PART
I
Item
1. Business
Introduction
Nutra
Pharma is a holding company that owns intellectual property and operates in the biotechnology industry. Nutra Pharma was incorporated
under the laws of the state of California on February 1, 2000, under the original name of Exotic-Bird.com.
Through
its wholly-owned subsidiary, ReceptoPharm, Nutra Pharma conducts drug discovery research and development activities. In October 2009,
Nutra Pharma launched its first consumer product called Cobroxin®, an over-the-counter pain reliever designed to treat
moderate to severe chronic pain. In May 2010, Nutra Pharma launched its second consumer product called Nyloxin®, an over-the-counter
pain reliever that is a stronger version of Cobroxin® and is designed to treat severe chronic pain. In December 2014,
we launched Pet Pain-Away, an over-the-counter pain reliever designed to treat pain in cats and dogs.
We
have conducted our operations since October 2003. We are a biopharmaceutical company that engages in the acquisition, licensing and commercialization
of pharmaceutical products and technologies as well as homeopathic and ethical drugs for the management of pain, neurological disorders,
cancer, autoimmune and infectious diseases. Homeopathic drugs are natural products that contain ingredients listed in the HPUS (Homeopathic
Pharmacopoeia of the United States). An ethical drug is a licensed drug that has obtained Federal Drug Administration (“FDA”)
approval after extensive pre-clinical and clinical testing. We seek strategic licensing partnerships to reduce the risks associated with
the drug development process.
Our
wholly owned subsidiary and drug discovery arm, ReceptoPharm, has carried out our homeopathic and drug discovery research and clinical
development and has fully developed four homeopathic drugs for the relief of pain:
|
●
|
Nyloxin®
and Nyloxin® Extra Strength
|
|
●
|
Pet
Pain-Away: an over-the-counter pain reliever designed to relieve pain in cats and dogs
|
|
●
|
Equine
Pain-Away: an over-the-counter topical pain reliever designed to relieve pain in horses
|
|
●
|
Luxury
Feet: an over-the-counter pain reliever designed to relieve foot pain from high heels and stilettos
|
Our
business plan will continue its efforts to produce, market and distribute our Nyloxin®, Pet Pain-Away™, Equine Pain-Away™
and Luxury Feet™ branded products both domestically and internationally.
From
October 2009 until December 31, 2019, our operations centered on the marketing of Cobroxin® (our discontinued product),
Nyloxin® and Nyloxin® Extra Strength. In December of 2014, we launched Pet Pain-Away and began actively
marketing the product. During fiscal year 2019, we earned revenues of $104,393, $44,269 of it was from sales of Nyloxin®
and $60,124 of it was from sales of Pet Pain-Away. We launched Equine Pain-Away in October of 2019 and Luxury Feet officially launched
distribution in March of 2021.
Additionally,
the Company has developed two drug candidates:
|
●
|
RPI-78M,
to treat neurological diseases and autoimmune diseases, including; Multiple Sclerosis (MS), Adrenomyeloneuropathy (AMN), Amyotrophic
Lateral Sclerosis (ALS or Lou Gehrig’s disease), Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA) and Myasthenia Gravis; and
|
|
●
|
RPI-MN,
to treat viral diseases, including HIV/AIDS and Herpes.
|
The
Company has developed proprietary therapeutic protein products primarily for the prevention and treatment of viral and neurological diseases,
including Multiple Sclerosis (MS), Adrenomyeloneuropathy (AMN), Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) and pain in humans. These potential
products are subject to FDA approval.
We
continue to identify biotechnology related intellectual property and companies with which we may potentially be able to enter into arrangements,
agreements or to potentially acquire.
Industry
Overview of the Pain Market
Pain
is the most common symptom for patients seeking medical attention. Acute and chronic pain affects large numbers of Americans, with approximately
100 million U.S. adults burdened by chronic pain alone. The annual national economic cost associated with chronic pain is estimated to
be $560-$635 billion. (Institute of Medicine, Relieving Pain in America, 2011).
According
to the American Academy of Pain Medicine (AAPM), chronic pain affects approximately 1.5 billion people worldwide, on account of the high
prevalence of cardiovascular disorders, cancer, and diabetes. Algomedix
estimated the global sales for the treatment of chronic pain were $60 billion in 2015; and according
to the market research report published by P&S Intelligence, the global chronic pain treatment market is expected to reach $105.9
billion by 2024. The market growth is primarily driven by the rising prevalence of chronic conditions, surging geriatric population,
and increasing government support toward chronic pain management.
Our
Products
Nyloxin®/Nyloxin®
Extra Strength
We
offer Nyloxin®/Nyloxin® Extra Strength as our over-the-counter (OTC) pain reliever that has been clinically
proven to treat moderate to severe (Stage 2) chronic pain.
Nyloxin®
and Nyloxin® Extra Strength are available as a two ounce topical gel for treating joint pain and pain associated
with arthritis and repetitive stress, and as a one ounce oral spray for treating lower back pain, migraines, neck aches, shoulder pain,
cramps, and neuropathic pain. Both the topical gel and oral spray are packaged and sold as a one-month supply.
Nyloxin®
and Nyloxin® Extra Strength offer several benefits as a pain reliever. With increasing concern about consumers using
opioid and acetaminophen-based pain relievers, the Nyloxin® products provide an alternative that does not rely on opiates
or non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, otherwise known as NSAIDs, for their pain relieving effects. Nyloxin® also has
a well-defined safety profile. Since the early 1930s, the active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) of Nyloxin®, Asian cobra
venom, has been studied in more than 46 human clinical studies. The data from these studies provide clinical evidence that cobra venom
provides an effective treatment for pain with few side effects and has the following benefits:
|
●
|
safe
and effective;
|
|
●
|
all
natural;
|
|
●
|
long-acting;
|
|
●
|
easy
to use;
|
|
●
|
non-narcotic;
|
|
●
|
non-addictive;
and
|
|
●
|
analgesic
and anti-inflammatory.
|
Potential
side effects from the use of Nyloxin® are rare, but may include headache, nausea, vomiting, sore throat, allergic rhinitis
and coughing.
The
primary difference between Nyloxin® and Nyloxin® Extra Strength is the dilution level of the venom. The
approximate dilution levels for Nyloxin® and Nyloxin® Extra Strength are as follows:
Nyloxin®
|
●
|
Topical
Gel: 30 mcg/mL
|
|
●
|
Oral
Spray: 70 mcg/mL
|
Nyloxin®
Extra Strength
|
●
|
Topical
Gel: 60 mcg/mL
|
|
●
|
Oral
Spray: 140 mcg/mL
|
In
December 2011, we began marketing Nyloxin® and Nyloxin® Extra Strength at www.nyloxin.com. Both Nyloxin®
and Nyloxin®Extra Strength are packaged in a roll-on container, squeeze bottle and as an oral spray. Additionally,
Nyloxin® topical gel is available in an 8 ounce pump bottle.
We
are currently marketing Nyloxin® and Nyloxin® Extra Strength as treatments for moderate to severe chronic
pain. Nyloxin® is available as an oral spray for treating back pain, neck pain, headaches, joint pain, migraines, and
neuralgia and as a topical gel for treating joint pain, neck pain, arthritis pain, and pain associated with repetitive stress. Nyloxin®
Extra Strength is available as an oral spray and gel application for treating the same physical indications, but is aimed at treating
the most severe (Stage 3) pain that inhibits one’s ability to function fully.
The
Nyloxin products are available for sale on the www.Nyloxin.com website, the Nyloxin Amazon storefront at www.Amazon.com/nyloxin and on
the Walmart Marketplace. Nyloxin is also sold in physician offices. Clinics and small-chain pharmacies.
Nyloxin®
Military Strength
In
December 2012, we announced the availability of Nyloxin® Military Strength for sale to the United States Military and
Veteran’s Administration. Over the past few years, the U.S. Department of Defense has been reporting an increase in the use and
abuse of prescription medications, particularly opiates. In 2009, close to 3.8 million prescriptions for pain relievers were written
in the military. This staggering number was more than a 400% increase from the number of prescriptions written in the military in 2001.
But prescription drugs are not the only issue. The most common and seemingly harmless way to treat pain is with non–steroidal,
anti–inflammatory drugs (NSAIDS). But there are risks. Overuse can cause nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, heartburn, ulcers and internal
bleeding. In severe cases chest pain, heart failure, kidney dysfunction and life–threatening allergic reactions can occur. It is
reported that approximately 7,600 people in America die from NSAID use and some 78,000 are hospitalized. Ibuprofen, also an NSAID has
been of particular concern in the military. The terms “Ranger Candy” and “Military Candy” refer to the service
men and women who are said to use 800mg doses of Ibuprofen to control their pain. But when taking anti–inflammatory Ibuprofen in
high doses for chronic pain, there is potential for critical health risks; abuse can lead to serious stomach problems, internal bleeding
and even kidney failure. There are significantly greater health risks when abuse of this drug is combined with alcohol intake. Our goal
is that with Nyloxin®, we can greatly reduce the instances of opiate abuse and overuse of NSAIDS in high risk groups like
the US military. The Nyloxin® Military Strength represents the strongest version of Nyloxin® available
and is approximately twice as strong as Nyloxin® Extra Strength. We are working with outside consultants to register Nyloxin®
Military Strength and the other Nyloxin® products for sale to the US government and the various arms of the military
as well as the Veteran’s Administration. In February of 2018, Nyloxin was added to the Federal Supply Schedule but was subsequently
removed the following week without an adequate explanation. We have continued to work with our consultants to understand why our products
were improperly removed the Federal Supply Schedule and when we may be able to get re-listed on the Federal Supply Schedule for eventual
sales to governmental agencies or to the US Military.
International
Sales
We
are pursuing international drug registrations in Canada, Mexico, India, Australia, New Zealand, Central and South America and Europe.
Since European rules for homeopathic drugs are different than the rules in the US, we cannot estimate when this process will be completed.
On March 25, 2013 we announced the publication of our patent and trademark for Nyloxin® in India. We are actively seeking
new distribution partners in India.
On
May 14, 2015 we announced that we had engaged the Nature’s Clinic to begin the process of regulatory approval of our Company’s
Over–the–Counter pain drug, Nyloxin® for marketing and distribution in Canada. The Nature’s Clinic has
already begun setting up their Chatham, Ontario warehouse. Due to lack of funding, we have waited to complete the approval process to
begin distributing Nyloxin® and expect to re-engage in the process in 2021.
On
February 1, 2018 we announced a Distribution Agreement with the Australian company, Pharmachal PTY LTD to market and distribute Nyloxin®
in Australia and New Zealand. Pharmachal has begun the registration process with the TGA (Therapeutic Goods Administration). At
this time, we do not know if our products will qualify for TGA registration and cannot provide a timeline for the eventual distribution
in Australia.
Additionally,
we plan to complete several human clinical studies aimed at comparing the ability of Nyloxin® Extra Strength to replace
prescription pain relievers. We have provided protocols to several hospitals and will provide details and timelines when those protocols
have been accepted. We cannot provide any timeline for these studies until adequate financing is available.
To
date, our marketing efforts have been limited due to lack of funding. As sales increase, we plan to begin marketing more aggressively
to increase the sales and awareness of our products.
Pet
Pain–Away™
During
June of 2013, we announced the launch of our new homeopathic formula for the treatment of chronic pain in companion animals, Pet Pain–Away™.
Pet Pain–Away™ is a homeopathic, non–narcotic, non–addictive, over–the–counter pain reliever, primarily
aimed at treating moderate to severe chronic pain in companion animals. It is specifically indicated to treat pain from hip dysplasia,
arthritis pain, joint pain, and general chronic pain in dogs and cats. The initial product run was completed in December of 2014 and
launched through Lumaxa Distributors on December 19, 2014.
In
May of 2016, we signed a license agreement to begin the process of creating an infomercial (Direct Response) campaign for Pet Pain–Away™.
In November of 2016, we announced the license agreement with DEG Productions for the marketing and distribution of Pet Pain–Away
globally. DEG has the ability to earn the exclusive distribution rights for the product by reaching certain sales milestones. DEG has
created their own website (www.getpetpainaway.com) and began airing commercials in December of 2016.
In
February of 2020, we took back the marketing of Pet Pain-Away and are currently selling the product on Amazon.com and through www.petpainaway.com
Luxury
Feet
In
June of 2017, we announced the creation of Luxury Feet; an over–the–counter pain reliever and anti–inflammatory
product that is designed for women who experience pain or discomfort due to high heels and stilettos. We announced the official marketing
launch of Luxury Feet in March of 2021. The product is currently available through www.luxuryfeet.com and on Amazon.
Equine
Pain-Away (Formerly Equine Nyloxin)
In
October of 2013, we announced that we were in the process of launching the newest addition to our line of homeopathic treatments for
chronic pain, Equine Nyloxin. We had been working with trainers and veterinarians in the equine industry and have already identified
distributors for the product. The Equine Nyloxin® represents the Company’s first topical solution for the animal market.
Equine Nyloxin was rebranded as Equine Pain-Away™ and officially rolled into the market in October of 2019. Equine Pain-Away is
being marketed through several retailers and online at www.EquinePainAway.com and on Amazon.
Regulation
The
active pharmaceutical ingredient (API) in our over the counter products, Asian cobra venom, has an approved United States monograph under
the Homeopathic Pharmacopoeia of the United States (HPUS), which allowed us to register them with the FDA as homeopathic drugs. A United
States monograph is a prescribed formulation for the production of any drug or product that is recognized by law for a specific application
and that may be introduced into commerce. The FDA requires this registration process to maintain full compliance of companies marketing
and selling medicines classified as homeopathic. In August 2009, we successfully completed submission of final packaging and labeling
to the FDA to begin selling our over-the-counter pain reliever, Cobroxin®. In December 2009, we completed our submission
of final packaging and labeling to the FDA of Nyloxin® and Nyloxin® Extra Strength. In December 2016 we
completed our submission of final packaging and labeling to the FDA of Pet Pain-Away.
On
March 11, 2019, the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) sent us a warning letter regarding the claims and marketing
materials of our Nyloxin line of products. On April 10, 2019 we responded to the warning letter; addressing their concerns and outlining
the actions that we have taken and will take to comply with their requests for changes. The response goes on to commit to the FDA that
the company will make the changes necessary to properly and legally continue to market and distribute our products.
Manufacturing
ReceptoPharm
oversees Nyloxin’s and Pet Pain-Away’s manufacturing activities, both at its Good Manufacturing Practice (“GMP”)
certified facility and at a third-party manufacturing and bottling facility. ReceptoPharm is also responsible for acquiring appropriate
amounts of Asian cobra venom required to manufacture Nyloxin® and Pet Pain-Away.
Subject
to availability of funds, ReceptoPharm also plans to begin additional clinical studies for our pain relievers. These studies will be
designed to compare the efficacy of Nyloxin® Extra Strength to other prescription strength pain relievers. A ReceptoPharm
study published in Toxicon, which is the journal of the International Society of Toxinology, showed that ReceptoPharm’s
leading drug product for the treatment of pain (RPI-78) had pain-reducing effects that lasted four times as long as morphine without
the negative side effects associated with opioid-based pain relievers. Another study published in the journal Neuropharmacology showed
a new mechanism on the use of Alpha-Cobratoxin as a treatment for pain. Alpha-Cobratoxin is the main component of the cobra venom used
in Nyloxin® and Pet Pain-Away.
The
FDA requires those companies manufacturing homeopathic medicines to have their facilities certified as GMP. As of October 2005, ReceptoPharm’s
manufacturing and laboratory facility has been fully compliant with its GMP certification. In March 2009, ReceptoPharm received an ISO
Class 5 certification for its clean room facility. An ISO Class 5 certification is a type of classification granted for a clean room
facility according to the number and size of particles permitted per volume of air. An ISO Class 5 clean room has at most, 3,500 particles
per square meter.
Manufacturing
Nyloxin® and Pet Pain-Away entails a two-step process, the first of which consists of ReceptoPharm manufacturing the bulk
raw materials and completing the dilution levels of the active pharmaceutical ingredient (“API”) as provided for in the Homeopathic
Pharmacopeia of the United States, which is a compilation of continuously updated statements of Homeopathic Pharmacopoeia standards and
monographs as recognized by that organization. Once this process is completed, the second step entails transport of raw materials to
a third-party manufacturer that completes the final mixing, bottling and shipping processes.
We
began limited manufacturing of Nyloxin® in November 2010. We scaled up manufacturing in the first quarter of 2011. Our
production level is contingent upon product demand level and we can scale up as sales demand increases. We began manufacturing Pet Pain-Away
in late 2014 and completed the first run of products for distribution on December 19, 2014. We are currently expanding production capacity
in our facility to allow spot production of our products and future private label brands.
Marketing
and Distribution
In
August 2009, we completed an agreement with XenaCare granting them the exclusive license to market and distribute Cobroxin®
within the United States. To maintain this market exclusivity, XenaCare was required to meet certain minimum performance requirements.
On April 1, 2011, we notified our Cobroxin® Distributor, XenaCare Holdings that they were in breach of our agreement.
As a result of this, the distribution agreement was terminated effective April 10, 2011. XenaCare had a large stock of the product that
they had ordered from us and we have allowed them to continue to market their existing inventory of Cobroxin®. In October
2011 we discontinued their website at www.Cobroxin.com. All current traffic to that website is now redirected to www.Nyloxin.com. It
is our plan to eventually re-launch Cobroxin® with an eventual return to retail stores.
In
December of 2013, we announced an agreement with MyNyloxin.com for the exclusive rights to market and distribute Nyloxin®
in the Network Marketing channel. In November of 2014, MyNyloxin.com changed their name to Lumaxa. They provide a business opportunity
to their Distributors to earn commissions on the sale of our products through their Distributor groups. In January of 2014, we announced
the first product shipments to the MyNyloxin Independent Entrepreneurs (MIEs). Lumaxa conducts webinars, conference calls and live meetings
to support recruitment of new distributors as well as to provide product and business education.
In
May of 2016, we signed a license agreement to begin the process of creating an infomercial (Direct Response) campaign for Pet Pain-Away™.
In November of 2016, we announced the license agreement with DEG Productions for the marketing and distribution of Pet Pain-Away globally.
DEG has the ability to earn the exclusive distribution rights for the product by reaching certain sales milestones. DEG has created their
own website (www.getpetpainaway.com) and began airing commercials in December of 2016. In February of 2020, we took back the marketing
of Pet Pain-Away and are currently selling the product on Amazon.com and through www.petpainaway.com
In
late 2019 we created our own storefront on Amazon at www.Amazon.com/nyloxin. In August of 2020, we added Pet Pain-Away to the Amazon
site. In March of 2021, we added Luxury Feet and Equine Pain-Away to our Amazon storefront. In November of 2020 our Nyloxin line of products
was added to the Walmart Marketplace and sold online at www.Walmart.com.
We
are continuing our efforts to find strategic partnerships for the promotion, marketing, registration, licensing and sales of our products
domestically and internationally.
Dependence
on one or a Few Major Customers
With
respect to Nyloxin®, Nyloxin® Extra Strength and Pet Pain-Away, we have been distributing the products
online and to various retailers. We are seeking both domestic and international distributors for these products. It may be that a larger
distributor may require exclusivity in the US or any particular foreign market. If so, we would be dependent on that distributor for
those Nyloxin® sales.
International
Drug Registrations
We
are continuing our efforts to complete the registration process internationally. On March 25, 2013 we announced the publication of our
patent and trademark for Nyloxin® in India. We are currently working with potential Distributors in India. In February,
2015 we completed the first test shipments to India through our importer, S.Zhaveri Pharmakem. We are actively seeking new distribution
partners in India. In April of 2015 we announced the engagement of the Vancouver Commodity Group to identify potential distribution partners
in China. Later that month, we announced the acceptance of Nyloxin® by the China International Exchange and Promotive
Association for Medical and Healthcare (CPAM). With this approval, we have been working with several groups to find a large distributor
for our products in the People’s Republic of China. On May 14, 2015 we announced that we had engaged the Nature’s Clinic
to begin the process of regulatory approval of our Company’s Over-the-Counter pain drug, Nyloxin® for marketing
and distribution in Canada. The Nature’s Clinic has already begun setting up their Chatham, Ontario warehouse. Due to lack of funding,
we have waited to complete the approval process to begin distributing Nyloxin® and expect to re-engage in the process
in 2021. On February 1, 2018 we announced a Distribution Agreement with the Australian company, Pharmachal PTY LTD to market and distribute
Nyloxin® in Australia and New Zealand. Pharmachal has begun the registration process with the TGA (Therapeutic Goods Administration).
We will continue to work with them through the registration process but have no current timetable for distribution in Australia.
While
many countries adopt similar regulation to the United States for registering homeopathic drugs, the international application process
is more complex and may be lengthier. We will continue to seek qualified, well-funded distributors for the international distribution
of Cobroxin®, Nyloxin® and Pet Pain-Away. At this time, we have no way of knowing when we may begin the
process of marketing and distributing our products internationally as we navigate the regulatory process and seek qualified distributors.
ReceptoPharm’s
Homeopathic Drug Pain Relief Studies
Pending
adequate financing or revenues, we will continue our research and development into this area, with the ultimate goal of improving product
claims for Nyloxin® Extra Strength, which is a treatment for stage 3 pain. We have planned the following three studies
and will pursue these pending adequate financing:
MS
Neuropathic Pain Phase IV
This
is a planned 10-week patient trial period. We have thus far incurred costs of $5,000 with a total estimated budget of $130,000. We plan
to reinitiate this trial pending adequate funding.
Chronic
Back Pain Phase I
We
will continue our research and development in this area, with the ultimate goal of completing development of our future product, Recet,
which is an injectable version of Cobratoxin. This is a planned 4-week patient trial period. We have thus far incurred costs of $25,000
in prior years with a total estimated budget of $250,000. We plan to reinitiate this trial pending adequate funding.
Chronic
Back Pain Phase IV
We
will continue our research and development, with this ultimate goal of improving product claims for Nyloxin® Extra Strength,
which is a treatment for stage 3 pain. This is a planned 4-week patient trial period. We have an estimated budget of $250,000. We have
not yet incurred any costs associated with the Chronic Back Pain Phase IV project. We plan to reinitiate this trial pending adequate
funding.
All
of these studies have been delayed due to our lack of revenues and funding. We will reassess our start and completion dates upon generating
a sufficient amount of revenues, if ever.
ReceptoPharm
– Research and Development
ReceptoPharm
was engaged in the research and development of novel anticholinergic therapeutic protein products for the treatment of autoimmune and
neurologic disorders, including Human Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV), Multiple Sclerosis (MS) Adrenomyeloneuropathy (AMN), Rheumatoid Arthritis
(RA) and pain.
Drug
Applications
We
have set forth below a summary of ReceptoPharm’s proposed drugs and their potential applications.
Drug
|
|
Potential
Applications
|
RPI-78M
|
|
MS, AMN, Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA), Myasthenia
Gravis (MG) and Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis (ALS)
|
RPI-MN
|
|
HIV, Herpes, general anti-viral applications
|
RPI-78
|
|
Pain, Arthritis
|
RPI-70
|
|
Pain
|
We
believe that ReceptoPharm’s pharmaceutical products have a wide range of applications in a number of chronic, inherited and/or
life-threatening viral, autoimmune and neuromuscular degenerative diseases, even though none of these products have FDA or other approval
for the treatment of such diseases. These disorders target nerve cells, especially one specific type of cell receptor that is sensitive
to the neurotransmitter, acetylcholine, which plays an important role in the transmission of nerve impulses at synapses and myoneural
(muscle-nerve) junctions.
Primary
Disease Targets
Through
ReceptoPharm’s research program, our goal is to obtain required regulatory approvals of ReceptoPharm’s HIV, MS, and AMN products,
so that they can be marketed. In September of 2015 we were granted Orphan Designation by the US-FDA for the treatment of Pediatric Multiple
Sclerosis. The Orphan designation may greatly reduce the costs of clinical trials and shorten the timeline to potential drug approval.
ReceptoPharm secures confidentiality agreements prior to initiating contract research in order to protect any patentable opportunities.
Human
Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV) Infection
The
analytic firm ResearchAndMarketing.com reported in March 2021 that the HIV therapeutics market
was valued at $22.9B in 2019. The launch of long-acting injectable therapies and continued success of single-tablet regimens (STRs) will
drive growth in the market, which will expand at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 2%. By 2029, sales of anti-HIV therapeutics
will reach $28B. According to UNAIDS, an estimated 38 million people were living with HIV in 2019. There were 1.7 million new
infections in 2019 and 690,000 people died of AIDS-related illnesses. Since the beginning of the epidemic, more than 75.7 million people
have contracted HIV and nearly 33 million have died of HIV-related causes. Experts say that the drugs currently available may extend
life as much as 40 years, but all of these therapies have negative side effects and fail over time as the virus mutates. These facts
make new therapies a necessity. The foregoing information was obtained from the World Health Organization website at www.who.int and
the UNAIDS website at www.unaids.org.
To
cause infection, HIV needs to gain entry into cells through the attachment to receptors on the cell membrane. These receptors are called
chemokine receptors. There are two principal types, CCR5 and CXCR4. Different HIV strains use one of these types. A single drug
that would block all of the chemokine receptors (“tropism-independent”) could be more useful, for several reasons, than a
mixture of molecules that would have to be used to do the same.
HIV
infection therapy currently uses antiviral drug therapies that are associated with the virus’s attachment, fusion with and entry
into the host cell. At the present time, there are over 40-licensed antiretroviral drugs employed to combat HIV-1 infection and two licensed
by the FDA that act as binding/entry inhibitory drugs.
New
drugs and adjunct therapies with novel mechanisms of action or unique resistance profiles are needed in the fight against HIV. Constant
innovation, in terms of efficacy, side effect profile and dosing are occurring. Current research and development for HIV is focused on
adjunctive therapy, which when combined with existing HAART (Highly Active Anti-Retroviral Therapy) regimens reduce side effects, enhance
the efficacy of existing treatments and delay the progression of the HIV virus.
Both
of ReceptoPharm’s drugs inhibited HIV replication in MAGI cells by 50-60% and peripheral mononuclear cells by 90% in testing conducted
by Dr. Juan Lama of the La Jolla Institute for Molecular Medicine in San Diego, California. Separate Phase I studies by Cure Aids Now
of Miami, Florida, were conducted by Dr. Jamal with orally and parentally administered RPI-78M in HIV patients confirmed safety, tolerability
and provided preliminary evidence of efficacy.
RPI-MN
demonstrated the ability to inhibit the replication of highly drug-resistant strains of HIV isolates. Drug resistance has become a critical
factor in long-term management of HIV infection with some viral strains developing resistance in as little as 3 weeks.
Multiple
Sclerosis (MS)
Multiple
Sclerosis (MS) is thought to be an autoimmune disease that primarily causes central nervous system problems. In MS, the insulating fatty
material surrounding the nerve fibers, also known as myelin, which functions to speed signaling from one end of the nerve cell to the
other, is attacked by cells of the immune system causing problems in signal transduction. MS is the most common of demyelinating disorders,
having a prevalence of approximately 1 per 1,000 persons in most of the United States and Europe. According to the Accelerated Cure Project
for Multiple Sclerosis, a national nonprofit organization, 400,000 people in the US are affected by MS and another 2.1 million globally,
with 10,000 new cases diagnosed in the US every year. According to the National Multiple Sclerosis Society, although MS occurs most commonly
in adults, it is also diagnosed in children and adolescents. Estimates suggest that 8,000-10,000 children (up to 18 years old) in the
United States have MS, and another 10,000-15,000 have experienced at least one symptom suggestive of MS. Studies suggest that two to
five percent of all people with MS have a history of symptom onset before age 18.
People
with MS may experience diverse signs and symptoms. MS symptoms may include pain, fatigue, cognitive impairment, tremors, loss of coordination
and muscle control, loss of touch sensation, slurred speech and vision impairment. The course of the disease is unpredictable and for
most MS patients, the disease initially manifests a “relapsing-remitting” pattern. Periods of apparent stability are punctuated
by acute exacerbations that are sudden unpredictable episodes that might involve impaired vision, diminished ability to control a limb,
loss of bladder control, or a great variety of other possible neurologic deficits. In relapsing-remitting MS, some or all of the lost
function returns, however, the patient sustains an unceasing, often insidious, accumulation of neuronal damage. As the burden of neural
damage grows, new lesions are more likely to produce irreversible impairment of function. Typically, about eight to fifteen years after
onset, MS patients enter the secondary-progressive phase. Eventually, progressive MS sufferers become wheelchair-bound, and may become
blind and even incapable of speech. There is currently no FDA approved drug that reverses the course of the progressive form of MS.
RPI-78M
has shown efficacy in animal models (EAE) for MS and ReceptoPharm is planning new animal studies to gain more insight into the levels
of protection that the drugs afford. In one study conducted in August 2007, all members of an untreated animal control group developed
signs of disease with different levels of paralysis/muscle weakness. A similar group in the August 2007 study treated with RPI-78M showed
no disease in 90% of the animals in both acute and chronic applications of the test. Moreover, there were no toxicities reported though
the animals which received doses the equivalent of 280 times a human dose.
Furthermore,
we believe that the ability to modulate the host immunostimulatory environment could form the basis of an effective strategy for the
long-term control of autoimmunity in diseases like MS and Myasthenia gravis (MG) and is being studied as a therapeutic model for other
neuromuscular diseases. Also, we believe our data suggest that it is possible that our novel therapeutic proteins could have a general
application in autoimmune diseases based on human studies in Rheumatoid Arthritis and anecdotal reports from patients with Multiple Sclerosis.
In
August of 1984, Biogenix applied for and received an Intrastate Investigational Drug (FSDHRS Protocol RA-1 (002)) from the Department
of Health and Rehabilitation (HRS) in Florida that permitted the 4-week study of RPI-MN in 13 patients with Rheumatoid arthritis ranging
in age from 49 to 81. Patients were enrolled for a period of 4 weeks; the results showed 30% to 49% improvement in range of joint motion,
early morning stiffness and stamina (this data, along with other supporting intellectual property was acquired by ReceptoPharm from Biogenix).
We believe that the data obtained from the examination of clinical efficacy in these three diseases can augment information from prior
clinical studies and lead to the future investigation of treatments for other chronic conditions.
Adrenomyeloneuropathy
(AMN), Pediatric MS and other Orphan Indications
Adrenoleukodystrophy,
or ALD, is a genetically determined neurological disorder that, according to the Adrenoleukodystrophy Foundation, affects 1 in every
17,900 boys worldwide. The presentation of symptoms occurs between the ages of 4 and 10, and affects the brain with demyelination, which
is the stripping away of the fatty coating that keeps nerve pulses confined and maintains the integrity of nerve signals. This process
inhibits the nerves’ ability to conduct properly, which causes neurological deficits, including visual disturbances, auditory discrimination,
impaired coordination, dementia and seizures. Demyelination is an inflammatory response and nerve cells throughout the brain are destroyed.
Adrenomyeloneuropathy
(AMN) is the most common form of X-ALD, a maternally inherited type of ALD. AMN affects about 40-45% of X-ALD patients and usually presents
itself in adolescence or adult life and may be preceded by hypoadrenalism. It is characterized by spastic paraplegia and a peripheral
neuropathy, often being diagnosed as Multiple Sclerosis (MS). Nerve conduction studies in AMN show a predominant axonal neuropathy and
show a loss of all axons. Lorenzo’s oil, a mixture of glyceryltrioleate and glyceryltrierucate, has been used for over a decade
in an open, unblinded fashion with mixed results.
RPI-78M
has been utilized in two clinical studies, which were completed at the Charles Dent Metabolic Unit located in London, England. The last
trial was classified as a Phase IIb/IIIa study. These studies provided important safety data, showing RPI-78M to be well tolerated by
the patients. Further study is warranted to provide data on the potential efficacy of RPI-78M to treat the symptoms of AMN.
In
September of 2015, we were granted Orphan Designation by the US-FDA for the treatment of Pediatric Multiple Sclerosis. We are currently
working with potential sites of care to conduct a Phase I/II in Pediatric MS. The designation of RPI-78M as an Orphan Drug provides Nutra
Pharma with a 7-year period of market exclusivity in the U.S. once the drug is approved. Additional benefits over conventional drug applications
include: tax credits for clinical research costs, the ability to apply for grant funding, clinical trial design assistance, plus assistance
from the FDA in the drug development process and the waiver of Prescription Drug User Fee Act (PDUFA) filing fees which could be in excess
of $2.5 million. The granting of Orphan Drug Designation allows the Company to move forward with their preparation of an Investigative
New Drug Application and proposal of clinical trials. The FDA grants Orphan Drug Designation status to products that treat rare diseases,
providing incentives to sponsors developing drugs or biologics. According to the FDA, the Orphan Drug program has successfully enabled
the development and marketing of more than 400 drugs and biologic products for rare diseases since 1983. Evaluate Ltd., in its 2020 EvaluatePharma
Orphan Drug Report, estimated that orphan drug sales will constitute more than 18% of the total share of prescription drug sales by 2024,
totaling $217bn.
In
December of 2015, we announced that we had applied for an Orphan Drug designation from the US-FDA for the Company’s RPI-78M drug
candidate for the treatment of Myasthenia Gravis (MG). The application was subsequently rejected with an offer to re-file in the future
as more data becomes available.
Pain
and Arthritis
Protein
or peptide-based drugs are penetrating the pain market with neurotoxins taking the lead. Botox (Allergan) and Prialt (Elan) have the
potential to substitute over the long-term for morphine and other opiates in chronic pain indications. Opiates, though potent painkillers,
suffer from drawbacks because they are addictive, short acting, and drug-resistance inducing. We plan to assess the effects of several
peptides in animal models of pain in association with Soochow University in China. Several peptides have demonstrated positive effects
and the research and development continues.
August
2007 studies at Soochow University proved the potential of ReceptoPharm’s drug candidates, RPI-78 and RPI-70. When compared to
Dolantin, an opiate-based drug subordinate to morphine, the effects were very encouraging. While Dolantin provided immediate pain relief
it began wearing off just as RPI-70 began to take effect. The effects of RPI-70 do not seem dramatic in contrast to Dolantin, considering
the quantity of drug employed in this animal model. The concentration of RPI-70 was approximately 100 times less than the opiate product.
Also, RPI-70 showed real potential for combining with other pain killing medications. RPI-78 was calculated to be 150,000 times more
potent than aspirin. This product can be injected systemically providing evidence of a more practical application than Prialt, which
must be administered intrathecally (into the spinal cord). Opiate drugs induce tolerance and dependence. This problem is not encountered
with RPI-70 and RPI-78.
In
February 2009, ReceptoPharm filed a patent application with the United States Patent and Trademark Office for the use of RPI-78 as a
novel method for treating arthritis in humans. Also in February 2009, ReceptoPharm, in collaboration with Soochow University in China
published positive data from its recent animal studies on the use of RPI-78 (Cobratoxin) as a method for treating arthritis. In March
of 2011, ReceptoPharm was issued a patent for the use of cobratoxin as an analgesic (US patent #7,902,152). In February of 2012, ReceptoPharm,
in collaboration with Soochow University published another study that demonstrated a novel mechanism of action for the use of RPI-78
as a treatment for pain.
Nerve
Agent Countermeasures
In
February of 2018, we announced that we had filed a new provisional patent to protect our intellectual property surrounding the development
of nerve agent counter measures. In much the same way that our therapies protect the nerves of patients with disease, our findings indicate
that we may protect against – or at least mitigate the damage caused by - nerve agents that are utilized as chemical weapons; such
as sarin gas and VX. We will be working with experts in the field to have our products in testing shortly.
Nerve
agents are identified as a class of phosphorus-containing organic chemicals (organophosphates) that may disrupt the transfer of messages
to organs through the nerves. This disruption is caused by the over-stimulation of certain receptors on the surface of the neurons. These
same receptors are the target of Nutra Pharma’s drugs, which may block the action of the nerve agents or minimize the damage that
they may cause.
The
company has very encouraging preclinical data, a demonstrated molecular mechanism of action and a robust scientific rational for the
continued commercial development of its nerve agent counter measure. Organophosphate nerve agents such as VX and Sarin remain a troubling
threat to American service people and civilians as evidenced by the recent attacks in Syria, Malaysia and London. Supply chain issues
with existing counter measures and the safety and effectiveness of these drugs is a great concern. Based on our pre-clinical studies
and experience in neurobiology products, we believe that we have a superior product ready for testing in the near term.
On
September 22, 2020, Dr. Dale VanderPutten, our Chief Scientific Officer was invited by the Defense Threat Reduction Agency (DTRA) to
present our nerve agent countermeasure technology in a Tech Watch talk to an audience of military and civilian experts in chem/bio defense.
The talk titled “A Nicotinic Acetylcholine Receptor (nAChR) Directed Organophosphate Countermeasure” was presented in a virtual
internet meeting to a select expert audience invited by DTRA. The consensus of the comments and questions on the presentation supported
the idea that despite past efforts, there remains an unmet need for nAChR directed defenses and that our demonstration of human safety
in the clinic and pre-clinical proof of concept deserves aggressive follow up.
According
to a BBC report, chemical weapons remain a real threat to the West. In the nine-year period since
the beginning of the Syrian conflict there have been over a thousand documented uses of chemical weapons; making this issue a major topic
of concern in the US department of Defense and the United Nations.
Market
Values
Human
Immunodeficiency Virus (HIV)
The
analytic firm ResearchAndMarketing.com reported in March 2021 that the HIV therapeutics market
was valued at $22.9B in 2019. The launch of long-acting injectable therapies and continued success of single-tablet regimens (STRs) will
drive growth in the market, which will expand at a Compound Annual Growth Rate (CAGR) of 2%. By 2029, sales of anti-HIV therapeutics
will reach $28B. According to UNAIDS, an estimated 38 million people were living with HIV in 2019. There were 1.7 million new
infections in 2019 and 690,000 people died of AIDS-related illnesses. Since the beginning of the epidemic, more than 75.7 million people
have contracted HIV and nearly 33 million have died of HIV-related causes. Experts say that the drugs currently available may extend
life as much as 40 years, but all of these therapies have negative side effects and fail over time as the virus mutates. These facts
make new therapies a necessity. The foregoing information was obtained from the World Health Organization website at www.who.int and
the UNAIDS website at www.unaids.org.
Multiple
Sclerosis (MS)
MS
affects an estimated 2.5 million people globally with approximately 400,000 sufferers in the United States. There are 12 approved drugs
for the treatment of this disease. According to an April 2015 article published in the journal Neurology, the average annual cost
of these drugs has increased to over $60,000 per person. In 2013, sales by one manufacturer, Teva, were reported to be $4.328 billion
for its drug, Copaxone. Biogen has the largest market share in the MS drug category; bringing in $8 billion from the sales of Avonex,
Tysabri and Tecfidera. The global multiple sclerosis therapeutics market is expected to reach USD 24.8 billion by 2024 according to a
May, 2016 report by Grand View Research, Inc.
Adrenomyeloneuropathy
(AMN)
AMN/ALD
affects an estimated 30,000 people in the US with some estimates exceeding this number.
Pediatric
Multiple Sclerosis (pediatric-MS)
According
to the National Multiple Sclerosis Society, although MS occurs most commonly in adults, it is also diagnosed in children and adolescents.
Estimates suggest that 8,000-10,000 children (up to 18 years old) in the United States have MS, and another 10,000-15,000 have experienced
at least one symptom suggestive of MS. Studies suggest that two to five percent of all people with MS have a history of symptom onset
before age 18.
Myasthenia
Gravis (MG)
According
to the Myasthenia Gravis Foundation of America, the prevalence of MG in the United States is estimated to be about 64,000 patients. However,
MG is probably under diagnosed and the prevalence may be higher.
Current
Technologies
ReceptoPharm,
operating in its capacity as a clinical stage biotechnology company, created a process that safely modifies proteins derived from cobra
venom. ReceptoPharm also has rights to a drug delivery method that uses an aerosol formulation, which is administered under the tongue.
By using this shared aerosol delivery technology, oral delivery is attainable, an important step for a biologic product. The system is
50% efficient and affects drug delivery in approximately 40% of patients in which it was tested. Topical preparations are being examined
for future applications in treatment of such conditions as pain and Rheumatoid Arthritis (RA).
Business
Strategy
Pending
adequate financing or revenues, ReceptoPharm seeks to develop proprietary pharmaceutical products for human illnesses that qualify for
“Fast-Track” or “Orphan Drug” status under FDA regulations, which can expedite regulatory review. For some conditions,
the FDA has created the “two animal rule” which permits ReceptoPharm to collect data from ongoing animal research for human
treatment applications.
We
believe the results from ReceptoPharm’s research will assist in getting its applications processed through the FDA’s “Fast-Track”
approval process and enable ReceptoPharm to plan the commercialization of each product independently and/or through joint ventures, partnerships
and licensing arrangements. “Fast-Track” denotes life-threatening illnesses, while “Orphan” status refers to
serious ailments affecting less than 200,000 individuals nationwide. AMN qualifies under both labels because it is considered an orphan
disease and has no known cure. Pediatric MS and Myasthenia Gravis are also considered “Orphan” diseases because of the disease
prevalence as well as the lack of effective therapies.
In
the areas of HIV and MS, ReceptoPharm plans to conduct clinical studies of its HIV and MS drugs under development. These “Phase
II” studies will either prove or disprove the preliminary efficacy of ReceptoPharm’s HIV and MS drugs under development.
ReceptoPharm is in the process of attempting to secure agreements with third parties to conduct such clinical studies.
We
believe that ReceptoPharm’s proposed unique pharmaceutical products can be used alone or licensed for use in combination with other
therapeutic products and may be of interest to other established pharmaceutical companies as a means of extending the patent life of
their proprietary products.
Short-term
Goal
Although
we focused our drug development efforts from 2006 to 2008 on clinical trials for ReceptoPharm’s HIV drug, RPI-MN, our primary focus
now is on RPI-78M for the treatment of MS and MG. With the recent Orphan designation for Pediatric MS, we expect to move into Phase I/II
clinical studies by the end of 2021.
Mid-term
Goal
Our
midterm strategy is to license ReceptoPharm’s AMN, MS and HIV technologies in our attempt to bring these technologies to market
within 5 years, should we obtain adequate financing.
Long-Term
Goal
Our
long-term goal is the use of drugs developed by ReceptoPharm in the field of neurological diseases, infectious diseases and autoimmune
disorders. Due to our limited financial and operational resources, this goal will require us to establish strategic partners or alliances
with pharmaceutical companies, academic institutions, biotechnology companies, and clinical diagnostic laboratories, which will: (a)
complement ReceptoPharm’s research and development efforts; (b) reduce the risks associated with undertaking the entire process
of drug development and marketing; and (c) generate licensing based revenue streams. Additionally, we plan to continue identifying intellectual
property and companies in the biotechnology arena as potential acquisition candidates.
Compassionate
Release Programs
Certain
countries, such as Canada and the United Kingdom, permit their citizens to have access to investigational medications without
being approved for any applications by their respective “FDA type” agencies, and permit physicians to prescribe drugs they
believe are of possible benefits to the patients. Through these “Compassionate Release Programs”, ReceptoPharm has
supplied RPI-78M, its drug under investigation for MS and AMN, to physicians in the United Kingdom. The FDA does not offer this program.
Clinical
Trial Applications
ReceptoPharm
has developed Common Technical Documents (CTD) for both RPI-78M and RPI-MN that are used to support any clinical trial application. The
CTD is a complete history of the individual drug, including all of the in-vitro and in-vivo work accomplished to date, as well as pre-clinical
development work on the drug. Having these completed documents allows for expedited due diligence from regulatory bodies reviewing ReceptoPharm’s
applications for trials and approvals. With these documents, ReceptoPharm has successfully applied for approval to conduct a clinical
investigation in the United Kingdom under the regulation of the Medicines Health and Regulatory Agency (MHRA), which is the British equivalent
of the US-FDA.
Current
Research and Development Projects
Neurological
Studies
Pain
Studies
In
an effort to further support Nyloxin® Extra Strength, ReceptoPharm had planned to complete two human clinical studies
aimed at comparing the ability of Nyloxin® Extra Strength to replace prescription pain relievers. ReceptoPharm originally
estimated that these studies would begin during the second quarter of 2010; however, these studies have been delayed because of lack
of funding. We have no way of knowing at this time, if or when we will have adequate funding to reinitiate these trials.
AMN
Phase II
ReceptoPharm
has been conducting research and development in this area since February 2006 with an original expected completion date of September
2010, which includes a 12-month patient trial period that has already been completed. We have thus far expended approximately $400,000,
because ReceptoPharm has completed its AMN Phase II project, there is no further budget for this project.
AMN
Phase III
ReceptoPharm
had planned to continue research and development, with the ultimate goal of completing development of its future drug, RPI-78M. ReceptoPharm’s
originally estimated start and completion dates are July 2010 and December 2011, respectively, which includes a 12-month patient trial
period. ReceptoPharm has thus far incurred costs of $5,000. ReceptoPharm has an estimated budget of $500,000. We have no way of knowing
at this time, if or when we will have adequate funding to reinitiate these trials.
MS
Phase II (Pediatric MS Phase I/II)
We
are working with our Chief Scientific Officer, Dale Vanderputten, PhD; along with consultants to begin our Phase I/Phase II studies in
pediatric Multiple Sclerosis. Pending adequate financing or revenues, ReceptoPharm will continue its research and development, with the
ultimate goal of commencing these trials with RPI-78M under its Orphan Designation. ReceptoPharm has thus far incurred costs of $40,000.
ReceptoPharm has an estimated budget of $2,000,000. Our goal is to initiate these trials in 2021.
Currently,
ReceptoPharm’s total estimated costs for all of the above projects are approximately $3,000,000.
Since
receiving Orphan designation for the treatment of Pediatric MS, our plans have changed. We are now working with potential sites of care
to initiate a Phase I/II clinical trial in Pediatric MS. Our next step is to have a pre-IND meeting with the FDA to go over the proposed
trial protocols. It is our goal to begin these trials in 2021.
Dependence
on one or a Few Major Customers
We
have no customers with respect to our research and development projects since we have not received FDA approval for our drug candidates
and have not licensed any of our technologies.
Marketing
We
currently do not have a marketing program for our drug candidates because none of ReceptoPharm’s products have received FDA approval.
Our lack of financing has hampered our efforts to navigate the regulatory process in a timely fashion; however, if and when we have FDA-approved
drug treatments, we plan to develop a marketing strategy to market ReceptoPharm’s products through pharmaceutical companies, other
biotechnology companies, and diagnostic laboratories. Our Chief Executive Officer will market the treatments to licensing and development
officers of those companies and will otherwise direct our marketing program. Additionally, we will attempt to secure consulting agreements
with marketing consultants who will actively market our products to such companies and/or provide our Chief Executive Officer with marketing
guidance.
Potential
Revenue Segments
Our
potential revenue segments are composed of our attempt to generate revenues from license agreements, joint ventures in foreign countries
and drug sales.
To
date, we have not earned any revenues regarding any FDA drug candidate.
Product
Liability
We
maintain product liability insurance for our commercial products. Even so, product liability claims may result in significant legal costs
related to our defense of such actions if damage amounts exceed our product liability insurance coverage. The design, development, and
manufacture of drug products or diagnostic tests involves an inherent risk of product liability claims and corresponding damage to our
brand name reputation, including claims of product failure or harm caused by the drug product.
Sources
and Availability of Raw Materials
ReceptoPharm
uses the raw material, cobra venom, for the drugs that it studies and in the production of all of our over-the-counter products. We currently
have two US suppliers of cobra venom that we use according to product demand. In addition, there are other suppliers in China, Thailand
and India. ReceptoPharm’s management is responsible for locating cobra venom suppliers on an as-needed basis, which involves obtaining
a small test amount from a supplier for scientific validation of that raw material prior to purchase. Apart from cobra venom, we do not
currently use raw materials in our business.
Compliance
with Government Regulations and Need for Government Approval
The
production and marketing of potential drug products as well as research and development activities generally are subject to regulation
by numerous governmental authorities in the United States and other countries. In the United States, vaccines, drugs and certain diagnostic
products are subject to FDA review of safety and efficacy. The Federal Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act, the Public Health Service Act and
other federal statutes and regulations govern or influence the testing, manufacture, safety, labeling, storage, record keeping, approval,
advertising and promotion of such products. Noncompliance with applicable requirements can result in criminal prosecution and fines,
recall or seizure of products, total or partial suspension of production, or refusal of the government to approve Biological License
Applications (“BLAs”), Product License Applications (“PLAs”), New Drug Applications (“NDAs”) or refusal
to allow a company to enter into supply contracts. The FDA also has the authority to revoke product licenses and establishment licenses
previously granted.
In
order to obtain FDA approval to market a new biological or pharmaceutical product, proof of product safety, purity, potency and efficacy,
and reliable manufacturing capability must be submitted. This requires companies to conduct extensive laboratory, pre-clinical and clinical
tests. This testing, as well as preparation and processing of necessary applications, is expensive, time-consuming and often takes several
years to complete. There is no assurance that the FDA will act favorably in making such reviews. Our potential partners, or we, may encounter
significant difficulties or costs in their efforts to obtain FDA approvals, which could delay or preclude from marketing any products
that may be developed. The FDA may also require post-marketing testing and surveillance to monitor the effects of marketed products or
place conditions on any approvals that could restrict the commercial applications of such products. Product approvals may be withdrawn
if problems occur following initial marketing, such as, compliance with regulatory standards is not maintained. Delays imposed by governmental
marketing approval processes may materially reduce the period during which a company will have the exclusive right to exploit patented
products or technologies. Refusals or delays in the regulatory process in one country may make it more difficult and time consuming to
obtain marketing approvals in other countries.
The
FDA approval process for a new biological or pharmaceutical drug involves completion of preclinical studies and the submission of the
results of these studies to the FDA in an Initial New Drug application, which must be approved before human clinical trials may be conducted.
The results of preclinical and clinical studies on biological or pharmaceutical drugs are submitted to the FDA in the form of a BLA,
PLA or NDA for product approval to commence commercial sales. In responding to a BLA, PLA or NDA, the FDA may require additional testing
or information, or may deny the application. In addition to obtaining FDA approval for each biological or chemical product, an Establishment
License Application (“ELA”) must be filed and the FDA must inspect and license the manufacturing facilities for each product.
Product sales may commence only when both BLA/ PLA/ NDA and ELA are approved. In certain instances in which a treatment for a rare disease
or condition is concerned, the manufacturer may request the FDA to grant the drug product Orphan Drug status for a particular use. “Orphan
Drug” status refers to serious ailments affecting less than 250,000 individuals. In this event, the developer of the drug may request
grants from the government to defray the costs of certain expenses related to the clinical testing of such drug and be entitled to marketing
exclusivity and certain tax credits.
In
order to gain broad acceptance in the marketplace of a medical device, our partners or we will need to receive approval from the FDA
and other equivalent regulatory bodies outside of the United States. This approval will be based upon clinical testing programs at major
medical centers. Data obtained from these institutions will enable us, or our partners, to apply to the FDA for acceptance of its technology
as a “device” through a 510(k) application or exemption process. Once the data have been fully gleaned, it is expected that
this process would take ninety days.
According
to the FDA, a “device” is: “an instrument, apparatus, implement, machine, contrivance, implant, in vitro reagent, or
other similar or related article, including a component part, or accessory which is recognized in the official National Formulary, or
the United States Pharmacopoeia, or any supplement to them, intended for use in the diagnosis of disease or other conditions, or in the
cure, mitigation, treatment, or prevention of disease, in man or other animals, or intended to affect the structure or any function of
the body of man or other animals, and which does not achieve any of its primary intended purposes through chemical action within or on
the body of man or other animals and which is not dependent upon being metabolized for the achievement of any of its primary intended
purposes.”
The
FDA classifies devices as either Class I/II-exempt, Class II, or Class III.
Class
III: Pre-Marketing Approval, or PMA: A Pre-Marketing Approval or PMA is the most stringent type of device marketing application required
by FDA. A PMA is an application submitted to FDA to request clearance to market, or to continue marketing of a Class III medical device.
A PMA is usually required for products with which FDA has little previous experience and in such cases where the safety and efficacy
must be fully demonstrated on the product. The level of documentation is more extensive than for a 510(k) application and the review
timeline is usually longer. Under this level of FDA approval, the manufacturing facility will be inspected as well as the clinical sites
where the clinical trials are being or have been conducted. All the appropriate documents have to be compiled and available on demand
by the FDA. The manufacturing facility is registered with the FDA and the product or device is registered with the FDA.
Class
II: 510(k). This is one level down from the PMA and it is applied to devices with which the FDA has had previous experience. A 510(k)
is a pre-marketing submission made to FDA to demonstrate that the device to be marketed is as safe and effective, that is, substantially
equivalent, to a legally marketed device that is not subject to pre-market approval. Applicants must compare their 510(k) device to one
or more similar devices currently on the U.S. market and make and support their substantial equivalency claims. The legally marketed
device to which equivalence is drawn is known as the “predicate” device. Applicants must submit descriptive data and, when
necessary, performance data to establish that their device is SE to a predicate device. Again, the data in a 510(k) is to show comparability,
that is, substantial equivalency (SE) of a new device to a predicate device. Under this level of approval, the manufacturing facility
is registered with the FDA and the product or device is registered with the FDA. Inspections under this classification are possible.
All the appropriate cGMP and clinical data backing the claims made must be on file and available on demand by the FDA.
Class
I/II Exemption: This is the lowest level of scrutiny. Most Class I devices and a few Class II devices are exempt from the pre-marketing
notification requirements subject to the limitations on exemptions. However, these devices are not exempt from other general controls.
All medical devices must be manufactured under a quality assurance program, be suitable for the intended use, be adequately packaged
and properly labeled, and have establishment registration and device listing forms on file with the FDA. However, as described above,
all the appropriate documentation including cGMP and clinical data supporting the claims being made has to be on hand and available on
demand by the FDA. The data must be available to support all the product claims.
Sales
of biological and pharmaceutical products and medical devices outside the United States are subject to foreign regulatory requirements
that vary widely from country to country. Whether or not FDA approval has been obtained, approval of a product or a device by a comparable
regulatory authority of a foreign country must generally be obtained prior to the commencement of marketing in that country.
Effect
of Compliance with Federal, State, and Local Provisions for the Protection of the Environment
We
have no present or anticipated direct future costs associated with environmental compliance, since we are not and will not be directly
involved in manufacturing drug products as result of our research and development; however, we may be affected in the percentage licensing
fees we receive, since a company may consider the environmental expense as an offset to a determination of the percentage amount we receive.
ReceptoPharm produces a drug that has limited waste issues and related costs, but handles environmentally related matters through the
FDA’s Good Manufacturing Practices, the FDA mandated guidelines pertaining to the production of drugs in the United States.
Ability
to Compete
The
biotechnology research and development field is extremely competitive and is characterized by rapid change. Our competitors have substantially
greater financial, scientific, and human resources, and as a result greater research and product development capabilities. Our competitors
have competitive advantages with greater potential to develop revenue streams. Our competitors are located in the United States as well
as around the world. We will attempt to compete by establishing strategic partners or alliances with pharmaceutical companies, academic
institutions, biotechnology companies, and clinical diagnostic laboratories, which will enter into joint ventures, emphasizing that the
drugs RPI-MN and RPI-78M possess the following properties:
|
●
|
They
lack measurable toxicity but are still capable of attaching to and affecting the target site on the nerve cells. This means that
patients cannot overdose.
|
|
●
|
They
display no significant adverse side effects following years of investigations in humans and animals.
|
|
●
|
The
products are stable and resistant to heat, which gives the drug a long shelf life. The drugs’ stability has been determined
to be over 4 years at room temperature.
|
RPI-78M
can be administered orally; however, ReceptoPharm has not yet developed an orally administered RPI-78M. RPI-78M has been routinely delivered
by injection in a manner similar to insulin, but research over the past two years has given rise to administration by mouth. Oral delivery
presents patients with additional “quality of life” benefits by eliminating or decreasing the requirements for routine injections.
Should we receive adequate funding, ReceptoPharm plans to develop an orally administered RPI-78M by initiating new trials with an oral
version of that drug.
Main
Competitors (Biologics)
Competition
is intense among companies that develop and market products based on advanced cellular and molecular biology. ReceptoPharm’s competitors,
including Amgen, Sanofi-Aventis, Biogen-Idec, Cephalon, Genetech, Genzyme, Novartis, Regeneron and Bayer, which have far superior financial,
technological and operational resources. We face significant competition from these and other biotechnology and pharmaceutical firms
in the United States, Europe and elsewhere. Certain specialized biotechnology firms have also entered into cooperative arrangements with
major companies for development and commercialization of products, creating an additional source of competition.
Any
products or technologies that successfully address viral or neurological indications could negatively impact the market potential for
RPI-78M or RPI-MN. These include products that could receive approval for indications similar to those for which RPI-78M or RPI-MN seeks
approval, development of biologic or pharmaceutical treatments that are more effective than existing treatments and the development of
other modalities with reduced toxicity and side effects.
Interferon-based
drugs and their indications represent target markets for ReceptoPharm. Sales of interferon-based drugs annually exceed $8 billion and
have attracted the participation of several major drug companies, including Bayer and Roche. Currently, there are eight interferon-based
drugs licensed in Canada and the U.S.; five for the treatment of the milder Relapsing-Remitting form of MS, one for Hepatitis C, one
for granulomatous disease and one for genital warts. These interferons are also used in the treatment of other conditions where treatment
options are limited. The interferons for MS are Betaseron (Bayer), Avonex (Biogen), Plegridy (Biogen), Extavia (Novartis) and Rebif (EMD
Serono). Since the launch of these drugs, the number of patients undergoing treatment has stabilized at current levels, indicating that
there is a high turnover rate of patients in the administration of these individual drugs due to cost and side effects. Biogen developed
Avonex in the early 1990’s and has been shipping the drug since late 1996. In the United Kingdom, the National Institute for Clinical
Efficiency (NICE) has called for the withdrawal of Betaseron and another unrelated drug, Copaxone (Teva), from the market based on poor
cost/effectiveness.
Gilead
Sciences markets Harvoni as a ‘cure’ for Hepatitis C. It combines two drugs: Sovaldi (sofosbuvir) and ledipasvir. Harvoni
is taking over the market as Gilead has turned Hepatitis C into a curable illness and has generated over $25B in sales.
Main
Competitors (Venom-Based Drugs)
We
view our main competitors as those who also engage in the development of protein-based neurotoxins as therapeutics. Employing venoms
as therapeutics is not new. A large number of well-known pharmaceutical companies are developing novel therapies derived from
snake venoms and other reptiles. Most of those using snake venoms employ the anticoagulant enzymes usually from viperids (adders and
rattlesnakes) though elapids (cobra family) are also being investigated.
We
have set forth below a summary of venom-based drugs and their potential applications.
Company
|
|
Drug
|
|
Application
|
Pentapharm
|
|
Batroxobin
|
|
Anticoagulant from Lancehead viper
|
Knoll Pharmaceutical
|
|
Ancrod
|
|
Anticoagulant from rattlesnakes
|
Bristol-Myers Squibb
|
|
Capoten
|
|
Antihypertensive from Brazilian Pit Viper
|
Medicure
|
|
Aggrastat
|
|
Antiplatelet drug from vipers
|
Millennium Pharmaceutical
|
|
Integrilin
|
|
Antiplatelet drug from rattlesnakes
|
Amylin Pharmaceuticals
|
|
Byetta
|
|
Treatment for type 2 diabetes and obesity from
Gila Monster
|
Elan Pharmaceuticals
|
|
Prialt
|
|
Intrathecal drug from cone snails for intractable
pain
|
Current
cobra venom-based therapies include Keluoqu, a pain-killing drug on the market in China since 1978. Keluoque contains cobrotoxin as its
primary ingredient and is used to control severe pain in advanced cancer patients and for post-operative pain.
Bio-Therapeutics,
Inc.
On
October 3, 2003, we entered into a non-assignable license agreement between Bio-Therapeutics, Inc. (“
Bio-Therapeutics”) and us, which was then amended to make the license agreement assignable. This agreement was in
settlement of a lawsuit that we filed against Bio-Therapeutics alleging that Bio-Therapeutics owed us $850,000 in connection with a
merger agreement between Bio-Therapeutics and us that was cancelled.
The
2003 license agreement provides that for a non-exclusive license to certain intellectual property of Bio-Therapeutics, which consists
of the following two distinct technology platforms:
|
●
|
Alteration
of Proteins and Peptides - These include patented methods for altering the 3-Dimensional structure of certain proteins and peptides.
The natural peptides bind to receptors in the body with toxic effects. This technology allows us to alter the structure of these
peptides, preserving their receptor-binding characteristics, while making them non-toxic and therapeutic. Different receptors have
various functions in many disease states. By the peptides binding to these receptors in a controlled fashion, certain disease symptoms
may be treated. In connection with MS, binding to the acetylcholine receptor on the nerves allows for more efficient nerve conduction.
With HIV, binding to chemokine receptors may prevent the virus from entering and infecting new cells.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
Non-
Exclusive License for “Buccal Delivery System” (“Buccal”) – An innovative aerosolized drug delivery
system that is patent pending. Many therapeutic agents cannot be effectively delivered by aerosol formulation due to their large
size and/or irregular shapes. Since these therapeutic agents cannot be ingested orally without being degraded by the digestive system,
patients have no alternative but to directly inject these drugs. We have a non-exclusive license to the Buccal patent pending proprietary
aerosol formulation, which greatly enhances the permeability of the mucous membranes found on the roof of the mouth and the back
of the throat. This allows for the easy and efficient systemic delivery into the bloodstream of a much wider variety of proteins
and peptides. This non-exclusive license for “Buccal Delivery System” and patent pending application includes claims
that identify the active mucosal enhancer, its combination with therapeutic agents and the mode of delivery through aerosol. This
may allow for the effective and pain-free delivery of peptide and protein therapeutics for the treatment of HIV and MS.
|
Patents,
Trademarks, Licenses and Intellectual Property
We
have the following patents expiring at various dates indicated below:
Bio-Therapeutics
Patents
We
hold the license to certain intellectual property belonging to Bio-Therapeutics that has either been granted a patent or is in the patent
application process as follows:
U.S.
Patent No. 5,989,857, Polypeptide compositions and methods was granted in November 1999 with 10 claims. The patent outlines a method
of preparing a bioactive polypeptide in a stable, inactivated form, the method comprising the step of treating the polypeptide with ozonated
water in order to oxidize and/or stabilize the cysteine residues, and in turn, prevent the formation of disulfide bridges necessary for
bioactivity. This patent expired on May 10, 2016.
U.S.
Patent No. 6,670,148, Compositions comprising bioactive peptides prepared without formation of native disulfide bonds was granted in
December 2003, with 9 claims. The patent further describes a method of preparing a bioactive polypeptide in a stable, inactivated form,
the method comprising the step of treating the polypeptide with ozonated water in order to oxidize and/or stabilize the cysteine residues,
and in turn, prevent the formation of disulfide bridges necessary for bioactivity. The method can involve the use of ozonated water to
both oxidize the disulfide bridges in a bioactive polypeptide, and to then stabilize the resultant cysteine residues. Optionally, and
preferably, the method can involve the use of ozonated water to stabilize the cysteine residues, and thereby prevent the formation of
disulfide bridges, in a polypeptide produced by recombinant means in a manner that allows the polypeptide to be recovered with the disulfide
bridges unformed. This Patent expired on May 10, 2016.
U.S.
Patent Application Number 11/415377, Buccal Delivery System, with 20 claims. The patent describes a delivery formulation and system for
delivering inactivated bioactive peptides to the body. The formulation includes effective amounts of the peptide as well as a mucosal
permeation enhancer selected from the group consisting of quaternary ammonium salts. The system can be used by spraying the formulation
into the buccal cavity, e.g., to the roof of the mouth. This application is currently listed as abandoned as of December 2009.
U.S.
Patent Application Number 11/431126, Immunokine composition and method with 31 claims. The patent describes a composition and method
for preventing HIV infection of mammalian cells. One aspect of the invention relates to an anti-immunodeficiency virus immunokine capable
of binding to a cellular protein in a manner that prevents HIV infection of that cell. The compositions can include either an active
bioactive polypeptide, such as native cobratoxin, and/or an inactivated bioactive polypeptide, such as cobratoxin in which one or more
of the native disulfide bridges have been prevented from forming. The term “immunokine” is used to refer to an inactivated
bioactive polypeptide, whether inactivated by chemical, genetic, and/or synthetic means as described herein, with the proviso that a
corresponding active bioactive polypeptides can be included where applicable (e.g., for in vitro use). This application is currently
listed as abandoned as of June 2009.
ReceptoPharm
Patents
ReceptoPharm
has three issued and several patents pending with the United States Patent and Trademark Office. These patents include:
U.S.
Patent No. 8,034,777, Modified Anticholinergic Neurotoxins as Modulators of the Autoimmune Reaction was granted in October 2011with 7
claims. The patent describes a method of treatment of a human patient suffering from Multiple Sclerosis comprising the administration
of a disease-mitigating amount of a composition consisting of detoxified and modified alpha-cobratoxin in a saline solution. This patent
is meant to protect and support our work in the production of drugs for the treatment of auto-immune diseases.
U.S.
Patent No. 7,902,152, Use of cobratoxin as an analgesic was granted in March 2011 with 16 claims. The patent describes a composition
of matter for an analgesic and its method of use is disclosed. The method of use is for the treatment of chronic pain, especially to
the treatment of heretofore intractable pain as associated with advanced cancer. The pain associated with neurological conditions, rheumatoid
arthritis, viral infections and lesions is also contemplated. The method includes administering to a host an alpha-neurotoxin that is
characterized by its ability to blocking of the action of acetylcholine at nicotinic acetylcholine receptors. Currently, this would be
applied to the Company’s current and future drugs for the treatment of pain.
U.S.
Patent No. 7,758,894, Modified elapid venoms as stimulators of the immune reaction was granted in July, 2010 with 14 claims. The patent
describes a method of protection from infections by administering a detoxified and neurotropically active modified venom containing alpha-cobratoxin.
Protection includes bacterial, viral and parasitic infections. This patent is meant to protect and support our work in our production
of anti-infective treatments. Currently, this would be applied to RPI-MN and RPI-78.
U.S.
Patent Application Number 11/217,713, Modified venom and venom components as anti-retroviral agents with 10 claims was filed in September
2005. The present invention describes a method of treatment of human subject suffering from infection with HIV, comprising administering
a disease mitigating amount of a detoxified, modified cobra venom composition in an amount effective to ameliorate at least one symptom
of said infection. This patent is meant to protect and support our work in the production of anti-viral treatments. Currently, this would
be applied to RPI-MN and RPI-78.
U.S.
Patent Application Number 11/784,607, Treatment of Autoimmune Disorders Using Detoxified Cobratoxin was filed in April 2007. The patent
describes a method of treating patients suffering from autoimmune disorders comprising the administration of detoxified cobra venom.
This patent is meant to protect and support our work in the production of drugs for the treatment of auto-immune diseases. Currently,
this would be applied to RPI-78MN.
U.S.
Patent Application Number 12/317,115, Alpha-neurotoxin Proteins with Anti-inflammatory Properties and Uses Thereof was filed in December
2008. The patent describes a method of treating an arthritic condition comprising the administration to a subject in need thereof an
effective amount of a pharmaceutical composition comprising an isolated alpha-neurotoxin protein or an effective fragment thereof. This
patent is meant to protect and support our work in the production of drugs for the treatment of inflammatory diseases.
Patents
Assigned to Us by Nanologix, Inc.
Because
we have focused on our drugs, we have not continued any activity in our former Designer Diagnostics division since June 2011. As results
become available through the validation process taking place at National Jewish Hospital in Denver and funding becomes available, we
may revisit the technology and re-engage our efforts in Designer Diagnostics.
On
January 24, 2006, we entered into an Agreement with NanoLogix whereby we exchanged our entire holding of NanoLogix common stock
for intellectual property pertaining to the manufacture of test kits for the rapid isolation, detection and antibiotic sensitivity testing
of certain mycobacteria. The agreement provides that: (a) NanoLogix has reassigned to us 11 key patents protecting the diagnostics test
kit technology in exchange for our entire holding of NanoLogix stock represented by 4,556,174 shares of that stock; (b) NanoLogix has
licensed to us the remaining 18 patents that protect the diagnostics test kit technology in exchange for a 6% royalty on the gross sales
of the products based on the licensed technology or escalating minimum payments starting at $20,000 annually; (c) we issued to NanoLogix
1 million options of our restricted common stock at $.20 per share; and (d) we will allow NanoLogix to continue their use of these patents
for development of their hydrogen technology and other technologies unrelated to medical diagnostic test kits.
On
or about July 2009, we ceased paying the minimum royalties to Nanologix for the licensed patents and have allowed full rights to those
patents to revert back to Nanologix.
We
own 11 issued U.S. patents covering technologies related to growing, detecting, identifying, defining antibiotic sensitivity and designing
apparatus for the detection of 32 different paraffin-eating microorganisms that were assigned to us by Nanologix, Inc. These patents
will be used by our wholly owned subsidiary, Designer Diagnostics, should it again become operational.
U.S.
Patent No. 5,989,902, Method for determining the antimicrobial agent sensitivity of a nonparaffinophilic hydrophobic microorganism and
an associated apparatus was granted in November 1999 with 3 claims. The patent describes a method for determining a sensitivity of a
nonparaffinophilic hydrophobic microorganism to an antimicrobial agent. The method includes providing at least one receptacle containing
an aqueous broth including a carbon source and introducing the nonparaffinophilic hydrophobic microorganism into the receptacle. The
method further includes placing into the receptacle (i) a slide coated with a hydrophobic material and (ii) a predetermined quantity
of the antimicrobial agent to be tested. By observing the nonparaffinophilic hydrophobic microorganism growth or lack thereof on the
slide, it can be determined whether the predetermined quantity of the antimicrobial agent is effective in inhibiting growth of the nonparaffinophilic
hydrophobic microorganism on the slide. An associated apparatus is also disclosed. This Patent expired on November 13, 2017.
U.S.
Patent No. 5,981,210, Method for determining a presence or absence of a nonparaffinophilic hydrophobic microorganism in a body specimen
by using a DNA extraction procedure and a novel DNA extraction procedure was granted in November 1999 with 17 claims. The method of the
invention involves providing a first receptacle and a second receptacle. The first receptacle contains a sterile aqueous broth and the
second receptacle contains an aqueous broth including a carbon source. The method then includes placing into the first receptacle a first
support surface having a paraffin wax coating thereon and placing into the second receptacle a second support surface having a hydrophobic
material coating thereon. A body specimen, such as sputum, is then introduced into each of the first and second receptacles. The presence
of a nonparaffinophilic hydrophobic microorganism in the body specimen is determined by observing (i) a lack of microorganism growth
on the paraffin coated material of the first support surface and (ii) a presence of microorganism growth on the hydrophobic material
coating of the second support surface. The presence of the nonparaffinophilic hydrophobic microorganism can be further confirmed by performing
a DNA extraction. An associated DNA extraction procedure is also provided. This Patent expired on November 13, 2017.
U.S.
Patent No. 5,935,806, Method and apparatus for speciating and identifying MAI (Mycobacterium Avium Intracellulare) and testing the same
for antibiotic sensitivity was granted in August 1999 with 3 claims. The patent describes a method of speciating and identifying MAI
in a specimen comprises placing a paraffin coated slide in a receptacle containing a sterile aqueous solution inoculated with the specimen,
analyzing the slide after exposure to the specimen to determine the presence or absence of atypical Mycobacteria, and after the analysis
step, if atypical Mycobacteria are determined to be present, performing at least one speciation assay to ascertain if the atypical Mycobacteria
are MAI. A related apparatus is also disclosed for speciating and identifying MAI in a specimen comprising a paraffin-wax coated slide,
a tube having a sterile aqueous solution contained therein, the tube adapted to hold the slide, and at least one speciation assay means
for performing an assay to determine the presence or absence of MAI in the specimen after the specimen is introduced into the tube holding
the solution and the slide. An apparatus and method for determining the sensitivity of MAI to different antibiotics and dosages thereof
is also provided. This Patent expired on October 24, 2009 for failure to timely pay maintenance fees.
U.S.
Patent No. 5,882,920, Apparatus for determining the presence or absence of a paraffinophilic microorganism was granted in March 1999
with 4 claims. The patent describes a method of determining the presence of a paraffinophilic microorganism in a specimen taken from
a patient. The method includes providing a receptacle containing an aqueous solution and adjusting the solution to mimic the in vivo
clinical conditions of the patient. The method then further includes inoculating the solution with the specimen and then placing in the
receptacle a paraffin coated slide to bait the paraffinophilic microorganism. The slide is then analyzed after exposure to the specimen
to determine the presence or absence of the paraffinophilic microorganism. An associated apparatus is also disclosed. This Patent expired
on November 9, 2015.
U.S.
Patent No. 5,854,014, Apparatus for testing paraffinophilic microorganisms for antimicrobial sensitivity was granted in December 1998
with 2 claims. The patent describes an apparatus for determining the antimicrobial agent sensitivity of a paraffinophilic microorganism
from a specimen obtained from a patient. The apparatus includes a receptacle containing an aqueous solution, an amount of antimicrobial
agent to be tested and the specimen. The apparatus further consists of a paraffin coated slide placed into the receptacle. This Patent
expired October 24, 2009 for failure to timely pay maintenance fees.
U.S.
Patent No. 5,846,760, Method for determining a presence or absence of a nonparaffinophilic hydrophobic microorganism in a body specimen
and an associated kit was granted in December 1998 with 15 claims. The method of the invention involves providing a first receptacle
and a second receptacle. The first receptacle contains a sterile aqueous broth and the second receptacle contains an aqueous broth including
a carbon source. The method then includes placing into the first receptacle a first support surface having a paraffin wax coating thereon
and placing into the second receptacle a second support surface having a hydrophobic material coating thereon. A body specimen, such
as sputum, is then introduced into each of the first and second receptacles. The presence of a nonparaffinophilic hydrophobic microorganism
in the body specimen is determined by observing (i) a lack of microorganism growth on the paraffin coated material of the first support
surface and (ii) a presence of microorganism growth on the hydrophobic material coating of the second support surface. An associated
kit is also disclosed. This Patent expired on November 13, 2017.
U.S.
Patent No. 5,776,722, Method of testing a body specimen taken from a patient for the presence or absence of a microorganism and a further
associated method and associated apparatus was granted in July 1998 with 40 claims. The patent describes a method of testing a body specimen
taken from a patient for the presence or absence of a microorganism. A transport/isolator assembly is provided which includes a receptacle
and a baiting assembly including a baiting section having disposed thereon a coating material. A baiting liquid and the body specimen
are then introduced into the receptacle. The method further comprises securing the baiting assembly to the receptacle so that at least
a portion of the coated section is introduced into the baiting liquid. The transport/isolator assembly containing the baiting liquid
and the body specimen are then transported to a laboratory for subsequent observation of the coated section for growth or lack thereof
of the microorganism. A further method of processing the body specimen and an associated isolator/transport assembly kit as well as an
associated isolator/transport assembly are also disclosed. This Patent expired on September 25, 2017.
U.S.
Patent No. 5,569,592, Apparatus for testing MAI (Mycobacterium Avium Intracellulare) for antimicrobial agent sensitivity was granted
in October 1996 with 3 claims. The patent describes an apparatus for determining the sensitivity of MAI to different antimicrobial agents
and dosages thereof is provided. The apparatus comprises a plurality of test tubes adapted to contain an amount of an antimicrobial agent
to be tested and MAI complex organisms to be assayed and a separate paraffin coated slide adapted for placement in each of the test tubes.
The growth of the MAI complex organisms on the slide can be used to determine the concentration of the antimicrobial agent necessary
to resist MAI complex organism growth on the slide. An associated method is also disclosed. This Patent expired on October 29, 2013.
U.S.
Patent No. 5,472,877, Apparatus for determining the presence or absence of MAI (Mycobacterium Avium Intracellulare) was granted in December
1995 with 6 claims. The patent describes a method of speciating and identifying MAI in a specimen comprises placing a paraffin coated
slide in a receptacle containing a sterile aqueous solution inoculated with the specimen, analyzing the slide after exposure to the specimen
to determine the presence or absence of atypical Mycobacteria, and after the analysis step, if atypical Mycobacteria are determined to
be present, performing at least one speciation assay to ascertain if the atypical Mycobacteria are MAI. A related apparatus is also disclosed
for speciating and identifying MAI in a specimen comprising a paraffin-wax coated slide, a tube having a sterile aqueous solution contained
therein, the tube adapted to hold the slide, and at least one speciation assay means for performing an assay to determine the presence
or absence of MAI in the specimen after the specimen is introduced into the tube holding the solution and the slide. An apparatus and
method for determining the sensitivity of MAI to different antibiotics and dosages thereof is also provided. This Patent expired on December
5, 2012.
U.S.
Patent No. 5,316,918, Method and apparatus for testing MAI (Mycobacterium Avium Intracellulare) for antimicrobial agent sensitivity was
granted in May 1994 with 7 claims. The patent describes an apparatus and method for determining the sensitivity of MAI to different antimicrobial
agents and dosages thereof is provided. The apparatus comprises a plurality of test tubes adapted to contain an amount of an antimicrobial
agent to be tested and MAI complex organisms to be assayed and a separate paraffin coated slide adapted for placement in each of the
test tubes. The growth of the MAI complex organisms on the slide can be used to determine the concentration of the antimicrobial agent
necessary to resist MAI complex organism growth on the slide. An associated method is also disclosed. This Patent expired on May 31,
2011.
U.S.
Patent No. 5,153,119, Method for speciating and identifying MAI (Mycobacterium Avium Intracellulare) was granted in October 1992 with
15 claims. The patent describes a method of speciating and identifying MAI in a specimen comprises placing a paraffin coated slide in
a receptacle containing a sterile aqueous solution inoculated with the specimen, analyzing the slide after exposure to the specimen to
determine the presence or absence of atypical Mycobacteria, and after the analysis step, if atypical Mycobacteria are determined to be
present, performing at least one speciation assay to ascertain if the atypical Mycobacteria are MAI. A related apparatus is also disclosed
for speciating and identifying MAI in a specimen comprising a paraffin-wax coated slide, a tube having a sterile aqueous solution contained
therein, the tube adapted to hold the slide, and at least one speciation assay means for performing an assay to determine the presence
or absence of MAI in the specimen after the specimen is introduced into the tube holding the solution and the slide. An apparatus and
method for determining the sensitivity of MAI to different antibiotics and dosages thereof is also provided. This Patent expired on October
24, 2009.
Our
business is dependent upon our ability to protect our proprietary technologies and processes. Despite our efforts to protect our proprietary
rights, unauthorized parties may attempt to obtain and use proprietary information. We will rely on patent and trade secret law and nondisclosure
and other contractual arrangements to protect such proprietary information. We will file patent applications for our proprietary methods
and devices for patient treatments. Our efforts to protect our proprietary technologies and processes are subject to significant risks,
including that others may independently develop equivalent proprietary information and techniques, gain access to our proprietary information,
our proprietary information being improperly disclosed, or that we may ineffectively protect our rights to unpatented trade secrets or
other proprietary information.
Employees
We
employ a total of 4 employees, consisting of: (a) our Chief Executive Officer (b) Our Director of Marketing (c) our Chief Scientific
Officer, and (d) our Warehouse Manager. We utilize outside consultants, legal and accounting personnel as necessary and as funding permits.
Report
to Security Holders
We
are subject to the informational requirements of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. Accordingly, we file annual, quarterly and other
reports and information with the Securities and Exchange Commission. You may read and obtain a copy of these reports in Washington, D.C.
Our filings are also available to the public from commercial document retrieval services and the Internet world wide website maintained
by the Securities and Exchange Commission at www.sec.gov.
Item
1A. Risk Factors
You
should carefully consider the risks described below regarding our operations, financial condition, financing, our common stock and other
matters. If any of the following or other material risks actually occur, our business, financial condition, or results or operations
could be materially adversely affected.
Our
ability to continue as a going concern is in doubt absent obtaining adequate new debt or equity financing and achieving sufficient sales
levels.
We
incurred net losses of $6,591,442 and $3,884,695 for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018. We anticipate that these losses
will continue for the foreseeable future. We have a significant working capital deficiency, and have not reached a profitable level of
operations, which raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. Our continued existence is dependent upon
our achieving sufficient sales levels of our Nyloxin® and Pet Pain Away products and obtaining adequate financing. Unless
we can begin to generate material revenue, we may not be able to remain in business. We cannot assure you that we will raise enough money
or generate sufficient sales to meet our future working capital needs.
We
have a limited revenue producing history with significant losses and expect losses to continue for the foreseeable future.
We
have yet to establish any history of profitable operations. We have incurred annual losses of $6,591,442 and $3,884,695 during
the fiscal years of operations ending December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. As a result, at December 31, 2019, we had an accumulated
deficit of $67,864,284. Our revenues have been insufficient to sustain our operations and we expect our revenues will be insufficient
to sustain our operations for the foreseeable future. Our potential profitability will require the successful commercialization of our
Nyloxin® and Pet Pain-Away products; or a potential licensing of our therapies under development.
We
will require additional financing to sustain our operations and without it will be unable to continue operations.
At
December 31, 2019, we had a working capital deficit of $10,931,827. Our recurring losses from operations and working capital
deficiency raise substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern. We have a negative cash flow from operations of
approximately $0.70 million and $1.00 million for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, respectively. We have insufficient financial
resources to fund our operations.
We
have a history of failed distributors, which has negatively affected our revenues and may continue to do so if we fail to locate a successful
distributor.
Due
to poor performance, we cancelled our distribution agreement with our Cobroxin® distributor, XenaCare in April 2011. We
plan to re-launch Cobroxin®, but we have not yet ordered product or provided planned sales. To date, we have only limited
sales of Nyloxin® and Pet Pain-Away through outside distributors. If we fail to improve our own marketing and distribution
or fail to find a competent outside distributor our operations and financial condition will be negatively affected.
If
we cannot sell a sufficient volume of our products, we will be unable to continue in business.
From
October 2009 until December 31, 2019, our operations centered on the marketing of Cobroxin® (our discontinued product),
Nyloxin® and Nyloxin® Extra Strength. In December of 2014, we launched Pet Pain-Away and began actively
marketing the product. During fiscal year 2019, we earned revenues of $104,393, $44,269 of it was from sales of Nyloxin®
and $60,124 of it was from sales of Pet Pain-Away. During fiscal year 2018, we earned revenues of $130,596, $89,166 of it was from sales
of Nyloxin® and $41,430 of it was from sales of Pet Pain-Away If we cannot achieve sufficient sales levels of our Nyloxin®
and Pet Pain-Away products or we are unable to secure financing our operations will be negatively affected.
We
have a limited history of generating revenues on which to evaluate our potential for future success and to determine if we will be able
to execute our business plan; accordingly, it is difficult to evaluate our future prospects and the risk of success or failure of our
business.
Our
total sales of Cobroxin® from November 2009 are $1,995,673, with no significant sales since the second quarter of 2010.
Our total sales of Nyloxin® from January 1, 2011 to December 31, 2019 are $1,657,375. Our total sales of Pet Pain-Away
from December 2014 to December 31, 2019 are $138,453. You must consider our business and prospects in light of the risks and difficulties
we will encounter as an early-stage revenue producing company. These risks include:
|
●
|
our
ability to effectively and efficiently market and distribute our products;
|
|
●
|
our
ability to obtain market acceptance of our current products and future products that may be developed by us; and
|
|
●
|
our
ability to sell our products at competitive prices which exceed our per unit costs.
|
We
may be unable to address these risks and difficulties, which could materially and adversely affect our revenue, operating results and
our ability to continue to operate our business.
Our
growth strategy reflected in our business plan may be unachievable or may not result in profitability.
We
may be unable to implement our growth strategy reflected in our business plan rapidly enough for us to achieve profitability. Our growth
strategy is dependent on a number of factors, including market acceptance of our Nyloxin® and Pet Pain-Away products and
the acceptance by the public of using these products as pain relievers. We cannot assure you that our products will be purchased in amounts
sufficient to attain profitability.
Among
other things, our efforts to expand our sales of Nyloxin® and Pet Pain-Away will be adversely affected if:
|
●
|
we
are unable to attract sufficient customers to the products we offer in light of the price and other terms required in order for us
to attain the level of profitability that will enable us to continue to pursue our growth strategy;
|
|
●
|
adequate
penetration of new markets at reasonable cost becomes impossible limiting the future demand for our products below the level assumed
by our business plan;
|
|
●
|
we
are unable to scale up manufacturing to meet product demand, which would negatively affect our revenues and brand name recognition;
|
|
●
|
we
are unable to meet regulatory requirements in the intellectual marketplace that would otherwise allow us for wider distribution;
and
|
|
●
|
we
are unable to meet FDA regulatory requirements that would potentially expand our product base and potential revenues.
|
If
we cannot manage our growth effectively, we may not become profitable.
Businesses,
which grow rapidly often, have difficulty managing their growth. If we grow rapidly, we will need to expand our management by recruiting
and employing experienced executives and key employees capable of providing the necessary support. We cannot assure you that our management
will be able to manage our growth effectively or successfully.
Among
other things, implementation of our growth strategy would be adversely affected if we were not able to attract sufficient customers to
the products and services we offer or plan to offer in light of the price and other terms required in order for us to attain the necessary
profitability.
If
we are unable to protect our proprietary technology, our business could be harmed.
Our
intellectual property, including patents, is our key asset. We currently have 21 patents that we either own or have the rights to from
third parties. 16 of these patents have been approved and 5 are pending. Competitors may be able to design around our patents for our
Cobroxin®, Nyloxin® and Pet Pain-Away products and compete effectively with us. The cost to prosecute infringements
of our intellectual property or the cost to defend our products against patent infringement or other intellectual property litigation
by others could be substantial. We cannot assure you that:
|
●
|
pending
and future patent applications will result in issued patents,
|
|
●
|
patents
licensed by us will not be challenged by competitors,
|
|
●
|
our
patents, licensed and other proprietary rights from third parties will not result in costly litigation;
|
|
●
|
pending
and future patent applications will result in issued patents,
|
|
●
|
the
patents or our other intellectual property will be found to be valid or sufficiently broad to protect these technologies or provide
us with a competitive advantage,
|
|
●
|
if
we are sued for patent infringement, whether we will have sufficient funds to defend our patents, and
|
|
●
|
we
will be successful in defending against future patent infringement claims asserted against our products.
|
Should
any risks pertaining to the foregoing occur, our brand name reputation, results of operation and revenues will be negatively affected.
We
are subject to substantial FDA regulations pertaining to Nyloxin® and Pet Pain-Away, which may increase our costs or otherwise
adversely affect our operations.
Our
Nyloxin® and Pet Pain-Away products are subject to FDA regulations, including manufacturing and labeling, approval of
ingredients, advertising and other claims made regarding Nyloxin® and Pet Pain-Away, and product ingredients disclosure.
If we fail to comply with current or future regulations, the FDA could force us to stop selling Nyloxin® and Pet Pain-Away
or require us to incur substantial costs from adopting measures to maintain FDA compliance.
The
inability to provide scientific proof for product claims may adversely affect our sales.
The
marketing of Nyloxin® and Pet Pain-Away involves claims that they assist in reducing Stage 2 chronic pain, while Nyloxin®
Extra Strength and Nyloxin® Military Strength involves claims that they assist in reducing Stage 3 chronic pain.
The marketing of Pet Pain-Away involves claims that they assist in relieving pain in dogs and cats. Under FDA and Federal Trade Commission
(“FTC”) rules, we are required to have adequate data to support any claims we make concerning Nyloxin® and
Pet Pain-Away. We have scientific data for our Nyloxin® and Pet Pain-Away product claims; however, we cannot be certain
that these scientific data will be deemed acceptable to the FDA or FTC. If the FDA or FTC requests supporting information and we are
unable to provide support that it finds acceptable, the FDA or FTC could force us to stop making the claims in question or restrict us
from selling the products.
None
of our ethical drug candidates have received FDA approval.
Our
non-homeopathic or ethical products require a complex and costly FDA regulation process that takes several years for drug approval, if
ever. None of the drug applications we have submitted to the FDA have received FDA approval. If we do not receive FDA approval for our
drug applications, our operations and financial condition will be negatively affected.
If
we are unable to secure sufficient cobra venom from available suppliers, our operating results will be negatively affected.
We
secure cobra venom on an as-needed basis. If we do not have an available supplier to fill customer orders, there will be distribution
delays and/or our failure to fulfill purchase orders, either of which will negatively affect our brand name reputation and operating
results.
Our
Nyloxin® and Pet Pain-Away products may be unable to compete against our competitors in the pain relief market.
The
pain relief market is highly competitive. We compete with companies that have already achieved product acceptance and brand recognition,
including multi-billion dollar private label manufacturers and more established pharmaceutical and health products companies, or low
cost generic drug manufacturers. Most such companies have far greater financial and technical resources and production and marketing
capabilities than we do. Additionally, if consumers prefer our competitors’ products, or if these products have better safety,
efficacy, or pricing characteristics, our results could be negatively impacted. If we fail to develop and actualize strategies to compete
against our competitors we may fail to compete effectively, which will negatively affect our operations and operating results.
If
we incur costs resulting from product liability claims, our operating results will be negatively affected.
If
we become subject to product liability claims for Nyloxin® and Pet Pain-Away that exceed our product liability policy
limits, we may be subject to substantial litigation costs or judgments against us, which will negatively impact upon our financial and
operating results.
Loss
of any of our key personnel could have a material adverse effect on our operations and financial results.
We
are dependent upon a limited number of our employees: (a) our Chief Executive Officer who directs our operations; and (b) our Chief Scientific
Officer who conducts our research and development activities. Our success depends on the continued services of our senior management
and key research and development employees as well as our ability to attract additional members to our management and research and development
teams. The unexpected loss of the services of any of our management or other key personnel could have a material adverse effect upon
our operations and financial results.
We
may be unable to maintain and expand our business if we are not able to retain, hire and integrate key management and operating personnel.
Our
success depends in large part on the continued services and efforts of key management personnel. Competition for such employees is intense
and the process of locating key personnel with the combination of skills and attributes required to execute our business strategies may
be lengthy. The loss of key personnel could have a material adverse impact on our ability to execute our business objectives. We do not
have any key man life insurance on the lives of any of our executive officers.
Risks
Related to Our Common Stock
Because
the market for our common stock is limited, persons who purchase our common stock may not be able to resell their shares at or above
the purchase price paid by them.
Our
common stock trades on the OTC-Market, which is not a liquid market. There is currently only a limited public market for our common stock.
We cannot assure you that an active public market for our common stock will develop or be sustained in the future. If an active market
for our common stock does not develop or is not sustained, the price may decline.
Because
we are subject to the “penny stock” rules, brokers cannot generally solicit the purchase of our common stock, which adversely
affects its liquidity and market price.
The
SEC has adopted regulations, which generally define “penny stock” to be an equity security that has a market price of less
than $5.00 per share, subject to specific exemptions. The market price of our common stock on the OTC has been substantially less than
$5.00 per share and therefore we are currently considered a “penny stock” according to SEC rules. This designation requires
any broker-dealer selling these securities to disclose certain information concerning the transaction, obtain a written agreement from
the purchaser and determine that the purchaser is reasonably suitable to purchase the securities. These rules limit the ability of broker-dealers
to solicit purchases of our common stock and therefore reduce the liquidity of the public market for our shares.
Because
the majority of our outstanding shares are freely tradable, sales of these shares could cause the market price of our common stock to
drop significantly, even if our business is performing well.
As
of December 31, 2019, we had 5,876,746,111 outstanding shares that were subject to the limitations of Rule 144 under the Securities Act
of 1933. In general, Rule 144 provides that any non-affiliates, who have held restricted common stock for at least six-months, are entitled
to sell their restricted stock freely, provided that we stay current in our SEC filings. After one year, a non-affiliate may sell without
any restrictions.
An
affiliate may sell after one year with the following restrictions: (i) we are current in our filings, (ii) certain manner of sale provisions,
(iii) filing of Form 144, and (iv) volume limitations limiting the sale of shares within any three-month period to a number of shares
that does not exceed 1% of the total number of outstanding shares. A person who has ceased to be an affiliate at least three months immediately
preceding the sale and who has owned such shares of common stock for at least one year is entitled to sell the shares under Rule 144
without regard to any of the limitations described above.
An
investment in our common stock may be diluted in the future as a result of the issuance of additional securities or the exercise of options
or warrants.
In
order to raise additional capital to fund our strategic plan, we may issue additional shares of common stock or securities convertible,
exchangeable or exercisable into common stock from time to time, which could result in substantial dilution to any person who purchases
our common stock. Because we have a negative net tangible book value, purchasers will suffer substantial dilution. We cannot assure you
that we will be successful in raising funds from the sale of common stock or other equity securities.
Since
we intend to retain any earnings for development of our business for the foreseeable future, you will likely not receive any dividends
for the foreseeable future.
We
have not and do not intend to pay any dividends in the foreseeable future, as we intend to retain any earnings for development and expansion
of our business operations. As a result, you will not receive any dividends on your investment for an indefinite period of time.
Due
to factors beyond our control, our stock price may continue to be volatile.
The
market price of our common stock has been and is expected to be highly volatile. Any of the following factors could affect the market
price of our common stock:
|
●
|
our
failure to generate revenue,
|
|
●
|
our
failure to achieve and maintain profitability,
|
|
●
|
short
selling activities,
|
|
●
|
the
sale of a large amount of common stock by our shareholders including those who invested prior to commencement of trading,
|
|
●
|
actual
or anticipated variations in our quarterly results of operations,
|
|
●
|
announcements
by us or our competitors of significant contracts, new products, acquisitions, commercial relationships, joint ventures or capital
commitments,
|
|
●
|
the
loss of major customers or product or component suppliers,
|
|
●
|
the
loss of significant business relationships,
|
|
●
|
our
failure to meet financial analysts’ performance expectations,
|
|
●
|
changes
in earnings estimates and recommendations by financial analysts, or
|
|
●
|
changes
in market valuations of similar companies.
|
In
the past, following periods of volatility in the market price of a company’s securities, securities class action litigation has
often been instituted. A securities class action suit against us could result in substantial costs and divert our management’s
time and attention, which would otherwise be used to benefit our business.
Item
1B. Unresolved Staff Comments
None
Item
2. Properties
In
February of 2016, we moved offices to 12538 West Atlantic Blvd, Coral Springs, Florida. We had a 3-year lease that expired on
February 1, 2019 with an option to renew for an additional 3 years. Our offices were comprised of a reception area, conference room,
6 offices, a restroom, a kitchen and a file room. We paid monthly rent of approximately $3,200. We operated on a month-to-month lease
from March 1, 2019 through June 1, 2020 when we vacated the Coral Springs office to move all of our operations to our Plantation facility.
Since
May 13, 2004, ReceptoPharm has leased their office space at 1537 NW 65th Avenue, Plantation, Florida for three consecutive
two-year terms. ReceptoPharm’s 5,500 square foot facilities include a reception area, conference room and five offices, a warehouse
and a laboratory. On May 10, 2010, ReceptoPharm renewed the lease with Shelter Developers of America (“Shelter”) for the
last two-year term beginning on June 1, 2010 and ending May 31, 2012. On July 9, 2012 ReceptoPharm entered into a new lease agreement
for a five year period beginning on August 1, 2012. In February of 2016, we signed a lease extension agreement in exchange for certain
leasehold improvements that extended our lease through July 31, 2022. In January of 2021, we signed an updated lease with extended terms
through January 1, 2023. The lease calls for current monthly payments of approximately $6,500, which includes base rent, common area
expenses, real estate taxes and insurance. As of June 1, 2020 we have moved all of our operations into the Plantation facility.
We
incurred rent expense of $134,047 and $128,897 for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.
Item
3. Legal Proceedings
Patricia
Meding, et. al. v. ReceptoPharm, Inc. f/k/a Receptogen, Inc.
On
June 1, 2015, ReceptoPharm entered into a settlement agreement with Patricia Meding, a former officer and shareholder of ReceptoPharm.
The settlement relates to a lawsuit filed by Ms. Meding against ReceptoPharm (Patricia Meding, et. al. v. ReceptoPharm, Inc. f/k/a Receptogen,
Inc., Index No.: 18247/06, New York Supreme Court, Queens County) in which she claimed to own certain shares of ReceptoPharm stock and
claimed to be owed amounts on a series of promissory notes allegedly executed in 2001 and 2002.
The
settlement agreement executed on June 1, 2015 provides that ReceptoPharm will pay Ms. Meding a total of $360,000 over 35 months. The
first payment of $20,000 was made on July 1, 2015. A second payment of $20,000 was made on August 17, 2015 with 32 subsequent monthly
$10,000 payments due on the 15th of every month thereafter. To date, ReceptoPharm has made all monthly payments due under the agreement.
In the event of default on any of the payments due under the settlement agreement, the settlement amount would increase by an additional
$200,000. As of December 31, 2018, all payments were made and the settlement is concluded. We have recorded $200,000 in other income
for the over accrual of default upon payments in full in April 2018.
Paul
Reid et al. v. Nutra Pharma Corp. et al.
On
August 26, 2016, certain of former ReceptoPharm employees and a former ReceptoPharm consultant filed a lawsuit in the 17th Judicial Circuit
in and for Broward County, Florida (Case No. CACE16–015834) against Nutra Pharma and Receptopharm to recover $315,000 allegedly
owing to them under a settlement agreement reached in an involuntary bankruptcy action that was brought by the same individuals in 2012
and for payment of unpaid wages/breach of written debt confirms.
On
June 24, 2021, the parties entered into a confidential settlement agreement of the lawsuit. Nutra Pharma has fully performed under
the settlement and considers the case fully resolved.
Get
Credit Healthy, Inc. v. Nutra Pharma Corp. and Rik Deitsch, Case No. CACE 18-017055
On
August 1, 2018, Get Credit Healthy, Inc. filed a lawsuit against the Company and Rik Deitsch (collectively the “Defendants”)
in the 17th Judicial Circuit Court in and for Broward County, Florida (Case No. CACE 18-017055) to recover $100,000 allegedly owed under
an amended promissory note dated April 12, 2017. Counsel for Get Credit Healthy, Inc. requested an early mediation conference in an attempt
to resolve our dispute. We agreed to this request, and mediation took place on February 15, 2019. At December 31, 2018, we owed principal
balance of $101,818 and accrued interest of $21,023. The lawsuit was settled on February 15, 2019 for $104,000 with scheduled payments.
The repayments were made in full as of November 2020 (see Note 6 in our consolidated financial statements).
CSA
8411, LLC v. Nutra Pharma Corp., Case No. CACE 18-023150
On
October 12, 2018, CSA 8411, LLC filed a lawsuit against the Company in the 17th Judicial Circuit Court in and for Broward County, Florida
(Case No. CACE 18-023150) to recover $100,000 allegedly owed under an amended promissory note dated April 12, 2017. On November 1, 2018,
the Company filed its Answer and Affirmative Defenses to the Complaint. The Company believes that this lawsuit is without merit. Moreover,
the Company believes that it has a number of valid defenses to this claim. Among other things, the owner of CSA 8411, LLC violated the
terms of a Binding Memorandum of Understanding by failing to invest in the Company and fraudulently inducing the Company to enter into
the subject amended promissory note (contrary to the Get Credit Healthy lawsuit discussed above, we are certain that this individual
is the majority owner of CSA 8411, LLC). Opposing counsel reached out to schedule mediation, and mediation was set for June 21, 2019
in Plantation, FL however the mediation was unsuccessful. At December 31, 2019, we owed principal balance of $91,156 and accrued interest
of $29,948 (See Note 6) if the defenses and our new claims are deemed to be of no merit. Defendant also filed affirmative claims against
the Plaintiff, its owner Dan Oran and several related entities. The case has not been set for trial as of this date.
Securities
and Exchange Commission v. Nutra Pharma Corporation, Erik Deitsch, and Sean Peter McManus
On
September 28, 2018, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) filed a lawsuit in the United States
District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Case No. 2:18-cv-05459) against the Company, Mr. Deitsch, and Mr. McManus. The lawsuit
alleges that, from July 2013 through June 2018, the Company and the other defendants’ defrauded investors by making materially
false and misleading statements about the Company and violated anti-fraud and other securities laws.
The
violations alleged against the Company by the SEC include: (a) raising over $920,000 in at least two private placement offerings for
which the Company failed to file required registration statements with the SEC; (b) issuing a series of materially false or misleading
press releases; (c) making false statements in at least one Form 10-Q; and (d) failing to make required public filings with the SEC to
disclose the Company’s issuance of millions of shares of stock. The lawsuit makes additional allegations against Mr. McManus and
Mr. Deitsch, including that Mr. McManus acted as a broker without SEC registration and defrauded at least one investor by making false
statements about the Company, that Mr. Deitsch engaged in manipulative trades of the Company’s stock by offering to pay more for
shares he was purchasing than the amount the seller was willing to take, and that Mr. Deitsch failed to make required public filings
with the SEC. The lawsuit seeks both injunctive and monetary relief.
On
May 29, 2019 (following each of the defendants filing motions to dismiss), the SEC filed a First Amended Complaint which generally alleged
the same conduct as its original Complaint, but accounted for certain guidance provided by the United States Supreme Court in a case
that had been recently decided. Each of the defendants then moved to dismiss the SEC’s First Amended Complaint. On March 31, 2020,
the Court entered an Order granting in part and denying in part the various motions to dismiss. Following that Order, the SEC filed a
Second Amended Complaint (the operative pleading) and the defendants have filed their answers which generally deny liability. At this
time, discovery is closed and the SEC has indicated an intent to file a summary judgment motion regarding certain non-fraud claims asserted
in its Second Amended Complaint. The defendants have opposed the SEC’s request to file such motion(s). The Court conducted a hearing
on February 23, 2021 and set an initial briefing schedule for the SEC’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment wherein the Plaintiffs’
Motion for Partial Summary Judgment was due on April 5, 2021, the Defendants’ Consolidated (i.e., collectively, Nutra Pharma Corporation,
Erik “Rik” Deitsch, and Sean McManus) Response Brief to the SEC’s Motion is due May 3, 2021, and the Plaintiffs’
Reply Brief is due on May 19, 2021. On March 23, 2021, the Plaintiff filed a Motion for Extension of Time to file the Motion for Partial
Summary Judgment. On March 24, 2021, the Court entered an order granting the Motion for Extension of Time and modified the briefing schedule
as follows: Plaintiffs’ Motion was due on or before April 9, 2021, the Defendants’ Response is due on or before May 7, 2021,
and the Plaintiffs’ Reply is due on or before May 21, 2021. The Company disputes the allegations in this lawsuit and continues
to vigorously defend against the SEC’s claims. Mr. Deitsch and Mr. McManus have similarly defended the lawsuit since its filing
and each contest liability. The Company does not believe that it engaged in any fraudulent activity or made any material misrepresentations
concerning the Company and/or its products.
Item
4. Mine Safety Disclosures
None
Notes
to Consolidated Financial Statements
December
31, 2019 and 2018
1.
BASIS OF PRESENTATION AND SUMMARY OF SIGNIFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES
Organization
Nutra
Pharma Corp. (“Nutra Pharma”), is a holding company that owns intellectual property and operates in the biotechnology industry.
Nutra Pharma was incorporated under the laws of the state of California on February 1, 2000, under the original name of Exotic-Bird.com.
Through
its wholly-owned subsidiary, ReceptoPharm, Inc. (“ReceptoPharm”), Nutra Pharma conducts drug discovery research and development
activities. In October 2009, Nutra Pharma launched its first consumer product called Cobroxin®, an over-the-counter pain
reliever designed to treat moderate to severe chronic pain. In May 2010, Nutra Pharma launched its second consumer product called Nyloxin®,
an over-the-counter pain reliever that is a stronger version of Cobroxin® and is designed to treat severe chronic pain.
In December 2014, we launched Pet Pain-Away, an over-the-counter pain reliever designed to treat pain in cats and dogs.
Basis
of Presentation and Consolidation
The
accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements include the results of Nutra Pharma and its wholly-owned subsidiaries Designer Diagnostics
Inc. and ReceptoPharm (collectively “the Company”, “us”, “we” or “our”). We operate as
one reportable segment. Designer Diagnostics Inc. has been inactive since June 2011. All intercompany transactions and balances have
been eliminated in consolidation.
Reclassification
of Prior Year Presentation
Certain
prior year amounts have been reclassified for consistency with the current year presentation. These reclassifications had no effect on
the reported results of operations.
Liquidity
and Going Concern
Our
Consolidated Financial Statements are presented on a going concern basis, which contemplate the realization of assets and satisfaction
of liabilities in the normal course of business. We have experienced recurring, significant losses from operations, and have an accumulated
deficit of $67,864,284 at December 31, 2019. In addition, we have a significant amount of indebtedness in default, a working capital
deficit of $10,931,827 and a stockholders’ deficit of $11,701,035 at December 31, 2019.
There
is substantial doubt regarding our ability to continue as a going concern which is contingent upon our ability to secure additional financing,
increase ownership equity and attain profitable operations. In addition, our ability to continue as a going concern must be considered
in light of the problems, expenses and complications frequently encountered in established markets and the competitive environment in
which we operate.
We
do not have sufficient cash to sustain our operations for a period of twelve months from the issuance date of this report and will require
additional financing in order to execute our operating plan and continue as a going concern. Since our sales are not currently adequate
to fund our operations, we continue to rely principally on debt and equity funding; however, proceeds from such funding have not been
sufficient to execute our business plan. Our plan is to attempt to secure adequate funding until sales of our pain products are adequate
to fund our operations. We cannot predict whether additional financing will be available, and/or whether any such funding will be in
the form of equity, debt, or another form. In the event that these financing sources do not materialize, or if we are unsuccessful in
increasing our revenues and profits, we will be unable to implement our current plans for expansion, repay our obligations as they become
due and continue as a going concern.
The
accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements do not include any adjustments relating to the recoverability and classification of recorded
asset amounts or the amounts and classification of liabilities that might be necessary should we be unable to continue as a going concern.
Impact
of COVID-19 on our Operations
The
ramifications of the outbreak of the novel strain of COVID-19, reported to have started in December 2019 and spread globally, are filled
with uncertainty and changing quickly. Our operations have continued during the COVID-19 pandemic and we have not had significant disruption.
Beginning in June 2020, the Company experienced a delay in retail rollout as a downstream implication of the slowing economy. We also
closed our Coral Springs office in effort to save money. During May 2020, we received approval from SBA to fund our request for a PPP
loan for $64,895. We intended to use the proceeds primarily for payroll costs. During April and June 2020, we obtained the loan in the
amount of $154,900 from SBA under its Economic Injury Disaster Loan assistance program. We intended to use the proceeds primarily for
working capital purpose (See Note 13).
The
Company is operating in a rapidly changing environment so the extent to which COVID-19 impacts its business, operations and financial
results from this point forward will depend on numerous evolving factors that the Company cannot accurately predict. Those factors include
the following: the duration and scope of the pandemic; governmental, business and individuals’ actions that have been and continue
to be taken in response to the pandemic; and the distribution of testing and a vaccine.
Use
of Estimates
The
accompanying Consolidated Financial Statements are prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United
States of America which require management to make estimates and assumptions. These estimates and assumptions affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported
amounts of revenue and expense. Significant estimates include our ability to continue as going concern, the recoverability of inventories
and long-lived assets, the recoverability of amounts due from officer, the valuation of stock-based compensation and certain debt and
derivative liabilities, recognition of loss contingencies and deferred tax valuation allowances. Actual results could differ from
those estimates. Changes in facts and circumstances may result in revised estimates, which would be recorded in the period in which they
become known.
Revenue
from Contracts with Customers
On
January 1, 2018, we adopted Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”)
Topic 606, “Revenue from Contracts with Customers” (“ASC Topic 606”) using the modified retrospective
method applied to those contracts which were not completed as of January 1, 2018. The cumulative impact of adopting ASC Topic 606 resulted
in no changes to retained earnings at January 1, 2018. The impact to revenue for the year ended December 31, 2018 was an increase of
$4,403 as a result of applying ASC 606 to certain revenues generated through online distributors which are now presented gross as we
have control over providing the products related to such revenues. This new revenue recognition standard (new guidance) has a five-step
process: a) Determine whether a contract exists; b) Identify the performance obligations; c) Determine the transaction price;
d) Allocate the transaction price; and e) Recognize revenue when (or as) performance obligations are satisfied. The Company has
evaluated the impact of ASC Topic 606 and determined that there is no change to the Company’s accounting policies, except for the
recording of certain product sales to a distributor, in which a portion of the cash proceeds received is remitted back to the distributor.
Under ASC Topic 606, the Company determined that these sales should be recorded on a gross basis.
Our
revenues are primarily derived from customer orders for the purchase of our products. We recognize revenues as performance obligations
are fulfilled upon shipment of products. We record revenues net of promotions and discounts. For certain product sales to a distributor,
we record revenue including a portion of the cash proceeds that is remitted back to the distributor.
For
the year ended December 31, 2018, the revenue recognized from contracts with customers was $130,596. The impact of adoption of ASC 606
on our 2018 consolidated statement of operations was as follows:
|
|
With
Implementation
of
ASC 606
|
|
|
Before
Implementation
of
ASC 606
|
|
|
Effect
of
Implementation
|
|
Revenue
|
|
$
|
130,596
|
|
|
$
|
126,193
|
|
|
$
|
4,403
|
|
Costs of sales
|
|
|
(68,777
|
)
|
|
|
(64,374
|
)
|
|
|
(4,403
|
)
|
Net effect of ASC 606
implementation
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
–
|
|
There
was no balance sheet impact.
Accounting
for Shipping and Handling Costs
We
account for shipping and handling as fulfillment activities and record shipping and handling costs incurred within revenue.
Accounts
Receivable and Allowance for Doubtful Accounts
We
grant credit without collateral to our customers based on our evaluation of a particular customer’s credit worthiness. Accounts
receivable are due 30 days after the issuance of the invoice. In addition, allowances for doubtful accounts are maintained for potential
credit losses based on the age of the accounts receivable and the results of periodic credit evaluations of our customers’ financial
condition. Accounts receivable are written off after collection efforts have been deemed to be unsuccessful. Accounts written off as
uncollectible are deducted from the allowance for doubtful accounts, while subsequent recoveries are netted against the provision for
doubtful accounts expense. We generally do not charge interest on accounts receivable. We use third party payment processors and are
required to maintain reserve balances, which are included in accounts receivable.
Accounts
receivable are stated at estimated net realizable value. Accounts receivable are comprised of balances due from customers net of estimated
allowances for uncollectible accounts. During the year ended December 31, 2019, $2,789 of accounts receivable were written off and recorded
as bad debt expense. No allowance for doubtful account is deemed to be required at December 31, 2019 and 2018.
Inventories
Inventories,
which are stated at the lower of average cost or net realizable value, consist of packaging materials, finished products, and raw venom
that is utilized to make the API (active pharmaceutical ingredient). The raw unprocessed venom has an indefinite life for use. Commencing
on October 1, 2019, we classify inventory as short-term or long-term inventory based on timing of when it is expected to be consumed.
The Company regularly reviews inventory quantities on hand. If necessary, it records a net realizable value adjustment for excess
and obsolete inventory based primarily on its estimates of product demand and production requirements. Write-downs are charged to cost
of goods sold. We performed an evaluation of our inventory and related accounts at December 31, 2019 and 2018, and increased the reserve
on supplier advances for future venom purchases included in prepaid expenses and other current assets by $23,948 and $47,757, respectively.
At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the total valuation allowance for prepaid venom was $224,859 and $200,911, respectively.
Financial
Instruments and Concentration of Credit Risk
Our
financial instruments include cash, accounts receivable, accounts payable, accrued expenses, loans payable, due to officers and derivative
financial instruments. Other than certain warrant and convertible instruments (derivative financial instruments) and liabilities to related
parties (for which it was impracticable to estimate fair value due to uncertainty as to when they will be satisfied and a lack of similar
type transactions in the marketplace), we believe the carrying values of our financial instruments approximate their fair values because
they are short term in nature or payable on demand. Our derivative financial instruments are carried at a measured fair value.
Balances
in various cash accounts may at times exceed federally insured limits. We have not experienced any losses in such accounts. We do not
hold or issue financial instruments for trading purposes. In addition, for the year ended December 31, 2019, there were two customers
that accounted for 55% and 12% of the total revenues, respectively. For the year ended December 31, 2018, there were two customers that
accounted for 32% and 27% of the total revenues, respectively. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, 100% and 84% of the accounts receivable
balance are reserves due from two payment processors.
Operating
Lease Right-of-Use Asset and Liability
In
February 2016, the FASB issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) 2016-02, “Leases” (Topic 842), as amended
(“ASC Topic 842”). The new standard establishes a right-of-use (ROU) model that requires a lessee to record a ROU asset and
a lease liability on the balance sheet for all leases with terms longer than 12 months and classify as either operating or finance leases.
We adopted this standard effective January 1, 2019 using the modified retrospective approach for all leases entered into before the effective
date. Adoption of the ASC Topic 842 had a significant effect on our balance sheet resulting in increased non-current assets and increased
current and non-current liabilities. There was no impact to retained earnings upon adoption of the new standard. We did not have any
finance leases (formerly referred to as capital leases prior to the adoption of ASC Topic 842), therefore there was no change in accounting
treatment required. For comparability purposes, the Company will continue to comply with the previous disclosure requirements in accordance
with the existing lease guidance and prior periods are not restated.
The
Company elected the package of practical expedients as permitted under the transition guidance, which allowed us: (1) to carry forward
the historical lease classification; (2) not to reassess whether expired or existing contracts are or contain leases; and, (3) not to
reassess the treatment of initial direct costs for existing leases.
In
accordance with ASC Topic 842, at the inception of an arrangement, the Company determines whether the arrangement is or contains a lease
based on the unique facts and circumstances present and the classification of the lease including whether the contract involves the use
of a distinct identified asset, whether we obtain the right to substantially all the economic benefit from the use of the asset, and
whether we have the right to direct the use of the asset. Leases with a term greater than one year are recognized on the balance sheet
as ROU assets, lease liabilities and, if applicable, long-term lease liabilities. The Company has elected not to recognize on the balance
sheet leases with terms of one year or less under practical expedient in paragraph ASC 842-20-25-2.
Lease
liabilities and their corresponding ROU assets are recorded based on the present value of lease payments over the expected lease term.
The implicit rate within our operating leases are generally not determinable and, therefore, the Company uses the incremental borrowing
rate at the lease commencement date to determine the present value of lease payments. The determination of the Company’s incremental
borrowing rate requires judgment. The Company determines the incremental borrowing rate for each lease using our estimated borrowing
rate.
For
periods prior to the adoption of ASC Topic 842, the Company recorded rent expense based on the term of the related lease. The expense
recognition for operating leases under ASC Topic 842 is substantially consistent with prior guidance. As a result, there are no significant
differences in our results of operations presented.
The
impact of the adoption of ASC 842 on the balance sheet was:
|
|
As reported
|
|
|
Adoption
of ASC
|
|
|
Balance
|
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
842 - increase
|
|
|
January 1,
|
|
|
|
2018
|
|
|
(decrease)
|
|
|
2019
|
|
Operating lease right-of-assets
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
281,175
|
|
|
$
|
281,175
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
141,417
|
|
|
$
|
281,175
|
|
|
$
|
422,592
|
|
Operating lease liabilities, current portion
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
64,573
|
|
|
$
|
64,573
|
|
Operating lease liabilities, net of current
portion
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
216,602
|
|
|
$
|
216,602
|
|
Total liabilities
|
|
$
|
6,078,010
|
|
|
$
|
281,175
|
|
|
$
|
6,359,185
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
|
$
|
141,417
|
|
|
$
|
281,175
|
|
|
$
|
422,592
|
|
Derivative
Financial Instruments
Management
evaluates all of its financial instruments to determine if such instruments are derivatives or contain features that qualify as embedded
derivatives. For derivative financial instruments that are accounted for as liabilities, the derivative instrument is initially recorded
at its fair value and is then re-valued at each reporting date, with changes in the fair value reported as charges or credits to income.
For option-based simple derivative financial instruments, the Company uses the Black-Scholes option-pricing model to value the derivative
instruments at inception and subsequent valuation dates. The classification of derivative instruments, including whether such instruments
should be recorded as liabilities or as equity, is re-assessed at the end of each reporting period. Derivative instrument liabilities
are classified in the balance sheet as current or non-current based on whether or not net-cash settlement of the derivative instrument
could be required within 12 months of the balance sheet date.
We
do not use derivative instruments to hedge exposures to cash flow, market, or foreign currency risks.
Convertible
Debt
For
convertible debt that does not contain an embedded derivative that requires bifurcation, the conversion feature is evaluated to determine
if the rate of conversion is below market value and should be categorized as a beneficial conversion feature (“BCF”). A BCF
related to debt is recorded by the Company as a debt discount and with the offset recorded to equity. The related convertible debt is
recorded net of the discount for the BCF. The discount is amortized as additional interest expense over the term of the debt with the
resulting debt discount being accreted over the term of the note.
The
Fair Value Measurement Option
We
have elected the fair value measurement option for convertible debt with embedded derivatives that require bifurcation, and record the
entire hybrid financing instrument at fair value under the guidance of ASC Topic 815, Derivatives and Hedging (“ASC Topic
815”). The Company reports interest expense, including accrued interest, related to this convertible debt under the fair value
option, within the change in fair value of convertible notes and derivatives in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.
Derivative
Accounting for Convertible Debt and Options and Warrants
The
Company evaluated the terms and conditions of the convertible debt under the guidance of ASC 815, Derivatives and Hedging. The
conversion terms of some of the convertible notes are variable based on certain factors, such as the future price of the Company’s
common stock. The number of shares of common stock to be issued is based on the future price of the Company’s common stock. The
number of shares of common stock issuable upon conversion of the debt is indeterminate. Due to the fact that the number of shares of
common stock issuable could exceed the Company’s authorized share limit, the equity environment is tainted, and all additional
convertible debt and options and warrants are included in the value of the derivative liabilities. Pursuant to ASC 815-15, Embedded
Derivatives, the fair values of the convertible debt, options and warrants and shares to be issued were recorded as derivative liabilities
on the issuance date and revalued at each reporting period.
Property
and Equipment
Property
and equipment is recorded at cost. Expenditures for major improvements and additions are added to property and equipment, while replacements,
maintenance and repairs which do not extend the useful lives are expensed. Depreciation is computed using the straight-line method over
the estimated useful lives of the assets of 3 – 7 years.
Long-Lived Assets
The
carrying value of long-lived assets is reviewed annually and on a regular basis for the existence of facts and circumstances that may
suggest impairment. If indicators of impairment are present, we determine whether the sum of the estimated undiscounted future cash flows
attributable to the long-lived asset in question is less than its carrying amount. If less, we measure the amount of the impairment based
on the amount that the carrying value of the impaired asset exceeds the discounted cash flows expected to result from the use and eventual
disposal of the impaired assets.
Income
Taxes
We
compute income taxes in accordance with Financial Accounting Standard Board (“FASB”) Accounting Standard Codification (“ASC”)
Topic 740, Income Taxes (“ASC Topic 740”). Under ASC Topic 740, deferred taxes are recognized for the tax consequences
of temporary differences by applying enacted statutory rates applicable to future years to differences between the financial statement
carrying amounts and the tax bases of existing assets and liabilities. Deferred tax assets also arise from net operating losses carried
forward. Also, the effect on deferred taxes of a change in tax rates is recognized in income in the period that included the enactment
date. Temporary differences between financial and tax reporting arise primarily from the use of different methods to record bad debts
and /or sales returns, inventory reserves, and accrued expense.
On
an annual basis, we evaluate tax positions that have been taken or are expected to be taken in our tax returns to determine if they are
more than likely to be sustained if the taxing authority examines the respective position. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, we do not believe
we have a need to record any liabilities for uncertain tax positions or provisions for interest or penalties related to such positions.
Stock-Based
Compensation
We
account for stock-based compensation in accordance with FASB ASC Topic 718, Stock Compensation (“ASC Topic 718”).
ASC Topic 718, which requires that the cost resulting from all share-based transactions be recorded in the financial statements over
the respective service periods. It establishes fair value as the measurement objective in accounting for share-based payment arrangements
and requires all entities to apply a fair-value-based measurement in accounting for share-based payment transactions with employees.
The statement also establishes fair value as the measurement objective for transactions in which an entity acquires goods or services
from non-employees in share-based payment transactions.
Net
Loss Per Share
Net
loss per share is calculated in accordance with ASC Topic 260, Earnings per Share. Basic loss per share is calculated by dividing
net loss by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period. Diluted loss per share is calculated by dividing
net loss by the weighted average number of common shares and dilutive common stock equivalents outstanding. During periods in which we
incur losses, common stock equivalents, if any, are not considered, as their effect would be anti-dilutive or have no effect on earnings
per share. Any common shares issued as of a result of the exercise of conversion options and warrants would come from newly issued
common shares from our remaining authorized shares. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the following items were not included in dilutive
loss as the effect is anti-dilutive:
|
|
31-Dec-19
|
|
|
31-Dec-18
|
|
Options and warrants
|
|
|
52,500,000
|
|
|
|
12,600,000
|
|
Convertible notes payable at fair value
|
|
|
11,672,780,512
|
|
|
|
4,448,128,953
|
|
Convertible notes payable
|
|
|
1,624,914,267
|
|
|
|
1,131,893,633
|
|
Total
|
|
|
13,350,194,779
|
|
|
|
5,592,622,586
|
|
Recent
Accounting Pronouncements
In
December 2019, the FASB issued ASU No. 2019-12, Income Taxes (Topic 740): Simplifying the Accounting for Income Taxes (“ASU
2019-12”), which is intended to simplify various aspects related to accounting for income taxes. ASU 2019-12 removes certain exceptions
to the general principles in Topic 740 and also clarifies and amends existing guidance to improve consistent application. This guidance
is effective for fiscal years, and interim periods within those fiscal years, beginning after December 15th, 2020, with early adoption
permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the impact of this standard, and does not believe that it will have a material effect
on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
In
August 2020, the FASB issued ASU 2020-06, Accounting for Convertible Instruments and Contracts in an Entity’s Own Equity,
which simplifies and clarifies certain calculation and presentation matters related to convertible and equity and debt instruments. Specifically,
ASU-2020-06 removes requirements to separately account for conversion features as a derivative under ASC Topic 815 and removing the requirement
to account for beneficial conversion features on such instruments. Accounting Standards Update 2020-06 also provides clearer guidance
surrounding disclosure of such instruments and provides specific guidance for how such instruments are to be incorporated in the calculation
of Diluted EPS. The guidance under ASU 2020-06 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2021, including interim periods
within those fiscal years. Early adoption is permitted, but no earlier than fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2020. The Company
will adopt this standard using a modified retrospective approach effective January 1, 2022. The Company is currently evaluating the impact
of this standard, and does not believe that it will have a material effect on the accompanying consolidated financial statements.
All
other newly issued accounting pronouncements but not yet effective have been deemed either immaterial or not applicable.
2.
FAIR VALUE MEASUREMENTS
Certain
assets and liabilities that are measured at fair value on a recurring basis at December 31, 2019 and 2018 are measured in accordance
with FASB ASC Topic 820-10-05, Fair Value Measurements. FASB ASC Topic 820-10-05 defines fair value, establishes a framework for
measuring fair value and expands the disclosure requirements regarding fair value measurements for financial assets and liabilities as
well as for non-financial assets and liabilities that are recognized or disclosed at fair value on a recurring basis in the financial
statements.
The
statement requires fair value measurement be classified and disclosed in one of the following three categories:
Level
1:
|
|
Unadjusted
quoted prices in active markets that are accessible at the measurement date for identical unrestricted assets or liabilities;
|
Level
2:
|
|
Quoted
prices in markets that are not active or inputs which are observable either directly or indirectly for substantially the full term
of the asset or liability; and
|
Level
3:
|
|
Prices
or valuation techniques that require inputs that are both significant to the fair value measurement and unobservable (i.e. supported
by little or no market activity).
|
The
following table summarizes our financial instruments measured at fair value at December 31, 2019 and December 31, 2018:
|
|
Fair
Value Measurements at December 31, 2019
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Level
1
|
|
|
Level
2
|
|
|
Level
3
|
|
Warrant liability
|
|
$
|
1,411
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,411
|
|
Derivative liabilities
|
|
$
|
834,457
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
834,457
|
|
Convertible notes at fair value
|
|
$
|
5,814,047
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
5,814,047
|
|
|
|
Fair
Value Measurements at December 31, 2018
|
|
Liabilities:
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Level
1
|
|
|
Level
2
|
|
|
Level
3
|
|
Warrant liability
|
|
$
|
1,468
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,468
|
|
Convertible notes at fair value
|
|
$
|
1,156,341
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
1,156,341
|
|
The
following table shows the changes in fair value measurements for the warrant liability using significant unobservable inputs (Level 3)
during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:
Description
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
1,468
|
|
|
$
|
5,903
|
|
Total gain included
in earnings (1)
|
|
|
(57
|
)
|
|
|
(4,435
|
)
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
1,411
|
|
|
$
|
1,468
|
|
(1)
|
The
gain related to the revaluation of our warrant liability is included in “Change in fair value of convertible notes and derivatives”
in the accompanying consolidated statement of operations.
|
We
valued our warrants using a Dilution-Adjusted Black-Scholes Model. Assumptions used include (1) 1.55% to 1.59% risk-free rate, (2) warrant
life is the remaining contractual life of the warrants, (3) expected volatility of 348% (4) zero expected dividends (5) exercise price
set forth in the agreements (6) common stock price of the underlying share on the valuation date, and (7) number of shares to be issued
if the instrument is converted.
We
valued derivative liabilities using the number of potential convertible shares for warrants in equity and convertible notes with fixed
conversion price that are recorded at amortized cost times the closing stock price of our restricted common stock at December 31, 2019.
These derivative liabilities are recorded due to the fact that the number of shares of common stock issuable could exceed the Company’s
authorized share limit and the equity environment is tainted, and therefore all convertible debt and options and warrants should be accounted
for as liabilities.
The
following table summarizes assumptions and the significant terms of the convertible notes for which the entire hybrid instrument is recorded
at fair value at December 31, 2019 and 2018:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conversion
Price - Lower of Fixed
Price or Percentage of VWAP
for Look-back Period
|
Debenture
|
|
Face
Amount
|
|
|
Interest
Rate
|
|
Default
Interest
Rate
|
|
Discount
Rate
|
|
Anti-Dilution
Adjusted
Price
|
|
%
of stock price for look-back period
|
|
|
Look-back
Period
|
2019
|
|
$
|
1,244,204
|
|
|
8%-10%
|
|
20%-24%
|
|
N/A
|
|
$0.00010-$0.000293
|
|
|
50%-60%
|
|
|
3
to 25 Days
|
2018
|
|
$
|
1,340,026
|
|
|
8%-12%
|
|
18%-20%
|
|
25.95-27.95
|
|
$0.0002-$0.20
|
|
|
40%-60%
|
|
|
3 to 25 Days
|
Using
the stated assumptions summarized in table above, we calculated the inception date and reporting period fair values of each note issued.
The following table shows the changes in fair value measurements for the convertible notes at fair value using significant unobservable
inputs (Level 3) during the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018:
Description
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
Beginning balance
|
|
$
|
1,156,341
|
|
|
$
|
1,925,959
|
|
Purchases and issuances
|
|
|
688,274
|
|
|
|
472,029
|
|
Day one loss on value of hybrid instrument
(1)
|
|
|
926,109
|
|
|
|
2,021,041
|
|
Loss from change in fair value (1)
|
|
|
3,423,935
|
|
|
|
130,344
|
|
Gain on settlement
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
(958,581
|
)
|
Debt discount
|
|
|
(22,344
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Settlement through issuance of common stock
|
|
|
(83,268
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Conversion to common
stock
|
|
|
(275,000
|
)
|
|
|
(2,434,451
|
)
|
Ending balance
|
|
$
|
5,814,047
|
|
|
$
|
1,156,341
|
|
(1)
|
The losses related to the valuation of the
convertible notes are included in “Change in fair value of convertible notes and derivatives” in the accompanying consolidated
statement of operations.
|
3.
INVENTORIES
Inventories
are valued at the lower of cost or net realizable value on an average cost basis. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, inventories were as
follows:
|
|
December
31,
2019
|
|
|
December
31,
2018
|
|
Raw Materials
|
|
$
|
52,183
|
|
|
$
|
33,431
|
|
Finished Goods
|
|
|
8,177
|
|
|
|
1,871
|
|
Total Inventories
|
|
|
60,360
|
|
|
|
35,302
|
|
Less: Long-term inventory
|
|
|
(52,183
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Current portion
|
|
$
|
8,177
|
|
|
$
|
35,302
|
|
4.
PROPERTY AND EQUIPMENT
Property
and equipment consists of the following at December 31, 2019 and 2018:
|
|
December
31, 2019
|
|
|
December
31, 2018
|
|
Computer equipment
|
|
$
|
25,120
|
|
|
$
|
25,120
|
|
Furniture and fixtures
|
|
|
34,757
|
|
|
|
34,757
|
|
Lab equipment
|
|
|
53,711
|
|
|
|
53,711
|
|
Telephone equipment
|
|
|
12,421
|
|
|
|
12,421
|
|
Office equipment – other
|
|
|
16,856
|
|
|
|
16,856
|
|
Leasehold improvements
|
|
|
73,168
|
|
|
|
73,168
|
|
Total
|
|
|
216,033
|
|
|
|
216,033
|
|
Less: Accumulated depreciation
|
|
|
(209,270
|
)
|
|
|
(205,533
|
)
|
Property and equipment,
net
|
|
$
|
6,763
|
|
|
$
|
10,500
|
|
We
review our long-lived assets for recoverability if events or changes in circumstances indicate the assets may be impaired. At December
31, 2019, we believe the carrying values of our long-lived assets are recoverable. Depreciation expense for the years ended December
31, 2019 and 2018 was $3,737 and $5,963, respectively.
5.
DUE TO/FROM OFFICER
At
December 31, 2019, the balance due to our President and CEO, Rik Deitsch, is $122,812, which is an unsecured demand loan that bears interest
at 4%. During the year ended December 31, 2019, we advanced $134,015 to and collected $5,000 from Mr. Deitsch and the Companies owned
by him. Additionally, accrued interest on the demand loan was $6,330 and is included in the due to officer account. For the year ended
December 31, 2019, we recorded a bad debt expense of $59,000. The Company has fully reserved receivables from companies owned by the
Company’s CEO. The reserve was $564,470 and $505,470 as of December 31, 2019 and 2018, which represents a full valuation allowance
for amounts owed by these Companies.
At
December 31, 2018, the balance due to our President and CEO, Rik Deitsch, is $186,497, which is an unsecured demand loan that bears interest
at 4%. During the year ended December 31, 2018, we advanced $162,775 to and collected $105,900 from Mr. Deitsch and the Companies owned
by him. Additionally, accrued interest on the demand loan was $7,674 and is included in the due to officer account. As of December 31,
2018, we recorded a bad debt expense of $505,470 which represents a full valuation allowance for amounts owed by these Companies.
6.
DEBTS
Debts
consist of the following at December 31, 2019 and 2018:
|
|
December
31,
2019
|
|
|
December
31,
2018
|
|
Note payable– Related Party
(Net of discount of $0 and $2,400, respectively) (1)
|
|
$
|
14,400
|
|
|
$
|
12,000
|
|
Notes payable – Unrelated third parties (Net
of discount of $8,921 and $17,870, respectively) (2)
|
|
|
1,385,163
|
|
|
|
1,469,690
|
|
Convertible notes payable – Unrelated third parties
(Net of discount of $17,370 and $29,371, respectively) (3)
|
|
|
872,256
|
|
|
|
751,955
|
|
Convertible notes payable,
at fair value (Net of discount of $22,344 and $0, respectively) (4)
|
|
|
5,814,047
|
|
|
|
1,156,341
|
|
Other advances from an
unrelated third party (5)
|
|
|
175,000
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Ending balances
|
|
|
8,260,866
|
|
|
|
3,389,986
|
|
Less: Long-term portion-Notes
payable-Unrelated third parties
|
|
$
|
(-)
|
|
|
$
|
(51,410
|
)
|
Less: Long-term portion-Convertible
Notes payable-Unrelated third parties
|
|
|
(907,912
|
)
|
|
|
-
|
|
Current portion
|
|
$
|
7,352,954
|
|
|
$
|
3,338,576
|
|
(1)
|
During
2010 we borrowed $200,000 from one of our directors. Under the terms of the loan agreement, this loan was expected to be repaid in
nine months to a year from the date of the loan along with interest calculated at 10% for the first month plus 12% after 30 days
from funding. We are in default regarding this loan. The loan is under personal guarantee by Mr. Deitsch. We repaid principal balance
in full as of December 31, 2016. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, we owed this director accrued interest of $159,555 and $141,808.
The interest expense for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 was $17,747 and $15,772.
|
|
|
|
In
December 2017, we issued a promissory note to a related party in the amount of $12,000 with original issuance discount of $2,000.
The note was amended in December 2018 with original issuance discount of $2,400 and was due in twelve months from the execution and
funding of the note. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the principal balance of the loan is $14,400 and $12,000, net of debt discount
of $0 and $2,400, respectively. The Note was settled in June 2020.
|
|
|
(2)
|
At
December 31, 2019 and 2018, the balance of $1,385,163 and $1,469,690 net of discount of $8,921 and $17,870, respectively, consisted
of the following loans:
|
|
●
|
In
August 2016, we issued two Promissory Notes for a total of $200,000 ($100,000 each) to a company owned by a former director of the
Company. The notes carry interest at 12% annually and were due on the date that was six-months from the execution and funding of
the note. Upon default in February 2017, the Notes became convertible at $0.008 per share. During March 2017, we repaid principal
balance of $6,365. During April 2017, the Notes with accrued interest were restated. The restated principal balance of $201,818 bears
interest at 12% annually and was due October 12, 2017. During June 2017, we repaid principal balance of $8,844. The loan was reclassified
to notes payable – unrelated third parties after the director resigned in March 2018. At December 31, 2018, we owed principal
balance of $192,974, and accrued interest of $40,033. The principal balance of $101,818 and
accrued interest of $21,023 were settled on February 15, 2019 for $104,000 with scheduled payments through May 1, 2020. We
recorded a gain on settlement of debt in other income for $18,841. The Company additionally repaid $13,500 during the year
ended December 31, 2019. At December 31, 2019, we owed principal balance of $160,633 and accrued interest of $50,971.
$90,500 of the balance owed including the accrued interest of $21,023, was settled with payments made through
November 2020. The remaining principal balance of $91,156 and accrued interest of $29,948 is being disputed in court and negotiation
for settlement (See Note 13).
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
On
August 2, 2011 under a settlement agreement with Liquid Packaging Resources, Inc. (“LPR”), we agreed to pay LPR a total
of $350,000 in monthly installments of $50,000 beginning August 15, 2011 and ending on February 15, 2012. This settlement amount
was recorded as general and administrative expenses on the date of the settlement. We did not make the December 2011 or January 2012
payments and on January 26, 2012, we signed the first amendment to the settlement agreement where we agreed to pay $175,000, which
was the balance outstanding at December 31, 2011(this includes a $25,000 penalty for non-payment). We repaid $25,000 during the three
months ended March 31, 2012. We did not make all of the payments under such amendment and as a result pursuant to the original settlement
agreement, LPR had the right to sell 142,858 shares (5,714,326 shares pre reverse stock split) of our free trading stock held in
escrow by their attorney and receive cash settlements for a total amount of $450,000 (the initial $350,000 plus total default penalties
of $100,000). The $100,000 penalty was expensed during 2012. LPR sold the note to Southridge Partners, LLP (“Southridge”)
for consideration of $281,772 in June 2012. In August 2013 the debt of $281,772 reverted back to LPR.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
At
December 31, 2012, we owed University Centre West Ltd. approximately $55,410 for rent, which was assigned and sold to Southridge,
and it is currently outstanding and carries no interest.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
In
April 2016, we issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $10,000 bearing interest at 10% annually. The
note was due in one year from the execution and funding of the note. The note is in default and negotiation of settlement. At December
31, 2019 and 2018, the accrued interest is $3,755 and $2,739.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
In
May 2016, the Company issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $75,000 bearing monthly interest at a
rate of 2%. The note was due in six months from the execution and funding of the note. During April 2017, we accepted the offer of
a settlement to issue 5,000,000 common shares as a repayment of $25,000. The note is in default and in negotiation of settlement.
At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the outstanding principal balance is $50,000 and accrued interest is $49,967 and $37,801.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
In
June 2016, the Company issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $50,000 bearing monthly interest at
a rate of 2%. The note was due in six months from the execution and funding of the note. The note is in default and negotiation of
settlement. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the outstanding principal balance is $50,000 and accrued interest is $43,166 and $31,000.
|
|
●
|
In
August 2016, we issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $150,000 bearing monthly interest at a rate
of 2.5%. The note was due in six months from the execution and funding of the note. During April 2017, the note with accrued interest
were restated. The restated principal balance of $180,250 bears monthly interest at a rate of 2.5% and was due October 20, 2017.
During January 2018, the note with accrued interest were restated. The restated principal balance of $220,506 bears monthly interest
at a rate of 2.5% and was due July 12, 2018. In connection with this restated note, we issued 2,000,000 shares of our restricted
common stock (See Note 7). We recorded a debt discount in the amount of $2,765 to reflect the value of the common stock as a reduction
to the carrying amount of the debt and a corresponding increase to common stock and additional paid-in capital. Amortization for
the debt discount for the year ended December 31, 2018 was $2,765. During July 2018, we issued 5,000,000 restricted shares due to
the default on repayment of the promissory note of $220,506 restated in January 2018 (See Note 7). The shares were valued at fair
value of $5,500. During December 2018, the note with accrued interest were restated. The restated principal balance of $282,983 bears
monthly interest at a rate of 2.0% and was due June 17, 2019. In connection with this restated note, we issued 10,000,000
shares of our restricted common stock (See Note 7). We recorded a debt discount in the amount of $3,945 to reflect the value of the
common stock as a reduction to the carrying amount of the debt and a corresponding increase to common stock and additional paid-in
capital. Amortization for this debt discount for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 was $3,616 and $329, respectively. During
September 2019, the Notes of $282,983 plus accrued interest amended in December 2018 were restated. The restated principal balance
of $333,543 were due September 2020. In connection with this restated note, we issued 20,000,000 shares of our common stock. The
common stock was valued at $5,895(See Note 7) and recorded as a debt discount that was amortized over the life of the note. Amortization
for this debt discount for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $1,474 and debt discount at December 31, 2019 is $4,421. The Note
is in default and negotiation of settlement. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the principal balance is $333,543 and $282,983, and the
accrued interest is $25,127 and $2,830, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
On
September 26, 2016, we issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $75,000 bearing interest at 10% annually.
The note was due in one year from the execution and funding of the note. In March 2018, $15,000 of the principal balance of the note
was assigned to an unrelated third party and is in negotiation of settlement. In January 2019, the remaining principal balance of
$60,000 and accrued interest of $15,900 was restated in the form of a Convertible Note (See Note 6(4)). At December 31, 2019 and
2018, the principal balance outstanding is $15,000 and $75,000, and the accrued interest is $1,371 and $17,271, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
In
October 2016, we issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $50,000 bearing monthly interest at a rate
of 2%. The note was due in six months from the execution and funding of the note. The note is in default and in negotiation of settlement.
At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the accrued interest is $39,466 and $27,300.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
In
June 2017, we issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $12,500 bearing interest at 10% annually. The
note was due in one year from the execution and funding of the note. The note is in default and in negotiation of settlement. At
December 31, 2019 and 2018, the accrued interest is $3,212 and $1,944.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
During
July 2017, we received a loan for a total of $200,000 from an unrelated third party. The loan was repaid through scheduled payments
through August 2017 along with interest on average 15% annum. We have recorded loan costs in the amount of $5,500 for the loan origination
fees paid at inception date. The debt discount was fully amortized as of December 31, 2018. During June 2018, the loan was settled
with two unrelated third parties for $130,401 and $40,000, respectively, with the monthly scheduled repayments of approximately $5,000
and $2,000 per month to each unrelated party through July 2020. We recorded a gain on settlement of debt in other income for $20,927
in June 2018. The Company repaid a total of $34,976 and $42,698 during 2018 and 2019, respectively. At December 31, 2019 and 2018,
the principal balance is $92,728 and $135,426. The portion of settlement of $130,401 was repaid in full in April 2021. The remaining
balance of $33,874 is in default and negotiation of settlement.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
In
July 2017, we issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $50,000 with original issue discount of $10,000.
The note was due in six months from the execution and funding of the note. The original issuance discount was fully amortized as
of December 31, 2019. The note is in default and in negotiation of settlement. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the principal balance
of the note is $50,000.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
In
September 2017, we issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $51,000 with original issue discount of
$8,500. The note was due in six months from the execution and funding of the note. The original issuance discount was fully amortized
as of December 31, 2018. The Company repaid $8,500 in cash in November 2017. In May 2018, the Noteholder received a total of 187,500,000
shares of our restricted common stock with a fair value of $243,750 in satisfaction of the remaining balance of $42,500. We recorded
a loss on settlement of debt in other expense for $201,250 (See Note 7). As of December 31, 2018, the note was repaid in full.
|
|
●
|
In
September 2017, we issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $36,000 with original issue discount of
$6,000. During September 2018 and 2019, the Note was amended with original issuance discount of $6,000 each due in September 2019
and 2020, respectively. The Note was further restated in September 2020. The restated principal balance was $33,000 with the original
issuance discount of $3,000 and was due March 2021. The original issue discount is amortized over the term of the loan. Amortization
for the debt discount for the years ended 2019 and 2018 was $7,500 and $4,000, respectively. Repayments of $1,500, $7,000 and $5,000
have been made during 2017, 2018 and 2019, respectively. The Note is under personal guarantee by Mr. Deitsch. At December 31, 2019
and 2018, the principal balance of the note is $30,000 and $27,500, net of debt discount of $4,500 and $6,000, respectively. During
March 2021, the remaining balance of $30,000 was sold to an unrelated third party in the form of a convertible note at a fixed conversion
price of $0.01 per share. The new note carries interest at 12% with scheduled monthly payments of $1,000 beginning in April 2021
through March 2024.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
In
October 2017, we issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $50,000 with original issuance discount of
$10,000. The note was due in six months from the execution and funding of the note. In connection with the issuance of this promissory
note, we issued 5,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock. We recorded a debt discount in the amount of $3,200 to reflect the
value of the common stock as a reduction to the carrying amount of the debt and a corresponding increase to common stock and additional
paid-in capital. At December 31, 2017, the principal balance of the note is $60,000. Debt discount and original issuance discount
were fully amortized as of December 31, 2018. During April 2018, we issued a total of 1,000,000 restricted shares to a Note holder
due to the default on repayment (See Note 7). The shares were valued at fair value of $1,700. During April 2018, the Note was restated
in the amount of $60,000 including the original issuance discount of $10,000 due October 2018. In connection with this restated note,
we issued 5,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock. We recorded a debt discount in the amount of $8,678 to reflect the value
of the common stock as a reduction to the carrying amount of the debt and a corresponding increase to common stock and additional
paid-in capital. The debt discount and original issuance discount for a total of $18,678 have been fully amortized as of December
31, 2018. During November 2018, the Note was restated in the amount of $60,000 including the original issuance discount of $10,000
due May 2019. In connection with this restated note, we issued 5,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock. We recorded a debt
discount in the amount of $2,381 to reflect the value of the common stock as a reduction to the carrying amount of the debt and a
corresponding increase to common stock and additional paid-in capital. Pursuant to the restatement of the Note, the Company agreed
that the original issuance discount of $10,000 from the April 2018 Note would be paid to the lender upon execution of restated Note
in November 2018. The settlement agreement executed in December 2018 provides that 10,000,000 shares are issued due to the late payment.
The shares were valued at $3,000. During July 2019, payment of original issuance discount of $10,000 was made. During September 2019,
we issued additional 10,000,000 restricted shares due to the late payment of the original issuance discount of $10,000. The shares
were valued at fair value of $4,000. The restated Note in November 2018 and prior notes are all under personal guarantee by Mr. Deitsch.
Amortization of debt discount and original issuance discount for the year ended December 31, 2019 and 2018 was $8,254 and $4,127,
respectively, for the restated Note in November 2018. As of December 31, 2019 and 2018, the amount due is $60,000 and $61,746, net
of discount of $0 and $8,254, respectively. During January and July 2020, this Note and the Note of $76,076 amended in August 2018(See
Note 6(3)) were combined and restated and was due January 2021. The Note was further restated in February 2021 and is due in August
2021(See Note 13).
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
In
November 2017, we issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $120,000 with original issuance discount
of $20,000. The note was due in six months from the execution and funding of the note. In connection with the issuance of this promissory
note, we issued 10,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock. We recorded a debt discount in the amount of $5,600 to reflect
the value of the common stock as a reduction to the carrying amount of the debt and a corresponding increase to common stock and
additional paid-in capital. The debt discounts were fully amortized as of December 31, 2018. 1,500,000 shares of common stocks were
issued due to the default of repayments with a fair value of $2,250 in May 2018(See Note 7). During March 2020, $50,000 of the Note
of $120,000 with original issuance discount of $20,000 originated in November 2017 was settled for 125,000,000 shares. An additional
36,000,000 shares were issued to satisfy the default provision of the original note and 10,000,000 shares were issued along with
the restatement. The total fair value of issued stock was $119,700. The remaining balance of $70,000 was restated with additional
issuance discount of $14,000. The $84,000 due in September 2020 is in default and negotiation of further settlement. At December
31, 2019 and 2018, the principal balance of the loan is $120,000.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
In
November 2017, we issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $18,000 with original issuance discount of
$3,000. The note was due in six months from the execution and funding of the note. In connection with the issuance of this promissory
note, we issued 5,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock (See Note 7). We recorded a debt discount in the amount of $2,900
to reflect the value of the common stock as a reduction to the carrying amount of the debt and a corresponding increase to common
stock and additional paid-in capital. The debt discounts were fully amortized as of December 31, 2018. The note is in default and
in negotiation of settlement. In September 2018, 7,000,000 shares of common stock were issued due to the default of repayments with
a fair value of $5,600. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the principal balance of the note is $18,000 and the accrued interest is $2,000
and $0, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
In
December 2017, we issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $60,000 with original issuance discount of
$10,000. The note was due in one year from the execution and funding of the note. During August 2018, the Note holder sold the debt
of $60,000 to a non-related party. The subsequent note holder received a total of 145,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock
with a fair value of $101,500 in satisfaction of the Note of $60,000 in full. We recorded a loss on settlement of debt in other expense
for $41,500 (See Note 7). As a result of the settlement of the note, the debt discount has been fully amortized as of December 31,
2018. At December 31, 2018, the note was repaid in full.
|
(3)
|
At
December 31, 2019 and 2018, the balance of $872,256 and $751,955 net of discount of $17,370 and $29,371, respectively,
consisted of the following convertible loans:
|
|
●
|
On
March 19, 2014, we issued two Convertible Debentures in the amount of up to $500,000 each (total $1,000,000) to two non-related parties.
The first tranche of $15,000 each (total $30,000) of the funds was received during the first quarter of 2014. The notes carry interest
at 8% and were due on March 19, 2018. The note holders have the right to convert the notes into shares of Common Stock at a price
of $0.20. During 2018, repayment of $3,000 was made. At December 31, 2018, the principal balance of the note is $27,000 and the accrued
interest is $11,412. The two outstanding Notes were settled in connection with issuance of the convertible note in the amount of
up to $1,000,000 in February 2019 (See Note 6(4)), as a result, we recorded a gain on settlement of debt in other income for $38,412.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
During
July 2016, we issued a convertible note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $50,000 bearing monthly interest at a rate of
2.0% and convertible at $0.05 per share. During January 2017, the Note was restated with principal amount of $56,567 bearing monthly
interest rate of 2.5%. The New Note of $56,567 was due on July 26, 2017 and convertible at $0.05 per share. During February 2018,
the Notes with accrued interest of $65,600 was restated. The restated principal balance of $65,600 bears monthly interest at a rate
of 2.5% and was due August 14, 2018. In connection with this restated note, we issued 1,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock.
We recorded a debt discount in the amount of $4,035 to reflect the value of the common stock as a reduction to the carrying amount
of the debt and a corresponding increase to common stock and additional paid-in capital. The debt discount was fully amortized as
of December 31, 2018. During August 2018, the Notes with accrued interest of $10,476 were restated. The restated principal balance
of $76,076 bears monthly interest at a rate of 2.5% and was due February 2019. In connection with this restated note, we issued 5,000,000
shares of our restricted common stock. We recorded a debt discount in the amount of $3,800 to reflect the value of the common stock
as a reduction to the carrying amount of the debt and a corresponding increase to common stock and additional paid-in capital. Amortization
of debt discount of $2,850 has been recorded as of December 31, 2018. The remaining debt discount of $950 was fully amortized during
the three months ended March 31, 2019. The note is under personal guarantee by Mr. Deitsch. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the convertible
note payable was recorded at $76,076 and $75,126, net of discount of $0 and $950, respectively. The accrued interest as of December
31, 2019 and 2018 is $12,150 and $8,177. During January and July 2020, this Note and the Note of $60,000 amended in November 2018(See
Note 6(2)) were combined and restated and was due January 2021. The Note was further restated in February 2021 and is due in August
2021(See Note 13).
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
In
October 2017, we issued a promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount of $60,000 with original issuance discount of
$10,000 and a conversion option. The note was due in six months from the execution and funding of the note. In connection with the
issuance of this promissory note, we issued 5,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock. We recorded a debt discount in the amount
of $3,300 to reflect the value of the common stock as a reduction to the carrying amount of the debt and a corresponding increase
to common stock and additional paid-in capital. The debt discounts were fully amortized as of December 31, 2018. The loan is in default
and in negotiation of settlement. In April 2018, 1,000,000 shares of common stock were issued due to the default of repayments with
a fair value of $1,500 (See Note 7). At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the principal balance of the note is $60,000.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
During
January through December 2018, we issued convertible notes payable to the 20 unrelated third parties for a total of $618,250 with
original issue discount of $62,950. The notes are due in six months from the execution and funding of each note. The notes are convertible
into shares of Company’s common stock at a conversion price ranging from $0.0003 to $0.001 per share. The difference between
the conversion price and the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the date of issuance of the convertible notes resulted
in a beneficial conversion feature in the amount of $249,113. In addition, upon the issuance of convertible notes, the Company issued
10,250,000 shares of common stock (See Note 7). The Company has recorded a debt discount in the amount of $6,542 to reflect the value
of the common stock as a reduction to the carrying amount of the convertible debt and a corresponding increase to common stock and
additional paid-in capital. The total discount of $255,655 and original issuance discount of $62,950 was amortized over the term
of the debt. Amortization for the year ended December 31, 2018 was $290,184. At December 31, 2018, the principal balance of the notes,
net of discount of $28,421 is $589,829.
|
During
February 2019, we issued convertible notes payable of $70,000 with original issuance discount of $5,000. The notes were due in six months
from the execution and funding of each note. The notes are convertible into shares of Company’s common stock at a conversion price
of $0.0005 per share. During December 2019, $22,000 of the Note was amended to extend the maturity date to June 2020. In connection with
the issuance and restatements of the notes, the Company granted the following warrants at an exercise price of $0.001 per share in 2019.
The warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes method and recorded as a debt discount that was amortized over the life of the notes.
The Notes were further restated in August and October 2020 and are currently in default and in negotiation of settlement.
Month
of
Issuance
|
|
Number
of
Warrants
|
|
|
Fair
Value
of
Warrants
|
|
|
Month
of
Expiration
|
February, 2019
|
|
|
110,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
8,147
|
|
|
August, 2019
|
December, 2019
|
|
|
44,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
7,370
|
|
|
August, 2020
|
During
May 2019, we restated two convertible notes payable with additional original issue discount of $6,400 and issued 6,000,001 shares of
common stock with a fair value of $1,800 (See Note 7). The two restated notes were due in August 2019 and are in default. The total discount
of $8,200 was amortized over the term of the notes.
During
November 2019, we issued a convertible promissory note to an unrelated third party for $137,500 with original issuance discount of $12,500.
The note was due six months from the execution and funding of the notes. The Noteholder had the right to convert the note into shares
of Common Stock at a fixed conversion price of $0.000275. The Note is in default and negotiation of settlement.
During
December 2019, we issued a convertible promissory note to an unrelated third party for $22,000 with original issuance discount of $2,000.
The note was due six months from the execution and funding of the notes. The Noteholder had the right to convert the note into shares
of Common Stock at a fixed conversion price of $0.0002. The Note is in default and negotiation of settlement.
During
2019, repayments of $13,500 were made in cash to three of the Notes. Six of the Notes for a total of $87,100 were repaid in stocks as
the part of settlement of issuances of 800,000,000 shares of common stocks during December 2019(see Note 7).
Amortization
for the year ended December 31, 2019 was $55,222. At December 31, 2019, the principal balance of the notes, net of discount of $17,370
is $736,180. $574,550 of the above mentioned convertible notes payable to 16 of the unrelated third parties are in default
and in negotiation of settlement. Two of the above mentioned convertible notes payable for a total of $19,500 was settled in full in
March and April 2021(See Note 13).
|
(4)
|
At
December 31, 2019 and 2018, the balance of $5,814,047 and $1,156,341 net of discount of $22,344 and $0, respectively,
consisted of the following convertible loans:
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
During
December 2015, Mr. Deitsch, assigned $80,000 of his outstanding loan to an unrelated third party in the form of a Convertible Redeemable
Note. The note carries interest at 4% and was due on December 7, 2016. The Note reverted back as the promissory note upon maturity
date. On June 27, 2017, the Company owed principal balance of $80,000 plus accrued interest of $4,971. The total of $84,971 was assigned
and sold to an unrelated third party in the form of a Convertible Redeemable Note (See Note 6(2)). The note carries interest at 8%
and was due on June 27, 2018, unless previously converted into shares of restricted common stock. The Noteholder has the right to
convert the note into shares of Common Stock at fifty-five percent (55%) of lowest closing bid prices of our restricted common stock
for the twenty trading days preceding the conversion date including the date of receipt of conversion notice. During July and August
2017, the Note holder made conversions of a total of 164,935,000 shares of our restricted common stock satisfying the principal balance
of $55,325 with a fair value of $225,143. During February 2018, the Note holder made conversions of a total of 109,876,500 shares
of our restricted common stock with a fair value of $462,625 in satisfaction of the remaining principal balance of $29,646 in full.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
On
March 31, 2017, we issued a convertible debenture in the amount of $80,000 to Coventry Enterprises, LLC (“Coventry”).
The note carries interest at 8% and was due on March 30, 2018, unless previously converted into shares of restricted common stock.
Coventry has the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at a fifty-five percent (55%) of the of the lowest closing
bid price of our restricted common stock for the twenty trading days preceding the conversion date including the date of receipt
of conversion notice. During February 2018, the Noteholder made a conversion of 70,123,500 shares of our restricted common stock
with a fair value of $294,885 in satisfaction of a portion of the Note in the amount of $30,854 (See Note 7).
|
|
|
The
noteholder sold and assigned the remaining balance of $49,146 with accrued interest of $3,276 to an unrelated third party in the
form of a Convertible Redeemable Note. The note carries interest at 8% and was due on February 13, 2019, unless previously converted
into shares of restricted common stock. The noteholder has the right to convert the note into shares of our restricted common stock
at sixty percent of the lowest trading price of our restricted common stock for the twenty-five prior trading days including the
conversion date. During April and May 2018, the Note holder made conversions of a total of 65,885,713 shares of our restricted common
stock with a fair value of $145,161 in satisfaction of the remaining principal balance of $49,146 and accrued interest in full (See
Note 7).
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
On
July 18, 2017, we issued a convertible debenture in the amount of $150,000 to Coventry. The note carries interest at 8% and was due
on July 18, 2018, unless previously converted into shares of restricted common stock. Coventry has the right to convert the note
into shares of Common Stock at a fifty-five percent (55%) of the of the lowest closing bid price of our restricted common stock for
the twenty trading days preceding the conversion date including the date of receipt of conversion notice. During February 2018, the
noteholder sold and assigned the balance of $150,000 with accrued interest of $6,000 to an unrelated third party in the form of a
Convertible Redeemable Note. The note carries interest at 8% and was due on February 13, 2019, unless previously converted into shares
of restricted common stock. The noteholder has the right to convert the note into shares of our restricted common stock at sixty
percent of the lowest trading price of our restricted common stock for the twenty-five prior trading days including the conversion
date. During May and June 2018, the Noteholder made conversions of a total of 120,891,284 shares of our restricted common stock with
a fair value of $200,475 in partial satisfaction of the note in the amount of $70,000 (See Note 7). During July through September
2018, the Note holder made conversions of a total of 206,988,570 shares of our restricted common stock with a fair value of $176,655
in satisfaction of the remaining principal balance $86,000 and accrued interest in full (See Note 7).
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
On
March 28, 2016, we signed an expansion agreement with Brewer and Associates Consulting, LLC (“B+A”) to the original consulting
agreement dated on October 15, 2015 for consulting services for twelve months for a monthly fee of $7,000. To relieve our cash obligation
of $36,000 per original agreement, we issued three convertible notes for a total of $120,000 which includes the fees due under the
original agreement and the new monthly fees due under the expansion agreement. The $40,000 and $60,000 of the Notes were paid in
full as of December 31, 2016 and December 31, 2017, respectively. The remaining balance of $20,000 Notes is in default and negotiation
of settlement. The conversion price is equal to 55% of the average of the three lowest volume weighted average prices for the three
consecutive trading days immediately prior to but not including the conversion date. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the convertible
notes payable with principal balance of $20,000, at fair value, were recorded at $56,373 and $47,481, respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
During
June 2016, we issued a Convertible Debenture in the amount of $72,000 to an unrelated third party as a result of debt sale. The Note
carries interest at 8% and was due on June 20, 2017, unless previously converted into shares of restricted common stock. The convertible
note holder has the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at fifty-five percent (55%) of the average of the three
lowest volume weighted average prices (the VWAP) of our restricted common stock for the fifteen trading days preceding the conversion
date. During August 2018, the Note holder received a total of 300,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock in satisfaction of
the principal balance of $72,000 with accrued interest in full (See Note 9).
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
During
June 2016, the notes payable of $50,000 originating in January 2016 with accrued interest of $4,800 was assigned and sold to an unrelated
third party in the form of a Convertible Redeemable Note. The note carries interest at 8% and was due on June 16, 2017, unless previously
converted into shares of restricted common stock. The Noteholder has the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at
fifty-five percent (55%) of the average of the three lowest VWAP prices of our restricted common stock for the fifteen trading days
preceding the conversion date. During May 2018, the Note holder made a conversion of 228,000,000 shares of our restricted common
stock with a fair value of $319,200 in satisfaction of the principal balance of $54,800 in full (See Note 7).
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
In
April 2017, we issued a Convertible Promissory Note for $33,000 to an unrelated third party. The note carries interest at 12% annually
and was due on January 30, 2018. The Holder has the right to convert the loan, beginning on the date which is one hundred eighty
(180) days following the date of the Note, into common stock at a price of sixty percent (60%) of the average of the three lowest
trading prices of our restricted common stock for the fifteen trading days preceding the conversion date. During October 2017, the
Noteholder made the conversions of a total of 50,125,000 of our restricted common stock satisfying the principal balance of $16,040
with a fair value of $35,596. During June 2018, the Note holder made a conversion of 150,000,000 shares of our restricted common
stock with a fair value of $180,000 in satisfaction of the remaining principal balance of $16,960 with accrued interest in full (See
Note 7).
|
|
●
|
During
May and October 2017, we issued two Convertible Debenture for a total of $90,000 ($45,000 each) to Labrys. The notes carried interest
at 12% and were due on July 19, 2017 and November 3, 2017, respectively, unless previously converted into shares of restricted common
stock. Labrys has the right to convert the notes into shares of Common Stock at sixty percent (60%) of the lowest trading price of
our restricted common stock for the twenty-five trading days preceding the conversion date. During November 2017, the Note holder
made a conversion of 62,059,253 shares of stock satisfying the principal balance of $11,057 and accrued interest for a fair value
of $51,732. During February 2018, we issued 45,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock with a fair value of $247,500 to Labrys
in settlement of the remaining balance of $78,943 and accrued interest in full (See Note 7). Based on the conversion methodology,
the debt was valued at $1,206,081 prior to conversion, and the Company recorded a gain on settlement of $958,581, which is recorded
within gain (loss) on settlement of debt, net, within the statement of operations.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
During
May 2017, we issued a Convertible Debenture in the amount of $64,000 to an unrelated third party. The note carries interest at 8%
and was due on May 4, 2018, unless previously converted into shares of restricted common stock. We have accrued interest at default
interest rate of 20% after the note’s maturity date. The Note holder has the right to convert the note into shares of Common
Stock at a sixty percent (60%) of the lowest trading price of our restricted common stock for the twenty trading days preceding the
conversion date. During November 2017, the Note holder made a conversion of our restricted common stocks satisfying the principal
balance of $856 and penalty of $6,400 for a fair value of $21,399. During February 2018, the remaining balance of $63,144 with accrued
interest and penalty of $12,442 was assigned and sold to three unrelated third parties. During June 2018, a Note holder made a conversion
of 50,670,000 shares of our restricted common stock with a fair value of $70,938 in satisfaction of the balance of $34,060 plus accrued
interest of $8,607 (See Note 7). During December 2019, the principal balance of $16,752 with accrued interest of $3,232 assigned
and sold to a third party was settled as the part of settlement of issuances of 800,000,000 shares of common stocks during December
2019(See Note 7). At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the remaining principal of $12,629 and $29,381 plus accrued interest of $9,782 and
$7,138, at fair value, was recorded at $62,253 and $63,315. The remaining principal balance of the Note is in default.
|
|
|
|
|
|
All
of the convertible notes discussed below are with a single unrelated third party.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
During
December 2016, we issued a Convertible Debenture to an unrelated third party in the amount of $110,000. The note carries interest
at 12% and matured on September 8, 2017. Unless previously converted into shares of restricted common stock, the Note holder has
the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at a sixty percent (60%) of the lowest trading prices of our restricted
common stock for the twenty-five trading days preceding the conversion date. During June and July 2017, the Note holder made conversions
of a total of 179,800,000 shares of stock satisfying the principal balance of $63,001 and accrued interest for a fair value of $298,575.
During February 2018, the remaining balance of $46,999 with accrued interest of $2,820 was assigned and sold to an unrelated third
party in the form of a Convertible Redeemable Note. As part of the debt sale, the Company entered into a settlement agreement with
the original noteholder for a settlement of a default penalty of the original debt. During February and July, 2018, we issued a total
of 105,157,409 shares of our restricted common stock to the original Note holder with a fair value of $147,220. At December 31, 2018,
the Company owed additional shares to the original noteholder and recorded an accrual of $32,400 to account for the cost of the shares,
and the shares were issued in January 2019 (See Note 7).
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
The
new note of $49,819 carries interest at 8% and was due on February 13, 2019, unless previously converted into shares of restricted
common stock. We have increased the outstanding principal due by 10% and accrued interest at default interest rate of 24%
after the note’s maturity date. The Noteholder has the right to convert the note into shares of our restricted common stock
at sixty percent of the lowest trading price of our restricted common stock for the twenty-five prior trading days including the
conversion date. The conversion discount was further decreased to fifty percent due to the default on the Note. During September
2018, the Noteholder made a conversion of 52,244,433 shares of our restricted common stock with a fair value of $37,011 in satisfaction
of principal balance of $15,000 and accrued interest in full (See Note 7). At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the convertible note payable
with principal balance of $38,301 and $34,819, at fair value, was recorded at $246,819 and $62,508.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
During
February 2018, we issued a convertible debenture in the amount of $200,000 to an unrelated third party. The note carries interest
at 8% and was due in February 2019, unless previously converted into shares of restricted common stock. We have increased the
outstanding principal due by 10% and accrued interest at default interest rate of 24% after the note’s maturity date. The
Note holder has the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at sixty percent of the lowest trading price of our restricted
common stock for the twenty-five trading days including the date of receipt of conversion notice. The conversion discount was
further decreased to fifty percent due to the default on the Note. In connection with the issuance of the convertible note payable,
we recorded a day-one derivative loss of $1,646,242. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the convertible note payable with principal balance
of $220,000 and $200,000, at fair value, was recorded at $1,412,175 and $358,665. The note carries additional $200,000
“Back-end Note” ($100,000 each) with the same terms as the original note.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
During
April 2018, $65,000 of one of the $100,000 Back-end Note was funded. The note carries interest at 8% and was due in February 2019,
unless previously converted into shares of restricted common stock. We have increased the outstanding principal due by 10% and
accrued interest at default interest rate of 24% after the note’s maturity date. The Note holder has the right to convert
the note into shares of Common Stock at sixty percent of the lowest trading price of our restricted common stock for the twenty-five
trading days including the date of receipt of conversion notice. The conversion discount was further decreased to fifty percent
due to the default on the Note. In connection with the issuance of the convertible note payable, we recorded a day-one derivative
loss of $110,700. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the convertible note payable with principal balance of $71,500 and $65,000,
at fair value, was recorded at $458,957 and $115,165.
|
|
●
|
During
March 2018, we issued a convertible debenture in the amount of $60,000 to an unrelated third party. The note carries interest at
8% and was due in March 2019, unless previously converted into shares of restricted common stock. We have increased the outstanding
principal due by 10% and accrued interest at default interest rate of 24% after the note’s maturity date. The Note holder
has the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at sixty percent of the lowest trading price of our restricted common
stock for the twenty-five trading days including the date of receipt of conversion notice. The conversion discount was further
decreased to fifty percent due to the default on the Note. In connection with the issuance of the convertible note payable, we
recorded a day-one derivative loss of $48,418. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the convertible note payable with principal balance
of $66,000 and $60,000, at fair value, was recorded at $417,576 and $107,329. The note carries an additional “Back-end
Note” with the same terms as the original note that enables the lender to lend to us another $60,000.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
During
June 2018, the $60,000 Back-end Note was funded. The note carries interest at 8% and was due in March 2019, unless previously converted
into shares of restricted common stock. We have increased the outstanding principal due by 10% and accrued interest at default
interest rate of 24% after the note’s maturity date. The Note holder has the right to convert the note into shares of Common
Stock at sixty percent of the lowest trading price of our restricted common stock for the twenty-five trading days including the
date of receipt of conversion notice. The conversion discount was further decreased to fifty percent due to the default on the
Note. In connection with the issuance of the convertible note payable, we recorded a day-one derivative loss of $68,067. At December
31, 2019 and 2018, the convertible note payable with principal balance of $66,000 and $60,000, at fair value, was recorded
at $417,577 and $105,334.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
During
May 2018, we issued a convertible debenture in the amount of $60,000 to an unrelated third party. The note carries interest at 8%
and was due in May 2019, unless previously converted into shares of restricted common stock. We have accrued interest at default
interest rate of 24% after the note’s maturity date. The Note holder has the right to convert the note into shares of Common
Stock at sixty percent of the lowest trading price of our restricted common stock for the twenty-five trading days including the
date of receipt of conversion notice. The conversion discount was further decreased to fifty percent due to the default on the
Note. In connection with the issuance of the convertible note payable, we recorded a day-one derivative loss of $59,257. At December
31, 2019 and 2018, the convertible note payable with principal balance of $60,000, at fair value, was recorded at $369,372
and $106,681.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
During
August 2018, we issued a convertible debenture in the amount of $31,500 to an unrelated third party. The note carries interest at
8% and was due in August 2019, unless previously converted into shares of restricted common stock. We have accrued interest at default
interest rate of 24% after the note’s maturity date. The Note holder has the right to convert the note into shares of Common
Stock at sixty percent of the lowest trading price of our restricted common stock for the twenty-five trading days including the
date of receipt of conversion notice. The conversion discount was further decreased to fifty percent due to the default on the
Note. In connection with the issuance of the convertible note payable, we recorded a day-one derivative loss of $23,794. At December
31, 2019 and 2018, the convertible note payable with principal balance of $31,500, at fair value, was recorded at $183,565
and $55,409.
|
All
of the above convertible notes with principal balance of a total of $511,319, plus the additional principal increases due to the default
terms, were settled in October 2020 (See Note 13).
|
●
|
During
July 2018, we issued a convertible debenture in the amount of $50,000 to an unrelated third party. The note carries interest at 8%
and was due in July 2019, unless previously converted into shares of restricted common stock. We have accrued interest at default
interest rate of 24% after the note’s maturity date. The Note holder has the right to convert the note into shares of Common
Stock at fifty five percent of the average three lowest trading price of our restricted common stock for the fifteen trading days
including the date of receipt of conversion notice. In connection with the issuance of the convertible note payable, we recorded
a day-one derivative loss of $46,734. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the convertible note payable, at fair value, was recorded at
$180,176 and $96,157.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
During
August 2018, we issued a convertible debenture in the amount of $20,000 to an unrelated third party. The note carries interest at
8% and was due in August 2019, unless previously converted into shares of restricted common stock. We have accrued interest at default
interest rate of 24% after the note’s maturity date. The Note holder has the right to convert the note into shares of Common
Stock at fifty five percent of the average three lowest trading price of our restricted common stock for the fifteen trading days
including the date of receipt of conversion notice. In connection with the issuance of the convertible note payable, we recorded
a day-one derivative loss of $17,829. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the convertible note payable, at fair value, was recorded at
$70,635 and $38,297.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
During
January 2019, the principal balance of $60,000 from a promissory note of $75,000 originated in September 2016 (See Note 6(2)) and
accrued interest of $15,900 was restated in the form of a Convertible Note. The new note of $75,900 was due in one year from the
restatement of the note. The Noteholder has the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at 50% discount to the average
trading price of the three lowest closing stock prices for the twenty days prior to the notice of conversion. In connection with
the issuance of the convertible note payable, we recorded a day-one derivative loss of $75,900.
|
|
|
At
December 31, 2019, the convertible note payable, at fair value, was recorded at $253,000.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
During
February 2019, we issued a convertible promissory note to an unrelated third party in the amount up to $1,000,000 paid upon tranches.
The note is due two years from the execution and funding of the note per tranche. The Noteholder has the right to convert the note
into shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of the lower of $0.0005 or 50% discount to the average trading price of the three
lowest closing stock prices for the twenty days prior to the notice of conversion. The four tranches of the Note in the amount of
$372,374 has been funded as of December 31, 2019. In connection with issuance of the convertible note, the Noteholder agreed to eliminate
two outstanding Notes of $27,000 and the accrued interest of $11,412 that were held by the Noteholder’s defunct entities. In
connection with the issuance of the convertible note payable, we recorded a day-one derivative loss of $610,210. During May and June
2019, the Note holder made conversions of a total of 750,000,000 shares of stock satisfying the principal balance of $100,000 for
a fair value of $275,000 (See Note 7). At December 31, 2019, the convertible note payable with
principal balance of $272,374, at fair value, was recorded at $907,912. Proceeds in the amount
of $122,362 have been funded subsequent to December 31, 2019. During January 2020 through February 2020, the Note holder received
a total of 500,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock in satisfaction the $175,000 of the Note with a fair value of $425,000.
During February through April 2021, the Note holder received a total of 232,150,000 shares of our restricted common stock in satisfaction
the $116,075 of the Note with a fair value of $2,292,809. The remaining balance of $103,660 is due March 2023.
|
|
|
|
|
●
|
During
June 2019, we issued a convertible promissory note to an unrelated third party for $240,000 with original issuance discount of $40,000.
The note was due one year from the execution and funding of the notes. In connection with the issuance of this note, we issued 16,000,000
shares of our restricted common stock. The common stock was valued at $4,688 and recorded as a debt discount that was amortized over
the life of the note (See Note 7). The Noteholder has the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at a conversion price
of the lower of $0.0005 or 50% discount to the average trading price of the three lowest closing stock prices for the twenty days
prior to the notice of conversion. In connection with the issuance of the convertible note
payable, we recorded a day-one derivative loss of $240,000. Amortization for the debt discount for the year ended December 31, 2019
was $22,344. At December 31, 2019, the debt discount is $22,344. The convertible note payable, at fair value, was recorded at $800,000.
The Note is in default and negotiation of settlement.
|
|
|
|
|
(5)
|
At
December 31, 2019 and 2018, the balance of $175,000 and $0, respectively, consisted of the following advances received from a third
party: During the periods from May 2019 through December 2019, the Company received a total of $175,000 in deposits from a third
party in connection with a Joint Venture proposal. The deposits were considered as payments towards the purchase of equity in the
joint venture. The joint venture is currently on hold pending the outcome of the lawsuit with the Securities and Exchange Commission
(see Note 12). During February and May 2020, the Company received an additional total of $50,000 in deposits from this third party
in connection with a Joint Venture proposal.
|
7.
STOCKHOLDERS’ DEFICIT
Authorized
Shares
On
March 7, 2018, we obtained written consents from stockholders holding a majority of our outstanding voting stock to approve an amendment
of the Company’s articles of incorporation, as amended, to increase the number of authorized shares of common stock from 2,000,000,000
to 8,000,000,000.
Series
A Preferred Stock
Effective
October 30, 2017, pursuant to authority of its Board of Directors, the Company filed a Certificate of Determination to authorize the
issuance of 20,000,000 shares of stock designated “preferred shares”, issuable from time to time in one or more series
and authorize the Board of Directors to fix the number of shares constituting any such series, and to determine or alter the dividend
rights, dividend rate, conversion rights, voting rights, right and terms of redemption (including sinking fund provisions), the redemption
price or prices and the liquidation preference of any wholly unissued series of such preferred shares, and the number of shares constituting
any such series.
Effective
October 30, 2017 the Board of Directors authorized the issuance of 3,000,000 shares of Series A Preferred Stock (“Series A Preferred”).
Terms of the Series A Preferred include the following:
|
1.
|
The
Series A Preferred votes with the Company’s common stock as a single class on all matters or consents for the Company’s
common stockholders. Each share of Series A Preferred is entitled to one thousand votes per share.
|
|
|
|
|
2.
|
The
Series A Preferred will not be entitled to dividends unless the Company pays cash dividends or dividends in other property to holders
of outstanding shares of common stock, in which event, each outstanding share of the Series A Preferred will be entitled to receive
dividends of cash or property in an amount or value equal to one thousand multiplied by the amount paid in respect of one share of
common stock. Any dividend payable to the Series A Preferred will have the same record and payment date and terms as the dividend
payable on the common stock.
|
|
3.
|
Upon
any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, the holders of all shares of Series A Preferred
then outstanding shall be entitled to be paid out of the assets of the Company available for distribution to its stockholders an
amount in cash equal to $0.133 in cash per share before any distribution is made on any shares of the Company’s common stock.
If upon any voluntary or involuntary liquidation, dissolution or winding up of the Company, the application of all amounts available
for payments with respect to Series A Preferred would not result in payment in full of Series A Preferred, the holders shall share
equally and ratably in any distribution of assets of the Company in proportion to the full liquidation preference to which each is
entitled.
|
|
|
|
|
4.
|
The
Series A Preferred does not have any redemption rights.
|
Common
Stock Issued with Indebtedness
In
January and February 2018, in connection with four notes payable, we issued a total of 4,250,000 shares of our restricted common stock
with a fair value of $9,887 (See Note 6).
In
April 2018, in connection with a note payable, we issued a total of 5,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock with a fair value
of $8,678 (See Note 6).
In
August 2018, in connection with a note payable, we issued a total of 5,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock with a fair value
of $3,800 (See Note 6).
In
October through December, 2018, in connection with a note payable, we issued a total of 25,500,000 shares of our restricted common stock
with a fair value of $9,781 (See Note 6).
In
May 2019, in connection with amendment of two convertible notes payable, we issued a total of 6,000,001 shares of our common stock with
a fair value of $1,800 (See Note 6).
In
June 2019, in connection with issuance of a convertible notes payable, we issued a total of 16,000,000 shares of our common stock with
a fair value of $4,688 (See Note 6).
In
September 2019, in connection with amendment of a promissory notes payable, we issued 20,000,000 shares of our common stock with a fair
value of $5,895 (See Note 6).
Common
Stock Issued for Conversion of Convertible Debt
During
February 2018, a Note holder made conversions of a total of 70,123,500 shares of our restricted common stock with a fair value of $294,885
in satisfaction of the principal balance of $30,854 of an $80,000 Note originated in March 2017 (See Note 6).
During
February 2018, a Note holder received 109,876,500 shares of our restricted common stock with a fair value of $462,625 upon conversion
of $29,646 of an $84,971 Note originated in June 2017 (See Note 6).
During
February 2018, a Note holder received 45,000,000 of our restricted common stock with a fair value of $247,500 upon conversion of the
remaining balance of $78,943 of $90,000 Notes originated in May and October 2017 (See Note 6).
During
April and May 2018, a Note holder made conversions of a total of 65,885,713 shares of our restricted common stock with a fair value of
$145,161 in satisfaction of the remaining principal balance of $49,146 assigned and purchased from a Note originated in March 2017 (See
Note 6).
During
May and June 2018, a Note holder made conversions of a total of 120,891,284 shares of our restricted common stock with a fair value of
$200,475 in satisfaction of the balance of $70,000 of a $156,000 Note assigned and purchased from a Note originated in July 2017 (See
Note 6).
During
May 2018, a Note holder received a total of 228,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock with a fair value of $319,200 in satisfaction
of the remaining principal balance of $54,800 assigned and purchased from a Note originated in June 2016 (See Note 6).
During
June 2018, a Note holder made a conversion of 150,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock with a fair value of $180,000 in satisfaction
of the remaining principal balance of $16,960 of $33,000 Notes originated in May 2017 (See Note 6).
During
June 2018, a Note holder made a conversion of 50,670,000 shares of our restricted common stock with a fair value of $70,938 in satisfaction
of the principal balance of $34,060 and accrued interest of $6,476 assigned and purchased from a Note originated in May 2017 (See Note
6).
During
July through September 2018, a Note holder made conversions of a total of 206,988,570 shares of our restricted common stock with a fair
value of $176,655 in satisfaction of the remaining principal balance $86,000 and accrued interest in full from a Note originated in February
2018(See Note 6).
During
September 2018, a Note holder made a conversion of 52,244,433 shares of our restricted common stock with a fair value of $37,011 in satisfaction
of principal balance of $15,000 and accrued interest in full from a Note originated in February 2018 (See Note 6).
During
August 2018, a Note holder received a total of 300,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock with a fair value of $300,000 in satisfaction
of the principal balance of $72,000 with accrued interest in full for a Note originated in July 2016 (See Note 6).
During
May and June 2019, the Note holder made conversions of a total of 750,000,000 shares of stock for a fair value of $275,000 satisfying
the principal balance of $100,000 of a Note originated in February 2019 in the amount of up to $1,000,000.(See Note 6).
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Fair Value
of
|
|
Date
|
|
shares
converted
|
|
|
Debt
Converted
|
|
5/6/2019
|
|
|
250,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
75,000
|
|
5/31/2019
|
|
|
250,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
6/6/2019
|
|
|
250,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
100,000
|
|
Common
Stock Issued for Settlement of Accounts Payable, Accrued expense and Debt
During
May 2018, a Note holder received a total of 187,500,000 shares of our restricted common stock with a fair value of $243,750 in satisfaction
of the remaining balance of $42,500 from a Note originated in September 2017 in full. We recorded a loss on settlement of debt in other
expense for $201,250 (See Note 6).
During
August 2018, a Note holder received a total of 145,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock with a fair value of $101,500 in satisfaction
of the Note of $60,000 originated in December 2017 in full. We recorded a loss on settlement of debt in other expense for $41,500 (See
Note 6).
During
August 2018, the Company issued a total of 2,800,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock to settle the outstanding
fees of $4,200 with a fair value of $2,800. We recorded a gain on settlement of accounts payable in other expense for $1,400.
During
January 2019, in connection with the settlement of a default penalty of debt of $110,000 originated in December 2016, we issued a total
of 81,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock with a fair value of $32,400 to the Note holder (See Note 6). We had an accrual of
$32,400 to account for the cost of the shares at December 31, 2018.
During
December 2019, six convertible promissory Notes for a total of $87,100 (See Note 6(3)), one Note of $19,984 assigned from the convertible
Note of $29,381 (See Note 6(4)), and the accrued consulting fees of $39,000, were settled with 800,000,000 shares of common stocks. The
shares were valued at fair value of $454,000. We recorded a loss on settlement in other expense for $244,632.
Common
Stock Issued for Debt Modification and Penalty
During
February and July, 2018, in connection with the settlement of a default penalty of debt, we issued a total of 105,157,409 shares of our
restricted common stock with a fair value of $147,220 to the Note holder (See Note 6).
During
April 2018, we issued a total of 1,000,000 restricted shares to a Note holder due to the default on repayment of the promissory note
of $50,000 originated in October 2017.The shares were valued at fair value of $1,700.
During
April through December, 2018, we issued a total of 33,625,000 restricted shares to 14 Note holders due to the default on repayment of
the promissory notes. The shares were valued at fair value of $25,615.
During
May and June 2019, we issued a total of 3,500,000 restricted shares to three Note holders due to the default on repayment of the convertible
notes. The shares were valued at fair value of $1,050.
During
July through September 2019, we issued a total of 18,500,000 restricted shares to five Note holders due to the default on repayment of
the convertible notes. The shares were valued at fair value of $6,650.
Common
Stock Issued for Services
During
June 2018, the Company signed an agreement with a consultant for investor relation services for twelve months. In connection with the
agreement, 100,000,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stocks were issued. The shares were valued at $0.0012 per share.
The Company recorded an equity compensation charge of $50,000 and $70,000 during the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018.
During
April 2019, we signed an agreement with a consultant to provide investor relation services for twelve months. In connection with the
agreement, 120,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock were issued. The shares were valued at $24,000.
During
June 2019, we signed an agreement with a consultant to provide investor relation services for twelve months. In connection with the agreement,
15,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock were issued. The shares were valued at $6,000.
The
Company recorded an equity compensation charge of $21,500 during the year ended December 31, 2019. The remaining unrecognized compensation
cost of $8,500 will be recognized by the Company over the remaining service period.
Warrants
Issued with Debt
The
Company granted the following warrants at an exercise price of $0.001 per share in connection with issuances of convertible notes payable
of $70,000 in February 2019 and amendment of convertible notes payable of $22,000 in December 2019. The warrants were valued using the
Black-Scholes method and recorded as a debt discount and additional paid in capital. No warrants have been exercised.
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Fair Value
of
|
|
|
Month of
|
|
Month of
Issuance
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
Expiration
|
|
February, 2019
|
|
|
110,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
8,147
|
|
|
|
August,
2019
|
|
December, 2019
|
|
|
44,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
7,370
|
|
|
|
August,
2020
|
|
Beneficial
Conversion Features
During
2018, the Company has recorded a beneficial conversion feature in the amount of $249,113 as additional paid-in capital due to the difference
between the conversion price and the fair value of the Company’s common stock on the date of issuance of the convertible notes
(See Note 6).
8.
STOCK WARRANTS
Common
Stock Warrants
During
March, 2013, the Company issued a total of 65,000 warrants to purchase common stock at an exercise price of $0.01 per share in connection
with issuance of a convertible note payable to Coventry. The warrants expired on March 22, 2018.
On
September 3, 2013 and September 12, 2013, the Company issued 500,000 and 375,000 warrants, respectively, to purchase common stock at
an exercise price of $0.025 and $0.01 per share in connection with issuances of convertible notes payable to Coventry. The warrants expired
on September 3, 2018 and September, 12, 2018, respectively.
On
March 31, 2017, in connection with the issuance of an $80,000 Note, we granted three-year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 6,000,000
shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.005 per share. The warrants were valued at their fair value of $539 and $977 using
the Black-Scholes method on December 31, 2019 and 2018. The warrants expired on March 30, 2020.
On
March 3, 2016, in connection with the issuance of a convertible note, we granted five-year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 2,500,000
shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.03 per share. The warrants were valued at their fair value of $872 and $491 using
the Black-Scholes method at December 31, 2019 and 2018. The warrants expired on March 3, 2021.
On
April 4, 2016, in connection with the issuance of convertible notes, we granted three-year warrants to purchase an aggregate of 4,000,000
shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $0.05 per share. The warrants were valued at their fair value of $0 using the Black-Scholes
method at December 31, 2018. The warrants expired on April 4, 2019.
During
April 2014, the Company issued a total of 100,000 warrants to purchase common stock at an exercise price of $0.025 per share in
connection with issuance of a convertible note payable to Coventry. The warrants were valued at their fair value of $0 using the Black-Scholes
method at December 31, 2018. The warrants expired on April 9, 2019.
The
Company granted the following warrants at an exercise price of $0.001 per share in connection with issuances of three convertible notes
payable of $70,000 in February 2019 and amendment of one convertible notes payable of $22,000 in December 2019. The warrants were valued
using the Black-Scholes method and recorded as a debt discount and additional paid in capital. No warrants have been exercised.
Month of
Issuance
|
|
Number
of Warrants
|
|
|
Fair
Value of Warrants
|
|
|
Month
of Expiration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
February, 2019
|
|
|
110,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
8,147
|
|
|
|
August,
2019
|
|
December, 2019
|
|
|
44,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
7,370
|
|
|
|
August,
2020
|
|
A
summary of warrants outstanding in conjunction with private placements of common stock were as follows during the years ended December
31, 2019 and 2018:
|
|
Number
Of shares
|
|
|
Weighted
average exercise price
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance December 31, 2017
|
|
|
13,540,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.023
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Issued
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(940,000
|
)
|
|
|
0.015
|
|
Balance December 31, 2018
|
|
|
12,600,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.026
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Issued
|
|
|
154,000,000
|
|
|
|
0.001
|
|
Expired
|
|
|
(114,100,000
|
)
|
|
|
0.0027
|
|
Balance December 31, 2019
|
|
|
52,500,000
|
|
|
$
|
0.0028
|
|
The
following table summarizes information about fixed-price warrants outstanding as of December 31, 2019 and 2018:
|
|
Exercise
Price
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Number
Outstanding
|
|
|
Weighted
Average Contractual Life
|
|
|
Weighted
Average Exercise Price
|
|
2019
|
|
$
|
0.001-0.03
|
|
|
|
10,187,671
|
|
|
|
0.62
years
|
|
|
$
|
0.0028
|
|
2018
|
|
$
|
0.005-0.05
|
|
|
|
12,600,000
|
|
|
|
1.11
years
|
|
|
$
|
0.026
|
|
At
December 31, 2019, the aggregate intrinsic value of all warrants outstanding and expected to vest was $0. The intrinsic value of warrant
share is the difference between the fair value of our restricted common stock and the exercise price of such warrant share to the extent
it is “in-the-money”. Aggregate intrinsic value represents the value that would have been received by the holders of in-the-money
warrants had they exercised their warrants on the last trading day of the year and sold the underlying shares at the closing stock price
on such day. The intrinsic value calculation is based on the $0.0005, closing stock price of our restricted common stock on December
31, 2019. There were no in-the-money warrants at December 31, 2019.
9.
INCOME TAXES
The
Company’s tax expense differs from the “expected” tax expense for the years ended December 31, 2019 and 2018, (computed
by the following blended rate), are approximately as follows.
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
Tax Rate Reconciliation:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federal tax rate
|
|
|
21.00
|
%
|
|
|
21.00
|
%
|
Add: State taxes
|
|
|
5.50
|
%
|
|
|
5.50
|
%
|
Permanent difference
|
|
|
-1.15
|
%
|
|
|
-1.15
|
%
|
Valuation allowance
and change in federal tax rate
|
|
|
-25.35
|
%
|
|
|
-25.35
|
%
|
Tax rate
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
Computed “expected”
tax expense (benefit) - Federal
|
|
$
|
(1,384,203
|
)
|
|
|
(793,340
|
)
|
Computed “expected” tax expense (benefit)
- State
|
|
|
(286,398
|
)
|
|
|
(164,145
|
)
|
Permanent differences
|
|
|
1,313,998
|
|
|
|
571,235
|
|
Change in federal tax rate
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,134,665
|
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
356,603
|
|
|
|
(3,748,415
|
)
|
Provision for income
taxes
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
Net deferred income tax assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Reserve for prepaid inventory
|
|
$
|
18,174
|
|
|
$
|
12,104
|
|
Accrued salary
|
|
|
316,659
|
|
|
|
296,834
|
|
Reserve for receivables from officer
|
|
|
14,954
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
|
9,398,889
|
|
|
|
9,083,135
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(9,748,676
|
)
|
|
|
(9,392,073
|
)
|
Net deferred income tax
asset
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Due
to the uncertainty of the utilization and recoverability of the loss carry-forwards and other deferred tax assets, we have provided a
valuation allowance to fully reserve such assets. The valuation allowances increased by $356,603 for the year ended December 31,
2019 and decreased by $3,748,415 for the year ended December 31, 2018.
As
of December 31, 2019, the Company has net operating loss of approximately $37.1 million as of December 31, 2019, of which $1.7
million were incurred after December 31, 2017 that are available to offset future taxable income with no expiration date. The
remaining approximately $35.4 million of net operating loss of expired between 2030 and 2037.
In
December 2017, the United States Government passed new tax legislation that, among other provisions, lowered the corporate tax rate from
34% to 21%. In addition to applying the new lower corporate tax rate in 2018 and thereafter to any taxable income the Company may have,
the legislation affects the way the Company can use and carryforward net operating losses previously accumulated and results in a revaluation
of deferred tax assets and liabilities recorded on the balance sheet. Given that current deferred tax assets are offset by a full valuation
allowance, these changes will have no net impact on the balance sheet. However, when the Company becomes profitable, the Company will
receive a reduced benefit from such deferred tax assets.
The
Company’s 2017 through 2019 tax returns are subject to examination by the Internal Revenue Services and various state authorities.
10.
ACCRUED EXPENSES
Accrued
expenses consisted of the following:
|
|
December
31,
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
|
2018
|
|
Accrued consulting fees
|
|
$
|
161,550
|
|
|
$
|
161,550
|
|
Accrued settlement expenses
|
|
|
35,000
|
|
|
|
347,400
|
|
Accrued payroll taxes
|
|
|
167,906
|
|
|
|
120,182
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
231,186
|
|
|
|
180,509
|
|
Accrued
others
|
|
|
16,905
|
|
|
|
22,208
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
612,547
|
|
|
$
|
831,849
|
|
11.
PREPAID EXPENSES
Prepaid
expenses and other current assets consist of the following:
|
|
December
31, 2019
|
|
|
December
31, 2018
|
|
Supplier advances for future purchases
|
|
$
|
224,859
|
|
|
$
|
200,911
|
|
Reserve for supplier
advances
|
|
|
(224,859
|
)
|
|
|
(200,911
|
)
|
Net supplier advances
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Prepaid professional fees
|
|
|
8,650
|
|
|
|
13,000
|
|
Deferred stock compensation
|
|
|
8,500
|
|
|
|
50,000
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
17,150
|
|
|
$
|
63,000
|
|
We
performed an evaluation of our inventory and related accounts at December 31, 2019 and 2018, and increased the reserve on supplier advances
for future venom purchases by $23,948 and $47,757, respectively. At December 31, 2019 and 2018, the total valuation allowance for prepaid
venom is $224,859 and $200,911, respectively.
12.
COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Operating
Leases
In
February 2016, we entered into our current three-year operating lease for monthly payments of approximately $3,200 which expired in February
2019. The lease is currently month-to-month, thus classified as short-term and not reported on the balance sheet under ASC 842.
ReceptoPharm
leases a lab and renewed its operating lease agreement for five years beginning August 1, 2017 for monthly payments of approximately
$6,900 with a 5% increase each year.
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2019
|
|
Lease cost
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease cost
|
|
$
|
89,021
|
|
Short-term lease cost
|
|
|
45,026
|
|
Total lease cost
|
|
$
|
134,047
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Balance sheet information
|
|
|
|
|
Operating ROU Assets
|
|
$
|
207,530
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating lease obligations, current portion
|
|
|
73,278
|
|
Operating lease obligations,
non-current portion
|
|
|
143,322
|
|
Total operating
lease obligations
|
|
$
|
216,600
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average remaining lease term (in years)
– operating leases
|
|
|
2.67
|
|
Weighted average discount rate-operating leases
|
|
|
8
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental cash flow information related
to leases were as follows, for the year ended December 31, 2019:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash paid for amounts included in the measurement
of operating lease liabilities
|
|
$
|
79,950
|
|
Future
minimum payments under these lease agreements are as follows:
December
31,
|
|
Total
|
|
2020
|
|
$
|
87,991
|
|
2021
|
|
|
91,379
|
|
2022
|
|
|
62,274
|
|
Total
future lease payments
|
|
$
|
241,644
|
|
Less
imputed interest
|
|
|
25,044
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
216,600
|
|
Consulting
Agreements
During
July 2015, we signed an agreement with a company to provide for consulting services for five years. In connection with the agreement,
500,000 shares of our restricted common stock and a one year 8% note of $50,000 were granted. The shares were valued at $0.18 per share.
As the services provided were in dispute, the shares and note payable have not been issued as of December 31, 2019. We have accrued the
$142,500 in accrued expense and equity compensation.
During
October 2015, the Company signed an agreement with a consultant for consulting services for a year. In connection with the agreement,
2,500,000 shares of the Company’s restricted common stock were granted and the Company was to make monthly cash payments of $3,000.
As of December 31, 2016, the Company recorded an equity compensation charge of $31,750, however, only 1,000,000 of the shares have been
issued. As of December 31, 2019, $19,150 has been recorded in accrued expense to account for the 1,500,000 shares of common stock that
have not been issued.
Litigation
Patricia
Meding, et. al. v. ReceptoPharm, Inc. f/k/a Receptogen, Inc.
On
June 1, 2015, ReceptoPharm entered into a settlement agreement with Patricia Meding, a former officer and shareholder of ReceptoPharm.
The settlement relates to a lawsuit filed by Ms. Meding against ReceptoPharm (Patricia Meding, et. al. v. ReceptoPharm, Inc. f/k/a Receptogen,
Inc., Index No.: 18247/06, New York Supreme Court, Queens County) in which she claimed to own certain shares of ReceptoPharm stock and
claimed to be owed amounts on a series of promissory notes allegedly executed in 2001 and 2002.
The
settlement agreement executed on June 1, 2015 provides that ReceptoPharm will pay Ms. Meding a total of $360,000 over 35 months. The
first payment of $20,000 was made on July 1, 2015. A second payment of $20,000 was made on August 17, 2015 with 32 subsequent monthly
$10,000 payments due on the 15th of every month thereafter. To date, ReceptoPharm has made all monthly payments due under the agreement.
In the event of default on any of the payments due under the settlement agreement, the settlement amount would increase by an additional
$200,000. As of December 31, 2019, all payments were made and the settlement was concluded. We have recorded $200,000 in gain
on settlement of debt on the consolidated statements of operations upon payments in full in April 2018.
Paul
Reid et al. v. Nutra Pharma Corp. et al.
On
August 26, 2016, certain of former ReceptoPharm employees and a former ReceptoPharm consultant filed a lawsuit in the 17th Judicial Circuit
in and for Broward County, Florida (Case No. CACE16–015834) against Nutra Pharma and Receptopharm to recover $315,000 allegedly
owing to them under a settlement agreement reached in an involuntary bankruptcy action that was brought by the same individuals in 2012
and for payment of unpaid wages/breach of written debt confirms.
On
June 24, 2021, the parties entered into a confidential settlement agreement of the lawsuit. Nutra Pharma has fully performed under
the settlement and considers the case fully resolved.
Get
Credit Healthy, Inc. v. Nutra Pharma Corp. and Rik Deitsch, Case No. CACE 18-017055
On
August 1, 2018, Get Credit Healthy, Inc. filed a lawsuit against the Company and Rik Deitsch (collectively the “Defendants”)
in the 17th Judicial Circuit Court in and for Broward County, Florida (Case No. CACE 18-017055) to recover $100,000 allegedly owed under
an amended promissory note dated April 12, 2017. Counsel for Get Credit Healthy, Inc. requested an early mediation conference in an attempt
to resolve our dispute. We agreed to this request, and mediation took place on February 15, 2019. At December 31, 2018, we owed principal
balance of $101,818 and accrued interest of $21,023. The lawsuit was settled on February 15, 2019 for $104,000 with scheduled payments.
The repayments were made in full as of November 2020 (See Note 6).
CSA
8411, LLC v. Nutra Pharma Corp., Case No. CACE 18-023150
On
October 12, 2018, CSA 8411, LLC filed a lawsuit against the Company in the 17th Judicial Circuit Court in and for Broward County, Florida
(Case No. CACE 18-023150) to recover $100,000 allegedly owed under an amended promissory note dated April 12, 2017. On November 1, 2018,
the Company filed its Answer and Affirmative Defenses to the Complaint. The Company believes that this lawsuit is without merit. Moreover,
the Company believes that it has a number of valid defenses to this claim. Among other things, the owner of CSA 8411, LLC violated the
terms of a Binding Memorandum of Understanding by failing to invest in the Company and fraudulently inducing the Company to enter into
the subject amended promissory note (contrary to the Get Credit Healthy lawsuit discussed above, we are certain that this individual
is the majority owner of CSA 8411, LLC). Opposing counsel reached out to schedule mediation, and mediation was set for June 21, 2019
in Plantation, FL however the mediation was unsuccessful. At December 31, 2019, we owed principal balance of $91,156 and accrued interest
of $29,948 (See Note 6) if the defenses and our new claims are deemed to be of no merit.
Defendant
also filed affirmative claims against the Plaintiff, its owner Dan Oran and several related entities. The case has not been set
for trial as of this date.
Securities
and Exchange Commission v. Nutra Pharma Corporation, Erik Deitsch, and Sean Peter McManus
On
September 28, 2018, the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) filed a lawsuit in the United States
District Court for the Eastern District of New York (Case No. 2:18-cv-05459) against the Company, Mr. Deitsch, and Mr. McManus. The lawsuit
alleges that, from July 2013 through June 2018, the Company and the other defendants’ defrauded investors by making materially
false and misleading statements about the Company and violated anti-fraud and other securities laws.
The
violations alleged against the Company by the SEC include: (a) raising over $920,000 in at least two private placement offerings for
which the Company failed to file required registration statements with the SEC; (b) issuing a series of materially false or misleading
press releases; (c) making false statements in at least one Form 10-Q; and (d) failing to make required public filings with the SEC to
disclose the Company’s issuance of millions of shares of stock. The lawsuit makes additional allegations against Mr. McManus and
Mr. Deitsch, including that Mr. McManus acted as a broker without SEC registration and defrauded at least one investor by making false
statements about the Company, that Mr. Deitsch engaged in manipulative trades of the Company’s stock by offering to pay more for
shares he was purchasing than the amount the seller was willing to take, and that Mr. Deitsch failed to make required public filings
with the SEC. The lawsuit seeks both injunctive and monetary relief.
On
May 29, 2019 (following each of the defendants filing motions to dismiss), the SEC filed a First Amended Complaint which generally alleged
the same conduct as its original Complaint, but accounted for certain guidance provided by the United States Supreme Court in a case
that had been recently decided. Each of the defendants then moved to dismiss the SEC’s First Amended Complaint. On March 31, 2020,
the Court entered an Order granting in part and denying in part the various motions to dismiss. Following that Order, the SEC filed a
Second Amended Complaint (the operative pleading) and the defendants have filed their answers which generally deny liability. At this
time, discovery is closed and the SEC has indicated an intent to file a summary judgment motion regarding certain non-fraud claims asserted
in its Second Amended Complaint. The defendants have opposed the SEC’s request to file such motion(s). The Court conducted a hearing
on February 23, 2021 and set an initial briefing schedule for the SEC’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment wherein the Plaintiffs’
Motion for Partial Summary Judgment was due on April 5, 2021, the Defendants’ Consolidated (i.e., collectively, Nutra Pharma Corporation,
Erik “Rik” Deitsch, and Sean McManus) Response Brief to the SEC’s Motion was due May 3, 2021, and the Plaintiffs’
Reply Brief was due on May 19, 2021. On March 23, 2021, the Plaintiff filed a Motion for Extension of Time to file the Motion for Partial
Summary Judgment. On March 24, 2021, the Court entered an order granting the Motion for Extension of Time and modified the briefing schedule
as follows: Plaintiffs’ Motion was due on or before April 9, 2021, the Defendants’ Response was due on or before May 7, 2021,
and the Plaintiffs’ Reply was due on or before May 21, 2021. The Company disputes the allegations in this lawsuit and continues
to vigorously defend against the SEC’s claims. Mr. Deitsch and Mr. McManus have similarly defended the lawsuit since its filing
and each contest liability. The Company does not believe that it engaged in any fraudulent activity or made any material misrepresentations
concerning the Company and/or its products.
13.
SUBSEQUENT EVENTS
Convertible
Notes Payable
During
August 2020, the convertible promissory notes of $38,500 was amended with additional original issuance discount of $7,550 due February
2021. During October 2020, the convertible promissory note of $16,500 was amended with additional original issuance discount (OID) of
$1,650 due April 2021.The Noteholders have the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.0005.
In connection with the issuance of amended convertible notes, the Company granted the following warrants at an exercise price of $0.001
per share. The warrants were valued using the Black-Scholes method and recorded as a debt discount. No warrants have been exercised.
The gross proceeds of the notes were allocated to debt and warrants issued on a relative fair value basis. The debt discounts associated
with the warrants and OID for $29,481 and $9,200, respectively, are amortized over the life of the notes.
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Fair Value
of
|
|
|
Month of
|
Month of
Issuance
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
Warrants
|
|
|
Expiration
|
August, 2020
|
|
|
92,100,000
|
|
|
$
|
20,848
|
|
|
August, 2021
|
October, 2020
|
|
|
39,930,000
|
|
|
$
|
8,633
|
|
|
October, 2022
|
Pursuant
to the Note agreement in the amount up to $1,000,000 signed in February 2019, the proceeds in the amount of $372,374 have been funded
as of December 31, 2019. Proceeds in the amount of $122,362 have been funded subsequent to December 31, 2019. During January 2020 through
February 2020, the Note holder received a total of 500,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock in satisfaction the $175,000 of
the Note with a fair value of $425,000. During February through June 2021, the Note holder received a total of 237,850,000 shares of
our restricted common stock in satisfaction the $118,925 of the Note with a fair value of $2,328,149. The remaining balance of
$100,810 is due March 2023.
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Fair Value
of
|
|
Date
|
|
shares
converted
|
|
|
Debt
Converted
|
|
1/21/2020
|
|
|
250,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
150,000
|
|
2/18/2020
|
|
|
250,000,000
|
|
|
$
|
275,000
|
|
2/25/2021
|
|
|
137,700,000
|
|
|
$
|
1,500,930
|
|
3/3/2021
|
|
|
67,380,000
|
|
|
$
|
599,682
|
|
4/26/2021
|
|
|
27,070,000
|
|
|
$
|
192,197
|
|
6/1/2021
|
|
|
5,700,000
|
|
|
$
|
35,340
|
|
During
January and March 2020, we issued convertible promissory notes to an unrelated third party for a total of $68,750 with original issuance
discount of $6,250. The Noteholder has the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at a fixed conversion price of $0.0005.
The Notes were due in January and March 2021. The Notes are in default and negotiation of settlement.
During
February and March 2020, we issued convertible promissory notes to an unrelated third party for a total of $22,000 with original issuance
discount of $2,000. The notes were due six months from the execution and funding of the notes. The Noteholder has the right to convert
the note into shares of Common Stock at a fixed conversion price of $0.0003. The Notes are in default and negotiation of settlement.
During
March 2020, we issued a convertible promissory note to an unrelated third party for $5,500 with original issuance discount of $500. The
note was due six months from the execution and funding of the notes. The Noteholder has the right to convert the note into shares of
Common Stock at a fixed conversion price of $0.0002. The Note is in default and negotiation of settlement.
During
March 2020, we issued a convertible promissory note to an unrelated third party for $5,500 with original issuance discount of $500. The
note was due six months from the execution and funding of the notes. The Noteholder has the right to convert the note into shares of
Common Stock at a fixed conversion price of $0.0005. The Note is in default and negotiation of settlement.
During
August 2020, we issued a convertible promissory note to an unrelated third party for a $22,000 with original issuance discount of $2,000.
The Noteholder has the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at a fixed conversion price of $0.0005. The note is due
August 2021.
During
July 2020, we issued a convertible promissory note to an unrelated third party for $20,900 with original issuance discount of $1,900.
The Noteholder has the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at a fixed conversion price of $0.00052. The note was due
January 2021. The Note is in default and negotiation of settlement.
During
August 2020, we issued a convertible promissory note to an unrelated third party for $5,500 with original issuance discount of $500.
The Noteholder has the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at a fixed conversion price of $0.0005. The note was due
February 2021. The Note is in default and negotiation of settlement.
During
October and November 2020, we issued convertible promissory notes to 3 unrelated third parties for $208,800 with original issuance
discount of $19,800. The Noteholders have the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at a conversion price ranging from
$0.00022 to $0.0005 per share. The notes were due in April and May 2021. The Notes are in default and negotiation of settlement.
During
November 2020, we issued a convertible promissory note to an unrelated third party for $139,150 with original issuance discount of $12,650.
The Noteholder has the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at a fixed conversion price of $0.00055. The note is due
November 2021.
During
November and December 2020, we issued two convertible promissory notes to unrelated third parties for a total of $57,500 with original
issuance discount of $7,500. The notes are due one year from the execution and funding of the notes. The Noteholders have the right to
convert the note into shares of Common Stock at a conversion price of $0.0008. In connection with the issuance of convertible notes,
the Company granted the 71,875,000 warrants at an exercise price of $0.002 per share that expire one year from the date of issuance.
The warrants are valued using the Black-Scholes method and recorded as a debt discount. No warrants have been exercised. The gross proceeds
of the notes were allocated to debt and warrants issued on a relative fair value basis. The debt discounts associated with the warrants
and OID for $30,417 and $7,500, respectively, are amortized over the life of the notes.
During
November 2020, the Note holder assigned $20,000 of the $75,900 convertible note restated in January 2019 to a third party. The third
party subsequently received a total of 100,000,000 shares of our restricted common stock in satisfaction the $20,000 of the Note with
a fair value of $140,000. At December 31, 2020, the balance of $55,900 remains outstanding. The note was due January 2021. The
Note is in default and negotiation of settlement.
During
the first quarter of 2021, we issued convertible promissory notes to the unrelated third parties for a total of $717,667 with original
issuance discount of $93,609. The Noteholders have the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at a conversion price ranging
from $0.0003 to $0.002 per share. The notes are due one year from the execution and funding of the notes.
During
the second quarter of 2021, we issued convertible promissory notes to the unrelated third parties for a total of $265,650 with original
issuance discount of $34,650. The Noteholders have the right to convert the note into shares of Common Stock at a conversion price ranging
from $0.0008 to $0.002 per share. The notes are due one year from the execution and funding of the notes.
PPP
Loan
During
May 2020, we entered into a two-year loan agreement with the U. S. Small Business Administration for a Payroll Protection Program (PPP)
loan, for $64,895 with an annual interest rate of one percent (1%), with a term of twenty-four (24) months, whereby a portion of the
loan proceeds have been used for certain labor costs, office rent costs and utilities, which may be subject to a loan forgiveness, pursuant
to the terms of the SBA/PPP program.
Economic
Injury Disaster Loan
During
April and June 2020, the Company executed the standard loan documents required for securing a loan from the SBA under its Economic Injury
Disaster Loan assistance program (the “EIDL Loan”) considering the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the Company’s
business. Pursuant to the Loan Authorization and Agreement (the “SBA Loan Agreement”), the principal amount of the EIDL Loan
was $154,900, with proceeds to be used for working capital purposes. Interest accrues at the rate of 3.75% per annum. Installment payments,
including principal and interest, are due twelve months from the date of the SBA Loan Agreement in the amount of $731. The balance of
principal and interest is payable over a 360 month period from the date of the SBA Loan Agreement. In connection therewith, the Company
received a $5,000 advance, which does not have to be repaid. The SBA requires that the Company collateralize the loan to the maximum
extent up to the loan amount. If business fixed assets do not “fully secure” the loan the lender may include trading assets
(using 10% of current book value for the calculation), and must take available equity in the personal real estate (residential and investment)
of the principals as collateral.
Restatement
of Promissory Notes
During
January 2020, the Note of $60,000 with original issuance discount of $10,000 amended in November 2018 and the Note of $88,225 plus accrued
interest at a rate of 2.5% monthly to an unrelated third party were combined and restated. The restated principal balance was $148,225
that carries interest at a rate of 2.0% monthly due July 2020. During July 2020, the restated Note of $148,225 plus accrued interest
of $18,701 was further restated. The new principal balance was $166,926 that carries interest at a rate of 2.0% monthly and was due January
2021. During February 2021, we issued 29,072,500 shares of common stock to satisfy the accrued interest of $23,258 with fair value of
$343,056. The settlement of accrued interest resulted in a loss on settlement of debt in other income for $319,798. The principal balance
of $166,926 was further restated. The restated balance is $183,619 with an original issuance discount of $16,693 and is due August 2021.
Settlement
of Convertible Promissory Notes
During
February through August 2018, we issued seven convertible promissory notes to an unrelated third party due one year from the execution
dates. The principal balance of these Notes on December 31, 2019 was $511,319. During September 2020, the Note holder received a total
of 107,133,333 shares of our restricted common stock in satisfaction of the principal balance of $22,000 and accrued interest of $10,140.
During October 2020, the Note holder received a total of 107,817,770 shares of our restricted common stock in satisfaction of the principal
balance of $22,000 and accrued interest of $10,345. During October 2020, the Note holder sold the remaining debt of $467,319 and accrued
interest of $166,168 for $250,000 to a non-related party.
|
|
Number of
|
|
|
Fair Value
of
|
|
Date
|
|
shares
converted
|
|
|
Debt
Converted
|
|
9/21/2020
|
|
|
107,133,333
|
|
|
$
|
171,413
|
|
10/5/2020
|
|
|
107,817,770
|
|
|
|
64,691
|
|
During
March 2021, in connection with this settlement of the $6,000 of the Note of $11,000 originated in November 2018, we issued 11,000,000
shares of common stocks in satisfaction of $6,000 of the Note with a fair value of $104,500 and made a repayment of $5,000 in cash. The
settlement resulted in a loss on settlement of debt in other expense for $98,500.
During
April 2021, in connection with this settlement of the remaining balance of $8,500 of the Note of $12,000 originated in December 2018,
we issued 2,000,000 shares of common stocks in satisfaction of $4,000 of the Note with a fair value of $15,200 and made a repayment of
$4,500 in cash. The settlement resulted in a loss on settlement of debt in other expense for $11,200.
Settlement
and Restatement of Promissory Notes
During
March 2020, $50,000 of the Note of $120,000 with original issuance discount of 20,000 originated in November 2017 was settled for 125,000,000
shares. An additional 36,000,000 shares were issued to satisfy the default provision of the original note and 10,000,000 shares were
issued along with the restatement. The total fair value of issued stock was $119,700. The remaining balance of $70,000 was restated with
additional issuance discount of $14,000. The $84,000 due in September 2020 is in default and negotiation of further settlement.
Settlement
of a Related-Party Note
During
June 2020, the Note of $14,400 with original issuance discount of $2,400 to a related party amended in December 2018 was settled with
cash payment of $14,400 and 5,000,000 shares of common stocks. The shares were valued at fair value of $3,000.
Common
Stock Issued for Default Payments
During
January 2020, we issued a total of 75,000,000 restricted shares to a Note holder due to the default on repayments of the convertible
promissory note of a total of $148,225 amended in August and November 2018. The shares were valued at fair value of $45,000.
During
July 2020, we issued a total of 1,000,000 restricted shares to a Note holder due to the default on repayments of the promissory note
of $22,000 originated in December 2019. The shares were valued at fair value of $700.
During
September 2020, we issued a total of 10,000,000 restricted shares to a Note holder due to the default on repayments of the promissory
note of $333,543 plus accrued interest amended in September 2019. The shares were valued at fair value of $6,000.
During
October 2020, we issued a total of 1,500,000 restricted shares to a Note holder due to the default on repayments of the promissory note
of $84,000 amended in March 2020. The shares were valued at fair value of $900.
During
January 2021, we issued a total of 25,000,000 restricted shares to a Note holder due to the default on repayments of the promissory note
of $166,926 amended in July 2020. The shares were valued at fair value of $107,500.
Convertible
notes receivable
On
March 10, 2021, we purchased a convertible note from an unrelated third party for a total of $26,950 with original issuance discount
of $2,450. The note is convertible into common shares for $0.01 per common share and mature on March 10, 2022.