Fairfax's Frivolous Lawsuit Dismissed by Court
29 February 2008 - 4:51AM
PR Newswire (US)
NEW YORK, Feb. 28 /PRNewswire/ -- Institutional Credit Partners,
LLC ("ICP") and William F. Gahan announce the Honorable Judge
Deanne Wilson's dismissal of all claims brought against them by
Fairfax Financial Holdings, Ltd (NYSE/TSX: FFH, "Fairfax") and Crum
& Forster Holdings, Ltd ("C&F"). This is a major setback in
Fairfax's crusade to silence its critics. ICP CEO Thomas Priore,
expressed his satisfaction with Judge Wilson's decision, "We are
pleased by the Court's decision as ICP should never have been a
party to this litigation. Fairfax's suit against ICP and others is
designed only to stifle the flow of critical research and adverse
opinions. Yesterday's ruling was a major setback to this campaign
and encouraging to others battling similar litigious intimidation."
The dismissal of Fairfax's lawsuit does not affect ICP's
counterclaims against Fairfax, wherein it alleges, among other
things, a scheme (the "Transaction") to improperly avoid
approximately $400 million in U.S. income taxes and mislead the
financial markets as to Fairfax's shorting of Odyssey Re Holdings
Corp. (NYSE: ORH, "Odyssey") stock, a subsidiary of Fairfax. ICP
believes that Odyssey remains liable for this amount in addition to
approximately $300 million in penalties and interest. A copy of
ICP's letter to the Board of Directors of Bank of America
Corporation requesting specific public disclosures regarding the
problematic Transaction in which BOA participated, can be found at
http://www.post233.com/ . In July 2006, Fairfax and its New Jersey
subsidiary, C&F, had filed a complaint against several analysts
and investment funds, claiming that they had conspired to spread
"disinformation" about Fairfax's business operations. In its
headline-grabbing complaint, Fairfax claimed an absurd $6 billion
in damages asserting that its reputation had been damaged and its
stock price depressed by the defendants. Just last week, Fairfax
attempted to use its strike suit against ICP as both a sword and a
shield. In a public conference call with investors, Fairfax' CEO,
Prem Watsa, when asked by ICP's William Gahan to provide adequate
and truthful disclosure regarding the alleged tax evasion
Transaction, responded with prepared remarks outlining Gahan's
participation in the aforementioned racketeering conspiracy. Now
that Fairfax's lawsuit has been thrown out of court, Watsa has no
excuse to continue dismissing his duty to inform the markets about
such disclosure peculiarities, among which include: (i) How was
Fairfax able to acquire beneficial ownership, with voting rights,
of 4.3 million Odyssey shares (the "Subject Stock") on March 3rd
2003 when SEC filings made by third party investors on March 31st
2003 claimed beneficial ownership and voting interest in all but
1.3 million shares of Odyssey's publicly available stock? (ii) If
Odyssey stock was sold short to Fairfax, why wasn't this material
information disclosed in the Transaction's original documentation
filed with the SEC? Furthermore, why wasn't this short sale
reported to the New York Stock Exchange ("NYSE") as required by
NYSE Rule 421? (iii) If, as was repeatedly claimed in SEC filings,
the Transaction was executed for "investment purposes", why was
Fairfax unable to realize a profit from a greater than 75% increase
in Odyssey's share price over the life of the Transaction? Why
didn't BOA incur a loss from being short the Subject Stock over the
same period of time? What was the non-tax business purpose for the
Transaction? The complete list of unanswered disclosure questions
asked by ICP and disregarded by Watsa can be found at
http://www.post233.com/ . It should be noted that other market
participants, against whom this racketeering action is still
pending, are being attacked for their criticism of the same
accounting standards to which Fairfax, Odyssey and their outside
auditor, PricewaterhouseCoopers LLP, have admitted deficiencies. In
fact, one day after Fairfax publicly announced the filing of its
initial racketeering complaint, the company admitted accounting
errors which were found to have inflated Fairfax's shareholder's
equity by an average of $216 million, or 9%, per year from 1997 to
2005. As part of Fairfax's 2006 Annual Report, to which its
auditors have agreed, "the company did not maintain effective
internal control over financial reporting ... " ICP says it is
prepared for Fairfax's next move. Judge Wilson has granted Fairfax
and C&F until March 27, 2008 to amend their complaint against
ICP and others for the third time. Says ICP's Priore, "We expect
Fairfax to fabricate new claims in its attempt to use the courts as
a shield against public scrutiny. We would welcome the opportunity
to question Fairfax's CEO under oath about the tax transaction and
other required public disclosures." DISCLOSURE: ICP and its
affiliates hold investments from which they will profit in the
event of a decline in the creditworthiness of Fairfax and/or
Odyssey. ICP may change its investments from time to time,
including the extent nature and form of these investments. However,
ICP anticipates holding, for the foreseeable future, investments
whose value will increase in the event of a decline in the
creditworthiness of Fairfax and/or Odyssey. ICP has made and will
continue to make these investment decisions on the basis of its
analysis, beliefs, and assumptions that it believes to be
reasonable. Any statements contained herein are intended solely for
informational purposes. All allegations concerning any individual
or entity are just that, allegations, until proven in a court of
law. The reader is directed to the source documents to confirm all
statements contained herein. DATASOURCE: Institutional Credit
Partners, LLC CONTACT: Pen Pendleton for Institutional Credit
Partners, LLC, +1-212-371-5999 Web site: http://www.icpcapital.com/
http://www.post233.com/
Copyright