can be sold
through numerous commodity market traders worldwide.
|
|
28. |
Events after the reporting period |
|
|
(a) |
Termination of retained interest royalty
|
On January 14, 2015, the Company finalized the agreement to
terminate the retained interest royalty from Crocodile Gold and received CAD $20
million in cash consideration, along with net smelter royalties on future
production from the Fosterville and Stawell mines. Refer to note 12 for further
information.
(b) |
Declaration of
dividend |
On February 19, 2015, the Companys Board of Directors
approved a dividend of $0.023 per share, payable to shareholders of record
on March 2, 2015. |
|
45
CERTIFICATION
I, Scott Perry, certify that:
1. |
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of AuRico
Gold Inc.; |
|
|
2. |
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
|
|
3. |
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
|
|
4. |
The issuers other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d- 15(f)) for the issuer and
have: |
|
(a) |
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report
is being prepared; |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
Designed such internal control over financial reporting,
or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed
under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles; |
|
|
|
|
(c) |
Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and |
|
|
|
|
(d) |
Disclosed in this report any change in the issuers
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period
covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuers internal control over
financial reporting. |
5. |
The issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the issuers auditors and the audit committee of
the issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
|
(a) |
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuers ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuers
internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: February 19, 2015 |
By: /s/ Scott
Perry
|
|
Scott
Perry |
|
Chief
Executive Officer |
CERTIFICATION
I, Robert Chausse, certify that:
1. |
I have reviewed this annual report on Form 40-F of AuRico
Gold Inc.; |
|
|
2. |
Based on my knowledge, this report does not contain any
untrue statement of a material fact or omit to state a material fact
necessary to make the statements made, in light of the circumstances under
which such statements were made, not misleading with respect to the period
covered by this report; |
|
|
3. |
Based on my knowledge, the financial statements, and
other financial information included in this annual report, fairly present
in all material respects the financial condition, results of operations
and cash flows of the issuer as of, and for, the periods presented in this
report; |
|
|
4. |
The issuers other certifying officer and I are
responsible for establishing and maintaining disclosure controls and
procedures (as defined in Exchange Act Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e)) and
internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Exchange Act
Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d- 15(f)) for the issuer and
have: |
|
(a) |
Designed such disclosure controls and procedures, or
caused such disclosure controls and procedures to be designed under our
supervision, to ensure that material information relating to the issuer,
including its consolidated subsidiaries, is made known to us by others
within those entities, particularly during the period in which this report
is being prepared; |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
Designed such internal control over financial reporting,
or caused such internal control over financial reporting to be designed
under our supervision, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the
reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial
statements for external purposes in accordance with generally accepted
accounting principles; |
|
|
|
|
(c) |
Evaluated the effectiveness of the issuers disclosure
controls and procedures and presented in this report our conclusions about
the effectiveness of the disclosure controls and procedures, as of the end
of the period covered by this report based on such evaluation;
and |
|
|
|
|
(d) |
Disclosed in this report any change in the issuers
internal control over financial reporting that occurred during the period
covered by the annual report that has materially affected, or is
reasonably likely to materially affect, the issuers internal control over
financial reporting. |
5. |
The issuers other certifying officer(s) and I have
disclosed, based on our most recent evaluation of internal control over
financial reporting, to the issuers auditors and the audit committee of
the issuers board of directors (or persons performing the equivalent
functions): |
|
(a) |
All significant deficiencies and material weaknesses in
the design or operation of internal control over financial reporting which
are reasonably likely to adversely affect the issuers ability to record,
process, summarize and report financial information; and |
|
|
|
|
(b) |
Any fraud, whether or not material, that involves
management or other employees who have a significant role in the issuers
internal control over financial reporting. |
Date: February 19, 2015 |
By: /s/ Robert
Chausse
|
|
Robert
Chausse |
|
Chief
Financial Officer |
2
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the annual report of AuRico Gold Inc. (the
Company) on Form 40-F for the period ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Scott
Perry, Chief Executive Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:
|
(1) |
The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and |
|
|
|
|
(2) |
The information contained in this Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. |
February 19, 2015 |
/s/ Scott
Perry
|
|
Scott Perry |
|
Chief Executive Officer |
A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to AuRico Gold Inc. and will be retained by AuRico Gold
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
CERTIFICATION PURSUANT TO
18 U.S.C. §1350,
AS ADOPTED
PURSUANT TO
SECTION 906 OF THE SARBANES-OXLEY ACT OF 2002
In connection with the annual report of AuRico Gold Inc. (the
Company) on Form 40-F for the period ended December 31, 2014 as filed with the
Securities and Exchange Commission on the date hereof (the Report), I, Robert
Chausse, Chief Financial Officer of the Company, certify, pursuant to 18 U.S.C.
§1350, as adopted pursuant to Section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002,
that to the best of my knowledge:
|
(1) |
The Report fully complies with the requirements of
Section 13(a) or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934;
and |
|
|
|
|
(2) |
The information contained in this Report fairly presents,
in all material respects, the financial condition and results of
operations of the Company. |
February 19, 2015 |
/s/ Robert
Chausse
|
|
Robert Chausse |
|
Chief Financial Officer |
A signed original of this written statement required by Section
906 has been provided to AuRico Gold Inc. and will be retained by AuRico Gold
Inc. and furnished to the Securities and Exchange Commission or its staff upon
request.
2
|
|
|
|
KPMG LLP |
Telephone (416) 777-8500 |
|
Bay Adelaide Centre |
Fax (416) 777-8818 |
|
333 Bay Street Suite 4600 |
Internet www.kpmg.ca |
|
Toronto ON M5H 2S5 |
|
|
Canada |
|
Consent of Independent Registered Public
Accounting Firm
To the Board of Directors of AuRico Gold Inc.
We consent to the use in this annual report on Form 40-F of:
- our Independent Auditors Report of Registered Public Accounting Firm,
dated February 19, 2015, on the consolidated financial statements of AuRico
Gold Inc. (the Company), comprising the consolidated balance sheets of the
Company as at December 31, 2014 and December 31, 2013, the consolidated
statements of operations, comprehensive income, shareholders equity and cash
flows for the years then ended, and notes, comprising a summary of significant
accounting policies and other explanatory information,
- our Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm, dated
February 19, 2015, on the effectiveness of the Companys internal control over
financial reporting as of December 31, 2014,
each of which is incorporated by reference in this annual
report on Form 40-F of the Company for the fiscal year ended December 31,
2014.
Our report indicates that the comparative information presented
for the year ended December 31, 2013 has been restated.
We also consent to the incorporation by reference of such
reports in the Registration Statements No. 333-173458, 333-175079 and No.
333-177638 on Form S-8 and the Registration Statement No. 333-189227 on Form
F-3D of the Company.
Chartered Professional Accountants, Licensed Public Accountants
Toronto, Canada
February 19, 2015
KPMG LLP is a Canadian limited liability partnership
and a member firm of the KPMG |
network of independent member firms affiliated with
KPMG International Cooperative |
(KPMG International), a Swiss entity. |
KPMG Canada provides services to KPMG LLP.
|
CONSENT OF EXPERT
I, Chris Bostwick, do hereby consent to the filing of the
scientific and technical information in the Annual Information Form (the AIF)
of AuRico Gold Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2014 and the
use of my name in the Annual Information Form and Annual Report on Form 40-F of
the Company for the year ended December 31, 2014, filed with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission, and any amendments thereto, and the
incorporation by reference into the Form F-3 (File No. 333-189227) of the
Company and any Registration Statement on Form S-8 of the Company filed with the
United States Securities and Exchange Commission, of the Companys AIF and
Annual Report on Form 40-F.
Dated: February 19, 2015 |
By: /s/ Chris J.
Bostwick
|
|
Chris J.
Bostwick |
|
AuRico
Gold Inc. |
|
Senior
Vice President, Technical Services |
CONSENT OF EXPERT
I, Jeffrey Volk, do hereby consent to the filing of the
resources information in the Annual Information Form (the AIF) of AuRico Gold
Inc. (the Company) for the year ended December 31, 2014 and the use of my name
in the Annual Information Form and Annual Report on Form 40-F of the Company for
the year ended December 31, 2014, filed with the United States Securities and
Exchange Commission, and any amendments thereto, and the incorporation by
reference into the Form F-3 (File No. 333-189227) of the Company and any
Registration Statement on Form S-8 of the Company filed with the United States
Securities and Exchange Commission, of the Companys AIF and Annual Report on
Form 40-F.
Dated: February 19, 2015 |
By: /s/ Jeffrey
Volk
|
|
Jeffrey
Volk |
|
AuRico
Gold Inc. |
|
Director Reserves
and Resources |
Aurico Gold (NYSE:AUQ)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2024 to May 2024
Aurico Gold (NYSE:AUQ)
Historical Stock Chart
From May 2023 to May 2024