Google Wins Java Copyright Case Against Oracle
27 May 2016 - 7:10AM
Dow Jones News
SAN FRANCISCO—A federal jury here ruled that Google's use of
Oracle Corp.'s Java software didn't violate copyright law, the
latest twist in a six-year legal battle between the two Silicon
Valley titans.
Oracle sued Google, a unit of Alphabet Inc., in 2010 for using
parts of Java without permission in its Android smartphone
software. A federal appeals court ruled in 2014 that Oracle could
copyright the Java parts, but Google argued in a new trial this
month that its use of Java was limited and covered by rules
permitting "fair use" of copyright material.
A 10-person jury on Thursday agreed.
Google acknowledged using 11,000 lines of Java software code.
But it said that amounted to less than 0.1% of the 15 million lines
of code in its Android mobile-operating system, which runs most of
the world's smartphones.
"Today's verdict that Android makes fair use of Java APIs
represents a win for the Android ecosystem, for the Java
programming community, and for software developers who rely on open
and free programming languages to build innovative consumer
products," Google said in a statement.
The verdict is unlikely to end the long legal saga, which
already had a brief stop at the U.S. Supreme Court. Oracle quickly
said it would appeal.
"We strongly believe that Google developed Android by illegally
copying core Java technology to rush into the mobile device
market," Oracle General Counsel Dorian Daley said in a statement.
"Oracle brought this lawsuit to put a stop to Google's illegal
behavior. We believe there are numerous grounds for appeal and we
plan to bring this case back to the Federal Circuit on appeal."
The tech community has watched the case closely because it could
set precedent for how software programs use so-called application
program interfaces, or APIs, important snippets of computer code
that help apps, websites or programs talk to each other.
Oracle sued Google for using 37 Java APIs in Android. Google
said requiring it to have a license for the APIs would stifle
software innovation by discouraging programmers from using APIs.
That would make software development harder and could render some
apps inoperable, Google said.
Oracle, meanwhile, argued that Google took its property without
permission. Oracle says the verdict hurts innovation by weakening
intellectual-property protections for software and discouraging
tech companies from investing to create new programs.
In prior rounds, tech companies were split on the case. On the
issue of whether Java was copyrightable, for instance,
Hewlett-Packard Co., Red Hat Inc. and Yahoo Inc. backed Google,
while Microsoft Corp. sided with Oracle.
During the nearly three-week trial, Google argued that
executives at Java's creator, Sun Microsystems Inc., didn't believe
Google needed a license to use Java. Oracle acquired Sun in 2010.
Former Sun Chief Executive Jonathan Schwartz, a Google witness,
testified that he was upset Google never obtained a license for
Java, but he didn't think it needed one.
Oracle argued that Google executives knew they needed a license
to use the Java APIs but decided to use them anyway. Oracle showed
internal Google emails in which executives discussed needing a
license.
Write to Jack Nicas at jack.nicas@wsj.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
May 26, 2016 16:55 ET (20:55 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2016 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
Red Hat (NYSE:RHT)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2024 to May 2024
Red Hat (NYSE:RHT)
Historical Stock Chart
From May 2023 to May 2024