Alaska Pacific Energy Corporation (CE) (ASKE) Share Price

(SONG and PCAP)

...should read...

(SONG and BCAP)

This POS has not ever been worth any wait.
Admit it - yer STILL Stuck in a steaming zoyes boys pile of shit fraud!

Agree.

Only scammers attempting to pump and dump this garbage would have anything positive to say about ASKE...especially now that docummented fraudster Jake P. Noch is involved who has a history of failed tickers (SONG and PCAP) because of his MASSIVE 3a10 share dumping.

AVOID THIS SCAM!

What happened to Jordan Weinstein and the series A?

You sure would like that so that investors can't be warned about your scams and your history of fraud.

It's a Jake take. lol
Yeah, another fraudster.

JAKE P. NOCH FRAUD PART II

https://www.billboard.com/pro/spotify-indie-label-streaming-fraud-millions-fake-accounts-countersuit/

Spotify Countersues Indie Label, Alleging Massive Streaming Fraud & Millions of Fake Accounts

Spotify has countersued indie label Sosa Entertainment and its founder Jake Noch, alleging massive streaming fraud, unjust enrichment and the creation of millions of fake accounts to generate…

In November 2019, indie hip-hop label Sosa Entertainment and its founder, 20-year-old Jake Noch, filed a lawsuit against Spotify that alleged the streaming service failed to pay royalties on over 550 million streams of its music. The suit, which was also brought on behalf of Noch’s PRO Pro Music Rights (which was later removed), sought $150,000 in statutory damages for each infringement, and alleged that Spotify removed its music not because it detected “abnormal streaming activity,” as the service claimed, but because it was trying to dodge paying royalties on the streams.

Now, Spotify has fired back with a countersuit alleging that Noch “designed a scheme to artificially generate hundreds of millions of fraudulent streams” in order to “manipulate Spotify’s system to extract undeserved royalties at the expense of hardworking artists and songwriters.” The filing, which is supported by screenshots of messages allegedly between Noch and a “bot farmer” and charts that show streams on Noch’s music go from zero into the hundreds of thousands in a matter of days, also alleges that Noch directed the bot farmer to create millions of fake accounts and changed the names of songs in his catalog to closely resemble those of established hit songs, like XXXTentacion’s “SAD!” and DJ Snake’s “Taki Taki.”

Spotify has countersued indie label Sosa Entertainment and its founder Jake Noch, alleging massive streaming fraud, unjust enrichment and the creation of millions of fake accounts to generate…

BY DAN RYS

In November 2019, indie hip-hop label Sosa Entertainment and its founder, 20-year-old Jake Noch, filed a lawsuit against Spotify that alleged the streaming service failed to pay royalties on over 550 million streams of its music. The suit, which was also brought on behalf of Noch’s PRO Pro Music Rights (which was later removed), sought $150,000 in statutory damages for each infringement, and alleged that Spotify removed its music not because it detected “abnormal streaming activity,” as the service claimed, but because it was trying to dodge paying royalties on the streams.

Now, Spotify has fired back with a countersuit alleging that Noch “designed a scheme to artificially generate hundreds of millions of fraudulent streams” in order to “manipulate Spotify’s system to extract undeserved royalties at the expense of hardworking artists and songwriters.” The filing, which is supported by screenshots of messages allegedly between Noch and a “bot farmer” and charts that show streams on Noch’s music go from zero into the hundreds of thousands in a matter of days, also alleges that Noch directed the bot farmer to create millions of fake accounts and changed the names of songs in his catalog to closely resemble those of established hit songs, like XXXTentacion’s “SAD!” and DJ Snake’s “Taki Taki.”

Indie Hip-Hop Label Files Suit Against Spotify Over Catalog Takedown

Noch, who lists himself as the chief executive of Sosa and Pro Music Rights, as well as a handful of additional music companies, has quite the proud litigious history, having released several press releases touting lawsuits against Spotify, Apple, Google, YouTube, Amazon, SoundCloud, Pandora, Deezer, iHeartRadio and more. Pro Music Rights claims a database of some 2 million tracks, including more than 23,000 by various artists using some form of the name “LEGATO,” like LEGATO_DIMY, LEGATODE45, LEGATODI001, LEGATOGILL2002 and LEGATOKAL999, to name a few.

According to Spotify’s counterclaim, filed Monday (May 18), the service first detected artificial streaming activity on Noch’s content in March 2016 and eventually banned his music from the service, before extending that ban to all content related to Noch. Noch then tried to “smuggle” the content back onto the service using slightly different names and created millions of fake accounts to stream that music.

In June 2016, a whistleblower contacted Spotify with screenshots that purported to show Noch directing the person to create millions (direct quote: “i need millions”) of fake accounts. And while Spotify had identified the fraud a few months prior, the company had already paid a small amount of royalties to Sosa and Noch — royalties that otherwise would have gone to legitimate songwriters with songs being streamed by legitimate fans. According to the complaint, for one of Noch’s albums that jumped from zero streams to more than 400,000 in just days, 99% of its streams came from Spotify’s ad-supported free tier and from accounts registered to male users in the United States, a pattern that was also found for other works.

Noch then changed distributors and changed the names of some of his companies in order to dodge Spotify’s fraud detection systems, with slightly different artist names, song titles and cover artwork. In one section of the complaint, attorneys wrote that “analysts at Spotify found that 5,500 ‘users’ streaming one of the Sosa albums ‘originated’ from a small American town with a total population of 10,000. For that album, the stream count jumped from zero to 749,000 streams in a span of only two days… This pattern is highly anomalous and not at all correlated to any possible pattern of genuine streaming activity.”

In another example from the complaint, in what the filing calls “title track parasitism,” Noch and Sosa uploaded tracks called “SAD!” with the same punctuation as the XXXTentacion hit, and “Taki Take,” shortly after the similarly-named DJ Snake song reached the top 20 of the Billboard Hot 100. Some of the tracks that Noch and Sosa would release on Spotify were AI-generated sound loops.

In all, Spotify’s counterclaim seeks relief for fraud, fraudulent concealment, breach of contract, indemnification, unjust enrichment and deceptive business practices. As another line in the complaint reads, “This was one of the most egregious fraudulent streaming operations from a single rights holder that Spotify had to deal with in its company’s history.”

After the publication of this story, Noch provided a comment to Billboard which reads, in part, “Spotify’s claims are laughable… I also greatly look forward to the day we get to go to court, and I hope that all of Spotify’s shareholders will pay close attention to these cases… Time will prove that we are right.”

JAKE P. NOCH FRAUD PART I

https://www.vice.com/en/article/v7gmvd/spotify-sues-self-described-music-prodigy-who-allegedly-ran-royalties-scam


Spotify Sues Self-Described 'Music Prodigy' Who Allegedly Ran Royalties Scam

Spotify says Jake Noch "[generated] hundreds of millions of fraudulent streams" and engaged in "title track parasitism" among other fraudulent practices on its platform.

JC

By Jelisa Castrodale

May 19, 2020, 4:38pm

Last November, the 20-year-old head of indie hip-hop label Sosa Entertainment filed a massive (and massively complicated) lawsuit against Spotify, alleging that the digital music service hadn't paid royalties on more than 550 million streams of its songs. According to Billboard, Sosa Entertainment founder Jake Noch also named his other company, PRO Music Rights, as a plaintiff in the lawsuit, and the co-plaintiffs sought millions of dollars in damages, asking for $150,000 for each infringement.

Noch's lawsuit accused Spotify of a number of transgressions, including unfair and deceptive business practices, willfully removing Sosa Entertainment's content, "obliterating" his expectations, and refusing to pay royalties. In a statement, Noch said that he was willing to "fight to the end" if it meant that Spotify would ultimately compensate the artists who were affected.

"I have a duty to see this through so that I can pay my artists what they are owed from Spotify," he said. "I know others feel the same way as I blaze this trail for the music community, who I know is behind me and roots for our success in bringing down Spotify."

Part of Noch's problems with the company started in the spring of 2017 when Spotify removed all of Sosa Entertainment's song's from its servers and "blanket banned" Noch and his companies from using the platform going forward. According to Noch—who describes himself as a "musical prodigy" in his lawsuit—Spotify informed him that the songs were removed because of "abnormal streaming activity," but the company didn't give him the opportunity to explain what could've caused the weird-looking streaming data. Noch has alleged that Spotify just "fabricated a reason" to kick him off the platform, in an attempt to avoid having to pay the royalties that he was due.

But in its own countersuit, filed on Monday, Spotify says no, it was just because of the abnormal streaming, and also because Noch allegedly "designed a scheme to artificially generate hundreds of millions of fraudulent streams" in order to game the system and rack up a ton of royalty payments.

"Starting in 2016, Noch designed a scheme to artificially generate hundreds of millions of fraudulent streams on songs he had seeded on Spotify’s online music-streaming service," the company's complaint reads. "Noch’s objective was plain: to manipulate Spotify’s system to extract undeserved royalties at the expense of hardworking artists and songwriters."

Billboard reports that Spotify removed Noch's content from its platform after being contacted by a whistleblower who claimed that Noch had instructed a bot farmer to create literally millions of fake accounts to stream songs from the Sosa Entertainment catalog. Spotify's own analysts became suspicious when one of Noch's records went from zero streams to 400,000 in under a week, while a second album racked up 749,000 streams in two days. (Spotify also apparently determined that 5,500 of the accounts that played the latter record supposedly all lived in the same American town—even though the town's total population was just around 10,000 people.)

The company has also accused Noch of "title track parasitism," which involves uploading songs with the same name and punctuation of legitimate hit songs. Spotify's legal filing identified two "AI-generated sound loops" that had been given the same name as then-popular tracks by DJ Snake and XXXTentacion.

"This was one of the most egregious fraudulent streaming operations from a single rights holder that Spotify had to deal with in its company’s history," Spotify wrote in its complaint. The company's countersuit is asking for compensation for a long list of Noch's alleged transgressions, including fraud, fraudulent concealment, breach of contract, indemnification, unjust enrichment and deceptive business practices.

Damn, most 20-year-olds can only dream of being dragged that hard by an international streaming service. A musical prodigy, indeed.

https://repository.law.umich.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1039&context=mbelr

Welp, Jake has now motioned for another illegal 3a10 so I'm here now too.

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1766244983302987942

Thank you posting.

Could you please explain what this means?

Thanks

https://x.com/JPNFamilyOffice/status/1856362332949025066

Why isn't Jake P Noch's company Pro Music Rights (SONG) recognized in this? He claims it to be the fifth music rights organization with 7.4% market share but according to this his company isn't even recognized as a legitimate music rights organization. Why is it that in every legitimate major third party publication in regards to the industry his company is never mentioned, recognized or acknowledged as a legitimate company in the space? The only one that seems to recognize it as such is Jake. https://www.billboard.com/pro/house-judiciary-letter-copyright-office-examine-pro-royalty-distributions/

https://x.com/flowinvesting

Jake claims to have made EDM. EDM? Oh you mean all the auto generated electronic music that was used in the attempted Spotify streaming scam? https://www.billboard.com/pro/spotify-indie-label-streaming-fraud-millions-fake-accounts-countersuit/

https://investorshub.advfn.com/boards/read_msg.aspx?message_id=175000889

https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1766244983302987942

https://x.com/JPNFamilyOffice/status/1826411360307347595

https://x.com/JPNFamilyOffice/status/1826398068646052150

Things sure do look good here.....

LOL

Blah blah blah LMFAO at an aske stock pimp.

Dime a dozen.

SMH.

I'm sorry to hear that from you. You actually made a tear come to my eye with those strong words.

You are a freaking bullshit spewing moron and nothing more.
Always have been.
Go pound sand.

You are so lost with your senses and lost with reality

No they can't. It's Expert Market. Try to go place a bid and tell me what it says to you

Any tom dick or harry trader can place a bid any time he or she wants.
He or she can remove it in the wink of any eye too.
BFD.

It had a bid last time I checked, so therefore it's not worthless.

This POS has not ever been worth any wait.
Admit it - yer STILL Stuck in a steaming zoyes boys pile of shit fraud!

LMFAO.

Ahhhhh, I see.

It's a Jake take. lol

Will have to see what happens.

So. Is Michael Zoyes still running the show here, or is he in prison again?

Will be worth the wait 🚀

Theyre all full of shit.
Lying sleazeballs.

Yes

$ASKE TRADED MILLIONS TODAY AND THEY ARE RECENTLY T A VERIFIED
LOOK
https://www.otcmarkets.com/stock/ASKE/security

People are still here trying to get rich..... Some people never learn!

RIP ASKE

EXPERT MARKET

ASKE Share Structure (as of 7/23/2021):
A/S = 15 Billion
O/S = 6,562,076,629
Restricted = 4,400,780,532
Unrestricted = 2,161,296,097
Float = 1,837,962,763 (as of 6/21/2017)

you must.

Like i give a rats ass?
Anyone can call out a historical low and subsequent high...BFD.
LMFAO.

its up 800% from no bid

A real turd. Like its always been.
Lmfao.

ASKE YTD volume 6,995,606,671

30% is 30%.

30% gain on $1000 is $300

30% gain on $10,000 is $3000

30% gain on $25000 is $7500

Another LAUGHABLE NOTHING BURGER.

ASKE up 30% today

on low volume

Yea been watching them manipulate that handle...couple sideways days and a little up than boom.

That "cup" appears to be overflowing with bullshit.