Sinclair Sees Weakness in Presidential Ads
21 September 2016 - 5:40AM
Dow Jones News
Stocks across the broadcast industry fell Tuesday as investors
feared that television advertising spending on the race for the
White House wouldn't be as high as expected.
Sinclair Broadcast Group Inc. withdrew its political-spending
forecast for the year on Tuesday morning because of the "unusual
nature" of this year's election. As recently as August, the company
said it was expecting a "record year" for campaign spending.
Shares of Sinclair fell 9.9% to $25.84 in afternoon trading.
E.W. Scripps Co. shares dropped 8.8%, Tegna Inc. declined 4.4%, and
Tribune Media Co. fell 4%.
Over all, political ad-spending levels for this presidential
election have shrunk from 2012, as Republican nominee Donald Trump
has aired an historically low number of TV ads. In 2012, Republican
nominee Mitt Romney spent nearly $50 million on advertising through
July. Mr. Trump spent $20 million in the same period this cycle,
according to the latest figures disclosed to the Federal Election
Commission.
Mr. Trump's $20 million was spent entirely on the primary. After
becoming his party's effective nominee in May and officially
accepting the nomination in July, his campaign didn't begin airing
TV ads again until mid-August. Since mid-June, the Clinton campaign
has aired nearly 115,000 TV ad spots, compared with 20,000 aired by
the Trump campaign, according to the Center for Public
Integrity.
Industry watchers are divided over whether the lower spending is
a short-term anomaly caused by the abnormal nature of Mr. Trump's
campaign or a sign of a broader rollback of the importance of
television advertising.
Throughout the primary, Mr. Trump relied largely on free media
through interviews with cable networks, which often carried his
rallies live on air.
"It seems to be more of a Trump story than a general story,"
Travis Ridout, a Washington State Professor who wrote a book about
campaign advertising, said. He added that in "this presidential
campaign, everyone knows too much about Hillary Clinton and Donald
Trump, and thus the ability for advertising to have any impact is
really quite small."
Mrs. Clinton's ad-spending levels this election cycle are
roughly consistent with what President Barack Obama spent in 2012.
Through July of that year, he spent $111 million on advertising,
compared with $108 million spent by Mrs. Clinton in the comparable
period this year.
"While we previously anticipated a decline in presidential ad
spending in the third quarter based on the late fundraising by the
Trump campaign, we have yet to see significant spending, even at
the levels we initially anticipated," Sinclair's Chief Financial
Officer Chris Ripley said.
For the third quarter, Sinclair now expects to take in $46
million of political spending, down from its previous estimate of
$58 million to $68 million.
Sinclair is exposed to a number of battleground states,
including having 20 or more channels each in Ohio, Florida,
Pennsylvania and Michigan and markets in North Carolina and
Virginia. In 2012, total political spending accounted for 11% of
its annual broadcast revenue.
Still Sinclair said it was "hopeful" presidential advertising
spending will increase as polls tighten.
Jan Dawson, Chief Analyst of Jackdaw Research, estimates that
presidential campaigns account for about 30% of total political
spending for local TV station owners.
Mr. Trump's super PAC firepower on the airwaves looks likely to
improve in the coming weeks, as two billionaires—casino owner
Sheldon Adelson and TD Ameritrade founder Joe Ricketts—have pledged
a combined $6 million to support the nominee. Their efforts will at
least in part be aimed at erasing Mrs. Clinton's major advantage in
TV advertising.
Mr. Trump and his allies are likely to ramp up their spending on
TV ads in the final stage of the election. Since returning to the
airwaves in mid-August, the campaign's ad spending has escalated
each week. In the week beginning Sept. 4, his campaign aired nearly
10,000 ad spots, up from 6,000 the previous week.
Mr. Trump's campaign has said it doesn't see the need to spend
as much on TV ads as Mrs. Clinton; the Trump camp has said it is
looking to run a leaner campaign operation.
Write to Austen Hufford at austen.hufford@wsj.com and Rebecca
Ballhaus at Rebecca.Ballhaus@wsj.com
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
September 20, 2016 15:25 ET (19:25 GMT)
Copyright (c) 2016 Dow Jones & Company, Inc.
TD Ameritrade (NASDAQ:AMTD)
Historical Stock Chart
From Apr 2024 to May 2024
TD Ameritrade (NASDAQ:AMTD)
Historical Stock Chart
From May 2023 to May 2024