NOTES TO CONDENSED CONSOLIDATED FINANCIAL STATEMENTS
(Unaudited)
NOTE 1. ORGANIZATION AND BASIS OF PRESENTATION
Organization
inContact, Inc. (“inContact,” “we,” “us,” “our,” or the “Company”) is incorporated in the state of Delaware. We provide cloud contact center software solutions through our inContact
®
Customer Interaction Cloud, an advanced contact handling and performance management software application. Our services also provide a variety of connectivity options for carrying inbound calls and linking agents to our inContact applications. We provide customers the ability to monitor agent effectiveness through our user survey tools and the ability to efficiently monitor their agent needs. We are also an aggregator and provider of network connectivity services. We contract with a number of third party providers for the right to resell the various telecommunication services and products they provide, and then offer all of these services to the customers. These services and products allow customers to buy only the network connectivity services they need, combine those services in a customized enhanced contact center package, receive one bill for those services, and call a single point of contact if a service problem or billing issue arises.
Basis of Presentation
These unaudited Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements of inContact and its subsidiaries have been prepared in accordance with accounting principles generally accepted in the United States (“GAAP”) and the rules and regulations of the United States Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). Such rules and regulations allow the omission of certain information and footnote disclosures normally included in financial statements prepared in accordance with GAAP, so long as the statements are not misleading. In the opinion of management, these financial statements and accompanying notes contain all adjustments (consisting of normal recurring adjustments) necessary to present fairly the financial position and results of operations for the periods presented herein. These Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements should be read in conjunction with the consolidated audited financial statements and notes thereto contained in the Annual Report on Form 10-K for the year ended December 31, 2015, filed with the SEC on March 4, 2016. The results of operations for the three months ended March 31, 2016 are not necessarily indicative of the results to be expected for the year ending December 31, 2016. Our significant accounting policies are set forth in Note 1 to the Consolidated Financial Statements in the 2015 Annual Report on Form 10-K and changes, if any, are included below.
Revenue Recognition
Revenue is recognized when all of the following four criteria are met: (1) persuasive evidence of an arrangement exists, (2) the fee is fixed or determinable, (3) collection is reasonably assured, and (4) delivery has occurred or services have been rendered. Determining whether and when some of these criteria have been satisfied often involves assumptions and judgments that can have a significant impact on the timing and amount of revenue we report.
Our revenue is reported and recognized based on the type of services provided to the customer as follows:
Software
Revenue
. Software revenue includes two main sources of revenue:
(1) Software delivery and support of our inContact cloud software solutions that are provided on a monthly subscription basis and associated professional services. Because our customers purchasing software and support services on a monthly recurring basis do not have the right to take possession of the software, we consider these arrangements to be service contracts and are not within the scope of Industry Topic 985,
Software
. We generally bill monthly recurring subscription charges in arrears and recognize these charges in the period in which they are earned. In addition to the monthly recurring revenue, revenue is also received on a non-recurring basis for professional services or on a recurring basis related to improving a customer’s contact center efficiency and effectiveness as it relates to utilization of the inContact cloud software solutions.
For subscription service contracts with multiple elements (hosted software, training, installation and long distance services), we follow the guidance provided in Accounting Standards Codification (“ASC”) 605-25,
Revenue Recognition for Multiple Element Arrangements
. In addition to the monthly recurring subscription revenue, we also derive revenue on a non-recurring basis for professional services included in implementing or improving a customer’s inContact cloud software solutions experience. Because our professional services, such as training and implementation, are not considered to have standalone value, we defer revenue for upfront fees received for professional services in multiple element arrangements and recognize such fees as revenue over the estimated life of the customer. Fees for network connectivity services in multiple element arrangements within the inContact cloud software solutions are based on usage and recognize as revenue in the same manner as fees for telecommunication services discussed in the “Network Connectivity Services Revenue” below.
7
(2) Perpetual product and services revenues ar
e primarily
derived from the sale of licenses to our
Workforce Optimization on-premise software
products and services. For software license arrangements that do not require significant modification or customization of the underlying software, revenue is r
ecognized when all revenue recognition criteria are met.
Many of our customers purchase a combination of software, service, hardware, post contract customer support (“PCS”) and hosting. For software and software related multiple element arrangements that fall within the scope of the software revenue guidance in Topic 985, Software , we allocate revenue to the delivered elements of the arrangement using the residual method, whereby revenue is allocated to the undelivered elements based on vendor-specific objective evidence of fair value (“VSOE”) of the undelivered elements with the remaining arrangement fee allocated to the delivered elements and is recognized as revenue assuming all other revenue recognition criteria are met. If we are unable to establish VSOE for the undelivered elements of the arrangement, including PCS, revenue recognition is deferred for the entire arrangement until all elements of the arrangement are delivered. PCS provided to our customers includes technical software support services and unspecified software upgrades to customers on a when-and-if available basis. PCS revenue is recognized ratably over the term of the maintenance period, which is typically 15 months. When PCS is included within a multiple element arrangement, we utilize the bell-shaped curve approach to establish VSOE for the PCS. Under the bell-shaped curve approach of establishing VSOE, we perform a VSOE compliance test on a quarterly basis to ensure that a substantial majority of our actual PCS renewals are within a sufficiently narrow range.
Product revenue from customers who purchase our products for resale is generally recognized when such products are released (on a “sell-through” basis). Periodically we review our reseller arrangements as our business and products change.
Network Connectivity Service Revenue
. Network Connectivity Services revenue is derived from network connectivity, such as dedicated transport, switched long distance and data services. These services are provided over our network or through third party network connectivity providers. Our network is the backbone of our subscription software and allows us to provide the all-in-one inContact cloud software solutions. Revenue for network connectivity usage is derived based on customer specific rate plans and the customer’s call usage and is recognized in the period the call is initiated. Customers are also billed monthly charges in arrears and revenue is recognized for such charges over the billing period. If the billing period spans more than one month, earned but unbilled revenues are recognized as revenue for incurred usage to date.
Long-term Debt
We record debt issuance costs as a direct deduction from the carrying amount of our long-term borrowings, as well as costs incurred for subsequent modification of debt, incurred in connection with our long-term borrowings and credit facilities. We amortize these costs as an adjustment to interest expense over the remaining contractual life of the associated long-term borrowing or credit facility using the effective interest method for term loans and convertible debt borrowings, and the straight-line method for revolving credit facilities. When unscheduled principal payments are made, we adjust the amortization of our deferred debt-related costs to reflect the expected remaining terms of the borrowing.
Operating Leases
Rent expense and lease incentives, including landlord construction allowances, are recognized on a straight-line basis over the lease term, commencing generally on the date the Company takes possession of the leased property. The unamortized portion of deferred rent is included in deferred rent and lease incentive obligation.
Recently Issued Accounting Standards
In May 2014, the Financial Accounting Standards Board (“FASB”) issued Accounting Standards Update (“ASU”) No. 2014-09, “
Revenue from Contracts with Customers
.” The guidance in the ASU supersedes existing revenue recognition guidance and the core principle behind ASU 2014-09 is that an entity should recognize revenue to depict the transfer of promised goods and services to customers in an amount that reflects the consideration to which the entity expects to be entitled in exchange for delivering those goods and services. This model involves a five-step process that includes identifying the contract with the customer, identifying the performance obligations in the contract, determining the transaction price, allocating the transaction prices to the performance obligations in the contract and recognizing revenue when (or as) the entity satisfies the performance obligations. In July 2015, the FASB ratified a one-year delay in the effective date of ASU 2014-09, which makes the effective date for the Company the first quarter of fiscal 2018. The ASU allows two methods of adoption; a full retrospective approach where three years of financial information are presented in accordance with the new standard, and a modified retrospective approach where the ASU is applied to the most current period presented in the financial statements with a cumulative effect recognized as of the date of initial application. This update could impact the timing and amounts of revenue recognized. We are currently evaluating which transition approach to use and assessing the impact of adopting the new revenue standard on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
8
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-08, “
Principal versus Agent Considerations (Reporting Revenue Gross versus Net)
” that amends the principal versus agent guidance i
n ASU 2014-09. The guidance in this ASU clarifies that the analysis must focus on whether the entity has control of the goods or services before they are transferred to the customer. Additional guidance is also provided about how to apply the control princ
iple when services are provided and when goods or services are combined with other goods or services. The effective date for the Company is the first quarter of fiscal 2018. We are currently evaluating the transition method that will be used and assessing
the impact the updated standard will have on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In April 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-10, “
Identifying Performance Obligations and Licensing
” that amends the revenue guidance in ASU 2014-09 on identifying performance obligations and accounting for licenses of intellectual property. The update allows an entity to exclude immaterial promised good and services from the assessment of performance obligations and also permits certain treatment of shipping and handling costs related to providing goods and services to a customer. Additionally, this ASU provides guidance on determining if promised goods or services are separately identifiable or whether the promise is to transfer a combined item to which promised goods and/or services are inputs. This ASU includes implementation guidance on determining whether an entity’s promise to grant a license provides a customer with either a right to use the entity’s intellectual property (which is satisfied at a point in time) or a right to access the entity’s intellectual property (which is satisfied over time). The effective date of the standard for the Company will coincide with ASU 2014-09 during the first quarter 2018. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that the updated standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In January 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-01, “
Recognition and Measurement of Financial Assets and Liabilities
.” This pronouncement will change the income statement impact of equity investments held by an entity, financial liabilities under the fair value option and the presentation and disclosure requirements for financial instruments. This ASU is effective in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2017 and early adoption of some provisions are permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact of this new standard on our consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
In February 2016, the FASB issued ASU 2016-02, “
Leases (Topic 842)
,” which requires recognition on the balance sheet of assets and liabilities related to the rights and obligations created by leases with a term of more than 12 months. Consistent with current GAAP, the recognition, measurement and presentation of expenses and cash flows arising from a lease will depend on its classification as a finance or operating lease. However, the new guidance differs from current GAAP in that it requires both types of leases to be recognized on the balance sheet. Related disclosures will include both qualitative and quantitative requirements to help investors better understand the amounts recorded in the financial statements. This ASU is effective in fiscal years beginning after December 15, 2018 and early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently assessing the impact of this new standard on our consolidated financial statements.
In March 2016, the FASB issued ASU No. 2016-09, “
Improvements to Employee Share-Based Payment Accounting
.” The objective of this update is to simplify several aspects of accounting for employee share-based payment transactions, including the income tax consequences, classification of awards as either equity or liabilities, and classification on the statement of cash flows. This update is effective for the Company during the first quarter 2017 and early adoption is permitted. The Company is currently evaluating the effect that the updated standard will have on its consolidated financial statements and related disclosures.
We reviewed all other recently issued accounting standards in order to determine their effects, if any, on the consolidated financial statements. Based on that review, we believe that none of these standards will have a significant effect on current or future results of operations.
NOTE 2. BASIC AND DILUTED NET LOSS PER COMMON SHARE
Basic earnings per common share is computed by dividing the net loss applicable to common shareholders by the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding during the period. Diluted earnings per common share is computed by dividing the net loss by the sum of the weighted-average number of common shares outstanding plus the weighted average common stock equivalents, which would have been outstanding if the potentially dilutive securities had been issued. Potentially dilutive securities include outstanding options, unvested restricted stock awards, and potential shares from Convertible Notes. The dilutive effect of potentially dilutive securities is reflected in diluted earnings per common share by application of the treasury method.
9
As a result of incurring a net loss for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, no potentially dilutive securities are included in the calculation of diluted earnings per share because such effect wou
ld be anti-dilutive. The following table summarizes potentially dilutive securities, using the above security classifications
(in thousands):
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Stock options
|
|
|
2,984
|
|
|
|
2,941
|
|
Restricted stock awards
|
|
|
1,954
|
|
|
|
1,395
|
|
Potential shares from Convertible Notes
|
|
|
8,082
|
|
|
|
8,082
|
|
Total potentially dilutive shares
|
|
|
13,020
|
|
|
|
12,418
|
|
NOTE 3. FAIR VALUE OF FINANCIAL INSTRUMENTS
The accounting guidance for fair value measurements defines fair value, establishes a market-based framework or hierarchy for measuring fair value and expands disclosures about fair value measurements. The guidance is applicable whenever assets and liabilities are measured and included in the Condensed Consolidated Financial Statements at fair value. The fair value of a financial instrument is the amount that could be received upon the sale of an asset or paid to transfer a liability in an orderly transaction between market participants at the measurement date. Financial assets are marked to bid prices and financial liabilities are marked to offer prices. Fair value measurements do not include transaction costs. The fair value hierarchy prioritizes the quality and reliability of the information used to determine fair values. Categorization within the fair value hierarchy is based on the lowest level of input that is significant to the fair value measurement. The fair value hierarchy is defined into the following three categories:
Level 1: Quoted market prices in active markets for identical assets or liabilities.
Level 2: Inputs that reflect quoted prices for identical assets or liabilities in less active markets; quoted prices for similar assets or liabilities in active markets; benchmark yields, reported trades, broker/dealer quotes, inputs other than quoted prices that are observable for the assets or liabilities; or inputs that are derived principally from or corroborated by observable market data by correlation or other means.
Level 3: Unobservable inputs that reflect our own assumptions incorporated in valuation techniques used to measure fair value. These assumptions are required to be consistent with market participant assumptions that are reasonably available.
Assets Measured at Fair Value on a Recurring Basis:
The following table summarizes our investments measured at fair value on a recurring basis using the above input categories as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015
(in thousands):
|
|
March 31, 2016
|
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Total
|
|
|
Level 1
|
|
|
Level 2
|
|
|
Total
|
|
Cash equivalents:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Money market funds
|
|
$
|
5,382
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
5,382
|
|
|
$
|
4,071
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
4,071
|
|
Commercial paper
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
999
|
|
|
|
999
|
|
Total cash equivalents
|
|
|
5,382
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,382
|
|
|
|
4,071
|
|
|
|
999
|
|
|
|
5,070
|
|
Investments:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Commercial paper
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
22,521
|
|
|
|
22,521
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
27,846
|
|
|
|
27,846
|
|
Corporate debt securities
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
46,972
|
|
|
|
46,972
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
45,830
|
|
|
|
45,830
|
|
Municipal bonds
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
511
|
|
|
|
511
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,433
|
|
|
|
1,433
|
|
Total investments
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
70,004
|
|
|
|
70,004
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
75,109
|
|
|
|
75,109
|
|
Total assets measured at fair
value
|
|
$
|
5,382
|
|
|
$
|
70,004
|
|
|
$
|
75,386
|
|
|
$
|
4,071
|
|
|
$
|
76,108
|
|
|
$
|
80,179
|
|
Fair Value Measurements
Money Market Funds
– We value our money market funds using quoted active market prices for such funds.
Commercial paper, Corporate debt securities, and Municipal bonds
– The fair value of these securities are estimated using observable market prices for identical securities that may be traded in less-active markets, if available. When observable market prices for identical securities are not available, we value these securities using non-binding market price quotes from brokers which we review
10
for reasonableness using observable market data; quoted prices for similar instruments; or pricing models, such as a discounted cash flows.
Other Financial Instruments
The carrying amounts of cash and cash equivalents (other than investments recorded on a fair value basis disclosed above), accounts and other receivables, and trade accounts payable approximate fair value because of the immediate or short-term maturities of these financial instruments.
The fair value of the Convertible Notes is considered to be a Level 2 measurement because it is based on a recent bid price quote for the Convertible Notes, reflecting activity in a less than active market. The carrying value and estimated fair value of our Convertible Notes are as follows (
in thousands
):
|
|
March 31, 2016
|
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
|
|
Carrying Value
|
|
|
Estimated Fair Value
|
|
|
Carrying Value
|
|
|
Estimated Fair Value
|
|
Convertible notes
|
|
$
|
83,029
|
|
|
$
|
104,547
|
|
|
$
|
81,985
|
|
|
$
|
108,330
|
|
NOTE 4. INVESTMENTS – AVAILABLE FOR SALE
Our investments generally consist of money market funds, commercial paper, corporate debt securities and municipal bonds. All of our investments have original maturity (maturity at the purchase date) of less than 12 months. Investments with original maturities of three months or less are classified as cash equivalents.
We classify our investments as available for sale at the time of purchase and we reevaluate such classification as of each balance sheet date. These short-term investments are carried at fair value with unrealized gains or losses classified as a component of accumulated other comprehensive loss. Amortization of premiums and accretion of discounts to maturity are computed under the effective interest method and is included in interest income. Interest on securities is included in interest income when earned. Realized gains and losses on the sale of investments are determined using the specific identification method and recorded in "Other income (expense)” in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.
Our investments as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015 were as follows
(in thousands)
:
|
March 31, 2016
|
|
|
Amortized Cost
|
|
|
Gross Unrealized Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value/Net Carrying Value
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
Commercial paper
|
$
|
22,521
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
22,521
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
$
|
22,521
|
|
Corporate debt securities
|
|
46,982
|
|
|
|
(10
|
)
|
|
|
46,972
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
46,972
|
|
Money market funds
|
|
5,382
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
5,382
|
|
|
|
5,382
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Municipal bonds
|
|
511
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
511
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
511
|
|
Total
|
$
|
75,396
|
|
|
$
|
(10
|
)
|
|
$
|
75,386
|
|
|
$
|
5,382
|
|
|
$
|
70,004
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
|
Amortized Cost
|
|
|
Gross Unrealized Losses
|
|
|
Fair Value/Net Carrying Value
|
|
|
Cash and Cash Equivalents
|
|
|
Investments
|
|
Commercial paper
|
$
|
28,845
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
|
$
|
28,845
|
|
|
$
|
999
|
|
|
$
|
27,846
|
|
Corporate debt securities
|
|
45,911
|
|
|
|
(81
|
)
|
|
|
45,830
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
45,830
|
|
Money market funds
|
|
4,071
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
4,071
|
|
|
|
4,071
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Municipal bonds
|
|
1,433
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,433
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
1,433
|
|
Total
|
$
|
80,260
|
|
|
$
|
(81
|
)
|
|
$
|
80,179
|
|
|
$
|
5,070
|
|
|
$
|
75,109
|
|
11
As of March 31, 2016 all our investments had contractual maturities of less than one year.
At March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015, we had $10,000 and $81,000 of net unrealized losses on certain investments, respectively. We regularly review our investment portfolio to identify and evaluate investments that have indications of possible impairment that is other-than-temporary. Factors considered in determining whether a loss is temporary include:
|
·
|
the length of time and extent to which fair value has been lower than the cost basis;
|
|
·
|
the financial condition, credit quality and near-term prospects of the investee; and
|
|
·
|
whether it is more likely than not that the Company will be required to sell the security prior to recovery.
|
We believe that there were no investments held at March 31, 2016 that were other-than-temporarily impaired. For the three months ended March 31, 2016, proceeds from maturities of investments were $21.8 million for an immaterial realized gain, $1.0 million of these maturities were securities included in cash equivalents. We had no sales of investments for the three months ended March 31, 2015.
NOTE 5. ACQUISITIONS
AC2 Acquisition
On January 13, 2016, we acquired 100% of the outstanding shares of AC2 Solutions, Inc. (“AC2”), a Delaware corporation. AC2 provides Workforce Optimization products and services to call centers.
inContact acquired AC2 for an aggregate purchase price of
approximately $12.3 million, which was paid with cash in the amount of $12.0 million and 40,456 restricted shares of the Company’s common stock valued at $344,000. An additional 505,700 restricted shares of our common stock were issued, but not included in the purchase considerations as the shares will vest as services are provided over a two year period.
The acquisition of AC2 was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting in accordance with ASC 805,
Business Combinations
. Under the purchase method of accounting, the total purchase price is allocated to the preliminary tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values, as determined by management. The total purchase price was allocated using information currently available. The purchase price allocation for the AC2 acquisition will be finalized during calendar year 2016. As a result, we may continue to adjust the preliminary estimated purchase price allocation after obtaining more information regarding asset valuations, liabilities assumed, and revision of preliminary estimates. The following is the total preliminary purchase price allocation on estimated purchase consideration based on information available as of March 31, 2016
(in thousands)
:
|
|
Amount
|
|
Assets acquired:
|
|
|
|
|
Cash and cash equivalents
|
|
$
|
78
|
|
Accounts receivable
|
|
|
100
|
|
Other current assets
|
|
|
63
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
6,710
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
8,243
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
15,194
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities assumed:
|
|
|
|
|
Accrued liabilities
|
|
|
136
|
|
Current portion of deferred revenue
|
|
|
74
|
|
Deferred tax liability
|
|
|
2,666
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
2,876
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
12,318
|
|
In connection with the acquisition, we incurred professional fees of $188,000, including transaction costs such as legal and valuation services, which were expensed as incurred. These costs are included within general and administrative expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.
The premium paid over the fair value of the net assets acquired in the purchase, or goodwill, represents future economic benefits expected to arise from deploying cutting edge technology to enhance our competitive differentiation. All of the goodwill was assigned to the Software segment. The entire amount allocated to goodwill is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
Intangible assets acquired from the acquisition include customer relationships, which are amortized on a double-declining basis, technologies, patents and a non-competition agreement, which are amortized on a straight-line basis and in-process research and
12
development which has an initial indefinite life and is expected to be amortized once technical feasibility is established. The fair valu
es of the intangible assets were determined primarily using the income approach and the discount rates range from 20% to 25%. The following sets forth the intangible assets purchased as part of the AC2 acquisition and their respective preliminary estimated
economic useful life at the date of the acquisition (
in thousands, except useful life
)
:
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Economic Useful
Life (in years)
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
$
|
710
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Technology
|
|
|
321
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
In-process research and development
|
|
|
3,014
|
|
|
Indefinite
|
|
Patents
|
|
|
2,641
|
|
|
|
12
|
|
Non-competition agreement
|
|
|
24
|
|
|
|
2
|
|
Total intangible assets
|
|
$
|
6,710
|
|
|
|
|
|
The Company recorded a deferred tax benefit of $2.7 million at the time of the acquisition. The tax benefit related to recording a deferred tax liability upon acquisition of AC2 related to acquisition of intangibles for which no tax benefit will be derived. The reduction of carrying value resulted in a partial reversal of the deferred tax asset valuation allowance upon consolidation.
Attensity Acquisition
On February 8, 2016, we acquired certain intangible assets from Attensity Group, Inc., a Delaware corporation, Biz360, Inc., a California corporation, and Attensity Americas, Inc., a Delaware corporation (collectively “Attensity”). The purchase consideration was approximately $6.6 million in cash. The patents purchased from Attensity provide advanced analytics technology to corporate customers. The acquisition of Attensity technology was accounted for under the purchase method of accounting in accordance with ASC 805,
Business Combinations
. Under the purchase method of accounting, the total purchase price is allocated
to the tangible and identifiable intangible assets acquired and liabilities assumed based on their estimated fair values, as determined by management. The total purchase price was allocated using information currently available. The purchase price allocation for the Attensity acquisition will be finalized during calendar year 2016. As a result, we may continue to adjust the preliminary estimated purchase price allocation after obtaining more information regarding asset valuations, liabilities assumed, and revision of preliminary estimates. The following is the total preliminary purchase price allocation on estimated purchase consideration based on information available as of March 31, 2016
(in thousands)
:
|
|
Amount
|
|
Assets acquired:
|
|
|
|
|
Property, plant and equipment and other assets
|
|
|
290
|
|
Intangible assets
|
|
|
4,917
|
|
Goodwill
|
|
|
1,525
|
|
Total assets acquired
|
|
|
6,732
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Liabilities assumed:
|
|
|
|
|
Current portion of deferred revenue
|
|
|
157
|
|
Long-term portion of deferred revenue
|
|
|
25
|
|
Total liabilities assumed
|
|
|
182
|
|
Net assets acquired
|
|
$
|
6,550
|
|
In connection with the acquisition, we incurred professional fees of $27,000, including transaction costs such as legal and valuation services, which were expensed as incurred. These costs are included within general and administrative expenses in the Condensed Consolidated Statements of Operations and Comprehensive Loss.
The premium paid over the fair value of the net assets acquired in the purchase, or goodwill, represents future economic benefits expected to arise from synergies from enhancing our product offerings through the addition of text analysis technology. All of the goodwill was assigned to the Software segment. The entire amount allocated to goodwill is not expected to be deductible for tax purposes.
13
Intangible assets acquired from the acquisition include
customer relationships
,
which are amortized on a double-declin
ing basis,
technologies and patents, which are amortized on a straight-line basis
and in-process research and development which has an initial indefinite life and is expected to be amortized once technical feasibility is established
. The fair values of the
intangible assets were determined primarily using the income approach and the discount rates range from
25
% - 30%. The following sets forth the intangible assets purchased as part of the Attensity acquisition and their respective preliminary estimated eco
nomic useful life at the date of the acquisition (
in thousands, except useful life
)
:
|
|
Amount
|
|
|
Economic Useful
Life (in years)
|
|
Customer relationships
|
|
|
140
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
Technology
|
|
|
141
|
|
|
|
5
|
|
In-process research and development
|
|
|
3,193
|
|
|
Indefinite
|
|
Patents
|
|
|
1,443
|
|
|
|
8
|
|
Total intangible assets
|
|
$
|
4,917
|
|
|
|
|
|
NOTE 6. INTANGIBLE ASSETS
Intangible assets consisted of the following (
in thousands
):
|
March 31, 2016
|
|
|
December 31, 2015
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Intangible
|
|
|
Gross
|
|
|
Accumulated
|
|
|
Intangible
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Assets, Net
|
|
|
Assets
|
|
|
Amortization
|
|
|
Assets, Net
|
|
Customer lists acquired
|
$
|
28,973
|
|
|
$
|
(21,449
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,524
|
|
|
$
|
28,123
|
|
|
$
|
(20,859
|
)
|
|
$
|
7,264
|
|
Technology and patents
|
|
35,112
|
|
|
|
(14,799
|
)
|
|
|
20,313
|
|
|
|
24,358
|
|
|
|
(14,222
|
)
|
|
|
10,136
|
|
Trade names and
trademarks
|
|
3,212
|
|
|
|
(1,476
|
)
|
|
|
1,736
|
|
|
|
3,190
|
|
|
|
(1,358
|
)
|
|
|
1,832
|
|
Total intangible assets
|
$
|
67,297
|
|
|
$
|
(37,724
|
)
|
|
$
|
29,573
|
|
|
$
|
55,671
|
|
|
$
|
(36,439
|
)
|
|
$
|
19,232
|
|
Amortization expense was $1.3 million and $1.4 million during the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
Based on the recorded intangibles at March 31, 2016, estimated amortization expense is expected to be $3.6 million during the remainder of 2016, $4.3 million in 2017, $3.8 million in 2018, $3.4 million in 2019, $3.3 million in 2020 and $5.0 million thereafter.
NOTE 7. ACCRUED LIABILITIES
Accrued liabilities consisted of the following (
in thousands
):
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
December 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Accrued payroll and other compensation
|
|
$
|
5,408
|
|
|
$
|
4,726
|
|
Accrued state sales taxes
|
|
|
3,828
|
|
|
|
3,939
|
|
Accrued vendor charges
|
|
|
1,093
|
|
|
|
1,281
|
|
Accrued interest
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
717
|
|
Other
|
|
|
2,376
|
|
|
|
2,165
|
|
Total accrued liabilities
|
|
$
|
12,705
|
|
|
$
|
12,828
|
|
NOTE 8. LONG-TERM DEBT AND CAPITAL LEASE OBLIGATIONS
Convertible Notes
On March 30, 2015, we issued $115.0 million in aggregate principal amount of 2.50% Convertible Senior Notes (the “Convertible Notes”) due April 1, 2022, unless earlier converted by the holder pursuant to their terms. Net proceeds from the Convertible Notes were approximately $111.2 million, net of transaction fees. The Convertible Notes pay interest in cash semiannually in arrears at a rate of 2.50% per annum.
14
The Convertible Notes are unsecured and will be senior in right of payment to any future debt that is expressly subordinated to the Convertible Notes. The Convertible Notes will be structurally subordinated to all debt and other liabilities and commitmen
ts of our subsidiaries, including trade payables and any guarantees that they may provide with respect to any of our existing or future debt, and will be effectively subordinated to any secured debt that we may incur to the extent of the assets securing su
ch indebtedness.
The Convertible Notes are convertible by the holders under certain circumstances. The conversion price of the Convertible Notes at any time is equal to $1,000 divided by the then-applicable conversion rate. The Convertible Notes have a conversion rate of 70.2790 shares of common stock per $1,000 principal amount of Convertible Notes, which represents an effective conversion price of approximately $14.23 per share of common stock and would result in the issuance of approximately 8.1 million shares if all of the Convertible Notes were converted. The conversion rate has not changed since issuance of the Convertible Notes, although throughout the term of the Convertible Notes, the conversion rate may be adjusted upon the occurrence of certain events. Upon conversion, the Company has the option of satisfying the conversion obligation with cash, shares of Company common stock, or a combination of cash and common shares.
Holders may tender their Convertible Notes for conversion at any time prior to the close of business on the business day immediately preceding October 1, 2021, only under the following circumstances:
|
·
|
during any calendar quarter commencing after the calendar quarter which ended on March 31, 2015, if the closing sale price of our common stock, for at least 20 trading days (whether or not consecutive) in the period of 30 consecutive trading days ending on the last trading day of the immediately preceding calendar quarter, is more than 130% of the conversion price of the Convertible Notes in effect on each applicable trading day;
|
|
·
|
during the ten consecutive business day period immediately after any five consecutive trading-day period in which the trading price for the Convertible Notes for each such trading day was less than 98% of the closing sale price of our common stock on such date multiplied by the then-current conversion rate;
|
|
·
|
upon the occurrence of specified corporate events, as described in the indenture governing the Convertible Notes, such as a consolidation, merger, or binding share exchange; or
|
|
·
|
we have called the Convertible Notes for redemption.
|
On or after October 1, 2021, until the close of business on the second scheduled trading day immediately preceding the maturity date, holders may tender their Convertible Notes for conversion regardless of whether any of the foregoing conditions have been satisfied.
As of March 31, 2016, the Convertible Notes were not convertible.
In accordance with accounting guidance for convertible debt with a cash conversion option, we separately accounted for the debt and equity components of the Convertible Notes in a manner that reflected our estimated nonconvertible debt borrowing rate. We estimated the carrying amount of the debt component of the Convertible Notes to be $81.6 million at the issuance date by measuring the fair value of a similar liability that does not have a convertible feature. The carrying amount of the equity component was determined to be approximately $33.4 million by deducting the carrying amount of the debt component from the principal amount of the Convertible Notes, and was recorded as an increase to additional paid-in capital. The excess of the principal amount of the debt component over its carrying amount (the “debt discount”) is being amortized as interest expense over the term of the Convertible Notes using the effective interest method. The equity component is not remeasured as long as it continues to meet the conditions for equity classification.
We allocated transaction costs related to the issuance of the Convertible Notes, including underwriting discounts of $2.7 million and other transaction related fees of $1.1 million to the debt and equity components, respectively. Issuance costs attributable to the debt component were recorded as a direct deduction to the related debt liability and are being amortized as interest expense over the term of the Convertible Notes, and issuance costs attributable to the equity component were netted with the equity component in additional paid-in capital. The carrying amount of the equity component, net of issuance costs, was $32.3 million. Including the impact of the debt discount and related deferred debt issuance costs, the effective interest rate on the Convertible Notes is approximately 8.29%.
15
Based on the closing mark
et price of our common stock on March 31, 2016, the if-converted value of the Convertible Notes was less than the aggregate principal amount of the Convertible Notes and consists of the following
(in thousands)
:
|
|
March 31,
|
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
2.50% Convertible Notes, bearing interest at 2.50% payable semi-annually with final
principal payment to be made April 1, 2022
|
|
$
|
115,000
|
|
Unamortized debt issuance costs
|
|
|
(2,318
|
)
|
Unamortized debt discounts
|
|
|
(29,653
|
)
|
Net carrying value of Convertible Notes
|
|
$
|
83,029
|
|
Revolving Credit Agreement
On July 16, 2009, we entered into a revolving credit loan agreement (“Revolving Credit Agreement”) with Zions First National Bank (“Zions”), which was subsequently amended in June 2013 and August 2014. Under the terms of the Revolving Credit Agreement, Zions agreed to loan up to $15.0 million. The Revolving Credit Agreement is collateralized by substantially all the assets of inContact. The balance outstanding under the Revolving Credit Agreement cannot exceed the lesser of (a) $15.0 million or (b) the sum of 85% of eligible billed receivables, and 65% of eligible earned, but unbilled receivables as calculated on the 5th and 20th of each month. The interest rate on the Revolving Credit Agreement with Zions is 4.0% per annum above the ninety day LIBOR. We drew $11.0 million on the Revolving Credit Agreement in December 2014, which was repaid in March 2015. There was $15 million of unused commitment at March 31, 2016, based on the maximum available advance amount calculated on the March 20, 2016 borrowing base certificate. Interest under the Revolving Credit Agreement is paid monthly in arrears. In August 2014, we amended certain terms of the Revolving Credit Agreement (“Amendment”). The Amendment extended the term from July 2015 to July 2016, added the Uptivity subsidiary as a guarantor of obligations arising under the loan agreement, pledged Uptivity’s assets to Zions as additional security, increased the financial covenant of minimum quarterly EBITDA from $2.5 million to $2.9 million, which is only applicable if net cash is less than $2.5 million, increased the amount of additional debt from $200,000 to $600,000 for each of the calendar years ending December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016 and $200,000 for each calendar year thereafter, and increased the outstanding principal amount of our additional debt due at any time from $500,000 to $1.2 million for each of the calendar years ending December 31, 2014, 2015 and 2016 and $500,000 for each calendar year thereafter. There was no balance on the Revolving Credit Agreement at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.
The Zions Revolving Credit Agreement contains certain covenants, which were established by amendment to the Revolving Credit Agreement in August 2014. As of March 31, 2016, the most significant covenants require that the aggregate value of cash, cash equivalents and marketable securities shall not be less than the outstanding balance on the Revolving Credit Agreement plus $2.9 million, and if at any time the aggregate value is less than the minimum liquidity position, a minimum quarterly EBITDA of $2.9 million, calculated as of the last day of each calendar quarter, is required. We are in compliance with the Revolving Credit Agreement’s covenants at March 31, 2016.
The Revolving Credit Agreement imposes certain restrictions on inContact’s ability, without the approval of Zions, to incur additional debt, make distributions to stockholders, or acquire other businesses or assets.
Term Loans
We entered into three term loan agreements (“Term Loans”) with Zions. We drew $4.0 million, $3.0 million, $1.0 million and $5.0 million from the Term Loans in April 2013, December 2013, June 2014 and December 2014, respectively. Interest on the Term Loans was due monthly in arrears and the principal was payable in 36 equal monthly installments. The interest rate on the Term Loans is between 4.0% and 4.5% per annum above the ninety day LIBOR rate, adjusted as of the date of any change in the ninety day LIBOR.
The financial covenants of the Term Loans were the same as the Revolving Credit Agreement, were collateralized by the same assets as the Revolving Credit Agreement and could be prepaid without penalty or premium. During the three months ended March 31, 2015, we paid $10.4 million of total term loan principal to Zions. There was no balance on the term loans at March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.
Capital Leases
During the three months ended March 31, 2015, we paid $1.4 million of capital lease obligations. There was no capital lease obligation as of March 31, 2016 and December 31, 2015.
16
Interest Expense:
The following table presents the components of interest expense incurred on the Convertible Notes and on other borrowings
(in thousands)
:
|
|
Three Months Ended
|
|
|
|
March 31, 2016
|
|
|
March 31, 2015
|
|
2.50% Convertible Notes:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest expense at 2.50% coupon rate
|
|
$
|
717
|
|
|
$
|
-
|
|
Interest accretion of debt discount
|
|
|
947
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Amortization of deferred debt issuance costs
|
|
|
97
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Total interest from 2.50% Convertible Notes
|
|
|
1,761
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
Other Borrowings:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Interest from other borrowings
|
|
|
4
|
|
|
|
434
|
|
Total interest expense
|
|
$
|
1,765
|
|
|
$
|
434
|
|
NOTE 9. CAPITAL TRANSACTIONS
During the three months ended March 31, 2016, we received 64,000 shares of our common stock from cancelled restricted stock awards from separated employees and for the settlement of $529,000 in payroll taxes, associated with the lapsing of the selling restriction of restricted stock awards.
From the exercise of stock options, we issued 133,000 shares of common stock and 61,000 shares of treasury stock for proceeds of $751,000 during the three months ended March 31, 2016. We issued 96,000 shares of common stock and 3,000 shares of treasury stock as a result of the vesting of restricted stock awards. We issued 49,000 shares of common stock and no shares of treasury stock for proceeds of $387,000 under the employee stock purchase plan during the three months ended March 31, 2016.
NOTE 10. COMMITMENTS AND CONTINGENCIES
Litigation
In May 2009, inContact was served in a lawsuit titled California College, Inc., et al., v. UCN, Inc., et al. In the lawsuit, California College alleges that (1) inContact made fraudulent and/or negligent misrepresentations in connection with the sale of its services with those of Insidesales.com, Inc., another defendant in the lawsuit, (2) that inContact breached its service contract with California College and an alleged oral contract between the parties by failing to deliver contracted services and product and failing to abide by implied covenants of good faith and fair dealing, and (3) the conduct of inContact interfered with prospective economic business relations of California College with respect to enrolling students. California College filed an amended complaint that has been answered by Insidesales.com and inContact. California College originally sought damages in excess of $20.0 million. Furthermore, Insidesales.com and inContact filed cross-claims against one another, which they subsequently agreed to dismiss with prejudice. In October 2011, California College reached a settlement with Insidesales.com, the terms of which have not been disclosed and remain confidential. In June of 2013, California College amended its damages claim to $14.4 million, of which approximately $5.0 million was alleged pre-judgment interest. On September 10, 2013, the court issued an order on inContact's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment. The court determined that factual disputes exist as to several of the claims, but dismissed California College's cause of action for intentional interference with prospective economic relations and the claim for prejudgment interest. Dismissing the claim for prejudgment interest effectively reduced the claim for damages to approximately $9.2 million. In February 2016 the trial court granted the inContact motion to stay the trial without date pending an interlocutory appeal to the Utah Supreme Court of the trial court’s December 2015 ruling with respect to allowing California College’s experts to testify at trial. inContact has denied all of the substantive allegations of the complaint and continues to defend the claims. Management believes the claims against inContact are without merit. We cannot determine at this time whether the chance of success on one or more of inContact’s defenses or claims is either probable or remote, and are unable to estimate the potential loss or range of loss should it not be successful. The Company believes that this matter will not have a material impact on our financial position, liquidity or results of operations.
On January 15, 2014, Microlog Corporation (“Microlog”) filed a patent infringement suit against inContact in the United States District Court for the District of Delaware, Case No. 1:99-mc-09999, alleging that we are infringing one or more claims made in U.S. Patent No. 7,092,509 (the “’509 Patent”), entitled “Contact Center System Capable of Handling Multiple Media Types of Contacts and Method for Using the Same.” Microlog is seeking a declaratory judgment, injunctive relief, damages and an ongoing royalty, and costs, including attorney’s fees and expenses. In December 2014 inContact filed a Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings which is pending before the Court. inContact also filed a petition for Inter Partes Review of the 509 Patent in January 2015 before the United
17
States Patent and Trademark Office Patent Trial and Appeal board, and the PTAB has instituted the Inter Partes Review f
or the 509 Patent on all claims included in our petition. We are defending the claims vigorously. However, no estimate of the loss or range of loss can be made at this time.
On May 2, 2014, Info Directions, Inc. (“IDI”) notified inContact of a Demand for Arbitration regarding a dispute related to the Software as a Service Agreement between IDI and inContact dated December 19, 2012 pursuant to which IDI was to provide inContact with billing systems software. IDI has asserted damages totaling at least $3.6 million. inContact has asserted counterclaims and is defending this arbitration vigorously. The Arbitration Hearing in this matter was held in Rochester, New York in mid-April, 2016. No decision has been reached at this time; however, management believes the allegations and alleged damages set forth in IDI's Arbitration Demand to be without merit. The Company believes that this matter will not have a material impact on our financial position, liquidity or results of operations.
We have established liabilities of $877,000 relative to all contingent matters above. We believe the amounts provided in our consolidated financial statements are adequate in light of the probable and estimable liabilities. We have certain contingencies which are reasonably possible, with exposures to loss which are in excess of the amount accrued. However, the remaining reasonably possible exposure to loss cannot currently be estimated.
We are the subject of certain additional legal matters, which we consider incidental to our business activities. It is the opinion of management that the ultimate disposition of these other matters will not have a material impact on our financial position, liquidity or results of operations.
NOTE 11. STOCK-BASED COMPENSATION
Stock-based compensation cost is measured at the grant date based on the fair value of the award granted and recognized as expense using the graded-vesting method over the period in which the award is expected to vest. Stock-based compensation expense recognized during a period is based on the value of the portion of stock-based awards that is ultimately expected to vest during the period.
We record stock-based compensation expense (including stock options, restricted stock and employee stock purchase plan) to the same departments where cash compensation is recorded as follows (
in thousands
):
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Costs of revenue
|
$
|
268
|
|
|
$
|
267
|
|
Selling and marketing
|
|
373
|
|
|
|
493
|
|
Research and development
|
|
1,252
|
|
|
|
588
|
|
General and administrative
|
|
596
|
|
|
|
1,266
|
|
Total stock-based compensation expense
|
$
|
2,489
|
|
|
$
|
2,614
|
|
We utilize the Black-Scholes model to determine the estimated fair value for grants of stock options. The Black-Scholes model requires the use of subjective and complex assumptions to determine the fair value of stock-based awards, including the option’s expected term, expected dividend yield, the risk-free interest rate and the price volatility of the underlying stock. The expected dividend yield is zero, based on our historical dividend rates and our intent to not declare dividends for the foreseeable future. Risk-free interest rates are based on U.S. Treasury rates. Volatility is based on historical stock prices over a period equal to the estimated life of the option. Stock options are issued with exercise prices representing the current market price of our common stock on the date of grant. Stock options issued are generally subject to a four-year vesting period with a contractual term of ten years.
The grant date fair value of the restricted stock award is determined using the closing market price of the Company’s common stock on the grant date, with the associated compensation expense amortized over the vesting period of the restricted stock awards, net of estimated forfeitures.
18
We estimated the fair value of options granted under our employee stock-based compensation arrangements at the date of grant using the following weighted-average expected assumptions:
|
Three Months Ended March 31,
|
|
|
|
2016
|
|
|
|
2015
|
|
Dividend yield
|
None
|
|
|
None
|
|
Volatility
|
49%
|
|
|
50%
|
|
Risk-free interest rate
|
1.90%
|
|
|
1.70%
|
|
Expected life (years)
|
5.8
|
|
|
5.7
|
|
During the three months ended March 31, 2016, we granted 536,000 stock options with exercise prices ranging from $8.36 to $8.43 and a weighted-average fair value of $3.95 and 945,000 restricted stock awards and units with a weighted-average fair value of $8.50.
As of March 31, 2016, there was $9.0 million of unrecognized compensation cost related to non-vested stock-based compensation awards granted under our stock-based compensation plans. The compensation cost is expected to be recognized over a weighted average period of two years.
NOTE 12. RELATED PARTY TRANSACTIONS
We paid our Chairman of the Board of Directors (the “Chairman”) $7,000 per month during the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 for consulting and other activities, and such amounts have been recognized in our financial statements as general and administrative expenses. Amounts payable to the Chairman for such services were $7,000 and $7,000 at March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
As a result of the May 2014 acquisition of Uptivity, we are a party to an agreement to sell software and services with a company that is owned by two employees and other minority shareholders of inContact. Revenue related to this agreement included in our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss was approximately $7,000 and $150,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively. Related accounts receivable at March 31, 2016 and 2015 was $2,000 and $72,000, respectively.
The principal location of the employees from the May 2014 acquisition of Uptivity is in Columbus, Ohio. Their facility is a 36,000 square foot office that is leased from Cabo Leasing LLC, which is owned by two employees and other minority shareholders of inContact. The amount of rent for this facility included in our Condensed Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss was approximately $203,000 and $199,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015, respectively.
In October 2015, inContact entered into a referral agreement with a sales lead generation company in which two employees and other minority shareholders hold individual minority ownership interests. We will pay commissions under this agreement based on sales generated. The amount of commissions expense included in our Consolidated Statement of Operations and Comprehensive Loss was approximately $23,000 for the three months ended March 31, 2016. There was no recorded payable on the balance sheet as of March 31, 2016, specific to this agreement.
NOTE 13. SEGMENTS
We operate under two business segments: Software and Network connectivity. The Software segment includes all monthly recurring revenue related to the delivery of our software applications, plus the associated professional services and setup fees. The Network connectivity segment includes all voice and data long distance services provided to customers.
Management evaluates segment performance based on financial information such as revenue, costs of revenue, and other operating expenses. Management does not evaluate and manage segment performance based on assets.
For segment reporting, we classify operating expenses as either “direct” or “indirect.” Direct expense refers to costs attributable solely to either selling and marketing efforts or research and development efforts, for a given segment. Indirect expense refers to costs that management considers to be overhead in running the business.
19
Operating segment revenues and profitability for three months ended March 31, 2016 and 2015 were as follows (
in thousands, except percentages
):
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2016
|
|
|
Three Months Ended March 31, 2015
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Network
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Network
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Software
|
|
|
Connectivity
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
|
Software
|
|
|
Connectivity
|
|
|
Consolidated
|
|
Net revenue
|
|
$
|
41,548
|
|
|
$
|
20,839
|
|
|
$
|
62,387
|
|
|
$
|
32,466
|
|
|
$
|
18,872
|
|
|
$
|
51,338
|
|
Costs of revenue
|
|
|
16,665
|
|
|
|
13,436
|
|
|
|
30,101
|
|
|
|
13,697
|
|
|
|
11,811
|
|
|
|
25,508
|
|
Gross profit
|
|
|
24,883
|
|
|
|
7,403
|
|
|
|
32,286
|
|
|
|
18,769
|
|
|
|
7,061
|
|
|
|
25,830
|
|
Gross margin
|
|
|
60
|
%
|
|
|
36
|
%
|
|
|
52
|
%
|
|
|
58
|
%
|
|
|
37
|
%
|
|
|
50
|
%
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Operating expenses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Direct selling and marketing
|
|
|
16,425
|
|
|
|
856
|
|
|
|
17,281
|
|
|
|
13,986
|
|
|
|
823
|
|
|
|
14,809
|
|
Direct research and development
|
|
|
7,965
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
7,965
|
|
|
|
6,293
|
|
|
|
-
|
|
|
|
6,293
|
|
Indirect
|
|
|
9,349
|
|
|
|
899
|
|
|
|
10,248
|
|
|
|
9,035
|
|
|
|
1,069
|
|
|
|
10,104
|
|
Total operating expenses
|
|
|
33,739
|
|
|
|
1,755
|
|
|
|
35,494
|
|
|
|
29,314
|
|
|
|
1,892
|
|
|
|
31,206
|
|
Income (Loss) from operations
|
|
$
|
(8,856
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,648
|
|
|
$
|
(3,208
|
)
|
|
$
|
(10,545
|
)
|
|
$
|
5,169
|
|
|
$
|
(5,376
|
)
|
20