Supports Robust New Development
Project
even at current lower Commodity
Prices
33% IRR After Tax
Lowest quartile costs
with
US$0.42/lb Cu Eq for
DSO and US$0.80/lb Cu Eq for
Concentrate Production
33% Increase in NPV approx.
with
only 10% Lift in Commodity Prices
Probable Reserves at
4.1% Cu
Equivalent Grade (before recoveries)
SUBIACO, Western Australia, March 18, 2016 /CNW/ - RTG Mining Inc. ("RTG",
the "Company") (TSX Code: RTG, ASX Code: RTG) is pleased to
announce the results from an independent Feasibility Study ("FS")
for 100% of the high grade Mabilo Copper/Gold Project (the
"Project") in southeast Luzon, Philippines. The Feasibility Study
demonstrates the potential for Mabilo to outperform, specifically
reinforcing the resilience of the Project despite current commodity
prices. The Project is both high grade and low cost underpinning
the robust economics presented in the FS including a 33% IRR after
tax (43.6% with only a 10% lift in commodity prices) and an
equivalent operating cost of US$0.80/lb copper equivalent for concentrate
production.
"RTG targets high grade, low operating cost gold projects with
low technical and Project risk," said Justine Magee, CEO, RTG Mining. "Since investing
in the Mabilo Project in June 2014,
the Company has added significant value through rapid and
successful exploration to delineate a substantial resource (see
November 11, 2015 press release), and
again in maintaining this accelerated pace through to a full FS in
less than 15 months from the maiden resource.
The high quality resource at Mabilo presents RTG with an
excellent near term development opportunity that is financially
robust, attractive to potential debt providers, and with additional
drilling the resource is expected to grow further, which will only
enhance the already strong financials. We look forward to first
production and to bringing continued value to our
shareholders."
The Mabilo Project is a joint venture between Mt. Labo
Exploration and Development Corporation ("Mt. Labo") and Galeo
Equipment Corporation in the
Philippines.
MABILO 1.35 Mtpa CASE HIGHLIGHTS*
A Robust New Development Opportunity
Probable Mineral
Reserves:
|
|
7.792Mt @ 2.04 g/t
Au, 1.95% Cu, 8.79 g/t Ag, 45.5% Fe
|
|
|
|
|
|
Containing
316Kt Cu equivalent at 4.1% (before recoveries)
|
|
|
|
IRR (after
tax):
|
|
33.4%
(US$5000/t Cu, US$1200/oz Au and US$50/t Fe)
|
|
|
|
Payback for
Plant:
|
|
2.5 years
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
DSO
Capex:
|
|
US$17.4M
|
|
|
|
DSO
Opex
|
|
US$0.42/lb Cu
equivalent
|
|
|
|
DSO
Production
|
|
25,000t of Cu and
39,000oz Au
34,700t of Cu
equivalent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Plant
Capex
|
|
US$161.4M (includes
US$14.83 of recoverable VAT)
|
|
|
|
Plant
Pre-strip
|
|
US$24.4M (includes
US$2.61 of recoverable VAT)
|
|
|
|
Plant
Opex:
|
|
$0.80/lb Cu
equivalent
|
|
|
|
Plant Annual
Production
Contained
Metal:
|
|
38,300t Cu
equivalent
|
|
|
*
|
The FS is based on a
treatment rate of 1Mtpa. A treatment rate of 1.35Mtpa was
also considered in an upside case. Factored indicative
capital and operating cost estimates were developed for a planned
throughput of 1.35 Mtpa.
|
|
|
DEVELOPMENT
SCHEDULE
Optimized
Approach to Maximize Returns at Mabilo
Project implementation is planned to be executed in two key
stages. Stage 1 is intended to minimize initial capital
requirements through a Direct Shipping Ore ("DSO") Operation of an
exceptionally high grade, near surface oxide portion of the Mabilo
Resource. By utilization of existing infrastructure within easy
transport of the Project, the joint venture is able to defer the
more capital intensive components of primary production. The early
cash flow generated by the DSO should then also minimize any
possible equity dilution in the financing of the Stage 2 Primary
Production Plant.
Stage 1 will mine the oxide ore down to 30 Relative Level (95m
below surface). Three main products will be produced from this
oxide mining stage.
- Gold cap ore will be crushed on site and trucked to a nearby
existing CIL processing plant. The plant is planned to be upgraded
to 300,000tpa throughput and will likely be operated by the Mabilo
Joint Venture personnel.
- Both oxide skarn and high-grade supergene chalcocite will be
crushed on site with a plan to truck to the existing Larup Port,
within 40km, for direct shipping.
Stage 2 of the operation involves processing of primary ore
through a purpose-built plant on site. The Mabilo process plant is
planned to be built in parallel with the oxide mining phase and
Stage 2 permitting process. The processing plant will be a simple
crush, grind, float plant with low technical risk, producing three
concentrates for sale and is estimated to require approximately 15
months for construction.
Both mining stages are financially robust with the DSO
enabling start up and early generation of cash flow within 4-5
months of finalizing the DSO operating permits. The capital
expenditure required for the DSO is relatively nominal at
approximately US$18M and is capable
of generating net operating cash flow after tax in the order of
US$ 68M (based on US$5,000/t Cu, US$1,200/oz Au and US$50/t Fe).
Mt. Labo is currently in the final stages of obtaining the
necessary operating permits for the first stage of production with
timing ultimately dependent on the regulatory processes in
the Philippines. The Company is
also in discussions with potential debt financiers for the project
development.
MABILO FEASIBILITY ECONOMICS
(AFTER-TAX)
Highly Sensitive to Both
a Growth in Commodity Prices and Resources
The robust feasibility results provide the foundation to grow
the Project while generating early cashflows. Mabilo is highly
sensitive to both a growth in commodity prices and resources. The
1.35Mtpa case project IRR escalates from 33% to 43.5%* with only a
10% increase in commodity price assumptions. The FS, compiled by
Lycopodium Minerals Pty Ltd ("Lycopodium"), is based on the inputs
from a number of consultants and the Mabilo Joint Venture ("MJV")
including Lycopodium, CSA Global Pty Ltd, Orelogy Consultants Pty
Ltd, Orway Mineral Consultants Pty Ltd, Knight Piesold Pty Ltd and
Conrad Partners Limited.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1
Mtpa
Case
|
|
1.35Mtpa
Case
|
|
10% Increase
in
Commodity
Prices to
1.35
Mtpa
|
|
20% Increase
in
Commodity
Prices to
1.35
Mtpa
|
Financial
Analysis*
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
IRR
|
|
26.09%
|
|
33.45%
|
|
43.62%
|
|
56.29%
|
NPV
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0%
|
|
US$197M
|
|
US$223M
|
|
US$285M
|
|
US$361M
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
28%
Increase
|
|
63%
Increase
|
|
5%
|
|
US$126M
|
|
US$156M
|
|
US$207M
|
|
US$269M
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
33%
Increase
|
|
72%
Increase
|
|
8%
|
|
US$96M
|
|
US$125M
|
|
US$171M
|
|
US$226M
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
37%
Increase
|
|
81%
Increase
|
Payback for Plant
(Years)
|
|
2.5
|
|
2.5
|
|
2.42
|
|
2.25
|
|
*All the economics,
including calculations of equivalent estimates referred to in this
announcement are based on the following commodity price
assumptions: US$5000/t Cu, US$1200/oz Au and US$50/t 62% Fe. The FS
is based on a 1 Mtpa plant base case.
|
|
Factored indicative capital and operating cost estimates were
developed for a planned throughput of 1.35 Mtpa.
Separately, there remains significant upside in the Project from
both extensions to the North Mineralised Zone and Inferred
Resources contained within the pit. 41% of the 3.91Mt Inferred
Resource falls within the final design of the pit, representing
1.61Mt at 1.22% Cu and 1.21g/t Au that could provide near term
potential to significantly grow the resource. The pit optimization
study shows that an increase in reserves by 19% results in a 24%
increase in undiscounted cashflows.
OVERVIEW OF PLANNED OPERATIONS
Producing 3 High Quality Concentrates Through the Plant
The FS on the construction and operation of the plant forms the
basis for the life of mine plan, which incorporates both the Stage
1 mining and DSO on the oxide ore and the Stage 2 development of a
processing plant for the primary ore. The primary plant will
include a simple crush, grind, float facility with thickening and
filtration to produce 3 high quality concentrates. The plant
produces the following three (3) high-grade products:
- 27% Cu and 21g/t Au concentrate
- 3g/t Au pyrite concentrate
- 65% magnetite concentrate
The FS is based on a treatment rate of 1 Mtpa. A factored
case at a treatment rate of 1.35 Mtpa was also considered by
applying a factor of 7.3% to the capital costs. Given the
planned operating throughput is likely based on the 1.35Mtpa case,
sensitivity modeling for the 1.35 Mtpa case is shown below
indicating strong operating and economic results:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.35Mtpa
Case*
|
|
10% Increase
in
Commodity Prices*
|
|
20% Increase
in
Commodity Prices*
|
Oxide/DSO
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capex
|
|
|
|
US$17.4M
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cu
Produced
|
|
|
|
25,000 t
|
|
|
|
|
Au
Produced
|
|
|
|
39,000 oz
|
|
|
|
|
CuEq
Produced**
|
|
|
|
34,700
t
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Net Operating
Cashflow before Tax
|
|
|
|
US$95M
|
|
US$110M
|
|
US$125M
|
Net Operating
Cashflow after Tax
|
|
|
|
US$68M
|
|
US$78M
|
|
US$88M
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
Costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Tonne
|
|
|
|
US$62
|
|
|
|
|
Per
CuEq
|
|
|
|
US$0.42/lb
|
|
|
|
|
Primary/Plant
Operation
|
Capex
|
|
|
|
US$161.37M
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(includes
US$14.83M of
recoverable VAT)
|
|
|
|
|
Pre- strip for Stage
2
|
|
|
|
US$24.37
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(includes US$2.6M
of recoverable VAT)
|
|
|
|
|
Contained Metal in
Average Annual Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Cu
|
|
|
|
18,300 t
|
|
|
|
|
Au
|
|
|
|
67,000 oz
|
|
|
|
|
Fe
|
|
|
|
347,000 t
|
|
|
|
|
CuEq**
|
|
|
|
38,300
t
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ave Annual Net
Operating Cashflow before Tax
|
|
|
|
US$72.9M
|
|
US$84M
|
|
US$97M
|
Ave Annual Net
Operating Cashflow after Tax
|
|
|
|
US$51.8M
|
|
US$58M
|
|
US$67M
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average
Costs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per Tonne
|
|
|
|
US$54/t
|
|
|
|
|
Per
CuEq
|
|
|
|
US$0.80/lb
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production Metrics
for Stage 2
|
Mining
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Pre-strip
|
|
Mt
|
|
18
|
|
|
|
|
Average Mining
Rate
|
|
Tpd
|
|
28,400
|
|
|
|
|
Average Mine
Production
|
|
Mtpa
|
|
10.4
|
|
|
|
|
Total Material
Mined
|
|
Mt
|
|
80.4
|
|
|
|
|
Overall Strip
Ratio
|
|
W:O
|
|
10
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Processing
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Daily Mill
Throughput
|
|
Tpd
|
|
3,700
|
|
|
|
|
Annual Mill
Throughput
|
|
Tpa
|
|
1,350,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Production
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Average Annual Cu/Au
Con Produced
|
|
Tpa
|
|
64,900
|
|
|
|
|
Average Annual Pyrite
Con Produced
|
|
Tpa
|
|
219,000
|
|
|
|
|
Average Annual
Magnetite Con Produced
|
|
Tpa
|
|
534,000
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recoveries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold Recoveries in
Cu/Au Con
|
|
%
|
|
55.1
|
|
|
|
|
Gold Recoveries in
Pyrite Con
|
|
%
|
|
29.8
|
|
|
|
|
Copper
Recoveries
|
|
%
|
|
83.7
|
|
|
|
|
Silver
Recoveries
|
|
%
|
|
60.7
|
|
|
|
|
Iron
Recoveries
|
|
%
|
|
60.7
|
|
|
|
|
Payables/NSR -
DSO
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Gold Cap
Ore
|
|
%
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
Copper in Oxide
Skarn
|
|
%
|
|
30
|
|
|
|
|
Gold in
Chalcocite
|
|
%
|
|
75
|
|
|
|
|
Copper in
Chalcocite
|
|
%
|
|
74
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Payables/NSR -
Plant
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Copper in Cu/Au
Concentrate
|
|
%
|
|
87
|
|
|
|
|
Gold in Cu/Au
Concentrate
|
|
%
|
|
91
|
|
|
|
|
Gold in Pyrite
Concentrate
|
|
%
|
|
50
|
|
|
|
|
Silver in Cu/Au
Concentrate
|
|
%
|
|
83
|
|
|
|
|
Iron in Magnetite
Concentrate
|
|
%
|
|
100
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
*All the economics,
including calculations of equivalent estimates referred to in this
announcement are based on the following commodity price
assumptions: US$5000/t Cu, US$1200/oz Au and US$50/t 62% Fe. The FS
is based on a 1 Mtpa plant base case.
Factored indicative capital and operating cost estimates were
developed for a planned throughput of 1.35 Mtpa.
|
** The Copper
equivalent tonnes is based on the following formula –
CuEq = (Cu produced/contained*$5000) + (Au
produced/contained*$1200+ (Any Contained Fe metal produced*
$50))/$5000
|
|
MINERAL RESERVES
March 2016 Mineral Reserve Estimate
The Probable Reserve represents an equivalent copper grade of
4.1%* (before recoveries) containing 316Kt of equivalent
copper.
|
Probable Mineral
Reserve Estimate
|
Ore
|
|
Waste
|
|
Strip
Ratio
|
Class
|
Type
|
|
Mt
|
|
Fe
%
|
|
Au
g/t
|
|
Cu
%
|
|
Ag
g/t
|
|
Mt
|
|
Probable
|
Gold Cap
|
|
0.351
|
|
40.1
|
|
3.11
|
|
0.38
|
|
3.26
|
|
77.713
|
|
10.0
|
Supergene
|
|
0.104
|
|
36.5
|
|
2.20
|
|
20.7
|
|
11.9
|
|
|
Oxide
Skarn
|
|
0.182
|
|
43.6
|
|
2.52
|
|
4.17
|
|
19.9
|
|
|
Fresh
|
|
7.155
|
|
45.9
|
|
1.97
|
|
1.70
|
|
8.73
|
|
|
Total Probable
Ore
|
|
7.792
|
|
45.5
|
|
2.04
|
|
1.95
|
|
8.79
|
|
|
The copper equivalent
grade is based on the following formula –
CuEq=((((AuOz*$1,200)+(CuMetal*$5,000)+(FeMetal*$50)+
(AgOz*$14)) / $5,000)/Total ore tonnes)
|
|
The November 2015 resource
estimation provided by CSA Global Pty Ltd classified the resource
for the Mabilo Project as Indicated and Inferred. Only Indicated
Mineral Resources as defined in NI 43-101 were used to establish
the Probable Mineral Reserves. No reserves were categorized as
Proven.
Application of edge dilution and ore loss to the resource model
resulted in a 4% increase in the mining model tonnages and a 5%
decrease in gold, copper and silver grades. This mining model was
used in all mine planning activities, including pit optimization,
mine design and mine scheduling.
Mineral Reserves are quoted within specific pit designs based on
indicated resources only and take into consideration the mining,
processing, metallurgical, economic and infrastructure modifying
factors.
The Mineral Reserves and Resources in this announcement conform
to the latest Canadian Institute of Mining, Metallurgy and
Petroleum (standards, and have been reconciled from JORC
categories. No Inferred Mineral Resources (JORC) have been included
in the Reserves in the FS.
MINERAL RESOURCE ESTIMATE
CSA Global has completed two resource estimates for the Mabilo
Project, the first in November 2014
and the second in November 2015. The
November 2015 resource was an update
of the November 2014 estimate based
on infill drilling and formed the basis of the DFS. All resource
estimation technical reports were completed in compliance with NI
43-101, JORC and CIM standards. There has been no additional
drilling on the deposit since the release of the last resource.
Mineral Resource
Estimate as at November 2015 for the Mabilo Project
|
Weathering
State
|
Classification
|
Million
Tonnes
|
Cu
%
|
Au
g/t
|
Ag
g/t
|
Fe
%
|
Cu
Metal
(Kt)
|
Au Oz
('000s)
|
Fe
Metal
(Kt)
|
Oxide +
Supergene
|
Indicated
|
0.78
|
4.1
|
2.7
|
9.7
|
41.2
|
32.1
|
67.1
|
320.8
|
Inferred
|
0.05
|
7.8
|
2.3
|
9.6
|
26
|
3.7
|
3.5
|
12.3
|
Fresh
|
Indicated
|
8.08
|
1.7
|
2
|
9.8
|
46
|
137.7
|
510.5
|
3,713.70
|
Inferred
|
3.86
|
1.4
|
1.5
|
9.1
|
29.1
|
53.3
|
181.5
|
1,121.80
|
Combined
|
Indicated
(Total)
|
8.86
|
1.9
|
2
|
9.8
|
45.6
|
169.8
|
577.6
|
4,034.50
|
Combined
|
Inferred
(Total)
|
3.91
|
1.5
|
1.5
|
9.1
|
29
|
57
|
184.9
|
1,134.10
|
Note:
Differences may occur due to rounding. All elements reported as
total estimated in-situ for
blocks above 0.3 g/t Au lower cut-off, no recovery factors have
been considered. Mineral Resources
that are not Mineral Reserves do not have demonstrated economic
viability.
|
CAPITAL COSTS
2-Stage Development:
Overall Low Capital Costs
The capital cost estimates were derived from first principles
for the 1 Mtpa process plant to an accuracy of +/- 15% and then the
capital cost estimates were factored with an accuracy of +/- 25%
for the 1.35 Mtpa process plant.
The capital costs for the Project will be required in two
tranches. The first tranche will be prior to oxide mining
commencing. The second tranche is planned to coincide with the
development and construction schedule associated with Stage 2 of
the Project.
Cost
Area
|
Stage 1 -DSO
US$M
|
Direct
|
|
Pre-Strip
|
3.30
|
Mobilisation
|
0.66
|
Site Preparation,
Roads and Environment
|
3.65
|
Port
|
0.30
|
Buildings and
Equipment
|
0.55
|
Mining
Facilities
|
1.40
|
Upgrade Apex CIL
Plant
|
0.71
|
Direct Works
Subtotal
|
10.57
|
Indirect
|
|
Land
Acquisition
|
5.62
|
Contingency
|
1.16
|
Indirect
Subtotal
|
6.78
|
TOTAL OXIDE MINING
CAPITAL COSTS
|
17.35
|
Cost
Area
|
Stage 2 – Primary
Plant
US$M
|
Direct
|
|
|
|
Treatment
Plant
|
57.41
|
Infrastructure, Roads
and Port
|
31.86
|
Pit Dewatering
Bores
|
1.28
|
Management
Costs
|
12.67
|
Direct Works
Subtotal
|
103.22
|
Indirect
|
|
Project
Indirects
|
11.49
|
Owners
Costs
|
13.21
|
Land
Acquisition
|
4.60
|
Contingency
|
14.02
|
Value Added
Tax
|
14.83
|
Indirect
Subtotal
|
58.16
|
TOTAL PRIMARY
PLANT CAPITAL COSTS
|
161.37
|
OPERATING COSTS
Mabilo is Open Pit,
High Grade & Low Cost
The operating cost estimates were derived from first principles
for the 1Mtpa process plant and then plant costs were factored with
an accuracy of +/- 25% for the 1.35Mtpa operating scenario. All
costs are in 2015 US dollars.
The mining costs were derived from IMC's Mabilo Mine Operating Cost
Estimate Report, which were then reviewed by Orelogy Consulting.
The costs are based on a contract mining operation with bench rates
($/bcm), ore rehandle rates ($/t), grade control and dump
rehabilitation plus annual fixed mining overheads.
Process plant operating costs for the 1.0Mtpa FS base case were
compiled from information sourced by Lycopodium and the Mt Labo
Joint Venture ("MJV"):
- Manning levels and pay rates advised by MJV to suit the
proposed process plant unit operations and plant throughput.
- Consumable prices from supplier budget quotations and the
Lycopodium database.
- Flotation reagent consumption and metal / concentrate
recoveries based on laboratory test work results and the mining
schedule.
- Modelling by Orway Mineral Consultants for crushing and
grinding energy and consumables, based on ore characteristics
derived from relevant test work.
- First principle estimates, where required, based on typical
operating experience or standard industry practice.
- Benchmarking within the
Philippines and comparison with costs at other similar
operations.
Processing costs for the 1.35Mtpa upside case were then factored
from the FS base case.
The process plant availability has been nominated as 91.3% for
milling and downstream operations and 80% for the crushing plant
including scheduled and unscheduled maintenance. The product
filters will operate in a semi batch mode and a lower operating
availability of 75%.
G&A costs were based on current operations in the Philippines and amended to account for the
size of the operation and people employed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stage 1 -
DSO
|
|
Stage 2 – Primary
Plant
|
Average Operating
Costs
|
|
|
|
|
Mining US$/t mined
(includes pre-strip costs)
|
|
1.57
|
|
1.49
|
Mining US$/t ore
(excludes pre-strip costs)
|
|
7.49
|
|
14.09
|
Processing US$/t
ore
|
|
41.26
|
|
32.14
|
G&A US$/t
ore
|
|
6.89
|
|
7.65
|
Total Operating
Cost US$/t ore
|
|
61.91
|
|
53.89
|
MINING
Mining is planned to be conducted using open pit methods. The
ore is to be accessed in a series of stages. The stage designs were
generated in order to enhance the scheduling process aiming to
defer waste mining as much as practically possible and to bring
forward higher-grade ores. Five (5) meter high benches have been
used, given the scale of the operation and the equipment planned
for the mining operation. A bench height of 5m mined in two 2½m
flitches results in acceptable dilution and ore loss projections. A
mining contractor is assumed for both pre-production and the
ongoing development of the mine.
There are three distinct different loading and hauling
situations that require different fleets:
- Pioneering and Pit Development - Pioneering and pit
development will be undertaken by 100t excavators (Komatsu PC 1250)
and 40t articulated 6WD trucks (Caterpillar 745).
- Ore and Waste Mining - The main fleet for the ore and
waste mining activities consists of 100t excavators and 55t rigid
haul trucks (Caterpillar 773).
- Bulk Waste Mining - A 200t excavator (Komatsu PC 2000)
and a fleet of 90t haul trucks (Caterpillar 777) will be used to
undertake waste stripping of the last two cutbacks.
Free digging is expected in all oxide materials while fresh rock
materials are broken and loosened with drilling and blasting.
METALLURGY AND PROCESSING
The proposed process plant design for the Mabilo Project is
based on a robust metallurgical flowsheet designed for optimum
recovery with minimum operating costs, based on an initial 1Mtpa
throughput, and then upgraded and optimized for a planned 1.35Mtpa
throughput. The flowsheet is constructed from unit operations
that are well proven in industry.
The treatment plant design incorporates the following unit
process operations:
- Single stage open circuit primary crushing to produce a crushed
product size of 80% passing (P80) 120 mm.
- A crushed ore surge bin with a nominal capacity of 120t.
Surge bin overflow will be conveyed to a dead stockpile of 20,000
tonnes. Ore from the dead stockpile will be reclaimed by
front-end loader ("FEL") to feed the mill during periods when the
crushing circuit is off-line.
- Grinding of ore in a SAG mill circuit in closed circuit with
hydrocyclones to produce a P80 grind size of 90 µm.
- Bulk sulphide flotation to recover copper sulphides and gold
bearing pyrite.
- Two-stage cleaner flotation to recover copper sulphides into a
copper concentrate and pyrite into a product for sale.
- Concentrate thickening and pressure filtration to produce a
copper concentrate filter cake.
- Pyrite thickening and pressure filtration to produce a pyrite
concentrate filter cake.
- Magnetic separation of the bulk sulphide tails to recover
magnetite into concentrate.
- Concentrate thickening and pressure filtration to produce a
magnetite concentrate filter cake.
- Combined tailings pumping to the tailings storage facility
("TSF").
A planned flowsheet for the process is shown above.
Ultimately, the ability to develop and progress the plans as
considered in the FS are dependent upon many factors including the
ability to secure the necessary permits, working successfully with
local communities and governments, securing all necessary surface
rights and the support of the Philippine regulatory bodies and our
partners.
MARKETING AGREEMENT & DEBT FINANCING
Underway with Positive Progress to Date
Mt. Labo has appointed Conrad Partners, based in Hong Kong, as its agent for the marketing of
offtake for both Stage 1, the planned DSO and Stage 2, namely the
production of three high grade concentrate products. Conrad
Partners has completed a full marketing report for the FS, based on
discussions with potential offtake parties and has provided the
underlying assumptions used in the compilation of the Life of Mine
Financial Model based on the FS results.
RTG is in discussions with a number of potential debt financiers
for the Project including both traditional bank debt, derivative
instruments and notes and offtake linked facilities. The feedback
and progress on the financing has been very positive to date and
with the completion of the Feasibility Study, the Company will be
able to further advance those discussions with a view to finalizing
a mandate with a preferred provider.
ABOUT RTG MINING INC
RTG Mining Inc. is a mining and exploration company listed on
the main board of the Toronto Stock Exchange and Australian
Securities Exchange Limited. RTG is focused on developing the
high-grade copper/gold/magnetite Mabilo Project and advancing
exploration on the highly prospective Bunawan Project, both in
the Philippines, while also
identifying major new projects which will allow the Company to move
quickly and safely to production.
RTG has an experienced management team (previously responsible
for the development of the Masbate Gold Mine in the Philippines through CGA Mining Limited),
and has B2Gold as one of its major shareholders in the Company.
B2Gold is a member of both the S&P/TSX Global Gold and Global
Mining Indices.
CAUTIONARY NOTE REGARDING FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENTS
This announcement includes certain "forward-looking statements"
within the meaning of Canadian securities legislation. Statement
regarding interpretation of exploration results, plans for further
exploration and accuracy of mineral resource and mineral reserve
estimates and related assumptions and inherent operating risks, are
forward-looking statements. Forward-looking statements involve
various risks and uncertainties and are based on certain factors
and assumptions. There can be no assurance that such statements
will prove to be accurate, and actual results and future events
could differ materially from those anticipated in such statements.
Important factors that could cause actual results to differ
materially from RTG's expectations include uncertainties related to
fluctuations in gold and other commodity prices and currency
exchange rates; uncertainties relating to interpretation of drill
results and the geology, continuity and grade of mineral deposits;
uncertainty of estimates of capital and operating costs, recovery
rates, production estimates and estimated economic return; the need
for cooperation of government agencies in the development of RTG's
mineral projects; the need to obtain additional financing to
develop RTG's mineral projects; the possibility of delay in
development programs or in construction projects and uncertainty of
meeting anticipated program milestones for RTG's mineral projects
and other risks and uncertainties disclosed under the heading "Risk
Factors" in RTG's Annual Information Form for the year ended
31 December 2014 filed with the
Canadian securities regulatory authorities on the SEDAR website at
sedar.com.
QUALIFIED PERSON AND COMPETENT PERSON STATEMENT
The information in this release that relates to exploration
results at the Mabilo Project is based upon information prepared by
or under the supervision of Robert Ayres
BSc (Hons), who is a Qualified Person and a Competent
Person. Mr Ayres is a member of the Australian Institute of
Geoscientists and a full-time employee of Mt Labo Exploration and
Development Company, a Philippine mining company, an associate
company of RTG Mining Limited. Mr Ayres has sufficient experience
that is relevant to the style of mineralisation and type of deposit
under consideration and to the activity being undertaken, to
qualify as a Competent Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the
"Australasian Code for Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral
Resources and Ore Reserves" and to qualify as a "Qualified Person"
under National Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for
Mineral Projects ("NI 43-101"). Mr. Ayres has verified the data
disclosed in this release, including sampling, analytical and test
data underlying the information contained in the release. Mr. Ayres
consents to the inclusion in the release of the matters based on
his information in the form and the context in which it
appears.
The information in this release that relates to Mineral
Resources is based on information prepared by or under the
supervision of Mr Aaron Green, who
is a Qualified Person and Competent Person. Mr Green is a Member of
the Australian Institute of Geoscientists and is employed by CSA
Global Pty Ltd, an independent consulting company. Mr Green has
sufficient experience that is relevant to the style of
mineralisation and type of deposit under consideration and to the
activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person
as defined in the 2012 Edition of the "Australasian Code for
Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore
Reserves" and to qualify as a "Qualified Person" under National
Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects
("NI 43-101"). Mr. Green has verified the data disclosed in this
release, including sampling, analytical and test data underlying
the information contained in the release. Mr Green consents to the
inclusion in the release of the matters based on his information in
the form and context in which it appears.
The information in this release that relates to Mineral Reserves
and Mining is based on information prepared by or under the
supervision of Mr Carel Moormann,
who is a Qualified Person and Competent Person. Mr Moormann is a
Fellow of the AusIMM and is employed by Orelogy, an independent
consulting company. Mr Moormann has sufficient experience that is
relevant to the type of deposit under consideration and to
the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent
Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the "Australasian Code for
Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore
Reserves" and to qualify as a "Qualified Person" under National
Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects
("NI 43-101"). Mr Moormann has verified the data disclosed in this
release, including sampling, analytical and test data underlying
the information contained in the release. Mr Moormann consents to
the inclusion in the release of the matters based on his
information in the form and context in which it appears.
The information in this release that relates to Metallurgy and
Processing is based on information prepared by or under the
supervision of David Gordon, who is
a Qualified Person and Competent Person. David Gordon is a Member of the Australasian
Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and is employed by Lycopodium
Minerals Pty Ltd, an independent consulting company. David Gordon has sufficient experience that is
relevant to the type of process under consideration and to
the activity which he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent
Person as defined in the 2012 Edition of the "Australasian Code for
Reporting of Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore
Reserves" and to qualify as a "Qualified Person" under National
Instrument 43-101 – Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects
("NI 43-101"). David Gordon has
verified the data disclosed in this release, including sampling,
analytical and test data underlying the information contained in
the release. David Gordon consents
to the inclusion in the release of the matters based on his
information in the form and context in which it appears.
The information in this release that relates to areas outside of
exploration results, Mineral Resources, Mineral Reserves and
Metallurgy and Processing is based on information prepared by or
under the supervision of Mark
Turner, who is a Qualified Person and Competent Person.
Mark Turner is a Fellow of the
Australasian Institute of Mining and Metallurgy and is employed by
RTG Mining Inc, the Company. Mark
Turner has sufficient experience that is relevant to
the information under consideration and to the activity which
he is undertaking to qualify as a Competent Person as defined in
the 2012 Edition of the "Australasian Code for Reporting of
Exploration Results, Mineral Resources and Ore Reserves" and to
qualify as a "Qualified Person" under National Instrument 43-101 –
Standards of Disclosure for Mineral Projects ("NI 43-101").
Mark Turner has verified the data
disclosed in this release. Mark
Turner consents to the inclusion in the release of the
matters based on his information in the form and context in which
it appears.
For the ASX announcement including JORC tables Section 1 to 4
please refer to the RTG Mining website (www.rtgmining.com) and on
the ASX, under announcements (www.asx.com.au).
SOURCE RTG Mining Inc.