TSX-V: AZR
VANCOUVER, April 4, 2017 /CNW/ - AZARGA METALS CORP.
("Azarga Metals" or the "Company") (TSX-V:AZR)
announces the results of its maiden Mineral Resource estimate for
its Unkur Copper-Silver Project in the Zabaikalsky Region of
eastern Russia. The estimate is an
Inferred Mineral Resource of 42 million tonnes at 0.52% copper
and 38g/t silver, containing 220,000 tonnes (ie, 480 million
pounds) of copper and 52 million ounces of silver. This equates
to approximately 380,000 tonnes (ie, 840 million pounds) of copper
equivalent at 0.90% or approximately 124 million ounces of silver
equivalent at 91g/t, assuming a copper price of US$3.00/lb, silver price of US$20/oz and 100% recovery. The Mineral Resource
estimate was independently prepared by SRK Consulting (Russia) Ltd. ("SRK"), in accordance
with NI 43-101.
"The maiden Mineral Resource estimate is a very successful
result from just our first few months of physical exploration at
Unkur," said Dorian L. (Dusty)
Nicol, the Company's president and CEO. He went on to say,
"importantly, mineralization is open in multiple directions,
which supports growth potential" and "this further
stimulates our belief that Unkur has the potential to be a globally
significant copper-silver deposit."
A Technical Report covering the Mineral Resource estimate will
be filed on SEDAR within 45 days of this news release.
SUMMARY
An Inferred Mineral Resource was estimated based on three
domains. Zone 1 is the stratigraphically upper zone of
mineralization and Zone 2 is the stratigraphically lower zone,
which is divided into a northern (N) and southern (S) sub-zone.
Zone 1 and Zone 2 are further divided into near surface and
underground mineralization.
Table 1: Unkur
Copper-Silver Project Inferred Mineral Resource estimate summary as
at 31 March 2017
|
Category /
zone
|
|
Tonnage
(million
tonnes)
|
|
Copper
grade (%)
|
|
Silver
grade (g/t)
|
|
Copper
equivalent
grade (%)
|
|
Silver
equivalent
grade (g/t)
|
Near surface
(NS)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Zone
1
|
|
23
|
|
0.54
|
|
40
|
|
0.93
|
|
95
|
- Zone 2
(North)
|
|
9
|
|
0.47
|
|
43
|
|
0.89
|
|
91
|
- Zone 2
(South)
|
|
1
|
|
0.42
|
|
4
|
|
0.46
|
|
47
|
- Total near
surface
|
|
33
|
|
0.52
|
|
39
|
|
0.90
|
|
92
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Underground
(UG)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Zone
1
|
|
8
|
|
0.53
|
|
34
|
|
0.86
|
|
88
|
- Zone 2
(North)
|
|
1
|
|
0.47
|
|
43
|
|
0.89
|
|
91
|
- Total
underground
|
|
10
|
|
0.52
|
|
35
|
|
0.87
|
|
88
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zone 1 NS +
UG
|
|
31
|
|
0.54
|
|
38
|
|
0.91
|
|
93
|
Zone 2 NS +
UG
|
|
11
|
|
0.46
|
|
38
|
|
0.84
|
|
85
|
Total
Resource
|
|
42
|
|
0.52
|
|
38
|
|
0.90
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Notes: (1) CIM
Definition Standards were followed for Mineral Resources; (2) Pit
constrained Mineral Resources are reported within a conceptual pit
shell; (3) Mineral resources are not Mineral Reserves and do not
have demonstrated economic viability; (4) Mineral Resources are
reported at a cut-off grade of 0.3% copper equivalent for near
surface and 0.7% copper equivalent for underground; (5) copper and
silver equivalent grades were estimated using US$3.00/lb copper
price, US$20.00/oz silver price and 100% recovery using the
formulae Cu eq = Cu + (0.009722 x Ag) and Ag eq = Ag + (102.86 x
Cu); and (6) numbers may not add due to rounding.
|
GROWTH POTENTIAL
Azarga Metals considers that there is strong potential to grow
the Mineral Resource at the Unkur Copper-Silver Project beyond that
identified in this maiden Mineral Resource estimate. The
mineralization is open in both directions along strike and further
exploration drilling will aim to extend mineralization along
strike. Of key interest for growth potential is the zone of thicker
and higher grade mineralization in the northern part of the
Inferred Mineral Resource area (see Figure 2). The next phase of
work will focus on using geologic and geophysical exploration to
target potential extensions of this higher grade zone. The
mineralization also remains open down-dip. In addition to this
Unkur Copper-Silver Project Inferred Mineral Resource area and its
potential extensions, there are numerous additional occurrences of
copper-silver mineralization and geochemical / geophysical
anomalies within the Company's 5,390 hectare Unkur License.
DETAILS OF MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE DATED 31 MARCH 2017
Details of Mineral Resource estimate dated 31 March 2017
The Mineral Resource estimate was prepared by SRK, under the
direction of Robin Simpson MAIG, an independent Qualified Person as
defined by National Instrument 43-101 ("NI 43-101"). The
results are reported in accordance with NI 43-101 and the 2014 CIM
Definition Standards. The Qualified Person visited the Unkur
Copper-Silver Project and SGS Laboratories in Chita during
October 2016.
Robin Simpson has approved this
written disclosure of the Mineral Resource estimate.
Data verification
The Qualified Person has verified the database the Mineral
Resource estimate is based on. This verification was done by
personal inspection of drill core, drill sites and trenches during
the site visit, and by checking database content against primary
data sources and historical information.
Exploration Information
The estimate is based on 4,580 meters of diamond drilling (from
16 drill-holes) and 186 meters of channel sampling (from four
trenches), completed during Azarga Metals' exploration campaign
from August 2016 until February 2017.
In the opinion of the Qualified Person, the core and channel
samples collected by Azarga Metals are sufficiently accurate and
reliable for use in Mineral Resource estimation, and there are no
material data quality issues related to drilling, sampling,
recovery or other factors.
Intervals identified by Azarga Metals' geologists as potentially
mineralized were sampled, typically on one meter lengths. The
half-core samples from drill core, and channel samples from
trenches, were sent to SGS Laboratories in Chita for analysis of
copper and silver. Standard QA/QC protocols were followed,
including analysis of duplicates and standards and check analyses
by ALS Laboratories in Chita. The results of this QA/QC checking
will be presented in the forthcoming Technical Report.
The main identified zone of copper-silver mineralization (Zone
1) is intersected by 13 drill-holes and two trenches. Drill-hole
collar and trench locations are tabulated in Table 2 and the
mineralized intersections are summarized in Table 3. The locations
of these intersections are shown in Figure 3.
Table 2: Drill-hole
collar and trench locations from August 2016 to February 2017
physical exploration program at Unkur Copper-Silver
Project
|
Hole or
trench ID
|
|
X
|
|
Y
|
|
Z (RL m)
|
|
Maximum
depth (m)
|
|
Starting
dip (deg)
|
|
Starting
azimuth
(deg)
|
AM-020
|
|
20595906
|
|
6303578
|
|
902.7
|
|
284.9
|
|
-70
|
|
249
|
AM-001
|
|
20595871
|
|
6303108
|
|
929.7
|
|
400.5
|
|
-69
|
|
241
|
AM-002
|
|
20596077
|
|
6303227
|
|
919.4
|
|
520.5
|
|
-70
|
|
248
|
AM-003
|
|
20595911
|
|
6302753
|
|
930.5
|
|
100.0
|
|
-72
|
|
242
|
AM-004
|
|
20596093
|
|
6302871
|
|
935.5
|
|
382.9
|
|
-70
|
|
242
|
AM-005
|
|
20596247
|
|
6302510
|
|
913.7
|
|
160.0
|
|
-71
|
|
241
|
AM-006
|
|
20596388
|
|
6302620
|
|
955.1
|
|
572.0
|
|
-69
|
|
221
|
AM-007
|
|
20596411
|
|
6302155
|
|
927.7
|
|
80.0
|
|
-70
|
|
222
|
AM-008
|
|
20596611
|
|
6302365
|
|
1,007.8
|
|
601.3
|
|
-72
|
|
228
|
AM-009
|
|
20596725
|
|
6301968
|
|
983.0
|
|
238.0
|
|
-69
|
|
224
|
AM-011
|
|
20596936
|
|
6301672
|
|
952.3
|
|
178.5
|
|
-68
|
|
223
|
AM-013
|
|
20597233
|
|
6301394
|
|
995.8
|
|
100.0
|
|
-68
|
|
220
|
AM-015
|
|
20597567
|
|
6301246
|
|
1042.0
|
|
201.0
|
|
-68
|
|
217
|
AM-017
|
|
20596211
|
|
6302467
|
|
916.1
|
|
277.5
|
|
-71
|
|
230
|
AM-019
|
|
20596639
|
|
6301879
|
|
938.9
|
|
226.7
|
|
-69
|
|
224
|
AM-018
|
|
20595635
|
|
6302977
|
|
937.8
|
|
256.6
|
|
-73
|
|
241
|
TR K601
|
|
20596492
|
|
6301887
|
|
969.1
|
|
14.0
|
|
0
|
|
236
|
TR K615
|
|
20597213
|
|
6301311
|
|
1,015.4
|
|
115.0
|
|
0
|
|
222
|
TR K616
|
|
20597472
|
|
6301143
|
|
1,049.5
|
|
29.0
|
|
0
|
|
233
|
Table 3:
Intersections used for estimation(1)
|
Hole or trench
ID
|
|
From
(m)
|
|
To
(m)
|
|
Length
(m)
|
|
Copper
grade (%)
|
|
Silver
grade (%)
|
|
Copper
equivalent
grade (%)
|
|
True
thickness
(m)
|
Zone 1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AM-020
|
|
227.0
|
|
241.0
|
|
14
|
|
0.51
|
|
28.44
|
|
0.79
|
|
10.6
|
AM-001(2)
|
|
82.5
|
|
125.5
|
|
33
|
|
0.83
|
|
79.81
|
|
1.61
|
|
20.1
|
AM-002
|
|
432.5
|
|
472.5
|
|
40
|
|
0.31
|
|
12.77
|
|
0.44
|
|
33.8
|
AM-003(3)
|
|
40.5
|
|
77.5
|
|
37
|
|
0.43
|
|
39.63
|
|
0.82
|
|
26.9
|
AM-004(4)
|
|
319.5
|
|
358.5
|
|
31
|
|
0.44
|
|
27.23
|
|
0.70
|
|
23.7
|
AM-006
|
|
440.5
|
|
456.5
|
|
16
|
|
0.34
|
|
11.02
|
|
0.45
|
|
14.4
|
AM-007
|
|
47.0
|
|
60.0
|
|
13
|
|
0.25
|
|
17.12
|
|
0.41
|
|
10.9
|
AM-008
|
|
352.3
|
|
364.3
|
|
12
|
|
0.24
|
|
6.02
|
|
0.30
|
|
9.9
|
AM-011
|
|
145.5
|
|
153.9
|
|
8.4
|
|
0.92
|
|
61.73
|
|
1.52
|
|
7.3
|
AM-013
|
|
70.0
|
|
78.0
|
|
8
|
|
0.53
|
|
22.62
|
|
0.75
|
|
6.8
|
AM-015
|
|
135.0
|
|
145.0
|
|
10
|
|
0.29
|
|
4.55
|
|
0.34
|
|
8.7
|
AM-017
|
|
189.5
|
|
202.5
|
|
13
|
|
1.28
|
|
103.91
|
|
2.29
|
|
9.8
|
AM-019
|
|
39.0
|
|
49.0
|
|
10
|
|
0.48
|
|
12.39
|
|
0.60
|
|
8.6
|
TR K615
|
|
8.0
|
|
17.0
|
|
9
|
|
0.30
|
|
14.03
|
|
0.44
|
|
6.9
|
TR K616
|
|
18.0
|
|
29.0
|
|
11
|
|
0.41
|
|
6.32
|
|
0.47
|
|
8.1
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zone 2 (N)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
AM-001
|
|
311.5
|
|
346.5
|
|
35
|
|
0.47
|
|
43.49
|
|
0.89
|
|
|
AM-019
|
|
106.0
|
|
119.0
|
|
13
|
|
0.17
|
|
4.99
|
|
0.22
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zone 2 (S)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TR K601
|
|
0.0
|
|
10.0
|
|
10
|
|
0.73
|
|
2.07
|
|
0.75
|
|
|
Notes: (1) copper
and silver equivalent grades were estimated using US$3.00/lb copper
price, US$20.00/oz silver price and 100% recovery using the
formulae Cu eq = Cu + (0.009722 x Ag) and Ag eq = Ag + (102.86 x
Cu); (2) mineralization begins at base of moraine, possibly
intersection has been truncated by glacial erosion – composite
excludes barren zone from 104.5 to 114.5; (3) mineralization begins
at base of moraine, possibly intersection has been truncated by
glacial erosion; and (4) composite excludes barren zone from 335.5
to 343.5.
|
Section lines for drilling are spaced approximately 300m apart.
Where there are two Zone 1 intersections on the same drill section,
the spacing between intersections is typically 200m to 300m.
Estimation methodology and parameters
A wireframe interpretation of Zone 1 was constructed at a
nominal threshold of 0.10% copper. Based on the limits of the
current sampling coverage, the modelled domain has a strike length
of 3,400 meters northwest-southeast, and a down dip extent of up to
550 meters, but this zone is open down dip and along strike in both
directions. The Zone 1 domain generally dips 50 to 60 degree to the
east or northeast, and has an average true thickness of 19
meters.
Approximately parallel to Zone 1, and 100 to 150m southwest, a
second zone of mineralization has been interpreted, from two drill
intersections, one trench intersection, and one outcrop. This
second zone is stratigraphically below Zone 1.
The Lower Proterozoic sedimentary rocks that host mineralization
are partly covered by Quaternary moraine. The thickness of the
moraine cover over the northern part of the mineralization is up to
100 meters. The moraine cover generally is thinner to the south,
and mineralization in the southern part of Zone 1 and Zone 2 can be
exposed by trenching.
Topography was modelled based on drill collar locations, and
using additional elevation information digitized from topographic
maps.
Copper and silver grades within the Zone 1 mineralized domain
were estimated by 2D Ordinary Kriging. A single 2D composite was
generated for each intersection. The true thickness assigned to
each composite was calculated based on the local orientations of
the drill intersection and the Zone 1 wireframe. No grade capping
was applied to either the samples or the composites. The block size
for 2D Kriging was 100 meters north-south and 100 meters
vertically. The results of the estimation were copied into a 3D
block model, with sub-blocking down to 1.5625 meters, in order to
achieve a good fit to the relatively narrow mineralization
wireframe.
The copper and silver grades for Zone 2, which contains fewer
intersections than Zone 1, were estimated by a simple average of
sample grades for the northern and southern portions.
For the mineralized domains and the host rocks, a dry bulk
density value of 2.67t/m3 was used for converting
volumes into tonnages. This factor is the average value of samples
collected by Azarga. A dry bulk density factor of
2.0t/m3 was assumed for the moraine material.
The portion of the mineralization model that met the CIM
definition of a Mineral Resource ("…reasonable prospects for
eventual economic extraction") was established by using NPV
Scheduler software to generate a pit shell to constrain reporting
of the near surface resource. The input parameters for the pit
shell are shown in Table 4. Within the pit (the near surface
component of the resource), no mineralized blocks have an estimated
grade of less than 0.4% (copper equivalent), and no further cut-off
grade was applied. Below the pit, a cut-off grade of 0.7% (copper
equivalent) was applied to define an underground component of the
Mineral Resource. This cut-off was estimated using the same
parameters in Table 4, but assuming 20% dilution and an underground
mining production cost of US$20 per
tonne.
Table 4: Economic
parameters for pit shell
|
Parameters
|
|
Units
|
|
Amount
|
Geotechnical
|
|
|
|
|
- Moraine
slope
|
|
Deg
|
|
30
|
- Bedrock
slope
|
|
Deg
|
|
45
|
Mining
factors
|
|
|
|
|
- Dilution (at
0 grade)
|
|
%
|
|
5
|
-
Recovery
|
|
%
|
|
95
|
Processing
|
|
|
|
|
- Copper
recovery
|
|
%
|
|
90
|
- Silver
recovery
|
|
%
|
|
90
|
Operating
costs
|
|
|
|
|
- Waste mining
cost
|
|
US$/trock
|
|
1.20
|
- Resource
mining cost
|
|
US$/trock
|
|
1.50
|
- Incremental
mining cost
|
|
US$/1m
|
|
0.005
|
- Reference
level
|
|
Z
Elevation
|
|
1,000
|
- Processing
cost
|
|
US$/tore
|
|
10.00
|
-
G&A
|
|
US$/tore
|
|
2.00
|
- Royalty,
selling cost (Cu)
|
|
%
|
|
8.0
|
- Royalty,
selling cost (Ag)
|
|
%
|
|
6.5
|
Metal
price
|
|
|
|
|
-
Copper
|
|
US$/lb
|
|
3.00
|
-
Silver
|
|
US$/oz
|
|
20.00
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Mineral Resources were classified as Inferred, based on the
intersection spacing relative to the interpreted continuity and
potential complexity of the deposit.
Qualified Person
The Company's President and Chief Executive Officer,
Dorian L. (Dusty) Nicol, B.Sc. Geo,
MA Geo, a Qualified Person as defined by NI 43-101, has reviewed
and approved the exploration information disclosures contained in
this Press Release.
About Azarga Metals Corp.
Azarga Metals is a mineral exploration and development company
that owns 60% of the Unkur Copper-Silver Project in the Zabaikalsky
province in eastern Russia.
AZARGA METALS CORP.
"Dusty Nicol"
Dorian L.
(Dusty) Nicol, President and CEO
Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services
Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX
Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or
accuracy of this release.
Cautionary Statement:
This news release contains forward-looking statements that are
based on the Corporation's current expectations and estimates.
Forward-looking statements are frequently characterized by words
such as "plan", "expect", "project", "intend", "believe",
"anticipate", "estimate", "suggest", "indicate" and other similar
words or statements that certain events or conditions "may" or
"will" occur. Such forward-looking statements involve known and
unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that could cause
actual events or results to differ materially from estimated or
anticipated events or results implied or expressed in such
forward-looking statements. Such factors include, among others: the
actual results of current planned exploration activities;
conclusions of economic evaluations; changes in project parameters
as plans to continue to be refined; possible variations in ore
grade or recovery rates; accidents, labour disputes and other risks
of the mining industry; delays in obtaining governmental approvals
or financing; and fluctuations in metal prices. There may be other
factors that cause actions, events or results not to be as
anticipated, estimated or intended. Any forward-looking statement
speaks only as of the date on which it is made and, except as may
be required by applicable securities laws, the Corporation
disclaims any intent or obligation to update any forward-looking
statement, whether as a result of new information, future events or
results or otherwise. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees
of future performance and accordingly undue reliance should not be
put on such statements due to the inherent uncertainty therein.
SOURCE Azarga Metals Corp.