TIDMCASP
RNS Number : 3981D
Caspian Sunrise plc
29 June 2021
Caspian Sunrise PLC
("Caspian Sunrise" or the "Company")
Annual Report and Financial Statements for the Year Ended 31
December 2020
Caspian Sunrise, the Central Asian oil and gas company with a
focus on Kazakhstan, is pleased to announce its audited final
results for the year ended 31 December 2020.
Highlights for the year:
Operational:
-- Aggregate production for 2020 was 545,667 barrels (2019:
506,620) an increase of approximately 7.7%
-- Reserves at 31 December 2020 P1 15.6 mmbls & P2 26.8
mmbls (2019: P1 16.1 mmbls & P2 27.3 mmbls)
Financial:
-- Revenue: up 18% at $14.3 million (2019: $12.1 million)
-- Loss after tax for the year $3.5 million (2019: $1.4 million)
-- Cash at bank: $0.3 million (2019: $4.1 million)
-- Total assets: $125.7 million (2019: $127.5 million)
-- Exploration assets $61.4 million (2019: $60.0 million)
-- Plant, property & equipment $52.8 million (2019: $51.3 million)
The Report and Accounts and Notice of Annual General Meeting
will shortly be posted to shareholders and
available from the Company's website at https://www.caspiansunrise.com/investors/reports
Caspian Sunrise PLC
Clive Carver +7 727 375 0202
Executive Chairman
WH Ireland, Nominated Advisor
& Broker
James Joyce +44 (0) 207 220 1666
James Sinclair-Ford
This announcement has been posted to:
www.caspiansunrise.com/investors
The information contained within this announcement is deemed by
the Company to constitute inside information under the Market Abuse
Regulation (EU) No. 596/2014.
CHAIRMAN'S STATEMENT
Introduction
Without doubt 2020 was our toughest year to date. Actions taken
at the onset of Covid-19 together with the recovery in
international oil prices ensured the Group's survival, however,
progress on our medium / longer term objectives was limited during
the year under review.
Now, with a much improved international oil price and a recently
doubled domestic price together with positive recent news at 3A
Best and the Caspian Explorer, we are on a path to recovery.
The impact of Covid-19
We were fortunate that when Covid-19 struck we had sufficient
production from the shallow MJF structure at our flagship BNG asset
from which to fund the Group's day-to - day operations.
Nevertheless we were forced to take some difficult decisions.
Cost cutting
It was clear to the Board that Covid-19 would severely affect
the Group both financially and operationally. The sharp fall in
international and domestic prices began in Q1 2020 followed by
disruption to operations, most notably crew changeovers and the
supply of almost everything required to make an oilfield work meant
we had to make changes.
In March 2020, principally in light of restrictions in crew
changeovers, we announced that the suspension of all new drilling
activities and that we would focus only on the completion of work
likely to generate early revenue. In early May 2020, as part of
wider measures we announced that following earlier reductions the
costs of the Board had been further reduced to 25% of previous
levels and these reductions remain in place. In addition we
announced cuts to the workforce in the field and in the corporate
offices in Almaty. We also announced that we had secured additional
financial support from local oil traders.
GBP1 million equity placing
Our policy where possible is to avoid dilutive equity placings
to fund day-to - day operations. However, the Covid-19 induced
squeeze on an already tight working capital position meant we were
obliged to raise GBP1 million before expenses by issuing 36,363,629
new shares at a price of 2.75p per share. The funds raised were
used to pay existing liabilities.
Oil prices
International prices have recovered from a low of approximately
$16 per barrel to approximately $75 per barrel and this additional
revenue has been instrumental in the Group's survival. However, the
domestic price at which we are obliged to sell 40-45% of oil
produced fell from approximately $19 per barrel before Covid-19 to
approximately $6 per barrel during the period under review, which
resulted in a loss on each barrel sold to the domestic market.
After the period end the domestic price doubled to approximately
$12 per barrel and has recently increased further to approximately
$18 per barrel.
Our oil & gas assets
BNG Contract Area
The Group's principal asset is its 99% interest in the BNG
Contract Area. We first took a stake in the BNG Contract Area in
2008, as part of the acquisition of 58.41% of portfolio of assets
owned by Eragon Petroleum Limited.
In 2017, we increased our stake to 99% upon the completion of
the merger with Baverstock GmbH. Since 2008, approximately $100
million has been spent at BNG.
The BNG Contract Area is located in the west of Kazakhstan 40
kilometers southeast of Tengiz on the edge of the Mangistau Oblast,
covering an area of 1,561 square kilometers of which 1,376 square
kilometers has 3D seismic coverage acquired in 2009 and 2010. We
became operators at BNG in 2011, since when we have identified and
developed both shallow and deep structures.
Shallow structures
There are two confirmed and producing shallow structures at BNG
with the possibility of a third.
MJF structure
In 2013, we announced the discovery of the MJF structure and
have subsequently drilled 8 wells of which 6 are currently
producing with an aggregate capacity of approximately 1,300
bopd.
The productive Jurassic aged reservoir consists of stacked pay
intervals with most ranging in thickness from two meters to 17
meters. The current mapped lateral extent of the MJF field is now
approximately 13km2.
The producing wells range in depth from 2,192 meters to 2,450
meters.
In December 2018, we applied to move the MJF structure, which
was part of the overall BNG licence, from an appraisal licence to a
full production licence, under which the majority of the oil
produced from the MJF wells may be sold by reference to world
rather than domestic Kazakh prices. The full production licence
became effective in July 2019, with the first revenues based on
international prices received in August 2019.
Following the award of the MJF export licence the Kazakh
regulatory authorities assessed historic costs of $32 million
against the MJF structure, repayable quarterly over a 10 year
period. As previously announced we believe such an assessment to be
mistaken as despite the MJF structure representing only 1% of the
surface area of the BNG Contract Area it has been assessed to bear
100% of the BNG historic costs. However, the Kazakh courts have
recently denied our appeal and we have no further appeal options
open to us.
Well 154 has a Planned Depth of 2,480 meters and will be the
first horizontal well drilled on the BNG Contract Area. The well is
targeting a Middle Jurassic reservoir.
South Yelemes
This structure remains the subject of a slow moving licence
upgrade application for a separate 25 year production licence.
Until the application is approved we are unable produce from the
four existing wells on the structure.
The first wells were drilled on the South Yelemes structure
during the Soviet era. Well 54 was intermittently active between
periods of being shut in to allow pressure to be restored. There
are three other wells at South Yelemes (805, 806 & 807). The
production capacity from the existing wells at South Yelemes was in
aggregate approximately 300 bopd.
Until recently these older wells were the only wells on the BNG
Contract Area to use artificial lift to assist the oil to flow to
the surface. We believe the structure may have untapped quantities
of oil at higher levels than previously explored making it
potentially suitable for a horizontal drilling campaign once the
improved licence is awarded.
Deep structures
We have identified two deep structures at the BNG Contract Area.
The first is the Airshagyl structure, which extends to 58 km2. The
second is the Yelemes Deep structure which extends over an area of
36 km2.
Sub-surface conditions at the two discovered deep structures at
BNG present significant technical challenges in drilling and
completing the wells. These are the extremely high temperature and
extreme over pressure that exist below the salt layer. At the
Airshagyl structure the salt layer is typically found at depths
between 3,700 and 4,000 meters where at the Yelemes Deep structure
the salt layer is typically found at depths between 3,000 and 3,500
meters.
The extreme pressure below the salt layer requires the use of
high density drilling fluid to maintain control of the well during
drilling. The high density drilling fluid's principal role is to
help prevent dangerous blow-outs. The attributes of the high
density barite weighted drilling fluid, which allow the wells to be
controlled during the drilling phase, act against us when we
attempt to clear the well for production.
To the extent that drilling fluids, which include solid
particles added to increase density, are not fully recovered they
can form a barrier between the wellbore and the reservoir impeding
the flow of hydrocarbons into the well.
Competent third party experience has been difficult to find, as
the exceptional temperature and pressure are unusual for many
international consultancies more used to conventional shallower
exploration. We have however, developed our drilling techniques and
now use drilling fluids with lower density, which we have found
easier to remove once drilling has been completed.
3A Best
In January 2019, we acquired 100% of the 3A Best Group JSC, a
Kazakh corporation owning an existing Contract Area of some 1,347
sq. km located near the Caspian port city of Aktau, for a final
consideration of $11.8 million payable by the issue of 149,253,732
Caspian Sunrise shares issued at a price of 6.15p per share.
The Contract Area, which has been designated by the Kazakh
authorities as a strategic national asset, surrounds and goes below
the established shallow field at Dunga, currently owned by Total,
which we believe to be producing at the rate of approximately
15,000 bopd.
In June 2021, we announced a farm out of 15% of the 3A Best
Contract Area in return for our new partners assuming
responsibility for the current 3A Best work programme commitments,
the farm out is conditional on the deferral of obligations under
the licence and the extension of the license to be granted. We also
granted our new partners an option to acquire the remaining 85%,
exercisable after completion of the current work programme
commitments, at a price to be determined by an independent
expert.
Caspian Explorer
In January 2020, we announced the proposed acquisition of the
Caspian Explorer for a headline consideration of $25 million to be
satisfied by the issue of 160,256,410 shares at an issue price of
12p per share.
In parts of the northern Caspian Sea, where we believe there are
attractive oil producing prospects, the water levels are extremely
shallow and the prospects cannot be explored with traditional deep
water rigs. The principal ways of exploring these properties are
either from a land base or by the use of a specialist shallow
drilling vessel such as the Caspian Explorer, which we believe to
be the only one of its class operational in the Caspian Sea.
Land based options typically involve either the creation of
man-made islands from which to drill as if onshore or less commonly
drilling out from an onshore location. Both are expensive compared
to the use of a specialist drilling platform such as the Caspian
Explorer.
The acquisition completed in October 2020, by when the fall in
the Company's share price reduced the headline price paid to $3.7
million. The acquisition of the Caspian Explorer marks the Group's
first step into off-shore exploration, which is typically more
expensive and complicated than on-shore exploration but if
successful can provide greater returns.
We were pleased in June 2021, to announce the first charter for
the Caspian Explorer being a part of the Group. The charter is with
the North Caspian Operating Company ("NCOC") the principal operator
in the region, comprising the Republic of Kazakhstan working
through KazMunaiGas (KMG), and international oil companies
including Shell, ExxonMobil, Eni, Total and CNPC, the consortium
operating the Kashagan field. The charter, which will be undertaken
in Q3 2021, is safety related rather than new drilling. We look
forward to further charters as development of the northern Caspian
Sea progresses.
Licences & Work Programmes
BNG
BNG LLP Ltd holds two contracts for a subsoil use. The first is
the exploration contract, covering the full extent of the BNG
Contract Area (except the MJF structure), originally issued in 2007
and successively extended until 2024.
The second is the export contract covering just the MJF
structure which runs to 2043 and under which the majority of oil
produced may be sold by reference to international rather than
domestic prices.
During 2020, certain work programme obligations at the BNG
Contract Area were deferred from 2020 to 2021. While we are yet to
fully comply with both the BNG work programme commitments and
payment of the social obligations, given the issues imposed by
Covid-19, the Board are not unduly concerned about any impact on
the BNG licence given the penalties can be applied until the
commitments are fulfilled and the absence of a significant
non-compliance.
The Company is in discussions with third parties to work
together to drill A9, a further deep well which forms part of the
current BNG work commitment.
3A Best
Similarly at 3A Best we are not in compliance with existing work
programme commitments, largely as we have been waiting for a
revised work programme, which is agreed in principle but yet to be
formally confirmed. The Group has applied for a deferral of the
amounts due and work program commitments during 2020. On the date
of this report the Group is still negotiating with the Ministry and
local officials. The recent farm-out transaction has been
structured such that our new partners will fund drilling the well
forming the bulk of the existing work programme, following which we
would be in compliance.
Accordingly, the Board does not believe the level of compliance
with the previous work programme is a threat to the licence.
Reserves
BNG
In 2011 Gaffney Cline & Associates ("GCA") undertook a
technical audit of the BNG license area and subsequently Petroleum
Geology Services ("PGS") to undertake depth migration work, based
on the 3D seismic work carried out in 2009 and 2010.
The work of GCA resulted in confirming total unrisked resources
of 900 million barrels from 37 prospects and leads mapped from the
3D seismic work undertaken in 2009 and 2010. The report of GCA also
confirmed risked resources of 202 million barrels as well as
Most-Likely Contingent Resources of 13 million barrels on South
Yelemes.
In September 2016 GCA assessed the reserves attributable to the
BNG shallow structures (MJF & South Yelemes). Between then and
the end of 2020, approximately 2.5 mmbls of oil were produced,
which under financial reporting rules are deducted from the
assessment of reserves as at 31 December 2020.
As at 31 December As at 31 December
2020 2019
mmbls mmbls
------------------ ------------------
BNG
------------------ ------------------
Shallow P1 15.6 16.1
------------------ ------------------
Shallow P2 26.8 27.3
------------------ ------------------
Deep P1 Nil Nil
------------------ ------------------
Deep P2 Nil Nil
------------------ ------------------
Operational review
Introduction
The impact of Covid-19 meant we did not drill any new wells in
the period under review. All operational activities were targeted
at improving production at producing wells and in getting wells
previously drilled to flow.
MJF structure
Approximately 96% of all the oil produced in 2020 was from the
MJF structure.
The first wells were drilled on the MJF structure in 2016, since
when it has produced in aggregate approximately 2.1 million
barrels. As the original wells drilled continue to age additional
work is required to keep them operational.
During the period under review we produced 545,667 barrels of
oil at an average of 1,491 bopd (2019: 506,620 barrels at an
average of 1,388 bopd). Subsequently, Well 154 was spudded in April
2021 with a Planned Measured Depth of 2,480 meters. Drilling is
nearing completion with much of the casing laid. This is the first
horizontal well on the BNG Contract Area.
South Yelemes structure
Test production commenced in 1994 on the South Yelemes
structure. Since 2010 it has produced approximately 405,000
barrels. No production has been allowed at this structure since May
2020 when we submitted our application to upgrade the structure to
a 25 year production licence under which a majority of the oil
produced could be sold by reference to international rather than
domestic prices.
Typically such an application would take 6 months. We therefore
believe it to be an indirect casualty of the impact of Covid-19.
Our expectation is for a Q3 2021 approval.
Airshagyl structure
Three deep wells have been drilled to date on the Airshagyl
structure, A5, A6 & A8.
A5
Well A5 was spudded in July 2013, and drilled to a total depth
of 4,442 meters with casing set to a depth of 4,077 meters to allow
open-hole testing. Core sampling revealed the existence of a gross
oil-bearing interval of at least 105 meters from 4,332 meters to at
least 4,437 meters.
We have struggled during the period under review and
subsequently with stuck pipes in this well. Remedial work
undertaken in the period under review and subsequently to remove
the obstructions in the well has not proved successful. At various
times work paused to allow equipment and crews to be used on other
wells. Our intention is now to drill a new side-track from a depth
of 4,500 meters.
Other deep wells
A local contractor has been hired for hydraulic fracking at Deep
Wells A6, A8 & 801, which if successful could lead to H2
production. Commencement of the work has been delayed pending final
agreement of the chemical composition of the materials to be used
given the extreme temperatures in the wells.
A6
The second well drilled on the Airshagyl structure was Deep Well
A6, which was spudded in 2015 and drilled to a depth of 4,528
meters. Initially problems in perforating the well prevented it
being put on test. Latterly the issue has been blockages from
unrecovered drilling fluid. During the period under review we
conducted several acid treatments to clear the well ready for
commercial production but these were not successful.
A8
In November 2018, Deep Well A8 was spudded with a planned Total
Depth of 5,300 meters, initially targeting the same pre-salt
carbonates that were successfully identified in the Deep Well A5 at
depths of 4,342 meters but with a prime target being the deeper
carbonate of the Devonian to Mississippian ages towards the planned
Total Depth of 5,300 meters.
We identified intervals of interest at depths of 4,342 meters.
We then had to decide whether to seek to produce from the intervals
identified or whether to continue to the original Total Depth of
5,300 meters.
Using pipes and crews previously in use at Deep Well A5 further
we tried to clear the well to allow production from the interval
between 4,343 meters and 4,499 meters. While this resulted in
limited gas and oil shows they were not at commercial levels.
Our intention is to fracture and complete the well at the
current 4,500 meter depth. In the event this does not result in
commercial quantities of oil we plan to drill a further 800 meters
to the original Devonian target at a depth of 5,300 meters.
New wells
We are looking at ways of partnering with others to drill a
fourth deep well, A9, to comply with the existing 2021 work
programme commitments.
Yelemes Deep structure
The only well drilled to date on the Yelemes Deep Structure is
Deep well 801 which was drilled in 2014 / 2015 to a depth of 5,050
meters.
No significant development work was conducted on the Yelemes
Deep Structure in the period under review or subsequently. As noted
above the next event will be the fracking exercise.
3A Best
No work was undertaken in the period under review or
subsequently, in part as we were waiting on the Kazakh authorities
to agree to a revised licence and work programme schedule. Our new
partners have taken responsibility for compliance with existing
work programme commitments, which include drilling a well to a
depth of 2,500 metres, which we expect to cost approximately $2.5
million and would bring us into compliance with the existing work
programme commitments.
Caspian Explorer
We became owner of the Caspian Explorer in October 2020. In the
period under review and subsequently the Caspian Explorer has been
inactive and is moored at its home port of Aktau.
In addition to the safety related charter announced in June
2021, we have held discussions with potential hirers, which could
lead to contracts in 2022 and beyond, However, there are no other
contracts yet in place.
Financial review
Review of the results for the 12 months to 31 December 2020
Revenue
Revenue in 2020 increased by approximately 18 per cent to $14.3
million (2019: $12.1 million)
Oil prices
Export prices fell from the mid $60's per barrel to a low of $16
per barrel before recovering steadily to the mid / high $60's per
barrel per barrel. Domestic prices fell from approximately $19 per
barrel at the start of the period to approximately $6 per barrel as
the full impact of Covid-19 bit and have yet to recover.
Production volumes
Production volumes in 2020 were some 7.7% higher at 545,667
barrels at an average of 1,491 bopd compared to 506,620 barrels in
2019 at an average of 1,388 bopd. This increase is despite the
missing contribution from the South Yelemes field.
International vs Domestic sales
The proportion of oil sold on the international market in 2020
was materially greater than in 2019, as the export licence only
became effective in August 2019.
Net effect
The combination of greater production volumes, lower prices and
a greater portion of sales being to the export market resulted in
an 18 per cent increase in revenues for 2020.
Gross profit
The method of accounting for production sold under an
exploration phase of an appraisal licence differs from the sale of
oil under a full production licence in which commercial production
is considered to have been reached.
Under an appraisal licence revenues are treated as a
contribution to the costs associated with the main objective, which
is to ascertain the productive capabilities of the producing wells
concerned. Therefore, whilst revenue is recorded and equivalent
amount is included as a cost of sale resulting in a zero gross
profit.
Under a production licence only the actual costs of production
are recorded as costs of sales so that any excess of receipts over
direct costs is shown as gross profit.
Gross profit increased by approximately 84 per cent to $9.4
million (2019: $5.1 million), principally as the result of a
greater proportion of sales being for the export market.
Selling expenses
Selling expenses were $3.9 million (2019: $2.2 million) and
relate to export and customs duties.
Other administrative expenses
Other administrative expenses declined by 6 per cent to $3.7
million (2019: $3.9 million).
Loss for the year
The loss for the year before tax was $ 1.7 million of which
approximately $2.6 million related to impairment provisions (2019:
profit of $0.9 million).
Tax charge
The tax charge for 2020 fell by approximately 25 per cent to
$1.8 million (2019: $2.3 million).
Oil and gas assets
Unproven oil & gas assets
The carrying value of unproven oil and gas assets increased to
$61.4 million (2019: $60.0 million).
Plant, property and equipment
The value of plant property and equipment increased to
approximately $52.8 million (20191: $51.3 million), reflecting the
acquisition in the year of the Caspian Explorer.
Other receivables
Other receivables fell from $11.4 million to $10.4 million as
the result of a $1 million fall in prepayments resulting from the
diminished drilling activities, an increase of $0.5 million in
recoverable VAT and a decrease of $0.5 million in other
receivables.
Cash position
At the year-end we had cash balances of approximately $0.3
million (2019: $4.1 million). This reflects the extremely tight
working capital position following the impact of Covid-19.
Liabilities
Trade and other payables under 12 months
Trade and other payables fell to approximately $11.0 million
(2019: 14.8 million), short term borrowings increased to $5.6
million (2019: $4.1 million) and the provisions for payments in
less than 12 months stayed broadly similar at approximately $9.3
million (2019: $9.5 million) of which the provision for BNG licence
payments was $3.2 million in both years.
Historic costs estimate
Following the award of the MJF export licence the Kazakh
regulatory authorities assessed historic costs of $32 million
against the MJF structure, repayable quarterly over a 10 year
period. This is in addition to the extremely, low domestic price
for oil is too great a financial burden for the MJF structure to
bear and produce significant additional cash for further
drilling.
As previously announced we believe such an assessment to be
mistaken as despite the MJF structure representing only 1% of the
surface area of the BNG Contract Area it has been assessed to bear
100% of the BNG historic costs. However, the Kazakh courts have
recently denied our appeal and we have no further appeal options
open to us. We will therefore continue to make the quarterly
payments of approximately $800,000. The aggregate liability,
discounted over the period to 2029 fell from $27.4 million at 31
December 2019 to $25.1 million at 31 December 2020 as the results
of payments made in the period under review.
Production from other structures on the BNG Contract Area should
be without further assessed historic costs as these have been fully
allocated against the MJF structure.
Cashflows
During the period under review approximately $10.8 million was
received from customers and approximately $12.5 million paid out to
suppliers, creditors and staff with a further $1.5 million spent on
unproven oil and gas assets and $3.0 million spent on property,
plant and equipment. This was in part funded by $2.5 million raised
via the issue of equity and additional loans and resulted in cash
balances at the year falling by $3.7 million to $0.3 million.
Oraziman family loans
During the period under review the support from the Oraziman
family in the form of subordinated loans increased from $4.1
million to $5.6 million.
Funding Policy
Our approach to funding the business since our IPO in 2007 is
where possible to minimise the issuance of equity and therefore to
use other forms of funding to develop our assets. In this way we
seek to preserve the upside for existing shareholders, even if this
is at the expense of higher costs in the short term.
However, the full impact of the Covid-19 virus hit the Group at
a time when our finances were already stretched following the move
of the MJF structure to a full production licence, with the
associated working capital hit. Accordingly we were forced to raise
GBP1 million to meet existing liabilities not capable of being
funded from the reduced operational cashflow.
Going concern
The financial outlook has improved when compared to the position
12 months ago but not yet to the point where the material
uncertainty in respect of going concern highlighted in the 2019
Financial Statements and the 2020 interim statements has fully
receded.
At 31 December 2020, the Group had cash of $0.3 million and net
current liabilities of $19.0 million. The imbalance reflects the
financial impact of Covid-19 and market volatility in respect of
commodity prices. As at 1 June 2021 the Group had cash of
approximately $0.7 million.
On the brighter side the dramatic decline in international
prices, which fell as low as $16 per barrel has been reversed with
the Brent price recently exceeding $75 per barrel. As is the case
with domestic prices which have recently tripled.
The Caspian Explorer has its first charter as part of the Group
and the current work programme costs at 3A Best are to be funded by
our new partners subject to the license extension.
On the negative side we have yet to see any meaningful
production from any of the deep wells and the BNG historic costs on
the MJF structure, which were assessed and now confirmed at $32
million payable quarterly over a ten year period will continue to
consume a large proportion of the cash generated from international
sales at the MJF structure.
The Board have assessed cash flow forecasts prepared for a
period of at least 12 months from the of approval of the financial
statements and assessed the risks and uncertainties associated with
the operations and funding position, including the potential
further effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Inevitably, there is an international price below which the
Group would need to take further action to conserve costs or raise
additional funding. The Board considers that price to be around the
$54 per barrel level.
The Group's liquidity remains dependent on a number of key
factors:
-- The Group continues to forward sell its domestic production
and receive advances from oil traders with $2.5m currently advanced
and the continued availability of such arrangements is important to
working capital. Whilst the Board anticipate such facilities
remaining available given its trader relationships and recent oil
price increases, should they be withdrawn or reduced more quickly
than forecast cash flows allow then additional funding would be
required.
-- The Group has approximately $0.2m of aged creditors which are
being settled over the coming months from operating cash flows.
Whilst relations are positive with the suppliers, if their support
is withdrawn additional funding may be required.
-- The Group has $5.6m of loans due on demand or within the
forecast period to its largest shareholder and their connected
companies. Whilst the Board has received assurances that the
facilities will not be called for payment unless sufficient
liquidity exists, there are no binding agreements currently in
place to this effect and if repayment was required additional
funding would be needed.
-- The Group has $6.0m of liabilities due on demand under social
development program and $3.2 of BNG licence payments due within the
forecast period to the Kazakh government. Whilst the Board has
forecasted the payment of BNG licence payments, there are no
payments planned for social development program within the forecast
period as the Board expects additional payment deferrals to be
approved.
-- The Group is looking to partner with others to drill further
deep wells thereby reducing the costs.
-- As noted above, the forecasts remain sensitive to oil prices,
which have shown significant volatility. Independent of the factors
above, if international oil prices fell below $54/bbl additional
actions would be required including some or all of the following:
further cost reductions, additional payment deferrals and raising
funds.
These circumstances continue to indicate the existence of a
material uncertainty which may cast significant doubt about the
Group's ability to continue as a going concern and therefore may be
unable to realise its assets and discharge its liabilities in the
normal course of business. The financial statements do not include
the adjustments that would result if the Group was unable to
continue as a going concern.
Notwithstanding the material uncertainty described above, after
making enquiries and assessing the progress against the forecast,
projections and the status of the mitigating actions referred to
above, the Directors have a reasonable expectation that the Group
will continue in operation and meet its commitments as they fall
due over the going concern period. Accordingly, the Directors
continue to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the
financial statements.
Board changes
In August 2020, Aibek Oraziman joined the board as a
non-executive director.
By Q4 2020, it became clear that the temporary cost saving
measures announced earlier in the year would need to be extended.
Accordingly, Tim Field who had been a non-executive director since
January 2019, left the board and I ceased to be Executive Chairman
and Chief Financial Officer and became a non-executive
director.
Talgat Kuzbakov, who has been with the Group for 10 years was
appointed Chief Financial Officer but not a board member.
In December 2020, we also announced that Seokwoo Shin our Chief
Operating Officer who has been with the Group for three years and
had previously spent more than 30 years with the Korea National Oil
Corporation would join the Board.
The board now comprises two executive directors and three
non-executive directors. The composition of the various board
committees has been updated to reflect these changes as is set out
more fully in the Corporate Governance Report.
Employees
The Group currently employees 201 staff, including Directors, of
whom 200 are based in Kazakhstan and split principally between the
corporate offices in Almaty and in the field.
Outlook
To benefit from the expected upturn in economic activity we
first needed to survive. In the absence of further unexpected
shocks we believe the actions taken to deal with the impact of
Covid-19 has secured that survival.
The dramatic recovery in international and domestic oil prices
provides a significant boost to operating cashflows. A much greater
positive impact would be for one or more of our deep wells to start
to flow at commercial rates, which remains our principal
objective.
Clive Carver
Chairman
28 June 2021
Qualified Person & Glossary
Qualified Person
Mr. Assylbek Umbetov, a member Association of Petroleum
Engineers, has reviewed and approved the technical disclosures in
these financial statements.
Glossary
SPE - the Society of Petroleum Engineers
Bopd - barrels of oil per day mmbls - million barrels.
Proven reserves
Proven reserves (P1) are those quantities of petroleum which, by
analysis of geosciences and engineering data, can be estimated with
reasonable certainty to be commercially recoverable, from a given
date forward, from known reservoirs and under defined economic
conditions, operating methods, and government regulations.
If deterministic methods are used, the term reasonable certainty
is intended to express a high degree of confidence that the
quantities will be recovered.
If probabilistic methods are used, there should be at least a
90% probability that the quantities actually recovered will equal
or exceed the estimate.
Probable reserves
Probable reserves are those additional reserves which analysis
of geosciences and engineering data indicate are less likely to be
recovered than proved reserves but more certain to be recovered
than possible reserves. It is equally likely that actual remaining
quantities recovered will be greater than or less than the sum of
the estimated proved plus probable reserves (2P).
In this context, when probabilistic methods are used, there
should be at least a 50% probability that the actual quantities
recovered will equal or exceed the 2P estimate.
Possible reserves
Possible reserves are those additional reserves which analysis
of geosciences and engineering data indicate are less likely to be
recovered than probable reserves.
The total quantities ultimately recovered from the project have
a low probability to exceed the sum of proved plus probable plus
possible (3P), which is equivalent to the high estimate scenario.
In this context, when probabilistic methods are used, there should
be at least a 10% probability that the actual quantities recovered
will equal or exceed the 3P estimate.
Contingent resources
Contingent resources are those quantities of petroleum
estimated, as of a given date, to be potentially recoverable from
known accumulations, but the applied project(s) are not yet
considered mature enough for commercial development due to one or
more contingencies.
Contingent resources may include, for example, projects for
which there are currently no viable markets, or where commercial
recovery is dependent on technology under development, or where
evaluation of the accumulation is insufficient to clearly assess
commerciality.
Contingent resources are further categorised in accordance with
the level of certainty associated with the estimates and may be
sub-classified based on project maturity and/or characterized by
their economic status.
Prospective resources
Prospective resources are those quantities of petroleum
estimated, as of a given date, to be potentially recoverable from
undiscovered accumulations.
Potential accumulations are evaluated according to their chance
of discovery and, assuming a discovery, the estimated quantities
that would be recoverable under defined development projects.
The Kazakh oil and gas licensing and taxation environment
Introduction
Oil & gas is a heavily regulated industry throughout the
world, with strict rules on licencing and taxation. Set out below
is a summary of the position in Kazakhstan.
Licensing
Exploration licences
The initial licence to develop a field is typically an
exploration licence where the focus is on completing agreed work
programmes. Exploration licence are typically two years in duration
and it is usual for there to be several consecutive two-year
exploration licence extensions agreed during the exploration
phase.
Appraisal licences
In the event the project appears commercial, the exploration
licence is usually upgraded to an appraisal licence.
Under an appraisal licence, oil produced incidentally while
exploring and assessing may be sold but only at domestic prices.
Taxation under an appraisal licence is limited with only modest
deductions. Changes to the legislation in the last few years has
reduced the length of appraisal licences from six to five years,
with a concession of reduced social obligation payments.
Full production licences
To sell oil by reference to world prices requires either the
Contract Area as a whole or a particular structure to be upgraded
to a full production licence. Under a full production licence there
is only limited scope to develop areas not already drilled.
Additionally, a significant minority portion of production
typically remains at domestic prices although the majority is sold
by reference to world prices.
Taxes
There are five different taxes that apply to Kazakh oil &
gas producers. Each has its own basis of calculation with some
being related to profits, others by reference to world oil prices
and yet others by reference to the volume of oil sold.
The overall impact is that as world prices increase so does the
percentage taken by the Kazakh state.
Strategic Report
The Directors present their strategic report on the Group for
the year ended 31 December 2020.
Introduction
This strategic report comprises: the Group's objectives; the
strategy; the business model; and a review of the Group's business
using key performance indicators. The Chairman's statement, which
also forms the main part of the strategic review, contains a review
of the development and performance of the Group's business during
the financial year, and the position of the Group's business at the
end of that year. Additionally, a summary of the principal risks
and uncertainties facing the business is set out immediately after
the Directors' report.
Objectives
The Group's objective is to create shareholder value from the
development of oil and gas projects and associated activities.
However, as set out in the Chairman's statement as the impact of
Covid-19 struck the Board's immediate focus switched to
survival.
The Group has a number of secondary objectives, including
promoting the highest level of health and safety standards,
developing our staff to their highest potential and being a good
corporate citizen in our chosen countries of operations.
Strategy
The Group's long-term strategy is to build an attractive
portfolio of oil and gas exploration and production assets
initially in Central Asia, and in particular Kazakhstan where the
board has the greatest experience. Additionally, the Group will
seek to exploit associated opportunities where the board believes
it can add significant value and contribute towards the success of
the Group as a whole.
The Group's principal asset is its 99 per cent interest in BNG.
Additionally, the Group owns a 100 per cent interest in the 3A Best
Contract Area, of which it has agreed to sell 15% to fund existing
3A Best work programme commitments and granted an option for the
sale of the remaining 85% at a valuation to be assessed by an
independent expert. During 2020 the Group also acquired a 100%
interest in the Caspian Explorer, a shallow water drilling vessel
designed for the Northern parts of the Caspian Sea.
Business model
The business model is straightforward. To take assets at any
stage of the development cycle and to improve them to the point
they contribute to the Group's profitability or that they may be
sold on at a profit to provide funding for additional
development.
Our main asset BNG has been developed over the past 13 years
with more than $100 million spent and is set to be a very
substantial asset for many years to come.
While we seek to grow our asset portfolio with appropriately
timed acquisitions we are also prepared and able to sell assets
when their value to others exceeds the value we can see. This was
the case in 2015, when, in poor market conditions, we sold our then
second asset Galaz for a headline price of $100 million, which
represented a profit of $15 million on our interest in the asset,
and which provided $33 million to re-invest into BNG.
Further growth by acquisition
When appropriate the Group will consider acquiring additional
assets or related businesses where the Board believes they would
increase shareholder value, including by providing funding or
infrastructure to develop the Group's other assets.
In Kazakhstan the Directors believe the Group is exceptionally
well placed through its local presence to identify and buy
undervalued oil and gas assets on an opportunistic basis.
Key performance indicators
The Non-Financial Key Performance Indicators are:
-- Operational (wells drilled at end of year) 2020: 17 (2019: 17)
-- Aggregate production for 2020 was 545,667 barrels (2019:
506,620) an increase of approximately 7.7%
-- Reserves at 31 December 2020 P1 15.6 mmbls & P2 26.8
mmbls (2019: P1 16.1 mmbls & P2 27.3 mmbls)
The Financial Key Performance Indicators are:
-- Revenue: up 18% at $14.3 million (2019: $12.1 million)
-- Loss after tax for the year $3.5 million (2019: $1.4 million)
-- Cash at bank: $0.3 million (2019: $4.1 million)
-- Total assets: $125.7 million (2019: $127.5 million)
-- Exploration assets $61.4 million (2019: $60.0 million)
-- Plant, property & equipment $52.8 million (2019: $51.3 million)
January - May 2021 production was at the average rate of 1,379
bopd, with a production capacity of 2,000 bopd from existing wells
including those at South Yelemes
Assets & Reserves
Details of the Group's assets and reserves are set out in the
Chairman's statement.
Financial
At current international prices and with current levels of
production the income from export sales is sufficient to cover day
to day Group operations and G&A costs but insufficient to fund
significant additional drilling.
In the event any of our four deep wells already drilled start to
produce oil, the associated revenues should transform the Group's
cash flows. The same would be the case in the event the Caspian
Explorer is chartered at market rates.
Drilling wells at a rate faster than could be funded from oil
sales, would require additional funding, as would any acquisitions
to be funded by cash. Potential sources of such funding would
include: further advances from local oil traders for the sale of
oil yet to be produced; industry funding in the form of
partnerships with larger industry players; further support from
existing shareholders; and equity funding from financial
institutions. Additionally, funding may be available from selected
asset sales.
Dividends
It is the policy of the Board to work towards a position where
meaningful dividends can be paid. This requires not only
consistently profitable trading but also in all likelihood a
corporate reorganisation to create distributable reserves. New
corporate subsidiaries have been incorporated in the UAE, with a
view improving and simplifying the Group structure and easing the
future payment of dividends.
Any dividend declared will be set at an affordable level that
does not conflict with the need to fund value enhancing growth,
whether by further investments in our existing fields or by
acquisition.
S 172 Statement
The Board is mindful of the duties of directors under S.172 of
the Companies Act 2006.
Directors act in a way they consider, in good faith, to be most
likely to promote the success of the Company for the benefit of its
members. In doing so, they each have regard to a range of matters
when making decisions for the long term success of the Company.
Our culture is that of treating everyone fairly and with respect
and this extends to all our principal stakeholders. Through
engaging formally and informally with our key stakeholders, we have
been able to develop an understanding of their needs, assess their
perspectives and monitor their impact on our strategic
ambition.
As part of the Board's decision-making process, the Board and
its Committees consider the potential impact of decisions on
relevant stakeholders whilst also having regard to a number of
broader factors, including the impact of the Company's operations
on the community and environment, responsible business practices
and the likely consequences of decisions on the long term.
Our objective is to act in way that meets the long term needs of
all our main stakeholder groups. However, in so doing we pay
particular regard to the longer term needs of shareholders.
We engage with investors on our financial performance, strategy
and business model and until the Covid-19 virus struck our Annual
General Meeting provided an opportunity for investors to meet and
engage with members of the Board.
In particular during the period under review and subsequently
the Board concluded that the Group's survival during unprecedented
conditions was the best way to seek to meet stakeholders
expectations over the medium / longer term.
The Board continues to encourage senior management in each
location to engage with staff, suppliers, customers and the
community in order to assist the Board in discharging its
obligations.
During 2020 the Board has been particularly mindful of the
impact of the ongoing Covid-19 pandemic when making any decision.
This has impacted all areas of decision making and is not limited
to ensuring that its impact on employees, contractors, suppliers
and the communities in which we operate is factored into any
decision, but also to ensure that its reputational, financial and
other impact is also considered. As a consequence of this focus
additional prudent precautionary measures were designed in to
operational proposals made to the Board, the 2020 drilling
activities were revised, additional equity funds raised, certain
work programme obligations of BNG were deferred to 2021, work
program commitments of 3A Best were applied for a deferral, these
decision were made to ensure financial sustainability (see
Chairman's Statement for more information).
Further details of how the Directors have had regard to the
issues, factors and stakeholders considered relevant in complying
with S 172 (1) (a)-(f), the methods used to engage with
stakeholders and the effect on the Group's decisions during the
year can be found throughout this report and in particular at page
4 (in relation to decision-making), page 15 (where the Group's
strategy, objectives and business model are addressed), page 18 (in
relation to employees) the ESG report on page 24 (in relation to
social and environmental matters).
We seek to attract and retain staff by acting as a responsible
employer. The health and safety of our employees is important to
the Company and an area we have to regularly report on the Kazakh
regulatory authorities.
We continue to provide support to communities and governments
through the provision of employment, the payment of taxes and
supporting social and economic development in the surrounding
areas, both through social investment and local procurement. We
have contributed to a range of social programmes for well over a
decade.
We have established long-term partnerships that complement our
in-house expertise, and have built a network of specialised
partners within the industry and beyond.
Clive Carver
Chairman
28 June 2021
Directors' report
The Directors present their annual report on the operations of
the Company and the Group, together with the audited financial
statements for the year ended 31 December 2020.
The Strategic report forms part of the business review for this
year.
Principal activity
The principal activity of the Group is oil and gas exploration
and production.
Results and dividends
The consolidated statement of profit or loss is set out on page
40 and shows a $3.5 million loss for the year after tax (2019:
US$1.4 million).
The Directors do not recommend the payment of a dividend for the
year ended 31 December 2020 (2019: US$ nil).
The position and performance of the Group is discussed below and
further details are given in the business review.
Review of the year
The review of the year and the Directors' strategy are set out
in the Chairman's Statement and the Strategic Report.
Events after the reporting period
Other than the operational and financial matters set out in
these financial statements there have been no material events
between 31 December 2020, and the date of this report, which are
required to be brought to the attention of shareholders. Please
refer to note 28 of these financial statements for further
details.
Board changes
On 24 August 2020 Aibek Oraziman joined the Board as a
non-executive director
On 1 December 2020; Tim Field, a non-executive director since
January 2019, left the board Clive Carver, previously Executive
Chairman and Chief Financial Officer, reverted to being
non-executive Chairman.
On 4 March 2021, Seokwoo Shin joined the Board as Chief
Operating Officer, an executive director.
Employees
Staff employed by the Group are based primarily in
Kazakhstan.
The recruitment and retention of staff, especially at management
level, is increasingly important as the Group continues to build
its portfolio of oil and gas assets. As well as providing employees
with appropriate remuneration and other benefits together with a
safe and enjoyable working environment, the Board recognises the
importance of communicating with employees to motivate them and
involve them fully in the business.
For the most part, this communication takes place at a local
level and staff are kept informed of major developments through
email updates. They also have access to the Group's website.
The Group has taken out full indemnity insurance on behalf of
the Directors and officers.
Health, safety and environment
It is the Group's policy and practice to comply with health,
safety and environmental regulations and the requirements of the
countries in which it operates, to protect its employees, assets
and environment.
Charitable and Political donations
During the year the Group made no charitable or political
donations.
Directors and Directors' interests
The Directors of the Group and the Company who held office
during the period under review and up to the date of the Annual
Report are as follows:
Directors' interests
Director Number of Ordinary Shares
As at 31 December As at 31 December
2020 2019
------------------ ------------------
Clive Carver 2,245,000 nil
------------------ ------------------
Kuat Oraziman* 41,485,330 41,485,330
------------------ ------------------
Edmund Limerick 7,911,583 6,430,000
------------------ ------------------
Tim Field 1,461,987 nil
------------------ ------------------
Aibek Oraziman** 861,944,255 N/A
------------------ ------------------
Seokwoo Shin nil nil
------------------ ------------------
* taken together on 31 December 2020 Mr Oraziman and his adult
children held 903,429,585 shares representing 43.2% of the issued
share capital shares
** Aibek Oraziman and his sister Aidana Urazimanova each hold a
50% stake in Akku Investments LLP, which held 861,944,255 Caspian
Sunrise shares, including 57,369,124 shares previously held by the
late Rafik Oraziman.
Biographical details of the current Directors are set out on the
Company's website www.caspiansunrise.com .
Details of the Directors' individual remuneration, service
contracts and interests in share options are shown in the
Remuneration Committee Report.
Shareholders over 3% at the date of this report
Shareholder Shares held %
Akku Investments LLP 861,944,255 41.22
------------ ------
Dae Han New Pharm
Co Limited 224,830,964 10.75
------------ ------
Kairat Satylganov 221,625,001 10.60
------------ ------
Raushen Sagdieyva 66,425,290 3.18
------------ ------
Financial instruments
Details of the use of financial instruments by the Group and its
subsidiary undertakings are contained in note 25 of the financial
statements.
Statement of disclosure of information to auditor
All of the current Directors have taken all the steps that they
ought to have taken to make themselves aware of any information
needed by the Group's auditor for the purposes of their audit and
to establish that the auditors are aware of that information.
The Directors are not aware of any relevant audit information of
which the auditor is unaware.
Auditor BDO LLP have indicated their willingness to continue in
office and a resolution concerning their reappointment will be
proposed at the next Annual General Meeting.
Directors' responsibilities
The Directors are responsible for preparing the annual report
and the financial statements in accordance with applicable law and
regulations.
Company law requires the Directors to prepare financial
statements for each financial year. Under that law the Directors
have elected to prepare the Group and Company financial statements
in accordance with international accounting standards in conformity
with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.
Under Company law the Directors must not approve the financial
statements unless they are satisfied that they give a true and fair
view of the state of affairs of the Group and Company and of the
profit or loss of the Group for that period.
The Directors are also required to prepare financial statements
in accordance with the rules of the London Stock Exchange for
companies trading securities on the London Stock Exchange AIM
Market.
In preparing these financial statements, the Directors are
required to:
-- select suitable accounting policies and then apply them consistently;
-- make judgements and accounting estimates that are reasonable and prudent;
-- state whether they have been prepared in accordance with
international accounting standards in conformity with the
requirements of the Companies Act 2006 subject to any material
departures disclosed and explained in the financial statements;
and
-- prepare the financial statements on the going concern basis
unless it is inappropriate to presume that the Company and the
Group will continue in business.
The Directors are responsible for keeping adequate accounting
records that are sufficient to show and explain the Group's and the
Company's transactions and disclose with reasonable accuracy at any
time the financial position of the Group and the Company and enable
them to ensure that the financial statements comply with the
requirements of the Companies Act 2006.
They are also responsible for safeguarding the assets of the
Group and the Company and hence for taking reasonable steps for the
prevention and detection of fraud and other irregularities.
Website publication
The Directors are responsible for ensuring the annual report and
the financial statements are made available on a website.
Financial statements are published on the Group's website in
accordance with legislation in the United Kingdom governing the
preparation and dissemination of financial statements, which may
vary from legislation in other jurisdictions.
The maintenance and integrity of the Group's website is the
responsibility of the Directors.
The Directors' responsibility also extends to the ongoing
integrity of the financial statements contained therein.
Clive Carver
Chairman
28 June 2021
Principal and other risks and uncertainties facing the
business
Introduction
Risk assessment and evaluation is an essential part of the
Group's planning and an important aspect of the Group's internal
control system.
Oil & gas exploration and production is a dangerous activity
and as such is necessarily subject to an extremely rigorous health
and safety regime. The Board aims to identify and evaluate the
risks the Group faces or is likely to face in future both from its
immediate activities and from the wider environment. This helps to
inform and shape the Group's strategy and to quantify its tolerance
to risk.
Operational success generally helps to mitigate financial risks.
Typically with increases in production as new wells come on stream
the ability to generate cash improves the Group's financial
position which can then lead to further operational success.
As the Group develops, its approach to risk management and
mitigation will be refined. In due course we plan to include a
formal risk register including all the principal operational and
non-operational risks to the business. Such a risk register would
be reviewed and assessed at least once a year by our new Corporate
Governance Committee.
The Group is subject to various risks relating to political,
economic, legal, social, industry, business and financial
conditions. The following risk factors, which are not exhaustive,
are particularly relevant to the Group's business activities and
are listed in the Board assessment in the order of greatest
potential impact.
Covid-19 risk
A significant and current risk to the business is the prolonged
worldwide impact of the COVID-19 pandemic.
As set out more fully in the Chairman's Statement and the
Strategic Report the impact to date has been extensive both
financially in the sharp decline in revenues and operationally as
getting crews, equipment and consumables to site has proved
difficult under extensive lockdown restrictions.
We have sought to mitigate the impact of Covid-19 by cost
cutting and reducing the pace of new drilling operations. At this
stage however, it is not possible to know how long the impact of
Covid-19 will last and its long term impact on the Group.
Pricing risk
As has been witnessed following Covid-19 the Group's financial
performance will be adversely affected by a prolonged fall in the
price of oil, international or domestic.
Brent oil prices below $54 per barrel for a prolonged period
would require further cost cutting and may require raising addition
equity funding on onerous terms.
Financing risks
Despite owing our own rigs exploring for oil is still an
expensive business. However, the relatively low value of the Kazakh
Tenge compared to the US$ reduces the costs of exploration and
production as most staff costs and some equipment costs are
denominated in Kazakh Tenge.
For domestic sales the Group typically enters into contracts
with oil traders to forward sell its production and receives
advances as part of its operating activities. With respect to
export sales again we typically use different local oil traders but
usually have to wait two months for payment. The continued
availability of such arrangements is important to working capital
and, in the event the Group was unable to continue to access these
arrangements, additional funding would be required.
The risk is considered reduced given the expected growth in
production revenues and is mitigated by maintaining strong
relationships with the oil traders.
Group financial forecasts based on revenues from export sales
indicate sufficient working capital is available to meet all
shallow structure cost and the Group's G&A expenditure.
However, pending any meaningful contribution from oil sales from
our deep wells new drilling will require additional funding.
Potential sources of funding include further advances from local
traders; industry funding in the form of partnerships with larger
industry player; if appropriate equity funding from financial
institutions; further support from existing shareholders; and
selected asset sales.
Refer to note 1.1 for further details on funding and going
concern.
Exploration risk
Despite the success of our shallow wells there is no assurance
that the Group's future exploration activities will continue to be
successful. In particular, the high pressure and high temperature
encountered when drilling below the salt layer has proved extremely
difficult to control to allow prolonged flow tests to commence.
The Group seeks to reduce this risk by acquiring and evaluating
3D seismic information before committing to drill exploration and
appraisal wells.
The Group also seeks to engage suitably skilled personnel either
as employees or contractors to undertake detailed assessments of
the areas under exploration.
Operational risks
It is the nature of oil and gas operations that each project is
long term. It can be many years before the exploration and
evaluation expenditures incurred are proven to be viable and can
progress to reach commercial production.
To control these risks the Board arranges for the provision of
technical support, directly or through appointed agents and also as
appropriate commissions technical research and feasibility studies
both prior to entering into these commitments and subsequently in
the life of these projects.
In addition, operational risks include equipment failure, well
blowouts, pollution, fire and the consequences of bad weather.
Where the Group is project operator, it takes an increased
responsibility for ensuring that the Group is compliant with all
relevant legislation. The Group endeavours to use competent people
with appropriate skills to manage such risks at the appropriate
levels within the Group structure. Additionally, where appropriate
the Group engages expert contractors.
Permitting risks
We operate in a highly regulated industry. As such we are only
able to fulfil our work programme obligations once agreed with the
Kazakh regulatory authorities after we receive all the required
permits, licences and other permissions. Delays in receiving these
regulatory clearances usually results in additional costs.
Regulatory delays are inevitable, common place and likely to
increase as a result of the impact of the Covid-19 virus. Our
experienced Kazakh workforce has both a thorough knowledge of the
complex rules and a detailed practical understanding of the
workings of each of the regulatory bodies with whom we need to
deal. Accordingly, we believe we are well placed to minimise the
financial impact of regulatory delays.
Covid-19 has resulted in work programmes being deferred from one
year to another, as is the case at the BNG Contract Area, and
management have detected a more lenient approach from the Kazakh
regulatory authorities.
The recent 3A Best farm-out has been entered into to provide the
funding to meet existing work programme commitments.
Environmental
Risks relating to environmental matters are now set out in the
new Environmental, Social and Governance Report.
Other regulatory requirements
Existing and possible future legislation, regulations and
actions could cause additional expense, capital expenditures,
restrictions and delays in the activities of the Group, the extent
of which cannot be predicted.
Before exploration and production can commence the Group must
obtain regulatory approval and there is no assurance that such
approvals will be obtained. No assurance can be given that new
rules and regulations will not be enacted or existing legislations
will not be applied in a manner, which could limit or curtail the
Group's activities.
The Group employs staff experienced in the requirements of the
Kazakh environmental authorities and seeks through their experience
to mitigate the risk of non-compliance with accepted best
practice.
The impact of the Covid-19 virus is likely to add to the times
required to obtain the required regulatory approvals.
The impact of the BNG historic costs assessed against the MJF
structure and the delays in renewing licences at 3A Best and the
BNG South Yelemes structure indicate the financial consequences of
regulatory issues.
Political risk
To date the Group operates solely in Kazakhstan. The nature of
the Group's investments requires the commitment of significant
funding to facilitate exploration and evaluation expenditure in
Kazakhstan.
While the Group enjoys good working relationships with the
Kazakh regulatory authorities there can be no assurances that the
laws and regulations and their reinterpretation will not change in
future periods and that, as a result, the Group's activities would
be affected.
However, the Directors believe with the exceptionally high
proportion of Kazakh nationals in key positions and the Group's
prolonged experience of operating in Kazakhstan, it is as well
placed as any internationally listed company operating in
Kazakhstan to avoid inadvertently falling foul of local regulations
or customs.
Exchange rate risk
The Group's income is denominated in US$ and its expenditure is
denominated in US$ and Kazakh Tenge. In the year under review the
Tenge depreciated against the US$ by approximately 11%. In the
event that the Kazakh Tenge is devalued further against the US$,
the Group benefits as income is unaffected. With approximately 50%
of the Group's costs incurred in Tenge the depreciation of the
Tenge against the US$ materially benefits the Group commercially.
Given the relative strengths of the US$ and the Kazakh Tenge, the
Group has decided not to seek to hedge this foreign currency
exposure.
Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) Report
Introduction
This report covers our ESG approach and performance for the year
ended 31 December 2020.
We aim to work in an open and transparent manner, both within
the Company and with all our stakeholders, including:
-- Employees
-- Local communities
-- Shareholders
-- Suppliers
-- Contractors
-- Regulators
ENVIRONMENTAL
Introduction
Oil and gas exploration and production is a long term activity
requiring effective environmental stewardship. We have operated in
Kazakhstan now for more than 15 years and have only been able to do
by complying with all applicable environmental standards.
We recognise that society is transitioning towards a low-carbon
future, and we support this goal. However, even in the most
ambitious scenarios, this shift will be gradual, and will require
significant energy and economic prosperity to be achieved.
We believe that oil will continue to play an important role in
the global economy for decades to come, and new sources of oil
supply are required for a sustainable energy transition.
Climate change
Assessing the risks
We have no particular insights into assessing climate control
risks beyond those underpinning the regulations in Kazakhstan. We
therefore look to the Kazakh regulatory authorities to set the
standards to which we work.
Compliance with the standards
We comply with all relevant Kazakh environmental requirements,
including environmental laws and regulations and industry
guidelines.
Specific initiatives
-- We seek to recycle gas produced as a by-product at BNG to
power the Contract Area's day-to-day operations.
-- We seek wherever possible to avoid flaring, which in any event is a regulated activity.
-- Our workers at the BNG Contract Area are drawn from the local
community, lessening the transportation carbon footprint
-- We make extensive use of existing oil pipelines to move our oil
-- Largely as the result of Covid-19 restriction the use of
international travel for management and board meetings has been
severely restricted with no full face to face board meetings for
more than 12 months
Health and safety
Our daily operations prioritise health and safety and protecting
the environment and we seek to comply with all health and safety
related regulations.
SOCIAL
Since the Group's formation in 2006, the social obligations
payments made principally to the authorities in the regions in
which the group operates have funded a range of projects for the
benefit of the local communities concerned.
GOVERNANCE
Introduction
In 2019 we introduced a new Corporate Governance committee to
oversee the way the Group conducts itself.
The Committee currently comprises Clive Carver, Edmund Limerick
and Aibek Oraziman with Clive Carver acting as chairman.
Remit of the Committee
Overall compliance with the Group's compliance, corporate
governance, risk management, market disclosure and related
obligations rests with the Board. Nonetheless, the Board recognises
that the Group is required to assess such matters on an ongoing
basis and make timely and accurate disclosure of price sensitive
the Market Abuse Regulations and the AIM Rules for Companies.
At the appropriate time the Board plans to include a formal risk
register including all the principal operational and
non-operational risks to the business to be considered by the
Governance & Risk Committee. This will be in addition to the
procedures already in place as set out elsewhere in this document.
The Board changes noted above have delayed the adoption of the
formal risk register.
Meetings of the Committee
The committee intends to meet at least once a year.
Share dealing policy
The Group has adopted and operates a share dealing code for
Directors and employees in accordance with the AIM Rules.
Internal controls
The Board acknowledges responsibility for maintaining
appropriate internal control systems and procedures to safeguard
the shareholders' investments and the assets, employees and the
business of the Group.
The Board intends to establish and operate a policy of
continuous review and development of appropriate financial controls
together with operating procedures consistent with the accounting
policies of the Group. The Board notes however, that in periods of
severe cost cutting it becomes more difficult to implement and
operate control systems reliant on the fullest segregation of
duties.
Internal audit
The Board does not consider it appropriate for the current size
of the Group to establish an internal audit function. However, this
will be kept under review.
Bribery and corruption
The Bribery Act 2010 came into force on 1 July 2011.
The Company is committed to acting ethically, fairly and with
integrity in all its endeavours and compliance with legislation is
monitored. The principal terms of the Bribery Act have been
translated into Russian and circulated to our Kazakh based staff.
Consideration of the Bribery Act is a standing item at board
meetings.
The Company's culture
Our culture might best be described as one where we strive for
commercial success while treating others fairly and with respect.
The Board firmly believes that sustained success will best be
achieved by following this simple philosophy. Accordingly, in
dealing with each of the Groups principal stakeholders, we
encourage our staff to operate in an honest and respectful
manner.
Given the simplicity of the culture we do not believe lengthy
illustrations of our culture in action add much. We also believe in
getting proper value for money spent. Given the high percentage of
the Groups shares represented by senior management figures we seek
to spend the Groups money very carefully. We believe this goes hand
in hand with being a low-cost operator.
Kazakhstan plays an important part in the Group's culture. It is
where we operate; where almost all staff are based; it is the
nationality of most staff and of the majority of shareholders.
The Group is committed to promoting a culture based on ethical
values and behaviours across the business. Policies are in place
covering key matters such as equality, protection of sensitive
information, conflicts of interest, whistleblowing and health and
safety as well as environmental concerns.
The impact of Covid-19
The cost saving measures introduced in response to the severe
impact of Covid-19 on the business and in particular the changes at
board level have inevitably resulted in a slowing of the pace at
which we seek to move to a better level of Corporate Governance. In
particular none of the Group's non-executive directors qualifies as
fully independent, either for reasons of length of service,
previous executive roles or being a significant shareholder.
QCA Code
In September 2018, new regulations took force under which all
companies with shares trading on AIM were required to comply with a
recognised corporate governance code and to disclose how the
implementation of the governance code has been applied or to
explain any areas of departure from its requirements.
Caspian Sunrise, in line with the majority of AIM companies,
elected to apply the rules of the Quoted Companies Alliance (QCA)
Corporate Governance Code ("QCA Code"), which is based around 10
broad principles.
The QCA Code requires significant additional disclosures which
have been made to our corporate website www.caspiansunrise.com. It
also requires explanations of departures from the guidelines of the
QCA code.
Under the QCA regulations we have the option to cross refer to
disclosures made on the website rather than repeat them all in this
annual report.
The principal disclosures such as the Remuneration Committee and
Directors' report will continued to be included in this annual
report. However, for a full assessment of the Company you are
encouraged to review the website for both the regulatory
disclosures, and as we progress, more information on the activities
of the Company.
Board composition, skills and capabilities
-- Between 1 January 2020 and 21 August 2020, the Board had two
executive directors and two non-executive directors.
-- Between 21 August and 1 December 2020, the Board had two
executive directors and three non-executive directors
-- Between 1 December and 31 December 2020, the Board comprise
one executive director and three non-executive directors.
The Board currently comprises two executive directors and three
non-executive directors.
Clive Carver, non-executive Chairman
Clive is a fellow of the Institute of Chartered Accountants in
England and Wales (FCA) and a fellow of the Association of
Corporate Treasurers (FCT). He was from 2012 until 1 December 2020,
Executive Chairman and Chief Financial Officer. He is an
experienced non-executive director having been chairman of a number
of AIM companies in recent years. He is currently Executive
Chairman and Chief Financial Officer of an unquoted technology
company and an non-executive director of the UK's only listed
architectural practice.
Kuat Oraziman, Chief Executive Officer
Kuat Oraziman runs the Company's operations in Kazakhstan. Kuat
Oraziman is a trained geologist and member of the Academy of
Sciences. He has more than 26 years oil and gas experience in
Kazakhstan. The Oraziman family hold in aggregate approximately 43%
of the Company's shares and as at 31 December 2020 provided $5.6
million by way of cash advances against a master loan
agreement.
Seokwoo Shin, Chief Operating Officer
Seokwoo Shin was educated at Sungkyunkwan University in Korea.
He worked for the Korean National Oil Corporation from 1987 until
2019 with spells in Korea, the United Kingdom, Russia and most
recently Kazakhstan, where he was responsible for KNOC's Kazakh oil
fields. He joined Caspian Sunrise in 2018 and on 4 March 2021, was
appointed the board as chief Operating Officer.
Edmund Limerick, Senior Non-Executive Director
Edmund is a Russian speaking former lawyer and investment banker
who ran an institutional investment fund focused on Central Asia.
Edmund was called to the Bar in 1987, and served as an officer in
the Foreign & Commonwealth Office until 1992 with postings in
Paris, Dakar and Amman. He was an international corporate lawyer at
Clifford Chance, Freshfields and Milbank Tweed (where he headed the
Moscow Office) before joining Deutsche Bank as a director in
Moscow, London and Dubai. In 2006, he joined Altima Partners where
he managed the Altima Central Asia Fund, focusing on Kazakhstan.
Edmund has served as a director of Caspian Sunrise plc since 2010,
and chairs the Audit and Remuneration Committees.
Aibek Oraziman, Non-executive director
Aibek Oraziman was educated in Kazakhstan and in the United
Kingdom. He more than 12 years oil and gas experience in
Kazakhstan, including 3 years in the field at Aktobe working for a
local oil company. He was appointed to the Caspian Sunrise board on
21 August 2020 and together with is sister he holds 861,944,255
shares representing 41.3% of the shares in issue.
The Board believes it possesses the skills required to build a
successful and durable oil and gas business focused on
Kazakhstan.
Operational skills are maintained through an active day-to-day
interaction with leading international consultancies and
contractors engaged to assist in the development of the Group's
assets. Non-operational skills are maintained principally via the
Group's interaction with its professional advisers plus the
experience gained from sitting on the boards of other commercial
enterprises. Where gaps are identified as the Group evolves and as
funding permits, new appointments will be made. The Board retains
full and effective control over the Group.
The Group holds at least four Board meetings each year, at which
operational, financial and other reports are considered and, where
appropriate, voted on.
The Board also has a list of standing items, including
compliance with the UK Bribery Act, litigation and existence of
open and closed periods for director dealings, which are considered
at each meeting. Apart from these formal board meetings, which have
taken place in the year, additional meetings and calls are arranged
when necessary to review strategy, planning, operational, financial
performance, risk and capital expenditure and human resource and
environmental management.
The Group currently does not evaluate board performance on a
formal basis. However, it intends at the appropriate time to
formalise the assessment of both executive and non-executive board
members.
The Group is aware of its need to facilitate succession planning
and in the period under review conducted a detailed assessment of
the risks relating to succession. Currently board audit,
remuneration and corporate governance committees contain only
non-executive directors.
Board and committee meetings
Attendances of Directors at board and committee meetings
convened in the year, and which they were eligible to attend in
person or by phone, are set out below:
Director Board meetings Remuneration Committees Audit Committee
attended attended attended
Clive Carver 6 of 6 N/A N/A
--------------- ------------------------ ----------------
Kuat Oraziman 6 of 6 N/A N/A
--------------- ------------------------ ----------------
Edmund Limerick 6 of 6 2 of 2 2 of 2
--------------- ------------------------ ----------------
Tim Field 5 of 5 2 of 2 2 of 2
--------------- ------------------------ ----------------
Aibek Oraziman 2 of 2 N/A 1 of 1
--------------- ------------------------ ----------------
Aibek Oraziman joined the board on 21 August 2020
Tim Field resigned from the board on 1 December 2020
Board committee membership in 2020
Director Audit Committee Remuneration Committee Corporate Governance
Committee
Served Served Served Served Served Served
from to from to from to
----------- ------------ ----------- ------------ ----------- ------------
Clive Carver 1 December 31 December 1 December 31 December 1 December 31 December
----------- ------------ ----------- ------------ ----------- ------------
Kuat Oraziman N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A N/A
----------- ------------ ----------- ------------ ----------- ------------
Edmund Limerick 1 January 31 December 1 January 31 December 1 January 31 December
----------- ------------ ----------- ------------ ----------- ------------
Tim Field 1 January 30 November 1 January 30 November 1 January 30 November
----------- ------------ ----------- ------------ ----------- ------------
Aibek Oraziman 21 August 31 December 21 August 31 December 21 August 31 December
----------- ------------ ----------- ------------ ----------- ------------
The Board has established the following committees:
Audit Committee
The Audit Committee which currently comprises Edmund Limerick,
Aibek Oraziman and Clive Carver, with Edmund Limerick acting as
Chairman, determines and examines any matters relating to the
financial affairs of the Group including the terms of engagement of
the Group's auditors and, in consultation with the auditors, the
scope of the audit.
The Audit Committee receives and reviews reports from the
management and the external auditors of the Group relating to the
annual and interim amounts and the accounting and internal control
systems of the Group. In addition, it considers the financial
performance, position and prospects of the Group and the Company
and ensures they are properly monitored and reported on.
Remuneration Committee
The Remuneration Committee, which currently comprises Edmund
Limerick Aibek Oraziman and Clive Carver, with Edmund Limerick
acting as Chairman, reviews the performance of the senior
management, sets and reviews their remuneration and the terms of
their service contracts and considers the Group's bonus and option
schemes.
28 June 2021
Remuneration Committee Report
Remuneration Committee
The Remuneration Committee currently comprises Edmund Limerick,
Aibek Oraziman and Clive Carver and is chaired by Edmund
Limerick.
Remuneration policy
The Group's and the Company's policy is to provide remuneration
packages that will attract, retain and motivate its executive
Directors and senior management. This consists of a basic salary,
ancillary benefits and other performance-related remuneration
appropriate to their individual responsibilities and having regard
to the remuneration levels of comparable posts.
The Remuneration Committee determines the contract term, basic
salary, and other remuneration for the members of the Board and the
senior management team.
Service contracts
Details of the current Directors' service contracts are as
follows:
Executive Date of service agreement Date of last renewal
/ appointment letter of appointment
Clive Carver 20 March 2019 21 June 2019
-------------------------- ---------------------
Kuat Oraziman 6 December 2019 19 June 2018
-------------------------- ---------------------
Edmund Limerick 25 January 2019 13 June 2017
-------------------------- ---------------------
Aibek Oraziman 21 August 2020 N/A
-------------------------- ---------------------
Seokwoo Shin 4 March 2021 N/A
-------------------------- ---------------------
Notwithstanding their service agreements or letters of
appointment the directors who served throughout the period under
review have agreed until further notice to restrict their
remuneration to approximately 25% of previous amounts without any
accrual for the 75% sacrificed.
Basic salary and benefits
The basic salaries of the Directors who served during the
financial year are established by reference to their
responsibilities and individual performance.
2020 2020 2020 2019
Salary Share options Total Total
Directors / fees US$ US$ US$
US$
Clive Carver Chairman 311,800 - 311,800 425,289
--------------- -------- --------------- -------- --------
Kuat Oraziman CEO 251,393 - 251,393 170,620
--------------- -------- --------------- -------- --------
Edmund Limerick Non-executive 40,320 10,839 51,159 81,781
--------------- -------- --------------- -------- --------
Tim Field Non-executive 39,020 10,839 49,859 76,996
--------------- -------- --------------- -------- --------
Total 642,533 21,678 664,211 754,686
-------- --------------- -------- --------
Share option amounts refer to the IFRS 2 accounting charge.
There were no company pension contributions in respect of any
director
A significant portion of the reduced amounts relating to 2020
were taken in the form of Ordinary Shares, issued at a price of
3.2p per share.
Bonus schemes
All Executive Directors are eligible for consideration of
participation in the Company bonus scheme. However, as in previous
years no bonuses are payable in respect of the year ended 31
December 2020 (2019: nil).
Long term incentives
Share options
The current interests as at approval of accounts of the current
Directors in share options agreements are as follows:
Directors Granted Exercise Expiry Date
price
14 December
Clive Carver 2,400,000 4p 2021
---------- --------- ---------------
Directors
---------- --------- ---------------
Clive Carver 3,000,000 20p 21 August 2024
---------- --------- ---------------
Kuat Oraziman 3,000,000 20p 21 August 2024
---------- --------- ---------------
Edmund Limerick 750,000 20p 21 August 2024
---------- --------- ---------------
Edmund Limerick 1,000,000 20p 5 June 2029
---------- --------- ---------------
Seokwoo Shin nil [Nil N/A
---------- --------- ---------------
There were no options exercised in 2020.
The following options have lapsed to date in 2021
Directors Expired Exercise Expiry date
price
12 January
Clive Carver 750,000 13p 2021
---------- --------- ------------
12 January
Kuat Oraziman 3,090,000 13p 2021
---------- --------- ------------
12 January
Edmund Limerick 750,000 13p 2021
---------- --------- ------------
Cash based incentives
In May 2019, we introduced a cash based long term incentive
arrangements for the senior management team since 2012, Kuat
Oraziman and Clive Carver.
Under these arrangements, provided the share price growth
exceeds pre-set targets starting at 17.23p, then for every $500
million increase in the Group's market capitalisation above $300
million, as adjusted to take account of dividends paid, both Kuat
Oraziman and Clive Carver, would receive payments of $3 million
each.
The principal hurdles under these arrangements are set out in
the table below.
Market cap threshold Share price target Pay-out rate Pay-out amount
(each) (each)
$' billion Pence per share % $' million
------------------- ------------- ---------------
0.8 17.23 0.6 3.0
------------------- ------------- ---------------
1.3 20.67 0.6 3.0
------------------- ------------- ---------------
1.8 24.81 0.6 3.0
------------------- ------------- ---------------
2.3 29.77 0.6 3.0
------------------- ------------- ---------------
2.8 35.72 0.6 3.0
------------------- ------------- ---------------
The scheme continues beyond the numbers in the table such that
with the threshold for market capitalisation increasing at the rate
of $0.5 billion and the corresponding share price threshold
increasing from the earlier threshold by a constant factor of
1.2.
Each threshold must be sustained for at least 30 consecutive
days for the awards to be triggered. There may be only one pay-out
for each market capitalisation threshold crossed no matter how many
times it is crossed.
For the avoidance of doubt the arrangements described above
remain in full force despite the changes to board composition and
roles as set out in this Remuneration Committee report and
elsewhere in these financial statements.
Whilst the Incentive Scheme is in place neither of the
recipients will be granted any further options.
On behalf of the Directors of Caspian Sunrise plc
Edmund Limerick
Chairman of Remuneration Committee
28 June 2021
Audit Committee Report
The Audit Committee
The Audit Committee, which currently comprises Edmund Limerick,
Clive Carver and Aibek Oraziman, with Edmund Limerick acting as
Chairman, determines and examines any matters relating to the
financial affairs of the Group including the terms of engagement of
the Group's auditors and, in consultation with the auditors, the
scope of the audit.
Role and responsibilities
The Audit Committee is responsible for monitoring the integrity
of the Company's financial statements, reviewing significant
financial reporting issues, reviewing the effectiveness of the
Group's internal control and risk management systems.
In addition, it considers the financial performance, position
and prospects of the Group and the Company and ensures they are
properly monitored and reported on. It oversees the relationship
with the Auditor (including advising on their appointment, agreeing
the scope of the audit and reviewing the audit findings).
The committee met on two occasions during the year under
review.
The Board and the Audit Committee do not consider it appropriate
for the current size of the Group to establish an internal audit
function. However, this will be kept under review.
Edmund Limerick
Chairman of Audit Committee
28 June 2021
Independent auditor's report to the members of Caspian Sunrise
plc
Opinion on the financial statements
In our opinion:
-- the financial statements give a true and fair view of the
state of the Group's and of the Parent Company's affairs as at 31
December 2020 and of the Group's loss for the year then ended;
-- the Group financial statements have been properly prepared in
accordance with international accounting standards in conformity
with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006;
-- the Parent Company financial statements have been properly
prepared in accordance with international accounting standards in
conformity with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006 and as
applied in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act
2006; and
-- the financial statements have been prepared in accordance
with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006.
We have audited the financial statements of Caspian Sunrise plc
(the 'Parent Company') and its subsidiaries (the 'Group') for the
year ended 31 December 2020 which comprise the Consolidated
Statement of Profit or Loss, the Consolidated Statement of
Comprehensive Income, the Consolidated Statement of Changes in
Equity, the Parent Company Statement of Changes in Equity, the
Consolidated Statement of Financial Position, the Parent Company
Statement of Financial Position, the Consolidated and Parent
Company Statements of Cash Flows and notes to the financial
statements, including a summary of significant accounting policies.
The financial reporting framework that has been applied in their
preparation is applicable law and international accounting
standards in conformity with the requirements of the Companies Act
2006 and, as regards the Parent Company financial statements, as
applied in accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act
2006.
Basis for opinion
We conducted our audit in accordance with International
Standards on Auditing (UK) (ISAs (UK)) and applicable law. Our
responsibilities under those standards are further described in the
Auditor's responsibilities for the audit of the financial
statements section of our report. We believe that the audit
evidence we have obtained is sufficient and appropriate to provide
a basis for our opinion.
Independence
We remain independent of the Group and the Parent Company in
accordance with the ethical requirements that are relevant to our
audit of the financial statements in the UK, including the FRC's
Ethical Standard as applied to listed entities, and we have
fulfilled our other ethical responsibilities in accordance with
these requirements.
Material uncertainty in relation to going concern
We draw attention to note 1.1 in the financial statements
concerning the Group and the Parent Company's ability to continue
as a going concern. Note 1.1 highlights that Group and Parent
Company's ability to meet its liabilities and commitments as they
fall due without additional funding is sensitive to the oil prices
realised across the forecast period and, separately, it is
dependent upon the deferral of financial obligations and drilling
commitments associated with its licences, the continued
availability of oil trader advances and the continued support of
certain creditors together with other matters set out therein.
These factors are outside the control of the Group and the Parent
Company and there is no certainty that any funding that may
therefore be required can be secured within the necessary
timescales. These events or conditions indicate that a material
uncertainty exists that may cast signi cant doubt on the Group and
the Parent Company's ability to continue as a going concern. Our
opinion is not modi ed in respect of this matter.
In auditing the financial statements, we have concluded that the
Directors' use of the going concern basis of accounting in the
preparation of the financial statements is appropriate. We consider
going concern to be a Key Audit Matter based on our assessment of
the risk and the effect on our audit.
Our evaluation of the Directors' assessment of the Group and the
Parent Company's ability to continue to adopt the going concern
basis of accounting, and our response to this key audit matter
included:
-- We discussed the potential impact of Covid-19 with management
and the Audit Committee including their assessment of risks and
uncertainties associated with areas such as production disruption,
commodity price volatility and the impact on the availability of
funding. We formed our own assessment of risks and uncertainties
based on our understanding of the business and oil sector.
-- We obtained management's cash flow forecasts and critically
assessed the key inputs. In doing so, we compared oil prices to
market data, production levels to recent performance trends and
operating costs to historical data.
-- We evaluated the completeness of forecast licence related
expenditure against the licence work programs and payments due
under the 3A Best licence. We inspected submissions made to the
relevant authorities for deferral of work program commitments and
payments due and held discussions with management and the Audit
Committee regarding the status of such applications.
-- We compared the forecast cash payments in respect of the BNG
production licence award against the $32m assessment received from
the Government payable in instalments over 10 years. We discussed
the status of the court process with management and the Audit
Committee which seeks to reduce the payments, while noting the
relevant instalments are included in the forecast.
-- We considered the appropriateness of the Board's judgment
regarding the availability of sufficient oil trader funding through
the forecast period. In doing so, we considered factors such as the
production profile, oil price trends, the terms of the arrangements
and the history of transactions with the oil traders.
-- We assessed the terms of the loans provided from the Group's
largest shareholder and his connected companies, the dependence on
continued support and the Board's conclusion that the loans will
not be called for payment for at least the next 12 months unless
the Group has sufficient liquidity. We obtained written
representation from the Board regarding this assessment.
-- We evaluated management's sensitivity analysis and performed
our own sensitivity analysis in respect of the key assumptions
underpinning the forecasts, including specific scenarios such as
reduced revenue cash flows or the impact of one or more adverse
events such as withdrawal of facilities, withdrawal of creditor
support or licence payments or commitments being enforced.
-- We assessed the validity of any mitigating actions identified by Management.
-- We reviewed the adequacy and completeness of the disclosure
included within the financial statements in respect of going
concern against the requirement of the accounting standards and the
results of our audit testing.
Our responsibilities and the responsibilities of the Directors
with respect to going concern are described in the relevant
sections of this report.
Overview
81% (FY19: 83%) of Group (loss)/profit
Coverage before tax, 100% (FY19:100%) of Group
revenue and 92% (FY19: 90%) of Group
total assets.
2020 2019
Carrying value of non-current
assets
BNG production licence payment
Key audit matters obligations
Going concern
Revenue recognition
Revenue recognition was identified
as a key audit matter in 2019 as that
was the first year of export related
revenues following the award of the
production licence which required greater
allocation of resource and audit effort
by the engagement team in the first
year the accounting policy was established.
--------------------------------------------------
Group financial statements as a whole
Materiality
US$1.9m (2019: US$1.9m) based on 1.5%
(2019: 1.5%) of total assets
--------------------------------------------------
An overview of the scope of our audit
Our Group audit was scoped by obtaining an understanding of the
Group and its environment, including the Group's system of internal
control, and assessing the risks of material misstatement in the
financial statements. We also addressed the risk of management
override of internal controls, including assessing whether there
was evidence of bias by the Directors that may have represented a
risk of material misstatement.
The Group's operations principally comprise oil and gas
exploration and production in Kazakhstan. We assessed there to be
four significant components comprising BNG, 3A Best, Caspian
Explorer and the Parent Company. These components, which were
subject to full scope audit procedures, represent the principal
business units.
Non-BDO member firms performed a full scope audit of BNG, 3A
Best and Caspian Explorer in Kazakhstan, under our direction and
supervision as Group auditors. The audit of the Parent Company and
the Group consolidation were performed in the United Kingdom by the
Group audit team.
Our involvement with component auditors
For the work performed by component auditors, we determined the
level of involvement needed in order to be able to conclude whether
sufficient appropriate audit evidence has been obtained as a basis
for our opinion on the Group financial statements as a whole. Our
involvement with component auditors included the following:
-- Detailed Group reporting instructions were sent to the
component auditors, which included the significant areas to be
covered by the audit.
-- We reviewed the component auditor's work papers remotely, as
a result of Covid-19 travel restrictions, reviewed Group reporting
submissions received and held regular calls with the component
audit teams during the planning and completion phases of their
audit to discuss significant findings from their audit.
-- We held calls and meetings with members of Group and
component management to discuss accounting and audit matters
arising.
-- The Group audit team was actively involved in the direction
of the audits performed by the component auditors, along with the
consideration of findings and determination of conclusions drawn.
We performed additional procedures in respect of the significant
risk areas where considered necessary.
Key audit matters
Key audit matters are those matters that, in our professional
judgement, were of most significance in our audit of the financial
statements of the current period and include the most significant
assessed risks of material misstatement (whether or not due to
fraud) that we identified, including those which had the greatest
effect on: the overall audit strategy, the allocation of resources
in the audit, and directing the efforts of the engagement team.
These matters were addressed in the context of our audit of the
financial statements as a whole, and in forming our opinion
thereon, we do not provide a separate opinion on these matters. In
addition to going concern, described in the Material uncertainty
related to going concern section above, we determined the matters
described below to be the key audit matters to be communicated in
our report.
Key audit matter How the scope of our audit addressed
the key audit matter
Carrying value of non-current
assets
3A Best
As at 31 December 2020, the We assessed whether indicators
Group's oil and gas assets of impairment existed in respect
related to the 3A Best exploration of the 3A Best unproven oil
licence, the BNG exploration and gas assets. Audit procedures
and production licences, performed included reviewing
and the drilling rig vessel correspondence from the Government
related to Caspian Explorer. regarding licence payment obligations
These were carried at US$114.3m which, as unfulfilled, provide
as shown in notes 11 and the Government with the right
12. At each reporting period to withdraw the licence. We
end, management are required discussed management's judgment
to assess the non-current that the obligations would ultimately
assets for indicators of be deferred and the licence
impairment and, where such be extended with the Audit Committee.
indicators exist, perform In assessing this judgment,
an impairment test. we inspected applications submitted
to the Government, the history
In performing the impairment of investment in Kazakh oil
indicator review for the fields by the Group and the
unproven oil and gas assets previous extensions and revisions
in the exploration phase, to work program commitments
management are required to and obligations. We also reviewed
make a number of judgements the disclosures of this risk
as detailed in notes 1.8 included in note 2.1 of the
and 2.1. In respect of the financial statements.
3A Best oil and gas assets,
as detailed in note 2.1 the BNG production and exploration
company is not in compliance assets
with its licence commitments We inspected the licences to
and management has applied confirm valid title and assessed
significant judgment in concluding the compliance with the licence
that its application to the conditions through review of
Government for deferral of correspondence with the authorities
the payments due in July and inquiries of management.
2020 under the licence will
be successful and that the For the exploration licence,
licence will be renewed. we inspected budgets and work
As a result of the impairment programs submitted to the Kazakh
assessment, no impairment authorities to confirm that
was recorded by management. further drilling and exploration
is planned for the licence.
In respect of the BNG production We considered the results of
and exploration licences exploration activity in the
and the drilling rig vessel, period for indications that
as detailed in note 2.3 and the licences would be abandoned
2.6 management assessed there or that the recoverable value
was no impairment trigger would be below cost. We also
and the carrying amounts reviewed the disclosures of
were recoverable. this risk included in note 2.1
and 11 of the financial statements.
Given the judgment and estimation
required by management, we For the production licence we
considered this area to be reviewed management's impairment
a key focus for our audit. indicator analysis and formed
our own assessment of potential
impairment indicators. As part
of the impairment indicator
analysis we evaluated management's
ceiling test by assessing the
inputs into the net present
value forecasts. In doing so,
we compared the oil price forecasts
as at 31 December 2020 to market
consensus forecasts and compared
operational production and cost
assumptions to the 2015 Competent
Person's Report, historical
data and other third party sources.
We recalculated the discount
rate and performed sensitivity
analysis in respect of significant
inputs. We also reviewed the
disclosures of this risk included
in note 2.3 and 12 of the financial
statements.
We relied on our previous years
work on evaluation of the independence
and competence of the Competent
Person as a management expert
and assessed if any changes
were required.
Caspian explorer vessel
Due to the lack of charters
since the asset was acquired,
we obtained and challenged management's
vessel valuation, which supports
the carrying value of the vessel
through resale.
In addition we obtained the
signed charter agreement for
the vessels use in Q3 2021,
which provides evidence to support
management's plans to realise
the value of the vessel through
future charters. We also reviewed
the disclosures of this risk
included in note 2.6 and 12
of the financial statements.
Key observations:
We found management's conclusion
that the carrying value of the
3A Best, BNG oil and gas assets
and Caspian Explorer drilling
rig vessel are supportable to
be appropriate. We found the
judgments made by management
to be reasonable and the disclosures
in the notes to be sufficient.
------------------------------------------
BNG production licence payment
obligations
Under the terms of the BNG We reviewed the terms of the
licence, on award of the licence to confirm that a payment
production contract the Group obligation was triggered upon
incurred an obligation for award of the contract.
payments under the licence
as detailed in note 2.7 and We reviewed correspondence with
20. Whilst the quantum to the relevant authorities regarding
be paid has been assessed the assessment of the quantum
by the Government authorities, of the payment due and the terms
it remains subject to dispute. of payment which formed the
Management recorded a provision basis for the amounts recorded
of $25.1m as at 31 December as a provision.
2020. The estimate of the
provision requires Management We recalculated the provision
to exercise judgment and and compared the discount rate
estimate in terms of the to market bond yield data for
extent of the obligation similar termed instruments.
and the applicable discount
rate. We evaluated the accounting
policy established by management
Given the judgment and estimation against relevant IFRS literature
required and the material and the nature of the transaction.
impact of the transaction, In particular, this involved
this was considered to be assessing the extent to which
a focus for our audit and capitalisation of the cost was
a key audit matter. appropriate in conjunction with
our technical specialists.
We assessed the disclosures
included in the financial statements
at notes 2.7 and 20.
Key observations:
We found the judgments and estimates
made by management in respect
of the BNG production licence
payment obligations to be appropriate.
------------------------------------------
Our application of materiality
We apply the concept of materiality both in planning and
performing our audit, and in evaluating the effect of
misstatements. We consider materiality to be the magnitude by which
misstatements, including omissions, could influence the economic
decisions of reasonable users that are taken on the basis of the
financial statements.
In order to reduce to an appropriately low level the probability
that any misstatements exceed materiality, we use a lower
materiality level, performance materiality, to determine the extent
of testing needed. Importantly, misstatements below these levels
will not necessarily be evaluated as immaterial as we also take
account of the nature of identified misstatements, and the
particular circumstances of their occurrence, when evaluating their
effect on the financial statements as a whole.
Based on our professional judgement, we determined materiality
for the financial statements as a whole and performance materiality
as follows:
Group financial statements Parent company financial
statements
2020 2019 2020 2019
US$ US$ US$ US$
------------------- ------------------- ------------------- ---------------------
Materiality 1,900,000 1,900,000 1,500,000 1,710,000
------------------- ------------------- ------------------- ---------------------
Basis for determining 1.5% of total assets 80% of Group 90% of Group
materiality materiality materiality
---------------------------------------- ------------------- ---------------------
Rationale for We have determined an asset based measure
the benchmark is appropriate as the Group continues to focus
applied on developing its oil and gas projects that
requires significant capital expenditure.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Performance
materiality 1,200,00 1,425,000 1,000,000 1,280,000
------------------- ------------------- ------------------- ---------------------
Basis for determining 65% of Group 75% of Group 65% of Parent 75% of Parent
performance Materiality Materiality Company Company Materiality
materiality considering considering Materiality considering
the nature the nature considering the nature
of activities of activities the nature of activities
and historic and historic of activities and historic
audit adjustments audit adjustments and historic audit adjustments
audit adjustments
------------------- ------------------- ------------------- ---------------------
Component materiality
We set materiality for each component of the Group based on a
percentage of between 26% and 80% of Group materiality dependent on
the size and our assessment of the risk of material misstatement of
that component. Component materiality ranged from US$500,000 to
US$1,500,000. In the audit of each component, we further applied
performance materiality levels of 65% of the component materiality
to our testing to ensure that the risk of errors exceeding
component materiality was appropriately mitigated.
Reporting threshold
We agreed with the Audit Committee that we would report to them
all individual audit differences in excess of US$95,000 (2019:
US$70,000). We also agreed to report differences below this
threshold that, in our view, warranted reporting on qualitative
grounds.
Other information
The directors are responsible for the other information. The
other information comprises the information included in the Annual
Report and Financial Statements other than the financial statements
and our auditor's report thereon. Our opinion on the financial
statements does not cover the other information and, except to the
extent otherwise explicitly stated in our report, we do not express
any form of assurance conclusion thereon. Our responsibility is to
read the other information and, in doing so, consider whether the
other information is materially inconsistent with the financial
statements or our knowledge obtained in the course of the audit, or
otherwise appears to be materially misstated. If we identify such
material inconsistencies or apparent material misstatements, we are
required to determine whether this gives rise to a material
misstatement in the financial statements themselves. If, based on
the work we have performed, we conclude that there is a material
misstatement of this other information, we are required to report
that fact.
We have nothing to report in this regard.
Other Companies Act 2006 reporting
Based on the responsibilities described below and our work
performed during the course of the audit, we are required by the
Companies Act 2006 and ISAs (UK) to report on certain opinions and
matters as described below.
Strategic In our opinion, based on the work undertaken
report and in the course of the audit:
Directors' * the information given in the Strategic report and the
report Directors' report for the financial year for which
the financial statements are prepared is consistent
with the financial statements; and
* the Strategic report and the Directors' report have
been prepared in accordance with applicable legal
requirements.
In the light of the knowledge and understanding
of the Group and Parent Company and its environment
obtained in the course of the audit, we have
not identified material misstatements in the
strategic report or the Directors' report.
Matters on We have nothing to report in respect of the following
which we matters in relation to which the Companies Act
are required 2006 requires us to report to you if, in our
to report opinion:
by exception
* adequate accounting records have not been kept by the
Parent Company, or returns adequate for our audit
have not been received from branches not visited by
us; or
* the Parent Company financial statements are not in
agreement with the accounting records and returns; or
* certain disclosures of Directors' remuneration
specified by law are not made; or
* we have not received all the information and
explanations we require for our audit.
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Responsibilities of Directors
As explained more fully in the Directors' responsibilities
statement, the Directors are responsible for the preparation of the
financial statements and for being satisfied that they give a true
and fair view, and for such internal control as the Directors
determine is necessary to enable the preparation of financial
statements that are free from material misstatement, whether due to
fraud or error.
In preparing the financial statements, the Directors are
responsible for assessing the Group's and the Parent Company's
ability to continue as a going concern, disclosing, as applicable,
matters related to going concern and using the going concern basis
of accounting unless the Directors either intend to liquidate the
Group or the Parent Company or to cease operations, or have no
realistic alternative but to do so.
Auditor's responsibilities for the audit of the financial
statements
Our objectives are to obtain reasonable assurance about whether
the financial statements as a whole are free from material
misstatement, whether due to fraud or error, and to issue an
auditor's report that includes our opinion. Reasonable assurance is
a high level of assurance, but is not a guarantee that an audit
conducted in accordance with ISAs (UK) will always detect a
material misstatement when it exists. Misstatements can arise from
fraud or error and are considered material if, individually or in
the aggregate, they could reasonably be expected to influence the
economic decisions of users taken on the basis of these financial
statements.
Extent to which the audit was capable of detecting irregularities, including fraud
Irregularities, including fraud, are instances of non-compliance
with laws and regulations. We design procedures in line with our
responsibilities, outlined above, to detect material misstatements
in respect of irregularities, including fraud. The extent to which
our procedures are capable of detecting irregularities, including
fraud is detailed below:
-- Holding discussions with management and the audit committee
to understand the laws and regulations relevant to the Group and
the Parent company. These included the significant laws and
regulations of Kazakhstan to be those relating to the oil and gas
industry, elements of financial reporting framework, tax
legislation and environmental regulations;
-- Holding discussions with management and the audit committee
to determine any known or suspected instances of non-compliance
with laws and regulations or fraud identified by them;
-- Testing the appropriateness of journal entries made through
the year by applying specific criteria to detect possible
irregularities and fraud;
-- Reviewing the licences to assess the extent to which the
Group was in compliance with the conditions of the licence and
considering management's assessment of the impact of instances of
non-compliance where applicable;
-- Performing a detailed review of the Group's year-end
adjusting entries and investigating any that appear unusual as to
nature or amount and agreeing to supporting documentation;
-- For significant and unusual transactions, particularly those
occurring at or near year-end, obtaining evidence for the rationale
of these transactions and the sources of financial resources
supporting the transactions;
-- Assessing the judgements made by management when making key
accounting estimates and judgements, and challenging management on
the appropriateness of these judgements (refer to key audit matters
above);
-- Reviewing minutes from board meetings of those charges with
governance to identify any instances of non-compliance with laws
and regulations;
-- Communicating relevant identified laws and regulations and
potential fraud risks to all engagement team members and remaining
alert to any indications of fraud or non-compliance with laws and
regulations throughout the audit; and
-- Directing the auditors of the significant components to
ensure an assessment is performed on the extent of the components
compliance with the relevant local and regulatory framework.
Our audit procedures were designed to respond to risks of
material misstatement in the financial statements, recognising that
the risk of not detecting a material misstatement due to fraud is
higher than the risk of not detecting one resulting from error, as
fraud may involve deliberate concealment by, for example, forgery,
misrepresentations or through collusion. There are inherent
limitations in the audit procedures performed and the further
removed non-compliance with laws and regulations is from the events
and transactions reflected in the financial statements, the less
likely we are to become aware of it.
A further description of our responsibilities is available on
the Financial Reporting Council's website at:
www.frc.org.uk/auditorsresponsibilities . This description forms
part of our auditor's report.
Use of our report
This report is made solely to the Parent Company's members, as a
body, in accordance with Chapter 3 of Part 16 of the Companies Act
2006. Our audit work has been undertaken so that we might state to
the Parent Company's members those matters we are required to state
to them in an auditor's report and for no other purpose. To the
fullest extent permitted by law, we do not accept or assume
responsibility to anyone other than the Parent Company and the
Parent Company's members as a body, for our audit work, for this
report, or for the opinions we have formed.
Ryan Ferguson (Senior Statutory Auditor)
For and on behalf of BDO LLP, Statutory Auditor
London,
United Kingdom
28 June 2021
BDO LLP is a limited liability partnership registered in England
and Wales (with registered number OC305127).
Consolidated Statement of Profit or Loss
Notes Year to Year to
31 December 31 December
20 20 2019
-------------------------------------------- -------
US$'000 US$'000
-------------------------------------------- ------- ------------------ ------------------
Revenue 3 14,298 12,108
Cost of sales (4,864) (6,971)
-------------------------------------------- ------- ------------------ ------------------
Gross profit 9,434 5,137
Selling expense (3,897) (2,220)
-------------------------------------------- ------- ------------------ ------------------
Impairment reversal of unproven and
proved oil and gas assets 12 - 2,414
Provision for expected credit losses
of long-term assets 15 (2,551) -
Share-based payments (22) (31)
Other administrative costs (3,662) (3,907)
-------------------------------------------- ------- ------------------ ------------------
Total administrative expenses (6,235) (1,524)
-------------------------------------------- ------- ------------------ ------------------
Operating (loss) / income 4 (698) 1,393
Finance cost 7 (1,067) (452)
Finance income 8 20 -
(Loss) / Profit before taxation (1,745) 941
Tax charge 9 (1,748) (2,343)
-------------------------------------------- ------- ------------------ ------------------
Loss after taxation from continuing
operations (3,493) (1,402)
-------------------------------------------- ------- ------------------ ------------------
Loss for the year from discontinued
operations - -
------------------ ------------------
Loss for the year (3,493) (1,402)
------------------ ------------------
Loss attributable to owners of the parent (3,413) (1,278)
Loss attributable to non-controlling
interest (80) (124)
-------
Loss for the year (3,493) (1,402)
-------------------------------------------- ------- ------------------ ------------------
Basic and diluted profit/(loss) per
ordinary share (US cents) (0. 18) (0. 07)
-------------------------------------------- ------- ------------------ ------------------
Consolidated Statement of Comprehensive Income
Year ended Year ended
31 December 31 December
20 20 201 9
---------------------------------------------
US$000 US$000
--------------------------------------------- ------------- -------------
Loss after taxation (3,493) (1,402)
--------------------------------------------- ------------- -------------
Other comprehensive income:
Exchange differences on translating foreign
operations 403 268
Total comprehensive loss for the year (3,090) (1,134)
--------------------------------------------- ------------- -------------
Total comprehensive loss attributable to:
Owners of parent (3,010) (1,010)
Non-controlling interest (80) (124)
--------------------------------------------- ------------- -------------
Consolidated Statement of Changes in Equity
Share Share Deferred Cumulative Other Retained Total Non-controlling Total
capital premium shares translation reserves deficit attributable interests equity
US$'000 US$'000 reserve US$'000 US$'000 to the owner US$'000 US$'000
US$'000 US$'000 of the
Parent
US$'000
Total equity
as at 1
January
2020 28,120 246,299 64,702 (55,643) (2,362) (220,477) 60,639 (5,729) 54,910
--------------- ------- ------- -------- ----------- -------- --------- ------------ --------------- --------
Loss after
taxation - - - - - (3,413) (3,413) (80) (3,493)
Exchange
differences
on
translating
foreign
operations
and recycling
of exchange
differences
on
disposal of
subsidiaries - - - 403 - - 403 - 403
--------------- ------- ------- -------- ----------- -------- --------- ------------ --------------- --------
Total
comprehensive
income/(loss)
for the year - - - 403 - (3,413) (3,010) (80) (3,090)
--------------- ------- ------- -------- ----------- -------- --------- ------------ --------------- --------
Shares issue 2,095 1,571 - - - - 3,666 - 3,666
Debts to
equity
conversion
(note 17) 112 246 - - - - 358 - 358
Shares placing
in cash (note
17) 477 834 - - - - 1,311 - 1,311
Arising on
employee
share options - - - - - 22 22 - 22
Total equity
as at 31
December
2020 30,804 248,950 64,702 (55,240) (2,362) (223,868) 62,986 (5,809) 57,177
--------------- ------- ------- -------- ----------- -------- --------- ------------ --------------- --------
Share Share Deferred Cumulative Other Retained Total Non-controlling Total
capital premium shares translation reserves deficit attributable interests equity
US$'000 US$'000 reserve US$'000 US$'000 to the owner US$'000 US$'000
US$'000 US$'000 of the
Parent
US$'000
Total equity
as at 1
January
2019 25,416 229,020 64,702 (55,911) (2,362) (219,230) 41,635 (5,605) 36,030
--------------- ------- ------- -------- ----------- -------- --------- ------------ --------------- --------
Loss after
taxation - - - - - (1,278) (1,278) (124) (1,402)
Exchange
differences
on
translating
foreign
operations
and recycling
of exchange
differences
on
disposal of
subsidiaries - - - 268 - - 268 - 268
--------------- ------- ------- -------- ----------- -------- --------- ------------ --------------- --------
Total
comprehensive
income/(loss)
for the year - - - 268 - (1,278) (1,010) (124) (1,134)
--------------- ------- ------- -------- ----------- -------- --------- ------------ --------------- --------
Shares issue 2,648 17,115 - - - - 19,763 - 19,763
Share options
exercised 56 164 - - - - 220 - 220
Arising on
employee
share options - - - - - 31 31 - 31
--------------- ------- ------- -------- ----------- -------- --------- ------------ --------------- --------
Total equity
as at 31
December
2019 28,120 246,299 64,702 (55,643) (2,362) (220,477) 60,639 (5,729) 54,910
--------------- ------- ------- -------- ----------- -------- --------- ------------ --------------- --------
Equity Description and purpose
Share capital The nominal value of shares issued
Share premium Amount subscribed for share capital in excess of
nominal value
Deferred shares The nominal value of deferred shares issued
Cumulative translation reserve Gains/losses arising on
retranslating the net assets of overseas operations into US
Dollars, less amounts recycled on disposal of subsidiaries and
joint ventures
Other reserves Fair value of warrants issued and capital
contribution arising on discounted loans
Retained deficit Cumulative losses recognised in the
consolidated statement of profit or loss, adjustments on the
acquisition of non-controlling interests and transfers in respect
of share based payments
Non-controlling interest The interest of non-controlling parties
in the net assets of the subsidiaries
Parent Company Statement of Changes in Equity
Share Share Deferred Other reserves Retained Total attributable
capital premium shares US$'000 deficit to the owner
US$'000 US$'000 US$'000 US$'000 of the Parent
US$'000
Total equity as at 1 January 2020 28,120 246,299 64,702 - (138,167) 200,954
--------------------------------------- -------- -------- -------- -------------- --------- ------------------
Total comprehensive loss for the year - - - - (104,436) (104,436)
Shares issue 2,095 1,571 - - - 3,666
Debts to equity conversion (note 17) 112 246 - - - 358
Shares placing in cash (note 17) 477 834 - - - 1,311
Arising on employee share options - - - - 22 22
Total equity as at 31 December 2020 30,804 248,950 64,702 - (242,581) 101,875
--------------------------------------- -------- -------- -------- -------------- --------- ------------------
Total equity as at 1 January 2019 25,416 229,020 64,702 14,936 (144,911) 189,163
---------------------------------------- ------ ------- ------ -------- --------- -------
Total comprehensive loss for the year - - - - (8,223) (8,223)
Restructuring of Intragroup Debt (note
17) - - - (14,936) 14,936 -
Shares issue 2,648 17,115 - - - 19,763
Stock options exercised 56 164 - - - 220
Arising on employee share options - - - - 31 31
Total equity as at 31 December 2019 28,120 246,299 64,702 - (138,167) 200,954
---------------------------------------- ------ ------- ------ -------- --------- -------
Equity Description and purpose
Share capital The nominal value of shares issued
Share premium Amount subscribed for share capital in excess of
nominal value
Deferred shares The nominal value of deferred shares issued
Other reserves Capital contribution arising on discounted
loans
Retained deficit Cumulative losses recognised in the profit or
loss
Consolidated S tatement of Financial Position
Company number 5966431 Notes Group Group
2020 201 9
US$'000 US$'000
--------------------------------------------- ----- --------- ---------
Assets
Non-current assets
Unproven oil and gas assets 11 61,413 60,040
Property, plant and equipment 12 52,845 51,326
Other receivables 15 4,246 5,745
Restricted use cash 241 241
--------------------------------------------- ----- --------- ---------
Total non-current assets 118,745 117,352
--------------------------------------------- ----- --------- ---------
Current assets
Inventories 1 4 392 384
Other receivables 15 6,195 5,663
Cash and cash equivalents 16 329 4,060
--------------------------------------------- ----- --------- ---------
Total current assets 6,916 10,107
--------------------------------------------- ----- --------- ---------
Total assets 125,661 127,459
--------------------------------------------- ----- --------- ---------
Equity and liabilities
Capital and reserves attributable to equity
holders of the parent
Share capital 17 30,804 28,120
Share premium 248,950 246,299
Deferred shares 17 64,702 64,702
Other reserves (2,362) (2,362)
Retained deficit (223,868) (220,477)
Cumulative translation reserve (55,240) (55,643)
--------------------------------------------- ----- --------- ---------
Equity attributable to the owners of the
Parent 62,986 60,639
--------------------------------------------- ----- --------- ---------
Non-controlling interests 27 (5,809) (5,729)
--------------------------------------------- ----- --------- ---------
Total equity 57,177 54,910
--------------------------------------------- ----- --------- ---------
Current liabilities
Trade and other payables 18 11,012 14,836
Short - term borrowings 19 5,600 4,050
Provision for BNG licence payment 20 3,178 3,178
Other current provisions 20 6,117 6,304
--------------------------------------------- ----- --------- ---------
Total current liabilities 25,907 28,368
--------------------------------------------- ----- --------- ---------
Non-current liabilities
Deferred tax liabilities 23 6,629 7,244
Provision for BNG licence payment 20 21,887 24,216
Other non-current provisions 20 413 428
Other payables 18 13,648 12,293
--------------------------------------------- ----- --------- ---------
Total non-current liabilities 42,577 44,181
--------------------------------------------- ----- --------- ---------
Total liabilities 68,484 72,549
--------------------------------------------- ----- --------- ---------
Total equity and liabilities 125,661 127,459
--------------------------------------------- ----- --------- ---------
Parent Company Statement of Financial Position
Company number 05966431 Notes Company Company
2020 201 9
US$'000 US$'000
------------------------------------------ ----- --------- ---------
Assets
Non-current assets
Investments in subsidiaries 13 15,487 223,781
Other receivables 15 89,265 10,704
Total non-current assets 104,752 234,485
------------------------------------------ ----- --------- ---------
Current assets
Other receivables 15 9 7
Cash and cash equivalents 16 3 87
------------------------------------------ ----- --------- ---------
Total current assets 12 94
------------------------------------------ ----- --------- ---------
Total assets 104,764 234,579
------------------------------------------ ----- --------- ---------
Equity and liabilities
Capital and reserves attributable
to equity holders of the parent
Share capital 17 30,804 28,120
Share premium 248,950 246,299
Deferred shares 17 64,702 64,702
Retained deficit (242,581) (138,167)
Equity attributable to the owners of the
Parent 101,875 200,954
------------------------------------------ ----- --------- ---------
Total equity 101,875 200,954
------------------------------------------ ----- --------- ---------
Current liabilities
Short-term borrowings 19 2,069 1,814
Trade and other payables 18 820 31,811
Total current liabilities 2,889 33,625
------------------------------------------ ----- --------- ---------
Non-current liabilities - -
Total non-current liabilities - -
------------------------------------------ ----- --------- ---------
Total liabilities 2,889 33,625
------------------------------------------ ----- --------- ---------
Total equity and liabilities 104,764 234,579
------------------------------------------ ----- --------- ---------
The Company incurred a loss for the year ended 31 December 2020
in the amount of US$ 104,436,000 (2019: loss of US$ 8,223,000).
Consolidated and Parent Company Statements of Cash Flows
Group Group Company Company
2020 2019 2020 2019
Notes US$'000 US$'000 US$'000 US$'000
-------- -------- -------- --------
Cash flows from operating activities
Cash received from customers 10,807 16,465 - -
Payments made to suppliers for
goods and services (11,124) (6,767) (1,263) (1,128)
Payments made to employees (1,423) (1,226) (399) (597)
-------------------------------------- ----- -------- -------- -------- --------
Net cash flow from operating
activities (1,740) 8,472 (1,662) (1,725)
-------------------------------------- ----- -------- -------- -------- --------
Cash flows from investing activities
Purchase of property, plant
and equipment (3,019) (669) - -
Additions to unproven oil and
gas assets (1,520) (5,822) - -
Advances repaid by subsidiaries - - 302 108
Advances issued to subsidiaries - - (35) (100)
Net cash flow from investing
activities (4,539) (6,491) 267 8
-------------------------------------- ----- -------- -------- -------- --------
Cash flows from financing activities
Net proceeds from issue of ordinary
share capital 1,311 220 1,311 220
Loans repaid 25 - (28) - -
Loans received 25 1,237 1,330 - 1,330
Repayment of loans provided
by subsidiaries - - - (38)
Net cash flow from financing
activities 2,548 1,522 1,311 1,512
-------------------------------------- ----- -------- -------- -------- --------
Net increase/(decrease) in cash
and cash equivalents (3,731) 3,503 (84) (205)
Cash and cash equivalents at
the beginning of the year 4,060 557 87 292
-------------------------------------- ----- -------- -------- -------- --------
Cash and cash equivalents at
the end of the year 16 329 4,060 3 87
-------------------------------------- ----- -------- -------- -------- --------
Significant non-cash transactions include the following and
details can be found in notes 6, 7, 9, 11, 12, 13, 16, 17:
- Acquisition of 100% interest at KC Caspian Explorer in
exchange of issue of 160,256,410 new Caspian Sunrise with the
consideration value of US$ 3,666,000 on the date (2019: Acquisition
of 100% interest at 3A Best in exchange of issue of 149,253,732 new
Caspian Sunrise shares with the consideration value of US$
11,795,000);
- Share-based payments in the amount of US$ 22,000 (2019: US$ 31,000);
- Withholding tax in the amount of US$ 1,748,000 (2019: US$ 1,860,000);
- Exchange differences on translating foreign operations of US$ 6,000 (2019: US$ 49,000);
- Depreciation charge of US$ 1,688,000 (2019: US$ 148,000);
- Interest expense of US$ 1,067,000 (2019: US$ 452,000);
- Issuance of 8,938,570 ordinary shares at 3.2 pence per share
with the consideration value of US$ 357,319 in settlement of
outstanding salary and expenses.
- Impairment of $145.7 million to the Parent Company's
investment in subsidiaries arising following a reduction in the
Group's market capitalisation.
* Additions to unproven oil and gas assets contain the amount of
US$ 8,275 in relation to payroll expenses capitalized (2019: US$:
185,500).
Notes to the Financial Statements
General information
Caspian Sunrise plc ("the Company") is a public limited company
incorporated and domiciled in England and Wales. The address of its
registered office is 5 New Street Square, London, EC4A 3TW. These
consolidated financial statements were authorised for issue by the
Board of Directors on 28 June 2021.
The principal activities of the Group are exploration and
production of crude oil.
1 Principal accounting policies
The principal accounting policies applied in the preparation of
these consolidated financial statements are set out below.
1.1 Basis of preparation
The Group's and Parent's financial statements have been prepared
in accordance with international accounting standards in conformity
with the requirements of the Companies Act 2006 and as applied in
accordance with the provisions of the Companies Act 2006
Going concern
The financial outlook has improved when compared to the position
12 months ago but not yet to the point where the material
uncertainty in respect of going concern highlighted in the 2019
Financial Statements and the 2020 interim statements has fully
receded.
At 31 December 2020, the Group had cash of $0.3 million and net
current liabilities of $19.0 million. The imbalance reflects the
financial impact of Covid-19 and market volatility in respect of
commodity prices. As at 1 June 2021 the Group had cash of
approximately $0.7 million.
On the brighter side the dramatic decline in international
prices, which fell as low as $16 per barrel has been reversed with
the Brent price recently exceeding $75 per barrel. As is the case
with domestic prices which have recently tripled.
The Caspian Explorer is forecast to start generating income H2
and the current work programme costs at 3A Best are to be funded by
our new partners subject to the license extension.
On the negative side we have yet to see any meaningful
production from any of the deep wells and the BNG historic costs on
the MJF structure, which were assessed and now confirmed at $32
million payable quarterly over a ten-year period will continue to
consume a large proportion of the cash generated from international
sales at the MJF structure.
The Board have assessed cash flow forecasts prepared for a
period of at least 12 months from the of approval of the financial
statements and assessed the risks and uncertainties associated with
the operations and funding position, including the potential
further effects of the COVID-19 pandemic.
Inevitably, there is an international price below which the
Group would need to take further action to conserve costs or raise
additional funding. The Board considers that price to be around the
$54per barrel level in the absence of any reduction to the assessed
BNG historic costs.
The Group's liquidity remains dependent on a number of key
factors:
-- The Group continues to forward sell its domestic production
and receive advances from oil traders with $2.5m currently advanced
and the continued availability of such arrangements is important to
working capital. Whilst the Board anticipate such facilities
remaining available given its trader relationships and recent oil
price increases, should they be withdrawn or reduced more quickly
than forecast cash flows allow then additional funding would be
required.
-- The Group has approximately $0.2m of aged creditors which are
being settled over the coming months from operating cash flows.
Whilst relations are positive with the suppliers, if their support
is withdrawn additional funding may be required.
-- The Group has $5.6m of loans due on demand or within the
forecast period to its largest shareholder and their connected
companies. Whilst the Board has received assurances that the
facilities will not be called for payment unless sufficient
liquidity exists, there are no binding agreements currently in
place to this effect and if repayment was required additional
funding would be needed.
-- The Group has $6.0m of liabilities due on demand under social
development program and $3.2m of BNG licence payments due within
the forecast period to the Kazakh government. Whilst the Board has
forecasted the payment of BNG licence payments, there are no
payments planned for social development program within the forecast
period as the Board expects additional payment deferrals to be
approved.
-- The Group is looking to partner with others to drill further
deep wells thereby reducing the costs.
-- As noted above, the forecasts remain sensitive to oil prices,
which have shown significant volatility. Independent of the factors
above, if international oil prices fell below $54/bbl additional
actions would be required including some or all of the following:
further cost reductions, additional payment deferrals and raising
funds.
These circumstances continue to indicate the existence of a
material uncertainty which may cast significant doubt about the
Group's ability to continue as a going concern and therefore may be
unable to realise its assets and discharge its liabilities in the
normal course of business. The financial statements do not include
the adjustments that would result if the Group was unable to
continue as a going concern.
Notwithstanding the material uncertainty described above, after
making enquiries and assessing the progress against the forecast,
projections and the status of the mitigating actions referred to
above, the Directors have a reasonable expectation that the Group
will continue in operation and meet its commitments as they fall
due over the going concern period. Accordingly, the Directors
continue to adopt the going concern basis in preparing the
financial statements.
The Company has taken advantage of section 408 of the Companies
Act 2006 and has not included its own profit or loss in these
financial statements.
The preparation of financial statements in conformity with IFRSs
requires the Management to make judgements, estimates and
assumptions that affect the application of policies and reported
amounts in the financial statements.
The areas involving a higher degree of judgement or complexity,
or areas where assumptions or estimates are significant to the
financial statements are disclosed in note 2.
1.2 New and revised standards and interpretations
The Group applied for the first time, certain standards and
amendments, which are effective for annual periods beginning on or
after 1 January 2020. The Group has not early adopted any other
standard, interpretation or amendment that has been issued but is
not yet effective. The nature and effect of the changes that result
from the adoption of these new standards are described below. Other
than the changes described below, the accounting policies adopted
are consistent with those of the previous financial year.
Several other amendments and interpretations apply for the first
time in 2020, but do not have an impact on the consolidated
financial statements of the Group. The Group has not early adopted
any standards, interpretations or amendments that have been issued
but are not yet effective.
Amendments to IFRS 3: Definition of a Business
The amendment to IFRS 3 Business Combinations clarifies that to
be considered a business, an integrated set of activities and
assets must include, at a minimum, an input and a substantive
process that, together, significantly contribute to the ability to
create output. Furthermore, it clarifies that a business can exist
without including all of the inputs and processes needed to create
outputs. These amendments had no impact on the consolidated
financial statements of the Group, but may impact future periods
should the Group enter into any additional business
combinations.
Amendments to IFRS 7, IFRS 9 and IAS 39 Interest Rate Benchmark
Reform
The amendments to IFRS 9 and IAS 39 Financial Instruments:
Recognition and Measurement provide a number of reliefs, which
apply to all hedging relationships that are directly affected by
interest rate benchmark reform. A hedging relationship is affected
if the reform gives rise to uncertainty about the timing and/or
amount of benchmark-based cash flows of the hedged item or the
hedging instrument. These amendments have no impact on the
consolidated financial statements of the Group as it does not
hedge.
Amendments to IAS 1 and IAS 8 Definition of Material
The amendments provide a new definition of material that states,
"information is material if omitting, misstating or obscuring it
could reasonably be expected to influence decisions that the
primary users of general purpose financial statements make on the
basis of those financial statements, which provide financial
information about a specific reporting entity." The amendments
clarify that materiality will depend on the nature or magnitude of
information, either individually or in combination with other
information, in the context of the financial statements. A
misstatement of information is material if it could reasonably be
expected to influence decisions made by the primary users. These
amendments had no impact on the consolidated financial statements
of, nor is there expected to be any future impact to the Group.
Conceptual Framework for Financial Reporting issued on 29 March
2018
The Conceptual Framework is not a standard, and none of the
concepts contained therein override the concepts or requirements in
any standard. The purpose of the Conceptual Framework is to assist
the IASB in developing standards, to help preparers develop
consistent accounting policies where there is no applicable
standard in place and to assist all parties to understand and
interpret the standards. This will affect those entities which
developed their accounting policies based on the Conceptual
Framework. The revised Conceptual Framework includes some new
concepts, updated definitions and recognition criteria for assets
and liabilities and clarifies some important concepts. These
amendments had no impact on the consolidated financial statements
of the Group.
Amendments to IFRS 16 Covid-19 Related Rent Concessions
On 28 May 2020, the IASB issued Covid-19-Related Rent
Concessions - amendment to IFRS 16 Leases
The amendments provide relief to lessees from applying IFRS 16
guidance on lease modification accounting for rent concessions
arising as a direct consequence of the Covid-19 pandemic. As a
practical expedient, a lessee may elect not to assess whether a
Covid-19 related rent concession from a lessor is a lease
modification. A lessee that makes this election accounts for any
change in lease payments resulting from the Covid-19 related rent
concession the same way it would account for the change under IFRS
16, if the change were not a lease modification.
New standards, interpretations and amendments not yet
effective
Below is a list of new and revised IFRSs that are not yet
mandatorily effective (but allow early application) for the year
ending 31 December 2020 and have not been early adopted by the
Group. These standards are not expected to have a material impact
on the Group in the future reporting periods and on foreseeable
future transactions.
Effective for
annual periods
beginning on
or after
Property, Plant and Equipment: Proceeds before 01-Jan-22
intended use - Amendments to IAS 16
----------------
Reference to the Conceptual Framework - Amendments 01-Jan-22
to IFRS 3
----------------
Onerous Contracts - Cost of Fulfilling a Contract 01-Jan-22
Amendments to IAS 37
----------------
Annual Improvements to IFRS Standards 2018-2020 01-Jan-22
----------------
Classification of Liabilities as Current or Non-current 01-Jan-23
- Amendments to IAS 1
----------------
IFRS 17, 'Insurance Contracts' 01-Jan-23
----------------
1.3 Basis of consolidation
Subsidiary undertakings are entities that are directly or
indirectly controlled by the Group. Control is achieved when the
Group is exposed, or has rights, to variable returns from its
involvement with the investee and has the ability to affect those
returns through its power over the investee. Generally, there is a
presumption that a majority of voting rights result in control. To
support this presumption and when the Group has less than a
majority of the voting or similar rights of an investee, the Group
considers all relevant facts and circumstances in assessing whether
it has power over an investee. The consolidated financial
statements present the results of the Company and its subsidiaries
("the Group") as if they formed a single entity. Intercompany
transactions and balances between group companies are therefore
eliminated in full.
The purchase method of accounting is used to account for the
acquisition of subsidiary undertakings by the Group. The cost of an
acquisition is measured at the fair value of the assets given,
equity instruments issued and liabilities incurred or assumed at
the date of exchange. Identifiable assets acquired and liabilities
and contingent liabilities assumed in a business combination are
measured initially at their fair values at the acquisition date,
irrespective of the extent of any non-controlling interest. The
excess of the cost of acquisition over the fair value of the
Group's share of the identifiable net assets acquired is recorded
as goodwill.
1.4 Operating Loss
Operating loss is stated after crediting all operating income
and charging all operating expenses, but before crediting or
charging the financial income or expenses.
1.5 Foreign currency translation
1.5.1 Functional and presentational currencies
Items included in the financial statements of each of the
Group's entities are measured using the currency of the primary
economic environment in which the entity operates ("the functional
currency"). The consolidated financial statements are presented in
US Dollars ("US$"), which is the Group's presentational currency.
Beibars Munai LLP, Munaily Kazakhstan LLP, BNG Ltd LLP and Roxi
Petroleum Kazakhstan LLP, 3A_Best Group JSC, and Caspian Technical
Services LLP subsidiary undertakings of the Group during the
period, undertake their activities in Kazakhstan and the Kazakh
Tenge is the functional currency of these entities. The functional
currency for the Company, Beibars BV, Ravninnoe BV, Galaz Energy
BV, BNG Energy BV and Eragon Petroleum FZE is USD as USD reflects
the underlying transactions, conducts and events relevant to these
companies.
1.5.2 Transactions and balances in foreign currencies
In preparing the financial statements of the individual
entities, transactions in currencies other than the entity's
functional currency ("foreign currencies") are recorded at the
rates of exchange prevailing at the dates of the transactions. At
each reporting date, monetary items denominated in foreign
currencies are retranslated at the rates prevailing at the
reporting date. Non-monetary items carried at fair value that are
denominated in foreign currencies are retranslated at the rates
prevailing at the date when the fair value was determined.
Non-monetary items, including the parent's share capital, that are
measured in terms of historical cost in a foreign currency are not
retranslated. Exchange differences are recognised in profit or loss
in the period in which they arise.
1.5.3 Consolidation
For the purpose of consolidation all assets and liabilities of
Group entities with a functional currency that is not US$ are
translated at the rate prevailing at the reporting date. The profit
or loss is translated at the exchange rate approximating to those
ruling when the transaction took place. Exchange difference arising
on retranslating the opening net assets from the opening rate and
results of operations from the average rate are recognised directly
in other comprehensive income (the "cumulative translation
reserve"). On disposal of a foreign operator, related cumulative
foreign exchange gains and losses are reclassified to profit and
loss and are recognized as part of the gain or loss on
disposal.
1.6 Current tax
Current tax is based on taxable profit for the year. Taxable
profit differs from profit as reported in the profit or loss
because it excludes items of income or expense that are taxable or
deductible in other years and it further excludes items that are
never taxable or deductible. The Group's liability for current tax
is calculated using tax rates that have been enacted or
substantively enacted by the reporting date.
In case of the uncertainty of the tax treatment, the Group
assess, whether it is probable or not, that the tax treatment will
be accepted, and to determine the value, the Group use the most
likely amount or the expected value in determining taxable profit
(tax loss), tax bases, unused tax losses, unused tax credits and
tax rates.
Withholding tax payable at Kazakhstan
According to requirements of the Tax Code of Kazakhstan,
withholding taxes payable for non-residents should be withheld from
the total amount of interest income of non-residents and paid to
the government when interest is paid (in cash) to non-residents.
The companies should pay taxes from non-residents' interest income
derived from sources in the Republic of Kazakhstan on behalf of
these non-residents.
1.7 Deferred tax
Deferred tax is provided on temporary differences between the
carrying amounts of assets and liabilities for financial reporting
purposes and the amounts used for taxation purposes. The following
temporary differences are not provided for: the initial recognition
of assets or liabilities that affect neither accounting nor taxable
profit other than in a business combination, and differences
relating to investments in subsidiaries to the extent that they
will probably not reverse in the foreseeable future.
The amount of deferred tax provided is based on the expected
manner of realisation or settlement of the carrying amount of
assets and liabilities, using tax rates enacted or substantively
enacted at the reporting date.
Deferred tax liabilities are generally recognised for all
taxable temporary differences. A deferred tax asset is recorded
only to the extent that it is probable that taxable profit will be
available, against which the deductible temporary differences can
be utilised.
1.8 Unproven oil and gas assets
The Group applies the full cost method of accounting for
exploration and unproven oil and gas asset costs, having regard to
the requirements of IFRS 6 'Exploration for and Evaluation of
Mineral Resources'. Under the full cost method of accounting, costs
of exploring for and evaluating oil and gas properties are
accumulated and capitalised by reference to appropriate cost pools.
Such cost pools are based on license areas. The Group currently has
two cost pools.
Exploration and evaluation costs include costs of license
acquisition, technical services and studies, seismic acquisition,
exploration drilling and testing, but do not include costs incurred
prior to having obtained the legal rights to explore an area, which
are expensed directly to the profit or loss as they are
incurred.
Plant and equipment assets acquired for use in exploration and
evaluation activities are classified as property, plant and
equipment. However, to the extent that such asset is consumed in
developing an unproven oil and gas asset, the amount reflecting
that consumption is recorded as part of the cost of the unproven
oil and gas asset.
The amounts included within unproven oil and gas assets include
the fair value that was paid for the acquisition of partnerships
holding subsoil use in Kazakhstan. These licenses have been
capitalised to the Group's full cost pool in respect of each
license area.
Exploration and unproven oil and gas assets related to each
exploration license/prospect are not amortised but are carried
forward until the technical feasibility and commercial feasibility
of extracting a mineral resource are demonstrated.
Commercial reserves are defined as proved oil and gas
reserves.
Proven oil and gas properties
Once a project reaches the stage of commercial production and
production permits are received, the carrying values of the
relevant exploration and evaluation asset are assessed for
impairment and transferred to proven oil and gas properties and
included within property plant and equipment. The costs transferred
comprise direct costs associated with the relevant wells and
infrastructure, together with an allocation of the wider
unallocated exploration costs in the cost pool such as original
acquisition costs for the field.
Proven oil and gas properties are accounted for in accordance
with provisions of the cost model under IAS 16 "Property Plant and
Equipment" and are depleted on unit of production basis based on
commercial reserves of the pool to which they relate.
As part of the Kazakh licencing regime, upon award of a
production contract in respect of the BNG licence area, an
obligation to make a payment to the licencing authority is
triggered, settled over a 10 year period in equal quarterly
instalments. Such payments are considered to form a cost of the
licence and are capitalised to proven oil and gas assets and
subsequently depreciated on a units of production basis in
accordance with the Group's depreciation policy. In circumstances
where the amount assessed by the authorities is contested, the
Group records a provision discounted using a Kazakh government bond
yield with a term approximating the payment profile and the
discount is unwound over the payment term and charged to finance
costs. Payments made are charged against the provision.
Impairment
Exploration and unproven intangible assets are reviewed for
impairments if events or changes in circumstances indicate that the
carrying amount may not be recoverable as at the reporting date.
Intangible exploration and evaluation assets that relate to
exploration and evaluation activities that are not yet determined
to have resulted in the discovery of the commercial reserve remain
capitalised as intangible exploration and evaluation assets subject
to meeting a pool-wide impairment test as set out below.
In accordance with IFRS 6 the Group firstly considers the
following facts and circumstances in their assessment of whether
the
Group's exploration and evaluation assets may be impaired,
whether:
-- the period for which the Group has the right to explore in a
specific area has expired during the period or will expire in the
near future, and is not expected to be renewed;
-- substantive expenditure on further exploration for and
evaluation of mineral resources in a specific area is neither
budgeted nor planned;
-- exploration for and evaluation of hydrocarbons in a specific
area have not led to the discovery of commercially viable
quantities of hydrocarbons and the Group has decided to discontinue
such activities in the specific area; and
-- sufficient data exists to indicate that although a
development in a specific area is likely to proceed, the carrying
amount of the exploration and evaluation assets is unlikely to be
recovered in full from successful development or by sale.
If any such facts or circumstances are noted, the Group perform
an impairment test in accordance with the provisions of IAS 36. The
aggregate carrying value is compared against the expected
recoverable amount of the cash generating unit, being the relevant
cost pool. The recoverable amount is the higher of value in use and
the fair value less costs to sell.
An impairment loss is reversed if the asset's or cash-generating
unit's recoverable amount exceeds its carrying amount.
Impairment of development and production assets and other
property, plant and equipment
At each balance sheet date, the Group reviews the carrying
amounts of its PP&E to determine whether there is any
indication that those assets have suffered an impairment loss. If
any such indication exists, the recoverable amount of the asset is
estimated in order to determine the extent of the impairment loss
(if any). Where the asset does not generate cash flows that are
independent from other assets, the Group estimates the recoverable
amount of the cash-generating unit to which the asset belongs. The
recoverable amount is the higher of fair value less costs to sell
and value in use. Fair value less costs to sell is determined by
discounting the post-tax cash flows expected to be generated by the
cash-generating unit, net of associated selling costs, and takes
into account assumptions market participants would use in
estimating fair value including future capital expenditure and
development cost for extraction of the field reserves. In assessing
value in use, the estimated future cash flows are discounted to
their present value using a pre-tax discount rate that reflects
current market assessments of the time value of money and the risks
specific to the asset for which the estimates of future cash flows
have not been adjusted.
If the recoverable amount of an asset (or cash-generating unit)
is estimated to be less than its carrying amount, the carrying
amount of the asset (cash-generating unit) is reduced to its
recoverable amount. An impairment loss is recognised as an expense
immediately.
Where an impairment loss subsequently reverses, the carrying
amount of the asset (cash-generating unit) is increased to the
revised estimate of its recoverable amount, but so that the
increased carrying amount does not exceed the carrying amount that
would have been determined had no impairment loss been recognised
for the asset (cash-generating unit) in prior years. A reversal of
an impairment loss is recognised as income immediately.
Workovers/Overhauls and maintenance
From time to time a workover or overhaul or maintenance of
existing proven oil and gas properties is required, which normally
falls into one of two distinct categories. The type of workover
dictates the accounting policy and recognition of the related
costs:
Capitalisable costs - cost will be capitalised where the
performance of an asset is improved, where an asset being
overhauled is being changed from its initial use, the assets'
useful life is being extended, or the asset is being modified to
assist the production of new reserves.
Non-capitalisable costs - expense type workover costs are costs
incurred as maintenance type expenditure, which would be considered
day-to-day servicing of the asset. These types of expenditures are
recognised within cost of sales in the statement of comprehensive
income as incurred. Expense workovers generally include work that
is maintenance in nature and generally will not increase production
capability through accessing new reserves, production from a new
zone or significantly extend the life or change the nature of the
well from its original production profile.
1.9 Abandonment
Provision is made for the present value of the future cost of
the decommissioning of oil wells and related facilities. This
provision is recognised when the asset is installed. The estimated
costs, based on engineering cost levels prevailing at the reporting
date, are computed on the basis of the latest assumptions as to the
scope and method of decommissioning. The corresponding amount is
capitalised as a part of the oil and gas asset and, when in
production is amortised on a unit-of-production basis as part of
the depreciation, depletion and amortisation charge. Any adjustment
arising from the reassessment of estimated cost of decommissioning
is capitalised, while the charge arising from the unwinding of the
discount applied to the decommissioning provision is treated as a
component of the interest charge.
1.10 Restricted use cash
Restricted use cash is the amount set aside by the Group for the
purpose of creating an abandonment fund to cover the future cost of
the decommissioning of oil and gas wells and related facilities and
in accordance with local legal rulings.
Under the Subsoil Use Contracts the Group must place 1% of the
value of exploration costs in an escrow deposit account, unless
agreed otherwise with the Ministry of Energy. At the end of the
contract this cash will be used to return the field to the
condition that it was in before exploration started.
1.11 Property, plant and equipment
All property, plant and equipment assets are stated at cost or
fair value on acquisition less accumulated depreciation.
Depreciation is provided on a straight-line basis, at rates
calculated to write off the cost less the estimated residual value
of each asset over its expected useful economic life. The residual
value is the estimated amount that would currently be obtained from
disposal of the asset if the asset were already of the age and in
the condition expected at the end of its useful life. Expected
useful economic life and residual values are reviewed annually.
The annual rates of depreciation for class of property, plant
and equipment are as follows:
- motor vehicles 4-5 years
- other over 2-4 years
The Group assesses at each reporting date whether there is any
indication that any of its property, plant and equipment has been
impaired. If such an indication exists, the asset's recoverable
amount is estimated and compared to its carrying value.
1.12 Investments (Company)
Investments in subsidiary undertakings are shown at cost less
allowance for impairment. Long-term advances to subsidiaries are
discounted at estimated market rate of interest with the difference
between a fair value and a face value of the advance being recorded
within investments.
Loan are amortised cost is assessed for expected credit loss
under IFRS 9.
1.13 Financial instruments
The Group classifies financial instruments, or their component
parts on initial recognition, as a financial asset, a financial
liability or an equity instrument in accordance with the substance
of the contractual agreement.
Financial assets and financial liabilities are recognised when
the Group becomes a party to the contractual provisions of the
financial instrument.
Financial assets
Financial assets are classified as either financial assets at
amortised cost, at fair value through other comprehensive income
("FVTOCI") or at fair value through profit or loss ("FVPL")
depending upon the business model for managing the financial assets
and the nature of the contractual cash flow characteristics of the
financial asset.
A loss allowance for expected credit losses is determined for
all financial assets, other than those at FVPL, at the end of each
reporting period. The Group applies a simplified approach to
measure the credit loss allowance for any trade receivables using
the lifetime expected credit loss provision. The lifetime expected
credit loss is evaluated for each trade receivable taking into
account payment history, payments made subsequent to year end and
prior to reporting, past default experience and the impact of any
other relevant and current observable data. The Group applies a
general approach on all other receivables classified as financial
assets. The general approach recognises lifetime expected credit
losses when there has been a significant increase in credit risk
since initial recognition.
The Group derecognises a financial asset when the contractual
rights to the cash flows from the asset expire, or when it
transfers the financial asset and substantially all the risks and
rewards of ownership of the asset to another party. The Group
derecognises financial liabilities when the Group's obligations are
discharged, cancelled or have expired.
The Group's financial assets consist of cash and other
receivables. Cash and cash equivalents are defined as short term
cash deposits which comprise cash on deposit with an original
maturity of less than 3 months. Other receivables are initially
measured at fair value and subsequently at amortised cost.
The Group's financial liabilities are non-interest bearing trade
and other payables, other interest bearing borrowings. Non-interest
bearing trade and other payables and other interest bearing
borrowings are stated initially at fair value and subsequently at
amortised cost.
Where a loan is renegotiated on substantially different terms,
this is treated as an extinguishment of the original financial
liability and the recognition of a new financial liability with a
gain or loss recorded in the income statement. In accordance with
IFRS 9, following a modification or renegotiation of a financial
asset or financial liability that does not result in
de-recognition, an entity is required to recognise any modification
gain or loss immediately in profit or loss. Any gain or loss is
determined by recalculating the gross carrying amount of the
financial liability by discounting the new contractual cash flows
using the original effective interest rate. The difference between
the original contractual cash flows of the liability and the
modified cash flows discounted at the original effective interest
rate is recorded in the income statement.
Share capital issued to extinguish financial liabilities is fair
valued with any difference to the carrying value of the financial
liability taken to the profit or loss.
1.14 Inventories
Inventories are initially recognised at cost, and subsequently
at the lower of cost and net realisable value. Cost comprises all
costs of purchase and other costs incurred in bringing the
inventories to their present location and condition.
1.15 Other provisions
A provision is recognised when the Group has a present legal or
constructive obligation as a result of a past event, and it is
probable that an outflow of economic benefits will be required to
settle the obligation. If the effect is material, provisions are
determined by discounting the expected future cash flows at a
pre-tax rate that reflects current market assessments of the time
value of money and, where appropriate, the risks specific to the
liability.
1.16 Share capital
Ordinary and deferred shares are classified as equity.
Incremental costs directly attributable to the issue of new shares
or options are shown in equity as a deduction from the
proceeds.
1.17 Share-based payments
The Group has used shares and share options as consideration for
services received from employees.
Equity-settled share-based payments to employees and others
providing similar services are measured at fair value at the date
of grant. The fair value determined at the grant date of such an
equity-settled share-based instrument is expensed on a
straight-line basis over the vesting period, based on the Group's
estimate of the shares that will eventually vest.
Equity-settled share-based payment transactions with other
parties are measured at the fair value of the goods or services
received, except where the fair value cannot be estimated reliably,
in which case they are measured at the fair value of the equity
instruments granted, measured at the date the entity obtains the
goods or the counterparty renders the service. The fair value
determined at the grant date of such an equity-settled share-based
instrument is expensed since the shares vest immediately. Where the
services are related to the issue of shares, the fair values of
these services are offset against share premium where
permitted.
Fair value is measured using the Black-Scholes model. The
expected life used in the model has been adjusted based on the
Management's best estimate, for the effects of non-transferability,
exercise restrictions and behavioural considerations.
1.18 Warrants
Warrants are separated from the host contract as their risks and
characteristics are not closely related to those of the host
contracts. Where the exercise price of the warrants is in a
different currency to the functional currency of the Company, at
each reporting date the warrants are valued at fair value with
changes in fair values recognised through profit or loss as they
arise. The fair values of the warrants are calculated using the
Black-Scholes model. Where the warrant exercise price is in the
same currency as the functional currency of the issuer and involve
the issuance of a fixed number of shares the warrants are recorded
in equity.
1.19 Revenue
Revenue from contracts with customers is recognised when or as
the Group satisfies a performance obligation by transferring a
promised good or service to a customer. A good or service is
transferred when the customer obtains control of that good or
service. The transfer of control of oil sold by the Group usually
coincides with title passing to the customer. The Group satisfies
its performance obligations at a point in time.
Under the terms of domestic oil sales arrangements, the
performance obligation is satisfied when the local refinery
provides the seller and the customer with the act of acceptance of
crude oil of quantity and quality according to the agreement
between the parties.
Under the terms of export sales arrangements, the performance
obligation is satisfied when the Ocean Bill of Lading is issued by
the transport company that reflects the fact of boarding the crude
oil of specified quantity and quality on the tanker.
Revenue is measured at the fair value of the consideration
received, excluding value added tax ("VAT") and other sales taxes
or duty. Royalties are not included in revenue, they are paid on
production and recorded within cost of sales.
Payments in advance by oil traders are recorded initially as
deferred revenue, reflecting the nature of the transaction.
Subsequently, the deferred revenue is reduced and revenue is
recorded, as sales are made under the Group's revenue recognition
policy with the performance obligation satisfied.
Revenue from the use by third parties of the Caspian Explorer
will be recognised when the contracted services are performed.
1.20 Cost of sales
The Group started to calculate the cost of sales on crude oil
sold during 2019 because its asset BNG has received the production
license on part of its contract territory in July 2019. On the rest
of its territory (%) BNG continues to work under Exploration
license. During test production on Exploration cost of sales cannot
be reliably estimated and therefore a cost of sales equal to
revenue is recognised and credited to the unproven oil and gas
assets.
1.21 Segmental reporting
Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the
internal reporting provided to the chief operating decision maker.
The chief operating decision maker, who is responsible for
allocating resources and assessing performance of the operating
segments and making strategic decisions, has been identified as the
Board of Directors. The Group has one operating segment being oil
exploration and production in Kazakhstan and therefore one
reporting segment. The Group has several cost pools divided based
on the different contractual territory of its assets. As the
activity of all cost pools is the same (oil exploration and
production) and all of them operate geographically in Kazakhstan,
the Group reports one segment in its financials.
1.22 Interest receivable and payable
Interest income and expense are reported on an accrual basis
using the effective interest rate method.
1.23 Forward Sales
Advance payments are taken for oil to be sold on the domestic
market with the liability reduced over time as oil is delivered
based on the then prevailing domestic oil price.
1.24 Exchange rates
For reference the year end exchange rate from sterling to US$
was 1.36 and the average rate during the year was 1.3. The year-end
exchange rate from KZT to US$ was 420.91 and the average rate
during the year was 412.95.
2 Critical accounting estimates and judgements
In the process of applying the Group's accounting policies,
which are described in note 1, Management has made the following
judgements and key assumptions that have the most significant
effect on the amounts recognised in the financial statements.
2.1 Carrying value of exploration and evaluation costs (note
11)
Under the full cost method of accounting for exploration and
evaluation costs, such costs are capitalised as intangible assets
by reference to appropriate cost pools, and are assessed for
impairment on a concession basis based on the impairment indicators
detailed in accounting policy note 1.8. As at 31 December 2020, the
Group assessed the exploration and evaluation assets disclosed in
note 11 and determined that no indicators of impairment existed at
a cost pool level in respect of the BNG cost pool. The Group also
considered whether the factors that gave rise to the original
impairment loss no longer existed and reversal of the impairment is
appropriate. In forming this assessment, the Board considered the
oil reserves and resources associated with the licence area, the
results of exploration activity to date, the successful transition
to production of the MJF licence area in the previous year and the
net present value of the shallow structures, the status of licences
and future plans for the licence areas. In forming its assessment,
the Board considered the Group's commitments under the licence
detailed in note 20 and the impact of outstanding obligations.
Having undertaken this assessment the Group concluded that no
indicators of impairment existed and that no reversal in respect of
previous impairment provisions attributable to the unproven oil and
gas assets of US$9,479,000 was yet appropriate given the absence of
a significant breakthrough on the deep structures at 31 December
2020.
Judgment has been applied in assessing whether impairment of the
exploration and evaluation assets asset of 3A Best is required at
31 December 2020 noting that the application for deferral of
obligations under the licence and the extension of the license has
been submitted and management anticipate such approvals being
provided given the impact of Covid-19, their understanding of the
Kazakh market and plans for the asset.. However, the authorities
have the right to withdraw the licence as payments due by July 2020
have not been made in respect of obligations. The Board considers
the risk of the licence being withdrawn to be remote given the
history of investment by the Group in Kazakhstan, the impact of
COVID-19 in 2020 on the Group's cash generation and ability to
undertake work program commitments and past experience. An
application to extend the licence has been submitted together with
an application to defer the obligations and commitments in 2020. In
addition, thet carrying value of 3A Best has not been impaired
based on discussions before the year end which resulted in a farm
out of 15% of the Contract Area for a deemed cost of $2.5 million,
which implies a cost of 100% greater than it carrying value.
The Beibars cost pool remains impaired based on the continuance
of the force majeure. The Group has decided to formally relinquish
any interest in Beibars.
2.2 Transfer of costs to proven oil and gas assets (prior year)
(note 11 & 12)
Judgment has been applied in assessing that the MJF area assets
meets the criteria for reclassification to proven oil and gas
assets under the Group's accounting policy in note 1.8. In
concluding that it was appropriate to transfer the asset to proven
oil and gas assets management took account of the award of a
production licence enabling exports and sales at international
prices together with the production volumes. In August 2019 BNG has
received the required production license for its MJF structure and
got the export permission starting September 2019. According to the
approach above BNG moved the related O&G assets to the
production stage in August 2019 and accordingly started charging
DD&A expense. The Board considers the remaining BNG contract
area to remain in an exploration phase given the level of wells and
production relative to plans for the field, the exploration status
of the licence and the requirement to sell its test oil in the
domestic market which represents a substantial discount to the
international market such that production is primarily a by product
of continued exploration and appraisal.
2.3 Recoverability of proven oil and gas assets (note 12)
The proven oil and gas assets, representing the MJF structure,
have been assessed for indicators of impairment at 31 December 2020
including assessment of the discounted cash flows indicated by the
Group's field plan. This analysis required judgment and estimation
in determining forecast prices as at 31 December 2020 based on
conditions existing at that time, future production and reserves,
operating costs and development costs for the field and the
discount rate. The forecasts demonstrated significant headroom with
prices based on forward prices of $51 bbl adjusted for net back
adjustments, reserves calculated using the most recent Competent
Person's report and discount rates run at 10% and 15%. Having
undertaken this assessment the Group concluded that no indicators
of impairment existed.
Having undertaken this assessment at 31 December 2019 the Group
concluded that the factors no longer applied, noting the successful
exploration activity and the transition to commercial production
and decided to release the previous impairment attributable to the
unproven oil and gas assets of US$2,414,000. The allocation between
proven and unproven oil and gas assets required judgment and was
based on relative costs incurred between the proven and unproven
asset categories as the original impairment arose when the proven
oil and gas assets formed part of the single BNG unproven oil and
gas cost pool.
2.4 Recoverability of VAT (note 15)
The Group holds VAT receivables of $3.8 million (2019:
$3.3million) as detailed in note 15 which are anticipated to be
primarily recovered through offset of future VAT payable in
accordance with Kazakh legislation. Management have assessed the
recoverability of the asset based on forecast levels of VAT
payables which demonstrate that the balance will be recovered
within 3 years (2019: 3.5 years). This required estimates regarding
future production, oil prices and expenditure.
2.5 Decommissioning (note 20)
Provision has been made in the accounts for future
decommissioning costs to plug and abandon wells in note 20. The
costs of provisions have been added to the value of the unproven
oil and gas asset and will be depreciated on a unit of production
basis.
The decommissioning liability is stated in the accounts at
discounted present value and accreted up to the final expected
liability by way of an annual finance charge. The Group has
potential decommissioning obligations in respect of its interests
in Kazakhstan. The extent to which a provision is required in
respect of these potential obligations depends, inter alia, on the
legal requirements at the time of decommissioning, the cost and
timing of any necessary decommissioning works, and the discount
rate to be applied to such costs. Actual costs incurred in future
periods may substantially differ from the amounts of provisions. In
addition, future changes in environmental laws and regulations,
estimates of deposit useful lives and discount rates may affect the
carrying value of this provision.
2.6 Acquisition of Caspian Explorer (note 22)
Judgment was required in assessing the accounting treatment for
the purchase of Caspian Explorer as an asset purchase rather than a
business combination. In forming this assessment, management
elected to make the optional concentration test according to IFRS .
80% of the total assets of the acquired entities were represented
by the carrying value of the submersible drilling rig and related
assets (the barge). Therefore, the management concluded that the
fair value of the gross assets acquired were concentrated in a
single identifiable asset (group of assets). As such, the fair
value of the purchase consideration was allocated to the assets and
liabilities acquired, costs associated with the transaction
capitalised and no deferred tax arose on the transaction.
Judgment has been applied in assessing whether impairment of the
asset is required at 31 December 2020 noting that the scrap value
of the barge plus the cost of the separate drilling rig supported
by a clear comparable sale approach as well as the future expected
cash flows and supports the recoverability of the vessel's carrying
value.
2.7 Provision for BNG licence payments (note 10, 11, 20)
As part of the Kazakh licencing regime, upon award of a
production contract in respect of the BNG licence area, an
obligation to make a payment to the licencing authority was
triggered, settled over a 10 year period in equal quarterly
instalments. Judgment was required in assessing the appropriate
accounting policy for the transaction including assessment of the
terms of the arrangement. Such payments are considered to form a
cost of the licence and are capitalised to proven oil and gas
assets. As at 31 December 2020, the Group was contesting the amount
levied by the authorities although at the date of these financial
statements final judgment has been made against the company. As
such, a provision for the amounts due has been made based on the
received judgment. Estimation was also required in selecting an
appropriate discount rate for the provision and a rate of 2.7% has
been applied, based on US dollar Eurobonds yields in Kazakhstan
with a comparable term. Estimation was also required in selecting
an appropriate discount rate for the provision and a rate of 2.7%
has been applied, based on US dollar Eurobonds yields in Kazakhstan
with a comparable term.
2.8 Uncertain tax positions (note 20)
As detailed in note 20, judgment has been applied in assessing
the extent to which tax treatments adopted by the Group
historically will be accepted or rejected by the relevant tax
authority and the resulting measurement of uncertain tax positions
in circumstances were it is probable that the treatment will be
challenged.
2.9 Indemnity receivables in relation to 3A Best acquisition
(note 21)
Under the terms of the SPA for 3A Best, the three vendors
provided indemnities that obligations related to the period prior
to acquisition would be reimbursed. Judgment has been applied in
assessing the recoverability of the indemnity receivables detailed
in note 21, which included assessment of the terms of the SPA,
confirmations received from the vendors and assessments of the
ability to meet such payments. The Board while still intending to
obtain full recovery has made a provision for two thirds of the
amounts due on the expected credit losses as at 31 December 2020
(note 15).
2.10 Recoverability of investments (note 13)
The recoverability of investments is dependent upon the future
production of the subsidiaries from existing producing assets and
unproven exploration assets, and future prices achieved, which will
determine if any provision is required against investments. The
directors have assessed the impairment indicators, and made
judgements in reflection to recoverability and make impairments as
appropriate. The management has estimated that a provision was
required of US$145.7m at the year end (2019: nil).
2.11 Estimation of credit losses of receivables from
subsidiaries (note 15)
In the parent company there are substantial receivables from the
subsidiaries. Management has used judgement to determine to the
expected credit losses against these receivable's which involves
estimates of over the ability of the subsidiaries to repay these
loans. Management has estimated an expected credit loss was
required of US$19.9m at the year end (2019: US$12.9m).
3 Segment reporting & revenue
Operating segments
Operating segments are reported in a manner consistent with the
internal reporting provided to the chief operating decision maker.
The chief operating decision maker, who is responsible for
allocating resources and assessing the performance of the operating
segments and making strategic decisions, has been identified as the
Board of Directors. The Group operated in two operating segments
during 2020: Exploration for and production of oil and oil and gas
services in Kazakhstan. All revenues from test phase and commercial
phase production are generated domestically in Kazakhstan. 100% of
the Group's oil revenue was derived from three major customers (two
local market operators - 15% and the export trader - 85%). The
revenue split of oil sales in 2020 between the domestic traders
(ANK-Energo LLP, Petro Synthesis) and the export trader (Euro-Asian
Oil SA) was US $2,112,000 and US $12,186,000 respectively.
Revenue
The Group's revenues are derived from the sale of oil in
Kazakhstan. After moving part of O&G assets into Production
phase The Group started to receive export revenues in September
2019.
Under the terms of sales on the local market, the performance
obligation is the supply of oil and the performance obligation is
satisfied at a point in time, being the delivery of oil to the
refinery. Control passes to the customer at this point with title
and risk transferred.
Under the terms of export sales control over the oil delivered
is with the Group until the customer confirms it has been shipped
on the board of the tanker. When advances are received from oil
traders for delivery of future production at specified prices,
deferred revenue is recorded and the liability reduced as oil is
delivered.
Where advances are made for future production and the financing
component of such transactions is material, a finance charge is
recorded based on the market rate of interest.
No trade receivables or accrued income was applicable at year
end (2019: $Nil).
4 Operating (loss)/income
Group operating (loss)/income for the year has been arrived after
charging:
------------------------------------------------------------------------
Group Group
20 20 201 9
US$'000 US$'000
--------------------------------------------------- --------- --------
Staff costs (note 6) (1,256) (1,420)
Depreciation of property, plant and equipment
(note 12) (1,688) (148)
Auditors' remuneration (note 5) (188) (196)
Share based payment remuneration (note 6) (22) (31)
Expected credit loss provision against amount
due in respect of 3A Best (note15) (2,551) -
Reversal of impairment (notes 11 and 12) - 2,414
5 Group Auditor's remuneration
Fees payable by the Group to the Company's auditor BDO and its
member firms in respect of the year:
Group Group
20 20 2019
US$'000 US$'000
--------------------------------------------- -------- --------
Fees for the audit of the annual financial
statements 146 153
Audit related services 5 9
Other services - tax related 9 8
--------------------------------------------- -------- --------
160 170
--------------------------------------------- -------- --------
Fees payable by the Group to Grant Thornton and its associates
in respect of the year:
Group Group
20 20 2019
US$'000 US$'000
---------------------------------------------- -------- --------
Auditing of accounts of subsidiaries of the
Company 28 26
28 26
---------------------------------------------- -------- --------
6 Employees and Directors
Staff costs during the year Group Company Group Company
20 20 20 20 201 201 9
US$'000 US$'000 9 US$'000
US$'000
---------------------------------- --------- --------- -------- --------
Wages and salaries 1, 256 432 1, 420 590
Social security costs 5 6 - 7 6 12
Pension costs 83 - 90 -
Share-based payments 22 22 31 31
---------------------------------- --------- --------- -------- --------
1, 6
1, 417 454 1 7 63 3
---------------------------------- --------- --------- -------- --------
Payroll expenses were capitalized in the amount
of US$8,275 (201 9 : US$185,500) and expensed as
cost of sales in the amount of US$258,510 (2019:
US$ $109,315).
Average monthly number of people Group Company Group Company
employed 20 20 20 20 201 9 201 9
(including executive Directors)
---------------------------------- ------ ------- ------ -------
Technical 9 - 1 1 1
Field operations 145 - 47 -
Finance 8 2 9 2
Administrative and support 19 2 1 6 2
---------------------------------- ------ ------- ------ -------
181 4 8 3 5
---------------------------------- ------ ------- ------ -------
Directors' remuneration Group Group
20 20 2019
US$'000 US$'000
-------------------------- -------- --------
Director's emoluments 643 729
Share-based payments 22 25
-------------------------- -------- --------
665 754
-------------------------- -------- --------
The Directors are the key management personnel of the Company
and the Group. Details of Directors' emoluments and interests in
shares are shown in the Remuneration Committee Report. The highest
paid director had emoluments totalling US$312,000 (2019:
US$425,289).
7 Finance cost
Group Group
20 20 201 9
US$'000 US$'000
--------------------------------------------- -------- --------
Loan interest payable 368 8 2
Unwinding of discount on BNG licence payment
provision (note 20) 685 368
Unwinding of discount on provisions (note
20) 14 2
--------------------------------------------- -------- --------
1,067 452
--------------------------------------------- -------- --------
8 Finance income
Group Group
20 20 201 9
US$'000 US$'000
------------------------------------------ -------- --------
Interest income at BNG LLP and KC Caspian 20 -
9 Taxation
Analysis of charge for the year Group Group
20 20 2019
US$'000 US$'000
--------------------------------- -------- --------
Current tax charge 1 ,748 1 , 860
Deferred tax charge (note 23) - 483
1,748 2,343
--------------------------------- -------- --------
Group Group
2020 201 9
US$'000 US$'000
------------------------------------------------------ -------- --------
(Loss) / Profit before tax (1,745) 941
------------------------------------------------------ -------- --------
Tax on the above at the standard rate of corporate
income tax in the UK 19% (2019: 19%) (332) 179
Effects of:
Non-deductible expenses - 1,183
Withholding tax on interest expense 1,748 1,860
Utilization of tax losses not previously recognized (1,070) (1,888)
Unrecognised tax losses carried forward 1,402 1,009
1,748 2,343
------------------------------------------------------ -------- --------
10 Earnings/(loss) per share
Basic earnings/(loss) per share is calculated by dividing the
income/(loss) attributable to ordinary shareholders by the weighted
average number of ordinary shares outstanding during the year
including shares to be issued.
There is no difference between the basic and diluted loss per
share as the Group made a loss for the current and prior year.
Dilutive potential ordinary shares include share options granted to
employees and directors where the exercise price (adjusted
according to IAS33) is less than the average market price of the
Company's ordinary shares during the period.
The calculation of earnings/(loss) per share is based on:
2020 2019
------------------------------------------------------ ---------- ----------
The basic weighted average number of ordinary
shares in 1,8 71 , 1,8 24 ,
issue during the year 288 , 151 955 , 952
The earnings / (loss) for the year attributable
to owners of the parent from continuing operations
(US$'000) (3,413) (1,278)
The loss for the year attributable to owners
of the parent from discontinued operations
(US$'000) - -
------------------------------------------------------ ---------- ----------
There were 2,500,000 potentially dilutive instruments in the
year (2019: 3,000,000).
11 Unproven oil and gas assets
COST Group
US$'000
--------------------------------------------------- ---------
Cost at 1 January 2019 68,488
--------------------------------------------------- ---------
Additions 8,886
Sales from test production net of costs of sales (5,466)
Acquisitions (note 21) 11,293
Reclassification to PP&E (12,000)
Foreign exchange difference (1,507)
--------------------------------------------------- ---------
Cost at 31 December 201 9 69,694
--------------------------------------------------- ---------
Additions 1,520
Sales from test production net of cost of sales (149)
Foreign exchange difference (173)
--------------------------------------------------- ---------
Cost at 31 December 2020 70,892
--------------------------------------------------- ---------
ACCUMULATED IMPAIRMENT Group
US$'000
---------------------------------------------- --------
Accumulated impairment at 1 January 201 9 12,801
---------------------------------------------- --------
Reclassification to PP&E (2,414)
Foreign exchange difference (733)
Accumulated impairment at 31 December 201 9 9,654
---------------------------------------------- --------
Foreign exchange difference (175)
Accumulated impairment at 31 December 2020 9,479
Net book value at 1 January 2019 55,687
Net book value at 31 December 201 9 60,040
Net book value at 31 December 20 20 61,413
---------------------------------------------- --------
Unproven oil and gas assets represent license acquisition costs
and subsequent exploration expenditure in respect of two licenses
held by Kazakh group entities. The carrying values of those assets
at 31 December 2020 were as follows: 3A Best-Group JSC
US$11,521,000 (2019: US$ 12,666,000) and BNG Ltd LLP US$49,892,000
(2019: US$47,374,000).
The Directors have carried out an impairment review of these
assets on a cost pool level as detailed in note 2.1.
A previous impairment provision amount of US$12,068.000 (US$
9,654,000 net of deferred tax) was partly reversed in 2019. The
reversal of US$ 2,414.000 has been made by the means of
reclassification to proved oil and gas assets in 2019. At
31.12.2020 the balance of accumulated impairment was US$ 9,479,000
(see note 2).
12 Property, plant and equipment
Following the commencement of commercial production in July 2019
the Group reclassified part of BNG assets from unproven oil and gas
assets to proven oil and gas assets.
Proved Motor Other Total
oil and Vehicles
gas assets
Group US $'000 US $'000 US $'000 US $'000
Cost at 1 January 2019 - 56 266 322
Additions 564 - 8,071* 8,635
Transferred from unproved
oil and gas assets 12,000** - - 12,000
Additions to Proved O&G
assets
related to BNG licence
payment
provision 28,335*** - - 28,335
Reversal of impairment (note
11) 2,414 - - 2,414
Disposals - - (3) (3)
Foreign exchange difference 5 - - 5
----------------------------- --------------------- ---------------------- -------------------- ------------------
Cost at 31 December 2019 43,318 56 8,334 51,708
----------------------------- --------------------- ---------------------- -------------------- ------------------
Additions 1,366 - 19 1,385
Acquisitions (Caspian
Explorer)
(note 22) - - 2,837 2,837
Foreign exchange difference (962) - (13) (975)
----------------------------- --------------------- ---------------------- -------------------- ------------------
Cost at 31 December 2020 43,722 56 11,177 54,955
----------------------------- --------------------- ---------------------- -------------------- ------------------
Depreciation at 1 January
2019 - 31 203 234
Charge for the year 130 8 10 148
Disposals - - (3) (3)
Foreign exchange difference - - 3 3
----------------------------- --------------------- ---------------------- -------------------- ------------------
Depreciation at 31 December
2019 130 39 213 382
----------------------------- --------------------- ---------------------- -------------------- ------------------
Charge for the year 1,230 8 450 1,688
Foreign exchange difference 30 - 10 40
----------------------------- --------------------- ---------------------- -------------------- ------------------
Depreciation at 31 December
2020 1,390 47 673 2,110
----------------------------- --------------------- ---------------------- -------------------- ------------------
Net book value at:
----------------------------- --------------------- ---------------------- -------------------- ------------------
01 January 2019 - 25 63 88
----------------------------- --------------------- ---------------------- -------------------- ------------------
31 December 2019 43,188 17 8,121 51,326
----------------------------- --------------------- ---------------------- -------------------- ------------------
31 December 2020 42,332 9 10,504 52,845
----------------------------- --------------------- ---------------------- -------------------- ------------------
*$7,966,000 of $8,071,000 relate to the acquisition during 2019
of drilling rigs and other fixed assets. The Group acquired the
drilling rigs in September 2019 with 58,333,333 shares issued as
consideration with the assets recorded based on the market price of
the shares issued.
**$12,000,000 - the amount of O&G assets transferred from
Unproven O&G to Proved O&G assets at BNG asset for the MJF
structure. Refer to note 2.
*** Refer to notes 20 and 2 for details.
13 Investments (Company)
Investments Company
US$'000
--------------------------------------------------------- -----------------
Cost
At 1 January 2019 276,239
Increase in investments 11,795
---------------------------------------------------------- -----------------
At 31 December 2019 288,034
---------------------------------------------------------- -----------------
Increase in investments 3,666
Reclassification related to intercompany restructuring (66,259)
---------------------------------------------------------- -----------------
At 31 December 2020 225,441
---------------------------------------------------------- -----------------
Impairment -
At 31 December 2019 64,253
---------------------------------------------------------- -----------------
Impairment 145,701
At 31 December 2020 209,954
---------------------------------------------------------- -----------------
Net book value at:
--------------------------------------------------------- -----------------
31 December 2019 223,781
31 December 2020 15,487
---------------------------------------------------------- -----------------
During 2020 the Company acquired 100% interest at Caspian
Explorer for US$3,666,000 by means of issuing the Company's shares.
The carrying value of the investments has been assessed by the
Directors including the fair value associated with the asset
(please see note 22 for the transaction details).
During 2020 the Group simplified its intragroup loans as
follows: (i) the Company acquired Eragon Petroleum Limited's long
term receivable of $18.9m due from BNG Ltd LLP in exchange for a
loan payable to Eragon Petroleum Limited; (ii) the Company's long
term receivables from BNG Ltd LLP were transferred to Eragon FZE in
exchange for a receivable from Eragon FZE; (iii) Eragon UK declared
a dividend of $49.3m to Caspian Sunrise plc which it settled by
offset against receivables due from Caspian Sunrise (see note 18).
The receivable from Eragon FZE is repayable on demand but is
classified as long term because this reflects the expected timing
of actual funds flow. As part of the restructuring US$ 66m at the
Company's standalone accounts were reclassified from the
investments to the receivables from subsidiaries (note 15).
The directors review the investments recoverability on a regular
basis, together with the associated future cash flows of each
company. During 2020 the reduction in the Group's market
capitalisation was considered an impairment trigger. The discount
rate used for the assessment was 15%, which the Directors believe
to appropriate in the circumstances. Based on this assessment the
Company considers that the carrying value of the investments may
not be fully recoverable as the subsidiaries may not generate
sufficient future profits and accordingly, these amounts have been
impaired. The Company recorded an impairment in relation to the
investments of $145.7m as at 31 December 2020 (2019: nil).
During 2019 the Company acquired 100% interest at 3A-Best group
JSC for US$11,975,000 by means of issuing the Company's shares. The
carrying value of the investments has been assessed by the
Directors including consideration of the discounted cash flows
associated with the proven oil and gas assets, underlying BNG and
3A-Best contract area progress and the continued exploration value
of the assets.
Direct investments
Name of undertaking Country of Effective Effective Registered Nature
incorporation holding and holding and address of business
proportion proportion
of voting of voting
rights held rights held
at 31 December at 31 December
2020 2019
----------------------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ----------------- ------------
5 New Street
Square
Eragon Petroleum London Holding
Limited United Kingdom 100% 100% EC4A 3TW Company
CN-135789,
Eragon Petroleum Jebel Ali, Management
FZE Dubai 100% 100% Dubai, UAE Company
Utrechtseweg
79
1213 TM
Hilversum Holding
Beibars BV Netherlands 100% 100% The Netherlands Company
Utrechtseweg
79
1213 TM
Hilversum Holding
Ravninnoe BV Netherlands 100% 100% The Netherlands Company
152/140
Karasay
Batyr Str.,
Roxi Petroleum Kazakhstan Almaty, Management
LLP Kazakhstan 100% 100% Kazakhstan Company
Indirect investments held by Eragon Petroleum Limited
Name of undertaking Country of Effective Effective Registered Nature
incorporation holding and holding and address of business
proportion proportion
of voting of voting
rights held rights held
at 31 December at 31 December
2020 2019
----------------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- -------------------- --------------
Utrechtseweg
79
1213 TM Hilversum Holding
Galaz Energy BV Netherlands 100% 100% The Netherlands Company
Utrechtseweg
79
1213 TM Hilversum Holding
BNG Energy BV Netherlands 100% 100% The Netherlands Company
152/140 Karasay
Batyr Str., Oil Production
BNG Ltd LLP Kazakhstan 99% 99% Almaty, Kazakhstan Company
152/140 Karasay
3A-Best Group Batyr Str., Exploration
JSC Kazakhstan 100% 100% Almaty, Kazakhstan Company
152/140 Karasay Drilling
Batyr Str., & Service
CTS LLP Kazakhstan 100% 100% Almaty, Kazakhstan Company
CN-135789,
Prosperity Petroleum Jebel Ali, Management
Ltd* UAE 100% - Dubai, UAE Company
152/140 Karasay
Batyr Str., Drilling
KC Caspian LLP* Kazakhstan 100% 100% Almaty, Kazakhstan Vessel owner
*During 2020 the Company has acquired 100% interest in
Prosperity Petroleum Ltd and KC Caspian LLP, the companies owing
submersible drilling vessel (pls see note 22 for details).
During 2019 Eragon Petroleum FZE has established the subsidiary
with100% interest: Caspian Technical Services LLP (CTS LLP). The
main activity of the new subsidiary is drilling services for the
companies of the group.
Indirect investments held by Beibars BV
Name of undertaking Country of Effective Effective Registered Nature
incorporation holding and holding and address of business
proportion proportion
of voting of voting
rights held rights held
at 31 December at 31 December
2018 2017
-------------------- --------------- --------------- --------------- ------------------- ------------
152/140 Karasay
Batyr Str., Exploration
Beibars Munai LLP Kazakhstan 50% 50% Almaty, Kazakhstan Company
Beibars Munai LLP is a subsidiary as the Group is considered to
have control over the financial and operating policies of this
entity. Its results have been consolidated within the Group.
14 Inventories
Group Group
2020 2019
US$'000 US$'000
------------------------- ------- -------
Materials and supplies 392 384
------------------------- ------- -------
392 384
------------------------- ------- -------
15 Other receivables
Group Group Company Company
2020 201 9 2020 2019
US$ '000 US$ '000 US$ '000 US$'000
----------------------------- -------- -------- -------- -------
Amounts falling due after
one year:
Prepayments made 435 2,459 - -
VAT receivable 3,811 3,286 53 69
Intercompany receivables
(note 13) - 89,212 10,635
4,246 5,745 89,265 10,704
----------------------------- -------- -------- -------- -------
Amounts falling due within
one year:
Prepayments made 2,187 1,159 9 7
Other receivables* 4,008 4,504 - -
----------------------------- -------- -------- -------- -------
6,195 5,663 9 7
----------------------------- -------- -------- -------- -------
The VAT receivables relate to purchases made by operating
companies in Kazakhstan and will be recovered through VAT payable
resulting from sales to the local market.
*US$1,275,000 out of US$4,008,000 (2019: US$3,826,000) at Other
receivables of the Group accounts represent the amounts
reimbursable by the vendors of 3A Best under the indemnities
provided on acquisition of the exploration asset (note 21). At
31.12.2020 the amount is shown net of provision for expected credit
losses: during 2020 the amount has been impaired on US $2,551,000
or 2/3 of the originally recognised due to the uncertainty of the
100% recoverability the receivable in future periods.
The current intercompany receivables bear interest rates between
LIBOR + 2% and LIBOR + 7%.
Inter-company receivables has been assessed for expected credit
losses considering factors such as the status of underlying
licenses, reserves, financial models and future risks and
uncertainties. The provision substantially refers to balances
considered credit impaired. Inter-company receivables from the
subsidiaries in the table above are shown net of provisions of
US$19.9 million (2019: US$12.9 million). The movement in the
expected credit loss provision related to the inter-company
receivables was as follows:
Group Group Company Company
20 20 201 9 2020 201 9
Denomination US$'000 US$'000 US$'000 US$'000
------------------ ------- ------- ------- -------
As at 1 January - - 12,913 12,212
Charge - - 6,999 701
As at 31 December - - 19,912 12,913
------------------ ------- ------- ------- -------
The Company recognised US$ 6,999,000 of expected loss on
provisions in relation to its receivables from subsidiaries in 2020
(2019: loss of US$ 701 thousand).
16 Cash and cash equivalents
Group Group Company Company
20 20 2019 2020 2019
US$'000 US$'000 US$'000 US$'000
--------------------------------- --------- --------- -------- --------
Cash at bank and in hand 329 4,060 3 87
--------------------------------- --------- --------- -------- --------
Funds are held in US Dollars, Sterling and Kazakh Tenge currency
accounts to enable the Group to trade and settle its debts in
the currency in which they occur and in order to mitigate the
Group's exposure to short-term foreign exchange fluctuations.
All cash is held in floating rate accounts.
Group Group Company Company
20 20 201 9 20 20 201 9
Denomination US$'000 US$'000 US$'000 US$'000
--------------- ------- ------- ------- -------
US Dollar 292 3,842 1 87
Sterling 2 - 2 -
Kazakh Tenge 35 218 - -
329 4,060 3 87
--------------- ------- ------- ------- -------
17 Called up share capital
Group and Company
Number Number
of ordinary of deferred
shares US$'000 shares US$'000
--------------------------------- ---------------- --------- ------------- ---------
Balance at 1 January 2019 1,670,873,820 25,416 373,317,105 64,702
Share options exercised 4,200,000 56 - -
Acquisition of 100% interest
at 3A Best-Group JSC (note
21) 149,253,732 1,919 - -
Equipment bought during
2019 (note 11) 58,333,333 729 - -
--------------------------------- ---------------- --------- ------------- ---------
Balance at 31 December 2019 1,882,660,885 28,120 373,317,105 64,702
--------------------------------- ---------------- --------- ------------- ---------
Shares issued to the directors
to repay salary debts* 8,938,570 112 - -
Shares issued in exchange
of GBP1m cash** 36,363,629 477 - -
Acquisition of 100% interest
at KC Caspian Explorer (note
22) 160,256,410 2,095 - -
--------------------------------- ---------------- --------- ------------- ---------
Balance at 31 December 2020 2,088,219,494 30,804 373,317,105 64,702
--------------------------------- ---------------- --------- ------------- ---------
Caspian Sunrise Plc has authorised share capital of
GBP100,000,000 divided into 6,640,146,055 ordinary shares of 1p
each and 373,317,105 deferred shares of 9p each.
* On 6 July 2020 the Company has issued total 8,938,570 ordinary
shares at 3.2 pence per share in settlement of outstanding salary
and expenses.
** On 4 August 2020 the Company raised GBP1 million through
placing of 36,363,629 new ordinary shares to new and existing
investors at an issue price of 2.75 pence per share. The cash has
entirely been spent on repayments to the Company creditors.
18 Trade and other payables - current
Group Group Company Company
20 20 201 9 20 20 201 9
US$'000 US$'000 US$'000 US$'000
------------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Trade payables 2,892 1,384 191 575
Taxation and social security 1,629 1,813 22 22
Accruals 136 282 109 172
Other payables 3,369 4,368 382 364
Intercompany payables - - 116 30,678
Advances received (deferred
revenue) 2,986 6,989 - -
11,012 14,836 820 31,811
------------------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------
As at 31 December 2020 and 31 December 2019, the Group received
a significant amount of prepayments from the oil traders in
relation to increasing production on the BNG oil field.
During 2020 the Group simplified its intragroup loans as
follows: (i) the Company acquired Eragon Petroleum Limited's long
term receivable of $18.9m due from BNG Ltd LLP in exchange for a
loan payable to Eragon Petroleum Limited; (ii) the Company's long
term receivables from BNG Ltd LLP were transferred to Eragon FZE in
exchange for a receivable from Eragon FZE; (iii) Eragon UK declared
a dividend of $49.3m to Caspian Sunrise plc which it settled by
offset against receivables due from Caspian Sunrise (see note
13).
.
18 Trade and other payables - non-current
Group Group Company Company
20 20 201 9 20 20 201 9
US$'000 US$'000 US$'000 US$'000
------------------------ ------- ------- ------- -------
Intercompany payables - - - -
Taxation 13,648 12,293 - -
------------------------ ------- ------- ------- -------
13,648 12,293 - -
------------------------ ------- ------- ------- -------
Taxation payable relate to withholding tax accrued on the
interest expense at the BNG subsidiary level.
19 Short-term borrowings
Group Group Company Company
20 20 201 9 20 20 201 9
US$'000 US$'000 US$'000 US$'000
----------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------
Mr. Oraziman (a) 3,624 2,288 777 727
Fosco BV (b) 672 661 - -
Other borrowings (c) 1,304 1,101 1,292 1,087
----------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------
5,600 4,050 2,069 1,814
----------------------- ------- ------- ------- -------
a) At the start 2019 Eragon Petroleum FZE, a wholly owned
subsidiary, had an outstanding loan of US$ 913,000 from Kuat
Oraziman. Caspian Sunrise had an outstanding loan of US$ 400,000
from Kuat Oraziman. During 2019 Mr. Oraziman provided an additional
US$300,000 to Caspian Sunrise. The total balance of these loans as
at 31 December 2019, including the accrued interest, was US$
1,704,000. Additionally, during 2019 a loan due from Roxi Kazahstan
LLP to KC Caspian Explorer, an entity controlled by Aibek Oraziman,
was assigned to Kuat Oraziman. The balance of the loan at 31
December 2020 was US$ 531,000 (2019: US$ 584,000).
During 2020 the companies of the Group accrued US$ 145,000 of
interest on the existing loans. In addition Kuat Oraziman has
provided direct loans to the following subsidiaries: US$ 616,000 to
CTS LLP, US$ 575,000 to BNG LLP. Both loans are not interest
bearing and were nominated in Kazakh tenge.
b) During July 2016 Fosco BV, a company controlled by Mr
Oraziman, therefore a related party of the Group, provided an on
demand loan to BNG LLP in the amount of US$ 0.63 million. The loan
is interest bearing with the rate of Libor+ 1%.
c) The total amount borrowed by the Group at 31 December 2020
US$1,304,000 (2019: US$1,101,000) was payable to Kuat Oraziman and
a legal entities controlled by Mr Oraziman. The loans are interest
bearing with the rate of 7% and repayable during 2021.
During 2021 all the loans payable by the Group to Mr. Kuat
Oraziman and the related companies have been assigned to Akku
Investment LLP, the company controlled by Oraziman family.
20 Provisions and contingencies
Group only BNG licence Employee Liabilities Abandonment 201 9
payments holiday under Social fund Total
* provision Development
Program
and historical
cost
----------------------------- ------------ ----------- ---------------- ------------ ---------
US $'000 US $'000 US $'000 US $'000 US $'000
----------------------------- ------------ ----------- ---------------- ------------ ---------
Balance at 1 January
201 9 - 75 3,440 125 3,640
Increase in provision 28,652 - 3,048 450 32,150
Paid in the year (1,626) (75) (339) - (2.040)
Unwinding of discount 368 - - 2 370
Foreign exchange difference - - 5 1 6
----------------------------- ------------ ----------- ---------------- ------------ ---------
Balance at 31 December
201 9 27,394 - 6,154 578 34,126
----------------------------- ------------ ----------- ---------------- ------------ ---------
Non-current provisions 24,216 - - 428 24,644
Current provisions 3,178 - 6,154 150 9,482
----------------------------- ------------ ----------- ---------------- ------------ ---------
Balance at 31 December
201 9 27,394 - 6,154 578 34,126
----------------------------- ------------ ----------- ---------------- ------------ ---------
Group only BNG licence Employee Liabilities Abandonment 20 20
payments holiday under Social fund Total
* provision Development
Program
and historical
cost
----------------------------- ------------ ----------- ---------------- ------------ ---------
US $'000 US $'000 US $'000 US $'000 US $'000
----------------------------- ------------ ----------- ---------------- ------------ ---------
Balance at 1 January
20 20 27,394 - 6,154 578 34,126
Increase in provision - - - 91 91
Change in estimate - - - (81) (81)
Paid in the year (3,014) - - - (3,014)
Unwinding of discount 685 - - 14 699
Foreign exchange difference - - (181) (45) 6
----------------------------- ------------ ----------- ---------------- ------------ ---------
Balance at 31 December
20 20 25,065 - 5,973 557 31,595
----------------------------- ------------ ----------- ---------------- ------------ ---------
Non-current provisions 21,887 - - 413 22,300
Current provisions 3,178 - 5,973 144 9,295
----------------------------- ------------ ----------- ---------------- ------------ ---------
Balance at 31 December
20 20 25,065 - 5,973 557 31,595
----------------------------- ------------ ----------- ---------------- ------------ ---------
*The subsoil use contract held by BNG Ltd for the Yelemes field
stipulates that it must make a payment to the Kazakhstan Government
upon award of a production contract after commercial feasibility.
The Kazakhstan Government has assessed the amount payable as a
total of US$32.5m. The sum is paid on a quarterly basis from 1 July
2019 in equal instalments and the final payment is due to be paid
on 1 April 2029. The payments have been discounted to their net
present value. This discounted value has been capitalised as
Property, plant and equipment (note 11) and will be amortised over
the productive period. Any changes in estimated payments and
discount rate are dealt with prospectively and result in a
corresponding adjustment to property plant and equipment. The Group
is currently contesting the value of the amount assessed.
Amounts in relation to Subsoil Use Contracts are included in the
table above and relate to the licence areas disclosed below:
a) BNG Ltd LLP
BNG Ltd LLP a subsidiary, signed a contract #2392 dated 7 June
2007 with the Ministry of Energy and Mineral Resources of RK for
exploration at Airshagyl deposit, located in Mangistau region.
Under addendum No.1 dated 17 April 2008, the Contract Area was
increased. The contract was valid for 4 years and expired on 7 June
2011. Addendum No. 6 to the Subsoil Use Contract for extension of
exploration period up to June 2013 was obtained on 13 July 2011. On
16 July 2013 BNG Ltd LLP signed Addendum No. 7 extending the
exploration period for two consecutive years until June 2015. On 22
June 2015 BNG Ltd LLP signed Addendum No. 9 extending the
exploration period for three consecutive years until June 2018. On
24 December 2015 BNG Ltd LLP signed Addendum No.10 according to
which the geological territory was extended by 140.6 sq kilometres.
On 23 September 2016 addendum No.11 was signed that reduced the
penalties for non-fulfilment of the contractual obligations from
30% to 1%. On 20 December 2017 BNG Ltd LLP signed addendum No.12
where amended its contractual obligations increasing the minimal
work program for 2016-2018 from US$16.5 million to US$21.5 million.
All other obligations, including social obligations, remained the
same. In June 2018 BNG Ltd LLP signed the Addendum No.13 with the
Ministry of Energy for the 6 years appraisal period on the BNG
oilfield until June 2024.
In accordance with the terms of the addendum #13, BNG Ltd LLP
remains committed to the following:
-- For the six-year appraisal period US$238,000 per annum should
be invested in the social development of the region starting from
January 2019;
-- To fund minimum cumulative work program during the appraisal period of US$ 28,103,000
-- Investing not less than 1% of total investments in
professional training of Kazakhstani personnel engaged in work
under the contract; and
-- Transferring, on an annual basis, 1% of exploration
expenditures to a liquidation fund through a special deposit
account in a bank located within the Republic of Kazakhstan.
The license commitments are established for the license term as
a whole, with annual schedules contained therein under the license.
Should the company have unfulfilled commitments or outstanding
payments under social programs, a 1% penalty is applied until the
commitments are fulfilled. Refer to table above. During 2020,
certain work programme obligations at the BNG Contract Area were
deferred from 2020 to 2021. While we are yet to fully comply with
both the BNG work programme commitments and payment of the social
obligations, given the issues imposed by Covid-19, the Board are
not unduly concerned about any impact on the BNG licence given the
penalties can be applied until the commitments are fulfilled and
the absence of a significant noncompliance.
On 11 July 2019, BNG Ltd LLP has signed the Production contract
with the Ministry of Energy of Republic of Kazakhstan on the part
of the territory. The Contract is valid during 25 years till
2043.
b) 3A-Best Group JSC
As at 31.12.2019 3A-Best had the following debts related to its
SSU contract: US$2,500,000 of social development payment and about
$US 1,000,000 of the debts related to previous years' work program
obligations. According to the Addendum #8 to the Contract signed by
the company on January 20 2020 3A-Best has agreed the following
schedule of payments related to the social development and the work
program related to previous SSUC extension(s):
-- To make payment of US$580,000 quarterly during 6 quarters till June 2021;
-- To drill 2 shallow wells with the total depth of 5,750 meters
during the period January-June 2020;
-- To make investments of approximately US$2,350,000 during the period January-June 2020.
According to the SPA related to the acquisition of 3A-Best the
Company has been indemnified by the previous owners from any
previous debts (quarterly payments of US$580,000 to discharge the
historic obligations) and they guaranteed to make repayments on a
timely basis. The Group is responsible for the work program
obligations agreed with the Ministry of Energy of Kazakhstan for
the period January-June 2020 (US$2,350,000). The Group is not in
compliance with these work program obligations. The Group has
applied for a deferral of the amounts due and work program
commitments during 2020. On the date of this report the Group is
still negotiating the payments schedule with the Ministry and local
officials.
The recent farm-out of 15% of the 3A Best Contract Area is
expected to provide the funding required to bring the work
programme into compliance. The Group continues to pursue the 3A
Best vendors for the historic amounts due.
Contingent liabilities
A subsidiary of the Group is subject to an open tax assessment
in respect of the 2012 tax year. The Group has taken professional
advice and continues to dispute the assessment. If the Group is
unsuccessful in defending its position, the amount payable based on
the assessment would be US$2 million plus potential fines and
penalties. The assessment involves interpretation of contractual
arrangements between companies in the Group. The matter is
considered to represent an uncertain tax position under IFRS and
management have determined that the most likely outcome method of
measurement is most appropriate. Based on professional advice, the
development of the matter over several years and all relevant facts
and circumstances no provision is considered to be applicable.
21 Purchase of 3A-Best Group JSC
On 21 January 2019, the Company acquired 100% of the shares of
3A-Best Group JSC, a company that owns a 1,347 sq km Contract Area
located close to the Caspian port city of Aktau in the Mangystau
Province of Kazakhstan.
The purchase price is satisfied by the issue of 149,253,732 new
Companies shares at the price of 6.15 p per share, that represents
closing price of Company's shares at the date the SPA was signed
and the substantive conditions had been met such that control
passed to the Company, notwithstanding delays in the shares of
3A-Best being legally transferred to the Company and associated
issuance of the Company's shares in consideration owing to
procedural delays. Management have analysed the structure of the
transaction and the underlying activities and concluded that the
transaction represents an asset purchase.
The fair value of the identifiable assets and liabilities of
3ABest as at the date of acquisition were:
US$'000
------------------------------------------ -----------
Exploration assets 6,404
Receivable from sellers recognized
in other non-current receivables* 3,826
Other non-current receivables 502
Total assets 10,732
Current contractual provisions 2,906
Other payables related to contractual
obligations 920
Total liabilities 3,826
Total identifiable net assets at
fair value 6,906
Total value of shares issued as
consideration 11,795
Additional fair value recorded
to unproven oil and gas assets 4,889
* Based on the terms of SPA previous owners of 3A-Best must
compensate the Group for all contractual obligations of 3ABest
incurred in the period up to SPA sign off date under an
indemnification in the SPA. Therefore, the Group has recognized the
receivable equal to the contractual provisions and other payables
related to the contractual obligations in the completion date
balance sheet. The Group assessed the receivable for expected
credit losses, considering scenarios around the probability of
default by one or more of the vendors and concluded no expected
credit loss is applicable as 31 December 2019.
22 Purchase of Caspian Explorer
On 19 October 2020 the Company announced the completion of the
transaction to acquire Caspian Explorer, the entities (Prosperity
Petroleum Limited and KC Caspian Explorer LLP) owing a drilling
vessel that designed to operate in the shallow waters of the
northern Caspian Sea. The consideration has been satisfied by the
issue of 160,256,410 new Caspian Sunrise shares at a price of 1.75p
per share (the "Consideration Shares"). The acquisition was
approved by independent shareholders in February 2020. Management
has analysed the structure of the transaction and the underlying
activities and concluded that the transaction represents an asset
purchase.
The fair value of the identifiable assets and liabilities of
Caspian Explorer as at the date of acquisition were:
US$'000
------------------------------------- -----------
Property, Plant and Equipment 2,837
Other non-current assets 96
Other current assets* 833
Total assets 3,776
Trade and other payables 100
Total liabilities 100
Total identifiable net assets at
fair value 3,666
Total value of shares issued as
consideration 3,666
* US $ 530,000 of this amount was receivable from EPC-Munai LLP
at the date of acquisition, the related party to the Company (note
26.1).
23 Deferred tax
Deferred tax liabilities comprise:
Group Group
20 20 2019
---------------------------------------------
US$'000 US$'000
--------------------------------------------- ------- -------
Deferred tax on exploration and evaluation
assets acquired 6,629 7,244
6,629 7,244
--------------------------------------------- ------- -------
The Group recognises deferred taxation on fair value uplifts to
its oil and gas projects arising on acquisition. These liabilities
reverse as the fair value uplifts are depleted or impaired.
The movement on deferred tax liabilities was as follows:
Group Group
20 20 201 9
US$'000 US$'000
---------------------------------------------- ------- -------
At beginning of the year 7,244 6,733
Deferred tax related to impairment reversal - 483
Foreign exchange (615) 28
6,629 7,244
---------------------------------------------- ------- -------
As at 31 December 2020 the Group has accumulated deductible tax
expenditure related to BNG expenditure of approximately US$85
million (31 December 2019 US$89 million) available to carry forward
and offset against future profits. This represents an unrecognised
deferred tax asset of approximately US$17 million (31 December
2019: US$17.8 million). Given the uncertainties regarding such
deductions and the developing nature of the relevant tax system no
deferred tax asset is recorded. Beibars have tax losses carried
forward of US$5.1 million (31 December 2019: US$5.1 million). This
asset is fully impaired and there is insufficient certainty of
future profitability to utilise these deductions.
24 Share option scheme and LTIP scheme
During the year the Group and the Company had in issue
equity-settled share-based instruments to its Directors and certain
employees. Equity-settled share-based instruments have been
measured at fair value at the date of grant and are expensed on a
straight-line basis over the vesting period, based on an estimate
of the shares that will eventually vest. Options generally vest in
three equal tranches over the three years following the grant.
Number of Number of Options exercised Total options Weighted
options options expired outstanding average
granted exercise
price
in pence
(p) per
share
As at 31 December
2019 91,458,226 (55,818,226) (15,300,000) 20,340,000 15
----------------------- ---------- ---------------- ----------------- ------------------- ---------
Directors - (1,000,000) - (1,000,000) -
Employees and others - (2,950,000) - (2,950,000) -
----------------------- ---------- ---------------- ----------------- ------------------- ---------
As at 31 December
2020 91,458,226 (59,768,226) (15,300,000) 16,390,000 15
----------------------- ---------- ---------------- ----------------- ------------------- ---------
The options were issued to Directors and employees as
follows:
16,390,000 outstanding options as at 31 December 2020 are
exercisable.
The range of exercise prices of share options outstanding at the
yearend is 4p - 20p (2019: 4p - 20p). The weighted average
remaining contractual life of share options outstanding at the end
of the year is 2.9 years (2019: 4.3 years).
Long Term Incentive Plan (LTIP) scheme:
On 5 June 2019 the Company made awards under a long term
incentive plan. Clive Carver, Non-executive Chairman, and Kuat
Oraziman, Chief Executive Officer, are entitled to receive cash
payments to be triggered by the Company's attainment of both
pre-set market capitalisation and share price targets as
follows:
Market cap threshold Share price target Pay-out rate Pay-out amount
(each) (each)
$ billion Pence per share % $' million
0.8 17.23 0.6 3.0
1.3 20.67 0.6 3.0
1.8 24.81 0.6 3.0
2.3 29.77 0.6 3.0
2.8 35.72 0.6 3.0
The scheme continues beyond the numbers in the table such that
with the threshold for market capitalisation increasing at the rate
of $0.5 billion and the corresponding share price threshold
increasing from the earlier threshold by a constant factor of 1.2.
Each threshold must be sustained for at least 30 consecutive days
for the awards to be triggered. Payments shall be made only when
the Company has free cash either in the form of distributable
reserves or as a result of a non interest bearing subordinated
shareholder loan or an equity placing at a price not below the
relevant share price threshold.
There may be only one pay-out for each market capitalisation
threshold crossed no matter how many times it is crossed.
The Group has determined that at inception and 31 December 2019
and 2020, the fair value of the cash settled share based payment
award is immaterial based on analysis of the thresholds, historical
volatility rates and the applicable share price and market
capitalisation in the period.
25 Financial instrument risk exposure and management
In common with all other businesses, the Group and Company are
exposed to risks that arise from its use of financial instruments.
This note describes the Group and Company's objectives, policies
and processes for managing those risks and the methods used to
measure them. Further quantitative information in respect of these
risks is presented throughout these financial statements.
The significant accounting policies regarding financial
instruments are disclosed in note 1.
There have been no substantive changes in the Group or Company's
exposure to financial instrument risks, its objectives, policies
and processes for managing those risks or the methods used to
measure them from previous years unless otherwise stated in this
note.
Principal financial instruments
The principle financial instruments used by the Group and
Company, from which financial instrument risk arises, are as
follows:
Group Group Company Company
Financial assets 20 20 2019 2020 2019
US$'000 US$'000 US$'000 US$'000
------------------------------ --------- --------- --------- ---------
Intercompany receivables - - 89,212 10,635
Other receivables 4,008 4,504 - -
Restricted use cash 241 241 - -
Cash and cash equivalents 329 4,060 3 87
------------------------------ --------- --------- --------- ---------
4,625 4,979 96,504 10,722
------------------------------ --------- --------- --------- ---------
Financial liabilities Group Group Company Company
2020 2019 2020 2019
US$'000 US$'000 US$'000 US$'000
------------------------------ --------- --------- --------- ---------
Trade and other payables 6,397 6,634 682 1,111
Other payables - current - - 117 13,115
Other payables - non-current - - - 17,563
Borrowings - current 5,600 4,050 2,069 1,814
11,998 10,656 2,868 33,603
------------------------------ --------- --------- --------- ---------
Changes in liabilities arising from financial activities
Below is the movement of financial liabilities of the Group for
the years ended 31 December 2020 and 2019:
Foreign
Disposal exchange
1 January Loans Interest of loans difference, 31 December
2020 received accrued Repayment net 2020
--------------- ---------- ---------- --------- ----------- ---------- ------------- ------------
Financial
liabilities
Borrowings 4,050 1,237 313 - - - 5,600
Foreign
Disposal exchange
1 January Loans Interest of loans difference, 31 December
2019 received accrued Repayment net 2018
--------------- ---------- ---------- --------- ----------- ---------- ------------- ------------
Financial
liabilities
Borrowings 2,572 1,330 160 - (28) 3 4,050
Below is the movement of financial liabilities of the Company
for the years ended 31 December 2020 and 2019:
Foreign
Disposal exchange
1 January Loans Interest of loans difference, 31 December
2020 received accrued Repayment net 2020
--------------- ---------- ---------- --------- ----------- ---------- ------------- ------------
Financial
liabilities
Borrowings 1,814 134 121 - - - 2,069
Foreign
Conversion exchange 31
1 January Loans Interest to equity difference, December
2019 received accrued Repayment net 2018
------------- ---------- --------- --------- ------------ ---------- ---------------- ---------
Financial
liabilities
Borrowings 400 1,330 84 - - - 1,814
---------
Principal financial instruments
The principal financial instruments used by the Group and
Company, from which financial instrument risk arises, are as
follows:
-- other receivables
-- cash at bank
-- trade and other payables
-- borrowings
General objectives, policies and processes
The Board has overall responsibility for the determination of
the Group and Company's risk management objectives and policies
and, whilst retaining ultimate responsibility for them, it has
delegated the authority for designing and operating processes that
ensure the effective implementation of the objectives and policies
to the Group and Company's finance function. The Board receives
regular reports from the finance function through which it reviews
the effectiveness of the processes put in place and the
appropriateness of the objectives and policies it sets.
The overall objective of the Board is to set policies that seek
to reduce risk as far as possible without unduly affecting the
Group and Company's competitiveness and flexibility. Further
details regarding these policies are set out below:
Credit risk
The maximum exposure to credit risk is represented by the
carrying amount of each financial asset in the balance sheet which
at the year end amounted to US$ 4.6 million (2019: US$ 8.8
million).
Credit risk with respect to Group receivables and advances is
mitigated by active and continuous monitoring the credit quality of
its counterparties through internal reviews and assessment.
The Company is exposed to credit risk on its receivables from
its subsidiaries. The subsidiaries are exploration and development
companies with no current commercial exploitation sales and
therefore, whilst the receivables are due on demand, they are not
expected to be paid until there is a successful outcome on a
development project resulting in commercial exploitation sales
being generated by a subsidiary. In application of IFRS 9 the
Company has calculated the expected credit loss from these
receivables (Note 15).
The carrying amount of financial assets recorded in the Group
and Company financial statements, which is net of any impairment
losses, represents the Group's and Company's maximum exposure to
credit risk.
Credit risk with cash and cash equivalents is reduced by placing
funds with banks with high credit ratings.
Capital
The Company and Group define capital as share capital, share
premium, deferred shares, other reserves, retained deficit and
borrowings. In managing its capital, the Group's primary objective
is to provide a return for its equity shareholders through capital
growth. Going forward the Group will seek to maintain a gearing
ratio that balances risks and returns at an acceptable level and
also to maintain a sufficient funding base to enable the Group to
meet its working capital and strategic investment needs. In making
decisions to adjust its capital structure to achieve these aims,
either through new share issues or the issue of debt, the Group
considers not only its short-term position but also its long-term
operational and strategic objectives.
The Group's gearing ratio as at 31 December 2020 was 10% (2019:
9%).
There has been no other significant changes to the Group's
Management objectives, policies and processes in the year.
Liquidity risk
Liquidity risk arises from the Group and Company's Management of
working capital and the amount of funding committed to its
exploration programme. It is the risk that the Group or Company
will encounter difficulty in meeting its financial obligations as
they fall due.
The Group and Company's policy is to ensure that it will always
have sufficient cash to allow it to meet its liabilities when they
become due. To achieve this aim, it seeks to raise funding through
equity finance, debt finance and farm-outs sufficient to meet the
next phase of exploration and where relevant development
expenditure.
The Board receives cash flow projections on a periodic basis as
well as information regarding cash balances. The Board will not
commit to material expenditure in respect of its ongoing
exploration programmes prior to being satisfied that sufficient
funding is available to the Group to finance the planned
programmes.
For maturity dates of financial liabilities as at 31 December
2020 and 2019 see table below. The amounts are contractual payments
and may not tie to the carrying value:
On Demand Less than 3 months 3-12 months 1- 5 years Over 5 years Total
---------------------- ---------- ------------------- ------------ ----------- ------------- -------
Group 2020 US$'000 5,600 2,891 3,506 - - 11,997
Group 2019 US$'000 4,050 1,384 5,222 - - 10,656
Company 2020 US$'000 2,069 681 117 - - 2,867
Company 2019 US$'000 1,814 575 536 - 30,678 33,603
---------------------- ---------- ------------------- ------------ ----------- ------------- -------
Interest rate risk
The majority of the Group's borrowings are at fixed rate. As a
result the Group is not exposed to the significant interest rate
risk.
Currency risk
The Group and Company's policy is, where possible, to allow
group entities to settle liabilities denominated in their
functional currency (primarily US$ and Kazakh Tenge) in that
currency. Where the Group or Company entities have liabilities
denominated in a currency other than their functional currency (and
have insufficient reserves of that currency to settle them) cash
already denominated in that currency will, where possible, be
transferred from elsewhere within the Group.
In order to monitor the continuing effectiveness of this policy,
the Board receives a periodic forecast, analysed by the major
currencies held by the Group and Company.
The Group and Company are primarily exposed to currency risk on
purchases made from suppliers in Kazakhstan, as it is not possible
for the Group or Company to transact in Kazakh Tenge outside of
Kazakhstan. The finance team carefully monitors movements in the
US$/Kazakh Tenge rate and chooses the most beneficial times for
transferring monies to its subsidiaries, whilst ensuring that they
have sufficient funds to continue its operations. The currency risk
relating to Tenge is significant.
In the event that Kazakhstani Tenge devalues against the US$ by
30% the Group would incur foreign exchange losses in the amount of
US$40 million (2019: US$49 million) that would be reflected in
other comprehensive income. The impact of such a devaluation on the
translation of monetary assets and liabilities (predominantly
intercompany loans) held in Kazakhstan and denominated in non-Tenge
currencies would be exchange losses recorded in the statement of
changes in equity of US$40 million (2019: US$49 million).
26 Related party transactions (please see also note 27)
The Company has no ultimate controlling party.
26.1 Loan agreements
The Company has loans outstanding as at 31 December, 2020 and
2019 with members of the Oraziman family and legal entities
controlled by the Oraziman family, details of which have been
summarised in note 199.
At 31.12.2020 KC Caspian Explorer LLP, the group 100%
subsidiary, had at its list of receivables the interest free loan
provided to EPC-Munai LLP on the amount of US $530,000. EPC-Munai
is the company controlled by Oraziman family.
26.2 Key management remuneration
Key management comprises the Directors and details of their
remuneration are set out in note 6.
* On 6 July 2020 the Company has issued total 8,938,570 ordinary
shares at 3.2 pence per share in settlement of outstanding salary
and expenses.
26.3 3A Best
At 31 December 2020, three Caspian Sunrise shareholders owed US$
1,275,000 each in respect of indemnities provided on the
acquisition of 3A Best. During 2020 the Group recognised a credit
loss provision of US $2,551,000 related to the asset (note 15). The
liability of one of the shareholders, the late Rafik Oraziman, is
covered by amounts due by the Company to the Oraziman family. The
Company continues to work with the other two shareholder to recover
the amounts due but in these financial statements has provided in
full for the amounts due.
26.4 Caspian Explorer
The purchase of the Caspian Explorer and 3A Best (note 22) was
from vendors including members of the Oraziman family.
26.5 Purchases
During 2019 the Group had purchased drilling and workover
services from the related party KazSmartEnerKon LLP, a company
registered in Kazakhstan, which was owned by Mr. Kuat Oraziman,
amounted US$ 3 million. These expenses were capitalized to unproven
oil and gas assets. At 31.12.2020 the Group has no payable and
receivable from KazSmartEnerKon LLP in relation to these drilling
services.
27 Non-controlling interest
Group Group
2020 201 9
---------------------------------------
US$'000 US$'000
--------------------------------------- ------- -------
Balance at the beginning of the year (5,729) (5,605)
Share of loss for the year (80) (124)
(5,809) (5,729)
--------------------------------------- ------- -------
As at 31 December 2020 non-controlling interest represents
minority share in BNG Ltd LLP and Beibars Munai LLP (as at 31
December 2019: BNG Ltd LLP and Beibars Munai LLP).
28 Events after the reporting period
Issue of shares
On 13 May 2021 the Company has issued 3,017,956 ordinary shares
at the price of 2.35p per share to satisfy a non-related party
existing debt.
3A-Best farm-out
On 3 June 2021, the Group announced that Eragon Petroleum FZE,
its 100% subsidiary, has entered into a farm out agreement with a
local partner under which that partner has agreed to complete the
outstanding work programme commitments in return for a 15% interest
in the 3A Best Contract Area conditional on the license
extension.
The work in question is principally the drilling of a 2,250
meter well at an expected approximate cost of $2.5 million.
The local partner has also been granted an option, exercisable
after the completion of the current work programme commitments, to
acquire the remaining 85% of the 3A Best Contract Area at a price
to be determined by an independent expert to be appointed by the
parties should the option be exercised by the local partner.
Caspian Explorer
Also on 3 June 2021, the Group announced the first charter for
the Caspian Explorer, the shallow water drilling vessel acquired in
2020 and specialising in operations in the shallow northern Caspian
Sea.
The charter is with North Caspian Operating Company ("NCOC") the
principal operator in the region, comprising the Republic of
Kazakhstan working through KazMunaiGas (KMG), and international oil
companies including Shell, ExxonMobil, Eni, Total and CNPC, the
consortium operating the Kashagan field.
The charter, which will be undertaken this year, is safety
related rather than new drilling. Accordingly the period of the
charter is shorter than for a new drill and the fee much lower.
This information is provided by RNS, the news service of the
London Stock Exchange. RNS is approved by the Financial Conduct
Authority to act as a Primary Information Provider in the United
Kingdom. Terms and conditions relating to the use and distribution
of this information may apply. For further information, please
contact rns@lseg.com or visit www.rns.com.
RNS may use your IP address to confirm compliance with the terms
and conditions, to analyse how you engage with the information
contained in this communication, and to share such analysis on an
anonymised basis with others as part of our commercial services.
For further information about how RNS and the London Stock Exchange
use the personal data you provide us, please see our Privacy
Policy.
END
FR PPUAUQUPGPGR
(END) Dow Jones Newswires
June 29, 2021 02:00 ET (06:00 GMT)
Caspian Sunrise (LSE:CASP)
Historical Stock Chart
From Dec 2024 to Jan 2025
Caspian Sunrise (LSE:CASP)
Historical Stock Chart
From Jan 2024 to Jan 2025