Indicate by check mark if the registrant is a well-known seasoned issuer, as defined in Rule 405 of the Securities Act. Yes
☐
No
☒
Indicate by check mark if the registrant is not required to file reports pursuant to Section 13 or 15(d) of the Act. Yes
☐
No
☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant: (1) has filed all reports required to be filed by Section 13 or 15(d) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to file such reports), and (2) has been subject to such filing requirements for the past 90 days. Yes
☒
No
☐
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant has submitted electronically and posted on its corporate Web site, if any, every Interactive Data File required to be submitted and posted pursuant to Rule 405 of Regulation S-T (§232.405 of this chapter) during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the registrant was required to submit and post such files).
☒
Yes
☐
No
Indicate by check mark if disclosure of delinquent filers pursuant to Item 405 of Regulation S-K is not contained herein, and will not be contained, to the best of the registrant’s knowledge, in definitive proxy or information statements incorporated by reference in Part III of this Form 10-K or any amendment to this Form 10-K.
☒
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a large accelerated filer, an accelerated filer, a non-accelerated filer or a smaller reporting company. See definitions of “large accelerated filer”, “accelerated filer” and “smaller reporting company” in Rule 12b-2 of the Exchange Act. (Check one):
Indicate by check mark whether the registrant is a shell company (as defined in Rule 12b-2 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934). Yes
☐
No
☒
The aggregate market value of the registrant’s common stock held by non-affiliates of the registrant was approximately $37,197,028 based on the closing price of the registrant’s common stock on the Nasdaq Global Select Market of $2.78 per share on June 30, 2016. Shares of common stock held by each executive officer and director and each person who beneficially owns 10% or more of the outstanding common stock have been excluded from this calculation. This determination of affiliate status may not be conclusive for other purposes.
The number of outstanding shares of the registrant’s common stock, par value $0.001 per share, as of March 8, 2017 was 23,748,096.
Portions of the registrant’s proxy statement to be filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, pursuant to Regulation 14A in connection with the registrant’s 2017 Annual Meeting of Stockholders, which will be filed subsequent to the date hereof, are incorporated by reference into Part III of this annual report on Form 10-K. Such proxy statement will be filed with the SEC not later than 120 days following the end of the registrant’s fiscal year ended December 31, 2016.
In this Annual Report on Form 10-K, Annual Report, unless the context requires otherwise, "aTyr Pharma," “aTyr,” "Company," "we," "our," and "us" means aTyr Pharma, Inc. and its subsidiary, Pangu BioPharma Limited.
The market data and certain other statistical information used in this Annual Report are based on independent industry publications, governmental publications, reports by market research firms or other independent sources. Some data are also based on our good faith estimates. Information that is based on estimates, forecasts, projections, market research or similar methodologies is inherently subject to uncertainties and actual events or circumstances may differ materially from events and circumstances reflected in this information.
We own various U.S. federal trademark applications and unregistered trademarks, including our company name, Resolaris™ and Stalaris™. All other trademarks or trade names referred to in this Annual Report are the property of their respective owners. Solely for convenience, the trademarks and trade names in this prospectus are referred to without the symbols
®
and ™, but such references should not be construed as any indicator that their respective owners will not assert, to the fullest extent under applicable law, their rights thereto.
This Annual Report on Form 10-K contains “forward-looking statements” that involve risks and uncertainties, as well as assumptions that even if they never materialize or prove incorrect, could cause our results to differ materially from those expressed or implied by such forward-looking statements. We make such forward-looking statements pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and other federal securities laws. All statements other than statements of historical facts contained in this Annual Report on Form 10-K are forward-looking statements. In some cases, you can identify forward-looking statements by terms such as "may," "will," "expect," "anticipate," "estimate," "intend," "plan," "predict," "potential," "believe," "should" and similar expressions. Forward-looking statements in this Annual Report on Form 10-K include, but are not limited to, statements about:
The cautionary statements made in this report are intended to be applicable to all related forward-looking statements wherever they may appear in this report. We urge you not to place undue reliance on these forward-looking statements, which speak only as of the date of this report. Except as required by law, we assume no obligation to update our forward-looking statements, even if new information becomes available in the future.
Item 1A.
Risk Factors
You should carefully consider the following risk factors, as well as the other information in this Annual Report on Form 10-K, and in our other public filings. The occurrence of any of these risks could harm our business, financial condition, results of operations and/or growth prospects or cause our actual results to differ materially
from those contained in forward-looking statements we have made in this report and those we may make from time to time. You should consider all of the risk factors described in our public filings when evaluating our business.
Risks related to the discovery, development and regulation of our Physiocrine-based product candidates
Resolaris, Stalaris and any other product candidates that we may develop from our discovery engine represent novel therapeutic approaches, which may cause significant delays or may not result in any commercially viable drugs.
We have concentrated our research and development efforts on Physiocrine biology, a new area of biology, and our future success is highly dependent on the successful development of Physiocrine-based product candidates, including Resolaris, Stalaris and additional product candidates arising from the Resokine pathway or other pathways. Physiocrine-based biology represents a novel approach to drug discovery and development, and to our knowledge, no drugs have been developed using, or based upon, this approach. Despite the successful development of other naturally occurring proteins, such as erythropoietin and insulin, as therapeutics, Physiocrines represent a novel class of protein therapeutics, and our development of these therapeutics is based on our new understanding of human physiology. In particular, the mechanism of action of Physiocrines and their role in immuno-modulation and tissue regeneration have not been studied extensively, nor has the safety of this class of protein therapeutics been evaluated extensively in humans. The Physiocrines that we elect to develop may not have the physiological functions that we currently ascribe to them, may have limited or no therapeutic applications, or may present safety problems of which we are not yet aware. We cannot be sure that our discovery engine will yield Physiocrine-based therapeutic product candidates that are safe, effective, approvable by regulatory authorities, manufacturable, scalable, or profitable.
Because our work in Physiocrine biology and our product candidates represent a new therapeutic approach, developing and commercializing our product candidates subjects us to a number of challenges, including:
|
•
|
defining indications within our targeted rare diseases and clinical endpoints within each indication that are appropriate to support regulatory approval;
|
|
•
|
obtaining regulatory approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration, or the FDA, and other regulatory authorities that have little or no experience with the development of Physiocrine-based therapeutics;
|
|
•
|
educating medical personnel regarding the potential side effect profile of each of our product candidates, such as the potential for the development of antibodies against our purified protein therapeutics;
|
|
•
|
developing processes for the safe administration of these product candidates, including long-term follow-up for all patients who receive our product candidates;
|
|
•
|
sourcing clinical and, if approved, commercial supplies for the materials used to manufacture and process our product candidates;
|
|
•
|
developing a manufacturing process and distribution network that ensures consistent manufacture of our product candidates in compliance with current Good Manufacturing Practices, or cGMPs, and related requirements, with a cost of goods that allows for an attractive return on investment;
|
|
•
|
establishing sales and marketing capabilities after obtaining any regulatory approval to gain market acceptance; and
|
|
•
|
developing therapeutics for rare and more common diseases or indications beyond those addressed by our current product candidates.
|
Moreover, public perception of safety issues, including adoption of new therapeutics or novel approaches to treatment, may adversely influence the willingness of subjects to participate in clinical trials, or if approved, of physicians to adopt and prescribe novel therapeutics. Physicians, hospitals and third-party payors often are slow to adopt new products, technologies and treatment practices. Physicians may decide the therapy is too complex or unproven to adopt and may choose not to administer the therapy. Based on these and other factors, healthcare providers and payors may decide that the benefits of any Physiocrine-based therapeutic for which we receive regulatory approval do not or will not outweigh its costs. Any inability to successfully develop commercially viable drugs would have an adverse impact on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
31
If we are unable to successfully complete or otherwise advance clini
cal development, obtain regulatory or marketing approval for, or successfully commercialize, Resolaris or Stalaris, or experience significant delays in doing so, our business will be materially harmed.
To date, we have expended significant time, resources and effort on the discovery and development of Resolaris, including conducting preclinical studies and our clinical trials. We have not yet commenced or completed any evaluation of Resolaris in human clinical trials designed to demonstrate efficacy to the satisfaction of the FDA. We have not yet commenced clinical development of Stalaris. We currently generate no revenue from the sale of any product, and our ability to generate product revenues and to achieve commercial success, which we do not expect will occur for many years, if ever, will initially depend on our ability to successfully develop, obtain regulatory approval for and commercialize Resolaris or Stalaris for the treatment of one or more of our target rare disease indications in the United States and any foreign jurisdictions. Before we can market or sell Resolaris or Stalaris in the United States or foreign jurisdictions, we will need to commence and complete additional clinical trials (including larger, pivotal trials, which we have not yet commenced), manage clinical and manufacturing activities, obtain necessary regulatory approvals from the FDA in the United States and from similar regulatory authorities in other jurisdictions, obtain adequate clinical and commercial manufacturing supplies, build commercial capabilities, which may include entering into a marketing collaboration with a third party, and in some jurisdictions, obtain reimbursement authorization, among other things. We cannot assure you that we will be able to successfully complete the necessary clinical trials, obtain regulatory approvals, secure an adequate commercial supply for, or otherwise successfully commercialize, Resolaris or Stalaris. If we do not receive regulatory approvals for Resolaris or Stalaris, and even if we do obtain regulatory approvals, we may never generate significant revenues, if any, from commercial sales. If we fail to successfully commercialize Resolaris or Stalaris, we may be unable to generate sufficient revenues to sustain and grow our company, and our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations will be adversely affected.
Data generated in our preclinical studies and patient sample data relating to the Resokine pathway may not be predictive or indicative of the immuno-modulatory activity or therapeutic effects, if any, of Resolaris in patients.
Our scientists discovered the Resokine pathway using
in vivo
screening systems designed to test potential immuno-modulatory activity in animal models of severe immune activity or inflammation, combined with data relating to the potential blockade of the Resokine pathway in a population of patients with myopathy that occurs in a particular rare disease, anti-synthetase syndrome, with Jo-1 antibodies. Translational medicine, or the application of basic scientific findings to develop therapeutics that promote human health, is subject to a number of inherent risks. In particular, scientific hypotheses formed from nonclinical observations may prove to be incorrect, and the data generated in animal models or observed in limited patient populations may be of limited value, and may not be applicable in clinical trials conducted under the controlled conditions required by applicable regulatory requirements and our protocols. For example, we have not extensively studied the activity of the Resokine pathway in patients with rare genetic myopathies with an immune component, or RMICs, which forms the basis for our clinical trials of Resolaris in FSHD and limb-girdle muscular dystrophy 2B, or LGMD2B, nor have we evaluated the activity of the Resokine pathway in patients with interstitial lung disease, or ILD. Our knowledge of the activity of this pathway in Jo-1 antibody patients may not be applicable to our target patient populations in RMICs or rare pulmonary diseases with an immune component, or RPICs. In addition, our classification of diseases based on the existence of immune cell invasion (RMICs and RPICs) and our hypothesis that these represent potential indications for Resolaris and Stalaris may not prove to be therapeutically relevant. Accordingly, the conclusions that we have drawn from animal studies and patient sample data regarding the potential immuno-modulatory activity of molecules containing the immuno-modulatory domain, or iMod domain, may not be substantiated in other animal models or in clinical trials. Any failure to demonstrate in controlled clinical trials the requisite safety and efficacy of Resolaris, Stalaris or other product candidates that we may develop will adversely affect our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
We have not studied Resolaris, Stalaris or any of our other product candidates in any human clinical trials designed primarily to show efficacy.
Preclinical and clinical data are often susceptible to varying interpretations and analyses, which may delay, limit or prevent regulatory approval. Many companies that have believed their product candidates performed satisfactorily in preclinical studies and clinical trials have nonetheless failed to obtain marketing approval of their products. Accordingly, our earlier preclinical and clinical studies should not be relied upon as evidence that our current or future clinical trials will succeed. Study designs and results from previous studies are not necessarily predictive of our future clinical trial designs or results, and initial results may not be confirmed upon full analysis of the complete study data. In particular, Resolaris may not achieve positive results in our current and planned clinical trials in RMICs, and any results observed in our Phase 1b/2 clinical trials of Resolaris in patients with FSHD and LGMD2B may not be predictive of results for any future clinical studies. Stalaris may not achieve positive results in our planned clinical trials in healthy subjects and in RPICs or any other clinical studies. In addition, study data from our clinical trials in adult patients might not be predictive of safety, tolerability, immunogenicity or activity in young adults and children. Additionally, Resolaris and Stalaris may fail to show the desired safety and efficacy in later stages of clinical development, such as pivotal clinical trials, despite having successfully advanced through initial clinical trials. Any failure of Resolaris, Stalaris or any other product candidates that we may develop at any stage in the clinical development process would have a material adverse impact on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
32
Becaus
e we are developing novel product candidates for the treatment of diseases in which there is little clinical drug development experience and, in some cases, are using new endpoints or methodologies, the regulatory pathways for approval are not well defined
, and as a result, there is greater risk that our clinical trials will not result in our desired outcomes.
Our initial clinical focus is on the development of Physiocrine-based therapeutics for the treatment of rare diseases, including FSHD, LGMD2B and potentially DMD, where patients may benefit from the activation of immuno-modulatory pathways. There are currently no approved treatments for FSHD or LGMD2B. As a result, the design and conduct of clinical trials for these indications are subject to increased risk, and we may experience setbacks with our ongoing or planned clinical trials for Resolaris or other product candidates that we may develop because of the limited clinical experience in our target indications. In particular, regulatory authorities in the United States and European Union have not issued definitive guidance as to how to measure and achieve efficacy. In later stage trials, we may not achieve a pre-specified endpoint with statistical significance in our planned clinical trials of Resolaris in this indication or in other indications where there is limited or no regulatory guidance regarding appropriate clinical endpoints, which would decrease the chance of obtaining marketing approval for Resolaris. Additionally, it is difficult to establish clinically relevant endpoints for some of these indications because it may take a long time before any therapeutic effects of a drug can be observed.
We could also face challenges in designing clinical trials and obtaining regulatory approval for product candidates from our discovery engine due to the lack of historical clinical trial experience for this novel class of therapeutics. At the moment, because no Physiocrine-based products have received regulatory approval anywhere in the world, it is difficult to determine whether regulatory agencies will be receptive to the approval of our product candidates and to predict the time and cost associated with obtaining regulatory approval. The clinical trial requirements of the FDA and other regulatory agencies and the criteria these regulators use to determine the safety and efficacy of a product candidate vary substantially according to the type, complexity, novelty and intended use and market of the potential products. The regulatory approval process for novel product candidates such as ours can be more expensive and take longer than for other, better known or more extensively studied classes of product candidates. Any inability to design clinical trials with protocols and endpoints acceptable to applicable regulatory authorities, and to obtain regulatory approvals for our product candidates, would have an adverse impact on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
We may encounter substantial delays and other challenges in our clinical trials or we may fail to demonstrate safety and efficacy to the satisfaction of applicable regulatory authorities.
Before obtaining marketing approval from regulatory authorities for the sale of our product candidates, we must conduct extensive clinical trials to demonstrate the safety and efficacy of the product candidates in humans. Clinical trials are expensive, time-consuming, often delayed and uncertain as to outcome. We cannot guarantee that our ongoing and planned clinical trials of Resolaris in RMICs, planned clinical trials of Stalaris in RPICs, or any other clinical trials that we may plan to conduct, will be initiated or conducted as planned or completed on schedule, if at all. Following our submission of an investigational new drug application, or IND, to the FDA to evaluate Resolaris in our Phase 1b/2 trial in adult patients with FSHD in the United States, our IND was placed on full clinical hold to address the nonclinical issue of the comparability of the drug substance used in our preclinical toxicology studies to that used in our Phase 1 clinical trial and proposed for use in the U.S. clinical trial in FSHD patients. We responded to the FDA’s comparability request, and, in January 2015, our IND was removed from full clinical hold, allowing us to initiate the Phase 1b/2 trial in the United States. Our IND was placed on partial clinical hold, which prohibited the evaluation of Resolaris at doses higher than 3.0 mg/kg. The partial clinical hold was lifted in December 2016. We cannot assure you that our product candidates will not be subject to new clinical holds or significant delay in the future. Any inability to initiate or complete our clinical trials of Resolaris, Stalaris or other product candidates in the United States, as a result of clinical holds or otherwise, would delay our clinical development plans, may require us to incur additional clinical development costs and could impair our ability to obtain U.S. regulatory approval for such product candidates.
A failure of one or more clinical trials can occur at any stage of testing, and our clinical trials may not be successful. Events that may prevent successful or timely completion of clinical development include, but are not limited to:
|
•
|
inability to generate sufficient preclinical, toxicology, or other in vivo or in vitro data to support the initiation of human clinical trials, including trials of certain dosages;
|
|
•
|
delays in reaching consensus with regulatory agencies on trial design;
|
|
•
|
delays in reaching agreement on acceptable terms with prospective clinical contract research organizations, or CROs, and clinical trial sites;
|
|
•
|
delays in obtaining required Institutional Review Board, or IRB, or Ethics Committee approval at each clinical trial site;
|
|
•
|
delays in recruiting suitable patients to participate in our clinical trials, or delays that may result if the number of patients required for a clinical trial is larger than we anticipate;
|
|
•
|
imposition of a clinical hold by regulatory agencies, which may occur after our submission of data to these agencies or an inspection of our clinical trial operations or trial sites;
|
33
|
•
|
failure by our CROs, investigators, other third parties or us to adhere to clinical trial requirements;
|
|
•
|
failure to perform in accordance with the FDA’s good clinical practices, or GCPs, or applicable regulatory requirements in other countries;
|
|
•
|
delays in the testing, validation, manufacturing and delivery of our product candidates to the clinical sites;
|
|
•
|
delays in having patients complete participation in a trial or return for post-treatment follow-up;
|
|
•
|
disagreements with regulators regarding our interpretation of data from preclinical studies or clinical trials;
|
|
•
|
occurrence of adverse events associated with the product candidate that are viewed to outweigh its potential benefits; or
|
|
•
|
changes in regulatory requirements and guidance that require amending or submitting new clinical protocols.
|
Any delay in or inability to successfully complete preclinical and clinical development could result in additional costs to us and impair our ability to generate revenue. In addition, if we make manufacturing or formulation changes to our product candidates (including recent changes in our contract manufacturer, production capacity and manufacturing cell line), we may need to conduct additional studies to bridge our modified product candidates to earlier versions. Clinical trial delays could also shorten any periods during which we may have the exclusive right to commercialize our product candidates or allow our competitors to bring products to market before we do, which could impair our ability to obtain orphan exclusivity and successfully commercialize our product candidates and may harm our business and results of operations.
If the results of our clinical trials are perceived to be negative or inconclusive, or if there are safety concerns or adverse events associated with our product candidates, we may:
|
•
|
be required to perform additional clinical trials to support approval or be subject to additional post-marketing testing requirements;
|
|
•
|
be delayed in obtaining marketing approval for our product candidates, if at all;
|
|
•
|
obtain approval for indications or patient populations that are not as broad as intended or desired;
|
|
•
|
obtain approval with labeling that includes significant use or distribution restrictions or safety warnings;
|
|
•
|
be subject to changes in the way the product is manufactured or administered;
|
|
•
|
have regulatory authorities withdraw their approval of the product or impose restrictions on its distribution in the form of a modified risk evaluation and mitigation strategy, or REMS;
|
|
•
|
be subject to litigation; or
|
|
•
|
experience damage to our reputation.
|
To date, the safety and efficacy of Physiocrine-based therapeutics in humans has not been studied to any significant extent. Accordingly, our product candidates could potentially cause adverse events that have not yet been predicted. In addition, the inclusion of critically ill patients in our clinical trials may result in deaths or other adverse medical events due to the natural progression of the disease. As described above, any of these events could prevent us from successfully completing the clinical development of our product candidates and impair our ability to commercialize any products.
Resolaris, Stalaris and any other product candidates that we may discover and develop may cause undesirable side effects or have other properties that could delay or prevent their regulatory approval, limit the commercial profile of an approved label, or result in significant negative consequences following marketing approval, if any.
Undesirable side effects caused by Resolaris, Stalaris and any other product candidates that we may discover or develop, or safety, tolerability or toxicity issues that may occur in our preclinical studies, clinical trials or in the future, could cause us or regulatory authorities to interrupt, restrict, delay, or halt clinical trials and could result in a more restrictive label or the delay or denial of regulatory approval by the FDA or other comparable foreign authorities.
34
In our Phase 1b
/2 clinical trials, we have observed low levels of antibodies to Resolaris in some subjects in response to the administration of Resolaris. Although such elevated antibody observations were without associated clinical symptoms, the development of higher le
vels of such antibodies over a longer course of treatment may ultimately limit the efficacy of Resolaris and trigger a negative autoimmune response, including the development of anti-synthetase syndrome. Anti-synthetase syndrome can include one or more of
the following clinical features: ILD, inflammatory myopathy and inflammatory polyarthritis. Other symptoms which may occur in this setting include fever, weight loss, fatigue, Raynaud’s phenomenon of the digits, rash and difficulty swallowing.
Some patient
s in our Phase 1b/2 clinical trials have experienced generalized infusion related reactions, or IRRs, and discontinued dosing. We established procedural measures, including a decreased concentration and intravenous delivery rate of Resolaris, in an effort
to minimize the occurrence of generalized IRRs and the formation of anti-drug antibodies. After implementation of these procedures, we did observe a decreased rate of IRRs in our clinical trials, but we cannot assure that these measures will continue to be
effective in minimizing the occurrence of generalized IRRs or the formation of anti-drug antibodies, or result in the retention of patients in our trials. Generalized IRRs and other complications or side effects could harm further development and/or comme
rcialization of Resolaris, Stalaris and any other product candidates.
Additionally, our product candidates are designed to be administered by intravenous injection, which may cause side effects, including acute immune responses and injection site reactions
. The risk of adverse immune responses remains a significant concern for protein therapeutics, and we cannot assure that these or other risks will not occur in any of our clinical trials for Resolaris, Stalaris or other product candidates we may develop. T
here is also a risk of delayed adverse events as a result of long-term exposure to protein therapeutics that must be administered repeatedly for the management of chronic conditions, such as the development of antibodies, which may occur over time. If any
such adverse events occur, which may include the development of anti-synthetase syndrome from
antibodies or the occurrence of IRRs associated with
antibodies, further advancement of our clinical trials could be halted or delayed, which would have a materia
l adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
If one or more of our product candidates receives marketing approval, and we or others later identify undesirable side effects or other safety concerns caused by such products, a number of potentially significant negative consequences could result, including but not limited to:
|
•
|
regulatory authorities may withdraw approvals or suspend licenses of such products;
|
|
•
|
regulatory authorities may require additional warnings on the label;
|
|
•
|
we may be required to create a REMS plan, which could include a medication guide outlining the risks of such side effects for distribution to patients, a communication plan for healthcare providers, or other elements to assure safe use;
|
|
•
|
we could be sued and held liable for harm caused to patients; and
|
|
•
|
our reputation may suffer.
|
Any of these events could prevent us from achieving or maintaining market acceptance of the particular product candidate, if approved, and could significantly harm our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
We may not be successful in our efforts to identify or discover additional product candidates.
A key element of our strategy is to leverage our discovery engine to identify tRNA synthetases that exhibit activity in physiological disease pathways of interest, and to develop purified forms of these proteins that are suitable for therapeutic application. A significant portion of the research that we are conducting involves new compounds and drug discovery methods, including our proprietary technology. Our drug discovery activities using our proprietary technology may not be successful in identifying product candidates that are useful in treating rare or more common diseases. Our research programs, including Project ORCA, may initially show promise in identifying potential product candidates, such as Stalaris, yet fail to yield product candidates for clinical development for a number of reasons, including:
|
•
|
the research methodology used may not be successful in identifying appropriate potential product candidates; or
|
|
•
|
potential product candidates may, on further study, be shown to have harmful side effects or other characteristics that indicate that they are unlikely to be medicines that will receive marketing approval and achieve market acceptance.
|
Research programs to identify new product candidates require substantial technical, financial and human resources. We may choose to focus our efforts and resources on a potential product candidate that ultimately proves to be unsuccessful. If we are unable to identify suitable product candidates for preclinical and clinical development and regulatory approval, we will not be able to generate product revenues, which would have an adverse impact on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
35
We may encounter difficulties enrolling patients in our clinical trials for a variety of reasons, including the limited number of patients who have the diseases for which our product candidates
are being studied, which could delay or halt the clinical development of our product candidates.
Identifying and qualifying patients to participate in our ongoing and planned clinical trials of Resolaris and any other clinical trials that we may conduct for our product candidates is critical to our success. In particular, each of the conditions for which we currently plan to evaluate Resolaris is a rare disease with limited patient pools from which to draw for clinical trials. For example, while estimates of FSHD prevalence vary, studies exploring the topic have identified average prevalence rates of approximately one in 17,000. Applying this rate to the U.S. population, as of November 1, 2014, yields a domestic FSHD population of approximately 19,000. In addition, we estimate that LGMD affects an estimated 16,000 patients in the U.S., approximately 3,000 of whom have LGMD2B. The eligibility criteria for our clinical trials may further limit the pool of available participants in our trials. We may be unable to identify and enroll a sufficient number of patients with the disease in question and who meet the eligibility criteria for, and are willing to participate in, our clinical trials. Once enrolled, patients may decide or be required to discontinue from our clinical trials due to inconvenience, burden of trial requirements, adverse events associated with our product candidates or limitations required by trial protocols.
Our ability to identify, recruit enroll and maintain a sufficient number of patients, or those with required or desired characteristics to achieve diversity in a study, to complete our clinical trials in a timely manner may also be affected by other factors, including:
|
•
|
proximity and availability of clinical trial sites for prospective patients;
|
|
•
|
severity of the disease under investigation;
|
|
•
|
design of the study protocol and the burdens to patients of compliance with our study protocols;
|
|
•
|
perceived risks and benefits of the product candidate under study;
|
|
•
|
availability of competing therapies and clinical trials for the patient populations and indications under study;
|
|
•
|
efforts to facilitate timely enrollment in clinical trials;
|
|
•
|
patient referral practices of physicians; and
|
|
•
|
ability to monitor patients adequately during and after treatment.
|
We are initially focused on the development of Physiocrine-based therapeutics to treat rare conditions. We plan to seek initial marketing approval in the United States. We may not be able to initiate or continue clinical trials if we cannot enroll a sufficient number of eligible patients to participate in the clinical trials required by the FDA or other regulatory agencies. Our ability to successfully initiate, enroll and complete a clinical trial in any foreign country is subject to numerous risks unique to conducting business in foreign countries, including:
|
•
|
difficulty in establishing or managing relationships with CROs and physicians;
|
|
•
|
different requirements and standards for the conduct of clinical trials;
|
|
•
|
our inability to locate qualified local consultants, physicians and partners; and
|
|
•
|
the potential burden of complying with a variety of foreign laws, medical standards and regulatory requirements, including the regulation of pharmaceutical and biotechnology products and treatment.
|
Additionally, if patients are unwilling to participate in our clinical trials because of negative publicity from adverse events in our clinical trials or in the biotechnology or protein therapeutics industries or for other reasons, including competitive clinical trials for similar patient populations, the timeline for recruiting patients, conducting studies and obtaining regulatory approval of potential products may be delayed. These delays could result in increased costs, delays in advancing our product development or termination of our clinical trials altogether. If we have difficulty enrolling and maintaining a sufficient number of patients to conduct our clinical trials as planned for any reason, we may need to delay, limit or terminate ongoing or planned clinical trials, any of which would have an adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
36
We may face manufacturing stoppages and other challenges associated with the clinical or commercial manufacture of our Physiocrine-based therapeutics.
All entities involved in the preparation of therapeutics for clinical trials or commercial sale, including our existing contracted development and manufacturing organizations (CDMOs) for our product candidates, are subject to extensive regulation. Components of a finished therapeutic product approved for commercial sale or use in late-stage clinical trials must be manufactured in accordance with cGMP. These regulations govern manufacturing processes and procedures (including record keeping) and the implementation and operation of quality systems to control and assure the quality of investigational products and products approved for sale. Poor control of production processes can lead to the introduction of contaminants or to inadvertent changes in the properties or stability of our product candidates that may not be detectable in final product testing. We or our CDMOs must supply all necessary documentation in support of a biologics license application, or BLA, or a new drug application, or NDA, on a timely basis and must adhere to the FDA’s GLP and cGMP regulations enforced by the FDA through its facilities inspection program. The facilities and quality systems of our CDMOs and other CROs must pass a pre-approval inspection for compliance with applicable regulations as a condition of regulatory approval of our product candidates. In addition, the regulatory authorities may, at any time, audit or inspect a manufacturing facility involved with the preparation of our product candidates or the associated quality systems for compliance with the regulations applicable to the activities being conducted. If these facilities do not pass a pre-approval plant inspection, FDA approval of the products will not be granted.
The regulatory authorities also may, at any time following approval of a product for sale, audit the facilities in which the product is manufactured. If any such inspection or audit of our facilities or those of our CDMOs and CROs identifies a failure to comply with applicable regulations or if a violation of our product specifications or applicable regulations occurs independently of such an inspection or audit, we or the relevant regulatory authority may require remedial measures that may be costly or time-consuming for us or a third party to implement and that may include the temporary or permanent suspension of a clinical trial or commercial sales or the temporary or permanent closure of a facility. Any such remedial measures imposed upon us or third parties with whom we contract could materially harm our business.
If we or any of our CDMOs and CROs fail to maintain regulatory compliance, the FDA can impose regulatory sanctions including, among other things, refusal to approve a pending application for a new biologic product or drug product, or revocation of a pre-existing approval. Additionally, if supply from one approved manufacturer is interrupted, there could be a significant disruption in clinical or commercial supply. An alternative manufacturer would need to be qualified through a BLA or NDA supplement which could result in further delay. The regulatory agencies may also require additional studies if a new manufacturer is relied upon for commercial production. Switching manufacturers may involve substantial costs and is likely to result in a delay in our desired clinical and commercial timelines.
In addition, the manufacture of Resolaris and any other Physiocrine-based therapeutics that we may develop presents challenges associated with biologics production, including the inherent instability of larger, more complex molecules and the need to ensure uniformity of the drug substance produced in different facilities or across different batches. We have changed cell lines for the production of Resolaris in connection with our engagement of a new CDMO to meet our projected needs for pivotal clinical trials and a commercial chemistry, manufacturing and controls specification, which may present production challenges or delays. The process of manufacturing biologics is extremely susceptible to product loss due to contamination, equipment failure or improper installation or operation of equipment, or vendor or operator error. Even minor deviations from normal manufacturing and distribution processes for any of our product candidates could result in reduced production yields, product defects, and other supply disruptions. Furthermore, although Physiocrines represent a class of proteins that may share immuno-modulatory properties in various physiological pathways, each Physiocrine has a different structure and may have unique manufacturing requirements that are not applicable across the entire class. For example, Fc fusion proteins, such as Stalaris, include an additional antibody domain to improve pharmacokinetic, or PK, characteristics, and may therefore require a more complex and time-consuming manufacturing process than other Physiocrines. Currently, we are producing our Stalaris molecule in
E.coli
by expression in inclusion bodies and refolding to recreate the native structure. The manufacturing processes for one of our product candidates may not be readily adaptable to other product candidates that we develop, and we may need to engage multiple third-party manufacturers to produce our product candidates. Any adverse developments affecting manufacturing operations for our product candidates may result in shipment delays, inventory shortages, lot failures, withdrawals or recalls or other interruptions in the supply of our drug substance and drug product which could delay the development of our product candidates. We may also have to write off inventory, incur other charges and expenses for supply of drug product that fails to meet specifications, undertake costly remediation efforts, or seek more costly manufacturing alternatives. Any manufacturing stoppage or delay, or any inability to consistently manufacture adequate supplies of our product candidates for our ongoing or planned clinical trials or on a commercial scale will harm our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
37
Although the FDA an
d the European Commission have granted orphan drug designation to Resolaris for the treatment of FSHD and LGMD, we may not receive orphan drug designation for Resolaris in other jurisdictions or for other indications that we may pursue, or for any other pr
oduct candidates we may develop under any new applications for orphan drug designation that we may submit, and any orphan drug designations that we have received or may receive may not confer marketing exclusivity or other expected commercial benefits.
The FDA and the European Commission have each granted orphan drug designations to Resolaris for the treatment of FSHD and for the treatment of LGMD. We may also apply for orphan drug designation in other territories and for other indications and product candidates. Orphan drug status confers up to ten years of marketing exclusivity in Europe, and up to seven years of marketing exclusivity in the United States, for a particular product in a specified indication. To date, we have been granted orphan drug designation for only one product candidate in the United States and the European Union for two indications. We cannot assure you that we will be able to obtain orphan drug designation, or rely on orphan drug or similar designations to exclude other companies from manufacturing or selling products using the same principal mechanisms of action for the same indications that we pursue beyond these timeframes. Furthermore, marketing exclusivity in Europe can be reduced from ten years to six years if the initial designation criteria have significantly changed since the market authorization of the orphan product. Even if we are the first to obtain marketing authorization for an orphan drug indication, there are circumstances under which a competing product may be approved for the same indication during the period of marketing exclusivity, such as if the later product is shown to be clinically superior to the orphan product, or if the later product is deemed a different product than ours. Further, the marketing exclusivity would not prevent competitors from obtaining approval of the same product candidate as ours for indications other than those in which we have been granted orphan drug designation, or for the use of other types of products in the same indications as our orphan product.
Even if we complete the necessary preclinical studies and clinical trials, we cannot predict when or if we will obtain regulatory approval to commercialize a product candidate, and the scope of any approval may be narrower than we expect.
We cannot commercialize a product until the appropriate regulatory authorities have reviewed and approved the product candidate. Even if our product candidates demonstrate safety and efficacy in clinical trials, the regulatory agencies may not complete their review processes in a timely manner, or we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval. Additional delays may result if an FDA Advisory Committee or regulatory authority recommends non-approval or restrictions on approval. In addition, we may experience delays or rejections based upon additional government regulation from future legislation or administrative action, or changes in regulatory agency policy during the period of product development, clinical trials and the review process. Regulatory agencies also may approve a product candidate for fewer or more limited indications than requested, may impose restrictions on dosing or may grant approval subject to the performance of post-marketing studies. In addition, regulatory agencies may not approve the labeling claims that are necessary or desirable for the successful commercialization of our product candidates.
Failure to obtain marketing approval in international jurisdictions would prevent our medicines from being marketed in such jurisdictions.
In order to market and sell our medicines in the European Union and many other jurisdictions, we must obtain separate marketing approvals and comply with numerous and varying regulatory requirements. The approval procedure varies among countries and can involve additional testing, and we have limited regulatory experience in many jurisdictions. The time required to obtain approval in one jurisdiction may differ substantially from that required to obtain approval in other jurisdictions. The regulatory approval process outside the United States generally includes all of the risks associated with obtaining FDA approval. In addition, in many countries outside the United States, it is required that the product be approved for reimbursement before the product can be approved for sale in that country. We may not obtain approvals from regulatory authorities outside the United States on a timely basis, if at all. Approval by one regulatory authority does not ensure approval by regulatory authorities in other countries or jurisdictions, and we may not be able to file for marketing approvals and may not receive necessary approvals to commercialize our medicines in any market.
A breakthrough therapy or fast track designation by the FDA may not lead to expedited development or regulatory review or approval.
In October 2016 and January 2017, the FDA granted Resolaris fast track designations for the treatment of FSHD and LGMD2B, respectively. We may also seek, from time to time, breakthrough therapy or fast track designation for Resolaris for other indications and for any other product candidates that we may develop, although we may elect not to do so. A breakthrough therapy program is for a product candidate intended to treat a serious or life-threatening condition, and preliminary clinical evidence indicates that the product candidate may demonstrate substantial improvement on a clinically significant endpoint(s) over available therapies. A fast track program is for a product candidate that treats a serious or life-threatening condition, and nonclinical or clinical data demonstrate the potential to address an unmet medical need. The FDA has broad discretion whether or not to grant these designations. Accordingly, even if we believe a particular product candidate is eligible for breakthrough therapy or fast track designation, we cannot assure you that the FDA would decide to grant it. Even though we have received fast track designation for Resolaris for the treatment of FHSD and LGMD2B, or even if we receive breakthrough therapy or fast track designation of other indications or for our other product candidates, we may not experience a faster development process, review or approval compared to conventional FDA procedures. The FDA may withdraw breakthrough therapy or fast track designation if it believes that the product no longer meets the qualifying criteria. In addition, the breakthrough therapy program is a relatively new program. As a result, we cannot be certain
38
whether any of our product candidates can or will qualify for breakthrou
gh therapy designation. Our business may be harmed if we are unable to avail ourselves of these or any other expedited development and regulatory pathways.
Even if we obtain regulatory approval for a product candidate, our products will remain subject to regulatory scrutiny.
Even if Resolaris, Stalaris or any other product candidates that we discover and develop are approved, they will be subject to ongoing regulatory requirements for manufacturing, labeling, packaging, storage, advertising, promotion, sampling, record-keeping, conduct of post-marketing studies, and submission of safety, efficacy, and other post-market information, including both federal and state requirements in the United States and requirements of comparable foreign regulatory authorities.
Manufacturers and manufacturers’ facilities are required to comply with extensive FDA, and comparable foreign regulatory authority, requirements, including ensuring that quality control and manufacturing procedures conform to cGMP regulations. As such, we and our contract manufacturers will be subject to continual review and inspections to assess compliance with cGMP and adherence to commitments made in any BLA, NDA, or marketing authorization application, or MAA. Accordingly, we and others with whom we work will need to continue to expend time, money, and effort in all areas of regulatory compliance, including manufacturing, production, and quality control.
Any regulatory approvals that we receive for our product candidates may be subject to limitations on the approved indicated uses for which the product may be marketed or to the conditions of approval, or contain requirements for potentially costly post-marketing testing, including Phase 4 clinical trials, and surveillance to monitor the safety and efficacy of the product candidate. We will be required to report certain adverse reactions and production problems, if any, to the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities. If new safety issues emerge, we may be required to change our labeling. Any new legislation addressing drug safety or efficacy issues could result in delays in product development or commercialization, or increased costs to assure compliance.
We will have to comply with requirements concerning advertising and promotion for our products. Promotional communications with respect to prescription drugs are heavily scrutinized by the FDA, the Department of Justice, state attorneys general and comparable foreign regulatory authorities. For example, we may face claims associated with the use or promotion of our products for uses outside the scope of their approved label indications. Violations, including actual or alleged promotion of our products for unapproved, or off-label, uses are subject to enforcement letters, inquiries and investigations, and civil and criminal sanctions. Any actual or alleged failure to comply with labeling and promotion requirements may have a negative impact on our business. In the United States, engaging in impermissible promotion of our products for off-label uses can also subject us to false claims litigation under federal and state statutes, which can lead to civil and criminal penalties and fines and agreements that would materially restrict the manner in which we promote or distribute our drug products. These false claims statutes include the federal False Claims Act, which allows any individual to bring a lawsuit against a pharmaceutical company on behalf of the federal government alleging submission of false or fraudulent claims, or causing to present such false or fraudulent claims, for payment by a federal program such as Medicare or Medicaid. If the government prevails in the lawsuit, the individual will share in any fines or settlement funds. Since 2004, these False Claims Act lawsuits against pharmaceutical companies have increased significantly in volume and breadth, leading to several substantial civil and criminal settlements based on certain sales practices promoting off-label drug uses. This growth in litigation has increased the risk that a pharmaceutical company will have to defend a false claims action, pay settlement fines or restitution, agree to comply with burdensome reporting and compliance obligations, and be excluded from Medicare, Medicaid and other federal and state healthcare programs. If we do not lawfully promote our approved products, we may become subject to such litigation and, if we are not successful in defending against such actions, those actions could compromise our ability to become profitable.
The holder of an approved BLA, NDA or MAA must submit new or supplemental applications and obtain approval for certain changes to the approved product, product labeling, or manufacturing process. We could also be asked to conduct post-marketing clinical trials to verify the safety and efficacy of our products in general or in specific patient subsets. If original marketing approval were obtained through an accelerated approval pathway, we could be required to conduct a successful post-marketing clinical trial to confirm clinical benefit for our products. An unsuccessful post-marketing study or failure to complete such a trial could result in the withdrawal of marketing approval.
If a regulatory agency discovers previously unknown problems with a product, such as adverse events of unanticipated severity or frequency, or problems with the facility where the product is manufactured, or disagrees with the promotion, marketing or labeling of a product, such regulatory agency may impose restrictions on that product or us, including requiring withdrawal of the product from the market. If we fail to comply with applicable regulatory requirements, a regulatory agency or enforcement authority may, among other things:
|
•
|
issue untitled or warning letters;
|
|
•
|
impose civil or criminal penalties;
|
|
•
|
suspend or withdraw regulatory approval;
|
39
|
•
|
suspend any of our ongoing clinical trials;
|
|
•
|
refuse to approve pending applications or supplements to approved applications submitted by us;
|
|
•
|
impose restrictions on our operations, including closing our contract manufacturers’ facilities; or
|
|
•
|
seize or detain products, or require or request a product recall.
|
Any government investigation of alleged violations of law could require us to expend significant time and resources in response, and could generate negative publicity. Any failure to comply with ongoing regulatory requirements may significantly and adversely affect our ability to commercialize and generate revenue from our products. If regulatory sanctions are applied or if regulatory approval is withdrawn, the value of our company and our operating results will be adversely affected.
Because of our focus on treatments for severe, rare diseases, Resolaris, Stalaris and other product candidates that we develop may be subject to requests for treatment use under individual patient INDs, which would present a variety of risks.
FDA regulations permit an investigational drug or biologic to be used for the treatment of an individual patient by a licensed physician under certain circumstances if the patient has a serious disease or condition, generally defined as a disease or condition associated with morbidity that has a substantial impact on day-to-day functioning. We believe that Resolaris, Stalaris and other product candidates that we develop may be susceptible to physician requests for use in these settings given the severity of the disease indications that we are targeting and the limited availability of approved and other investigational therapeutics for these indications. The treatment use of our product candidates under individual patient INDs would present a number of risks, including the following:
|
•
|
The treatment use of our product candidates under individual patient INDs may be subject to less stringent or otherwise different protocols from our clinical trials, subjecting the patient to additional risk, which could negatively affect the perception of our product candidates among physicians, patients and regulators;
|
|
•
|
The actual or perceived availability of a product candidate for use under individual patient INDs may impair patient enrollment in our clinical trials; and
|
|
•
|
Any decision to make quantities of our product candidates available for use under individual patient INDs may impair our or our third-party manufacturers’ ability to timely supply adequate quantities of our product candidates for our clinical trials.
|
Physicians may independently file individual patient INDs for Resolaris or, when in clinical trials, for Stalaris or one of our other product candidates. We may disagree with a physician’s or the FDA’s conclusion that our product candidate is suitable for evaluation under a particular individual patient IND, and any decision by us not to make our product candidate available for evaluation under this setting may subject us to negative publicity or market perception.
As part of the recently enacted 21st Century Cures Act, or Cures Act, as the manufacturer of an investigational drug for a serious disease or condition, we will be required to make available, such as by posting on our website, our policy on evaluating and responding to requests for individual patient access to such investigational drug. This requirement applies on the later of 60 calendar days after the date of enactment of the Cures Act or the first initiation of a Phase 2 or Phase 3 trial of the investigational drug.
Risks related to our financial condition and capital requirements
We have incurred significant losses since our inception and anticipate that we will continue to incur significant losses for the foreseeable future.
We are a clinical stage biotherapeutics company, and we have not yet generated any revenues from product sales. We have incurred net losses in each year since our inception in 2005, including net losses of $57.9 million, $48.0 million and $24.4 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. As of December 31, 2016, we had an accumulated deficit of $216.0 million.
We have devoted most of our financial resources to research and development, including our clinical and preclinical development activities. To date, we have financed our operations primarily through the sale of equity securities and convertible debt and through commercial bank debt. The amount of our future net losses will depend, in part, on the rate of our future expenditures and our ability to obtain funding through equity or debt financings, grant funding or strategic collaborations. We have not commenced pivotal clinical trials for any product candidate and it will be several years, if ever, before we have a product candidate ready for commercialization. Even if we obtain regulatory approval to market a product candidate, our future revenues will depend upon the size of any markets in which our product candidates have received approval, and our ability to achieve sufficient market acceptance, reimbursement from third-party payors and adequate market share for our product candidates in those markets. However, even if we obtain adequate market share for our product candidates, because the potential markets in which our product candidates may ultimately receive regulatory approval are very small, we may never become profitable despite obtaining such market share and acceptance of our products.
40
We expect to continue to incur significant expenses and increasing operating losses for the foreseeable future. We antic
ipate that our expenses will increase substantially if and as we:
|
•
|
continue our research and preclinical and clinical development of Resolaris, Stalaris or any other product candidates that we may develop;
|
|
•
|
initiate and conduct any additional preclinical studies, clinical trials or other studies for Resolaris, Stalaris and any other product candidates that we may develop;
|
|
•
|
further develop the manufacturing process for our product candidates;
|
|
•
|
change or add additional manufacturers, including manufacturers of quantities of drug substance suitable for pivotal clinical trials and commercialization;
|
|
•
|
seek regulatory approvals for our product candidates that successfully complete clinical trials;
|
|
•
|
establish a sales, marketing and distribution infrastructure to commercialize any products for which we may obtain marketing approval;
|
|
•
|
seek to identify and validate additional product candidates;
|
|
•
|
make milestone or other payments under our in-license agreements;
|
|
•
|
maintain, protect and expand our portfolio of owned and in-licensed intellectual property;
|
|
•
|
acquire or in-license other product candidates and technologies;
|
|
•
|
attract and retain skilled personnel;
|
|
•
|
create additional infrastructure to support our operations as a public company and our product development and planned future commercialization efforts; and
|
|
•
|
experience any delays or encounter challenges with any of the above.
|
The net losses we incur may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter and year to year, such that a period-to-period comparison of our results of operations may not be a good indication of our future performance. In any particular quarter or quarters, our operating results could be below the expectations of securities analysts or investors, which could cause our stock price to decline.
We have never generated any revenue from product sales and may never be profitable.
Our ability to generate revenue and achieve profitability depends on our ability, alone or with strategic collaboration partners, to successfully complete the development of, and obtain the regulatory approvals necessary to commercialize, Resolaris and any other product candidates that we may develop. We do not anticipate generating revenues from product sales for the foreseeable future, if ever. Our ability to generate future revenues from product sales depends heavily on our success in:
|
•
|
completing research, preclinical development and clinical development of Resolaris, Stalaris and other product candidates, potentially with a partner in one or more of our programs;
|
|
•
|
seeking and obtaining regulatory approvals for product candidates for which we complete clinical trials;
|
|
•
|
developing a sustainable, scalable, reproducible, and transferable manufacturing process for Resolaris, Stalaris and any other product candidates that we may develop;
|
|
•
|
establishing and maintaining supply and manufacturing relationships with third parties that can provide products and services that are adequate in both amount and quality to support clinical development and the market demand for our product candidates, if approved;
|
|
•
|
launching and commercializing product candidates for which we obtain regulatory approval, either by collaborating with a partner or, if launched independently, by establishing a sales force, marketing and distribution infrastructure;
|
|
•
|
maintaining, protecting and expanding our portfolio of intellectual property rights, including patents, trademarks, trade secrets and know-how;
|
|
•
|
obtaining market acceptance of Physiocrine therapeutics and our product candidates as viable treatment options for our target indications;
|
|
•
|
addressing any competing technological and market developments;
|
|
•
|
implementing additional internal systems and infrastructure, as needed;
|
41
|
•
|
identifying and validating new Physiocrine therapeutic product candidates;
|
|
•
|
attracting, hiring and retaining qualified personnel; and
|
|
•
|
negotiating favorable terms in any licensing, collaboration or other arrangements into which we may enter.
|
Even if Resolaris, Stalaris or any of the other product candidates that we may develop is approved for commercial sale, we anticipate incurring significant costs associated with commercializing any approved product candidate. Our expenses could increase beyond expectations if we are required by the FDA or other regulatory agencies, domestic or foreign, to perform clinical trials and other studies in addition to those that we currently anticipate. In cases where we are successful in obtaining regulatory approvals to market one or more of our product candidates, our revenue will be dependent, in part, upon the size of the markets in the territories for which we gain regulatory approval, the accepted price for the product, the ability to get reimbursement at any price, the competition we face, and whether we own the commercial rights for that territory. If the number of our addressable rare disease patients is not as significant as we estimate, the indication approved by regulatory authorities is narrower than we expect, or the reasonably accepted population for treatment is narrowed by competition, physician choice or treatment guidelines, we may not generate significant revenue from sales of such products, even if approved. Even if we are able to generate revenues from the sale of any approved products, we may not become profitable and may need to obtain additional funding to continue operations.
We will likely need to raise additional capital or enter into strategic partnering relationships to fund our operations. Failure to obtain this necessary capital when needed may force us to delay, limit or terminate our product development efforts or other operations.
We are currently advancing Resolaris through clinical development, preparing to initiate clinical development for Stalaris and conducting preclinical development activities directed at the identification and selection of additional Physiocrine-based therapeutic candidates, including Project ORCA. The development of protein therapeutics is expensive, and we expect our research and development expenses to increase substantially in connection with our ongoing activities.
As of December 31, 2016, our cash, cash equivalents and available-for-sale investments were approximately $76.1 million. We expect that our existing cash, cash equivalents and available-for-sale investments will be sufficient to fund our current operations through at least the next 12 months. However, our operating plan may change as a result of many factors currently unknown to us, and we may need to seek additional funds sooner than planned, through public or private equity or debt financings, government or other third-party funding, marketing and distribution arrangements and other collaborations, strategic alliances and licensing arrangements or a combination of these approaches. Our future funding requirements will depend on many factors, including but not limited to:
|
•
|
the scope, rate of progress, results and cost of our clinical trials, nonclinical testing, and other related activities;
|
|
•
|
the cost of manufacturing clinical supplies, and establishing commercial supplies, of our product candidates and any products that we may develop;
|
|
•
|
the number and characteristics of product candidates that we pursue;
|
|
•
|
the cost, timing, and outcomes of regulatory review of our product candidates;
|
|
•
|
the cost and timing of establishing sales, marketing, and distribution capabilities; and
|
|
•
|
the terms and timing of any collaborative, licensing, and other arrangements that we may establish, including any required milestone and royalty payments thereunder.
|
In any event, we will require additional capital to complete additional clinical trials, including larger, pivotal clinical trials, to obtain regulatory approval for, and to commercialize, our product candidates.
For some of our programs and product candidates, we may decide to enter into strategic partnerships, including collaborations with pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies, to enhance and accelerate the development and potential commercialization of our product candidates. We face significant competition in seeking appropriate partners, and the negotiation process is time-consuming and complex. Moreover, we may not be successful in our efforts to establish a strategic partnership or other collaborative arrangement for any of our product candidates and programs for a variety of reasons, including strategic fit with partners and differences in analysis of commercial value and regulatory risk. We may not be able to negotiate strategic partnerships on a timely basis, on acceptable terms or at all. We are unable to predict when, if ever, we will enter into any strategic partnership because of the numerous risks and uncertainties associated with establishing strategic partnerships. Even if we are successful in our efforts to establish strategic partnerships, the terms that we agree upon may not be favorable to us and we may not be able to maintain such strategic partnerships if, for example, we encounter unfavorable results or delays during development or approval of a product candidate or sales of an approved product are lower than expectations.
42
Raising funds in the current economic
environment may present additional challenges. Even if we believe we have sufficient funds for our current or future operating plans, we may seek additional capital if market conditions are favorable or if we have specific strategic considerations. If we a
re unable to obtain funding on a timely basis, we may be required to significantly curtail, delay or discontinue one or more of our research or development programs or the commercialization of any product candidates, or we may be unable to expand our opera
tions, maintain our current organization and employee base or otherwise capitalize on our business opportunities, as desired, which could materially affect our business, financial condition and results of operations.
Raising additional capital may cause dilution to our existing stockholders, restrict our operations, require us to relinquish rights to our technologies or product candidates on terms unfavorable to us and divert management’s attention from our product development activities.
The terms of any financing may adversely affect the holdings or the rights of our stockholders and the issuance of additional securities, whether equity or debt, by us, or the possibility of such issuance, may cause the market price of our shares to decline. The sale of additional equity or convertible securities would cause dilution to all of our stockholders. The incurrence of additional indebtedness would increase our fixed payment obligations and may require us to agree to certain restrictive covenants, such as limitations on our ability to incur additional debt, limitations on our ability to acquire, sell or license intellectual property rights and other operating restrictions that could adversely impact our ability to conduct our business. We may seek funds through arrangements with collaborative partners or otherwise at an earlier stage than desirable and we may be required to relinquish rights to some of our technologies or product candidates or otherwise agree to terms unfavorable to us, any of which may have a material adverse effect on our business, operating results and prospects. In addition, any fundraising efforts may divert our management from their day-to-day activities, which may adversely affect our ability to develop and commercialize our product candidates.
We have a significant amount of debt that may cause risks that could adversely affect our business, operating results and financial condition.
On November 18, 2016, we entered into a loan and security agreement, or Loan Agreement, for a term loan with Silicon Valley Bank and Solar Capital Ltd., which we refer to as the Term Loan. The Loan Agreement provides up to $20 million principal in new term loans, $10 million of which was funded on November 18, 2016. The remaining $10 million is available for draw as follows: $5 million is available until June 30, 2017 and $5 million is available until December 31, 2017, each at the Company’s discretion, subject to achievement of certain financial and clinical milestones. The Term Loan is secured by substantially all of our assets and the assets of our domestic subsidiaries, except that the collateral does not include any intellectual property held by us or our respective subsidiaries or more than 65% of any voting securities in our foreign subsidiaries owned or held of record by us. However, pursuant to the terms of a negative pledge arrangement, we have agreed not to encumber any of the intellectual property of ours or our subsidiaries. The level and nature of our indebtedness could, among other things:
|
•
|
make it difficult for us to obtain any necessary financing in the future;
|
|
•
|
limit our flexibility in planning for or reacting to changes in our business;
|
|
•
|
reduce funds available for use in our operations and corporate development initiatives;
|
|
•
|
impair our ability to incur additional debt because of financial and other restrictive covenants or the liens on our assets that secure our current debt;
|
|
•
|
hinder our ability to raise equity capital, because in the event of a liquidation of our business, debt holders receive a priority before equity holders;
|
|
•
|
make us more vulnerable in the event of a downturn in our business; and
|
|
•
|
place us at a possible competitive disadvantage relative to less leveraged competitors and competitors that have better access to capital resources.
|
In addition, if we do not meet certain conditions set forth in the Loan Agreement, we will not be able to draw the remaining $10 million available under the Term Loan, which could materially harm our financial condition. We may also incur significantly more debt in the future, which will increase each of the risks described above related to our indebtedness.
The Loan Agreement for the Term Loan contains operating covenants that may restrict our business and financing activities.
The Loan Agreement restricts, among other things, our ability to:
|
•
|
convey, sell, lease, transfer, assign or otherwise dispose of certain of our assets;
|
|
•
|
engage in any business other than the businesses we currently engage in or reasonably related thereto or reasonable extensions thereof;
|
43
|
•
|
undergo
certain change of control events;
|
|
•
|
create, incur, assume, or be liable with respect to certain indebtedness;
|
|
•
|
pay dividends and make certain other restricted payments;
|
|
•
|
make certain investments;
|
|
•
|
enter into any material transactions with any affiliates, with certain exceptions; or
|
|
•
|
permit certain of our subsidiaries to hold or maintain certain assets in excess of certain specified amounts.
|
The operating restrictions and covenants in the Loan Agreement, as well as any future financing agreements that we may enter into, may restrict our ability to finance our operations, engage in business activities or expand or fully pursue our business strategies. Our ability to comply with these covenants may be affected by events beyond our control and we may not be able to meet those covenants. A breach of any of the covenants under the Loan Agreement could result in a default under the Loan Agreement, which could cause all of the outstanding indebtedness under the Term Loan to become immediately due and payable.
Risks related to our reliance on third parties
We rely, and expect to continue to rely, on third parties to conduct some or all aspects of our product manufacturing, protocol development, research and preclinical and clinical testing, and these third parties may not perform satisfactorily.
We currently rely, and expect to continue to rely, on third parties to conduct some or all aspects of product manufacturing, protocol development, research and preclinical and clinical testing with respect to our product candidates. Any of these third parties may terminate their engagements with us at any time. If we need to enter into alternative arrangements, it could delay our product development activities. Our reliance on these third parties for research and development activities reduces our control over these activities but does not relieve us of our responsibility to ensure compliance with all required regulations and study protocols. For example, for Resolaris, Stalaris and any other product candidates that we develop and commercialize on our own, we will remain responsible for ensuring that each of our clinical trials is conducted in accordance with the applicable study plan and protocols and cGCPs so long as we continue to develop and commercialize on our own.
If these third parties do not successfully carry out their contractual duties, meet expected deadlines or conduct our research and development activities, including clinical trials, in accordance with regulatory requirements or our stated study plans and protocols, we will not be able to complete, or may be delayed in completing, the preclinical studies and clinical trials required to support future BLA or NDA submissions and approval of our product candidates.
We rely on third parties to manufacture our clinical supply of Resolaris, and we intend to rely on third parties to produce nonclinical, clinical and commercial supplies of Stalaris and any future product candidate.
We do not have, nor do we plan to acquire, the infrastructure or capability internally to manufacture our nonclinical and clinical quantities of our product candidates, and we lack the internal resources and capability to manufacture any of our product candidates on a clinical or commercial scale. Reliance on CDMOs and CROs, entails risks to which we would not be subject if we manufactured the product candidates ourselves, including:
|
•
|
the inability to negotiate manufacturing agreements with third parties under commercially reasonable terms;
|
|
•
|
reduced control as a result of using third-party CDMOs and CROs for all aspects of manufacturing activities;
|
|
•
|
termination or nonrenewal of manufacturing agreements with third parties in a manner or at a time that is costly or damaging to us; and
|
|
•
|
disruptions to the operations of our CDMOs, CROs or suppliers caused by conditions unrelated to our business or operations, including the insolvency or bankruptcy of the CDMOs, CROs or supplier.
|
Any of these events could lead to clinical trial delays or failure to obtain regulatory approval, or impact our ability to successfully commercialize future products. Some of these events could be the basis for FDA action, including injunction, recall, seizure or total or partial suspension of production.
Additionally, each CDMO may require licenses to manufacture our product candidates or components thereof if the applicable manufacturing processes are not owned by the CDMO or in the public domain, and we may be unable to transfer or sublicense the intellectual property rights we may have with respect to such activities. These factors could cause the delay of clinical development, regulatory submissions, required approvals or commercialization of our product candidates, cause us to incur higher costs and prevent us from commercializing our products successfully.
44
We curre
ntly rely on a single CDMO for bulk drug substance for Resolaris for our projected needs for ongoing and anticipated pivotal clinical trials. Subject to the satisfactory completion of process validation and other requirements, we may contract with this CDM
O for larger scale commercial manufacturing. Similarly, we currently rely on a single CDMO for process development and scale-up of Stalaris. We do not have long-term contracts with our CDMOs, and our CDMOs may terminate their agreements with us for a var
iety of reasons including technical issues or our material breach of our obligations under the applicable agreement. Furthermore, our CDMOs may reallocate resources away from the production of our product candidates if we delay manufacturing under certain
circumstances, and the manufacturing facilities in which our product candidates are made could be adversely affected by earthquakes and other natural disasters, labor shortages, power failures, and numerous other factors. If our CDMOs fail to meet contract
ual requirements, and we are unable to secure one or more replacement CDMOs capable of production at a substantially equivalent cost, our clinical development activities may be delayed, or we could lose potential revenue. Manufacturing biologic drugs is co
mplicated and tightly regulated by the FDA and comparable regulatory authorities around the world, and although alternative CDMOs with the necessary manufacturing and regulatory expertise and facilities exist, it could be expensive and take a significant a
mount of time to arrange for alternative CDMOs, transfer manufacturing procedures to these alternative CDMOs, and demonstrate comparability of material produced by such new CDMOs. New CDMOs of any product would be required to comply with applicable regulat
ory requirements. These CDMOs may not be able to manufacture our product candidates at costs, or in quantities, or in a timely manner necessary to complete the clinical development of our product candidates or make commercially successful products.
We rely, and expect to continue to rely, on third parties to conduct, supervise and monitor our clinical trials, and if these third parties perform in an unsatisfactory manner, it may harm our business.
We have relied, and expect to continue to rely, on third-party CROs, clinical investigators and clinical trial sites to ensure our clinical trials are conducted properly and on time. While we have and will continue to enter into agreements governing their activities, we will have limited influence over their actual performance. We will control only certain aspects of our CROs’ activities. Nevertheless, we will be responsible for ensuring that each of our clinical trials is conducted in accordance with the applicable protocol, legal and regulatory requirements, and scientific standards, and our reliance on the CROs does not relieve us of our regulatory responsibilities.
We and our investigators and CROs are required to comply with GCPs for conducting, recording and reporting the results of clinical trials to assure that the data and reported results are credible and accurate and that the rights, integrity and confidentiality of clinical trial participants are protected. The FDA enforces GCPs through periodic inspections of study sponsors, principal investigators and clinical trial sites. If we or our investigators and CROs fail to comply with applicable GCPs, the clinical data generated in our future clinical trials may be deemed unreliable and the FDA may require us to perform additional unanticipated clinical trials before approving any marketing applications. Upon inspection, the FDA may determine that our clinical trials did not comply with GCPs. In addition, our future clinical trials will require a sufficient number of test subjects to evaluate the safety and effectiveness of our product candidates. Accordingly, if our investigators and CROs fail to comply with these regulations or fail to recruit a sufficient number of patients, we may be required to repeat such clinical trials, which would delay the regulatory approval process.
Our investigators and CROs are not our employees, and we are therefore unable to directly monitor whether or not they devote sufficient time and resources to our clinical and nonclinical programs. They may also have relationships with other commercial entities, including our competitors, for whom they may also be conducting clinical trials or other drug development activities that could harm our competitive position. If our investigators or CROs do not successfully carry out their contractual duties or obligations, fail to meet expected deadlines, or if the quality or accuracy of the clinical data they obtain is compromised due to the failure to adhere to our clinical protocols or regulatory requirements, or for any other reasons, our clinical trials may be extended, delayed or terminated, and we may not be able to obtain regulatory approval for, or successfully commercialize our product candidates. As a result, our financial results would be harmed, our costs could increase, our ability to generate revenues could be delayed and the commercial prospects for our product candidates will be adversely affected.
Our reliance on third parties requires us to share our trade secrets, which increases the possibility that a competitor will discover them or that our trade secrets will be misappropriated or disclosed.
We rely on third parties to manufacture our product candidates, and we collaborate with various academic institutions in the development of our discovery engine for therapeutic applications of Physiocrines. In connection with these activities, we are required, at times, to share trade secrets with them. We seek to protect our proprietary technology in part by entering into confidentiality agreements and, if applicable, material transfer agreements, collaborative research agreements, consulting agreements or other similar agreements with our collaborators, advisors, employees and consultants prior to beginning research or disclosing proprietary information. These agreements typically limit the rights of the third parties to use or disclose our confidential information, such as trade secrets. Despite the contractual provisions employed when working with third parties, the need to share trade secrets and other confidential information increases the risk that such trade secrets become known by our competitors, are inadvertently incorporated into the technology of others, or are disclosed or used in violation of these agreements. Given that our proprietary position is based, in part, on our know-how and trade secrets, a competitor’s discovery of our trade secrets or other unauthorized use or disclosure would impair our competitive position and may have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
45
I
n addition, these agreements typically restrict the ability of our collaborators, advisors, employees and consultants to publish data potentially relating to our trade secrets. Our academic collaborators typically have rights to publish data, provided that
we are notified in advance and may delay publication for a specified time in order to secure intellectual property rights to which we are entitled arising from the collaboration. In other cases, publication rights are controlled exclusively by us, althoug
h in some cases we may share these rights with other parties. We also conduct joint research and development programs that may require us to share trade secrets under the terms of our research and development partnerships or similar agreements. Despite our
efforts to protect our trade secrets, our competitors may discover our trade secrets, either through breach of these agreements, independent development or publication of information including our trade secrets in cases where we do not have proprietary or
otherwise protected rights at the time of publication. A competitor’s discovery of our trade secrets would impair our competitive position and have an adverse impact on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
Risks related to the commercialization of our product candidates
If we are unable to establish sales and marketing capabilities or enter into agreements with third parties to market and sell our product candidates, we may be unable to generate any revenues.
We do not currently have any infrastructure for the sales, marketing and distribution of pharmaceutical products. In order to market our product candidates, if approved by the FDA or any other regulatory body, we must build our sales, marketing, managerial and other non-technical capabilities or make arrangements with third parties to perform these services. There are risks involved with both establishing our own sales and marketing capabilities and entering into arrangements with third parties to perform these services. For example, recruiting and training a sales force is expensive and time consuming and could delay any product launch. If the commercial launch of a product candidate for which we recruit a sales force and establish marketing capabilities is delayed or does not occur for any reason, we would have prematurely or unnecessarily incurred these commercialization expenses. This may be costly, and our investment would be lost if we cannot retain or reposition our sales and marketing personnel.
Factors that may inhibit our efforts to commercialize our medicines on our own include:
|
•
|
our inability to recruit and retain adequate numbers of effective sales and marketing personnel;
|
|
•
|
the inability of sales personnel to obtain access to physicians or persuade adequate numbers of physicians to prescribe any future medicines;
|
|
•
|
the lack of complementary medicines to be offered by sales personnel, which may put us at a competitive disadvantage relative to companies with more extensive product lines; and
|
|
•
|
unforeseen costs and expenses associated with creating an independent sales and marketing organization.
|
If we enter into arrangements or collaborations with third parties to perform sales, marketing and distribution services, our product revenues or the profitability of these product revenues to us are likely to be lower than if we were to market and sell any medicines that we develop ourselves. In addition, we may not be successful in entering into arrangements with third parties to sell and market our product candidates or may be unable to do so on terms that are favorable to us. We likely will have little control over such third parties, and any of them may fail to devote the necessary resources and attention to sell and market our medicines effectively. If we do not establish sales and marketing capabilities successfully, either on our own or in collaboration with third parties, we will not be successful in commercializing our product candidates.
We rely on third-party manufacturers to produce Resolaris, Stalaris and any other product candidates that we may develop, but we have not entered into agreements with any such manufacturers to support commercialization.
We have not yet secured manufacturing capabilities for commercial quantities of Resolaris, Stalaris or any other product candidates. Although we intend to rely on third-party manufacturers for commercialization, we have only entered into agreements with such manufacturers to support our human proof-of-concept clinical trials. We have not yet entered into a long-term commercial supply agreement to support full scale commercial production, and we or our contract manufacturers may be unable to process validation activities necessary to enter into commercial supply agreements or otherwise negotiate agreements with the manufacturers to support our commercialization activities at commercially reasonable terms.
We may run into technical or scientific issues related to development or manufacturing that we may be unable to resolve in a timely manner or with available funds. If we or our manufacturing partners are unable to scale the manufacturing process to produce commercial quantities of our product candidates, or our manufacturing partners do not pass required regulatory pre-approval inspections, our commercialization efforts will be harmed.
46
In addition, any significant disruption in our relationships with our manufacturers could harm our business. There are a relatively small number of potential manufacturers for Resolaris, Stalaris and any other product candidates that we may deve
lop, and such manufacturers may not be able to supply our drug products at the times we need them or on commercially reasonable terms. Any disruption to our relationship with our current manufacturers and any manufacturers that we contract with in the futu
re will result in delays in our ability to complete the clinical development of, or to commercialize, Resolaris, Stalaris and any other product candidates we may develop, and may require us to incur additional costs.
We face intense competition and rapid technological change and the possibility that our competitors may develop therapies that are more advanced or effective than ours, which may adversely affect our financial condition and our ability to successfully commercialize our product candidates.
We are engaged in the development of medicines for severe, rare diseases, which is a competitive and rapidly changing field. We have competitors both in the United States and internationally, including major multi-national pharmaceutical companies, biotechnology companies and universities and other research institutions. In the area of rare myopathies with an immune component, we expect to face competition from a number of companies, academic institutions and other organizations, including Sarepta Therapeutics, PTC Therapeutics, Inc., Marathon Pharmaceuticals, Santhera Pharmaceuticals, Italfarmaco S.p.A, Summit Therapeutics, Catabasis Pharmaceuticals, Inc., FibroGen, Inc., F. Hoffmann-La Roche AG, Bristol Myers Squibb, Milo Biotechnology, LLC, Nobelpharma Co. Ltd., Pfizer, Inc., and Ultragenyx Pharmaceuticals, that are engaged in the clinical development of therapeutics to address muscle loss and muscle weakness in a variety of indications. More specifically, in the area of LGMD, we are aware of a number of academic institutions engaged in the clinical development of therapeutics, including Genethon, a not-for-profit research laboratory created by the Association Française contre les Myopathies, or French Muscular Dystrophy Association, which has completed an experimental Phase 1 clinical trial in LGMD2C using gene therapy; Nationwide Children’s Hospital, which is currently conducting a Phase 1/2a clinical trial of an AAV vector to transport the alpha-sarcoglycan gene into muscles in LGMD2D; and NeuroGen Brain and Spine Institute in India, which is currently conducting a Phase 1 clinical trial in an unspecified form of LGMD using stem cell therapy. In addition, Pfizer currently has a program Domagrozumab (PF-06252616) which is in Phase 1b/2 clinical trials for the treatment of LGMD2I as well as a Phase 2 program for DMD. Although there are currently no approved products for the treatment of FSHD, Acceleron Pharma Inc. is developing a clinical candidate, ACE-083, a locally acting protein therapeutic designed to increase muscle mass and strength in patients with neuromuscular disorders and other diseases characterized by a loss of muscle function, including FSHD in which it initiated a Phase 2 trial in the fourth quarter of 2016. In addition, Facio Therapies, Novogen, Fulcrum Therapeutics, Ultragenyx Pharmaceuticals, Inc. and Idera Pharmaceuticals, Inc. are developing chemical compounds that may repress one of the causal genes responsible for FSHD. In the area of DMD, two therapies have been approved in the last 12 months: Exondys 51 from Sarepta and Emflaza from Marathon Pharmaceuticals. Marathon Pharmaceuticals and PTC Therapeutics, Inc. recently announced entering an asset purchase agreement whereby PTC Therapeutics, Inc. will acquire all rights to Emflaza.Exondys 51 is an antisense oligonucleotide indicated for the treatment of DMD in patients who have a confirmed mutation of the DMD gene that is amenable to exon 51 skipping. Many larger companies, universities and private and public research institutions are also actively engaged in the development of therapeutics to address muscle loss and muscle weakness in a variety of indications.
We may also face competition from numerous companies in the field of RPICs, including several companies that currently market Esbriet (pirfenidone) and Ofev (nintedanib), both of which were approved by the FDA for the treatment of ILD in October 2014.
Many of our competitors have substantially greater financial, technical and other resources, such as larger research and development staff and experienced marketing and manufacturing organizations. Competition may increase further as a result of advances in the commercial applicability of technologies and greater availability of capital for investment in these industries. Our competitors may succeed in developing, acquiring or licensing on an exclusive basis, products that are more effective, safer, more convenient or less costly than any product candidate that we may develop, or achieve earlier patent protection, regulatory approval, product commercialization and market penetration than us. Additionally, technologies developed by our competitors may render our potential product candidates uneconomical or obsolete, and we may not be successful in marketing our product candidates against competitors.
Even if we are successful in achieving regulatory approval to commercialize a product candidate faster than our competitors, we may face competition from biosimilars due to the changing regulatory environment. In the United States, the Biologics Price Competition and Innovation Act of 2009 created an abbreviated approval pathway for biological products that are demonstrated to be “highly similar,” or biosimilar, to or “interchangeable” with an FDA-approved biological product. This new pathway could allow competitors to reference data from biological products already approved after 12 years from the time of approval. In Europe, the European Commission has granted marketing authorizations for several biosimilars pursuant to a set of general and product class-specific guidelines for biosimilar approvals issued over the past few years. In Europe, a competitor may reference data from biological products already approved, but will not be able to get on the market until ten years after the time of approval. This ten year period will be extended to 11 years if, during the first eight of those ten years, the marketing authorization holder obtains an approval for one or more new therapeutic indications that bring significant clinical benefits compared with existing therapies. In addition, companies may be developing biosimilars in other countries that could compete with our products. If competitors are able to obtain marketing approval for biosimilars referencing our products, our products may become subject to competition from such biosimilars, with the attendant competitive pressure and consequences. Expiration or successful challenge of our applicable patent rights could also trigger competition from other products, assuming any relevant exclusivity period has expired.
47
Finally, as a result of the expiration or successful challenge of our patent rights, we could face more litigation with respect to the validity or scope of patents relating to our competitors’ products. The availability of our competitors’ products
could limit the demand, and the price we are able to charge, for any products that we may develop and commercialize.
The commercial success of any current or future product candidate will depend upon the degree of market acceptance by physicians, patients, third-party payors and others in the medical community.
Even with the requisite approval from the FDA and comparable foreign regulatory authorities, the commercial success of our product candidates will depend in part on the medical community, patients, and third-party payors accepting our product candidates as medically useful, cost-effective, and safe. Any product that we bring to the market may not gain market acceptance by physicians, patients, third-party payors and others in the medical community. If these products do not achieve an adequate level of acceptance, we may not generate significant product revenue and may not become profitable. The degree of market acceptance of these product candidates, if approved for commercial sale, will depend on a number of factors, including:
|
•
|
the potential efficacy and potential advantages over alternative treatments;
|
|
•
|
the prevalence and severity of any side effects, including any limitations or warnings contained in a product’s approved labeling;
|
|
•
|
the prevalence and severity of any side effects resulting from the administration of our product candidates by injection;
|
|
•
|
the clinical indications for which approval is granted;
|
|
•
|
relative convenience and ease of administration;
|
|
•
|
the willingness of the target patient population to try new therapies and of physicians to prescribe these therapies;
|
|
•
|
the strength of marketing and distribution support and timing of market introduction of competitive products;
|
|
•
|
publicity concerning our products or competing products and treatments; and
|
|
•
|
the availability of sufficient third-party insurance coverage or reimbursement.
|
Even if a potential product displays a favorable efficacy and safety profile in preclinical studies and clinical trials, market acceptance of the product will not be known until after it is launched. Our efforts to educate the medical community and third-party payors on the benefits of the product candidates may require significant resources and may never be successful. Such efforts to educate the marketplace may require more resources than are required by the conventional technologies marketed by our competitors, and our competitors may have substantially greater resources or brand recognition to effectively market their products. If our product candidates are approved but fail to achieve an adequate level of acceptance by physicians, patients, third-party payors, and others in the medical community, we will not be able to generate sufficient revenue to become or remain profitable.
The insurance coverage and reimbursement status of newly-approved products is uncertain. Failure to obtain or maintain adequate coverage and reimbursement for new or current products could limit our ability to market those products and decrease our ability to generate revenue.
There is significant uncertainty related to the insurance coverage and reimbursement of newly approved products. In the United States, the principal decisions about reimbursement for new medicines are typically made by the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services, or CMS, an agency within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, as CMS decides whether and to what extent a new medicine will be covered and reimbursed under Medicare. Private payors often follow CMS with respect to coverage policy and payment limitations in setting their own reimbursement policies. It is difficult to predict what CMS will decide with respect to reimbursement for fundamentally novel products such as ours, as there is no body of established practices and precedents for these new products. Reimbursement agencies in Europe may be more conservative than CMS. For example, a number of cancer drugs have been approved for reimbursement in the United States, but have not been approved for reimbursement in certain European countries. There may be significant delays in obtaining reimbursement for newly approved medicines, and our inability to promptly obtain coverage and profitable payment rates from third-party payors for any approved medicines could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
Outside the United States, international sales are generally subject to extensive governmental price controls and other market regulations, and we believe the increasing emphasis on cost-containment initiatives in Europe, Canada, and other countries has and will continue to put pressure on the pricing and usage of our product candidates. In many countries, the prices of medical products are subject to varying price control mechanisms as part of national health systems. In general, the prices of medicines under such systems are substantially lower than in the United States. Other countries allow companies to fix their own prices for medicines, but monitor and control company profits. Additional foreign price controls or other changes in pricing regulation could restrict the amount that we are able to charge for our product candidates. Accordingly, in markets outside the United States, the reimbursement for our products may be reduced compared with the United States and may be insufficient to generate commercially reasonable revenues and profits. Net prices for medicines may be reduced by mandatory discounts or rebates required by government healthcare programs or private payors and by any future relaxation of laws that currently restrict imports of medicines from countries where they may be sold at lower prices than in the United States.
48
Moreover, increasing efforts by governmental and third-party payors, in the United States and abroad, to cap or reduce healthcare
costs may cause such organizations to limit both coverage and level of reimbursement for new products and, as a result, they may not cover or provide adequate payment for our product candidates. We expect to experience pricing pressures in connection with
the sale of any of our product candidates, due to the trend toward managed healthcare, the increasing influence of health maintenance organizations and additional legislative changes, including the potential repeal and replacement of the Affordable Care A
ct. The downward pressure on healthcare costs in general, particularly prescription drugs and surgical procedures and other treatments, has become very intense. As a result, increasingly high barriers are being erected to the entry of new products.
In addition, drug prices are under significant scrutiny in the markets in which our products may be sold. Drug pricing and other health care costs continues to be subject to intense political and societal pressures which we anticipate will continue and escalate on a global basis. As a result, our business and reputation may be harmed, our stock price may be adversely impacted and experience periods of volatility, we may have difficulty raising funds and our results of operations may be adversely impacted.
If the market opportunities for our product candidates are smaller than we believe they are, our revenues may be adversely affected and our business may suffer. Because the target patient populations of our product candidates are small, we must be able to successfully identify patients and capture a significant market share to achieve and maintain profitability.
We focus our research and product development on treatments for rare diseases. Given the small number of patients who have the diseases that we are targeting, it is critical to our ability to grow and become profitable that we continue to successfully identify patients with these rare diseases. Our projections of both the number of people who have these diseases, as well as the subset of people with these diseases who have the potential to benefit from treatment with our product candidates, are based on our beliefs and estimates. These estimates have been derived from a variety of sources, including the scientific literature, surveys of clinics, patient foundations, or market research, and may prove to be incorrect. New studies may change the estimated incidence or prevalence of these diseases. The number of patients may turn out to be lower than expected. The effort to identify patients with diseases we seek to treat is in early stages, and we cannot accurately predict the number of patients for whom treatment might be possible. Additionally, the potentially addressable patient population for each of our product candidates may be limited or may not be amenable to treatment with our product candidates, and new patients may become increasingly difficult to identify or gain access to, which would adversely affect our results of operations and our business. Further, even if we obtain significant market share for our product candidates, because the potential target populations are very small, we may never achieve profitability despite obtaining such significant market share.
Our target patient populations are relatively small, and there is currently no standard of care treatment directed at some of our target indications, such as FSHD and LGMD2B. As a result, the pricing and reimbursement of our product candidates, if approved, is uncertain, but must be adequate to support commercial infrastructure. If we are unable to obtain adequate levels of reimbursement, our ability to successfully market and sell our product candidates will be adversely affected. The manner and level at which reimbursement is provided for services related to our product candidates (e.g., for administration of our product to patients) is also important. Inadequate reimbursement for such services may lead to physician resistance and adversely affect our ability to market or sell our products.
Risks related to our intellectual property
If we are unable to obtain, maintain or protect intellectual property rights related to our product candidates, or if the scope of such intellectual property protection is not sufficiently broad, we may not be able to compete effectively in our markets.
We rely upon a combination of patents, trade secret protection and confidentiality agreements to protect the intellectual property related to our technologies and product candidates. Our success depends in large part on our and our licensors’ abilities to obtain and maintain patent and other intellectual property protection in the United States and in other countries for our proprietary technology and product candidates.
We have sought to protect our proprietary position by filing patent applications in the United States and abroad related to our novel technologies and product candidates that are important to our business. This process is expensive and time consuming, and we may not be able to file and prosecute all necessary or desirable patent applications at a reasonable cost or in a timely manner. It is also possible that we will fail to identify patentable aspects of our research and development output before it is too late to obtain patent protection.
49
The patentability of inventions, and the validity, enforceability
and scope of patents in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical fields involves complex legal and scientific questions and can be uncertain. As a result, patent applications that we own or in-license may not issue as patents with claims that cover our product
candidates, or at all, in the United States or in foreign countries for many reasons. For example, there is no assurance that we were the first to invent or the first to file patent applications in respect of the inventions claimed in our patent applicati
ons or that our patent applications claim patentable subject matter. We may also be unaware of potentially relevant prior art relating to our patents and patent applications, and this prior art, if any, may be used by third parties as grounds to seek to in
validate a patent or to prevent a patent from issuing from a pending patent application. Even if patents do successfully issue and even if such patents disclose aspects of our product candidates, third parties may challenge their validity, enforceability o
r scope, which may result in such patents being narrowed or invalidated. Furthermore, even if they are unchallenged, our patents and patent applications may not adequately protect our intellectual property, provide exclusivity for our product candidates or
prevent others from designing around our claims. If the breadth or strength of protection provided by the patents and patent applications we hold, license or pursue with respect to our product candidates is threatened, it could threaten our ability to com
mercialize our product candidates. Further, if we encounter delays in our clinical trials, the period of time during which we could market any of our product candidates under patent protection, if approved, would be reduced. Since patent applications in th
e United States and most other countries are confidential for a period of time after filing, we cannot be certain that we were the first to file any patent application related to our product candidates. Changes to the patent laws in the United States and o
ther jurisdictions could also diminish the value of our patents and patent applications or narrow the scope of our patent protection. Any of these outcomes could impair our ability to prevent competition from third parties, which may have an adverse impact
on our business.
If the patent applications we own or have in-licensed that relate to our programs or product candidates do not issue as patents, if their breadth or strength of protection is threatened, or if they fail to provide exclusivity for our product candidates, it could dissuade companies from collaborating with us to develop product candidates, and threaten our ability to commercialize future products. We cannot offer any assurances about which, if any, patents will issue, the breadth of any such patents or whether any issued patents will be found invalid and unenforceable or will be threatened by third parties. Any successful opposition to these patents or any other patents owned by or licensed to us could deprive us of rights necessary for the successful commercialization of any product candidates that we may develop. In addition, patents have a limited term. In the United States, the natural expiration of a patent is generally 20 years after it is filed. Although various extensions may be available, the life of a patent, and the protection it affords, is limited. Even if a patent does issue for any of our pending patent applications, possible delays in regulatory approvals could mean that the period of time during which we could market a product candidate under patent protection could be reduced from what we generally would expect. Since patent applications in the United States and most other countries are confidential for a period of time after filing, and some remain so until issued, we cannot be certain that we were the first to file any patent application related to a product candidate. Furthermore, if third parties have filed such patent applications, an interference proceeding in the United States can be initiated by a third party to determine who was the first to invent any of the subject matter covered by the patent claims of our applications. Even if patents covering aspects of our product candidates are obtained, once the patent life has expired for a product, we may be open to competition from generic medications.
In addition to the protection afforded by patents, we rely on trade secret protection and confidentiality agreements to protect proprietary know-how that is not patentable or that we elect not to patent, processes for which patents are difficult to enforce and any other elements of our product candidate discovery and development processes that involve proprietary know-how, information or technology that is not covered by patents. However, trade secrets can be difficult to protect. We seek to protect our proprietary technology and processes, in part, by entering into confidentiality agreements with our employees, consultants, scientific advisors and contractors. We also seek to preserve the integrity and confidentiality of our data and trade secrets by maintaining physical security of our premises and physical and electronic security of our information technology systems, but it is possible that these security measures could be breached. Although we expect all of our employees and consultants to assign their inventions to us, and all of our employees, consultants, advisors and any third parties who have access to our proprietary know-how, information or technology to enter into confidentiality agreements, we cannot provide any assurances that all such agreements have been duly executed or that our trade secrets and other confidential proprietary information will not be disclosed or that competitors will not otherwise gain access to our trade secrets or independently develop substantially equivalent information and techniques. For example, any of these parties may breach the agreements and disclose our proprietary information, including our trade secrets, and we may not be able to obtain adequate remedies for such breaches. Misappropriation or unauthorized disclosure of our trade secrets could impair our competitive position and may have a material adverse effect on our business. Additionally, if the steps we take to maintain the confidentiality of our trade secrets are inadequate, we may have insufficient recourse against third parties for misappropriating our proprietary information and processes. In addition, others may independently discover our trade secrets and proprietary information. For example, the FDA, as part of its Transparency Initiative, is currently considering whether to make additional information publicly available on a routine basis, including information that we may consider to be trade secrets or other proprietary information, and it is not clear at the present time how the FDA’s disclosure policies may change in the future, if at all.
If we are unable to prevent material disclosure of the non-patented intellectual property related to our technologies to third parties, and there is no guarantee that we will have any such enforceable trade secret protection, we may not be able to establish or maintain a competitive advantage in our market, which could materially adversely affect our business, results of operations and financial condition.
50
Further, the laws of some foreign
countries do not protect proprietary rights to the same extent or in the same manner as the laws of the United States. As a result, we may encounter significant problems in preventing third parties from practicing our inventions in countries outside the U
nited States, or from selling or importing products made using our inventions in and into the United States or other jurisdictions.
Claims that our product candidates or the manufacture, sale or use of our future products infringe the patent or other intellectual property rights of third parties could result in costly litigation or could require substantial time and money to resolve, even if litigation is avoided.
Our commercial success depends in part on our avoiding infringement of the patents and proprietary rights of third parties. There is a substantial amount of litigation, both within and outside the United States, involving patent and other intellectual property rights in the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries, including patent infringement lawsuits, interferences, oppositions and inter partes reexamination proceedings before the United States Patent and Trademark Office, or USPTO, and corresponding foreign patent offices. Numerous U.S. and foreign issued patents and pending patent applications, which are owned by third parties, exist in the fields in which we are pursuing development candidates. As the biotechnology and pharmaceutical industries expand and more patents are issued, the risk increases that our product candidates may be subject to claims of infringement of the patent rights of third parties.
Third parties may assert that we are employing their proprietary technology without authorization. There may be third-party patents or patent applications with claims to materials, formulations, methods of manufacture or methods for treatment related to the use or manufacture of our product candidates. Because patent applications can take many years to issue, there may be currently pending patent applications which may later result in issued patents that our product candidates may infringe. In addition, third parties may obtain patents in the future and claim that use of our technologies infringes upon these patents. If any third-party patents were held by a court of competent jurisdiction to cover the manufacturing process of any of our product candidates, any molecules formed during the manufacturing process or any final product itself, the holders of any such patents may be able to block our ability to commercialize such product candidate unless we obtained a license under the applicable patents, or until such patents expire.
Similarly, if any third-party patents are held by a court of competent jurisdiction to cover aspects of our formulations, processes for manufacture or methods of use, the holders of any such patents may be able to block our ability to develop and commercialize the applicable product candidate unless we obtain a license or until such patent expires. In either case, such a license may not be available on commercially reasonable terms or at all.
Parties making claims against us may obtain injunctive or other equitable relief, which could effectively block our ability to further develop and commercialize one or more of our product candidates. Defense of these claims, regardless of their merit, would involve substantial litigation expense and would be a substantial diversion of employee resources from our business. In the event of a successful claim of infringement against us, we may have to pay substantial damages, including treble damages and attorneys’ fees for willful infringement, pay royalties, redesign our infringing products or obtain one or more licenses from third parties, which may not be able to be obtained on reasonable commercial terms or at all, or require substantial time and monetary expenditure.
We may not be successful in obtaining or maintaining necessary rights to our Physiocrine therapeutic product candidates and processes for our development pipeline through acquisitions and in-licenses.
We believe that we have rights to intellectual property, through licenses from third parties and under patents that we own, that is necessary or useful to develop our product candidates. Because our programs may involve additional product candidates that may require the use of proprietary rights held by third parties, the growth of our business will likely depend in part on our ability to acquire, in-license or use these proprietary rights. In addition, our product candidates may require specific formulations to work effectively and efficiently and these rights may be held by others. We may be unable to acquire or in-license any compositions, methods of use, processes or other third-party intellectual property rights from third parties that we identify on reasonable commercial terms or at all. The licensing and acquisition of third-party intellectual property rights is a competitive area, and a number of more established companies are also pursuing strategies to license or acquire third-party intellectual property rights that we may consider attractive. These established companies may have a competitive advantage over us due to their size, cash resources and greater clinical development and commercialization capabilities.
We sometimes collaborate with U.S. and foreign academic institutions to accelerate our preclinical research or development under written agreements with these institutions. These institutions may provide us with an option to negotiate a license to the institution’s rights in technology resulting from the collaboration. Regardless of any such right of first negotiation for intellectual property, we may be unable to negotiate a license within the specified time frame or under terms that are acceptable to us. If we are unable to do so, the institution may offer the intellectual property rights to other parties, potentially blocking our ability to pursue our program.
51
In addition, companies that perceive us to be a competitor may be unwilling to assign or license rights to us. We also may be unable to license or acquire
third-party intellectual property rights on terms that would allow us to make an appropriate return on our investment. If we are unable to successfully obtain rights to required third-party intellectual property rights, our business, financial condition an
d prospects for growth could suffer.
If we fail to comply with our obligations in the agreements under which we license intellectual property rights from third parties or otherwise experience disruptions to our business relationships with our licensors, we could lose license rights that are important to our business.
We are a party to a number of intellectual property license agreements that are important to our business and expect to enter into additional license agreements in the future. Our existing license agreements impose, and we expect that future license agreements will impose, various diligence, milestone payment, royalty and other obligations on us. If we fail to comply with our obligations under these agreements, or we are subject to a bankruptcy, the licensor may have the right to terminate the license, in which event we would not be able to market products covered by the license. For example, under the terms of the license agreements that we may enter into pursuant to our amended and restated research funding and option agreement with The Scripps Research Institute, or TSRI, TSRI has the right to terminate the license under various circumstances, including our failure to make payments to TSRI when due, our default in our indemnification and insurance obligations under the agreement, our failure to meet diligence obligations, as determined by TSRI, our underreporting or underpayment of amounts due to TSRI, our conviction of a felony related to the manufacture, use or sale of licensed products, services or processes and our institution of any challenges to the validity or enforceability of any of the licensed patents.
We may need to obtain licenses from third parties to advance our research or allow commercialization of our product candidates, and we have done so from time to time. We may fail to obtain any of these licenses at a reasonable cost or on reasonable commercial terms, if at all. In that event, we may be required to expend significant time and resources to develop or license replacement technology. If we are unable to do so, we may be unable to develop or commercialize the affected product candidates, which could harm our business significantly. We cannot provide any assurances that third-party patents do not exist which might be enforced against our current product candidates or future products, resulting in either an injunction prohibiting our sales, or, with respect to our sales, an obligation on our part to pay royalties or other forms of compensation to third parties.
In some cases, patent prosecution of our licensed technology is controlled by the licensor. Under the license agreements that we may enter into pursuant to our amended and restated research funding and option agreement with TSRI, TSRI is responsible for the prosecution and maintenance of the licensed patent rights, subject to our right to be consulted and to be informed of the progress of patent applications, patents and related submissions. If our licensors fail to obtain and maintain patent or other protection for the proprietary intellectual property we license from them, we could lose our rights to the intellectual property or our exclusivity with respect to those rights, and our competitors could market competing products using such intellectual property. In certain cases, we may control the prosecution of patents resulting from licensed technology. In the event we breach any of our obligations related to such prosecution, we may incur significant liability to our licensors. Licensing of intellectual property is of critical importance to our business and involves complex legal, business and scientific issues and is complicated by the rapid pace of scientific discovery in our industry. Disputes may arise regarding intellectual property subject to a license agreement, including:
|
•
|
the scope of rights granted under the license agreement and other interpretation-related issues;
|
|
•
|
the extent to which our technology and processes infringe on intellectual property of the licensor that is not subject to the license agreement;
|
|
•
|
the sublicensing of patent and other rights under our collaborative development relationships;
|
|
•
|
our diligence obligations under the license agreement and what activities satisfy those diligence obligations;
|
|
•
|
the ownership of inventions and know-how resulting from the joint creation or use of intellectual property by our licensors and us and our sublicensees or partners, if any; and
|
|
•
|
the priority of invention of patented technology.
|
If disputes over intellectual property that we have licensed prevent or impair our ability to maintain our current licensing arrangements on acceptable terms, we may be unable to successfully develop and commercialize the affected product candidates.
We may become involved in lawsuits to protect or enforce our patents or the patents of our licensors, which could be expensive, time-consuming and unsuccessful.
Competitors may infringe or otherwise violate our patents, the patents of our licensors or our other intellectual property rights. To counter infringement or unauthorized use, we may be required to file infringement claims, which can be expensive and time-consuming. Any claims that we assert against perceived infringers could also provoke these parties to assert counterclaims against us alleging that we infringe their intellectual property rights. In addition, in an infringement proceeding, a court may decide that a patent of ours or our licensors is not valid, is unenforceable or is not infringed, or may refuse to stop the other party from using the technology at issue on the grounds that our patents do not cover the technology in question. An adverse result in any litigation or defense proceedings could put one or more of our patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly and could put our patent applications at risk of not issuing.
52
Interference or derivation proceedings provoked by third parties or brought by us may be necessary to determine the priority of inventions or other matters of inventorship with respect to our patents or patent applications or those of our licenso
rs. We may also become involved in other proceedings, such as re-examination or opposition proceedings, before the USPTO or its foreign counterparts relating to our intellectual property or the intellectual property rights of others. An unfavorable outcome
in any such proceedings could require us to cease using the related technology or to attempt to license rights to it from the prevailing party, or could cause us to lose valuable intellectual property rights. Our business could be harmed if the prevailing
party does not offer us a license on commercially reasonable terms, if any license is offered at all. Our defense of litigation or interference proceedings may fail and, even if successful, may result in substantial costs and distract our management and o
ther employees. We may not be able to prevent, alone or with our licensors, misappropriation of our intellectual property rights, particularly in countries where the laws may not protect those rights as fully as in the United States. In addition, the uncer
tainties associated with litigation could have a material adverse effect on our ability to raise the funds necessary to continue our clinical trials, continue our research programs, license necessary technology from third parties, or enter into development
partnerships that would help us bring our product candidates to market. We may also become involved in disputes with others regarding the ownership of intellectual property rights. For example, we jointly develop intellectual property with certain parties
, and disagreements may therefore arise as to the ownership of the intellectual property developed pursuant to these relationships. If we are unable to resolve these disputes, we could lose valuable intellectual property rights.
Furthermore, because of the substantial amount of discovery required in connection with intellectual property litigation, there is a risk that some of our confidential information could be compromised by disclosure during this type of litigation. There could also be public announcements of the results of hearings, motions or other interim proceedings or developments. If securities analysts or investors perceive these results to be negative, it could have a material adverse effect on the price of our common stock.
We may be subject to claims that our employees, consultants or independent contractors have wrongfully used or disclosed confidential information of third parties or that our employees have wrongfully used or disclosed alleged trade secrets of their former employers.
We employ individuals who were previously employed at universities or other biotechnology or pharmaceutical companies, including our competitors or potential competitors. Although we try to ensure that our employees, consultants and independent contractors do not use the proprietary information or know-how of others in their work for us, we may be subject to claims that we or our employees, consultants or independent contractors have inadvertently or otherwise used or disclosed intellectual property, including trade secrets or other proprietary information, of any of our employee’s former employer or other third parties. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these claims. If we fail in defending any such claims, in addition to paying monetary damages, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights or personnel, which could adversely impact our business. Even if we are successful in defending against such claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to management and other employees.
We may be subject to claims challenging the inventorship or ownership of our patents and other intellectual property.
We may be subject to claims that former employees, collaborators or other third parties have an ownership interest in our patents or other intellectual property. For example, we may have inventorship disputes arise from conflicting obligations of consultants or others who are involved in developing our product candidates. Litigation may be necessary to defend against these and other claims challenging inventorship or ownership, or we may enter into agreements to clarify the scope of our rights in such intellectual property. If we fail in defending any such claims, in addition to paying monetary damages, we may lose valuable intellectual property rights, such as exclusive ownership of, or right to use, valuable intellectual property. Such an outcome could have a material adverse effect on our business. Even if we are successful in defending against such claims, litigation could result in substantial costs and be a distraction to management and other employees.
Obtaining and maintaining our patent protection depends on compliance with various procedural, document submission, fee payment and other requirements imposed by governmental patent agencies, and our patent protection could be reduced or eliminated for non-compliance with these requirements.
Periodic maintenance fees, renewal fees, annuity fees and various other governmental fees on patents or applications will be due to be paid to the USPTO and various governmental patent agencies outside of the United States in several stages over the lifetime of the patents or applications. We have systems in place to remind us to pay these fees, and we employ an outside firm and rely on our outside counsel to pay these fees due to non-U.S. patent agencies. The USPTO and various non-U.S. governmental patent agencies require compliance with a number of procedural, documentary, fee payment and other similar provisions during the patent application process. We employ law firms and other professionals to help us comply, and in many cases, an inadvertent lapse can be cured by payment of a late fee or by other means in accordance with the applicable rules. However, there are situations in which non-compliance can result in abandonment or lapse of the patent or patent application, resulting in partial or complete loss of patent rights in the relevant jurisdiction. In such an event, our competitors might be able to enter the market and this circumstance would have a material adverse effect on our business.
53
Issued patents covering our product candidates could be found invalid or unenforceable if challenged in court.
If we or one of our licensors initiated legal proceedings against a third party to enforce a patent covering one of our product candidates, the defendant could counterclaim that the patent covering our product candidate is invalid or unenforceable. In patent litigation in the United States, defendant counterclaims alleging invalidity or unenforceability are commonplace. Grounds for a validity challenge could be an alleged failure to meet any of several statutory requirements, including lack of novelty, obviousness or non-enablement. Grounds for an unenforceability assertion could be an allegation that someone connected with prosecution of the patent withheld relevant information from the USPTO, or made a misleading statement, during prosecution. Third parties may also raise similar claims before administrative bodies in the United States or abroad, even outside the context of litigation. Such mechanisms include re-examination, post grant review, and equivalent proceedings in foreign jurisdictions (e.g., opposition proceedings). Such proceedings could result in revocation or amendment to our patents in such a way that they no longer cover our product candidates. The outcome following legal assertions of invalidity and unenforceability is unpredictable. With respect to the validity question, for example, we cannot be certain that there is no invalidating prior art, of which we and the patent examiner were unaware during prosecution. If a defendant were to prevail on a legal assertion of invalidity or unenforceability, we would lose at least part, and perhaps all, of the patent protection on our product candidates. Such a loss of patent protection would have a material adverse impact on our business.
Changes in patent law could diminish the value of patents in general, thereby impairing our ability to protect our products.
As is the case with many other biotechnology companies, our success is heavily dependent on intellectual property, particularly patents. Obtaining and enforcing patents in the biotechnology industry involve both technological and legal complexity, and therefore obtaining, maintaining and enforcing biotechnology patents is costly, time-consuming and inherently uncertain. In addition, recent legislative and judicial developments in the United States and elsewhere have in some cases removed the protection afforded to patent owners, made patents more difficult to obtain, or increased the uncertainty regarding the ability to obtain, maintain and enforce patents. For example, Congress has recently passed, and the United States is currently implementing, wide-ranging patent reform legislation, and may pass further patent reform legislation in the future. Recent U.S. Supreme Court rulings have narrowed the scope of patent protection available in certain circumstances and weakened the rights of patent owners in certain situations. For example, in a recent case,
Association for Molecular Pathology v. Myriad Genetics, Inc.
, the U.S. Supreme Court held that certain claims to naturally occurring substances are not patentable. Although we do not believe that any of the patents owned or licensed by us will be found invalid based on this decision, we cannot predict how future decisions by the courts, the U.S. Congress, or the USPTO may impact the value of our patents. In addition to increasing uncertainty with regard to our ability to obtain patents in the future, this combination of events has created uncertainty with respect to the value of patents generally, once obtained. Depending on decisions and actions by the U.S. Congress, the federal courts, the USPTO and their respective foreign counterparts, the laws and regulations governing patents could change in unpredictable ways that would weaken our ability to obtain new patents or to maintain and enforce our existing patents and patents that we might obtain in the future.
Recent patent reform legislation could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of our patent applications and the validity or defense of our issued patents.
On September 16, 2011, the Leahy-Smith America Invents Act, or the Leahy-Smith Act, was signed into law. The Leahy-Smith Act includes a number of significant changes to U.S. patent law, including provisions that affect the way patent applications will be prosecuted and may also affect patent litigation. The USPTO is currently developing regulations and procedures to govern administration of the Leahy-Smith Act, and many of the substantive changes to patent law associated with the Leahy-Smith Act, and in particular, the first to file provisions, were enacted March 16, 2013. Although it is not clear what, if any, impact the Leahy-Smith Act will have on the operation of our business, the Leahy-Smith Act and its implementation could increase the uncertainties and costs surrounding the prosecution of our patent applications and the enforcement or defense of our issued patents, all of which could have a material adverse effect on our business and financial condition.
54
We have not yet registered Resolaris or Stalaris as a trademark, and failure to secure or maintain adequate protection for ou
r trademarks could adversely affect our business.
We have filed U.S. trademark applications for the Resolaris and Stalaris marks but they have not yet matured to registration, and we have yet to file any foreign trademark applications for the Resolaris or Stalaris marks. The USPTO has examined our U.S. application for the Resolaris mark and there are no outstanding objections to the application. The USPTO has yet to begin the examination process for our application to register the Stalaris mark, and it could raise objections to our application. Although we would be given an opportunity to respond to those objections, we may be unable to overcome such objections. In addition, in the USPTO and in comparable agencies in many foreign jurisdictions, third parties are given an opportunity to oppose pending trademark applications and to seek to cancel registered trademarks. Opposition or cancellation proceedings have been filed and may in the future be filed against certain of our trademark applications or registrations, and our trademark applications or registrations may not survive such proceedings. Furthermore, third parties have alleged, and may allege in the future, that the Resolaris or Stalaris marks in particular or any other trademark or trade name that we elect to use for our product candidates, may cause confusion in the marketplace. Specifically, in April 2015, Alexion Pharmaceuticals (Alexion) sent a letter to our counsel alleging that our anticipated use of the Resolaris trademark would cause patients, practitioners and researchers to mistakenly associate us with Alexion or its Soliris product. Alexion claims ownership of a U.S. trademark registration for its Soliris mark. Alexion concluded its letter by requesting that we select a new name for our Resolaris product and withdraw our pending trademark application for the mark. In February 2017 our counsel received a letter from counsel to Novartis AG (Novartis) alleging that our anticipated use of the Stalaris trademark would cause consumer confusion with its Ilaris product. Novartis claims ownership of a U.S. trademark registration for its Ilaris mark. Additionally, Novartis also expressed concerns about the potential for confusion between the Resolaris mark and Novartis’ Ilaris mark. Novartis concluded its letter by demanding that we abandon our U.S. trademark application for the Stalaris mark. We evaluate such actual and potential allegations in the course of our business, and such evaluations may cause us to change our commercialization or branding strategy for our product candidates, which may require us to incur additional costs. In particular, we are assessing Alexion and Novartis’ allegations and will determine whether we need to, or should, select a different name for the product or contest any trademark enforcement actions. Moreover, any name we propose to use with our product candidates in the United States must be approved by the FDA, regardless of whether we have registered it, or applied to register it, as a trademark. The FDA typically conducts a review of proposed product names, including an evaluation of potential for confusion with other product names. If the FDA objects to any of our proposed proprietary product names, we may be required to expend significant additional resources in an effort to identify a suitable substitute name that would qualify under applicable trademark laws, not infringe the existing rights of third parties and be acceptable to the FDA.
We may not be able to protect our intellectual property rights throughout the world.
Filing, prosecuting and defending patents on product candidates in all countries throughout the world would be prohibitively expensive, and our intellectual property rights in some countries outside the United States can be less extensive than those in the United States. In addition, the laws of some foreign countries do not protect intellectual property rights to the same extent as federal and state laws in the United States. Consequently, we may not be able to prevent third parties from practicing our inventions in all countries outside the United States, or from selling or importing products made using our inventions in and into the United States or other jurisdictions. Competitors may use our technologies in jurisdictions where we have not obtained patent protection to develop their own products and further, may export otherwise infringing products to territories where we have patent protection, but enforcement is not as strong as that in the United States. These products may compete with our products and our patents or other intellectual property rights may not be effective or sufficient to prevent them from competing.
Many companies have encountered significant problems in protecting and defending intellectual property rights in foreign jurisdictions. The legal systems of certain countries, particularly certain developing countries, do not favor the enforcement of patents, trade secrets and other intellectual property protection, particularly those relating to biotechnology products, which could make it difficult for us to stop the infringement of our patents or marketing of competing products in violation of our proprietary rights generally. Proceedings to enforce our patent rights in foreign jurisdictions could result in substantial costs and divert our efforts and attention from other aspects of our business, could put our patents at risk of being invalidated or interpreted narrowly and our patent applications at risk of not issuing and could provoke third parties to assert claims against us. We may not prevail in any lawsuits that we initiate and the damages or other remedies awarded, if any, may not be commercially meaningful. Accordingly, our efforts to enforce our intellectual property rights around the world may be inadequate to obtain a significant commercial advantage from the intellectual property that we develop or license.
55
Risks related to our business operations
Our future success depends on our ability to retain key employees, consultants and advisors and to attract, retain and motivate qualified personnel.
We are highly dependent on principal members of our executive team, the loss of whose services may adversely impact the achievement of our objectives. While we have entered into employment agreements with each of our executive officers, any of them could leave our employment at any time, as all of our employees are “at will” employees. Recruiting and retaining other qualified employees, consultants and advisors for our business, including scientific and technical personnel, will also be critical to our success. There is currently a shortage of skilled personnel in our industry, which is likely to continue. As a result, competition for skilled personnel is intense and the turnover rate can be high. We may not be able to attract and retain personnel on acceptable terms given the competition among numerous pharmaceutical and biotechnology companies for individuals with similar skill sets. In addition, the available pool of skilled employees may be further reduced if immigration laws change in a manner that increases restrictions on immigration. Failure to succeed in preclinical studies or clinical trials may make it more challenging to recruit and retain qualified personnel. The inability to recruit or loss of the services of any executive, key employee, consultant or advisor may impede the progress of our research, development and commercialization objectives. Furthermore, our common stock is currently trading at a price below the exercise price of most of our outstanding stock options. As a result, these “under water” options are less useful as a motivation and retention tool for our existing employees. Conversely, if our employees exercise outstanding stock options and sell their stock in the public market resulting in significant gains, we may experience an increased turnover rate.
We are subject to a variety of risks associated with international operations that could materially adversely affect our business.
We currently conduct research activities through our majority-owned (98%) Hong Kong subsidiary, Pangu BioPharma Limited, in collaboration with the Hong Kong University of Science and Technology. Additionally, we are currently conducting our Phase 1b/2 clinical trials of Resolaris in patients with FSHD and LGMD2B in the European Union. If any of our product candidates are approved for commercialization outside of the United States, we expect to either use our own sales organization or selectively enter into agreements with third parties to market our products on a worldwide basis or in more limited geographical regions. We are, and we expect that we will continue to be, subject to a variety of risks related to international operations, including:
|
•
|
different regulatory requirements for approval of drugs and biologics in foreign countries;
|
|
•
|
reduced or uncertain protection for intellectual property;
|
|
•
|
unexpected changes in tariffs, trade barriers and regulatory requirements;
|
|
•
|
economic weakness, including inflation, or political instability in particular foreign economies and markets;
|
|
•
|
compliance with tax, employment, immigration and labor laws for employees living or traveling abroad; and
|
|
•
|
foreign currency fluctuations, which could result in reduced revenues, and other obligations incident to doing business in another country.
|
Any failure to continue our international operations or to commercialize our product candidates outside of the United States may impair our ability to generate revenues and harm our business, prospects and results of operations.
We may need to expand our organization and we may experience difficulties in managing this growth, which could disrupt our operations.
As we continue our ongoing Phase 1b/2 clinical trials of Resolaris, prepare for additional clinical trials of Resolaris and Stalaris and expand our other clinical development activities, as well as continue our operations as a public company, we may increase our full-time employee base and hire more consultants and contractors. In addition to certain members of our management team being relatively new to our company, our management may need to divert a disproportionate amount of its attention away from our day-to-day activities and devote a substantial amount of time to managing these growth activities. We may not be able to effectively manage the expansion of our operations, which may result in weaknesses in our infrastructure, operational mistakes, loss of business opportunities, loss of employees and reduced productivity among remaining employees. Our expected growth could require significant capital expenditures and may divert financial resources from other projects, such as the conduct of additional clinical activities for Resolaris and the development of additional product candidates. If our management is unable to effectively manage our growth, our expenses may increase more than expected, our ability to generate or grow revenues could be reduced, and we may not be able to implement our business strategy. Our future financial performance and our ability to develop and commercialize product candidates and compete effectively will depend, in part, on our ability to effectively manage any future growth.
We may use our financial and human resources to pursue a particular business strategy, research program or product candidate and fail to capitalize on strategies, programs or product candidates that may be more profitable or for which there is a greater likelihood of success.
56
Because we have limited resources, we may forego or delay pursuit of certain strategic opportunities or opportunities with certain programs or product c
andidates or for indications that later prove to have greater commercial potential. Our resource allocation decisions may cause us to fail to capitalize on viable commercial products or profitable market opportunities. In addition, we may elect to pursue a
research, clinical or commercial strategy that ultimately does not yield the results that we desire. Our spending on current and future research and development programs for product candidates may not result in any commercially viable products. If we do n
ot accurately evaluate the commercial potential or target market for a particular product candidate, we may relinquish valuable rights to that product candidate through strategic collaboration, licensing or other royalty arrangements in cases in which it w
ould have been more advantageous for us to retain sole development and commercialization rights to such product candidate, or we may allocate internal resources to a product candidate in a therapeutic area or market in which it would have been more advanta
geous to enter into a partnering arrangement. Any failure to allocate resources or capitalize on strategies in a successful manner will have an adverse impact on our business.
Our employees, principal investigators, consultants and commercial partners may engage in misconduct or other improper activities, including non-compliance with regulatory standards and requirements and insider trading.
We are exposed to the risk of fraud or other misconduct by our employees, principal investigators, consultants and commercial partners. Misconduct by these parties could include intentional failures to comply with the regulations of the FDA and non-U.S. regulators, provide accurate information to the FDA and non-U.S. regulators, comply with healthcare fraud and abuse laws and regulations in the United States and abroad, report financial information or data accurately or disclose unauthorized activities to us. In particular, sales, marketing and business arrangements in the healthcare industry are subject to extensive laws and regulations intended to prevent fraud, misconduct, kickbacks, self-dealing and other abusive practices. These laws and regulations may restrict or prohibit a wide range of pricing, discounting, marketing and promotion, sales commission, customer incentive programs and other business arrangements. Such misconduct could also involve the improper use of information obtained in the course of clinical trials, which could result in regulatory sanctions and cause serious harm to our reputation. We have adopted a code of conduct applicable to all of our employees, but it is not always possible to identify and deter employee misconduct, and the precautions we take to detect and prevent this activity may not be effective in controlling unknown or unmanaged risks or losses or in protecting us from governmental investigations or other actions or lawsuits stemming from a failure to comply with these laws or regulations. If any such actions are instituted against us, and we are not successful in defending ourselves or asserting our rights, those actions could have a significant impact on our business, including the imposition of significant fines or other sanctions.
We face potential product liability, and, if successful claims are brought against us, we may incur substantial liability and costs. If the use of our product candidates harms patients, or is perceived to harm patients even when such harm is unrelated to our product candidates, our regulatory approvals could be revoked or otherwise negatively impacted and we could be subject to costly and damaging product liability claims.
The use of our product candidates in clinical trials and the sale of any products for which we obtain marketing approval exposes us to the risk of product liability claims. Product liability claims might be brought against us by patients, healthcare providers, pharmaceutical companies or others selling or otherwise coming into contact with our products. There is a risk that our product candidates may induce adverse events. If we cannot successfully defend against product liability claims, we could incur substantial liability and costs. In addition, regardless of merit or eventual outcome, product liability claims may result in:
|
•
|
impairment of our business reputation;
|
|
•
|
withdrawal of clinical trial participants;
|
|
•
|
costs due to related litigation;
|
|
•
|
distraction of management’s attention from our primary business;
|
|
•
|
substantial monetary awards to patients or other claimants;
|
|
•
|
the inability to commercialize our product candidates; and
|
|
•
|
decreased demand for our product candidates, if approved for commercial sale.
|
We carry product liability insurance for our clinical trials covering $5.0 million per occurrence and up to $5.0 million in the aggregate, subject to certain deductibles and exclusions. Although we believe the amount of our insurance coverage is typical for companies similar to us in our industry, we may not have adequate insurance coverage or be able to maintain insurance coverage at a reasonable cost or in sufficient amounts to protect us against losses due to liability. If and when we obtain marketing approval for product candidates, we intend to expand our insurance coverage to include the sale of commercial products; however, we may be unable to obtain product liability insurance on commercially reasonable terms or in adequate amounts. On occasion, large judgments have been awarded in class action lawsuits based on drugs or medical treatments that had unanticipated adverse effects. A successful product liability claim or series of claims brought against us could cause our stock price to decline and adversely affect our reputation and, if judgments exceed our insurance coverage, could adversely affect our results of operations and business.
57
Patients with the diseases targeted by our product candidate
s are often already in severe and advanced stages of disease and may have both known and unknown significant pre-existing and potentially life-threatening health risks. During the course of treatment, patients may suffer adverse events, including death, fo
r reasons that may be related to our product candidates. Such events could subject us to costly litigation, require us to pay substantial amounts of money to injured patients, delay, negatively impact or end our opportunity to receive or maintain regulator
y approval to market our products, or require us to suspend or abandon our commercialization efforts. Even in a circumstance in which we do not believe that an adverse event is related to our products, the investigation into the circumstance may be time-co
nsuming or inconclusive. These investigations may interrupt our sales efforts, delay our regulatory approval process in other countries, or impact and limit the type of regulatory approvals our product candidates receive or maintain. As a result of these f
actors, a product liability claim, even if successfully defended, could have a material adverse effect on our business, financial condition or results of operations.
If we fail to comply with environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, we could become subject to fines or penalties or incur costs that could have a material adverse effect on the success of our business.
We are subject to numerous environmental, health and safety laws and regulations, including those governing laboratory procedures and the handling, use, storage, treatment and disposal of hazardous materials and wastes. Our operations involve the use of hazardous and flammable materials, including chemicals and biological materials. Our operations also produce hazardous waste products. We generally contract with third parties for the disposal of these materials and wastes. We cannot eliminate the risk of contamination or injury from these materials. In the event of contamination or injury resulting from our use of hazardous materials, we could be held liable for any resulting damages, and any liability could exceed our resources. We also could incur significant costs associated with civil or criminal fines and penalties.
Although we maintain workers’ compensation insurance to cover us for costs and expenses we may incur due to injuries to our employees resulting from the use of hazardous materials or other work-related injuries, this insurance may not provide adequate coverage against potential liabilities. In addition, we may incur substantial costs in order to comply with current or future environmental, health and safety laws and regulations. These current or future laws and regulations may impair our research, development or production efforts. Failure to comply with these laws and regulations also may result in substantial fines, penalties or other sanctions.
We are subject to anti-corruption laws in the jurisdictions in which we operate.
We are subject to a number of anti-corruption laws, including the U.S. Foreign Corrupt Practices Act, or the FCPA, and various other anti-corruption laws. The FCPA generally prohibits companies and their intermediaries from making improper payments to foreign officials for the purpose of obtaining or keeping business and/or other benefits. Our business relies on approvals and licenses from government and regulatory entities, and as a result, we are subject to certain elevated risks associated with interactions with these entities. Although we have adopted a code of business conduct and ethics that includes provisions governing the interactions of employees with government entities to mitigate these risks. If we are not in compliance with anti-corruption laws and other laws governing the conduct of business with government entities (including local laws), we may be subject to criminal and civil penalties and other remedial measures, which could harm our reputation and have a material adverse impact on our business, financial condition, results of operations and prospects. Any investigation of any actual or alleged violations of such laws could also harm our reputation or have an adverse impact on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
We will incur significant increased costs as a result of operating as a public company, and our management will be required to devote substantial time to new compliance initiatives.
As a public company, we will incur significant legal, accounting and other expenses that we did not incur as a private company. In addition, the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002, or Sarbanes-Oxley Act, as well as rules subsequently implemented by the Securities and Exchange Commission, or SEC, and The Nasdaq Global Select Market have imposed various requirements on public companies. In July 2010, the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act, or the Dodd-Frank Act, was enacted. There are significant corporate governance and executive compensation related provisions in the Dodd-Frank Act that require the SEC to adopt additional rules and regulations in these areas such as “say on pay” and proxy access. Recent legislation permits smaller “emerging growth companies” to implement many of these requirements over a longer period and up to five years from the pricing of our IPO. We have elected to take advantage of this legislation but cannot guarantee that we will not be required to implement these requirements sooner than budgeted or planned and thereby incur unexpected expenses. Stockholder activism, the current political environment and the current high level of government intervention and regulatory reform may lead to substantial new regulations and disclosure obligations, which may lead to additional compliance costs and impact the manner in which we operate our business in ways we cannot currently anticipate. Our management and other personnel will need to devote a substantial amount of time to these compliance initiatives. Moreover, these rules and regulations will increase our legal and financial compliance costs and will make some activities more time-consuming and costly. For example, we expect these rules and regulations to make it more difficult and more expensive for us to maintain director and officer liability insurance and we have been required to incur substantial costs to maintain our current levels of such coverage.
58
Unfavorable global economic conditions could adversely affect our business,
financial condition or results of operations.
Our results of operations could be adversely affected by general conditions in the global economy and in the global financial markets. The recent global financial crisis caused extreme volatility and disruptions in the capital and credit markets. For example, in the recent U.K. referendum on its membership in the European Union resulted in a vote in favor of leaving the European Union (commonly referred to as “Brexit”), which could lead to a period of considerable uncertainty, particularly in relation to global financial markets which in turn could adversely affect our ability to raise additional capital. A severe or prolonged economic downturn, such as the recent global financial crisis, could result in a variety of risks to our business, including inability to raise additional capital when needed on acceptable terms, if at all. A weak or declining economy could also strain our manufacturers, possibly resulting in supply disruption. Any of the foregoing could harm our business and we cannot anticipate all of the ways in which the current economic climate and financial market conditions could adversely impact our business.
We or the third parties upon whom we depend may be adversely affected by earthquakes, droughts, floods, fires or other natural disasters and our business continuity and disaster recovery plans may not adequately protect us from a serious disaster.
We are located in San Diego, California and our manufacturing activities are conducted by contract manufacturing organizations at various locations in the United States. We currently anticipate that if Resolaris receives marketing approval, commercial production may take place in the United States and/or the United Kingdom. Some of these geographic locations have in the past experienced natural disasters, including severe earthquakes. Earthquakes, droughts, floods, fires, disease epidemics or other natural disasters could severely disrupt our operations, and have a material adverse effect on our business, results of operations, financial condition and prospects. If a natural disaster, power outage or other event occurred that prevented us from using all or a significant portion of our facilities, that damaged critical infrastructure, such as the manufacturing facilities of our third-party contract manufacturers, or that otherwise disrupted operations, it may be difficult or, in certain cases, impossible for us to continue our business for a substantial period of time. The disaster recovery and business continuity plans we have in place currently are limited and are unlikely to prove adequate in the event of a serious disaster or similar event. We may incur substantial expenses as a result of the limited nature of our disaster recovery and business continuity plans, as well as limits on our insurance coverage, which could have a material adverse effect on our business, prospects, financial condition and results of operations.
Risks related to the ownership of our common stock
The market price of our common stock may be highly volatile, and you could lose all or part of your investment.
The market price of our common stock is likely to be volatile. Our stock price could be subject to wide fluctuations in response to a variety of factors, including the following:
|
•
|
adverse results or delays in preclinical studies or clinical trials;
|
|
•
|
the imposition of a clinical hold on our product candidates or our inability to cause the clinical hold to be lifted;
|
|
•
|
any delay in filing a BLA, NDA or IND for any of our product candidates and any adverse development or perceived adverse development with respect to the FDA’s review of that BLA, NDA or IND;
|
|
•
|
failure to successfully develop and commercialize our product candidates;
|
|
•
|
the perception of limited market sizes or pricing for our product candidates;
|
|
•
|
failure by us or our licensors to prosecute, maintain or enforce intellectual property rights covering our product candidates and processes;
|
|
•
|
changes in laws or regulations applicable to future products;
|
|
•
|
inability to obtain adequate product supply for our product candidates or the inability to do so at acceptable prices;
|
|
•
|
adverse regulatory decisions;
|
|
•
|
introduction of new products, services or technologies by our competitors;
|
|
•
|
inability to obtain additional capital;
|
|
•
|
failure to meet or exceed financial or operational projections we may provide to the public;
|
|
•
|
failure to meet or exceed the financial or operational projections of the investment community;
|
|
•
|
the perception of the pharmaceutical industry by the public, politicians, legislatures, regulators and the investment community;
|
|
•
|
significant acquisitions, strategic partnerships, joint ventures or capital commitments by us or our competitors;
|
59
|
•
|
disputes or other developments relating to proprietary rights, including patents, litigation matters and
our ability to obtain patent protection for our technologies;
|
|
•
|
additions or departures of key scientific or management personnel;
|
|
•
|
significant lawsuits, including patent or stockholder litigation;
|
|
•
|
if securities or industry analysts do not publish research or reports about our business, or they issue an adverse or misleading opinion regarding our stock;
|
|
•
|
changes in the market valuations of similar companies;
|
|
•
|
general market or macroeconomic conditions;
|
|
•
|
sales of our common stock by us or our stockholders in the future; and
|
|
•
|
trading volume of our common stock.
|
In addition, companies trading in the stock market in general, and The Nasdaq Global Select Market and biotechnology companies in particular, have experienced extreme price and volume fluctuations that have often been unrelated or disproportionate to the operating performance of these companies. Broad market and industry factors may negatively affect the market price of our common stock, regardless of our actual operating performance.
Our executive officers, directors, principal stockholders and their affiliates own a significant percentage of our stock and will be able to exert significant control over matters submitted to stockholders for approval.
As of March 8, 2017, based on the latest information publicly available to us, our executive officers, directors, five percent stockholders and their affiliates beneficially own approximately 69% of our voting stock. Therefore, these stockholders will have the ability to influence us through their ownership positions and may be able to determine all matters requiring stockholder approval. For example, these stockholders, acting together, may be able to control elections of directors, amendments of our organizational documents, or approval of any merger, sale of assets, or other major corporate transaction. This may prevent or discourage unsolicited acquisition proposals or offers for our common stock that you may believe are in your best interest as one of our stockholders.
We are an “emerging growth company,” and we cannot be certain if the reduced reporting requirements applicable to emerging growth companies will make our common stock less attractive to investors.
We are an “emerging growth company,” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, or the JOBS Act. For as long as we continue to be an emerging growth company, we may take advantage of exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not emerging growth companies, including not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation and our periodic reports and proxy statements and exemptions from the requirements of holding a nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved. We could be an emerging growth company for up to five years from the pricing of our IPO, although circumstances could cause us to lose that status earlier, including if the market value of our common stock held by non-affiliates exceeds $700 million as of any June 30 before that time or if we have total annual gross revenue of $1 billion or more during any fiscal year before that time, in which cases we would no longer be an emerging growth company as of the following December 31 or, if we issue more than $1 billion in non-convertible debt during any three-year period before that time, we would cease to be an emerging growth company immediately. Even after we no longer qualify as an emerging growth company, we may still qualify as a “smaller reporting company” which would allow us to take advantage of many of the same exemptions from disclosure requirements, including not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act and reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements. We cannot predict if investors will find our common stock less attractive because we may rely on these exemptions. If some investors find our common stock less attractive as a result, there may be a less active trading market for our common stock and our stock price may be more volatile.
Under the JOBS Act, emerging growth companies can also delay adopting new or revised accounting standards until such time as those standards apply to private companies. We have irrevocably elected not to avail ourselves of this exemption from new or revised accounting standards and, therefore, will be subject to the same new or revised accounting standards as other public companies that are not emerging growth companies.
Future sales and issuances of equity or debt securities could result in dilution to our stockholders, impose restrictions or limitations on our business and could cause our stock price to fall.
60
We will need additional capital in the future to continue our planned operations, and we may seek additional funding through a combination of equity offe
rings, debt financings, government or other third-party funding and other collaborations, strategic alliances and licensing arrangements. These financing activities may have an adverse effect on our stockholders’ rights, the market price of our common stoc
k and on our operations, and may require us to relinquish rights to some of our technologies, intellectual property or product candidates, issue additional equity or debt securities, or otherwise agree to terms unfavorable to us. We have an effective shelf
registration statement on Form S-3 that provides for the sale of up to $150 million in the aggregate of common stock, preferred stock, debt securities, warrants and/or units by us from time to time in one or more offerings. We have also entered into a sal
es agreement with Cowen and Company, LLC for the sale of up to $35 million of common stock, from time to time, $20 million of which is currently registered under the Form S-3. To date, no shares of common shares have been sold pursuant to such sales agreem
ent.
Any future debt financings may impose restrictive covenants or otherwise adversely affect the holdings or the rights of our stockholders, and any equity financings will be dilutive to our stockholders. Furthermore, additional equity or debt financing
might not be available to us on reasonable terms, if at all.
In additional, sales of a substantial number of shares of our common stock by our existing stockholders in the public market or the perception that these sales might occur, could depress the market price of our common stock and could impair our ability to raise capital through the sale of additional equity securities. Certain holders of our securities are entitled to rights with respect to the registration of their shares under the Securities Act pursuant to a registration and voting rights agreement. Registration of these shares under the Securities Act would result in the shares becoming freely tradable without restriction under the Securities Act. Any sales of securities by these stockholders could have a material adverse effect on the trading price of our common stock, even if there is no relationship between such sales and the performance of our business.
We have also registered all common stock that we may issue under our employee benefits plans. As a result, these shares can be freely sold in the public market upon issuance, subject to restrictions under the securities laws. In addition, our directors and executive officers may establish programmed selling plans under Rule 10b5-1 of the Securities Exchange Act for the purpose of effecting sales of our common stock. Further, we intend to file a registration statement on Form S-8 to register the shares of common stock underlying the option to purchase up to 145,000 shares of our common stock that has been granted as an inducement grant prior to the time at which such option becomes exercisable. If any of these events cause a large number of our shares to be sold in the public market, the sales could reduce the trading price of our common stock and impede our ability to raise future capital.
If securities analysts do not publish research or reports about our business or if they publish negative evaluations of our stock, the price of our stock could decline.
The trading market for our common stock will rely in part on the research and reports that industry or financial analysts publish about us or our business. We may never obtain research coverage by industry or financial analysts. If no or few analysts commence coverage of us, the trading price of our stock would likely decrease. Even if we do obtain analyst coverage, if one or more of the analysts covering our business downgrade their evaluations of our stock, the price of our stock could decline. If one or more of these analysts cease to cover our stock, we could lose visibility in the market for our stock, which in turn could cause our stock price to decline.
We could be subject to securities class action litigation.
In the past, securities class action litigation has often been brought against a company following a decline in the market price of its securities. This risk is especially relevant for us because pharmaceutical companies have experienced significant stock price volatility in recent years. If we face such litigation, it could result in substantial costs and a diversion of management’s attention and resources, which could harm our business.
We have broad discretion in the use of our cash and cash equivalents and may not use them effectively.
We have considerable discretion in the application of our existing cash and cash equivalents. We expect to use our existing cash to fund research and development activities and for working capital and general corporate purposes, including funding the costs of operating as a public company. In addition, pending their use, we may invest our existing cash in short-term, investment-grade, interest-bearing securities. We may use these proceeds for purposes that do not yield a significant return or any return at all for our stockholders.
Our ability to use our net operating loss carryforwards and certain other tax attributes may be limited.
We have incurred substantial losses during our history, we do not expect to become profitable in the near future and we may never achieve profitability. Unused losses generally are available to be carried forward to offset future taxable income, if any, until such unused losses expire. Under Sections 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended, if a corporation undergoes an “ownership change,” generally defined as a greater than 50% change (by value) in its equity ownership over a three-year period, the corporation’s ability to use its pre-change net operating loss carryforwards, or NOLs, and other pre-change tax attributes (such as research tax credits) to offset its post-change taxable income or taxes may be limited. We completed an analysis through September 7,
61
2011, and determined that on November 30, 2006 an ownership change occurred, for which we have adjusted our NOL and research and development tax cred
it carryforwards. We may have experienced an ownership change subsequent to September 7, 2011, including as a result of our IPO, and we may also experience ownership changes in the future as a result of subsequent shifts in our stock ownership, some of whi
ch may be outside of our control. As a result, our ability to use our pre-change NOLs to offset U.S. federal taxable income may be subject to limitations, which could potentially result in increased future tax liability to us. In addition, at the state lev
el, there may be periods during which the use of NOLs is suspended or otherwise limited, which could accelerate or permanently increase state taxes owed.
We do not intend to pay dividends on our common stock, and therefore any returns will be limited to the value of our stock.
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock. We anticipate that we will retain future earnings for the development, operation and expansion of our business and do not anticipate declaring or paying any cash dividends for the foreseeable future. Any return to stockholders will therefore be limited to the appreciation of their stock.
Provisions in our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws, as well as provisions of Delaware law, could make it more difficult for a third party to remove our current management, acquire us or increase the cost of acquiring us, even if doing so would benefit our stockholders.
Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation, amended and restated bylaws and Delaware law contain provisions that may have the effect of delaying or preventing a change in control of us or changes in our management. Our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and bylaws include provisions that:
|
•
|
authorize “blank check” preferred stock, which could be issued by our board of directors without stockholder approval and may contain voting, liquidation, dividend and other rights superior to our common stock;
|
|
•
|
create a classified board of directors whose members serve staggered three-year terms;
|
|
•
|
specify that special meetings of our stockholders can be called only by our board of directors, the chairperson of our board of directors, our chief executive officer or our president;
|
|
•
|
prohibit stockholder action by written consent;
|
|
•
|
establish an advance notice procedure for stockholder approvals to be brought before an annual meeting of our stockholders, including proposed nominations of persons for election to our board of directors;
|
|
•
|
provide that our directors may be removed only for cause;
|
|
•
|
provide that vacancies on our board of directors may be filled only by a majority of directors then in office, even though less than a quorum;
|
|
•
|
specify that no stockholder is permitted to cumulate votes at any election of directors;
|
|
•
|
expressly authorize our board of directors to modify, alter or repeal our amended and restated bylaws; and
|
|
•
|
require supermajority votes of the holders of our common stock to amend specified provisions of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation and amended and restated bylaws.
|
These provisions, alone or together, could delay or prevent hostile takeovers and changes in control or changes in our management.
In addition, because we are incorporated in Delaware, we are governed by the provisions of Section 203 of the Delaware General Corporation Law, which limits the ability of stockholders owning in excess of 15% of our outstanding voting stock to merge or combine with us.
Any provision of our amended and restated certificate of incorporation or amended and restated bylaws or Delaware law that has the effect of delaying or deterring a change in control could limit the opportunity for our stockholders to receive a premium for their shares of our common stock, and could also affect the price that some investors are willing to pay for our common stock.
PART
II
Item 5. Market for Registrant’s Common Equity, Related Stockholder Matters and Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
Market Information
Our common stock began trading on The NASDAQ Global Select Market on May 7, 2015 and trades under the symbol “LIFE”. Prior to such time, there was no public market for our common stock. The following table sets forth the high and low sales prices per share of our common stock for the periods indicated as reported on The NASDAQ Global Select Market.
|
|
Price Range
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2016:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
First Quarter
|
|
$
|
9.63
|
|
|
$
|
3.50
|
|
Second Quarter
|
|
$
|
4.36
|
|
|
$
|
2.48
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
3.85
|
|
|
$
|
2.62
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
3.80
|
|
|
$
|
2.10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Price Range
|
|
|
|
High
|
|
|
Low
|
|
Year Ended December 31, 2015:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Second Quarter (commencing May 6, 2015)
|
|
$
|
28.29
|
|
|
$
|
12.90
|
|
Third Quarter
|
|
$
|
21.00
|
|
|
$
|
9.59
|
|
Fourth Quarter
|
|
$
|
13.26
|
|
|
$
|
7.37
|
|
Holders of Record
As of March 8, 2017, there were approximately 68 holders of record of our common stock. The approximate number of holders is based upon the actual number of holders registered in our records at such date and excludes holders in "street name" or persons, partnerships, associations, corporations, or other entities identified in security positions listings maintained by depository trust companies.
Dividend Policy
We have never declared or paid any cash dividends on our common stock. We currently intend to retain all available funds and any future earnings to support our operations and finance the growth and development of our business. We do not intend to pay cash dividends on our common stock for the foreseeable future. Any future determination related to our dividend policy will be made at the discretion of our board of directors and will depend upon, among other factors, our results of operations, financial condition, capital requirements, contractual restrictions, business prospects and other factors our board of directors may deem relevant.
Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans
Information about our equity compensation plans is incorporated herein by reference to Item 12 of Part III of this Annual Report.
64
Performance Graph
The following is not deemed “filed” with the Securities and Exchange Commission and is not to be incorporated by reference into any filing we make under the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, whether made before or after the date hereof and irrespective of any general incorporation by reference language in such filing.
The following graph shows a comparison from May 7, 2015 (the date our common stock commenced trading on The NASDAQ Global Select Market) through December 31, 2016 of the cumulative total return for our common stock, the NASDAQ Biotechnology Index (NBI) and the NASDAQ Composite Index (CCMP). The graph assumes an initial investment of $100 on May 7, 2015. The comparisons in the graph are not intended to forecast or be indicative of possible future performance of our common stock
Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities
During the year ended December 31, 2016, we did not issue or sell any unregistered securities not previously disclosed in a Quarterly Report on Form 10-Q or in a Current Report on Form 8-K.
Issuer Purchases of Equity Securities
We did not repurchase any securities during the quarter ended December 31, 2016.
65
Item 6. Selected
Financial Data.
The selected financial data set forth below is derived from our audited consolidated financial statements and may not be indicative of future operating results. The following selected financial data should be read in conjunction with the Consolidated Financial Statements and notes thereto and Item 7, “Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Condition and Results of Operations” included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. Amounts are in thousands, except per share amounts.
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Statements of Operations Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
$
|
(57,940
|
)
|
|
$
|
(47,616
|
)
|
|
$
|
(23,554
|
)
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(57,855
|
)
|
|
|
(47,973
|
)
|
|
|
(24,350
|
)
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(57,760
|
)
|
|
|
(48,144
|
)
|
|
|
(24,350
|
)
|
Net loss per share, basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(2.44
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
(29.69
|
)
|
Weighted average shares outstanding, basic and diluted
|
|
|
23,681,019
|
|
|
|
15,838,353
|
|
|
|
834,221
|
|
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Consolidated Balance Sheet Data:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash, cash equivalents and available-for-sale investments
|
|
$
|
76,149
|
|
|
$
|
125,349
|
|
|
$
|
15,853
|
|
Total assets
|
|
|
80,524
|
|
|
|
129,675
|
|
|
|
20,644
|
|
Preferred stock warrant liabilities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
319
|
|
Convertible promissory note
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,000
|
|
Working capital
|
|
|
66,243
|
|
|
|
85,802
|
|
|
|
6,396
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion and issuance costs
|
|
|
9,198
|
|
|
|
1,776
|
|
|
|
5,142
|
|
Redeemable convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
95,619
|
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(215,979
|
)
|
|
|
(158,124
|
)
|
|
|
(110,151
|
)
|
Total stockholders’ deficit
|
|
|
62,801
|
|
|
|
115,050
|
|
|
|
(91,010
|
)
|
66
Item 7. Management’s Discussion and Analysis of Financial Co
ndition and Results of Operations.
You should read the following discussion and analysis together with “Item 6. Selected Financial Data” and the consolidated financial statements and related notes included elsewhere in this Annual Report on Form 10-K. The following discussion contains forward-looking statements that involve risks and uncertainties. Our actual results could differ materially from those expressed or implied in any forward-looking statements as a result of various factors, including those set forth under the caption “Item 1A. Risk Factors.”
Overview
We engage in the discovery and clinical development of innovative medicines for patients suffering from severe, rare diseases using our knowledge of Physiocrine biology, a newly discovered set of physiological pathways. Through our research efforts, we believe that Physiocrines evolved over billions of years to promote homeostasis in complex organisms. We have evidence to support that some of these proteins evolved to govern and orchestrate the mammalian immune system. We believe immune imbalance is underappreciated in many disease types and may ultimately be responsible for much of the pathophysiology associated with a number of important genetic and immunology based diseases.
By focusing on immune pathways in disease, we believe our therapeutic candidates have the potential to restore patients to a healthier state, achieve homeostatic balance and ultimately lead to improved clinical outcomes. To date, our discovery efforts have generated three immunology-based investigational innovative therapeutic programs in three different therapeutic areas:
|
•
|
Resolaris
: We internally discovered and developed Resolaris, our first Physiocrine-based therapeutic candidate, based on a protein naturally secreted from muscle that acts on T-cells at the tissue level to promote healthier muscle. We believe this may translate into an innovative therapeutic for rare genetic myopathies with an immune component (e.g. T-cells in the patients’ muscle), including limb-girdle muscular dystrophy (LGMD), facioscapulohumeral muscular dystrophy (FSHD), and Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD). Resolaris also represents an example of our first therapeutic modality - natural protein therapy – adding back a pathway that is insufficiently produced by the human body to counteract disease.
|
|
•
|
Stalaris
:
Our scientists successfully engineered the first fusion protein with a Physiocrine, Stalaris, to provide designed properties to enhance the immuno-modulatory aspects of a Physiocrine
in vivo
. We plan to develop Stalaris as a potential therapeutic for patients with rare pulmonary diseases with an immune component, including interstitial lung disease. This fusion protein, which utilizes the Fc region of an antibody, also potentially represents a novel Fc-Physiocrine platform for future Physiocrine-based therapies.
|
|
•
|
Project ORCA
:
Our third program, represents a third therapeutic modality distinct from Resolaris or Stalaris. It also diversifies our pipeline by addressing severe diseases in a therapeutic area that differs from those of our first two programs. We use code name “Project ORCA” for this preclinical research program.
|
Our expansive Physiocrine patent estate provides us with potential product protection as we pioneer this new and important area of human biology. To protect our industry unique pipeline based on our proprietary new biology, we have built an intellectual property estate comprising over 175 issued patents or allowed patent applications that are owned or exclusively licensed by us, including over 300 potential Physiocrine-based protein compositions. We believe it is in the best interest of our stakeholders, including patients, caregivers, and our stockholders, to advance one or more of our three current programs based on Physiocrine biology with the expertise of or funding from appropriate strategic partners.
Since our inception in 2005, we have devoted substantially all of our resources to the therapeutic application of Physiocrines, including the preclinical development of and clinical trials for Resolaris, the creation, licensing and protection of related intellectual property and the provision of general and administrative support for these operations. We have not generated any revenue from product sales and, through December 31, 2016, have funded our operations primarily with the aggregate proceeds from the sales of our common stock in our initial public offering (IPO), private placement of redeemable convertible preferred stock and convertible promissory notes, commercial bank debt and a convertible promissory note issued to our landlord.
In May 2015, we completed our IPO whereby we sold 6,164,000 shares of common stock at a public offering price of $14.00 per share. As a result of the IPO, we raised a total of $75.9 million in net proceeds after deducting underwriting discounts and commissions of approximately $6.0 million and offering expenses of approximately $4.4 million. In addition, in connection with the IPO, all outstanding redeemable convertible preferred stock converted into 16,279,859 shares of our common stock.
67
In June 2016, we filed a Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-211998) containing two prospectuses: (i) a base prospectus which covers the offering, issuance and sale of up to $150.0 million in the aggregate of an indete
rminate number of shares of common stock and preferred stock, an indeterminate principal amount of debt securities and an indeterminate number of warrants and units; and (ii) a sales agreement prospectus covering the offering, issuance and sale of up to a
maximum aggregate offering price of $20.0 million of our common stock that may be sold from time to time under a sales agreement with Cowen and Company, LLC (Cowen). In accordance with the terms of such sales agreement entered with Cowen, we may offer and
sell shares of our common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $35.0 million from time to time through Cowen.
To date, no shares of common stock have been sold pursuant to such sales agreement.
We will be required to file another prospectus su
pplement in the event we intend to offer more than $20.0 million in shares of our common stock in accordance with the sales agreement. The sales agreement prospectus amount of $20.0 million is included in the base prospectus amount of $150.0 million.
We have never been profitable and have incurred net losses in each annual and quarterly period since our inception. For the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, we have incurred consolidated net losses of $57.9 million, $48.0 million and $24.4 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2016, we had an accumulated deficit of $216.0 million.
Substantially all of our net losses resulted from costs incurred in connection with our development of and clinical trials for Resolaris, our other research and development programs and from general and administrative costs associated with our operations. We expect to continue to incur significant expenses and increasing operating losses for the foreseeable future, at least until we apply for and receive regulatory approval for Resolaris, Stalaris or another product candidate and generate substantial revenues from its commercialization, if ever. Our net losses may fluctuate significantly from quarter to quarter and year to year, depending on the nature and extent of our research and development expenses and clinical trials. We expect our expenses will increase substantially in connection with our ongoing activities as we:
|
•
|
conduct clinical trials of Resolaris, Stalaris and any additional product candidates we may develop;
|
|
•
|
continue our research and product development efforts;
|
|
•
|
manufacture preclinical study and clinical trial materials;
|
|
•
|
expand, protect and maintain our intellectual property portfolio;
|
|
•
|
seek regulatory approvals for our product candidates that successfully complete clinical trials;
|
|
•
|
hire additional staff, including clinical, operational, financial and technical personnel, if and when necessary, to execute on our business plan and create additional infrastructure to support our operations as a public company; and
|
|
•
|
implement operational, financial and management systems.
|
We do not expect to generate any revenues from product sales unless and until we successfully complete development and obtain regulatory approval for one or more of our product candidates, which we expect will take a number of years at a minimum. If we obtain regulatory approval for any of our product candidates, we expect to incur significant commercialization expenses related to product sales, marketing, manufacturing and distribution. Accordingly, we will need to raise substantial additional capital beyond the net proceeds from our IPO. The amount and timing of our future funding requirements will depend on many factors, including the pace and results of our preclinical and clinical development efforts and the timing and nature of the regulatory approval process for our product candidates. We anticipate that we will seek to fund our operations through public or private equity or debt financings, collaborations, strategic partnerships or other sources. However, we may be unable to raise additional capital or enter into such other arrangements when needed on favorable terms or at all. Our failure to raise capital or enter into such other arrangements when needed would have a negative impact on our financial condition and ability to develop our product candidates.
Financial Operations Overview
Organization and Business; Principles of Consolidation
We conduct substantially all of our activities through aTyr Pharma, Inc., a Delaware corporation, at our facility in San Diego, California. aTyr Pharma, Inc. was incorporated in the state of Delaware in September 2005. The consolidated financial statements include the accounts of aTyr Pharma, Inc., and its 98% majority-owned subsidiary in Hong Kong, Pangu BioPharma Limited as of December 31, 2016. All intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated in consolidation.
68
Research and Development Expenses
To date, our research and development expenses have related primarily to the development of and clinical trials for Resolaris and to research efforts targeting the potential therapeutic application of other Physiocrine-based immuno-modulators in rare disease indications. These expenses consist primarily of:
|
•
|
salaries and employee-related expenses, including stock-based compensation and benefits for personnel in research and product development functions;
|
|
•
|
costs associated with conducting our preclinical, development and regulatory activities, including fees paid to third-party professional consultants, service providers and our scientific, therapeutic and clinical advisory board;
|
|
•
|
costs to acquire, develop and manufacture preclinical study and clinical trial materials;
|
|
•
|
costs incurred under clinical trial agreements with clinical research organizations, or CROs, and investigative sites;
|
|
•
|
costs for laboratory supplies;
|
|
•
|
payments and stock issuances related to licensed products and technologies; and
|
|
•
|
allocated facilities, depreciation and other allocable expenses.
|
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Clinical trial and other development costs incurred by third parties are expensed as the contracted work is performed. We accrue for costs incurred as the services are being provided by monitoring the status of the trial or project and the invoices received from our external service providers. We adjust our accrual as actual costs become known.
Product candidates in later stages of clinical development generally have higher development costs than those in earlier stages of clinical development, primarily due to the increased size and duration of later-stage clinical trials. We expect that the levels of our research and development expenses will increase during the foreseeable future as we: (i) continue to advance Resolaris in clinical development; (ii) advance our Stalaris discovery program; and (iii) engage in additional research, discovery and development activities relating to our discovery engine for therapeutic applications of Physiocrines, including Project ORCA.
We cannot determine with certainty the timing of initiation, the duration or the completion costs of current or future preclinical studies and clinical trials of our product candidates. At this time, due to the inherently unpredictable nature of preclinical and clinical development and given the early stage of our programs, we are unable to estimate with any certainty the costs we will incur or the timelines we will require in the continued development of Resolaris, Stalaris and any other product candidates that we may develop. Clinical and preclinical development timelines, the probability of success and development costs can differ materially from expectations. We anticipate that we will make determinations as to which product candidates to pursue and how much funding to direct to each product candidate on an ongoing basis in response to the results of ongoing and future preclinical studies and clinical trials, regulatory developments and our ongoing assessments as to each product candidate’s commercial potential. In addition, we cannot forecast which product candidates may be subject to future collaborations, when such arrangements will be secured, if at all, and to what degree such arrangements would affect our development plans and capital requirements.
General and Administrative Expenses
General and administrative expenses consist primarily of salaries and related costs for employees in executive, finance and administration, corporate development and administrative support functions, including stock-based compensation expenses and benefits. Other significant general and administrative expenses include accounting, legal services, expenses associated with applying for and maintaining patents, cost of insurance, cost of various consultants, occupancy costs, information systems costs and depreciation.
Other Income (Expense)
Other income (expense) consists primarily of interest income earned on cash and cash equivalents and available-for-sale investments and interest expense on our loans outstanding with Silicon Valley Bank (SVB). Commencing November 2016, interest expense includes interest charges from our Term Loan borrowing with SVB and Solar Capital Ltd. (Solar).
69
Critical Accounting Policies and Significant Judgments and Estimates
Our management’s discussion and analysis of financial condition and results of operations is based on our consolidated financial statements, which have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States, or GAAP. The preparation of these consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities as of the date of the consolidated financial statements, as well as the reported expenses during the reporting periods. We monitor and analyze these items for changes in facts and circumstances, and material changes in these estimates could occur in the future. We base our estimates on our historical experience and on various other factors we believe to be reasonable under the circumstances, the results of which form the basis for making judgments about the carrying value of assets and liabilities that are not readily apparent from other sources. Changes in estimates are reflected in reported results for the period in which they become known. Actual results may differ materially from these estimates under different assumptions or conditions.
We discuss our accounting policies and assumptions that involve a higher degree of judgment and complexity within Note 2 to our audited consolidated financial statements appearing elsewhere in this Annual Report. We believe the following accounting policies related to research and development expense accruals and stock-based compensation involve the most significant estimation and judgment in accounting for our reported consolidated financial results.
Research and Development Expense Accruals
As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we are required to estimate our accrued expenses. This process involves reviewing open contracts and purchase orders, communicating with our personnel to identify services that have been performed on our behalf and estimating the level of service performed and the associated cost incurred for the service when we have not yet been invoiced or otherwise notified of the actual cost. The majority of our service providers invoice us monthly in arrears for services performed or when contractual milestones are met. We make estimates of our accrued expenses as of each balance sheet date in our consolidated financial statements based on facts and circumstances known to us at that time. We periodically confirm the accuracy of our estimates with the service providers and make adjustments if necessary. Examples of estimated accrued research and development expenses include fees paid to investigative sites and Clinical Research Organizations (CROs) in connection with clinical trials; service providers in connection with preclinical development activities; and service providers related to product manufacturing, development and distribution of clinical supplies
.
We currently rely on third parties for the clinical development of Resolaris and Stalaris and the manufacture of Resolaris and Stalaris to support our ongoing and future clinical trials. We pay these third parties, including consultants, CROs, manufacturers and other service providers, pursuant to contractual arrangements, which may include provisions for time and materials-based payments, project-based fees and milestone payments. We base our accrual for these expenses on our estimates of the services received and efforts expended pursuant to our contractual arrangements. The financial terms of these agreements are subject to negotiation, vary from contract to contract and may result in uneven payment flows. There may be instances in which payments made to our service providers will exceed the level of services provided and result in a prepayment of the clinical expense. Payments under some of these contracts depend on factors such as the successful enrollment of patients and the completion of clinical milestones. In accruing service fees, we estimate the time period over which services will be performed and the level of effort to be expended in each period. If the actual timing of the performance of services or the level of effort varies from our estimate, we adjust the accrual or prepaid accordingly.
Although we do not expect our estimates to be materially different from amounts actually incurred, if our estimates of the status and timing of services performed differs from the actual status and timing of services performed, we may report amounts that are too high or too low in any particular period. To date, there has been no material differences between our estimates and the amounts actually incurred.
Stock-Based Compensation
Stock-based compensation expense represents the grant date fair value of employee stock option grants recognized as expense over the requisite service period of the awards (usually the vesting period) on a straight-line basis, net of estimated forfeitures. For stock option grants with performance-based milestones, the expense is recorded over the service period after the achievement of the milestone is probable or the performance is achieved. For stock option grants with market-based conditions, the expense is recorded using the accelerated attribution method over the requisite service period for each vesting tranche. We account for stock options granted to non-employees using the fair value approach. These options are subject to periodic revaluation over their vesting terms. We estimate fair value of employee and non-employee stock option grants using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. We estimate the fair value of the market-based stock option grants using Monte Carlo simulations. We generally estimate the fair value using assumptions, including the risk-free interest rate, the expected volatility of a peer group of similar companies, the expected term of the awards and the expected dividend yield. These estimates involve inherent uncertainties and the application of management’s judgment. If factors change and different assumptions are used, our stock-based compensation expense could be materially different in the future.
70
Results of Operations
Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2016 and 2015
The following table summarizes our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015 (in thousands):
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Increase /
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
$
|
42,846
|
|
|
$
|
34,504
|
|
|
$
|
8,342
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
15,094
|
|
|
|
13,112
|
|
|
|
1,982
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
(357
|
)
|
|
|
393
|
|
Research and development expenses.
Research and development expenses were $42.8 million and $34.5 million for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The increase of $8.3 million was due primarily to a $3.2 million increase in clinical and non-clinical development costs for Resolaris, a $2.4 million increase in manufacturing development costs for Stalaris, a $2.0 million increase in other pre-clinical development costs, a $1.2 million increase related cGMP manufacturing of Resolaris to support future clinical trials and a $1.5 million increase related to compensation expenses resulting from increased headcount in research and development functions. The increase was offset by a decrease related to a one-time $1.4 million non-cash expense for the assignment of certain intellectual property rights in the prior year period and a $0.6 million reduction of non-cash stock-based compensation.
General and administrative expenses.
General and administrative expenses were $15.1 million and $13.1 million for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The increase of $2.0 million was due primarily to a $1.8 million increase in personnel costs resulting from increased headcount, including $0.8 million of non-cash stock-based compensation.
Other income (expense).
Other income (expense) was $36,000 and $(0.4) million for the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. The change was primarily a result of decreased interest expense from lower commercial debt balance during the current period as compared to the same period in the prior year.
Comparison of the Years Ended December 31, 2015 and 2014
The following table summarizes our results of operations for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014 (in thousands):
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
Increase /
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
(Decrease)
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development expenses
|
|
$
|
34,504
|
|
|
$
|
16,777
|
|
|
$
|
17,727
|
|
General and administrative expenses
|
|
|
13,112
|
|
|
|
6,777
|
|
|
|
6,335
|
|
Other income (expense)
|
|
|
(357
|
)
|
|
|
(796
|
)
|
|
|
439
|
|
Research and development expenses.
Research and development expenses were $34.5 million and $16.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The increase of $17.7 million was due primarily to a $11.4 million increase related to manufacturing costs and clinical development incurred in support of various activities for Resolaris, a $4.1 million increase related to compensation expenses (including $2.0 million of non-cash stock-based compensation) as a result of increased headcount across our research and development organization and a $1.4 million increase related to the issuance of common stock in connection with the amendment and restatement of our research funding and option agreement with the The Scripps Research Institute, or TSRI.
General and administrative expenses.
General and administrative expenses were $13.1 million and $6.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The increase of $6.3 million was due primarily to a $3.8 million increase in personnel costs resulting from increased headcount (including $1.1 million of non-cash stock-based compensation), a $1.7 million increase in costs associated with being a public company and a $0.3 million increase related to intellectual property-related projects.
Other income (expense).
Other income (expense) was $(0.4) million and $(0.8) million for the years ended December 31, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The decrease of $0.4 million in other expense was primarily a result of $0.3 million increase in interest income related to short-term and long-term investments and a $0.1 million decrease in interest expense related to the $5.0 million we borrowed in June 2014 under a loan agreement with Silicon Valley Bank, or SVB.
71
Liquidity and Capital Resources
We have incurred losses and negative cash flows from operations since our inception. As of December 31, 2016, we had an accumulated deficit of $216.0 million and we expect to continue to incur net losses for the foreseeable future. As of December 31, 2016, we had cash, cash equivalents and available-for-sale investments of $76.1 million. We believe that our existing cash and cash equivalents as of December 31, 2016 will be sufficient to meet our anticipated cash requirements for a period of one year from the filing date of this Annual Report.
Sources of Liquidity
From our inception through December 31, 2016, we have funded our operations primarily with aggregate proceeds from the sales of our common stock through our IPO, the private placement of redeemable convertible preferred stock and convertible promissory notes and commercial bank debts.
Debt Financing
In each of July 2013 and June 2014, we borrowed $5.0 million under a $10.0 million loan and security agreement with SVB, which we refer to as the SVB Loan. Beginning in July 2014, we began to make payments of principal and interest which were due through the maturity date of June 1, 2017. The interest rate was a per annum fixed rate of 5.0% and 5.88% for the $5.0 million drawn in each of July 2013 and June 2014, respectively. This loan was repaid in full in November 2016 upon entering into the Term Loan discussed below.
On November 18, 2016, we entered into a loan and security agreement with SVB and Solar, which we refer to as the Term Loan. SVB and Solar agreed to lend us up to $20.0 million, issuable in three separate tranches of: (i) $10.0 million which was funded on November 18, 2016; (ii) $5.0 million may be drawn down by us at any time before the earlier of June 30, 2017 or an event of default, at our discretion, subject to achievement of certain financial and clinical milestones; and (iii) $5.0 million may be drawn down by us any time after June 30, 2017 and before the earlier of December 31, 2017 or an event of default, at our discretion, subject to achievement of certain milestones specified for the second tranche and additional financial and clinical milestones.
We will make interest only payments through December 1, 2017 or June 1, 2018, if we draw the second tranche, followed by consecutive equal monthly payments of principal and interest in arrears through the maturity date of November 18, 2020. The Term Loan provides for an interest rate equal to the sum of the prime rate, as reported in The Wall Street Journal on the last date of the month preceding the month in which interest will accrue, plus 4.10%. The Term Loan also provides for a final interest payment equal to 8.75% of the funded amount, which is due when the Term Loan becomes due or upon the prepayment of the loan. We have the option to prepay the outstanding balance of the loan in full, subject to a prepayment fee ranging from 1.0% to 3.0% depending upon when the prepayment occurs, including any non-usage fees. The Term Loan provides for a 2.0% non-usage fee for any unfunded amount in the event we do not draw the second tranche and third tranche, payable no later than the expiration date for the second tranche or third tranche, as applicable, or the date of cancellation of the loan due to prepayment or an event of default.
In connection with the Term Loan, we issued warrants to each of SVB and Solar to purchase an aggregate of 47,771 shares of our common stock with an exercise price of $3.14 per share. The warrants are immediately exercisable and will expire on November 18, 2023, provided that such warrants have not been previously exercised or have expired in connection with certain fundamental transactions involving us.
Of the $10.0 million funded in the first tranche of the Term Loan, approximately $2.6 million was used to repay in full our principal and interest obligations under the SVB Loan. We did not pay any termination or other fees in connection with the repayment of amounts due under the SVB Loan.
Cash Flows
The following table sets forth a summary of the net cash flow activity for each of the periods indicated (in thousands):
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating activities
|
|
$
|
(52,861
|
)
|
|
$
|
(36,797
|
)
|
|
$
|
(22,824
|
)
|
Investing activities
|
|
|
33,527
|
|
|
|
(71,994
|
)
|
|
|
(2,246
|
)
|
Financing activities
|
|
|
4,697
|
|
|
|
147,917
|
|
|
|
2,512
|
|
Net increase (decrease) in cash
|
|
$
|
(14,637
|
)
|
|
$
|
39,126
|
|
|
$
|
(22,558
|
)
|
72
Operating activities.
Net cash used in operating activities was $52.9
million, $36.8 million and $22.8 million for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. The net cash used in operating activities in each of these periods was primarily due to our net losses. The primary differences between net cash u
sed in operating activities and our net loss in the year ended December 31, 2016 related to non-cash charges including $0.9 million for depreciation and $5.0 million for stock-based compensation and $1.4 million of cash used by changes in our prepaid and o
ther assets, accounts payable and accrued expense accounts. The primary differences between net cash used in operating activities and our net loss in the year ended December 31, 2015 related to non-cash charges including: $0.9 million for depreciation, $4.
9 million for stock-based compensation, $1.4 million for the issuance of common stock for technology to TSRI and $3.3 million of cash provided by changes in our prepaid and other assets, accounts payable and accrued expense accounts. The primary difference
s between net cash used in operating activities and our net loss in the year ended December 31, 2014 related to non-cash charges including: $0.8 million for depreciation and amortization, $1.8 million for stock-based compensation offset by $1.3 million of
cash used by changes in our prepaid and other assets, accounts payable and accrued expense accounts.
Investing activities.
Net cash provided by investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2016 consisted of $34.1 million of net maturities of investment securities and $0.6 million of property and equipment purchases. Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2015 consisted of $71.3 million of net purchases of investment securities and $0.7 million of property and equipment purchases. Net cash used in investing activities for the year ended December 31, 2014 consisted of $2.0 million of net purchases of investments and $0.2 million of property and equipment purchases.
Financing activities.
Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2016 was $4.7 million and consisted primarily of $9.7 million of net proceeds from the Term Loan offset by $5.2 million of principal payments. Net cash provided by financing activities for the year ended December 31, 2015 was $147.9 million and consisted primarily of $75.6 million of net proceeds from the issuance of Series E redeemable convertible preferred stock and $76.9 million of proceeds from the IPO net of offering costs paid in the period, offset by $3.2 million of principal payments on the SVB Loan and $2.0 million repayment of convertible debt and related accrued interest. Net cash provided by financing activities during the year ended December 31, 2014 was $2.5 million and consisted primarily of $5.0 million of proceeds from the SVB Loan offset by $1.6 million of principal payments on the SVB Loan and $1.0 million of costs paid in connection with our planned initial public offering.
Funding Requirements
To date, we have not generated any revenues from product sales. We expect our expenses to increase in connection with our ongoing activities, particularly as we continue to advance Resolaris in clinical development, continue our research and development activities with respect to potential Physiocrine-based therapeutics, and seek marketing approval for Resolaris and other product candidates that we may develop. In addition, if we obtain marketing approval for any of our product candidates, we expect to incur significant commercialization expenses related to product sales, marketing, manufacturing and distribution. We currently have no sales or marketing capabilities and would need to expand our organization to support these activities. Furthermore, we expect to incur additional costs associated with operating as a public company. Accordingly, we will need to obtain substantial additional funding in connection with our continuing operations. Our forecast of the period of time through which our financial resources will be adequate to support our operations is a forward-looking statement that involves risks and uncertainties, and actual results could vary materially.
Our future capital requirements are difficult to forecast and will depend on many factors, including:
|
•
|
our ability to initiate, and the progress and results of, our planned clinical trials of Resolaris;
|
|
•
|
the scope, progress, results and costs of preclinical development, and clinical trials for our other product candidates;
|
|
•
|
the costs, timing and outcome of regulatory review of our product candidates;
|
|
•
|
the costs and timing of preparing, filing and prosecuting patent applications, maintaining and enforcing our intellectual property rights and defending any intellectual property-related claims;
|
|
•
|
the costs and timing of future commercialization activities, including product manufacturing, marketing, sales and distribution, for any of our product candidates for which we receive marketing approval; and
|
|
•
|
the extent to which we acquire or in-license other products and technologies.
|
73
Until such time, if ever, as we can gene
rate substantial product revenues, we expect to finance our cash needs through a combination of equity offerings, debt financings, collaborations, strategic partnerships and/or licensing arrangements. To the extent we raise additional capital through the s
ale of equity or convertible debt securities, the ownership interest of our stockholders will be diluted, and the terms of these securities may include liquidation or other preferences that adversely affect the rights of our common stockholders. Debt finan
cing, if available, may involve agreements that include covenants limiting or restricting our ability to take specific actions, such as incurring additional debt, making capital expenditures or declaring dividends. If we raise additional funds through coll
aborations, strategic partnerships or licensing arrangements with third parties, we may have to relinquish valuable rights to our product candidates, our other technologies, future revenue streams or research programs or grant licenses on terms that may no
t be favorable to us. If we are unable to raise additional funds through equity or debt financings when needed, we may be required to delay, limit, reduce or terminate our product development or future commercialization efforts or grant rights to develop a
nd market our product candidates even if we would otherwise prefer to develop and market such product candidates ourselves.
Contractual Obligations and Commitments
The following table summarizes our contractual obligations as of December 31, 2016:
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payments Due by Period
|
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Less than 1 Year
|
|
|
1-3 Years
|
|
|
3-5 Years
|
|
|
More than 5 Years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(in thousands)
|
|
Term Loan, principal payments including final payment
|
|
$
|
10,875
|
|
|
$
|
249
|
|
|
$
|
6,448
|
|
|
$
|
4,178
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Operating lease
(1)
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
|
386
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total
|
|
$
|
11,261
|
|
|
$
|
635
|
|
|
$
|
6,448
|
|
|
$
|
4,178
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
(1)
|
Our operating lease obligations relate to our corporate headquarters in San Diego, California. We lease 17,083 square feet of office and laboratory space under an operating lease that expires in May 2017 and 7,411 square feet we subleased from a tenant of our landlord that expires in June 2017. In January 2017, we extended our primary facility lease with our landlord through May 2019 for an additional commitment of $1.5 million.
|
We enter into contracts in the normal course of business with clinical trial sites and clinical supply manufacturing organizations and with vendors for preclinical safety and research studies, research supplies and other services and products purposes. These contracts generally provide for termination after a notice period, and therefore are cancelable contracts and not included in the table of contractual obligations and commitments.
We may have payment obligations under our agreements with TSRI certain of which are contingent upon future events such as our achievement of specified development, regulatory and commercial milestones, and we are required to make development milestone payments and royalty payments in connection with the sale of products developed under these agreements. As of December 31, 2016, we were unable to estimate the timing or likelihood of achieving the milestones or making future product sales and, therefore, any related payments are not included in the table above.
We are party to an amended and restated research funding and option agreement with TSRI, under which we provide funding to TSRI to conduct certain research activities related to aminoacyl tRNA synthetases. Under the research funding and option agreement, TSRI has granted us options to enter into license agreements to acquire rights and exclusive licenses to develop, make, have made, use, have used, import, have imported, offer to sell, sell and have sold certain licensed products, processes and services based on certain technology arising from the sponsored research activities. Pursuant to the terms of these license agreements, TSRI is entitled to receive tiered royalties as a percentage of net sales, ranging from the low to mid-single digits, with these royalty rates subject to adjustment under certain circumstances. Additionally, we have agreed to pay TSRI a percentage of non-royalty revenue we receive from our sublicensees or partners, with the amount owed decreasing if we enter into the applicable sublicense agreement or partnering agreement after meeting a specified clinical milestone. We are obligated to make payments to TSRI of up to an aggregate of $2.75 million under each license agreement upon the achievement of specific clinical and regulatory milestone events.
We have payment obligations under our agreement with FUJIFILM Diosynth Biotechnologies, U.S.A., Inc. (Fujifilm) related to development and production milestones of up to the mid seven figures for process optimization, scale-up and demonstration, and cGMP manufacturing of the drug substance of Resolaris.
In addition, we are billed for consumables on a pass-through basis. In the next 12 months, we are committed to pay Fujifilm approximately $0.6 million based on development and production milestones.
74
In addition, we have payment obligations under our agreement with a third party contracted development and manufacturing organization of up to low seven figures related to the developmen
t of the manufacturing process and for the production of drug substance for Stalaris. In the next 12 months, we are committed to pay the third party contract manufacturing organization approximately $2.2 million based on development and production mileston
es.
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
For discussion of recently issued accounting pronouncements, refer to the Section titled “Recently Accounting Pronouncements” within Note 2 of our financial statements included in this Annual Report.
Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements
We did not have during the periods presented, and we do not currently have, any off-balance sheet arrangements, as defined in the rules and regulations of the SEC.
JOBS Act
In April 2012, the JOBS Act was enacted. Section 107 of the JOBS Act provides that an emerging growth company can take advantage of the extended transition period provided in Section 7(a)(2)(B) of the Securities Act for complying with new or revised accounting standards. Thus, an emerging growth company can delay the adoption of certain accounting standards until those standards would otherwise apply to private companies. We have irrevocably elected not to avail ourselves of this extended transition period and, as a result, we will adopt new or revised accounting standards on the relevant dates on which adoption of such standards is required for other companies.
Item 7A. Quantitative and Qualitative Disclosures About Market Risk
Interest Rate Risk
We are exposed to market risk related to changes in interest rates. As of December 31, 2016, we had cash and cash equivalents, and available-for-sale investments totaling of $76.1 million. We invest our excess cash in investment-grade, interest-bearing securities. The primary objective of our investment activities is to preserve principal and liquidity. To achieve this objective, we invest in money market funds, U.S. treasury and high quality marketable debt instruments of corporations and financial institutions, government sponsored and asset backed securities with contractual maturity dates of less than two years. If interest rates were to increase instantaneously and uniformly by 100 basis points, compared to interest rates as of December 31, 2016, the increase would not have had a material effect on the fair market value of our portfolio.
We do not believe that our cash, cash equivalents and investments have significant risk of default or illiquidity. While we believe our cash and cash equivalents do not contain excessive risk, we cannot provide absolute assurance that in the future our investments will not be subject to adverse changes in market value. In addition, we maintain significant amounts of cash and cash equivalents at one or more financial institutions that are in excess of federally insured limits.
Our Term Loan bears interest at variable rates equal to the sum of the prime rate, as reported in the Wall Street Journal on the last date of the month preceding the month in which interest will accrue, plus 4.10%. Accordingly, increases in these published rates would increase our interest payments under the Term Loan. A one percentage point increase in interest rates would increase expense by approximately $0.1 million annually and would not materially affect our results of operations.
Foreign Currency Exchange Risk
We incur expenses, including for CROs and clinical trial sites, outside the United States based on contractual obligations denominated in currencies other than the U.S. dollar, including Pounds Sterling and Euro. At the end of each reporting period, these liabilities are converted to U.S. dollars at the then-applicable foreign exchange rate. As a result, our business is affected by fluctuations in exchange rates between the U.S. dollar and foreign currencies. We do not enter into foreign currency hedging transactions to mitigate our exposure to foreign currency exchange risks. Exchange rate fluctuations may adversely affect our expenses, results of operations, financial position and cash flows. Recently, the Pounds Sterling has experienced higher volatility as a result of the British political decision to leave the European Union (Brexit). However, to date, fluctuations including those related to Brexit have not had a significant impact to us and a movement of 10% in the U.S. dollar to Pounds Sterling or U.S. dollar to Euro exchange rates would not have a material effect on our results of operations or financial condition.
Effects of Inflation
Inflation generally affects us by increasing our cost of labor, manufacturing, clinical trial, and other research and development and administration costs. We do not believe that inflation has had a material effect on our results of operations or financial condition during the periods presented.
75
Item 8. Financial Stateme
nts and Supplementary Data
Report of Independent Registered Public Accounting Firm
The Board of Directors and Stockholders of
aTyr Pharma, Inc.
We have audited the accompanying consolidated balance sheets of aTyr Pharma, Inc. as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the related consolidated statements of operations, comprehensive loss, stockholders’ equity (deficit) and cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company’s management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.
We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. We were not engaged to perform an audit of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, and evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.
In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the consolidated financial position of aTyr Pharma, Inc. at December 31, 2016 and 2015, and the consolidated results of its operations and its cash flows for each of the three years in the period ended December 31, 2016, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.
/s/ Ernst & Young LLP
San Diego, California
March 16, 2017
76
aTyr Pharma, Inc.
Consolidated Balance Sheets
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
38,388
|
|
|
$
|
53,025
|
|
Available-for sale investments, short-term
|
|
|
33,759
|
|
|
|
42,510
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
2,621
|
|
|
|
2,415
|
|
Total current assets
|
|
|
74,768
|
|
|
|
97,950
|
|
Available-for sale investments, long-term
|
|
|
4,002
|
|
|
|
29,814
|
|
Property and equipment, net
|
|
|
1,421
|
|
|
|
1,793
|
|
Other assets
|
|
|
333
|
|
|
|
118
|
|
Total assets
|
|
$
|
80,524
|
|
|
$
|
129,675
|
|
Liabilities and Stockholders’ Equity
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current liabilities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Accounts payable
|
|
$
|
2,606
|
|
|
$
|
3,872
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
|
|
5,450
|
|
|
|
4,595
|
|
Current portion of deferred rent
|
|
|
130
|
|
|
|
315
|
|
Current portion of long-term debt
|
|
|
339
|
|
|
|
3,366
|
|
Total current liabilities
|
|
|
8,525
|
|
|
|
12,148
|
|
Deferred rent, net of current portion
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
130
|
|
Long-term debt, net of current portion and issuance costs
|
|
|
9,198
|
|
|
|
1,776
|
|
Other long-term liabilities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
571
|
|
Commitments and contingencies (Note 5)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stockholders’ equity:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common stock, $0.001 par value; authorized shares – 150,000,000 and 95,500,000
at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively; issued and outstanding shares –
23,744,832 and 23,670,079 at December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
Additional paid-in capital
|
|
|
278,832
|
|
|
|
273,321
|
|
Accumulated other comprehensive loss
|
|
|
(76
|
)
|
|
|
(171
|
)
|
Accumulated deficit
|
|
|
(215,979
|
)
|
|
|
(158,124
|
)
|
Total stockholders’ equity
|
|
|
62,801
|
|
|
|
115,050
|
|
Total liabilities and stockholders’ equity
|
|
$
|
80,524
|
|
|
$
|
129,675
|
|
See accompanying notes.
77
aTyr Pharma, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Operations
(in thousands, except share and per share data)
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Research and development
|
|
$
|
42,846
|
|
|
$
|
34,504
|
|
|
$
|
16,777
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
15,094
|
|
|
|
13,112
|
|
|
|
6,777
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
57,940
|
|
|
|
47,616
|
|
|
|
23,554
|
|
Loss from operations
|
|
|
(57,940
|
)
|
|
|
(47,616
|
)
|
|
|
(23,554
|
)
|
Interest income (expense), net
|
|
|
65
|
|
|
|
(386
|
)
|
|
|
(832
|
)
|
Loss on extinguishment of debt
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Change in fair value of warrant liabilities
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
36
|
|
Total other income (expense)
|
|
|
36
|
|
|
|
(357
|
)
|
|
|
(796
|
)
|
Loss before income taxes
|
|
|
(57,904
|
)
|
|
|
(47,973
|
)
|
|
|
(24,350
|
)
|
Income tax benefit
|
|
|
49
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(57,855
|
)
|
|
|
(47,973
|
)
|
|
|
(24,350
|
)
|
Accretion to redemption value of redeemable convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(416
|
)
|
Net loss attributable to common stockholders
|
|
|
(57,855
|
)
|
|
|
(47,988
|
)
|
|
|
(24,766
|
)
|
Net loss per share attributable to common stockholders, basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(2.44
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
(29.69
|
)
|
Weighted average common stock shares outstanding, basic and diluted
|
|
|
23,681,019
|
|
|
|
15,838,353
|
|
|
|
834,221
|
|
See accompanying notes.
78
aTyr Pharma, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Comprehensive Loss
(in thousands)
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(57,855
|
)
|
|
$
|
(47,973
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24,350
|
)
|
Other comprehensive gain (loss):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Change in unrealized gain (loss) on available for sale investments, net of tax
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
(171
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
Comprehensive loss
|
|
$
|
(57,760
|
)
|
|
$
|
(48,144
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24,350
|
)
|
See accompanying notes.
79
aTyr Pharma, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Stockholders’ Equity (Deficit)
(in thousands, except share data)
|
|
Redeemable Convertible
Preferred Stock
|
|
|
Common Stock
|
|
|
Additional
Paid-In
|
|
|
Stockholder
Note
|
|
|
Non-
Controlling
|
|
|
Other
Comprehensive
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Total
Stockholders’
Equity
|
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Shares
|
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Capital
|
|
|
Receivable
|
|
|
Interest
|
|
|
Loss
|
|
|
Deficit
|
|
|
(Deficit)
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2013
|
|
|
73,487,415
|
|
|
$
|
93,165
|
|
|
|
856,591
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
17,373
|
|
|
$
|
(69
|
)
|
|
$
|
2,414
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(85,801
|
)
|
|
$
|
(66,082
|
)
|
Exercise of common stock options
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
53,289
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
Changes in share repurchase liability
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
13
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,791
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,791
|
|
Dissolution of affiliates
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,038
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
405
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(2,443
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(2,038
|
)
|
Accretion to redemption value of redeemable convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
416
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(416
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(416
|
)
|
Net loss
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(24,350
|
)
|
|
|
(24,350
|
)
|
Balance as of December 31, 2014
|
|
|
73,487,415
|
|
|
|
95,619
|
|
|
|
909,880
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
19,209
|
|
|
|
(69
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(110,151
|
)
|
|
|
(91,010
|
)
|
Issuance of Series E redeemable convertible preferred stock for cash
|
|
|
68,166,894
|
|
|
|
75,650
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Conversion of redeemable convertible preferred stock in connection with initial public offering
|
|
|
(141,654,309
|
)
|
|
|
(171,284
|
)
|
|
|
16,279,859
|
|
|
|
16
|
|
|
|
171,268
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
171,284
|
|
Issuance of common stock through initial public offering, net
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
6,164,000
|
|
|
|
6
|
|
|
|
75,897
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
75,903
|
|
Repayment of stockholder note receivable
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(9
|
)
|
|
|
69
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
60
|
|
Exercise of common stock options
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
196,500
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
534
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
535
|
|
Reclassification of preferred stock warrant liability to additional paid-in-capital
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
290
|
|
Issuance of common stock to The Scripps Research Institute
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
119,840
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,411
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,411
|
|
Changes in share repurchase liability
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(120
|
)
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4,856
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4,856
|
|
Accretion to redemption value of redeemable convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
15
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
Net unrealized loss on investments
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(171
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(171
|
)
|
Net loss
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(47,973
|
)
|
|
|
(47,973
|
)
|
Balance as of December 31, 2015
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
23,670,079
|
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
273,321
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(171
|
)
|
|
|
(158,124
|
)
|
|
|
115,050
|
|
Exercise of common stock options
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
17,972
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
20
|
|
Issuance of common stock pursuant to employee stock purchase plan
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
56,781
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
143
|
|
Issuance of warrants related to term loan
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
217
|
|
Changes in share repurchase liability
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
102
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
5,029
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
5,029
|
|
Net unrealized gain on investments, net of tax
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
95
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(57,855
|
)
|
|
|
(57,855
|
)
|
Balance as of December 31, 2016
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
23,744,832
|
|
|
$
|
24
|
|
|
$
|
278,832
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(76
|
)
|
|
$
|
(215,979
|
)
|
|
$
|
62,801
|
|
See accompanying notes.
80
aTyr Pharma, Inc.
Consolidated Statements of Cash Flows
(in thousands)
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss
|
|
$
|
(57,855
|
)
|
|
$
|
(47,973
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24,350
|
)
|
Adjustments to reconcile net loss to net cash used in operating activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
900
|
|
|
|
869
|
|
|
|
829
|
|
Issuance of common stock for technology
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
1,411
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Stock-based compensation
|
|
|
5,029
|
|
|
|
4,856
|
|
|
|
1,791
|
|
Amortization of debt discount
|
|
|
173
|
|
|
|
297
|
|
|
|
426
|
|
Loss on debt extinguishment
|
|
|
29
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Change in fair value of preferred stock warrant liability
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(29
|
)
|
|
|
(36
|
)
|
Amortization of premium of available-for-sale investment securities
|
|
|
531
|
|
|
|
789
|
|
|
|
43
|
|
Deferred rent
|
|
|
(315
|
)
|
|
|
(295
|
)
|
|
|
(277
|
)
|
Changes in operating assets and liabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prepaid expenses and other assets
|
|
|
(421
|
)
|
|
|
(666
|
)
|
|
|
(1,043
|
)
|
Accounts payable and accrued expenses
|
|
|
(932
|
)
|
|
|
3,944
|
|
|
|
(207
|
)
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
|
(52,861
|
)
|
|
|
(36,797
|
)
|
|
|
(22,824
|
)
|
Cash flows from investing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Purchase of property and equipment
|
|
|
(600
|
)
|
|
|
(664
|
)
|
|
|
(249
|
)
|
Purchases of available-for-sale investment securities
|
|
|
(28,089
|
)
|
|
|
(109,445
|
)
|
|
|
(5,397
|
)
|
Maturities of available-for-sale investment securities
|
|
|
62,216
|
|
|
|
38,115
|
|
|
|
3,400
|
|
Net cash provided by (used in) investing activities
|
|
|
33,527
|
|
|
|
(71,994
|
)
|
|
|
(2,246
|
)
|
Cash flows from financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of preferred stock for cash, net of issuance costs
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
75,648
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Issuance of common stock through initial public offering, net of offering costs
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
76,902
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Costs paid in connection with initial public offering
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(999
|
)
|
Proceeds from issuance of common stock through option exercises
|
|
|
20
|
|
|
|
604
|
|
|
|
72
|
|
Proceeds from employee stock purchase plan
|
|
|
143
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Proceeds from borrowing, net
|
|
|
9,736
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
5,000
|
|
Repayments on notes payable to bank
|
|
|
(5,202
|
)
|
|
|
(3,237
|
)
|
|
|
(1,561
|
)
|
Repayment of convertible debt
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(2,000
|
)
|
|
|
—
|
|
Net cash provided by financing activities
|
|
|
4,697
|
|
|
|
147,917
|
|
|
|
2,512
|
|
Net change in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
|
(14,637
|
)
|
|
|
39,126
|
|
|
|
(22,558
|
)
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of year
|
|
|
53,025
|
|
|
|
13,899
|
|
|
|
36,457
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at the end of year
|
|
$
|
38,388
|
|
|
$
|
53,025
|
|
|
$
|
13,899
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental disclosure of cash flow information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest paid
|
|
$
|
225
|
|
|
$
|
925
|
|
|
$
|
415
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Supplemental schedule of noncash investing and financing activities:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issuance of warrants in connection with borrowings
|
|
$
|
217
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
148
|
|
Changes in share repurchase liability
|
|
$
|
102
|
|
|
$
|
(120
|
)
|
|
$
|
13
|
|
See accompanying notes.
81
aTyr Pharma, Inc.
Notes to Consolidated Financial Statements
1. Organization, Business and Basis of Presentation
Organization and Business
We were incorporated in the state of Delaware on September 8, 2005. We are focused on the discovery and clinical development of innovative medicines for patients suffering from severe, rare diseases.
Principles of Consolidation
Our consolidated financial statements include our accounts, our 98% majority-owned subsidiary in Hong Kong, Pangu BioPharma Limited (Pangu BioPharma). All intercompany transactions and balances are eliminated in consolidation.
Use of Estimates
Our consolidated financial statements are prepared in accordance with generally accepted accounting principles (GAAP). The preparation of our consolidated financial statements requires us to make estimates and assumptions that impact the reported amounts of assets, liabilities and expenses and the disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities in our consolidated financial statements and accompanying notes. The most significant estimates in our consolidated financial statements relate to the fair value of equity issuances and awards, and clinical trial and research and development expenses. Although these estimates are based on our knowledge of current events and actions we may undertake in the future, actual results may ultimately differ materially from these estimates and assumptions.
Segment Reporting
Operating segments are identified as components of an enterprise about which separate discrete financial information is available for evaluation by the chief operating decision-maker in making decisions regarding resource allocation and assessing performance. We view our operations and manage our business in one operating segment.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting Policies
Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents consist primarily of readily available checking, money market accounts and money market funds. We consider all highly liquid investments that mature in three months or less when purchased to be cash equivalents.
Investment Securities
Investment securities primarily consist of investment grade corporate debt securities, asset-backed securities, commercial paper and United States Treasury securities. We classify all investment securities as available-for-sale. Investment securities are carried at fair value, with the unrealized gains and losses, if any, reported as a component of other comprehensive income (loss) in stockholders’ equity (deficit) until realized. Realized gains and losses from the sale of investment securities, if any, are determined on a specific identification basis. A decline in the market value of any investment security below cost that is determined to be other than temporary will result in an impairment charge to earnings and a new cost basis for the security is established. No such impairment charges were recorded for any period presented. Premiums and discounts are amortized or accreted over the life of the related security as an adjustment to yield using the straight-line method and are included in interest income. Interest income is recognized when earned. As of December 31, 2016, we held an aggregate total of $37.8 million of investment securities which consisted of corporate debt securities, asset-backed securities, commercial paper and United States Treasury securities, all of which will mature in less than one year and there was a $27,000 difference between the amortized cost and fair value of these investment securities. As of December 31, 2015, we held $72.3 million of corporate debt securities, all of which mature in less than two years, and there was $0.2 million difference between the amortized cost and fair value of these investment securities.
Concentration of Credit Risk
Financial instruments that potentially subject us to significant concentration of credit risk consist primarily of cash, cash equivalents and investment securities. We have established guidelines regarding diversification of investments and their maturities, which are designed to maintain principal and maximize liquidity. We maintain deposits in federally insured financial institutions in excess of federally insured limits. We have not experienced any losses in such accounts and we believe that we are not exposed to significant credit risk due to the financial position of the depository institutions in which those deposits are held.
82
Property and Equipment
Property and equipment are stated at cost and depreciated on a straight-line basis over the estimated useful life of the related assets (generally three to seven years). Leasehold improvements are stated at cost and amortized on a straight-line basis over the lesser of the remaining term of the related lease or the estimated useful life of the leasehold improvements. Repairs and maintenance costs are charged to expense as incurred
.
Impairment of Long-Lived Assets
Long-lived assets consist primarily of property and equipment. An impairment loss is recorded if and when events and circumstances indicate that assets might be impaired and the undiscounted cash flows estimated to be generated by those assets are less than the carrying amount of those assets. While our current and historical operating losses are indicators of impairment, we believe that future cash flows to be received support the carrying value of our long-lived assets and, accordingly, have not recognized any impairment losses since inception.
Accrued Expenses
As part of the process of preparing our consolidated financial statements, we are required to estimate accrued expenses, including accrued research and development expenses for fees paid to investigative sites and CROs in connection with clinical trials; service providers in connection with preclinical development activities; service providers related to product manufacturing; and other professional services. The accrual process involves reviewing open contracts and purchase orders, communicating with our personnel to identify services that have been performed on our behalf and estimating the level of service performed and the associated cost incurred for the service when we have not yet been invoiced or otherwise notified of the actual cost. We make estimates of accrued expenses as of each balance sheet date in our consolidated financial statements based on facts and circumstances known to us at that time. Although we do not expect the estimates to be materially different from amounts actually incurred, if the estimates of the status and timing of services performed differs from the actual status and timing of services performed, we may report amounts that are too high or too low in any particular period.
Deferred Rent
Rent expense, including the value of tenant improvement allowances received, is recorded on a straight-line basis over the term of the lease. The difference between rent expense and amounts paid under the lease agreements is recorded as deferred rent in the accompanying consolidated balance sheets.
Research and Development Costs
Research and development costs are expensed as incurred. Research and development costs include: salaries and employee-related expenses, including stock-based compensation and benefits for personnel in research and product development functions; costs associated with conducting our preclinical, development and regulatory activities, including fees paid to third-party professional consultants, service providers and our scientific, therapeutic and clinical advisory boards; costs to acquire, develop and manufacture preclinical study and clinical trial materials; costs incurred under clinical trial agreements with clinical research organizations and investigative sites; costs for laboratory supplies; payments related to licensed products and technologies; allocated facilities and information technology costs; and depreciation.
Patent Costs
Costs related to filing and pursuing patent applications are recorded as general and administrative expense and expensed as incurred since recoverability of such expenditures is uncertain.
Stock-Based Compensation
Stock-based compensation expense represents the cost of the grant date fair value of employee stock option and restricted stock unit grants recognized over the requisite service period of the awards (usually the vesting period) on a straight-line basis and the cost of the fair value of restricted stock units recognized over the requisite period. We recognize forfeitures as they occur as a reduction of expense. For stock option grants with performance-based milestones, the expense is recorded over the service period after the achievement of the milestone is probable or the performance condition is achieved. For stock option grants with market-based conditions, the expense is recorded using the accelerated attribution method over the requisite service period for each vesting tranche. We account for stock options granted to non-employees using the fair value approach. These option grants are subject to periodic revaluation over their vesting terms. We estimate the fair value of employee and non-employee stock option grants using the Black-Scholes option pricing model. We estimate the fair value of the market-based stock option grants using a Monte Carlo simulation. The fair value of restricted stock units is determined by the closing price as of the grant date.
83
I
ncome Taxes
We account for income taxes under the asset and liability method, which requires the recognition of deferred tax assets and liabilities for the expected future tax consequences of events that have been included in the financial statements. Under this method, deferred tax assets and liabilities are determined on the basis of the differences between the financial statements and tax basis of assets and liabilities using enacted tax rates in effect for the year in which the differences are expected to reverse. The effect of a change in tax rates on deferred tax assets and liabilities is recognized as income in the period that includes the enactment date.
We recognize net deferred tax assets to the extent that we believe these assets are more likely than not to be realized. In making such a determination, we consider all available positive and negative evidence, including future reversals of existing taxable temporary differences, projected future taxable income, tax-planning strategies and results of recent operations. If we determine that we would be able to realize the deferred tax assets in the future in excess of their net recorded amount, we would make an adjustment to the deferred tax asset valuation allowance, which would reduce the provision for income taxes.
We record uncertain tax positions on the basis of a two-step process whereby (1) we determine whether it is more likely than not that the tax positions will be sustained on the basis of the technical merits of the position and (2) for those tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold, we recognize the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50% likely to be realized upon ultimate settlement with the related tax authority. We recognize interest and penalties related to unrecognized tax benefits within income tax expense. Any accrued interest and penalties are included within the related tax liability.
In November 2015, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2015-17,
Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes
, which requires all deferred tax assets and liabilities to be classified as noncurrent on the balance sheet. The new accounting guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of interim or annual reporting periods.
We elected to early adopt this guidance prospectively beginning in the year ended December 31, 2015 and prior periods were not retrospectively adjusted. There was no material impact on the financial statements upon adoption.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09,
Compensation-Stock Compensation (Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting
, which involves several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 will be effective for the annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within those annual periods, with early adoption permitted. We elected to early adopt this guidance beginning in the year ended December 31, 2016. Upon adoption, the balance of the unrecognized excess tax benefits will be reversed with the impact recorded to retained earnings net of any change to the valuation allowance as a result of the adoption. Due to the full valuation allowance on the U.S. deferred tax assets, there was no material impact in our consolidated financial position or results of operations upon adoption.
Net Loss Per Share
Basic net loss per share is calculated by dividing the net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the period, without consideration for common stock equivalents and adjusted for the weighted average number of common shares outstanding that are subject to repurchase. We have excluded 25,984, 61,814 and 61,457 shares subject to repurchase from the weighted average number of common shares outstanding for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, respectively. Diluted net loss per share attributable to common stockholders is calculated by dividing the net loss attributable to common stockholders by the weighted average number of common stock equivalents outstanding for the period determined using the treasury-stock method. Dilutive common stock equivalents are comprised of redeemable convertible preferred stock, redeemable convertible preferred stock issuable upon conversion of convertible promissory note, warrants for the purchase of redeemable convertible preferred stock, warrants for common stock and options outstanding under our stock option plan. For all periods presented, there is no difference in the number of shares used to calculate basic and diluted shares outstanding due to our net loss position.
84
Potentially dilutive securities not included in the calculation of diluted net loss per share because to do so would be anti
-dilutive are as follows (in common share equivalents):
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Redeemable convertible preferred stock outstanding
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
9,238,868
|
|
Redeemable convertible preferred stock issuable upon
conversion of convertible promissory note
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
94,455
|
|
Warrants for redeemable convertible preferred stock
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
25,970
|
|
Warrants for common stock
|
|
|
121,512
|
|
|
|
25,970
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Common stock options and awards
|
|
|
4,091,701
|
|
|
|
2,625,280
|
|
|
|
1,514,471
|
|
Employee stock purchase plan
|
|
|
36,836
|
|
|
|
17,363
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
|
4,250,049
|
|
|
|
2,668,613
|
|
|
|
10,873,764
|
|
The following table summarizes our net loss per share (in thousands, except per share data):
|
|
Year Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Numerator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Consolidated net loss
|
|
$
|
(57,855
|
)
|
|
$
|
(47,973
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24,350
|
)
|
Accretion to redemption value
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(15
|
)
|
|
|
(416
|
)
|
Net loss attributable to common stockholders
|
|
|
(57,855
|
)
|
|
|
(47,988
|
)
|
|
|
(24,766
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Denominator:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding
|
|
|
23,707,003
|
|
|
|
15,900,167
|
|
|
|
895,678
|
|
Weighted average common shares subject to repurchase
|
|
|
(25,984
|
)
|
|
|
(61,814
|
)
|
|
|
(61,457
|
)
|
Weighted average common shares outstanding - basic and diluted
|
|
|
23,681,019
|
|
|
|
15,838,353
|
|
|
|
834,221
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net loss per share - basic and diluted
|
|
$
|
(2.44
|
)
|
|
$
|
(3.03
|
)
|
|
$
|
(29.69
|
)
|
Recent Accounting Pronouncements
In August 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (FASB) issued Accounting Standards Update (ASU) No. 2014-15,
Presentation of Financial Statements — Going Concern (Subtopic 205-40): Disclosure of Uncertainties about an Entity’s Ability to Continue as a Going Concern
. ASU 2014-15 provides that in connection with preparing financial statements for each annual and interim reporting period, an entity’s management should evaluate whether there are conditions or events, considered in the aggregate, that raise substantial doubt about the entity’s ability to continue as a going concern within one year after the date that the financial statements are issued (or within one year after the date that the financial statements are available to be issued when applicable). ASU 2014-15 is effective for the annual reporting period ending after December 15, 2016, and for annual and interim periods thereafter. Early adoption is permitted. The adoption of this guidance did not affect our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
In April 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-03,
Interest - Imputation of Interest (Subtopic 835-30): Simplifying the Presentation of Debt Issuance Costs
. ASU 2015-03 requires that debt issuance costs related to a recognized debt liability be presented in the balance sheet as a direct deduction from that debt liability, consistent with the presentation of a debt discount. The recognition and measurement guidance for debt issuance costs is not affected by ASU 2015-03. ASU 2015-03 is effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2015, and interim periods within those fiscal years. We adopted ASU 2015-03 in January 2016 and the guidance did not affect our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-01,
Financial Instruments-Overall: Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Financial Liabilities
, which requires that (i) all equity investments, other than equity-method investments, in unconsolidated entities generally be measured at fair value through earnings and (ii) when the fair value option has been elected for financial liabilities, changes in fair value due to instrument-specific credit risk will be recognized separately in other comprehensive income. Additionally, ASU 2016-01 changes the disclosure requirements for financial instruments. The new standard will be effective for fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018, and interim periods within fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2019. Early adoption is permitted for certain provisions. The adoption of ASU 2015-03 is not expected to have a material impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
85
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU
No. 2016-02,
Leases (Topic 842)
, to increase transparency and comparability among organizations by requiring recognition of lease assets and lease liabilities on the balance sheet and disclosure of key information about leasing arrangements. The new standa
rd will become effective for interim and annual periods beginning after December 15, 2018, with early adoption permitted, and is required to be adopted at the earliest period presented using a modified retrospective approach. We are currently evaluating th
e impact the provisions will have on our consolidated financial position or results of operations and whether we will adopt the guidance early.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09,
Compensation-Stock Compensation(Topic 718): Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting
, which involves several aspects of the accounting for share-based payment transactions, including income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. ASU 2016-09 will be effective for the annual periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and interim periods within those annual periods, with early adoption permitted. We elected to early adopt this guidance prospectively beginning in the year ended December 31, 2016. There was no material impact on the financial position or results of operations upon adoption.
In June 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-13,
Financial Instruments-Credit Losses
(Topic 326): Measurement of Credit Losses on Financial Instruments
, which provides financial statement users with more decision-useful information about the expected credit losses on financial instruments and other commitments to extend credit held by a reporting entity at each reporting date.
To achieve this objective, the amendments in this Update replace the incurred loss impairment methodology in current GAAP with a methodology that reflects expected credit losses and requires consideration of a broader range of reasonable and supportable information to inform credit loss estimates.
ASU 2016-13 will be effective for the annual periods beginning after December 15, 2019 and interim periods within those annual periods, with early adoption permitted beginning after December 15, 2018. We are currently evaluating the impact the provisions will have on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
In August 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-15,
Statement of Cash Flows (Topic 230), Classification of Certain Cash Receipts and Cash Payments
which addresses eight specific cash flow issues to reduce the existing diversity in practice. The cash flow issues include debt prepayment or debt extinguishment costs, settlement of zero-coupon debt instruments or other debt instruments with coupon interest rates that are insignificant in relation to the effective interest rate of the borrowing, contingent consideration payments made after a business combination, proceeds from the settlement of insurance claims, proceeds from the settlement of corporate-owned life insurance policies, including bank-owned life insurance policies, distributions received from equity method investees, beneficial interests in securitization transactions and separately identifiable cash flows and application of the predominance principle. ASU 2016-15 will be effective for the annual periods beginning after December 15, 2017 and interim periods within those annual periods, with early adoption permitted. We adopted ASU 2016-15 for the year-ended December 31, 2016. The adoption of this guidance did not have a material impact on our consolidated financial position or results of operations.
3. Fair Value Measurements
The carrying amounts of cash equivalents, prepaid and other assets, accounts payable and accrued liabilities are considered to be representative of their respective fair values because of the short-term nature of those instruments. Based on the borrowing rates currently available to us for loans with similar terms, which is considered a Level 2 input, we believe that the fair value of our Term Loan approximates its carrying values. Investment securities are recorded at fair value.
The accounting guidance defines fair value, establishes a consistent framework for measuring fair value and expands disclosure for each major asset and liability category measured at fair value on either a recurring or nonrecurring basis. Fair value is defined as an exit price, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants. As such, fair value is a market-based measurement that should be determined based on assumptions that market participants would use in pricing an asset or liability. As a basis for considering such assumptions, the accounting guidance establishes a three-tier fair value hierarchy, which prioritizes the inputs used in measuring fair value as follows:
Level 1: Observable inputs such as quoted prices in active markets.
Level 2: Inputs, other than the quoted prices in active markets that are observable either directly or indirectly.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs in which there is little or no market data, which require the reporting entity to develop its own assumptions.
86
Financial assets measured at fair value on a recurring basis consist of investment s
ecurities. Investment securities are recorded at fair value, defined as the exit price in the principal market in which we would transact, representing the amount that would be received to sell an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transac
tion between market participants. Level 2 securities are valued using quoted market prices for similar instruments, non-binding market prices that are corroborated by observable market data, or discounted cash flow techniques and include our investments in
corporate debt securities, commercial paper, asset-backed securities and United States Treasury securities.
We have no financial liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis.
None of our non-financial assets and liabilities is recorded at fair
value on a non-recurring basis. No transfers between levels have occurred during the periods presented.
Assets and liabilities measured at fair value on a recurring basis are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fair Value Measurements Using
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Quoted
Prices
in
Active
Markets
for
Identical
Assets
(Level 1)
|
|
|
Significant
Other
Observable
Inputs
(Level 2)
|
|
|
Significant
Unobservable
Inputs
(Level 3)
|
|
As of December 31, 2016:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Assets:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
29,251
|
|
|
$
|
29,251
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Available-for-sale investments, short-term:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper
|
|
|
7,843
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
7,843
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Corporate debt securities
|
|
|
20,913
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
20,913
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
United States Treasury securities
|
|
|
5,003
|
|
|
|
5,003
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Sub-total short-term investments
|
|
|
33,759
|
|
|
|
5,003
|
|
|
|
28,756
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Available-for-sale investments, long-term:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-backed securities
|
|
|
4,002
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4,002
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Sub-total long-term investments
|
|
|
4,002
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
4,002
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value
|
|
$
|
67,012
|
|
|
$
|
34,254
|
|
|
$
|
32,758
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
As of December 31, 2015:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Current:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
46,545
|
|
|
$
|
46,545
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Available-for-sale investments, short-term:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper
|
|
|
2,996
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
2,996
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Corporate debt securities
|
|
|
39,514
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
39,514
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Sub-total short-term investments
|
|
|
42,510
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
42,510
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Available-for-sale investments, long-term:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-backed securities
|
|
|
10,912
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
10,912
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Corporate debt securities
|
|
|
16,903
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
16,903
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
United States Treasury securities
|
|
|
1,999
|
|
|
|
1,999
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Sub-total long-term investments
|
|
|
29,814
|
|
|
|
1,999
|
|
|
|
27,815
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Total assets measured at fair value
|
|
$
|
118,869
|
|
|
$
|
48,544
|
|
|
$
|
70,325
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
As of December 31, 2016 and 2015, available-for-sale investments are detailed as follows (in thousands):
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
|
|
Gross
Amortized
Cost
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
|
Market Value
|
|
Available-for-sale investments, short-term:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper
|
|
$
|
7,843
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
7,843
|
|
Corporate debt securities
|
|
$
|
20,942
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(29
|
)
|
|
$
|
20,913
|
|
United States Treasury securities
|
|
|
5,002
|
|
|
|
1
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
5,003
|
|
|
|
$
|
33,787
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
(29
|
)
|
|
$
|
33,759
|
|
Available-for-sale investments, long-term:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-backed securities
|
|
$
|
4,001
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
4,002
|
|
|
|
$
|
4,001
|
|
|
$
|
1
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
4,002
|
|
87
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
|
|
Gross
Amortized
Cost
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Gains
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
|
Market Value
|
|
Available-for-sale investments, short-term:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper
|
|
$
|
2,996
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
2,996
|
|
Corporate debt securities
|
|
|
39,575
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(61
|
)
|
|
|
39,514
|
|
|
|
$
|
42,571
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(61
|
)
|
|
$
|
42,510
|
|
Available-for-sale investments, long-term:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Asset-backed securities
|
|
$
|
10,928
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(16
|
)
|
|
$
|
10,912
|
|
Corporate debt securities
|
|
|
16,990
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(87
|
)
|
|
|
16,903
|
|
United States Treasury securities
|
|
|
2,006
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(7
|
)
|
|
|
1,999
|
|
|
|
$
|
29,924
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
(110
|
)
|
|
$
|
29,814
|
|
Available-for-sale investments that are in an unrealized loss position as of December 31, 2016 are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Estimated
Fair
Value
|
|
|
Gross
Unrealized
Losses
|
|
Corporate debt securities
|
|
$
|
20,913
|
|
|
$
|
(29
|
)
|
As of December 31, 2016, all available-for-sale investments have contractual maturity dates less than one year. As of December 31, 2016, there are 11 available-for-sale investments in gross unrealized loss position, all of which have been in such position for less than twelve months.
At each reporting date, we perform an evaluation of impairment to determine if the unrealized losses are other-than-temporary. Factors considered in determining whether a loss is other-than-temporary include the length of time and extent to which fair value has been less than the cost basis, the financial condition of the issuer, and our intent and ability to hold the investment until recovery of its amortized cost basis. We intend, and have the ability, to hold our investments in unrealized loss positions until their amortized cost basis has been recovered. Based on our evaluation, we determined that the unrealized losses were not other-than-temporary as of December 31, 2016.
4. Balance Sheet Details
Property and equipment consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Computer and office equipment
|
|
$
|
401
|
|
|
$
|
336
|
|
Scientific and laboratory equipment
|
|
|
3,965
|
|
|
|
3,518
|
|
Tenant improvements
|
|
|
1,687
|
|
|
|
1,687
|
|
|
|
|
6,053
|
|
|
|
5,541
|
|
Less accumulated depreciation and amortization
|
|
|
(4,632
|
)
|
|
|
(3,748
|
)
|
|
|
$
|
1,421
|
|
|
$
|
1,793
|
|
Accrued expenses consist of the following (in thousands):
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Accrued salaries, wages and benefits
|
|
|
1,977
|
|
|
|
1,710
|
|
Other accrued expenses (1)
|
|
|
3,473
|
|
|
|
2,885
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,450
|
|
|
$
|
4,595
|
|
(1)
Other accrued expenses include expenses for clinical research organizations and contract manufacturing organizations.
88
5. Debt, Commitments and Contingencies
Commercial Bank Debt
In each of July 2013 and June 2014, we borrowed $5.0 million under a $10.0 million loan and security agreement with SVB, which we refer to as the SVB Loan. Beginning in July 2014, we began to make payments of principal and interest which were due through the maturity date of June 1, 2017. The interest rate was a per annum fixed rate of 5.0% and 5.88% for the $5.0 million drawn in each of July 2013 and June 2014, respectively. The final payment was contractually due in June 2017 with an additional fee of $0.5 million. The SVB Loan was collateralized by all of our assets, other than our intellectual property, and contains customary affirmative and negative covenants, reporting requirements and events of default. In November 2016, pursuant to the loan and security agreement with Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) and Solar Capital Ltd. (Solar), we paid SVB the balance of $2.6 million, including interest and $0.5 million final payment, in full.
Term Loan
On November 18, 2016, we entered into a loan and security agreement with SVB and Solar, which we refer to as the Term Loan. SVB and Solar agreed to lend us up to $20.0 million, issuable in three separate tranches of: (i) $10.0 million which was funded on November 18, 2016; (ii) $5.0 million may be drawn down by us at any time before the earlier of June 30, 2017 or an event of default, at our discretion, subject to achievement of certain financial and clinical milestones; and (iii) $5.0 million may be drawn down by us any time after June 30, 2017 and before the earlier of December 31, 2017 or an event of default, at our discretion, subject to achievement of certain milestones specified for the second tranche and additional financial and clinical milestones.
Pursuant to the Term Loan agreement, we have interest only payments through December 1, 2017 or June 1, 2018, if we draw the second tranche, followed by consecutive equal monthly payments of principal and interest in arrears through the maturity date of November 18, 2020. The Term Loan bears interest at the prime rate, as reported in The Wall Street Journal on the last date of the month preceding the month in which interest will accrue, plus 4.10%. The Term Loan also provides for a final interest payment equal to 8.75% of the funded amount, which is due when the Term Loan becomes due or upon the prepayment of the Term Loan. We have the option to prepay the outstanding balance of the loan in full, subject to a prepayment fee ranging from 1.0% to 3.0% depending upon when the prepayment occurs, including any non-usage fees. The loan agreement provides for a 2.0% non-usage fee for any unfunded amount in the event we do not draw the second tranche and third tranche, payable no later than the expiration date for the second tranche or third tranche, as applicable, or the date of cancellation of the loan due to prepayment or an event of default.
We received cash proceeds of $7.3 million, net of a $2.6 million repayment of the principal, accrued interest and the $0.5 million final payment of the SVB Loan. We did not pay any termination or other fees in connection with the repayment of amounts due under the SVB Loan.
In connection with the Term Loan, the debt issuance costs have been recorded as a debt discount of Term Loan in our balance sheet, which are being accreted to interest expense over the life of the Term Loan using an effective interest rate of 12.28%. The final maturity payment is being accrued over the life of the Term Loan through interest expense.
Future principal payments for the Term Loan, including the final payment, are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
December 31, 2016
|
|
2017
|
|
$
|
249
|
|
2018
|
|
|
3,100
|
|
2019
|
|
|
3,348
|
|
2020
|
|
|
4,178
|
|
|
|
$
|
10,875
|
|
Facility Lease
In December 2011, we entered into a noncancelable operating lease that included certain tenant improvement allowances and is subject to base lease payments, which escalate over the term of the lease, additional charges for common area maintenance and other costs. The lease expires in May 2017 and we have an option to extend the lease for a period of five years. In January 2017, we extended the lease for two years to May 2019. Rent expense for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 was $0.5 million, $0.4 million and $0.2 million, respectively.
89
In conjunction with the initial lease, we borrowed $2.0 million under a subordinated unsecured convertible promissory note issued to the venture arm of our landlord. The convertible promissory note carried an
annual interest rate of 8.0%. In May 2015, the $2.0 million outstanding principal balance of the convertible promissory note and the $0.5 million accrued interest on the convertible promissory note was repaid in full in connection with our IPO.
In June 2016, we entered into a sublease agreement with a tenant of our landlord for additional facility space in our existing building that commenced in August 2016 and will expire in June 2017.
As of December 31, 2016, future minimum payments under the non-cancelable operating lease are as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Operating
Lease
|
|
2017
|
|
$
|
386
|
|
2018
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
$
|
386
|
|
Research Agreements and Funding Obligations
In October 2007, we entered into a research funding and option agreement for certain technologies from The Scripps Research Institute (TSRI). Under the agreement, we provide funding to TSRI to conduct certain research activities. The agreement renews automatically for successive 12 month periods starting on May 31st of each year unless we provide 30 days’ prior written notice to terminate the agreement. TSRI has the right to terminate the agreement if we fail to make any payment under the agreement or for breach or insolvency. Under the research funding and option agreement, TSRI has granted us options to enter into license agreements to acquire rights and exclusive licenses to develop, make, have made, use, have used, import, have imported, offer to sell, sell, and have sold certain licensed products, processes and services based on certain technology arising from the sponsored research activities. Pursuant to the terms of these license agreements, TSRI is entitled to receive tiered royalties as a percentage of net sales and a percentage of nonroyalty revenue we may receive from our sublicensees or partners, with the amount owed decreasing if we enter into the applicable sublicense or partnering agreement after meeting a specified clinical milestone. In addition, we are obligated to pay TSRI up to an aggregate of $2.75 million under each license agreement upon the achievement of specific clinical and regulatory milestone events. In January 2015, we and TSRI entered into an amended and restated research funding and option agreement pursuant to which we agreed to issue 119,840 shares of our common stock to TSRI in consideration for the adjustment of sublicense payments and the assignment of certain intellectual property rights by TSRI to us. The $1.4 million fair value of the common stock issued to TSRI was recorded to research and development expense. We issued the shares of common stock to TSRI on March 31, 2015. We entered into amendments to our research funding and option agreement to provide an additional $0.9 million of funding for the year ended December 31, 2016.
During the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, excluding the fair value of the common stock issued to TSRI described above, we recognized expense under the agreement in the amount of $1.6 million, $0.7 million and $0.6 million, respectively. A member of our board of directors is a faculty member at TSRI and such payments fund a portion of his research activities conducted at TSRI.
During the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014, we provided charitable donations to the National Foundation for Cancer Research of $0.4 million. We have requested that the donations be restricted to certain basic research in cancer biology and therapeutics, a portion of which funds research activities conducted at TSRI in the laboratory of a member of our board of directors.
Manufacturing Agreements
On June 16, 2015, we entered into a Master Services Agreement (the MSA) with FUJIFILM Diosynth Biotechnologies U.S.A., Inc. (Fujifilm) to complete the development of the manufacturing process and for the production of the drug substance for Resolaris, our drug in clinical development. Pursuant to the MSA, Fujifilm will provide the drug substance for Resolaris to support future clinical trials, including potential pivotal trials. Under the initial scope of work executed pursuant to the MSA, Fujifilm will conduct process optimization, scale-up and demonstration, and cGMP manufacturing of the drug substance of Resolaris, and we are required to pay Fujifilm based on development and production milestones up to the mid seven figures. In addition, we are billed for consumables on a pass-through basis and have entered into statements of work for stability studies. In the next 12 months, we are committed to pay Fujifilm approximately $0.6 million based on development and production milestones. During the year ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, expenses associated with this agreement were $8.4 million and $5.1 million, respectively.
90
In August 2016, we entered into a
Master Services Agreement
with a third party contract development and manufacturing organization to comple
te the development of the manufacturing process and for the production of drug substance for Stalaris. We are required to pay the third party contract manufacturer a total payment in the low seven figures subject to certain rights of cancellation. In addit
ion, we are billed for consumables on a pass-through basis. In the next 12 months, we are committed to pay the third party contract manufacturing organization approximately $2.2 million based on development and production milestones. For the year ended De
cember 31, 2016, expenses associated with this agreement were $1.0 million.
6. Stockholders’ Equity
Common Stock
In May 2015, in connection with our IPO,
we filed an amended and restated certificate of incorporation, authorizing 150,000,000 shares of common stock and 7,285,456 shares of redeemable convertible preferred stock, and 5,000,000 shares of undesignated preferred stock. As of December 31, 2016, no preferred stock is issued and outstanding.
Registration Statement on Form S-3
On June 13, 2016, we filed a Registration Statement on Form S-3 (File No. 333-211998) containing two prospectuses: (i) a base prospectus which covers the offering, issuance and sale of up to $150 million in the aggregate of an indeterminate number of shares of common stock and preferred stock, an indeterminate principal amount of debt securities and such indeterminate number of warrants and units; and (ii) a sales agreement prospectus covering the offering, issuance and sale of up to a maximum aggregate offering price of up to $20 million of our common stock that may be sold from time to time under a sales agreement with Cowen and Company, LLC (Cowen). In accordance with the terms of such sales agreement entered with Cowen, we may offer and sell shares of our common stock having an aggregate offering price of up to $35 million from time to time through Cowen. We are required to file another prospectus supplement in the event we intend to offer more than $20 million in shares of our common stock in accordance with the sales agreement. The sales agreement prospectus amount of $20 million is included in the base prospectus amount of $150 million.
2014 Stock Plan
We adopted a stock option plan in 2007 (the 2007 Plan), which was subsequently amended, restated and renamed in July 2014 (the 2014 Plan) to provide for the incentive stock options, nonstatutory stock options, stock and rights to purchase restricted stock to eligible recipients. Recipients of incentive stock options are eligible to purchase shares of our common stock at an exercise price equal to no less than the estimated fair market value of such stock on the date of grant. The maximum term of options under the 2014 Plan is ten years. Options granted generally vest over four years.
2015 Stock Plan
In April 2015, our board of directors adopted, and our stockholders approved, the 2014 Stock Plan (the 2015 Plan). The 2015 Plan became effective on May 6, 2015 and we ceased granting any new awards under our 2014 Plan. Awards granted under the 2014 Plan prior to our IPO that are forfeited, canceled, reacquired by us prior to vesting satisfied without the issuance of stock or otherwise terminated (other than by exercise) will be added to shares available for issuance under the 2015 Plan. A total of 1,574,566 shares of our common stock were initially reserved for issuance under the 2015 Plan. In addition, the number of shares reserved and available for issuance under the 2015 Plan will automatically increase each January 1, beginning on January 1, 2016 and thereafter until January 1, 2019, by the lesser of (i) 1,840,000 shares, (ii) 4% of the outstanding number of shares of our common stock on the immediately preceding December 31 or (iii) an amount determined by our board of directors. Pursuant to this provision, 949,793 and 946,803 additional shares were reserved for issuance under the 2015 Plan on January 1, 2017 and 2016, respectively. Shares underlying any awards under the 2015 Plan that are forfeited, canceled, reacquired by us prior to vesting, satisfied without the issuance of stock or otherwise terminated (other than by exercise) will be added to shares available for issuance under the 2015 Plan.
The maximum term of options granted under 2015 Plan is ten years. For an initial grant to an employee, 25% of the options generally vest on the first anniversary of the original vesting date, with the balance vesting monthly over the remaining three years. For subsequent grants to an employee, the options generally vest monthly over a four-year term.
Inducement Grant
In September 2016, we granted a non-qualified option to purchase 145,000 shares of our common stock at an exercise price of $3.29 per share as an inducement award in connection with the hiring of our Senior Vice President, Research. This option will vest over a period of four (4) years, with 25% vesting on the one year anniversary of the grant date and the remaining 75% vesting on a monthly basis over three years thereafter, subject to continuous employment. This option was an inducement grant issued outside of the 2015 Plan in accordance with NASDAQ Listing Rule 5635(c)(4). We intend to file a registration statement on Form S-8 to register the shares of common stock underlying this option prior to the time at which this option becomes exercisable. In addition, from time to time, we may make inducement grants of stock options to new employees.
91
Employee Stock Purchase Plan
In April 2015, our board of directors adopted, and our stockholders approved, our 2015 Employee Stock Purchase Plan (the 2015 ESPP). The 2015 ESPP became effective on May 6, 2015. A total of 227,623 shares of our common stock were initially reserved for issuance under the 2015 ESPP. In addition, the number of shares reserved and available for purchase under the 2015 ESPP will automatically increase each January 1, beginning on January 1, 2016 and thereafter until January 1, 2019, by 1% of the outstanding number of shares of our common stock on the immediately preceding December 31 or such lesser number of shares as determined by the administrator of the 2015 ESPP. Pursuant to this provision, 237,448 and 236,700 additional shares were reserved for issuance under the 2015 ESPP on January 1, 2017 and 2016, respectively.
Stock-based Compensations
Stock Options
Stock option activity is summarized as follows:
|
|
Number of
Outstanding
Options
|
|
|
Weighted
Average
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Weighted
Remaining Contractual Term
|
|
|
Aggregate
Intrinsic Value
(in 000s)
|
|
Outstanding as of December 31, 2015
|
|
|
2,625,280
|
|
|
$
|
8.83
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
2,266,419
|
|
|
$
|
5.56
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
|
|
(15,892
|
)
|
|
$
|
1.24
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Canceled/forfeited/expired
|
|
|
(860,819
|
)
|
|
$
|
10.17
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Outstanding as of December 31, 2016
|
|
|
4,014,988
|
|
|
$
|
6.73
|
|
|
|
7.82
|
|
|
$
|
519
|
|
Options vested and expected to vest as of December 31, 2016
|
|
|
4,014,988
|
|
|
$
|
6.73
|
|
|
|
7.82
|
|
|
$
|
519
|
|
Options exercisable as of December 31, 2016
|
|
|
1,419,562
|
|
|
$
|
6.27
|
|
|
|
5.88
|
|
|
$
|
519
|
|
The assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of the employee stock option grants were as follows:
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Expected term (in years)
|
|
5.50 – 6.08
|
|
|
5.50 – 6.08
|
|
|
5.77 – 6.56
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
1.2% – 2.1%
|
|
|
1.5% – 1.9%
|
|
|
1.7% – 2.7%
|
|
Expected volatility
|
|
80.7% – 84.0%
|
|
|
79.2% – 100.9%
|
|
|
|
111.0
|
%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
The assumptions used in the Black-Scholes option pricing model to determine the fair value of the ESPP offering were as follows:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Expected term (in years)
|
|
|
0.50
|
|
|
|
0.50
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
0.4% – 0.6%
|
|
|
|
0.3
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
75.5% – 80.8%
|
|
|
|
67.3
|
%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Expected term
. The expected term represents the period of time that options are expected to be outstanding. Because we do not have sufficient history of exercise behavior, we determine the expected life assumption using the simplified method, which is an average of the contractual term of the option and its vesting period.
Risk-free interest rate.
We base the risk-free interest rate assumption on the U.S. Treasury’s rates for U.S. Treasury zero-coupon bonds with maturities similar to those of the expected term of the award being valued.
Expected volatility.
The expected volatility assumption is based on volatilities of a peer group of similar companies whose share prices are publicly available. The peer group was developed based on companies in the biotechnology industry.
Expected dividend yield.
We base the expected dividend yield assumption on the fact that we have never paid cash dividends and have no present intention to pay cash dividends.
92
Performance Options with Market Conditions
In October 2015, we granted our employees and certain consultants performance options with a market condition to purchase up to an aggregate 169,402 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $10.24. Upon achievement of specified performance goals by October 2017, such performance-based options shall begin to vest over four years in equal monthly installments, otherwise the options will be subject to forfeiture. The fair value of the stock options awarded that include market-based performance conditions is estimated on the date of the grant using a Monte Carlo simulation, based on the market price of the underlying common stock, expected performance measurement period, expected peer group stock price volatility and expected risk-free interest rate. The weighted average grant date fair value was $4.23.The performance options with market conditions grants are expensed using the accelerated attribution method over the requisite service period of 4.8 years regardless of whether the market condition is achieved or earned and vest.
In January 2016, we granted to our executives, employees and certain consultants performance options with a market condition to purchase up to an aggregate 396,960 shares of common stock at an exercise price of $9.13. Upon achievement of specified goals by January 4, 2018, such performance options shall begin to vest over four years in equal monthly installments, otherwise the options will be subject to forfeiture. The fair value of the performance options with a market condition is estimated on the date of the grant using a Monte Carlo simulation, based on the market price of the underlying common stock, expected performance measurement period, expected peer group stock price volatility and expected risk-free interest rate. The weighted average grant date fair value was $1.93. The performance options with market conditions grants are expensed using the accelerated attribution method over the requisite service period of 5.1 years regardless of whether the market condition is achieved or earned and vest.
The assumptions used at grant date to determine the fair value of the performance options with a market condition were as follows:
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Expected term (in years)
|
|
|
5.06
|
|
|
|
4.81
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
|
|
2.2
|
%
|
|
|
2.1
|
%
|
Expected volatility
|
|
|
83.3
|
%
|
|
|
80.6
|
%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
|
|
0.0
|
%
|
Restricted Stock Units
During the year ended December 31, 2016, we granted restricted stock units to employees. Restricted stock unit activity is summarized as follows:
|
|
Number of Outstanding
Restricted Stock Units
|
|
|
Weighted Average
Grant Date
Fair Value
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2015
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Granted
|
|
|
131,593
|
|
|
$
|
4.96
|
|
Released
|
|
|
(2,080
|
)
|
|
$
|
5.48
|
|
Forfeited
|
|
|
(52,800
|
)
|
|
$
|
4.95
|
|
Balance as of December 31, 2016
|
|
|
76,713
|
|
|
$
|
4.95
|
|
The allocation of stock-based compensation for all options, including performance options with market condition and restricted stock units is as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Research and development
|
|
$
|
1,876
|
|
|
$
|
2,524
|
|
|
$
|
527
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
|
3,153
|
|
|
|
2,332
|
|
|
|
1,264
|
|
|
|
$
|
5,029
|
|
|
$
|
4,856
|
|
|
$
|
1,791
|
|
The weighted–average grant date fair value per share of stock options granted by us, excluding performance options with market conditions, during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 was $3.34, $11.29 and $10.18, respectively. The aggregate intrinsic value of stock options exercised during the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014 was $34,000, $1.9 million and $0.4 million, respectively. As of December 31, 2016, total unrecognized share-based compensation expense related to unvested stock options and restricted stock units was approximately $9.6 million. This unrecognized cost is expected to be recognized ratably over a weighted-average period of approximately 2.9 years.
93
During the fourth quarter of 2014, we m
odified certain vesting conditions of performance-based equity awards for our Chief Executive Officer which resulted in incremental share-based compensation costs of $0.7 million, of which $0.6 million was recognized as expense during the year ended Decemb
er 31, 2014.
In October 2015, our Compensation Committee of the Board of Directors approved an amendment to accelerate the vesting schedule of certain outstanding stock options representing 931,749 shares granted to active employees and certain consultants under the 2014 Plan to change the vesting schedule of such options from six-years to four-years retroactive to the original vesting commencement dates. We recorded $0.8 million of stock compensation expense in connection with the modification during the year ended December 31, 2015.
Warrants
In November 2016, in connection with the Term Loan, we issued warrants to each of SVB and Solar to purchase an aggregate of 47,771 shares of our common stock with an exercise price of $3.14 per share. The warrants are immediately exercisable and will expire on November 18, 2023, provided that such warrants have not been previously exercised or have expired in connection with certain fundamental transactions involving us.
Warrants outstanding as of December 31, 2016:
Number
|
|
|
Exercise Price
|
|
|
Expiration
|
Outstanding
|
|
|
Per Share
|
|
|
Date
|
|
9,051
|
|
|
$
|
6.63
|
|
|
September 2017
|
|
2,006
|
|
|
$
|
7.48
|
|
|
March 2021
|
|
14,913
|
|
|
$
|
20.12
|
|
|
July 2023
|
|
95,542
|
|
|
$
|
3.14
|
|
|
November 2023
|
|
121,512
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Common Stock Reserved for Future Issuance
Common stock reserved for future issuance is as follows:
|
|
As of December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Common stock warrants
|
|
|
121,512
|
|
|
|
25,970
|
|
Common stock options and awards outstanding
|
|
|
4,091,701
|
|
|
|
2,625,280
|
|
Shares available under the 2015 Plan
|
|
|
510,760
|
|
|
|
903,350
|
|
Shares available under the 2015 ESPP Plan
|
|
|
407,542
|
|
|
|
227,623
|
|
|
|
|
5,131,515
|
|
|
|
3,782,223
|
|
7. Income Taxes
Pretax earnings (loss) were generated by both domestic and foreign operations as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
United States
|
|
$
|
(57,096
|
)
|
|
$
|
(47,490
|
)
|
|
$
|
(34,885
|
)
|
Foreign
|
|
|
(808
|
)
|
|
|
(483
|
)
|
|
|
10,535
|
|
|
|
$
|
(57,904
|
)
|
|
$
|
(47,973
|
)
|
|
$
|
(24,350
|
)
|
94
A reconciliation of the expected statutory federal income tax provision to the actual income tax provision is summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
Years Ended December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Expected income taxes benefit at federal statutory rate
|
|
$
|
(19,687
|
)
|
|
$
|
(16,311
|
)
|
|
$
|
(8,279
|
)
|
State income taxes, net of federal benefit
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(2,023
|
)
|
Permanent items and other
|
|
|
675
|
|
|
|
865
|
|
|
|
368
|
|
Research credits
|
|
|
(6,800
|
)
|
|
|
(2,674
|
)
|
|
|
(372
|
)
|
Unrecognized tax benefits
|
|
|
2,720
|
|
|
|
1,070
|
|
|
|
144
|
|
Foreign rate differential
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
84
|
|
|
|
(3,391
|
)
|
Change in tax rate
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
3,551
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Change in valuation allowance
|
|
|
22,902
|
|
|
|
13,415
|
|
|
|
13,553
|
|
Income tax (benefit) expense
|
|
$
|
(49
|
)
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
Deferred income taxes are provided for temporary differences in recognizing certain income and expense items for financial and tax reporting purposes. The deferred tax assets consisted primarily of the income tax benefits from net operating loss (NOL) carryforwards, research and development credits and capitalized research and development expenses, along with other accruals and reserves. Valuation allowances of $71.2 million and $48.3 million as of December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively, have been recorded to offset deferred tax assets as realization of such assets does not meet the more-likely-than-not threshold under ASC 740,
Accounting for Income Taxes
.
Significant components of our deferred tax assets are summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Net operating loss carryforwards
|
|
$
|
33,713
|
|
|
$
|
24,869
|
|
Capitalized research and development expenses
|
|
|
21,624
|
|
|
|
14,181
|
|
Research credits and other state credits
|
|
|
9,227
|
|
|
|
3,565
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
3,874
|
|
|
|
4,176
|
|
Reserve and accruals
|
|
|
2,711
|
|
|
|
1,528
|
|
Valuation allowance
|
|
|
(71,149
|
)
|
|
|
(48,319
|
)
|
Net deferred tax assets
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
|
$
|
—
|
|
As of December 31, 2016, we had approximately $87.8 million, $94.5 million, and $6.5 million of net operating loss carryforwards for federal, state, and foreign purposes, respectively, net of Section 382 limitations, available to offset future taxable income. The federal and state net operating loss carryforwards begin to expire in 2025 and 2016, respectively. California net operating loss carryforwards of $1.4 million will expire in 2017. California net operating loss carryforwards of $93.1 million will expire from 2028 through 2034. The foreign net operating losses carry over indefinitely. As of December 31, 2016, we had federal and state research and development credit carryforwards of approximately $2.8 million and $2.5 million, respectively, net of Section 382 limitations, which begin to expire in 2026 for federal purposes and carry over indefinitely for state purposes. We had $11.0 million of federal Orphan Drug Credits as of December 31, 2016, which will begin to expire in 2035.
In November 2015, the FASB issued ASU No. 2015-17,
Balance Sheet Classification of Deferred Taxes,
which requires all deferred tax assets and liabilities to be classified as noncurrent on the balance sheet. The new accounting guidance is effective for annual reporting periods beginning after December 15, 2016 and interim periods therein. Early adoption is permitted as of the beginning of interim or annual reporting periods.
We elected to early adopt this guidance prospectively beginning in the year ended December 31, 2015 and prior periods were not retrospectively adjusted. There was no material impact on the consolidated financial position or results of operations upon adoption.
Utilization of the domestic NOL and research and development credit carryforwards may be subject to a substantial annual limitation due to ownership change limitations that may have occurred or that could occur in the future, as required by Section 382 and 383 of the Internal Revenue Code of 1986, as amended (the Code), as well as similar state and foreign provisions. These ownership changes may limit the amount of NOL and research and development credit carryforwards that can be utilized annually to offset future taxable income and tax, respectively. In general, an “ownership change” as defined by Section 382 of the Code results from a transaction or series of transactions over a three-year period resulting in an ownership change of more than 50 percentage points of the outstanding stock of a company by certain stockholders. Since the Company’s formation, we raised capital through the issuance of capital stock on several occasions which on its own or combined with the purchasing stockholders’ subsequent disposition of those shares, has resulted in such an ownership change, and could result in an ownership change in the future.
95
Upon the occurrence of an ownership change
under Section 382 as outlined above, utilization of the NOL and research and development credit carryforwards become subject to an annual limitation under Section 382 of the Code, which is determined by first multiplying the value of our stock at the time
of the ownership change by the applicable long-term, tax-exempt rate, which could be subject to additional adjustments. Any limitation may result in expiration of a portion of the NOL or research and development credit carryforwards before utilization. We
completed an analysis through September 7, 2011, and had adjusted our NOL and research and development tax credit carryforwards accordingly. Ownership changes that may have occurred subsequent to September 7, 2011, and future ownership changes, including
any ownership change resulting from this offering, may further limit our ability to utilize its remaining tax attributes.
We recognize a tax benefit from an uncertain tax position when it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including resolutions of any related appeals or litigation processes, based on the technical merits. Income tax positions must meet a more-likely-than-not recognition threshold to be recognized.
Our practice is to recognize interest and penalties related to income tax matters in income tax expense. We had no accrual for interest and penalties on our balance sheet and had not recognized interest or penalties in the consolidated statements of operations for the years ended December 31, 2016, 2015 and 2014.
Due to the existence of the valuation allowance, future changes in unrecognized tax benefits will not impact our effective tax rate.
Uncertain tax positions are evaluated based upon the facts and circumstances that exist at each reporting period. Subsequent changes in judgment based upon new information may lead to changes in recognition, derecognition, and measurement. Adjustments may result, for example, upon resolution of an issue with the taxing authorities, or expiration of a statute of limitations barring an assessment for an issue.
The activity related to our unrecognized tax benefits is summarized as follows (in thousands):
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
|
2014
|
|
Balance as of beginning of year
|
|
$
|
5,033
|
|
|
$
|
1,106
|
|
|
$
|
947
|
|
Increase related to prior year tax positions
|
|
|
1,890
|
|
|
|
2,404
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
Increase related to current year tax positions
|
|
|
6,077
|
|
|
|
1,523
|
|
|
|
177
|
|
Other decreases
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
—
|
|
|
|
(18
|
)
|
Balance as of end of year
|
|
$
|
13,000
|
|
|
$
|
5,033
|
|
|
$
|
1,106
|
|
We do not anticipate that the amount of unrecognized tax benefits as of December 31, 2016 will change within the next twelve months.
We are subject to taxation in the United States, Hong Kong and state jurisdictions. Our tax years from inception are subject to examination by the United States, Hong Kong and California authorities due to the carry forward of unutilized NOLs and research and development credits.
8. Employee Benefits
401(k) Plan
We maintain a defined contribution 401(k) plan available to eligible employees. Employee contributions are voluntary and are determined on an individual basis, limited to the maximum amount allowable under federal tax regulations. In April 2015, our Board of Directors approved a policy, beginning on June 1, 2015, to match employee contributions equal to 50% of the participant’s contribution of up to a maximum of 6% of the participant’s annual salary. We made discretionary contributions totaling $0.2 million and $0.1 million during the years ended December 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
9. Quarterly Financial Data (Unaudited)
The following financial information reflects all normal recurring adjustments, which are, in our opinion, necessary for a fair statement of the results of the interim periods. Summarized quarterly data for 2016 and 2015 are as follows (in thousands, except per share data):
96
|
|
For the quarters ended
|
|
|
|
March 31
|
|
|
June 30
|
|
|
September 30
|
|
|
December 31
|
|
2016:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
$
|
16,115
|
|
|
$
|
15,433
|
|
|
$
|
13,865
|
|
|
$
|
12,527
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(16,087
|
)
|
|
|
(15,383
|
)
|
|
|
(13,819
|
)
|
|
|
(12,566
|
)
|
Basic and diluted net loss per share
|
|
$
|
(0.68
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.65
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.58
|
)
|
|
|
(0.53
|
)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2015:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses
|
|
$
|
8,922
|
|
|
$
|
10,898
|
|
|
$
|
11,313
|
|
|
$
|
16,483
|
|
Net loss
|
|
|
(9,071
|
)
|
|
|
(11,080
|
)
|
|
|
(11,329
|
)
|
|
|
(16,493
|
)
|
Basic and diluted net loss per share
|
|
$
|
(9.39
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.74
|
)
|
|
$
|
(0.48
|
)
|
|
|
(0.70
|
)
|
Net loss per share is computed independently for each of the quarters presented. Therefore, the sum of the quarterly per-share calculations will not necessarily equal the annual per share calculation.
10. Subsequent Events
In January 2017, we extended our primary facility lease with our landlord through May 2019 for an additional commitment of $1.5 million.
Item 9. Changes in and Disagreements With Accountants on Accounting and Financial Disclosure
None
Item 9A. Controls and Procedures
Evaluation of Disclosure Controls and Procedures
We maintain disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, or the Exchange Act, that are designed to ensure that information required to be disclosed in our periodic and current reports that we file with the SEC is recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms, and that such information is accumulated and communicated to our management, including our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, as appropriate, to allow timely decisions regarding required disclosure. In designing and evaluating the disclosure controls and procedures, management recognizes that any controls and procedures, no matter how well designed and operated, can provide only reasonable and not absolute assurance of achieving the desired control objectives. In reaching a reasonable level of assurance, management necessarily is required to apply its judgment in evaluating the cost-benefit relationship of possible controls and procedures. In addition, the design of any system of controls also is based in part upon certain assumptions about the likelihood of future events, and there can be no assurance that any design will succeed in achieving its stated goals under all potential future conditions; over time, control may become inadequate because of changes in conditions, or the degree of compliance with policies or procedures may deteriorate. Because of the inherent limitations in a cost-effective control system, misstatements due to error or fraud may occur and not be detected.
We carried out an evaluation, under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, of the effectiveness of the design and operation of our disclosure controls and procedures, as defined in Rules 13a-15(e) and 15d-15(e) under the Exchange Act. Based on this evaluation, our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures were effective at the reasonable assurance level as of December 31, 2016.
Management’s Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15-d-15(f) of the Exchange Act. Internal control over financial reporting is a process designed under the supervision and with the participation of our management, including our Principal Executive Officer and Principal Financial Officer, to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America.
As of December 31, 2016, our management assessed the effectiveness of our internal control over financial reporting using the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission in Internal Control – 2013 Integrated Framework (2013 Framework). Based on this assessment, our management concluded that our internal control over financial reporting was effective as of December 31, 2016.
97
This Annual Report on Form 10-K does not include an attestation report of our r
egistered public accounting firm due to a transition period established by the JOBS Act for emerging growth companies.
Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting
During the quarter ended December 31, 2016, there have been no changes in our internal control over financial reporting, as such term is defined in Rules 13a-15(f) and 15d-15(f) promulgated under the Exchange Act, that have materially affected, or are reasonably likely to materially affect, our internal control over financial reporting.
Item 9B. Other Information
None.