data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/afd0e/afd0e4892a1ea07ffba688b596bb0c31fd510a16" alt="A letter on a black background Description automatically generated"
Trading
Symbols
AIM:
UFO
FWB:
I3A1
23 May 2024
Alien
Metals Ltd
("Alien" or "the Company")
Financial Results for the Year Ended 31 December
2023
Alien Metals Ltd (AIM: UFO), a
global minerals exploration and development company, today
announces the release of its audited, financial results for the
year ended 31 December 2023.
The Company's full Annual Report
is being sent to shareholders, and is available on the Company's
website, www.alienmetals.uk.
The entirety of the Annual Report
is set out below.
For further information please
visit the Company's website at www.alienmetals.uk or
contact:
Strand Hanson (Financial and
Nominated Adviser)
James Harris / James Dance /
Robert Collins
Tel: +44 (0) 207409
3494
WH Ireland Ltd (Broker)
Harry Ansell / Katy
Mitchell
Tel: +44 (0) 207 220
1666
Yellow Jersey (Financial
PR)
Charles Goodwin / Shivantha
Thambirajah / Zara McKinlay
Tel: +44 (0) 20 3004
9512
CHAIRMAN'S REPORT
Dear Shareholders,
I am pleased to present the
Chairman's statement for Alien Metals Limited (the "Company",
"Alien Metals", or "Alien") for the year ended 31 December 2023.
The Company made significant progress during the year, particularly
on the Hancock Iron Ore Project, culminating in the publishing of
the Development study in February 2024.
Project updates
Hancock Iron Ore Project:
The 90% owned Hancock Iron Ore
Project ("Hancock" or the "Project") is located 17 kilometres
("km") north of the regional iron ore mining hub of Newman, Western
Australia. The geology of the area supports nearby world class iron
ore mines and the Company has an opportunity to build on the
current high confidence JORC compliant mineral resources and ore
reserves to develop a long life, direct ship, high grade iron ore
mine.
The Project has progressed
significantly during 2023 culminating in the publishing of a
development study (the "Development Study") in early 2024.
Highlights from the Development Study include:
·
MRE of 8.4Mt @ 60% Fe JORC Mineral Resource,
including an upgraded Indicated Resource of 4.5Mt@ 60.2%
Fe.
·
Based on 8Mt of the Mineral Resource being
converted to mining inventory, robust project financials of the
base case produced the following:
o an average annualised EBITDA of A$39m
o a
pre-tax NPV10 of A$146m and a pre-tax IRR of 133%
o All in sustaining cost of US$85/t
o Production rate of 1.25mtpa
o Initial development Capital Cost of A$28m
o Other key highlights from the Development Study include the
following:
o High confidence in the Capital and Operational Costs with
pricing received through the Early Contractor involvement and
Preferred Tenderer process resulting in up-to-date tendered pricing
for more than 90% of the Capital Costs and Operational
Costs.
o Initial production plan focussed on current 3.9Mt mining
inventory with further upside to mine the entire Mineral Resource
of 8.4Mt and beyond to be realised through ongoing exploration
upside. Further work confirmed a 165% increase in Indicated
Resources from 2.8mt to 4.5mt as part of an updated Mineral
Resource Statement.
Ore processing will utilise a
mobile dry crushing and screening plant capable of producing 1.25Mt
to 1.5Mt of 100% fines product per annum on a single shift basis.
Sprint capacity of the plant working on a double shift basis is up
to 3.0Mt per annum.
·
Low start-up cost of A$28m capital
including:
o A$18.0m for main roads intersection and access to
Site,
o A$2.5m for site establishment and pre-production
capital,
o A$6.5m of owners costs, working capital and contingency
allowances.
·
Reduction in costs achieved through the close
proximity to the Mining Hub of Newman. The proximity allows the
Company to avoid extensive construction capital costs associated
with airstrip, mining camp and associated services.
·
Provisional export capacity through the Port of
Port Hedland has been secured and remains on track for final
approvals during the first half of 2024.
CSA Global conducted an
independent review based on existing geological information and a
site visit to express an opinion about the Exploration Potential of
the Hancock Project. Their findings included:
·
Tenement E47/3954: Significant exploration
potential has been identified, in addition to the 8.4Mt Mineral
Resource outside of the known Mineral Resource area.
·
Tenement E47/3954: Walk up drill targets, with a
potential to increase the existing Mineral Resource
·
Hancock Project Tenements E47/3954 and E47/5001:
Significant strike lengths of Weeli Wolli Formation BIF and
Boolgeeda Iron Formations identified and yet to be adequately
explored.
·
Alien has also separately completed an additional
internal review of Project Tenement E47/5001, identifying
(interpreted from GSWA 250k mapping) significant underlying
geological lithologies that are suitable hosts for iron ore
mineralisation and exploration potential.
·
Success through accelerating exploration
activities could therefore significantly increase the existing
8.4Mt JORC Mineral Resources, resulting in potential for increases
to planned production and mine life.
Alien plans to conduct additional
exploration during 2024 to target an increase in its Mineral
Resource while preparing for the mining development. During April
2024, the Western Australian Department of Mines granted the mining
lease (M47/1633) for the project, giving security of tenure for a
21 year term through to 17 April 2045, and allowing for site
development to commence in 2024, assuming the requisite funding has
been secured.
The Company continued work on
multiple fronts towards putting the Project into
production.
In November, the Company signed a
conditional, non-binding, Memorandum of Understanding with the
Pilbara Ports Authority for Iron Ore exports. This would provide
access to the Utah Bulk Handling Facility, with multi-user berth in
Port Hedland. The Company has also substantially agreed the terms
for a binding agreement, which would be subject to typical
regulatory approvals.
The Company executed a Native
Title Project Mining Agreement with the Karlka Nyiyaparli
Aboriginal Corporation RNTBC ("KNAC"). This covers the Project and
associated tenements. In addition, the signing of Heritage
Agreements with (KNAC) enabled the Western Australian Department of
Mines, Industry Regulation and Safety to grant the Miscellaneous
Licence from the Great Northern Highway to the project.
During the year, the Company
completed infill diamond core drilling (13 holes for 1,048.9
metres) at the high grade Sirius Deposit in May 2023 with results
released in July 2023 showing consistent grades of over 60% Fe with
low levels of deleterious elements. These results were included in
the Mineral Resource Estimates included in the Development
Study.
A Heritage Agreement with the PKKP
Aboriginal Corporation RNTBC was also executed during the year for
the Vivash Gorge Project. This was done to facilitate the
exploration of licence E47/3071 cooperatively with the Puutu Kunti
Kurrama and Pinikura people, whilst ensuring best practice
protection of their cultural heritage.
Pinderi Hills Project:
Alien undertook a detailed review
of historical data on the Elizabeth Hill mining lease during the
year including site visits. The review supports a significant
opportunity for high-grade polymetallic mineralisation. The key
base metals results of this review, include:
-
1 metre ("m") @ 3.98% Cu, 12 troy ounces ("ozt")
Ag, 0.95% Ni from 35m in EC002
-
1m @ 3.5% Cu, 125ozt Ag, 0.58% Ni from 2m in
UGD063
-
5.2m @ 2.18% Ni, 166ozt Ag, 0.76% Cu from 3m in
UGD069
-
1.05m @ 1.90% Ni, 114ozt Ag, 1.25% Cu, from 5.05m
in UGD072
Some of these results extend
outside of the known mineralisation zones and support potential
extensions to the silver resource envelope. In addition, following
significant corporate activity targeting the region during the
year, including the announced SQM and Hancock Prospecting joint
$1.7 billion bid for Azure Minerals and SQM's announced strategic
joint venture with Novo Resources (ASX:NVO) for lithium, the
Company undertook a preliminary review for lithium prospectivity
within the Pinderi Hills project which is in progress as at the
date of this report.
Alien Metals engaged consultants
to review the Munni Munni PGM project during the period with a view
to potential joint venture funding to enable the project to
progress. The project area contains a
historic JORC 2004 compliant resource of 24 million tonnes @ 2.9
grams per tonne ("g/t") PGM and gold for 1.14 million ounces
('moz') palladium ('Pd'), 0.83 moz Pt ('platinum'), 152 thousand
ounces ("koz") Au ("gold") and 76 koz Rh ("rhodium"). Potential
exists for a much larger, high value, multi-commodity resource,
many of which appear on critical mineral lists. Munni Munni
represents one of the largest undeveloped primary PGM Resources in
Australia. Alien Metals newly appointed Board member, Robert Mosig,
has intimate knowledge of this project and will assist in
development of plans to extract value.
Subsequent to year end, the
Company through its wholly owned subsidiary Alien Metals Australia
Pty Ltd, entered into a joint venture with Errawarra Resources Ltd
(ASX: ERW) in respect of the lithium rights on the Pinderi Hills
Project. Errawarra has the potential to earn up to a 50% interest
in the lithium rights in the Project by spending up to A$4 million
with the first A$500,000 being by the way of a subscription for
common shares in the capital of the Company. Proceeds of the
subscription will be applied to general working capital
purposes:
• Stage 1: Errawarra will earn-in
for a 25% participating interest in the joint venture by spending
A$1m on the Project, within 24 months of the date of entering into
the Agreement; and
• Stage 2: Errawarra will earn-in
for a further 25% participating interest in the joint venture by
spending a further A$2.5m on the Project , within 60 months of the
date of entering into the Agreement.
At the conclusion of Stage 2,
Errawarra's interest in the Project will be 50% and from that
point, the Parties will contribute towards any Project related
expenditure on a pro-rata basis. If Errawarra does not meet the
required spend (as noted above) in either Stage 1 or Stage 2, its
interest in the joint venture will reduce proportionally. If AMA
chooses not to contribute on a pro-rata basis following the
completion of Errawarra's Stage 2 earn in, AMA's 50% interest will
dilute on a pro rata basis, and in the event that AMA's interest in
the joint venture falls below 10%, its remaining holding will
convert to a 2% gross revenue royalty.
Donovan 2 Copper-Gold Project:
Alien Metals is taking steps to
divest its projects in Mexico given the strength of its Australian
based portfolio.
Funding
The Company raised £2 million in
August 2023, issuing 1,000,000,000 shares at 0.2 pence a share. In
July 2023 the Company executed a short-term funding facility for $1
million. $0.5 million of this facility was subsequently cancelled
following the capital raise in August 2023.
Subsequent to year end the Company
entered into a further short term funding facility of A$2 million.
This facility will meet short-term capital requirements and
contribute towards exploration and the ongoing review of strategic
funding options to maximise value for the Company's shareholders
and stakeholders, including: Considering various longer-term
financing options, including continued discussions with strategic
partners regarding offtake funding, debt, equity project funding in
connection with the Hancock Project and the Pinderi Hills PGM,
silver and base metals project; and actively exploring the
potential for the sale or joint venture of non-core assets
providing further funding for the Company.
Financial Results
Alien Metals Limited reported a
loss for the twelve months ended 31 December 2023 of
$3,721,000 (31 December 2022: loss of
$2,375,000).
Included in the 2023 financial
results is non-cash share based payment expense of $216,000, a
write down of the carrying value of the Mexico exploration assets
in the amount of $794,000, and the write down of other assets in
the amount of $140,000.
Board Changes
During the year Mr Guy Robertson
(26 April 2023), Ms Elizabeth Henson (4 August 2023) and Mr Alwyn
Vorster (4 August 2023) were appointed to the Board. Mr Vorster
resigned subsequent to year end (15 March 2024) given other
commitments, however remains as an advisor on the Hancock
project.
Mr Robert Mosig was appointed as a
director on 15 March 2024.
Mr Daniel Smith (6 September
2023), Mr Mark Culbert (4 August 2023), Jo Battershill (26 April
2023) and Mr Roderick McIllree (30 June 2023) resigned as directors
during the year.
Outlook
Looking ahead, we remain focused
on delivering long-term value for our shareholders by continuing to
advance our exploration and development projects.
We will continue to prioritise
safety, sustainability, and good governance in all our operations,
as we work to create value for all our stakeholders.
Conclusion
In conclusion, I would like to
thank our employees, contractors, and shareholders for their
continued support during the year. We are pleased with the progress
we have made, and we look forward to updating you on our
achievements in the coming year.
Yours sincerely,
Guy Robertson
Interim Executive
Chairman
22 May 2024
DIRECTORS' REPORT
The Directors present their
Report, together with the Consolidated Financial Statements and
Independent Auditor's Report, for the year ended 31 December
2023.
Principal Activities
The principal activity of the
Group is to create and develop a multi-commodity portfolio of
exploration and mining projects in jurisdictions with established
mining communities, stable political backgrounds, and where strong
operational controls can be assured.
The Group's principal activities
are in the premier Pilbara mining region of Western
Australia.
Business Review
Alien Metals' geological team
continue to assess and identify projects that fit with the Group's
strategic objectives. Wherever possible, the projects are acquired
on a low-cost option basis whilst preliminary exploration is
undertaken to assess the merits of further work and with clear
value drivers for shareholders and stakeholders alike.
Where preliminary studies show
evidence of sufficient mineralisation, increasingly comprehensive
studies and development will be undertaken with a view to
delineating a compliant mineral resource estimate in readiness for
mine development or of the potential sale of the asset to a
producing mining company, at which time a significant premium over
its acquisition and development cost may be justified.
A detailed review of the business of
the Group during the year and an indication of likely future
developments may be found in the Chairman's Report on pages 3, 4
and 5.
Principal risks and uncertainties
are discussed on pages 7 to 12.
Results and Dividends
The loss of the Group for the year
ended 31 December 2023 amounts to $3,721,000 (31 December 2022:
loss of $2,375,000).
The Directors do not recommend the
payment of a dividend for the year (31 December 2022:
Nil).
Directors and Directors' Interests
The Directors who served during
the year ended 31 December 2023 had the following beneficial
interests in the shares of the Company at year end.
Director
|
31 December
2023
|
31 December
2022
|
Ordinary
Shares
|
Options
|
Performance
Rights
|
Ordinary
Shares
|
Options
|
Performance
Rights
|
A Vorster*
|
12,500,000
|
65,000,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
G Robertson***
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
E Henson**
|
8,455,722
|
65,000,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
D J Smith*******
|
4,517,715
|
45,000,000
|
-
|
4,517,715
|
57,342,509
|
-
|
M C Culbert******
|
6,666,666
|
-
|
-
|
6,666,666
|
7,500,000
|
-
|
J L Battershill*****
|
-
|
50,000,000
|
-
|
-
|
50,000,000
|
-
|
R McIllree****
|
137,404,762
|
230,000,000
|
-
|
137,404,762
|
230,000,000
|
-
|
* Appointed 4 August 2023, resigned 15 March
2024
** Appointed 4 August 2023
*** Appointed 26 April 2023
**** Appointed 7 September 2022, resigned 30 June
2023
***** Resigned 26 April 2023
****** Resigned 4 August 2023
******* Resigned 6 September 2023
Further details on options can be
found in Note 17 to the Financial
Statements. Directors' remuneration is disclosed in Note
20.
Substantial shareholders
The substantial shareholders with
more than a 3% shareholding at 29 February 2024 are shown below
|
|
|
Percentage
|
Bennelong Limited
|
7.21%
|
Windfield Metals Limited
|
5.92%
|
Gilmore Capital Limited
|
4.06%
|
Key Performance Indicators ("KPIs")
The Board monitors the activities
and performance of the Group on a regular basis. The Board uses
financial indicators based on budget versus actual to assess the
performance of the Group. The indicators set out below will be used
by the Board to assess performance over the period.
The three main KPIs for the Group
are as follows. These allow the Board to monitor costs and plan
future exploration and development activities:
|
2023
|
2022
|
Cash and cash equivalents
($)
|
676,000
|
2,177,000
|
Administrative expenses as a
percentage of total assets (%)
|
16%
|
13%
|
Exploration costs capitalised
during the year ($)
|
1,708,000
|
3,029,000
|
Principal Risks and Uncertainties
Risks are formally reviewed by the
Board, and appropriate processes are put in place to monitor and
mitigate them. If more than one event occurs, it is possible that
the overall effect of such events would compound the possible
adverse effects on the Group.
The financing, exploration,
development and mining of any of the Company's properties is
subject to a number of factors including the price of copper,
silver, gold, lead, iron ore and zinc, laws and regulations,
political conditions, currency fluctuations, environmental
regulations, hiring and retaining qualified people and obtaining
necessary services in jurisdictions where the Company
operates.
The Board periodically carries out
robust assessments of the emerging and principal risks facing the
Company including those that would threaten its business model,
future performance, solvency or liquidity. The assessment includes
a review of all material controls including those which are related
to finance, operations and compliance.
The Audit Committee is responsible
for monitoring the effectiveness of the Company's risk management
and internal control systems, and reports to the Board as
required.
Alien Metals operates with a small
team of key personnel and with open lines of internal
communication. Where new risks are identified, they are reported to
the Company Secretary or the Board. Where practicable, a method of
mitigation is determined, and the risk together with any form of
mitigation is presented to the Board for discussion.
The following is a brief
discussion of those distinctive or special characteristics of the
Company's operations and industry which may have a material impact
or constitute risk factors in respect of the Company's future
financial performance.
Principal risks and
uncertainties
Key risks
|
Description of
risk
|
Mitigating
factors
|
Strategic
risks
|
Exploration and development
and future acquisitions
|
The Group's operations are subject to all of the hazards and
risks incidental to exploration, development and the production of
minerals, including damage to life or property, environmental
damage and legal liability for damage, which could have a material
adverse impact on the business and its financial
performance.
The Group may acquire additional mining concessions in
Australia or elsewhere in the world.
The Group may be unable to obtain suitable mining concessions
at competitive prices.
Any exploration programme entails risks relating to the
location of economic ore bodies, the development of appropriate
metallurgical processes, the receipt of necessary governmental
permits and the construction of mining and processing
facilities.
In the event that the Group's portfolio of mining concessions
is deemed by management not to warrant further exploration and the
Group is unsuccessful in acquiring suitable new projects, the Group
will have no exploration or development projects to
pursue.
|
Our mineral concessions are evaluated carefully by qualified
geologists and independent advisors are engaged as and when
appropriate.
The management team has significant experience operating in
Australia.
|
No reserves or
resources
|
The Group has announced its maiden mining reserve and
associated mining inventory.
No assurance can be given that any future exploration
programme will result in any new resources and or
discoveries.
|
The Group received an independent assessment of the reserve
resource potential of the Hancock project and believes that there
is good potential to delineate additional mineral resources in
accordance with JORC.
|
|
|
| |
Key risks
|
Description of
risk
|
Mitigating
factors
|
Strategic
risks
|
Mineral concessions and
titles risks
|
In relation to exploration and mining concessions over which
the Group holds legal rights, if the Group fails to fulfil the
specific terms of any of its concessions or operates in the
concession areas in a manner that violates Mexican or Australian
mining law, regulators may impose fines, suspend or revoke the
concessions, any of which could have a material adverse effect on
the Group's operations and proposed operations.
Ownership of the mineral concessions in Mexico has been
transferred from the Group's former operating subsidiary Alien
Metals de Mexico SA de CV ("ASM") to its new operating subsidiary,
Compañía Minera Estrella de Plata SA de CV ("CMEP"). Whilst the
Group has previously received legal opinions in respect of title of
ASM to its properties. There is no guarantee that the title to such
properties will not be challenged or impugned by third parties. The
Group's concessions could be subject to prior unregistered
agreements, transfers or other claims and title could be affected
by unidentified or unknown defects or government actions. A formal
legal opinion has not been obtained as to the legal title of CMEP
to the mineral concessions.
|
The Group's mineral concessions have been registered in the
name of CMEP and no contest or objection was
received.
The Group is aware of necessary minimum expenditure and
annual rental obligations for all its exploration and mining
permits and maintains the necessary payments and expenditure
obligations to negate any risk from this aspect.
Prior to entering into agreements relating to mineral
concessions, formal searches and reviews of legal documentation are
conducted to provide evidence of the legal owner, including
outsourcing of legal and/or tenement due diligence to legal
practitioners.
At 31 December 2023 the exploration and evaluation assets in
Mexico had been written down to nil.
|
|
|
| |
Key risks
|
Description of
risk
|
Mitigating
factors
|
Financial
risks
|
Requirement of additional
financing
|
Failure to obtain sufficient financing for any projects would
result in a delay or indefinite postponement of exploration,
development or production on properties covered by the Group's
concessions or even the loss of a concession.
Additional financing might not be available when needed, or
if available, the terms of such financing might not be favourable
to the Group and could involve substantial dilution to
shareholders. In the absence of adequate funding or cost
reductions, the Group may not be able to continue as a going
concern.
|
The Group has an experienced Board and management team with
significant experience in financing mining
activities.
The Group has been successful in raising funds in the past
and it is our intention to raise additional funds in future to
support the ongoing development of the business.
|
Liquidity
risk
|
The Group's approach to managing liquidity risk is to ensure
that it will have sufficient liquidity to meet liabilities when
due. The Group's accounts payable have contractual maturities of
less than 30 days and are subject to normal trade terms. In the
short-term, liabilities will be funded by cash.
|
The Group ensures sufficient funds will be available to allow
it to meet its liabilities as they fall due. To achieve this, cash
balances and cash flow projections are reviewed by the Board on a
regular basis. The Board will not commit to material expenditures
prior to being satisfied that sufficient funding is
available.
|
Capital management
risk
|
The Group's objective when managing capital is to safeguard
the Group's ability to continue as a going concern and have access
to adequate funding for its exploration and development projects so
that it can provide returns for shareholders and benefits for other
stakeholders. The Group manages the capital structure and makes
adjustments in light of changes in economic conditions and risk
characteristics of the underlying assets.
|
In order to maintain or adjust the capital structure, the
Group may issue new shares, acquire debt, or sell assets.
Management regularly reviews cash flow forecasts to determine
whether the Group has sufficient cash reserves to meet future
working capital requirements and to take advantage of business
opportunities.
|
Price risk
|
The price risk is the risk that the fair value or future cash
flows of a financial instrument will fluctuate because of changes
in market prices, whether those changes are caused by factors
specific to the individual financial instrument or its issuer, or
factors affecting all similar financial instruments in the
market.
|
The Group does not currently have any financial instruments
in issue other than share options and warrants.
The Group does not hedge its exposure to price
risk.
|
Foreign currency
risk
|
The Group's exploration expenditure is made in Mexican pesos,
Australian dollars or US dollars and head office expenses are
predominantly made in the UK in pounds sterling. The Group is
therefore exposed to the movement in exchange rates for these
currencies.
At the year end, the majority of the Group's cash resources
were held in GBP and AUD. The Group therefore also has downside
exposure to any weakening of GBP and AUD against the US dollar as
this would increase expenses in US dollar terms and accelerate the
depletion of the Group's cash resources. Any strengthening of GBP
or AUD against the US dollar would, however, result in a reduction
in expenses in US dollar terms and preserve the Group's cash
resources.
In addition, any movements in pounds sterling, Australian
dollars or Mexican peso would affect the presentation of the
consolidated statement of financial position when the net assets of
the Mexican and Australian subsidiaries and the parent company in
the UK are translated from their functional currencies into US
dollars.
|
The Group does not currently hedge foreign exchange
risk.
There is not considered to be any material exposure in
respect of other monetary assets and liabilities of the
Group.
|
Credit
risk
|
The Group's credit risk is primarily attributable to cash and
the financial stability of the institutions holding
it.
The Group's maximum exposure to credit risk is attributable
to cash. The credit risk on cash is limited because the Group
invests its cash in deposits with well capitalised financial
institutions with strong credit ratings.
|
The Group invests its cash in deposits with well-capitalised
financial institutions with strong credit
ratings.
|
Investment
risk
|
The Group may from time to time hold shares in other mining
companies. There is not always a liquid market for the shares in
companies and it may not always be possible to sell such shares at
the optimum time or price.
|
The Group has previously been successful in realising value
from investments.
|
|
|
| |
Key risks
|
Description of
risk
|
Mitigating
factors
|
External
risks
|
Metals
prices
|
The Group's ability to obtain further financing will depend
in part on the price of commodity prices, including copper, silver,
lead, iron ore and zinc, and the industry's perception of its
future price. The Group's resources and financial results of
operations will also be affected by fluctuations in metal prices
over which the Group has no control.
A reduction in the metal prices could prevent the Group's
properties from being economically mined or result in curtailment
of existing production activities or result in the impairment and
write-off of assets. The price of commodities, which is affected by
numerous factors including inflation levels, fluctuations in the US
dollar and other currencies, supply and demand and political and
economic conditions, could have a significant influence on the
market price of the Company's common shares.
|
It is an accepted risk that the Group's performance will be
impacted by the price of metals.
The Board and management believe the price of precious metals
in particular will increase in the long term.
The Group does not hedge its exposure to metals
prices.
|
|
|
| |
Key risks
|
Description of
risk
|
Mitigating
factors
|
Operational
risks
|
Reliance on
contractors
|
The Group relies on contractors to implement exploration and
development programmes. The failure of a contractor or key service
provider to properly perform its services to the Group could delay
or inconvenience the Group's operations and have a materially
adverse effect on the Group.
|
The Group has operated in Australia and in Zacatecas in
Mexico, for several years and has well-established and trusted
relationships with various contractors.
|
Key
personnel
|
The Group's business is dependent on retaining the services
of a small number of key personnel of the appropriate calibre as
the business develops. The Group has entered into employment
agreements with certain key managers. The success of the Group is
and will continue to be to a significant extent, dependent on the
expertise and experience of the directors and senior management.
The loss of one or more of these individuals could have a
materially adverse effect on the Group. The Group does not
currently have any insurance in place with respect to key
personnel.
|
The Board has established a Nomination & Remuneration
Committee which is responsible for considering succession planning
and ensuring remuneration is sufficient to attract and retain staff
of the necessary calibre. The Company also has the ability, and
track record, to attract new Directors and personnel if and when
required.
|
Environmental
factors
|
The Group's operations are subject to environmental
regulation in the jurisdictions in which it operates. Such
regulation covers a wide variety of matters including, without
limitation, prevention of waste, pollution and protection of the
environment, labour regulations and health and safety. The Group
might also be subject under such regulations to clean-up costs and
liability for toxic or hazardous substances, which might exist on
or under any of the properties covered by its concessions, or which
might be produced as a result of its operations.
If the Group does not comply with environmental regulations
or does not file environmental impact statements in relation to
each of its concessions, it might be subject to penalties, its
operations might be suspended, closed and/or its concessions may be
revoked.
Environmental legislation and permit requirements are likely
to evolve in a manner which will require stricter standards and
enforcement, increased fines and penalties for non-compliance, more
stringent environmental assessments of proposed projects and a
heightened degree of responsibility for companies and their
directors and employees.
The Group's activities could be subject to prolonged
disruptions due to weather conditions depending on the location of
operations in which the Group has interests.
|
The Group has an experienced Board and management team with
an awareness and knowledge of these types of
risk.
Concessions are evaluated carefully prior to their
acquisition for environmental risks and consultants are engaged to
advise on specific risks when appropriate.
The Group has an excellent track record on environmental
matters.
|
Political
risk
|
The Group is conducting its exploration activities in the
Zacatecas region of Mexico, and in Western Australia. The Group may
be adversely affected by changes in economic, political, judicial,
administrative or other regulatory factors such as taxation in
these jurisdictions, where the Group operates and holds its major
assets.
Mexico may have a more volatile political environment and/or
more challenging trading conditions than in some other parts of the
world. There is no assurance that future political and economic
conditions in Mexico will not result in the government of Mexico
adopting different policies in respect of foreign development and
ownership of mineral resources. Any such changes in policy may
result in changes in laws affecting ownership of assets, taxation,
rates of exchange, environmental protection, labour relations, and
repatriation of income and return of capital. These changes may
affect both the Group's ability to undertake exploration and
development activities in respect of future properties in the
manner currently contemplated, as well as its ability to continue
to explore and develop those properties, in respect of which it has
obtained exploration and development rights to
date.
|
The Directors believe the governments of Australia and Mexico
support the development of natural resources by foreign
operators.
|
Payment
obligations
|
Under the mineral property concessions and certain other
contractual agreements to which a member of the Group is, or may in
the future become, a party, any such company is, or may become,
subject to payment and other obligations. If such obligations are
not complied with when due, in addition to any other remedies which
may be available to other parties, this could result in dilution or
forfeiture of interests held by such companies.
|
The Directors have in place a system of internal controls to
ensure any payment obligations are complied with.
|
Regulatory
approvals
|
The operations of the Group require approvals, licenses and
permits from various regulatory authorities, governmental and
otherwise. There can be no guarantee that the Group will be able to
obtain or maintain all necessary approvals, licenses and permits
that may be required to explore and develop its various projects
and/or commence construction or operation of mining facilities that
economically justify the cost.
|
The Group has significant experience in operating in Mexico
and Australia and believes that the Group holds or will obtain all
necessary approvals, licenses and permits under applicable laws and
regulations in respect of its current projects.
|
Competition
|
The Group competes with numerous other companies and
individuals in the search for and acquisition of mineral claims,
leases and other mineral interests, as well as for the recruitment
and retention of qualified employees. There is significant
competition for the silver and other precious metals opportunities
available and, as a result, the Group may be unable to acquire
further mineral concessions on terms it considers
acceptable.
|
The Group and its management team have significant experience
in mining operations in Australia and Mexico. Through its
experience and relationships, counterparties may consider the Group
to have lower transaction risk than its
competitors.
|
Conflicts of
interest
|
Certain directors and officers of the Group also serve as
directors and/or officers of other companies involved in mineral
exploration and development and consequently there is the potential
for conflicts of interest. The Group expects that any such director
or officer shall disclose such interest in accordance with its
articles of association or his contractual obligations to the Group
and any decision made by any of such directors and officers
involving the Group will be made in accordance with their duties
and obligations to deal fairly and in good faith with a view to the
best interests of the Group and its shareholders.
|
The Group's Articles of Association have been adopted by
shareholders and any conflicts of interest are dealt with in
accordance with the rules set out therein.
In the event of a conflict of interests, the conflicted
director shall not vote on the relevant matter.
|
Health and
Safety
|
Alien Metals operates in an environment with work related
hazards and risk of injuries and accidents. A comprehensive health
and safety programme is the primary means for delivering best
practices in health and safety management. This programme is
regularly required to be updated to incorporate employee
suggestions, lessons learned from past incidents and new guidelines
related to new projects with the aim of identifying areas for
further improvement of health and safety management. This requires
continuous improvement of the health and safety programme. Employee
involvement is recognised as fundamental in recognising and
reporting unsafe conditions and avoiding events that may result in
injuries and accidents.
|
The Group has established and published robust corporate
health, safety, environmental and community relations policies, and
at the operations level have put into place clear safe operating
procedures covering a variety of the Group's activities. The active
participation of all staff in the development, implementation and
further development of these procedures is actively
encouraged.
|
|
|
| |
Internal Controls
The Board recognises the
importance of both financial and non-financial controls and has
reviewed the Group's control environment and any related shortfalls
during the year. Since the Group was established, the Directors are
satisfied that, given the current size and activities of the Group,
adequate internal controls have been implemented. Whilst they are
aware that no system can provide absolute assurance against
material misstatement or loss, in light of the current activity and
proposed future development of the Group, continuing reviews of
internal controls will be undertaken to ensure that they are
adequate and effective.
Going Concern
These financial statements have
been prepared on a going concern basis, as set out in Note
2.4.
The Directors have prepared cash
flow forecasts for the period ending 31 May 2025, which take into
account the cost and operational structure of the Group and Parent
Company, planned exploration and evaluation expenditure, licence
commitments and working capital requirements. These forecasts
indicate that the Group and parent Company's cash resources are not
sufficient to cover the projected expenditure for the period of 12
months from the date of approval of these financial statements.
These forecasts indicate that the Group and Parent Company, in
order to meet their operational objectives, and expected
liabilities as they fall due, will be required to raise additional
funds within the next 12 months.
Whilst the Directors are confident
that they will be able to secure the necessary funding, the current
conditions do indicate the existence of a material uncertainty that
may cast doubt regarding the applicability of the going concern
assumption and the auditors have made reference to this in their
audit report. The Directors are confident in the Company's ability
to raise additional funds as required, from existing and/or new
investors, within the next 12 months. Thus, they continue to adopt
the going concern basis of accounting in preparing these financial
statements. The auditors make reference to going concern by way of
a material uncertainty over the ability of the Company and the
Group to fund the forecasted expenditure.
Directors' and Officers' Indemnity
Insurance
During the financial year, the
Company maintained insurance cover for its Directors and Officers
under a Directors' and Officers' liability insurance policy. The
Company has not provided any qualifying indemnity cover for the
Directors.
Provision of Information to Auditor
So far as each of the Directors is
aware at the time this report is approved:
· there is no relevant audit information of which the Company's
auditor is unaware; and
· the Directors have taken all steps that they ought to have
taken to make themselves aware of any relevant audit information
and to establish that the auditor is aware of that
information.
Auditor
PKF Littlejohn LLP was appointed
in the current year and signified its willingness to be reappointed
in office as auditor.
This report was approved by the
Board on 21 May 2024 and signed on its behalf.
Guy Robertson
Executive Chairman
STATEMENT OF DIRECTORS' RESPONSIBILITIES
The Directors are responsible for
preparing the Annual Report and the Financial Statements in
accordance with the applicable law and regulations including the
AIM Rules for Companies.
The Directors are required to
prepare Financial Statements
for each financial year. The Directors have
elected to prepare the Group's Financial Statements in accordance
with UK-adopted International Accounting Standards. The Directors
must not approve the Financial Statements unless they are satisfied
that they give a true and fair view of the state of affairs of the
Group and of the profit or loss of the Group for that period. In
preparing these Financial Statements, the Directors are required
to:
· select suitable accounting policies and then apply them
consistently;
· make judgments and accounting estimates that are reasonable
and prudent;
· state whether applicable UK-adopted International Accounting
Standards have been followed, subject to any material departures
disclosed and explained in the Financial Statements;
· prepare the Financial Statements on the going concern basis
unless it is inappropriate to presume that the Group will continue
in business.
The Directors are responsible for
keeping adequate accounting records that are sufficient to show and
explain the Group's transactions and disclose with reasonable
accuracy at any time the financial position of the Group. They are
also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the Group, and
hence for taking reasonable steps for the prevention and detection
of fraud and other irregularities.
The Directors are responsible for
the maintenance and integrity of the corporate and financial
information included on the Group's website, https://www.alienmetals.uk. The Group is compliant
with AIM Rule 26 regarding the Group's website.
The Directors confirm that they
have complied with the above requirements in preparing these
Financial Statements.
CORPORATE GOVERNANCE REPORT
The Board recognises the value and
importance of maintaining the highest standards of corporate
governance and is committed to the principles and best practice of
good corporate governance. In this regard the Directors have
elected to comply with the 2018 UK Corporate Governance Code ("the
Code") though there are a number of provisions which the Group have
not complied with due to it not being practical to do so, having
regard to the size and stage of development of the Group. The
Directors remuneration is disclosed in Note 19.
Although the Code contains a set
of five Principles that emphasise the value of good corporate
governance to long term sustainable success and focuses on the
application of such Principles, it does not set out a rigid set of
rules but instead offers flexibility through the application of
Principles and through "comply or explain" Provisions and
supporting guidance.
The Company is small with a modest
resource base. The Company has a clear mandate to optimise the
allocation of limited resources to support its development plans.
As such, the Company strives to maintain a balance between
conservation of limited resources and maintaining robust corporate
governance practices. As the Company evolves, the Board is
committed to enhancing the Company's corporate governance policies
and practices deemed appropriate for the size and maturity of the
organisation.
During the year the Board
consisted of three Directors: an Non-Executive Chairman, an
Executive Director and one Non-Executive Director ("NED"). The
Board considers that appropriate oversight of the Group's provided
by the currently constituted Board. The sections below set out the
way in which the Group applies the Principles.
Principle 1: Board Leadership and Company
Purpose
Alien Metals' objective is to
create a multi-commodity portfolio of exploration and mining
projects in established mining jurisdictions, stable political
backgrounds and where strong operational controls can be
assured.
The Company routinely evaluates
mining projects in a wide array of world-class mining jurisdictions
including Mexico and Australia.
Where preliminary studies evidence
sufficient mineralisation, increasingly comprehensive studies will
be undertaken with a view to delineating a compliant mineral
resource estimate in readiness for the potential sale of the asset
to a producing mining company, at which time a significant premium
over its acquisition and development cost may be
justified.
The Executive Director is
responsible for overseeing the long-term success and strategic
direction of the Company in accordance with the schedule of matters
reserved for Board decision and is responsible for monitoring the
activities of the executive
management.
The Board usually meets a minimum
of four times a year but may meet more frequently on ad-hoc basis
as and when required. The Chairman is ultimately responsible for
ensuring that each Board decision is taken having sufficient
information on and with all due discussion as is relevant to such
decision. All Directors attended each meeting held during the
year.
The Company has effective
procedures in place to monitor and deal with conflicts of interest.
The Board is aware of the other commitments and interests of its
Directors and changes to these commitments and interests are
reported to, and, where appropriate, agreed with the rest of the
Board.
The Company has also adopted an
Anti-Corruption and Bribery Policy to ensure compliance with the
relevant laws governing anti-corruption and anti-bribery as well as
a Share Dealing Code for Directors and applicable employees to
ensure compliance with AIM Rule 21 and the provisions of the Market
Abuse Regulations relating to dealings in the Group's
securities.
Provision 5 of the Code recommends
that the Board appoints a Director from the workforce, creates a
formal workforce advisory panel or appoints a designated
Non-Executive Director to engage with the workforce. However, due
to the Group currently having a small number of employees, the
Board does not consider this to be appropriate but at such time as
the size of the workforce increases, it will review the position
and make any such appointments or take other actions it considers
appropriate.
Principle 2: Division of Responsibilities
The Group has a schedule of
matters reserved for its own decision and two committees comprised
entirely of Non-Executive Directors: the Audit and Risk Committee
(the "ARC") and the Nomination and Remuneration Committee (the
"N&R Committee", each with formally delegated duties and
responsibilities set out in respective Terms of
Reference.
The division of responsibilities
between the Chairman and senior management is clearly defined in
writing. However, they work closely together to ensure effective
decision making and the successful delivery of the Group's
strategy.
Each Director has a Letter of
Appointment or a Services Agreement in place to ensure that they
clearly understand the requirements of the role. All Directors are
required to allocate sufficient time to the Company to discharge
their responsibilities effectively.
Due to the size of the Board, the
nomination of any one particular director to act as a Senior
Independent Director, as recommended by Code Provision 12, is not
currently considered to be appropriate or improve the effective
operation of the Board. However, the matter is kept under
review.
Provision 11 of the Code requires
at least half the Board, excluding the Chairman, to be
Non-Executive Directors whom the Board considers to be independent.
During the year the Alien Metals Board consisted of three
Non-Executive Directors - Daniel Smith, Mark Culbert and Jonathan
Battershill - of which Mark Culbert was deemed to be independent by
virtue of not having been granted Options in the prior year. Daniel
Smith and Jonathan Battershill were not considered to be
independent by virtue of each having been granted Options in the
most recent award and as each were recompensed for the provision of
material consultancy services to the Company outside of their
respective standard remuneration as Directors.
The change in Board during the
year saw the appointment of an Executive Director, Guy Robertson,
and two Non-Executive Directors, Alwyn Vorster and Elizabeth
Henson. Subsequent to the period end, on 15 March 2024, Rob Mosig
was appointed as a Non-Executive Director, replacing Alwyn Vorster,
and Guy Robertson resumed his position as Executive Chairman on an
interim basis. On the same date, Elizabeth Henson assumed the role
of Senior Independent Non-Executive Director.
Principle 3: Composition, Succession and
Evaluation
During the year ended 31 December
2023, the Board comprised of one Executive Director and three
Non-Executive Directors.
The Board established a N&R
Committee and an ARC, each with formally delegated duties and
responsibilities set out in respective Terms of Reference, to
assist with oversight and governance.
The Board and its advisers have
significant experience in the mining sector and from that, a strong
network of individuals working in the sector. The N&R Committee
leads the process for Board appointments and is responsible for
review of the Board size, structure and composition (both Executive
and Non-Executive) including any potential new applicants to ensure
the Board contains the right balance of skills, knowledge and
experience to manage and grow the business. The N&R Committee
will make recommendations to the Board on any proposed or suggested
changes to the Board with a view on the leadership needs of the
business including succession planning.
The Board does not carry out a
formal annual evaluation of its performance, its committees, the
Chairman and individual Directors, which is contrary to the
recommendation of Code Provision 21.
However, the Chairman continuously
considers the performance of the Board, its committees and of
individual directors and provides feedback when appropriate.
Similarly, the Chairman invites feedback in the same manner from
the Non-Executive Directors and the Company Secretary.
The Board considers the time and
cost involved in carrying out a formal process, especially one that
is externally facilitated, cannot be justified for the Company at
this stage in its development. Nonetheless, the Board acknowledges
the merits in carrying out formal Board evaluations and will
monitor the continuing suitability of this stance as the Company
grows in size.
Principle 4: Audit, Risk and Internal
Control
The ARC is currently comprised of
the full Board, given the Company had only 3 Directors at year end.
However, other individuals such as executive management may be
invited to attend all or any part of any meeting when deemed
appropriate. The Company's external auditors are invited to attend
meetings of the Committee on a regular basis
The ARC has responsibility for,
among other things, the monitoring of the integrity of the
financial statements of the Company and its Group and the
involvement of the Group's auditors in that process. It focuses in
particular on compliance with accounting policies and ensuring that
an effective system of external audit and financial control is
maintained, including considering the scope of the annual audit and
the extent of the non-audit work undertaken by external auditors
and advising on the appointment of external auditors. The ultimate
responsibility for reviewing and approving the annual report and
accounts and the half-yearly reports remains with the Board. The
Audit Committee will meet at least three times a year at the
appropriate times in the financial reporting and audit cycle. The
committee also review the emerging and principal risks of the
business, refer to Principal Risks and Uncertainties on page
7.
Independence of the External Auditor
The independence of the auditor is
considered by the Audit Committee each year. In assessing the
auditor's independence, the Audit Committee considers:
·
Ratio of audit fees to non-audit fees
·
Length of tenure
·
Whether there are any known material
relationships between the Company, its directors and senior
executives, and the audit firm, its partners, and the audit
team
·
Application of constructive challenge and
professional scepticism
Audit and non-audit fees are
disclosed in the financial statements.
The Audit Committee considers the
nature and value (in the context of the audit fee) of any non-audit
services on the auditor's independence and is required to give its
prior approval of any such non-audit services.
Effectiveness of the external audit process
In considering the effectiveness
of the external audit process, the Audit Committee
consider:
·
Effectiveness of the audit plan, its delivery and
execution
·
Knowledge and experience of the audit
team
·
Robustness of the audit
The Group's external auditor is
PKF Littlejohn LLP for the audit of the 31 December 2023
accounts.
Having assessed the performance,
objectivity and independence of the auditor, the Committee will be
recommending the reappointment of PKF Littlejohn LLP as auditor to
the Company at the 2024 Annual General Meeting.
During the year to 31 December
2023, the Audit Committee considered the following key issues in
relation to the Financial Statements:
Issue
|
Action
|
·
Accounting policies
|
The Committee reviewed and
discussed the significant accounting policies with management and
the external auditor and reached the conclusion that each policy
was appropriate to the Group.
|
·
Carrying value of intangibles
|
The Committee reviewed the
impairment assessment report prepared by management and agreed that
given the reasonable expectation that the Group will achieve its
milestone targets in the near future that no impairment to the
value of the intangibles was required as at 31 December 2023, other
than the impairment recorded in relation to assets in
Mexico.
|
·
Going concern review
|
The Committee considered the
ability of the Group to operate as a Going Concern considering
cash-flow forecasts for the next 12 months. It was determined by
the Committee that the forecasts indicate that the Group and parent
Company's cash resources are not sufficient to cover the projected
expenditure for the period of 12 months. Notwithstanding, the
Directors are confident in the Company's ability to raise
additional funds as required, from existing and/or new investors,
within the next 12 months. Thus, they continue to adopt the going
concern basis of accounting preparing these financial statements.
Refer to page 12 and note 2.4 for further information on going
concern.
|
·
Review of audit and non-audit services and
fees
|
The external auditor is not
engaged by the Group to carry out any non-audit work in respect of
which it might, in the future, be required to express an audit
opinion.
The Committee reviewed the fees
charged for the provision of audit and non-audit services and
determined that they were in line with fees charged to companies of
similar size and stage of development.
The Committee considered and was
satisfied the external auditor's assessment of its own
independence.
|
Internal audit function
The Audit Committee considers
annually whether there is a need for an internal audit function and
makes a recommendation to the Board if a change is considered to be
appropriate. The Company's operations are small in scale, the
organisational structure is flat, and the cost of an internal audit
function is not considered to be justified at present.
Principle 5: Remuneration
The N&R Committee is currently
comprised of the full Board, given the Company had only three
Directors at year end.
The N&R Committee recognises
that an effective Board comprises a range and balance of skills,
experience, knowledge, genders and independence, with individuals
that are prepared to challenge each other whilst working as a team,
which requires a range of personal attributes, including character,
intellect, sound judgement, honesty and courage.
In addition, the N&R Committee
is responsible for establishing a formal and transparent procedure
for developing policy on executive remuneration and to set the
remuneration packages of individual Directors. This includes
agreeing with the Board the framework for remuneration of executive
management of the Company as it is designated to consider. It is
furthermore responsible for determining the total individual
remuneration packages of each Director including, where
appropriate, bonuses, incentive payments and share
options.
Provision 34 of the Code specifies
that the remuneration of Non-Executive Directors should not include
share options or other performance-related elements. However,
although all Non-Executive Directors have been granted Options, the
Board considers the quantum of Options granted to each
Non-Executive Director is such that it does not impair or
compromise their impartiality or objectivity in decision making.
The independence of Non-Executive Directors is reviewed and will
continue to be reviewed by the Board on a regular
basis.
The scale and structure of the
remuneration and compensation packages for the Directors is set
taking into account time commitment, comparatives, and risks and
responsibilities, to ensure that the amount of compensation
adequately reflects the individual's previous performance,
achievements, experience, responsibilities and the risks of the
office or position held, and in the context of the Company's risk
profile, to ensure they do not encourage excessive risk
taking.
Remuneration Policy
The Company's remuneration policy
is intended to support the Company's long-term strategy and
sustainable success in a manner consistent with the Company's
purpose and values, attracting and retaining the highest quality of
directors and senior executives. The pay policy aligns with
Provision 40 of the code and is as follows:
·
remuneration of Directors is disclosed in annual
accounts for clarity and to ensure transparency.
·
remuneration structures are limited to salaries
and options to avoid complexity and are clearly communicated by the
Board to ensure predictability.
·
align the interests of the Board and senior
executives with shareholders'.
·
align the interests of the workforce (including
the Board and senior executives) with the Company's purpose and
values.
·
avoid incentivising excessive risk taking by the
Board and senior executives.
·
be proportionate to the contribution of the
individuals concerned, and;
·
be sensitive to pay and employment conditions
elsewhere in the group.
The remuneration policy does not
require post-employment shareholding requirements. Share options
ordinarily lapse upon the resignation of the option holder, unless
the Board determines otherwise.
The scale and structure of the
remuneration and compensation packages of Directors is set taking
into account time commitment, comparatives, risks and
responsibilities, to ensure that the amount of compensation
adequately reflects the individual's previous performance,
achievements, experience, responsibilities and risks of the office
or position held, and in the context of the Company's risk profile,
to ensure they do not encourage excessive risk taking on the part
of the recipient of such compensation.
As the Company is at an early
stage of development, the use of traditional performance standards,
such as corporate profitability, is not considered by the N&R
Committee to be appropriate in the evaluation of corporate or
directors' performance. Discretionary bonuses may be paid to aid
staff retention and reward performance.
The Board considers that the
remuneration policy has operated as intended in terms of company
performance and quantum.
The Company provides executive
directors with base salaries which represent their minimum
compensation for services rendered during the financial year. The
base salaries of Directors and senior executives depend on the
scope of their experience, responsibilities, and performance. A
description of the material terms of each director's contract is
provided under "Terms of Directors' Employment, Termination and
Change of Control Benefits" below.
The N&R Committee has
considered the risk implications of the Company's compensation
policies and practices and has concluded that there is no
appreciable risk associated with such policies and practices since
such policies and practices do not have the potential of
encouraging an executive officer or other applicable individual to
take on any undue risk or to otherwise expose the Company to
inappropriate or excessive risks. Furthermore, although the Company
does not have in place any specific prohibitions preventing
executives from purchasing financial instruments, including prepaid
variable forward contracts, equity swaps, collars, or units of
exchange funds that are designed to hedge or offset a decrease in
market value of options or other equity securities of the Company
granted in compensation or held directly or indirectly, by the
director, the Company is unaware of the purchase of any such
financial instruments by any director.
The Chair welcomes major
shareholders to discuss the Company's strategy and governance,
including, on the appointment of key Board appointments. The Chair
reports to the Board as a whole, on the views of major
shareholders.
The Company does not anticipate
making any significant changes to its compensation policies and
practices during 2024.
Culture and employees
At the Company's present stage of
development, it has fewer than 10 employees and its culture
therefore exists principally in the Boardroom and amongst any
contractors. It is considered that the Board is well positioned to
ensure that policy, practices and behaviour throughout the business
is aligned with the Company's purpose, values and strategy. In the
event that the Board had any concerns, it would require management
to take remedial action.
The Board recognises the
importance of the remuneration structure supporting its strategy
and reinforcing the culture of the organisation.
Board assessments
The Chair continuously considers
the performance of the Board, its committees and of individual
directors, and provides feedback when appropriate. Similarly, the
Chair invites feedback in the same manner from the Non-Executive
Directors and the Company Secretary. The N&R Committee
considers the time and cost involved in carrying out a formal
process, especially one that is externally facilitated, cannot be
justified for the Company at this stage in its
development.
The N&R Committee acknowledges
the merits in carrying out formal Board evaluations and will
monitor the continuing suitability of this stance as the Company
grows in size.
Relations with stakeholders
The Company is committed to a
continuous dialogue with shareholders as it believes that this is
essential to ensure a greater understanding of and confidence
amongst its shareholders in the medium and longer term strategy of
the Group and in the Board's ability to oversee its implementation.
It is the responsibility of the Board as a whole to ensure that a
satisfactory dialogue takes place.
Whilst the Company is a BVI
registered company, the UK Corporate Governance code references
Section 172 of the Companies Act 2006 which requires Directors to
take into consideration the interests of stakeholders in their
decision making. The Board is committed to understanding and
engaging with all key stakeholder groups of the Company in order to
maximise value and promote long-term Company success in line with
our strategic objectives. The Board recognises how the Company's
activities and decisions will impact employees, those with which it
has a business relationship, the community and environment and its
reputation for high standards of business conduct. In weighing all
of the relevant factors, the Board, acting in good faith and fairly
between members, makes decisions and takes actions that it
considers will best lead to the long-term success of the
Company.
During the year, the Board
assessed its current activities between the Board and its
stakeholders, which demonstrated that the Board actively engages
with its stakeholders and takes their various objectives into
consideration when making decisions. Specifically, actions the
Board has taken to engage with its stakeholders in 2023
include:
•
Attended the 2023 AGM and prepared to answer any questions raised
by shareholders;
• Made
presentations at conferences and published recordings and slide
decks on the Company's exploration activities;
•
Evaluated the relationships with the Company's various
collaborators through management and identified ways to strengthen
relationships and arrangements with key collaborations;
and
•
Monitored company culture and engaged with employees on efforts to
continuously improve company culture and morale.
The Board believes that
appropriate steps and considerations have been taken during the
year so that each Director has an understanding of the various key
stakeholders of the Company. The Board recognises its
responsibility to consider all such stakeholder needs and concerns
as part of its discussions, decision-making, and in the course of
taking actions, and will continue to make stakeholder engagement a
top priority in the coming years.
The Chairman and other Directors,
as appropriate, make themselves available for contact with major
shareholders and other stakeholders in order to understand their
issues and concerns.
The Company plans to use the AGM
as an opportunity to communicate with its shareholders. To ensure
compliance with the Governance Code, the Board proposes separate
resolutions for each issue, and proxy forms allow shareholders who
are unable to attend the AGM to vote for or against or to withhold
their vote on each resolution. The results of all proxy voting will
be published on the Group's website after the AGM. Shareholders who
attend the AGM will have the opportunity to ask
questions.
The Group's website is the primary
source of information on the Group. The website includes an
overview of the activities of the Group and all recent Group
announcements.
Going Concern
The Directors have reviewed cash
flow forecasts for the period ending 31 May 2025, which indicate
that the Group and parent Company's cash resources are not
sufficient to cover the projected expenditure for the period of 12
months from the date of approval of these financial statements. The
Directors are confident in the Company's ability to raise
additional funds as required, from existing and/or new investors,
within the next 12 months. Thus, they continue to adopt the going
concern basis of accounting preparing these financial
statements
Provisions not applied
The Company is small with a modest
resource base. The Company has a clear mandate to optimise the
allocation of limited resources to support its development plans.
To ensure the appropriate corporate governance is applied to the
size and maturity of the Company, there are certain provisions the
group specifically does not comply with, given the size of the
Group, as noted below:
Employee Engagement
Due to the Company only having a
small number of employees, the Board has not appointed a director
from the workforce, created a formal workforce advisory panel or
designated a Non-Executive Director to engage with the workforce.
This is contrary to Code Provision 5 and is explained in the
section headed "Culture and employees". At such time as the size of
the workforce increases, the Board will review the position and
make any such appointments or take other actions it considers
appropriate.
Senior Independent Director
The Board had not appointed a
Senior Independent Director for the full year. This is contrary to
Code provision 12. The role of a Senior Independent Director is to
provide a sounding board for the Chair and serve as an intermediary
for the other directors and shareholders. In addition, a senior
independent director would be expected to meet the other
Non-Executive directors without the Chair present, to appraise his
performance. Elizabeth Henson was appointed as Senior Independent
Non-Executive Director from 4 August 2023.
The Company Secretary, as well as
each of the Non-Executive Directors, is available as a sounding
Board to the Chair and to serve as an intermediary for
shareholders. The Company Secretary is also available to serve as
an intermediary for any of the directors when required. Due to the
size of the Board, the nomination of any one particular director to
act as a Senior Independent Director is not currently considered to
be appropriate and would not improve its effective operation.
However, the matter is kept under review.
Open advertising
The Board does not always use open
advertising and/or an external search consultancy for the
appointment of the Chair and Non-Executive Directors. This is
Contrary to Code Provision 20. Given the size of the Company and
skills required by the Board it is not always possible to run an
open advertising process.
Annual evaluation of the performance of the
Board
The Board does not carry out a
formal annual evaluation of its performance, its committees, the
Chair and individual directors. This is contrary to Code Provision
21 and is explained in the section headed "Board
assessments".
Board Committees
The Nomination and Remuneration
Committee and the Audit and Risk Committee are comprised of two
Non-Executive directors, Ms Elizabeth Henson and Mr Robet
Mosig.
Performance related pay
Non-Executive Directors
participate in the Company's share option plan. This is contrary to
Code Provision 34. The Company's Non-Executive Directors
participate in the Company's discretionary share option plan (the
"Unapproved Plan") because the Board considers that the holding of
options helps align the interests of the Non-Executive Directors
with shareholders by incentivising their decision making with a
view to providing growth in the Company's share price. The
Company's long-term success will be dependent upon raising
additional finance in future; aligning the interests of all
directors and senior executives with shareholders incentivises all
concerned to achieve the best possible price for such placings and
to minimise undue dilution of interests.
Viability statement
In accordance with the UK
Corporate Governance Code published in July 2018, the Directors
have assessed the prospects of the Group and concluded that it is
appropriate to adopt the going concern basis of accounting based on
the amount of cash on hand at the end of the year and alternative
funding options available at the time of publication of this
report. The assessment of going concern is disclosed in Note
2.
The Board's assessment of the
Group's current position and principal risks are disclosed in the
Directors' Report on page 6.
The Directors consider that the
Annual Report and the Financial Statements, taken as a whole, are
fair, balanced, and understandable and provide the information
necessary for the shareholders to assess the Company's position and
performance, business model and strategy. Refer to the Statement of
Directors Responsibilities on page 13.
Elizabeth Henson
Senior Independent Non-Executive
Director
22 May 2024
Independent Auditor's Report to the Members of Alien Metals
Limited
Opinion
We have audited the financial
statements of Alien Metals Limited (the 'Group') for the year ended
31 December 2023 which comprise the Consolidated Statement of
Comprehensive Income, the Consolidated Statement of Financial
Position, the Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity, the
Consolidated Statement of Cash Flows and notes to the financial
statements, including significant accounting policies. The
financial reporting framework that has been applied in their
preparation is applicable law and UK-adopted International
Accounting Standards.
In our opinion, the financial
statements:
·
give a true and fair view of the state of the
Group's affairs as at 31 December 2023 and of its loss for the year
then ended; and
·
have been properly prepared in accordance with
UK-adopted International Accounting Standards.
Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in
accordance with International Standards on Auditing (UK) (ISAs
(UK)) and applicable law. Our responsibilities under those
standards are further described in the Auditor's responsibilities
for the audit of the financial statements section of our report. We
are independent of the Group in accordance with the ethical
requirements that are relevant to our audit of the financial
statements in the UK, including the FRC's Ethical Standard as
applied to listed entities, and we have fulfilled our other ethical
responsibilities in accordance with these requirements. We believe
that the audit evidence we have obtained is sufficient and
appropriate to provide a basis for our opinion.
Material uncertainty related to going
concern
We draw attention to note 2.4 in
the financial statements, which indicates that the Group holds a
cash and cash equivalents balance of $676,000 as at 31 December
2023 and that the Group will be required to raise further finance,
equity and/or debt, in order to fund its forecasted expenditure
over the next twelve months. As stated in note 2.4, these events or
conditions, along with the other matters as set forth in note 2.4,
indicate that a material uncertainty exists that may cast
significant doubt on the Group's ability to continue as a going
concern. Our opinion is not modified in respect of this
matter.
In auditing the financial
statements, we have concluded that the director's use of the going
concern basis of accounting in the preparation of the financial
statements is appropriate. Our evaluation of the directors'
assessment of the Group's ability to continue to adopt the going
concern basis of accounting included reviewing and challenging
cashflow forecasts prepared by management covering the 12 months
from the approval of these financial statements and the related key
assumptions, confirming their mathematical accuracy, ascertaining
the Group's current financial position and cash reserves,
discussing their strategies regarding future fund raises, and
reviewing post year end arrangements entered into by the
Group.
In relation to the Group's
reporting on how it has applied the UK Corporate Governance Code,
we have nothing material to add or draw attention to in relation
to:
·
the directors' statement in the financial
statements about whether the directors considered it appropriate to
adopt the going concern basis of accounting; and
·
the directors' identification in the financial
statements of the material uncertainty related to the entity's
ability to continue as a going concern over a period of at least
twelve months from the date of approval of the financial
statements.
Our responsibilities and the
responsibilities of the directors with respect to going concern are
described in the relevant sections of this report.
Our application of materiality
The scope of our audit was
influenced by our application of materiality. The quantitative and
qualitative thresholds for materiality determine the scope of our
audit and the nature, timing and extent of our audit
procedures.
Materiality for the consolidated
financial statements was set at $360,000 and was based upon 2%
(2022: 1.5%) of gross assets (2022: $274,000). Performance
materiality and the triviality threshold for the financial
statements were set at $252,000 and $18,000 respectively (2022:
$137,000 and $13,700). We also agreed to report to the Board of
Directors any other differences below the threshold for triviality
that we believed warranted reporting on qualitative grounds. The
amount was determined based upon where the areas of significant
risk arose. Gross assets include exploration and evaluation assets
which make up the majority of the financial statement balances and
the going concern of the group is dependent on its ability to fund
operations going forward including the valuation of its assets
which represent the underlying value of the Group.
For each component in the scope of
our Group audit, we allocated a materiality that was less than our
overall Group materiality. The range of materiality applied across
group components was between $228,000 and $117,000 (2022: $185,000
and $130,000).
Our approach to the audit
In designing our audit, we
determined materiality and assessed the risks of material
misstatement in the financial statements. In particular we looked
at areas involving significant accounting estimates and judgements
by the directors and considered future events that are inherently
uncertain, such as the carrying value of exploration and evaluation
assets and the fair value assigned to share warrants and share
options issued in the year. We also addressed the risk of
management override of internal controls, including among other
matters consideration of whether there was evidence of bias that
represented a risk of material misstatement due to
fraud.
A full scope audit was performed
on the complete financial information of four of the components of
the Group and a limited scope review was performed on the remaining
three as they were assessed as insignificant.
Of the seven reporting components
of the Group, one is located in the British Virgin Islands, one is
located in Mexico, two are located in the United Kingdom and three
are located in Australia. PKF Littlejohn LLP audited the ultimate
parent company, situated in the British Virgin Islands, and all
other reporting components. The Engagement Partner conducted audit
work in the United Kingdom but interacted regularly with the
management team in the Australia during all stages of the audit and
was responsible for the scope and direction of the audit process.
This, in conjunction with additional procedures performed, gave us
appropriate evidence for our opinion on the Group financial
statements.
Key audit matters
Key audit matters are those
matters that, in our professional judgment, were of most
significance in our audit of the financial statements of the
current period and include the most significant assessed risks of
material misstatement (whether or not due to fraud) we identified,
including those which had the greatest effect on: the overall audit
strategy, the allocation of resources in the audit; and directing
the efforts of the engagement team. These matters were addressed in
the context of our audit of the financial statements as a whole,
and in forming our opinion thereon, and we do not provide a
separate opinion on these matters. In addition to the matter
described in the Material uncertainty related to going concern
section, we have determined the matters described below to be the
key audit matters to be communicated in our report.
Key Audit Matter
|
How our scope addressed this matter
|
Carrying value of intangible assets (Note
8)
|
The carrying value of intangible assets related to
exploration and evaluation assets amounted to $16,593k as at 31
December 2023 and as such, is material. The carrying value of these
assets is dependent on the successful development on its iron ore
resources in Western Australia.
Management are required to assess by reference to IFRS 6
Exploration and Evaluation
Assets, whether there are potential indicators of impairment
of the Group's exploration and evaluation assets at each reporting
date.
If potential indicators of impairment are identified,
management are required to perform a full assessment of the
recoverable value of the exploration and evaluation assets in
accordance with IAS 36 Impairment
of Assets.
Given the inherent judgement involved in the assessment of
whether there are indications of impairment in exploration and
evaluation assets, as required by IFRS 6, there is a risk the
carrying amount of exploration and evaluation assets are overstated
and should be impaired.
|
Our work in this area included but
was not limited to:
· Substantive testing on additions capitalised to exploration
and evaluation assets during the year to especially assess whether
they are:
o appropriate to capitalise; and
o are allocated to a valid legal right to explore which is
owned by the Group.
· Obtaining, reviewing and critically assessing management's
impairment assessment and obtaining supporting evidence for
management's key inputs and judgements therein;
· Assessing whether impairment indicators exist in line with
IFRS 6, including considering factors such as the licence status
and its expiry date.
· Reviewing the licences terms to ensure that any minimum
expenditure terms enclosed have been adequately met or are expected
to be met over the licence period;
· Discussing with management their plans regarding future
exploration on the licence areas; and
· Assessing the appropriateness of the accounting policies and
disclosures included in the financial statements in accordance with
IFRS 6.
Our work found the judgements
applied to assess the carrying value of exploration and evaluation
assets to be reasonable. We note that the recoverability of the
carrying value of exploration and evaluation assets is dependent
upon the Group successfully securing additional funding or
obtaining the financial support of a joint venture partner or
similar.
|
Other information
The other information comprises
the information included in the annual report, other than the
financial statements and our auditor's report thereon. The
directors are responsible for the other information contained
within the annual report. Our opinion on the Group financial
statements does not cover the other information and, except to the
extent otherwise explicitly stated in our report, we do not express
any form of assurance conclusion thereon. Our responsibility is to
read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the
other information is materially inconsistent with the financial
statements or our knowledge obtained in the course of the audit, or
otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If we identify such
material inconsistencies or apparent material misstatements, we are
required to determine whether this gives rise to a material
misstatement in the financial statements themselves. If, based on
the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material
misstatement of this other information, we are required to report
that fact.
We have nothing to report in this
regard.
Corporate Governance Statement
We have reviewed the directors'
statement in relation to going concern, longer-term viability and
that part of the Corporate Governance Statement relating to the
company's compliance with the provisions of the UK Corporate
Governance Code specified for our review.
Based on the work undertaken as
part of our audit, we have concluded that each of the following
elements of the Corporate Governance Statement is materially
consistent with the financial statements or our knowledge obtained
during the audit:
·
Directors' statement with regards the
appropriateness of adopting the going concern basis of accounting
and any material uncertainties identified set out on page 18 and
19;
·
Directors' explanation as to their assessment of
the Group's prospects, the period this assessment covers and why
the period is appropriate set out on page 18 and 19;
·
Directors' statement on whether they have a
reasonable expectation that the Group will be able to continue in
operation and meets its liabilities set out on page 18 and
19;
·
Directors' statement that they consider the
annual report and the financial statements, taken as a whole, to be
fair, balanced and understandable set out on page 19;
·
Board's confirmation that it has carried out a
robust assessment of the emerging and principal risks set out on
page 15;
·
The section of the annual report that describes
the review of effectiveness of risk management and internal control
systems set out on page 15; and
·
The section describing the work of the audit
committee set out on page 15 and 16.
Responsibilities of directors
As explained more fully in the
directors' responsibilities statement, the directors are
responsible for the preparation of the financial statements and for
being satisfied that they give a true and fair view, and for such
internal control as the directors determine is necessary to enable
the preparation of financial statements that are free from material
misstatement, whether due to fraud or error.
In preparing the financial
statements, the directors are responsible for assessing the Group's
ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable,
matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis
of accounting unless the directors either intend to liquidate the
Group or to cease operations, or have no realistic alternative but
to do so.
Auditor's responsibilities for the audit of the financial
statements
Our objectives are to obtain
reasonable assurance about whether the financial statements as a
whole are free from material misstatement, whether due to fraud or
error, and to issue an auditor's report that includes our opinion.
Reasonable assurance is a high level of assurance but is not a
guarantee that an audit conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will
always detect a material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements
can arise from fraud or error and are considered material if,
individually or in the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected
to influence the economic decisions of users taken on the basis of
these financial statements.
Irregularities, including fraud,
are instances of non-compliance with laws and regulations. We
design procedures in line with our responsibilities, outlined
above, to detect material misstatements in respect of
irregularities, including fraud. The extent to which our procedures
are capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud is
detailed below:
·
We obtained an understanding of the Group and the
sector in which it operates to identify laws and regulations that
could reasonably be expected to have a direct effect on the
financial statements. We obtained our understanding in this regard
through discussions with management and independent
research.
·
We determined the principal laws and regulations
relevant to the Group in this regard to be those arising from the
British Virgin Islands ("BVI") Business Companies Act, AIM Rules,
local tax legislation and local environmental, employment and
health and safety laws.
·
We designed our audit procedures to ensure the
audit team considered whether there were any indications of
non-compliance by the Group with those laws and regulations. These
procedures included, but were not limited to:
o Discussions with management regarding compliance with laws
and regulations by the Group;
o Reviewing of Board meeting minutes; and
o Reviewing of regulatory news announcements.
·
We also identified the risks of material
misstatement of the financial statements due to fraud. We
considered, in addition to the non-rebuttable presumption of a risk
of fraud arising from management override of controls, that there
was potential for management bias in relation to the carrying value
of intangible assets and the accounting for asset acquisitions. We
addressed these risks by challenging the assumptions and judgements
made by management when auditing these significant accounting
estimates (see the Key Audit Matters section of our
report).
·
As in all of our audits, we addressed the risk of
fraud arising from management override of controls by performing
audit procedures which included, but were not limited to: the
testing of journals; reviewing accounting estimates for evidence of
bias; and evaluating the business rationale of any significant
transactions that are unusual or outside the normal course of
business.
Because of the inherent
limitations of an audit, there is a risk that we will not detect
all irregularities, including those leading to a material
misstatement in the financial statements or non-compliance with
regulation. This risk increases the more that compliance with a law
or regulation is removed from the events and transactions reflected
in the financial statements, as we will be less likely to become
aware of instances of non-compliance. The risk is also greater
regarding irregularities occurring due to fraud rather than error,
as fraud involves intentional concealment, forgery, collusion,
omission or misrepresentation.
A further description of our
responsibilities for the audit of the financial statements is
located on the Financial Reporting Council's website at:
www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities.
This description forms part of our auditor's report.
Use of our report
This report is made solely to the
company's members, as a body, in accordance with our engagement
letter dated 28 March 2023. Our audit work has been undertaken so
that we might state to the company's members those matters we are
required to state to them in an auditor's report and for no other
purpose. To the fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept
or assume responsibility to anyone, other than the company and the
company's members as a body, for our audit work, for this report,
or for the opinions we have formed.
Alistair Roberts (Engagement Partner)
15 Westferry Circus
For and on behalf of PKF Littlejohn
LLP
Canary Wharf
Statutory Auditor
London E14 4HD
22 May 2024
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF COMPREHENSIVE INCOME
Year ended 31 December 2023
|
|
Group
|
Continuing Operations
|
Note
|
Year ended 31 December
2023
$
|
Year
ended 31 December 2022
$
|
Administration expenses
|
6
|
(2,712,000)
|
(2,352,000)
|
Other losses
|
6
|
(1,153,000)
|
(30,000)
|
Other gains
|
6
|
178,000
|
-
|
Operating loss
|
|
(3,687,000)
|
(2,382,000)
|
Finance costs
|
18
|
(42,000)
|
-
|
Finance income
|
18
|
8,000
|
7,000
|
Loss for the year before taxation
|
|
(3,721,000)
|
(2,375,000)
|
Income tax
|
7
|
-
|
-
|
Loss for the year
|
|
(3,721,000)
|
(2,375,000)
|
Loss attributable to:
|
|
|
|
-
owners of the Parent
|
|
(3,721,000)
|
(2,375,000)
|
|
|
(3,721,000)
|
(2,375,000)
|
Other Comprehensive Income:
|
|
|
|
Items that may be subsequently reclassified to profit or
loss
|
|
|
|
Exchange differences recognised
directly in equity
|
|
(415,000)
|
(1,531,000)
|
Total Comprehensive Income
|
|
(415,000)
|
(1,531,000)
|
Attributable to:
|
|
|
|
- owners of the Parent
|
|
(415,000)
|
(1,531,000)
|
Total Comprehensive Income
|
|
(415,000)
|
(1,531,000)
|
-
Total comprehensive income attributable to
continuing operations
|
|
|
|
Total comprehensive loss for the year attributable to equity
shareholders of the parent
|
|
(4,136,000)
|
(3,906,000)
|
Earnings/(loss) per share (cents) from continuing operations
attributable to owners of the Parent - Basic &
Diluted
|
21
|
(0.065)
|
(0.050)
|
The Notes on pages 30 to 49 form
part of these Financial Statements.
CONSOLIDATED STATEMENT OF FINANCIAL POSITION
As at 31 December 2023
|
|
Group
|
|
Note
|
2023
$
|
2022
$
|
Non-Current Assets
|
|
|
|
Intangible assets
|
8
|
16,593,000
|
15,639,000
|
Assets under
construction
|
9
|
455,000
|
455,000
|
Plant and equipment
|
|
10,000
|
-
|
Right of use asset
|
10
|
24,000
|
17,000
|
Total Non-current assets
|
|
17,082,000
|
16,111,000
|
Current Assets
|
|
|
|
Trade and other
receivables
|
11
|
261,000
|
318,000
|
Cash and cash
equivalents
|
12
|
676,000
|
2,177,000
|
Total Current Assets
|
|
937,000
|
2,495,000
|
Total Assets
|
|
18,019,000
|
18,606,000
|
Current Liabilities
|
|
|
|
Trade and other
payables
|
13
|
726,000
|
446,000
|
Lease liability
|
10
|
26,000
|
17,000
|
Convertible note
|
14
|
571,000
|
-
|
Total Current Liabilities
|
|
1,323,000
|
463,000
|
Total Liabilities
|
|
1,323,000
|
463,000
|
Net Assets
|
|
16,696,000
|
18,143,000
|
Equity attributable to owners of the Parent
|
|
|
|
Share capital
|
15
|
82,097,000
|
79,586,000
|
Warrant reserve
|
16
|
834,000
|
739,000
|
Share-based payment
reserve
|
16
|
854,000
|
771,000
|
Foreign exchange translation
reserve
|
16
|
279,000
|
694,000
|
Accumulated losses
|
|
(67,368,000)
|
(63,647,000)
|
Total Equity
|
|
16,696,000
|
18,143,000
|
The Financial Statements were
approved and authorised for issue by the Board of Directors
on 20 May 2024 and were signed on its behalf by:
Guy Robertson
Interim Executive
Chairman
The Notes on pages 30 to 49 form
part of these Financial Statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
Share
capital
$
|
Warrant
reserve
$
|
Share based payment
reserve
$
|
Foreign exchange translation
reserve
$
|
Retained
losses
$
|
Total
equity
$
|
As at 1 January 2022
|
70,422,000
|
865,000
|
1,179,000
|
2,225,000
|
(62,420,000)
|
12,271,000
|
Loss for the year
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(2,375,000)
|
(2,375,000)
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange differences recognised
directly in equity
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(1,531,000)
|
-
|
(1,531,000)
|
Total comprehensive income for the year
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(1,531,000)
|
(2,375,000)
|
(3,906,000)
|
Transactions with owners
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issue of ordinary
shares
|
9,365,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
9,365,000
|
Cost of capital
|
(141,000)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(141,000)
|
Share based payment
charge
|
(60,000)
|
422,000
|
192,000
|
-
|
-
|
554,000
|
Exercise of options &
warrants
|
-
|
(437,000)
|
(17,000)
|
-
|
454,000
|
-
|
Expiry of warrants &
options
|
-
|
(111,000)
|
(8,000)
|
-
|
119,000
|
-
|
Expiry of options in prior
year
|
-
|
-
|
(575,000)
|
-
|
575,000
|
-
|
Total transactions with owners
|
9,164,000
|
(126,000)
|
(408,000)
|
-
|
1,148,000
|
9,778,000
|
As at 31 December 2022
|
79,586,000
|
739,000
|
771,000
|
694,000
|
(63,647,000)
|
18,143,000
|
Loss for the year
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(3,721,000)
|
(3,721,000)
|
Other comprehensive income
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Exchange differences recognised
directly in equity
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(415,000)
|
-
|
(415,000)
|
Total comprehensive income for the year
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(415,000)
|
(3,721,000)
|
(4,136,000)
|
Transactions with owners
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Issue of ordinary
shares
|
2,606,000
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
2,606,000
|
Cost of capital
|
(128,000)
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
(128,000)
|
Share based payment
charge
|
-
|
95,000
|
121,000
|
-
|
-
|
216,000
|
Exercise of options &
warrants
|
33,000
|
-
|
(38,000)
|
-
|
-
|
(5,000)
|
Total transactions with owners
|
2,511,000
|
95,000
|
83,000
|
-
|
-
|
2,689,000
|
As at 31 December 2023
|
82,097,000
|
834,000
|
854,000
|
279,000
|
(67,368,000)
|
16,696,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The Notes on pages 30 to 51 form
part of these Financial Statements
|
|
Group
|
|
|
Note
|
2023
$
|
2022
$
|
|
Cash flows from operating activities
|
|
|
|
|
Loss before taxation from
continuing operations
|
|
(3,721,000)
|
(2,375,000)
|
|
Adjustments for:
|
|
|
|
|
Share based payments
|
17
|
216,000
|
192,000
|
|
Impairment - Exploration and
evaluation
|
6,8
|
794,000
|
-
|
|
Impairment - Other
|
6
|
140,000
|
-
|
|
Loss on initial recognition of
convertible note
|
6
|
198,000
|
-
|
|
Other gains
|
6
|
(169,000)
|
-
|
|
Exchange difference
|
|
(379,000)
|
(42,000)
|
|
Finance charges
|
|
-
|
(7,000)
|
|
Depreciation and
amortisation
|
6
|
52,000
|
102,000
|
|
Increase in trade and other
receivables
|
|
(94,000)
|
(53,000)
|
|
Decrease in trade and other
payables
|
|
(242,000)
|
(209,000)
|
|
Net cash used in operating activities
|
|
(3,205,000)
|
(2,392,000)
|
|
Cash flows from investing activities
|
|
|
|
|
Acquisition of intangibles
|
8
|
(21,000)
|
(432,000)
|
|
Additions of
intangibles
|
8
|
(1,708,000)
|
(3,029,000)
|
|
Expenditure on plant and
equipment
|
|
(10,000)
|
-
|
|
Expenditure on assets under
construction
|
9
|
-
|
(164,000)
|
|
Net cash used in investing activities
|
|
(1,739,000)
|
(3,625,000)
|
|
Cash flows from financing activities
|
|
|
|
|
Proceeds from issue of
shares
|
15
|
2,639,000
|
2,452,000
|
|
Cost of share issue
|
15
|
(128,000)
|
(141,000)
|
|
Proceeds from convertible
note
|
14
|
500,000
|
-
|
|
Lease payments
|
10
|
(46,000)
|
(102,000)
|
|
Net cash generated from financing
activities
|
|
2,965,000
|
2,209,000
|
|
Net decrease in cash and cash equivalents
|
|
(1,979,000)
|
(3,808,000)
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at beginning of
year
|
|
2,177,000
|
6,431,000
|
|
Effect of exchange rate fluctuations on
translation
|
|
478,000
|
(446,000)
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents at end of year
|
12
|
676,000
|
2,177,000
|
|
Major non-cash transactions
During the year, shares based
payment expenses of $216,000 relating to the issue of options and
warrants were recorded.
During the year, an impairment of
$794,000 related to exploration and evaluation assets in Mexico was
recorded. During the year, an impairment of $140,000 related to
other net assets recorded in Mexico was recorded.
During the year, a gain on
derivative liability of $131,000 was recorded in other gains which
represented the change in value of the option for the convertible
note to be settled in shares of the Company. A further $38,000 was
recorded as a write-back of a deferred tax liability.
NOTES TO THE FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
For the year ended 31 December 2023
ACCOUNTING POLICIES
1. General Information
The principal activity of Alien
Metals Limited ("the Company") and its subsidiaries (together "the
Group") is the acquisition and development of mineral resource
assets.
The Company's shares are traded on
AIM, a market operated by the London Stock Exchange. The Company is
incorporated in the British Virgin Islands and domiciled in the
United Kingdom.
The address of its registered
office is Craigmuir Chambers, PO Box 71, Road Town, Tortola,
BVI.
2. Summary of Significant Accounting
Policies
The principal accounting policies
applied in the preparation of these Financial Statements are set
out below. These policies have been consistently applied to all the
periods presented, unless otherwise stated.
2.1 Basis of Preparation of Financial
Statements
The Group Financial Statements
have been prepared in accordance with UK-adopted international
accounting standards. The Group Financial Statements have also been
prepared under the historical cost convention, except as modified
for assets and liabilities recognised at fair value on an asset
acquisition.
The Financial Statements are
presented in US dollars rounded to the nearest thousand.
The preparation of Financial
Statements in conformity with IFRS requires the use of certain
critical accounting estimates. It also requires management to
exercise its judgement in the process of applying the Accounting
Policies. The areas involving a higher degree of judgement or
complexity, or areas where assumptions and estimates are
significant to the Group and Company Financial Statements are
disclosed in Note 4.
2.2 Changes in Accounting Policy and
Disclosures
(a) New and amended standards adopted by
the Group
The International Accounting
Standards Board (IASB) issued various amendments and revisions to
International Financial Reporting Standards and IFRIC
interpretations. The amendments and revisions applicable for the
period ended 31 December 2023 did not result in any material
changes to the financial statements of the Group.
b)
New standards, amendments and interpretations in issue but not yet
effective or not yet endorsed and not early
adopted
Standards, amendments and
interpretations that are not yet effective and have not been early
adopted are as follows:
Standard
|
Impact on initial application
|
Effective date
|
IAS 1 (Amendments)
|
Classification of liabilities as
current or non-current
|
1 January 2024
|
IAS 1 (Amendments)
|
Presentation of Financial
Statements: Non-current liabilities with covenants
|
1 January 2024
|
IFRS 16 (Amendments)
|
Lease Liability in a Sale and
Leaseback
|
1 January 2024
|
None are expected to have a material
effect on the Group Financial Statements.
2.3 Basis of Consolidation
The Group Financial Statements
consolidate the Financial Statements of Alien Metals Limited and
the Financial Statements
of all of its subsidiary undertakings made up to
31 December 2023.
Subsidiaries are entities over
which the Group has control. The Group controls an entity when the
Group is exposed to, or has rights to, variable returns from its
involvement with the entity and has the ability to affect those
returns through its power over the entity. Where an entity does not
have returns, the Group's power over the investee is assessed as to
whether control is held. Subsidiaries are fully consolidated from
the date on which control is transferred to the Group. They are
deconsolidated from the date that control ceases.
Below is a summary of subsidiaries
of the Group:
Name of subsidiary
|
Place of
business
|
Parent
company
|
Share capital
held
|
Principal
activities
|
|
Arian Silver Corporation (UK)
Ltd
|
England
and Wales
|
Alien
Metals Limited
|
100%
|
Holding
|
Arian Silver (Holdings)
Limited
|
England
and Wales
|
Alien
Metals Limited
|
100%
|
Holding
|
A.C.N. 643 478 371 Pty
Ltd
|
Australia
|
Alien
Metals Limited
|
100%
|
Exploration
|
Iron Ore Company of Australia Pty
Ltd
|
Australia
|
Alien
Metals Limited
|
100%
|
Exploration
|
Alien Metals Australia Pty
Ltd
|
Australia
|
Alien
Metals Limited
|
100%
|
Exploration
|
Mallina Exploration Pty
Ltd
|
Australia
|
Alien
Metals Limited
|
100%
|
Exploration
|
Compañía Minera Estrella de Plata
S.A. de C.V.
|
Mexico
|
Alien
Metals Limited
|
100%
|
Exploration
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Inter-company transactions,
balances, income and expenses on transactions between group
companies are eliminated on consolidation. Profits and losses
resulting from intercompany transactions that are recognised in
assets are also eliminated. Accounting policies of subsidiaries
have been changed where necessary to ensure consistency with the
policies adopted by the Group.
2.4 Going Concern
These financial statements have
been prepared on the going concern basis. The Group's business
activities, together with the factors likely to affect its future
development, performance and position are set out in the Chairman's
Statement and the Strategic Report.
As at 31 December 2023, the Group
had cash and cash equivalents of $676,000. The Directors have
prepared cash flow forecasts to 31 May 2025 which take account of
the cost and operational structure of the Group, planned
exploration and evaluation expenditure, licence commitments and
working capital requirements. These forecasts indicate that the
Group's cash resources are not sufficient to cover the projected
expenditure for the period for a period of 12 months from the date
of approval of these financial statements.
In common with many exploration
and evaluation entities, the Company will need to raise further
funds within the next 12 months in order to meet its expected
liabilities as they fall due and progress the Group into
construction and eventual production of revenues. The Directors are
confident in the Company's ability to raise additional funds as
required, from existing and/or new investors, within the next 12
months.
Given the Group's current cash
position and its demonstrated ability to raise capital, the
Directors have a reasonable expectation that the Group and Parent
Company has adequate resources to continue in operational existence
for the foreseeable future.
Notwithstanding the above, these
circumstances indicate that a material uncertainty exists that may
cast significant doubt on the Group's ability to continue as a
going concern and, therefore, that the Group and Parent Company may
be unable to realise their assets or settle their liabilities in
the ordinary course of business. As a result of their review, and
despite the aforementioned material uncertainty, the Directors have
confidence in the Group and Parent Company's forecasts and have a
reasonable expectation that the Group will continue in operational
existence for the going concern assessment period and have
therefore used the going concern basis in preparing these
consolidated financial statements. The auditors make reference to
going concern by way of a material uncertainty in their
report.
2.5 Segment Reporting
Operating segments are reported in
a manner consistent with the internal reporting provided to the
chief operating decision-maker. The chief operating decision-maker,
who is responsible for allocating resources and assessing
performance of the operating segments, has been identified as the
Board of Directors that makes strategic decisions.
Segment results, include items
directly attributable to a segment as well as those that can be
allocated on a reasonable basis. The Board of Directors considers
there to be only one operating segment during the year, the
exploration, development and exploitation of mineral resources, and
three geographical segments, being Mexico, Australia and United
Kingdom.
2.6 Foreign Currencies
(a) Functional and presentation currency
Items included in the Financial
Statements of the Group's entities are measured using the currency
of the primary economic environment in which the entity operates
(the 'functional currency'). The functional currency of the Company
is Pounds Sterling, the functional currency of the Australian
subsidiaries is Australian Dollars and Mexican subsidiary Mexican
pesos. The Financial Statements are presented in US dollars,
rounded to the nearest thousand.
(b) Transactions and balances
Foreign currency transactions are
translated into the functional currency using the exchange rates
prevailing at the dates of the transactions or valuation where such
items are re-measured. Foreign exchange gains and losses resulting
from the settlement of such transactions and from the translation
at year-end exchange rates of monetary assets and liabilities
denominated in foreign currencies are recognised in the
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income.
(c) Group companies
The results and financial position
of all the Group's entities (none of which has the currency of a
hyperinflationary economy) that have a functional currency
different from the presentation currency are translated into the
presentation currency as follows:
· assets and liabilities for each statement of financial
position presented are translated at the closing rate at the date
of that statement of financial position;
· income and expenses for each statement of comprehensive
income presented are translated at average exchange rates (unless
this average is not a reasonable approximation of the cumulative
effect of the rates prevailing on the transaction dates, in which
case income and expenses are translated at the dates of the
transactions); and
· all resulting exchange differences are recognised in other
comprehensive income where material.
On consolidation, exchange
differences arising from the translation of the net investment in
foreign entities, and of monetary items receivable from foreign
subsidiaries for which settlement is neither planned nor likely to
occur in the foreseeable future, are taken to other comprehensive
income. When a foreign operation is sold, such exchange differences
are recognised in the income statement as part of the gain or loss
on sale.
2.7 Intangible Assets
Exploration and evaluation assets
The Group recognises expenditure
as exploration and evaluation assets when it determines that those
assets will be successful in finding specific mineral resources.
Expenditure included in the initial measurement of exploration and
evaluation assets and which are classified as intangible assets
relate to the acquisition of rights to explore, topographical,
geological, geochemical and geophysical studies, exploratory
drilling, trenching, sampling and activities to evaluate the
technical feasibility and commercial viability of extracting a
mineral resource. Capitalisation of pre-production expenditure
ceases when the mining property is capable of commercial
production.
Exploration and evaluation assets are recorded and held at
cost
Exploration and evaluation assets
are not subject to amortisation but are assessed annually for
impairment. The assessment is carried out by allocating exploration
and evaluation assets to cash generating units ("CGU's"), which are
based on specific projects or geographical areas. The CGU's are
then assessed for impairment using a variety of methods including
those specified in IFRS 6.
Whenever the exploration for and
evaluation of mineral resources in cash generating units does not
lead to the discovery of commercially viable quantities of mineral
resources and the Group has decided to discontinue such activities
of that unit, the associated expenditures are written off to the
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income.
Exploration and evaluation assets recorded at fair-value on
acquisition
Exploration assets which are
acquired are recognised at fair value. When an acquisition of an
entity whose only significant assets are its exploration asset
and/or rights to explore, the Directors consider that the fair
value of the exploration assets is equal to the consideration. Any
excess of the consideration over the capitalised exploration asset
is attributed to the fair value of the exploration
asset.
During the year, the Company
completed one acquisition which has been treated as an asset
acquisition. Per IFRS 3, an entity shall determine whether a
transaction or other event is a business combination by
applying the definition in this IFRS, which requires that the
assets acquired and liabilities assumed constitute
a business. If the assets acquired are not a business,
the reporting entity shall account for the transaction or other
event as an asset acquisition. As the acquisitions were not
considered to meet the definition of a business combination under
IFRS 3, the Group Financial Statements are prepared as though the
group has acquired an asset. The fair value of the assets were
determined by management and the assets were classified as
intangible assets given that they represent exploration and
evaluation assets.
2.8 Investment in Subsidiaries
Investments in Group undertakings
are stated at cost, which is the fair value of the consideration
paid, less any impairment provision.
2.9 Assets Under Construction
Assets under construction are
stated at historical cost less accumulated depreciation and any
accumulated impairment losses. Assets under construction are not
depreciated until they are completed and brought into
use.
All assets are subject to annual
impairment reviews. An asset's carrying
amount is written down immediately to its recoverable amount if the
asset's carrying amount is greater than its estimated recoverable
amount.
Subsequent costs are included in
the asset's carrying amount or recognised as a separate asset, as
appropriate, only when it is probable that future economic benefits
associated with the item will flow to the Group and the cost of the
item can be measured reliably. The carrying amount of the
replacement part is derecognised. All other repairs and maintenance
are charged to the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income
during the financial period in which they are incurred.
The asset's residual value and
useful economic lives are reviewed, and adjusted if appropriate, at
the end of each reporting period.
Gains and losses on disposal are
determined by comparing the proceeds with the carrying amount and
are recognised within 'Other net gains / (losses)' in the
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income.
2.10 Right of Use Assets and Leases
The Group leases certain property,
plant and equipment.
The lease liability is initially
measured at the present value of the lease payments that are not
paid. Lease payments generally include fixed payments less any
lease incentives receivable. The lease liability is discounted
using the interest rate implicit in the lease or, if that rate
cannot be readily determined, the Group's incremental borrowing
rate. The Group estimates the incremental borrowing rate based on
the lease term, collateral assumptions, and the economic
environment in which the lease is denominated. The lease liability
is subsequently measured at amortized cost using the effective
interest method. The lease liability is remeasured when the
expected lease payments change as a result of new assessments of
contractual options and residual value guarantees.
The right-of-use asset is
recognised at the present value of the liability at the
commencement date of the lease less any incentives received from
the lessor. Added to the right-of-use asset are initial direct
costs, payments made before the commencement date, and estimated
restoration costs. The right-of-use asset is subsequently
depreciated on a straight-line basis from the commencement date to
the earlier of the end of the useful life of the right-of-use asset
or the end of the lease term. The right-of-use asset is
periodically reduced by impairment losses, if any, and adjusted for
certain remeasurements of the lease liability.
Each lease payment is allocated
between the liability and finance charges. The corresponding rental
obligations, net of finance charges, are included in lease
liabilities, split between current and non-current depending on
when the liabilities are due. The interest element of the finance
cost is charged to the Statement of Profit and Loss over the lease
period so as to produce a constant periodic rate of interest on the
remaining balance of the liability for each period. Assets obtained
under finance leases are depreciated over their useful lives. The
lease liabilities are shown in Note 10.
Exemptions are applied for short
life leases and low value assets, with payment made under operating
leases charged to the Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive
Income on a straight-line basis of the period of the
lease.
2.11 Impairment of Non-Financial Assets
Assets that have an indefinite
useful life, for example, intangible assets not ready to use, are
not subject to amortisation and are tested annually for impairment.
An impairment loss is recognised for the amount by which the
asset's carrying amount exceeds its recoverable amount. The
recoverable amount is the higher of an asset's fair value less
costs to sell and value in use. For the purposes of assessing
impairment, assets are grouped at the lowest levels for which there
are separately identifiable cash flows (cash generating
units).
Non-financial assets that suffered
impairment (except goodwill) are reviewed for possible reversal of
the impairment at each reporting date.
2.12 Financial Assets
(a)
Classification
The Group classifies its financial
assets in the following categories: at amortised cost including
trade receivables and other financial assets at amortised cost, at
fair value through other comprehensive income and at fair value
through profit or loss, loans and receivables, and
available-for-sale. The classification depends on the purpose for
which the financial assets were acquired. Management determines the
classification of its financial assets at initial
recognition.
(b)
Recognition and measurement
Amortised cost
Trade and other receivables are
recognised initially at the amount of consideration that is
unconditional, unless they contain significant financing
components, in which case they are recognised at fair value. The
group holds the trade and other receivables with the objective of
collecting the contractual cash flows, and so it measures them
subsequently at amortised cost using the effective interest
method.
The group classifies its financial
assets as at amortised cost only if both of the following criteria
are met:
·
the asset is held within a business model whose
objective is to collect the contractual cash flows;
and
·
the contractual terms give rise to cash flows
that are solely payments of principle and
interest.
(c) Impairment of financial assets
The Group recognises an allowance
for expected credit losses (ECLs) for all debt instruments not held
at fair value through profit or loss. ECLs are based on the
difference between the contractual cash flows due in accordance
with the contract and all the cash flows that the Group expects to
receive, discounted at an approximation of the original effective
interest rate. The expected cash flows will include cash flows from
the sale of collateral held or other credit enhancements that are
integral to the contractual terms.
ECLs are recognised in two stages.
For credit exposures for which there has not been a significant
increase in credit risk since initial recognition, ECLs are
provided for credit losses that result from default events that are
possible within the next 12-months (a 12-month ECL). For those
credit exposures for which there has been a significant increase in
credit risk since initial recognition, a loss allowance is required
for credit losses expected over the remaining life of the exposure,
irrespective of the timing of the default (a lifetime
ECL).
For trade receivables (not subject
to provisional pricing) and other receivables due in less than 12
months, the Group applies the simplified approach in calculating
ECLs, as permitted by IFRS 9. Therefore, the Group does not track
changes in credit risk, but instead, recognises a loss allowance
based on the financial asset's lifetime ECL at each reporting
date.
The Group considers a financial
asset in default when contractual payments are 90 days past due.
However, in certain cases, the Group may also consider a financial
asset to be in default when internal or external information
indicates that the Group is unlikely to receive the outstanding
contractual amounts in full before taking into account any credit
enhancements held by the Group. A financial asset is written off
when there is no reasonable expectation of recovering the
contractual cash flows and usually occurs when past due for more
than one year and not subject to enforcement activity.
At each reporting date, the Group
assesses whether financial assets carried at amortised cost are
credit impaired. A financial asset is credit-impaired when one or
more events that have a detrimental impact on the estimated future
cash flows of the financial asset have occurred.
(d)
Derecognition
The Group derecognises a financial
asset only when the contractual rights to the cash flows from the
asset expire, or when it transfers the financial asset and
substantially all the risks and rewards of ownership of the asset
to another entity.
On derecognition of a financial
asset measured at amortised cost, the difference between the
asset's carrying amount and the sum of the consideration received
and receivable is recognised in profit or loss. This is the same
treatment for a financial asset measured at fair value through
profit and loss.
2.13 Financial Liabilities
Financial liabilities are
classified, at initial recognition, as financial liabilities at
fair value through profit or loss, loans and borrowings, payables,
or as derivatives designated as hedging instruments in an effective
hedge, as appropriate. All financial liabilities are recognised
initially at fair value and, in the case of loans and borrowings
and payables, net of directly attributable transaction
costs.
The Group's financial liabilities
include trade and other payables. Financial liabilities measured at
amortised cost include current borrowings and trade and other
payables that are short term in nature. Financial liabilities are
derecognised if the Group's obligations specified in the contract
expire or are discharged or cancelled. Convertible loan notes are
classified entirely as liabilities and contain an embedded
derivative which has been designated as at fair value through
profit or loss on initial recognition and, as such, the embedded
conversion feature is not separated.
Subsequent measurement
The measurement of financial
liabilities depends on their classification, as described
below:
Trade and other payables
After initial recognition, trade
and other payables are subsequently measured at amortised cost
using the effective interest rate ('EIR method'). Gains and losses
are recognised in the statement of profit or loss and other
comprehensive income when the liabilities are derecognised, as well
as through the EIR amortisation process.
Amortised cost is calculated by
considering any discount or premium on acquisition and fees or
costs that are an integral part of the EIR. The EIR amortisation is
included as finance costs in the Consolidated Statement of
Comprehensive Income.
Derecognition
A financial liability is
derecognised when the associated obligation is discharged or
cancelled or expires.
When an existing financial
liability is replaced by another from the same lender on
substantially different terms, or the terms of an existing
liability are substantially modified, such an exchange or
modification is treated as the derecognition of the original
liability and the recognition of a new liability. The difference in
the respective carrying amounts is recognised in profit or loss and
other comprehensive income.
Fair value
All assets and liabilities for
which fair value is measured or disclosed in the
consolidated Financial Statements
are categorised within the fair value hierarchy.
The fair value hierarchy prioritises the inputs to valuation
techniques used to measure fair value. The Group uses the following
hierarchy for determining and disclosing the fair value of
financial instruments and other assets and liabilities for which
the fair value was used:
-
level 1: quoted prices in active markets for identical assets or
liabilities;
-
level 2: inputs other than quoted prices included in level 1 that
are observable for the asset or liability, either directly (as
prices) or indirectly (derived from prices); and
-
level 3: inputs for the asset or liability that are not based on
observable market data (unobservable inputs).
2.14 Cash and Cash Equivalents
Cash and cash equivalents comprise
cash at bank and in hand.
2.15 Taxation
Tax for the period comprises
current and deferred tax. Tax is recognised in the income
statement, except to the extent that it relates to items recognised
directly in equity. In this case the tax is also recognised
directly in other comprehensive income or directly in equity,
respectively. The current income tax charge is calculated on the
basis of the tax laws enacted or substantively enacted at the end
of the reporting period in the countries where the Company's
subsidiaries and associates operate and generate taxable income.
Management periodically evaluates positions taken in tax returns
with respect to situations in which applicable tax regulation is
subject to interpretation. It establishes provisions where
appropriate on the basis of amounts expected to be paid to the tax
authorities.
Deferred income tax is recognised,
using the liability method, on temporary differences arising
between the tax bases of assets and liabilities and their carrying
amounts in the consolidated Financial
Statements. However, the deferred tax is
not accounted for if it arises from initial recognition of an asset
or liability in a transaction other than a business combination
that, at the time of the transaction, affects neither accounting
nor taxable profit or loss. Deferred income tax is determined using
tax rates (and laws) that have been enacted, or substantially
enacted, by the end of the reporting period and are expected to
apply when the related deferred income tax asset is realised, or
the deferred income tax liability is settled.
Deferred income tax assets are
recognised only to the extent that it is probable that future
taxable profit will be available against which the temporary
differences can be utilised.
Deferred income tax liabilities
are provided on taxable temporary differences arising from
investments in subsidiaries, associates and joint arrangements,
except for deferred income tax liability where the timing of the
reversal of the temporary difference is controlled by the group and
it is probable that the temporary difference will not reverse in
the foreseeable future. Generally, the group is unable to control
the reversal of the temporary difference for associates. Only where
there is an agreement in place that gives the group the ability to
control the reversal of the temporary difference not
recognised.
Deferred income tax assets are
recognised on deductible temporary differences arising from
investments in subsidiaries, associates and joint arrangements only
to the extent that it is probable the temporary difference will
reverse in the future and there is sufficient taxable profit
available against which the temporary difference can be
utilised.
Deferred income tax assets and
liabilities are offset when there is a legally enforceable right to
offset current tax assets against current tax liabilities, and when
the deferred income tax assets and liabilities relate to income
taxes levied by the same taxation authority on either the taxable
entity or different taxable entities where there is an intention to
settle the balances on a net basis.
There has been no tax credit or
expense for the period relating to current or deferred
tax.
2.16 Share Capital, and Other
Reserves
Ordinary shares are classified as
equity. Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new
shares or options are shown in equity, as a deduction, net of tax,
from the proceeds provided
Other reserves consist of the share
option reserve and the foreign exchange translation reserve. See
Note 16 for further detail.
2.17 Share Based Payments
The Group operates a number of
equity-settled share-based schemes, under which the entity receives
services from employees or third-party suppliers as consideration
for equity instruments (shares, options and warrants) of the Group.
The Group may also issue warrants to share subscribers as part of a
share placing. The fair value of the equity-settled share based
payments is recognised as an expense in the Consolidated Statement of
Comprehensive Income or charged to equity
depending on the nature of the service provided or instrument
issued. The total amount to be expensed or charged in the case of
options is determined by reference to the fair value of the options
or warrants granted:
·
including any market performance
conditions;
·
excluding the impact of any service and
non-market performance vesting conditions (for example,
profitability or sales growth targets, or remaining an employee of
the entity over a specified time period); and
·
including the impact of any non-vesting
conditions (for example, the requirement for employees to
save).
In the case of shares and warrants
the amount charged is determined by reference to the fair value of
the services received if available. If the fair value of the
services received is not determinable the shares are valued by
reference to the market price and the warrants are valued by
reference to the fair value of the warrants granted as described
previously.
Non-market vesting conditions are
included in assumptions about the number of options or warrants
that are expected to vest. The total expense or charge is
recognised over the vesting period, which is the period over which
all of the specified vesting conditions are to be satisfied. At the
end of each reporting period, the directors revise their estimates
of the number of options that are expected to vest based on the
non-market vesting conditions. It recognises the impact of the
revision to original estimates, if any, in the Consolidated Statement of
Comprehensive Income or equity as
appropriate, with a corresponding adjustment to the share based
payment reserve or warrant reserve in equity.
When the warrants or options are
exercised, the Company issues new shares. The proceeds received,
net of any directly attributable transaction costs, are credited to
share capital (nominal value) when the warrants or options are
exercised.
2.18 Finance Income and Cost
Finance income and finance costs
are recognised using the effective interest rate method.
3. Financial Risk
Management
3.1 Financial Risk Factors
The Group's activities expose it
to a variety of financial risks being market risk (including,
interest rate risk, currency risk and price risk), credit risk and
liquidity risk. The Group's overall risk management programme
focuses on the unpredictability of financial markets and seeks to
minimise potential adverse effects on the Group's financial
performance.
Market
Risk
Market risk is the risk that the
Group's future earnings will be adversely impacted by changes in
market prices. Market risk for Alien Metals comprises two types of
risk: foreign currency risk and price risk.
(b) Foreign currency risks
The Group's operational
expenditure is made in Mexico in Mexican pesos, in Australia in
Australian dollars, and head office expenses are predominantly made
in the UK in pounds sterling, and United States dollars. The Group
is therefore exposed to the movement in exchange rates for these
currencies. The Group does not currently hedge foreign exchange
risk.
At the year end the majority of
the Group's cash resources were held in Australian dollars. The
Group therefore also has downside exposure to any strengthening of
United States dollar and pounds sterling against the Australia
dollar as this would increase expenses in Australian dollar terms
and accelerate the depletion of the Group's cash resources. Any
weakening of United States dollar, or pounds sterling against the
Australian dollar would, however, result in a reduction in expenses
in Australian dollar terms and preserve the Group's cash
resources.
The carrying amounts of the
Group's foreign currency denominated financial assets and monetary
liabilities at the reporting date are as follows:
|
Liabilities
|
Assets
|
|
2023
|
2022
|
2023
|
2022
|
Pounds sterling
|
123,893
|
51,000
|
2,646,758
|
4,605,000
|
Australian dollars
|
500,848
|
196,000
|
15,363,381
|
13,495,000
|
Mexican pesos
|
-
|
41,000
|
-
|
142,000
|
Sensitivity Analysis
The Group holds cash in pounds
sterling and Australian dollars to settle accounts payable balances
derived in those currencies. The main risk is through foreign
exchange fluctuations in companies where the cash balances are held
in a currency that is different to the functional
currency.
Exposure to foreign currency risk
sensitivity analysis:
|
Against A$
US$
|
15% strengthening in the United
States dollar
|
(77,000)
|
15% weakening in the United States
dollar
|
77,000
|
A 15% variation is considered an
appropriate level of sensitivity given recent levels of foreign
exchange volatility.
(c) Price risk
The price risk is the risk that
the Group's future earnings will be adversely impacted by changes
in the market prices of commodities. Given the Group has yet to
enter production it is not possible to quantify this impact at this
stage.
(d) © Interest rate risk
Interest rate risk is the risk
that the value of a financial instrument or cash flows associated
with the instrument will fluctuate due to changes in market
interest rates. Interest rate risk arises from interest bearing
financial assets and liabilities that the Group uses. Treasury
activities take place under procedures and policies approved and
monitored by the Board to minimise the financial risk faced by the
Group. Interest bearing assets comprise cash and cash equivalents
which are considered to be short-term liquid assets. No sensitivity
analysis has been disclosed as management does not consider any
reasonable fluctuation in interest rates to be sufficiently
material to disclose as there are no variable interest bearing
loans and interest income is only from cash held with
banks.
Credit
Risk
Credit risk arises from cash and
cash equivalents as well as outstanding receivables. Management
does not expect any losses from non-performance of these
receivables.
The amount of exposure to any
individual counter party is subject to a limit, which is assessed
by the Board. No credit limits were exceeded during the reporting
period, and management does not expect any losses from
non-performance by these counterparties.
The Group considers the credit
ratings of banks in which it holds funds in order to reduce
exposure to credit risk.
Liquidity
Risk
The Company's approach to managing
liquidity risk is to ensure that it will have sufficient liquidity
to meet liabilities when due. The directors regularly review cash
flow forecasts to determine whether the Group has sufficient cash
reserves to meet future working capital requirements and
discretionary business development opportunities including
exploration activities.
As at 31 December 2023, the
Company had cash and other receivables of $937,000 to settle
accounts payable and lease liabilities of $752,000. The Company's
accounts payable have contractual maturities of less than 30 days
and are subject to normal trade terms. In the short-term,
liabilities will be funded by cash.
The Group's assets are at an early
stage and in order to meet financing requirements for their
development the Company has raised funds by way of several share
placements, which is a common practice for junior mineral
exploration companies.
Although the Company has been
successful in the past in raising equity finance, there can be no
assurance that the funding required by the Group will be made
available to it when needed or, if such funding were to be
available, that it would be offered on reasonable terms. The terms
of such financing might not be favourable to the Group and might
involve substantial dilution to existing shareholders.
3.2 Capital Risk Management
The Group's objective when
managing capital is to safeguard the Group's ability to continue as
a going concern and have access to adequate funding for its
exploration and development projects, so that it can provide
returns for shareholders and benefits for other stakeholders. The
Group manages the capital structure and makes adjustments in the
light of changes in economic conditions and risk characteristics of
the underlying assets. In order to maintain or adjust the capital
structure the Group may issue new shares, acquire debt, or sell
assets. Management regularly reviews cash flow forecasts to
determine whether the Group has sufficient cash reserves to meet
future working capital requirements and to take advantage of
business opportunities.
4. Critical Accounting Estimates and
Judgements
The preparation of the Group
Financial Statements in conformity with IFRSs requires Management
to make estimates and assumptions that affect the reported amounts
of assets and liabilities and disclosure of contingent assets and
liabilities at the date of the Financial
Statements and the reported amount of
expenses during the year. Actual results may vary from the
estimates used to produce these Financial Statements.
Estimates and judgements are
continually evaluated and are based on historical experience and
other factors, including expectations of future events that are
believed to be reasonable under the circumstances.
Significant items subject to such
estimates and assumptions include, but are not limited
to:
Recognition and Impairment of exploration and evaluation
costs
Exploration and evaluation costs
had a carrying value at 31 December 2023 of $16,593,000 (2022:
$15,639,000): refer to Note 8 for more information. During the year
asset acquisitions with a carrying value of $21,000 were recognised
(2022: $7,707,000), refer to Note 8 for more information. The Group
has a right to renew exploration permits and the asset is only
depreciated once extraction of the resource commences. Management
tests annually whether exploration projects have future economic
value in accordance with the accounting policy stated in
Note 2.7.
Each exploration project is
subject to an annual review by either a consultant or senior
company geologist to determine if the exploration results returned
during the year warrant further exploration expenditure and have
the potential to result in an economic discovery. This review takes
into consideration the expected costs of extraction, long term
metal prices, anticipated resource volumes and supply and demand
outlook. In the event that a project does not represent an economic
exploration target and results indicate there is no additional
upside, a decision will be made to discontinue
exploration.
Fair value of assets acquired
During the prior year the group
acquired a number of interests in different projects and these
acquisitions did not fall within the scope of IFRS 3 but rather
IFRS 6. As a result, these assets acquired were required to
initially be recognised as fair value. The Directors assessed the
fair value of all project interests acquired as being equal to the
fair value of the consideration to acquire said interests in
projects. See note 9 for further details
Fair value of financial liabilities
During the year the group entered
into a convertible loan note with an embedded derivative and
warrants which were measured at fair value. See note 14 for further
details.
Share based payment transactions
The Group has made awards of
options and warrants over its unissued share capital to certain
Directors and employees as part of their remuneration package.
Certain warrants have also been issued to shareholders as part of
their subscription for shares and to suppliers for various services
received.
The valuation of these options and
warrants involves making a number of critical estimates relating to
price volatility, future dividend yields, expected life of the
options and forfeiture rates. These assumptions have been
described in more detail in Note 17.
5. Segmental Information
As at 31 December 2023, the Group
operates in three geographical areas, the UK, Mexico and Australia.
The Company operates in one geographical area, the UK. Activities
in the UK are mainly administrative in nature whilst activities in
Australia and Mexico relate to exploration and evaluation work. The
reports used by the chief operating decision maker are based on
these geographical segments.
The Group generated $9,000 in other
income during the year ended 31 December 2023 (2022:
Nil).
2023
|
Australia
|
Mexico
$
|
UK
$
|
Total
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrative expenses
|
(870,000)
|
(1,000)
|
(1,841,000)
|
(2,712,000)
|
Other losses
|
(557,000)
|
(140,000)
|
(456,000)
|
(1,153,000)
|
Other gains
|
-
|
-
|
178,000
|
178,000
|
Operating loss from continued
operations per reportable segment
|
(1,427,000)
|
(141,000)
|
(2,119,000)
|
(3,687,000)
|
Reportable segment
assets
|
15,290,000
|
-
|
2,729,000
|
18,019,000
|
Reportable segment
liabilities
|
(544,000)
|
-
|
(779,000)
|
(1,323,000)
|
Reportable segment net
assets
|
14,746,000
|
-
|
1,950,000
|
16,696,000
|
Segment assets and liabilities are
allocated based on geographical location.
2022
|
Australia
|
Mexico
$
|
UK
$
|
Total
$
|
|
|
|
|
|
Administrative expenses
|
(171,000)
|
(98,000)
|
(2,083,000)
|
(2,352,000)
|
Other gains/(losses)
|
-
|
-
|
(30,000)
|
(30,000)
|
Operating loss from continued
operations per reportable segment
|
(171,000)
|
(98,000)
|
(2,113,000)
|
(2,382,000)
|
Reportable segment
assets
|
15,660,000
|
783,000
|
2,163,000
|
18,606,000
|
Reportable segment
liabilities
|
(291,000)
|
(15,000)
|
(157,000)
|
(463,000)
|
Reportable segment net
assets
|
15,369,000
|
768,000
|
2,006,000
|
18,143,000
|
6.
Expenses/Income by Nature
|
2023
$
|
2022
$
|
|
|
|
Directors' fees (Note
20)
|
273,000
|
438,000
|
Employee wages and
salaries
|
864,000
|
307,000
|
Fees payable to the Company's
auditors for the audit of the consolidated financial
statements
|
62,000
|
59,000
|
Professional, legal and consulting
fees
|
1,013,000
|
962,000
|
Insurance
|
71,000
|
82,000
|
Office and administrative
expenses
|
185,000
|
90,000
|
Depreciation
|
52,000
|
102,000
|
Travel and subsistence
|
194,000
|
133,000
|
Share option expense
|
216,000
|
192,000
|
Other expenses
|
190,000
|
42,000
|
Foreign exchange
movement
|
(408,000)
|
(55,000)
|
Total administrative
expenses
|
2,712,000
|
2,352,000
|
Impairment - Exploration and
evaluation assets
|
794,000
|
-
|
Impairment - Other net
assets
|
140,000
|
-
|
Loss on initial recognition of
convertible note
|
198,000
|
-
|
Other
|
21,000
|
-
|
Other losses
|
1,153,000
|
-
|
Gain on revaluation of convertible
note derivative
|
131,000
|
-
|
Other
|
47,000
|
-
|
Other gains
|
178,000
|
-
|
7. Taxation
|
Group
|
|
2023
$
|
2022
$
|
|
Loss before tax from continued
operations
|
(3,721,000)
|
(2,375,000)
|
|
Income tax using the weighted
corporation tax rate 19.2% (2022: 18.6%)
|
(713,000)
|
(442,000)
|
|
Expenditure not deductible for tax
purposes
|
248,000
|
(57,000)
|
|
Net tax effect of losses carried
forward on which no deferred tax asset is recognised
|
465,000
|
385,000
|
|
Income tax for the year
|
-
|
-
|
|
No charge to taxation arises due
to the losses incurred.
The weighted average applicable
tax rate of 19.2% (2022: 18.6%) used is a combination of the 19%
standard rate of corporation tax in the UK, 25% Australian
corporation tax and 30% Mexican tax rate. The Group has accumulated
tax losses of approximately $32,887,000 (2022: $30,459,000) available to carry
forward against future taxable profits.
Under IFRS, a net deferred tax
asset has not been recognised due to the uncertainty as to the
amount that can be utilised. No adjustments are required in respect
of the subsidiaries.
8. Intangible
Assets
|
|
Exploration & Evaluation Assets at Cost and Net Book
Value
|
2023
$
|
2022
$
|
Balance as at 1 January
|
15,639,000
|
5,939,000
|
Additions
|
1,708,000
|
3,029,000
|
Asset acquisitions
|
21,000
|
7,707,000
|
Impairment
|
(794,000)
|
-
|
Foreign exchange
differences
|
19,000
|
(1,036,000)
|
As at 31 December
|
16,593,000
|
15,639,000
|
Deferred exploration costs relate to
the initial acquisition of the licences and subsequent exploration
expenditure incurred in evaluating the projects. Asset acquisitions
related to the assets of Mallina Exploration Pty Ltd. A subsidiary
of the Group also granted a 2% gross revenue royalty to the seller
of any iron ore produced from the tenement.
In accordance with IFRS 6, the
Directors undertook an assessment of the following areas and
circumstances which could indicate the existence of
impairment:
• The Group's right
to explore in an area has expired or will expire in the near future
without renewal.
• No further
exploration or evaluation is planned or budgeted for.
• A decision has been
taken by the Board to discontinue exploration and evaluation in an
area due to the absence of a commercial level of
reserves.
• Sufficient data
exists to indicate that the book value may not be fully recovered
from future development and production.
As a result of the review, the
Directors concluded that the Mexico assets were fully impaired, as
no further exploration or evaluation is planned for Mexico. An
impairment of $794,000 was recorded in other losses for the year.
The Directors do not consider any other assets to be
impaired.
9. Assets Under
Construction
|
|
|
2023
$
|
2022
$
|
Balance as at 1 January
|
455,000
|
291,000
|
Additions
|
-
|
164,000
|
As at 31 December
|
455,000
|
455,000
|
Mining plant equipment,
recertification costs and the related transport costs capitalised
as a Mining asset in A.C.N 643 478 371 Pty Ltd in relation to the
headframe and associated equipment for the Elizabeth Hill Silver
mine.
10. Right of Use Assets and
Lease Liability
At the reporting date, the Group
had one property, in Australia, under lease agreement. The Group
recognised the following right of use asset and related lease
liability in respect of this lease agreement. A lease previously
recognised for office space in London, United Kingdom, was fully
amortised during the year.
Right of use asset
|
|
|
2023
$
|
2022
$
|
Balance as at 1 January
|
17,000
|
131,000
|
Additions
|
55,000
|
-
|
Amortisation
|
(48,000)
|
(102,000)
|
Foreign exchange
differences
|
-
|
(12,000)
|
As at 31 December
|
24,000
|
17,000
|
Lease liability
|
|
|
2023
$
|
2022
$
|
Balance as at 1 January
|
17,000
|
131,000
|
Additions
|
55,000
|
-
|
Rental payments
|
(46,000)
|
(102,000)
|
Foreign exchange
differences
|
-
|
(12,000)
|
As at 31 December
|
26,000
|
17,000
|
A maturity analysis of the
undiscounted minimum lease payments due are as follows:
|
2023
$
|
No later than one year
|
41,000
|
As at 31 December
|
41,000
|
11. Trade and Other
Receivables
|
|
|
2023
$
|
2022
$
|
|
VAT receivable
|
125,000
|
133,000
|
|
Prepayments
|
7,000
|
95,000
|
|
Other receivables
|
129,000
|
90,000
|
|
As at 31 December
|
261,000
|
318,000
|
|
Trade and other receivables are
all due within one year. The fair value of all receivables is the
same as their carrying values stated above. These assets, excluding
prepayments, are the only form of financial asset within the Group,
together with cash and cash equivalents.
The carrying amounts of the
Group's trade and other receivables are denominated in the
following currencies:
|
|
|
|
2023
$
|
2022
$
|
|
|
|
UK Pounds
|
171,000
|
173,000
|
Australian Dollars
|
90,000
|
75,000
|
Mexican Peso
|
-
|
70,000
|
As at 31 December
|
261,000
|
318,000
|
|
|
| |
The maximum exposure to credit
risk at the reporting date is the carrying value of each class of
receivable mentioned above. The Group does not hold any collateral
as security. All trade and other receivables are considered fully
recoverable and performing.
12. Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
|
2023
$
|
2022
$
|
Cash at bank and in
hand
|
676,000
|
2,177,000
|
13. Trade and Other
Payables
|
|
|
|
2023
$
|
2022
$
|
|
Trade payables
|
591,000
|
272,000
|
|
Other payables
|
36,000
|
69,000
|
|
Accrued expenses
|
99,000
|
105,000
|
|
As at 31 December
|
726,000
|
446,000
|
|
The carrying amounts of the
Group's trade and other payables are denominated in the following
currencies:
|
|
|
|
2023
$
|
2022
$
|
|
|
|
UK Pounds
|
207,000
|
148,000
|
US Dollars
|
-
|
37,000
|
Mexican Peso
|
-
|
15,000
|
Australian Dollars
|
519,000
|
246,000
|
As at 31 December
|
726,000
|
446,000
|
|
|
| |
14. Convertible
Note
|
|
|
2023
$
|
2022
$
|
|
Liability - Host
|
500,000
|
-
|
|
Liability - Derivative
|
71,000
|
-
|
|
Total
|
571,000
|
-
|
|
During the year, the Company
issued 500,000 convertible notes with a face value of US$500,000
which was received in cash. The initial
fair value of the liability portion of the convertible notes was
determined using a market interest rate for an equivalent
non-convertible notes at the issue date. The liability is
subsequently measured on an amortised cost basis until extinguished
on conversion or maturity. The convertible notes include a
derivative liability, which represents the value of the option to
convert the notes to ordinary shares of the Company. The fair value
of the derivative liability was determined using a Monte Carlo
Simulation model. A loss of $198,000 was recognised on the initial
recognition of the derivative liability, which was recorded in
other losses. Thereafter a revaluation gain of $131,000, which
represents the change in value of the derivative liability during
the year, was recorded in other gains. Refer to note 17 for further
details.
15. Share Capital and Share
Premium
The Company is authorised to issue
an unlimited number of common shares of no par value.
Issued share capital
Group
|
Number
of shares
|
Total
$
|
|
At 1 January 2022
|
3,902,181,625
|
70,422,000
|
|
Share issue costs - 1 January
2022
|
-
|
(60,000)
|
|
Issue of Ordinary Shares on
exercise of warrants - 21 January 2022
|
202,247,000
|
367,000
|
|
Issue of Ordinary Shares on
exercise of options - 21 January 2022
|
1,100,000
|
4,000
|
|
Issue of Ordinary Shares on
exercise of warrants - 10 February 2022
|
1,111,111
|
5,000
|
|
Issue of Ordinary Shares on
exercise of warrants - 10 February 2022
|
816,666
|
3,000
|
|
Issue of Ordinary Shares as
consideration for asset acquisition - 23 February 2022 (Note
8)
|
50,000,000
|
467,000
|
|
Issue of Ordinary Shares on
exercise of warrants - 14 March 2022
|
3,333,333
|
12,000
|
|
Issue of Ordinary Shares as
consideration for asset acquisition - 22 March 2022 (Note
8)
|
138,703,396
|
1,384,000
|
|
Issue of Ordinary Shares as
consideration for asset acquisition - 22 March 2022 (Note
8)
|
358,617,818
|
3,577,000
|
|
Issue of Ordinary Shares on
exercise of warrants - 22 March 2022
|
66,666,666
|
153,000
|
|
Issue of Ordinary Shares on
exercise of warrants - 22 March 2022
|
26,610,661
|
73,000
|
|
Issue of Ordinary Shares on
exercise of warrants - 13 April 2022
|
14,000
|
1,000
|
|
Issue of Ordinary Shares on
exercise of warrants - 13 April 2022
|
122,267
|
1,000
|
|
Issue of Ordinary Shares on
exercise of warrants - 13 April 2022
|
984,375
|
3,000
|
|
Issue of Ordinary Shares on
exercise of options - 26 April 2022
|
2,000,000
|
7,000
|
|
Issue of Ordinary Shares as
consideration for asset acquisition - 20 June 2022 (Note
8)
|
7,827,883
|
69,000
|
|
Share issue costs - 7 September
2022
|
-
|
(12,000)
|
|
Issue of Ordinary Shares for cash
- 8 September 2022
|
300,000,000
|
1,814,000
|
|
Share issue costs - 28 September
2022
|
-
|
(128,000)
|
|
Issue of Ordinary Shares on
exercise of options - 1 December 2022
|
2,500,000
|
8,000
|
|
Issue of Ordinary Shares as
consideration for asset acquisition - 20 December 2022 (Note
8)
|
260,000,000
|
1,416,000
|
|
At 31 December 2022
|
5,324,836,801
|
79,586,000
|
Issue of Ordinary Shares for cash
- 12 January 2023
|
2,500,000
|
8,000
|
Issue of Ordinary Shares for cash
- 16 May 2023
|
8,142,373
|
25,000
|
Issue of Ordinary Shares for cash
- 10 August 2023
|
1,000,000,000
|
2,545,000
|
Issue of Ordinary Shares in lieu
of fees - 3 November 2023
|
26,315,000
|
61,000
|
Share issue costs - 10 August
2023
|
-
|
(128,000)
|
At 31 December 2023
|
6,361,794,174
|
82,097,000
|
On 12 January 2023 2,500,000
options, with no par value, were exercised at an issue price of
0.25 pence per share.
On 16 May 2023 8,142,373 options,
with no par value, were exercised at an issue price of 0.25 pence
per share.
On 10 August 2023, the Company
completed a placement of 1,000,000,000 shares, at 0.20 pence per
share, in order to raise gross proceeds of GBP
2,000,000.
On 3 November 2023, the Company
issued 26,315,000 shares in lieu of fees.
16. Other Reserves
|
2023
$
|
2022
$
|
Foreign currency translation
reserve
|
279,000
|
694,000
|
Share based payment
reserve
|
854,000
|
771,000
|
Warrant reserve
|
834,000
|
377,000
|
The foreign currency translation
reserve represents the effect of changes in exchange rates arising
from translating the Financial
Statements of subsidiary undertakings into
the Company's presentational currency. The share-based payment
reserve arises on the grant of share options to directors,
employees and other eligible persons under the share option plan.
Refer to Note 17 for more information. The
warrants reserve arises on the issue of warrants. Refer to Note 17
for further information.
17. Share Based Payments
Share options outstanding at 31
December 2023 have the following expiry dates and exercise
prices:
|
|
|
Number
|
Grant date
|
Expiry date
|
Exercise
price in £ per share
|
2023
|
2022
|
2018
|
14-May-23
|
0.0025
|
-
|
10,642,373
|
2019
|
28-Mar-24
|
0.0025
|
12,342,509
|
12,342,509
|
2019
|
28-Mar-24
|
0.0022
|
3,000,000
|
3,000,000
|
2019
|
28-Mar-24
|
0.0030
|
3,000,000
|
3,000,000
|
2019
|
28-Mar-24
|
0.0045
|
4,000,000
|
4,000,000
|
2020
|
30-Aug-23
|
0.0045
|
-
|
18,750,000
|
2020
|
30-Aug-23
|
0.0050
|
-
|
18,750,000
|
2020
|
30-Aug-23
|
0.0055
|
-
|
22,500,000
|
2021
|
21-Oct-24
|
0.0100
|
10,000,000
|
10,000,000
|
2021
|
21-Oct-24
|
0.0115
|
10,000,000
|
10,000,000
|
2021
|
21-Oct-24
|
0.0145
|
15,000,000
|
15,000,000
|
2022
|
26-Sep-26
|
0.008 -
0.014
|
345,000,000
|
345,000,000
|
2023
|
31-Jul-27
|
0.0072
|
22,500,000
|
-
|
2023
|
31-Jul-27
|
0.0090
|
30,000,000
|
-
|
2023
|
31-Jul-27
|
0.0108
|
37,500,000
|
-
|
2023
|
31-Jul-27
|
0.0126
|
40,000,000
|
-
|
Total
|
|
|
532,342,509
|
472,984,882
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Options with an expiry date of
28-Mar-24 expired subsequent to year
end.
Warrants outstanding at 31
December 2023 have the following expiry dates and exercise
prices:
Grant date
|
Expiry date
|
Exercise
price in £ per share
|
Number
2023
|
Number
2022
|
2020
|
18-May-23
|
0.0012
|
-
|
2,625,000
|
2020
|
10-Sep-23
|
0.006
|
-
|
12,000,000
|
2020
|
18-May-23
|
0.015
|
-
|
11,208,125
|
2020
|
30-Nov-23
|
0.013
|
-
|
13,600,000
|
2021
|
17-Nov-24
|
0.085
|
23,529,401
|
23,529,401
|
2022
|
14-Sept-25
|
0.0025
|
7,200,000
|
7,200,000
|
2022
|
31-Dec-25
|
0.0025
|
100,000,000
|
100,000,000
|
2023
|
1-Jul-26
|
0.005198
|
10,000,000
|
-
|
2023
|
1-Jul-24
|
Note
1
|
250,000
|
-
|
2023
|
1-Jul-26
|
Note
1
|
250,000
|
-
|
Total
|
|
|
141,229,401
|
170,162,516
|
|
|
|
|
| |
Note 1: During the year,
commitment and conversion warrants were issued in relation to the
convertible note. The number of warrants to be issued depends on
the number of notes converted to shares at a future date. Each
tranche of the Conversion Warrants will have an exercise price to
the lower of a 25% premium to the 10-day VWAP on Alien's shares
prior to the date of the Deed (1 July 2023) and the Assumed
Conversion Date (1 July 2024). Where the noteholder elects to
convert the notes in to shares, the noteholder will receive 0.5 12
month warrants, and 0.5 36 month warrants for every note converted.
The maximum number of warrants to be issued is therefore 250,000 12
month warrants and 250,000 36 month warrants.
The estimate of the fair value of
the share options and warrants is measured based on the
Black-Scholes model. The parameters used for options and warrants
granted in the year ended 31 December 2023 are detailed
below:
|
2023
Options
|
2023
Options
|
2023
Options
|
2023
Options
|
|
Granted on:
|
07/07/2023
|
07/07/2023
|
07/07/2023
|
07/07/2023
|
|
Life (years)
|
3
years
|
3
years
|
3
years
|
3
years
|
|
Exercise price (pence per
share)
|
0.72
|
0.90
|
1.08
|
1.26
|
|
Risk free rate
|
4.1%
|
4.1%
|
4.1%
|
4.1%
|
|
Expected volatility
|
102%
|
102%
|
102%
|
102%
|
|
Expected dividend yield
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Marketability discount
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
|
Total fair value (£)
|
50,000
|
62,000
|
74,000
|
75,000
|
|
|
2023
Conversion Warrants
|
2023
Conversion Warrants
|
2023
Commitment Warrants
|
Granted on:
|
01/07/2023
|
01/07/2023
|
01/07/2023
|
Life (years)
|
1
year
|
3
years
|
3
years
|
Exercise price (pence per
share)
|
Variable
|
Variable
|
0.5198
|
Risk free rate
|
4.7%
|
3.6%
|
3.6%
|
Expected volatility
|
75%
|
75%
|
75%
|
Expected dividend yield
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Marketability discount
|
-
|
-
|
-
|
Total fair value (£)
|
29,000
|
42,000
|
5,000
|
The expected volatility is based on
the historical share prices over the prior comparable period of the
Company share price.
The movement of share options for
the year to 31 December 2023 is shown below:
|
2023
|
|
2022
|
|
Number
|
Weighted average exercise
price (£)
|
|
Number
|
Weighted
average exercise price (£)
|
As at 1 January
|
472,984,882
|
0.0100
|
|
134,834,882
|
0.0100
|
Granted (not yet
vested)
|
130,000,000
|
0.0106
|
|
345,000,000
|
0.0100
|
Exercised
|
(10,642,373)
|
0.0100
|
|
(5,600,000)
|
0.0100
|
Expired
|
(60,000,000)
|
0.0050
|
|
(1,250,000)
|
0.0100
|
Outstanding as at 31 December
|
532,342,509
|
0.0100
|
|
472,984,882
|
0.0100
|
Exercisable at 31 December
|
57,342,509
|
0.0100
|
|
127,984,882
|
0.0100
|
The movement of warrants for the
year to 31 December 2023 is shown below:
|
2023
|
|
2022
|
|
Number
|
Weighted average exercise
price (£)
|
|
Number
|
Weighted
average exercise price (£)
|
|
As at 1 January
|
170,162,516
|
0.004
|
|
389,620,248
|
0.0024
|
|
Granted
|
10,000,000
|
0.0052
|
|
130,729,411
|
0.0025
|
|
Granted
|
500,000
|
Variable
|
|
|
|
|
Exercised
|
-
|
NA
|
|
(301,906,079)
|
0.0024
|
|
Expired
|
(39,433,115)
|
0.0068
|
|
(48,281,064)
|
0.0024
|
|
Outstanding as at 31 December
|
141,229,401
|
0.004
|
|
170,162,516
|
0.004
|
|
Exercisable at 31 December
|
140,729,401
|
0.004
|
|
170,162,516
|
0.004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
The weighted price and life for
warrants and options for the year end 31 December 2023 is as
follows:
|
2023
|
Range of exercise prices
($)
|
Weighted average exercise
price ($)
|
Number of
shares
|
Weighted average remaining
life expected (years)
|
Weighted average remaining
life contracted (years)
|
0.004-0.6
|
0.00874
|
674,071,899
|
1.85
|
1.85
|
The total fair value charged to
the statement of comprehensive income for the year ended 31
December 2023 and included in administrative expenses was $216,000
(2022: $192,000).
Options and warrants exercised in
2023 resulted in 10,642,374 shares being issued (2022: 130,729,411)
at a weighted average price of £0.0025 each (2022: £0.0025 each)
and as a result $38,377 was recorded as share capital.
During the year 130,000,000
incentive options (2022: 178,000,000) were conditionally granted to
certain directors and are to be awarded on the basis of length of
service. The options were granted with various exercise prices at
premiums to the share price on the date they were
awarded.
|
Number
|
Exercisable by
|
Premium to price on date of
issue
|
Exercise price in £ per
share
|
A Vorster
|
12,500,000
|
31/07/2027
|
100%
|
0.0072
|
A Vorster
|
15,000,000
|
31/07/2027
|
150%
|
0.0090
|
A Vorster
|
17,500,000
|
31/07/2027
|
200%
|
0.0108
|
A Vorster
|
20,000,000
|
31/07/2027
|
250%
|
0.0126
|
E Henson
|
10,000,000
|
31/07/2027
|
100%
|
0.0072
|
E Henson
|
15,000,000
|
31/07/2027
|
150%
|
0.0090
|
E Henson
|
20,000,000
|
31/07/2027
|
200%
|
0.0108
|
E Henson
|
20,000,000
|
31/07/2027
|
250%
|
0.0126
|
18. Net Finance Charges
|
Group
|
|
2023
$
|
2022
$
|
|
Finance charges
|
(42,000)
|
-
|
|
Interest income
|
8,000
|
7,000
|
|
|
34,000
|
7,000
|
|
19. Employees
|
Group
|
Staff costs (excluding Directors)
|
2023
$
|
2022
$
|
|
Salaries and wages
|
760,000
|
256,000
|
|
Social security costs
|
34,000
|
13,000
|
|
Pensions
|
70,000
|
38,000
|
|
|
864,000
|
307,000
|
|
The average monthly number of
employees during the year was 4 (2022: 6).
20. Directors' Remuneration
2023
|
Short term employment
benefits
$
|
Share based
payment
$
|
Total
$
|
Executive Directors
|
|
|
|
G Robertson
|
44,000
|
-
|
44,000
|
R McIllree
|
37,000
|
-
|
37,000
|
Non-Executive Directors
|
|
|
|
A Vorster
|
61,000
|
61,000
|
122,000
|
E Henson
|
26,000
|
61,000
|
87,000
|
D Smith
|
37,000
|
-
|
37,000
|
J Battershill
|
5,000
|
-
|
5,000
|
M C Culbert
|
10,000
|
-
|
10,000
|
|
220,000
|
122,000
|
342,000
|
Employers tax contributions of
$10,000 have not been included in the above. During the year, A
Vorster was issued 65,000,000 options and E Henson was issued
65,000,000 options, with fair value charged to the statement of
comprehensive income for $61,000 and $61,000,
respectively.
|
|
2022
|
Short term employment
benefits
$
|
Share based
payment
$
|
Total
$
|
Executive Directors
|
|
|
|
B Brodie Good
|
210,000
|
-
|
210,000
|
R McIllree
|
27,000
|
-
|
27,000
|
Non-Executive Directors
|
|
|
|
D J Smith
|
74,000
|
-
|
74,000
|
J L Battershill
|
63,000
|
192,000
|
255,000
|
M C Culbert
|
32,000
|
-
|
32,000
|
|
406,000
|
192,000
|
598,000
|
Employers tax contributions of
$31,000 have not been included in the above. During 2022, Jonathan
Battershill was issued 35,000,000 options with fair value charged
to the statement of comprehensive income for $192,000.
21. Loss per Share
The calculation of the total basic
losses per share of 0.065 pence (2022: loss 0.050 pence)
is based on the losses attributable to equity
owners of the group of $3,721,000 (2022: $2,375,000) and on the weighted average number
of ordinary shares of 5,728,076,556 (2022: 4,712,310,829) in issue
during the year.
In accordance with IAS 33, basic
and diluted earnings per share are identical as the effect of the
exercise of share options or warrants would be to decrease the loss
per share.
22. Commitments
(a) Work programme commitment
As at 31 December 2023, Alien
Metals owned 16 mineral exploration licenses in Australia and 9
mineral exploration licenses in Mexico. These licences include
commitments to pay annual licence fees and minimum spend
requirements as follows:
|
License
fees
$
|
Minimum spend requirements
$
|
Total
$
|
Less than 1 year
|
91,000
|
455,000
|
546,000
|
1 to 5 years
|
291,000
|
1,964,000
|
2,255,000
|
Total
|
382,000
|
2,419,000
|
2,801,000
|
(b) Lease agreements
The Group had London offices under
lease agreement. The agreement was signed on 21 April 2021 and
covered office rent for the period from 1 May 2021 until 28 Feb
2023, with monthly payments of £6,916 (US$9,514) and a deposit of
£20,748 (US$28,542). This lease was not renewed. At 31 December
2023, nil remained payable in respect of this
lease.
The Group leased a property in
West Australia for on-site staff accommodation until 30 November
2024 with current monthly payments of A$3,545. At 31 December 2023,
$40,737 remained payable in respect of this lease.
23. Related Party Transactions
Transactions with key management personnel
During the year ended 31 December
2023, the Company did not enter into transactions involving
Directors other than Directors remuneration outlined in note
20.
24. Ultimate Controlling Party
The Directors believe there to be
no ultimate controlling party.
25. Events after the Reporting Date
On 15 March 2024, the Company
executed a funding package of up to A$2m that has been made
available through a convertible loan note from Bennelong Resource
Capital Pty Limited, a shareholder in the Company, with a current
holding of 7.2%. The facility is to be drawn in three tranches of
A$1m, $0.5m, and $0.5m, respectively. The facility is available for
a period of 12 months, incurs interest at the Secured Overnight
Financing Rate plus 10%, has a face value of A$1 per convertible
security, a commitment fee of 3% of funds drawn, and the lender is
to receive 25,000,000 warrants. The balance due under the facility
(including accrued interest at the end of each fiscal quarter) can
be converted into Ordinary Shares at the option of the
lender.
On 15 March 2024, Mr Alwyn Vorster
resigned as a director of the Company and was replaced by Mr Robert
Mosig.
During April 2024 the Company,
through its wholly owned subsidiary Alien Metals Australia Pty Ltd,
entered into a joint venture with Errawarra Resources Ltd (ASX:
ERW) in respect of the lithium rights on the Pinderi Hills Project.
Errawarra has the potential to earn up to a 50% interest in the
lithium rights in the Project by spending up to A$4 million with
the first A$500,000 being by the way of a subscription for common
shares in the capital of the Company.
There were no matters or
circumstances that have arisen since the end of the financial year,
other than those outlined above, that have significantly affected
or may significantly affect the operations of the Company, the
results of those operations, or state of affairs in future
financial years.