As previously announced on December 24, 2020, PRGX Global, Inc., a Georgia corporation (the “Company”), entered into an Agreement and Plan of Merger (the “Merger Agreement”) with Pluto Acquisitionco Inc., a Delaware corporation (“Parent”), and Pluto Merger Sub Inc., a Georgia corporation and wholly owned subsidiary of Parent (“Merger Sub”), pursuant to which Merger Sub will merge with and into the Company (the “Merger”), with the Company surviving as the surviving corporation (the “Surviving Corporation”) and a wholly owned subsidiary of Parent. Parent is an affiliate of Ardian North America Fund II, L.P. (“Ardian”).
In connection with the Merger, the Company filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission (the “SEC”) a definitive proxy statement, dated January 29, 2021 (the “Proxy Statement”), which the Company commenced mailing to shareholders on or about January 29, 2021. Set forth below are supplemental disclosures relating to the Merger.
SUPPLEMENTAL DISCLOSURES
Following the filing of the Proxy Statement, as of the date of this Current Report on Form 8-K, nine complaints have been filed on behalf of nine purported shareholders of the Company against the Company and the members of its Board of Directors. Of those nine complaints, four were filed in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, one of which also names Parent, Merger Sub and Ardian as defendants, two were filed in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, both of which also name Parent and Merger Sub as defendants, and three were filed in the United States District Court for the Northern District of Georgia, Atlanta Division. Those complaints are captioned as follows: Kross v. PRGX Global, Inc., et al., No. 1:21-cv-01024-KPF (S.D.N.Y.); Stein v. PRGX Global, Inc., et al., No. 1:21-cv-01057-KPF (S.D.N.Y.); Freeman v. PRGX Global Inc., et al., No. 1:21-cv-01429 (S.D.N.Y.); Schulz v. PRGX Global, Inc., et al., No. 1:21-cv-01447 (S.D.N.Y.); Ciccotelli v. PRGX Global, Inc., et al., No. 1:21-cv-00156-UNA (D. Del.); Waterman v. PRGX Global, Inc., et al., No. 1:21-cv-00178-UNA (D. Del.); Plumley v. PRGX Global, Inc., et al., No. 1:21-cv-00571-MHC (N.D. Ga.); Sabatini v. PRGX Global, Inc., et al., No. 1:21-cv-00586-MHC (N.D. Ga.); and Finger v. PRGX Global, Inc., et al., No. 1:21-cv-00703-MHC (N.D. Ga.) (collectively, the “Shareholder Actions”). The Shareholder Actions generally allege that the Proxy Statement omits certain material information in violation of Section 14(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934 and Rule 14a-9 promulgated thereunder, and further that the members of the Company’s Board of Directors are liable for those omissions under Section 20(a) of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. One of the Shareholder Actions also alleges a state law breach of fiduciary duty claim against the members of the Company’s Board of Directors with respect to the same disclosures. The relief sought in the Shareholder Actions includes, among other things, to enjoin the shareholder vote scheduled for March 2, 2021 at which the Company’s shareholders will vote on a proposal to adopt the Merger Agreement.
While the Company believes that the disclosures set forth in the Proxy Statement comply fully with applicable law, and vigorously denies any wrongdoing or liability with respect to the allegations and claims asserted, or which could have been asserted, in the Shareholder Actions, to resolve the purported shareholders’ claims and moot the disclosure claims, to avoid nuisance, potential expense, and delay, and to provide additional information to the Company’s shareholders, the Company has determined to voluntarily supplement the Proxy Statement with the below disclosures (the “Supplemental Disclosures”). The Supplemental Disclosures contained below should be read in conjunction with the Proxy Statement, which is available on the Internet site maintained by the SEC at http://www.sec.gov. The Company and the other named defendants deny that they have violated any laws or breached any duties to the Company’s shareholders. The Company is providing the Supplemental Disclosures solely to eliminate the burden and expense of litigation and to avoid any possible disruption to the Merger that could result from further litigation. Nothing in the Supplemental Disclosures should be deemed to be an admission of the legal necessity or materiality of any Supplemental Disclosure under applicable laws. To the extent that the information set forth below differs from or updates information contained in the Proxy Statement, the information set forth herein supersedes or supplements the information in the Proxy Statement. References to sections herein are references to the corresponding sections of the Proxy Statement; all page references are to pages in the Proxy Statement; and any capitalized terms that are used herein have the same meanings ascribed to them in the Proxy Statement.
If you have not already voted your shares in connection with the proposals to be decided at the Company’s virtual special meeting, you are urged to do so promptly. This Form 8-K does not affect the validity of any proxy card or voting instructions that the Company’s shareholders may have previously received or delivered. No action is required by any Company shareholder who has previously delivered a proxy card or voting instructions and who does not wish to revoke or change that proxy card or voting instructions.