TSX-V: MKO; OTCQX: MAKOF
VANCOUVER, BC, Oct. 19, 2020 /CNW/ - Mako Mining
Corp. (TSXV: MKO) (OTCQX: MAKOF) ("Mako" or the "Company")
is pleased to report the results of an updated mineral resource
estimate prepared by Mine Development Associates ("MDA"), a
division of RESPEC, out of Reno,
Nevada, at Mako's wholly-owned San Albino gold project ("San
Albino") located in Nueva Segovia,
Nicaragua. A technical report for the updated mineral
resource estimate will be filed in accordance with National
Instrument 43-101, Standards of Disclosure for Mineral
Projects ("NI 43-101") under the Company's SEDAR profile at
www.sedar.com within 45 days of this news release, and on the
Company's website at www.makominingcorp.com.
This updated technical report is part of the corporate
objectives established for Mako following the management changes
that were announced in 2019 (see press releases dated March 13, 2019 and August
9, 2019). In 2019, an infill drill program was
initiated, which grew to over 24,000 meters ("m"), that focused
primarily on the first 120 m from
surface at San Albino. The goal of the infill drilling
program was to better define the open pit mineral resource estimate
in the preliminary economic assessment dated April 29, 2015, prepared by P&E Mining
Consultants Inc. (the "2015 PEA"), which is superseded by this
updated technical report. As the infill drilling program
progressed, an internal geological model was created and in
February 2020 that internal model was
handed off to MDA as the foundation for the updated mineral
resource estimate. MDA found the Company's internal model
useful and reasonable, and refined the model only slightly before
using it to control the estimate.
MDA believes that the exploration procedures, sampling and data
derived by Mako is high quality and that the Company's internal
geological model was sound and required few changes. MDA has
also been retained to begin evaluating the exploration work being
performed at the Las Conchitas area, with the goal of preparing a
maiden mineral resource estimate.
Akiba Leisman, Chief Executive
Officer of Mako states that "this updated technical report confirms
San Albino's rank among the highest-grade open pit gold projects in
the world. Importantly, it is the first time a mineral
resource estimate has been calculated at San Albino where the
domains used for estimation are an accurate representation of the
geological controls that define the high-grade
mineralization. In addition, MDA, led by Principal Geologist
Steve Ristorcelli, has conservatively reflected the selective open
pit mining methods presently being utilized at San Albino, such
that management has confidence that the fully diluted open pit
grade of 9.54 g/t Au in the Measured and Indicated categories can
be met or exceeded when mined. It should also be noted that
the mineralization at San Albino remains open along strike and at
depth, and that while a substantial portion of the underground
resource in the Inferred mineral resource category from the 2015
PEA was not included in this resource update, it is in part due to
the lack of drilling below 120 m at
San Albino since 2013. The Company plans to begin addressing
the underground potential at San Albino in 2021 and looks forward
to continuing to work with MDA on future mineral resource estimates
at San Albino, Las Conchitas and other exploration targets on our
approximately 188 square kilometer land package."
Mineral Resources
For reporting, technical and economic factors likely to
influence the "reasonable prospects for eventual economic
extraction" were evaluated using the best judgement of
MDA. In evaluating the open-pit potential, MDA ran a series
of optimized pits using variable gold prices and parameters.
The chosen mining cost is US$2 per
tonne ("/t"), processing cost US$60/t, G&A cost US$5/t and metallurgical recoveries used are 95%
and 70% for gold and silver, respectively. To evaluate the
potential for underground mining, MDA ran a series of stope
optimizations at variable cutoffs and for the reporting cutoff
grade MDA assumes an average mining cost of US$70/t, processing cost of US$60/t and G&A of US$10/t. The factors used in defining
cutoff grades are based on US$1,750/oz gold.
For greater clarity, all mineral resources categorized by MDA,
including the Inferred mineral resources, are part of a likely
economic extraction plan.
Open Pit,
Underground and Historical Dumps
|
Measured
|
Cutoff
|
Tonnes
|
g/t
Au
|
Oz
Au
|
g/t
Ag
|
Oz
Ag
|
Various*
|
115,200
|
11.74
|
43,500
|
17.6
|
65,100
|
Indicated
|
Cutoff
|
Tonnes
|
g/t
Au
|
Oz
Au
|
g/t
Ag
|
Oz
Ag
|
Various*
|
426,300
|
9.86
|
135,100
|
17.4
|
238,600
|
Measured and
Indicated
|
Cutoff
|
Tonnes
|
g/t
Au
|
Oz
Au
|
g/t
Ag
|
Oz
Ag
|
Various*
|
541,500
|
10.21
|
177,800
|
17.4
|
303,700
|
Inferred
|
Cutoff
|
Tonnes
|
g/t
Au
|
Oz
Au
|
g/t
Ag
|
Oz
Ag
|
Various*
|
421,600
|
7.44
|
100,900
|
12.6
|
170,600
|
* Various includes
the fully diluted method for the open pit, for underground
resources a
cutoff grade of 2.5 g/t Au is used and for historical dumps a
cutoff grade of 1.0 g/t Au is
used.
|
Open
Pit
|
Measured
|
|
Tonnes
|
g/t
Au
|
Oz
Au
|
g/t
Ag
|
Oz
Ag
|
Fully
Diluted*
|
114,700
|
11.78
|
43,400
|
17.5
|
64,700
|
Indicated
|
|
Tonnes
|
g/t
Au
|
Oz
Au
|
g/t
Ag
|
Oz
Ag
|
Fully
Diluted*
|
196,200
|
8.25
|
52,000
|
15.6
|
98,500
|
Measured and
Indicated
|
|
Tonnes
|
g/t
Au
|
Oz
Au
|
g/t
Ag
|
Oz
Ag
|
Fully
Diluted*
|
310,900
|
9.54
|
95,400
|
16.3
|
163,200
|
Inferred
|
|
Tonnes
|
g/t
Au
|
Oz
Au
|
g/t
Ag
|
Oz
Ag
|
Fully
Diluted*
|
226,700
|
8.50
|
62,000
|
14.1
|
102,400
|
*
Effectively, all estimated vein material is above cutoff.
The fully diluted open pit grade
was determined by applying 1.0 m of dilution comprised of a 0.5 m
rind both above and
below all veins.
|
Underground
|
Measured
|
Cutoff g/t
Au
|
Tonnes
|
g/t
Au
|
Oz
Au
|
g/t
Ag
|
Oz
Ag
|
2.5
|
500
|
10.20
|
100
|
28.9
|
400
|
Indicated
|
Cutoff g/t
Au
|
Tonnes
|
g/t
Au
|
Oz
Au
|
g/t
Ag
|
Oz
Ag
|
2.5
|
230,100
|
11.24
|
83,100
|
18.9
|
140,100
|
Measured and
Indicated
|
Cutoff g/t
Au
|
Tonnes
|
g/t
Au
|
Oz
Au
|
g/t
Ag
|
Oz
Ag
|
2.5
|
230,600
|
11.22
|
83,200
|
19.0
|
140,500
|
Inferred
|
Cutoff g/t
Au
|
Tonnes
|
g/t
Au
|
Oz
Au
|
g/t
Ag
|
Oz
Ag
|
2.5
|
116,100
|
8.42
|
31,400
|
13.7
|
51,200
|
Historical Dumps,
Inferred
|
Cutoff g/t
Au
|
Tonnes
|
g/t
Au
|
Oz
Au
|
g/t
Ag
|
Oz
Ag
|
1.0
|
78,800
|
2.95
|
7,500
|
6.7
|
17,000
|
Composites
Composite lengths of 1.0 m were
used to support a resource block size of 1.0
m high. Although the majority of sample lengths are
1.0 m or less in the veins and halos,
some de-compositing was necessary. MDA evaluated the models
using 1.0 m and 1.5 m composites, and the model performed better
using 1.0 m composite intervals.
Capping of samples was done prior to compositing. Details
of capping levels and number of samples are given in the table
below. Capping levels were determined considering
coefficients of variation ("CV"), cumulative probability plots, and
outlier sample locations.
Domain
|
Au Capping
level (g/t)
|
Number
capped
|
Ag Capping
level (g/t)
|
Number
capped
|
Arras vein
|
100
|
7
|
150
|
7
|
Naranjo
vein
|
65
|
5
|
80
|
5
|
San Albino
vein
|
100
|
7
|
150
|
5
|
Historical
Dumps
|
25
|
42
|
70
|
21
|
Descriptive statistics of the composite samples are given in the
table below.
Arras
Vein
|
|
|
Valid
|
Median
|
Mean
|
Std
Dev
|
CV
|
Minimum
|
Maximum
|
Units
|
Au
|
698
|
7.65
|
14.30
|
19.26
|
1.3
|
0.04
|
212.69
|
g/t
|
Au
Capped
|
698
|
7.65
|
13.91
|
16.71
|
1.2
|
0.04
|
100.00
|
g/t
|
Ag
|
693
|
19.0
|
27.2
|
28.7
|
1.0
|
0.4
|
204.2
|
g/t
|
Ag
Capped
|
693
|
19.0
|
26.9
|
27.2
|
1.0
|
0.4
|
150.0
|
g/t
|
Naranjo
Vein
|
|
|
Valid
|
Median
|
Mean
|
Std
Dev
|
CV
|
Minimum
|
Maximum
|
Units
|
Au
|
121
|
13.80
|
20.99
|
20.82
|
0.9
|
0.06
|
89.87
|
g/t
|
Au
Capped
|
121
|
13.80
|
20.20
|
18.69
|
0.9
|
0.06
|
65.00
|
g/t
|
Ag
|
121
|
19.5
|
29.3
|
32.2
|
1.1
|
2.1
|
193.0
|
g/t
|
Ag
Capped
|
121
|
19.5
|
26.2
|
21.4
|
0.8
|
2.1
|
80.0
|
g/t
|
San Albino
Vein
|
|
|
Valid
|
Median
|
Mean
|
Std
Dev
|
CV
|
Minimum
|
Maximum
|
Units
|
Au
|
750
|
9.42
|
16.25
|
18.16
|
1.1
|
0.05
|
136.00
|
g/t
|
Au
Capped
|
750
|
9.42
|
16.03
|
17.08
|
1.0
|
0.05
|
100.00
|
g/t
|
Ag
|
750
|
17.9
|
26.4
|
25.5
|
0.9
|
0.3
|
177.0
|
g/t
|
Ag
Capped
|
750
|
17.9
|
26.3
|
25.1
|
0.9
|
0.3
|
150.0
|
g/t
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mineral Domains
Three major veins (San Albino, Naranjo and Arras) were modeled
based on drill and trench data. For the San Albino vein,
which comprises the majority of the open pit mineral resource
estimate, the hanging wall halo mineralization was modeled
separately from the footwall halo, while the mineralized halos
around Arras and Naranjo were modeled as envelopes without a
distinction of hanging wall and footwall. MDA did not
separate vein versus halo for the El Jobo vein or other
"miscellaneous" veins. El Jobo and miscellaneous veins are a
very small part of the total mineral resource and are entirely
categorized as Inferred mineral resources.
Two mineral domains – almost coincident with and driven by the
geologic model – were used to control the gold and silver resource
estimate: a low-grade halo domain containing mineralized wall rock
with grades generally between approximately 0.1 g/t Au and 2-4 g/t
Au, and a vein domain beginning at approximately 2-4 g/t
Au.
The gold mineralization in the low-grade domain is in sheared
and/or brecciated wallrock in the margins of gold-bearing quartz
veins and contains sparse, often broken or brecciated,
discontinuous quartz veins. The vein domain comprises quartz
vein with minor sulfides, and minor, intensely sheared and
mineralized wall rock. Cumulative probability plots indicate
the presence of a third and higher-grade sub-domain above
approximately 20-30 g/t Au. This high-grade mineralization is
contained in quartz veins with "styolitic" textures, galena, and
common visible gold. Although distinct, the higher-grade
quartz vein domain was not modeled separately from the main vein
domain because of volume and continuity considerations.
Estimation
A conservative approach has been applied to all estimation,
particularly where there is any uncertainty. The San Albino
vein, where the vast majority of the open pit ounces are located,
was particularly well drilled. In the San Albino vein, about
half of the block grade estimates were based on the closest samples
≤10 m away, and 85% of all blocks were located within 30 m of a composite sample. Classification
of the mineral resources considered adequacy and reliability of
sampling, geologic understanding, results of quality control
analyses, geologic complication, and apparent grade
continuity. A Measured mineral resource classification was
permitted only in the San Albino vein, because there is a very good
understanding of its geology and because there is extensive
drilling and trench sampling. Indicated mineral resources
were permitted only in San Albino and Arras veins. All
Naranjo vein has been classified as an Inferred mineral resource
because its geology is poorly understood, but like all Inferred
mineral resources, resource classification there will most likely
be upgraded with additional drilling. Historical workings at
Arras are likely substantially underreported so an area around
suspected workings has been classified as Inferred mineral
resources. Furthermore, any block that touches modeled
workings is classified as Inferred mineral resources, in addition
to reducing tonnes for mining.
Dilution
Mining dilution is an important factor at San Albino in part
because the vein is, in some places, so thin that the dilution can
render it uneconomic, but also because the operation requires very
detailed grade control. A helpful feature of the vein is that
in many places it has distinct hanging wall and footwall contacts,
which aid with grade control. This mineral resource includes
an approximately 0.5 m rind of
dilution both above and below the vein. The dilution grade
varies from zero to averaging up to 0.5 g/t Au. In all cases,
the dilution grade is taken from the mineral resource estimate and
is not a singularly applied grade. It is expected that
underground dilution will be greater because of ground conditions,
shallow dip, minimum mining height, and less control on locating
hanging wall and footwall. MDA is reporting
full-block-diluted grades for the underground for all material
within the optimized stopes at a mining cutoff of 2.5 g/t Au
(blocks are 1.0 m high by
1.0 m across strike and 2.0 m long).
Potential for Increased Grade
Clustering of high-grade data necessitated use of a quadrant
search to minimize spreading out the high grade. This
clustering is clearly demonstrated by the difference between
Measured versus Indicated mineral resource grades. While
higher grade in higher-classification material is not unusual, at
San Albino the effect was exaggerated by normal exploration and
follow-up drilling to better define the higher grades. Given
that history, both the Indicated and Inferred mineral resource
grades may increase as well.
Post Model Performance
After the effective date of the current mineral resource
estimate, there were seven new holes with assays in the mineralized
zone or projection of the mineralized zone. Four of those
holes drilled areas where the model predicted no mineralization,
which was confirmed by this later drilling. The other three
holes were drilled into areas where mineralization was
expected. One intersected good grade precisely where
mineralization was expected, although the model had interpolated
that area as low-grade halo mineralization. The second hole
intersected mineralization with good grade where adjacent holes on
either side of a fault were lower grade, however the location of
the mineralization was substantially different than expected as the
mineralized zone had been offset by faulting. The area around
this fault is classified as Inferred mineral resources.
Indeed, all mineralization around these faults is classified as
Inferred mineral resources because of this known lack of certainty
of location. The third hole intersected the vein where
predicted and encountered better than expected grade.
Importantly, San Albino is open along strike and at depth, and
with additional drilling, MDA believes that mineral resources are
likely to be upgraded and expanded.
2015 Resource Estimate
The 2015 PEA estimated mineral resources totaling 152,000
Indicated ounces of gold and 787,000 Inferred ounces of gold.
This updated mineral resource estimate totals 177,800 Measured and
Indicated ounces and 100,900 Inferred ounces of gold.
Comparing the 2015 and 2020 models, it was evident that the general
location of the 2015 mineralized zone was modeled appropriately
with respect to locations of the principal domains albeit generous
in thickness and extrapolation. Several 2015-modeled solids
depicting vein mineralization have since been drilled showing that
mineralization does not exist where modeled in 2015. Another
reason for the difference is that MDA took a more conservative
approach to modeling extrapolations and projections from drill
data, where no drilling was done since 2013. The 2020 volume
of modeled veins and veins-plus-halo were 89% and 46% lower,
respectively, compared to the 2015 single-domain volumes.
An important difference between the 2015 and 2020 models is the
interpretations of the mineralization. The vein and vein
zones (both averaging >15 g/t Au) have distinct, sharp-bounded
contacts usually within low-grade halos. By modeling these
veins and halos as one in 2015, the extreme high-grades in the vein
were spread out into the larger volume of the halo in the estimate,
thereby over-estimating metal, albeit at lower grades than exist in
the vein and vein zones.
Qualified Person
Steven Ristorcelli, CPG, a
geologist and qualified person (as defined under NI 43-101) has
read and approved the technical information contained in this press
release. Mr. Ristorcelli is the Principal Geologist at Mine
Development Associates in Reno,
Nevada working on the updated mineral resource estimate for
San Albino.
On behalf of the Board,
Akiba
Leisman
Chief Executive Officer
About Mako
Mako Mining Corp. is a publicly listed gold mining, development
and exploration firm. The Company is developing its high-grade San
Albino gold project in Nueva
Segovia, Nicaragua. Mako's
primary objective is to bring San Albino into production quickly
and efficiently, while continuing exploration of prospective
targets in Nicaragua.
Forward-Looking Information: Some of the
statements contained herein may be considered "forward-looking
information" within the meaning of applicable securities laws. The
forward-looking information contained herein is based on the
Company's current plans, expectations and assumptions, including
the expectation that narrow, high-grade structures at San Albino
can be mined open pit with limited levels of dilution; that the
average diluted grade will likely drift lower as more benches are
mined at San Albino; that the updated technical report will be
filed within 45 days from this news release; that a maiden mineral
resource estimate will be completed at Las Conchitas; that the
Company will begin to address in 2021 the lack of drilling
below 120 m at San Albino; that the
Company will continue to work with MDA on future mineral resource
updates at San Albino, Las Conchitas and other exploration targets
on its land package; that the estimated costs and cut-off grades
used in the mineral resources estimates will prove to be accurate;
the expectation that the current grades may increase and mineral
resources may be expanded.. Such forward-looking information is
subject to a variety of risks and uncertainties which could cause
actual events or results to differ materially from those reflected
in the forward-looking information, including, without limitation,
the risk of economic and/or technical failure at the San Albino
project associated with making a production decision without
demonstrated economic and technical viability; that grades may not
increase; that mineral resources may not be expanded; the Company
determines not to work with MDA on additional work in the future;
that the cut-off grades and other assumptions used in the mineral
resource estimates do not prove accurate; that the Company does not
continue to find positive results from its reconnaissance
exploration program and proposed drilling on its concessions; that
exploration and assay results do not confirm continuity of
mineralization as expected; political risks and uncertainties
involving the Company's exploration properties; the inherent
uncertainty of cost estimates and the potential for unexpected
costs and expense; commodity price fluctuations and other risks and
uncertainties as disclosed in the Company's public disclosure
filings on SEDAR at www.sedar.com. Such information contained
herein represents management's best judgment as of the date hereof,
based on information currently available and is included for the
purposes of providing investors with the Company's plans and
expectations regarding the San Albino project, and may not be
appropriate for other purposes. Mako does not undertake to
update any forward-looking information, except in accordance with
applicable securities laws.
Neither the TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services
Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX
Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or
accuracy of this release.
SOURCE Mako Mining Corp.