ALDA Atlantica Inc (PK)

In addition, pursuant to a Share Escrow and Reset Agreement (the “Reset Agreement”) entered into among the Purchaser, the Sellers’ Representative, the Sellers, the Company and the escrow agent thereunder contemporaneously with the Stock Purchase Agreement, the Sellers placed in escrow an additional 423,928 shares of the Company’s Common Stock then owned by them (the “Escrow Shares”), which at the time represented all but 70 of the remaining shares of the Company’s Common Stock owned by the Sellers.  Pursuant to the Reset Agreement, if, during the five-year period following June 29, 2007 (the “Acquisition Period”), the Company acquired one or more companies having a combined enterprise value of at least $10 million (a “Threshold Acquisition”), the Escrow Shares would reset, at that time, to a number of newly-issued shares of the Company’s Common Stock that would represent (collectively with the 70 shares previously retained by the Sellers) 5% of the Company’s then fully-diluted Common Stock. If a Threshold Acquisition did not occur during the Acquisition Period, all of the Escrow Shares would be released to the Sellers without any reissuance or adjustment in their amount.

A Threshold Acquisition by the Company did not occur during the Acquisition Period and, as a result, the Company subsequently received the required notice from the Sellers’ Representative requesting the release of the Escrow Shares to the Sellers in accordance with the terms of the Reset Agreement.  Accordingly, on November 12, 2012, all of the Escrow Shares were released to the Sellers without any reissuance or adjustment in their amount.  

See the 8-K Current Report dated June 29, 2007 and filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 3, 2007, and see the Schedule 14F-1 Information Statement filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 3, 2007 and mailed to our stockholders on or about July 5, 2007.  See Part IV, Item 15 of this Report.

Description of Business

We are currently seeking potential assets, property or businesses to acquire, in a business combination, by reorganization, merger or acquisition.  We have had no material business operations since March 7, 1997.  Our plan of operation for the next 12 months is to: (i) consider guidelines of industries in which we may have an interest; (ii) adopt a business plan regarding engaging in the business of any selected industry; and (iii) to commence operations through funding and/or the acquisition or business combination with a “going concern” engaged in any industry selected.  We are unable to predict the time as to when and if we may actually participate in any specific business endeavor, and we will be unable to do so until we determine any particular industry in which we may conduct business operations.

4

We are not currently engaged in any substantive business activity except the search for potential assets, property or businesses to acquire, and we have no current plans to engage in any other activity in the foreseeable future unless and until we complete any such acquisition.  In our present form, we are deemed to be a “shell company” seeking to acquire or merge with a business or company.  We do not intend to restrict our search for business opportunities to any particular business or industry, and the areas in which we will seek out business opportunities may include all lawful businesses.  We recognize that the number of suitable potential business ventures that may be available to us will be extremely limited, and may be restricted to businesses or entities that desire to become a publicly-held company while avoiding what many may deem to be the adverse factors related to an initial public offering (“IPO”) as a method of “going public.”  The most prevalent of these factors include the substantial time requirements, legal and accounting costs, the inability to obtain an underwriter who is willing to publicly offer and sell securities on behalf of the particular entity, the lack of or the inability to obtain the required financial statements for such an undertaking, state limitations on the amount of dilution to public investors in comparison to the stockholders of any such entity, along with other conditions or requirements imposed by various federal and state securities laws, rules and regulations and federal and state agencies that implement them.

Amendments to Rule 144, adopted by the SEC and effective on February 15, 2008, codify the SEC’s prior position limiting the tradeability of certain securities of shell companies, including those issued by us in any business combination, and further limit the tradeability of additional securities of shell companies; these proposals will further restrict the availability of opportunities for us to acquire any business or enterprise that desires to utilize us as a means of going public.  See the heading “Rule 144” in Part II, Item 5, for a discussion of the general requirements of Rule 144 and the limitations of Rule 144 with respect to shell companies.

Any of these types of business combination transactions, regardless of the particular prospect, would require us to issue a substantial number of shares of our common stock that could amount to as much as 95% or more of our outstanding voting securities; accordingly, investments in the private enterprise, if available, would be much more favorable than any investment in us.

Management intends to consider a number of factors prior to making any decision to participate in any specific business endeavor, none of which may be determinative or provide any assurance of success.  These may include, but will not be limited to, as applicable, an analysis of the quality of the particular business or entity’s management and personnel; the anticipated acceptability of any new products or marketing concepts that any such business or company may have; the merits of any such business’s or company’s technology or intellectual property; the present financial condition, projected growth potential and available technical, financial and managerial resources; working capital, history of operations and future prospects; the nature of present and expected competition; the quality and experience of any such business’s or company’s management services and the depth of management; the business’ or the company’s potential for further research, development or exploration; risk factors specifically related to the business’s or company’s operations; the potential for growth, expansion and profit; the perceived public recognition

5

or acceptance of products, or services offered and trademarks and name identification; and numerous other factors that are difficult, if not impossible, to properly or accurately quantify or analyze, let alone describe or identify, without referring to specific objective criteria of an identified business or company.

Regardless, the results of operations of any specific entity may not necessarily be indicative of what may occur in the future, by reason of changing market strategies, plant or product expansion, changes in product emphasis, future management personnel and changes in innumerable other factors.  Further, in the case of a new business venture or one that is in a research and development mode, the risks will be substantial, and there will be no objective criteria to examine the effectiveness or the abilities of its management or its business objectives.  Also, a firm market for its products or services may yet need to be established, and with no past track record, the profitability of any such business will be unproven and cannot be predicted with any certainty.

Our management will attempt to meet personally with management and key personnel of any entity providing a potential business opportunity for us, visit and inspect material facilities, obtain independent analysis or verification of information provided and gathered, check references of material personnel and conduct other reasonably prudent measures calculated to ensure a reasonably thorough review of any particular business opportunity; however, due to time constraints of management and limited capital, these activities may be limited.  

Although we currently have no plans to do so, depending on the nature and extent of services rendered, we may compensate members of our management in the future for services that they may perform for us.  Because we currently have extremely limited resources, and we are unlikely to have any significant resources until we have determined a business or enterprise to engage in or have completed a business combination, management expects that any such compensation would take the form of an issuance of shares of our common stock to these persons; this would have the effect of further diluting the holdings of our other stockholders.  There are presently no preliminary agreements or understandings between us and members of our management respecting such compensation.  Any shares issued to members of our management would be required to be resold under an effective registration statement filed with the SEC or could not be publicly sold until 12 months after we file the Form 10 information about the business combination with the SEC as required by SEC Form 8-K.  These provisions could further inhibit our ability to complete any business combination where finders or others who may be subject to these resale limitations refuse to provide us with any introductions or to close any such transactions unless they are paid requested fees in cash rather than our shares or unless we agree to file a registration statement with the SEC that includes any shares that are to be issued to them, at no cost to them.  These expenses could limit potential acquisition candidates, especially those in need of cash resources, and could affect the number of shares that our stockholders retain following any such transaction, by reason of the increased expense.

Substantial fees are also often paid in connection with the completion of all types of business combinations, ranging from a small amount to as much as $400,000 or more. These fees are usually divided among promoters or founders or finders, after deduction of legal, accounting and other related expenses, and it is not unusual for a portion of these fees to be paid to members of management or to principal stockholders as consideration for their agreement to retire a portion of their shares of common stock or as consideration to them to provide an indemnification for all of our prior liabilities.  Members of management may also actively negotiate or otherwise consent to the purchase of all or any portion of their shares of common stock as a condition to, or in connection with, a proposed business combination.  It is not anticipated that any such opportunity will be afforded to other stockholders or that such other stockholders will be afforded the opportunity to approve or consent to any particular stock buy-out transaction.  In the event that any such fees are paid or shares are purchased, these requirements may become a factor in

6

negotiations regarding any business combination with us and, accordingly, may also present a conflict of interest for such individuals.  Any of these types of fees that are paid in shares of our common stock will also be subject to the resale limitations embodied in Rule 144 that prohibit, among other requirements, the public resale of these shares until 12 months after the filing of the Form 10 information with the SEC.  We have no present arrangements or understandings respecting any of these types of fees or opportunities, other than pursuant to our management services agreement with Richland, Gordon & Company.   See the description of our management services agreement with Richland, Gordon & Company contained in Part III, Item 13 of this Report, and a copy of that agreement included in Part IV, Item 15 of this Report, with respect to, among other things, certain cash fees that may be payable by us to Richland, Gordon in connection with future financings and business combinations by us.  

Competitive Business Conditions and Our Competitive Position in the Industry and Methods of Competition

Management believes that there are literally thousands of shell companies engaged in endeavors similar to those engaged in by us; many of these companies have substantial current assets and cash reserves.  Competitors also include thousands of other publicly-held companies whose business operations have proven unsuccessful, and whose only viable business opportunity is that of providing a publicly-held vehicle through which a private entity may have access to the public capital markets via a reverse reorganization or merger.  There is no reasonable way to predict our competitive position or that of any other entity in these endeavors; however, we, have limited assets and no cash reserves, will no doubt be at a competitive disadvantage in competing with shell companies that have significant cash resources and have recent operating histories when compared with our lack of any substantive operations for many years.

Effect of Existing or Probable Governmental Regulations on our Business

We are subject to the following regulations of the SEC and applicable securities laws, rules and regulations:

Smaller Reporting Company

We are subject to the reporting requirements of Section 13 of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the “Exchange Act”), and subject to the disclosure requirements of Regulation S-K of the SEC, as a “smaller reporting company.”  That designation will relieve us of some of the informational requirements of Regulation S-K applicable to larger companies.

Sarbanes/Oxley Act

We are also subject to the Sarbanes/Oxley Act of 2002.  The Sarbanes/Oxley Act created a strong and independent accounting oversight board to oversee the conduct of auditors of public companies and strengthens auditor independence.  It also requires steps to enhance the direct responsibility of senior members of management for financial reporting and for the quality of financial disclosures made by public companies; establishes clear statutory rules to limit, and to expose to public view, possible conflicts of interest affecting securities analysts; creates guidelines for audit committee members’ appointment, compensation and oversight of the work of public companies’ auditors; management's assessment of our internal controls; auditor attestation to management’s conclusions about internal controls; prohibits certain insider trading during pension fund blackout periods; requires companies and auditors to evaluate internal controls and procedures; and establishes a federal crime of securities fraud, among other provisions. Compliance with the requirements of the Sarbanes/Oxley Act has substantially increased our legal and accounting costs.

Exchange Act Reporting Requirements

Section 14(a) of the Exchange Act requires all companies with securities registered pursuant to Section 12(g) of the Exchange Act to comply with the rules and regulations of the SEC regarding proxy solicitations, as outlined in Regulation 14A. Matters submitted to stockholders at special or annual meetings thereof or pursuant to a written consent will require us to provide our stockholders with the information outlined in Schedules 14A or 14C of Regulation 14; preliminary copies of this information must be submitted to the SEC at least 10 days prior to the date that definitive copies of this information are forwarded to our stockholders.

7

We are also required to file Annual Reports on SEC Form 10-K and Quarterly Reports on SEC Form 10-Q with the SEC on a regular basis, and will be required to timely disclose certain material events (e.g., changes in corporate control; acquisitions or dispositions of a significant amount of assets other than in the ordinary course of business; and bankruptcy) in a Current Report on SEC Form 8-K.

Emerging Growth Company

We are an “emerging growth company” as defined in the Jumpstart Our Business Startups Act of 2012, or “JOBS Act.”  As long as we remain an “emerging growth company,” we may take advantage of certain exemptions from various reporting requirements that are applicable to other public companies that are not an “emerging growth company,” like those applicable to a “smaller reporting company,” including, but not limited to, a scaled down description of our business in Securities and Exchange Commission filings; no requirements to include risk factors in Exchange Act filings; no requirement to include certain selected financial data and supplementary financial information in Securities and Exchange Commission filings; not being required to comply with the auditor attestation requirements of Section 404 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act; reduced disclosure obligations regarding executive compensation in our periodic reports and proxy statements that we file under the Exchange Act; no requirement for Sarbanes-Oxley Act Section 404(b) auditor attestations of internal control over financial reporting; and exemptions from the requirements of holding an annual nonbinding advisory vote on executive compensation and seeking nonbinding stockholder approval of any golden parachute payments not previously approved.  We are also only required to file audited financial statements for the previous two fiscal years when filing registration statements, together with reviewed financial statements of any applicable subsequent quarter.

We may take advantage of these reporting exemptions until we are no longer an “emerging growth company.”  We can remain an “emerging growth company” for up to five years.  We would cease to be an “emerging growth company” prior to such time if we have total annual gross revenues of $1 billion or more and when we become a “larger accelerated filer,” have a public float of $700 million or more or we issue more than $1 billion of non-convertible debt over a three-year period.

Under the JOBS Act, emerging growth companies can also delay adopting new or revised accounting standards until such time as those standards apply to private companies.  We have irrevocably elected not to avail ourselves of this exemption from new or revised accounting standards and, therefore, will be subject to the same new or revised accounting standards as other public companies that are not emerging growth companies.

Number of Total Employees and Number of Full Time Employees

We have no employees.

ITEM 1A.  RISK FACTORS

As a smaller reporting company, we are not required to provide risk factors.

ITEM 2:  PROPERTIES

Our Company has no assets, property or business; its principal executive office address and telephone number are the office address and telephone number of Alan D. Gordon, who is our President and a director and an affiliate of Mirabella Holdings, LLC (our current majority stockholder), which are provided at no cost to the Company.  See Part I, Item 1. Because the Company has had no business, its activities have been limited to keeping itself in good standing in the State of Utah.  These activities have consumed an insignificant amount of management’s time; accordingly, the costs to Mr. Gordon of providing the use of his office and telephone have been minimal.

ITEM 3:  LEGAL PROCEEDINGS

We are not a party to any pending legal proceeding and, to the knowledge of our management; no federal, state or local governmental agency is presently contemplating any proceeding against us.  No director, executive officer or affiliate of ours or owner of record or beneficially of more than 5% of our common stock is a party adverse to us or has a material interest adverse to us in any proceeding.

8

ITEM 4:  MINE SAFETY DISCLOSURES

None; not applicable.

PART II

ITEM 5:  MARKET FOR REGISTRANT’S COMMON EQUITY, RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS AND ISSUER PURCHASES OF EQUITY SECURITIES

Market Information

There is no “established trading market” for our shares of common stock. Commencing on or about January 5, 2006, our shares of common stock were listed on the OTC Bulletin Board of the Financial Industry Regulatory Authority, Inc. (“FINRA”) under the symbol “AIAN”; we received a new symbol of “ATTC” in conjunction with the reverse split as discussed under the caption “Business Development” herein.  We applied for a symbol change and were granted on October 14, 2013, the new symbol “ALDA.”  However, management does not expect any established trading market to develop in our shares of common stock unless and until we have material operations.  In any event, no assurance can be given that any market for our common stock will develop or be maintained. If a public market ever develops in the future, the sale of shares of our common stock that are deemed to be “restricted securities” pursuant to Rule 144 by members of management or others may have a substantial adverse impact on any such market.

Set forth below are the high and low closing bid prices for our common stock for each quarter of 2013 and 2014.  These bid prices were obtained from OTC Markets Group, Inc. formerly known as the “Pink Sheets, LLC.” All prices listed herein reflect inter-dealer prices, without retail mark-up, mark-down or commissions and may not represent actual transactions.

9

Rule 144

The following is a summary of the current requirements of Rule 144:

Shell Companies

The following is an excerpt from Rule 144(i) regarding resales of securities of shell companies:

“(i)

Unavailability to securities of issuers with no or nominal operations and no or nominal non-cash assets.

(1)

This section is not available for the resale of securities initially issued by an issuer defined below:

(i)

An issuer, other than a business combination related shell company, as defined in §230.405, or an asset-backed issuer, as defined in Item 1101(b) of Regulation AB (§229.1101(b) of this chapter), that has:

(A)

No or nominal operations; and

(B)

Either:

(1)

No or nominal assets;

(2)

Assets consisting solely of cash and cash equivalents; or

(3)

Assets consisting of any amount of cash and cash equivalents and nominal other assets; or

10

(ii)

An issuer that has been at any time previously an issuer described in paragraph (i)(1)(i).

(2)

Notwithstanding paragraph (i)(1), if the issuer of the securities previously had been an issuer described in paragraph (i)(1)(i) but has ceased to be an issuer described in paragraph (i)(1)(i); is subject to the reporting requirements of section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act; has filed all reports and other materials required to be filed by section 13 or 15(d) of the Exchange Act, as applicable, during the preceding 12 months (or for such shorter period that the issuer was required to file such reports and materials), other than Form 8-K reports (§249.308 of this chapter); and has filed current “Form 10 information” with the SEC reflecting its status as an entity that is no longer an issuer described in paragraph (i)(1)(i), then those securities may be sold subject to the requirements of this section after 12 months have elapsed from the date that the issuer filed “Form 10 information” with the SEC.

(3)

The term “Form 10 information” means the information that is required by Form 10 or Form 20-F (§249.220f of this chapter), as applicable to the issuer of the securities, to register under the Exchange Act each class of securities being sold under this rule.  The issuer may provide the “Form 10 information” in any filing of the issuer with the SEC.  The “Form 10 information” is deemed filed when the initial filing is made with the SEC.”

Securities of a shell company cannot be publicly sold under Rule 144 in the absence of compliance with this subparagraph.

Section 4(1) of the Securities Act

Since we are a shell company as defined in subparagraph (i) of Rule 144, our shares of common stock that were issued while or after we became a shell company cannot be publicly resold under Rule 144 until we comply with the requirements outlined above under the heading “Shell Companies.”  Until those requirements have been satisfied, any resales of our shares of common stock must be made in compliance with the provisions of the exemption from registration under the Securities Act provided in Section 4(1) thereof, applicable to persons other than “an issuer, underwriter or a dealer.”  That will require that such shares of common stock be sold in “routine trading transactions,” which would include compliance with substantially all of the requirements of Rule 144, including the availability of “current public information” about us as required by subparagraph (c) (1) or (c)(2) of Rule 144, regardless of the Rule’s availability; and such resales may be limited to our non-affiliates.  It has been the position of the SEC that the Section 4(1) exemption is not available for the resale of any securities of an issuer that is or was a shell company, by directors, executive officers, promoters or founders or their transferees.  See NASD Regulation, Inc., CCH Federal Securities Law Reporter, 1990-2000 Decisions, Paragraph No. 77,681, the so-called “Worm-Wulff Letter.”  The current position of the SEC that is contained in Securities Act Release No. 33-8869, effective February 15, 2008, and that codified the position of the SEC set forth in the Worm-Wulff Letter and revised Rule 144 as outlined above, is that Rule 144 now defines what resales can be made under Section 4(1) of the Securities Act, and with limited exceptions, which are set forth in footnote 172 of that Release, shares of shell companies must be sold in compliance with Rule 144(i) that is quoted above.

Holders

We currently have 661 shareholders, not including an indeterminate number who may hold shares in “street name.”

Dividends

We have not declared any cash dividends with respect to our common stock, and do not intend to declare dividends in the foreseeable future.  Our future dividend policy cannot be ascertained with any certainty, and if and until we determine to engage in any business or we complete any acquisition, reorganization or merger, no such policy will be formulated.  There are currently no material restrictions limiting, or that are likely to limit, our ability to pay dividends on our securities.

11

Securities Authorized for Issuance Under Equity Compensation Plans

Recent Sales of Unregistered Securities; Use of Proceeds from Registered Securities

We have had no recent sales of restricted securities.

Use of Proceeds of Registered Securities

There were no proceeds received during the calendar year ended December 31, 2014, from the sale of registered securities.

Purchases of Equity Securities by Us and Affiliated Purchasers

During the last three fiscal years, there were no purchases of any equity securities of ours by us or any person on our behalf; nor were there any purchases of our equity securities by any affiliate of ours during the last three fiscal years.

ITEM 6:  SELECTED FINANCIAL DATA

Not required for smaller reporting companies.

ITEM 7:  MANAGEMENT’S DISCUSSION AND ANALYSIS OF FINANCIAL CONDITION AND RESULTS OF OPERATION

Forward-looking Statements

Statements made in this Annual Report, which are not purely historical, are forward-looking statements with respect to the goals, plan objectives, intentions, expectations, financial condition, results of operations, future performance and our business, including, without limitation, (i) our ability to raise capital, and (ii) statements preceded by, followed by or that include the words “may,” “would,” “could,” “should,” “expects,” “projects,” “anticipates,” “believes,” “estimates,” “plans,” “intends,” “targets” or similar expressions.

Accordingly, results actually achieved may differ materially from expected results in these statements.  Forward-looking statements speak only as of the date they are made.  We do not undertake, and specifically

12

disclaim, any obligation to update any forward-looking statements to reflect events or circumstances occurring after the date of such statements.

Plan of Operation

Our plan of operation for the next 12 months is to: (i) consider guidelines of industries in which we may have an interest; (ii) adopt a business plan regarding engaging in the business of any selected industry; and (iii) commence such operations through funding and/or the acquisition of a “going concern” engaged in any industry selected.

During the next 12 months, our only foreseeable cash requirements will relate to maintaining our good standing; the payment of our SEC reporting filing expenses, including associated legal and accounting fees; costs incident to reviewing or investigating any potential business venture; and maintaining our good standing as a corporation in our state of organization.  We anticipate that these funds will be provided to us in the form of loans from Mirabella Holdings, LLC (“Mirabella”), our majority shareholder, although Mirabella is under no obligation to provide any such loans in the future.  Currently, any such loans that may be provided to us from time to time by Mirabella are made pursuant to a demand promissory note that has been issued by us to Mirabella, which loans are unsecured, payable on demand and bear interest at a rate of 10% per annum, compounded quarterly.  See the description of that demand promissory note contained in Part III, Item 13 of this Report, and a copy of that note included in Part IV, Item 15 of this Report.

Liquidity and Capital Resources

We have no current cash resources.

Results of Operations

Year Ended December 31, 2014, Compared to Year Ended December 31, 2013

Other than maintaining its good corporate standing in the State of Utah, compromising and settling its debts and seeking the acquisition of assets, properties or businesses that may benefit the Company and its stockholders, the Company has had no material business operations in the two most recent calendar years.

At December 31, 2013, the Company had $5,000 in assets and we had $0 in assets as of December 31, 2014. See the Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Item 8 of this Annual Report.

During the period ended December 31, 2014, the Company had a net loss of $214,758, resulting from operations, as compared to a net loss of $210,668 for the same period ended December 31, 2013.  Primarily all of these losses are the result of attorney’s fees, accounting fees and management fees.  See the Financial Statements and Supplementary Data, Item 8 of this Report.

During calendar 2014, expenses were paid by Mirabella, a majority stockholder of the Company, in the aggregate amount of $28,293, and during calendar 2013 expenses were also paid by Mirabella in the aggregate amount of $87,044. The aggregate amount of $331,676 outstanding as of December 31, 2014 on the loans provided to us by Mirabella, which includes the $1,275 of expenses paid by Mirabella during 2007 that were not converted into a capital contribution, is unsecured, bears interest at the rate of 10% per annum, compounded quarterly, and is due and payable to Mirabella on demand.   See the description of our demand promissory note issued to Mirabella contained in Part III, Item 13 of this Report, and a copy of that note included in Part IV, Item 15 of this Report.

While Mirabella currently pays our limited operating and other expenses on our behalf, Mirabella is not obligated to pay any of those expenses, and we can provide no assurance that Mirabella will continue to pay any of those expenses in the future.

Off-Balance Sheet Arrangements

We had no Off-Balance Sheet arrangements of any kind for the year ended December 31, 2014.

13

ITEM 7A:  QUANTITATIVE AND QUALITATIVE DISCLOSURES ABOUT MARKET RISK

Not required for smaller reporting companies.

ITEM 8:  FINANCIAL STATEMENTS AND SUPPLEMENTARY DATA

14

FINANCIAL STATEMENTS

December 31, 2014

C O N T E N T S

15

REPORT OF INDEPENDENT REGISTERED PUBLIC ACCOUNTING FIRM

To the Board of Directors and Stockholders

Atlantica, Inc.

Chicago, Illinois

We have audited the accompanying balance sheets of Atlantica, Inc. as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the related statements of operations, stockholders' equity (deficit), and cash flows for the years then ended. These financial statements are the responsibility of the Company's management. Our responsibility is to express an opinion on these financial statements based on our audits.

We conducted our audits in accordance with the standards of the Public Company Accounting Oversight Board (United States). Those standards require that we plan and perform the audit to obtain reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements are free of material misstatement. The Company is not required to have, nor were we engaged to perform, an audit of its internal control over financial reporting. Our audits included consideration of internal control over financial reporting as a basis for designing audit procedures that are appropriate in the circumstances, but not for the purpose of expressing an opinion on the effectiveness of the Company’s internal control over financial reporting. Accordingly, we express no such opinion. An audit also includes examining, on a test basis, evidence supporting the amounts and disclosures in the financial statements, assessing the accounting principles used and significant estimates made by management, as well as evaluating the overall financial statement presentation. We believe that our audits provide a reasonable basis for our opinion.

In our opinion, the financial statements referred to above present fairly, in all material respects, the financial position of Atlantica, Inc. as of December 31, 2014 and 2013, and the results of its operations and its cash flows for the years then ended, in conformity with U.S. generally accepted accounting principles.

The accompanying financial statements have been prepared assuming that the Company will continue as a going concern.  As disclosed in Note 2 to the financial statements, the Company does not generate significant revenue and has negative cash flow from operations.  This raises substantial doubt about the Company’s ability to continue as a going concern.  Management’s plans in regard to these matters are also described in Note 2.  The financial statements do not include any adjustments that might result in the outcome of this uncertainty.

/s/HJ & Associates, LLC

HJ & Associates, LLC

Salt Lake City, Utah

February 23, 2015

16

ATLANTICA, INC.

Balance Sheets

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

19

ATLANTICA, INC.

Statements of Cash Flows

The accompanying notes are an integral part of these financial statements.

20

ATLANTICA, INC.

Notes to Audited Financial Statements

December 31, 2014

NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES

This summary of significant accounting policies of Atlantica, Inc. is presented to assist in understanding the Company’s financial statements. The financial statements and notes are representations of the Company’s management, which is responsible for their integrity and objectivity. These accounting policies conform to accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America and have been consistently applied in the preparation of the financial statements.

a. Organization and Business Activities

The financial statements presented are those of Atlantica, Inc. (the Company). The Company was incorporated in the State of Utah on March 3, 1938. The Company name at that time was Red Hills Mining Company. On February 5, 1953, the Company changed its name to Allied Oil and Minerals Company. On January 8, 1971, the Company changed its name to Community Equities Corporation. On March 26, 1996, the Company changed its name to Atlantica, Inc.

The Company had two subsidiaries; Keys Equities, Inc. (Keys), a Florida corporation incorporated on July 31, 1996, and Allied Equities, Inc. (Allied), a Florida corporation incorporated on July 15, 1996. On March 1, 1998, the Company transferred its right, title and interest in a mining claim in Utah to Allied. The mining claim had a book value of $-0-. On March 1, 1998, the Company distributed the shares of the two subsidiaries to its shareholders in a liquidating dividend.

The Company has not engaged in any business operations since 1990. The Company’s only activity since that time has consisted of taking actions necessary to restore and preserve its good standing in the State of Utah. The Company presently has no assets. The Company intends to continue to seek out the acquisition of assets, property or a business that may be beneficial to the Company and its stockholders. In considering whether to complete any such acquisition, the Board of Directors will make the final determination and the approval of stockholders will not be sought unless required by applicable law, the articles of incorporation or bylaws of the Company or contract.

b. Accounting Method

The Company’s financial statements are prepared using the accrual method of accounting. The Company has elected a December 31 year-end.

Certain balances in prior year financial statements have been adjusted to conform to current year presentation.

c. Estimates

The preparations of financial statements in conformity with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America requires management to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and liabilities at the date of the financial statements and the reported amounts of revenues and expenses during the reporting period.  Actual results could differ from those estimates.

d. Cash and Cash Equivalents

The Company considers all highly liquid investments with original maturities at the date of purchase of three months or less to be cash equivalents.

21

ATLANTICA, INC.

Notes to Audited Financial Statements

December 31, 2014

NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES (Continued)

e. Income Taxes

The Company utilizes an asset and liability approach for financial accounting and reporting for income taxes. Deferred income taxes are provided for temporary differences in the bases of assets and liabilities as reported for financial statement and income tax purposes.

Due to the change in ownership provisions of the Tax Reform Act of 1986, net operating loss carry-forwards for Federal income tax reporting purposes are subject to annual limitations. Should a change in ownership occur, net operating loss carry-forwards may be limited as to use in the future.

Deferred income taxes are provided using the liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences.  Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases.  Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely than not that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized.  Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of the changes in tax laws and rates of the date of enactment.

When tax returns are filed, it is highly certain that some positions taken would be sustained upon examination by the taxing authorities, while others are subject to uncertainty about the merits of the position taken or the amount of the position that would be ultimately sustained.  The benefit of a tax position is recognized in the financial statements in the period during which, based on all available evidence, management believes it is more likely than not that the position will be sustained upon examination, including the resolution of appeals or litigation processes, if any.  Tax positions taken are not offset or aggregated with other positions.  Tax positions that meet the more-likely-than-not recognition threshold are measured as the largest amount of tax benefit that is more than 50 percent likely of being realized upon settlement with the applicable taxing authority.  The portion of the benefits associated with tax positions taken that exceeds the amount measured as described above is reflected as a liability for unrecognized tax benefits in the accompanying balance sheet along with any associated interest and penalties that would be payable to the taxing authorities upon examination.

Interest and penalties associated with unrecognized tax benefits are classified as operating expenses in the statement of income.

f. Basic Loss Per Share

The computation of basic (loss) per share of common stock is based on the weighted average number of shares outstanding during the period.

22

ATLANTICA, INC.

Notes to Audited Financial Statements

December 31, 2014

NOTE 1 - SUMMARY OF SIGNFICANT ACCOUNTING POLICIES  (Continued)

g. Revenue Recognition Policy

The Company currently has no source of revenues. Revenue recognition policies will be determined when principal operations begin.

h. Recent Accounting Pronouncements

The Company has applied early adoption of Topic 915 for the current financial year although compliance with this standard is mandatory only with effect from December 15, 2014. The effect of the change is to provide information that is useful to present and potential investors, creditors, donors, and other capital market participants in making rational investment, credit, and similar resource allocation decisions.  The Company entered into the Development Stage January 1, 1997, and the cumulative information was not useful to present and potential investors, creditors, donors, and other capital market participants in making rational investment, credit, and similar resource allocation decisions.

The Company has reviewed all other recently issued, but not yet adopted, accounting standards in order to determine their effects, if any, on its results of operation, financial position or cash flows.  Based on that review, the Company believes that none of these pronouncements will have a significant effect on its financial statements.

NOTE 2 - GOING CONCERN

The Company’s financial statements are prepared using accounting principles generally accepted in the United States of America applicable to a going concern which contemplates the realization of assets and liquidation of liabilities in the normal course of business. The Company has not established revenues sufficient to cover its operation costs.  In addition, the Company has no assets, a working capital deficit and accumulated losses.  This raises substantial doubt about our ability to continue as a going concern.  The Company is seeking the acquisition of, or merger with, an existing operating company.  

The Company is relying on its principal shareholder to pay all of our operating and other expenses until we can complete a reorganization or merger.  While the Company's principal stockholder currently pays the Company's limited operating and other expenses, on the Company's behalf, that principal stockholder is not obligated to pay any of those expenses and the Company can provide no assurance that such stockholder will continue to pay any of those expenses in the future.  This stockholder paid a total of $28,293 in expenses for the Company in the year ended December 31, 2014, increasing the aggregate amount of a demand note held by this stockholder to $331,676.

NOTE 3 - INCOME TAXES

Deferred taxes are provided using the asset and liability method whereby deferred tax assets are recognized for deductible temporary differences and operating loss and tax credit carryforwards and deferred tax liabilities are recognized for taxable temporary differences. Temporary differences are the differences between the reported amounts of assets and liabilities and their tax bases. Deferred tax assets are reduced by a valuation allowance when, in the opinion of management, it is more likely that some portion or all of the deferred tax assets will not be realized. Deferred tax assets and liabilities are adjusted for the effects of changes in tax laws and rates on the date of enactment.

23

ATLANTICA, INC.

Notes to Audited Financial Statements

December 31, 2014

NOTE 3 - INCOME TAXES  (Continued)

Net deferred tax assets consist of the following components as of December 31, 2014 and 2013:

A valuation allowance is provided when it is more likely than not that all or a portion of the deferred tax asset will not be realized.  The valuation allowance increased by $83,500 from $429,000 to $512,500 during the year ended December 31, 2014.

The income tax provision differs from the amount of income tax determined by applying the U.S. federal and state income tax rate of 39% to pretax income from continuing operations for the years ended December 31, 2014 and 2013 due to the following:

At December 31, 2014, the Company had net operating loss carryforwards of $371,556 that may be offset against future taxable income from the year 2015 through 2034. No tax benefit has been reported in the December 31, 2014 financial statements since the potential tax benefit is offset by a valuation allowance of the same amount.

Due to the change in majority ownership that occurred under the Stock Purchase Agreement on June 29, 2007, described under “Note 4 – Change in Control of Issuer” below, net operating loss carryforwards for Federal income tax reporting purposes are subject to annual limitations under provisions of the Tax Reform Act of 1986.  The net operating loss carryforwards and the resulting deferred tax asset as of December 31, 2014 have been adjusted to reflect the limitations imposed.

The Company or one of its subsidiaries files income tax returns in the U.S. federal jurisdiction, and the state of Utah jurisdiction.  With few exceptions, the Company is no longer subject to U.S. federal, state and local, or non-U.S. income tax examinations by tax authorities for years before 2007.

The Company recognizes interest accrued related to unrecognized tax benefits in interest expense and penalties in operating expenses.  During the years ended December 31, 2014, and 2013, the Company recognized no interest and no penalties.  The Company had no payments of interest and penalties accrued at December 31, 2014 or 2013.

24

ATLANTICA, INC.

Notes to Audited Financial Statements

December 31, 2014

NOTE 4 – CHANGE IN CONTROL OF ISSUER

Pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Stock Purchase Agreement”) entered into on June 29, 2007, among Mirabella Holdings, LLC (the “Purchaser”), Duane S. Jenson, Travis T. Jenson, Thomas J. Howells, Leonard W. Burningham (collectively with Duane S. Jenson, Travis T. Jenson and Thomas J. Howells, the “Sellers”), and Leonard W. Burningham, as the representative of the Sellers (the “Sellers’ Representative”), the Purchaser acquired from the Sellers a total of 1,966,872 shares of the Company’s Common Stock (the “Acquired Shares”), representing 80% of the Company’s currently outstanding shares, for a purchase price of $525,000 in cash.

In addition, pursuant to a Share Escrow and Reset Agreement (the “Reset Agreement”) entered into among the Purchaser, the Sellers’ Representative, the Sellers, the Company and the escrow agent thereunder contemporaneously with the Stock Purchase Agreement, the Sellers placed in escrow an additional 423,928 shares of the Company’s Common Stock currently owned by them (the “Escrow Shares”), which represent all but 70 of the remaining shares of the Company’s Common Stock owned by the Sellers.  Pursuant to the Reset Agreement, upon the future acquisition by the Company, within the five-year period following June 29, 2007 (the “Acquisition Period”), of one or more companies having a combined enterprise value of at least $10 million (a “Threshold Acquisition”), the Escrow Shares will reset, at that time, to a number of newly-issued shares of the Company’s Common Stock that will represent (collectively with the 70 shares previously retained by the Sellers) 5% of the Company’s then fully-diluted Common Stock. In the event that a Threshold Acquisition does not occur within the Acquisition Period, all of the Escrow Shares will be released to the Sellers without any reissuance or adjustment in their amount.

A Threshold Acquisition by the Company did not occur during the Acquisition Period and, as a result, the Company subsequently received the required notice from the Sellers’ Representative requesting the release of the Escrow Shares to the Sellers in accordance with the terms of the Reset Agreement.  Accordingly, on November 12, 2012, all of the Escrow Shares were released to the Sellers without any reissuance or adjustment in their amount.  

The Stock Purchase Agreement, the Escrow Agreement and the Reset Agreement were filed as exhibits to the Company’s Form 8-K and 14F-1 Information Statement, both of which were filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 3, 2007.  See Part IV, Item 15.

NOTE 5 - COMMON STOCK

On March 13, 1998, the Company approved a one-for-20 (1:20) reverse stock split. After the split, the Company had authorized 25,000,000 shares and changed the par value from $0.01 to $0.0001. On this same date, 24,050,000 shares were issued to the directors of the Company for services rendered, valued at $0.0001 per share. The stock split is reflected on a retroactive basis.

On January 26, 2007, the majority stockholders of the Company voted in favor of amending and restating the Company’s Articles of Incorporation to change the total number of shares which the corporation shall be authorized to issue to 60,000,000 shares of capital stock, such total number of shares shall consist of 50,000,000 shares of $0.0001 par value common voting stock and 10,000,000 shares of preferred stock, having a par value of $0.0001 per share. The majority stockholders also approved a one-for-ten (1:10) reverse stock split of the Company’s issued and outstanding common shares, which became effective on February 15, 2007. The stock split is reflected on a retroactive basis.

25

ATLANTICA, INC.

Notes to Audited Financial Statements

December 31, 2014

NOTE 6 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS

Expenses incurred by the Company for legal and filing fees were paid out-of- pocket by a related party. On May 11, 1998, the shareholders of the Company completed a quasi-reorganization whereby the accumulated deficit of the Company was offset against paid-in capital to the extent possible. The quasi- reorganization has been reflected on a retroactive basis.

Expenses paid during the years ended December 31, 1999, 1998 and 1997 were paid by the Company’s President and were recorded as additional paid-in capital. Expenses during the year ended December 31, 2006, 2005, 2004, 2003, 2002, 2001 and 2000 were paid by certain related parties and recorded as loans to shareholders totaling $46,010 at December 31, 2006.  In conjunction with the closing of the transactions under the Stock Purchase Agreement entered into on June 29, 2007, described under “Note 4 – Change in Control of Issuer” above, all such loans, along with an additional $6,945 of expenses paid by certain related parties during the year ended December 31, 2007 and recorded as loans to shareholders, plus the Company’s other related party payables, all of which totaled $66,471 in the aggregate, were converted by that related party into contributions to the Company’s capital, with appropriate adjustments made to the Company’s additional paid-in capital account.  Other expenses during the years ended December 31, 2007 through December 31, 2014 were paid by Mirabella Holdings, LLC, the Company's majority shareholder, and recorded as loans by shareholders totaling $331,676 at December 31, 2014.  Expenses of $28,293 were paid during the year ended December 31, 2014.  The accrued interest related to the outstanding loans was $101,212 as of December 31, 2014, and $62,894 as of December 31, 2013.  The loans are evidenced by a promissory note, are unsecured, are due on demand and accrue interest at the rate of 10% per annum, compounded quarterly.  No payments were made during the year ended December 31, 2013.  Accrued interest for the year ended December 31, 2007 was immaterial and has been accrued in each of the years ended December 31, 2008 through December 31, 2014.   The note was issued by the Company on April 29, 2009 and covers all loans made by Mirabella Holdings, LLC to the Company since November 6, 2007, as well as all loans made since that date and any such loans that may be made by Mirabella Holdings, LLC in the future.  A copy of the note was filed as an exhibit to our Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2008; see Part IV, Item 15 of this Report.   

On April 29, 2009, the Company entered into a management services agreement (the “Management Services Agreement”) with Richland, Gordon & Company (“Richland”), a private investment firm beneficially owned by Alan D. Gordon, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer and one of the Company’s directors.  Pursuant to the Management Services Agreement, Richland provides certain financial and management consulting services to the Company, including, among other things, advice regarding the Company's operations, identification of potential businesses for the Company to acquire or other suitable business combinations for the Company, and advice regarding the Company's general preparation for its initial acquisition, other business combination or financing transaction that may occur in the future.  

26

ATLANTICA, INC.

Notes to Audited Financial Statements

December 31, 2014

NOTE 6 - RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS (Continued)

The Management Services Agreement has a term of ten years and provides for the Company to pay to Richland an annual management fee equal to the greater of (i) $120,000 or (ii) 5% of the Company's consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the agreement).  The management fee is payable in quarterly installments in arrears, on April 15, July 15, October 15 and January 15 of each year, with respect to the immediately preceding calendar quarter, equal to the greater of (i) $30,000 and (ii) 5% of the Company's consolidated EBITDA for the immediately preceding calendar quarter, with such payments commencing July 15, 2009 and covering services provided by Richland during the period from January 1, 2008 (prior to the date of the agreement) and continuing through the quarter ending June 30, 2009; however, the management fees accrue and are not initially payable to Richland until the Company’s completion of its initial acquisition or financing that occurs subsequent to the date of the agreement.  Accordingly, we accrued management fees payable to Richland totaling $120,000 during the year ended December 31, 2014, which fees, along with any other management fees that may subsequently accrue, are due and payable to Richland if and when such an acquisition or financing is completed by the Company.  

The Management Services Agreement also provides for the Company to pay a separate, cash transaction-based fee for investment banking services that Richland provides in connection with future acquisitions and financing transactions that may be completed by the Company.  This transaction-based fee equals 1% of the transaction value of any acquisitions or other business combinations or debt or equity financings completed by the Company subsequent to the date of the agreement; however, the amount of the initial transaction-based fee payable to Richland is reduced by the amount of all prior management fees earned by Richland under the agreement.  To date, no transaction-based fee has accrued or is otherwise payable by the Company to Richland.  Under the Management Services Agreement, the Company also reimburses Richland for all reasonable out-of-pocket expenses incurred by Richland in providing its services to the Company and indemnifies Richland and its agents and affiliates for any damages that they may suffer in connection with providing these services.  This expense reimbursement is payable on April 15, July 15, October 15 and January 15 of each year, with respect to expenses incurred by Richland during the immediately preceding calendar quarter.  To date, no such expenses have been incurred by Richland and, accordingly, no expenses have been reimbursed by the Company to Richland and no expense reimbursement obligation has been accrued or is otherwise payable by the Company.

A copy of the Management Services Agreement was filed as an exhibit to our Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2008; see Part IV, Item 15 of this Report.

NOTE 7 – SUBSEQUENT EVENTS

The Company has evaluated subsequent events pursuant to ASC Topic 855 from the balance sheet date through the date the financial statements were issued, and determined there are no events to disclose.

27

ITEM 9:  CHANGES IN AND DISAGREEMENTS WITH ACCOUNTANTS ON ACCOUNTING AND FINANCIAL DISCLOSURE

None; not applicable.

ITEM 9A:  CONTROLS AND PROCEDURES

Our management, with the participation of our principal executive and principal financial officer, evaluated the effectiveness of our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by this Annual Report.  Based on that evaluation, our President and CFO, concluded that our disclosure controls and procedures as of the end of the period covered by the Annual Report were effective and that the information required to be disclosed by us in reports filed under the Exchange Act is (i) recorded, processed, summarized and reported within the time periods specified in the SEC’s rules and forms and (ii) accumulated and communicated to our management, including our President and our CFO, as appropriate to allow timely decisions regarding disclosure.  A controls system cannot provide absolute assurance, however, that the objectives of the controls system are met, and no evaluation of controls can provide absolute assurance that all control issues and instances of fraud, if any, within a company have been detected.

Management’s Annual Report on Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

Our management is responsible for establishing and maintaining adequate internal control over financial reporting (as defined in Rule 13a-15(f) under the Exchange Act).  Our internal control over financial reporting is a process designed to provide reasonable assurance regarding the reliability of financial reporting and the preparation of financial statements for external purposes of accounting principles generally accepted in the United States.

Because of its inherent limitations, internal control over financial reporting may not prevent or detect misstatements.  Therefore, even those systems determined to be effective can provide only reasonable assurance of achieving their control objectives.

Our management, with the participation of the President and our CFO, evaluated the effectiveness of our internal controls over financial reporting as of December 31, 2014.  In making this assessment, management used the criteria set forth by the Committee of Sponsoring Organizations of the Treadway Commission (“COSO”) in Internal Control – Integrated Framework.  Based on this evaluation, our management, with the participation of the President and CFO, concluded that, as of December 31, 2014, our internal controls over financial reporting were effective.

This Annual Report does not include an attestation report of our registered public accounting firm regarding our internal controls over financial reporting.  Management’s report was not subject to attestation by our registered public accounting firm pursuant to temporary rules of the SEC that permit us to provide only management’s report in this Annual Report.

Changes in Internal Control Over Financial Reporting

There have been no changes in internal control over financial reporting.

ITEM 9B:  OTHER INFORMATION

None, not applicable.

28

PART III

ITEM 10:  DIRECTORS, EXECUTIVE OFFICERS, AND CORPORATE GOVERNANCE

Identification of Directors and Executive Officers

Our executive officers and directors and their respective ages, positions and biographical information are set forth below.

*

These persons presently serve in the capacities indicated.

Background and Business Experience

Alan D. Gordon.  Mr. Gordon is 59 years of age.  Mr. Gordon has served as the Chairman and Chief Executive Officer of Richland, Gordon & Company, a private investment firm, since 1983.

Shelley Goff, Secretary and Chief Financial Officer, is 54 years of age. Ms. Goff graduated from the University of Utah in 1992 with a B.S. in Finance. Ms. Goff has been the sole proprietor of The Financial Organizer since 1990 and prepares documents for filing with the Securities and Exchange Commission for public companies on EDGAR.

Frederick G. Pierce, II.  Mr. Pierce is 60 years of age.  Mr. Pierce has been a private investor in real estate and private equity for the past five years.

Daniel B. Zwirn.  Mr. Zwirn is 43 years of age.  Mr. Zwirn is Managing Member of Zwirn Family Interests, LLC, a private investment firm, and has served in that position since founding the company in May 2009.  From 2001 through May 2009, he founded and managed the business of D.B. Zwirn & Co. (“DBZ”), a private investment firm of which he was Managing Partner and Chief Investment Officer.  Through its ongoing, normal operations, DBZ managed up to $6 billion of equity capital and approximately $12 billion of assets.

Director Compensation

Our Directors do not receive any compensation for their services in such capacities.

Significant Employees

We do not employ any non-officers who are expected to make a significant contribution to its business.

Family Relationships

There are no family relationships between any of our officers or directors.

Involvement in Other Public Companies Registered Under the Exchange Act

None of our officers or directors currently serve on the Board of Directors of any other public company.

29

Involvement in Certain Legal Proceedings

During the past five years, no present or former director, executive officer or person nominated to become a director or an executive officer of ours:

(1) was a general partner or executive officer of any business against which any bankruptcy petition was filed, either at the time of the bankruptcy or two years prior to that time;

(2) was convicted in a criminal proceeding or named subject to a pending criminal proceeding (excluding traffic violations and other minor offenses);

(3) was subject to any order, judgment or decree, not subsequently reversed, suspended or vacated, of any court of competent jurisdiction, permanently or temporarily enjoining, barring, suspending or otherwise limiting his involvement in any type of business, securities or banking activities; or

(4) was found by a court of competent jurisdiction (in a civil action), the SEC or the Commodity Futures Trading Commission to have violated a federal or state securities or commodities law, and the judgment has not been reversed, suspended or vacated.

Promoters and control person.

See the heading “Transactions with Related Persons” below.

Compliance With Section 16(a) of the Exchange Act

Our shares of common stock are registered under the Exchange Act, and therefore our officers, directors and holders of more than 10% of our outstanding shares are subject to the provisions of Section 16(a) which requires them to file with the SEC initial reports of ownership and reports of changes in ownership of common stock and our other equity securities.  Officers, directors and greater than 10% beneficial owners are required by SEC regulations to furnish us with copies of all Section 16(a) reports they file.  Based solely on our review of the copies of reports that we received and written representations that no other reports were required, we believe that our executive officers, directors and greater than 10% stockholders complied with all applicable filing requirements on a timely basis during 2014.

Code of Ethics

The Company adopted a Code of Ethics that was filed as an exhibit 14 to our Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2001 and is incorporated herein by reference. See Part IV, Item 15 of this report.

Corporate Governance

Nominating Committee

We have not established a Nominating Committee because of our limited operations; and because we have only three directors and two executive officers, we believe that we are able to effectively manage the issues normally considered by a Nominating Committee.  Following the entry into any business combination or the completion of any acquisition, merger or reorganization, a further review of this issue will no doubt be necessitated and undertaken by management.

Audit Committee

We have not established an Audit Committee because of our limited operations; and because we have only three directors and two executive officers, we believe that we are able to effectively manage the issues normally considered by a Audit Committee.  Following the entry into any business combination or the completion of any acquisition, merger or reorganization, a further review of this issue will no doubt be necessitated and undertaken by management.

30

ITEM 11:  EXECUTIVE COMPENSATION

SUMMARY COMPENSATION TABLE

31

ITEM 12:  SECURITY OWNERSHIP OF CERTAIN BENEFICIAL OWNERS AND MANAGEMENT AND RELATED STOCKHOLDER MATTERS

Security Ownership of Certain Beneficial Owners

The following table sets forth the shareholdings of those persons who own more than five percent of our Company’s common stock as of December 31, 2014 and to the date hereof:

Ownership of Principal Shareholders

(1)

For purposes of this calculation, the number of shares of common stock outstanding is 2,458,590.

(2)

Security Ownership of Management

The following table sets forth the share holdings of our Company’s directors and executive officers as of December 31, 2014 and to the date hereof:

(1)

For purposes of this calculation, the number of shares of common stock outstanding was 2,458,590.

(2)

Includes 1,966,872 shares owned by Mirabella Holdings, LLC, a Delaware limited liability company owned by the Alan D. Gordon GS Trust.  Mr. Gordon is the trustee of the Alan D. Gordon GS Trust and in such capacity may be deemed to have voting and dispositive power over the shares owned by Mirabella Holdings, LLC.

32

Changes in Control

There are no present arrangements or pledges of our securities which may result in a change in control of us.  

Securities Authorized for Issuance under Equity Compensation Plans

Equity Compensation Plan Information

ITEM 13:  CERTAIN RELATIONSHIPS AND RELATED TRANSACTIONS, AND DIRECTORS INDEPENDENCE

Transactions with Related Persons

Pursuant to a Stock Purchase Agreement (the “Stock Purchase Agreement”) entered into on June 29, 2007, among Mirabella Holdings, LLC (the “Purchaser”), Duane S. Jenson, Travis T. Jenson, Thomas J. Howells, Leonard W. Burningham (collectively with Duane S. Jenson, Travis T. Jenson and Thomas J. Howells, the “Sellers”), and Leonard W. Burningham, as the representative of the Sellers (the “Sellers’ Representative”), the Purchaser acquired from the Sellers a total of 1,966,872 shares of the Company’s Common Stock (the “Acquired Shares”), representing 80% of the Company’s currently outstanding shares, for a purchase price of $525,000 in cash.

In addition, pursuant to a Share Escrow and Reset Agreement (the “Reset Agreement”) entered into among the Purchaser, the Sellers’ Representative, the Sellers, the Company and the escrow agent thereunder contemporaneously with the Stock Purchase Agreement, the Sellers placed in escrow an additional 423,928 shares of the Company’s Common Stock then owned by them (the “Escrow Shares”), which at the time represented all but 70 of the remaining shares of the Company’s Common Stock owned by the Sellers.  Pursuant to the Reset Agreement, if, during the five-year period following June 29, 2007 (the “Acquisition Period”), the Company acquired one or more companies having a combined enterprise value of at least $10 million (a “Threshold Acquisition”), the Escrow Shares would reset, at that time, to a number of newly-issued shares of the Company’s Common Stock that would represent (collectively with the 70 shares previously retained by the Sellers) 5% of the Company’s then fully-diluted Common Stock. If a Threshold Acquisition did not occur during the Acquisition Period, all of the Escrow Shares would be released to the Sellers without any reissuance or adjustment in their amount.

A Threshold Acquisition by the Company did not occur during the Acquisition Period and, as a result, the Company subsequently received the required notice from the Sellers’ Representative requesting the release of the Escrow Shares to the Sellers in accordance with the terms of the Reset Agreement.  Accordingly, on November 12, 2012, all of the Escrow Shares were released to the Sellers without any reissuance or adjustment in their amount.  

The Stock Purchase Agreement, the Escrow Agreement and the Reset Agreement were filed as exhibits to the Company’s Form 8-K and 14F-1 Information Statement, both of which were filed with the Securities and Exchange Commission on July 3, 2007.  See Part VI, Item 15.

33

On April 29, 2009, the Company entered into a management services agreement (the “Management Services Agreement”) with Richland, Gordon & Company (“Richland”), a private investment firm beneficially owned by Alan D. Gordon, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer and one of the Company’s directors.  Pursuant to the Management Services Agreement, Richland provides certain financial and management consulting services to the Company, including, among other things, advice regarding the Company's operations, identification of potential businesses for the Company to acquire or other suitable business combinations for the Company, and advice regarding the Company's general preparation for its initial acquisition, other business combination or financing that may occur in the future.  

The Management Services Agreement has a term of ten years and provides for the Company to pay to Richland an annual management fee equal to the greater of (i) $120,000 or (ii) 5% of the Company's consolidated EBITDA (as defined in the agreement).  The management fee is payable in quarterly installments in arrears, on April 15, July 15, October 15, and January 15 of each year with respect to the immediately preceding calendar quarter equal to the greater of (i) $30,000 and (ii) 5% of the Company’s consolidated EBITDA for the immediately preceding calendar quarter, with such payments commencing July 15, 2009 and covering services provided by Richland during the period from January 1, 2008 (prior to the date of the agreement) and continuing through the quarter ending June 30, 2009; however, the management fees accrue and are not initially payable to Richland until the Company’s completion of its initial acquisition or financing that occurs subsequent to the date of the agreement.  Accordingly, we accrued management fees payable to Richland totaling $120,000 during the year ended December 31, 2014, which fees, along with any other management fees that may subsequently accrue, are due and payable to Richland if and when such an acquisition or financing is completed by the Company.  

A copy of the Management Services Agreement was filed as an exhibit to our Annual Report dated December 31, 2008; see Part IV, Item 15 of this Report.

Other than the transactions pursuant to the Stock Purchase Agreement, the Escrow Agreement, the Reset Agreement, the Mirabella Loans and the Management Services Agreement, there were no other material transactions, or series of similar transactions, during our Company’s last fiscal year, or any currently proposed transactions, or series of similar transactions, to which our Company or any of our subsidiaries was or is to be a party, in which the amount involved exceeded the lesser of $120,000 or one percent of the average of the small business issuer’s total assets at year-end for the last three completed fiscal years and in which any director, executive officer or any security holder who is known to us to own of record or beneficially more than five percent of any class of our common stock, or any member of the immediate family of any of the foregoing persons, had an interest.

34

Promoters and Certain Control Persons

See the heading “Transactions with Related Persons” above.

Parents of the Smaller Reporting Company

We have no parents.

Director Independence

Currently two of our three directors satisfy the independence requirements of the New York Stock Exchange’s listing standards.  Alan Gordon is not considered independent because of, among other things, his position as President and Chief Executive Officer of the Company.

ITEM 14:  PRINCIPAL ACCOUNTANT FEES AND SERVICES

The following is a summary of the fees billed to us by our principal accountants during the fiscal years ended December 31, 2014, and 2013:

Audit Fees - Consists of fees for professional services rendered by our principal accountants for the audit of our annual financial statements and review of the financial statements included in our Forms 10-Q or services that are normally provided by our principal accountants in connection with statutory and regulatory filings or engagements.

Audit-related Fees - Consists of fees for assurance and related services by our principal accountants that are reasonably related to the performance of the audit or review of our financial statements and are not reported under “Audit fees.”

Tax Fees - Consists of fees for professional services rendered by our principal accountants for tax compliance, tax advice and tax planning.

All Other Fees - Consists of fees for products and services provided by our principal accountants, other than the services reported under “Audit fees,” “Audit-related fees,” and “Tax fees” above.

Policy on Audit Committee Pre-Approval of Audit and Permissible Non-Audit Services of Independent Auditors

We have not adopted an Audit Committee; therefore, there is no Audit Committee policy in this regard. However, we do require approval in advance of the performance of professional services to be provided to us by our principal accountant. Additionally, all services rendered by our principal accountant are performed pursuant to a written engagement letter between us and the principal accountant.

35

PART IV

ITEM 15:  EXHIBITS AND FINANCIAL STATEMENT SCHEDULES

(a)(1)(2)    Financial Statements.  See the audited financial statements for the year ended December 31, 2014 contained in Item 8 above which are incorporated herein by this reference.

(a)(3)         Exhibits.  The following exhibits are filed as part of this Annual Report:

Exhibit No.

Description of Exhibits

2.1

Stock Purchase Agreement, dated as of June 29, 2007, among Mirabella Holdings, LLC, Duane S. Jenson, Travis T. Jenson, Thomas J. Howells, Leonard W. Burningham, and Leonard W. Burningham, as the representative of the sellers thereunder (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.1 to the Company’s Form 8-K report, filed on July 3, 2007).

3.1

Articles of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated herein by reference to Exhibits 99.B and 99.C to the Company’s Form 10-SB Registration Statement, filed on June 3, 1998, as amended).

3.2

Amended Articles of Incorporation of the Company (incorporated by reference to the Company’s DEF 14C Definitive Information Statement, filed on or about December 27, 2006).

3.3

By-Laws of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 3 of the Company’s Form 10-KSB Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2001, filed on June 28, 2005).

10.1

Escrow Agreement, dated as of June 29, 2007, among Mirabella Holdings, LLC, Leonard W. Burningham, as the representative of the sellers and the escrow agent thereunder  (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.2 to the Company’s Form 8-K report, filed on July 3, 2007).

10.2

Share Escrow and Reset Agreement, dated as of June 29, 2007, among Mirabella Holdings, LLC, Duane S. Jenson, Travis T. Jenson, Thomas J. Howells, Leonard W. Burningham, Leonard W. Burningham, as the representative of the sellers, the Company  and the escrow agent thereunder  (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company’s Form 8-K report, filed on July 3, 2007).

10.3

Management Services Agreement, dated April 29, 2009, between Atlantica, Inc. and Richland, Gordon & Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.3 to the Company's Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2008).

10.4

Demand Promissory Note, dated April 29, 2009, and issued by Atlantica, Inc. payable to Mirabella Holdings, LLC (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 10.4 to the Company's Form 10-K Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2008).

14

Code of Ethics of the Company (incorporated by reference to Exhibit 14 of the Company’s Form 10-KSB Annual Report for the year ended December 31, 2001, filed on June 28, 2005).

31.1*

Certification of Alan D. Gordon, the Company’s President and Chief Executive Officer, pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

36

31.2*

Certification of Shelley Goff, the Company’s Secretary, Chief Financial Officer, and Principal Accounting Officer pursuant to section 302 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.

32*

Certification of Alan D. Gordon and Shelley Goff pursuant to section 906 of the Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002.