VANCOUVER, BC, Sept. 5,
2024 /CNW/ - Augusta Gold Corp. (TSX: G) (OTCQB:
AUGG) (FSE:11B) ("Augusta Gold" or the "Company") is
pleased to announce the results of the Feasibility Study for its
100% owned, construction-ready Reward Project (the
"Project") located in the Walker Lane gold district of
southern Nevada near the town of
Beatty.
Highlights
- Proven and Probable Mineral Reserves of 370,000 oz of gold
grading 0.025 oz/t gold (0.86 g/t) in a conventional open pit, heap
leach operation with a life-of-mine (LOM) strip ratio of
2.37:1
- Project has all required permits in place to commence
construction
- The Company's Bullfrog Project is located seven miles to the
northwest and hosts Measured and Indicated Mineral Resources of
1,209,290 oz gold grading 0.53 g/t gold and Inferred Mineral
Resources of 257,900 oz gold grading 0.48 g/t gold
- Significant synergies from the Reward Project are expected to
be realized for the Company's larger Bullfrog project located
across the valley
- The Company has also initiated a strategic review process to
evaluate alternative opportunities to maximize shareholder
return
- The Company has agreed in principle with its lender, Augusta
Investments Inc. (the "Lender"), to extend the term of its
loan with the Lender through to February 28,
2025
President and CEO Don Taylor
commented, "The Reward Project is construction-ready, strategically
located and anticipated to be our first development in the district
and will help support the development of our larger Bullfrog
Project located seven miles away. The Reward Project could be
in production within 12 months of commencing full-scale
construction, in a rapidly growing and highly prolific
district. Our goal is to be a low cost, 150,000 oz Au per
annum producer in Nevada by 2027.
Given the project is construction-ready, it is important to
highlight that at a price of US$2,400/oz Au, the Project reflects a
US$127M NPV and 33.4% IRR." NPV and
IRR values are shown in Table 5 below.
The Reward Project is a planned open pit, heap leach operation
processing 5,479 tons per day with average annual gold production
of 39 koz over the LOM, with a peak of 47 koz. Ore will be crushed
to P80 1/4" and placed on the leach pad using conveyors
and radial stackers. The initial lift will be agglomerated to
ensure pad stability and LOM permeability. Contract
mining will be employed at Reward to lower pre-production capital
requirements.
Metallurgical testing by McClelland labs has indicated gold
recoveries of approximately 81%. Recoveries used for the
Reward study are 79% applying a 2% deduction for potential
operational losses.
The Reward Project contains 370,000 oz of Proven and Probable
Mineral Reserves at an average grade of 0.025 opt gold (0.86
g/t). The potential for additional reserves has been
identified at the bottom of the current reserve pit outline but
will require drilling before this opportunity can be quantified
further.
Both of the company's Reward and Bullfrog projects are
strategically located in the prolific Beatty district in Nevada, an area where AngloGold Ashanti PLC
("AGA") and other companies are very active in exploration,
development, and asset consolidation.
AGA spent US$370 million to
acquire Corvus Gold and another US$150
million to acquire Coeur Mining Inc.'s Beatty district properties (both in 2022) and
has stated its intention to make the Beatty district into a new gold production
centre for AGA. AGA's most advanced property in the district is the
North Bullfrog Project, which hosts mineral reserves of
1.0M oz Au grading 0.43 g/t Au. AGA
continues to seek requisite permitting and approvals for
construction of the North Bullfrog Project, which AGA does not
anticipate receiving this year.
Augusta Gold's completion of its
Reward feasibility study and having obtained all required permits
to commence construction at the Reward Project therefore
strategically places Augusta Gold on
track to becoming the first modern gold producer in the
district.
Table 1. Reward Mineral Reserves
|
Reward Mineral
Reserves
|
|
k
tons
|
oz
Au/ton
|
k oz
Au
|
Proven
|
6,052
|
0.027
|
164
|
Probable
|
8,999
|
0.023
|
205
|
Proven and
Probable
|
15,052
|
0.025
|
370
|
Notes:
|
|
1.
|
All estimates of
Mineral Reserves have been prepared in accordance with National
Instrument 43 - 101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral
Projects ("NI 43-101") and Item 1300 of Regulation S-K
of the United States Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended
("SK 1300")
|
2.
|
Thomas L. Dyer, PE,
RESPEC of Reno, Nevada, is a Qualified Person as defined in NI
43-101 and SK 1300, is responsible for reporting Proven and
Probable Mineral Reserves for the Reward Project. Mr. Dyer is
independent of the Company.
|
3.
|
Mineral Reserves are
based on prices of $1,850 per ounce Au. The reserves were defined
based on pit designs that were created to follow optimized pit
shells created in Whittle.
|
4.
|
Reserves are reported
using a 0.008 oz Au per ton cut-off grade
|
5.
|
The Mineral Reserves
point of reference is the point where is material is fed into the
crusher.
|
6.
|
The effective date of
the Mineral Reserves estimate is September 3, 2024.
|
7.
|
Columns may not sum due
to rounding.
|
Table 2. Reward Feasibility Study Summary
Contained Au,
oz
|
369,692
|
Annual Au oz (avg
payable oz)
|
38,563
|
Max Annual Au
oz
|
46,595
|
Total Au Recovered
(oz)
|
292,057
|
Payable
Ounces
|
291,210
|
LOM ore grade (opt
Au)
|
0.025
|
LOM Tons
|
15,051,695
|
Mine Life
(years)
|
7.6
|
All-in Sustaining Cost
per ounce
|
$1,328
|
Pre-Production Capital
Cost
|
$89,700,000
|
1.
|
All-in Sustaining Cost
per ounce is a non-GAAP financial measure. See "Note Regarding
Non-GAAP Financial Measures" below for a discussion on non-GAAP
financial measures and a reconciliation to U.S. GAAP. The Company
believes that these measures provide investors with an improved
ability to evaluate the prospects of the Company. As the Project is
not in production the prospective non‐GAAP financial measures or
ratios may not be reconciliated to the nearest comparable measures
under U.S. GAAP and the equivalent historical non-GAAP financial
measure for each prospective non‐GAAP measure or ratio discussed
herein is nil$.
|
Table 3. Capital Cost Summary
Description
|
Cost3 (US$M)
|
Pre-Production Process
Capital
|
$78.9
|
Mining
Capital
|
$10.8
|
Total Initial
Capital1
|
$89.7
|
Sustaining Capital –
Mine & Process
|
$32.1
|
Working Capital &
Initial Fills2
|
$7.4
|
1.
|
Numbers are rounded and
may not sum perfectly.
|
2.
|
Working capital
credited in Years 7 and 8.
|
3.
|
Costs reflect
standalone costs of the Reward project with 100% of capital
expensed to Reward, and does not include any potential capital cost
synergies from development of the Bullfrog project.
|
Table 4. Life of Mine Operating Cost Summary
Description
|
LOM Cost (US$/ton
ore)
|
Mine
|
$10.92
|
Process & Support
Services
|
$8.09
|
Site G &
A
|
$2.88
|
Total1
|
$21.88
|
1.
|
Numbers are rounded and
may not sum perfectly
|
Table 5. Sensitivity Assessment for the Reward Project
Au Price ($/oz)
USD
|
After-Tax NPV 5%
($M)1
|
After-Tax
IRR
|
Payback
(years)
|
$2,600
|
$163.5
|
41.1 %
|
1.9
|
$2,400
|
$126.9
|
33.4 %
|
2.4
|
$2,200
|
$91.0
|
25.7 %
|
3.3
|
$1,9752
|
$50.6
|
16.6 %
|
5.1
|
$1,800
|
$15.2
|
8.6 %
|
6.3
|
$1,725
|
$0
|
5.0 %
|
6.9
|
1.
|
Costs reflect
standalone costs of the Reward project with 100% of capital
expensed to Reward, excluding any potential capital or operating
cost synergies from the Bullfrog project.
|
2.
|
The feasibility study
results use a base case of $1,975/oz Au.
|
Permitting highlights
The following principal permits and authorizations have been
granted for the Reward Project allowing for ground clearing and
construction:
- Mine Plan of Operations N-82840,
authorized by U.S. Department of the Interior – Bureau of Land
Management (BLM).
- Water Pollution Control Permit NEV2007101, issued by the Nevada
Division of Environmental Protection – Bureau of Mining Regulation
and Reclamation (NDEP-BMRR).
- Mine Reclamation Permit #0300, issued by the NDEP-BMRR.
- Water appropriation permits 76390 and 89658, issued by the
Nevada Division of Water Resources (NDWR) for mining, milling,
dewatering, and domestic uses.
- Biological Opinion 84320-2008-F-0293, approved by U.S. Fish and
Wildlife Service (USFWS).
- Class II Air Quality Permit AP1041-2492, issued by NDEP –
Bureau of Air Pollution Control (BAPC).
Strategic Review and Loan Terms
The Company has also initiated a strategic review process to
evaluate opportunities to maximize shareholder return. The
strategic alternatives review could include, among other things, a
joint venture transaction, a sale of the Company, the Project, or
all the assets of the Company, a merger or other business
combination, or another form of strategic transaction. The Company
has not made any decisions related to any strategic alternatives at
this time and there can be no assurance that the strategic review
will lead to any transaction or any other change or outcome.
The Company has agreed in principle with its Lender to extend
the term of its loan with the Lender through to February 28, 2025. Exact terms will be disclosed
in the coming days once finalized and once all requisite approvals
have been obtained. The Company is also considering further
alternatives with its Lender to manage its existing debt position
in a manner that facilitates obtaining construction financing for
Reward. These alternatives include, but are not limited to,
converting part or all of the Lender's current debt to equity.
Other than the decision to extend the term of the loan, the Company
has not made any decisions related to alternatives with its Lender
at this time and there can be no assurance that this consideration
will lead to any transaction or any other change or outcome.
The Company does not intend to provide announcements or updates
unless or until it determines that further disclosure is
appropriate or necessary.
Technical Report and Qualified Persons
The comprehensive feasibility study for the Reward Project was
led by Kappes Cassidy & Associates from Reno, NV with support from SRK, RESPEC, Knight
Piesold, NewFields and APEX Geoscience Ltd.
The qualified persons are Mark
Gorman of Kappes, Cassiday & Associates; Thomas Dyer of RESPEC; Mike Dufresne of APEX Geoscience Ltd.;
Timothy D. Scott of Kappes, Cassiday
& Associates; Mathew Haley of
NewFields; James Cremeens of Knight
Piesold Consulting; and Mark Willow
of SRK Consulting (U.S.), Inc.; each of whom is an independent
"Qualified Person" under NI 43-101 and SK 1300.
A technical report supporting the results disclosed herein will
be published within 45 days. The effective date of the technical
report is September 3, 2024. For
readers to fully understand the information in this release they
should read the technical report in its entirety when it is
available on SEDAR+ and EDGAR, including all qualifications,
assumptions, exclusions and risks. The technical report is intended
to be read as a whole and sections should not be read or relied
upon out of context.
The scientific and technical information contained in this news
release relating to the Reward Project and the sampling, analytical
and test data underlying the scientific and technical information
has been reviewed, approved and verified by the QPs for the
technical report. The data was verified using data validation and
quality assurance procedures under high industry standards.
QA/QC of Underlying Data
From 2015 to early 2017, CR Reward LLC completed a compilation,
audit and update of the drill hole database. Drill hole locations,
survey data and readily accessible assay certificates were uploaded
into the commercially-available DataShed software package. Assays
that did not have assay certificates were retained in an Excel
spreadsheet and combined with the DataShed assays for the assay
verification. Lithology, alteration, structure, and quartz vein
data from selected holes were digitized from geologic paper logs in
January 2017. These data were also
brought into DataShed. The drill hole database consisting of 348
historical holes was audited, compiled, and verified by CR Reward
LLC in 2016 and 2017 based on provided electronic files, for all
historical drilling, and assay certificates. CR Reward LLC
completed additional drilling in 2017 and 2018 consisting of 3,443
meters in 28 core holes.
The historical gold values at the Project were validated by
comparing the historical analytical certificates (and logs) to the
digital assay database. All available downhole surveys were
digitized and utilized to properly plot analytical data down-hole.
Drill hole collar data was verified versus geological logs or
survey files with collar elevations checked against a modern lidar
survey. Drillholes with questionable data were omitted from the
database and were not used to generate the underlying mineral
resource estimate. All of the 2017 and 2018 drill hole data
provided by CR Reward LLC was verified by the appropriate QPs. The
results of the validation program indicate that the sample database
is of sufficient accuracy and precision to be used for the
generation of the feasibility study results.
Bullfrog Mineral Resource Estimate
|
|
|
Classification
|
Tonnes
(Mt)
|
Au grade
(g/t)
|
Ag grade
(g/t)
|
Au Contained
(koz)
|
Ag Contained
(koz)
|
|
Measured
|
30.13
|
0.544
|
1.35
|
526.68
|
1,309.13
|
|
Indicated
|
40.88
|
0.519
|
1.18
|
682.61
|
1,557.49
|
|
Measured and
Indicated
|
71.01
|
0.530
|
1.26
|
1,209.29
|
2,866.62
|
|
Inferred
|
16.69
|
0.481
|
0.96
|
257.90
|
515.72
|
1.
|
Oxide estimated Mineral
Resources are reported within a pit shell using the Lerch Grossman
algorithm, a gold price of US$1,550/oz and a recovery of 82% for Au
and silver price of US$20/oz and a recovery of 20% For
Ag.
|
2.
|
Sulphide estimated
Mineral Resources are reported within a pit shell using the Lerch
Grossman algorithm, a gold price of US$1,550/oz and a recovery of
50% for Au and silver price of US$20/oz and a recovery of 12% for
Ag. No sulphide material was reported for Montgomery-Shoshone or
Bonanza.
|
3.
|
Mining costs for
mineralized material and waste are US$2.25/tonne.
|
4.
|
Processing, general and
administration, and refining costs are US$5.00/tonne,
US$0.50/tonne, and US$0.05/tonne respectively.
|
5.
|
Due to rounding, some
columns or rows may not compute as shown.
|
6.
|
Estimated Mineral
Resources are stated as in situ dry metric tonnes.
|
7.
|
The estimate of Mineral
Resources may be materially affected by legal, title, taxation,
socio-political, marketing, or other relevant issues.
|
8.
|
The effective date of
the Bullfrog mineral resource estimate is December 31,
2021.
|
The scientific and technical information contained in this news
release related to the Bullfrog Project is based upon the technical
report summary, prepared pursuant to S-K 1300, entitled "S-K 1300
Technical Report, Mineral Resource Estimate, Bullfrog Gold Project,
Nye County, Nevada" with an
effective date of December 31, 2021,
an issue date of March 16, 2022, and
an amended issue date of December 18,
2023. The mineral resource estimate is also prepared in
accordance with NI 43-101. The Bullfrog technical report was
prepared by Forte Dynamics, Inc., a QP firm, in compliance with S-K
1300 and was based upon information prepared by QPs Russ Downer and
Adam House. A current technical
report for the Bullfrog Project can be found on both the Company's
EDGAR and SEDAR+ profiles.
North Bullfrog
AGA's mineral reserve estimate at North Bullfrog was derived
from AGA's Mineral Resource and Mineral Reserve Report as of
December 31, 2023, available on AGA's
website at https://www.anglogoldashanti.com/. Per AGA's report, the
estimate was based on information signed off by Mrs. TM Flitton, a
Qualified Person who is a full-time employee of AGA.
About Augusta Gold
Augusta Gold is an exploration
and development company focused on building a long-term business
that delivers stakeholder value through developing the Reward and
Bullfrog gold projects and pursing accretive M&A opportunities.
The Reward and Bullfrog gold projects are located in the prolific
Bullfrog mining district approximately 120 miles north-west of
Las Vegas, Nevada and just outside
of Beatty, Nevada. The Company is
led by a management team and board of directors with a proven track
record of success in financing and developing mining assets and
delivering shareholder value. For more information, please visit
www.augustagold.com.
Forward Looking Statements
Certain statements and information contained in this new release
constitute "forward-looking statements", and "forward-looking
information" within the meaning of applicable securities laws
(collectively, "forward-looking statements"). These statements
appear in a number of places in this new release and include
statements regarding our intent, or the beliefs or current
expectations of our officers and directors, including that
significant synergies from the Reward Project are expected to be
realized for the Company's larger Bullfrog project located across
the valley; Augusta Gold is on track
to becoming the first modern gold producer in the district; the
Reward Project is construction-ready, strategically located and
anticipated to be our first development in the district, and will
help support the development of our larger Bullfrog Project located
seven miles away; the Reward Project could be in production within
12 months of commencing full-scale construction, in a rapidly
growing and highly prolific district; our goal is to be a low cost,
150,000 oz Au per annum producer in Nevada by 2027; the Reward Project is a
planned open pit, heap leach operation processing 5,479 tons per
day with average annual gold production of 39 koz over the LOM,
with a peak of 47 koz; ore will be crushed to P80 1/4" and placed
on the leach pad using conveyors and radial stackers; the initial
lift will be agglomerated to ensure pad stability and LOM
permeability; contract mining will be employed at Reward to lower
pre-production capital requirements; metallurgical testing by
McClelland labs has indicated gold recoveries of approximately 81%;
recoveries for the Reward study are set at 79% applying a 2%
deduction for potential operational losses; the potential for
additional reserves has been identified at the bottom of the
current reserve pit outline but will require drilling before this
opportunity can be quantified further; the strategic alternatives
review could include, among other things, a joint venture
transaction, a sale of the Company, the Project, or all the assets
of the Company, a merger or other business combination, or another
form of strategic transaction; that the Company will extend the
terms of its loan with its Lender through to February 28, 2025; the Company is also
considering further alternatives with the Lender to manage its
existing debt position in a manner that facilitates obtaining
construction financing for Reward; these alternatives include, but
are not limited to, converting part or all of the Lender's current
debt to equity; a technical report supporting the results disclosed
herein will be published within 45 days; planned operations at
Reward (including tons per day processed, strip ratio, ore
processing and agglomeration; the financial results of the
Feasibility Study (including recoveries, NPV, IRR, and payback
period). When used in this news release words such as "to be",
"will", "planned", "expected", "potential", "anticipated" and
similar expressions are intended to identify these forward-looking
statements. Although the Company believes that the expectations
reflected in such forward-looking statements and/or information are
reasonable, undue reliance should not be placed on forward-looking
statements since the Company can give no assurance that such
expectations will prove to be correct. These statements involve
known and unknown risks, uncertainties and other factors that may
cause actual results or events to vary materially from those
anticipated in such forward-looking statements, including risks
generally related to uncertainty of resource and reserve estimates;
uncertainty as to the Company's future operating costs and ability
to raise capital; risks relating to cost increases for capital and
operating costs; risks of shortages and fluctuating costs of
equipment or supplies; risks relating to fluctuations in the price
of gold; the inherently hazardous nature of mining-related
activities; potential effects on our operations of environmental
regulations in Nevada; risks due
to legal proceedings; risks related to construction of mining
projects generally; that the Company will be able to finalize terms
for an extension of its loan and obtain all requisite approvals
therefor; and the risks, uncertainties and other factors identified
in the Company's periodic filings with Canadian securities
regulators and the United States Securities and Exchange
Commission. Such forward-looking statements are based on various
assumptions, including assumptions made with regard to the Company
securing adequate financing; the results of the Company's economic
studies at Bullfrog; the Company making affirmative production
decisions at Reward and Bullfrog; our forecasts and expected cash
flows; our projected capital and operating costs; our expectations
regarding mining and metallurgical recoveries; mine life and
production rates; that laws or regulations impacting mine
development or mining activities will remain consistent; our
approved business plans, our mineral resource and reserve estimates
and results of the feasibility study; our experience with
regulators; political and social support of the mining industry in
Nevada; our experience and
knowledge of the Nevada mining
industry and our expectations of economic conditions and the price
of gold. While the Company considers these assumptions to be
reasonable, based on information currently available, they may
prove to be incorrect. Except as required by applicable law, we
assume no obligation to update or to publicly announce the results
of any change to any forward-looking statement contained herein to
reflect actual results, future events or developments, changes in
assumptions or changes in other factors affecting the forward-
looking statements. If we update any one or more forward-looking
statements, no inference should be drawn that we will make
additional updates with respect to those or other forward-looking
statements. You should not place undue importance on
forward-looking statements and should not rely upon these
statements as of any other date. All forward-looking statements
contained in this news release are expressly qualified in their
entirety by this cautionary statement.
Note Regarding Non-GAAP Financial Measures (Reward
Project)
In this press release, we have provided information prepared or
calculated according to U.S. GAAP, as well as provided certain
non-U.S. GAAP prospective financial performance measures. Because
the non-U.S. GAAP performance measures do not have standardized
meanings prescribed by U.S. GAAP, they may not be comparable to
similar measures presented by other companies. These measures
should not be considered in isolation or as substitutes for
measures of performance prepared in accordance with U.S. GAAP.
There are limitations associated with the use of such non-U.S. GAAP
measures. Since these measures do not incorporate revenues, changes
in working capital and non-operating cash costs, they are not
necessarily indicative of potential operating profit or loss, or
cash flow from operations as determined in accordance with U.S.
GAAP.
The non-U.S. GAAP measures associated with All-In sustaining
costs ("AISC"), Cash Operating Costs and Cash Costs, as defined
below, and the resulting AISC per ounce metric are not, and are not
intended to be, presentations in accordance with U.S. GAAP. These
metrics represent costs and unit-cost measured related to the
Reward Project.
We believe that these metrics help investors understand the
economics of the Reward Project. We present the non-U.S. GAAP
financial measures for our Reward Project in the tables below.
Actual U.S. GAAP results may vary from the amounts disclosed in
this news release. Other companies may calculate these measures
differently.
AISC and Respective Unit Cost Measure
AISC consists of Cash Costs (as described below), plus sustaining
capital costs. The sum of these costs is divided by the
corresponding payable gold ounces to determine the per ounce metric
stated in this press release above.
Cash Costs consist of Cash Operating Costs (as described below),
plus royalties.
Cash Costs and AISC are non-U.S. GAAP metrics developed by the
World Gold Council to provide transparency into the costs
associated with producing gold and provide a comparable standard.
The Company reports Cash Costs and AISC on a per ounce basis
because we believe this metric more completely reflects mining
costs over the life of mine. Similar metrics are widely used in the
gold mining industry as comparative benchmarks of performance.
Cash Operating Costs is a non-U.S. GAAP metric used by the
Company to measure aggregate costs of operations that will
generally be within the Company's direct control. We believe this
metric reflects the operating performance potential for the Reward
Project for the mining, processing, administration, and sales
functions. Contractual obligations for surface land rights (project
royalties) are excluded from this metric. Cash Operating Costs
consist of Reward Project operating costs and refining costs, and
exclude royalties.
Other costs excluded from Cash Operating Costs, Cash Costs, and
AISC include depreciation and amortization, income taxes,
government royalties, financing charges, costs related to business
combinations, asset acquisitions other than sustaining capital, and
asset dispositions.
The following tables demonstrate the calculation of Cash
Operating Costs, Cash Costs, AISC, and related AISC unit-cost
metric as presented in this press release:
|
Units
|
Life of Mine
|
Payable Gold
|
koz
|
291.21
|
Total Operating
Costs
|
US$ millions
|
$
329.39
|
Refining &
Transportation Charge
|
US$ millions
|
$
0.62
|
Total Operating Costs
& Refining & Transportation Charge
|
US$ millions
|
$
330.01
|
Royalty
Payable
|
US$ millions
|
$
15.21
|
Total Operating Costs,
Refining & Royalties¹
|
US$ millions
|
$
345.22
|
|
|
|
Cash Cost per
ounce¹
|
US$/oz
|
$
1,185
|
|
|
|
Sustaining Capital and
Reclamation & Closure
|
US$ millions
|
$
41.57
|
All-In-Sustaining
Costs
|
US$ millions
|
$
386.79
|
|
|
|
AISC per
ounce
|
US$/oz
|
$
1,328
|
|
Units
|
Life of Mine
|
Payable Gold
|
koz
|
291.21
|
Mining Costs
|
US$ millions
|
$
164.33
|
Processing
Costs
|
US$ millions
|
$
121.77
|
Site General and
Administrative Costs
|
US$ millions
|
$
43.29
|
Total Operating
Costs
|
US$ millions
|
$
329.39
|
Refining &
Transportation Charge
|
US$ millions
|
$
0.62
|
Total Operating Costs
& Refining & Transportation Charge
|
US$ millions
|
$
330.01
|
Royalty
Payable
|
US$ millions
|
$
15.21
|
Total Operating Costs,
Refining & Royalties¹
|
US$ millions
|
$
345.22
|
1.
|
Cash Cost = Total
Operating Costs & Refining & Transportation Charge +
Royalty Payable
|
View original content to download
multimedia:https://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/augusta-gold-announces-feasibility-study-results-for-its-100-owned-construction-ready-reward-project-initiates-strategic-process-302239065.html
SOURCE Augusta Gold Corp.