•
HUB’s business relies on the performance of, and HUB faces stark competition for, highly skilled personnel, including its management, other key employees and qualified employees, and the loss of one or more of such personnel or of a significant number of its team members or the inability to attract and retain executives and qualified employees HUB needs to support its operations and growth, could harm HUB’s business.
•
Changes in tax laws or exposure to additional income tax liabilities could affect HUB’s future profitability.
•
As a cyber security provider, if any of HUB’s systems, its customers’ cloud or on-premises environments, or its internal systems are breached or if unauthorized access to customer or third-party data is otherwise obtained, public perception of its business may be harmed, and HUB may lose business and incur losses or liabilities.
•
Undetected defects and errors may increase HUB’s costs and impair the market acceptance of its products and solutions.
•
HUB may not be able to adequately protect or enforce its intellectual property rights or prevent unauthorized parties from copying or reverse engineering its products or technology. Its efforts to protect and enforce its intellectual property rights and prevent third parties from violating its rights may be costly.
•
The dynamic regulatory environment around privacy and data protection may limit HUB’s offering or require modification of its products and services, which could limit its ability to attract new customers and support its existing customers and increase its operational expenses. HUB could also be subject to investigations, litigation, or enforcement actions alleging that it fails to comply with the regulatory requirements, which could harm its operating results and adversely affect its business.
•
HUB’s actual or perceived failure to adequately protect personal data could subject it to sanctions and damages and could harm HUB’s reputation and business.
•
HUB may be required to indemnify its directors and officers in certain circumstances.
•
A market for HUB’s securities may not develop or be sustained, which would adversely affect the liquidity and price of its securities.
•
HUB’s internal controls over financial reporting may not be effective and its independent registered public accounting firm may not be able to certify as to their effectiveness, which could have a significant and adverse effect on HUB’s business and reputation.
•
HUB’s ordinary shares are currently listed and, following the consummation of the Business Combination, unless otherwise approved by the Israeli court, may continue to be listed for a period of time on the Tel Aviv Stock Exchange (TASE), and this may result in price variations.
•
Class action litigation due to stock price volatility or other factors could cause HUB to incur substantial costs and divert management’s attention and resources.
•
If HUB’s estimates or judgments relating to its critical accounting policies are based on assumptions that change or prove to be incorrect, HUB’s operating results could fall below expectations of securities analysts and investors, resulting in a decline in HUB’s stock price.
•
Provisions of Israeli law and HUB’s articles of association may delay, prevent or make difficult an acquisition of HUB, prevent a change of control, and negatively impact HUB’s share price.
•
The HUB ordinary shares and HUB warrants may not be listed on a national securities exchange after the Business Combination, which could limit investors’ ability to make transactions in such securities and subject HUB to additional trading restrictions.
•
If, following the Business Combination, securities or industry analysts do not publish or cease publishing research or reports about HUB, its business, or its market, or if they change their recommendations regarding the HUB ordinary shares adversely, then the price and trading volume of the HUB ordinary shares could decline.