VANCOUVER, Aug. 8, 2018 /CNW/ - Filo Mining Corp (TSX-V:
FIL) (Nasdaq First North: FIL) ("Filo Mining" or the "Company")
is pleased to announce an updated Mineral Resource estimate for its
100% controlled Filo del Sol copper-gold-silver deposit located
along the Chile-Argentina border.
Please view PDF version of News Release
Commenting on today's news release, Adam
Lundin, President and CEO of Filo Mining remarked, "The
2017/18 drill program at Filo del Sol proved very successful, and
as a result the Company confirms increased tonnage and contained
metal in the Indicated Resource category. The resource conversion
from Inferred to Indicated for all metals is significant, is in
line with expectations and again illustrates just how exciting the
Filo del Sol project is. Supported with this updated
estimate, I am confident that the Company will meet the targeted
release of a prefeasibility study in Q1 2019."
Highlights (see Table 1 for resource details):
- Significant Increase in Indicated resource tonnes and
contained metals:
-
- Total indicated resource tonnes increased by 14% to 425.1
million tonnes;
- Total indicated contained gold in all zones increased by 12% to
4.4 million ounces
- Total indicated contained copper in all zones increased by 12%
to 3.1 billion pounds
- Total indicated contained silver in all zones increased by 34%
to 147 million ounces
- The resource is comprised of four distinct mineral zones
based on metallurgy and mineralogy. The first three zones are
amenable to leach processing and are listed below in order of
increasing depth below surface:
-
- The gold oxide zone (AuOx) contains 679 thousand ounces
of gold Indicated plus 226 thousand ounces of gold Inferred at a
0.20 g/t Au cutoff.
- The copper-gold oxide (CuAuOx) zone contains 2.2 billion
pounds of copper and 2.4 million ounces of gold Indicated plus 0.5
billion pounds of copper and 735 thousand ounces of gold Inferred
at a 0.15% CuEq cutoff.
- The silver zone (Ag) contains 114 million ounces of
silver Indicated plus 22 million ounces of silver Inferred at a 20
g/t Ag cutoff.
- These three zones are underlain by a copper-gold
sulphide zone (Sulphide), which has not been tested
metallurgically yet but based on the mineralogical characteristics
is likely to be able to be processed by flotation to produce a
concentrate.
- It is important to note that there are significant zones of
higher grade material within the broader resource envelope shown in
Table 1 - these can be seen at the higher cut-off grades shown in
Tables 2-5.
- Favourable topography for open pit mining methods.
- High proportion of resource in the Indicated category.
Seventy-one percent of the total updated resource is now
Indicated. The proportion of the resource classified as
indicated varies between zones and cutoff grades. At the
base-case cutoff grades, 71% of the AuOx zone, 78% of the CuAuOx
zone and 82% of the Ag zone are classified as indicated.
- Exploration Upside. The resource remains open for
expansion in several directions and at depth. To date only 3
kilometres of the approximately 7 kilometre long strike length of
the Filo alteration zone has been drill tested. All
holes drilled into the deposit, including the deepest holes at 500
metres long, end in mineralization and the potential for porphyry
copper-gold mineralization at depth and lateral to the deposit is
considered excellent.
The resource estimate presented in Table 1 represents the total
Indicated and Inferred Mineral Resource, divided between the four
mineral zones. Each of these zones was reported at a
different cutoff grade, based on expectations of the most important
metal or metals in each zone. Base-case cutoff grades are
shown in Table 1 and each zone is reported at a range of cutoff
grades in Tables 2-5 below. These four discreet mineralized
zones have been aggregated to derive the total mineral
resource.
This new resource estimate updates and replaces the resource
estimate released on August 21, 2017
and is based on a total of 44,600 metres of drilling in 188 holes
including an additional 6,390 metres of reverse circulation
drilling in 33 new holes and 2,533 metres of diamond drilling in 12
new holes from the drill program completed in March 2018.
This resource update will form the basis for a Pre-Feasibility
Study ("PFS") which is currently underway. Details of the
methodology used to develop the resource will be included in the
National Instrument 43-101 Technical Report describing the results
of the PFS which is expected to be completed in Q1 2019. The
PFS will continue on from the PEA in studying a leach-only
operation, and so will evaluate only the AuOx, CuAuOx and Ag
zones.
The Mineral Resource estimate as of the effective date of
June 11, 2018 is shown in the tables
below:
Table 1: Total Resource
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zone
|
Cutoff
|
Category
|
Tonnes
|
Cu
|
Au
|
Ag
|
lbs Cu
|
Ounces Au
|
Ounces Ag
|
(millions)
|
(%)
|
(g/t)
|
(g/t)
|
(millions)
|
(thousands)
|
(thousands)
|
AuOx
|
0.20 g/t
Au
|
Indicated
|
49.9
|
0.04
|
0.42
|
3.0
|
45
|
679
|
4,810
|
Inferred
|
20.8
|
0.08
|
0.34
|
2.4
|
35
|
226
|
1,580
|
CuAuOx
|
0.15 %
CuEq
|
Indicated
|
259.2
|
0.38
|
0.29
|
2.7
|
2,166
|
2,385
|
22,500
|
Inferred
|
74.3
|
0.29
|
0.31
|
2.1
|
481
|
735
|
5,040
|
Ag
|
20 g/t Ag
|
Indicated
|
40.5
|
0.50
|
0.43
|
87.6
|
446
|
562
|
114,180
|
Inferred
|
8.8
|
0.36
|
0.43
|
79.3
|
70
|
121
|
22,400
|
Sulphide
|
0.30 %
CuEq
|
Indicated
|
75.5
|
0.27
|
0.34
|
2.2
|
451
|
813
|
5,370
|
Inferred
|
71.2
|
0.30
|
0.33
|
2.5
|
470
|
750
|
5,740
|
Total
|
Indicated
|
425.1
|
0.33
|
0.32
|
10.7
|
3,108
|
4,439
|
146,860
|
Inferred
|
175.1
|
0.27
|
0.33
|
6.2
|
1,056
|
1,832
|
34,760
|
1
– CuAuOx copper equivalent (CuEq) assumes metallurgical
recoveries of 82% for copper, 55% for gold and 71% for silver based
on preliminary metallurgical testwork, and metal prices of US$3/lb
copper, US$1300/oz gold, US$20/oz silver. The CuEq formula
is: CuEq=Cu+Ag*0.0084+Au*0.4239;
|
2 – Sulphide
copper equivalent (CuEq) assumes metallurgical recoveries of 84%
for copper, 70% for gold and 77% for silver based on similar
deposits, as no metallurgical testwork has been done the Sulphide
mineralization, and metal prices of US$3/lb copper, US$1300/oz
gold, US$20/oz silver. The CuEq formula is:
CuEq=Cu+Ag*0.0089+Au*0.5266;
|
3 – The Qualified Person
for the resource estimate is James N. Gray, P.Geo. of
Advantage Geoservices Ltd.;
|
4 – All figures are rounded
to reflect the relative accuracy of the estimate;
|
5 – Mineral Resources are
not Mineral Reserves and do not have demonstrated economic
viability;
|
6 – The resource was
constrained by a Whittle® pit shell using the following
parameters: Cu $3/lb, Ag $20/oz, Au $1300/oz, slope of 45°, a
mining cost of $2.50/t and an average process cost of
$13.26/t.
|
Comparison to 2017 Resource Estimate
Differences between the current estimate and the 2017 estimate
are due to a combination of new data collected during the 2017/2018
drill campaign and associated modifications to the geology model
and zone definitions for some of the mineral zones. In
aggregate, the indicated resource increased by 52.2 million tonnes
(14%) while copper, gold and silver grades remained virtually
unchanged.
At the base-case cutoff grade of 0.2 g/t gold, the AuOx zone saw
a slight decrease of 2.6 million indicated tonnes (5%) due to new
information from drilling at the north end of the gold zone.
The grade remained unchanged at 0.42 g/t gold.
At the base-case cutoff grade of 0.15% CuEq, the CuAuOx zone saw
a sizeable increase of 83.9 million indicated tonnes (48%), with a
slight decrease in grade from 0.42% copper to 0.38% copper.
This results in an overall increase in indicated contained copper
of 530 million pounds (32%). This change resulted from a
combination of new drill data, and a modification in the split
between oxide and sulphide copper mineralization based on
sequential copper analyses and detailed logging.
The oxide / sulphide split resulted in a decrease in the
indicated tonnes for the Sulphide zone of 33.1 million tonnes (31%)
and a corresponding decrease in contained copper of 207 million
pounds (31%). A large proportion of this material was not
lost from the resource, but was reclassified as CuAuOx
material.
Total indicated tonnes for the Ag Zone increased by 4 million
(11%) and the silver grade increased from 69.5 g/t to 87.6 g/t for
an overall increase in contained indicated ounces of 33 million
(40%). This increase was primarily a result of new drill
data.
TABLE 2: Gold Oxide
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zone
|
Cutoff
|
Category
|
Tonnes
|
Cu
|
Au
|
Ag
|
lbs Cu
|
Ounces Au
|
Ounces Ag
|
(millions)
|
(%)
|
(g/t)
|
(g/t)
|
(millions)
|
(thousands)
|
(thousands)
|
AuOx
|
0.10 g/t
Au
|
Indicated
|
76.5
|
0.04
|
0.33
|
2.5
|
64
|
799
|
6,140
|
Inferred
|
31.4
|
0.06
|
0.27
|
2.2
|
41
|
276
|
2,200
|
0.20 g/t
Au
|
Indicated
|
49.9
|
0.04
|
0.42
|
3.0
|
45
|
679
|
4,810
|
Inferred
|
20.8
|
0.08
|
0.34
|
2.4
|
35
|
226
|
1,580
|
0.40 g/t
Au
|
Indicated
|
22.4
|
0.04
|
0.60
|
3.6
|
22
|
427
|
2,560
|
Inferred
|
4.9
|
0.09
|
0.49
|
3.5
|
10
|
77
|
540
|
0.50 g/t
Au
|
Indicated
|
13.1
|
0.04
|
0.70
|
3.6
|
13
|
295
|
1,500
|
Inferred
|
1.7
|
0.09
|
0.60
|
3.9
|
4
|
33
|
210
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TABLE 3: Copper Gold Oxide
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zone
|
Cutoff
|
Category
|
Tonnes
|
Cu
|
Au
|
Ag
|
lbs Cu
|
Ounces Au
|
Ounces Ag
|
(millions)
|
(%)
|
(g/t)
|
(g/t)
|
(millions)
|
(thousands)
|
(thousands)
|
CuAuOx
|
0.15 %
CuEq
|
Indicated
|
259.2
|
0.38
|
0.29
|
2.7
|
2,166
|
2,385
|
22,500
|
Inferred
|
74.3
|
0.29
|
0.31
|
2.1
|
481
|
735
|
5,040
|
0.30 %
CuEq
|
Indicated
|
233.6
|
0.40
|
0.30
|
2.8
|
2,071
|
2,230
|
21,260
|
Inferred
|
63.6
|
0.32
|
0.33
|
2.2
|
445
|
665
|
4,550
|
0.50 %
CuEq
|
Indicated
|
93.5
|
0.61
|
0.35
|
3.7
|
1,252
|
1,037
|
11,070
|
Inferred
|
20.9
|
0.46
|
0.39
|
2.8
|
210
|
259
|
1,850
|
0.70 %
CuEq
|
Indicated
|
38.0
|
0.89
|
0.36
|
4.4
|
750
|
442
|
5,430
|
Inferred
|
4.4
|
0.67
|
0.50
|
2.5
|
64
|
71
|
350
|
TABLE 4: Silver Zone
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zone
|
Cutoff
|
Category
|
Tonnes
|
Cu
|
Au
|
Ag
|
lbs Cu
|
Ounces Au
|
Ounces Ag
|
(millions)
|
(%)
|
(g/t)
|
(g/t)
|
(millions)
|
(thousands)
|
(thousands)
|
Ag
|
20 g/t
Ag
|
Indicated
|
40.5
|
0.50
|
0.43
|
87.6
|
446
|
562
|
114,180
|
Inferred
|
8.8
|
0.36
|
0.43
|
79.3
|
70
|
121
|
22,400
|
50 g/t Ag
|
Indicated
|
27.4
|
0.50
|
0.42
|
113.1
|
303
|
371
|
99,780
|
Inferred
|
5.6
|
0.39
|
0.42
|
105.3
|
48
|
76
|
18,970
|
60 g/t Ag
|
Indicated
|
23.9
|
0.51
|
0.42
|
121.8
|
266
|
324
|
93,480
|
Inferred
|
4.8
|
0.41
|
0.43
|
114.1
|
43
|
66
|
17,480
|
80 g/t Ag
|
Indicated
|
17.3
|
0.51
|
0.42
|
141.8
|
196
|
233
|
78,730
|
Inferred
|
3.2
|
0.43
|
0.44
|
135.7
|
31
|
45
|
14,040
|
TABLE 5: Sulphide Mineralization
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Zone
|
Cutoff
|
Category
|
Tonnes
|
Cu
|
Au
|
Ag
|
lbs Cu
|
Ounces Au
|
Ounces Ag
|
(millions)
|
(%)
|
(g/t)
|
(g/t)
|
(millions)
|
(thousands)
|
(thousands)
|
Hypo
|
0.30 %
CuEq
|
Indicated
|
75.5
|
0.27
|
0.34
|
2.2
|
451
|
813
|
5,370
|
Inferred
|
71.2
|
0.30
|
0.33
|
2.5
|
470
|
750
|
5,740
|
0.40 %
CuEq
|
Indicated
|
56.1
|
0.30
|
0.36
|
2.4
|
365
|
644
|
4,340
|
Inferred
|
59.7
|
0.32
|
0.34
|
2.6
|
419
|
649
|
5,060
|
0.50 %
CuEq
|
Indicated
|
24.4
|
0.34
|
0.40
|
2.9
|
183
|
313
|
2,270
|
Inferred
|
29.3
|
0.37
|
0.36
|
3.4
|
238
|
340
|
3,190
|
0.60 %
CuEq
|
Indicated
|
6.9
|
0.39
|
0.49
|
3.9
|
58
|
107
|
850
|
Inferred
|
9.4
|
0.43
|
0.41
|
5.1
|
89
|
124
|
1,540
|
Estimation Methods
The resource estimate was completed by James N. Gray, P.Geo. of Advantage Geoservices
Ltd., an Independent Qualified Person as defined by National
Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects (NI
43-101) in accordance with the Canadian Institute of Mining,
Metallurgy and Petroleum (CIM) Standards on Mineral Resources and
Mineral Reserves, adopted by CIM Council, as amended.
Estimation methods are summarized below. Further details of
the estimation methods and procedures will be available in a NI
43-101 Technical Report which will be filed on SEDAR
(www.sedar.com) within 45 days of completion of the PFS, expected
to be early in 2019.
The resource estimate is controlled by a geologic model based on
three-dimensional interpretation of drill results and surface
geological mapping. An additional 45 holes have been included
in this resource update compared to the 2017 Mineral Resource
estimate. In total, 188 holes (30 core and 158 RC) have been
utilized in the resource estimation. Copper, silver, and gold
assays were composited to a constant length of two metres.
Outliers to the composite distributions were controlled by
high-grade capping. Grades for the three elements were
estimated by ordinary kriging using Gemcom® software, into 15 x 15
x 12m blocks. Average rock
densities were applied based on the geologic model. A total
of 1,369 density measurements have been made on core samples.
Bulk density for the deposit averages 2.31 tonnes/m3.
Contiguous blocks were assigned as Inferred Mineral Resource
where they are nominally: within 50m
of a drillhole and/or have sample data in at least three octants of
a 150m spherical search. Indicated
blocks are greater than 25m inside
the classified volume and estimated by at least three holes, and
within 65m of the closest hole or
have samples in at least five octants of a 150m spherical search.
Reasonable prospects of eventual economic extraction were
established by the optimization of a Whittle® pit shell using the
following parameters: Cu $3/lb, Ag
$20/oz, Au $1300/oz, average recoveries of: 75% Cu, 68% Au
and 82% Ag, slope of 45°, mining cost of $2.50/t and an average process cost (including
G&A) of $13.26/t. These
parameters are the same as those used for the 2017 Resource in
order to allow for a direct comparison of the changes. All
material included in the Mineral Resource Estimate is within the
optimized pit shell.
There are no known legal, political, environmental or other
risks that could materially affect the potential development of the
mineral resource.
QUALIFIED PERSONS
Mr. James N. Gray, P.Geo. of
Advantage Geoservices Ltd., is an Independent Qualified Person as
defined by National Instrument 43-101 Standards of Disclosure
for Mineral Projects (NI 43-101) and is an independent consultant
to the Company. Mr. Gray prepared the Mineral Resource
Estimate contained herein and has reviewed and approved the
technical information pertaining to it contained in this news
release.
Mr. Bob Carmichael, B.A.Sc,
P.Eng., is the Qualified Person as defined by National Instrument
43-101. Mr. Carmichael is Vice President, Exploration for the
Company and has reviewed and verified that the technical disclosure
contained in this news release is accurate.
QUALITY ASSURANCE/QUALITY CONTROL
Samples were collected at the drill site by Company personnel
with initial splitting carried out at a facility near the drill
sites and final splitting completed at the Company's core
processing facilities located in San Juan, Argentina or Copiapo, Chile. Individual
samples represent final splits from 2 metre intervals down the
hole. Samples were analysed the ALS laboratory in Mendoza,
Argentina or Lima, Peru (2017/2018) or ACME Labs in
Santiago, Chile. Samples
were crushed, split and 500g was pulverized to 85% passing 200
mesh. Gold analyses were by fire assay fusion with AAS finish
on a 30g sample. Copper and silver were analysed by atomic
absorption following a 4 acid digestion. Samples were also
analyzed for a suite of 36 elements with ICP-ES. Copper and
gold standards as well as blanks and duplicates (field, preparation
and analysis) were randomly inserted into the sampling sequence for
Quality Control. On average, 9% of the submitted samples
correspond to Quality Control samples.
ABOUT FILO DEL SOL
Filo Mining's flagship project is its 100% controlled Filo del
Sol Project located on the border between San Juan Province,
Argentina and Region III,
Chile. Filo del Sol is located
between the prolific Maricunga and El Indio Gold Belts, two major
mineralized trends that contain such deposits as Caspiche, La
Coipa, Veladero, El Indio, and Pascua
Lama. The region is mining-friendly and hosts a number of
large scale mining operations. The project area is covered
under the Mining Integration and Complementation Treaty between
Chile and Argentina, which provides the framework for
the development of cross border mining projects.
ADDITIONAL INFORMATION
Filo Mining is listed on the TSX-V and Nasdaq First North
Exchange under the trading symbol "FIL". Pareto Securities AB
is the Company's Certified Adviser on Nasdaq First North.
This information is information that Filo Mining Corp. is
obliged to make public pursuant to the EU Market Abuse Regulation.
This information was submitted for publication, through the agency
of the contact person set out below, on August 8, 2018 at 5:00
a.m. Vancouver Time.
On behalf of the board of directors of Filo Mining,
Adam Lundin,
President and CEO,
Filo Mining
Neither TSX Venture Exchange nor its Regulation Services
Provider (as that term is defined in the policies of the TSX
Venture Exchange) accepts responsibility for the adequacy or
accuracy of this release.
Cautionary Note Regarding Forward-Looking Statements
Certain statements made and information contained herein in the
press release constitutes "forward-looking information" and
"forward-looking statements" within the meaning of applicable
securities legislation (collectively, "forward-looking
information"), concerning the business, operations and financial
performance and condition of Filo Mining Corp. The forward-looking
information contained in this press release is based on information
available to the Company as of the date of this press release.
Except as required under applicable securities legislation, the
Company does not intend, and does not assume any obligation, to
update this forward-looking information. Generally, this
forward-looking information can frequently, but not always, be
identified by use of forward-looking terminology such as "plans",
"expects" or "does not expect", "is expected", "budget",
"scheduled", "estimates", "forecasts", "intends", "anticipates" or
"does not anticipate", or "believes", or variations of such words
and phrases or statements that certain actions, events, conditions
or results "will", "may", "could", "would", "might" or "will be
taken", "occur" or "be achieved" or the negative connotations
thereof.
All statements other than statements of historical fact may be
forward-looking statements. Forward-looking information is
necessarily based on estimates and assumptions that are inherently
subject to known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors
that may cause the actual results, level of activity, performance
or achievements of the Company to be materially different from
those expressed or implied by such forward-looking information,
including but not limited to: risks and uncertainties relating to,
among other things, the inherent uncertainties regarding cost
estimates, changes in commodity prices, currency fluctuation,
financing, unanticipated resource grades, infrastructure, results
of exploration activities, cost overruns, availability of
financing, materials and equipment, timeliness of government
approvals, taxation, political risk and related economic risk and
unanticipated environmental impact on operations, as well as other
risks and uncertainties more fully described under "Risk Factors"
and elsewhere in the Company's most recent Annual Information Form
available under the Company's profile at www.sedar.com and on the
Company's website. These risks and uncertainties may
cause the actual results, level of activity, performance or
achievements of the Company to be materially different from those
expressed or implied by such forward-looking information.
The Company believes that the expectations reflected in the
forward-looking information included in this press release are
reasonable but no assurance can be given that these expectations
will prove to be correct and such forward-looking information
should not be unduly relied upon. This forward-looking information
speaks as of the date of this press release. Forward-looking
information in this news release includes, but is not limited to,
statements regarding the Company's expectations and estimated with
respect to the assumptions used in the mineral resource estimates
for the Filo del Sol project; expected timing for the completion of
a PFS, expectations with regard to processing methods, potential
for the discovery of mineralization at depth, potential for adding
to mineral resources through exploration; estimations of commodity
prices, mineral resources, and costs.
Statements relating to "mineral resources" are deemed to be
forward looking information, as they involve the implied
assessment, based on certain estimates and assumptions that the
mineral resources described can be profitably produced in the
future.
Forward-looking information is based on certain assumptions that
the Company believes are reasonable, including that the current
price of and demand for commodities will be sustained or will
improve, the supply of commodities will remain stable, that the
general business and economic conditions will not change in a
material adverse manner, that financing will be available if and
when needed on reasonable terms and that the Company will not
experience any material labour dispute, accident, or failure of
plant or equipment. These factors are not, and should not be
construed as being, exhaustive. Although the Company has attempted
to identify important factors that would cause actual results to
differ materially from those contained in forward-looking
information, there may be other factors that cause results not to
be as anticipated, estimated, or intended. There can be no
assurance that such statements will prove to be accurate, as actual
results and future events could differ materially from those
anticipated in such statements as a result of the factors discussed
in the "Risks and Uncertainties" section and elsewhere in the
Company's most recent Management's Discussion and Analysis and in
the "Risk Factors" section of Filo Mining's most recent Annual
Information Form, which are available under the Company's profile
on SEDAR at www.sedar.com.. All of the forward-looking information
contained in this document is qualified by these cautionary
statements. Readers are cautioned not to place undue reliance on
forward-looking information due to the inherent uncertainty
thereof.
SOURCE Filo Mining Corp.