TIDMBBOX
RNS Number : 5409F
Tritax Big Box REIT plc
23 February 2015
23 February 2015
Tritax Big Box REIT plc
(the "Group" or the "Company")
FULL YEAR RESULTS FOR THE PERIOD FROM 1 NOVEMBER TO 31 DECEMBER
2014
Tritax Big Box REIT plc (ticker: BBOX), the only real estate
investment trust giving pure exposure to very large logistics
warehouse assets ("Big Boxes") in the UK, is today reporting its
full year results for the Group for the period from 1 November 2013
to 31 December 2014.
Financial highlights:
-- The IPO in December 2013 raised gross proceeds of GBP200
million at an issue price of 100 pence per share. In July 2014, the
Company's shares moved to a premium listing and trading on the
London Stock Exchange Main Market.
-- Further equity fundraisings in May, July and November 2014
raised a total of more than GBP280 million, at issue prices of
between 103 and 105 pence per share.
-- We paid the first interim dividend of 1.85 pence per share in
August 2014, for the period to 30 June 2014, and the second interim
dividend of 1.50 pence per share in December 2014, for the period
from 1 July to 31 October 2014. A third interim dividend of 0.80
pence per share will be payable in March 2015, for the period from
1 November to 31 December 2014. In 2015, we are on track to achieve
our initial target dividend on the IPO issue price of 6 pence per
share.
-- The properties were independently valued as at 31 December
2014 at GBP619.28 million (including forward funded commitments),
an uplift of 9.3% over the aggregate acquisition price (excluding
acquisition costs).
-- The net asset value ("NAV") per share increased from 98.00
pence at the time of the IPO to 107.02 pence as at 31 December
2014, a rise of 9.2%.
-- Annualised rent roll as at 31 December 2014 of GBP36.16
million including forward funded commitments.
-- Our loan to value ("LTV") ratio was 32.9% as at 31 December
2014, with long-term debt drawn at the period end of GBP203.64
million.
-- The average debt margin payable across the portfolio is 1.76%
over 3-month LIBOR; we have used interest rate caps to limit our
exposure to interest rate increases.
Operational highlights:
-- The net proceeds from the IPO and the equity fundraisings in
May and July 2014 were fully invested, on time and in line with our
stated objectives. During the period, we acquired 14 Big Box assets
let to some of the UK's largest retailers, global logistics
companies and renowned manufacturers.
-- The properties in our portfolio are in strong distribution
locations and provide UK geographic diversification.
-- We benefit from a diverse covenant spread, with all
properties leased to institutional-grade tenants.
-- Our weighted average unexpired lease term across the
portfolio was 13.9 years as at 31 December 2014.
-- Our portfolio was fully let or contracted and income producing during the period.
Post Balance Sheet highlights:
-- In January 2015 we exchanged contracts, subject to detailed
planning consent, to provide GBP98.8 million of forward funding for
a new distribution warehouse pre-let to Ocado, Erith.
-- In February 2015, we drew a further GBP13.17 million of
senior debt with a term to maturity of four years, hedged via a
coterminous swap.
Further equity fundraising
Further to the exchange of contracts on a new distribution
warehouse facility for Ocado announced on 29 January 2015, the
Company is currently in advanced negotiations for the acquisition
of three additional assets, each of which is under offer in
solicitors' hands and subject to exclusivity agreements.
In addition, the Manager is engaged in detailed discussions with
the owners of a number of other suitable assets that meet the
Company's Investment Policy. In order to assist in the financing of
these investment opportunities, the Company is currently
considering a further equity fundraising in the near term pursuant
to its Share Issuance Programme. Further details will be published
in due course.
Richard Jewson, Chairman of Tritax Big Box REIT plc,
commented:
"The fundamentals of the Big Box market remain highly
favourable. With the economy continuing to recover, online retail
in the UK growing rapidly and companies wanting to increase the
efficiency of their distribution, occupier demand for Big Boxes is
set to stay strong. At the same time, the supply of new Big Boxes
is severely constrained and will not materially increase in the
short to medium term. With demand exceeding supply, we expect to
see rents continue to rise.
The expectation of rental growth and the important role Big
Boxes play in the UK economy has strengthened investment demand and
compressed yields during 2014. This presents an opportunity for us
to create additional supply, through forward funded pre-let
investments of securely let modern purpose-built assets at a
discount to their completed investment value.
The last year has shown our ability to source excellent
investments and to buy them at attractive prices. We believe the
Group is now one of the first ports of call for vendors and their
agents when looking to sell Big Boxes. This will help us to
continue to grow and diversify the portfolio.
In summary, we remain confident of delivering excellent returns
for our shareholders, through a stable and growing income stream
with the potential for capital appreciation."
For further information, please contact:
Tritax Group via Newgate Communications
Colin Godfrey (Partner, Fund Manager)
Newgate Communications (Financial Tel: 020 7680 6550
PR) Email: tritax@newgatecomms.com
James Benjamin
Andre Hamlyn
Jefferies International Limited Tel: 020 7029 8000
Gary Gould
Stuart Klein
Alex Collins
Akur Limited Tel: 020 7493 3631
Anthony Richardson
Tom Frost
Siobhan Sergeant
Meeting for investors and analysts and audio recording of
results available
A meeting for investors and analysts will be held at 11am today
at:
Newgate Communications:
Sky Light City Tower
50 Basinghall Street
London, EC2V 5DE
In addition, later in the day an audio recording of this meeting
and the presentation will also be available to download from the
Company's website: www.tritaxbigbox.co.uk
The Annual Report and Accounts will today be available on the
Company's website at www.tritaxbigbox.co.uk. In accordance with
Listing Rule 9.6.1, copies of these documents will also be
submitted today to the UK Listing Authority via the National
Storage Mechanism and will be available for viewing shortly at
www.morningstar.co.uk/uk/NSM.
Hard copies of the Annual Report and Accounts will be sent to
shareholders, along with the notice for Annual General Meeting
2015, on or around 11 March 2015.
NOTES:
Tritax Big Box REIT plc is a real estate investment trust to
which Part 12 of the UK Corporation Tax Act 2010 applies ("REIT").
The Company invests in a portfolio of well-located, modern "Big
Box" assets, typically targeting buildings greater than 500,000 sq.
ft., let to institutional-grade tenants on long-term leases
(typically between 12 and 25 years in length) with upward-only rent
reviews (providing the potential for inflation linked earnings
growth), and with geographic and tenant diversification throughout
the UK. The Company seeks to exploit the significant opportunity in
this sub-sector of the UK logistics market owing to strong tenant
demand in high growth areas of the economy and limited stock
supply. The Company is the first listed vehicle to give pure
exposure to the "Big Box" asset class in the UK.
Further information on Tritax Big Box REIT is available at
www.tritaxbigbox.co.uk
Chairman's statement
I am pleased to present the Group's results for the period from
1 November 2013 to 31 December 2014.
This has been an exceptional period for the Group, during which
we believe we have been the most successful investor in the UK Big
Box market. The fundamentals of our market remain attractive and we
are confident of delivering excellent returns for our
shareholders.
Overview
This was an extremely active period for the Group, during which
we consistently achieved our short-term objectives and made strong
progress towards our medium-term objectives.
The initial public offering ("IPO") in December 2013 raised
gross proceeds of GBP200 million, with the Company's shares
admitted to trading on the Specialist Fund Market ("SFM") of the
London Stock Exchange and listed on the Official List of the
Channel Islands Stock Exchange Authority ("CISEA").
Our investment manager, Tritax Management LLP (the "Manager"),
immediately began to put the net proceeds from the IPO to use,
purchasing high-quality Big Box assets with institutional-grade
tenants. The number of attractive opportunities available to us was
such that we had three further equity issuances during 2014,
raising an additional GBP280 million. Each issuance was at a price
above both the flotation price and our published NAV at that time.
We were pleased that our shareholders recognised the attractiveness
of our proposition, resulting in each of these fundraisings being
oversubscribed.
In July 2014, we moved from the SFM to a premium listing on the
Official List of the UK Financial Conduct Authority, with the
shares trading on the Main Market of the London Stock Exchange. As
a consequence, on 5 August 2014 we cancelled the trading of our
shares on the CISEA and our listing on the CISEA's Official
List.
By the end of 2014, we had fully invested the proceeds from the
IPO and the fundraisings in May and July 2014. This meant that, in
little more than 12 months since the IPO, we had built an excellent
portfolio of 14 Big Boxes, with good diversification both by
geography and by tenant. The valuation uplift of 9.3% (excluding
acquisition costs) at 31 December 2014 is particularly creditable
given that we had only owned some of these assets for a matter of
weeks at that date. This performance is reflected in the total
return we generated during the period of 10.4%, which is ahead of
our target of more than 9%. This is measured as the growth in net
asset value over the period and including dividends paid, as set
out in our investment objectives.
The quality and breadth of our portfolio demonstrates the
Manager's outstanding market knowledge, range of contacts and
ability to negotiate attractive off-market deals, which offer good
value for shareholders and meet vendors' desire for speed and
certainty of execution. Over 80% of the assets we acquired (by
value) in 2014 were off-market transactions.
Financial results
We believe that specialisation and market forces have led to
outperformance and that this is reflected in our financial results
for the period.
Under International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") as
adopted by the European Union, our operating profit for the period
was GBP46.67 million, with total comprehensive income of GBP41.84
million. Basic and diluted earnings per share for the period were
15.10 pence, which includes the net valuation gain of GBP29.09
million we recognised as a result of revaluing our investment
properties and derivative interest rate caps.
The NAV per share at 31 December 2014 was 107.02 pence, prior to
adjusting for the third interim dividend for the period of 0.80
pence per share. This compares favourably with the NAV per share of
98.0 pence immediately following the IPO.
We have adopted European Public Real Estate Association ("EPRA")
best practice recommendations and aim for the Company's shares to
be included in EPRA's investment indices during 2015, which we
expect to broaden the range of potential institutional investors
able to invest in our shares. Under EPRA's methodology, EPS for the
period were 4.60 pence and the NAV per share at 31 December 2014
was 107.57 pence. A full list of our EPRA performance measures is
set out below.
The Group has a low and highly transparent cost base. The total
expense ratio of 1.13% compares favourably with our peers.
Dividends
One of our key aims is to deliver a high-quality, low risk
income stream to shareholders. During the period, we paid two
interim dividends. The first, which we paid in August 2014, was
1.85 pence per share and related to the period from the IPO until
30 June 2014. In December 2014, we paid a second dividend of 1.50
pence per share, for the period from 1 July to 31 October 2014.
The Board has also declared a third interim dividend of 0.80
pence per share. This will be paid on 18 March 2015, to
shareholders on the register at 6 March 2015.
Taken together, the second and third interim dividends mean that
we will have paid 2.30 pence per share for the second half of 2014,
which achieves the objective we set out at the time of our July
2014 fundraising. Our target is to achieve an annual dividend of 6
pence per share, based on the IPO price of 100 pence per share. We
are on track to do so in 2015, provided we successfully continue to
implement our investment and financing plans, with the objective of
growing the dividend thereafter.
Financing
By December 2014, we had raised a gross total of nearly GBP481
million of equity and drawn down nine senior debt facilities
totalling GBP203.64 million, with a further GBP13.17 million of
facilities undrawn at the period end. We have broadened our banking
arrangements during the second half of the calendar year, adding
Santander UK and Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen Girozentrale (Helaba)
to our initial relationship with Barclays.
The average unexpired term of the loans is 4.3 years, excluding
any options to extend. The portfolio's LTV of 32.9% at 31 December
2014 is below both our initial objective of around 45% and our
medium-term target of 40%. This reflects the timing of our equity
fundraisings and subsequent property investments and we expect to
be at an LTV in line with our target once we are fully
invested.
The prospectus published in July 2014 launching our share
issuance programme remains live until July 2015. Approximately 245
million shares remain available for issuance pursuant to the
Company's Share Issuance Programme.
Hedging and loan interest
Managing risk is essential to delivering the quality of income
stream we are targeting for our shareholders. We have therefore
protected the Group from a potential significant rise in interest
rates by using derivative instruments to cap the interest rates on
all nine of the senior debt facilities we had drawn by the period
end.
The notional value of debt, as covered by interest rate caps was
GBP198.9 million at 31 December 2014, meaning that we had
effectively hedged 97.7% of our senior debt at that date. The caps'
weighted average strike rate was 2.09%, which, when added to the
weighted average margin payable on our debt facilities of 1.76%,
gives us an all-in running capped rate of borrowing of 3.85%. While
this is the maximum rate payable under our existing loans, the
average margin payable of 1.76% over 3-month LIBOR gives an all-in
rate payable at the period end of approximately 2.32%.
Outlook
The fundamentals of the Big Box market remain highly favourable.
With the economy continuing to recover, online retail in the UK
growing rapidly and companies wanting to increase the efficiency of
their distribution, occupier demand for Big Boxes is set to stay
strong. At the same time, the supply of new Big Boxes is severely
constrained and will not materially increase in the short to medium
term. With demand exceeding supply, we expect to see rents continue
to rise.
The expectation of rental growth and the important role Big
Boxes play in the UK economy has strengthened investment demand and
compressed yields during 2014. This presents an opportunity for us
to create additional supply, through forward funded pre-let
investments of securely let modern purpose-built assets at a
discount to their completed investment value.
The last year has shown our ability to source excellent
investments and to buy them at attractive prices. We believe the
Group is now one of the first ports of call for vendors and their
agents when looking to sell Big Boxes. This will help us to
continue to grow and diversify the portfolio.
In summary, we remain confident of delivering excellent returns
for our shareholders, through a stable and growing income stream
with the potential for capital appreciation.
Richard Jewson Chairman
23 February 2015
Our market
We believe that the Big Box sector is one of the most exciting
asset classes in today's UK property market. In this section, we
explain what a Big Box is and why we believe the fundamentals of
our market are so compelling.
Why commercial property?
We are part of a fast moving world economy. News and information
affect global stock markets almost instantaneously, meaning that
equity markets can respond quickly. Commercial property has
longer-term characteristics and shares some of the features of
bonds. Gilt yields recently reached an historic low, with investors
seeking a safe haven amidst global political instability, world
economic uncertainty and low inflation.
Commercial property investments have a very reassuring feature,
namely that they benefit from upward only rent reviews. This means
that as long as the tenant remains solvent, the landlord's income
will not reduce during the lease term. In addition, if the economy
grows and rents rise, landlords capture income growth. Some leases
offer even more certainty, through inflation-linked rent reviews,
while others can provide for fixed uplifts. Commercial property can
therefore offer a form of inflation-proofing.
Alongside the potential for attractive and growing income,
commercial property can deliver capital growth from yield
compression, rental growth (applied to a constant yield) and asset
management. As a REIT our shareholders enjoy the longer-term
features of commercial property, diversification of risk and
professional management of a pool of properties, coupled with the
liquidity offered by our shares.
Why Big Boxes? The best of logistics
Big Box assets are very large and highly efficient distribution
centres and logistics hubs. Their primary function is to hold
finished goods for distribution, either downstream to other parts
of the supply chain or directly to consumers.
While Big Boxes are a sub-sector of logistics, they have
characteristics not evident in the rest of the logistics sector. As
a result, we believe Big Boxes should be viewed very differently
from smaller logistics buildings. Big Boxes as we know them today
did not exist in the UK before the early 1990s, when distribution
buildings of more than 300,000 sq ft were extremely rare. Most high
quality Big Boxes have been constructed over the past 15 years.
A Big Box typically has the following characteristics:
-- a large floor area, generally between 300,000 and 1,000,000 sq ft;
-- an eaves height of between ten and 25 metres, allowing for
the installation of racking or mezzanine floors to increase the
useable space;
-- a strategic location, with close links to major roads,
(potentially also airports, sea ports or rail freight hubs), to
allow efficient goods inwards stocking and downstream
distribution;
-- modern designs, making the building energy efficient and able
to accommodate the latest truck specifications;
-- significant capital investments by tenants, as noted above; and
-- committed, institutional-grade occupiers, willing to sign up
to long leases with regular, upward-only rent reviews, either with
fixed increases or linked to an inflation index or open market.
Big Boxes are exciting assets because:
-- they offer their occupiers economies of scale and cost
savings not available in smaller buildings;
-- they act as the nucleus for distribution either at a national or regional level;
-- they allow occupiers to store full product lines under one
roof, making management easier and more efficient;
-- planning permission for Big Boxes is more difficult to
obtain, due to their scale and the extent of traffic movements,
which restricts supply and supports rental growth;
-- for non-food distribution, tall buildings allow for very high
racking and/or the accommodation of mezzanine floors - attractive
to tenants because rents are paid on the ground floor area of a
warehouse, not its volume;
-- in Big Boxes we see tenants making very significant
investment in respect of internal fit-out and automation, which
can, and typically does, eclipse the cost of the actual building.
With such high levels of investment, tenants are usually prepared
to commit to very long lease terms, which are rarely seen in other
sectors of commercial property; and
-- the rapidly growing area of e-retail distribution is
typically facilitated by Big Boxes, either as a dedicated e-retail
facility or alongside traditional formats.
Long lead times and barriers to new construction mean the supply
of Big Boxes will not materially increase in the short to medium
term. With strong occupier demand, this creates a significant
supply-demand imbalance that benefits asset owners.
Growing demand for Big Boxes
Demand for Big Box assets comes from three sources: retailers
(both conventional and online), third-party logistics companies
("3PLs"), and other companies such as manufacturers.
Occupiers use Big Boxes to improve their operational efficiency
and the growth of online sales has also been a major factor in
their uptake. As the 3PLs often use Big Boxes to support their
contracts with retailers, trends in the retail market are key
drivers of demand in the Big Box sub-sector. Overall, we believe
that the advent of Big Boxes is one of the most important
developments in the history of modern retailing.
Operational efficiency
In recent years, businesses have faced rising costs and a
difficult economic environment. This has accelerated the
attractiveness of Big Boxes because they offer previously
unavailable benefits in terms of efficiency, economies of scale,
flexibility and low cost of use. To drive operational efficiency,
occupiers are increasingly investing in technologically advanced
systems that allow them to stock automatically and rapidly retrieve
products within the warehouse.
Many companies are using Big Boxes to centralise their
previously dispersed distribution facilities into fewer, larger
units. This also helps them to optimise their stock management and
to expand their product range. Marks & Spencer, for example, is
in the process of consolidating its UK logistics network from 110
small warehouses for clothing, home and gift products into four
significantly larger distribution centres, including Castle
Donington, which is part of our portfolio.
3PLs are also increasingly focusing on Big Box assets to
centralise multiple contracts and achieve economies of scale. By
operating more flexibly and efficiently, Big Boxes allow them to
tender more competitively.
Retail trends
The growth in online retail has been a key driver of the
increased demand for Big Boxes. Online sales growth has outstripped
the UK's total retail market growth for a number of years.
In 2014, the Centre for Retail Research estimated that online
transactions in the UK would reach GBP45 billion during the year,
an increase of nearly 16% on 2013 and around 13.5% of total retail
sales. Growth in 2015 is expected to exceed 16%, meaning that
British online shoppers will spend more per head than anywhere else
in the world. This volume of sales and rate of growth puts pressure
on retailers to have large, highly efficient distribution
facilities that can fulfil orders quickly and accurately. This is
particularly the case as customers expect ever-faster delivery,
with next day and even same day delivery increasingly becoming the
norm.
Pure-play online retailers, such as Amazon, ASOS and Ocado, have
led the way in developing advanced facilities. However, most of the
UK's largest online operations still belong to traditional high
street retailers. These hybrid retailers need to combine the
requirements of conventional and online retail logistics. While
some prefer to segregate their online and offline operations, many
co-locate them to achieve economies of scale. As a result, both
pure-play online retailers and hybrid retailers increasingly rely
on Big Box assets.
The retail market is also developing in other ways that favour
Big Boxes. The expense of renting, fitting out and running high
street stores means that retailers want to make the most of that
space. As a result, stores are carrying less stock and aim to
respond rapidly to customer demand for products, by restocking only
those items that are selling and being able to do so quickly. John
Lewis Partnership, for example, has moved from a store framework of
approximately 60:40 storage to sales space, to a new store format
of 20:80 in favour of sales space. Along with the rise of
click-and-collect, this means retailers need much greater control
over the timing and efficiency of deliveries to stores. Speed and
reliability are crucial, which is where Big Boxes come into their
own.
As a consequence of these drivers, occupiers often use Big Boxes
as hybrid retail outlets. Making multiple use of the same asset is
highly attractive to occupiers, both in terms of operational
efficiency and in keeping abreast of consumer trends. Computerised
tracking of store sales and analysis of online spending habits
allow retailers not only to respond more quickly to sales patterns
and trends but also provide important data for customer targeted
marketing or specific product lines.
Occupational supply
The supply of logistics properties peaked in 2009, following a
spate of speculative development in the run up to the economic
downturn. The majority of well-located assets from this supply peak
are now occupied, with the last speculative buildings from 2009
taken up in the third quarter of 2014.
During the recession the absence of suitable Big Boxes available
to let led some retailers to purchase land and construct their own
logistics facilities. A number of these have since been sold and
leased by the retailer; this is known as a 'sale and lease
back'.
While there is some speculative development of smaller
buildings, we are not aware of any properties of over 350,000 sq ft
that are currently being speculatively built. This is because of
the significant capital commitment of construction, and the
difficulties of obtaining appropriate sites and planning
permissions and meeting the specification of occupiers in this size
band.
Limited supply and strong occupational demand mean there is now
a shortage of Big Boxes to let and some key areas of the country
currently have no new-build supply. We have, therefore, seen an
upturn in the amount of space acquired through built-to-suit
solutions, where the facility is built to the tenant's
specification under an agreement for lease. This is currently the
only route for tenants looking to let a building of more than
500,000 sq ft.
Increasing numbers of tenants are also actively looking for
built-to-suit opportunities in the right locations, as a means of
designing best-in-class Big Boxes with proprietary automated stock
picking and re-stocking systems. This helps occupiers to maintain
their competitive edge, in a market where consumers often view
reliability and speed of delivery as being equally important as
price.
The process of building new assets is both lengthy and
difficult. If a site already has outline planning consent and
suitable infrastructure, then a Big Box asset can take
approximately 12 months to build. However, the difficulty of
finding sites of suitable size, with excellent transport links,
sufficient power supply and a suitable local workforce, means that
new builds can often take closer to three years to complete,
assuming that planning permission is received. Significant tenant
fit out of automated machinery can then take a further 12 months or
more, before the Big Box is fully operational.
While we expect the supply of Big Boxes to increase over time,
these dynamics mean that demand is likely to outstrip supply for
some time to come. This creates opportunities for rising rents and
increasing capital values for landlords.
Rising rents
Sustained demand and limited supply have inevitably led to
rental growth. Data from CBRE for 2014 shows double digit annual
rental growth for parts of the M25 motorway while growth in other
key locations has outstripped inflation.
This demonstrates that some local markets have seen rental
growth well above average, due to scarcity of supply and strong
competition for sites from other land uses. Growth in rents is
expected to become increasingly apparent in the regions during
2015.
For Big Box units taken through a pre-let or D&B process, a
premium above the prevailing rent for an existing unit is typical
partly because the rent start date can be over a year later. There
is significant variation between deals, but in recent years this
premium has averaged around 15-20%.
The attractions of the UK logistics market
The UK economy was one of the fastest growing G7 economies in
2014, as conditions improved across the main service industries and
in manufacturing. Looking forward, the most recent predictions from
independent forecasters indicate that the rate of UK GDP growth
will settle at around 2.5% in 2015.
There are a number of factors that we believe make the UK one of
the best locations in the world for Big Box distribution. These
include the country's mature transport infrastructure, with
excellent road, rail and air links, as well as numerous ports that
can handle the large container ships that are increasingly used to
import goods. According to government forecasts, the market share
of intermodal container traffic between the country's ports and its
hinterland is set to increase from the current level of around 30%
to 63% by 2033.
In addition, the UK's relatively small size and dense population
allows Big Box users to construct networks of regional distribution
centres that can cover the country, while remaining within legal
limits on driving times. This reduces the risk of late or missed
deliveries and cuts costs.
These factors have in turn facilitated the growth of online
retail. Figures from the Centre for Retail Research show that the
UK is the largest European market for internet shopping, with
estimated sales in 2014 more than one quarter higher than in
Germany, which is the next largest, and several times higher than
other economies such as Spain, the Netherlands and Italy.
The UK is also a major adopter of mobile technology, which is an
increasingly important channel for online sales. The Centre for
Retail Research estimates that 17.6% of UK online sales were via
mobile devices in 2014, the highest proportion in Europe.
Retail versus industrial property yields
Historically, prime retail yields of c. 4% were the norm. This
low yield reflected the limited obsolescence of property fabric and
reliable growth in income from consistently rising rents.
Industrial property attracted higher yields of 6.5% or more, which
were greater than on retail property due to higher perceived
obsolescence and abundant land supply, which in turn suppressed
rental growth. However, the relationship between retail and
industrial yields has been reversing, with high street retail under
attack from shopping centres and online, while prime logistics are
benefiting from online sales growth, lower obsolescence, tight land
supply and the cost savings delivered by scale. As a result, prime
yields in the two sectors are converging.
Hardening investment yields
While volumes of investment transactions in 2014 are likely to
have been a little below the high watermark of 2013, overall 2014
was an above-average year for investment volumes. This has led to
lower yields. Prime logistics yields have reduced from around 6.5%
in January 2013 to 5.00% as at January 2015, compared to prime
shops which have improved very little over the same period from
4.85% to 4.50%.
CBRE is forecasting that prime logistics yields will sharpen
still further. This is partly due to the belief that rental growth
will drive a large component of total returns. In addition, the
sector has witnessed significant allocation increases due to UK
institutions being underweight, with inflows reported at GBP3.82
billion raised by these funds during 2014 (the highest for this
asset class on record), of which GBP1.78 billion was in the second
half of the year. At the same time, the UK logistics sector has
become increasingly attractive to overseas buyers seeking long
leases to prime covenants and a positive yield gap above the cost
of borrowing.
The ultra-prime benchmark for a distribution warehouse was set
in the second quarter of 2014, with L&G's forward funded
purchase of Gazeley's 938,449 sq ft development at Milton Keynes,
which is let to Waitrose for 30 years with RPI uplifts of between
1.5% and 2.5% paid annually subject to five yearly open market
reviews. The price paid for this investment of circa GBP110 million
reputedly reflected a yield of 4.6% although this yield would now
stand at around 4.25%.
Although yields have hardened for logistics, attractive
opportunities remain for investors, with CBRE stating that there is
still value at the prime end of the market. Despite hardening
yields, lower interest rates have allowed us to buy investments at
sharper yields without compromising on quality or our dividend
ambitions.
Although demand for prime logistics investments is outstripping
supply, the Manager continues to source a good number of high
quality investments, mainly off-market. Inevitably the paucity of
quality warehouses for rent is leading occupiers to sign pre-lets
on built-to-suit new build developments. The Manager is sourcing an
increasing number of forward funded opportunities which can offer
the benefit of yield arbitrage and we expect this trend to continue
in the near term.
The positive yield gap
Our business applies prudent gearing to amplify returns. This is
only possible when property yields are higher than the cost of
debt. As commercial property yields have reduced, interest rates
have also fallen, which has maintained an attractive positive yield
gap.
Our approach to gearing is flexible and we will adapt this
depending upon prevailing market influences from time to time; in
particular, the relationship between investment yield, rents and
rental growth, medium-term interest rates and inflation.
Our business model
What we do
We own and manage some of the highest-quality Big Boxes in the
UK. We aim to buy for value, by identifying and exploiting market
imperfections, using our experience and expertise to build an asset
portfolio that is well diversified by tenant and geography. We
prudently apply leverage to increase returns and further expand and
diversify our portfolio. We intend to hold our assets for the long
term but would consider selling if we could unlock value and
reinvest the proceeds in a more attractive opportunity.
The value we add
The starting point for value creation is our ability to source
investments. This depends on the Manager's close relationships with
key market players built up over many years. The Manager also
spends considerable time researching asset owners and developing
relationships with them. This means we often source investments
off-market, enabling us to buy at better prices. Over 80% of the
assets in our portfolio were acquired off-market. This is achieved
through a combination of a singular and clear investment focus,
impeccable track record of performance, and an unparalleled network
of investment agency, developer and occupier contacts.
The Manager's expertise means we give vendors a rapid decision
on whether we will proceed with an investment opportunity. We can
complete transactions quickly, but always following a process of
thorough due diligence. This speed and certainty of execution is
highly attractive to vendors and often more important to them than
simply securing the best price. We can buy an asset directly or by
acquiring the special purpose vehicle that owns it. Purchasing the
vehicle can reduce costs in certain circumstances.
We have a clear investment policy but we are also pragmatic. We
typically look for assets of more than 400,000 sq ft and with at
least 12 years left on the lease. However, we will buy smaller
assets or assets with shorter leases where we consider that there
may be opportunity to add value. Buying smaller properties reduces
the risk which may be inherent in the investment, for example due
to a near-term lease expiry, but which we view as an opportunity to
add value.
The assets we buy are usually strategically important to our
tenants. We work with them to maximise their operational
effectiveness, for example by extending buildings or adding
mezzanine floors. This encourages tenants to sign long leases,
increasing the security of our revenues and increasing capital
values. Where we buy properties with the potential to add value, we
look to turn them into core foundation assets for our portfolio
through asset management. If, having added value, the investment
does not sit well within our portfolio, then we would consider a
sale in order to purchase a more suitable asset.
Sustaining our advantage
As a specialist investor in Big Boxes, we have already
established a reputation as one of the industry's most
forward-thinking owners and managers. This makes us the obvious
choice for asset owners looking to sell Big Boxes. The consistency
of the Manager's team is also a substantial advantage. It helps us
to maintain our relationships in a market where changes in
personnel are common.
As our portfolio grows, we benefit from economies of scale,
increased diversification by geography, tenant and building type,
and a larger list of contacts, helping us to source attractive
investments off market. A larger portfolio also gives us even
greater insight into market developments and more control over the
evidence for rent reviews and lease renewals.
Delivering returns
By buying high-quality properties with excellent tenants and
carefully managing our assets, we can deliver a robust, low-risk
rental stream, the growth of which will directly contribute to
rising dividends. We believe that these are attractive attributes,
particularly when viewed in the context of the current low
inflation and low interest rates in the UK. Our asset selection and
management approach also adds value to our investments, allowing
our shareholders to benefit from attractive total returns.
In addition, our status as a REIT helps to create value for
shareholders. For example, as a REIT, we are not subject to
Corporation Tax on profits and gains in respect of our qualifying
property rental business. In addition, we can pay dividends that
qualify as a property income distribution ("PID"), which offers tax
advantages for certain UK shareholders.
Asset management
Knowledge of our tenants' business requirements allows us to
identify and execute asset management initiatives which can grow
our rental income and capital values. Asset management
opportunities tend to be linked to one or more of the
following:
-- The tenant's need for an extension to the existing building,
an alteration to the unit's layout or specification, an additional
unit on the same or adjacent site, or capital investment to improve
mechanisation, which we can lever to enhance annual rent and/or the
lease length. The majority of our assets have low site cover.
-- Lease extensions, which give the occupier an opportunity to
protect its logistic operations from the site and its capital
commitment within the properties. An extension of the lease term
not only increases long-term income but can enhance the capital
value of our investment.
-- Rent reviews, which can deliver a significant rental uplift
or agree a lower rental increase in exchange for a lease term
extension.
-- The tenant no longer requiring a unit, which may give us the
opportunity to negotiate a surrender premium, whilst simultaneously
re-letting the unit to a new occupier, perhaps on improved terms.
This can provide an enhanced investment profile, while avoiding the
risks and costs of holding a vacant property.
-- The tenant's corporate responsibility objectives, which may
encourage capital expenditure for initiatives such as installing
solar panels to help the tenant achieve ambitious environmental or
staff welfare targets. This produces cost effective energy for
occupiers and can enhance the income return to us.
Our objectives and strategy
Our objectives
We have set clear objectives, which reflect our aim of creating
value for shareholders. By investing in a diversified portfolio of
Big Box assets, we look to provide shareholders with long-term,
stable and increasing income streams and attractive capital
returns.
In particular, assuming the Company is fully invested and
geared, we aim to deliver the following targets:
-- an annual dividend of 6 pence on the IPO price of 100 pence
per share, with the potential to grow the dividend through our
long-term, upward-only (some inflation protected) lease agreements;
and
-- a net total return (dividend paid plus growth in net asset
values) in excess of 9% a year, over the medium term.
We also have a longer-term ambition to grow our NAV to in excess
of GBP1bn. This scale will deliver a number of benefits for
shareholders.
Our investment policy
To deliver these returns, we follow a rigorous investment
policy. Under this policy, we invest in assets that typically:
-- are let or pre-let. We do not invest in speculative
developments and will only forward fund pre-let opportunities where
a tenant has already signed an agreement for lease;
-- have institutional-grade tenants, with sound business and/ or good growth potential;
-- are in the right locations in the UK, with excellent
transport connections and good workforce availability;
-- have modern units of a size, age and specification to meet
the requirements of major occupiers (where possible to include
expansion options);
-- have leases to institutional standards, with regular
upward-only rent reviews and a typical unexpired lease length on
purchase of 12-25 years, to provide long-term and secure income
flows;
-- show evidence that the site is strategically important to the
tenant, such as extensive investment in fitting-out the unit or
proximity to the tenant's market or other key assets; and
-- there may be exceptions to our policy where we perceive
opportunity to deliver value for our Shareholders without
significantly upscaling aggregated portfolio risk.
We continue to target assets with a geared yield range of
approximately 5-7% and which offer value to our shareholders.
Our acquisition focus
In executing our investment policy, we typically acquire
property assets representing one or more of our three investment
pillars:
-- Foundation assets - The quality and sustainability of our
rental income underpins our business. Foundation assets provide our
core, low-risk income. They are usually let on long leases to
tenants with excellent covenant strength. The buildings are
commonly new or modern and in prime locations, and the leases have
regular upward-only rent reviews, often either fixed or linked to
CPI or RPI indices.
-- Value add - These assets are typically let to tenants with
strong covenants and offer the chance to grow the assets' capital
value or rental income. We do this using our asset management
capabilities and understanding of occupier requirements. These
assets are usually highly re-lettable.
-- Growth covenants - These are fundamentally sound assets in
strong locations, but let to tenants we perceive to be undervalued
and who have the opportunity to improve their financial strength.
Examples include young e-retailers or companies that have strong
growth prospects as the UK economy continues its recovery, offering
value enhancement through yield compression.
More generally, we seek value and look to exploit market
imperfections, so we can deliver outperformance for our
shareholders. Some properties within our portfolio have cross-over
characteristics and so fall within more than one of the 'three
investment pillars'.
Our operational strategy
To help us deliver long-term and sustainable returns to our
shareholders, we focus on the following strategic areas:
STRATEGIC AREA IMPLEMENTATION AND BENEFITS
------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------
Management team As an externally managed business,
Recruit and retain a profoundly we depend on the Manager's
knowledgeable and talented management employees for our success.
team, committed to delivering The Manager therefore looks
value to shareholders. to employ the highest-calibre
professionals and has a team
dedicated to running the Group,
comprising highly experienced
people with a track record
of successfully investing
in the sector.
The Manager also draws on
the skills and experience
of its other employees. We
benefit from their professional
expertise, the market knowledge
they gain from working on
other investment business
and the cost efficiencies
of utilising some of them
part-time.
------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------
Occupiers Building relationships with
Develop and maintain a deep understanding tenants is a key part of creating
of the businesses that use our value. It enables us to work
space, to create long-term partnerships. collaboratively with them,
to deliver asset management
initiatives that meet their
business objectives and unlock
value for shareholders.
Letting a number of properties
to one tenant also creates
opportunities for cross-fertilisation
strategies, for example by
agreeing to limit rent increases
on one property in return
for extending the lease term
on another. This can benefit
both us and the tenant.
------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------
Operational excellence As an externally managed business,
Rigorously control costs and operational we have a simple and transparent
efficiencies, while not comprising cost base, which largely comprises
growth or reputation. the management fee, the directors'
fees, and accounting, audit,
legal and regulatory fees.
This helps us to focus closely
on cost control and efficiency,
with the result that our total
expense ratio of 1.13% is
one of the lowest in our peer
group.
------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------
Capital risk management The Group is financed through
Achieve the right risk and return a combination of equity and
balance of equity and debt, to medium-term debt. Using debt
finance our business and enhance increases returns to shareholders
returns. and allows us to diversify
further our investment portfolio.
We look to invest the proceeds
of any equity issuance before
drawing down debt, to limit
the interest expense and to
maximise returns on equity.
We are targeting an LTV of
45% initially during the growth
phase of our business and
a medium-term LTV of 40%,
which we believe is a conservative
level given the quality of
our investments.
We have negotiated debt facilities
with three banks to date,
reducing the Group's dependence
on any one lender. Debt is
currently secured at the asset
level, to limit any default
risk to the asset rather than
across the Group, but we may
consider cross-collateralised
arrangements where considered
beneficial.
------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------
Corporate responsibility We aim to run the Group responsibly.
Strive to assume our corporate This includes looking to buy
responsibilities towards society buildings with A, B or C Energy
and the environment, in every Performance Certificate ratings
part of our business. where possible. We also favour
tenants with strong corporate
responsibility credentials
and work collaboratively with
them to improve their performance,
for example, by increasing
the number of roof lights
in the building or by investing
in or funding energy efficient
initiatives, such as power
generation through solar panels
or wind turbines.
------------------------------------------- ---------------------------------------
Key performance indicators
Our objective is to deliver attractive returns to shareholders,
by executing the investment policy described above. Set out below
are the key performance indicators we will report on each year, to
track the progress we are making.
KPI AND DEFINITION PERFORMANCE
----------------------------------------- -----------------------------------
1. Total return (TR) 10.4%
In relation to our investment Group's TR for the period
objective, TR measures the change to 31 December 2014
in the net asset value over the
period plus dividends paid. As
explained above, we are targeting
a TR in excess of 9% per annum
over the medium-term.
----------------------------------------- -----------------------------------
2. EPRA NAV per share* 107.57 pence
The value of our assets (based EPRA NAV per share at 31 December
on an independent valuation) less 2014
the book value of our liabilities,
attributable to shareholders and The EPRA NAV per share at
calculated in accordance with IPO was 98.0 pence.
EPRA guidelines.
This is an increase of 9.8%.
* EPRA earnings, EPRA NAV and
EPRA EPS are alternate metrics
to their IFRS equivalents that
are calculated in accordance with
the Best Practices Recommendations
of the European Public Real Estate
Association (EPRA).
(The Company uses these alternative
metrics as they provide a transparent
and consistent basis to enable
a comparison between European
property companies)
----------------------------------------- -----------------------------------
3. Loan to value ratio (LTV) 32.9%
The proportion of the Group's LTV at 31 December 2014
property portfolio that is funded
by borrowings. Our initial target This reflects the timings
LTV is 45% of the Group's gross of our investments and draw
assets, with a medium-term target down of debt and will be in
of 40%. The LTV will always be line with our target once
subject to a maximum of 50% of we are fully invested and
the Group's gross assets at the geared
time of drawdown.
----------------------------------------- -----------------------------------
4. Dividend against target 4.15 pence per share
Dividends paid and declared to Dividend per share for the
shareholders in relation to the period to 31 December 2014
period against the IPO price of
100 pence per share. This was lower than our initial
target due to the cash drag
experienced between the raising
of equity and full investment.
We are on track to achieve
our initial target of 6 pence
per share in 2015.
----------------------------------------- -----------------------------------
5. EPRA EPS* 4.60 pence per share
Post-tax earnings that are attributable EPRA EPS for the period to
to shareholders, calculated in 31 December 2014
accordance with EPRA guidelines.
----------------------------------------- -----------------------------------
6. Total expense ratio (TER) 1.13%
The ratio of total administration TER for the period to 31 December
and property operating costs expressed 2014
as a percentage of average net
asset value throughout the period This ratio is set to decrease
(from point of full investment further as the NAV of the
of IPO proceeds). Over the medium-term Group grows and associated
the Group is targeting a TER of overheads reduce relatively
1% or below per annum. through 2015 and beyond.
----------------------------------------- -----------------------------------
7. Weighted average unexpired 13.9 years
lease term (WAULT) WAULT at 31 December 2014
The average unexpired lease term
of the property portfolio, weighted This compares well to our
by annual passing rents. target of at least 12 years.
Following the acquisition
of Ocado our WAULT has increased
to 15.3 years.
----------------------------------------- -----------------------------------
EPRA performance measures
Detailed below is a summary table showing the EPRA performance
measures (EPMs).
MEASURE AND DEFINITION PURPOSE PERFORMANCE
------------------------------ --------------------------- ------------------------------
1. EPRA Earnings A key measure of GBP12.75 million/4.60
Earnings from operational a company's underlying pps
activities. operating results
and an indication EPRA earnings as at
of the extent to 31 December 2014
which current dividend
payments are supported
by earnings.
------------------------------ --------------------------- ------------------------------
2. EPRA NAV Makes adjustments GBP506.12 million/107.57
Net asset value adjusted to IFRS NAV to provide pps
to include properties stakeholders with
and other investment the most relevant EPRA NAV as at 31 December
interests at fair information on the 2014
value and to exclude fair value of the
certain items not assets and liabilities
expected to crystallise within a true real
in a long-term investment estate investment
property business. company with a long-term
investment strategy.
------------------------------ --------------------------- ------------------------------
3. EPRA NNNAV Makes adjustments GBP503.53 million/107.02
EPRA NAV adjusted to EPRA NAV to provide pps
to include the fair stakeholders with
values of: the most relevant EPRA NNNAV as at 31
(i) financial instruments; information on the December 2014
(ii) debt and; current fair value
(iii) deferred taxes. of all the assets All debt as at 31 December
and liabilities 2014 is floating rate
within a real estate debt, which has been
company. valued at par. We believe
that all current margins
payable would still
be achievable in the
current market.
------------------------------ --------------------------- ------------------------------
4.1 EPRA Net Initial A comparable measure 5.52%
Yield (NIY) for portfolio valuations.
Annualised rental This measure should EPRA NIY as at 31 December
income based on the make it easier for 2014
cash rents passing investors to
at the balance sheet judge themselves,
date, less non-recoverable how the valuation
property operating of portfolio X
expenses, divided compares with portfolio
by the market value Y.
of the property, increased
with (estimated) purchasers'
costs.
------------------------------ --------------------------- ------------------------------
4.2 EPRA 'Topped-Up' A comparable measure 5.56%
NIY for portfolio valuations.
This measure incorporates EPRA 'Topped-Up' NIY
an adjustment to the This measure should as at 31 December 2014
EPRA NIY in respect make it easier for
of the expiration investors to judge After adding minimum
of rent-free periods themselves, how stepped rent increases
(or other unexpired the valuation of of GBP226,263 to annualised
lease incentives such portfolio X compares rental income used for
as discounted rent with portfolio Y. EPRA NIY
periods and step rents).
------------------------------ --------------------------- ------------------------------
5. EPRA Vacancy A "pure" (%) measure 0.00%
Estimated Market Rental of investment property
Value (ERV) of vacant space that is vacant, EPRA ERV as at 31 December
space divided by ERV based on ERV. 2014
of the whole portfolio.
------------------------------ --------------------------- ------------------------------
6. EPRA Cost Ratio A key measure to 19.4%
Administrative and enable meaningful
operating costs (including measurement of the EPRA cost ratio as at
and excluding costs changes in a company's 31 December 2014
of direct vacancy) operating costs.
divided by gross rental This ratio is both inclusive
income. and exclusive of vacancy
costs.
------------------------------ --------------------------- ------------------------------
Manager's Report
This was a highly successful period, during which the Group
implemented its investment and financing strategies as advised by
the Manager and continued to position it for further success.
Investment activity
The Group acquired 14 Big Box assets between the IPO and 31
December 2014, at which time the portfolio comprised the properties
in the table below.
These are high quality modern assets, with good geographical
spread and diverse tenants. The portfolio also presents a variety
of asset management opportunities, which have the potential to
provide income growth and capital appreciation.
The average size of the properties in the portfolio at 31
December 2014 was 595,725 sq ft. The weighted average unexpired
lease term at the same date was 13.9 years.
The portfolio properties in the table below are listed
chronologically in order of acquisition.
Rent
per Next
Purchase Size sq rent
Month price NIY Annual passing (sq ft review
Tenant Location of acquisition (GBP) (%) rent (GBP) ft) (GBP) date
---------------- --------------- ---------------- --------- ----- --------------- ---------- ------- ---------
Sainsbury's
Supermarket
Ltd Leeds Dec 2013 48.75 6.65 3,295,716 571,552 5.77 May 2018
Marks &
Spencer Castle
plc Donington Dec 2013 82.58 6.20 4,351,723 906,240 4.80 Dec 2016
Tesco Stores
Ltd Chesterfield Mar 2014 28.64 6.60 1,999,804 501,751 3.99 May 2015
Tesco Stores
Ltd Didcot Apr 2014 27.20 6.90 1,920,000 288,295 6.66 Aug 2019
Next Group
Plc Doncaster Jun 2014 60.00 6.07 3,854,857 755,055 5.11 Mar 2018
Wm Morrision
Supermarkets
plc Sittingbourne Jun 2014 97.80 5.20 5,419,974 919,443 5.89 Jun 2015
DHL Supply Langley
Chain Ltd Mill Aug 2014 17.53 6.50 1,214,480 255,680 4.75 Aug 2019
DHL Supply
Chain Ltd Skelmersdale Aug 2014 28.87 6.50 2,000,000 470,385 4.25 Aug 2019
Wolseley
UK Ltd Ripon Aug 2014 12.24 6.73 838,500 221,763 3.78 Sep 2016
Rolls-Royce
Motor Cars Bognor
Ltd Regis Oct 2014 36.98 6.25 2,379,481 313,220 7.23 Oct 2020
CDS
(Superstores
International)
Ltd (trading
as The Range) Thorne Nov 2014 48.50 6.10 3,122,994 750,431 4.16 Oct 2017
Tesco Stores
Ltd Middleton Dec 2014 22.45 8.25 1,959,767 302,111 6.49 Dec 2017
Kuehne & Dove Valley
Nagel Ltd* Park Dec 2014 29.27 6.00 1,858,000 343,248 5.41 Apr 2017
L'Oréal Trafford
(UK) Ltd Park Dec 2014 25.83 7.13 1,947,231 261,959 7.45 Aug 2015
---------------- --------------- ---------------- --------- ----- --------------- ---------- ------- ---------
Total 566.64 36,162,527 6,861,103
--------------------------------------------------- --------- ----- --------------- ---------- ------- ---------
*Guaranteed by Hays Plc
Valuation and portfolio growth
CBRE independently valued the portfolio at 31 December 2014, in
accordance with the RICS Valuation - Professional Standards January
2014. The properties were valued individually without
premium/discount applying to the portfolio as a whole. The
portfolio's market value was GBP619.28 million including forward
funded commitments, compared with the assets' combined purchase
price of GBP566.64 million, excluding purchase costs. This
represents an increase of GBP52.64 million or 9.3%, when compared
to the property purchase prices excluding acquisition costs.
The capital growth in our portfolio collectively reflects the
capital growth for each property since purchase. If the portfolio
in place at 31 December 2014 had been held throughout the period,
we calculate that the annualised capital growth would have been
25.9%. This assumes that the growth in the period since ownership
was consistent. Whilst this is an artificial measure, this does
provide Shareholders with a more realistic growth metric for
comparison against stabilised alternative
property investments.
The valuation increase reflects the strong investment demand for
industrial logistics, which has resulted in yields hardening. It
also highlights our success in sourcing off-market deals at
attractive prices for the Group.
Manager's report - our portfolio
Sainsbury's, Leeds
------------------------------------
Key facts
Acquisition price: GBP48.75m
Net initial yield: 6.65%
Size: 571,522 sq ft
Eaves height: 13m
Built: 2000
Lease expiry: November 2026
-- One of Sainsbury's 13 main regional distribution centres in
the UK, strategically located near the A1(M) motorway, rail and air
links
-- Core to Sainsbury's operational needs, distributing food to
145 superstores and 45 local stores between Northampton and
Newcastle
-- Low site density of circa 31% offers the opportunity to accommodate expansion
-- Potential asset management opportunities identified
Marks & Spencer, Castle Donington
-------------------------------------
Key facts
Acquisition price: GBP82.58m
Net initial yield: 5.20%
Size: 906,240 sq ft
Eaves height: 25m
Built: 2011
Lease expiry: December 2036
-- Newly developed building bespoke for M&S, providing
modern design features such as very high eaves, energy efficient
systems and dedicated rail freight terminal and sidings
-- Strategically located for transportation via road (M1), rail
and air, for central UK distribution for e-commerce
-- M&S has committed significant capital expenditure to the
unit, creating multiple mezzanine floors and highly sophisticated
automated picking and handling equipment
-- Rent is reviewed upwards only to open market value, with a
minimum increase equivalent to 1.5% per annum and compounded five
yearly, currently passing off a low base rent which we believe is
reversionary on the open market
-- Low site cover of circa 41% gives potential for extension and/or a rail terminal building
Tesco, Chesterfield
------------------------------------
Key facts
Acquisition price: GBP28.64m
Net initial yield: 6.60%
Size: 501,751 sq ft
Eaves height: 15m
Built: 2005
Lease expiry: May 2020
-- Developed to modern standards incorporating high eaves, low site cover and cross docking
-- Accessible location five minutes from Junction 30 of the M1,
providing excellent connectivity to wider motorway network
-- Rent passing off a low base of GBP3.99 per sq ft, which
should allow for an opportunity to capture growth at next review in
May 2015
-- Tesco recently closed an 840,000 sq ft facility in Daventry
and transferred much of that operation to this warehouse
-- Potential asset management opportunities identified
Tesco, Didcot
------------------------------------
Key facts
Acquisition price: GBP27.20m
Net initial yield: 6.90%
Size: 288,259 sq ft
Eaves height: 11m
Built: 1989
Lease expiry: July 2024
-- Strategically located in a core south east position, adjacent
to the A34 dual carriageway linking junction 13 of the M4 and
junction 9 of the M40 motorways, as well as rail and air
connections
-- Facility has integral cold store for Tesco's food
distribution, serving in excess of 120 stores in a 60-mile radius,
while Tesco has also committed to developing a 100,000 sq ft
"dot-com" unit two miles away
-- Low site cover of circa 45%
-- Potential asset management opportunities identified
Next, Doncaster
------------------------------------------
Key facts
Acquisition price: GBP60.00m
Net initial yield: 6.07%
Size: 755,055 sq ft
Eaves height: 17.5m
Built: 2003, extended 2005
Lease expiry: March 2023
-- Unit was developed in 2003 and extended in 2005, to
accommodate Next's expansion requirements
-- Extension contains a fully automated stock picking system,
installed at considerable expense to the tenant
-- Tenant further committed to the location, having submitted
planning for another 600,000 sq ft facility on an adjoining parcel
of land that will link via a connecting bridge to our building
-- Excellent location for access to wider motorway network via
the M18, as well as rail and air links
-- Potential asset management opportunities identified
Morrisons, Sittingbourne
------------------------------------
Key facts
Acquisition price: GBP97.80m
Net initial yield: 5.20%
Size: 919,443 sq ft
Eaves height: 15m
Built: 2009
Lease expiry June 2039
-- Unit was developed in 2009 and provides modern design features
-- Strategically located four miles from Junction 5 of the M2
and 28 miles south east of the M25 (approximately 30 minutes to
City of London), and close to rail and container port
facilities
-- Unit is Morrisons' principal South East regional distribution
facility, supplying 85 superstores and 53 "M Locals" with chilled,
ambient and cold goods
-- Rent is reviewed to RPI capped at 2.0% and paid annually,
which provides for long-term growth
-- Low site cover of circa 42%
-- Potential asset management opportunities identified
DHL, Langley Mill
------------------------------------
Key facts
Acquisition price: GBP17.53m
Net initial yield: 6.50%
Size: 255,680 sq ft
Eaves height: 12m
Built: 2006
Lease expiry: August 2024
-- Modern, high-specification distribution facility with
ancillary offices and extensive parking over 13.24 acres, plus low
site cover of circa 45%
-- Well located, approximately eight miles north west of
Nottingham, and accessed from Junction 26 of the M1 motorway
-- Centrally located in the UK, to allow for optimum
distribution coverage within the maximum HGV drive time
-- Tenant committed significant further capital expenditure to
fit the unit out, in order to fulfil a new national distribution
contract
DHL, Skelmersdale
------------------------------------
Key facts
Acquisition price: GBP28.87m
Net initial yield: 6.50%
Size: 470,385 sq ft
Eaves height: 12.75m
Built: 2003
Lease expiry: August 2024
-- Highly specified and fully fitted distribution facility, with
ancillary offices and extensive parking over 29.5 acres, plus low
site cover of circa 36%
-- Strategically located approximately one mile from Junction 4
of the M58 motorway and five miles from Junction 6 of the M6
-- Port of Liverpool is approximately 14 miles away, where
construction is under way on a new container port capable of
bringing some of the world's largest container ships to the North
West region
-- DHL has committed significant capital expenditure to fit the
unit out, in order to fulfil a new distribution contract; the unit
will also operate as a multi-contracted facility
Wolseley, Ripon
-------------------------------------
Key facts
Acquisition price: GBP12.24m
Net initial yield: 6.73%
Size: 221,763 sq ft
Eaves height: 12m
Built: 2001
Lease expiry: September 2026
-- Attractive initial yield and low passing rent
-- High-specification property with ancillary offices and
extensive parking over approximately 10.9 acres, plus low site
cover of circa 46%
-- One of five Wolseley regional distribution centres in the UK
-- Conveniently positioned close to Junction 50 of the A1, it
serves the North of England, Scotland, and Northern Ireland
Rolls-Royce Motor Cars, Bognor Regis
----------------------------------------------------------
Key facts
Acquisition price: GBP36.98m
Net initial yield: 6.25%
Size: 313,220 sq ft
Eaves height: 10m
Built: construction targeted to complete
in 2016
Lease expiry: 10 years from Practical Completion,
expected to expire October
2025
-- Pre-let forward funding investment for a new Technology and
Logistics Centre for Rolls-Royce Motor Cars
-- The Company benefits from income during the development phase
(under a developer's licence) and fixed increases equivalent to 3%
compound realised five yearly from lease commencement
-- New centre to be built on 18.95 acres site and used as a
warehouse and distribution centre for inbound production parts, a
car body store and finished car store with workshop for car
preparation
-- Site located on the Oldlands Farm Business Park and will
benefit from the new Bognor Regis Northern Relief Road, due to open
in 2015
-- New facility lies eight miles from Goodwood, West Sussex,
Rolls-Royce Motor Cars' historic home, headquarters and principal
UK assembly plant
-- Low site cover of circa 37%
The Range, Thorne
-------------------------------------
Key facts
Acquisition price: GBP48.50m
Net initial yield: 6.10%
Size: 750,431 sq ft
Eaves height: 15.8m
Built: 2006
Lease expiry: September 2032
-- High-specification property, providing a modern national
logistics distribution centre, with ancillary offices and extensive
parking over approximately 42.7 acres
-- Low site cover of circa 40%
-- Prominent position adjacent to the M18 motorway and two miles
from Junction 6, with easy access to the wider motorway network of
M1, A1(M) and M62
-- Area is a major UK distribution location with good transport
links, supported by favourable demographics for a suitable labour
force
Tesco, Middleton
------------------------------------
Key facts
Acquisition price: GBP22.45m
Net initial yield: 8.25%
Size: 302,111 sq ft
Eaves height: 10.8m
Built: 1988
Lease expiry: December 2023
-- High income return/attractive yield
-- Located in Stakehill, an established 200-acre industrial
estate providing over 2.5 million sq ft of logistics space and home
to a critical mass of occupiers, including Sainsbury's, Aldi,
Booker and several third-party logistics companies
-- Situated just east of Junction 20 of the M62, with Manchester
approximately eight miles to the east and Liverpool 42 miles to the
west
-- Very low site cover of circa 31%
-- Potential asset management opportunities identified
Kuehne & Nagel, Dove Valley Park
------------------------------------------
Key facts
Acquisition price: GBP29.27m
Net initial yield: 6.00%
Size: 343,248 sq ft
Eaves height: 12m
Built: 1997, extended 1999
Lease expiry: March 2028
-- Dove Valley Park is a major 200 acre industrial/distribution
estate situated in an established distribution location in the
North Midlands, close to East Midlands airport and Birmingham Rail
Freights, with direct access onto the A50 dual carriageway linking
the M6 and M1
-- Property is leased to Kuehne & Nagel Limited and
guaranteed by Hays plc, a global recruitment company
-- Low site cover of circa 43%
L'Oréal (UK), Trafford Park
------------------------------------------
Key facts
Acquisition price: GBP25.83m
Net initial yield: 7.13%
Size: 261,259 sq ft
Eaves height: 10.2m
Built: 2004, extended 2013
Lease expiry: August 2019
-- Property located in one of Europe's largest and most
successful business parks, with direct access to the M60 and the
Manchester Ship Canal
-- Trafford Park benefits from the North West's largest rail
freight terminal, running straight through to mainland Europe
-- Potential asset management opportunities identified
-- Rent reviewed annually, upwards only at 3% per annum compound
-- Tenant extension of 53,859 sq ft reflects 315,118 sq ft in
total equating to an underlying rent of GBP6.18 sq ft
-- Low site cover of circa 45%
Post period-end acquisitions
On 29 January 2015, the Company exchanged contracts (subject to
detailed planning consent) to provide forward funding investment
for a new distribution warehouse facility inside the M25 at
Crossdox, Bronze Age Way, Erith. The facility is pre-let in its
entirety to Ocado Holdings Ltd for 30 years and guaranteed by Ocado
Group Plc ("Ocado"). The investment price is GBP98.8 million,
reflecting a yield of 5.25% (net of standard acquisition
costs).
Ocado has an option to introduce a third-party joint guarantor
to the lease on the later of 30 April 2015 and the date of grant of
detailed planning consent which, if exercised, would increase the
investment price to GBP99.9 million and reduce the yield to 4.9%
(net of standard acquisition costs). The lease length would reduce
to 25 years, the rent would reduce and the rent review provisions
would change slightly.
Financial results
Operating profit under IFRS was GBP46.67 million for the period.
There were two principal drivers of this positive performance. The
first was the portfolio's strong rental income, which equates to a
running yield based on book cost of 6.14%. The results also
benefited from the gain of GBP31.67 million, net of property
acquisition costs, recognised on revaluing the Group's investment
properties at the period end. This gain was after accounting for
all costs associated with asset purchases during the period.
Administrative and other expenses, which include the Manager's
fee and other costs of running the Group, were GBP3.60 million,
equivalent to 0.58% of the portfolio's market value, as provided by
CBRE, at 31 December 2014. This compares very favourably with the
expenses of the Company's peers.
Net financing costs were GBP4.82 million for the period,
including a reduction in the fair value of interest rate
derivatives of GBP2.58 million. Further information on financing
and hedging is provided below.
Total profit before tax for the period was GBP41.84 million,
which resulted in earnings per share (basic and diluted) of 15.10
pence.
Financing and hedging
During the period, the Group drew down nine senior debt
facilities, resulting in total long-term bank borrowings of
GBP203.64 million as at 31 December 2014. The weighted average
margin payable across these loans was 1.76% over 3-month LIBOR.
The LTV ratio at 31 December 2014 was 32.9%, which is lower than
the Group's initial LTV target of 45%. The Group had available
undrawn debt facilities totalling GBP13.2 million at the period
end.
The Group's medium-term target is an LTV ratio of 40% against
the Group's gross asset value, which the Manager believes is a
conservative level given the quality of the Group's investments.
All facilities, other than the facility for Wolseley, Ripon,
contain LTV covenants requiring an income sweep at 65% LTV and a
hard default level of 70% LTV. The Wolseley, Ripon facility
provides for an LTV covenant with an income sweep level at 55% and
a hard default at 60%. The Group has also negotiated for all
facilities (other than Wolseley, Ripon and The Range, Doncaster)
margin rachets linked to LTV covenants. As at 31 December 2014, the
Group could afford to suffer a potential fall in property values of
22.3% on the asset with least headroom and 63.9% on the asset with
most headroom, before being in breach of its LTV covenants.
Each loan is interest only and secured against the associated
property and the shares of the entity that owns that property. Each
property-owning entity is either directly or ultimately owned by
the Company. None of the properties are cross-collateralised and
the debt is non-recourse to the Company. This means that if a
particular asset were to breach its banking covenants, then the
breach should not adversely affect the Group's other assets. This
provides clarity and future visibility on income available for
distribution to our shareholders. The Company may employ
cross-collateralised debt arrangements where considered
beneficial.
The Group average term to maturity across its debt facilities
excluding extension options was 4.31 years as at the period end.
The Manager has successfully broadened the Group's debt funding
relationships, adding Santander UK and Landesbank Hessen-Thüringen
Girozentrale (Helaba) to its initial relationship with
Barclays.
The Group has designed its debt strategy to minimise the effect
of a significant rise in underlying interest rates, through a
series of derivative interest rate cap instruments. During the
period, the Group entered into nine separate interest rate caps,
matching the tenor of each of the debt facilities, with a weighted
average strike rate secured for the debt portfolio of 2.09%, which
when combined with the average margin equates to a capped all-in
rate of borrowing of 3.85%. The total aggregated premium paid
during the period to secure these caps was GBP4.96 million. By
using interest rate caps, the Group has effectively hedged 97.7% of
its long-term debt at 31 December 2014.
The Group obtains advice from JC Rathbone Associates for advice
on its hedging strategy and to review and monitor the interest
rates as they are booked by the lending bank. This ensures that the
Group benefits from specialist advice and competitive pricing. In
February 2015, the Group drew an additional senior debt totalling
GBP13.17 million from Barclays against the asset let to Kuehne
& Nagel, Dove Valley Park. This newest facility was agreed for
a period of four years with an extension option available of 12
months, and was hedged by way of a coterminous interest rate
swap.
The table below summarises each senior debt facility drawn in
the period.
Senior debt facilities secured in the period
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Long-term
debt drawn
Asset Lender Expiry date (GBP)
-------------------------- -------------- -------------- ------------
Sainsbury's Leeds Barclays June 2018(2) 23,500,000
Marks & Spencer, Castle
Donington Barclays June 2019(2) 49,275,000
Tesco, Didcot Barclays June 2018(1) 12,240,000
Next, Doncaster Barclays June 2018(1) 16,429,250
Morrisons, Sittingbourne Barclays June 2019(2) 53,790,000
November
DHL, Langley Mill Helaba 2019 7,060,000
November
DHL, Skelmersdale Helaba 2019 11,600,000
December
Wolseley, Ripon Santander UK 2019 5,500,000
November
The Range, Thorne Barclays 2019(1) 24,250,000
-------------------------- -------------- -------------- ------------
Total 203,644,250
---------------------------------------------------------- ------------
(1) 12 month extension option available
(2) Extension option available of up to 24 months
EPRA
The Company plans to qualify for the EPRA investment indices, in
terms of both analysis and reporting, from the end of the first
quarter of 2015. This should allow the Company to access a broader
investor base, devoted to investing in the European listed real
estate sector, from which it could seek future investment.
The Company looks to comply with EPRA's best practice
recommendations, taking the view that EPRA metrics focus on areas
of reporting which are of greatest importance to real estate
investors and where they would like to see increased consistency
between companies.
The Group's EPRA earnings per share for the period ended 31
December 2014 was 4.60 pence and EPRA NAV as at the period end date
was 107.57 pence. For a full list of EPRA performance measures,
please refer to the table above.
Dividend
On 8 July 2014, the Company declared its first interim dividend
of 1.85 pence per share, which it paid on 8 August 2014.
The Company declared its second interim dividend of 1.50 pence
per share on 20 November 2014 and paid it on 17 December 2014.
The Company has declared a third interim dividend for the period
of 0.80 pence per share. This will be paid on 18 March 2015, to
shareholders on the register at 6 March 2015. See note 14.
Fundraising
We believe that there is a healthy pipeline of suitable new
investment opportunities. Further to the exchange of contracts on a
new distribution warehouse facility for Ocado announced on 29
January 2015, the Company is currently in advanced negotiations for
the acquisition of three additional assets, each of which is under
offer, in solicitors' hands and subject to exclusivity
agreements.
In addition, the Manager is engaged in detailed discussions with
the current owners of a number of other suitable assets that meet
the Company's Investment Policy. In order to assist in the
financing of these investment opportunities, the Company is
currently considering a further equity fundraising in the near term
pursuant to its share issuance programme. Further details will be
published in due course.
Alternative Investment Fund Manager ("AIFM")
On 1 July 2014, Tritax Management LLP was authorised and
regulated by the Financial Conduct Authority as a full scope AIF.
As a result, the Manager is authorised to provide its services to
the Group and the Group benefits from the rigorous reporting and on
going compliance regime applicable to AIFMs in the UK.
Tritax Management LLP
Manager
23 February 2015
Our principal risks
The Board has overall responsibility for our risk management and
internal controls, with the Audit Committee reviewing the
effectiveness of our risk management process on its behalf.
We aim to operate in a low-risk environment, focusing on a
single sector of the UK real estate market and one of our key aims
is to deliver an attractive, growing and secure income for
shareholders, together with the opportunity for capital
appreciation. The Board therefore recognises that effective risk
management is key to the Group's success. Risk management ensures a
defined approach to decision making that seeks to decrease the
uncertainty surrounding anticipated outcomes, balanced against the
objective of creating value for shareholders.
Approach to managing risk
Our risk management process is designed to identify, evaluate
and mitigate (rather than eliminate) the significant risks we face.
The process can therefore only provide reasonable, and not
absolute, assurance. As an investment company, we outsource key
services to the Manager, the Administrator and other service
providers, and rely on their systems and controls.
At least twice a year, the Board undertakes a formal risk review
with the assistance of the Audit Committee, to assess the
effectiveness of our risk management and internal control systems.
During the course of these reviews, the Board has not identified or
been advised of any failings or weaknesses which it has determined
to be material.
Principal risks
Our principal risks and uncertainties are set out below. They
have the potential to affect materially our business, either
favourably or unfavourably. Some risks may currently be unknown,
while others that we currently regard as immaterial, and have
therefore not been included here, may turn out to be material in
the future.
PROPERTY RISK
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Our property performance will depend on general real estate
market conditions.
IMPACT MITIGATION
An adverse change in our property Our property portfolio is 100%
valuations may lead to breach let, with long unexpired weighted
of our banking covenants. Market average lease terms and an
conditions may also reduce institutional-grade tenant
the revenues we earn from our base. All the leases contain
property assets, which may upward-only rent reviews which
affect our ability to pay dividends are either fixed, RPI/CPI linked
to shareholders. A severe fall or at open market value. These
in values may result in us factors help maintain our asset
selling assets to repay our values.
loan commitments, resulting
in a fall in our NAV. We manage our activities to
operate within our banking
covenants and constantly monitor
our covenant headroom on LTV
and interest cover.
Our ability to grow the portfolio may be affected by competition
for investment properties in the Big Box sector.
IMPACT MITIGATION
Competitors in the sector may We have extensive contacts
be better placed to secure in the sector and often benefit
property acquisitions, as they from off-market transactions.
may have greater financial We also maintain close relationships
resources or greater ability with a number of investors
to borrow or leverage funds, in the sector and some developers,
thereby restricting our ability giving us the best possible
to grow our NAV. opportunity to secure future
acquisitions.
We are not exclusively reliant
on acquisitions to grow the
portfolio. Our leases contain
upward-only rent review clauses,
which mean we can generate
additional income and value
from the current portfolio.
Our property performance will depend on the performance
of the UK retail sector and the continued growth of online
retail.
IMPACT MITIGATION
Our focus on the Big Box sector Our investment policy limits
means we directly rely on the our exposure to any one tenant
distribution requirements of to 20%, which prevents significant
UK retailers. Insolvencies single retailer exposure.
in the larger retailers and
online retailers could affect To mitigate geographical shifts
our revenues earned and property in retailers' focus, we invest
valuations. in assets with a diverse spread
of location, with easy access
to large ports and key motorway
junctions. Before investing,
we undertake a thorough due
diligence process, particularly
over the strength of the underlying
covenant.
We select assets that have
strong property fundamentals
(good location, modern design,
sound fabric) and which should
therefore be attractive to
other occupiers should the
current occupier fail.
In addition, we focus on assets
let to tenants with strong
financial covenants.
FINANCIAL RISK
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Our use of floating rate debt will expose the business
to underlying interest rate movements.
IMPACT MITIGATION
Interest on our debt facilities We have entered into interest
is payable based on a margin rate derivatives to hedge our
over LIBOR. Any adverse movements direct exposure to movements
in LIBOR could significantly in LIBOR. These derivatives
impair our profitability and cap our exposure to LIBOR rises
ability to pay dividends to and have terms coterminous
shareholders. with the loans.
We aim, where reasonable, to
minimise the level of unhedged
debt with LIBOR exposure, by
taking out hedging instruments
with a view to keeping variable
rate debt approximately 90%+
hedged.
A lack of debt funding at appropriate rates may restrict
our ability to grow.
IMPACT MITIGATION
Without sufficient debt funding, Before we contractually commit
we may be unable to pursue to buying an asset, we enter
suitable investment opportunities discussions with our lenders
in line with our investment to get an outline heads of
objectives. If we cannot source terms on debt financing. This
debt funding allows us to ensure that we
at appropriate rates, this can borrow against the asset
will impair our ability to and maintain our borrowing
maintain our targeted level policy.
of dividend.
The Board keeps our liquidity
and gearing levels under review.
We only enter into forward
funding commitments if they
are supported by available
funds.
We have broadened our lender
base in the second half of
the period, entering into banking
facilities with two new lenders.
This has created new banking
relationships for us, with
the aim of keeping lending
terms as competitive as possible.
The Big Box sub-sector should
remain popular with lenders,
owing to long leases and letting
to single tenants with strong
financial covenants, that enable
us to attract debt funding.
We must be able to operate within our banking covenants.
IMPACT MITIGATION
If we were unable to operate We continually monitor our
within our banking covenants, banking covenant compliance,
this could lead to default to ensure we have sufficient
and our bank funding being headroom and to give us early
recalled. warning of any issues that
may arise. We enter into interest
rate caps to mitigate the risk
of interest rate rises and
also invest in assets let to
institutional grade covenants.
CORPORATE RISK
---------------------------------------------------------------------------------
There can be no guarantee that we will achieve our investment
objectives.
IMPACT MITIGATION
Our investment objectives include At 31 December 2014, we had
achieving the dividend and acquired 14 Big Box assets
total returns targets. that meet our investment criteria.
The Manager's significant experience
The amount of any dividends in the sector should continue
paid or total return we achieve to provide us with access to
will depend on, among other assets that meet our investment
things, successfully pursuing criteria going forward.
our investment policy and the
performance of our assets. Rental income from our current
Future dividends are subject portfolio, coupled with our
to the Board's discretion and hedging policy, supports the
will depend, among other things, 6 pence per share dividend
on our earnings, financial target, a significant investment
position, cash requirements, objective. Movement in capital
level and rate of borrowings, value is subject to market
and available profit. yield movements and the ability
of the Manager to execute successfully
asset management strategies.
We are reliant on the continuance of the Manager.
IMPACT MITIGATION
We continue to rely on the Unless there is a default,
Manager's services. As a result, either party may terminate
our performance will, to a the Investment Management Agreement
large extent, depend on the by giving not less than 12
Manager's abilities. Termination months' written notice, which
of the Investment may not be given before the
Management Agreement would fourth anniversary of the IPO.
severely affect our ability The Management Engagement Committee
to effectively manage our operations. regularly reviews and monitors
the Manager's performance.
In addition, the Board meets
regularly with the Manager,
to ensure we maintain a positive
working relationship.
TAXATION RISK
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------
We operate as a UK REIT and have a tax-efficient corporate
structure, with advantageous consequences for UK shareholders.
Any change to our tax status or in UK tax legislation could
affect our ability to achieve our investment objectives
and provide favourable returns to shareholders.
IMPACT MITIGATION
If the Company fails to remain The Board is ultimately responsible
a REIT for UK tax purposes, for ensuring we adhere to the
our profits and gains will UK REIT regime. It monitors
be subject to UK corporation the REIT compliance reports
tax. provided by:
* the Manager on potential transactions;
* the Administrator on asset levels; and
* our registrar and broker on shareholdings.
The Board has also engaged
third-party tax advisers to
help monitor REIT compliance
requirements.
The Strategic Report was approved on behalf of the Board by:
Richard Jewson Chairman
23 February 2015
Directors' Responsibilities Statement
The Directors are responsible for preparing the Annual Report
and the Group and parent company financial statements in accordance
with applicable law and regulations.
Company law requires the Directors to prepare the Group and
Company financial statements for each financial year. The Group
financial statements have been prepared in accordance with
International Financial Reporting Standards ("IFRS") as adopted by
the European Union and the Company financial statements have been
prepared in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted
Accounting Practice (United Kingdom Accounting Standards and
applicable law). Under company law, the Directors must not approve
the financial statements unless they are satisfied that they give a
true and fair view of the state of affairs of the Group and Company
and of the profit or loss for the Group for that period.
In preparing the financial statements, the Directors are
required to:
-- Select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently;
-- Make judgements and estimates that are reasonable and prudent;
-- For the Group financial statements, state whether they have
been prepared in accordance with IFRSs as adopted by the European
Union, subject to any material departures disclosed and explained
in the Group financial statements;
-- For the Company financial statements, state whether they have
been prepared in accordance with United Kingdom Generally Accepted
Accounting Practice, subject to any material departures disclosed
and explained in the Company financial statements; and
-- Prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis
unless it is inappropriate to presume that the Group and the
Company will continue in business.
The Directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting
records that are sufficient to show and explain the Group and
Company's transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any
time the financial position of the Group and Company and enable
them to ensure that its financial statements comply with the
Companies Act 2006 and, as regards the Group financial statements,
Article 4 of the IAS Regulation.
They have general responsibility for taking such steps as are
reasonably open to them to safeguard the assets of the Group and
hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection
of fraud and other irregularities.
Under applicable law and regulations, the Directors are also
responsible for preparing a Directors' Report, a Directors'
Remuneration Report and a Corporate Governance Statement that
comply with that law and those regulations.
Website publication
The Directors are responsible for ensuring the Annual Report,
including the financial statements, is made available on a website.
Financial statements are published on the Company's website in
accordance with legislation in the United Kingdom governing the
preparation and dissemination of financial statements, which may
vary from legislation in other jurisdictions. The maintenance and
integrity of the Company's website is the responsibility of the
Directors. The Directors' responsibility also extends to the
ongoing integrity of the financial statements contained
therein.
Directors' responsibility statement
We confirm that to the best of our knowledge:
-- The financial statements have been prepared in accordance
with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS) as adopted
by the European Union and Article 4 of the IAS Regulation and, give
a true and fair view of the assets, liabilities, financial position
and profit or loss of the Company and the undertakings included in
the consolidation as a whole;
-- The Strategic Report includes a fair review of the
development and performance of the business and the position of the
Company and the undertakings included in the consolidation taken as
a whole, together with a description of the principal risks and
uncertainties that they face; and
-- The Annual Report and accounts taken as a whole is fair,
balanced and understandable and provides the information necessary
for shareholders to assess the Company's performance, business
model and strategy.
Signed on behalf of the Board by:
Richard Jewson
Chairman
23 February 2015
Group Statement of Comprehensive Income
For the period ended 31 December 2014
Note For the For the
period period
1 November 1 March
2013 2013
to 31 to 31 October
December 2013
2014 GBP'000
GBP'000
=================================================== ==== =========== ==============
Gross rental income 6 18,603 -
Service charge income 6 511 -
Service charge expense 6 (511) -
Net rental income 18,603 -
=================================================== ==== =========== ==============
Administrative and other expenses 8 (3,603) -
=================================================== ==== =========== ==============
Operating profit before changes in fair value
of investment properties and interest rate
derivatives 15,000 -
=================================================== ==== =========== ==============
Changes in fair value of investment properties 15 31,668 -
=================================================== ==== =========== ==============
Operating profit 46,668 -
Finance income 10 205 -
Finance expense 11 (2,452) -
Changes in fair value of interest rate derivatives 21 (2,577) -
=================================================== ==== =========== ==============
Profit before taxation 41,844 -
Tax charge on profit for the period 12 - -
Total comprehensive income (attributable to
the Shareholders) 41,844 -
=================================================== ==== =========== ==============
Earnings per share - basic and diluted 13 15.10p -
=================================================== ==== =========== ==============
EPRA earnings per share - basic and diluted 13 4.60p -
=================================================== ==== =========== ================
Group Statement of Financial Position
As at 31 December 2014
Note At At
31 December 31 October
2014 2013
GBP'000 GBP'000
============================================== ==== ============ ===========
Non-current assets
============================================== ==== ============ ===========
Investment property 15 586,179 -
Interest rate derivatives 21 2,379 -
============================================== ==== ============ ===========
Total non-current assets 588,558 -
Current assets
Trade and other receivables 17 30,668 50
Cash and cash equivalents 18 98,616 -
============================================== ==== ============ ===========
Total current assets 129,284 50
Total assets 717,842 50
============================================== ==== ============ ===========
Current liabilities
Deferred rental income (7,332) -
Trade and other payables 19 (6,048) -
============================================== ==== ============ ===========
Total current liabilities (13,380) -
Non-current liabilities
Bank borrowings 20 (200,933) -
============================================== ==== ============ ===========
Total non-current liabilities (200,933) -
Total liabilities (214,313) -
Total net assets 503,529 50
============================================== ==== ============ ===========
Equity
Share capital 24 4,705 50
Share premium reserve 25 272,536 -
Capital reduction reserve 26 184,444 -
Retained earnings 27 41,844 -
============================================== ==== ============ ===========
Total equity 503,529 50
============================================== ==== ============ ===========
Net asset value per share - basic and diluted 28 107.02p 100.00p
EPRA net asset value per share - basic and
diluted 28 107.57p 100.00p
============================================== ==== ============ ===========
Group Cash Flow Statement
For the period ended 31 December 2014
Note For the For the
period period
1 November 1 March
2013 2013
to 31 to 31 October
December 2013
2014 GBP'000
GBP'000
===================================================== ==== =========== ==============
Cash flows from operating activities
===================================================== ==== =========== ==============
Profit for the period (attributable to equity
Shareholders) 41,844 -
Less: Changes in fair value of investment properties (31,668) -
Add: Changes in fair value of interest rate
derivatives 2,577 -
Less: Finance income (205) -
Add: Finance expense 2,452 -
Accretion of tenant lease incentive (937) -
Increase in trade and other receivables (1,787) -
Increase in deferred income 7,332 -
Increase in trade and other payables 3,194 -
===================================================== ==== =========== ==============
Cash generated from operations 22,802 -
Net cash flow generated from operating activities 22,802 -
===================================================== ==== =========== ==============
Investing activities -
Purchase of investment properties (555,696) -
Forward funded payment (27,204) -
Licence fee received 1,514 -
Interest received 115 -
Long-term restricted cash deposits 18 (4,310) -
===================================================== ==== =========== ==============
Net cash flow used in investing activities (585,581) -
===================================================== ==== =========== ==============
Financing activities -
Proceeds from issue of Ordinary Share capital 480,901 -
Cost of share issues (9,594) -
Bank borrowings drawn 215,144 -
Bank borrowings repaid (11,500) -
Loan arrangement fees paid (2,658) -
Bank interest paid (1,418) -
Interest rate cap premium paid (4,956) -
Dividends paid to equity holders (8,834) -
===================================================== ==== =========== ==============
Net cash flow generated from financing activities 657,085 -
===================================================== ==== =========== ==============
Net increase in cash and cash equivalents for
the period 94,306 -
Cash and cash equivalents at the start of the - -
period
===================================================== ==== =========== ==============
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of the
period 18 94,306 -
===================================================== ==== =========== ==============
Group Statement of Changes in Equity
Undistributable Distributable reserves
reserves
================================ =================================
Capital
reduction Retained
Share capital Share premium reserve earnings Total
GBP'000 GBP'000 GBP'000 GBP'000 GBP'000
============================== =============== =============== ========== ========== =========
1 November 2013 50 - - - 50
Total comprehensive income - - - 41,844 41,844
Issue of Ordinary Shares
Shares issued in relation
to IPO 1,950 198,000 - - 199,950
Share issue expenses in
relation to IPO (4,000) - - (4,000)
Shares issued in relation
to Tap (June 2014) 200 20,579 - - 20,779
Share issue expenses in
relation to Tap
(June 2014) - (402) - - (402)
Shares issued in relation
to further Equity issue
(July 2014) 1,456 148,544 - - 150,000
Share issue expenses in
relation to further Equity
issue (July 2014) - (3,042) - - (3,042)
Shares issued in relation
to management contract 1 121 - - 122
Shares issued in relation
to further Equity issue
(December 2014) 1,048 108,952 - - 110,000
Share issue expenses in
relation to further Equity
issue (December 2014) - (2,216) - - (2,216)
Share based payments - - - 320 320
Transfer of share based
payments to liabilities
to reflect settlement - - - (320) (320)
Cancellation of share premium
account - (194,000) 194,000 - -
Dividends paid:
First interim dividend
for the period ended 31
December 2014 (1.85p) - - (4,070) - (4,070)
Second interim dividend
for the period
ended 31 December 2014
(1.50p) - - (5,486) - (5,486)
31 December 2014 4,705 272,536 184,444 41,844 503,529
============================== =============== =============== ========== ========== =========
1 March 2013 50 - - - 50
Total comprehensive income - - - - -
31 October 2013 50 - - - 50
============================== =============== =============== ========== ========== =========
Notes to the Consolidated Accounts
1. Corporate information
The consolidated financial statements of the Group for the
14-month period ended 31 December 2014 comprise the results of the
Company and its subsidiaries and were approved by the Board for
issue on 23 February 2015. Tritax Big Box REIT plc ("the Company")
is a public listed company incorporated and domiciled in England
and Wales. The Company's Ordinary Shares are admitted to the
official list of the UK Listing Authority, a division of the
Financial Conduct Authority, and traded on the London Stock
Exchange.
The nature of the Group's operations and its principal
activities are set out in the Strategic Report.
Accounting policies
2. Basis of preparation
The consolidated financial information has been prepared in
accordance with International Financial Reporting Standards (IFRS)
as issued by the International Accounting Standards Board (IASB) as
adopted by the European Union and in accordance with the Companies
Act 2006 and Article 4 of the IAS Regulations.
The Group's financial information has been prepared on a
historical cost basis, as modified for the Group's investment
properties and interest rate derivatives, which have been measured
at fair value through the Group Statement of Comprehensive
Income.
The consolidated financial information is presented in Sterling,
which is also the Group's functional currency, and all values are
rounded to the nearest thousand (GBP'000), except where otherwise
indicated.
The Group has chosen to adopt EPRA best practice guidelines for
calculating key metrics such as net asset value and earnings per
share.
The financial information does not constitute the Group's
statutory accounts for the period ended 31 December 2014 and 31
October 2013 but is derived from those accounts. Statutory accounts
for the period ended 31 October 2013, during which the Company was
dormant, have been delivered to the Registrar of Companies and
those for the period ended 31 December 2014 will be delivered in
due course. The Auditor has reported on the 2014 accounts; the
report was unqualified, did not include a reference to any matters
to which the Auditor drew attention by way of emphasis without
qualifying their report and did not contain a statement under
section 498 of the Companies Act 2006. No audit report was issued
with the statutory accounts for the period ended 31 October 2013 as
the company was dormant.
2.1. Going concern
The consolidated financial statements are prepared on a going
concern basis as explained in the Directors' Report.
3. Significant accounting judgements, estimates and
assumptions
The preparation of the Group's financial information requires
management to make judgements, estimates and assumptions that
affect the reported amounts of revenues, expenses, assets and
liabilities and the disclosure of contingent liabilities at the
reporting date. However, uncertainty about these assumptions and
estimates could result in outcomes that require a material
adjustment to the carrying amount of the asset or liability
affected in future periods.
3.1. Judgements
In the process of applying the Group's accounting policies,
management has made the following judgements, which have the most
significant effect on the amounts recognised in the consolidated
financial information:
Business combinations
The Group acquires subsidiaries that own investment properties.
At the time of acquisition, the Group considers whether each
acquisition represents the acquisition of a business or the
acquisition of an asset. The Group accounts for an acquisition as a
business combination where an integrated set of activities is
acquired in addition to the property.
Where such acquisitions are not judged to be the acquisition of
a business, they are not treated as business combinations. Rather,
the cost to acquire the corporate entity is allocated between the
identifiable assets and liabilities of the entity based upon their
relative fair values at the acquisition date. Accordingly, no
goodwill or additional deferred tax arises.
Operating lease contracts - the Group as lessor
The Group has acquired investment properties that are subject to
commercial property leases with tenants. The Group has determined,
based on an evaluation of the terms and conditions of the
arrangements, particularly the duration of the lease terms and
minimum lease payments, that it retains all the significant risks
and rewards of ownership of these properties and so accounts for
the leases as operating leases.
Fair valuation of investment property
The fair value of investment property is determined, by
independent property valuation experts, to be the estimated amount
for which a property should exchange on the date of the valuation
in an arm's length transaction. Properties have been valued on an
individual basis. The valuation experts use recognised valuation
techniques applying the principles of both IAS 40 and IFRS 13.
The valuations have been prepared in accordance with the Royal
Institution of Chartered Surveyors ("RICS") Valuation -
Professional Standards January 2014 ("the Red Book"). Factors
reflected include current market conditions, annual rentals, lease
lengths and location. The significant methods and assumptions used
by valuers in estimating the fair value of investment property are
set out in note 15.
Fair valuation of interest rate derivatives
In accordance with IAS 39, the Group values its interest rate
derivatives at fair value. The fair values are estimated by the
loan counterparty with revaluation occurring on a quarterly basis.
The counter parties will use a number of assumptions in determining
the fair values including estimations over future interest rates
and therefore future cash flows. The fair value represents the net
present value of the difference between the cash flows produced by
the contracted rate and the valuation rate.
4. Summary of significant accounting policies
4.1. Basis of consolidation
The consolidated financial statements incorporate the audited
financial statements of the Company and its subsidiaries, as at the
Balance Sheet date.
4.2. Subsidiaries
Subsidiaries are those entities controlled by the Company.
Control exists where the Company has the power, directly or
indirectly, to direct the financial and operating activities of an
entity so as to obtain benefits from its activities.
All intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated on
consolidation. The accounting policies of the subsidiaries are
consistent with those adopted by the Group.
4.3. Segmental information
The Directors are of the opinion that the Group is engaged in a
single segment business, being the investment in the United Kingdom
in Big Box assets.
4.4. Investment property and investment property under
construction
Investment property comprises completed property that is held to
earn rentals or for capital appreciation, or both. Property held
under a lease is classified as investment property when it is held
to earn rentals or for capital appreciation or both, rather than
for sale in the ordinary course of business or for use in
production or administrative functions.
Investment property is recognised when the risks and rewards of
ownership have been transferred and is measured initially at cost
including transaction costs. Transaction costs include transfer
taxes, professional fees for legal services and other costs
incurred in order to bring the property to the condition necessary
for it to be capable of operating. Subsequent to initial
recognition, investment property is stated at fair value. Gains or
losses arising from changes in the fair values are included in the
Group Statement of Comprehensive Income in the period in which they
arise under IAS 40 Investment Property.
Investment properties under construction are financed by the
Group where the Group enters into contracts for the development of
a pre-let property under a funding agreement. All such contracts
specify a fixed amount of consideration. The Group does not expose
itself to any speculative development risk as the proposed building
is pre-let to a tenant under an agreement for lease and the Group
enters into a fixed price development agreement with the developer.
Investment properties under construction are initially recognised
at cost (including any associated costs, which reflects the Group's
investment in the assets. Subsequently, the assets are remeasured
to fair value at each reporting date. The fair value of investment
properties under construction is estimated as the fair value of the
completed asset less any costs still payable in order to complete
which include an appropriate developer's margin.
Additions to properties include costs of a capital nature only.
Expenditure is classified as capital when it results in
identifiable future economic benefits, which are expected to accrue
to the Group. All other property expenditure is written-off in the
Group Statement of Comprehensive Income as incurred.
Investment properties cease to be recognised when they have been
disposed of or withdrawn permanently from use and no future
economic benefit is expected from its disposal. The difference
between the net disposal proceeds and the carrying amount of the
asset would result in either gains or losses at the retirement or
disposal of investment property. Any gains or losses are recognised
in the Group Statement of Comprehensive Income in the year of
retirement or disposal.
4.5. Derivative financial instruments
Derivative financial instruments, comprising interest rate caps
for hedging purposes, are initially recognised at cost and are
subsequently measured at fair value being the estimated amount that
the Group would receive or pay to terminate the agreement at the
period end date, taking into account current interest rate
expectations and the current credit rating of the Company and its
counterparties. The gain or loss at each fair value remeasurement
date is recognised in the Group Statement of Comprehensive Income.
Premiums payable under such arrangements are initially capitalised
into the Group's Statement of Financial Position, subsequently they
are remeasured and held at their fair values.
The Group uses valuation techniques that are appropriate in the
circumstances and for which sufficient data is available to measure
fair value, maximising the use of relevant observable inputs and
minimising the use of unobservable inputs significant to the fair
value measurement as a whole.
4.6. Fair value hierarchy
Level 1: Quoted (unadjusted) market prices in active markets for
identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Valuation techniques for which the lowest level input
that is significant to the fair value measurement is directly or
indirectly observable.
Level 3: Valuation techniques for which the lowest level input
that is significant to the fair value measurement is
observable.
For assets and liabilities that are recognised in the financial
statements on a recurring basis, the Group determines whether
transfers have occurred between levels in the hierarchy by
reassessing categorisation at the end of each reporting period.
4.7. Trade and other receivables
Trade and other receivables are recognised and carried at the
lower of their original invoiced value and recoverable amount.
Where the time value of money is material, receivables are carried
at amortised cost. A provision for impairment is made when there is
objective evidence that the Group will not be able to recover
balances in full. Balances are written-off when the probability of
recovery is assessed as being remote.
4.8. Forward funded pre-let investments
The Group enters into forward funding agreements for pre-let
investments.
4.8.1. Forward funded prepayments
Under the terms of the forward funded pre-payment agreements,
the total fixed price construction cost is paid to the developer
and is held in a restricted bank account. As construction costs are
incurred, funds are released subject to the authorisation of the
Group's subsidiary that has contracted the development along with
appropriate monitoring surveyor sign off. Accordingly, the initial
amount paid into the restricted bank account is shown as a forward
funded prepayment which reduces as construction costs are incurred
and funds are released from the restricted account and capitalised
accordingly.
4.8.2. Licence fees receivable
During the period between initial investment in a forward funded
agreement and the lease commencement date, the Group receives
licence fee income. This is payable by the developer to the Group
throughout this period and typically reflects the approximate level
of rental income that is expected to be payable under the lease, as
and when practical completion is reached. Under IFRS such licence
fees are deducted from the cost of the investment and are shown as
a receivable. Any economic benefit of the licence fee is reflected
within the Group Statement of Comprehensive Income as a movement in
the fair value of investment property and not within gross rental
income.
4.9. Cash and cash equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents includes cash in hand, deposits held
at call with banks, other short-term highly liquid investments with
original maturities of three months or less. Cash also includes
amounts held in restricted accounts to cover future rent free
periods, that is not available for every day use.
4.10. Trade payables
Trade payables are initially recognised at their fair value;
being at their invoiced value inclusive of any VAT that may be
applicable. Payables are subsequently measured at cost.
4.11. Bank borrowings
All bank borrowings are initially recognised at fair value net
of attributable transaction costs. Any attributable transaction
costs relating to the issue of the bank borrowings are amortised
through the Group Statement of Comprehensive Income over the life
of the debt instrument on a straight-line basis. After initial
recognition, all bank borrowings are measured at amortised cost,
using the effective interest method.
4.12. Share-based payments
Fees payable to the Manager are partly settled by the
reinvestment of 25% of the fee (net of taxes) in Ordinary Shares.
The cost is recognised based on the agreed fee structure contained
in the Investment Management Agreement, together with a
corresponding increase in equity. The Investment Management
Agreement allows for shares to be acquired from the market where
the trading share price is below Net Asset Value per Share. As a
result the Company may be obliged to pay cash to the Manager rather
than issue new Ordinary Shares at each reporting date and a
transfer is made from equity to liabilities to reflect this
obligation. Details of the Investment Management Agreement are
further set out in the Management Engagement Committee Report.
4.13. Dividends payable to Shareholders
Equity dividends are recognised when they become legally
payable. Interim equity dividends are recognised when paid. Final
equity dividends are recognised when approved by the Shareholders
at an annual general meeting.
4.14. Property income
4.14.1. Rental income
Rental income arising from operating leases on investment
property is accounted for on a straight-line basis over the lease
terms and is included in gross rental income in the Group Statement
of Comprehensive Income due to its operating nature, except for
contingent rental income, which is recognised when it arises.
Initial direct costs incurred in negotiating and arranging an
operating lease are recognised as an expense over the lease term on
the same basis as the lease income.
For leases which contain fixed or minimum uplifts, the rental
income arising from such uplifts is recognised on a straight-line
basis over the lease term.
Tenant lease incentives are recognised as a reduction of rental
revenue on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. The
lease term is the non-cancellable period of the lease together with
any further term for which the tenant has the option to continue
the lease where, at the inception of the lease, the Directors are
reasonably certain that the tenant will exercise that option.
Amounts received from tenants to terminate leases or to
compensate for dilapidations are recognised in the Group Statement
of Comprehensive Income when the right to receive them arises.
4.14.2. Service charges, insurances and other expenses
recoverable from tenants
Income arising from expenses recharged to tenants is recognised
in the period in which the compensation becomes receivable. Service
and insurance charges and other such receipts are included in net
rental income gross of the related costs, as the Directors consider
that the Group acts as principal in this respect.
4.15. Finance income
Finance income is recognised as interest accrues on cash
balances held by the Group. Interest charged to a tenant on any
overdue rental income is also recognised within finance income.
4.16. Finance costs
Any finance costs that are separately identifiable and directly
attributable to the acquisition or construction of an asset that
takes a period of time to complete are capitalised as part of the
cost of the asset. All other finance costs are expensed in the
period in which they occur. Finance costs consist of interest and
other costs that an entity incurs in connection with bank and other
borrowings.
4.17. Taxation
Taxation on the profit or loss for the period not exempt under
UK REIT regulations comprises current and deferred tax. Current tax
is expected tax payable on any non-REIT taxable income for the
period, using tax rates enacted or substantively enacted at the
period end date, and any adjustment to tax payable in respect of
previous years.
5. Standards issued but not yet effective
The following are new standards, interpretations and amendments,
which are not yet effective and have not been early adopted in this
financial information, that will or may have an effect on the
Group's future financial information:
IFRS 9: Financial Instruments (effective 1 January 2018 subject
to EU endorsement);
IFRS 15: Revenue from Contracts with Customers (effective 1
January 2017 subject to EU endorsement).
The Directors do not anticipate that the adoption of these
standards and interpretations will have a material impact on the
Group's financial statements in the period of initial application,
other than on presentation and disclosure.
6. Total property income
For the For the
period period
1 November 1 March
2013 2013
to 31 December to 31 October
2014 2013
GBP'000 GBP'000
======================================== =============== ==============
Rental income - freehold property 15,788 -
Rental income - long leasehold property 2,815 -
======================================== =============== ==============
Gross rental income 18,603 -
======================================== =============== ==============
Property insurance recoverable 460 -
Service charges recoverable 51 -
======================================== =============== ==============
Service charge income 511 -
======================================== =============== ==============
Total property income 19,114 -
======================================== =============== ==============
Included within rental income is GBP937,000 of accrued
contracted rental uplift income. See note 15.
7. Service charge expenses
For the For the
period period
1 November 1 March
2013 2013
to 31 December to 31 October
2014 2013
GBP'000 GBP'000
=========================== =============== ==============
Property insurance expense 460 -
Service charge expense 51 -
=========================== =============== ==============
Total property expenses 511 -
=========================== =============== ==============
8. Administrative and other expenses
For the For the
period period
1 November 1 March
2013 2013
to 31 December to 31 October
2014 2013
GBP'000 GBP'000
============================================================ =============== ==============
Investment management fees 2,330 -
Directors' remuneration (note 9) 154 -
============================================================ =============== ==============
Auditor's fees
* Fees payable for the audit of the Company's annual 44 -
accounts 14 -
9 -
27 -
* Fees payable for the audit of the Company's interim 60 -
accounts
* Fees payable for the audit of the Company's initial
accounts
* Fees payable for the audit of the Company's
subsidiaries
* Fees payable for taxation services
============================================================ =============== ==============
Total Auditor's fee 154 -
Corporate administration fees 254 -
Regulatory fees 25 -
Legal and professional fees 488 -
Marketing and promotional fees 95 -
Other administrative costs 103 -
============================================================ =============== ==============
3,603 -
============================================================ =============== ==============
The Auditor has also received GBP100,000 in respect of providing
reporting accountant services in connection with the initial
listing of the Company and a further GBP115,000 in relation to the
July 2014 offering. A total GBP81,000 in respect of advisory
services provided in connection with the acquisition of Group
assets. The fees relating to the listing of the Company have been
treated share issue expenses and offset against share premium. The
fees in relation to the acquisition of assets have been capitalised
in to the cost of the respective assets.
9. Directors' remuneration
For the For the
period period
1 November 1 March
2013 2013
to 31 December to 31 October
2014 2013
GBP'000 GBP'000
============================== =============== ==============
Directors' fees 141 -
Employer's National Insurance 13 -
154 -
============================== =============== ==============
A summary of the Directors' emoluments, including the
disclosures required by the Companies Act 2006, is set out in the
Directors' Remuneration Report. As Chairman of the Company's
Manager, Mark Shaw is not entitled to receive a fee.
10. Finance income
For the For the
period period
1 November 1 March
2013 2013
to 31 December to 31 October
2014 2013
GBP'000 GBP'000
=================================== =============== ==============
Interest received on bank deposits 205 -
=================================== =============== ==============
205 -
=================================== =============== ==============
11. Finance expense
For the For the
period period
1 November 1 March
2013 2013
to 31 December to 31 October
2014 2013
GBP'000 GBP'000
====================================== =============== ==============
Interest payable on bank borrowings 2,142 -
Amortisation of loan arrangement fees 310 -
====================================== =============== ==============
2,452 -
====================================== =============== ==============
12. Taxation
a) Tax charge in the Group Statement of Comprehensive Income
For the For the
period period
1 November 1 March
2013 2013
to 31 December to 31 October
2014 2013
GBP'000 GBP'000
================== =============== ==============
UK corporation tax - -
================== =============== ==============
A reduction in the UK corporation tax rate from 23% to 21% was
effective from 1 April 2014. In addition, the Government announced
its intention to further reduce the UK corporation tax rates from
21% to 20% from 1 April 2015. Accordingly, these rates have been
applied in the measurement of the Group's tax liability at 31
December 2014.
b) Factors affecting the tax credit for the year
The tax assessed for the year is lower than the standard rate of
corporation tax in the UK. The differences are explained below:
For the For the
period period
1 November 1 March
2013 2013
to 31 December to 31 October
2014 2013
GBP'000 GBP'000
====================================================== =============== ==============
Profit on ordinary activities before taxation 41,844 -
====================================================== =============== ==============
Theoretical tax at UK corporation tax rate of 21.71%
(31 October 2013: 23.0%) 9,084 -
REIT exempt income (2,672) -
Non-taxable items (6,406) -
Transfer pricing adjustment 144 -
Residual losses (150) -
====================================================== =============== ==============
Current tax credit - -
====================================================== =============== ==============
13. Earnings per share
Earnings per share (EPS) amounts are calculated by dividing
profit for the period attributable to ordinary equity holders of
the Company by the weighted average number of Ordinary Shares in
issue during the period. As there are no dilutive instruments
outstanding, basic and diluted earnings per share are
identical.
The calculation of basic and diluted earnings per share is based
on the following:
Weighted
Net profit average
attributable number
to Ordinary of Ordinary Earnings
For the period 1 November 2013 to 31 December Shareholders Shares(1) per share
2014 GBP'000 Number Pence
=================================================== ============= ============ ==========
Basic and diluted earnings per share 41,844 277,169,193 15.10p
=================================================== ============= ============ ==========
Adjustments to remove:
Changes in fair value of investment properties
(note 15) (31,668)
Changes in fair value of interest rate derivatives
(note 21) 2,577
=================================================== ============= ============ ==========
EPRA basic and diluted earnings per share 12,753 277,169,193 4.60p
=================================================== ============= ============ ==========
For the period 1 March 2013 to 31 October
2013
=================================================== ============= ============ ==========
Basic and diluted earnings per share - 50,000 -
=================================================== ============= ============ ==========
EPRA(2) basic and diluted earnings per share - 50,000 -
=================================================== ============= ============ ==========
(1) Based on the weighted average number of Ordinary Shares in
issue from the date of IPO to 31 December 2014.
(2) European Public Real Estate Association.
14. Dividends paid
For the For the
period period
1 November 1 March
2013 2013
to 31 December to 31 October
2014 2013
GBP'000 GBP'000
============================================= =============== ==============
First interim dividend in respect of period
ended
31 December 2014 at 1.85 pence per Ordinary 4,070 -
Share
(219,980,000 shares eligible)
Second interim dividend in respect of period
ended
31 December 2014 at 1.50 pence per Ordinary 5,486 -
Share
(365,733,316 shares eligible)
============================================= =============== ==============
Total dividends 9,556 -
============================================== =============== ==============
Total dividends per share 3.35p -
============================================== =============== ==============
On 8 July 2014, the Company announced the declaration of a first
interim dividend in respect of the period from admission of the
share capital of the Company to trading on the Specialist Fund
Market on 9 December 2013 to 30 June 2014 of 1.85 pence per
Ordinary Share, which was payable on 8 August 2014 to Ordinary
Shareholders on the register on 18 July 2014.
On 20 November 2014, the Company announced the declaration of a
second interim dividend in respect of the period from 1 July 2014
to 31 October 2014 of 1.50 pence per Ordinary Share which was
payable on 17 December 2014 to Shareholders on the register on 28
November 2014.
On 23 February 2015, the Company announced the declaration of a
third interim dividend in respect of the period 1 November 2014 to
31 December 2014 of 0.80 pence per Ordinary Share. The third
interim dividend will be paid on 18 March 2015 to Shareholders on
the register at 6 March 2015.
It is not proposed to pay a final dividend in respect of the
period.
15. Investment property
In accordance with IAS 40: Investment Property, the investment
property has been independently valued at fair value by CBRE
Limited ("CBRE"), an accredited independent valuer with a
recognised and relevant professional qualification and with recent
experience in the locations and categories of the investment
properties being valued. The valuations have been prepared in
accordance with the RICS Valuation - Professional Standards January
2014 ("the Red Book") and incorporate the recommendations of the
International Valuation Standards Committee which are consistent
with the principles set out in IFRS 13.
The Valuer in forming its opinion make a series of assumptions,
which are typically market related such as net initial yields and
expected rental values and are based on the Valuers' professional
judgement. The Valuer has sufficient current local and national
knowledge of the particular property markets involved and have the
skills and understanding to undertake the valuations
competently.
The valuations are the ultimate responsibility of the Directors.
Accordingly, the critical assumptions used in establishing the
independent valuation are reviewed by the Board.
All corporate acquisitions during the year have been treated as
asset purchases rather than business combinations because they are
considered to be acquisitions of properties rather than
businesses.
Investment Investment Investment
property property property
freehold long leasehold under construction Total
GBP'000 GBP'000 GBP'000 GBP'000
================================ ========== =============== =================== ========
As at 1 November 2013 - - - -
Property additions 442,698 103,375 7,501 553,574
Fixed rental uplift(1) 937 - - 937
Change in fair value during
the period 23,685 6,775 1,208 31,668
================================= ========== =============== =================== ========
As at 31 December 2014 467,320 110,150 8,709 586,179
================================= ========== =============== =================== ========
As at March 2013 and 31 October
2013 - - - -
================================= ========== =============== =================== ========
(1) Included within the carrying value of investment property is
GBP937,000 in respect of accrued contracted rental uplift income.
This balance arises as a result of the IFRS treatment of leases
with fixed rental uplifts and rent free periods, which requires the
recognition of rental income on a straight-line basis over the
lease term, with the difference between this and cash receipts
changing the carrying value of the property against which
revaluations are measured. Also see note 6.
For the period
31 December 31 October
2014 2013
GBP'000 GBP'000
============================ ============== ==========
Investment property at fair
value 586,179 -
Forward funding prepayments
(note 17) 27,204 -
Licence fee receivable 1,587 -
Restricted cash (note 18) 4,310
=============================== ============== ==========
Total portfolio valuation* 619,280 -
=============================== ============== ==========
* Including costs to complete on forward funded assets.
The valuation summary is set out on in the Strategic Report.
Fair value hierarchy
The following table provides the fair value measurement
hierarchy for investment property:
Date of Total Quoted prices Significant Significant
valuation GBP'000 in active observable unobservable
GBP'000 markets inputs inputs
(Level (Level (Level
1) 2) 3)
GBP'000 GBP'000 GBP'000
======================== ============ ======== ============= =========== =============
Assets measured at fair
value:
31 December
Investment properties 14 586,179 - - 586,179
Investment properties 31 October - - - -
13
======================== ============ ======== ============= =========== =============
There have been no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 during
any of the periods, nor have there been any transfers between Level
2 and Level 3 during any of the periods.
The valuations have been prepared on the basis of Market Value
(MV), which is defined in the RICS Valuation Standards, as:
"The estimated amount for which a property should exchange on
the date of valuation between a willing buyer and a willing seller
in an arm's-length transaction after proper marketing wherein the
parties had each acted knowledgeably, prudently and without
compulsion."
Market Value as defined in the RICS Valuation Standards is the
equivalent of fair value under IFRS.
The following descriptions and definitions relating to valuation
techniques and key unobservable inputs made in determining fair
values are as follows:
Valuation techniques: market comparable method
Under the market comparable method (or market comparable
approach), a property's fair value is estimated based on comparable
transactions in the market.
Unobservable input: passing rent
The rent at which space could be let in the market conditions
prevailing at the date of valuation (range: GBP838,500 -
GBP5,419,974 per annum).
Unobservable input: rental growth
The estimated average increase in rent based on both market
estimations and contractual arrangements.
Unobservable input: net initial yield
The net initial yield is defined as the initial gross income as
a percentage of the market value (or purchase price as appropriate)
plus standard costs of purchase (range: 4.54% - 7.50%).
Sensitivities of measurement of significant unobservable
inputs
As set out within significant accounting estimates and
judgements above, the Group's property portfolio valuation is open
to judgements and is inherently subjective by nature.
As a result the following sensitivity analysis has been
prepared:
-5% in +5% in +0.25% in -0.25% in
passing passing net initial net initial
rent rent yield yield
GBP'000 GBP'000 GBP'000 GBP'000
======================== ========= =========== ======== ============ ============
Increase/(decrease) in the fair
value of investment properties (30,964) 30,964 (26,835) 29,381
=================================== ========== ======== ============ ==============
16. Investments
The Group comprises a number of companies so has taken advantage
of the exemption under Section 410(2) of the Companies Act 2006 in
disclosing the names of only those subsidiary entities whose
results are deemed by Directors to principally affect the financial
statements:
Country of incorporation Ownership
%
================================== ========================= =========
Baljean Properties Limited Isle of Man 100%
The Sherburn RDC Unit Trust Jersey 100%
Tritax REIT Acquisition 3 Limited UK 100%
Tritax Acquisition 4 Limited Jersey 100%
Tritax Acquisition 5 Limited Jersey 100%
Sonoma Ventures Limited BVI 100%
Tritax Ripon Limited Guernsey 100%
Tritax Acquisition 8 Limited Jersey 100%
Tritax Acquisition 9 Limited Jersey 100%
Tritax Acquisition 10 Limited Jersey 100%
Tritax Acquisition 11 Limited Jersey 100%
Tritax Acquisition 12 Limited Jersey 100%
Tritax Acquisition 13 Limited Jersey 100%
Tritax Acquisition 14 Limited Jersey 100%
=================================== ======================== =========
The principal activity of all of the above companies is property
investment.
17. Trade and other receivables
31 December 31 October
2014 2013
GBP'000 GBP'000
================================== =========== ==========
Forward funded prepayment 27,204 -
Trade receivables 1,718 -
Licence fee receivable 1,587 -
Prepayments and other receivables 159 -
================================== =========== ==========
30,668 -
================================== =========== ==========
All trade receivables relate to amounts that are less than 30
days overdue as at the period end date.
18. Cash and cash equivalents
31 December 31 October
2014 2013
GBP'000 GBP'000
================== =========== ==========
Cash held at bank 94,306 -
Restricted cash 4,310 -
================== =========== ==========
98,616 -
================== =========== ==========
Restricted cash as at 31 December 2014 represents amounts
relating to future rent-free periods on asset purchases during the
period, where a cash deduction against the net purchase price was
agreed with the vendor. Currently the cash is held in an account at
the bank that has debt security over the asset to cover the periods
of cash shortfall as set out in the lease. The restricted cash is
not readily convertible to cash available on demand.
Cash and cash equivalents reported in the Consolidated Statement
of Cash Flows totalled GBP94.31 million as at the period end, which
excludes long-term restricted cash deposits totalling GBP4.31
million. Total cash and cash equivalents as reported in the Group
Statement of Financial Position equals GBP98.62 million.
19. Trade and other payables
31 December 31 October
2014 2013
GBP'000 GBP'000
========================= =========== ==========
Trade and other payables 2,720 -
Accruals 1,763 -
VAT 1,490 -
Tax liability 75 -
========================= =========== ==========
6,048 -
========================= =========== ==========
The tax liability arises from the acquisition of Sonoma Ventures
Limited and relates to the period prior to acquisition.
20. Bank borrowings
A summary of the drawn and undrawn bank borrowings in the period
is shown below:
Bank borrowings Bank borrowings Total
drawn undrawn GBP'000
GBP'000 GBP'000
========================================= =============== =============== ========
As at 1 November 2013 - - -
Bank borrowings drawn in the period 203,644 - 203,644
Bank borrowings available but undrawn in
the period - 13,172 13,172
========================================= =============== =============== ========
As at 31 December 2014 203,644 13,172 216,816
========================================= =============== =============== ========
As at 1 March 2013 and 31 October 2013 - - -
========================================= =============== =============== ========
The Group has entered into ten separate banking facilities
during the period, drawing on GBP203.6 million of debt while having
an undrawn debt facility available of GBP13.2 million at the period
end. The weighted average term to maturity of the Group's debt as
at the period end is 4.31 years.
Bank borrowings are secured by charges over individual
investment properties held by certain asset-holding subsidiaries.
The banks also hold charges over the shares of the subsidiaries and
any intermediary holding companies of those subsidiaries. The Group
does not provide any cross-Group guarantees nor does the Company
act as a guarantor to the banks.
Any associated fees in arranging the bank borrowings unamortised
as at the period end are offset against amounts drawn on the
facilities as shown in the table below:
31 December 31 October
2014 2013
GBP'000 GBP'000
================================================= =========== ==========
Bank borrowings drawn: due in more than one year 203,644 -
Less: Unamortised costs (2,711) -
================================================= =========== ==========
Non-current liabilities: Bank borrowings 200,933 -
================================================= =========== ==========
Maturity of bank borrowings
31 December 31 October
2014 2013
Drawn Drawn
GBP'000 GBP'000
================================ =========== ==========
Repayable between 1 and 2 years - -
Repayable between 2 and 5 years 203,644 -
Repayable in over 5 years - -
================================ =========== ==========
203,644 -
================================ =========== ==========
Of the Group's ten banking facilities, seven of these facilities
contained options for extension. There were four facilities with an
extension option of one year and a further three facilities with an
extension option of two years (split into two, one year
extensions). The extension options require the agreement of both
the Group and counterparty bank in order to exercise. Details of
the individual facilities can be found in the Manager's Report.
Each of the Group's facilities has an interest charge which is
payable quarterly based on a margin above 3 month Libor. The
weighted average margin payable by the Group on its debt portfolio
as at the period end was 1.76% above 3 month Libor.
The Group has been in compliance with all of the financial
covenants of the above facilities as applicable throughout the
period covered by these financial statements.
21. Interest rate derivatives
To mitigate the interest rate risk that arises as a result of
entering into variable rate linked loans, the Group entered into a
number of interest rate caps during the period. An interest rate
cap has been taken out in respect of each loan drawn to cap the
rate to which 3-month Libor can rise and are coterminous with the
initial term of the loan. The weighted average cap rate for the
Group as at the period end was 2.09%, which effectively caps the
Group's drawn borrowing facilities at an all-inclusive interest
rate payable of 3.85%. The total premium payable in the period
towards securing the interest rate caps was GBP4.96 million.
31 December 31 October
2014 2013
Drawn Drawn
GBP'000 GBP'000
============================================== =========== ==========
Non-current assets: Interest rate derivatives 2,379 -
============================================== =========== ==========
The interest rate derivatives are marked to market by the
relevant counterparty banks on a quarterly basis in accordance with
IAS 39. Any movement in the mark to market values of the
derivatives are taken to the Group Statement of Comprehensive
Income.
31 December 31 October
2014 2013
Drawn Drawn
GBP'000 GBP'000
=================================================== =========== ==========
Interest rate cap premium 4,956 -
Changes in fair value of interest rate derivatives (2,577)
=================================================== =========== ==========
2,379 -
=================================================== =========== ==========
It is the Group's target to hedge at least 90% of the total debt
portfolio using interest rate derivatives. As at the period end
date the total proportion of hedged debt equated to 97.7%, as shown
below.
31 December 31 October
2014 2013
Drawn Drawn
GBP'000 GBP'000
============================================ =========== ==========
Total bank borrowings (note 20) 203,644 -
Notional value of interest rate derivatives 198,918 -
============================================ =========== ==========
Proportion of hedged debt 97.7% -
============================================ =========== ==========
Fair value hierarchy
The following table provides the fair value measurement
hierarchy for interest rate derivatives:
Date of Total Quoted prices Significant Significant
valuation GBP'000 in active observable unobservable
GBP'000 markets inputs inputs
(Level 1) (Level 2) (Level 3)
GBP'000 GBP'000 GBP'000
=========================== ============== ======== ============= =========== =============
Asset measured at fair
value: 31 December
Interest rate derivatives 2014 2,379 - 2,379 -
31 October
Interest rate derivatives 2013 - - - -
=========================== ============== ======== ============= =========== =============
The fair value of these contracts are recorded in the Group
Statement of Financial Position and is determined by forming an
expectation that interest rates will exceed strike rates and
discounting these future cash flows at the prevailing market rates
as at the period end.
There have been no transfers between Level 1 and Level 2 during
any of the periods, nor have there been any transfers between Level
2 and Level 3 during any of the periods.
22. Financial risk management
Financial instruments
The Group's principal financial assets and liabilities are those
that arise directly from its operations: trade and other
receivables, trade and other payables and cash and cash
equivalents. The Group's other principal financial liabilities are
bank borrowings, the main purpose of which is to finance the
acquisition and development of the Group's investment property
portfolio.
Set out below is a comparison by class of the carrying amounts
and fair value of the Group's financial instruments that are
carried in the financial information:
Book value Fair value Book value Fair value
31 December 31 December 31 October 31 October
2014 2014 2013 2013
GBP'000 GBP'000 GBP'000 GBP'000
============================= ============ ============ =========== ===========
Financial assets
Interest rate derivatives 2,379 2,379 - -
Trade and other receivables 30,668 30,668 - -
Cash and short-term deposits 98,616 98,616 - -
============================= ============ ============ =========== ===========
Financial liabilities
Trade and other payables (4,285) (4,285) - -
============================= ============ ============ =========== ===========
Risk management
The Group is exposed to market risk (including interest rate
risk), credit risk and liquidity risk. The Board of Directors
oversees the management of these risks. The Board of Directors
reviews and agrees policies for managing each of these risks that
are summarised below.
Market risk
Market risk is the risk that the fair values of financial
instruments will fluctuate because of changes in market prices. The
financial instruments held by the Group that are affected by market
risk are principally the Group's bank balances along with a number
of interest rate caps entered into to mitigate interest rate
risk.
Credit risk
Credit risk is the risk that counterparty will not meet its
obligations under a financial instrument or customer contract,
leading to a financial loss. The Group is exposed to credit risks
from both its leasing activities and financing activities,
including deposits with banks and financial institutions. Credit
risk is assisted by tenants being required to pay rentals in
advance under their lease obligations. The credit quality of the
tenant is assessed based on an extensive credit rating scorecard at
the time of entering into a lease agreement.
Outstanding trade receivables are regularly monitored. The
maximum exposure to credit risk at the reporting date is the
carrying value of each class of financial asset.
Trade receivables
Trade receivables, primarily tenant rentals, are presented in
the balance sheet net of allowances for doubtful receivables and
are monitored on a case by case basis. Credit risk is primarily
managed by requiring tenants to pay rentals in advance and
performing tests around strength of covenant prior to acquisition.
Any trade receivables past due as at the period end were received
shortly after the period end.
Credit risk related to financial instruments and cash
deposits
One of the principal credit risks of the Group arises with the
banks and financial institutions. The Board of Directors believes
that the credit risk on short-term deposits and current account
cash balances are limited because the counterparties are banks, who
are committed lenders to the Group, with high credit ratings
assigned by international credit-rating agencies.
Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk arises from the Group's management of working
capital and, going forward, the finance charges and principal
repayments on its borrowings. It is the risk that the Group will
encounter difficulty in meeting its financial obligations as they
fall due, as the majority of the Group's assets are property
investments and are therefore not readily realisable. The Group's
objective is to ensure it has sufficient available funds for its
operations and to fund its capital expenditure. This is achieved by
continuous monitoring of forecast and actual cash flows by
management.
The table below summarises the maturity profile of the Group's
financial liabilities based on contractual undiscounted
payments:
On demand Less than 3 to 12 1 to 5 years > 5 years Total
GBP'000 3 months months GBP'000 GBP'000 GBP'000
GBP'000 GBP'000
================= ========= ========= ======== ============ ========= ========
31 December 2014
Bank borrowings - 1,180 3,539 219,243 - 223,962
Trade and other
payables - 6,048 - - - 6,048
================= ========= ========= ======== ============ ========= ========
- 7,228 3,539 219,243 - 230,010
================= ========= ========= ======== ============ ========= ========
31 October 2013
Bank borrowings - - - - - -
Trade and other - - - - - -
payables
================= ========= ========= ======== ============ ========= ========
- - - - - -
================= ========= ========= ======== ============ ========= ========
Included within the contracted payments is GBP30.32 million of
bank interest payable up to the point of maturity across the
facilities.
23. Capital management
The primary objective of the Group's capital management is to
ensure that it remains a going concern and continues to qualify for
UK REIT status.
The Board, with the assistance of the Investment Manager,
monitors and reviews the Group's capital so as to promote the
long-term success of the business, facilitate expansion and to
maintain sustainable returns for Shareholders. The Group's policy
on borrowings is as follows:
The level of borrowing will be on a prudent basis for the asset
class, and will seek to achieve a low cost of funds, while
maintaining flexibility in the underlying security requirements,
and the structure of both the portfolio and the REIT Group.
The Directors intend that the Group will maintain a conservative
level of aggregate borrowings with a medium-term target of 40% of
the Group's gross assets. However, during the investment phase post
admission, the Group's target level of aggregate borrowings will be
45% of the Group's gross assets, with flexibility to increase to a
maximum level of 50% of the Group's gross assets on a temporary
basis during this phase.
Debt will be secured at the asset level subject to the
assessment of the optimal financing structure for the Group and
having consideration to key metrics including lender diversity,
debt type and maturity profiles.
24. Share capital
31 December 31 December 31 October 31 October
2014 2014 2013 2013
Number GBP'000 Number GBP'000
=========================== ================ ============= =========== ========== ==========
Issued and fully paid
at 1p each (formerly
GBP1.00 each) 470,495,220 4,705 50,000 50
============================================= ============= =========== ========== ==========
At beginning of period
- GBP1.00 Ordinary Shares 50,000 50 50,000 50
============================================= ============= =========== ========== ==========
Conversion to GBP0.01
Ordinary Shares 4,950,000 - - -
Shares issued in relation
to IPO December 2013 195,000,000 1,950 - -
Shares issued in relation
to
Tap issue June 2014 19,980,000 200 - -
Shares issued in relation
to
further Equity issue July 2014 145,631,068 1,456 - -
Shares issued in relation
to
management contract 122,248 1 - -
Shares issued in relation
to
further Equity December 2014 104,761,904 1,048 - -
=========================== ================ ============= =========== ========== ==========
At end of period 470,495,220 4,705 50,000 50
============================================= ============= =========== ========== ==========
On 9 December 2013, Tritax Big Box REIT plc announced that it
had raised GBP200 million through its IPO and the Ordinary Shares
issued had been admitted to trading on the SFM and the Official
List of the CISX. The Company's ticker symbol is BBOX. The initial
raising by the Company involved the issue of Ordinary Shares to the
relevant subscriber at a price of 100 pence per Ordinary Share.
On 4 June 2014, the Company issued a further 19,980,000 Ordinary
Shares (the "Tap issue"), at a price of 104 pence per share. Net
cash proceeds from the Tap issue amounted to GBP20.4 million.
On 8 July 2014, the Company announced that it had published a
prospectus in relation to the issue of 145,631,068 new Ordinary
Shares through a Placing, Open Offer and Offer for Subscription at
a price of 103 pence per Ordinary Share to raise up to GBP150
million, plus the proposed future issue of up to 350 million new
Ordinary Share through the Share Issuance Programme; and the
proposed admission of the Company's issued and to be issued
Ordinary Shares to the premium listing segment of the Official List
of the Financial Conduct Authority and to trading on the main
market for listed securities of the London Stock Exchange.
On 7 October 2014, the Company announced that in accordance with
the terms of the management fee arrangements with the Manager,
pursuant to 25% of the management fee being payable in new Ordinary
Shares of GBP0.01, it issued a further 122,248 shares in relation
to the period from IPO to 30 June 2014. The issue price per
Ordinary Share was 100 pence per share (based on the most recently
published net asset value of 101.85p per Ordinary Share as at 30
June 2014, less the first interim dividend declared of 1.85p per
share.
On 28 November 2014, the Company announced a total of
104,761,904 new Ordinary Shares of GBP0.01 to be issued at price of
105 pence per share in the form of a Placing as part of the
Company's Share Issuance Programme.
25. Share premium
The share premium relates to amounts subscribed for share
capital in excess of nominal value:
31 December 31 October
2014 2013
GBP'000 GBP'000
============================================ =========== =========== ==========
Balance at beginning of period - -
Share premium on Ordinary Shares issued December
in relation to IPO 2013 198,000 -
December
Share issue expenses in relation to IPO 2013 (4,000) -
Share premium on Ordinary Shares issued
in relation to Tap June 2014 20,579 -
Share issue expenses in relation to Tap June 2014 (402) -
Transfer to capital reduction reserve
(see note 26) (194,000) -
Share premium on Ordinary Shares issued
in relation to further
Equity issue July 2014 148,544 -
Share issue expenses in relation to further
Equity issue July 2014 (3,042) -
Share premium on Ordinary Shares issued
in to management 121 -
Share premium on Ordinary Shares issued
in relation to further December
Equity issue 2014 108,952 -
Share issue expenses in relation to further
Equity issue December
(December 2014) 2014 (2,216) -
============================================ =========== =========== ==========
Balance at end of period 272,536 -
========================================================= =========== ==========
26. Capital reduction reserve
31 December 31 October
2014 2013
GBP'000 GBP'000
================================================ =========== ==========
Balance at beginning of period - -
Transfer from share premium 194,000 -
First interim dividend for the period ended 31
December 2014 (4,070) -
Second interim dividend for the period ended 31
December 2014 (5,486) -
================================================ =========== ==========
Balance at end of period 184,444 -
================================================ =========== ==========
On 4 July 2014, the Company by way of Special Resolution,
cancelled the then value of its share premium account, by an Order
of the High Court of Justice, Chancery Division. As a result of
this cancellation, GBP194.0 million has been transferred from the
share premium account, into the capital reduction reserve account.
The capital reduction reserve account is classed as a distributable
reserve.
Please refer to note 14 for details of the declaration of
dividends to Shareholders.
27. Retained earnings
31 December 31 October
2014 2013
GBP'000 GBP'000
=============================== =========== ==========
Balance at beginning of period - -
Retained profit for the period 41,844 -
Balance at end of period 41,844 -
=============================== =========== ==========
28. Net asset value per share (NAV)
Basic NAV per share is calculated by dividing net assets in the
Group Statement of Financial Position attributable to ordinary
equity holders of the parent by the number of Ordinary Shares
outstanding at the end of the period. As there are no dilutive
instruments outstanding, basic and diluted NAV per share are
identical.
Net asset values have been calculated as follows:
31 December 31 October
2014 2013
GBP'000 GBP'000
===================================================== =========== ==========
Net assets per Group Statement of Financial Position 503,529 50
===================================================== =========== ==========
EPRA NAV 506,106 50
===================================================== =========== ==========
Ordinary Shares:
Issued share capital 470,495 50
===================================================== =========== ==========
Basic and diluted net asset value per share 107.02p 100p
===================================================== =========== ==========
Basic and diluted EPRA NAV per share 107.57p 100p
===================================================== =========== ==========
EPRA NAV is calculated as net assets per the Consolidated
Statement of Financial Position excluding fair value adjustments
for debt-related derivatives.
29. Operating leases
The future minimum lease payments under non-cancellable
operating leases receivable by the Group are as follows:
Less than 2-5 years More than Total
one year GBP'000 5 years GBP'000
GBP'000 GBP'000
================= ========== ========= ========= ========
31 December 2014 32,787 130,579 294,312 457,678
================= ========== ========= ========= ========
31 October 2013 - - - -
================= ========== ========= ========= ========
30. Transactions with related parties
For the period ended 31 December 2014 all Directors plus the
Partners of the Manager are considered key management personnel.
The terms and conditions of the Investment Management Agreement are
described in the Directors' Report. Details of all amounts paid for
services provided by Tritax Management LLP ("the Manager") are
provided in note 8.
Details of amounts paid to Directors for their services can be
found within the Directors' Remuneration Report.
On 13 November 2014, the Board announced that it had exchanged
contracts on The Range UK National Distribution Centre ("NDC") at
Nimbus Park, Thorne, Doncaster for a purchase price of GBP48.5
million (net of acquisition costs). The vendor of the property was
Tritax Prime Distribution Income Fund, a limited partnership
vehicle managed by the Manager. The four controlling Partners of
the Manager (or their beneficiaries), namely Mark Shaw, Colin
Godfrey, James Dunlop and Henry Franklin had total aggregated
equity interests in the limited partnership of 2.14%.
Throughout the period SG Commercial LLP ("SG Commercial") has
provided general property agency services to the Group. SG
Commercial has been paid fees totalling GBP1.71 million in respect
of agency services for the period; this represents a total of 40%
of agency fees paid by the Group. No fees remain outstanding as at
the period end. Of the four controlling Members of the Manager,
namely Mark Shaw, Colin Godfrey, James Dunlop and Henry Franklin,
all except Henry Franklin are also the controlling Members of SG
Commercial. While there are currently no existing contractual
arrangements between the Company and SG Commercial, the Company may
choose to appoint SG Commercial in the future from time to time on
either a sole or joint agency basis. Any such appointments have
been and will continue to be made on normal market-based
contractual terms. In the event that any such appointment is
proposed by the Manager, the Board has and shall continue to be
consulted and asked for its approval.
Mark Shaw does not vote at any meeting of the Board relating to
contractual terms to be agreed between the Company, the Manager and
SG Commercial, nor with respect to any investment decision where SG
Commercial is acting as agent in any capacity.
31. Capital commitments
The Group had no capital commitments outstanding as at 31
December 2014.
32. Subsequent events
On 29 January 2015, the Company announced that it has exchanged
contracts (subject to detailed planning consent) to provide forward
funding for a new distribution warehouse facility located inside
the M25 at Crossdox, Bronze Age Way, Erith, pre-let in its entirety
to Ocado Holdings Ltd, guaranteed by Ocado Group Plc ("Ocado"). The
investment price is GBP98.8 million, reflecting a yield of 5.25%
(net of standard acquisition costs).
Ocado has an option to introduce a third part joint guarantor to
the lease on the later of 30 April 2014 and the date of grant of
detailed planning consent which, if exercised, would result in an
increase in the investment price to GBP99.9 million and a reduced
yield of 4.9% (net of standard acquisition costs).
On 2 February 2015 and further to the acquisition of the
distribution centre in Dove Valley Park, Derby announced on 8
December 2014, the Board announced that the Company has drawn on
senior debt financing secured on the asset. This facility had
previously been agreed with Barclays Bank PLC to the value of
GBP13.2 million, reflecting a loan to value ratio of approximately
43.2%.
This information is provided by RNS
The company news service from the London Stock Exchange
END
FR PKBDPDBKBFBB
Tritax Big Box Reit (LSE:BBOX)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2024 to May 2024
Tritax Big Box Reit (LSE:BBOX)
Historical Stock Chart
From May 2023 to May 2024