White Gold Corp. (TSX.V: WGO, OTCQX: WHGOF, FRA:
29W) (the "Company") is pleased to announce an updated
Mineral Resource Estimate (“MRE”) for its flagship White Gold
project located approximately 95 km south of Dawson City in
west-central Yukon, Canada. The updated mineral resource includes a
significant increase in total gold ounces, including a 18.5%
increase in inferred resources and an 4.3% increase in indicated
resources. The White Gold project now comprises 1,203,000 ounces of
gold in the Indicated Resource category (17.7 million tonnes
averaging 2.12 g/t Au) and 1,116,600 ounces of gold in the Inferred
Resource category (24.5 million tonnes averaging 1.42 g/t Au) at
US$2,000/oz gold. The gold resources at the White Gold Project are
near surface, almost entirely captured within an open pit, and
remain open for expansion in multiple directions with additional
opportunities to increase total resources via targets within close
proximity. Additional increases to the size of the resource may
also be possible through an ongoing analysis of the resource block
model and by capturing additional ounces hosted within the Target
for Further Exploration area which hosts an additional estimated 10
– 12 million tonnes grading between 1 – 2 g/t Au. These results
form part of the Company’s work program supported by strategic
partners including Agnico Eagle Mines Limited (TSX: AEM, NYSE: AEM)
and Kinross Gold Corporation (TSX: K, NYSE: KGC).
“We are very pleased to have further increased
the size of our robust flagship deposit which is one of the
highest-grade open pit gold resources in Canada of this size or
greater owned by an exploration company. Furthermore, significant
additional resource growth potential exists on the deposits
themselves, as well as in the surrounding areas which has seen only
limited exploration and has strong prospectivity for new
discoveries. We are also very encouraged by the overall
prospectivity of our district scale land package for additional
gold and other mineral resource discoveries as this area of Yukon
continues to evolve as an emerging Canadian mining camp supported
by ongoing mine development efforts, infrastructure initiatives and
other investment,” stated David D’Onofrio, Chief Executive
Officer.
Maps and images accompanying this news release
can be found at
http://whitegoldcorp.ca/investors/exploration-highlights/.
Highlights:
Updated MRE includes four gold deposits – Golden
Saddle, Arc, Ryan’s Surprise and VG located within close proximity
and includes:
- 17.660 million tonnes of Indicated
Resources averaging 2.12 grams per tonne gold for 1.203 million
ounces of gold, representing 52% of total resources.
- 24.472 million tonnes of Inferred
Resources averaging 1.42 grams per tonne gold for 1.117 million
ounces of gold, representing 48% of total resources.
- Inferred and Indicated Mineral
Resources have increased by 18.5% and 4.3% respectively, compared
to the previous 2023 MRE(1).
- 97.5% of the resources are near
surface and within an open-pit. Indicated Resources of 1.201
million ounces of gold averaging 2.12 grams per tonne gold (an
increase of 6.7%) and open-pit Inferred Resources of 1.061 million
ounces of gold averaging 1.38 grams per tonne gold (an increase of
24.4%).
- Mineralization at the Golden
Saddle, Arc, Ryan’s Surprise and VG deposits all remain open along
strike and down dip to further expand the deposits and in addition
to multiple underexplored targets in close proximity.
- The project also hosts an
additional estimated 10 – 12 million tonnes grading between 1 – 2
g/t Au of material classified as a Target for Further Exploration
which has not been included in the current resource which may
further increase the size of the resource and is currently being
evaluated in this regard.
- The Company is also currently
evaluating additional opportunities to further increase the size of
the resources by optimizing the block model and wireframes of the
Golden Saddle and Arc deposits to add additional tonnage.
- Additional results from the
Company’s 2024 work program to be released in due course
Mineral Resource Estimate
Details
Table 1. White Gold Project, Yukon
Territory, Mineral Resource Statement, ACS October 28,
2024.
Area |
Type |
Classification |
Cut-off (g/t) |
Tonnes (000's) |
Grade (g/t) |
Contained Gold (oz) |
Golden Saddle |
Open Pit |
Indicated |
0.35 |
16,954 |
2.16 |
1,178,500 |
Inferred |
5,396 |
1.45 |
250,900 |
Underground |
Indicated |
2.3 |
23 |
2.77 |
2,100 |
Inferred |
382 |
3.06 |
37,500 |
Arc |
Open Pit |
Indicated |
0.35 |
683 |
1.02 |
22,400 |
Inferred |
6,781 |
1.09 |
236,700 |
Underground |
Inferred |
2.3 |
47 |
3.00 |
4,600 |
Ryan |
Open Pit |
Inferred |
0.35 |
5,499 |
1.57 |
278,300 |
Underground |
Inferred |
2.3 |
127 |
3.19 |
13,100 |
QV |
Open Pit |
Inferred |
0.35 |
6,240 |
1.47 |
295,500 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
All Deposits |
Open Pit |
Indicated |
0.35 |
17,637 |
2.12 |
1,200,900 |
All Deposits |
Open Pit |
Inferred |
23,916 |
1.38 |
1,061,400 |
All Deposits |
Underground |
Indicated |
2.3 |
23 |
2.84 |
2,100 |
All Deposits |
Underground |
Inferred |
556 |
3.09 |
55,200 |
All Deposits |
Total |
Indicated |
|
17,660 |
2.12 |
1,203,000 |
All Deposits |
Total |
Inferred |
|
24,472 |
1.42 |
1,116,600 |
-
Mineral Resources which are not Mineral Reserves do not have
demonstrated economic viability.
-
The estimate of Mineral Resources may be materially affected by
environmental, permitting, legal, title, taxation, socio-political,
marketing, or other relevant issues.
-
The Inferred Mineral Resource in this estimate has a lower level of
confidence than that applied to an Indicated Mineral Resource and
must not be converted to a Mineral Reserve. It is reasonably
expected that the majority of the Inferred Mineral Resource could
be upgraded to an Indicated Mineral Resource with continued
exploration.
-
The Mineral Resources in this report were estimated using the
Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM), CIM
Standards on Mineral Resources and Reserves, Definitions and
Guidelines prepared by the CIM Standing Committee on Reserve
Definitions and adopted by the CIM Council.
-
Open pittable resources are constrained by GEOVIA Whittle optimized
pit shells using a 0.35 g/t Au cut-of grade and are considered to
have reasonable prospects for eventual economic extraction,
assuming a gold price of US$2,000 per ounce, a C$:US$ exchange rate
of 0.75. an open pit mining cost of CDN$3.25 per tonne, a
processing and G&A cost of CDN$27.50 per tonne milled, and gold
recoveries of 92% for Golden Saddle, and VG, along with 85% for Arc
and Ryan’s Surprise. Underground resources assume a mining cost of
CDN$120/tonne.
-
The following bulk density values for mineralized material were
used: Golden Saddle (2.62 – 2.65 t/m3), Arc (2.55 t/m3), Ryan’s
Surprise (2.63 t/m3) and VG (2.65 t/m3).
-
High-grade gold assay values have been capped as follows: Golden
Saddle and Arc (8 – 18 g/t Au), Ryan’s Surprise (9 g/t Au) and VG
(3 – 10 g/t Au).
-
The Statement of Estimates of Mineral Resources has been compiled
by Mr. Gilles Arseneau, Ph.D., P.Geo, of ARSENEAU Consulting
Services (“ACS”). Mr. Arseneau has sufficient experience that is
relevant to the style of mineralization and type of deposit under
consideration and to the activity that he has undertaken to qualify
as a Qualified Person as defined in the CIM Standards of
Disclosure.
-
All numbers are rounded. Overall numbers may not be exact due to
rounding.
The current MRE for the White Gold project was
carried out by Arseneau Consulting Services (“ACS”) of Vancouver,
B.C. and is reported in accordance with the guidelines of the
Canadian Securities Administrators National Instrument 43-101 (“NI
43-101”) and has been estimated in conformity with generally
accepted Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and Petroleum
(“CIM”) “Estimation and Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve Best
Practices” guidelines. Mineral resources are not mineral reserves
and do not have demonstrated economic viability.
The MRE presents updated estimates for the
Golden Saddle, Arc, Ryan’s Surprise and VG deposits.
The updated MRE was prepared using a block model
approach using ordinary kriging interpolation for the Golden
Saddle, Arc and VG deposits and inverse distance squared (“ID2”)
interpolation for the Ryan’s Surprise deposit. Block model sizes
varied between deposits as follows: Golden Saddle and Arc (10 m);
Ryan’s Surprise (5 – 10 m); and VG (10 – 20 m). GEMS 6.8.4 software
was used for generating gold mineralization solids, a topography
surface, and resource estimation. Statistical analysis and resource
validations were performed using non-commercial software and with
Sage2001. Near surface resources were constrained using GEOVIA
Whittle pit optimization software. Pit slopes in rock were assumed
at 50° and the MRE assumes a long-term gold price of US$2,000 per
ounce. Gold recoveries used were 92% for the Golden Saddle and VG
deposits, and 85% for the Arc and Ryan’s Surprise deposits. Gold
recoveries are based on metallurgical testwork results for the
Golden Saddle and Arc deposits and are assumed for the Ryan’s
Surprise and VG deposits based on their close similarities to the
Arc and Golden Saddle deposits, respectively.
Mineralization on portions of both the Golden
Saddle and Arc deposits is known to extend beyond the limits of the
current resource estimate, however, the mineralization in these
areas did not meet the criteria to be classified as Mineral
Resources. Based on drilling at Golden Saddle and current geologic
models, there is an estimated 10 – 12 million additional tonnes
grading between 1 – 2 g/t Au of material classified as a Target for
Further Exploration (“TFFE”). The reader should be cautioned that
the potential quantity and grade of the TFFE is conceptual in
nature. There has been insufficient drilling to define a mineral
resource and it is uncertain if further exploration will result in
the target being advanced to a mineral resource. These zones form
more continuous mineralized units at US$ 2,000/oz gold and the
Company plans to further evaluate this mineralization through
re-modelling and optimization of the block model and wire frames to
determine if it can be incorporated in future resource
estimates.
A technical report to support the MRE for the
White Gold project, prepared in accordance with NI 43-101, will be
filed on SEDAR+ (https://www.sedarplus.ca/) and the Company’s
website (https://www.whitegoldcorp.ca/) within 45 days of the
issuance of this news release.
Resources & Opportunities in the
White Gold District
West-central Yukon is host to several highly
prospective mineral districts, including the White Gold, Dawson
Range, Klondike and Sixtymile districts. The Klondike was the
epicentre of the historic Klondike Gold Rush in 1896 with over 20
million ounces of placer gold production having occurred in the
region since that time. The Company’s property portfolio (Figure 1)
which covers large portions of the White Gold District, was
assembled by renowned prospector Shawn Ryan, and represents the
largest claim package in the region, consisting of 15,876 claims
across 26 properties and covering approximately 315,000 hectares.
Two significant advanced projects border the Company’s claims in
the south including the Coffee project owned by Newmont Corporation
(TSX: NGT, NYSE: NEM) with Indicated Resources of 2.14 Moz at 1.23
g/t Au, and Inferred Resources of 0.23 Moz at 1.01 g/t Au(2), and
Western Copper and Gold Corporation’s (TSX: WRN, NYSE: WRN) Casino
project, which has Measured and Indicated Resources of 7.6 billion
lb Cu and 14.5 Moz Au and Inferred Resources of 3.3 billion
lb Cu and 6.6 Moz Au(3). The region has seen significant investment
by various other major mining companies recently and the Yukon is
consistently ranked as a top 10 mining jurisdiction on the
Investment Attractiveness Index based on the Fraser Institute’s
Annual Survey of Mining Companies.
All four of White Gold’s near-surface deposits
are interpreted to represent structurally-controlled orogenic gold
deposits, collectively form the Company’s gold resource base in the
heart of its large land package, and remain open for expansion.
Golden Saddle DepositThe Golden
Saddle deposit is located 95 km south of Dawson City on the
Company’s White Gold property (Figure 2), which is supported by the
fully operational Thistle exploration camp with airstrip and barge
access, and up to 100-person capacity. The deposit consists of the
GS Main, GS Footwall and GS West zones and together the zones
define mineralization over a 1,500 m strike length and up to 725 m
down dip. Currently, the GS Main is the most significant zone in
terms of estimated ounces and overall grade; containing
approximately 95% of the Indicated ounces within the overall Golden
Saddle deposit. GS Main Zone contains a consistent high-grade core
of 832,000 gold ounces at a grade of 2.96 g/t gold in the Indicated
category and 107,000 gold ounces at a grade of 3.18 g/t gold
Inferred using a >1 g/t cut-off. Included in this high-grade
core is 525,600 gold ounces at a grade of 4.68 g/t gold in the
Indicated category and 81,900 gold ounces at a grade of 4.74 g/t
gold Inferred using a >3 g/t cut-off.
Gold mineralization at the Golden Saddle deposit
(Figure 2 & 3) is hosted in a meta-volcanic and meta-intrusive
assemblage broadly consisting of felsic orthogneiss, amphibolite,
and ultramafic units. Gold generally occurs as micron-scale blebs
along fractures or encapsulated by pyrite, and as visible gold
(less than 5 mm in size) located as free grains in quartz.
Mineralization is present in quartz veins and stockwork or breccia
with disseminated pyrite. Drill hole intersected gold
mineralization is spatially co-incident with structures, and
structures or faults which are interpreted to be the primary
conduits for hydrothermal fluids responsible for gold deposition.
The thicknesses of the mineralization and breccia zones are
variable from 5 m to over 50 m, and they pinch and swell along
strike. A consistent higher-grade core (> 3 g/t Au) occurs
within the main zone at Golden Saddle. Gold mineralization at
the Golden Saddle deposit remains open in all directions and
is known to extend beyond the limits of the current resource
estimate, however, the mineralization in these areas does not
currently meet the criteria to be classified as Mineral
Resources.
Arc DepositThe Arc deposit
(Figures 2 & 3) is located approximately 400 m south of the
Golden Saddle and consists of two zones, the Arc Main and Arc
Footwall zones, both trending E-NE and dipping to the north at
approximately 50 degrees. Mineralization at the Arc has been
defined over 1,200 m in strike length and up to 450 m down dip with
mineralization open along strike and down dip. Gold mineralization
at the Arc deposit is less well understood than the Golden Saddle,
which is partially a function of drilling at the Arc deposit being
more widely spaced. Gold mineralization is hosted within a
meta-sedimentary sequence dominated by banded (graphitic) quartzite
and interbedded pelitic biotite schist that is cross-cut by
numerous felsic to intermediate dikes and sills.
Gold mineralization appears to be focused within
breccia and shear zones that have been affected by hydrothermal
alteration and sulphide mineralization. Drilling has defined an
upper main zone as well as a lower footwall zone of anomalous gold
but of lesser tenure than the main upper zone. Mineralization
remains open to the east, west and at depth. The occurrence of gold
at Arc is not well understood but appears to be associated with
disseminated and veined pyrite, arsenopyrite and graphite.
Ryan’s Surprise DepositRyan’s
Surprise (Figures 2 & 4) is located 1.5 km west of the Golden
Saddle deposit, along a 6.5 km long x 1 km wide north-northwest
trend of anomalous gold and arsenic in soils (“Ryan’s Trend”),
which also hosts several other prospective early-stage targets in
close proximity with significant surface gold mineralization and
represent further potential for expansion of this project. Gold
mineralization at the Ryan’s Surprise deposit is primarily hosted
within a meta-sedimentary sequence dominated by banded (graphitic)
quartzite and interbedded pelitic biotite schist cross-cut by
numerous felsic – intermediate dikes and sills.
Gold mineralization appears to be focused within
breccia and shear zones that have been affected by hydrothermal
alteration and sulphide mineralization. Recent drilling has defined
multiple subparallel zones that are host to gold-bearing sulphide
mineralization including arsenopyrite and pyrite, and range in true
width from < 1 m to in some instances, > 10 m. The
mineralization footprint at the Ryan’s Surprise deposit measures
approximately 550 m north-south by 500 m east-west to a vertical
depth of 650 m remains open along strike and at depth.
Metallurgical work, and gold characterization and deportment
studies are required to further determine accurate gold recoveries.
However, host rocks, alteration and sulphide mineralization at
Ryan’s Surprise display many similarities to the Arc Deposit.
VG DepositThe VG deposit
(Figure 5) is located approximately 85km south of Dawson City and
11km north of the Golden Saddle deposit. Gold mineralization at the
VG deposit is hosted in quartz ± carbonate veins, stockwork and
breccia zones, and pyrite veinlets, including cubic pyrite and
visible gold, associated with intense-quartz-carbonate-sericite
alteration, pervasive K-spar and hematite emplaced along en-echelon
faults or shear zones. Visually, the style of gold mineralization
and alteration appears identical to the Golden Saddle deposit,
along with similar dominant host rocks of biotite-feldspar (±
augen)-quartz gneisses. To date, no metallurgical testwork has been
performed on the VG mineralization, however given its close
similarities to Golden Saddle, gold recoveries are assumed to be
similar. Opportunities exist at the VG deposit to quickly
upgrade a significant portion of Inferred Resources to Indicated,
as well as for expansion of gold mineralization at depth and along
strike. There are also several other prospective targets on the
property which have received limited exploration work and offer
potential for additional discoveries.
Qualified Persons, Technical Information and Quality
Control
The MRE for the White Gold Project was prepared
by Dr. Gilles Arseneau of Arseneau Consulting Services (ACS), an
Independent Qualified Person (“QP”) as defined under NI 43-101, who
has reviewed and approved the contents of this news release. The
technical content of this news release has also been reviewed and
approved by Terry Brace, P.Geo. and Vice President of Exploration
for the Company who is also a QP as defined under NI 43-101 –
Standards of Disclosure of Mineral Projects.
QA/QC
White Gold’s drill core sampling consisted of
collecting samples over 0.50 m to 2.50 m intervals (depending on
lithology and style of mineralization) over the entire hole length.
RC samples were collected at continuous 1.5 m intervals. All drill
core was cut in half using a diamond saw, with half of the core
placed in sample bags and the other half returned to the core box.
Standard, blank, and duplicate samples were inserted into both the
drill core and RC sample streams at regular intervals to meet a
designated QA/QC sample insertion rate. All samples were organized
into batches, flown via fixed-wing aircraft from camp, and
transported via courier to an ISO-certified laboratory for
analysis.
About White Gold Corp.The
Company owns a portfolio of 15,876 quartz claims across 26
properties covering approximately 315,000 hectares (3,150 km2)
representing approximately 40% of the Yukon’s emerging White Gold
District. The Company’s flagship White Gold project hosts four
near-surface gold deposits which collectively contain an estimated
1,203,000ounces of gold in Indicated Resources and 1,116,600 ounces
of gold in Inferred Resources (this news release). Regional
exploration work has also produced several other new discoveries
and prospective targets on the Company’s claim packages which
border sizable gold discoveries including the Coffee project owned
by Newmont Corporation with Measured and Indicated Resources of 2.1
Moz at 1.28 g/t gold and Inferred Resources of 0.2 Moz at 1.04 g/t
gold(2), and Western Copper and Gold Corporation’s Casino project
which has Measured and Indicated Resources of 7.6 Blb copper and
14.5 Moz gold and Inferred Resources of 3.3 Blb copper and 6.6 Moz
gold(3). For more information visit www.whitegoldcorp.ca.
(1) See White Gold Corp. technical report titled
“2023 Technical Report for the White Gold Project, Dawson Range,
Yukon, Canada ”, Effective Date April 15, 2023, Report Date May 30,
2023, NI 43-101 Compliant Technical Report prepared by Dr. Gilles
Arseneau, P.Geo., available on SEDAR+.(2) See Newmont Corporation
Form 10-K: Annual report for the year ending December 31, 2023, in
the Measured, Indicated, and Inferred Resources section, dated
February 29, 2024, available on EDGAR. Reserves and resources
disclosed in this Form 10-K have been prepared in accordance with
the Regulation S-K 1300, and do not indicate NI43-101
compliance.(3) See Western Copper and Gold Corporation technical
report titled “Casino project, Form 43-101F1 Technical Report
Feasibility Study, Yukon Canada”, Effective Date June 13, 2022,
Issue Date August 8, 2022, NI 43-101 Compliant Technical Report
prepared by Daniel Roth, PE, P.Eng., Mike Hester, F Aus IMM, John
M. Marek, P.E., Laurie M. Tahija, MMSA-QP, Carl Schulze, P.Geo.,
Daniel Friedman, P.Eng., Scott Weston, P.Geo., available on
SEDAR+.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward
Looking InformationThis news release contains
“forward-looking information” and “forward-looking statements”
(collectively, “forward-looking statements”) within the meaning of
the applicable Canadian securities legislation. All statements,
other than statements of historical fact, are forward-looking
statements and are based on expectations, estimates and projections
as at the date of this news release. Any statement that involves
discussions with respect to predictions, expectations, beliefs,
plans, projections, objectives, assumptions, future events or
performance (often but not always using phrases such as “expects”,
or “does not expect”, “is expected”, “anticipates” or “does not
anticipate”, “plans”, “proposed”, “budget”, “scheduled”,
“forecasts”, “estimates”, “believes” or “intends” or variations of
such words and phrases or stating that certain actions, events or
results “may” or “could”, “would”, “might” or “will” be taken to
occur or be achieved) are not statements of historical fact and may
be forward-looking statements. In this news release,
forward-looking statements relate, among other things, the
Company’s objectives, goals and exploration activities conducted
and proposed to be conducted at the Company’s properties; future
growth potential of the Company, including whether any proposed
exploration programs at any of the Company’s properties will be
successful; exploration results; and future exploration plans and
costs and financing availability.
These forward-looking statements are based on
reasonable assumptions and estimates of management of the Company
at the time such statements were made. Actual future results may
differ materially as forward-looking statements involve known and
unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors which may cause the
actual results, performance or achievements of the Company to
materially differ from any future results, performance or
achievements expressed or implied by such forward-looking
statements. Such factors, among other things, include: The
expected benefits to the Company relating to the exploration
conducted and proposed to be conducted at the White Gold
properties; the receipt of all applicable regulatory approvals for
the Offering; failure to identify any additional mineral resources
or significant mineralization; the preliminary nature of
metallurgical test results; uncertainties relating to the
availability and costs of financing needed in the future, including
to fund any exploration programs on the Company’s properties;
business integration risks; fluctuations in general macroeconomic
conditions; fluctuations in securities markets; fluctuations in
spot and forward prices of gold, silver, base metals or certain
other commodities; fluctuations in currency markets (such as the
Canadian dollar to United States dollar exchange rate); change in
national and local government, legislation, taxation, controls,
regulations and political or economic developments; risks and
hazards associated with the business of mineral exploration,
development and mining (including environmental hazards, industrial
accidents, unusual or unexpected formations pressures, cave-ins and
flooding); inability to obtain adequate insurance to cover risks
and hazards; the presence of laws and regulations that may impose
restrictions on mining and mineral exploration; employee relations;
relationships with and claims by local communities and indigenous
populations; availability of increasing costs associated with
mining inputs and labour; the speculative nature of mineral
exploration and development (including the risks of obtaining
necessary licenses, permits and approvals from government
authorities); the unlikelihood that properties that are explored
are ultimately developed into producing mines; geological factors;
actual results of current and future exploration; changes in
project parameters as plans continue to be evaluated; soil sampling
results being preliminary in nature and are not conclusive evidence
of the likelihood of a mineral deposit; title to properties;
ongoing uncertainties relating to the COVID-19 pandemic; and those
factors described under the heading “Risks Factors” in the
Company’s annual information form dated July 29, 2020 available on
SEDAR+. Although the forward-looking statements contained in this
news release are based upon what management of the Company
believes, or believed at the time, to be reasonable assumptions,
the Company cannot assure shareholders that actual results will be
consistent with such forward-looking statements, as there may be
other factors that cause results not to be as anticipated,
estimated or intended. Accordingly, readers should not place undue
reliance on forward-looking statements and information. There can
be no assurance that forward-looking information, or the material
factors or assumptions used to develop such forward-looking
information, will prove to be accurate. The Company does not
undertake to release publicly any revisions for updating any
voluntary forward-looking statements, except as required by
applicable securities law.
Neither the TSXV nor its Regulation
Services Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the
TSXV) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or accuracy of this
news release.
For Further Information, Please
Contact:
Contact Information:David
D’OnofrioChief Executive OfficerWhite Gold Corp.(647) 930-1880
ir@whitegoldcorp.ca
Request Meeting:
https://calendly.com/meet-with-wgo/15min
Photos accompanying this announcement are available at
https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/f62dcf61-58c3-46b8-9eec-4b7394a4c05ehttps://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/4a126849-5da4-4fe1-a416-b66713fbcf12https://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/7dd8fe7a-22cb-4fb3-ba4f-f316ee8885fchttps://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/66d9f5a7-b96b-458c-ab10-a2ad860c838fhttps://www.globenewswire.com/NewsRoom/AttachmentNg/1835d18c-5ca4-41b7-b874-c37e4012f0ce
Agnico Eagle Mines (NYSE:AEM)
Historical Stock Chart
From Oct 2024 to Nov 2024
Agnico Eagle Mines (NYSE:AEM)
Historical Stock Chart
From Nov 2023 to Nov 2024