NanoEE
2 years ago
Right, shenanigans.
19. In sum, Mr. Savov’s motion for judgment on the pleadings is GRANTED as to Counts I and III. Accordingly, Counts I and III are DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Although I lack equitable jurisdiction over Counts IV and V, the Company may elect to transfer them to a Delaware court of law. See 10 Del. C. § 1902.11 Finally, Count II is DISMISSED as MOOT.
I think you know what this pertains to, enjoy.
And if you don’t…
https://courts.delaware.gov/Opinions/Download.aspx?id=345220
NanoEE
2 years ago
Harry give him his shares.
“18. Separately and finally, Count II sought to block a stock transfer that was set to occur “on the 31st day after September 2, 2021.” Dkt. 20 ¶ 44. So Count II is moot. Because mootness is a question of subject matter jurisdiction,8 and the Company has not alleged facts suggesting that a transfer completed more than a year ago is “capable of repetition, but evad[ing] review,”9 I dismiss Count II sua sponte.10”
NanoEE
2 years ago
Don’t know if you are still around, after all this clowning around. “Company” is cited as Enzolytics.
“I . . . have significant concerns about entering an ex parte TRO here, where I have almost no information about the obligations that the [Company] says were violated, whether Delaware law applies, and so forth. Frankly, I’m left more confused after today’s call about the nature of the claim here and where Mr. Savov’s obligations were created . . . .
[Company] counsel should continue to update me on efforts to serve Mr. Savov . . . . But if that happens, [the Company will] need to show me . . . what the claims are. And for now, that seems to be a hurdle for the [Company].”
https://courts.delaware.gov/Opinions/Download.aspx?id=345220
NanoEE
3 years ago
If Dimitar is right in regard of his value of ITV-1, then there is value in IMMB. But to bring IMMB current, one of four things need to happen, voting out HZ as CEO and then electing a new CEO,
finding a reputable accounting firm that will require some money to back track all those years and then a lawyer to stamp it all. Time line, about a year for this all to get done. Unless you have the funds to make it sooner.
This will be very interesting to see how this unfolds.
Dodgeball
3 years ago
Meanwhile, Dimitar is organizing shareholders to bring $IMMB current.
From the Immunotech Laboratories BG Facebook page:
TO THE SHAREHOLDERS OF IMMUNOTECH LABORATORIES INC. (IMMB)
Dear shareholders in Immunotech Laboratories Inc. (IMMB),
For more than 5 years, the CEO of IMMB, Harry Zhabilov, has not organized the mandatory yearly shareholders meetings, has not made yearly balances of the company and has not conducted an audit of the company on purpose. I, Dimitar Savov, who own more than 15% in IMMB and am a majority shareholder in Immunotech Laboratories BG, believe that Zhabilov is purposefully leading IMMB towards bankruptcy in order to transfer its assets to a different company where he has more shares. All of us, the shareholders in IMMB, must unite and conduct a yearly shareholder meeting in order to elect a new board of directors. IMMB has an immense potential for profit and dividends, because the company owns 49% in Immunotech Laboratories BG; this means that IMMB will receive 49% of the profits from the sale of ITV-1, a medicinal product, which we have clinically tested for AIDS in Bulgaria (EU) and has shown very good treatment effect. Immunotech Laboratories BG has signed long-term agreements with many big partners for the sale of millions of sets of ITV-1 for countries like Ukraine, Greece, Romania, Turkey, and others. The average profit per set of ITV-1 will be 1500 EUR, which means profits in billions.
I ask for all shareholders in IMMB to contact us on immunotechlabsbg@gmail.com so we can coordinate our actions and bring IMMB to current status.
With respect,
Dimitar Savov
President of Immunotech Laboratories BG
NanoEE
3 years ago
Dimitri is on the hot seat.
https://backend.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/297979/content
“On July 15, 2021, an action was commenced against Dimitri Savov, a resident of Sofia, Bulgaria, in the Court of Chancery of the State of Delaware seeking a temporary restraining order, injunctive relief, a declaratory judgment and damages arising from illegitimate and false claims made by Mr. Savov regarding his purported ownership of stock in the Company. Additionally, Mr. Savov has made numerous defamatory statements about the Company and its Directors. These actions by Mr. Savov damaged the Company and constitute tortious interference with the Company’s current and prospective business relationships. The Company intends to pursue all available claims and remedies against Mr. Savov to the fullest extent permitted under the law and is in the process of filing a criminal complaint against Mr. Savov in Bulgaria. As 49% owner of IMMB BG, Enzolytics has assisted with the filing of forgery and fraud charges against Mr. Savov in Sofia earlier in the second quarter as well. The Company is working to mitigate the damages caused by Mr. Savov to relationships recently announced between the Company and other entities.“
Maybe I am off, but wasn’t there an SEC document showing IMMB 49% owner of ENZC?
He probably has an argument to fight back the claims in regard of Harry Zhabilov’s negotiations.
Who knows.
GLTA
NanoEE
4 years ago
Ah, making sense. I see they are trying to build a network with a Parent company.
Parent Company = Enzolytics Inc.(ENZC)
The daughter companies below working on specific drugs or the manufacturing of specific drugs
Immunotech Laboratories, Inc.(IMMB), manufacturing ITV 1-4
BioClonetics Immunotherapy, Inc., producing the Clone3
Biogenysis, Inc., whatever they do yada yada yada
Virogentics, Inc., whatever they do yada yada yada
ENZC Sub., Inc., whatever they do yada yada yada
Building value. If I am wrong, I stand to be corrected.
NanoEE
4 years ago
The address listed for the Enzolytics Inc. Quarterly extension June 30, 2021:
120 W. Pomona Ave
Monrovia, California
91016
Is listed for sale, ha, https://www.bhhscalifornia.com/listing-detail/120-w-pomona-avenue-monrovia-ca-91016_4542670
It is the same address that IMMB uses.
https://backend.otcmarkets.com/otcapi/company/financial-report/165975/content
After all these years you think there would have been some separation between the two, hmmm.
Harry doesn't want to let go of those shares.
NanoEE
4 years ago
B. Please list any subsidiaries, parents, or affiliated companies.
The Company is a 49% owner of the Bulgarian entity IMMB BG, which holds a sub-license agreement issued by ENZC for the proprietary immunotherapy treatment.
The Company is 100% owner of Biogenysis, Inc.
The Company is 100% owner of Virogentics, Inc.
The Company is 100% owner of ENZC Sub., Inc.
The Company is 100% owner of BioClonetics Immunotherapy, Inc.
Well, sub license agreement. Still tied to them.
NanoEE
4 years ago
https://finance.yahoo.com/news/curative-biotechnology-inc-files-2021-135000170.html
Dimiter Dimitrov, Ph.D.
This guy is light years ahead of Harry in this industry. Charles looks to be getting there but Harry's messy past maybe taking longer than it should have. Since Harry's smear from the Ebola "mis-information" in Africa, Charles may have to clean up verbiage(a lot of it) to rectify that Enzolytics Inc. is developing a viable product for the bio-tech world.
Granted Dimiter's medicines in development is a different path than Harry's, but much further ahead. They(Curative Biotech) look to be better organized and goal oriented.
Enzolytics Inc. maybe headed down a path but direction is unclear and not specific to investors. Organized, something is missing in Enzolytics mission statement to how the team will achieve through the path.
When Enzolytics Inc. has their ducks in a row, their "unknown" contractor(IMMB) will start producing the compounds ITV1-4 and generating revenue both in a wholistic therapy for over the counter and medicinal compound for treating viruses and diseases. This should garner enough for generating revenue.
IMMB getting current- Harry has to get IMMB current, if he wants to see value($). Granted he doesn't have to abide by a lot of the rules under a PENNY stock. But if he is looking to turn a profit on his venture with IMMB that is in "control"(speculation) of ENZC. Pink Current has to be at the fore front. If he cares only about curing the world and not so much money, then we are all SOL.
This information is only for the intent of IMMB investors and this information is only speculatively driven based on all present information to date.